上海市居家养老老年人自我照护缺陷理论模型的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
一、研究目的
     目前,上海市是全国老龄化程度最高的城市,居家养老是其主要养老模式。老年人因为各方面的原因,存在自我照护缺陷,需要他人活社会提供不同程度的照护,因而,成为居家养老中需重点关注的问题。本研究基于居家养老的大背景下,旨在探寻老年人自我照护缺陷的构成要素和影响因素,以期为社区护理人员制定有针对性的护理干预措施提供理论依据。
     二、研究方法
     本研究主要分为二大部分:
     (一)第一部分:上海市居家养老老年人自我照护缺陷的探索性研究
     该部分研究根据扎根理论方法论原则,采用目的抽样、理论抽样、滚雪球抽样的方法,对上海市居家养老老年人进行深入访谈和参与式观察等质性研究的方法,对老年人自我照护缺陷的感知、体验等进行研究。所有访谈均进行录音,并整理成word文字文档,采用质性研究资料分析软件Nvivo8中文版对收集的资料进行整理,通过运用开放式编码、主轴式编码和选择式编码的策略析出主题。
     (二)第二阶段:上海市居家养老老年人自我照护缺陷的量性研究
     根据前期质性的研究结果,选取研究变量及合适的测评工具,对老年人自我照护缺陷的构成要素及影响因素展开研究。采用方便抽样的方法选取上海市居家养老老年人进行量性研究;使用SPSS17.0软件做统计分析,了解上海市居家养老老年人自我照护缺陷的水平和相关因素的影响作用。
     三、研究结果
     (1)质性研究
     本研究运用扎根理论的研究方法,对上百名老年人进行了参与式观察以及对15名老年人进行了深度访谈,访谈时间总计1225分钟,平均81.6分钟;访谈资料转录文字及田野笔记共十万多余字,最终形成上海市居家养老老年人自我照顾缺陷的理论框架如下图所示:
     自我照护缺陷的理论模型共四个构成要素,即:自我存在延续的缺陷、自我健康恢复的缺陷、自我健康维护的缺陷和自我社会发展的缺陷。自我照护缺陷的影响因素可分为个人因素(个人社会学特征、健康状况、健康/疾病知识、老化自我感知、生活经历)和环境因素(物理环境和社会支持)。四个构成要素之间是动态发展并相互影响的。
     (2)量性研究
     1.上海市居家养老老年人自我存在延续的缺陷得分为(8.731.72)分,处于轻度缺陷水平;自我社会发展的缺陷得分(7.342.74)分,处于中度缺陷水平。老年人的自觉健康得分均值为(3.070.63)分,处于中等水平的健康;健康/疾病知识得分(5.671.34)分,处于不理想的水平;社会支持得分为(7.041.22)分,处于较为理想的水平。
     2.对上海市居家养老老年人自我存在延续的缺陷的单因素分析后,老年人的自我存在延续的缺陷得分按年龄、性别、养育子女、患病情况、宗教信仰、婚姻状态和家庭月收入分组差异有统计学意义,与其健康状况、健康/疾病知识和社会支持具有相关性。再进一步地进行逐步回归分析后得出,自我存在延续的缺陷的主要影响因素有年龄(=-0.206)、性别(=-0.115)、健康状况(=0.184)、健康/疾病知识(=0.260)和社会支持(=0.172)。
     3.对上海市居家养老老年人自我社会发展的缺陷的单因素分析后,老年人的自我发展缺陷的缺陷得分按年龄、性别、婚姻状态、文化程度、患病情况、医保形式、月家庭收入、宗教信仰和养育子女分组差异有统计学意义,与其健康状况、健康/疾病知识和社会支持具有相关性,再进一步地进行逐步回归分析后得出,自我社会发展的缺陷的主要影响因素有年龄(=-0.262)、健康状况(=0.151)、健康/疾病知识(=0.338)和社会支持(=0.141)。
     四、结论
     构建了上海市居家养老老年人自我照护缺陷的理论框架,说明了自我照护缺陷的基本构成要素及影响因素,为社区护理人员实施有针对性的护理干预措施提供理论依据。
Objective: Shanghai has the highest percentage of aging population in China, and home care is themost important models for the aged. The elderly have self-care deficits due to various reasons, andneed different levels of care from others. This study aims to explore the components andinfluencing factors of self-care defects of the home dwelling elderly’s in Shanghai, to furtherprovide theory basis for nursing interventions regarding home care.
