颌面创伤患者流行病学和损伤严重度量化评分研究
|
摘要
随着我国现代化进程的不断提高，交通和工业事故逐年增加，已成为社会第一公害。创伤作为“发达社会疾病”日趋严重地威胁人类的健康，影响人口素质和生存质量。口腔颌面创伤在和平时期约占全身创伤的7％～20％，所以日益受到创伤工作者的重视。我国政府也非常重视创伤的防治与救护，已把相关研究列入“973”计划。关于颌面创伤流行病学研究国内报道较少，况且随着地域、人口、社会经济等因素不同，其流行病学研究结果也不尽相同，失去了它的科研对比价值。而且现有的创伤评分方法无法有效地评估颌面创伤严重度，因此，探讨一种更符合专科特点的颌面创伤评分方法是十分必要的。本研究目的就是通过大量临床病例资料的回顾性研究，确定西安及周边省市地区颌面创伤患者的流行病学特点，为颌面创伤的防治提供全面详细的流行病学资料；客观准确地评价颌面创伤严重度，使创伤的诊断、救治及判断愈后建立在更科学的基础上。此外，研制数据库软件，建立颌面创伤数据库，为今后能及时、准确、客观、动态地评价颌面创伤创造一个良好的和必备的基础。
第四军医大学硕士学位论文
1、领面创伤患者临床流行病学研究
目的通过大量临床病例资料的流行病学回顾性研究，明确西
安及周边地区领面创伤患者的流行病学特点，为领面创伤的救治提
供较为准确的流行病学资料信息。方法回顾调查第四军医大学口
腔医学院1996年1月一2002年10月期间所有领面创伤住院患者，
创建领面创伤数据库，对每例患者的年龄、性别、伤因、致伤机制、
损伤的部位及特点、合并伤及治疗方法等内容逐一输入数据库，进
行统计分析。结果共收录1159例，男性多于女性，男:女为3.95:
1。交通损伤是主要伤因，共590例(59.92%)，其次暴力损伤221
例(19.07%)，非明确原因跌落伤112例(9.66%)、职业损伤85
例(7.33%)，运动损伤10例(0.86%)，医源性损伤7例(0.60%)。
面下部是最容易受损伤的部位，下领骨骨折中颊部最多，其次为裸
状突。四肢在合并伤中最多发，其次是颅脑和眼。结论应加强交
通事故中领面损伤的防治，注意其多发伤的特点，进一步研究领面
创伤的致伤机理及综合序列治疗方法及康复措施。
2、三种创伤严重度评分对领面创伤评估的比较
目的研究并比较了三种领面创伤严重度评分方法，以便设
计一种更符合口腔领面创伤专科特点的评分方法。方法从1159
例领面创伤患者中选出院前时间蕊30天、病例资料完整的患者
984例，分别以骨折处数和损伤部位分组，用155、RFISS和MISS
法进行评分，用SPSSll.0统计软件分析。结果MISS法较RFISS
法和155法更能准确地区分领面单处伤和多处伤。对不同部位的
领面部损伤MISS法评估更有临床意义。结论从领面创伤功能损
害的角度而言，MlsS法可以客观准确地评价领面创伤，并对治疗
方法的选择和预后的评估更有临床指导意义。
第四军医大学硕士学位论文
3、领面创伤信息化系统的应用及评价(协作项目)
目的应用领面创伤数据库系统，以评价其科学性及实用性，
以提高领面创伤信息化研究能力和水平。方法将第四军医大学口
腔医学院1996年1月一2002年10月期间所有领面创伤住院患者，
共1159例，分为两组。对每例患者的年龄、性别、伤因、致伤机
制、损伤的部位及特点、合并伤及治疗方法等内容逐一输入数据
库，进行回顾性和前瞻性应用研究，通过黑盒测试，评价及改进
此系统。结果通过使用系统可将领面创伤患者的伤因、伤情、救
治情况录入数据库，进行检索、统计分析和创伤评分研究:通过
网络可实现领面创伤的资源共享和协作研究。结论该系统稳定
性、安全性、兼容性可靠，专科特色明显，统计分析准确，可辅
助通过网络收集标准化的创伤病例研究资料并进行合作科研研
究。
With the modernization in our country, traffic and industry accidents have increased greatly and been the first public danger. Trauma has heavily threatened our survival quality as the "modern social disease". The government has attached great importance to the prevention and treatment of trauma. It was listed as "national 973 Project". The percent of maxillofacial trauma accounts for about 7%~20% of the trauma in the peace times. The treatment of maxillofacial trauma has been paid more and more attention. The epidemiology study in maxillofacial trauma is less; moreover, demographic and social-economic factors greatly influence the results of the study. The purpose of the present study is to ascertain the epidemiological characteristics and provide detail data of maxillofacial trauma by retrospective study of a large number of clinic data in Xi'an and other areas around it. At the same time, we try to objectively and accurately estimate maxillofacial injury severity. It is significative in diagnosis preventi
on and restoration of
maxillofacial injury. The present evaluation method can not effectively evaluate the severity of maxillofacial injury. So we try to probe into a method of maxillofacial injury score according to the specialty of maxillofacial trauma. Besides, we developed our database software and established oral and maxillofacial trauma database in order to evaluate maxillofacial injury objectively and accurately and dynamically.
