基于贡献能力的建设项目可持续评价研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
项目在建设和运营阶段,都会产生有利的和不利的影响,只有在项目能以最小的消耗(包括投入项目的物质和能源消耗,及对环境的污染等负效应)实现最大的综合贡献(项目在促进经济发展、社会进步及节能环保等综合方面所带来的正效应),发挥建设项目的最大效率,这样才是真正的走可持续发展道路。基于此,本文从关注建设项目的贡献能力这个角度出发,构建了基于贡献能力的建设项目可持续评价指标体系,实现了对建设项目贡献能力的合理评价,从而达到为决策主体在立项选案时提供科学依据,并为贡献能力大的建设项目提供更大激励的目的。
     本文在理论研究上,首先结合可持续发展的原理论述了建设项目评价指标体系的建立过程、筛选原则及评价方法;之后介绍了基于贡献能力的建设项目外部性,其中重点阐述了正外部性,为建设项目的贡献能力指标分析奠定了理论基础。
     在体系创新上,先从生态学的角度,结合生态足迹与能值分析法,构建了建设项目的生态贡献能力可持续评价模型。通过此模型不仅可以直观的判断出项目是处于生态盈余状态还是处于生态赤字状态,还可定量的评价出项目的生态贡献能力,使建设项目朝着低生态足迹的方向发展;并用北大奥运体育馆作案例分析,证明该模型的可操作性;然后从建设项目对经济、社会及环境方面贡献能力的角度,构建了基于综合贡献能力的建设项目可持续评价指标体系,详细介绍了各项具体指标的内容及获得方式,在评价方法上分别采用层次分析法和熵值法对建设项目的综合贡献能力进行主观和客观方面的评价
     在最后的实证分析中,先用层次分析法对单个成渝高速公路项目进行主观性评价,再引入几个样本项目,通过熵值法来客观评价。无论选用层次分析法还是熵值法,其最后的评价结果都表明成渝高速公路对当地的经济、社会和环境方面都做出了巨大贡献,且处于协调发展状态。
As we all know, at the projects’construction and operation period, the projects will have beneficial and adverse effects. When the projects can minimize consumption (including material consumption, and the environment pollution and energy consumption during the construction and operation, etc.) maximize contribution (projects brought the positive effects on the aspects of the promotion of economic development, social progress and environmental protection), exert the maximum efficiency of construction projects, this is the real path of sustainable development road for construction projects. Based on this, this paper started with the perspective of concerning on the contribution of capacity of the building projects, established sustainability evaluating indicator system, which based on contributing capacity of construction projects, realized the effect of reasonable assessed projects’contributing capacity, finally pruposed to give a scientific basis for the main decision-making to elect the best project, and also provided greater incentives to the large contributing capacity projects.
     On the theory researching, the paper combine with the principle of sustainable development projects, analyzed the process of establishing evaluating indicator system, the selection principles and evaluation methods. Then the paper introduced the externality of projects that based on the contributing capacity, especially introduced positive externality, in order to provide a theoretical foundation for analyzing the evaluation index system of projects’contributing capacity.
     On the system innovation, the paper from the ecological point of view, combined with the ecological footprint and energy analysis, designed the sustainability evaluation model of ecological contribution of construction project. This model can not only judge the project is in the state of ecological surplus or ecological deficit, but also quantitative evaluate of the ecological contributing capacity of project, so let the project developed toward low ecological footprint. Then the paper took Beijing Olympic Stadium as a case analysis to prove the operability of the model. At last from the system's view of construction projects on economic, social and environmental contributing capacity, the paper constructed an evaluating indicator system which based on comprehensive contributing capacity of construction projects. And it introduced the meaning of evaluating indicator system and the way of acquiring every index. Then the paper chose AHP and entropy evaluating model to comprehensively evaluate the comprehensive contributing capacity of the construction projects.
     On the Final case study, first used AHP to subjective evaluate the individual projects of Chen-Yu Expressway. And then the introduction of some sample projects used the entropy method to objectively evaluate. Regardless of selecting AHP or entropy, the results both showed that the Chen-Yu Expressway made a tremendous contribution to the local economic, social and environmental aspects, and the project was in the state of coordinated development.