     Methods: The first phase of this study was carried out to explore components of self-care deficitsby interviewing home dwelling elderly. A purposive sampling strategy incorporated with theoreticalsampling and snowball sampling was used to recruit participants from6communities in Shanghai.A total of15elderly were interviewed.They were asked to tell their experiences regard toself-deficits, including their perceptions of self-deficits and how they acted to ensure theirself-deficits. All the interviews were recorded on digital recorders, and then transcribed into worddocuments. Nvivi8.0was used to analyse data. Important themes of experience of home dwellingelderly were extracted through open, axial and selective coding strategy guided by the groundedtheory.
     Based on the results of the first phase, the second phase employed a quantitative design toexamine the levels of self-care defects of home dwelling elderly and relevant influencing factors.In this phase, data was collected by a cross-sectional survey in Shanghai. Therefore, the instrumentfor the survey was developed including the General information scale, the Self Perceptions ofHealth Scale, the Life Habits, and the Health Quotient Scale. SPSS17.0was adopted to establishdatabase and analysis.
     Results:
     1. The conceptual model of self-care defects was initially developed with four dimensions:continuity of self-survival deficits, self-health recovery deficits, self-health maintenance deficitsand self-social development deficits, the factors of self-deficit were personal and environmentalfactors.
     2. The self-survival deficits score of home dwelling elderly in Shanghai was (8.73±1.72), theself-social development deficits deficits score was (7.34±2.74).
     3. Age, gender, health status, health/diseases knowledge, and social support were found to bestatistically significantly associated with self-survival deficits.
     4. Age, health status, health knowledge, and social support had statistically significantcorrelations with self-social development deficits.
     Conclusion: A theoretical framework for self-deficits of home dewelling elderly was developed,which would guide the development of strategies for home care.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国国家统计局.2010年第六次全国人口普查主要数据公报(第1号)[EB/OL].
    [2011-4-28]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjgb/rkpcgb/qgrkpcgb/t20110428_402722232.htm.
    [2] Valmi D,Bergquist-Beringer S, Zauszniewski JA.Reliability, validity and factorstructure of the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale–Revised (ASAS-R)[J]. J Eval ClinPract,2010,16(6):1031–1040.
    [3] Orem, D.E. Nursing: concepts of practice [M].2th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill BookCompany,1980:230-232.
    [4]刘惠湖,陈玉敏.自我照顾之概念分析[J].《慈济护理杂志》,2000,3(1):8-13.
    [5] OREM, D.E. Nursing concepts of practice[M].6th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby,2001:542.
    [6] Kearny B, Fleischer B. Development of an instrument measure exercise of self-care agency[J]. ResNurs Health,1979,2(1):25-34.
    [7] Lorensen M. Psychometric properties of self-care management and life-qualityamongst elderly[J]. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing,1998,2(2):78-75.
    [8] Almeida MH, de Pinho Spínola AW, Iwamizu PS, et al. Reliability of the Instrument forClassifying Elderly People’s Capacity for Self-care [J]. Rev Saude Publica,2008,42(2):1-6.
    [9] Evers GC, Isenberg MA, Philipsen H, et al. Validity testing of the Dutch translation of theappraisal of self-care agency ASA scale[J]. Int J Nurs Stud,1993,30(4):331-342.
    [10] P rn I. Health and adaptedness[J].Theor Med.1993,14(4):295-303.
    [11]S derhamn O, EK A.-C., P rn I. The Self-care Ability Scale for the Elderly [J]. Scand. J. Occup.Ther,1996,3(2):69-78.
