14世纪-17世纪中叶朝鲜对明和日本贸易关系史研究
摘要
本文以迄今为止的贸易关系史研究成果为基础,着重考察十四世纪至十七世纪中叶朝、中、日三国贸易关系的来龙去脉及其基本特征。
本文由绪论、正文和结论三个部分构成。
绪论部分在进行课题说明的基础上,主要阐述了研究目的和意义、研究动态、研究内容和方法等问题。
正文第一章是东亚三国对外关系的形成与朝鲜的贸易政策部分,主要论述了东亚三国之间对外关系的形成与贸易,朝鲜前期贸易政策的本质与一般特征、朝鲜制定贸易法规的背景等。当时,中国周边国家臣服中国是弱国、小国与强国、大国之间维持平衡的基本手段,是弱小国家保持国家安全的重要一环。而且对朝鲜和日本来说,是统治者维持和巩固其统治地位的一种保障。
第二章是朝鲜对明、对日贸易的性质部分,主要论述了朝鲜对明贸易的事(?)朝贡性,朝鲜对日贸易的交邻性,特别是详细论述了倭寇的活动及其东亚三国贸易产生的重要影响。
第三章是朝鲜对明、对日贸易的形态部分,主要论述了朝鲜对明,对日贸易的形态与方法,种类以及贸易场所、通商渠道等。当时,朝鲜与明王朝之间的贸易基本上属于朝贡形式的官方贸易,私人贸易的成交量非常有限。朝鲜与日本之间的贸易以“进上-回赐”、官方贸易、私人贸易三个形态为主,此外还有不法商人进行的走私贸易。
第四章是朝鲜对明、对日贸易商品结构部分,主要论述了朝鲜对明进出口商品结构,朝鲜对日进出口商品结构等。其中,金银、牛马等都是朝鲜不得不以朝贡形式出口中国的紧缺货,备齐这些进贡品始终是朝鲜政府的沉重的负担。另外,从贸易的数量和价值来看,中国使节从朝鲜带走的比朝鲜使节从中国领回来的多得多。对当时只好以朝贡的方式尽藩属之礼仪和义务的朝鲜来说,这种不平等、不等价的贸易关系是不可避免的事情。
第九章是东亚局势的变化与通商圈的扩大部分,主要论述了对明、对日贸易给朝鲜带来的影响,逐步盛行的中介贸易,十六—十七世纪东亚局势的变化与东亚通商圈的扩大等。在以中国为中心的亚洲贸易体制下,苏木、胡椒等南亚物产
The main theme of this dissertation is about characteristics of trade relations of Chosun with Ming China and Japan during the period of 14~(th) -17~(th) centuries. These characteristics can be summarized for four Chinese letters, shi dajiao lin that is literally translated to "respect strong nations and maintain good relationship with neighbors." In other words, the motive of building good political relations with other nations was the main characteristic of trade of Chosun during the period. In addition to suggesting this theme, this research also provides comprehensive information on trade relations of Chosun with Ming China and Japan such as lists of products traded, changes in trade patterns during the period, and respective characteristics of trade between these trading partners.This research consists of five chapters. The chapter one, first, explains the concept of shi da jiao lin. shi da jiao lin literally means "respect the strong, and maintain good relations with neighbors." This chapter shows how this concept is applied in Chosun's relations with Ming China. Ming China in Asia during the period was the superpower in the region; building good relationships with China based on shi da spirit, that is, showing respect, was the main motive for Chosun to have trade relations with Ming China. By providing China with periodic offerings of various products in the form of trade, Chosun could attain military protection of China for herself in the case of national emergency. The Chosun government also attained legitimacy from her people for its governing activities by having endorsement from China, which most Chosun people culturally admired at then.Chapter two applies the "shi da jiao lin" concept to the case of Chosun's trade relations with Japan. Japan is the case of jiao lin, "maintaining good relations with neighbors." Due to barrenness of her land, Japan suffered from chronic shortage of
agricultural products, which created various economic problems in the time of agriculture-leading economy. As a result, Japan often became a troublesome neighbor to Chosun by some of her people landing on seaside villages of Chosun and plundering them. The Chosun government needed to keep a good relationship with the Japanese government by sending periodic gifts so that she could have a motive to control her people.Chapter three presents details of Chosun's trade with Ming China and Japan such as trade routes, lists of products traded at different times, trading places, and types of trades. Whereas the government-leading trade for political purpose mentioned above was the main one, we can see there were other types of trades existed. There were various types of private-level trades; their main interest was making profits. These trades were explained in this chapter.Chapter four focuses on studying types of products traded and trade balance of Chosun in the government-leading trades with the two nations. Whereas Chosun's trade with Japan was relatively balanced, the trade with Ming China was unbalanced; Chosun often provided more offerings to China than she received from China. This unbalance was inevitable due to the main motive of the trade, which was a political one rather than economic one.During 16th-17th Centuries, we can see an emergency of different motives in trade relations compared to that of 14lh -15th centuries, which was mainly a political one based on shi dajiao lin. This is the topic of Chapter 5. lEconomic interests gradually emerged in Chosun's trade relations with the two nations. Being located in a peninsular between the two nations, many individual merchants in Chosun realized they could make profits by reselling what they bought from one nation to the other. By the end of 17th century, this private-leading trade gradually started to lead trade relations of Chosun more than the previous government-leading trade did.
