货物运输通道的演变及实证研究
|
摘要
我国经济的持续增长与人民生活水平的提高极大地刺激了运输需求的增长,也直接导致交通结构的变化。由于区域资源条件的差异及区域发展的不平衡性,在经济高速发展的某些地区,会形成需求相对密集的条形地带,即运输通道,这类通道需要提供更高水平的运输服务。资料表明,我国的货物运输量主要集中在几大主要的运输通道。对于发展中的地区来说,采用何种方式以及在何时提供这些运输服务正是通道规划的任务。因此,运输通道的规划与建设已经成为整个综合交通体系规划中最重要的组成部分之一。
本文以货物运输为对象,在充分考虑综合交通网络上不同方式技术经济特点及其提供的服务水平差异的基础上,重点研究了运输通道中货物运输体系规划的相关方法与实证问题。论文的主要工作包括以下几方面：
(1)通过分析货物运输通道的基本类型与运行特征,总结了运输通道供需平衡的基本模式；从货运通道形成过程出发,提出了运输通道吸引腹地范围的分析与确定方法。论文以欧洲莱茵河通道和我国京九运输通道为例,验证了运输通道的演化规律,指出了政府执行力对通道成长速度的重要影响。
(2)深入剖析了货运通道内社会经济发展与运输需求的互动关系,利用定性和定量相结合的方法分析了二者之间的相互作用,构建了互动关系分析评价的指标体系,提出了基于主成分分析的运输弹性系数模型和灰色关联度分析模型,并以1985-2008年广深通道的演变为例进行了实证分析。研究结果表明：广深通道运输需求关联度最大的要素初期是经济总量(GDP)与人口(城市化)水平,随着沿通道区域经济结构的转变,关联最显著要素转变为反映社会与经济活动的指标(社会消费品零售总额)而非原来的GDP等指标。这对研究其他货运通道的形成与演变具有重要意义。
(3)结合综合交通运输体系中不同运输方式的技术经济特征,研究了运输通道内不同运输方式竞争力的内涵,建立了不同运输方式的市场竞争力分析与评估模型；结合市场经济发展原理,从宏观与微观角度研究了影响运输方式竞争力的主要要素,指出了宏观因素和微观因素的本质差异。在此基础上,构建了基于准时性、快速性、经济性、方便性、货物安全性、货物价值损失等6个微观影响因素的货物运输通道内运输方式竞争力模型,提出了可操作的参数标定与选择方法。结合我国西部某煤炭运输通道中公路和铁路两种方式竞争案例的分析,进一步探讨了相关参数对运输方式竞争力的具体作用,找出了提高既有运输方式竞争力的有效手段,并为探讨既有通道内新建运输方式或新建运输线路(途径)的合理性提供了科学手段。
(4)在借鉴既有运输通道规划方法基础上,研究了运输通道规划与运营中的关键技术问题；从需求(用户)和供给(政府)两方面研究了货物运输通道规划的目标,重构了基于需求侧的用户成本与基于供给(政府)侧的系统成本概念,阐述了货物运输通道系统成本的内、外部成本及其技术经济内涵。研究认为：系统成本体现了规划主体(政府)的目标,用户成本则决定着实际的方式分担结果；规划主体可以通过政策措施来影响通道中不同运输方式的选择,缩小系统成本与用户成本之问的差距。由于系统成本中外部成本的作用,由系统成本决定的社会均衡运量要比由用户成本决定的用户理想运量要小,且外部成本占系统成本中的比重越大,社会均衡运量与用户理想运量的差距越大。
(5)通过货物运输通道内部成本和外部成本将综合交通系统的可持续发展要求与服务水平(效率)结合起来,提出了综合货物运输通道规划的原则和目标,构建了基于系统成本分析的货物运输通道规划框架,从宏观、中观和微观三个层次对运输通道规划方案的具体内容与规划方法进行了深入阐述；研究结论可以为区域货物运输系统的规划提供参考。
货物运输通道的规划与发展深刻影响着相关区域社会发展与经济增长的速度与形态,各种因素相互作用的机理十分复杂。本文仅讨论了其中的部分问题,许多内容还有必要开展更加全面、持续的研究。
The sustained economic growth and improvement of people's living standards have greatly stimulated the growth of transport demand, but also directly resulted in traffic structural changes in China. Because of regional differences in terms of resources and unbalanced development, it will form a rectangular area where traffic demand is relatively dense in some areas of rapid economic development, namely, transport corridors. Such corridors need to be studied to provide a higher level of transportation services. Planning and construction of transport corridors have also become one of the most important components of the planning throughout the integrated transport system, which also makes the author to fix the study in the area.
On the basis of full consideration of differences in features and relative service levels of different modes in integrated traffic network, we focus on freight transport system's related theory and empirical issues of transport corridors. The main work includes the following aspects.
(1) By analyzing the basic types and characteristics of freight corridors, the paper discusses the mode of supply-demand balance about the transportation corridors and the formation of freight corridors, proposes the methods about determining the cover of transportation corridors. Based on above studies, the author summarizes the evolution of freight corridors, and put forward the viewpoints about the power of related regional governmental departments in promoting the growth of transport corridors. The analyses on the comparison of the Rhine and Beijing-Kowloon railway transport corridors have also been given to demonstrate above conclusions.
(2) The dissertation analyzes the correlation between social economic development and transportation demand deeply in freight corridors, and analyzes their interaction by qualitative and quantitative method, constructs the index system of the correlation evaluation, proposes the elasticity factor of transportation model and grey relational grade analysis model based on principal component analysis and finally makes an empirical analysis of the evolution of Guang-Shen corridor between 1985 and 2008. The research results show:in initial stage the elements of the largest relational grades with transportation demand of Guang-Shen corridor are economic aggregate (GDP) and the population (urbanization) level and along with the changes of economic structure of the areas among the corridors, the elements change to the indexes reflecting the social and economic activities (total retail sales of consumer goods) rather than the former index GDP, etc. The results above are significant for the research on the formation and evolution of other freight corridors.
(3) With techno-economic characteristics of different modes in integrated transportation system, the conceptual framework for the competitiveness of different models in transport corridors is studied. According to the principle of market economy, the dissertation analyses the influence factors via microscopic and macroscopic. Of course, the difference between micro-factors and macro-factors are discussed. Then, the competitiveness model of different transport models including six factors, namely punctuality, rapidity, economical, convenience and goods value, is established. The method for parameters calibration of competitiveness model is proposed. An example shows the application technology of the competitiveness model.
(4) The critical theory issues on planning and operation of transport corridors are researched on the basis of the existing transport corridor planning theory. An analysis is made of the freight transport corridors planning methods for demand (users) and supply (government). We rebuild the concept of user cost based on the demand side and system cost based on the supply (government) side and their applying scope. We also point out that the system cost, which indicate the goal of the subject in planning, consist of internal cost and external costs. Of course, it will also affect the freight mode choice by policy and measures. Society balance volume, which is decided by system cost, is smaller than user ideal volume for which is decided by user cost. Further more, the gap between these two volume changes along with the ratio of external cost of system cost.
(5) Sustainable Development and service level (efficiency) about the integrated transport system is combined by two generalized cost function. The system cost of the freight corridors is analyzed. The planning principles and objection of comprehensive freight corridors is submitted and based on system cost,the planning framework which makes a further probe into the planning content and point of transportation corridor from three scales:macroscopic, midscopic and microscopic is structured. These results will do favor to region freight transportation system planning and construction.
The development of freight transport corridors has impacts on the social variation and economic expansion of related regions both with speed and modes due to the complicated mechanism among factors involved. The thesis only discusses some issues among them, and a systematical and continued study is also necessary for future development.