    [12] Linda Coyle R. Information retrieval of self-care and dependent-care agents usingnetwellness, a consumer health information network[D]. Cincinnati: University ofCincinnati,2000.
    [13] Lorensen M. Effects on elderly women's self-care in case of acute hospitalization ascompared with men[J]. Health Care Women Int,1985,6(4):247-265.
    [14] S derhamn O, Evers G, Hamrin E. A Swedish version of the appraisal of Self-CareAgency (ASA) scale [J].Scand J Caring Sci,1996,10(1):3-9.
    [15] Lorensen M, Holter IM, Evers GC, et al. Cross-cultural testing of the "appraisal ofself-care agency: ASA scale" in Norway[J]. Int J Nurs Stud,1993,30(1):15-23.
    [16] Sousa VD, Zauszniewski JA, Bergquist-Beringer S, et al. Reliability, validity andfactor structure of the Appraisal of Self-Care Agency Scale-Revised (ASAS-R)[J]. J EvalClin Pract,2010,16(6):1031-1040.
    [17] Ruland CM, Kresevic D, Lorensen M. Including patient preferences in nurses’assessment of older patients [J]. J Clin Nurs,1997,6(6):495-504.
    [18] Fok MS, Alexander MF, Wong TK, et al. Contextualising the appraisal of Self-careAgency Scale in Hong Kong[J]. Contemp Nurse,2002,12(2):124-134.
    [19] Wang HH, Laffrey SC. Preliminary development and testing of instruments tomeasure self-care agency and social support of women in Taiwan[J]. Kaohsiung J MedSci,2000,16(9):459-467.
    [20]杨支兰,孙建萍,姚太平,等.汾阳市城区老年人的自我护理能力及其影响因素研究[J].护理研究(下旬版),2010,24(2):488-489.
    [1]截至2011年底中国60岁以上人口达1.85亿.[EB/OL].[2012/03/04].http://news.laoren.cn/news/v181875.html.
    [2]全国老龄办.《我国城市居家养老服务研究》新闻发布稿.[EB/OL].[2011/06/13].http://www.cncaprc.gov.cn/info/156.html.
    [3]上海老龄网.上海发布2010年老年人口信息[EB/OL].[2011/04/18].http://www.shanghai60.org.cn/content.php?id=278.
    [4]上海民政.2011年上海市老年人口和老龄事业监测统计信息[EB/OL].[2011/03/31].http://mzj.sh.gov.cn/gb/shmzj/node8/node194/userobject1ai32031.html.
    [5]东方网-文汇报.上海致力构建―9073‖养老格局.[EB/OL].[2010/03/25].http://news.sina.com.cn/c/2007-10-20/094012759450s.shtml.
    [6]解放日报.上海应对人口高速老龄化调查:居家养老和老龄产业[EB/OL].[2008/04/18].http://www.shanghaigss.org.cn/news_view.asp?newsid=5141.
    [7] Manton KG, Land KC. Multidimensional disability/mortality trajectories at age65and over:The impact of state dependence[J]. Social Indicators Research,1999,51,193-221.
    [8] Kendig H, Browing CJ, Young AE. Impact of illness and disability on the well-being of theolder people[J]. Disability and Rehabilitation,2000,22(1/2),15-22.
    [9] Chou KL, Chi I. Reciprocal relationship between fear of falling and depression in elderlyChinese primary care patients[J]. Aging&mental health,2008,12(5),587-594.
    [10]施志云.老年人药物不良反应与用药原则[J].中国误诊学杂志,2008,8(30),7551-7552.
    [11]林延君.居民失能相关健康状态评价[J].中国卫生经济,2004,23(5),37-39.
    [12]党俊武.盛世危情:失能老年人口浪潮考验中国的社会安全网[EB/OL].[2008/9/9].http://www.shanghaigss.org.cn/news_view.asp?newsid=5517.
    [13]彭展琼,失能老人照顾者的社会支持研究——以广州经验为例[D].天津:天津师范大学,2010.
