大城市（社会）生活空间问题及其解决机制研究
|
摘要
问题的提出：上个世纪70年代以来,发达国家相继进入到后工业化阶段,他们面临着社会要素和谐与工业化水平关系的可持续发展问题。这些问题都预示着人文主义应该有新的价值观念来指导和解决上述问题的困境。针对人文主义的后现代“社会正义”涵义的解读,引发了社会科学的大讨论。很多学科都提出了系统的社会理念,对区域学科构建新区域的理解起到了开拓性启蒙作用。
从20世纪70年代开始,区域科学包括人文地理学等相继转向对“社会空间”公正的探讨。前者以区域经济学思维下的重在区域“社会管理”重构下展开,“城乡统筹”理论是其重要理念。由于这些学科固有的经济(学原理)导向下的生态持续与社会持续观,很难全面耦合到社会价值新的发展趋势上。而城市研究是以“草根社区”等空间公正构建为方向,逐渐由二战后风行的现代城市功能区规划转向到90年代已形成的、具有居住公平思想的“新城市主义”规划。主要体现在社区(阶层)混居规划的导向。由于居住等消费文化的行为阶层性致使其社区“草根”(阶层)公正性逐渐失效,至今没有全面解决社会公平下城市空间公正的规划问题。近几年,社会公平与对偶空间公正建构的转向研究,成为跨学科的呼应检验的共识,同时也成跨社会科学与区域科学的研究范式。
人文地理学探讨城市空间公正,现阶段主要把握社会公平对应构建的社会空间公正方向,其焦点是研究公正的城市社会生活行为与对应社会空间能否耦合问题。也就是探讨城市社会生活空间问题,对其的研究人文地理学融合其他学科大致经历了三个深化阶段。
70年代注重研究城市生活(空间)质量问题必须耦合到对社会与文化要素的和谐水平上来。80年代到90年代国外研究主要集中探讨城市生活单元的社区问题方面。90后期年代以来发达国家对城市社会空间问题的探讨,主要关注社区体系构建原理。
依据理念与方法：人文地理学在“社会空间”研究方面,上个世纪90年代已形成了完整的“社会论”。其核心内容构成了《城市社会地理》学科。该理论以人文主义的“现象学”方法来探讨生活行为在城市空间的“社会意义”；用“存在主义”方法探讨行为存在空间的城市“社会结构”,他们共同揭示人们生活行为所形成的城市“社会空间”结构或体系。该体系健全与否,可以揭示哪(阶层人群)类型行为存在社会空间“剥夺”。被剥夺的空间就揭示对应阶层人群社会生活行为被剥夺,就会出现社会生活空间问题。本世纪以来城市社会地理学集中探讨集空间性、物质性与精神性(社会文化性)为一体的城市社会空间的结构体系。对此研究的概念集成已形成了“城市(社会)生活空间质量观”。由于随着社会经济的快速发展,特别是在后工业化阶段,城市物质功能空间系统逐步形成,体现社会公平的社区体系的完善与否成为衡量城市社会生活空间质高低的重要方面。因此社区体系构建下的城市社区生活空间对各阶层居民的社会生活行为具有公正性的现实意义。它是探讨城市社会空间问题的基本理论,也是解决城市(社会)生活空间问题的基本理念及其路径构建方向。
研究内容：工业化期间的城市生活空间问题主要是城市功能主导下的物质空间的缺失。发达国家上个世纪70年代以来相继进入后工业化时代,物质空间建构的空间问题基本解决。城市社会生活空间问题随着后福特主义消费文化的兴起与创新,致使人们追求生活行为的文化场所性的延伸与重组,新的社会生活空间问题不断出现,其问题类型已有十多个。尤其是对社会空间阶层行为“剥夺”产生的机制、形成的社会空间问题及其空间整治途径的研究,城市社会地理学等人文空间科学已分别有了针对性的研究,但是尚未从“社会-文化进程”的角度进行归纳并提升到上述的系统学理体系之中。对该系统归纳性综述是本论文的基础内容。
其次,中国的大城市发展正处于工业化与后工业化快速过渡阶段,后工业化的城市社会生活空间问题已现端倪,已有愈演愈烈的趋势。尤其是用现代城市功能理论规划并建设起来的城市产业开发区,既有城市扩展形成的边缘区社会空间“隔离”问题,还有开发区内社区生活空间“剥夺”问题,以及社区内生活行为场所的社区资源剥夺问题。对其社会生活空间问题及其解决机制与规划路径的研究是本论文的重点。
第三,发达国家人文空间学科中的文化生态学、城市社会学以及城市意象学(及建筑伦理)等学科自上世纪80年代以来针对各自学科的目标分别创立了城市空间社会公正为方向的研究范式。人文地理学的城市社会地理学在此基础上追索反映城市社会生活空间的公正价值指向,提出了居住社区体系布局、生活行为场所布局的“社会空间秩序”布局(微区位论)概念。借鉴上述理论应用到案例区的对应研究,提炼并形成理念性结论是本论文探讨的焦点。
本文研究是基于“城市社会生活空间质量观”理念下的城市生活空间问题及其解决路径研究,属于第三阶段聚焦的研究前沿内容。
综上,本文研究内容共包括五部分。从人文地理学角度,首先系统地综述人文地理学探讨城市(社会)生活空间质量(结构)研究的理念、原理与方法；第二,探讨性归纳现在西方国家城市社会生活空间问题的类型与体系,以及解决机制及其规划的路径；第三,试探性提出评价与解决城市社区空间(结构)质量问题的理念与方法；第四,针对上述几个方面,结合西安城市的适宜案例区进行具体研究；最后,综上研究尝试性提出中国在工业化阶段及其后转型期城市社会空间(结构)问题与解决机制及其规划路径。
研究结论：其一,国外在研究城市(社会)生活空间问题及其解决机制与规划路径方面,区域科学或城市学科等分别提出了自己的本体性理念,从社会公平与空间公正的思想统帅其理念逻辑,用人文地理学社区(会)空间结构角度审视、捋顺并组合其空间公正价值关系,其形成的理念或理论能够解决城市(社会)生活空间问题及其解决机制与规划路径问题。论文在此方面的梳理与总结是国内比较全面综述城市社会生活空间问题并提出系统解决机制以及路径的论文。
其二,国外在解决城市社会(生活)空间实践问题上,主要依赖于新区域科学的社会统筹原理,以及社会科学的社区管理进行治理。由于社会空间问题是社会问题的对应结果,因此必须从社会空间重构进行正向治理。国外虽然在“新城市主义”理念、城市社会地理理念与人本公共交通布局理念等方面有了各自的路径,但是还没有形成综合的系统路径。尤其是缺失在区域剥夺下,必须进行“区域补偿”的系统治理原理。
其三,应用上述理念从案例区的研究发现,国内大城市产业开发区的迅速建成,形成有工业化阶段向后工业化转型的混合型社会生活空间问题；探讨性提出了三类城市社会生活空间问题,他们具有互为共生的综合性：一是开发区扩展的边缘区“城市资源剥夺”形成的社会生活区域“隔离”问题,具有工业化阶段的典型特征；二是开发区内“社区(生活空间)剥夺”形成的社区体系“公正”结构问题；三是CBD区社区内生活行为场所的“社区资源剥夺”形成的低阶层“职住错位”问题。后两个问题具有后工业化阶段特征。这三类问题在城市社会空间上是互为因果机制关联的。对该问题的综合系统的讨论在国内尚属首次。
其四,上述三类城市社会生活空间问题,是对应三类“剥夺”空间而形成的社会区域并构成体系关系。对其治理必须从区域“剥夺”的区域“补偿”公正观出发。首先,从空间体系结构关系上依次通过构建三类“社会空间”的“可获性”体系途径,进行城市社会生活空间的整治机制与路径。其次,在从社会公平管理的角度对这其进行社区调整,及其社区管理。论文试探性提出中国在工业化及其后工业化转型期城市社会空间问题与解决机制及其规划路径。并尝试性提出社区管理的借鉴途径。
Raised issues:social justice and space fair ideas are universal values, is the fundamental driving force for social development, the objectives pursued, and spatial problems of sustainable development of modern city.Since the70's of the last century, after developed countries have entered the stage of industrialization, they faced social elements of harmonious relationship between industrialization and sustainable development issues.These problems are threatening humanism should have new values to guide and resolve the plight of these issues.Academic recognition/gongyi "theory of Justice" philosophy, presents social "equality","freedom" and "justice" is to balance the "social justice" phase of the development process.The humanist postmodern "social justice" meaning interpretation, sparked great debate in the social sciences.Many disciplines are proposed a system of social philosophy, regional discipline to build a new understanding of the enlightenment has played a pioneering role in the region.
Starting from in the1970of the20th century, regional science, including human geography have formed a steering "social space" just discussed.Under former regional economic thinking in the area "social management" under reconstruction."Concordance" theory is an important concept.Due to the inherent in these disciplines Economics (theory) under the guidance of concept of ecological and social sustainability, it is difficult to fully coupled to the social values on the new trends of development.Urban studies with "grass-roots community" building space just as the direction came after World War II popularity of functional district planning in modern cities turned to the90's, lived with a fair idea of the formation of "new urbanism" planning.Mainly in the communities (bracket) mix planning guide.Live class of consumer culture, including their community a "grass-roots"(class) the impartiality of progressive failure and there has been no comprehensive solution fair of urban space planning under the social justice issues.In recent years, social fairness and justice turned to the study of the construction of dual space, become the consensus of interdisciplinary echo test, but also across research paradigms in social sciences and science.
Study on urban space of human geography just at this stage mainly grasp the social spaces of social fairness and build a just direction, focusing on the city life of fair implementation of social space can be coupled.That explore the social life of the city space, study of its input from other disciplines of human geography has gone through three further stages.
70to the city life (space) quality issues must be coupled to the level of harmony between social and cultural elements.80's to the90's research mainly focuses on urban life abroad range of community issues. Developed since the late90's discussion on the problems of urban social space, focusing on principles of community building.