引文
[1-1]朱启贵.可持续发展评估[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,1999,6.
    [1-2]郑小晴.建设项目可持续性及其评价研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2005年
    [1-3]周坚,程慧萍.可持续意义的建设项目评价[J].评价与预测,2003,(08):123~124
    [1-4]谢洪礼.关于可持续发展指标体系的述评[J].Statistical Research,1998,(06),54~58
    [1-5]叶文虎.联合国可持续发展指标述评[J].中国人口·资源与环境,1997,7(3):83~87
    [1-6] Hardi P, Barg S. Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practice, occasional paper number 17. November 1997.International Institute for sustainable development.
    [1-7] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello Petal. Ecological Footprints of Nations. Commissioned by the Earth Council for the Rio Forums. International council for local Environmental Initiatives, Toronto.1997.
    [1-8] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello Petal. National Natural Capital Accounting with theEcological Fotprint Concept [J]. Ecological Economics,1999, (29):375~390
    [1-9] Carteret al, Cater R C, Howsam P, Tyrell S F. Impact and Sustainability of Community Water Supply and Sanitation Programmers in Developing Countries [J].Chartered Institution of Water Environmental Management,1999,(13):292~296
    [1-10] Yasuyoshi Miyatake. Ethnology Development and Sustainable Construction. Journal of Management in Engineering, 23.
    [1-11] M. Sohail, M. AsceL, S. Cavill, A. P. Cotton. Sustainable Operation and Maintenance of Urban Infrastructure [J]. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2005, (39).
    [1-12] Susanne Balslev Nielsen, Mortcn Ellc. Assessing the Potential for Change in Urban Infrastructure Systems. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20 (2000), 403~412.
    [1-13] Hojjat Adeli. Sustainable Infrastructure Systems and Environmentally--Conscious Design-A View for the Next Decade [J]. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 2002, (11):231
    [1-14] R. Rackwitz, A. Lentz a, M. Faber. Socio-economically Sustainable Civil Engineering Infrastructures by Optimization [J]. Structural Safety, 2005, (27): 187~229.
    [1-15] Shovini Dasgupta, Edwin K.L. Tam. Indicators and Framework for Assessing Sustainable Infrastructure [J]. Can. J. Civ. Eng. 2005, (32).
    [1-16] Halla R. Sahely, Christopher A. Kennedy, Barry J. Adams. Developing Sustainability Criteria for Urban Infrastructure Systems [J]. NRC Canada. J. Civ. Eng,2005,(32): 72~85
    [1-17] Minna Halme,Markku Anttonen. Sustainability Evaluation of European Household Services [J]. journal of cleaner production,2006,14:1529~1540.
    [1-18]成虎.建设项目全寿命期集成管理研究[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2002年.
    [1-19]蔚林巍,孙健.可持续发展战略下的项目管理[J].经济论坛,2003,(03):71~73
    [1-20]刘忆,李晓凯.工程项目的可持续性研究[J].2004,1(41):13~14
    [1-21]邓志国,綦振平.重大建设项目可持续性评价研究[J].山东工商学院学报,2004,18(5):78~83
    [1-22]黄溶冰,胡运权.基于可持续发展理论的大型建设项目评价模式研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2005,(01):54~55
    [1-23]朱嬿,臯酒?建设项目可持续性概念与后评价研究[J].建筑经济,2006,(01):11~16
    [1-24]董泽琴,孙铁珩.生态足迹研究[J].生态学报,2004,24(12):2735~2739
    [1-25]张畅.基于本地生态足迹的湖南省可持续发展评价[D].湖南:中南大学,2007
    [1-26] Shu Lihuang, Wan Linsu. Materials Flow Analysis and Energy Evaluation of Taipei’s Urban Construction [J]. Landscape and Urban Planning,2003,(06): 61~74
    [1-27]谢鸿宇.基于空间综合生态足迹分析的项目环境影响评价方法研究[D].湖北:武汉大学,2004
    [1-28]宋巍巍,刘年丰,谢鸿宇.基于综合生态足迹的项目生态环境影响分析研究[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2005,22(1)
    [1-29]周红.基于生态学的大型公共工程可持续能力研究[D].南京:东南大学,2006年.
