海底可控源电磁探测数值模拟与实验研究
|
摘要
海底蕴藏着丰富的矿产资源,也是人类生产活动空间的重要延拓,针对海底的探测活动日趋频繁。近年来,可控源电磁法(CSEM)在海底探测中的应用成为国际上研究的热点。目前海底CSEM探测主要针对深海(水深大于300m)环境下的高阻目标,而浅海环境下的高阻目标探测以及海底浅部低阻目标的探测仍然有待进一步研究。本文针对我国海域(大部分水深小于300m,有些海域水深只有几十米)油气资源勘探和海底工程环境勘察等领域所涉及的海底CSEM探测问题,借鉴深海和陆地CSEM探测的成功经验,分别研究了水平电性源频率域CSEM用于浅海环境下海底高阻目标探测和垂直磁性源时间域CSEM用于海底浅部低阻目标探测的基础理论和方法技术。首先,采用层状海底地电模型,建立了海底水平电性源频率域CSEM探测的电磁场数学模型,并对不同海洋地电模型参数和观测系统参数下海底的频率域电磁场响应进行了仿真,分析了水平电性源频率域CSEM探测浅海高阻目标体的可行性和探测范围,提出了相应观测系统的设计思路和数据处理方法。然后,基于典型的海洋地电模型,建立了海底垂直磁性源时间域CSEM探测的电磁场数学模型,并对不同海洋地电模型参数和观测装置参数下海底的时间域感应电压进行了仿真,分析了垂直磁性源时间域CSEM探测海底电导率的可行性和探测范围,提出了相应观测系统设计思路和数据处理方法。最后,对海底垂直磁源时间域CSEM探测进行了实验研究,给出了可实际应用的海底浅部低阻目标探测方案。
There is abundant mine resource in seafloor and seafloor itself is becoming one of important space of mankind’s life. More and more activities about seafloor detection are occurring. Recently, the application of controlled-source electromagnetic method (CSEM) to seafloor detection has become the study hotspot overseas. CSEM has been used to study marine lithosphere, investigate seafloor sediments distribution and explore mine resource in seafloor. Among these applications, CSEM has shown great success in hydrocarbon exploration in deep sea environment. According to the conductivity characteristic, the targets of seafloor CSEM detection include resistive target (e.g. hydrocarbon and hydrate) whose conductivity is smaller than that of surrounding medium and conductive target (e.g. water-filled structure , metallic pipe and metallic mine) whose conductivity is higher than that of surrounding medium. By far most of seafloor CSEM detection has been aiming at resistive target in deep sea (>300m). The detection of resistive target in shallow sea and the detection of conductive target in shallow seafloor need further research.
Aiming at the seafloor CSEM detection involved in the fields of hydrocarbon exploration in China sea (most area of it is shallow than 300m, some are of it is only several decades of meters deep) and seafloor engineering environment reconnaissance, inspired by the success experiences of CSEM detection in deep sea and on land, this paper studies the basic theory and techniques of resistive target detection in shallow sea using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM and conductive target detection in shallow seafloor using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM. First, the mathematic models of electromagnetic fields are established respectively for the two detection methods. Then simulations of electromagnetic responses are done to analyze the marine model parameters and the observation system parameters. At last, under the support of China 863 program, the experiments of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM are carried out.
The main contents of this paper can be summarized as followings:
(1) Based on the marine model of finite water depth and layered seafloor, the mathematic model of electromagnetic fields for seafloor detection using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM are established from Maxwell’s equations. The formulas of frequency-domain electromagnetic fields over seafloor for horizontal electric source in seawater are given. According to these formulas, the electromagnetic responses of 1D marine model under any system parameters could be simulated, providing theory base both for the analysis of detection range in different sea environment and for the inversion of measured data in seafloor detection using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM. During the derivation of formulas, not only electric dipole source but also long wire source is considered. The electromagnetic formulas with source length could be used to compute the electromagnetic field at small offset accurately. Moreover, the Coulomb-gauged potentials in each layer of the marine model are also solved so that the primary fields at any position could be computed, which is the foundation of finite-element modeling of 3D marine model.
(2) The simulation of seafloor detection using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM is done and the characteristics of electromagnetic responses under different model parameters and system parameters are analyzed. The effect of seawater and seafloor surrounding medium on the electromagnetic responses is studied and the detection range of 1D resistive target in shallow sea environment is discussed. The results of simulation show that horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM not only could be used to detect the hydrocarbon in deep sea, but also could be used to detect the hydrocarbon in shallow sea. However, the electromagnetic anomalies become smaller in shallow sea. When two resistive targets (e.g. hydrocarbon and hydrate) are present at the same time, the electromagnetic anomalies at different offset could be used to distinguish them. But horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM is not sensitive to conductive target under seafloor. The effect of system parameters on electromagnetic responses is also analyzed with the purpose to find the best system parameters for resistive target detection in shallow sea. From the analysis results, the design idea of observation system is put forward and the data process manners are presented. In shallow sea, inline Ex and Ez components at low frequency should be recorded, and reference station should be used to measure the background fields. Since the electromagnetic anomalies of resistive target in deep sea are more obvious than those in shallow sea, the observation system designed for shallow sea is also applicable to deep sea.
(3) Based on typical marine geoelectric model, the mathematic models of electromagnetic fields are also established for seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM. The inductive voltage formulas of three typical configurations (dipole configuration, central loop and coincident loop) are given. From these formulas, the inductive voltage in receiver loop for different seawater environment, different seafloor conductivities and different system parameters can be simulated. The seafloor conductivity can also be inversed from the measured voltage by these formulas. So these formulas provide theory base for the feasibility study of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM and for the inversion of measured data. The vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM has shown great performance on land. Once it is applied to seafloor detection successfully, the seafloor conductivities at different depth could be computed from the inductive voltage at different time.