Concluding, we can sec that the government was the main player in Chosun's trade relations during 14" 17" centuries and her main motive for trades was maintaining good political relations, which arc summarized in the concept of shi da jiuo ////. However, the private-leading trades based on personal interests started to emerge as a major driving force for trades during 17th century. Intermediary trades helped by geological location of Chosun helped the emergence of private-leading trades.This study contributes to the past studies on international relations of Chosun by studying trade and economic parts of Chosun's relations with other countries, li defines main characteristics of her trades during the period of 14(n-17lh centuries and provides ample information on details of trades such as lists and amounts of products. trade routes, trading market places, and so on.
本文由绪论、正文和结论三个部分构成。
绪论部分在进行课题说明的基础上,主要阐述了研究目的和意义、研究动态、研究内容和方法等问题。
正文第一章是东亚三国对外关系的形成与朝鲜的贸易政策部分,主要论述了东亚三国之间对外关系的形成与贸易,朝鲜前期贸易政策的本质与一般特征、朝鲜制定贸易法规的背景等。当时,中国周边国家臣服中国是弱国、小国与强国、大国之间维持平衡的基本手段,是弱小国家保持国家安全的重要一环。而且对朝鲜和日本来说,是统治者维持和巩固其统治地位的一种保障。
第二章是朝鲜对明、对日贸易的性质部分,主要论述了朝鲜对明贸易的事(?)朝贡性,朝鲜对日贸易的交邻性,特别是详细论述了倭寇的活动及其东亚三国贸易产生的重要影响。
第三章是朝鲜对明、对日贸易的形态部分,主要论述了朝鲜对明,对日贸易的形态与方法,种类以及贸易场所、通商渠道等。当时,朝鲜与明王朝之间的贸易基本上属于朝贡形式的官方贸易,私人贸易的成交量非常有限。朝鲜与日本之间的贸易以“进上-回赐”、官方贸易、私人贸易三个形态为主,此外还有不法商人进行的走私贸易。
第四章是朝鲜对明、对日贸易商品结构部分,主要论述了朝鲜对明进出口商品结构,朝鲜对日进出口商品结构等。其中,金银、牛马等都是朝鲜不得不以朝贡形式出口中国的紧缺货,备齐这些进贡品始终是朝鲜政府的沉重的负担。另外,从贸易的数量和价值来看,中国使节从朝鲜带走的比朝鲜使节从中国领回来的多得多。对当时只好以朝贡的方式尽藩属之礼仪和义务的朝鲜来说,这种不平等、不等价的贸易关系是不可避免的事情。
第九章是东亚局势的变化与通商圈的扩大部分,主要论述了对明、对日贸易给朝鲜带来的影响,逐步盛行的中介贸易,十六—十七世纪东亚局势的变化与东亚通商圈的扩大等。在以中国为中心的亚洲贸易体制下,苏木、胡椒等南亚物产
The main theme of this dissertation is about characteristics of trade relations of Chosun with Ming China and Japan during the period of 14~(th) -17~(th) centuries. These characteristics can be summarized for four Chinese letters, shi dajiao lin that is literally translated to "respect strong nations and maintain good relationship with neighbors." In other words, the motive of building good political relations with other nations was the main characteristic of trade of Chosun during the period. In addition to suggesting this theme, this research