Based on the concepts and methods:human geography in the "social space" study, the90's of the last century and has formed a complete set of "social theory ".The elements that constitute the core of the urban social geography disciplines.The theory of humanism "phenomenological" method to explore life in urban space "social significance";"Existentialism" space city method exists "social structure", they work together to reveal the formation of life city "social space" structure or system.The soundness of the system, and can reveal which (class crowd) type of social space "deprivation".Deprived of space corresponding to reveal segments of populations deprived of social life, there will be social space issues.
Urban social geography since this century focusing on the collection of spatiality, materiality and spirituality (society and culture) for the integration of urban social space structure system.This concept of integration has formed a "social concept of living space, the quality of the city ".As with rapid socio-economic development, particularly in the post-industrial phase, urban material features space systems evolved, reflecting the perfection of the system of social justice communities have become important aspects of urban social space high and low quality of life.Under the Community system of living space in urban communities for residents from all walks of the social life behavior has a practical significance of impartiality.lt is to explore the basic theory of urban social space to address city (social) construction of basic ideas and ways of living space problems.
Content:during the industrialization is mainly dominated by urban functions on urban living space lack of physical space.Developed since the70's of the last century have been entering the post-industrial age, physical space basically solved the problem of constructing. Social life of the city space with the rise of post-Fordism consumer culture and innovation, leading people to pursue life extension and restructuring of cultural sites, new social space problems are emerging, their problems over more than10types.Especially for the socio-spatial strata "deprivation" mechanisms, formation of social space and spatial regulation pathway of, urban social geography, the Humanities respectively, targeted research in space science, but not yet "socio-cultural process" point of induction, theoretical system and upgrading of these systems.Summary of narrative of the system is the basis of this paper.
Secondly, the development of big cities in China is excessive phase once in the industrialized and industrializing fast, post-industrial cities have signs for social living space, there is a growing trend.Especially in function theory in modern city planning and construction of urban industrial zone, urban social space in extended formation of fringe "isolate" problems, as well as community living space within the development zone "deprivation", as well as community resources in places of deprivation of life issues within the community. Space issues for their social life and its settlement mechanism study on the planned route and is the focus of this paper.
Third, the developed cultural space disciplines of cultural ecology, sociology and urban image of the city (and its architectural ethic) and other disciplines for their respective disciplines since the last century80's respective goals of the creation of the urban spaces of social justice-oriented paradigms.Urban social geography human geography based on the recovery of fair value that reflects the social life of the city space links to proposed layout of dwelling Community system layout, live venues,"socio-spatial order" layouts (micro-location theory) concepts.Reference correspondence theory applied to the case study mentioned above, refines and form the conceptual conclusions are the focus of this thesis.
This study is based on the "social concept of living space, the quality of the city" concept of study on urban space problems and the way of life, belong to the third focus of research frontiers.
In conclusion, the study comprises five parts.This article from the perspective of human geography, first systematic summary of human geography research (social) life quality (architecture) concepts, principles and methods of the study;Second, the exploratory inductive type social living space in cities in Western countries now issue and system, as well as addressing mechanism and its path planning;Third, the heuristic evaluation and urban community space (structural) concept of quality issues and methods;Ⅳ, for several of these areas, combined with the appropriate case area in XI'an city of specific studies;Finally, the comprehensive study tentatively suggested that at the stage of industrialization and urban social space in transition (structural) issues and resolution mechanism and its planned route.
Research and innovation:Research conclusions:one, abroad in research City (social) life space problem and settlement mechanism and planning path aspects, regional science or. city discipline, respectively made has themselves of ontology sexual concept, from social fair and space just of thought Commander its concept logic, with humanities geography community (will) spatial structure angle review, and smoothed Shun and combination its space just value relationship, its formed of concept or theory can settlement city (social) life space problem and settlement mechanism and planning path problem.Combs and summary of the thesis in this regard is the more comprehensive summary of the mechanism of urban social life space issues and propose system solutions as well as paper path.
Second, foreign urban social (living) space on practice issues, relies heavily on new regional scientific community co-ordinating principle, management of community management and social sciences.As a result social space problem is a social problem, it must be positive from socio-spatial reconstruction of governance.While abroad,"new urbanism" concept, the concept of urban social geography and human-oriented public transport layout ideas have their own path, but there is no comprehensive system path.Especially with missing in the area denied, must be "compensation" system of governance works.
Thirdly, apply these concepts from case study found that built big cities in China's rapid industrial development zone, the formation stage of industrialization of backward industrial restructuring hybrid social space;Exploratory raised the issue of three kinds of social living space in cities, they have a mutually symbiotic integrated: a zone extending fringe "urban resource deprivation" forms of life "quarantine" issues, with the typical characteristics of industrialization;In the second zone "community (living space) deprived of forming community system "just" structural problems;Three places are within the CBD area community life "community resource deprivation" formation of lower-class "level mismatch" problem.The latter two issues with the post-industrial phase characteristics.These three categories of issues on urban social space is both a mechanism associated.General conclusions on the subject system of its kind in the country for the first time.
Four, the three major types of social living space in cities, correspond to three types of "deprivation" spatial and social forms and form systems.Their governance must be from the region "deprived of regional "compensation" starting just idea.First of all, space architecture, construction, through the relationship between three types of "social space","accessibility" system means social regulation mechanisms and ways of living space in cities. Secondly, from the angle of social equity management to community adjustment, and community management.Paper tentatively suggested that in industrialized and post-industrial transition of urban social space problem and resolution mechanism and its planned route.And try to reference to community management of ways.
从20世纪70年代开始,区域科学包括人文地理学等相继转向对“社会空间”公正的探讨。前者以区域经济学思维下的重在区域“社会管理”重构下展开,“城乡统筹”理论是其重要理念。由于这些学科固有的经济(学原理)导向下的生态持续与社会持续观,很难全面耦合到社会价值新的发展趋势上。而城市研究是以“草根社区”等空间公正构建为方向,逐渐由二战后风行的现代城市功能区规划转向到90年代已形成的、具有居住公平思想的“新城市主义”规划。主要体现在社区(阶层)混居规划的导向。由于居住等消费文化的行为阶层性致使其社区“草根”(阶层)公正性逐渐失效,至今没有全面解决社会公平下城市空间公正的规划问题。近几年,社会公平与对偶空间公正建构的转向研究,成为跨学科的呼应检验的共识,同时也成跨社会科学与区域科学的研究范式。
人文地理学探讨城市空间公正,现阶段主要把握社会公平对应构建的社会空间公正方向,其焦点是研究公正的城市社会生活行为与对应社会空间能否耦合问题。也就是探讨城市社会生活空间问题,对其的研究人文地理学融合其他学科大致经历了三个深化阶段。
70年代注重研究城市生活(空间)质量问题必须耦合到对社会与文化要素的和谐水平上来。80年代到90年代国外研究主要集中探讨城市生活单元的社区问题方面。90后期年代以来发达国家对城市社会空间问题的探讨,主要关注社区体系构建原理。
依据理念与方法：人文地理学在“社会空间”研究方面,上个世纪90年代已形成了完整的“社会论”。其核心内容构成了《城市社会地理》学科。该理论以人文主义的“现象学”方法来探讨生活行为在城市空间的“社会意义”；用“存在主义”方法探讨行为存在空间的城市“社会结构”,他们共同揭示人们生活行为所形成的城市“社会空间”结构或体系。该体系健全与否,可以揭示哪(阶层人群)类型行为存在社会空间“剥夺”。被剥夺的空间就揭示对应阶层人群社会生活行为被剥夺,就会出现社会生活空间问题。本世纪以来城市社会地理学集中探讨集空间性、物质性与精神性(社会文化性)为一体的城市社会空间的结构体系。对此研究的概念集成已形成了“城市(社会)生活空间质量观”。由于随着社会经济的快速发展,特别是在后工业化阶段,城市物质功能空间系统逐步形成,体现社会公平的社区体系的完善与否成为衡量城市社会生活空间质高低的重要方面。因此社区体系构建下的城市社区生活空间对各阶层居民的社会生活行为具有公正性的现实意义。它是探讨城市社会空间问题的基本理论,也是解决城市(社会)生活空间问题的基本理念及其路径构建方向。
研究内容：工业化期间的城市生活空间问题主要是城市功能主导下的物质空间的缺失。发达国家上个世纪70年代以来相继进入后工业化时代,物质空间建构的空间问题基本解决。城市社会生活空间问题随着后福特主义消费文化的兴起与创新,致使人们追求生活行为的文化场所性的延伸与重组,新的社会生活空间问题不断出现,其问题类型已有十多个。尤其是对社会空间阶层行为“剥夺”产生的机制、形成的社会空间问题及其空间整治途径的研究,城市社会地理学等人文空间科学已分别有了针对性的研究,但是尚未从“社会-文化进程”的角度进行归纳并提升到上述的系统学理体系之中。对该系统归纳性综述是本论文的基础内容。
其次,中国的大城市发展正处于工业化与后工业化快速过渡阶段,后工业化的城市社会生活空间问题已现端倪,已有愈演愈烈的趋势。尤其是用现代城市功能理论规划并建设起来的城市产业开发区,既有城市扩展形成的边缘区社会空间“隔离”问题,还有开发区内社区生活空间“剥夺”问题,以及社区内生活行为场所的社区资源剥夺问题。对其社会生活空间问题及其解决机制与规划路径的研究是本论文的重点。
第三,发达国家人文空间学科中的文化生态学、城市社会学以及城市意象学(及建筑伦理)等学科自上世纪80年代以来针对各自学科的目标分别创立了城市空间社会公正为方向的研究范式。人文地理学的城市社会地理学在此基础上追索反映城市社会生活空间的公正价值指向,提出了居住社区体系布局、生活行为场所布局的“社会空间秩序”布局(微区位论)概念。借鉴上述理论应用到案例区的对应研究,提炼并形成理念性结论是本论文探讨的焦点。
本文研究是基于“城市社会生活空间质量观”理念下的城市生活空间问题及其解决路径研究,属于第三阶段聚焦的研究前沿内容。
综上,本文研究内容共包括五部分。从人文地理学角度,首先系统地综述人文地理学探讨城市(社会)生活空间质量(结构)研究的理念、原理与方法；第二,探讨性归纳现在西方国家城市社会生活空间问题的类型与体系,以及解决机制及其规划的路径；第三,试探性提出评价与解决城市社区空间(结构)质量问题的理念与方法；第四,针对上述几个方面,结合西安城市的适宜案例区进行具体研究；最后,综上研究尝试性提出中国在工业化阶段及其后转型期城市社会空间(结构)问题与解决机制及其规划路径。
研究结论：其一,国外在研究城市(社会)生活空间问题及其解决机制与规划路径方面,区域科学或城市学科等分别提出了自己的本体性理念,从社会公平与空间公正的思想统帅其理念逻辑,用人文地理学社区(会)空间结构角度审视、捋顺并组合其空间公正价值关系,其形成的理念或理论能够解决城市(社会)生活空间问题及其解决机制与规划路径问题。论文在此方面的梳理与总结是国内比较全面综述城市社会生活空间问题并提出系统解决机制以及路径的论文。
其二,国外在解决城市社会(生活)空间实践问题上,主要依赖于新区域科学的社会统筹原理,以及社会科学的社区管理进行治理。由于社会空间问题是社会问题的对应结果,因此必须从社会空间重构进行正向治理。国外虽然在“新城市主义”理念、城市社会地理理念与人本公共交通布局理念等方面有了各自的路径,但是还没有形成综合的系统路径。尤其是缺失在区域剥夺下,必须进行“区域补偿”的系统治理原理。
其三,应用上述理念从案例区的研究发现,国内大城市产业开发区的迅速建成,形成有工业化阶段向后工业化转型的混合型社会生活空间问题；探讨性提出了三类城市社会生活空间问题,他们具有互为共生的综合性：一是开发区扩展的边缘区“城市资源剥夺”形成的社会生活区域“隔离”问题,具有工业化阶段的典型特征；二是开发区内“社区(生活空间)剥夺”形成的社区体系“公正”结构问题；三是CBD区社区内生活行为场所的“社区资源剥夺”形成的低阶层“职住错位”问题。后两个问题具有后工业化阶段特征。这三类问题在城市社会空间上是互为因果机制关联的。对该问题的综合系统的讨论在国内尚属首次。
其四,上述三类城市社会生活空间问题,是对应三类“剥夺”空间而形成的社会区域并构成体系关系。对其治理必须从区域“剥夺”的区域“补偿”公正观出发。首先,从空间体系结构关系上依次通过构建三类“社会空间”的“可获性”体系途径,进行城市社会生活空间的整治机制与路径。其次,在从社会公平管理的角度对这其进行社区调整,及其社区管理。论文试探性提出中国在工业化及其后工业化转型期城市社会空间问题与解决机制及其规划路径。并尝试性提出社区管理的借鉴途径。