(4) The simulations of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM are done and the response characteristics of dipole configuration, central loop and coincident loop are analyzed for different model paprameters and system parameters. The results of simulation show that vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM can be used to resolve conductive seafloor and all of the three typical configurations can reflect the electromagnetic anomaly caused by conductive target. This provides theory argument for the application of these configurations to seafloor detection. But the results of simulation also show that the vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM can not resolve resistive seafloor. The water depth has a different manner from horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM to affect the responses of vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM and the shallow sea environment is propitious to seafloor detection. However, the electromagnetic responses of dipole configuration in shallow sea are more complicated than those in deep sea and thus are difficult to interpret. Furthermore, the effect of system parameters on seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source CSEM is analyzed and the design idea of observation system and the data process manners are put forward. Small size of central loop is the best configuration for seafloor detection and the dichotomy method can fix the seafloor conductivity quickly. The simulation study has provided theoretical direction for the development of observation system and data processing software.
(5) Experiments of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM is carried out both in flume and in field. From the experiments, the configuration, measurement manner and work parameters for seafloor detection are determined, and the detection method and the observation system are tested. The model experiments show that central loop is the best choice to underwater measurement among the three typical configurations due to the limit of manufacture condition and measurement environment and it has simple anomaly. The average effect appears when the manner of towing measurement is adopted. Thus higher frequency, less stacks and smaller velocity than static measurement should be used to detect small target. Because the electromagnetic anomaly of small target only occurs in small area, the configuration should be close to the target during measurement. The marine experiments show that the vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM can detect the conductive targets in shallow seafloor successfully and the observation system designed in this paper can scan seafloor expediently. The map of seafloor conductivity changing with the depth is obtained finally.
The main innovation works of this paper are as followings:
(1) The transform formulas from Lorentz-gauged potentials to Coulomb-gauged potentials are established and the solutions of Coulomb-gauged potentials in each layer of 1D marine model are derived for horizontal electric source. Furthermore, the recursion expressions of frequency-domain electromagnetic fields for a long wire source are derived.
(2) By the electromagnetic responses characteristics of resistive target in shallow sea, inline Ex and Ez components at low frequency are proposed to be used in the detection of resistive target in shallow sea. The reference station and the electric fields normalized by the background field are also advocated to improve the distinguishability of target anomaly.
(3) Seafloor detection using the vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM that is often used on land is studied for the first time and the mathematic models of electromagnetic fields are established. The formulas of time-domain inductive voltage are derived for the three typical configurations——dipole configuration, central loop and coincident loop respectively.
(4) By the simulation and experiments, the small, multi-turn, central loop is proposed to be used in the detection of conductive target in shallow seafloor. The manner of towing measurement can achieve continuous scan of seafloor and the inductive voltages at different time can reflect the change of seafloor conductivity with the depth.
The production of this paper has established theory foundation for the application of CSEM to hydrocarbon and hydrate exploration in China sea and to engineering environment reconnaissance. It has also provided theoretical direction for the design of observation system.
There is abundant mine resource in seafloor and seafloor itself is becoming one of important space of mankind’s life. More and more activities about seafloor detection are occurring. Recently, the application of controlled-source electromagnetic method (CSEM) to seafloor detection has become the study hotspot overseas. CSEM has been used to study marine lithosphere, investigate seafloor sediments distribution and explore mine resource in seafloor. Among these applications, CSEM has shown great success in hydrocarbon exploration in deep sea environment. According to the conductivity characteristic, the targets of seafloor CSEM detection include resistive target (e.g. hydrocarbon and hydrate) whose conductivity is smaller than that of surrounding medium and conductive target (e.g. water-filled structure , metallic pipe and metallic mine) whose conductivity is higher than that of surrounding medium. By far most of seafloor CSEM detection has been aiming at resistive target in deep sea (>300m). The detection of resistive target in shallow sea and the detection of conductive target in shallow seafloor need further research.
Aiming at the seafloor CSEM detection involved in the fields of hydrocarbon exploration in China sea (most area of it is shallow than 300m, some are of it is only several decades of meters deep) and seafloor engineering environment reconnaissance, inspired by the success experiences of CSEM detection in deep sea and on land, this paper studies the basic theory and techniques of resistive target detection in shallow sea using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM and conductive target detection in shallow seafloor using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM. First, the mathematic models of electromagnetic fields are established respectively for the two detection methods. Then simulations of electromagnetic responses are done to analyze the marine model parameters and the observation system parameters. At last, under the support of China 863 program, the experiments of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM are carried out.
The main contents of this paper can be summarized as followings:
(1) Based on the marine model of finite water depth and layered seafloor, the mathematic model of electromagnetic fields for seafloor detection using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM are established from Maxwell’s equations. The formulas of frequency-domain electromagnetic fields over seafloor for horizontal electric source in seawater are given. According to these formulas, the electromagnetic responses of 1D marine model under any system parameters could be simulated, providing theory base both for the analysis of detection range in different sea environment and for the inversion of measured data in seafloor detection using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM. During the derivation of formulas, not only electric dipole source but also long wire source is considered. The electromagnetic formulas with source length could be used to compute the electromagnetic field at small offset accurately. Moreover, the Coulomb-gauged potentials in each layer of the marine model are also solved so that the primary fields at any position could be computed, which is the foundation of finite-element modeling of 3D marine model.
(2) The simulation of seafloor detection using horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM is done and the characteristics of electromagnetic responses under different model parameters and system parameters are analyzed. The effect of seawater and seafloor surrounding medium on the electromagnetic responses is studied and the detection range of 1D resistive target in shallow sea environment is discussed. The results of simulation show that horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM not only could be used to detect the hydrocarbon in deep sea, but also could be used to detect the hydrocarbon in shallow sea. However, the electromagnetic anomalies become smaller in shallow sea. When two resistive targets (e.g. hydrocarbon and hydrate) are present at the same time, the electromagnetic anomalies at different offset could be used to distinguish them. But horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM is not sensitive to conductive target under seafloor. The effect of system parameters on electromagnetic responses is also analyzed with the purpose to find the best system parameters for resistive target detection in shallow sea. From the analysis results, the design idea of observation system is put forward and the data process manners are presented. In shallow sea, inline Ex and Ez components at low frequency should be recorded, and reference station should be used to measure the background fields. Since the electromagnetic anomalies of resistive target in deep sea are more obvious than those in shallow sea, the observation system designed for shallow sea is also applicable to deep sea.