also provides comprehensive information on trade relations of Chosun with Ming China and Japan such as lists of products traded, changes in trade patterns during the period, and respective characteristics of trade between these trading partners.This research consists of five chapters. The chapter one, first, explains the concept of shi da jiao lin. shi da jiao lin literally means "respect the strong, and maintain good relations with neighbors." This chapter shows how this concept is applied in Chosun's relations with Ming China. Ming China in Asia during the period was the superpower in the region; building good relationships with China based on shi da spirit, that is, showing respect, was the main motive for Chosun to have trade relations with Ming China. By providing China with periodic offerings of various products in the form of trade, Chosun could attain military protection of China for herself in the case of national emergency. The Chosun government also attained legitimacy from her people for its governing activities by having endorsement from China, which most Chosun people culturally admired at then.Chapter two applies the "shi da jiao lin" concept to the case of Chosun's trade relations with Japan. Japan is the case of jiao lin, "maintaining good relations with neighbors." Due to barrenness of her land, Japan suffered from chronic shortage of
agricultural products, which created various economic problems in the time of agriculture-leading economy. As a result, Japan often became a troublesome neighbor to Chosun by some of her people landing on seaside villages of Chosun and plundering them. The Chosun government needed to keep a good relationship with the Japanese government by sending periodic gifts so that she could have a motive to control her people.Chapter three presents details of Chosun's trade with Ming China and Japan such as trade routes, lists of products traded at different times, trading places, and types of trades. Whereas the government-leading trade for political purpose mentioned above was the main one, we can see there were other types of trades existed. There were various types of private-level trades; their main interest