1 Survey of Epidemiological Characters of Maxillofacial Injuries
Objective: To analyse the epidemiological characteristics of maxillofacial injuries. Method: A retrospective review of maxillofacial trauma patients admitted to the Stomatology Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University from January, 1996 to October, 2002 was done. Data were collected on age, sex, etiology and mechanism of injury, location and clinical characters, associated injuries and treatment. Statistic analysis of the data was done. Results: 1159 patients were reviewed. The majority of victims were males. The male: female ratio was 3.95:1. RTA(road traffic accidents)was the major cause of facial injury, 590(59.92%), followed by assault (19.07%), falls(9.66%), Industrial accidents (7.33%).A large proportion of facial injuries occurred on the lower face. The symphysis of mandible was most frequently damaged, followed by condylar. The most common associated trauma was extremity fractures. Conclusion: Prevention and management of maxillofacial trauma in RTA should be strengthened and its characteristics of multiple injuries should be always be anticipated and identified. Further studies in the mechanism and integrative treatment measures of maxillofacial injury should be done.
2 Comparison of Three Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score Methods in Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
Objective: To design a more reasonable method of evaluating maxillofacial injury severity by retrospective analysis. Method: 984 cases of maxillofacial trauma( <30 days before hospitalization) selected from 1159 cases were grouped by the number of fracture and site of trauma. They were evaluated with ISS, RFISS and MISS respectively. The results of ISS/RFISS/MISS were compared and analyzed with SPSS 11.0 software. Results: MISS could accurately differentiate between single and multiple facial injury. It is more meaningful for evaluating different sites of facial injury than ISS and RFISS. Conclusion: MISS can be used to evaluate maxillofacial injury objectively and accurately.
3 The Application and Testing of Maxillofacial Trauma Database System
Objective: To apply Maxillofacial Trauma Database System and evaluate the scientificalness and practicability of the system. Method: 1159 maxillofacial trauma patients' data admitted to the Stomatology Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University from January, 1996 to October, 2002 were divided in two groups. By applying retrospective and prospective methods, data were inputed in the system, according to age, sex, etiology and mechanism of injury, location and clinical char
第四军医大学硕士学位论文
1、领面创伤患者临床流行病学研究
目的通过大量临床病例资料的流行病学回顾性研究，明确西
安及周边地区领面创伤患者的流行病学特点，为领面创伤的救治提
供较为准确的流行病学资料信息。方法回顾调查第四军医大学口
腔医学院1996年1月一2002年10月期间所有领面创伤住院患者，
创建领面创伤数据库，对每例患者的年龄、性别、伤因、致伤机制、
损伤的部位及特点、合并伤及治疗方法等内容逐一输入数据库，进
行统计分析。结果共收录1159例，男性多于女性，男:女为3.95:
1。交通损伤是主要伤因，共590例(59.92%)，其次暴力损伤221
例(19.07%)，非明确原因跌落伤112例(9.66%)、职业损伤85
例(7.33%)，运动损伤10例(0.86%)，医源性损伤7例(0.60%)。
面下部是最容易受损伤的部位，下领骨骨折中颊部最多，其次为裸
状突。四肢在合并伤中最多发，其次是颅脑和眼。结论应加强交
通事故中领面损伤的防治，注意其多发伤的特点，进一步研究领面
创伤的致伤机理及综合序列治疗方法及康复措施。
2、三种创伤严重度评分对领面创伤评估的比较
目的研究并比较了三种领面创伤严重度评分方法，以便设
计一种更符合口腔领面创伤专科特点的评分方法。方法从1159
例领面创伤患者中选出院前时间蕊30天、病例资料完整的患者
984例，分别以骨折处数和损伤部位分组，用155、RFISS和MISS
法进行评分，用SPSSll.0统计软件分析。结果MISS法较RFISS
法和155法更能准确地区分领面单处伤和多处伤。对不同部位的
领面部损伤MISS法评估更有临床意义。结论从领面创伤功能损
害的角度而言，MlsS法可以客观准确地评价领面创伤，并对治疗
方法的选择和预后的评估更有临床指导意义。
第四军医大学硕士学位论文
3、领面创伤信息化系统的应用及评价(协作项目)
目的应用领面创伤数据库系统，以评价其科学性及实用性，
以提高领面创伤信息化研究能力和水平。方法将第四军医大学口
腔医学院1996年1月一2002年10月期间所有领面创伤住院患者，
共1159例，分为两组。对每例患者的年龄、性别、伤因、致伤机
制、损伤的部位及特点、合并伤及治疗方法等内容逐一输入数据
库，进行回顾性和前瞻性应用研究，通过黑盒测试，评价及改进