(3) Based on typical marine geoelectric model, the mathematic models of electromagnetic fields are also established for seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM. The inductive voltage formulas of three typical configurations (dipole configuration, central loop and coincident loop) are given. From these formulas, the inductive voltage in receiver loop for different seawater environment, different seafloor conductivities and different system parameters can be simulated. The seafloor conductivity can also be inversed from the measured voltage by these formulas. So these formulas provide theory base for the feasibility study of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM and for the inversion of measured data. The vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM has shown great performance on land. Once it is applied to seafloor detection successfully, the seafloor conductivities at different depth could be computed from the inductive voltage at different time.
(4) The simulations of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM are done and the response characteristics of dipole configuration, central loop and coincident loop are analyzed for different model paprameters and system parameters. The results of simulation show that vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM can be used to resolve conductive seafloor and all of the three typical configurations can reflect the electromagnetic anomaly caused by conductive target. This provides theory argument for the application of these configurations to seafloor detection. But the results of simulation also show that the vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM can not resolve resistive seafloor. The water depth has a different manner from horizontal electric-source frequency-domain CSEM to affect the responses of vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM and the shallow sea environment is propitious to seafloor detection. However, the electromagnetic responses of dipole configuration in shallow sea are more complicated than those in deep sea and thus are difficult to interpret. Furthermore, the effect of system parameters on seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source CSEM is analyzed and the design idea of observation system and the data process manners are put forward. Small size of central loop is the best configuration for seafloor detection and the dichotomy method can fix the seafloor conductivity quickly. The simulation study has provided theoretical direction for the development of observation system and data processing software.
(5) Experiments of seafloor detection using vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM is carried out both in flume and in field. From the experiments, the configuration, measurement manner and work parameters for seafloor detection are determined, and the detection method and the observation system are tested. The model experiments show that central loop is the best choice to underwater measurement among the three typical configurations due to the limit of manufacture condition and measurement environment and it has simple anomaly. The average effect appears when the manner of towing measurement is adopted. Thus higher frequency, less stacks and smaller velocity than static measurement should be used to detect small target. Because the electromagnetic anomaly of small target only occurs in small area, the configuration should be close to the target during measurement. The marine experiments show that the vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM can detect the conductive targets in shallow seafloor successfully and the observation system designed in this paper can scan seafloor expediently. The map of seafloor conductivity changing with the depth is obtained finally.
The main innovation works of this paper are as followings:
(1) The transform formulas from Lorentz-gauged potentials to Coulomb-gauged potentials are established and the solutions of Coulomb-gauged potentials in each layer of 1D marine model are derived for horizontal electric source. Furthermore, the recursion expressions of frequency-domain electromagnetic fields for a long wire source are derived.
(2) By the electromagnetic responses characteristics of resistive target in shallow sea, inline Ex and Ez components at low frequency are proposed to be used in the detection of resistive target in shallow sea. The reference station and the electric fields normalized by the background field are also advocated to improve the distinguishability of target anomaly.
(3) Seafloor detection using the vertical magnetic-source time-domain CSEM that is often used on land is studied for the first time and the mathematic models of electromagnetic fields are established. The formulas of time-domain inductive voltage are derived for the three typical configurations——dipole configuration, central loop and coincident loop respectively.
(4) By the simulation and experiments, the small, multi-turn, central loop is proposed to be used in the detection of conductive target in shallow seafloor. The manner of towing measurement can achieve continuous scan of seafloor and the inductive voltages at different time can reflect the change of seafloor conductivity with the depth.
The production of this paper has established theory foundation for the application of CSEM to hydrocarbon and hydrate exploration in China sea and to engineering environment reconnaissance. It has also provided theoretical direction for the design of observation system.
引文
[1]《探索海洋奥秘开发海洋资源》编委会.探索海洋奥秘开发海洋资源[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
[2]朱晓东,李杨帆,吴小根,等.海洋资源概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[3]江怀友,潘继平,邵奎龙,等.世界海洋油气资源勘探现状[J].中国石油企业,2008(03):77-79.
[4]康竹林.中国沿海大陆架油气勘探开发现状及前景[J].海洋地质动态,1998(10):1-4.
[5]常城,舒先林.中国海洋油气开发的战略分析[J].石油化工技术经济,2007,23(2):1-6.
[6]胡茂炎.天然气水合物新世纪一种重要的接替资源[J].探矿工程,2002,(4):1-2.
[7]雷怀彦,王先彬,房玄,等.天然气水合物研究现状与未来挑战[J].沉积学报,1999,17(3):493-498.
[8] S Hautot, J Perrot, M D Jegen, et al. Feasibility study of joint magnetotelluric/seismic interpretation for sub-basalt imaging[J]. Journal of Conference Abstracts, 2002, 7(2):I50-I51.
[9] L MacGregor. Imaging sub-basalt sediments using marine electromagnetic sounding[C]. AAPG Hedberg Conference, September 2002, Stavanger, Norway.
[10] K W Key, S C Constable, C J Weiss. Mapping 3D salt using the 2D marine magnetotelluric method: Case study from Gemini Prospect, Gulf of Mexico[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(1):B17-B27.
[11]何继善,鲍力知.海洋电磁法研究的现状和进展[J].地球物理学进展,1999,14(1):7-39.
[12] S Constable. Marine electromagnetic methods—A new tool for offshore exploration[J]. The Leading Edge, 2006:438-444.
[13] R N Edwards and A D Chave. A transient electric dipole-dipole method for mapping the conductivity of the sea floor[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(4):984-987.
[14] S J Cheesman, R N Edwards, A D Chave. On the theory of sea-floor conductivity mapping using transient electromagnetic systems[J]. Geophysics, 1987, 52(2):204-217.
[15]杨建文,R N Edwards.用于海底电导率填图的可控源时域电磁法[J].中国有色金属学报,1998,8(4):705-713.
[16] P A Wolfgram, R N Edwards, L K Law, et al. Polymetallic sulfide exploration on the deep sea floor: The feasibilly of the MINI-MOSES experiment[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(9):1808-1818.
[17] S Constable, L J Srnka. An introduction to marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA3-WA12.
