要素流动、产业转移与区域经济发展
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
区域经济的协调发展需要在一定的区域空间结构形态基础上开展,各种经济活动的产生需要将一定时期内分散在地理空间中的相关要素组织起来,进而必须克服时空因素对集约要素活动的约束。若能够借助某种方式让生产要素在整个时间和空间领域得到最佳的配置,从而使得区域内的人流、资金流、技术流等充分发挥作用,不仅能实现区域空间结构的发展与优化,更能以此达到区域经济从不平衡向平衡发展的目标。所以本文试图将空间优化思想融入新经济地理学的分析框架中,从区域经济空间结构优化的角度探讨区域经济协调发展如何实现,而实现区域空间结构的优化则需要依靠地区经济持续增长、生产要素和产业空间重组、地区利益格局重塑来完成。
     本文沿着要素、产业的转移到经济增长、产业空间集聚及地区间利益再分配,再到区域经济协调发展的主线展开分析。将产业转移的增长效应(空间优化效应)视为劳动力流动、资本转移和技术扩散共同作用的结果。以新经济地理学为理论基础,通过引入多要素流动和改进冰山成本的假设条件,尝试构建空间经济的一般均衡模型,考察劳动力流动、资本转移、技术扩散和产业空间集聚水平的相互作用机制,以及从理论上阐述要素流动、产业转移经济增长效应的发生机制。进而建立地方政府与转出企业间的利益分配博弈模型,以进一步明晰要素、产业的转移对地区利益分配格局重组产生的影响。
     研究发现,(1)我国1997-2011年期间要素流动与产业转移在不同的阶段呈现了不同的特征。其中劳动力的地域流动呈现出了明显的由中西部向东部流动特征和趋势,资本要素转移的省际差异较大,而技术要素在不同地区间的扩散并没有呈现出明显的规律;广义视角下东中西部地区间的产业转移的规模并不显著,而狭义视角下产业转移最开始普遍呈现从中西部向东部沿海转移的趋势,后期才逐渐演变为由东部沿海向内地转移。(2)单就要素流动而言,如果具有一定素质的劳动力从落后地区流入发达地区,将有利于流入地经济的快速增长。相反却造成了流出地人力资本及生产效率的损失而不利于经济的发展。资本流动的区域经济增长效应表现为提高经济增长的质量和总量。而技术扩散对区域经济收敛过程的影响应该是双重的。因而,产业转移的经济效益无论是对转出地还是对转入地,影响到底如何,不能一概而论,应由具体情况决定。(3)在坚持新经济地理学关于劳动力要素的跨区域流动引起产业空间结构的变化这一理论判断基础上,引入多要素流动和企业区位再选择相关假设的理论分析表明,要素转移会引起企业(产业)更大程度的转移,要素集中的地区将促进产业空间集聚的形成。实证研究发现东部地区对外产业转移的确会降低本地区产业空间集聚水平,而作为产业转移承接地的中西部地区则可以通过积极吸收来自于东部发达地区的人力资源、资本、技术的流入,并最终能够提高本地区的产业集聚水平。(4)在地方政府间的竞争行为博弈分析中发现,在要素流动与产业转移中,地方政府间竞争程度的增加既具有一定的正效应。但是也有如导致了产业结构趋同,重复投资等负效应。而转入地政府与转出企业间的博弈结果表明,要素、产业转移的利益分配均衡是一个不确定性问题,最终的地区利益分配格局与所处博弈阶段的利益系数有关。
     本文的最终研究结论告诉我们,空间结构优化是实现区域经济协调发展的重要途径,而实现空间结构优化需要通过生产要素空间配置的优化、产业空间结构的优化,以及地区利益格局的优化来最终实现。而在执行区域协调发展战略实现空间结构的优化的抓手则是依靠地区间的要素流动和产业转移。
Regional economic coordinated development needs certain region space structure form, which based on various economic activities need to spread a certain period in the geographical space related elements are organized, and have to overcome the factors of time and space constraints of factors of intensive activity. If able to through some way for factors of production across time and space to get optimal configuration, so as to make the area of the flow, cash flow, technology flow, such as give full play to the role, not only can realize the development of the regional spatial structure and optimization, to achieve regional economic never more balance to balance the development of the target. So this article attempts to optimize the space thinking integrated into the analysis framework of new economic geography, from the view point of regional economy spatial structure optimization of regional economic coordinated development of how to realize the problem, and the optimization of regional spatial structure, you need to realize regional economic sustained growth, the factors of production and industrial restructuring, regional interests pattern reshaping.