was making profits. These trades were explained in this chapter.Chapter four focuses on studying types of products traded and trade balance of Chosun in the government-leading trades with the two nations. Whereas Chosun's trade with Japan was relatively balanced, the trade with Ming China was unbalanced; Chosun often provided more offerings to China than she received from China. This unbalance was inevitable due to the main motive of the trade, which was a political one rather than economic one.During 16th-17th Centuries, we can see an emergency of different motives in trade relations compared to that of 14lh -15th centuries, which was mainly a political one based on shi dajiao lin. This is the topic of Chapter 5. lEconomic interests gradually emerged in Chosun's trade relations with the two nations. Being located in a peninsular between the two nations, many individual merchants in Chosun realized they could make profits by reselling what they bought from one nation to the other. By the end of 17th century, this private-leading trade gradually started to lead trade relations of Chosun more than the previous government-leading trade did.
Concluding, we can sec that the government was the main player in Chosun's trade relations during 14" 17" centuries and her main motive for trades was maintaining good political relations, which arc summarized in the concept of shi da jiuo ////. However, the private-leading trades based on personal interests started to emerge as a major driving force for trades during 17th century. Intermediary trades helped by geological location of Chosun helped the emergence of private-leading trades.This study contributes to the past studies on international relations of Chosun by studying trade and economic parts of Chosun's relations with other countries, li defines main characteristics of her trades during the period of 14(n-17lh centuries and provides ample information on details of trades such as lists and amounts of products. trade routes, trading market places, and so on.
引文
《太祖实录》、《定宗实录》、《太宗实录》、《世宗实录》、《文宗实录》、《端宗实录》、《世祖实录》、《成宗实录》、《燕山君日记》、《中宗实录》、《明宗实录》、《宜祖实录》、《光海君日记》、《仁祖实录》、《肃宗实录》、《三国史记》、《高丽史》、《通文馆志》、《高丽史节要》、《海东诸国记》、《朝鲜经国典》、《芝峰类设》、《承政院日记》、《燕行录选集》、《经国大典》、《万机要览》、《东国与地胜览》