[18] M J Tompkins, L J Srnka. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods—Introduction[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2): WA1-WA2.
[19] N Edwards, Marine controlled source electromagnetic principles, methodologies, future commercial applications[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2005, 26:675-700.
[20] T Eidesmo, S Ellingsrud, L M MacGregor,et al. Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarborn filled layers in deepwater areas[J]. First Break, 2002, 20:144-152.
[21] D Ridyard, B P Lindhom, T A Wicklund. Electromagnetic prospect scanning: The next frontier for exploration using SeaBed Logging[C], SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P735-739.
[22] D Andreis, L MacGregor. Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: Principles and applications[J]. Geophysics, 2008, 73(1):F21-F32.
[23]严似松.海洋工程导论[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1987.
[24]金庆焕.南海地质与油气资源[M].北京:地质出版社,1989.
[25]吕炳全,孙志国.海洋环境与地质[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997.
[26]许东禹,刘锡清,张训华,等.中国近海地质[M].北京:中国地质出版社,1997.
[27] P R Bannister. Determination of the electrical conductivity of the sea bed in shallow waters[J]. Geophysics, 1968, 33(6):995-1003.
[28] R N Edwards, L K Law, J M Delaurier. On measuring the electrical conductivity of the oceanic crust by a modified magnetometric resistvivity method[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 1981, 86:11609-11615.
[29] R N Edwards, D C Nobes, E G Trevino. Offshore electrical exploration of sedimentary basins: The effects of anisotropy in horizontally isotropic, layered media[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(5):566-576.
[30] R N Edwards, L K Law, P A Wolfgram. First results of the MOSES experiment: Sea sediment conductivity and thickness determination, Bute Inlet, British Columbia, by magnetometric offshore electrical sounding[J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(1):153-161.
[31] R N Edwards. On the resource evaluation of marine gas hydrate deposits using sea-floor transient electric dipole-dipole methods[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(1):63-74.
[32] T Eidesmo, S Ellingsrud, S E Johansen, et al. Long-offset techniques head advances in marine electromagnetic surveying[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2005(Nov):P34-41.
[33] J Chen, G M Hoversten, D Vasco,et al. A Bayesian model for gas saturation estimation using marine seismic AVA and CSEM data[J] Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA85-WA95.
[34] G M Hoversten, F Cassassuce, E Gasperikova,et al. Direct reservior parameter estimation using joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(3):C1-C13.
[35] Z Hou, Y Rubin, G M Hoversten, et al. Reservoir-parameter identification using minimum relative entropy-based Bayesian inversion of seismic AVA and marine CSEM data[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):O77-O88.
[36] J Hesthammer, M Boulaenko. The offshore EM challenge[J]. First Break, 2005, 23(Nov):59-66.
[37] S E Johansen, H E F Amundsen, T Rosten, et al. Subsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding[J]. First Break, 2005, 23(March):31-36.
[38] C K Choo, M Rosenquist, E Rollett,et al. Detecting hydrocarbon reservoir with seabed loggingTM in deepwater sabah, Malaysia[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P714-718.
[39] M Darnet, M C K Choo, R E Plessix,et al. Detecting hydrocarbon reservoirs from CSEM data in complex settings: Application to deepwater Sabah, Malaysia[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA97-WA103.
[40] B Farrelly, C Ringstad, S E Johnstad, et al. Remote characterization of hydrocarbon filled reservoirs at the Troll Field by Sea Bed Logging{C}. EAGE Fall Research Workshop, Rhodes,Greece, 19th-23rd September 2004.
[41] C K Choo, M Rosenquist, E Rollett, et al. Detecting hydrocarbon reservoir with seabed loggingTM in deepwater sabah, Malaysia[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P714-718.
[42] D Smit, S Saleh, J Voon,et al. Recent controlled source EM results show positive impact on exploration at Shell[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P3536-3541.
[43] K A Weitemeyer, S C Constable, K W Key, et al. First results from a marine controlled-source electromagnetic survey to detect gas hydrates offshore Oregon[J]. Geophysics Research Letters, 2006, 33(L03304).
[44] A Gribenko, M Zhdanov. Rigorous 3D inversion of marine CSEM data based on the integral equation method[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA73-WA84.
[45] P Weidelt. Guided waves in marine CSEM[J]. Geophys. J. Int., 2007, 171:153-176.
[46] J I Nordskag, L Amundsen. Asymptotic airwave modeling for marine controlled-source electromagnetic surveying[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(6):F249-F255.
[47] L Amundsen, L Loseth, R Mittet,et al. Decomposition of electromagnetic fields into upgoing and downgoing compoments[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(5):G211-G233.
[48] S Constable, C J Weiss. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(2):G43-G51.
[49] C J Weiss. The fallacy of the“shallow-water problem”in marine CSEM exploration[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(6):A93-A97.
[50] P D Aversana. Marine CSEM data interpretation: Pitfalls and possible solutions[J]. The Leading Edge, June 2007:686-691.
[51] P J Summerfield, L S Gale, X Lu, et al. Marine CSEM Acquisition Challenges, SEG Expanded Abstracts[J]. 2005, 24(538).
[52]王东坡,曾孝箴,薛林福,等.海洋阵列大地电磁测深法在辽东湾滩海深部地质构造研究中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(4):293-299.
[53]李桐林,林君,刘福春,等.国内外海洋大地电磁测深的发展综述[J].国外地质勘探技术,1998(4):1-10.
[54]邓明,沈高山,余平,等.基于麦克斯韦理论的海底大地电磁探测技术[J].海洋技术,2003,22(2):44-47.
[55]邓明,李哲,魏文博,等.带远参考测量方式的海底大地电磁同步采集技术[J].地质与勘探,2003,39(5):77-80.
[56]邓明,魏文博,谭捍东,等.海底大地电磁数据采集器[J].地球物理学报,2003,46(2):217-223.
[57]邓明,魏文博,邓靖武,等.海底天然大地电磁场的探测[J].测控技术,2003,22(1):5-8.
[58]丁建荣,王勇,于鹏,等.浅海电磁道分离同步采集的大地电磁测深观测试验[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(1):107-110.