     This article along, transfer of industry to economic growth, industrial spatial agglomeration, and regional interests redistribution, and then to the coordinated development of regional economy of an analysis. Take transferring industry growth effect (space optimization effect) as Labour mobility, capital transfer and outcome of combined action of technology diffusion. Based on the theory of new economic geography, by introducing the multi-factor flow and improve iceberg cost assumptions and trying to build a space general equilibrium model of economic, labor mobility, transfer of capital, technology diffusion and interaction mechanism of industrial spatial agglomeration level, flow and theoretically in this paper, the elements, the industrial transfer effect mechanism of economic growth. Transfer and the local government and enterprise profit distribution between the game model, to further clarify the elements, the transfer of industry on regional interest distribution pattern of the impact of restructuring.
     Research found that (1) our country during1997-2011elements flow and industry transfer in different phase presents different characteristics. Which shows obvious regional flow of labor from the Midwest to the east flow characteristics and trends, and the great provincial difference in the transfer of capital elements, technical elements in the spread between different regions did not show obvious regularity; Between east central and western regions under the broad perspective of the scale of the industry transfer is not significant, and the special perspective of industry transfer started generally present the trend that moved from the Midwest to the east coast, later gradually evolved from east coast to the mainland.(2) in terms of element flow, If have a certain quality of labor force from the backward area into the developed areas, will be conducive to defined the rapid economic growth. Instead the human capital and the production efficiency of the water loss and unfavorable to the development of economy. Regional economic growth effects of capital flows is to improve the quality of economic growth and the total amount. The technology diffusion effect on regional economic convergence process should be double. The economic benefits of industrial transfer counter rotating out of the ground or to turn into the ground, affect how, cannot treat as the same, should be decided by the specific situation.(3) Adhere to the new economic geography theory on Labour elements of cross-regional flow causes the change of the industrial spatial structure the theory judgment, based on the introduction of many elements flow and enterprise location after select the relevant hypothesis theory analysis shows that elements transfer will cause enterprise (industry) to a greater degree transfer, concentration of elements in will promote the formation of industrial spatial agglomeration. And the empirical study found that the eastern region of foreign industry transfer does decrease the region industrial spatial agglomeration level, as the central and western regions of the industrial transfer to undertake, can through the way of absorbing human resources, capital, technology flow from eastern areas, and eventually be able to raise the level of industrial agglomeration in the region.(4) in local government competition behavior between the game analysis found that in elements flow and industry transfer, the increase of the degree of competition between local governments on the one hand, has a positive effect. But is also lead to the convergence of industrial structure, repeated investment and other negative effects. And turn to the government and turn out of the game between enterprise and the results show that the elements balance of interests distribution, industrial relocation is a matter of uncertainty, the final pattern of regional interests distribution and the coefficient of the interests of the stage of the game.
     This final research conclusion tell us, spatial structure optimization is an important way to realize the coordinated development of regional economy, and realize spatial structure optimization need through the factors of production space configuration optimization, optimization of the industrial spatial structure, the optimization of pattern and regional interests to achieve. And in carrying out regional coordinated development strategy optimizing the spatial structure of the gripper is rely on elements flow and industry transfer between regions.
引文
① 威廉·配第:赋税论,载《配第经济著作选集》,商务印书馆,1981年.
    ② 转引自大卫·李嘉图:政治经济学及赋税原理,中译本,商务印书馆,1962年.
    [1]Aghion, P., P. Howitt. A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction. Econometric[J].1992,60:323-351.
    [2]Aiginger K., M. Pfaffermayr. The SingleMarket and Geographic Concentration in Europe[J]. Review of International Economics,2004,12(1):1-11.