《三国志》、《宋史》、《通志条略》、《中国正史》、《明史》、《大明律直解》、《明实录》、《明太祖实录》、《大明会典》、《明武宗实录》、《明仁宗实录》、《明经世文篇》、《高丽图经》
《日本书记》、《本朝通鉴》、《经济录》、《古事记云》、《华夷通商考》
崔南善,《新版朝鲜历史》,汉城,1945
李丙焘,《国史大观》,汉城,1949
金痒基,《东方文化交流史论考》,汉城乙酉文化社,1954
《朝鲜通史》(上),劳动新闻出版印刷所(科学院),1956
《朝鲜通史》(上1、2、3),吉林人民出版社,科学院(历史研究所),1962
全海宗,《韩中关系史研究》,一潮阁,1970
朴寿伊,《李朝贸易政策论考》,民众书馆,1974
闵斗基,《日本的历史》,知识产业社,1977
边太燮,《韩国史通论》,三营社,1980
金成洙,《西洋中世社会经济史论》,法文社,1981
《朝鲜全史》,科学百科辞典出版社,1983
李泰镇,《十六世纪东亚历史状况与文化》,知识产业社,1986
《朝鲜通史》,社会科学出版社,1987
车夏顺,《西洋史总论》,探究堂,1989
西鸣定生,《中国史入门》,出版社,1990
赵秉灿,《韩国市场经济史》,东国大学出版社,1992
《朝鲜古代中世纪史》,金日成综合大学出版社,1993
李春植,《中国通史》,韩国放送通信大学出版社,1993
黄文洙,《什么叫历史>,凡友社,1994
朴寿伊,《国际贸易史》,博英社,1994
金轩九,《日本史概论》,智英社,1994
金新,《贸易史》,石井出版社,1995
《朝鲜历史》(从原始到近世),金日成综合大学出版社,1996
李炯锡,《壬辰倭乱史》(上·中·下),壬辰战乱史刊行委员会,1977,
姜俊英,《一本书可以了解的中国》,知英社,1998
鲜于中镐,《韩国史特讲》,汉城大学出版部,1998
元志渊,《一夜读懂的日本史》,中央M & B.2002
柳成龙,《西崖先生文集》,卷16
朴真奭,《中朝友谊三千年》,廷边人民出版社,1984
张声振,《中日关系史》(卷1),1986
白凤南,《朝鲜经济史概论》,延边大学出版社,1988
韩俊光,《中朝关系简史》,辽宁人民出版社,1992
金龟春,《中朝日美系史》(上),延边大学出版社,1994
蒋非非,《中韩关系史》(古代篇),社会科学文献出版社,1998
朴文一,《中国古代文化对朝鲜和日本的影响》,黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,1999
姜龙范、刘子敏,《明代中朝关系史》,黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,1999
李宗勋,《唐·新罗·日本政治制度比较研究》,延边大学出版社,1999
金翰奎,《韩中关系史》,出版社,1999
安作璋,《二千年中国历史简编》,山东友谊出版社,2000
姜龙范等,《中朝日关系史》(下),黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,2000
夏秀瑞,《中国对外贸易史》,对外经济贸易大学出版社,2001
金龟春,《中朝韩日关系史研究论丛》(1),延边大学出版社,2001
汪向荣、汪皓,《中世纪的中日关系》,中国青年出版社,2001
李智舜,《中华经济五千年》,内蒙古人民出版社,2002
白新良,《中朝关系史》,世界知识出版社,2002
张岂之,《中国历史》(元·明·清),高等教育出版社,2002
陈文寿,《近世初期日本与华夷秩序研究》,香港社会科学出版社有限公司,2002
罔野昌子,《秀吉的朝鲜侵略和中国》,东京,燎原书店,1977
田代和生,《日朝关系的重新恢复与对马关系、近世日朝通交贸易历史的研究》,东京,创文社,1981
石井进,《详说日本史》,山川出版社,1993
野村兼太郎,《日本经济史》,日本,有裴阁
矢野仁一,《支那近代外国关系研究》,弘文堂
田中健夫,《倭寇和勘合贸易》,至文堂
喜多村浩,《贸易》,日本,东京,有裴阁
掘江保藏,《日本经济史》
稻业岩吉,《日丽关系》
岩波讲座,《日本历史》
宫下考吉,《经济史》
田川孝三,《李朝贡纳制研究》
山田宪太郎,《东西香药史》
孥仁荣,《鲜初女真贸易考》,震檀学报8辑,1937
李仁荣,《韩国满州关系史研究》,韩国文化丛书,乙酉文化史,1954
申奭镐,《朝鲜王朝开国当时的对明关系》,国史上的诸问题,第1辑,国史编篡委员会,1959
金圣七,《燕行小考》,历史学报12辑,1960
李铉淙,《明史接待考》,乡土汉城12号,1961
南都泳,《从丽末鲜初马政上看到的大明关系》,东国史学6辑,1963
姜圣祚,《对朝明官方贸易的考察》,中央大学硕士学位论文,1963
李铉熙,《朝鲜前期留京待卫野人考》,乡土汉城20号,1964
李铉淙,《对南洋诸国人来往贸易的思考》,史学研究18号,1964
全海宗,《韩中朝贡关系考》,东洋史学研究,1966
曹泳禄,《水牛角贸易与朝明关系》,东国史学9、10合集,1966