[59]邓明,邓靖武,魏文博,等.四阶Δ-Σ过抽样电路原理及其在微弱地学信号检测中的应用[J].地学前沿,2002,9(4):417-421.
[60]柳建新,严家斌,张胜业,等.多功能海底大地电磁数据处理软件包[J].物探化探计算技术,2002,24(3):234-239。
[61]王一新,王家林,王家映,等.瞬变电磁系统探测海底电导率的研究[J].地球物理学报,1998,41(6):841-847。
[62] M E Everett. Finite element analysis of shallow-water marine controlled-source electromagnetic signals for hydrocarbon exploration[D]. MARELEC-2006: Marine Establissement, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 19th-21th April 2006.
[63] E A Badea, M E Everett, G A Newman, et al. Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb-gauged potentials[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(3): 786-799.
[64] J D King. Using a 3D finite element forward modeling code to analyze resistive structures with controlled-source electromagnetics in a marine environment[D]. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2004.
[65] K Baba. Electrical structure in marine tectonic settings[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2005, 26:701-731.
[66] E S Um, D L Alumbaugh. On the physics of the marine controlled-source electromagnetic method[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA13-WA26.
[67] L O Loseth, H M Pedersen, B Ursin, et al. Low-frequency electromagnetic fields in applied geophysics: Waves or diffusion?[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(4):W29-W40.
[68] R N Edwards. Two-dimensional modeling of a towed in-line electric dipole-dipole sea-floor electromagnetic system: The optimum time delay or frequency for target resolution[J]. Geophysics, 1988, 53(6):846-853.
[69]蒋邦远.实用近区磁源瞬变电磁法勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
[70] M N Nabighian. Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space—An approximate representation[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44:1700-1705.
[71] J E Reid, J C Macnae. Comments on the electromagnetic“somke ring”concept[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(6):1908-1913.
[72] B R Spies. Depth of investigation in electromagnetic sounding methods[J]. Geophysics, 1989, 54(7):872-888.
[73] A P Raiche, R G Gallagher. Apparent resistivity and diffusion velocity[J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(10):1628-1633.
[74] T Wang. The electromagnetic smoke ring in a transversely isotropic medium[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(6):1779-1789.
[75] Y Li, K Key. 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: Part 1—An adaptive finite-element algorithm[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA51-WA62.
[76] Y Li, S Constable. 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: Part 2-- The effect of bathymetry[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA63-WA71.
[77] G M Hoversten, G A Newman, N Geier, et al. 3D modeling of a deepwater EM exploration survey[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(5):G239-G248.
[78] F A Maao. Fast finite-difference time-domain modeling for marine-subsurface electromagnetic problems[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):A19-A23.
[79] C J Weiss, S Constable. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EMmethods, Part II--Modeling and analysis in 3D[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):G321-G332.
[80]米萨克N.纳比吉安主编,赵经祥等译,勘察地球物理电磁法(第一卷)[M].北京:地质出版社,1992
[81] A A Kaufman, G V Keller. Frequency and transient soundings[M]. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1983.
[82]渤海找到亿吨级大油田(海讯)[J].中国海洋平台,1999(04):44.
[83]徐嘉信.中国海上油气田开发特点及其前景[J].中国海洋平台,1994,(z1):8-28.
[84] F N Kong. Hankel transform filters for dipole antenna radiation in a conductive medium[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2007, 55:83-89.
[85]王琦,朱而勤.海洋沉积学[M].北京:科学出版社,1989.
[86] K Weitemeyer, S Constable, K Key. Marine EM techniques for gas-hydrate detection and hazard mitigation[J]. The Leading Edge, 2006(May):629-632.
[87] D Dickins. Controlled-source electromagnetic modeling of the masking effect of marine gas hydrate on a deeper hydrocarbon reservoir[D]. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2007.
[88]陈建文,吴志强.天然气水合物的地球物理识别技术[J].海洋地质动态,2004,20(6):1-5。
[89] S C Constable, A S Orange, G M Hoversten. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration Part I: A sea-floor equipment system[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(3):816-825.
[90] G M Hoversten, S C Constable, H F Morrison. Marine magnetotellurics for base-of-salt mapping: Gulf of Mexico field test at the Gemini structure[J]. Geophysics, 2000, 65(5):1476-1488.
[91] P F Lezaeta, A D Chave, R L Evans. Correction of shallow-water electromagnetic data for noise induced by instrument motion[J]. Geophysics, 2005, 70(5):G127-G133.
[92] N B Christensen, K Dodds. 1D inversion and resolution analysis of marine CSEM data[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA27-WA38.
[93] P D Aversana. Marine CSEM in shallow water: acquisition and interpretation strategies[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, 2006, P724-728.
[94] X Lu, D Willen, J Zhang. Marine CSEM data processing techniques[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, 2006, P704-708.
[95]..郭玉松. TEM法在工程勘察中的研究与应用[J].工程勘察,1998(1):70-72.
[96]林君.电磁探测技术在工程与环境中的应用现状[J].物探与化探,2000,24(3):167-177.
[97]朱德兵.工程地球物理方法技术研究现状综述[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(1):163-170.
[98]张保祥,刘春华,汪家权.瞬变电磁法在地下水勘查中的应用[J].水利水电科技进展,2002,22(4):23-29.
[99]张运霞,韩自豪,周建雄,等.瞬变电磁法在煤层水探测中的应用[J].中国煤田地质,2005,17(6):45-47.
[100]刘国栋.电磁法及电法仪器的新进展和应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(增刊):46-51.
[101]宋先旺.瞬变电磁法在地质勘查中的应用效果[J].矿产与地质,1998,12(5):353-357.
[102] W L Anderson. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders 0 and 1 by adaptive digital filteing[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44(7):1287-1305.
[103] A D Chave. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion[J]. Geophysics, 1983, 48(12):1671-1686.
[104] W L Anderson, A D Chave. Discussion on:“Numerical integration of related Hankle transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion”by A.D. Chave (Geophysics, 48, P.1617-1686,December,1983)[J]. Geophysics, 1983, 48:1811-1813.
