都市圈道路网络优化及其评价理论研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
都市圈是城市发展的必然阶段,是国家和区域竞争力的重要体现。而道路系统是都市圈内一切实物流动的重要载体,是引导和促进都市圈经济和社会持续、快速、协调发展的主要动力。为了有效地满足都市圈内产生的交通需求,避免建设资源和道路设施的浪费,必须制定科学、系统的道路网络络规划。随着都市圈社会经济和交通运输的发展,对道路网络系统的要求不断提高,与此同时,以往道路规划和建设中存在的问题不断显现,使得对道路网络优化理论的深入研究尤显迫切。本文以最优化理论和现代组合优化理论为基础,以系统工程的思想为指导,借鉴已有研究成果,运用系统分析、定性与定量研究相结合等多种方法,对道路网络优化及其评价的理论和方法进行了深入分析和研究。
     本文首先介绍了都市圈的基础理论,利用改进的引力和场强模型,对北京都市圈范围界定进行实证性研究;从北京都市圈的现实条件和功能“扩散”、“再集中”的理念出发,提出了北京都市圈的“环型多功能集约型”整体发展思路。其次,对都市圈道路交通发展趋势进行了分析和预测,利用区位商模型分析了都市圈的道路交通及其客货运输区位的变化趋势;建立等长度递补变维分形模型预测了都市圈的道路客、货运交通结构的发展趋势;利用信息熵理论,建立了都市圈道路交通系统熵的测算模型,对北京都市圈道路交通系统演化方向进行了分析。再次,在交通需求预测的四阶段方法的基础上,根据都市圈内城际交通的特点,利用经济性、快速性和方便性指标,建立适合都市圈客运交通方式选择的Logit模型,确定模型参数的标定方法,并以北京都市圈为例,进行了都市圈道路交通需求预测的实证性研究。然后,在已有的交通网络设计研究成果的基础上,根据道路网络优化的实际需要,建立了道路网络优化的两阶段双层优化模型——远期优化模型和近期优化模型,研究了道路网络设计问题双层模型的遗传算法解法,并以北京都市圈道路网络优化问题为对象进行了实证性研究。最后,提出了基于DEA和加权灰色关联分析的道路网络评价方法,并将该组合方法用于评价北京都市圈道路网络综合发展水平。这种方法综合了DEA和灰色关联分析两种方法的优点,对每一个评价对象都去寻求最有利的指标权重系数分配,使得每一个评价对象对于标准对象的关联度都是相对最优的,从而得到客观公正的评价结果。
     论文取得的主要研究成果包括:改进了引力和场强模型,探讨了北京都市圈“环形多功能集约型”发展思路;建立了交通结构发展趋势预测的等长度递补变维分形模型和道路交通系统发展趋势预测的熵变模型;以小汽车、长途汽车和城际铁路列车为研究对象,研究了适合都市圈客运交通方式选择的Iogit模型;提出了道路网络优化的两阶段双层模型——远期规划模型和近期规划模型,并研究了模型的遗传算法求解方法;将数据包络分析方法(DEA)和灰色理论相结合,建立了都市圈道路网络综合评价的基于DEA的加权灰色关联分析模型。
Metropolitan area is the inevitable stage for city, and it is the important embodiment of competitiveness for a country or region. Road system is an important carrier for all material and objects flowed in metropolitan area, which leads the economy and society of the region to a continuous, fast and harmonious development.
     In order to meet with the traffic demand in the metropolitan area effectively, and to avoid the waste of construction sources and road facilities, it is required to establish scientific and systematic road network planning. With the development of the social economy and communications and transportation, Traffic demand on road network system improves constantly. Meanwhile, a lot of problems concerning to road planning and construction in the past appears, so it is especially urgent to study road network planning theory deeply. Road network optimization theory and evaluation method were studied in the dissertation on the basis of optimization theory and modern combination optimization theory, thought of systematic engineering, existed findings about road network optimization, systems analysis, qualitative analysis and quantitative analysis, and so on.