    [14] National Alliance for Careging and AARP.Caregiving in the US.[EB/OL].[2010/8/30].www.caregiving.org/data/04execsumm.pdf.
    [15] Navaie-Waliser M, Feldman PH, Gould DA, Levine C, Kuerbis AN, Donelan K. When thecaregiver needs care: the plight of vulnerable caregivers[J]. Am J Public Health,2002,92(3),409-413.
    [16]赵国琴,戚雯琰,黄晓玉,万欢儿,章金媛,魏淑萍.城镇社区老年人家庭护理研究[J].护理学杂志,2006,21(03),62-63.
    [17]吕桦,田晓燕,倪宗瓒.安徽省60岁以上老年人的家庭医疗需求及影响因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2001,21(08),91-92.
    [18]谁为未富先老的中国养老.[EB/OL].[2011/08/08].http://www.shanghaigss.org.cn/news_view.asp?newsid=4644.
    [19]黄成礼.人口老龄化对卫生费用增长的影响.[J].中国人口科学,2004,4,36-643.
    [20]姜安丽.护理理论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:82.
    [21] OREM DE. Nursing concepts of practice[M].6th ed. Saint Louis: Mosby,2001:542.
    [22]曾友燕,王志红,吕伟波,徐红梅,顾文娟.上海某社区老年人家庭护理需求的调查分析[J].解放军护理杂志,2008,25(03),31-33.
    [23]曾友燕,王志红,吕伟波,周兰姝.老年人对专业家庭护理服务需求的质性研究[J].中国实用护理杂志,2006,22(22),9-10.
    [24]姜安丽.护理理论[M],北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:72-74.
    [25] Orem DE. Nursing concepts of practice[M],2ed ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company,1980:230-232.
    [26] Kearney BY, Fleischer BJ. Development of an instrument to measure exercise of self-careagency[J]. Res Nurs Health,1979,2(1),25-34.
    [27] Lorensen M. Psychometric properties of self-care management and life-quality amongstelderly[J]. Clinical Effectiveness in Nursing,1998,2(2),78-75.
    [28] Almeida MH, de Pinho Spinola AW, Iwamizu PS, Okura RI, Barroso LP, Lima AC.
    [Reliability of the instrument for classifying elderly people's capacity for self-care][J]. RevSaude Publica,2008,42(2),317-323.
    [29] Evers GC IMA, Philipsen H ea. Validity testing of the Dutch translation of the appraisal ofself-care agency ASA scale[J]. Int J Nurs Stud,1993,30(4),331-342.
    [30] McBride SH. Comparative analys is of three instruments designed to measure self-careagency[J]. Nurs Res,1991,40(1),12-16.
    [31]耿桂灵,梁涛.自我护理能力的概念和测评方法的研究进展[J].护理研究(上旬版),2006,20.(01),4-6.
    [32]中国政府门户网站.中华人民共和国老年人权益保障法.[EB/OL].[2005/08/04]http://www.gov.cn/banshi/2005-08/04/content_20203.htm.
    [33] Funk IK. Funk&Wagnalls New Standard Dictionary of the English Language[M].NewYork:Funk&Wagnalls,1942:278.
    [34] Lenihan AA. Indentification of self-care behaviors in the eldery: A nursing assessment tool[J].Journal of Professional Nursing,1988,4,285-288.
    [35]姜安丽.新编护理学基础[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006:15.
    [36] Orem D. Nursing concepts of practice(6th ed.)[M]. St.Louis. MO:Mosby,2001:542.
    [37]姜安丽.护理理论[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:68-88.
    [38] Helen Cook Erickson, Evelyn Malcolm Tomlin, Mary Ann Price Swain. Modeling and rolemodeling: a theory and paradigm for nursing[M].Prentice-Hall,1983:120-127.
    [39] Hirschfeld MJ. Self care potential: is it present?[J]. Journal of gerontological nursing,1985,11(8),28-34.