Raised issues:social justice and space fair ideas are universal values, is the fundamental driving force for social development, the objectives pursued, and spatial problems of sustainable development of modern city.Since the70's of the last century, after developed countries have entered the stage of industrialization, they faced social elements of harmonious relationship between industrialization and sustainable development issues.These problems are threatening humanism should have new values to guide and resolve the plight of these issues.Academic recognition/gongyi "theory of Justice" philosophy, presents social "equality","freedom" and "justice" is to balance the "social justice" phase of the development process.The humanist postmodern "social justice" meaning interpretation, sparked great debate in the social sciences.Many disciplines are proposed a system of social philosophy, regional discipline to build a new understanding of the enlightenment has played a pioneering role in the region.
Starting from in the1970of the20th century, regional science, including human geography have formed a steering "social space" just discussed.Under former regional economic thinking in the area "social management" under reconstruction."Concordance" theory is an important concept.Due to the inherent in these disciplines Economics (theory) under the guidance of concept of ecological and social sustainability, it is difficult to fully coupled to the social values on the new trends of development.Urban studies with "grass-roots community" building space just as the direction came after World War II popularity of functional district planning in modern cities turned to the90's, lived with a fair idea of the formation of "new urbanism" planning.Mainly in the communities (bracket) mix planning guide.Live class of consumer culture, including their community a "grass-roots"(class) the impartiality of progressive failure and there has been no comprehensive solution fair of urban space planning under the social justice issues.In recent years, social fairness and justice turned to the study of the construction of dual space, become the consensus of interdisciplinary echo test, but also across research paradigms in social sciences and science.
Study on urban space of human geography just at this stage mainly grasp the social spaces of social fairness and build a just direction, focusing on the city life of fair implementation of social space can be coupled.That explore the social life of the city space, study of its input from other disciplines of human geography has gone through three further stages.
70to the city life (space) quality issues must be coupled to the level of harmony between social and cultural elements.80's to the90's research mainly focuses on urban life abroad range of community issues. Developed since the late90's discussion on the problems of urban social space, focusing on principles of community building.
Based on the concepts and methods:human geography in the "social space" study, the90's of the last century and has formed a complete set of "social theory ".The elements that constitute the core of the urban social geography disciplines.The theory of humanism "phenomenological" method to explore life in urban space "social significance";"Existentialism" space city method exists "social structure", they work together to reveal the formation of life city "social space" structure or system.The soundness of the system, and can reveal which (class crowd) type of social space "deprivation".Deprived of space corresponding to reveal segments of populations deprived of social life, there will be social space issues.
Urban social geography since this century focusing on the collection of spatiality, materiality and spirituality (society and culture) for the integration of urban social space structure system.This concept of integration has formed a "social concept of living space, the quality of the city ".As with rapid socio-economic development, particularly in the post-industrial phase, urban material features space systems evolved, reflecting the perfection of the system of social justice communities have become important aspects of urban social space high and low quality of life.Under the Community system of living space in urban communities for residents from all walks of the social life behavior has a practical significance of impartiality.lt is to explore the basic theory of urban social space to address city (social) construction of basic ideas and ways of living space problems.
Content:during the industrialization is mainly dominated by urban functions on urban living space lack of physical space.Developed since the70's of the last century have been entering the post-industrial age, physical space basically solved the problem of constructing. Social life of the city space with the rise of post-Fordism consumer culture and innovation, leading people to pursue life extension and restructuring of cultural sites, new social space problems are emerging, their problems over more than10types.Especially for the socio-spatial strata "deprivation" mechanisms, formation of social space and spatial regulation pathway of, urban social geography, the Humanities respectively, targeted research in space science, but not yet "socio-cultural process" point of induction, theoretical system and upgrading of these systems.Summary of narrative of the system is the basis of this paper.
Secondly, the development of big cities in China is excessive phase once in the industrialized and industrializing fast, post-industrial cities have signs for social living space, there is a growing trend.Especially in function theory in modern city planning and construction of urban industrial zone, urban social space in extended formation of fringe "isolate" problems, as well as community living space within the development zone "deprivation", as well as community resources in places of deprivation of life issues within the community. Space issues for their social life and its settlement mechanism study on the planned route and is the focus of this paper.
Third, the developed cultural space disciplines of cultural ecology, sociology and urban image of the city (and its architectural ethic) and other disciplines for their respective disciplines since the last century80's respective goals of the creation of the urban spaces of social justice-oriented paradigms.Urban social geography human geography based on the recovery of fair value that reflects the social life of the city space links to proposed layout of dwelling Community system layout, live venues,"socio-spatial order" layouts (micro-location theory) concepts.Reference correspondence theory applied to the case study mentioned above, refines and form the conceptual conclusions are the focus of this thesis.
This study is based on the "social concept of living space, the quality of the city" concept of study on urban space problems and the way of life, belong to the third focus of research frontiers.
In conclusion, the study comprises five parts.This article from the perspective of human geography, first systematic summary of human geography research (social) life quality (architecture) concepts, principles and methods of the study;Second, the exploratory inductive type social living space in cities in Western countries now issue and system, as well as addressing mechanism and its path planning;Third, the heuristic evaluation and urban community space (structural) concept of quality issues and methods;Ⅳ, for several of these areas, combined with the appropriate case area in XI'an city of specific studies;Finally, the comprehensive study tentatively suggested that at the stage of industrialization and urban social space in transition (structural) issues and resolution mechanism and its planned route.
Research and innovation:Research conclusions:one, abroad in research City (social) life space problem and settlement mechanism and planning path aspects, regional science or. city discipline, respectively made has themselves of ontology sexual concept, from social fair and space just of thought Commander its concept logic, with humanities geography community (will) spatial structure angle review, and smoothed Shun and combination its space just value relationship, its formed of concept or theory can settlement city (social) life space problem and settlement mechanism and planning path problem.Combs and summary of the thesis in this regard is the more comprehensive summary of the mechanism of urban social life space issues and propose system solutions as well as paper path.
Second, foreign urban social (living) space on practice issues, relies heavily on new regional scientific community co-ordinating principle, management of community management and social sciences.As a result social space problem is a social problem, it must be positive from socio-spatial reconstruction of governance.While abroad,"new urbanism" concept, the concept of urban social geography and human-oriented public transport layout ideas have their own path, but there is no comprehensive system path.Especially with missing in the area denied, must be "compensation" system of governance works.
Thirdly, apply these concepts from case study found that built big cities in China's rapid industrial development zone, the formation stage of industrialization of backward industrial restructuring hybrid social space;Exploratory raised the issue of three kinds of social living space in cities, they have a mutually symbiotic integrated: a zone extending fringe "urban resource deprivation" forms of life "quarantine" issues, with the typical characteristics of industrialization;In the second zone "community (living space) deprived of forming community system "just" structural problems;Three places are within the CBD area community life "community resource deprivation" formation of lower-class "level mismatch" problem.The latter two issues with the post-industrial phase characteristics.These three categories of issues on urban social space is both a mechanism associated.General conclusions on the subject system of its kind in the country for the first time.
Four, the three major types of social living space in cities, correspond to three types of "deprivation" spatial and social forms and form systems.Their governance must be from the region "deprived of regional "compensation" starting just idea.First of all, space architecture, construction, through the relationship between three types of "social space","accessibility" system means social regulation mechanisms and ways of living space in cities. Secondly, from the angle of social equity management to community adjustment, and community management.Paper tentatively suggested that in industrialized and post-industrial transition of urban social space problem and resolution mechanism and its planned route.And try to reference to community management of ways.