此系统。结果通过使用系统可将领面创伤患者的伤因、伤情、救
治情况录入数据库，进行检索、统计分析和创伤评分研究:通过
网络可实现领面创伤的资源共享和协作研究。结论该系统稳定
性、安全性、兼容性可靠，专科特色明显，统计分析准确，可辅
助通过网络收集标准化的创伤病例研究资料并进行合作科研研
究。
With the modernization in our country, traffic and industry accidents have increased greatly and been the first public danger. Trauma has heavily threatened our survival quality as the "modern social disease". The government has attached great importance to the prevention and treatment of trauma. It was listed as "national 973 Project". The percent of maxillofacial trauma accounts for about 7%~20% of the trauma in the peace times. The treatment of maxillofacial trauma has been paid more and more attention. The epidemiology study in maxillofacial trauma is less; moreover, demographic and social-economic factors greatly influence the results of the study. The purpose of the present study is to ascertain the epidemiological characteristics and provide detail data of maxillofacial trauma by retrospective study of a large number of clinic data in Xi'an and other areas around it. At the same time, we try to objectively and accurately estimate maxillofacial injury severity. It is significative in diagnosis preventi
on and restoration of
maxillofacial injury. The present evaluation method can not effectively evaluate the severity of maxillofacial injury. So we try to probe into a method of maxillofacial injury score according to the specialty of maxillofacial trauma. Besides, we developed our database software and established oral and maxillofacial trauma database in order to evaluate maxillofacial injury objectively and accurately and dynamically.
1 Survey of Epidemiological Characters of Maxillofacial Injuries
Objective: To analyse the epidemiological characteristics of maxillofacial injuries. Method: A retrospective review of maxillofacial trauma patients admitted to the Stomatology Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University from January, 1996 to October, 2002 was done. Data were collected on age, sex, etiology and mechanism of injury, location and clinical characters, associated injuries and treatment. Statistic analysis of the data was done. Results: 1159 patients were reviewed. The majority of victims were males. The male: female ratio was 3.95:1. RTA(road traffic accidents)was the major cause of facial injury, 590(59.92%), followed by assault (19.07%), falls(9.66%), Industrial accidents (7.33%).A large proportion of facial injuries occurred on the lower face. The symphysis of mandible was most frequently damaged, followed by condylar. The most common associated trauma was extremity fractures. Conclusion: Prevention and management of maxillofacial trauma in RTA should be strengthened and its characteristics of multiple injuries should be always be anticipated and identified. Further studies in the mechanism and integrative treatment measures of maxillofacial injury should be done.
2 Comparison of Three Maxillofacial Injury Severity Score Methods in Evaluation of Maxillofacial Trauma
Objective: To design a more reasonable method of evaluating maxillofacial injury severity by retrospective analysis. Method: 984 cases of maxillofacial trauma( <30 days before hospitalization) selected from 1159 cases were grouped by the number of fracture and site of trauma. They were evaluated with ISS, RFISS and MISS respectively. The results of ISS/RFISS/MISS were compared and analyzed with SPSS 11.0 software. Results: MISS could accurately differentiate between single and multiple facial injury. It is more meaningful for evaluating different sites of facial injury than ISS and RFISS. Conclusion: MISS can be used to evaluate maxillofacial injury objectively and accurately.