    [1-30]冯为民,任宏,曲成平等.建设项目综合评价体系及模型研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2004,26(6):103~107.
    [1-31] SHEN L.Y,WU Y.Z,HAO J.L. Application of system dynamics for assessment of sustainable performance of construction projects [J].Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE, 2005, 6A (04):339~349.
    [1-32]潘文辉.住宅项目可持续评价研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2005年.
    [1-33]李荣星.建设项目评价理论与方法体系研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006年.
    [1-34]汪文雄,李启明,李静华.大型建设工程项目满意度评价模型研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(4):125~128
    [1-35]孙灏.高速公路建设项目经济评价研究及实证分析[D].浙江:浙江大学,2006.
    [1-36] Social Analysis Sourcebook: incorporating social dimensions into Bank-supported Projects. Social Development, The World Bank. August, 2002.
    [1-37]胡永铨.基于和谐发展观的项目社会评价体系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2006(1):129~131.
    [1-38]阮陆隍.公路建设项目环境影响分析与评价研究[D].福建:福建农林大学,2008.
    [2-1]中国科学院可持续发展研究组.中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2000年.
    [2-2]逮元堂,王金南,李云生.可持续发展指标体系在中国的研究与应用[J].环境保护,2003,11:17~26
    [2-3]张志强,孙成权,程国栋等.可持续发展研究:进展与趋向[J].地球科学进展,1999,14(6).
    [2-4]张志强,程国栋,徐中民.可持续发展评估指标、方法及应用研究[J].冰川冻土,2002,24(4):344~360
    [2-5]《可持续发展指标体系》课题组,中国城市环境可持续发展指标体系研究手册—以三明市、烟台市为案例[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.
    [2-6] Robert Costnaza, Ralphdp Arge. The Value of the World’s Ecosystem Services and Natural Capital. Nature, Vol.387, 15, 1997.
    [2-7]中国科学院.中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2002.
    [2-8] Brown M T, Ulgiati S. Energy-based indices and rations to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation [J]. Ecological Engineering, 1997, (9):51~69.
    [2-9]周红.基于生态学的大型公共工程可持续能力研究[D].南京:东南大学,2006年.
    [2-10]Lisa Segnestam. Indicators of Environment and Sustainable Development-Theories and Practical Experience[M]. Environmental Economics Series. The World Bank, 2002.
    [2-11]李荣星.建设项目评价理论与方法体系研究[D].大连:大连理工大学,2006年.
    [2-12]谢洪礼.关于可持续发展指标体系的述评[J].统计研究,1998,6:54~58
    [2-13]韩英.可持续发展的理论与测度方法[M].北京:中国建筑工程出版社,2007.
    [3-1]马歇尔著,朱志泰,陈良璧译.经济学原理(上卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1964.
    [3-2]刘笑平,雷定.论外部性理论的内涵及意义[J].西北师大学报(社会科学版),2002,39(3):72~75.
    [3-3]刘开齐.环境经济学[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2003.
    [3-4]于付秀.环境外部性问题的政府管制研究[D].电子科技大学,2006.
    [3-5]陈旭.城市轨道交通外部性研究[D].华中科技大学,2005.
    [3-6]叶韵.基于外部性理论的城市规划研究[D]北京交通大学,2006.
    [3-7]余双喜.公路建设项目社会环境影响分析与评价方法研究[D].长沙理工大学,2005.
    [3-8]姚影,欧国立.基于外部性理论的城市轨道交通与房地产联合开发政策分析[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2008,7(4):31~34.
    [3-9]王冰,杨虎涛.论正外部性内在化的途径与绩效[J].东南学术,2002,6:158~165.
    [4-1] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P et al. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept [J]. Ecological Economics, 1999,29:375~390.