引文
[1][2][29][40][101][145][150][151][152][153][177][188][199][200][220][229][233王兴中等.城市社区体系规划原理[M].北京：科学出版社.2012,3；4；16；34；ⅲ；13；前言；179；89-108；133；5；79-80；169-183；70-80；79-83
[3][15][16][25][51][52][53]王兴中.中国城市生活空间结构研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.49；193-215；41-66；4-6；50-51；i；58
[4]A component of APA's Agenda for America's Communities Program[M].planning and community equity. planners press.American planning association.2009
[5]风笑天.生活质量研究：近三十年回顾及相关问题探讨[J],社会科学研究,2007(6)：1-8
[6]詹天庠,等.关于生活质量评估的指标与方法[J].中山大学学报论丛,1997,(6)
[7]潘祖光.“生活质量”研究的进展和趋势[J].浙江社会科学,1994,(6)
[8]林南等.生活质量的结构与指标[J].社会学研究,1987,(6)
[9]林南等.社会指标与生活质量结构模型探讨[J].中国社会科学,1989,(4)
[10]卢淑华,等.生活质量主客观指标作用机制研究[J].中国社会科学,1992,(1)
[11]风笑天,等.城市居民家庭生活质量：指标及其结构[J].社会学研究,2000,(4)
[12]杨晓俊,王兴中.居民消费行为与城市休闲、娱乐场所的空间关系[N].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,35(6)：55-58
[13]李郁、许学强.广州市城市意象空间分析[J].人文地理,1993(8)：27-35
[14]顾朝林宋国臣.城市意象研究及其在城市规划中的应用[J].城市设计,2001(3)：70-73
[17]许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1997.57-79
[18]刘纪远,刘明亮,庄大方,等.中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析[J].中国科学,2002,32(12)：31-41
[19]吴志强.论进入21世纪时中国城市规划体系的建立[J].城市规划汇刊2000,(1)：33-40
[20]宋蕾.廉租房居住环境设计研究—以济南市廉租房居住环境设计为例[D]硕士论文山东建筑大学24-26
[21]魏立华,闫小培.“城中村”非正规部门形成发展机制——以深圳市蔡屋围为例[J].经济地理,2006,26(6)：969-973
[22]王志章,王晓蒙.包容性增长：背景、概念与印度经验[J],南亚研究,2011,105-109
[23]LoweJ,EldorPederson.1983.Humangeography:anintegratedapproach[J].New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc.262-277
[24]沃姆斯利DJ等.1988.行为地理学导论[M].33,37-38,73-78,81-89,137-145
[26]RediscoveringGeographyCommittee.1997.RediscoveringGeoraphy-newrelevancefo
rscienceandsociety[M].WashingtonDC:NationalAcademyPress.21-39,44-46,71-74
[27]RediscoveringGeographyCommittee.1997.RediscoveringGeoraphy-newrelevancefo rscienceandsociety [M]. WashingtonDC:NationalAcademyPress.113,161-192.
[28]LeyD.1999.Geographywithouthumanagency:ahumanisticcritique.In:AgnewJohntal, ed.Humangeography:anessentialanthology[M].OfordUK:BlackwellPublishersInc.192-210
[30]Samuels M S. An Existential Geography. In:Harvey M E, Holly B P, eds. Themes in Geographic Thought. London:Croom Helm.1981.115-133
[31]Edited by John Agnew,David N.Livingstone and Alisdair Rogers,Human Geography An Essential Anthology Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
[32]AmericanPlanningAssociation.1994.PlanningandCommunityEquity,Chicago,Illinoi s,Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[33][112]王兴中.中国城市商娱场所微区位原理[M].北京：科学出版社.2009.前言
[34]Lowe J,Eldor Pederson.1983.Human geography:an integrated approach.New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc.262-277
[35]Duany, A. and E. Plater-Zyberk and R. Alminara. The New Civic Art[M]. New York:Rizzoli.2003
[36]Douglas Farr. Sustainable Urbanism:Urban Design with Nature [M]. John Wiley and Sons, INC. Hoboken, New Jersey,2008
[37]Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[38]冯健,周一星,2003.中国城市内部空间结构研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2003(3)：304-314
[39]柴彦威等,2011.职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究[J].北京：地理学报(2)：157-166
[41]徐学强等.广州市社会空间的因子生态分析[J].地理学报,1989,44(4)：386-395
[42]吴启焰,崔功豪.南京市居住空间分异特征及其形成机制[J].城市规划,1999,23(12)：23-35
[43]顾朝林等.2001.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(1)：64-74
[44]戴维·米勒.社会正义原则[M].南京：江苏人民出版社,2001：27-328
[45]迈克尔·沃尔泽.正义诸领域一为多元主义与平等一辩[M].南京：译林出版社,2002：105
[46]孙瑞祥.住房保障与社会公正研究[D].上海师范大学.2012.5
[47]约翰·罗尔斯著.谢廷光译.正义论[M].上海译文出版社.1991
[48]洋龙.平等与公平、正义、公正之比较[J].文史哲2004.4
[49]王兴中.城市生活空间质量观下的城市规划理念[J].现代城市研究,2011(8)：40-48
[50]乔治·萨顿.科学史和新人文主义[M].北京：华夏出版社,1989.125-141
[54]常芳.城市社区消费文化类型的资源配置及控制研究：以西安市为例[D].西安：西安外国语大学硕士论文,2011.5-8
[55]林智理论社会资源与可持续发展台州师专学报[N]1998年.第20卷4月第2期,11
[56王康：《社会学词典》,山东人民出版社,1988年,258
[57]李永展.全球时代下的台湾社区营造[J].国家与社会,2009,(7)：1-27
[58]Edward W.Soja.1999. Reassertions:Towards a Specialized Ontology. In:John Agnew. ed. Human Geography:An Essential Anthology[J]. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers. Inc.623-635
[59]Kareu Witten,Daniel Eneter and Adrian Field, The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources [J],Urban Studies, Carfak Publishing 2003,vol.40,No.l,161-177
[60]Howden-Chapman, P. and Tobias, M. Eds, Social Inequalities in Health:New Zealand 1999[J]. Wellington:Ministry of Health,2000,76
[61]Kareu Witten,Daniel Eneter and Adrian Field, The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources[J],Urban Studies, Carfak Publishing 2003,vol.40,No.1,161-177
[62]张侃侃,王兴中：略论社区体系下城市资源的公正配置[J].经济问题,2012年3月p52-54
[63]Claudia Hornberg, Andrea Pauli. Child poverty and environmentaljustice [J].International Journal of Hygiene and EnvironmentalHealth,2007,210:571-580
[64]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Measures of deprivationand their meaning in terms of social satisfaction [J].Theory and Decision,1999,47:89-100
[65]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Ranking incomedistributions by deprivation orderings[J]. Social Indicators Research,1999,46:125-135
[66]Christine Eibner, Roland Sturm. US-based indices of area-leveldeprivation:Results from HealthCare for Communities [J].SocialScience & Medicine,2006,62:348-359
[67]Anil Namdeo, Claire Stringer. Investigating therelationship betweenair pollution, health and social deprivation in Leeds, UK [J].Environment International,2008,34:585-591
[68]Catherine Cubbin et al. Is Neighborhood Deprivation IndependentlyAssociated with Maternal and Infant Health? Evidence from Floridaand Washington[J]. Matern Child Health,2008,12:61-74
[69]楚静.基于社区可获性原理下城市社区体系公正配置的控制研究[D].西安：西安外国语大学硕士论文,2011.30-31
[70]翟洲燕.基于社区体系结构原理下社区资源可获性评价原理研究——以西安市四个社区为例[D].西安：西安外国语大学硕士论文,2011.33
[71]Booth,C.On the city Physical Pattern and Social Structure[M],1967,Chicago University Press
[72][74][75][79][80][81][82][84][135][231]王兴中等.中国城市社会空间结构研究[M].北京,科学出版社2000,20；54,85,157；127；20；176-188；35；153；127；182-188
[73]Small, J.,1986, AModernDictionaryof Geography [M], Edwar, Arnoldl,41,147
[76]Ley D.1999.Geography without human agency:a humanistic critique.In:Agnew John t al,ed.Human geography:an essential anthology.Oford UK:Blackwell Publishers Inc.304-305
[77]D.Ley.A Social Geography of The City[M],Harper and Row,Publishes,New York 1983,319-320
[78]R·E·Park.宋俊岭译.城市社会学[M].华夏出版社.1987,109-112
[83]王兴中、刘彦随中国大城市土地利用变化与空间阻力关系机制[J].地理学与国土研究,1997：10-17
[85]田野等.不同阶层居民混合居住及可行性分析[J],建筑学报,2006,36
[86]Patirck Simon, "Belleville, all quarrierd'int6gration",1992,Mirgationet soci6t6, VoB, no19, janvier—fdvrier
[87]Jean—ClaudeChamboredonet,MadeleineLemaire.Proximit6spatialeetidstnacesocial e:lesrgnadson—semblesetleurpeuplement[J], Revuefrna～aisedescoiologie,1970. vol. Ⅺ, nol
[88][美]保罗.诺克斯,史蒂文.平奇.城市社会地理学导论(M].北京：商务印书馆,2005：10-117
[89]Pacione M. Quality of life-research in urban geography[J]. Urban Geography,2003, 24(3):314-339
[90]Alcock P. Understanding Poverty[J].3rd edn. New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2006. 66-70
[91]Townsend P. Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy,1987,16(1):125-146
[92]Knox P L, Pinch S. Urban Social Geography:An Introduction[J].4th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited,2000.122-125
[93]Pacione M. Urban Geography:A Global Perspective[J].2nd edn. London: Routledge,2005.309-310
[94]Noble M, Wright G, Smith George et al. Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level[J]. Environment and Planning A,2006,38:169-185.