    [3]Akamatsu K. A Historical Pattern of Economic Growth in Developing Countries[J], The Developing Economies,1962(1):3-25.
    [4]Angrist J, Chernozhukov V, Fernandez-val I. Quantile regression under misspecification, with an application to the U.S. wage structure[J]. Econometrica, 2006,74(2):539-564.
    [5]Arthue J. ExternalTrade in Developing Economies [J]. NBER, Working Paper,2001, (11):9-18.
    [6]Athar Hussain, Peter Lanjouw, and Nicholas Stern. Income Inequalities in China: Evidence from Household Survey Data[J]. World Development,1994,22 (12): 1947-1957.
    [7]Baptista R. Geographical clusters and innovation diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,2001,66:31-46.
    [8]Barrios S., E. Strobl. IndustryMobility and Geographic Concentration in the EuropeanUnion[J]. Economics Letters,2004,82(1):71-75.
    [9]Barro, Robert J. and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. Technology Diffusion, Convergence and Growth[J]. Journal of Economic Growth,1997(1):1-26.
    [10]Bruhart M, Traeger R. An Account of Geographic Concentration Pattern in Europe[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2005,35(5):597-642.
    [11]Chernozhukov V, Umantsev L. Conditional value at risk:aspects of modelling and estimation [J]. Empirical Economics,2001,3:271-292.
    [12]Chock D P, Winkler S L, Chen C. Astudy of the association between daily mortality and ambient air pollutant concentrations in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania[J]. Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association,2000,50:1481-1500.
    [13]Ciccone A. Agglomeration effects in Europe[J]. European Economic Review,2002, 46:213-227.
    [14]Cole T J, Green P J. Smoothing reference centile curves:the LMS method and penalized likelihood [J]. Statistics in Medicine,1992,11:1305-1319.
    [15]Combes, P. P.. Economic Structure and Local Growth:France,1984~1993[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,2002,47(3):329-355.
    [16]Cumings B. "The origins and development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial sector,product cycle and political consequences", International Organization,1984(4):1-40.
    [17]Cumings, B. The Origins and Development of the Northeast Asian Political Economy: Industrial Sector, Product Cycle and Political Consequences[J]. International Organization,1984(4):1-40.
    [18]Desmet K, M Fachamps. Changes in the Spatial Concentration of Employment across US Counties:a Sectoral Analysis 1972-2000[J]. Journal of Economic Geography, 2005,5(3):261-284.
    [19]Devereux M P., R. Griffith, H. Simpson. The Geographic Distribution of Production Activity in the UK[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2004,34(5):533-564.
    [20]Dieter Ernst, Linsu Kim. Global Production Networks, Knowledge Diffusion, and Local Capability Formation[J]. Research Policy,2002,31(6);8-9.
    [21]Dumais G., G Ellison, E.L. Glaeser. Geographic Concentration as a Dynamic Process[J]. Review ofEconomics and Statistics,2002,84(2):193-204.
    [22]Dunning J. The eclectic paradigm of international production:a restatement and some possible extensions[J]. Journal of international business studies,1988,19(1):1-31.
    [23]Ellison G., E. L. Glaeser. Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach[J]. Journal of Political Economy,1997,105(5):889-927.
    [24]Ellison, G, E.Glaeser. The Geographic Concentration of an Industry:Does Natural AdvantageExplain Agglomeration[J]. American Economic Association Papers and Proceedings,1999,89:311-316.
    [25]Ertur, Koch. Growth, Technologal Interdependence and Spatial Externalities:Theory and Evidence[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics,2007,22:1033-1062.
    [26]Ezcurra R., P. Pascual, M. Rapun. Regional Specialization in the European Union[J]. Regional Studies,2006,40(6):601-616.
    [27]Fan C, Scott A. Industrial agglomeration and development:a survey of spatial economic issues in East Asia and a statistical analysis of Chinese regions. Economic Geography,2003,79:295-319.
    [28]Fingleton. Equilibrium and Economic Growth:Spatial Econometric Models and Simulations[J]. Journal of Regional Science,2001,41:117-147.