本文以货物运输为对象,在充分考虑综合交通网络上不同方式技术经济特点及其提供的服务水平差异的基础上,重点研究了运输通道中货物运输体系规划的相关方法与实证问题。论文的主要工作包括以下几方面：
(1)通过分析货物运输通道的基本类型与运行特征,总结了运输通道供需平衡的基本模式；从货运通道形成过程出发,提出了运输通道吸引腹地范围的分析与确定方法。论文以欧洲莱茵河通道和我国京九运输通道为例,验证了运输通道的演化规律,指出了政府执行力对通道成长速度的重要影响。
(2)深入剖析了货运通道内社会经济发展与运输需求的互动关系,利用定性和定量相结合的方法分析了二者之间的相互作用,构建了互动关系分析评价的指标体系,提出了基于主成分分析的运输弹性系数模型和灰色关联度分析模型,并以1985-2008年广深通道的演变为例进行了实证分析。研究结果表明：广深通道运输需求关联度最大的要素初期是经济总量(GDP)与人口(城市化)水平,随着沿通道区域经济结构的转变,关联最显著要素转变为反映社会与经济活动的指标(社会消费品零售总额)而非原来的GDP等指标。这对研究其他货运通道的形成与演变具有重要意义。
(3)结合综合交通运输体系中不同运输方式的技术经济特征,研究了运输通道内不同运输方式竞争力的内涵,建立了不同运输方式的市场竞争力分析与评估模型；结合市场经济发展原理,从宏观与微观角度研究了影响运输方式竞争力的主要要素,指出了宏观因素和微观因素的本质差异。在此基础上,构建了基于准时性、快速性、经济性、方便性、货物安全性、货物价值损失等6个微观影响因素的货物运输通道内运输方式竞争力模型,提出了可操作的参数标定与选择方法。结合我国西部某煤炭运输通道中公路和铁路两种方式竞争案例的分析,进一步探讨了相关参数对运输方式竞争力的具体作用,找出了提高既有运输方式竞争力的有效手段,并为探讨既有通道内新建运输方式或新建运输线路(途径)的合理性提供了科学手段。
(4)在借鉴既有运输通道规划方法基础上,研究了运输通道规划与运营中的关键技术问题；从需求(用户)和供给(政府)两方面研究了货物运输通道规划的目标,重构了基于需求侧的用户成本与基于供给(政府)侧的系统成本概念,阐述了货物运输通道系统成本的内、外部成本及其技术经济内涵。研究认为：系统成本体现了规划主体(政府)的目标,用户成本则决定着实际的方式分担结果；规划主体可以通过政策措施来影响通道中不同运输方式的选择,缩小系统成本与用户成本之问的差距。由于系统成本中外部成本的作用,由系统成本决定的社会均衡运量要比由用户成本决定的用户理想运量要小,且外部成本占系统成本中的比重越大,社会均衡运量与用户理想运量的差距越大。
(5)通过货物运输通道内部成本和外部成本将综合交通系统的可持续发展要求与服务水平(效率)结合起来,提出了综合货物运输通道规划的原则和目标,构建了基于系统成本分析的货物运输通道规划框架,从宏观、中观和微观三个层次对运输通道规划方案的具体内容与规划方法进行了深入阐述；研究结论可以为区域货物运输系统的规划提供参考。
货物运输通道的规划与发展深刻影响着相关区域社会发展与经济增长的速度与形态,各种因素相互作用的机理十分复杂。本文仅讨论了其中的部分问题,许多内容还有必要开展更加全面、持续的研究。
The sustained economic growth and improvement of people's living standards have greatly stimulated the growth of transport demand, but also directly resulted in traffic structural changes in China. Because of regional differences in terms of resources and unbalanced development, it will form a rectangular area where traffic demand is relatively dense in some areas of rapid economic development, namely, transport corridors. Such corridors need to be studied to provide a higher level of transportation services. Planning and construction of transport corridors have also become one of the most important components of the planning throughout the integrated transport system, which also makes the author to fix the study in the area.
On the basis of full consideration of differences in features and relative service levels of different modes in integrated traffic network, we focus on freight transport system's related theory and empirical issues of transport corridors. The main work includes the following aspects.
(1) By analyzing the basic types and characteristics of freight corridors, the paper discusses the mode of supply-demand balance about the transportation corridors and the formation of freight corridors, proposes the methods about determining the cover of transportation corridors. Based on above studies, the author summarizes the evolution of freight corridors, and put forward the viewpoints about the power of related regional governmental departments in promoting the growth of transport corridors. The analyses on the comparison of the Rhine and Beijing-Kowloon railway transport corridors have also been given to demonstrate above conclusions.
(2) The dissertation analyzes the correlation between social economic development and transportation demand deeply in freight corridors, and analyzes their interaction by qualitative and quantitative method, constructs the index system of the correlation evaluation, proposes the elasticity factor of transportation model and grey relational grade analysis model based on principal component analysis and finally makes an empirical analysis of the evolution of Guang-Shen corridor between 1985 and 2008. The research results show:in initial stage the elements of the largest relational grades with transportation demand of Guang-Shen corridor are economic aggregate (GDP) and the population (urbanization) level and along with the changes of economic structure of the areas among the corridors, the elements change to the indexes reflecting the social and economic activities (total retail sales of consumer goods) rather than the former index GDP, etc. The results above are significant for the research on the formation and evolution of other freight corridors.
(3) With techno-economic characteristics of different modes in integrated transportation system, the conceptual framework for the competitiveness of different models in transport corridors is studied. According to the principle of market economy, the dissertation analyses the influence factors via microscopic and macroscopic. Of course, the difference between micro-factors and macro-factors are discussed. Then, the competitiveness model of different transport models including six factors, namely punctuality, rapidity, economical, convenience and goods value, is established. The method for parameters calibration of competitiveness model is proposed. An example shows the application technology of the competitiveness model.
(4) The critical theory issues on planning and operation of transport corridors are researched on the basis of the existing transport corridor planning theory. An analysis is made of the freight transport corridors planning methods for demand (users) and supply (government). We rebuild the concept of user cost based on the demand side and system cost based on the supply (government) side and their applying scope. We also point out that the system cost, which indicate the goal of the subject in planning, consist of internal cost and external costs. Of course, it will also affect the freight mode choice by policy and measures. Society balance volume, which is decided by system cost, is smaller than user ideal volume for which is decided by user cost. Further more, the gap between these two volume changes along with the ratio of external cost of system cost.
(5) Sustainable Development and service level (efficiency) about the integrated transport system is combined by two generalized cost function. The system cost of the freight corridors is analyzed. The planning principles and objection of comprehensive freight corridors is submitted and based on system cost,the planning framework which makes a further probe into the planning content and point of transportation corridor from three scales:macroscopic, midscopic and microscopic is structured. These results will do favor to region freight transportation system planning and construction.
The development of freight transport corridors has impacts on the social variation and economic expansion of related regions both with speed and modes due to the complicated mechanism among factors involved. The thesis only discusses some issues among them, and a systematical and continued study is also necessary for future development.
引文
[1]Adjadjihoue C.R. Corridor analysis and forecasting of intermodal transportation systems between Finland and Eastern European countries [R]. Acta Polytechnica Scandinavia, Civil Engineering and Building Construction Series No.101, Finnish Academy of Technology, Helsinki,1995.
[2]Afandizadeh Z. Optimization of Integrated Multimodal Urban Transportation Corridors [M]. Carleton University,1997.
[3]Aghezzaf E.H. Production planning and warehouse management in supply networks with inter-facility mold transfers [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,182(3), 1122-1139.