[95]Langlois A, Kitchen P. Identifying and measuring dimensions of urban deprivation in Montreal:An analysis of the 1996 census data[J]. Urban Studies,2001,38(1):119-139
[96]Broadway M J, Jesty G. Are Canadian inner cities becoming more dissimilar? An analysis of urban deprivation indicators[J]. Urban Studies,1998,35(9):1423-1438
[97]Haller B. Deprivation and poverty:A comparative analysis of Sweden and Great Britain[J]. Acta Sociologica 1996,39(2):141-168
[98]Pacione M. The geography of multiple deprivation in Scotland[J].Applied Geography,1995,15(2):115-133
[99]White P, Winchester H P M. The poor in the inner city:Stability and change in two Parisian neighborhoods[J]. Urban Geography,1991,12:35-54
[100]Fieldhouse E A, Tye R. Deprived people or deprived places? Exploring the ecological fallacy in studies of deprivation with the samples of anonymised records [J]. Environment and Planning A,1996,28:237-259
[102]David Ley.A Social Geography of the City[M],Harper and Row,Publishers,New York,1983
[103]埃比尼泽·霍华德.明日的田园城市[M].金经元(译).上海：商务印书馆,2000：116-123
[104]KainJF.Housingsegregation,Negroemploymentandmetropolitandecentralization[J]. Thequarterlyjournalofeconomics,1968,82(2):175-19
[105]Houston D S. Methods to test the spatial mismatch hypothesis[J]. E-conomic Geography,2005,81(4):407-434
[106]Shen Q, Sanchez T W. Residential location, transportation, and wel-fare-to-work in the United States:a case study of Milwaukee [J].Housing Policy Debate,2005, 16(3/4):393-431
[107]Stoil M A. Spatial mismatch, discrimination, and male youth em-ployment in the Washington, DC area:Implications for residentialmobility policies [J]. Journal of policy analysis and management,1999,18(l):77-98
[108]Ihlanfeldt K R, Sjoquist D L. The effect of job access on black andwhite youth employment:a cross-sectional analysis[J]. Urban Stud-ies,1991,28(2):255-265
[109]Samuels M S.1981. An Existential Geography[J]. In:Harvey M E, Holly B P, eds. Themes in Geographic Thought. London:Croom Helm.115-133
[110]Edited by John Agnew,David N.Livingstone and Alisdair Rogers[M],Human Geography An Essential Anthology Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
[111]AmericanPlanningAssociation.1994.PlanningandCommunityEquity[M],Chicago,I llinois,Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[113]Myers, D. Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1988,54:347-358
[114]Rogerson, Robert J. Quality of Life and City Competitiveness[J]. Urban Studies, 1999,36(5):969-985
[115]Shafer, C. S., Koo Lee, Turner, S. A tale of three greenway trails:user perceptions related to quality of life[J]. Landscape Urban Planning.2000,49:163-178
[116]Mitchell, G. Indicators as tools to guide progress on the sustainable development pathway,2000 in Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being; Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):5-18
[117]Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being; Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1): 5-18
[118]Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., Bonnes, M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[119]NRC (National Research Council). Community and Quality of Life:Data and Tools for Informed Decision-making[M]. Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press,2003
[120]Altman,I.and low,s.m.1992,place Attachment.Londen:Plenkm Hayvey,D.1973.Social Justice and the city[M].Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University press
[121]Johnston R. J.1997.Urban Geography:City structure[J].Progress in Human Geography,2(1):217-231
[122]Karen Witten, Daniel Exeter and Adrian Field.2003.The quality of urban environments:Mapping variation in access to community resources [J]. Urban Studies, 40(1):161-174
[123]Relph E.1976.Place and Placelessness. London:Pion,25-30
[124]Sorokin, P.A.1927.Social Mobility[M]. New York:Harper and Brothers
[125]Tuan, Yi-Fu.1974.Topophilia[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall
[126]Giddens A.1998.TheThird Way:the Renewal of Social Democracy Cambridge[M]: Polity Press
[127]D Rothblatt. North American Planning[M]. Autumn,A.P.A,1994.转引自张京祥.2005.西方城市规划思想史纲.南京：东南大学出版社：230
[128]王慧.2002.新城市主义的理念与实践、理想与现实[J].国外城市规划,(03)：39-42
[129]Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk.1992.The Second Coming of the Small Town.The Utne Reader,May/June
[130]Calthorpe,Peter.1993.TheNextAmericanMetropolis:Ecology,Community,and the American Dream[M].New York:Princeton Architectural Press
[131]Fuiji T,Hartshorn T A.The changing m etropolitan structure of A tlanta,G eorgia: Locations of functions and regional structure in a m ultinucleated urban area[J].U rban G eography,1995,16(8):680-707
[132]Duany, A. and E. Plater-Zyberk and R. Alminara. The New Civic Art[M]. New York:Rizzoli.2003.
[133]Douglas Farr. Sustainable Urbanism:Urban Design with Nature [M]. John Wiley and Sons, INC. Hoboken, New Jersey,2008
[134]Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[136]Anthony Giddens. Beyond left and right the future of radical polit-ics[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,1994.75-76
[137]张波,王兴中.国外对城市娱乐场所的空间关系研究的流派、阶段与趋势[J].人文地理,2005,(5)：1-7
[138]简·雅各布斯著,金衡山译.美国大城市的死与生[M].南京：译林出版社,2006135-136
[139]MARK FENTON, MS. Battling America's Epidemic of Physical Inactivity: Building More Walka-ble, Livable Communities [J] Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,2005, (37):S115-S118
[140]Department of Environment Transport and The Regions. A NewDeal for Transport: Better for Everyone[D]. The Government's WhitePaper on the Future of Transport. London,1998.56-70
[141]General Consumer Council for Northern Ireland. The Price of Being Poor,Belfast,Available[ET/OL].www.gccni.org.uk/filestore/document_uploads/transport_trap.pdf,2001-04-21
[142]Belinda M Wu, Julian P Hine.A PTAL approach to measuringchanges in bus service accessibility[J]. Transport Policy,2003,(10):308-310
[143]London Borough of Hammer smith and Fulham. June UDP Review:Revised Hypothetic Alterations[D]. London,2000.13
[144]唐相龙.2008.新城市主义及精明增长之解读[J].城市问题,(1)：88-90
[146]American Planning Association,1994.Planning and Community Equity[M]. Chicago, Illinois, Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[147]American Planning Association,1994.Planning and Community Equity[M]. Chicago, Illinois, Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[148]Douglas Farr,2008. Sustainable Urbanism.Hoboken,New Jersey:John Wiley and Sons[J],Lnc.Kenneth B. Hall,Jr., Gerald A. Poerterfield,2001
[149]Community by Design -New Urbanism for Suburbs and Small Communities[J]. New York:McGrew-Hill Companies
[154]Edited by John Agnew,David N.Livingstone and Alisdair Rogers[J],Human Geography An Essential Anthology Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
[155]Ebdon, D,S,1985:Statistics in geography:a practical approach. Oxford:Basil Blackwell
[156]Claudia Hornberg, Andrea Pauli. Child poverty and environmental justice [J].International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health,2007,210:571-580
[157]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Measures of deprivation and their meaning in terms of social satisfaction[J].Theory and Decision,1999,47:89-100
[158]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Ranking income distributions by deprivation orderings[J].Social Indicators Research,1999,46:125-135.
[159]Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A. Area. Class and health:should we be focusing on places or people[J]. Journal of Social Policy,1993,22:213-234
[160]Jamie Pearce, Karen Witten, Phil Bartie. Neighborhoods and health:a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility [J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,2006,60:389-395
[161]吉尔·格兰特著.叶齐茂,倪晓晖译.良好社区规划——新城市主义的理论与实践[M].北京,2010年.中国建筑工业出版社：18-25
[162]吴林海,刘荣增.2002.从“边缘城市主义”到“新城市主义”：价值理性的回归与启示科学技术与辩证法[J],(6)：16-17
[163]曹杰勇.2011.新城市主义理论——中国城市设计新视角[M].南京：东南大学出版社：79
[164]凯文·林奇.林庆怡等译.2001.城市形态[M].北京：华夏出版社
[165]任绍斌,吴明伟.2011.可持续城市空间的规划准则体系研究[J].城市规划,35(2)：49-56,63
[166]胡志鹏,胡慧琴.基于新城市主义理念下居住区适老性规划设计的思考[J].住宅产业,2010(8)：48
[167]潘秋玲,王兴中.城市生活质量空间评价研究[J].人文地理,1997(6)：29-37
[168]常芳,王兴中等.对新城市主义社区空间规划价值理念的审视[J].现代城市研究.2013.12(6)：16-20
[169]American Planning Association,1994.Planning and Community Equity[M]. Chicago, Illinois; Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[170]潘秋玲,王兴中.城市生活质量空间评价研究—以西安市为例[J].人文地理,1997,13(2)：29-36
[171]孙峰华,王兴中.中国城市生活空间及社区可持续发展研究现状与趋势[J].地理科学进展.2002,21(5)：491-499
[172]徐学强等.广州市社会空间的因子生态分析[J].地理学报,1989,44(4)：386-395
[173]吴启焰,崔功豪.南京市居住空间分异特征及其形成机制[J].城市规划,1999,23(12)：23-35
[174]顾朝林等.2001.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(1)：64-74
[175]冯健,周一星,2003.中国城市内部空间结构研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2003(3)：304-314
[176]柴彦威等,2011.职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究[J].北京：地理学报(2)：157-166
[178]冯健.转型期中国城市内部空间重构(M].北京：科学出版社,2004：110-113
[179]周江评.“空间不匹配”假设与城市弱势群体就业问题：美国相关研究及其对中国的启示[J].现代城市研究,2004(9)：8-14
[180]李纯斌,吴静.“空间失配”假设及对中国城市问题研究的启示[J].城市问题,2006(2)：16-21
[181]孟晓晨,吴静,沈凡卜.职住平衡的研究回顾及观点综述[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(6)：23-29
[182]郑思齐,龙奋杰,王铁军等.就业与居住的空间匹配——基于城市经济学的思考[J].城市问题,2007,(6)：56-62
[183]袁媛、吴缚龙、许学强.转型期中国城市贫困和剥夺的空间模式[J].地理学报2009,64(6)：753-763
[184]袁媛,薛德升,许学强.转型时期我国城市贫困研究述评[J].人文地理,2006,21(1)：93-99
[185]袁媛,许学强,薛德升.转型时期广州城市户籍人口新贫困的地域类型和分异机制[J].地理研究,2008,27(3)：672-682
[186]周春山,刘洋,朱红.转型时期广州市社会区分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1046-1056
[187]林顺利.空间视野下的中国城市贫困--以河北省保定市为例[D]华中师范大学博士论文2011.6,56
[189]戴学锋.旅游研究必须走出象牙塔[J].旅游学刊,2007,(1)：5-6.