3 The Application and Testing of Maxillofacial Trauma Database System
Objective: To apply Maxillofacial Trauma Database System and evaluate the scientificalness and practicability of the system. Method: 1159 maxillofacial trauma patients' data admitted to the Stomatology Hospital of Fourth Military Medical University from January, 1996 to October, 2002 were divided in two groups. By applying retrospective and prospective methods, data were inputed in the system, according to age, sex, etiology and mechanism of injury, location and clinical char
引文
[1] 洪民 步荣发 李季．建国以来我国颌面创伤临床与研究的回顾与进展．中华口腔医学杂志，1993，28：33-35．
[2] 张益 顾晓明 我国口腔颌面创伤外科的现状与展望．中华口腔医学杂志，2001，36：88-90．
[3] 王翰章．350例口腔颌面部损伤的分析．中华口腔杂志，1960，2：77-81
[4] 张德夫，李秀英，刘秋先．口腔颌面部损伤171报告．中华口腔杂志，1966，12：11-13．
[5] 丁鸿才，周树夏，刘宝林，等．颌面部损伤1389例临床分析．中华口腔杂志，1979，14：6-9
[6] 中国人民解放军口腔颌面专业协作组．颌面部创伤14961例临床分析及救治经验．中华口腔医学杂志，1988，23：204—206．
[7] 张益．颌骨骨折治疗与研究的近代发展与国内现状．口腔颌面外科杂志，1999，9：241-242．
[8] 薄斌，周树夏，顾晓明．AIS-ISS创伤评分法及其在颌面创伤中的应用．中华口腔医学杂志．2001，36(2)：1555—157．
[9] 杨建，石应康，杨宁．中国人重伤住院调查—创伤原因、部位、程度、救治和结局分析．中华创伤杂志，1997，13(6)：329329—332．
[10] 黎鳌，主编．现代创伤学，第1版．北京：人民卫生出版社，1996，184．
[11] 薄斌，顾晓明，周树夏．华西口腔医学杂志，1693名颌面创伤患者临床病例回顾性研究．1998，16(1)：56-58．
[12] Sastry SM, Sastry CM, Paul BK, et al. Leading cause of facial
trauma in the major trauma outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg,1995, 95:196.
[13] Anwar B. Bataineh,BDS,MScD, CSOS. Etiology and incidence maxillofacial fractures in the north of Jordan, 1998, 86:31-35.
[14] C.Oji.Jaw fracture in Enugu Nigeria, 1985-95. British J of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1999,37:106-109.
[15] G. J.van Beek,C.A Merkx Change in the pattern of fractures of the maxillofacial skeleton. Int J.Oral Maxillofac. Surg.1999, 28: 424-428.
[16] Ogundare BO, Bonnick A, Bayley N. Pattern of mandibular fractures in an urban major trauma center. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;61(6):713-8.
[17] 薄斌、周树夏等．颌面创伤患者心理健康水平流行病学调查．中华口腔医学杂志．2001，36(9)：382-384．
[18] 刘宝林，顾晓明．口腔颌面外科学．第1版 辽宁科学技术出版社 2000，153
[19] 何黎升；葛成等．1168例颌面部交通伤伤情分析．中华创伤杂志 2001．01．15；17(1)：42-44
[20] 蒋建群；全伟兴．颌面部骨折235例临床分析．实用新医学 2001．12．15；3(12)：1073-1074．
[21] 周志道．创伤评分．中华创伤杂志，2001，17(3)：133—134．
[22] 石照辉，封兴华，周树夏．颌面创伤严重度定量评分研究．2003，13(1)：44-46．
[23] Champion HR, et al. Trauma score. Crit Care Med,1981,9:672.
[24] Koehler J J, et al. Prehospital index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med, 1986, 15:178.
[25] Champion HR, Sacco WJ,Copes WS. Arevision of the trauma score[J]J.Trauma. 1989, 29:623.
[26] Association for the Advancement for Automotive Medicine. The abbreviated injury score,1990 Revision. 1st ed.IL: Des Plaibe, 1991,1-13.
[27] Bsker SP, O'Neill B,Haddon W, et al .The injury severity score: a method for describing patient with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma, 1974, 14:187-196。
[28] 谭宗奎．医院内创伤评分体系及国内应用现状．中国实用外科杂志．1996，16(12)：760-732．
[29] Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WJ, et al. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma, 1990,30:539.
[30] Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WJ, et al. Injury severity scoring again. J Trauma, 1996,41:380-383.