     Firstly, basic theory of the metropolitan area was introduced in the dissertation, and an improved gravitation and field intensity model was used to process demonstration research on definition of Beijing metropolitan area scope. From the actual condition of Beijing and the thought of "Diffusion" and "Re-concentration", a whole development idea of round and multi-functional intensive structure for Beijing metropolitan area was put forward.
     Secondly, trend of road network system of metropolitan area was analyzed and forecasted. A location quotient model was used to analyze the tendency of the location quotient of each cities and its passenger transportation and freight transportation, an Equal-length and Changeable-dimension Fractal Model was set up to predict the development tendency of road passengers and goods traffic structure, and an entropy change model was established to analyze the evolution direction of road network system of Beijing metropolitan area based on entropy theory.
     Thirdly, on the basis of the "four-step" method for traffic demand forecasting, and according to the characters of intercity traffic in metropolitan area, three indices, including economy, rapidity and convenience, were used to set up a new logit model suitable to modal split of passenger traffic, and method for calibrating the parameters of the model was introduced. Next, Beijing metropolitan was taken as an example to carry through the demonstrative study of traffic demand forecasting.
     Fourthly, according to the actual needs of the road network optimization, a two-stage bi-level programming model was presented in the dissertation on the basis of existed research of network design, including long-term optimization model and short-term optimization model. And Genetic Algorithm was used to solve the bi-level models, and the road network optimization of Beijing metropolitan area was taken as an example.
     Finally, theories of DEA and weighted gray correlation analysis were combined to evaluate the comprehensive level of road network system in metropolitan area. The new method can avoid the subjectivity when the weight vector is determined and get the optimality of the prior order evaluation by non-uniform weight.
     The following are the main conclusions of this dissertation:
     (1) A model of gravity and field strength was improved, and a comprehensive development strategy of "round and multi-functional intensive structure" was presented.
     (2) A new fractal forecasting model was put forward-"Equal-length and Changeable-dimension Fractal Model Using Compensating Figure", and an entropy change model was build to analyze the developing tendency of road system.
     (3) Using automobile, long-distance bus and railway as objects, a new logit model was presented, which is more suitable to modal spit in metropolitan area.
     (4) A two-stage and bi-level programming model for mixed transportation network design problem was presented which is composed of long-term model and short-term model. And the Genetic Algorithm is used to solve the model.
     (5) A new model called weighted gray correlation analysis method based on DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) was presented to evaluate road network system in metropolitan area.
引文
[1] 吴良镛等.京津冀地区城乡空间发展规划研究[R].北京:清华大学出版社,2002:60-65.
    [2] 许浩.日本三大都市圈规划及其对我国区域规划的借鉴意义[J].城市规划汇刊,2004(5):73-76.
    [3] 邵春福.交通规划原理[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2004:151-161.
    [4] 刘灿齐.现代交通规划学[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2001:134-138.
    [5] 王晓宁,裴玉龙.交通影响分析中的交通产生量预测[J].城市交通,2004,2(4):45-47.
    [6] 喻翔,毛敏,刘建兵,城市文通需求预侧组合模型的研究[J].西南交通大学学报,2003(1):75-79.
    [7] Kenneth E Train. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation[M]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 2003: 101-113.
    [8] Carlos Daganzo. Multinominal Probit: The Theory and Its Application to Demand Forecasting[M]. Academic Press, London. 1979: 68-169.
    [9] Moshe Ben-Akiva, Steven R. Lerman. Discrete Choice Analysis: The Theory and Application to TravelDemand[M]. The MITPress, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1987: 66-74.
    [10] 吴中,毛荣昌.MNL模型在交通方式划分中的新发展[J].交通标准化,2004,(7):39-41.
    [11] 王树盛.Probit模型及其在交通方式分担中的应用研究[J].ITS通讯,2005,7(4):48-50.
    [12] Benedikt Mandel, Marc Gaudry, Wemer Rothengatter. A Disaggregate Box-Cox Logit Mode Choice Model of Intercity Passenger Travel in Germany and Its Implications for High-Speed Rail Demand Forecasts[J]. TheAnnals of Regional Science, 1997, 31(2): 99-120.