高柄翊,《李朝韩国人的对外观念》,白山学报8号,1967
金炳夏,《李朝前期对日贸易研究》,韩国研究院,1969
李相伯,《李朝建国之研究》,震檀学报5号,1973
黄元九,《明史》(朝鲜传),译注1、2,东方学志14、15辑,1973、1974
全海宗,《十五世纪的东亚情势》,韩国史9,国史编篡委员会,1974
洪淳馨,《丙子胡乱和政治与文化的余波》,1974
《梨大史苑》,第12辑,胡乱和朝鲜的对明、清关系的变迁,1975
周翠兰,《朝明朝贡关系的研究》,庆熙大学硕士学位论文,1977
李铉淙,《对明关系》,韩国史9,国史编篡委员会,1977
李在熙,《朝鲜前期对明书册贸易》,震檀学报44号,1977
延正悦,《朝鲜初期贸易状况和法规之研究》,法史学研究4辑,1977
柳承宙,《朝鲜前期的金银矿业研究》,韩国史研究21号,1979
姜圣祚,《初期朝明间的官方贸易考》,关东大学论文集9辑,1981,
李铉淙,《对明贸易》,韩国史论2,朝鲜前期的商工业,国史编篡委员会,1982
金九镇,《朝鲜前期对女真关系和女真社会的实态》,东洋学14号,檀国大学,1984
全海宗,《朝鲜前期韩中关系的几点问题》,东洋学14号,檀国大学,1984
李泰镇,《国际贸易的盛行》,韩国史市民讲座9号,一潮阁,1991
柳承宙,《朝鲜后期朝清贸易小考》,国史馆论丛30号,国史编篡委员会,1991
韩明基,《十七世纪初银的流通及其影响》,奎章阁15号,汉城大学,1992
孙承喆,《朝鲜时代韩日关系史研究》,知识之泉,1994
李泰镇,《前近代韩中交易史的虚与实》,震檀学报78号,1994
金锺园,《丁卯胡乱》,韩国史29,国史编篡委员会,1995
河宇凤,《与日本的关系》,韩国史22,国史编篡委员会,1995
金东哲,《国际贸易的发达与磨擦》,韩国史28,国史编篡委员会,1996
韩明基,《宣祖后期至仁祖初期对明关系研究》,汉城大学博士学位论文,1997
韩明基,《朝鲜中期的政治和经济》,韩国史30,国史编纂委员会,1998
李铉淙,《朝鲜前期倭人接待考》,史学研究3、4、5号
李铉淙,《倭人关系》,韩国史9,国史编篡委员会
白南云,《朝鲜社会经济史》,经济学全集61号
申爽镐,《已卯士禍由来关考察》,青丘学发第20期
金汉周,《李朝时代的商业与手工业的关系》,李朝社会经济史
金在满,《契丹丝考》(上),东西间接贸易和直接贸易的形态,历史教育第七集
金斗锺,《欧美及西南方医学对韩国医学发展对的影响》《韩国贸易史》,韩国贸易协会刊
王启宗,《丰臣秀吉侵犯朝鲜之原因》,大陆杂志第38卷4期,台北
朱云影,《中国历代商业活动对于日韩越的影响》,中国文化对日韩越的影响,1981
郑梁生,《明代中日关系研究》,文史哲出版社,台北,1985
《韩国学论文集》第一辑,新序,北京大学韩国学研究所,社会科学文献出版社,1992
尹永日,《朝鲜与清朝贸易关系史研究》,延边大学博士学位论文,2004
末松保和,《高丽末朝鲜初期的对明关系》,京城帝国大学史学论丛2,1941
稻叶岩吉,《光海君的对后金政策》,国史上的问题1,1959
石原道博,《万历东征论》,朝鲜学报21、22合辑,1961
中村荣孝,《江户时代的日鲜关系、外交史上的德川政权》,日本关系史研究,1969
寺田窿信,《山西商人之研究》,京都大学东洋史研究会,1972
罔野昌子,《秀吉的朝鲜侵略与中国》,中山八郎教授颂寿纪念,(明清史论考),东京,燎原书店,1977
木宫泰彦,《日中文化交流史》,商务印书馆,1980
田中健夫,《东洋学》15,檀国大学东洋学研究所,1985
浜下武志·川胜平太编,《亚洲贸易圈与日本工业化1500—1900》,东京,1991
左岛显子,《壬辰倭乱讲和破绽》,年谱,朝鲜学,九州大朝鲜学研究会,1994
田村洋幸,《中世日朝贸易研究》
田村洋幸,《论朝鲜初期倭寇的系谱》,朝鲜学报23号
田村洋幸,《朝鲜倭寇的性质及其演变》,铃峰女子短大研究集报,第8辑
中村荣孝,《室町时代的日朝交通和书契及文引》,史学杂志
中村荣孝,《1510年入朝鲜三浦的日本人的争乱》,名古屋大学文学部研究论集2
中村荣孝,《日鲜关系史研究》(上卷)
中村荣孝,《日韩·日朝通交贸易史研究》,第六章
富村真演,《琉球王朝的朝贡贸易政策》,琉球大学文献学部,绝要人文社会5号
小叶田淳,《中世南岛通交贸易史研究》
黑田省三,《朝鲜贸易本质就》,日本历史,通卷第10号
四方博,《朝鲜近代资本主义的成立过程》,京都大学法文学会
青山公亮,《日丽交涉史研究》
三浦周行,《朝鲜的倭寇》
佐久间重男,《明朝的海禁政策》,东方学6辑
宫本区次、博多和福岗、宫本博士编,《九州经济史论集》
藤田丰八,《东西交涉使研究》,南海篇
三木荣,《朝鲜医学史及疾病史》
Harvard University press 1953. The Chinese world order.
Harvard University press 1968.
John k. Fairbank, Trade and diplomacy on the china coast.
Max Weber, 《Social Economy History》。