[4]Alexander I., Estache A., Oliveri A. A few things transport regulators should know about risk and the cost of capital [J]. Utilities Policy,2000,9,1-13.
[5]Aljarad S. N., Black W.R. Modeling Saudi Arabia-Bahrain Corridor Mode Choice. Journal of Transport Geography [J],1995,4,257-268.
[6]Al-Masaeid H.R., Al-Mashakbeh A.A., Qudah A.M. Economic costs of traffic accidents in Jordan [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention,1999,31(4),347-357.
[7]Andrea Ricci, Ian Black. The Social Costs of Intermodal Freight Transport [J], Research in Transportation Economics,2005, Vol 14,245-285.
[8]Basu P., Ghosh S. Tax rate uncertainty, labor supply and saving in a nonexpected utility maximizing model [J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance,2001,41 (1),49-68.
[9]Batten D.F.. Network Cities, Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century [J].1995, 32(2),235-240.
[10]Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete choice analysis, Theory and application to travel demand [M]. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,1985,151-165.
[11]Beuthe M., Degrandsart F., Geerts J-F., Jourquin B. External costs of the Belgian interurban freight traffic, a network analysis of their internalization [J], Transportation Research Part D, 2002,7,285-301.
[12]Borthwick R.B. Intermodal intercity passenger travel for the Washington-Baltimore region (Maryland) [D]. Dissertation abstracts international,2002.
[13]Bunker J.M. Evaluation of freight corridor mode performance, A literature review [R]. Queenland University of Technology,2001.
[14]Bureau of Transport Economics. Working Paper 40, Competitive Neutrality Between Road and Rail. URL, www.dot.gov.au/bte/docs/wp40.pdf.2001.
[15]Bureau of Transport Economics. Working paper 40, Competitive neutrality between road and rail [R]. Common wealth of Australia,1999.
[16]Button K. Does the theory of the'core'explain why airlines fail to cover their long-run costs of capital? [C]. Journal of Air Transport Management,2003,9,5-14.
[17]Carballo D.M., Pluckhahn T. Transportation corridors and political evolution in highland Mesoamerica:Settlement analyses incorporating GIS for northern Tlaxcala, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,2007,26(4),607-629.
[18]Cascetta E., Papola A. Dominance among alternatives in random utility models [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2009,43(2),170-179.
[19]Chang.lljoon. A network-based model for market share estimation among competing transportation modes in a regional corridor[w]. Dissertation international, Section B,5857.
[20]Chapman D., Pratt D., Larkham P. Dickins I. Concepts and definitions of corridors, evidence from England's Midlands [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,179-191.
[21]Charles L. Sea-river shipping competitiveness and its geographical market area for the Rhone-Saone corridor [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2008,16,100-116.
[22]Cholakis. The regeneration of an urban corridor:Enriching the experience of a highway strip at the city's edge (Manitoba) [M]. MAI,1999,37(2),399-412.
[23]Chu C.-P., Tsai J.-F. The optimal location and road pricing for an elevated road in a corridor [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2008,42,842-856.
[24]Cook P.D., Das S., Aeppli A. Martland C. Key factors in road-rail mode choice in India, Applying the logistics cost approach [C]. Proceedings of the 31st conference on winter simulation, Simulation - a bridge to the future, Phoenix, Arizona, USA,1999,1280-1286.
[25]De Borger B., Dunkerley F., Proost S. Capacity cost structure, welfare and cost recovery, Are transport infrastructures with high fixed costs a handicap? [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2009,43,506-521.
[26]De Borger B., Dunkerley F., Proost S. Strategic investment and pricing decisions in a congested transport corridor [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2007,62,294-316.
[27]Decorla-Souza P., Gardner B., Culp M., Everett J., Ngo C.,& Hunt J. Estimating costs & benefits of transportation corridor alternatives [J]. Transportation Research Record 1606, 115-123.
[28]Faller P. Changes in Transport users' motivations for modal choice, Freight transport [C]. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris,1985,7-17.
[29]Fernandez L.J., Cea C.J., Grange C.L. Production costs, congestion, scope and scale economies in urban bus transportation corridors [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2005,39, 383-403.
[30]Filina V.N. Competitiveness problems of the national transportation system [J]. Studies on Russian Economic Development,2008,19(3),248-261.
[31]Forkenbrock D.J. Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation. Transportation Research Part A,2001,35(4),321-337.
[32]Forkenbrock D.J. External costs of intercity truck freight transportation [J]. Transportation Research Part A,1999,33,505-526.
[33]Golias J J.C. Analysis of traffic corridor impacts from the introduction the new Athens Metro system [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2002,10,91-97.
[34]Grier D.V. Measuring the service levels of inland waterways, Alternative approaches for budget decision making [J]. TR News,2002,221,10-17.
[35]Hensher D. A. A practical approach to identifying the market potential for high speed rail, a case study in the Sydney-Canberra corridor [J]. Transportation Research part A,1997,6, 431-446.
[36]Hernandez Luis J.A. Temporal accessibility in archipelagos, inter-island shipping in the Canary Islands [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2002,10,231-239.
[37]Hesse M., Rodrigue J.-P. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2004,12,171-184.
[38]Holan S., Spinka C. Maximum likelihood estimation for joint mean-covariance models from unbalanced repeated-measures data [J]. Statistics & Probability Letters,2007,77(3),319-328.
[39]Jiang F., Johnson P., Calzada C. Freight demand characteristics and mode choice, An analysis of the results of modeling with disaggregates revealed preference data [J]. Journal of Transportation and Statistics,1999,2(2),149-158.
[40]Jiang R., Manchanda P., Rossi P.E. Bayesian analysis of random coefficient logit models using aggregate data [J]. Journal of Econometrics,2009,149(2),136-148.
[41]Jones Lang Lasalle Inc. Freight transport, Road versus rail-modal changes ahead [R].2008.
[42]Jorg S., Schmidt A, Frank A., Bremer S. Towards the multimodal transport of people and freight:interconnective networks in the RheinRuhr Metropolis [J], Journal of Transport Geography,2003, Vol 11,193-203.
[43]Kanafani A. Methodology for mode selection in corridor analysis of freight transportation [R]. Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California,1984.
[44]Kornerup P., Muller J.M. Choosing starting values for certain Newton-Raphson iterations [J]. Theoretical Computer Science,2006,351(1),101-110.
[45]Kreutzberger E.D. Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe, A generic approach [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2008,42(7),973-993.
[46]Lee W. A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.1998,18.
[47]Lefevre B. Long-term energy consumptions of urban transportation, A prospective simulation of "transport-land uses" policies in Bangalore [J]. Energy Policy,2009,37,940-953.
[48]Li Y.H. Application of combined traffic demand forecasting for comprehensive transport corridor, Proceedings-4th International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, NCM 2008,205-210.
[49]Liu M.J., Mao B.H., Gao F., Guo J.Y., Gao L.P. Analysis on commuter's activity chain choice behavior [C]. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies, ASCE, USA,2008,222-230.
[50]Marsay A., The cost of freight transport capacity enhancement, a comparison of road and rail[C]. The 24th Southern African Transport Conference,2005,1038-1047.
[51]Michael M.Cernea. Putting People First Sociological Variables in Rural Development. Beijing [M]. China Planting Press,1998,415-428.
[52]Minnesota Department of Transportation. Executive summary of Minnesota Statewide freight plan [R]. Minnesota,2005.
[53]Mitsuhashi I., Sasa K., Li Z. K., Gao H. J., Kim H-S. Future development of sea transportation corridors in Northeast Asia [C]. the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,2005,5, 1687-1702,
[54]Murphy P.R., Hall P.K. The relative importance of cost & service in freight transportation choice before & after deregulation, an update [J]. Transportation Journal,1995,35(1),30-38.