    [40] Geyer E. Self-care issues for the elderly[J]. Dimensions in oncology nursing: journal of theDivision of Nursing,1990,4(2),33-35.
    [41]辞海[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,1999:5307.
    [42] Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for QualitativeResearch[M].Chicago: Aldine,1967:154-156.
    [43] Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists.[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge UniversityPress,1987:5.
    [44] Strauss A, Corbin J. Basic of Qualitation Research: Grounded theory procedures&techniques[M].Newbury Oaks,CA: Sage.1990:12-29.
    [45]格拉泽著.费小冬译.扎根理论研究概述:自然呈现于生硬促成[M]. Mill Valley, USA:社会学出版社,2009:5-108.
    [46] Strauss A&C, J. Basic of Qualitation Research: Grounded theory procedures&techniques[M].Thous&s Oaks,CA: Sage,1990:12-29.
    [47]刘明.护理质性研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:40-43.
    [48] Lofland J, Lofland L. Analyzing social settings:A guide to qualitative observation andanalys is[M]. Belmont,CA:Wadswoth,1984:12-19.
    [49]凯西·卡麦兹(Kathy Charmaz)著.建构扎根理论:质性研究实践指南[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:34.
    [50] Glaser B SA. The discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for Qualitative Research[M].Chicago: Aldine,1967:61-62.
    [51]徐宗国.质性研究概论[M].台北:巨流,1997:209.
    [52] Glaser BG. Doing grounded theory:Issues and discussion[M]. Mill Valley. USA:SociologyPress,1998:1-254.
    [53]凯西·卡麦兹(Kathy Charmaz)著.建构扎根理论:质性研究实践指南[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2009:77-85.
    [54]安晓敏.扎根法及其对教育研究的启示[M].上海:上海教育科研,2006:28.
    [55] Strauss A CJ. Basic of Qualitation Research: Grounded theory procedures&techniques[M].Newbury Oaks,CA: Sage,1990:79.
    [56]刘明.护理质性研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:40-43.
    [57] Strauss A. Qualitative analysis for social scientists[M],CAmbridge:Cambridge UniversityPress,1987:58-64.
    [58] Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research:Grounded theroy procedures andtechniques[M].2nd ed. Thousand Oaks,CA: Sage,1998:128.
    [59]陈向明.扎根理论的思路和方法[J].教育研究与实验,1999,(4),58-63.
    [60]刘明.护理质性研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:142-146.
    [61] T The national Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical andBehavioral Research.Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection ofhuman subjects of research[M]. Washington,DC:Department of Health and Human Services,1979:118.
    [62]章志光.社会心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1997:73.
    [63]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典[M].第二版.北京:商务印书馆,1983:1327.
    [64]邹继华.老年护理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2009:62.
    [65]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典[M].第二版.北京:商务印书馆,1983:499.
    [66]李萍,宋长爱.中国居民就医行为研究进展[J].护理研究,2010,(17),1507-1509.
    [67] Helv KEDK.. Conceptual aIlalysis of compIiance.[J]. Clin Nurs,2000,9,5-12.
    [68]林正秋.中国饮食大辞典[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,1991:288.
    [69]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典[M].第二版.北京:商务印书馆,1983:1195.
    [70]张理义.临床心理学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2008:416.
    [71]穆光宗.老年发展论-21世纪成功老龄化战略的基本框架[J].人口研究,2002,29-37.
    [72]林传鼎.心理学大辞典[M].江西:江西科学技术出版社,1986:173.
    [73]朱智贤.心理学大辞典[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1989:316.
    [74]殷磊.老年护理学[M].第二版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2001:31.
    [75]吴小桃,刘旭峰.社会支持的本质及其测定[J].中国社会医学,1995,13(03),7-10.
    [76]弗兰克·戈布尔(Frank Goble).第三思潮:马斯洛心理学[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1987:12.
    [77]王莉莉.中国老年人社会参与的理论、实证与政策研究综述[J].人口与发展,2011,(03),35-43.