Wiliam ashey, 《British Economy History》。
《三国志》、《宋史》、《通志条略》、《中国正史》、《明史》、《大明律直解》、《明实录》、《明太祖实录》、《大明会典》、《明武宗实录》、《明仁宗实录》、《明经世文篇》、《高丽图经》
《日本书记》、《本朝通鉴》、《经济录》、《古事记云》、《华夷通商考》
崔南善,《新版朝鲜历史》,汉城,1945
李丙焘,《国史大观》,汉城,1949
金痒基,《东方文化交流史论考》,汉城乙酉文化社,1954
《朝鲜通史》(上),劳动新闻出版印刷所(科学院),1956
《朝鲜通史》(上1、2、3),吉林人民出版社,科学院(历史研究所),1962
全海宗,《韩中关系史研究》,一潮阁,1970
朴寿伊,《李朝贸易政策论考》,民众书馆,1974
闵斗基,《日本的历史》,知识产业社,1977
边太燮,《韩国史通论》,三营社,1980
金成洙,《西洋中世社会经济史论》,法文社,1981
《朝鲜全史》,科学百科辞典出版社,1983
李泰镇,《十六世纪东亚历史状况与文化》,知识产业社,1986
《朝鲜通史》,社会科学出版社,1987
车夏顺,《西洋史总论》,探究堂,1989
西鸣定生,《中国史入门》,出版社,1990
赵秉灿,《韩国市场经济史》,东国大学出版社,1992
《朝鲜古代中世纪史》,金日成综合大学出版社,1993
李春植,《中国通史》,韩国放送通信大学出版社,1993
黄文洙,《什么叫历史>,凡友社,1994
朴寿伊,《国际贸易史》,博英社,1994
金轩九,《日本史概论》,智英社,1994
金新,《贸易史》,石井出版社,1995
《朝鲜历史》(从原始到近世),金日成综合大学出版社,1996
李炯锡,《壬辰倭乱史》(上·中·下),壬辰战乱史刊行委员会,1977,
姜俊英,《一本书可以了解的中国》,知英社,1998
鲜于中镐,《韩国史特讲》,汉城大学出版部,1998
元志渊,《一夜读懂的日本史》,中央M & B.2002
柳成龙,《西崖先生文集》,卷16
朴真奭,《中朝友谊三千年》,廷边人民出版社,1984
张声振,《中日关系史》(卷1),1986
白凤南,《朝鲜经济史概论》,延边大学出版社,1988
韩俊光,《中朝关系简史》,辽宁人民出版社,1992
金龟春,《中朝日美系史》(上),延边大学出版社,1994
蒋非非,《中韩关系史》(古代篇),社会科学文献出版社,1998
朴文一,《中国古代文化对朝鲜和日本的影响》,黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,1999
姜龙范、刘子敏,《明代中朝关系史》,黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,1999
李宗勋,《唐·新罗·日本政治制度比较研究》,延边大学出版社,1999
金翰奎,《韩中关系史》,出版社,1999
安作璋,《二千年中国历史简编》,山东友谊出版社,2000
姜龙范等,《中朝日关系史》(下),黑龙江朝鲜民族出版社,2000
夏秀瑞,《中国对外贸易史》,对外经济贸易大学出版社,2001
金龟春,《中朝韩日关系史研究论丛》(1),延边大学出版社,2001
汪向荣、汪皓,《中世纪的中日关系》,中国青年出版社,2001
李智舜,《中华经济五千年》,内蒙古人民出版社,2002
白新良,《中朝关系史》,世界知识出版社,2002
张岂之,《中国历史》(元·明·清),高等教育出版社,2002
陈文寿,《近世初期日本与华夷秩序研究》,香港社会科学出版社有限公司,2002
罔野昌子,《秀吉的朝鲜侵略和中国》,东京,燎原书店,1977
田代和生,《日朝关系的重新恢复与对马关系、近世日朝通交贸易历史的研究》,东京,创文社,1981
石井进,《详说日本史》,山川出版社,1993
野村兼太郎,《日本经济史》,日本,有裴阁
矢野仁一,《支那近代外国关系研究》,弘文堂
田中健夫,《倭寇和勘合贸易》,至文堂
喜多村浩,《贸易》,日本,东京,有裴阁
掘江保藏,《日本经济史》
稻业岩吉,《日丽关系》
岩波讲座,《日本历史》
宫下考吉,《经济史》
田川孝三,《李朝贡纳制研究》
山田宪太郎,《东西香药史》
孥仁荣,《鲜初女真贸易考》,震檀学报8辑,1937
李仁荣,《韩国满州关系史研究》,韩国文化丛书,乙酉文化史,1954
申奭镐,《朝鲜王朝开国当时的对明关系》,国史上的诸问题,第1辑,国史编篡委员会,1959
金圣七,《燕行小考》,历史学报12辑,1960
李铉淙,《明史接待考》,乡土汉城12号,1961
南都泳,《从丽末鲜初马政上看到的大明关系》,东国史学6辑,1963
姜圣祚,《对朝明官方贸易的考察》,中央大学硕士学位论文,1963
李铉熙,《朝鲜前期留京待卫野人考》,乡土汉城20号,1964
李铉淙,《对南洋诸国人来往贸易的思考》,史学研究18号,1964
全海宗,《韩中朝贡关系考》,东洋史学研究,1966
曹泳禄,《水牛角贸易与朝明关系》,东国史学9、10合集,1966
高柄翊,《李朝韩国人的对外观念》,白山学报8号,1967
金炳夏,《李朝前期对日贸易研究》,韩国研究院,1969