[105] W L Anderson. Computation of Green’s tensor integrals for three-dimensional electromagnetic problems using fast Hankel transforms[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(10):1754-1759.
[106] G A Newman, G W Hohmann, W L Anderson. Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth[J]. 1986, 51(8):1608-1627.
[107] W L Anderson. A hybrid fast Hankel transform algorithm for electromagnetic modeling[J]. Geophysics, 1989, 54(2):263-266.
[108] D Guptasarma, B Singh. New digital linear filters for Hankel J0 and J1 transforms[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1997, 45:745-762.
[109] S S Rai. Transient electromagnetic response of a thin conducing plate embedded in conducting host rock[J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(8):1342-1349.
[110] A P Raiche, B R Spies. Coincident loop transient electromagnetic master curves for interpretation of two-layer earths[J]. Geophysics, 1981, 46(1):53-64.
[111] J C Macnae, R Smith, B D Polzer, et al. Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data[J]. Geophysics, 1991, 56(1):102-114.
[112] R S Smith, A P Annan, P D McGowan. A comparison of data from airborne, semi-airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(5):1379-1385.
[113] A A Kaufman. The influence of currents induced in the host rock on electromagnetic response of a spheroid directly beneath a loop[J]. Geophysics, 1981, 46(8):1121-1136.
[2]朱晓东,李杨帆,吴小根,等.海洋资源概论[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2005.
[3]江怀友,潘继平,邵奎龙,等.世界海洋油气资源勘探现状[J].中国石油企业,2008(03):77-79.
[4]康竹林.中国沿海大陆架油气勘探开发现状及前景[J].海洋地质动态,1998(10):1-4.
[5]常城,舒先林.中国海洋油气开发的战略分析[J].石油化工技术经济,2007,23(2):1-6.
[6]胡茂炎.天然气水合物新世纪一种重要的接替资源[J].探矿工程,2002,(4):1-2.
[7]雷怀彦,王先彬,房玄,等.天然气水合物研究现状与未来挑战[J].沉积学报,1999,17(3):493-498.
[8] S Hautot, J Perrot, M D Jegen, et al. Feasibility study of joint magnetotelluric/seismic interpretation for sub-basalt imaging[J]. Journal of Conference Abstracts, 2002, 7(2):I50-I51.
[9] L MacGregor. Imaging sub-basalt sediments using marine electromagnetic sounding[C]. AAPG Hedberg Conference, September 2002, Stavanger, Norway.
[10] K W Key, S C Constable, C J Weiss. Mapping 3D salt using the 2D marine magnetotelluric method: Case study from Gemini Prospect, Gulf of Mexico[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(1):B17-B27.
[11]何继善,鲍力知.海洋电磁法研究的现状和进展[J].地球物理学进展,1999,14(1):7-39.
[12] S Constable. Marine electromagnetic methods—A new tool for offshore exploration[J]. The Leading Edge, 2006:438-444.
[13] R N Edwards and A D Chave. A transient electric dipole-dipole method for mapping the conductivity of the sea floor[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(4):984-987.
[14] S J Cheesman, R N Edwards, A D Chave. On the theory of sea-floor conductivity mapping using transient electromagnetic systems[J]. Geophysics, 1987, 52(2):204-217.
[15]杨建文,R N Edwards.用于海底电导率填图的可控源时域电磁法[J].中国有色金属学报,1998,8(4):705-713.
[16] P A Wolfgram, R N Edwards, L K Law, et al. Polymetallic sulfide exploration on the deep sea floor: The feasibilly of the MINI-MOSES experiment[J]. Geophysics, 1986, 51(9):1808-1818.
[17] S Constable, L J Srnka. An introduction to marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods for hydrocarbon exploration[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA3-WA12.
[18] M J Tompkins, L J Srnka. Marine controlled-source electromagnetic methods—Introduction[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2): WA1-WA2.
[19] N Edwards, Marine controlled source electromagnetic principles, methodologies, future commercial applications[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2005, 26:675-700.
[20] T Eidesmo, S Ellingsrud, L M MacGregor,et al. Sea Bed Logging (SBL), a new method for remote and direct identification of hydrocarborn filled layers in deepwater areas[J]. First Break, 2002, 20:144-152.
[21] D Ridyard, B P Lindhom, T A Wicklund. Electromagnetic prospect scanning: The next frontier for exploration using SeaBed Logging[C], SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P735-739.
[22] D Andreis, L MacGregor. Controlled-source electromagnetic sounding in shallow water: Principles and applications[J]. Geophysics, 2008, 73(1):F21-F32.
[23]严似松.海洋工程导论[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,1987.
[24]金庆焕.南海地质与油气资源[M].北京:地质出版社,1989.
[25]吕炳全,孙志国.海洋环境与地质[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997.
[26]许东禹,刘锡清,张训华,等.中国近海地质[M].北京:中国地质出版社,1997.
[27] P R Bannister. Determination of the electrical conductivity of the sea bed in shallow waters[J]. Geophysics, 1968, 33(6):995-1003.
[28] R N Edwards, L K Law, J M Delaurier. On measuring the electrical conductivity of the oceanic crust by a modified magnetometric resistvivity method[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 1981, 86:11609-11615.
[29] R N Edwards, D C Nobes, E G Trevino. Offshore electrical exploration of sedimentary basins: The effects of anisotropy in horizontally isotropic, layered media[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(5):566-576.
[30] R N Edwards, L K Law, P A Wolfgram. First results of the MOSES experiment: Sea sediment conductivity and thickness determination, Bute Inlet, British Columbia, by magnetometric offshore electrical sounding[J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(1):153-161.
[31] R N Edwards. On the resource evaluation of marine gas hydrate deposits using sea-floor transient electric dipole-dipole methods[J]. Geophysics, 1997, 62(1):63-74.
[32] T Eidesmo, S Ellingsrud, S E Johansen, et al. Long-offset techniques head advances in marine electromagnetic surveying[J]. Oil & Gas Journal, 2005(Nov):P34-41.
[33] J Chen, G M Hoversten, D Vasco,et al. A Bayesian model for gas saturation estimation using marine seismic AVA and CSEM data[J] Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA85-WA95.