    [78] Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between humanpapillomavirus and cervical cancer[J]. J Clin Pathol,2002,55(4),244-265.
    [79]方积乾.现代医学统计学[M].北京.人民卫生出版社,2002:129.
    [80] Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, Cloutier R, Dion SA, St-Michel G. Socialconsequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessmentof handicap[J]. Int J Rehabil Res,1998,21(2),127-141.
    [81] Figueiredo S, Korner-Bitensky N, Rochette A, Desrosiers J. Use of the LIFE-H in strokerehabilitation: a structured review of its psychometric properties[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2010,32(9),705-712.
    [82] Gagnon C, Mathieu J, Noreau L. Measurement of participation in myotonic dystrophy:reliability of the LIFE-H[J]. Neuromuscul Disord,2006,16(4),262-268.
    [83] Desrosiers J NL, Robichaud L FP, Rochette A VC. Validity of the Assessment of Life Habits(LIFE-H) in older adults[J]. J Rehabil Med,2004,(36),177–182.
    [84] Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors oflong-term participation after stroke[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2006,28(4),221-230.
    [85] Desrosiers J, Noreau L, Rochette A, Bourbonnais D, Bravo G, Bourget A. Predictors oflong-term participation after stroke[J]. Disabil Rehabil,2006,28(4),221-230.
    [86] Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE. Communication: The MOS short-form general healthsurvey[J]. Medical Care,1988,26(7),724-732.
    [87]李春香,社区老人日常生活功能、自觉健康状态、忧郁态与自杀意念之相关性探讨[D],台湾:辅英科技大学,2007.
    [88]谢华真.健商HQ[M].北京:中国社会出版社,2009:1-2.
    [89]吕伟波.健康商数概述[J].上海护理,2007,7(5),82-83.
    [90]周国琴,张芳,张辉,唐燕,曾令丹,张萌.护理人员的健康商数调查与分析[J].护理与康复,2011,(04),289-290+293.
    [91]曾德建,出院后脑卒中患者日常生活活动和社会参与及其影响因素的研究[D],广州:中山大学,2008.
    [92]朱微微,郭岩.老年人长期护理需求及其影响因素的实证分析[J].中国护理管理,2010,(12),57-60.
    [93]王梅华,杨基然.老年人日常生活能力依赖的相关因素分析[J].中国公共卫生,2002,(03),107-109.
    [94]廖红.老年人日常生活能力与抑郁的关系[J].中国老年学杂志,2011,(13),2539-2540.
    [95]顾大男,曾毅.1992~2002年中国老年人生活自理能力变化研究[J].人口与经济,2006,(04),9-13.
    [96]章美娟,周小军,袁兆康,阮世颖.社区老年人日常生活能力评价与影响因素分析[J].中国全科医学,2007,10(24),2106-2108.
    [97]李宗华,李伟峰,高功敬.城市老年人社区参与意愿的影响因素分析[J].山东社会科学,2011,(03),112-117.
    [98]孟祥臻,翟庆峰,刘晓冬等.农村老年人健康知识知晓现状及影响因素分析[J].中国农村卫生事业管理,2008,28(10),793-795.
    [99]徐红丽.聊城城区东姚社区老年人健康状况调查分析[J].护理学杂志,2004,19(19),10-12.
    [100]赵和丹,王金龙,唐建良,漆文烨.嘉兴地区老年人社会支持及其影响因素分析[J].现代实用医学,2011,23(09),988-990.
    [101]杨宗传.人口老龄化与社会老年学的发展[J].医学与社会,2000,13(05),29-30+33.
    [102]季坚,张华,耿青.老年抑郁状态与日常生活能力的相关性分析[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2007,(11),1031-1032.
    [103]钮建中,卫志华,高玉珍,夏昭林.上海市某社区老年人精神健康及影响因素分析[J].上海预防医学杂志,2001,(12),560-564.
    [104]徐宗国.扎根理论研究法:渊源、原则、技术与涵义[J].香港社会科学学报,1994,(4),194-221.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700