    [29]Fitzenberger B, Kurz C. New insights on earnings trends across skill groups and industries in West Germany [J]. Empirical Economics,2003,28(3):479-514.
    [30]Fleisher, Belton M., Jian Chen. The Coast- Noncoast Income Gap, Productivity, and Regional Economic Policy in China[J]. Journal of Comparative Economics,1997, 25(2):220-236.
    [31]Fujita, M., P. Krugman, and A. Venables, The Spatial Economy:Cities, Regions, and International Trade[M]. Cambridge, MA:The MIT Press,1999.
    [32]Gao Ting. Regional industrial growth:Evidence from Chinese industries[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics,2004,34(1):101-124.
    [33]Green P J, Silverman B W. Nonparametric regression and generalized linear models: a roughness penalty approach [M]. Chapman Hall, New York,1994.
    [34]Guimaraes P., O. Figueiredo, D. Woodward. Measuring the Localization of Economic Activity:A Parametric Approach[J]. Journal of Regional Science,2007,47(4): 753-774.
    [35]Hanson G H. North American economic integration and industry location[J]. Oxford Review of Economic Policy,1998,14:30-44.
    [36]Hare, Denise. "Push" versus "Pull" Factors in Migration Outflows and Returns: Determinants of Migration Status and Spell Duration among China's Rural Population [J]. Journal of Development Studies,1999,35(3):45-72.
    [37]He C. Location of foreign manufacturers in China:agglomeration economies and country of origin effects[J]. Papers in Regional Science,2003,82(3):351-372.
    [38]Head K, Ries J, Swenson D. Agglomeration benefits and location choice:evidence from Japanese manufacturing investments [J]. Journal of International Ecnomics, 1995,38:223-248.
    [39]Henderson J. Externalities and industrial development[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1997,42(3):449-470.
    [40]Holmes T. J. How Industries Migrate When Agglomeration Economies are Important[J]. Journal of Urban Economics,1999,45(2):240-263.
    [41]Howwit. Endogenous Growth and Cross-Contry Income differences[J]. American Economic Review,2000,90:829-846.
    [42]Islam N. Growth Empirics:a Panel Data Approach[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110:1127-1170.
    [43]Johnson, D. Gale. Provincial Migration in China in the 1990s[J]. China Economic Review,2003, (14):22-31.
    [44]Keller W. Geographic Localization of International Technology Diffusion[J]. The American Economic Review,2002,92:120-142.
    [45]Kevin Honglin Zhang, Shunfeng Song. Rural- urban Migration and Urbanization in China:Evidence from Time- series and Cross- section Analyses [J]. China Economic Review,2003(14):386-400.
    [46]Kim S. Economic Integration and Convergence:U.S. Regions,1840-1987[J]. Journal of Economic History,1998,58(3):659-683.
    [47]Kim S. Expansion of Markets and the Geographic Distribution of Economic Activities:the Trends in US Regional Manufacturing Structure 1860-1987[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1995,110:881-908.
    [48]Kim, S. Economic Integration and Convergence:US Region,1840-1987[J]. The Journal of Economic History,1998,58:659-83.
    [49]Koenker R, Hallock K F. Quantile regression:an introduction[J]. Journal of Economic Perspectives,2001,15:143-156.
    [50]Kojmia K. DirectForeign Investment:A Japanese Model of Multinational Business Operations[M]. London:CroomHelm,1978.
    [51]Krugman P. First nature, second nature, and metropolitan location[J]. Journal of Regional Science,1993(34):129-144.
    [52]Krugman P. Increasing Returns and Economic Geography [J]. Journal of Political Economy,1991,99(3):483-499.
    [53]Krugman, P. Geography and Trade[M]. Boston:MIT Press,1991.
    [54]Lecraw D. J. Outward Direct Investment by Indonesian Firms:Motivation and Effects[J]. Journal of International Business Studies,1993(3):589-600.
    [55]Leon ledesma, Miguel A. Economic Growth and Verdoorns Law in The Spanish Regions[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economic,2002,17:99-121.
    [56]Lewis T. Economic developmentwith unlimited supplies of Labor[J]. The Manchester Schoo,1954,22(1):139-150.