[55]Nakagawaa D., Hatoko M. Reevaluation of Japanese high-speed rail construction recent situation of the north corridor Shinkansen and its way to completion [J]. Transport Policy, 2007,14,150-164.
[56]Nuzzolo A., Russo F. A logistic approach for freight modal choice model [C]. European Transport Conference,1998,137-146.
[57]O'Malley M., Brown A.G, Swain-Staley B.K. Maryland Statewide Freight Plan [R]. Maryland Department of Transportation, September,2009.
[58]Odgen K.W. Keynote Address Urban Goods Movement and Its Relation to Planning [C]. American 2nd Urban Goods and Freight Forecasting Conference,1996.
[59]Parsons-clough Harbour. Existing corridor conditions and opportunities-I-87 multimodal corridor study [R]. New York, New York State Department of Transportation,2004.
[60]Patterson Z., Ewing GO., Haider M. The potential for premium-intermodal services to reduce freight CO2 emissions in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor [J]. Transportation Research Part D,2008,13(1),1-9.
[61]Petersen E.R. A highway corridor planning model, QROAD [J], Transportation Research Part A,2002,36(2),107-125.
[62]Potoglou D., Kanaroglou P.S. Modelling car ownshio in urban areas, A case study of Hamilton, Canada [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2008,16,42-54.
[63]Priemus H., Nijkamp P., Shefer D. Intermodality and sustainable freight transport [J]. Transportation Planning and Technology,1999,23(2),79-81.
[64]Priemus H., Zonneveld W. What are corridors and what are the issues? Introduction to special issue, the governance of corridors [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,167-177.
[65]Qiu Y.Z., Chen S.F., Chen T. Evolution Mechanism of Demand for Comprehensive Transportation System Based on Metabolic Ecology [J], Journal of Southeast University (English Edition),2009Vol,25,271-273.
[66]Quinet E. A meta-analysis of Western European external costs estimates. Transportation Research Part D,2004,9(6),465-476.
[67]Reggiani et al. Towards a typology of European inter—urban transport corridors for advanced transport telematics applications [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,1995,3(1),53-67.
[68]Rich J., Kveiborg O., Hansen C.O. On structural inelasticity of modal substitution in freight transport [J]. Journal of Transport Geography.2009, doi,10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.012
[69]Rico A., Mendoza A., Mayoral E. Main freight land transport corridors in Mexico [J]. Transportation Research Record,1998,1613,79-87.
[70]Romein et al.The multi-scalar complexity of infrastructure planning, evidence from the Dutch-Flemish megacorridor [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,205-213.
[71]Schonharting J., Schmidt A., Frank A., Bremer S. Towards the multimodal transport of people and freight, interconnective networks in the RheinRuhr Metropolis [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11(3),193-203.
[72]Sen A.K., Tiwari G, Upadhyay V. Estimating marginal external costs of transport in Delhi [J]. Transport Policy,2010,17(1),27-37.
[73]Shinghal N., Fowkes T. Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002,38(5),367-378.
[74]Sternberg M. T., NHS/Railway corridors, A proposal for cost effective enhancements of the rural transportation infrastructure [R]. Rutland Redevelopment Authority,2002.
[75]Steven R.K. Intermodal and Multimodal Freight Policy, Planning, and Programming at State Departments of Transportation, Review of the Decade since the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act [J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2003,1858, 69-79.
[76]Sun Q.X., Hu S.J. Competition of Passenger Dedicated Railways [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2006,6(6),125-129.
[77]Taffe E J, Morrill R L, Gould P R. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries, a comparative analysis[J]. Geographical Review,1963,53(4),503-529.
[78]Tatimeni V.C., Demetsky M.J. Supply chain models for freight transportation planning [R]. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia,2005.
[79]Train K.E. Discrete choice methods with simulation [M]. The Second edition, Cambridge University Press,2003,189-207.
[80]Tsamboulas D., Moraitis P. Methodology for estimating freight volume shift in an international intermodal corridor [J]. Transportation Research Record,2007,2008,10-18.
[81]Turner S., Morrell P., An evaluation of airline beta values and their application in calculating the cost of equity capital [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management,2003,9,201-209.
[82]U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2007 Economic Census, Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, Preliminary Release [R]. December 2008.
[83]Van Schijndel W.J., Dinwoodie J. Congestion and multimodal transport, a survey of cargo transport operators in the Netherlands [J]. Transport Policy,2000,7(4),231-241.
[84]Viles R. L., Rosier D.J., How to use roads in the creation of greenways, case studies in three New Zealand Landscapes [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55,15-27.
[85]Voigt F. Comparing the efficiency of western European rail and road services [A],//The Economics of Long-Distance Transportation, London, The Macmillan Press Ltd.1983.
[86]Vries J. d., Priemus H., Megacorridors in north-west Europe, issues for transnational spatial governance [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,225-233.
[87]Weber T., Sloan A., Wolf J., Maryland's Green Infrastructure Assessment, Development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,77, 94-110.
[88]Whitesell W., Interest rate corridors and reserves [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2006, 53,1177-1194.
[89]Yang C.W., Sung Y.C. Constructing a mixed-logit model with market positioning to analyze the effects of new mode introduction [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2009, In Press, doi,10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.005.
[90]Yeates M. The North American City [M]. Harper and Row Publishers, New York,1990.
[91]Zhou X. S., Mahmassani H. S.,Zhang K.I., Dynamic micro-assignment modeling approach for integrated multimodal urban corridor management [C]. Transportation Research Part C,2008, 16,167-186.
[92]曹小曙,阎小培.20世纪走廊及交通运输走廊研究进展[J].城市规划,2003,8,15-56.
[93]曹信红,陆仁达.以国家高速公路网为重点,加快我国运输大通道建设[J].中国发展,2005,(4),65-71.
[94]陈峰,王子甲,李志强.城市轨道交通建设成本构成分析[J].城市交通,2008,30(9),52-54.
[95]陈凤仁,王广济.交通事故损失计算方法[J].汽车运输,1997,No5,10-11.
[96]程晓卿,孙全欣.入世过渡期内中国铁路运输企业竞争力的提高[J].铁道运输与经济,2003,25(6),1-3.
[97]丁慧.公路工程建设成本控制的途径和方法研究[J].科技信息,2008,(19),83-84.
[98]董焰.“十一五”综合运输发展思路研究[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,2004.
[99]傅立.灰色系统理论及其应用[D].科学技术文献出版社,1991.
[100]高永亮.东北地区运输通道整合研究[D].北京交通大学硕十学位论文,2006.
[101]韩彪.交通运输业的发展战略与我国的选择[J].北京,经济研究.1993,5,37-42.
[102]杭文,李旭宏,何杰.基于车辆轴型分类的公路货运车辆运营成本研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2005,22(9),87-92.
[103]何宇强,毛保华,陈团生,杨静.高速客运专线客流分担率模型及其应用研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(3),18-21.
[104]胡序威,周一星,顾朝林等.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究[M].北京,科学出版社,2000.
[105]黄承锋,杨秀苔.运输通道市场结构变动的静态博弈分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,2000,19(4),106-109.
[106]黄承锋.运输的交易成本与运输通道的产业区位优势[J].重庆交通学院学报,1999,18(3),33-39.
[107]黄承锋.运输通道合理运行及经济聚集作用研究[D].重庆大学博士学位论文,2001.
[108]贾顺平,毛保华,刘爽,孙启鹏.中国交通运输能源消耗水平测算与分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(1),22-27
[109]交通部科技情报所.运输通道理论与规划方法的研究[R].北京,交通部科技情报所,1991.