[190]Myers D. Community-relevant Measurement of Quality of Life:A Focus on Local Trends [J]. Urban Affairs Quarterly,1987,23(1):108-125
[191]Rogerson, Robert J. Quality of Life and City Competitiveness[J]. Urban Studies, 1999,36(5):969-985
[192]Shafer C S, Koo Lee, Turner S. A tale of three greenway trails:user perceptions related to quality of life[J]. Landscape Urban Planning,2000,49:163-178
[193]Mitchell G. Indicators as tools to guide progress on the sustainable development pathway,2000 in Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being; Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study[J]. Landscape andUrban Planning,2003,65(1):5-18
[194]Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being;Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65 (1):5-18
[195]Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome[J]. Landscape andUrban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[196]Tara Smith, Maurice Nelischer, Nathan Perkins. Quality of an Urban Community: a Framework for Understanding the Relationship between Quality and Physical form[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1997,39(2-3):229-241
[197]王兴中.城市内部生活场所的微区位研究进展[J].地理学报,2004,(增刊)：125-131
[198]杨卫丽等.城市生活质量与生活空间质量研究评介与展望[J],人文地理,2010,113(3),20-23)
[201]刘易斯·芒福德.城市发展史——起源、演变和前景.宋俊岭,倪文彦译[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1989.83
[202]王保森.基于“和谐”思想的城市规划理论研究[J].城市规划,2008(2)：75-76
[203][英]尼格尔·泰勒.1945年后西方城市规划理论的流变.李白玉,陈贞译[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2006.84,118
[204]罗小龙,张京祥.管治理念与中国城市规划的公众参与[J].城市规划汇刊,2001(2)：59-60
[205]段进.城市空间发展论[M].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,2006.245-248
[206][英]克莱拉·葛利德.规划引介.王雅娟,张尚武译[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007.5,293-297
[207]Bjorklund E M. The Danwei:Social-spatial Characteristic of Work Units in China's Urban Society[J]. Economic Geography,1986,62(1):19-29
[208]胡伟,李汉林.单位作为一种制度—关于单位研究的一种视角[J].江苏社会科学,2003(06)：68-76
[209]田毅鹏,漆思. “单位社会”的终结：东北老工业基地“典型单位制”背景下的社区建设[M].社会科学文献出版社,2005
[210]李汉林.转型社会中的整合与控制—关于中国单位制度变迁的思考[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2007,47(04)：46-55
[211]李立勋,温锋华,许学强.从业主维权刍议中国城市社区管治重构[J].人文地理,2007,22(06)：72-75
[212]王玲慧.定居城市—从单位部落走向社区[J].城市问题,1997(4)：27-35
[213]翟桂萍著：《公共空间的历史性建构：社区发展的政治学分析》[M].军事科学出版社,2009,213
[214]朱晓娟,王峰玉.被动城市化背景下转型社区研究—以郑州市庙张社区为例[J].现代城市研究,2011,(8)：21-26
[215]秦瑞英,阎小培,曹小曙.快速城市化进程中转型社区的特征及治理模式探析—以深圳市爱联社区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2008,27(3)：48-52
[216]刘宣.快速城市化下“转型社区”空间改造的障碍—广州,深圳案例[J].地理研究,2010,29(4)：693-702
[217]蔡禾.社区概论[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005：45
[218]夏铸九.台湾的社区营造—地方自主性和社区参与,收编于《社会总体营造》[M].台北：“行政院文化建设委员会”,2003：15-20
[219]王正,闫水玉,方瑜.基于生态理念的重庆双福新城总体城市设计[J].城市规划,2010(6)：80-83
[221]曹素璋.2011年,新区域主义理论述评[J],政治学研究,第2期
[222]威格里·斯托克.作为理论的治理：五个论点[M].国际社会科学6(中文版),1999年第2期
[223]张学良.2005年,国外新区域主义研究综述[J],外国经济与管理,第5期。
[224]Anthony Giddens. Beyond left and Right-The Ffuture of Radical Politics[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,1994
[225]段忠桥主编.当代国外社会思潮[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001,355--395
[226]Anthony Giddens. The Third Way:The Renewal of Social Democracy[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,1998
[227]王兴中,常芳.空间公正思潮下的区域同步发展观[J].地域发展与研究.
[228]Peter M. Burns.2004.Tourism Planning:A Third Way? [J]. Annals of Tourism Research,31:26-38
[230]张中华,王兴中,城市社区资源的可接近性与规划保障体系的构建—以西安为例[J].西安.建筑学报[D],2009,18-22
[232]刘晓霞.2009.基于城市社会—生活空间质量观的社区资源配置研究[D].西北大学博士学位论文：69
[3][15][16][25][51][52][53]王兴中.中国城市生活空间结构研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.49；193-215；41-66；4-6；50-51；i；58
[4]A component of APA's Agenda for America's Communities Program[M].planning and community equity. planners press.American planning association.2009
[5]风笑天.生活质量研究：近三十年回顾及相关问题探讨[J],社会科学研究,2007(6)：1-8
[6]詹天庠,等.关于生活质量评估的指标与方法[J].中山大学学报论丛,1997,(6)
[7]潘祖光.“生活质量”研究的进展和趋势[J].浙江社会科学,1994,(6)
[8]林南等.生活质量的结构与指标[J].社会学研究,1987,(6)
[9]林南等.社会指标与生活质量结构模型探讨[J].中国社会科学,1989,(4)
[10]卢淑华,等.生活质量主客观指标作用机制研究[J].中国社会科学,1992,(1)
[11]风笑天,等.城市居民家庭生活质量：指标及其结构[J].社会学研究,2000,(4)
[12]杨晓俊,王兴中.居民消费行为与城市休闲、娱乐场所的空间关系[N].西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,35(6)：55-58
[13]李郁、许学强.广州市城市意象空间分析[J].人文地理,1993(8)：27-35
[14]顾朝林宋国臣.城市意象研究及其在城市规划中的应用[J].城市设计,2001(3)：70-73
[17]许学强,周一星,宁越敏.城市地理学[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1997.57-79
[18]刘纪远,刘明亮,庄大方,等.中国近期土地利用变化的空间格局分析[J].中国科学,2002,32(12)：31-41
[19]吴志强.论进入21世纪时中国城市规划体系的建立[J].城市规划汇刊2000,(1)：33-40
[20]宋蕾.廉租房居住环境设计研究—以济南市廉租房居住环境设计为例[D]硕士论文山东建筑大学24-26
[21]魏立华,闫小培.“城中村”非正规部门形成发展机制——以深圳市蔡屋围为例[J].经济地理,2006,26(6)：969-973
[22]王志章,王晓蒙.包容性增长：背景、概念与印度经验[J],南亚研究,2011,105-109
[23]LoweJ,EldorPederson.1983.Humangeography:anintegratedapproach[J].New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc.262-277
[24]沃姆斯利DJ等.1988.行为地理学导论[M].33,37-38,73-78,81-89,137-145
[26]RediscoveringGeographyCommittee.1997.RediscoveringGeoraphy-newrelevancefo
rscienceandsociety[M].WashingtonDC:NationalAcademyPress.21-39,44-46,71-74
[27]RediscoveringGeographyCommittee.1997.RediscoveringGeoraphy-newrelevancefo rscienceandsociety [M]. WashingtonDC:NationalAcademyPress.113,161-192.