    [57]Lewis, W. A. The Evolution of the International Economic Order[M]. New Jersey: Princeton University Press,1978.
    [58]Machado J A F, Mata J. Counterfactual decomposition of changes in wage distributions using quantile regression[J]. Journal of Applied Econometrics 2005(4):445-465.
    [59]Manning W, Blumberg L, Moulton L. The demand for alcohol:the differential response to price [J]. Journal of Health Economics,1995,14:123-148.
    [60]Markusen, R, J., Venables, A. Multinational Firms and the New Trade Theory[J]. Journal of International Economics,1998,46:183-204.
    [61]Martin, P. and G. Ottaviano. Growth and Agglomerration[J]. International Economic Review,2001,42:947-968.
    [62]Montenegro C. The structure of wages in Chile 1960-1996:an application of quantile regression [J]. Estudios de Economia,1998,25:71-98.
    [63]Morillo D. Income mobility with nonparametric quantiles:a comparison of the U.S. and Germany [R]. Working paper,2000.
    [64]Nelson, and Phelps. Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion, and Ecomomic Growth [J]. The American Economic Review,1996,56:69-75.
    [65]Otsuka A. Determinants of new firm formation in Japan:A comparison of the manufacturing and service sectors[J]. Economics Bulletin,2008,18(5):1-7.
    [66]Ozawa, T. Castello, S. Toward "an Internationam Business" Paradigm of Endogenous Growth:Multinationals and Governments as Co-Endogenisers[J]. International Journal of the Economics of Business,2001 (2):211-228.
    [67]Ozawa, T. Foreign Direct Investment and Structural Transformation:Japan as a Recycler of Market and Industry[J]. Business and Contemporary World,1993 (2):129-150.
    [68]Papapetrou E. The unequal distribution of the public-private sector wage gap in Greece:evidence from quantile regression [J]. Applied Economics Letters,2006, 13(4):205-210.
    [69]Parzen M I, Wei L J, Ying Z. A resampling method based on pivotal estimating functions [J]. Biometrika,1994,81:341-350.
    [70]Patchell J. From production systems to learning systems:lessons from Japan[J]. Environment and Planning A,1993, (6):797-815.
    [71]Pennings E. Sleuwaegen L. International relocation:firm and industry determinants[J]. Economics Letters,2000,67(9):179-186.
    [72]Porter M. Clusters and the new economics of competition[J]. Harvard Business Review,1998,76(6):77-90.
    [73]Porter M. Competitive advantage of nations[J]. Harvard Business Review,1990, 68(2):73-93.
    [74]Porter, M. E. Competitive Advantage:Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance[M]. New York:The Free Press,1985.
    [75]Puga D. VenablesA. J. The Spread of Industry:Spatial Agglomeration in Economic Development J]. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies,1996(10): 440-464.
    [76]Romer, P. M. Endogenous Technological Change[J]. Journal of Political Economic, 1990,94:1002-1037.
    [77]Solow, R, M. A Contribution to the Thoery of Economic Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1994,70:65-94.
    [78]Storper M. The transition to flexible specialization in industry:External economies, the division of labor and the crossing of industrial divides[J]. Cambridge Journal of Economics,1989(13):273-305.
    [79]Susanto Basu, David Weil. Appropiate Technology and Growth[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1998,113:1025-1054.
    [80]Sweeney S., Feser E. Plant size and clustering of manufacturing activity[J]. Geographical Analysis,1998,30(1):45-64.
    [81]Tan, Z. A. Product Cycle Theory and Telecommunications Industry-foreign Direct Investment, Government Policy, and Indigenous Manufacturing in China[J]. Telecommunications Policy,2002,26(1):17-30.
    [82]Taylor J. Forecasting daily supermarket sales using exponentially weighted quantile regression [J]. European Journal of Operational Research,2007,178:154-167.
    [83]Thijs ten Raa, Haoran Pan. Competitive Pressures on China:Income Inequality and Migration [J]. Regional Science & Urban Economics,2005,35:671-699.
    [84]Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the productcycle [J]. The Quarterly Journal of Economics,1966,80(1):190-207.