[31] Bouillon B, Lefering R, Vorweg M, et al.Trauma score systems: cologne validation study, J Trauma, 1997,42:652-658.
[32] Senkowski CK, Mc Kenney MG. Trauma scoring systems: a review. J Am Coll Surg, 1999,189:491-503.
[33] Osier T, Rutledge R, Dies J, et al. ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Tranma,1996, 41:380-388.
[34] Osler T, Baker SP, long A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplified scoring. J Trauma, 1997, 43:922-926.
[35] 周志道．中华医学会创伤学会全国首届创伤评分研讨会纪要．中华创伤杂志，1992，8：375-377．
[36] 陈维庭．首届全国多发伤学术会议纪要．中华创伤杂志，1994，10：30-32．
[37] 谭宗奎，陈庄洪，唐运章，等．RISS法回顾分析验证2436例创伤病例报告．中华创伤杂志，1995，11：316-317．
[38]周毅，王智，王晓昕，等．1016例伤员损伤程度评分法与创伤严重度改良评分法比较．中华创伤杂志，1999，15：386-387．
[39]薄斌，顾晓明，周树夏 颌面部创伤严重度评价的改进实用口腔医学杂志2000 16：178-180．
[40]薄斌 周树夏 顾晓明 建立具有专科特点的颌面部损伤判定标准的探讨．中华创伤杂志 2001 17：440．
[41]叶炳飞，杨旭东，徐明耀，等．颌面部损伤量化评分的临床研究．口腔医学纵横杂志，1996，12(1)：6-9．
[42]葛成，何黎生，顾晓明．1702例颌面部损伤严重度的量化研究．中华创伤杂志，2001，17(2)：71-73．
[43]VicholasJ.V.Hogg,BSc,MScDDS et al.epidemiology of maxillofacial injury at trauma hospitals in Ontario Canada between 1992 and 1997. J trauma, 49:425-431。
[44]Virginia huang,MD. Carmen Moore,MD. et al. Maxillofacial Injury in Women. Annals of Surgery, 1998, 41:482-484.
[45]Richard H.Hang DDS, et al. An Epidemiologic Survey of Facial Fracture and Concomitant Injuries. J Oral Maxillofac surg, 1991, 48:926-932.
[46]刘桂才，周树夏，张鸣，等．下颌骨撞击伤对颞下颌关节紊乱病及关节强直发生的影响．中国临床康复．2002，6(21)：3176-3177．
[47]王正国．创伤与康复．中国临床康复．2002，6(2)：156．
[48]Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The abbreviative injury scale, 1990 revision. Des Plaines Ⅲ, 1990 1-74.
[49]Cannell H, Paterson A, Loukota R. Maxillofacial injuries in multiply injured patients. Br J oral Maxillofac Surg, 1996, 34:303
[50]葛成，何黎升，顾晓明等．改良面部损伤严重度评分法评价颌面部创伤1134例．中华创伤杂志，2001，17(2)：275-276．
[51]Knaus WA, Draper ER, Wager DP, et al. The APACHE Ⅳ prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critical ill hospitalized adults. Chest, 1991, 100:1619-1639
[52]周继红，尹志勇，朱佩芳，等．计算机创伤评分软件及创伤病例数据库的研制．中华创伤杂志，1998，14：142
[53]《中国人创伤数据库》结构和管理系统设计方案．《中国人创伤数据库建设》 专家联席会议制定，2000，7．http://www.traumachina.org/base_structl.pdf
[54]丁宝康，董健全．数据库实用教程．北京：清华大学出版社，2001，9：231
[55]柴治国，张少峰，张寿华，等．口腔修复科信息管理系统软件的设计与开发．医疗卫生装备，2003，24(4)：18-20
[56]邵海林．医院信息系统的开发与应用．解放军医院管理杂志，2001，8(5)：386-387
[57]刘彦普，顾晓明，张益．全国第二次口腔颌面创伤专题研讨会会议纪要．中华口腔医学杂志，2001，36：91-93．
[58]Jones J.M., Redmond A.D. and Templeton J. Uses and abuses of statistical models for evaluating trauma care. J Trauma. 1995; 38(1): 89-93.
[59]封兴华，石照辉，周树夏，等．颌面创伤资料信息化及其管理的整体构建及应用．中国新医药，2004,3(3)：14-16
[60]Knaus WA,Draper ER, Wager DP, et al. The APACHE Ⅳ prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critical ill hospitalized adults[J]. Chest, 1991,100:1619.