李相伯,《李朝建国之研究》,震檀学报5号,1973
黄元九,《明史》(朝鲜传),译注1、2,东方学志14、15辑,1973、1974
全海宗,《十五世纪的东亚情势》,韩国史9,国史编篡委员会,1974
洪淳馨,《丙子胡乱和政治与文化的余波》,1974
《梨大史苑》,第12辑,胡乱和朝鲜的对明、清关系的变迁,1975
周翠兰,《朝明朝贡关系的研究》,庆熙大学硕士学位论文,1977
李铉淙,《对明关系》,韩国史9,国史编篡委员会,1977
李在熙,《朝鲜前期对明书册贸易》,震檀学报44号,1977
延正悦,《朝鲜初期贸易状况和法规之研究》,法史学研究4辑,1977
柳承宙,《朝鲜前期的金银矿业研究》,韩国史研究21号,1979
姜圣祚,《初期朝明间的官方贸易考》,关东大学论文集9辑,1981,
李铉淙,《对明贸易》,韩国史论2,朝鲜前期的商工业,国史编篡委员会,1982
金九镇,《朝鲜前期对女真关系和女真社会的实态》,东洋学14号,檀国大学,1984
全海宗,《朝鲜前期韩中关系的几点问题》,东洋学14号,檀国大学,1984
李泰镇,《国际贸易的盛行》,韩国史市民讲座9号,一潮阁,1991
柳承宙,《朝鲜后期朝清贸易小考》,国史馆论丛30号,国史编篡委员会,1991
韩明基,《十七世纪初银的流通及其影响》,奎章阁15号,汉城大学,1992
孙承喆,《朝鲜时代韩日关系史研究》,知识之泉,1994
李泰镇,《前近代韩中交易史的虚与实》,震檀学报78号,1994
金锺园,《丁卯胡乱》,韩国史29,国史编篡委员会,1995
河宇凤,《与日本的关系》,韩国史22,国史编篡委员会,1995
金东哲,《国际贸易的发达与磨擦》,韩国史28,国史编篡委员会,1996
韩明基,《宣祖后期至仁祖初期对明关系研究》,汉城大学博士学位论文,1997
韩明基,《朝鲜中期的政治和经济》,韩国史30,国史编纂委员会,1998
李铉淙,《朝鲜前期倭人接待考》,史学研究3、4、5号
李铉淙,《倭人关系》,韩国史9,国史编篡委员会
白南云,《朝鲜社会经济史》,经济学全集61号
申爽镐,《已卯士禍由来关考察》,青丘学发第20期
金汉周,《李朝时代的商业与手工业的关系》,李朝社会经济史
金在满,《契丹丝考》(上),东西间接贸易和直接贸易的形态,历史教育第七集
金斗锺,《欧美及西南方医学对韩国医学发展对的影响》《韩国贸易史》,韩国贸易协会刊
王启宗,《丰臣秀吉侵犯朝鲜之原因》,大陆杂志第38卷4期,台北
朱云影,《中国历代商业活动对于日韩越的影响》,中国文化对日韩越的影响,1981
郑梁生,《明代中日关系研究》,文史哲出版社,台北,1985
《韩国学论文集》第一辑,新序,北京大学韩国学研究所,社会科学文献出版社,1992
尹永日,《朝鲜与清朝贸易关系史研究》,延边大学博士学位论文,2004
末松保和,《高丽末朝鲜初期的对明关系》,京城帝国大学史学论丛2,1941
稻叶岩吉,《光海君的对后金政策》,国史上的问题1,1959
石原道博,《万历东征论》,朝鲜学报21、22合辑,1961
中村荣孝,《江户时代的日鲜关系、外交史上的德川政权》,日本关系史研究,1969
寺田窿信,《山西商人之研究》,京都大学东洋史研究会,1972
罔野昌子,《秀吉的朝鲜侵略与中国》,中山八郎教授颂寿纪念,(明清史论考),东京,燎原书店,1977
木宫泰彦,《日中文化交流史》,商务印书馆,1980
田中健夫,《东洋学》15,檀国大学东洋学研究所,1985
浜下武志·川胜平太编,《亚洲贸易圈与日本工业化1500—1900》,东京,1991
左岛显子,《壬辰倭乱讲和破绽》,年谱,朝鲜学,九州大朝鲜学研究会,1994
田村洋幸,《中世日朝贸易研究》
田村洋幸,《论朝鲜初期倭寇的系谱》,朝鲜学报23号
田村洋幸,《朝鲜倭寇的性质及其演变》,铃峰女子短大研究集报,第8辑
中村荣孝,《室町时代的日朝交通和书契及文引》,史学杂志
中村荣孝,《1510年入朝鲜三浦的日本人的争乱》,名古屋大学文学部研究论集2
中村荣孝,《日鲜关系史研究》(上卷)
中村荣孝,《日韩·日朝通交贸易史研究》,第六章
富村真演,《琉球王朝的朝贡贸易政策》,琉球大学文献学部,绝要人文社会5号
小叶田淳,《中世南岛通交贸易史研究》
黑田省三,《朝鲜贸易本质就》,日本历史,通卷第10号
四方博,《朝鲜近代资本主义的成立过程》,京都大学法文学会
青山公亮,《日丽交涉史研究》
三浦周行,《朝鲜的倭寇》
佐久间重男,《明朝的海禁政策》,东方学6辑
宫本区次、博多和福岗、宫本博士编,《九州经济史论集》
藤田丰八,《东西交涉使研究》,南海篇
三木荣,《朝鲜医学史及疾病史》
Harvard University press 1953. The Chinese world order.
Harvard University press 1968.
John k. Fairbank, Trade and diplomacy on the china coast.
Max Weber, 《Social Economy History》。
Wiliam ashey, 《British Economy History》。