    [85]Wallsten S. An empirical test of geographic knowledge spillovers using geographic information systems and firm level data[J]. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 2001,31(5):571-599.
    [86]Weber A. Theory of the Location of Industries[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1929.
    [87]Whalley, John, Shuming Zhang. Inequality Change in China and (Hukou) Labor Mobility Restrictions[R]. NBER Working Paper 10683,2004, National Bureau of Economic Research.
    [88]Wolfson, M. C. Conceptual Issues in Normative Measurement When Inequalities Diverge[J]. American Economic Review,1994,84(2):353-358.
    [89]Young A. The Razor's Edge:Distortions and Incremental Reform in the People's Republic of China[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,2000,115(4):1091-1135.
    [90]Young, Alwyn. Growth without Scale Effect[J]. Journal of Political Economic,1998, 106:41-63.
    [91]Yu K. Smoothing regression quantile by combining k-NN estimation with local kernel fitting [J]. Statistica Sinica,1999,9:759-774.
    [92]白文扬.我国工业产业集中度实证研究[J].中国工业经济,1994(11):45-50.
    [93]蔡防,都阳.经济转型过程中的劳动力流动—长期性、效应和政策[J].学术研究,2004(6):16-22.
    [94]蔡昉,王德文,曲玥.中国产业升级的大国雁阵模型分析[J].经济研究,2009(9):4-14.
    [95]蔡防.农村剩余劳动力流动的制度性障碍分析—解释流动与差距同时扩大的悖论[J].经济学动态,2005(1):35-39.
    [96]陈栋生.东西互动、产业转移是实现区域协调发展的重要途径[J].中国金融,2008(4):20-21.
    [97]陈计旺.区际产业转移与要素流动的比较研究[J],生产力研究,1999(3):64-67.
    [98]陈建宝,丁军军,分位数回归技术综述[J],统计与信息论坛,2008(3):89-95
    [99]陈建军.中国现阶段产业区域转移的实证研究—结合浙江105家企业的问卷调 查报告的分析[J].管理世界,2002(6):64-74.
    [100]陈蕊,熊必琳.基于改进产业梯度系数的中国区域产业转移战略构想[J].中国科技论坛,2007(8):8-12.
    [101]陈秀山,徐瑛.中国制造业空间结构变动及其对区域分工的影响[J],经济研究,2008(10):104-116.
    [102]陈甬军,陈爱贞.从劳动力转移到产业区域转移—新型工业化背景下我国城市化演变趋势分析[J].经济理论与经济管理,2007(2):1-12.
    [103]戴宏伟.产业梯度产业双向转移与中国制造业发展[J].经济理论与经济管理,2006(12):45-50.
    [104]丁建军.产业转移的新经济地理学解释[J].财经科学,2011(1):35-45.
    [105]段平忠,人力资本流动对地区经济增长差距的影响[J].中国人口、资源与环境,2007(4):87-91.
    [106]樊新生,李小建.中国工业产业空间转移及中部地区发展对策研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004(3):64-68.
    [107]范剑勇.长三角一体化、地区专业化与制造业空间转移[J].管理世界,2004(11):77-85.
    [108]冯根福,刘志勇,蒋文定.我国东中西部地区间工业产业转移的趋势、特征及形成原因分析[J].2010(2):1-11.
    [109]傅允生,东部沿海地区产业转移趋势—基于浙江的考察[J].经济学家,2011(10):84-90.
    [110]郭腾云,徐勇,马国霞,王志强.区域经济空间结构理论与方法的回顾[J].地理科学进展,2009(1):111-118.
    [111]郭文杰,李泽红.劳动力流动、服务业增长与经济结构转换—基于中国省际面板数据的实证研究[J],数量经济技术经济研究,2009年第11期:51-62
    [112]贺灿飞,魏后凯.信息成本、集聚经济与中国外商投资区位[J].中国工业经济,2001(9):38-45.
    [113]胡荣才,刘晓岚,李伟.劳动力流动、工业化进程对区域经济影响研究—基于面板数据模型的视角[J].人口与经济,2011(2):45-51.