[34] G M Hoversten, F Cassassuce, E Gasperikova,et al. Direct reservior parameter estimation using joint inversion of marine seismic AVA and CSEM data[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(3):C1-C13.
[35] Z Hou, Y Rubin, G M Hoversten, et al. Reservoir-parameter identification using minimum relative entropy-based Bayesian inversion of seismic AVA and marine CSEM data[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):O77-O88.
[36] J Hesthammer, M Boulaenko. The offshore EM challenge[J]. First Break, 2005, 23(Nov):59-66.
[37] S E Johansen, H E F Amundsen, T Rosten, et al. Subsurface hydrocarbons detected by electromagnetic sounding[J]. First Break, 2005, 23(March):31-36.
[38] C K Choo, M Rosenquist, E Rollett,et al. Detecting hydrocarbon reservoir with seabed loggingTM in deepwater sabah, Malaysia[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P714-718.
[39] M Darnet, M C K Choo, R E Plessix,et al. Detecting hydrocarbon reservoirs from CSEM data in complex settings: Application to deepwater Sabah, Malaysia[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA97-WA103.
[40] B Farrelly, C Ringstad, S E Johnstad, et al. Remote characterization of hydrocarbon filled reservoirs at the Troll Field by Sea Bed Logging{C}. EAGE Fall Research Workshop, Rhodes,Greece, 19th-23rd September 2004.
[41] C K Choo, M Rosenquist, E Rollett, et al. Detecting hydrocarbon reservoir with seabed loggingTM in deepwater sabah, Malaysia[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P714-718.
[42] D Smit, S Saleh, J Voon,et al. Recent controlled source EM results show positive impact on exploration at Shell[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, P3536-3541.
[43] K A Weitemeyer, S C Constable, K W Key, et al. First results from a marine controlled-source electromagnetic survey to detect gas hydrates offshore Oregon[J]. Geophysics Research Letters, 2006, 33(L03304).
[44] A Gribenko, M Zhdanov. Rigorous 3D inversion of marine CSEM data based on the integral equation method[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA73-WA84.
[45] P Weidelt. Guided waves in marine CSEM[J]. Geophys. J. Int., 2007, 171:153-176.
[46] J I Nordskag, L Amundsen. Asymptotic airwave modeling for marine controlled-source electromagnetic surveying[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(6):F249-F255.
[47] L Amundsen, L Loseth, R Mittet,et al. Decomposition of electromagnetic fields into upgoing and downgoing compoments[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(5):G211-G233.
[48] S Constable, C J Weiss. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EM methods: Insights from 1D modeling[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(2):G43-G51.
[49] C J Weiss. The fallacy of the“shallow-water problem”in marine CSEM exploration[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(6):A93-A97.
[50] P D Aversana. Marine CSEM data interpretation: Pitfalls and possible solutions[J]. The Leading Edge, June 2007:686-691.
[51] P J Summerfield, L S Gale, X Lu, et al. Marine CSEM Acquisition Challenges, SEG Expanded Abstracts[J]. 2005, 24(538).
[52]王东坡,曾孝箴,薛林福,等.海洋阵列大地电磁测深法在辽东湾滩海深部地质构造研究中的应用[J].石油与天然气地质,2000,21(4):293-299.
[53]李桐林,林君,刘福春,等.国内外海洋大地电磁测深的发展综述[J].国外地质勘探技术,1998(4):1-10.
[54]邓明,沈高山,余平,等.基于麦克斯韦理论的海底大地电磁探测技术[J].海洋技术,2003,22(2):44-47.
[55]邓明,李哲,魏文博,等.带远参考测量方式的海底大地电磁同步采集技术[J].地质与勘探,2003,39(5):77-80.
[56]邓明,魏文博,谭捍东,等.海底大地电磁数据采集器[J].地球物理学报,2003,46(2):217-223.
[57]邓明,魏文博,邓靖武,等.海底天然大地电磁场的探测[J].测控技术,2003,22(1):5-8.
[58]丁建荣,王勇,于鹏,等.浅海电磁道分离同步采集的大地电磁测深观测试验[J].石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(1):107-110.
[59]邓明,邓靖武,魏文博,等.四阶Δ-Σ过抽样电路原理及其在微弱地学信号检测中的应用[J].地学前沿,2002,9(4):417-421.
[60]柳建新,严家斌,张胜业,等.多功能海底大地电磁数据处理软件包[J].物探化探计算技术,2002,24(3):234-239。
[61]王一新,王家林,王家映,等.瞬变电磁系统探测海底电导率的研究[J].地球物理学报,1998,41(6):841-847。
[62] M E Everett. Finite element analysis of shallow-water marine controlled-source electromagnetic signals for hydrocarbon exploration[D]. MARELEC-2006: Marine Establissement, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 19th-21th April 2006.
[63] E A Badea, M E Everett, G A Newman, et al. Finite-element analysis of controlled-source electromagnetic induction using Coulomb-gauged potentials[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(3): 786-799.
[64] J D King. Using a 3D finite element forward modeling code to analyze resistive structures with controlled-source electromagnetics in a marine environment[D]. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2004.
[65] K Baba. Electrical structure in marine tectonic settings[J]. Surveys in Geophysics, 2005, 26:701-731.
[66] E S Um, D L Alumbaugh. On the physics of the marine controlled-source electromagnetic method[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA13-WA26.
[67] L O Loseth, H M Pedersen, B Ursin, et al. Low-frequency electromagnetic fields in applied geophysics: Waves or diffusion?[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(4):W29-W40.
[68] R N Edwards. Two-dimensional modeling of a towed in-line electric dipole-dipole sea-floor electromagnetic system: The optimum time delay or frequency for target resolution[J]. Geophysics, 1988, 53(6):846-853.
[69]蒋邦远.实用近区磁源瞬变电磁法勘探[M].北京:地质出版社,1998.
[70] M N Nabighian. Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space—An approximate representation[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44:1700-1705.
[71] J E Reid, J C Macnae. Comments on the electromagnetic“somke ring”concept[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(6):1908-1913.
[72] B R Spies. Depth of investigation in electromagnetic sounding methods[J]. Geophysics, 1989, 54(7):872-888.