[61]Huelke DF, Campton AC. Facial injuries in automobile crashes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1983, 41:241.
[2] 张益 顾晓明 我国口腔颌面创伤外科的现状与展望．中华口腔医学杂志，2001，36：88-90．
[3] 王翰章．350例口腔颌面部损伤的分析．中华口腔杂志，1960，2：77-81
[4] 张德夫，李秀英，刘秋先．口腔颌面部损伤171报告．中华口腔杂志，1966，12：11-13．
[5] 丁鸿才，周树夏，刘宝林，等．颌面部损伤1389例临床分析．中华口腔杂志，1979，14：6-9
[6] 中国人民解放军口腔颌面专业协作组．颌面部创伤14961例临床分析及救治经验．中华口腔医学杂志，1988，23：204—206．
[7] 张益．颌骨骨折治疗与研究的近代发展与国内现状．口腔颌面外科杂志，1999，9：241-242．
[8] 薄斌，周树夏，顾晓明．AIS-ISS创伤评分法及其在颌面创伤中的应用．中华口腔医学杂志．2001，36(2)：1555—157．
[9] 杨建，石应康，杨宁．中国人重伤住院调查—创伤原因、部位、程度、救治和结局分析．中华创伤杂志，1997，13(6)：329329—332．
[10] 黎鳌，主编．现代创伤学，第1版．北京：人民卫生出版社，1996，184．
[11] 薄斌，顾晓明，周树夏．华西口腔医学杂志，1693名颌面创伤患者临床病例回顾性研究．1998，16(1)：56-58．
[12] Sastry SM, Sastry CM, Paul BK, et al. Leading cause of facial
trauma in the major trauma outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg,1995, 95:196.
[13] Anwar B. Bataineh,BDS,MScD, CSOS. Etiology and incidence maxillofacial fractures in the north of Jordan, 1998, 86:31-35.
[14] C.Oji.Jaw fracture in Enugu Nigeria, 1985-95. British J of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1999,37:106-109.
[15] G. J.van Beek,C.A Merkx Change in the pattern of fractures of the maxillofacial skeleton. Int J.Oral Maxillofac. Surg.1999, 28: 424-428.
[16] Ogundare BO, Bonnick A, Bayley N. Pattern of mandibular fractures in an urban major trauma center. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;61(6):713-8.
[17] 薄斌、周树夏等．颌面创伤患者心理健康水平流行病学调查．中华口腔医学杂志．2001，36(9)：382-384．
[18] 刘宝林，顾晓明．口腔颌面外科学．第1版 辽宁科学技术出版社 2000，153
[19] 何黎升；葛成等．1168例颌面部交通伤伤情分析．中华创伤杂志 2001．01．15；17(1)：42-44
[20] 蒋建群；全伟兴．颌面部骨折235例临床分析．实用新医学 2001．12．15；3(12)：1073-1074．
[21] 周志道．创伤评分．中华创伤杂志，2001，17(3)：133—134．
[22] 石照辉，封兴华，周树夏．颌面创伤严重度定量评分研究．2003，13(1)：44-46．
[23] Champion HR, et al. Trauma score. Crit Care Med,1981,9:672.
[24] Koehler J J, et al. Prehospital index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med, 1986, 15:178.
[25] Champion HR, Sacco WJ,Copes WS. Arevision of the trauma score[J]J.Trauma. 1989, 29:623.
[26] Association for the Advancement for Automotive Medicine. The abbreviated injury score,1990 Revision. 1st ed.IL: Des Plaibe, 1991,1-13.
[27] Bsker SP, O'Neill B,Haddon W, et al .The injury severity score: a method for describing patient with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma, 1974, 14:187-196。
[28] 谭宗奎．医院内创伤评分体系及国内应用现状．中国实用外科杂志．1996，16(12)：760-732．
[29] Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WJ, et al. A new characterization of injury severity. J Trauma, 1990,30:539.
[30] Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Copes WJ, et al. Injury severity scoring again. J Trauma, 1996,41:380-383.
[31] Bouillon B, Lefering R, Vorweg M, et al.Trauma score systems: cologne validation study, J Trauma, 1997,42:652-658.
[32] Senkowski CK, Mc Kenney MG. Trauma scoring systems: a review. J Am Coll Surg, 1999,189:491-503.