[110]荆新轩,付晓豫,施其洲,京沪运输通道-经济带系统协调研究,铁道运输与经济,Vol.31,No.7,2009.
[111]李德刚.综合运输网中的通道分析与系统配置研究[D].西南交通大学博士论文,2006.
[112]李婧.运输通道发展对节点城市经济影响的量化分析[J].科技交流,2008,160(3),55-60.
[113]李群仁,曾会欣,张力.京沪走廊各种运输方式的社会成本系统成本[J].中国铁路,1999,6,6-10.
[114]李伟,朱红,刘凤月.铁路煤炭运输抑尘剂的制备＼评价和应用[J].铁道学报,2008,30(4),125-128.
[115]刘建军.关于综合运输通道的发展设想[J].综合运输,2005,10,134-139.
[116]刘爽,朱晓宁,贾顺平.城市交通结构优化研究综述[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(1),28-38.
[117]刘爽.基于系统动力学的大城市交通结构演变机理及实证研究[D].北京交通大学博十学位论文,2009.
[118]刘奕.综合运输通道结构演化的自组织机制研究[J].综合运输,2009(8),24-27.
[119]罗清玉,隽志才,孙宝凤,贾洪飞.城市交通拥挤外部成本衡量方法研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(5),154-158.
[120]罗仁坚.运输枢纽与通道布局规划的关系及其分类[J].综合运输,2005,6,19-24.
[121]马俊.通道功能定位在资源优化配置中的作用[J].综合运输,2009,8,10-13.
[122]毛保华,彭宏勤,贾顺平.2009年中国综合交通体系发展趋势研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息[J],2010,10(2),17-22.
[123]毛保华,曾会欣,袁振洲.交通规划模型及其应用[M].中国铁道出版社,1999,148-169.
[124]彭其渊.2007年交通运输工程全国研究生暑期学校报告[R].2007.
[125]彭其渊.我国西部铁路运输通道的规划与设计研究[C].中国西部地区铁路网建设研讨会中国西部地区铁路网建设研讨会论文集,2000.
[126]齐彤岩,刘冬梅,陈金川,刘莹.北京市小汽车社会与个人支付成本比较分析[J].公路交通科技,2008,25(5),155-159.
[127]荣朝和,吴吴,程楠.关于通道规划及京沪通道资源优化配置的思考[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(3),11-18.
[128]邵俊杰,柏赟,毛保华.“三西”地区煤炭外运新通道研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(6),153-163.
[129]石油和化工节能编辑部.4月份主要能源产品价格情况[J].石油和化工节能,2006(3),32-33.
[130]苏顺虎.实行大客户集中结算深化铁路大客户战略实施[J].铁道货运,2006,3,1-3.
[131]苏小军,罗霞,陈高波等.AHP法在成渝物流通道合理化选择中的应用[J].重庆交通学院学报,2004,23(3),111-114.
[132]孙永福.京九铁路对经济社会发展重大作用研究[M].北京,经济管理出版社,2008.
[133]汪春华,王元庆,周伟..西江运输通道对产业带的促进作用[J],中国公路学报,2000,13,102-104.
[134]汪敏,陈顺怀.江海直达干散货船(队)运输竞争力评价指标体系分析[J].船海工程,2007,36(2),4-6.
[135]王春芝.国际物流通道优选理论方法与实证研究[D].吉林大学博士论文,2004.
[136]王建伟.空间运输联系与运输通道系统合理配置研究[D].长安大学博士学位论文,2004.
[137]王晶.北京市交通社会成本的评估[J].交通环保,2005,26(2),31-33.
[138]王明文,王江平,关宏志,孙小年,张育宏.复合通道发展模式的探讨[J].交通世界,2006,No 8B,72-74.
[139]王楠,陈才,刘继生.区际综合运输通道空间结构研究-以内蒙古东部地区与东北三省为例[J].人文地理,2008,3,54-58.
[140]王庆云.交通发展观：中国交通发展问题研究[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,2004.
[141]王庆云.交通运输发展理论与实践[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,2006.
[142]王先进.国外对公路交通基础设施属性的认识及其战略和政策体现[J].中外公路,2004,24(5),117-120.
[143]王元庆,贺竹磐.多方式协调发展的运输通道布局规划体系[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(3),73-78
[144]威廉·配第.政治算术[M].上海商务出版社,1978.
[145]肖惠兴.配合全国水运主通道规划建设我省区域性干线航道的研究[J].江苏交通工程,2001,2,1-4.
[146]肖秋生,徐慰慈.城市交通规划[M].北京,人民交通出版社,1990.
[147]谢亚伟.基于网络均衡的运输通道客流分配模型[J].公路交通科技,2006,23(5),143-146.
[148]徐文学,贾元华等.武汉都市圈交通发展战略与对策研究[M].北京,人民交通出版社,2007.
[149]徐玉巧.同一运输通道内不同交通线路占地对地区发展的影响对比研究[D].长安大学硕士论文,2008.
[150]严颖.城市轨道交通的外部性对房地产的影响研究综述[J].经济研究导刊,2007(11)：173-174.
[151]杨浩.铁路运输组织学[M].北京,中国铁道出版社,2006.
[152]姚志刚,王元庆,周伟.可持续发展的城市货运规划[J].城市交通,2005,3(2),17-20.
[153]易骞.运输通道公铁系统路径合理配置研究[D].西南交通大学硕士论文,2008.
[154]尤敏H.A.河运技术经济勘察[M].北京,人民交通出版社.1959.
[155]游历.锡盟煤炭运输通道规划的若干问题研究[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[156]袁长伟,吴群琪.双核都市圈运输通道旅客分担率模型及应用[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(6),80-83.
[157]袁婧.运输通道内运输方式布局探讨[J].交通标准化,2006,4,157-160.
[158]张国伍.交通运输系统分析[M].成都,西南交通大学出版社,1991.
[159]张锦.L-OD预测理论与现代物流规划方法研究[D],西南交通大学博士论文,2004.
[160]张文尝,金凤君,樊杰.交通经济带[M].北京,科学出版社,2002.
[161]张文尝.运输通道系统分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2001,2,134-139.
[162]张务栋.交通运输布局概论[M].上海,华东师范大学出版社,1993.
[163]张香平.城市地区私人小汽车使用的外部性研究[D].北京交通大学博士论文,2007.
[164]赵海静.一般通道的吸引范围研究[D].北京交通大学硕士论文,2008.
[165]赵航,何世伟,宋瑞.区域运输通道网络设计研究[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(5),74-78.
[166]赵莉,袁振洲,李之红,许旺土.综合客运通道设计的双层规划模型及算法[J].北京交通大学学报,2009,33(6),36-41.
[167]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2009[M].中国统计出版社,2009.
[168]朱健梅.竞争性运输通道选择的博弈模型研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(1),336-340.
[169]朱丽丽.长江中下游进口铁矿石运输模式的比较分析[J].船海工程,2008,37(5),7-10.
[2]Afandizadeh Z. Optimization of Integrated Multimodal Urban Transportation Corridors [M]. Carleton University,1997.
[3]Aghezzaf E.H. Production planning and warehouse management in supply networks with inter-facility mold transfers [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,182(3), 1122-1139.
[4]Alexander I., Estache A., Oliveri A. A few things transport regulators should know about risk and the cost of capital [J]. Utilities Policy,2000,9,1-13.
[5]Aljarad S. N., Black W.R. Modeling Saudi Arabia-Bahrain Corridor Mode Choice. Journal of Transport Geography [J],1995,4,257-268.