[73] A P Raiche, R G Gallagher. Apparent resistivity and diffusion velocity[J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(10):1628-1633.
[74] T Wang. The electromagnetic smoke ring in a transversely isotropic medium[J]. Geophysics, 2002, 67(6):1779-1789.
[75] Y Li, K Key. 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: Part 1—An adaptive finite-element algorithm[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA51-WA62.
[76] Y Li, S Constable. 2D marine controlled-source electromagnetic modeling: Part 2-- The effect of bathymetry[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA63-WA71.
[77] G M Hoversten, G A Newman, N Geier, et al. 3D modeling of a deepwater EM exploration survey[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(5):G239-G248.
[78] F A Maao. Fast finite-difference time-domain modeling for marine-subsurface electromagnetic problems[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):A19-A23.
[79] C J Weiss, S Constable. Mapping thin resistors and hydrocarbons with marine EMmethods, Part II--Modeling and analysis in 3D[J]. Geophysics, 2006, 71(6):G321-G332.
[80]米萨克N.纳比吉安主编,赵经祥等译,勘察地球物理电磁法(第一卷)[M].北京:地质出版社,1992
[81] A A Kaufman, G V Keller. Frequency and transient soundings[M]. New York: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1983.
[82]渤海找到亿吨级大油田(海讯)[J].中国海洋平台,1999(04):44.
[83]徐嘉信.中国海上油气田开发特点及其前景[J].中国海洋平台,1994,(z1):8-28.
[84] F N Kong. Hankel transform filters for dipole antenna radiation in a conductive medium[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2007, 55:83-89.
[85]王琦,朱而勤.海洋沉积学[M].北京:科学出版社,1989.
[86] K Weitemeyer, S Constable, K Key. Marine EM techniques for gas-hydrate detection and hazard mitigation[J]. The Leading Edge, 2006(May):629-632.
[87] D Dickins. Controlled-source electromagnetic modeling of the masking effect of marine gas hydrate on a deeper hydrocarbon reservoir[D]. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2007.
[88]陈建文,吴志强.天然气水合物的地球物理识别技术[J].海洋地质动态,2004,20(6):1-5。
[89] S C Constable, A S Orange, G M Hoversten. Marine magnetotellurics for petroleum exploration Part I: A sea-floor equipment system[J]. Geophysics, 1998, 63(3):816-825.
[90] G M Hoversten, S C Constable, H F Morrison. Marine magnetotellurics for base-of-salt mapping: Gulf of Mexico field test at the Gemini structure[J]. Geophysics, 2000, 65(5):1476-1488.
[91] P F Lezaeta, A D Chave, R L Evans. Correction of shallow-water electromagnetic data for noise induced by instrument motion[J]. Geophysics, 2005, 70(5):G127-G133.
[92] N B Christensen, K Dodds. 1D inversion and resolution analysis of marine CSEM data[J]. Geophysics, 2007, 72(2):WA27-WA38.
[93] P D Aversana. Marine CSEM in shallow water: acquisition and interpretation strategies[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, 2006, P724-728.
[94] X Lu, D Willen, J Zhang. Marine CSEM data processing techniques[C]. SEG/New Orleans 2006 Annual Meeting, 2006, P704-708.
[95]..郭玉松. TEM法在工程勘察中的研究与应用[J].工程勘察,1998(1):70-72.
[96]林君.电磁探测技术在工程与环境中的应用现状[J].物探与化探,2000,24(3):167-177.
[97]朱德兵.工程地球物理方法技术研究现状综述[J].地球物理学进展,2002,17(1):163-170.
[98]张保祥,刘春华,汪家权.瞬变电磁法在地下水勘查中的应用[J].水利水电科技进展,2002,22(4):23-29.
[99]张运霞,韩自豪,周建雄,等.瞬变电磁法在煤层水探测中的应用[J].中国煤田地质,2005,17(6):45-47.
[100]刘国栋.电磁法及电法仪器的新进展和应用[J].石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(增刊):46-51.
[101]宋先旺.瞬变电磁法在地质勘查中的应用效果[J].矿产与地质,1998,12(5):353-357.
[102] W L Anderson. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms of orders 0 and 1 by adaptive digital filteing[J]. Geophysics, 1979, 44(7):1287-1305.
[103] A D Chave. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion[J]. Geophysics, 1983, 48(12):1671-1686.
[104] W L Anderson, A D Chave. Discussion on:“Numerical integration of related Hankle transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion”by A.D. Chave (Geophysics, 48, P.1617-1686,December,1983)[J]. Geophysics, 1983, 48:1811-1813.
[105] W L Anderson. Computation of Green’s tensor integrals for three-dimensional electromagnetic problems using fast Hankel transforms[J]. Geophysics, 1984, 49(10):1754-1759.
[106] G A Newman, G W Hohmann, W L Anderson. Transient electromagnetic response of a three-dimensional body in a layered earth[J]. 1986, 51(8):1608-1627.
[107] W L Anderson. A hybrid fast Hankel transform algorithm for electromagnetic modeling[J]. Geophysics, 1989, 54(2):263-266.
[108] D Guptasarma, B Singh. New digital linear filters for Hankel J0 and J1 transforms[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 1997, 45:745-762.
[109] S S Rai. Transient electromagnetic response of a thin conducing plate embedded in conducting host rock[J]. Geophysics, 1985, 50(8):1342-1349.
[110] A P Raiche, B R Spies. Coincident loop transient electromagnetic master curves for interpretation of two-layer earths[J]. Geophysics, 1981, 46(1):53-64.
[111] J C Macnae, R Smith, B D Polzer, et al. Conductivity-depth imaging of airborne electromagnetic step-response data[J]. Geophysics, 1991, 56(1):102-114.
[112] R S Smith, A P Annan, P D McGowan. A comparison of data from airborne, semi-airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems[J]. Geophysics, 2001, 66(5):1379-1385.
[113] A A Kaufman. The influence of currents induced in the host rock on electromagnetic response of a spheroid directly beneath a loop[J]. Geophysics, 1981, 46(8):1121-1136.