    [114]胡宇辰.产业集群的相关理论分析[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2005.
    [115]江曼琦,张志强.产业空间集中影响因素探究—基于天津滨海新区制造业32个产业的面板数据分析[J].南开经济研究,2008(1):143-152.
    [116]金煜,陆铭,陈钊.中国的地区工业集聚:经济地理、新经济地理与经济政[J].经济研究,2006(4):79—89.
    [117]梁琦.中国工业的区位基尼系数—兼论外商直接投资对制造业集聚的影响[J].统计研究,2003(9):21-25.
    [118]梁琦.产业集聚论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004.
    [119]林理升,王晔倩.运输成本、劳动力流动与制造业区域分布[J].经济研究,2006(3):115-125.
    [120]林平凡,刘城.产业转移:转出地与转入地政府博弈分析—以广东产业转移工业园为例[J].广东社会科学,2009(1):33-37.
    [121]林毅夫,刘培林.中国的经济发展战略与地区收入差距[J].经济研究,2003(3):19-25.
    [122]刘红光,刘卫东,刘志高.区域间产业转移定量测度研究—基于区域间投入产出表分析[J].中国工业经济,2011(6):79-88.
    [123]刘满平.泛珠江.区域产业梯度分析及产业转移机制构建[J].经济理论与经济管理,2004(11):45-49.
    [124]刘社建,徐艳.城乡居民收入分配差距形成原因及对策研究[J].财经研究,2004(5):93-103
    [125]刘新争.比较优势、劳动力流动与产业转移[J],2012(2):45-50.
    [126]刘修岩,张学良.集聚经济与企业区位选择—基于中国地级区域企业数据的实证研究[J],财经研究,2010(11):83-92.
    [127]娄晓黎.产业转移与欠发达区域经济现代化[D].东北师范大学,2004.
    [128]卢根鑫.国际产业转移论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1997.
    [129]陆大道.区域发展及其空间结构[M].北京:科学出版社,1998.
    [130]路江涌,陶志刚.中国制造业区域聚集及国际比较[J].经济研究,2006(3):103-114.
    [131]罗勇,曹丽莉.中国制造业集聚程度变动趋势实证研究[J].经济研究, 2005(8):106-127.
    [132]罗浩.中国劳动力无限供给与产业区域粘性[J].中国工业经济,2003(4):53-58.
    [133]马子红.基于成本视角的区际产业转移动因分析[J].财贸经济,2006(8):46-51.
    [134]麦勇,徐晓莉.资本流动对区域经济增长的影响及启示[J].经济纵横,2007(7):53-56.
    [135]潘文卿,刘庆.中国制造业产业集聚与地区经济增长—基于中国工业企业数据的研究[J],清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(1):137-147.
    [136]潘越,杜小敏.劳动力流动、工业化进程与区域经济增长—基于非参数可加模型的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2010(5):34-48.
    [137]宋德勇,张文斌.新经济地理学模型与中国区域经济发展[J].重庆大学学报,2007(3):6-10.
    [138]苏红键,赵坚.产业专业化、职能专业化与城市经济增长—基于中国地级单位面板数据的研究[J].中国工业经济,2011(4):25-34.
    [139]陶良虎.国内外产业转移与中部地区产业承接问题研究[J].理论月刊2010(1):5-11.
    [140]汪斌,赵张耀.国际产业转移理论述评[J].浙江社会科学,2003(6):45-49.
    [141]王德,朱玮,叶晖.1985-2000年我国人口迁移对区域经济差异的均衡作用研究[J].人口与经济,2003(6):1-9.
    [142]王辉堂,王琦.产业转移理论述评及其发展趋向[J].经济问题探索,2008(1):45-48.
    [143]王文剑,仉建涛,覃成林.财政分权、地方政府竞争与FDI的增长效应[J].管理世界,2007(3):13-23.
    [144]王小鲁,樊纲.中国地区差距的变动趋势和影响因素[J].经济研究,2004(1):33-44.
    [145]王秀芝,尹继东.中国收入差距与劳动力流动关系研究综述[J].当代财经,2007(4):16-21
    [146]王子龙,谭清美,许箫迪.产业集聚水平测度的实证研究[J],2006(3):109-116.