[6]Al-Masaeid H.R., Al-Mashakbeh A.A., Qudah A.M. Economic costs of traffic accidents in Jordan [J]. Accident Analysis & Prevention,1999,31(4),347-357.
[7]Andrea Ricci, Ian Black. The Social Costs of Intermodal Freight Transport [J], Research in Transportation Economics,2005, Vol 14,245-285.
[8]Basu P., Ghosh S. Tax rate uncertainty, labor supply and saving in a nonexpected utility maximizing model [J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics & Finance,2001,41 (1),49-68.
[9]Batten D.F.. Network Cities, Creative Urban Agglomerations for the 21st Century [J].1995, 32(2),235-240.
[10]Ben-Akiva M., Lerman S.R. Discrete choice analysis, Theory and application to travel demand [M]. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA,1985,151-165.
[11]Beuthe M., Degrandsart F., Geerts J-F., Jourquin B. External costs of the Belgian interurban freight traffic, a network analysis of their internalization [J], Transportation Research Part D, 2002,7,285-301.
[12]Borthwick R.B. Intermodal intercity passenger travel for the Washington-Baltimore region (Maryland) [D]. Dissertation abstracts international,2002.
[13]Bunker J.M. Evaluation of freight corridor mode performance, A literature review [R]. Queenland University of Technology,2001.
[14]Bureau of Transport Economics. Working Paper 40, Competitive Neutrality Between Road and Rail. URL, www.dot.gov.au/bte/docs/wp40.pdf.2001.
[15]Bureau of Transport Economics. Working paper 40, Competitive neutrality between road and rail [R]. Common wealth of Australia,1999.
[16]Button K. Does the theory of the'core'explain why airlines fail to cover their long-run costs of capital? [C]. Journal of Air Transport Management,2003,9,5-14.
[17]Carballo D.M., Pluckhahn T. Transportation corridors and political evolution in highland Mesoamerica:Settlement analyses incorporating GIS for northern Tlaxcala, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology,2007,26(4),607-629.
[18]Cascetta E., Papola A. Dominance among alternatives in random utility models [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2009,43(2),170-179.
[19]Chang.lljoon. A network-based model for market share estimation among competing transportation modes in a regional corridor[w]. Dissertation international, Section B,5857.
[20]Chapman D., Pratt D., Larkham P. Dickins I. Concepts and definitions of corridors, evidence from England's Midlands [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,179-191.
[21]Charles L. Sea-river shipping competitiveness and its geographical market area for the Rhone-Saone corridor [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2008,16,100-116.
[22]Cholakis. The regeneration of an urban corridor:Enriching the experience of a highway strip at the city's edge (Manitoba) [M]. MAI,1999,37(2),399-412.
[23]Chu C.-P., Tsai J.-F. The optimal location and road pricing for an elevated road in a corridor [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2008,42,842-856.
[24]Cook P.D., Das S., Aeppli A. Martland C. Key factors in road-rail mode choice in India, Applying the logistics cost approach [C]. Proceedings of the 31st conference on winter simulation, Simulation - a bridge to the future, Phoenix, Arizona, USA,1999,1280-1286.
[25]De Borger B., Dunkerley F., Proost S. Capacity cost structure, welfare and cost recovery, Are transport infrastructures with high fixed costs a handicap? [J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2009,43,506-521.
[26]De Borger B., Dunkerley F., Proost S. Strategic investment and pricing decisions in a congested transport corridor [J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2007,62,294-316.
[27]Decorla-Souza P., Gardner B., Culp M., Everett J., Ngo C.,& Hunt J. Estimating costs & benefits of transportation corridor alternatives [J]. Transportation Research Record 1606, 115-123.
[28]Faller P. Changes in Transport users' motivations for modal choice, Freight transport [C]. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris,1985,7-17.
[29]Fernandez L.J., Cea C.J., Grange C.L. Production costs, congestion, scope and scale economies in urban bus transportation corridors [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2005,39, 383-403.
[30]Filina V.N. Competitiveness problems of the national transportation system [J]. Studies on Russian Economic Development,2008,19(3),248-261.
[31]Forkenbrock D.J. Comparison of external costs of rail and truck freight transportation. Transportation Research Part A,2001,35(4),321-337.
[32]Forkenbrock D.J. External costs of intercity truck freight transportation [J]. Transportation Research Part A,1999,33,505-526.
[33]Golias J J.C. Analysis of traffic corridor impacts from the introduction the new Athens Metro system [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2002,10,91-97.
[34]Grier D.V. Measuring the service levels of inland waterways, Alternative approaches for budget decision making [J]. TR News,2002,221,10-17.
[35]Hensher D. A. A practical approach to identifying the market potential for high speed rail, a case study in the Sydney-Canberra corridor [J]. Transportation Research part A,1997,6, 431-446.
[36]Hernandez Luis J.A. Temporal accessibility in archipelagos, inter-island shipping in the Canary Islands [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2002,10,231-239.
[37]Hesse M., Rodrigue J.-P. The transport geography of logistics and freight distribution [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2004,12,171-184.
[38]Holan S., Spinka C. Maximum likelihood estimation for joint mean-covariance models from unbalanced repeated-measures data [J]. Statistics & Probability Letters,2007,77(3),319-328.
[39]Jiang F., Johnson P., Calzada C. Freight demand characteristics and mode choice, An analysis of the results of modeling with disaggregates revealed preference data [J]. Journal of Transportation and Statistics,1999,2(2),149-158.
[40]Jiang R., Manchanda P., Rossi P.E. Bayesian analysis of random coefficient logit models using aggregate data [J]. Journal of Econometrics,2009,149(2),136-148.
[41]Jones Lang Lasalle Inc. Freight transport, Road versus rail-modal changes ahead [R].2008.
[42]Jorg S., Schmidt A, Frank A., Bremer S. Towards the multimodal transport of people and freight:interconnective networks in the RheinRuhr Metropolis [J], Journal of Transport Geography,2003, Vol 11,193-203.
[43]Kanafani A. Methodology for mode selection in corridor analysis of freight transportation [R]. Berkeley, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California,1984.
[44]Kornerup P., Muller J.M. Choosing starting values for certain Newton-Raphson iterations [J]. Theoretical Computer Science,2006,351(1),101-110.
[45]Kreutzberger E.D. Distance and time in intermodal goods transport networks in Europe, A generic approach [J]. Transportation Research Part A,2008,42(7),973-993.
[46]Lee W. A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits[J]. Environmental Impact Assessment Review.1998,18.
[47]Lefevre B. Long-term energy consumptions of urban transportation, A prospective simulation of "transport-land uses" policies in Bangalore [J]. Energy Policy,2009,37,940-953.
[48]Li Y.H. Application of combined traffic demand forecasting for comprehensive transport corridor, Proceedings-4th International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information Management, NCM 2008,205-210.
[49]Liu M.J., Mao B.H., Gao F., Guo J.Y., Gao L.P. Analysis on commuter's activity chain choice behavior [C]. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Traffic and Transportation Studies, ASCE, USA,2008,222-230.
[50]Marsay A., The cost of freight transport capacity enhancement, a comparison of road and rail[C]. The 24th Southern African Transport Conference,2005,1038-1047.
[51]Michael M.Cernea. Putting People First Sociological Variables in Rural Development. Beijing [M]. China Planting Press,1998,415-428.
[52]Minnesota Department of Transportation. Executive summary of Minnesota Statewide freight plan [R]. Minnesota,2005.
[53]Mitsuhashi I., Sasa K., Li Z. K., Gao H. J., Kim H-S. Future development of sea transportation corridors in Northeast Asia [C]. the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies,2005,5, 1687-1702,
[54]Murphy P.R., Hall P.K. The relative importance of cost & service in freight transportation choice before & after deregulation, an update [J]. Transportation Journal,1995,35(1),30-38.