    [13] Picard G, Gaudry M. Exploration of a Box-Cox Logit Model of Intercity Freight Mode Choice[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 1998, 34(1): 1-12.
    [14] Gaudry M and M Degenais. The Dogit Model[J]. Transportation Research B, 1978, 13(2): 105-111.
    [15] Small K. A Discrete Choice Model for Ordered Alternatives[J]. Econometrics, 1987(55): 409-424.
    [16] Chu C. A Paired Combinatorial Logit Model for Travel Demand Analysis[C]. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Transportation Research, 1989(4): 295-309.
    [17] Bhat C R. A Nested Logit Model With Covariance Heterogeneity[J]. Transportation Research B, 1997, (31): 11-21.
    [18] Voshva P. Application of Cross-Nested Logit Model to Mode Choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area[C]. Transportation Research Record: 1607, 1998: 6-15.
    [19] Wen C H and F S Koppelman. A Generalized Nested Logit Model[C]. Annual Conference of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000.
    [20] Swait J and W Adamowicz The Effect of Choice Environment and Task Demands on Consumer Behavior: Discriminating between Contribution and Confusion[R], Department of Rural Economy, University of Alberta, Working Paper, 1996.
    [21] Koppelman F S and C H Wen The Paired Combinatorial Logit Model: Properties, Estimation and Application[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2000(34): 75-89.
    [22] 周建,王树盛,隋水仙.巢式Logit交通方式划分模型及求解方法研究[J].山东交通学院学报,2005,13(4):28-31.
    [23] 刘卫果,胡思继.旅客交通方式选择行为的模糊机会约束规划模型[J].北方交通大学学报,2002,26(2):60-65.
    [24] 金安.Logit模型参数估计方法研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2004,4(2):71-75.
    [25] 葛亮,王炜,邓卫,王辛.基于可持续发展的城市客运交通方式分担率预测模型研究[J].公路交通科技,2004,21(8):95-98.
    [26] 吴红兵,陈义华.混合交通方式划分与交通分配联合模型[J].系统工程,2005,23(7): 77-80.
    [27] 徐永能,李旭宏,朱彦东,王健.大都市圈域走廊内各交通方式优化组合模型分析[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2005,5(4):35-39.
    [28] 王树盛,黄卫,陆振波.Mixed Logit模型及其在交通方式分担中的应用研究[J].公路交通科技,2006,23(5):88-91.
    [29] 陈义华,胥勇.一种基于模糊神经网络的交通方式划分模型[J].交通与计算机,2006,24(1):25-28.
    [30] 刘灿齐.交通网络设计问题的模型与算法的研究[J].公路交通科技,2003,20(2):57-62.
    [31] LeBlanc L J. An Algorithm for Discrete Network Design Problem[J]. Transportation Science, 1975(9): 183-199.
    [32] DioNume R, Florian M. Exact and Approximate Algorithm of Optimal Network Design[J]. Networks, 1979(9): 37-59.
    [33] Magnanti T, Mireault P, Wong'R. Tailor Benders Decomposition for Network Design[J]. Math Programming Study, 1986(26): 112-154.
    [34] Balaktishnan A, Magnanti T. A Dual-ascent Procedure for Large-Scale Uncapacitated network design[J]. OR, 1989(37): 716-740.
    [35] Ahujia R, Magnanti T, Odin J. Network flows: Theory, algorithm and application[M]. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1993: 598-638.
    [36] Holmberg K, Hellstrand J. Solving the Uncapacitated Network Design Problem by Lagrangean Heuristic and Branch-and-Bound[J]. O R, 1998(46): 247-259.
    [37] Holmberg K, Yuan D. A Lagrangean Heuristic Based Branch-and-Bound for the Capacitated Network Design Problem[J]. OR, 1998(46): 461-488.
    [38] Poorzahedy P, Tumquist M A. Approximate Algorithms for the Discrete Network Design Problem[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1982(16): 45-56.
    [39] Boyce D E, Janson B N. A Discrete Transportation Network Design Problem with Combined Trip Distribution and Assignment[J]. Transportation Research B, 1998(14): 147-154.