[28]LeyD.1999.Geographywithouthumanagency:ahumanisticcritique.In:AgnewJohntal, ed.Humangeography:anessentialanthology[M].OfordUK:BlackwellPublishersInc.192-210
[30]Samuels M S. An Existential Geography. In:Harvey M E, Holly B P, eds. Themes in Geographic Thought. London:Croom Helm.1981.115-133
[31]Edited by John Agnew,David N.Livingstone and Alisdair Rogers,Human Geography An Essential Anthology Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
[32]AmericanPlanningAssociation.1994.PlanningandCommunityEquity,Chicago,Illinoi s,Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[33][112]王兴中.中国城市商娱场所微区位原理[M].北京：科学出版社.2009.前言
[34]Lowe J,Eldor Pederson.1983.Human geography:an integrated approach.New York:John Wiley and Sons Inc.262-277
[35]Duany, A. and E. Plater-Zyberk and R. Alminara. The New Civic Art[M]. New York:Rizzoli.2003
[36]Douglas Farr. Sustainable Urbanism:Urban Design with Nature [M]. John Wiley and Sons, INC. Hoboken, New Jersey,2008
[37]Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[38]冯健,周一星,2003.中国城市内部空间结构研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2003(3)：304-314
[39]柴彦威等,2011.职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究[J].北京：地理学报(2)：157-166
[41]徐学强等.广州市社会空间的因子生态分析[J].地理学报,1989,44(4)：386-395
[42]吴启焰,崔功豪.南京市居住空间分异特征及其形成机制[J].城市规划,1999,23(12)：23-35
[43]顾朝林等.2001.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(1)：64-74
[44]戴维·米勒.社会正义原则[M].南京：江苏人民出版社,2001：27-328
[45]迈克尔·沃尔泽.正义诸领域一为多元主义与平等一辩[M].南京：译林出版社,2002：105
[46]孙瑞祥.住房保障与社会公正研究[D].上海师范大学.2012.5
[47]约翰·罗尔斯著.谢廷光译.正义论[M].上海译文出版社.1991
[48]洋龙.平等与公平、正义、公正之比较[J].文史哲2004.4
[49]王兴中.城市生活空间质量观下的城市规划理念[J].现代城市研究,2011(8)：40-48
[50]乔治·萨顿.科学史和新人文主义[M].北京：华夏出版社,1989.125-141
[54]常芳.城市社区消费文化类型的资源配置及控制研究：以西安市为例[D].西安：西安外国语大学硕士论文,2011.5-8
[55]林智理论社会资源与可持续发展台州师专学报[N]1998年.第20卷4月第2期,11
[56王康：《社会学词典》,山东人民出版社,1988年,258
[57]李永展.全球时代下的台湾社区营造[J].国家与社会,2009,(7)：1-27
[58]Edward W.Soja.1999. Reassertions:Towards a Specialized Ontology. In:John Agnew. ed. Human Geography:An Essential Anthology[J]. Oxford:Blackwell Publishers. Inc.623-635
[59]Kareu Witten,Daniel Eneter and Adrian Field, The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources [J],Urban Studies, Carfak Publishing 2003,vol.40,No.l,161-177
[60]Howden-Chapman, P. and Tobias, M. Eds, Social Inequalities in Health:New Zealand 1999[J]. Wellington:Ministry of Health,2000,76
[61]Kareu Witten,Daniel Eneter and Adrian Field, The Quality of Urban Environments: Mapping Variation in Access to Community Resources[J],Urban Studies, Carfak Publishing 2003,vol.40,No.1,161-177
[62]张侃侃,王兴中：略论社区体系下城市资源的公正配置[J].经济问题,2012年3月p52-54
[63]Claudia Hornberg, Andrea Pauli. Child poverty and environmentaljustice [J].International Journal of Hygiene and EnvironmentalHealth,2007,210:571-580
[64]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Measures of deprivationand their meaning in terms of social satisfaction [J].Theory and Decision,1999,47:89-100
[65]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Ranking incomedistributions by deprivation orderings[J]. Social Indicators Research,1999,46:125-135
[66]Christine Eibner, Roland Sturm. US-based indices of area-leveldeprivation:Results from HealthCare for Communities [J].SocialScience & Medicine,2006,62:348-359
[67]Anil Namdeo, Claire Stringer. Investigating therelationship betweenair pollution, health and social deprivation in Leeds, UK [J].Environment International,2008,34:585-591
[68]Catherine Cubbin et al. Is Neighborhood Deprivation IndependentlyAssociated with Maternal and Infant Health? Evidence from Floridaand Washington[J]. Matern Child Health,2008,12:61-74
[69]楚静.基于社区可获性原理下城市社区体系公正配置的控制研究[D].西安：西安外国语大学硕士论文,2011.30-31
[70]翟洲燕.基于社区体系结构原理下社区资源可获性评价原理研究——以西安市四个社区为例[D].西安：西安外国语大学硕士论文,2011.33
[71]Booth,C.On the city Physical Pattern and Social Structure[M],1967,Chicago University Press
[72][74][75][79][80][81][82][84][135][231]王兴中等.中国城市社会空间结构研究[M].北京,科学出版社2000,20；54,85,157；127；20；176-188；35；153；127；182-188
[73]Small, J.,1986, AModernDictionaryof Geography [M], Edwar, Arnoldl,41,147
[76]Ley D.1999.Geography without human agency:a humanistic critique.In:Agnew John t al,ed.Human geography:an essential anthology.Oford UK:Blackwell Publishers Inc.304-305
[77]D.Ley.A Social Geography of The City[M],Harper and Row,Publishes,New York 1983,319-320
[78]R·E·Park.宋俊岭译.城市社会学[M].华夏出版社.1987,109-112
[83]王兴中、刘彦随中国大城市土地利用变化与空间阻力关系机制[J].地理学与国土研究,1997：10-17
[85]田野等.不同阶层居民混合居住及可行性分析[J],建筑学报,2006,36
[86]Patirck Simon, "Belleville, all quarrierd'int6gration",1992,Mirgationet soci6t6, VoB, no19, janvier—fdvrier
[87]Jean—ClaudeChamboredonet,MadeleineLemaire.Proximit6spatialeetidstnacesocial e:lesrgnadson—semblesetleurpeuplement[J], Revuefrna～aisedescoiologie,1970. vol. Ⅺ, nol
[88][美]保罗.诺克斯,史蒂文.平奇.城市社会地理学导论(M].北京：商务印书馆,2005：10-117
[89]Pacione M. Quality of life-research in urban geography[J]. Urban Geography,2003, 24(3):314-339
[90]Alcock P. Understanding Poverty[J].3rd edn. New York:Palgrave Macmillan,2006. 66-70
[91]Townsend P. Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy,1987,16(1):125-146
[92]Knox P L, Pinch S. Urban Social Geography:An Introduction[J].4th edn. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited,2000.122-125
[93]Pacione M. Urban Geography:A Global Perspective[J].2nd edn. London: Routledge,2005.309-310
[94]Noble M, Wright G, Smith George et al. Measuring multiple deprivation at the small-area level[J]. Environment and Planning A,2006,38:169-185.
[95]Langlois A, Kitchen P. Identifying and measuring dimensions of urban deprivation in Montreal:An analysis of the 1996 census data[J]. Urban Studies,2001,38(1):119-139
[96]Broadway M J, Jesty G. Are Canadian inner cities becoming more dissimilar? An analysis of urban deprivation indicators[J]. Urban Studies,1998,35(9):1423-1438
[97]Haller B. Deprivation and poverty:A comparative analysis of Sweden and Great Britain[J]. Acta Sociologica 1996,39(2):141-168
[98]Pacione M. The geography of multiple deprivation in Scotland[J].Applied Geography,1995,15(2):115-133
[99]White P, Winchester H P M. The poor in the inner city:Stability and change in two Parisian neighborhoods[J]. Urban Geography,1991,12:35-54
[100]Fieldhouse E A, Tye R. Deprived people or deprived places? Exploring the ecological fallacy in studies of deprivation with the samples of anonymised records [J]. Environment and Planning A,1996,28:237-259
[102]David Ley.A Social Geography of the City[M],Harper and Row,Publishers,New York,1983
[103]埃比尼泽·霍华德.明日的田园城市[M].金经元(译).上海：商务印书馆,2000：116-123
[104]KainJF.Housingsegregation,Negroemploymentandmetropolitandecentralization[J]. Thequarterlyjournalofeconomics,1968,82(2):175-19
[105]Houston D S. Methods to test the spatial mismatch hypothesis[J]. E-conomic Geography,2005,81(4):407-434
[106]Shen Q, Sanchez T W. Residential location, transportation, and wel-fare-to-work in the United States:a case study of Milwaukee [J].Housing Policy Debate,2005, 16(3/4):393-431
[107]Stoil M A. Spatial mismatch, discrimination, and male youth em-ployment in the Washington, DC area:Implications for residentialmobility policies [J]. Journal of policy analysis and management,1999,18(l):77-98
[108]Ihlanfeldt K R, Sjoquist D L. The effect of job access on black andwhite youth employment:a cross-sectional analysis[J]. Urban Stud-ies,1991,28(2):255-265
[109]Samuels M S.1981. An Existential Geography[J]. In:Harvey M E, Holly B P, eds. Themes in Geographic Thought. London:Croom Helm.115-133
[110]Edited by John Agnew,David N.Livingstone and Alisdair Rogers[M],Human Geography An Essential Anthology Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
[111]AmericanPlanningAssociation.1994.PlanningandCommunityEquity[M],Chicago,I llinois,Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[113]Myers, D. Building knowledge about quality of life for urban planning[J]. Journal of the American Planning Association,1988,54:347-358
[114]Rogerson, Robert J. Quality of Life and City Competitiveness[J]. Urban Studies, 1999,36(5):969-985
[115]Shafer, C. S., Koo Lee, Turner, S. A tale of three greenway trails:user perceptions related to quality of life[J]. Landscape Urban Planning.2000,49:163-178
[116]Mitchell, G. Indicators as tools to guide progress on the sustainable development pathway,2000 in Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being; Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):5-18
[117]Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being; Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1): 5-18
[118]Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., Bonnes, M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[119]NRC (National Research Council). Community and Quality of Life:Data and Tools for Informed Decision-making[M]. Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press,2003
[120]Altman,I.and low,s.m.1992,place Attachment.Londen:Plenkm Hayvey,D.1973.Social Justice and the city[M].Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University press
[121]Johnston R. J.1997.Urban Geography:City structure[J].Progress in Human Geography,2(1):217-231
[122]Karen Witten, Daniel Exeter and Adrian Field.2003.The quality of urban environments:Mapping variation in access to community resources [J]. Urban Studies, 40(1):161-174
[123]Relph E.1976.Place and Placelessness. London:Pion,25-30
[124]Sorokin, P.A.1927.Social Mobility[M]. New York:Harper and Brothers
[125]Tuan, Yi-Fu.1974.Topophilia[M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall
[126]Giddens A.1998.TheThird Way:the Renewal of Social Democracy Cambridge[M]: Polity Press
[127]D Rothblatt. North American Planning[M]. Autumn,A.P.A,1994.转引自张京祥.2005.西方城市规划思想史纲.南京：东南大学出版社：230
[128]王慧.2002.新城市主义的理念与实践、理想与现实[J].国外城市规划,(03)：39-42
[129]Andres Duany and Elizabeth Plater-Zyberk.1992.The Second Coming of the Small Town.The Utne Reader,May/June
[130]Calthorpe,Peter.1993.TheNextAmericanMetropolis:Ecology,Community,and the American Dream[M].New York:Princeton Architectural Press
[131]Fuiji T,Hartshorn T A.The changing m etropolitan structure of A tlanta,G eorgia: Locations of functions and regional structure in a m ultinucleated urban area[J].U rban G eography,1995,16(8):680-707
[132]Duany, A. and E. Plater-Zyberk and R. Alminara. The New Civic Art[M]. New York:Rizzoli.2003.
[133]Douglas Farr. Sustainable Urbanism:Urban Design with Nature [M]. John Wiley and Sons, INC. Hoboken, New Jersey,2008
[134]Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[136]Anthony Giddens. Beyond left and right the future of radical polit-ics[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,1994.75-76
[137]张波,王兴中.国外对城市娱乐场所的空间关系研究的流派、阶段与趋势[J].人文地理,2005,(5)：1-7
[138]简·雅各布斯著,金衡山译.美国大城市的死与生[M].南京：译林出版社,2006135-136
[139]MARK FENTON, MS. Battling America's Epidemic of Physical Inactivity: Building More Walka-ble, Livable Communities [J] Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior,2005, (37):S115-S118
[140]Department of Environment Transport and The Regions. A NewDeal for Transport: Better for Everyone[D]. The Government's WhitePaper on the Future of Transport. London,1998.56-70
[141]General Consumer Council for Northern Ireland. The Price of Being Poor,Belfast,Available[ET/OL].www.gccni.org.uk/filestore/document_uploads/transport_trap.pdf,2001-04-21
[142]Belinda M Wu, Julian P Hine.A PTAL approach to measuringchanges in bus service accessibility[J]. Transport Policy,2003,(10):308-310
[143]London Borough of Hammer smith and Fulham. June UDP Review:Revised Hypothetic Alterations[D]. London,2000.13
[144]唐相龙.2008.新城市主义及精明增长之解读[J].城市问题,(1)：88-90
[146]American Planning Association,1994.Planning and Community Equity[M]. Chicago, Illinois, Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[147]American Planning Association,1994.Planning and Community Equity[M]. Chicago, Illinois, Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[148]Douglas Farr,2008. Sustainable Urbanism.Hoboken,New Jersey:John Wiley and Sons[J],Lnc.Kenneth B. Hall,Jr., Gerald A. Poerterfield,2001
[149]Community by Design -New Urbanism for Suburbs and Small Communities[J]. New York:McGrew-Hill Companies
[154]Edited by John Agnew,David N.Livingstone and Alisdair Rogers[J],Human Geography An Essential Anthology Blackwell Publishers Ltd 1996
[155]Ebdon, D,S,1985:Statistics in geography:a practical approach. Oxford:Basil Blackwell
[156]Claudia Hornberg, Andrea Pauli. Child poverty and environmental justice [J].International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health,2007,210:571-580
[157]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Measures of deprivation and their meaning in terms of social satisfaction[J].Theory and Decision,1999,47:89-100
[158]Satyar Chakravarty, Diganta Mukherjee. Ranking income distributions by deprivation orderings[J].Social Indicators Research,1999,46:125-135.