[55]Nakagawaa D., Hatoko M. Reevaluation of Japanese high-speed rail construction recent situation of the north corridor Shinkansen and its way to completion [J]. Transport Policy, 2007,14,150-164.
[56]Nuzzolo A., Russo F. A logistic approach for freight modal choice model [C]. European Transport Conference,1998,137-146.
[57]O'Malley M., Brown A.G, Swain-Staley B.K. Maryland Statewide Freight Plan [R]. Maryland Department of Transportation, September,2009.
[58]Odgen K.W. Keynote Address Urban Goods Movement and Its Relation to Planning [C]. American 2nd Urban Goods and Freight Forecasting Conference,1996.
[59]Parsons-clough Harbour. Existing corridor conditions and opportunities-I-87 multimodal corridor study [R]. New York, New York State Department of Transportation,2004.
[60]Patterson Z., Ewing GO., Haider M. The potential for premium-intermodal services to reduce freight CO2 emissions in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor [J]. Transportation Research Part D,2008,13(1),1-9.
[61]Petersen E.R. A highway corridor planning model, QROAD [J], Transportation Research Part A,2002,36(2),107-125.
[62]Potoglou D., Kanaroglou P.S. Modelling car ownshio in urban areas, A case study of Hamilton, Canada [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2008,16,42-54.
[63]Priemus H., Nijkamp P., Shefer D. Intermodality and sustainable freight transport [J]. Transportation Planning and Technology,1999,23(2),79-81.
[64]Priemus H., Zonneveld W. What are corridors and what are the issues? Introduction to special issue, the governance of corridors [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,167-177.
[65]Qiu Y.Z., Chen S.F., Chen T. Evolution Mechanism of Demand for Comprehensive Transportation System Based on Metabolic Ecology [J], Journal of Southeast University (English Edition),2009Vol,25,271-273.
[66]Quinet E. A meta-analysis of Western European external costs estimates. Transportation Research Part D,2004,9(6),465-476.
[67]Reggiani et al. Towards a typology of European inter—urban transport corridors for advanced transport telematics applications [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,1995,3(1),53-67.
[68]Rich J., Kveiborg O., Hansen C.O. On structural inelasticity of modal substitution in freight transport [J]. Journal of Transport Geography.2009, doi,10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.09.012
[69]Rico A., Mendoza A., Mayoral E. Main freight land transport corridors in Mexico [J]. Transportation Research Record,1998,1613,79-87.
[70]Romein et al.The multi-scalar complexity of infrastructure planning, evidence from the Dutch-Flemish megacorridor [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,205-213.
[71]Schonharting J., Schmidt A., Frank A., Bremer S. Towards the multimodal transport of people and freight, interconnective networks in the RheinRuhr Metropolis [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11(3),193-203.
[72]Sen A.K., Tiwari G, Upadhyay V. Estimating marginal external costs of transport in Delhi [J]. Transport Policy,2010,17(1),27-37.
[73]Shinghal N., Fowkes T. Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences [J]. Transportation Research Part E,2002,38(5),367-378.
[74]Sternberg M. T., NHS/Railway corridors, A proposal for cost effective enhancements of the rural transportation infrastructure [R]. Rutland Redevelopment Authority,2002.
[75]Steven R.K. Intermodal and Multimodal Freight Policy, Planning, and Programming at State Departments of Transportation, Review of the Decade since the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act [J]. Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2003,1858, 69-79.
[76]Sun Q.X., Hu S.J. Competition of Passenger Dedicated Railways [J]. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology,2006,6(6),125-129.
[77]Taffe E J, Morrill R L, Gould P R. Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries, a comparative analysis[J]. Geographical Review,1963,53(4),503-529.
[78]Tatimeni V.C., Demetsky M.J. Supply chain models for freight transportation planning [R]. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia,2005.
[79]Train K.E. Discrete choice methods with simulation [M]. The Second edition, Cambridge University Press,2003,189-207.
[80]Tsamboulas D., Moraitis P. Methodology for estimating freight volume shift in an international intermodal corridor [J]. Transportation Research Record,2007,2008,10-18.
[81]Turner S., Morrell P., An evaluation of airline beta values and their application in calculating the cost of equity capital [J]. Journal of Air Transport Management,2003,9,201-209.
[82]U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and Innovative Technology Administration, Bureau of Transportation Statistics and U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. 2007 Economic Census, Transportation Commodity Flow Survey, Preliminary Release [R]. December 2008.
[83]Van Schijndel W.J., Dinwoodie J. Congestion and multimodal transport, a survey of cargo transport operators in the Netherlands [J]. Transport Policy,2000,7(4),231-241.
[84]Viles R. L., Rosier D.J., How to use roads in the creation of greenways, case studies in three New Zealand Landscapes [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2001,55,15-27.
[85]Voigt F. Comparing the efficiency of western European rail and road services [A],//The Economics of Long-Distance Transportation, London, The Macmillan Press Ltd.1983.
[86]Vries J. d., Priemus H., Megacorridors in north-west Europe, issues for transnational spatial governance [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2003,11,225-233.
[87]Weber T., Sloan A., Wolf J., Maryland's Green Infrastructure Assessment, Development of a comprehensive approach to land conservation[J].Landscape and Urban Planning,2006,77, 94-110.
[88]Whitesell W., Interest rate corridors and reserves [J]. Journal of Monetary Economics,2006, 53,1177-1194.
[89]Yang C.W., Sung Y.C. Constructing a mixed-logit model with market positioning to analyze the effects of new mode introduction [J]. Journal of Transport Geography,2009, In Press, doi,10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.01.005.
[90]Yeates M. The North American City [M]. Harper and Row Publishers, New York,1990.
[91]Zhou X. S., Mahmassani H. S.,Zhang K.I., Dynamic micro-assignment modeling approach for integrated multimodal urban corridor management [C]. Transportation Research Part C,2008, 16,167-186.
[92]曹小曙,阎小培.20世纪走廊及交通运输走廊研究进展[J].城市规划,2003,8,15-56.
[93]曹信红,陆仁达.以国家高速公路网为重点,加快我国运输大通道建设[J].中国发展,2005,(4),65-71.
[94]陈峰,王子甲,李志强.城市轨道交通建设成本构成分析[J].城市交通,2008,30(9),52-54.
[95]陈凤仁,王广济.交通事故损失计算方法[J].汽车运输,1997,No5,10-11.
[96]程晓卿,孙全欣.入世过渡期内中国铁路运输企业竞争力的提高[J].铁道运输与经济,2003,25(6),1-3.
[97]丁慧.公路工程建设成本控制的途径和方法研究[J].科技信息,2008,(19),83-84.
[98]董焰.“十一五”综合运输发展思路研究[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,2004.
[99]傅立.灰色系统理论及其应用[D].科学技术文献出版社,1991.
[100]高永亮.东北地区运输通道整合研究[D].北京交通大学硕十学位论文,2006.
[101]韩彪.交通运输业的发展战略与我国的选择[J].北京,经济研究.1993,5,37-42.
[102]杭文,李旭宏,何杰.基于车辆轴型分类的公路货运车辆运营成本研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2005,22(9),87-92.
[103]何宇强,毛保华,陈团生,杨静.高速客运专线客流分担率模型及其应用研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(3),18-21.
[104]胡序威,周一星,顾朝林等.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究[M].北京,科学出版社,2000.
[105]黄承锋,杨秀苔.运输通道市场结构变动的静态博弈分析[J].重庆交通学院学报,2000,19(4),106-109.