    [40] Yang H, Bell M G H. Models and Algorithms for Road Network Design: a Review and Some NewDevelopments[J]. Transport Review , 1998a(18): 257-278.
    [41] Nair A S, L Gupta S. Non-linear Analysis of Traffic Flow[C]. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Proceedings, 2001: 681-685.
    [42] Gao Z Y, Wu J J, Sun H J. Solution Algorithm for the Bi-level Discrete Network Design Problem[J]: Transportation Research Part B, 2005(39): 479-495.
    [43] Jeon Kyunghwi, Lee Jong Sung, Ukkusuri Satish V, Waller S Travis. Selector Combinative Genetic. Algorithm to Relax Computational Complexity of Discrete Network Design Problem[C]. Transportation Research Record: 1964, 2006.
    [44] Abdulaal M, LeBlanc L J. Continuous Equilibrium Network Design Models[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 1979, 13B(1): 19-32.
    [45] D E Boyce, B N Janson. A Discrete Transportation Network Design Problem with Combined Trip Distribution and Assignment[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 1980(14): 147-154.
    [46] Kosanovich K A, Piovoso M J. PCA of Wavelet Transformed Process Data for Monitoring[J]. Intelligent Data Analysis , 1997, 1(1): 85-99.
    [47] David G A. Exact Local Solution of the Continuous Network Design Problem via Stochastic User Equilibrium Assignment [J]. Transportation Research B, 1994(28): 61-75.
    [48] Yihua Xiong, Jerry B, Schneider. Demand/Supply Relationship in Transportation Network Design Problems: A Genetic Algorithm Approach[C].Proceedings of the First Congress Held in Conjunction withA/E/C Systems, 1994: 938-941.
    [49] Yang H, Bell M G H. Models and Algorithms for Road Network Design: A Review and Some New Developments[J]. Transport Reviews, 1998(18): 257-278.
    [50] Q Menga, H Yang and M G H. An Equivalent Continuously Differentiable Model and a Locally Convergent Algorithm for the Continuous Network Design Problem[J]. Transportation Research PartB: Methodological, 2001, 35(1): 83-105.
    [51] Meng Q, Yang H. Benefit Distribution and Equity in Road Network Design [J]. Transportation ResearchB, 2002(36): 19-35.
    [52] 许良,高自友.基于路段能力可靠性的城市交通网络设计[J].中国公路学报,2006,19(2): 86-90.
    [53] 单连龙,高自友.具有弹性需求的城市出行分布和居住土地使用布局的组合模型及求解算法[J].公路交通科技,1999(4):61-65.
    [54] 赵彤,高自友.交通离散网络设计与土地使用问题的组合模型及求解算法[J].土木工程学报,2003,36(11:6-10.
    [55] Anthony Chen, Kitti Subprasom, Eric Z Ji. A Simulation-based Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (SMOGA) for Transportation Network Design Problem[C]. Proceedings of the Fourth International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis(ISUMA'03), 2003: 373-384.
    [56] Chen A, Yang C. Stochastic Transportation Network Design Problem with Spatial Equity Constraint[J]. Transportation NetworkModeling, 2004: 97-104.
    [57] Meng Q, Lee D H, Yang H, Huang H J. Transportation Network Optimization Problems with Stochastic User Equilibrium Constraints[C]. Journal of Transportation Research Board, Transportation Research Record: 1882.
    [58] CHIOU Suh Wen. Bi-level Programming for the Continuous Transport Network Design Problem[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2005, 39(4): 361-383.
    [59] JeffX Ban, Henry X Liu, Michael C, Ferris and Bin Ran. A General MPCC Model and Its Solution Algorithm for Continuous Network Design Problem[J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling2006, 43(5): 493-505.
    [60] Satish V Ukkusuri, Tom V Mathew, S Travis Waller. Robust Transportation Network Design Under Demand Uncertainty[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering, 2007, 22(1): 6-15.
    [61] Friesz T L, Shah S. An Overview of Nontraditional Formulations of Static and Dynamic Equilibrium NetworkDesign[J]. Transportation ResearchB, 2001(35): 5-21.