[33] Osier T, Rutledge R, Dies J, et al. ICISS: an international classification of disease-9 based injury severity score. J Tranma,1996, 41:380-388.
[34] Osler T, Baker SP, long A modification of the injury severity score that both improves accuracy and simplified scoring. J Trauma, 1997, 43:922-926.
[35] 周志道．中华医学会创伤学会全国首届创伤评分研讨会纪要．中华创伤杂志，1992，8：375-377．
[36] 陈维庭．首届全国多发伤学术会议纪要．中华创伤杂志，1994，10：30-32．
[37] 谭宗奎，陈庄洪，唐运章，等．RISS法回顾分析验证2436例创伤病例报告．中华创伤杂志，1995，11：316-317．
[38]周毅，王智，王晓昕，等．1016例伤员损伤程度评分法与创伤严重度改良评分法比较．中华创伤杂志，1999，15：386-387．
[39]薄斌，顾晓明，周树夏 颌面部创伤严重度评价的改进实用口腔医学杂志2000 16：178-180．
[40]薄斌 周树夏 顾晓明 建立具有专科特点的颌面部损伤判定标准的探讨．中华创伤杂志 2001 17：440．
[41]叶炳飞，杨旭东，徐明耀，等．颌面部损伤量化评分的临床研究．口腔医学纵横杂志，1996，12(1)：6-9．
[42]葛成，何黎生，顾晓明．1702例颌面部损伤严重度的量化研究．中华创伤杂志，2001，17(2)：71-73．
[43]VicholasJ.V.Hogg,BSc,MScDDS et al.epidemiology of maxillofacial injury at trauma hospitals in Ontario Canada between 1992 and 1997. J trauma, 49:425-431。
[44]Virginia huang,MD. Carmen Moore,MD. et al. Maxillofacial Injury in Women. Annals of Surgery, 1998, 41:482-484.
[45]Richard H.Hang DDS, et al. An Epidemiologic Survey of Facial Fracture and Concomitant Injuries. J Oral Maxillofac surg, 1991, 48:926-932.
[46]刘桂才，周树夏，张鸣，等．下颌骨撞击伤对颞下颌关节紊乱病及关节强直发生的影响．中国临床康复．2002，6(21)：3176-3177．
[47]王正国．创伤与康复．中国临床康复．2002，6(2)：156．
[48]Association for the Advancement of Automotive Medicine. The abbreviative injury scale, 1990 revision. Des Plaines Ⅲ, 1990 1-74.
[49]Cannell H, Paterson A, Loukota R. Maxillofacial injuries in multiply injured patients. Br J oral Maxillofac Surg, 1996, 34:303
[50]葛成，何黎升，顾晓明等．改良面部损伤严重度评分法评价颌面部创伤1134例．中华创伤杂志，2001，17(2)：275-276．
[51]Knaus WA, Draper ER, Wager DP, et al. The APACHE Ⅳ prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critical ill hospitalized adults. Chest, 1991, 100:1619-1639
[52]周继红，尹志勇，朱佩芳，等．计算机创伤评分软件及创伤病例数据库的研制．中华创伤杂志，1998，14：142
[53]《中国人创伤数据库》结构和管理系统设计方案．《中国人创伤数据库建设》 专家联席会议制定，2000，7．http://www.traumachina.org/base_structl.pdf
[54]丁宝康，董健全．数据库实用教程．北京：清华大学出版社，2001，9：231
[55]柴治国，张少峰，张寿华，等．口腔修复科信息管理系统软件的设计与开发．医疗卫生装备，2003，24(4)：18-20
[56]邵海林．医院信息系统的开发与应用．解放军医院管理杂志，2001，8(5)：386-387
[57]刘彦普，顾晓明，张益．全国第二次口腔颌面创伤专题研讨会会议纪要．中华口腔医学杂志，2001，36：91-93．
[58]Jones J.M., Redmond A.D. and Templeton J. Uses and abuses of statistical models for evaluating trauma care. J Trauma. 1995; 38(1): 89-93.
[59]封兴华，石照辉，周树夏，等．颌面创伤资料信息化及其管理的整体构建及应用．中国新医药，2004,3(3)：14-16
[60]Knaus WA,Draper ER, Wager DP, et al. The APACHE Ⅳ prognostic system: Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critical ill hospitalized adults[J]. Chest, 1991,100:1619.
[61]Huelke DF, Campton AC. Facial injuries in automobile crashes. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1983, 41:241.