[159]Macintyre S, Maciver S, Sooman A. Area. Class and health:should we be focusing on places or people[J]. Journal of Social Policy,1993,22:213-234
[160]Jamie Pearce, Karen Witten, Phil Bartie. Neighborhoods and health:a GIS approach to measuring community resource accessibility [J]. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,2006,60:389-395
[161]吉尔·格兰特著.叶齐茂,倪晓晖译.良好社区规划——新城市主义的理论与实践[M].北京,2010年.中国建筑工业出版社：18-25
[162]吴林海,刘荣增.2002.从“边缘城市主义”到“新城市主义”：价值理性的回归与启示科学技术与辩证法[J],(6)：16-17
[163]曹杰勇.2011.新城市主义理论——中国城市设计新视角[M].南京：东南大学出版社：79
[164]凯文·林奇.林庆怡等译.2001.城市形态[M].北京：华夏出版社
[165]任绍斌,吴明伟.2011.可持续城市空间的规划准则体系研究[J].城市规划,35(2)：49-56,63
[166]胡志鹏,胡慧琴.基于新城市主义理念下居住区适老性规划设计的思考[J].住宅产业,2010(8)：48
[167]潘秋玲,王兴中.城市生活质量空间评价研究[J].人文地理,1997(6)：29-37
[168]常芳,王兴中等.对新城市主义社区空间规划价值理念的审视[J].现代城市研究.2013.12(6)：16-20
[169]American Planning Association,1994.Planning and Community Equity[M]. Chicago, Illinois; Washington,D.C.:Plannners Press
[170]潘秋玲,王兴中.城市生活质量空间评价研究—以西安市为例[J].人文地理,1997,13(2)：29-36
[171]孙峰华,王兴中.中国城市生活空间及社区可持续发展研究现状与趋势[J].地理科学进展.2002,21(5)：491-499
[172]徐学强等.广州市社会空间的因子生态分析[J].地理学报,1989,44(4)：386-395
[173]吴启焰,崔功豪.南京市居住空间分异特征及其形成机制[J].城市规划,1999,23(12)：23-35
[174]顾朝林等.2001.北京城市意象空间及构成要素研究[J].地理学报,2001,56(1)：64-74
[175]冯健,周一星,2003.中国城市内部空间结构研究进展与展望[J].地理科学进展,2003(3)：304-314
[176]柴彦威等,2011.职住分离的空间差异性及其影响因素研究[J].北京：地理学报(2)：157-166
[178]冯健.转型期中国城市内部空间重构(M].北京：科学出版社,2004：110-113
[179]周江评.“空间不匹配”假设与城市弱势群体就业问题：美国相关研究及其对中国的启示[J].现代城市研究,2004(9)：8-14
[180]李纯斌,吴静.“空间失配”假设及对中国城市问题研究的启示[J].城市问题,2006(2)：16-21
[181]孟晓晨,吴静,沈凡卜.职住平衡的研究回顾及观点综述[J].城市发展研究,2009,16(6)：23-29
[182]郑思齐,龙奋杰,王铁军等.就业与居住的空间匹配——基于城市经济学的思考[J].城市问题,2007,(6)：56-62
[183]袁媛、吴缚龙、许学强.转型期中国城市贫困和剥夺的空间模式[J].地理学报2009,64(6)：753-763
[184]袁媛,薛德升,许学强.转型时期我国城市贫困研究述评[J].人文地理,2006,21(1)：93-99
[185]袁媛,许学强,薛德升.转型时期广州城市户籍人口新贫困的地域类型和分异机制[J].地理研究,2008,27(3)：672-682
[186]周春山,刘洋,朱红.转型时期广州市社会区分析[J].地理学报,2006,61(10)：1046-1056
[187]林顺利.空间视野下的中国城市贫困--以河北省保定市为例[D]华中师范大学博士论文2011.6,56
[189]戴学锋.旅游研究必须走出象牙塔[J].旅游学刊,2007,(1)：5-6.
[190]Myers D. Community-relevant Measurement of Quality of Life:A Focus on Local Trends [J]. Urban Affairs Quarterly,1987,23(1):108-125
[191]Rogerson, Robert J. Quality of Life and City Competitiveness[J]. Urban Studies, 1999,36(5):969-985
[192]Shafer C S, Koo Lee, Turner S. A tale of three greenway trails:user perceptions related to quality of life[J]. Landscape Urban Planning,2000,49:163-178
[193]Mitchell G. Indicators as tools to guide progress on the sustainable development pathway,2000 in Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being; Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study[J]. Landscape andUrban Planning,2003,65(1):5-18
[194]Kamp,Irene van, Kees Leidelmeijer, Gooitske Marsman, Augustinus de Hollander. Urban Environmental Quality and Human Well-being;Towards a Conceptual Framework and Demarcation of Concepts; a Literature Study [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,65 (1):5-18
[195]Bonaiuto M, Fornara F, Bonnes M. Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighborhood attachment in urban environments:a confirmation study on the city of Rome[J]. Landscape andUrban Planning,2003,65(1):41-52
[196]Tara Smith, Maurice Nelischer, Nathan Perkins. Quality of an Urban Community: a Framework for Understanding the Relationship between Quality and Physical form[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,1997,39(2-3):229-241
[197]王兴中.城市内部生活场所的微区位研究进展[J].地理学报,2004,(增刊)：125-131
[198]杨卫丽等.城市生活质量与生活空间质量研究评介与展望[J],人文地理,2010,113(3),20-23)
[201]刘易斯·芒福德.城市发展史——起源、演变和前景.宋俊岭,倪文彦译[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,1989.83
[202]王保森.基于“和谐”思想的城市规划理论研究[J].城市规划,2008(2)：75-76
[203][英]尼格尔·泰勒.1945年后西方城市规划理论的流变.李白玉,陈贞译[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2006.84,118
[204]罗小龙,张京祥.管治理念与中国城市规划的公众参与[J].城市规划汇刊,2001(2)：59-60
[205]段进.城市空间发展论[M].南京：江苏科学技术出版社,2006.245-248
[206][英]克莱拉·葛利德.规划引介.王雅娟,张尚武译[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2007.5,293-297
[207]Bjorklund E M. The Danwei:Social-spatial Characteristic of Work Units in China's Urban Society[J]. Economic Geography,1986,62(1):19-29
[208]胡伟,李汉林.单位作为一种制度—关于单位研究的一种视角[J].江苏社会科学,2003(06)：68-76
[209]田毅鹏,漆思. “单位社会”的终结：东北老工业基地“典型单位制”背景下的社区建设[M].社会科学文献出版社,2005
[210]李汉林.转型社会中的整合与控制—关于中国单位制度变迁的思考[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2007,47(04)：46-55
[211]李立勋,温锋华,许学强.从业主维权刍议中国城市社区管治重构[J].人文地理,2007,22(06)：72-75
[212]王玲慧.定居城市—从单位部落走向社区[J].城市问题,1997(4)：27-35
[213]翟桂萍著：《公共空间的历史性建构：社区发展的政治学分析》[M].军事科学出版社,2009,213
[214]朱晓娟,王峰玉.被动城市化背景下转型社区研究—以郑州市庙张社区为例[J].现代城市研究,2011,(8)：21-26
[215]秦瑞英,阎小培,曹小曙.快速城市化进程中转型社区的特征及治理模式探析—以深圳市爱联社区为例[J].地域研究与开发,2008,27(3)：48-52
[216]刘宣.快速城市化下“转型社区”空间改造的障碍—广州,深圳案例[J].地理研究,2010,29(4)：693-702
[217]蔡禾.社区概论[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2005：45
[218]夏铸九.台湾的社区营造—地方自主性和社区参与,收编于《社会总体营造》[M].台北：“行政院文化建设委员会”,2003：15-20
[219]王正,闫水玉,方瑜.基于生态理念的重庆双福新城总体城市设计[J].城市规划,2010(6)：80-83
[221]曹素璋.2011年,新区域主义理论述评[J],政治学研究,第2期
[222]威格里·斯托克.作为理论的治理：五个论点[M].国际社会科学6(中文版),1999年第2期
[223]张学良.2005年,国外新区域主义研究综述[J],外国经济与管理,第5期。
[224]Anthony Giddens. Beyond left and Right-The Ffuture of Radical Politics[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,1994
[225]段忠桥主编.当代国外社会思潮[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2001,355--395
[226]Anthony Giddens. The Third Way:The Renewal of Social Democracy[M]. Cambridge:Polity Press,1998
[227]王兴中,常芳.空间公正思潮下的区域同步发展观[J].地域发展与研究.
[228]Peter M. Burns.2004.Tourism Planning:A Third Way? [J]. Annals of Tourism Research,31:26-38
[230]张中华,王兴中,城市社区资源的可接近性与规划保障体系的构建—以西安为例[J].西安.建筑学报[D],2009,18-22
[232]刘晓霞.2009.基于城市社会—生活空间质量观的社区资源配置研究[D].西北大学博士学位论文：69