    [62] 高自友,张好智,孙会君.Bi-level Programming Models,Approaches and Applications in Urban Transportation Network Design Problems[J].交通运输系统工程与信息.2004,4(1):35-44.
    [63] S Travis Waller, Kyriacos C Mouskos, Dimitrios Kamaryiannis, Athanasios K Ziliaskopoulos A Linear Model for the Continuous Network Design Problem[J]. Computer-Aided Civil and lnfrastructure Engineering, 2006, 21(5): 334-345.
    [64] 朱辉.公路网建设方案优化方法研究[D].吉林大学硕士论文,1999:4-8.
    [65] Transportation Research Board: Transport assessment/traffic impact assessment guidelines, NCHRP Report 456, 2001.
    [66] Transportation Research Board: Guidebook for Assessing the Social and Economic Effects of Transportation Projects. NCHRP Report 456, 1999.
    [67] Transportation Research Board: Northeast Area Transportation Plan Work Plan. NCHRP Report456, 2000: 66-83.
    [68] Transportation Statistics Annual Report Part Ⅱ, Chapter 6: Transportation, Mobility, and Accessibility: An Introduction, 1997.
    [69] Michael G, H Bell. A Game Theory Approach to Measuring the Performance Reliability of Transport Networks[J]. Transportation Research Part B, 2000(34): 533-545.
    [70] Robert E, Skinner Jr. Trend of America Statewide Transportation Planning[J]. Transportation Inforrnation of NorthAmerica, 2001, 11(2): 1-4.
    [71] 李延忠,杨印生,金俊武.DEA方法在公路网综合评价中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2001,18(4):85-88.
    [72] 赵怀明,汪敏.基于虚拟决策单元的公路网DEA评价模型[J].交通标准化,2004(12): 41-44.
    [73] 朱辉,隽志才.DEA方法在公路网规划方案综合评价中的应用[J].公路,2005(6):111-115.
    [74] 陈敬武,李雅,袁志学,高敏.基于DEA模型的天津市公路网综合评价研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2006,35(3):54-59.
    [75] 顾政华,李旭宏.主成分分析法在公路网综合评价中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2003,20(5):70-73.
    [76] 陈斌,魏庆曜.高利等.基于多级关联灰度模型的公路建设社会经济环境影响评价[J].中国公路学报,2003.16(1):77-81.
    [77] 朱辉,李沛才,陈绍莹(灰色关联投影模型)公路网现状综合评价[J].长安大学学报(自然科学版),2005,25(5):79-82.
    [78] 朱辉,隽志才.灰色关联投影法在公路网综合评价中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2005, 22(2):90-94.
    [79] 朱顺应,王红.公路网规划技术评价指标相关性分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(12):131-136.
    [80] 吴涛,瞿尔仁,陈志忠,张乾坤,甄晓霞.公路网规划方案综合评价方法[J].合肥工业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,25(3):389-394.
    [81] 过秀成,肖慎,张立早,宋辉.多级模糊评判法在公路网规划方案评价中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2003,20(1):45-48.
    [82] 张生瑞,邵春福,严海.公路交通可持续发展评价指标及评价方法研究[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(2):74-78.
    [83] 翟冬梅,魏连雨,朱敏清公路网综合评价模型的研究[J].河北工业大学学报,2001,30(4):84-87.
    [84] 朱泰英,李妹菲,赵明.加权主成分分析法在公路网综合评价中的应用[J].北华大学学报,2003,4(6):532-535.
    [85] 蒲芳,邵世煌,吴晓琼.长江三角洲干线公路网规划方案的综合评价的研究[J].东华大学学报(自然科学版),2004,30(1):36-40.
    [86] 马荣国,刘艳妮.公路建设项目综合评价权重确定方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2005,5(2):110-112.
    [87] 周伟,向前忠.公路网规划后评价的理论与方法[J].中国公路学报,2003,(161):99-104.
    [88] 蒲芳,邵世煌,许尹勇.基于GIS的公路网评价系统的设计与实现[J].计算机工程,2003,29(16):142-144.