    [4-2]顾晓薇,王青.可持续发展的环境压力指标及其应用[M].北京:冶金工业出版社, 2005.
    [4-3]韩英.可持续发展的理论与测度方法[M].北京:中国建筑工程出版社,2007.
    [4-4]张坤民,温宗国,杜斌等.生态城市评估与指标体系[M].北京:化学工业出版社, 2003.
    [4-5]陶在朴.生态包袱与生态足迹[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2006.
    [4-6]周红.基于生态学的大型公共工程可持续能力研究[D].南京:东南大学,2006年.
    [4-7] Brown MT, Ulgiati S. Energy evaluation of the biosphere and natural capital [J]. Ambio,1999,8(6):486~494.
    [4-8] P. M. Pulselli, E. Simoncini, F. M.Pulselli. Energy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: En-building Indies to evaluate housing sustainability [J]. Energy and Buildings, 2007, 39:620~628.
    [4-9]郑小晴.建设项目可持续性及其评价研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2005年.
    [4-10]张芳怡,濮立杰,张健.基于能值分析理论的生态足迹模型及应用[J].自然资源学报,2006,21(24):653~660.
    [4-11]李思堂,李惠强.建筑业的可持续发展与减物质化生产初探[J].建筑经济,2004,(07):59~61.
    [4-12]郑娟儿,吴次芳.我国建筑节能的现状、潜力与政策设计研究[J].中国软科学,2005,(5):71~75.
    [4-13]钱锋,王伟东.建筑环境效率能值分析与评价[J].建筑学报,2007,(07):39~42.
    [5-1]胥卫平,赵晓华.西安市可持续发展能力环境影响评价指标体系实证[J].环境科学与技术,2007,30(1):61~65.
    [5-2]国家发展改革委、建设部编.建设项目经济评价方法与参数(第三版)[M].北京:中国计划出版社,2006年.
    [5-3]刘剑锋.公路建设项目社会经济环境影响评价的研究[J].重庆交通学院学报,2004,23(2):85~89.
    [5-4]王巍,赵国杰,毕星.工程项目可持续发展测评体系研究[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2008,10(2):122~125.
    [5-5]孙灏.高速公路建设项目经济评价研究及实证分析[[D].浙江:浙江大学,2002年.
    [5-6] Transportation Research Board. Guidebook for Assessing the Social and Economic Effects of Transportation on Projects. National Academy Press Washington DC, 2001.
    [5-7]余双喜.公路建设项目社会环境影响分析与评价方法研究[D].湖南:长沙理工大学, 2005年.
    [5-8]刘祺.铁路客运专线建设项目可持续发展评价研究[D].河北:华北电力大学,2008年.
    [5-9]张坤民,温宗国,杜斌等.生态城市评估与指标体系[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2003.
    [5-10]张生瑞,邵春福,严海.公路交通可持续发展评价指标及评价方法研究[J].中国公路学报,2005,18(2):74~78.
    [5-11]汪文雄,李启明,李静华.大型建设工程项目满意度评价模型研究[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(4):125~128.
    [5-12]韩英.可持续发展的理论与测度方法[M].北京:中国建筑工程出版社,2007.
    [5-13]傅祖芸.信息论——基础理论与应用[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2001.
    [5-14]乔家君.改进的熵值法在河南省可持续发展能力评估中的应用[J].资源科学,2004,26(1):113~119.
    [5-15]马致远.基于改进熵值法评价模型的交通可持续发展研究[D].成都理工大学,2007.
    [6-1] http://baike.baidu.com/view/121571.htm
    [6-2]崔炳权.成渝高速公路的效益与评价[J].四川建筑,1999,19(4):58~60.
    [6-3]张生瑞,周伟.高速公路建设项目的神经网络综合评价方法研究[J].中国公路学报,2001,14(4):91~95.
    [6-4]余双喜.公路建设项目社会环境影响分析与评价方法研究[D].长沙理工大学,2005.
    [6-5]张红红.高速公路社会影响评价指标可靠度估算方法[J].西安公路交通大学学报,2000,20(4):57~59.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700