[106]黄承锋.运输的交易成本与运输通道的产业区位优势[J].重庆交通学院学报,1999,18(3),33-39.
[107]黄承锋.运输通道合理运行及经济聚集作用研究[D].重庆大学博士学位论文,2001.
[108]贾顺平,毛保华,刘爽,孙启鹏.中国交通运输能源消耗水平测算与分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2010,10(1),22-27
[109]交通部科技情报所.运输通道理论与规划方法的研究[R].北京,交通部科技情报所,1991.
[110]荆新轩,付晓豫,施其洲,京沪运输通道-经济带系统协调研究,铁道运输与经济,Vol.31,No.7,2009.
[111]李德刚.综合运输网中的通道分析与系统配置研究[D].西南交通大学博士论文,2006.
[112]李婧.运输通道发展对节点城市经济影响的量化分析[J].科技交流,2008,160(3),55-60.
[113]李群仁,曾会欣,张力.京沪走廊各种运输方式的社会成本系统成本[J].中国铁路,1999,6,6-10.
[114]李伟,朱红,刘凤月.铁路煤炭运输抑尘剂的制备＼评价和应用[J].铁道学报,2008,30(4),125-128.
[115]刘建军.关于综合运输通道的发展设想[J].综合运输,2005,10,134-139.
[116]刘爽,朱晓宁,贾顺平.城市交通结构优化研究综述[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2009,9(1),28-38.
[117]刘爽.基于系统动力学的大城市交通结构演变机理及实证研究[D].北京交通大学博十学位论文,2009.
[118]刘奕.综合运输通道结构演化的自组织机制研究[J].综合运输,2009(8),24-27.
[119]罗清玉,隽志才,孙宝凤,贾洪飞.城市交通拥挤外部成本衡量方法研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(5),154-158.
[120]罗仁坚.运输枢纽与通道布局规划的关系及其分类[J].综合运输,2005,6,19-24.
[121]马俊.通道功能定位在资源优化配置中的作用[J].综合运输,2009,8,10-13.
[122]毛保华,彭宏勤,贾顺平.2009年中国综合交通体系发展趋势研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息[J],2010,10(2),17-22.
[123]毛保华,曾会欣,袁振洲.交通规划模型及其应用[M].中国铁道出版社,1999,148-169.
[124]彭其渊.2007年交通运输工程全国研究生暑期学校报告[R].2007.
[125]彭其渊.我国西部铁路运输通道的规划与设计研究[C].中国西部地区铁路网建设研讨会中国西部地区铁路网建设研讨会论文集,2000.
[126]齐彤岩,刘冬梅,陈金川,刘莹.北京市小汽车社会与个人支付成本比较分析[J].公路交通科技,2008,25(5),155-159.
[127]荣朝和,吴吴,程楠.关于通道规划及京沪通道资源优化配置的思考[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2007,7(3),11-18.
[128]邵俊杰,柏赟,毛保华.“三西”地区煤炭外运新通道研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2008,8(6),153-163.
[129]石油和化工节能编辑部.4月份主要能源产品价格情况[J].石油和化工节能,2006(3),32-33.
[130]苏顺虎.实行大客户集中结算深化铁路大客户战略实施[J].铁道货运,2006,3,1-3.
[131]苏小军,罗霞,陈高波等.AHP法在成渝物流通道合理化选择中的应用[J].重庆交通学院学报,2004,23(3),111-114.
[132]孙永福.京九铁路对经济社会发展重大作用研究[M].北京,经济管理出版社,2008.
[133]汪春华,王元庆,周伟..西江运输通道对产业带的促进作用[J],中国公路学报,2000,13,102-104.
[134]汪敏,陈顺怀.江海直达干散货船(队)运输竞争力评价指标体系分析[J].船海工程,2007,36(2),4-6.
[135]王春芝.国际物流通道优选理论方法与实证研究[D].吉林大学博士论文,2004.
[136]王建伟.空间运输联系与运输通道系统合理配置研究[D].长安大学博士学位论文,2004.
[137]王晶.北京市交通社会成本的评估[J].交通环保,2005,26(2),31-33.
[138]王明文,王江平,关宏志,孙小年,张育宏.复合通道发展模式的探讨[J].交通世界,2006,No 8B,72-74.
[139]王楠,陈才,刘继生.区际综合运输通道空间结构研究-以内蒙古东部地区与东北三省为例[J].人文地理,2008,3,54-58.
[140]王庆云.交通发展观：中国交通发展问题研究[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,2004.
[141]王庆云.交通运输发展理论与实践[M].北京,中国科学技术出版社,2006.
[142]王先进.国外对公路交通基础设施属性的认识及其战略和政策体现[J].中外公路,2004,24(5),117-120.
[143]王元庆,贺竹磐.多方式协调发展的运输通道布局规划体系[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(3),73-78
[144]威廉·配第.政治算术[M].上海商务出版社,1978.
[145]肖惠兴.配合全国水运主通道规划建设我省区域性干线航道的研究[J].江苏交通工程,2001,2,1-4.
[146]肖秋生,徐慰慈.城市交通规划[M].北京,人民交通出版社,1990.
[147]谢亚伟.基于网络均衡的运输通道客流分配模型[J].公路交通科技,2006,23(5),143-146.
[148]徐文学,贾元华等.武汉都市圈交通发展战略与对策研究[M].北京,人民交通出版社,2007.
[149]徐玉巧.同一运输通道内不同交通线路占地对地区发展的影响对比研究[D].长安大学硕士论文,2008.
[150]严颖.城市轨道交通的外部性对房地产的影响研究综述[J].经济研究导刊,2007(11)：173-174.
[151]杨浩.铁路运输组织学[M].北京,中国铁道出版社,2006.
[152]姚志刚,王元庆,周伟.可持续发展的城市货运规划[J].城市交通,2005,3(2),17-20.
[153]易骞.运输通道公铁系统路径合理配置研究[D].西南交通大学硕士论文,2008.
[154]尤敏H.A.河运技术经济勘察[M].北京,人民交通出版社.1959.
[155]游历.锡盟煤炭运输通道规划的若干问题研究[D].北京交通大学硕士学位论文,2006.
[156]袁长伟,吴群琪.双核都市圈运输通道旅客分担率模型及应用[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2007,27(6),80-83.
[157]袁婧.运输通道内运输方式布局探讨[J].交通标准化,2006,4,157-160.
[158]张国伍.交通运输系统分析[M].成都,西南交通大学出版社,1991.
[159]张锦.L-OD预测理论与现代物流规划方法研究[D],西南交通大学博士论文,2004.
[160]张文尝,金凤君,樊杰.交通经济带[M].北京,科学出版社,2002.
[161]张文尝.运输通道系统分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2001,2,134-139.
[162]张务栋.交通运输布局概论[M].上海,华东师范大学出版社,1993.
[163]张香平.城市地区私人小汽车使用的外部性研究[D].北京交通大学博士论文,2007.
[164]赵海静.一般通道的吸引范围研究[D].北京交通大学硕士论文,2008.
[165]赵航,何世伟,宋瑞.区域运输通道网络设计研究[J].土木工程学报,2007,40(5),74-78.
[166]赵莉,袁振洲,李之红,许旺土.综合客运通道设计的双层规划模型及算法[J].北京交通大学学报,2009,33(6),36-41.
[167]中华人民共和国国家统计局.中国统计年鉴2009[M].中国统计出版社,2009.
[168]朱健梅.竞争性运输通道选择的博弈模型研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2003,38(1),336-340.
[169]朱丽丽.长江中下游进口铁矿石运输模式的比较分析[J].船海工程,2008,37(5),7-10.