    [89] 陈红,魏风虎.公路生态系统评价指标体系构建方法研究[J].中国公路学报,2004,17(4): 89-92.
    [90] 杨云峰.公路网规划环境评价技术方法[J].交通运输工程学报,2006,6(1):113-117.
    [91] 张晓峰,周伟,王洁.公路网规划环境影响评价中的困难和不确定性分析[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(1):124-126.
    [92] 游清华,靳志宏,杨忠振.公路网规划整体性评价的分维数法初探[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2005,32(6):24-27.
    [93] 李文华,杨兆升,王希伟.基于分形几何学的区域公路网布局评价指标的研究[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2005,5(5):50-56.
    [94] 袁剑波,许雪大.基于分形理论的公路网评价研究[J].公路与汽运,2005(6):101-103.
    [95] 谢洪新,肖慎,杨海荣,陈荣生.神经网络在高速公路网综合评价中的应用[J].公路交通科技,2005,22(8):106-110.
    [96] 杜栋,庞庆华.现代综合评价方法与案例精选[M].清华大学出版社,2005:143-144.
    [97] 张伟.都市圈的概念、特征及其规划探讨.城市规划,2003,27(6):47-50.
    [98] Gottman J. Megalopolis, or the Urbanization of the Northeastem Seaboard[J]. Economic Geography, 1957, 33(7): 31-40.
    [99] 袁家冬,周筠,黄伟.我国都市圈理论研究与规划实践中的若干误区[J].地理研究,2006, 25(1):112-120.
    [100] 徐惠蓉.都市与区域共同发展[J].城市与区域经济,2001(7):18-23.
    [101] 姚士谋,陈彩虹,陈振光.我国城市群空间规划的新认识[J].地域研究与开发,2005, 24(3):37-41.
    [102] 周一星.城市地理学[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
    [103] 刘加顺.都市圈形成机理及协调发展研究[D].武汉理工大学.2005.
    [104] 王建.2030:中国空间结构大调整[J].中国改革,2005(8):53-56.
    [105] 郭熙保,黄国庆.试论都市圈概念及其界定标准[J].当代财经,2006(6):79-84.
    [106] 孟庆红.区域经济学.经济科学出版社,2003.
    [107] 姜世国,都市区范围界定方法探讨——以杭州市为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004, 20(1):67-72.
    [108] 杨开忠,李国平.持续首都[M].广州:广东教育出版社,2000.159-165.
    [109] 李昆仑.层次分析法在城市道路景观评价中的运用[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2005,38(1):143-148.
    [110] 杨浩.模型与算法[M].北京:北方交通大学出版社,2002:99-102.
    [111] 沈洁,张京祥.都市圈规划:地域空间规划的新范式[J].城市问题,2004(1):23-28.
    [112] 宋玥芳.都市圈规划编制体系研究[J].城市规划汇刊,2003(4):78-84.
    [113] 东京都都市计画局.东京新都市都市再生碓道筋—[M].2001.
    [114] 朱英明.城市群经济空间分析[M].北京:科学出版社,2004.
    [115] 肖昭升.我国综合运输结构问题成因分析[J].综合运输,2003(9):8-11.
    [116] 林震,杨浩.城市交通结构的优化模型分析.土木工程学报,2005,38(5):100-104.
    [117] 蒋惠园,杨大鸣.货运量预测方法的比较[J].运筹与管理,2002,11(3):74-79.
    [118] 赵闯,刘凯,李电生.基于广义回归神经网络的货运量预测[J].铁道学报,2004,26(1):12-15.
    [119] 樊福梅,梁平.基于分形的社会总用电量及其构成预测[J].中国电机工程学报,2004,24(11):91.
    [120] 孙霞,吴自勤,黄昀.分形原理及其应用[M].合肥:中国科技大学出版社,2003.
    [121] 金燕,郑永冰,陈文章.粮食产量预测的分形方法[J].辽宁农业科学,2005,(1):45-46.
    [122] 付昱华.变换形成的分形与海洋环境数据分析预测[J].海洋通报,2000,19(1):79-85.