    [147]魏后凯.现代区域经济学[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2006.
    [148]魏敏,李国平,王巨贤.我国梯度推移粘性性质及其原因的研究[J].当代财经, 2004(8):87-89.
    [149]文玫.中国工业在区域上的重新定位和聚集[J].经济研究,2004(2):84-94.
    [150]吴安.中国产业及劳动力逆向流动分析—以重庆与北京、广东的比较为例[J].中国工业经济,2004(12):12-19.
    [151]吴三忙,李善同.专业化、多样化与产业增长关系—基于中国省级制造业面板数据的实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2011(8):21-33.
    [152]吴晓军,赵海东.产业转移与次发达地区经发展[J].当代财经,2004(6):
    [153]夏万军,纪宏.技术扩散和区域经济收敛:一个理论模型的新框架[J],商业经济与管理,2007(6):28-31.
    [154]向晓梅.产业转移中的政府行为研究述评[J].学术研究,2011(5):89-95.
    [155]徐康宁,冯春虎.中国制造业地区性集中程度的实证研究[J].东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003(1):37—42.
    [156]徐维祥.区域经济发展差异的时空变化特征分析—浙江区域经济发展研究[J].经济学动态,2002(5):44-46.
    [157]严成樑,崔小勇.资本投入、经济增长与地区差距[J].经济科学,2012(2):21-33.
    [158]严浩坤.劳动力跨地区流动与地区差距[J].地理科学,2008(2):179—184.
    [159]严双建.我国区际产业转移中企业和政府的行为差异研究[D].同济大学,2007.
    [160]杨海水.地方政府竞争理论的发展述评[J].经济学动态,2004(10):35-40.
    [161]姚枝仲,周素芳.劳动力流动与地区差距[J].世界经济,2003(4):35-44.
    [162]叶琪.论农村劳动力转移与产业结构调整互动[J].财经科学,2006(3):80-85.
    [163]叶裕民,黄壬侠.中国流动人口特征与城市化政策研究[J].中国人民大学学报,2004(2):75-81.
    [164]张春法,冯海华,王龙国.产业转移与产业集聚的实证分析—以南京市为例[J].统计研究,2006(12):45-47.
    [165]张公嵬,梁琦.产业转移与资源的空间配置效应研究[J].2010(3):1-21.
    [166]张华,梁进社.产业空间集聚及其效应的研究进展[J].地理科学进展, 2007(2):14-24.
    [167]张军,吴桂英,张吉鹏.中国省际物质资本存量估算:1952—-2000[J].经济研究,2004(10):35-44.
    [168]张可云.区域大战与区域经济关系[M].北京:民主与建设出版社,2001.
    [169]张强,卢荻.技术扩散和经济增长:一个空间计量模型研究[J].上海经济研究,2011(8):42-53.
    [170]张同升,梁进社.中国制造业省区间分布的集中与分散研究[J].经济地理,2005(3):315-319.
    [171]张文武,梁琦.劳动地理集中、产业空间与地区收入差距[J].经济学(季刊).2011(2):691-708.
    [172]张秀生,王肇嘉.中国区际产业转移背景下的东部地区产业发展路径[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2010(3):312-317.
    [173]赵祥.地方政府竞争与FDI区位分布—基于我国省级面板数据的实证研究[J],经济学家,2009(8):53-61.
    [174]郑鑫,陈耀.运输费用、需求分布与产业转移—基于区位论的模型分析[J].中国工业经济,2012(2):57-67.
    [175]周黎安.中国地方官员的晋升锦标赛模式研究[J].经济研究,2007(7):36-50.
    [176]朱汉清.要素转移与产业转移的比较研究[J].经济学家,2010(12):58-63.
    [177]朱华晟,王缉慈.论产业群内地方联系的影响因素—以东莞电子信息产业群为例[J].经济地理,2002(4):385-393.
    [178]朱英明.产业空间结构与地区产业增长研究—基于长江三角洲城市群制造业的研究[J].经济地理,2006(3):386-390.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700