    [123] 傅立.灰色系统理论及其应用[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1992:68-72.
    [124] 李如生.非平衡态热力学和耗散结构[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1986.
    [125] 陈涛,陈森发.城市道路交通系统耗散结构特性的研究[J].土木工程学报,2004(1):74-75.
    [126] 范文涛,丁义明,龚小庆.建立系统科学基础理论框架的一种可能途径与若干具体思路之四——从韦达定理与控制论到突变论、分歧、混沌、分形、耗散结构、协同论及与统计物理学的关系[J].系统工程理论与实践,2002(8):19-20.
    [127] 叶中行.信息论基础[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
    [128] 杨秀虹,李适宇.耗散结构理论在环境承受阈研究中的应用初探[J].环境科学学报,2000(11):785-787.
    [129] 畅建霞,黄强,王义民等.基于耗散结构理论和灰色关联熵的水资源系统演化方向判别模型研究[J].水利学报,2002(11):107-112.
    [130] 中国高速公路及城乡公路网地图集[M].济南:山东地图出版社,2003.
    [131] 刘思峰,党耀国.预测方法与技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2005.
    [132] 毛保华,曾会欣,袁振洲.交通规划模型及其应用[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1999: 133-136
    [133] Nuzzolo, Agostino, Crisalli, Umberto and Gangemi, Francesca. A Behavioral Choice Model for the Evaluation of Railway Supply and Pricing Policies[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy andPractice, 2000, 34(5): 395-404.
    [134] Kottenhoff, Karl and Lindh, Christer. The Value and Effects of Introducing High Standard train and Bus Concepts in Blekinge, Sweden[J]. Transport Policy, 1995, 2(4): 235-241.
    [135] 裴玉龙,盖春英.考虑收费影响的公路路段行程时间函数研究[J].中国公路学报,2003,16(1): 91-94.
    [136] 何宇强等.高速客运专线客流分担率模型及其应用研究[J].铁道学报,2006,28(3):18-22.
    [137] 贺振欢,杨肇夏.Dial算法几点改进的研究[J].北方交通大学学报,2002,26(5):89-91.
    [138] 盖春英.公路网优化布局理论研究[D].哈尔滨工业大学博士论文,2003.
    [139] 高自友,张好智,孙会君.城市交通网络设计问题中双层规划模型、方法及应用[J].交通运输系统工程与信息,2004(1):36-44.
    [140] LeBlanc L J. An Algorithm for DiscreteNetwork Design Problem[J]. Transportation, 1975(9): 183-199.
    [141] 周和平,晏克非,徐汝华等.基于遗传算法的公路网络设计的双层优化模型[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2005(7):920-925.
    [142] 玄光男,程润伟.遗传算法与工程优化[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
    [143] 朱剑英.智能系统非经典数学方法[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2001.
    [144] 朱仁峰译.精通Matlab 7[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
    [145] 雷英杰等.Matlab遗传算法工具箱及应用[M].西安:西安电子科技大学出版社,2005.
    [146] 汪应洛.系统工程[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2003.
    [147] 王媛媛,陆化普,秦旭彦.基于灰色聚类分析的城市交通路网综合评价方法研究[J].公路交通科技,2005,22(8):118-121.
    [148] 邓聚龙.灰色系统基本方法[M].武汉:华中工学院出版社,1987.
    [149] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Phodes E. Measuring the efficiency of DMU[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1978(2): 429-444.
    [150] 魏权龄.评价相对有效性的方法[M].北京:人民出版社,1998.
    [151] 盛昭瀚,朱乔,吴广谋.DEA理论、方法与应用[M].北京:科学出版社,1996.
    [152] 杨印生,谢鹏扬,李洪伟.基于DEA的加权灰色关联分析方法[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2003(1):98-101.
    [153] 赵熠,邵春福,马楠.基于复合DEA的公路网资源优化分析[C].北京交通大学,全国博士生学术论坛文集,2005:401-407.
    [154] 马占新.一种用于区域公路交通网络综合评价的方法研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2005(5):23-31.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700