土壤种子库对黄土高原草地植被恢复的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
黄土高原植被破坏严重,是我国生态环境脆弱地区。不合理的利用导致了严重的水土流失。如何改善这一地区的生态环境是当前该区生态环境建设的主要任务。本研究以黄土高原典型草原区云雾山草地为研究区域,以封禁26年草地和放牧地为研究对象,采用野外调查和室内试验相结合的研究方法,研究封禁和放牧过程对植被特征变化和土壤种子库特征变化的影响,揭示典型草原退化和恢复过程中的草地植被和种子库的生态学效应。这可为退化植被如何快速恢复提供科学依据,同时对指导黄土高原其周边地区植被恢复具有重要借鉴意义。研究主要结果如下:
     1云雾山草原自然保护区地上植被的优势种和次优势种为:本氏针茅、大针茅、厚穗冰草、铁杆蒿、百里香、阿尔泰狗娃花和香薷,它们有着较高的重要值。地上植被生活型以多年生草本植物的比例最高,一年生草本次之,灌木比例较低。封禁和放牧措施显著改变了地上植被群落的结构:封禁措施显著提高了地上植被的物种数量、覆盖度、高度、生物量和多样性;小叶锦鸡儿的重要值在封禁样地较高,而铁杆蒿、狼毒、厚穗冰草、星毛委陵菜、白颖苔草和冷蒿这几种植物在放牧样地的重要值比封禁样地的高。
     2云雾山草原自然保护区土壤种子库特征的主要结论为:土壤种子库中共统计到37种物种,隶属于16科,其中禾本科、菊科、唇形科、豆科和毛茛科的植物占优势;从春季到秋季,种子库中豆科、禾本科、堇菜科所占比例呈下降趋势,唇形科和菊科所占比例明显提高;种子库的密度得到显著提高;种子库中种子数量在垂直分布上呈现出由表层土壤向深层逐层减少的变化规律;在水平分布上的变化规律为:封禁>放牧;阴坡>阳坡;下坡>中坡>上坡;封禁地土壤种子库中的Margalef丰富度和Shannon-Wienner指数都高于放牧地,Pielou均匀性指数低于放牧地。从春季到秋季,封禁地和放牧地土壤种子库的Margalef丰富度、Shannon-Wienner指数、Pielou均匀性指数都呈下降趋势。
     3百里香、异叶青兰和直径点地梅是云雾山自然保护区土壤种子库中的泛化种,生态位最宽,均达到3.0以上。物种均匀利用资源种类的程度在一定程度上决定了物种的生态位幅度。在同一资源空间中,种对间生态位宽度与生态位重叠并非成正相关关系。同一科属之间的生态位重叠系数均较高,表明在一定程度上生态位可以反映种群间亲缘关系的远近。
     4云雾山草原自然保护区,封禁措施、0~20cm土壤含水量、坡向和坡位为土壤种子库物种分布的主要影响因子,影响次序为:坡向>封禁措施=土壤含水量>坡位。
     5云雾山草原自然保护区,地上植被与土壤种子库相似性较低,且封禁草地的土壤种子库与地上植被的相似性高于放牧地。
The vegetation of Loess Plateau has been destroyed seriously. And the area is one of most fragile ecosystems in China. Severe desertification on the Loess Plateau as a result of improper land utilization has caused critical soil erosion and water shortages. To prevent further soil erosion, it is very important to cover the bare land surface with natural vegetation. Restoring the ecological balance is the main task to improve the region environment. Field survey and laboratory experiment were conducted to study changes of characteristics of the vegetation and soil seed bank in the fencing and grazing grassland on the loess plateau in typical prairie, to open out ecological significance of the vegetation and soil seed bank in degenerating and restoring succession series, which also could be regarded as a scientific basis for the rapid restoration of natural vegetation, and possessed reference meaning for other areas to restore natural vegetation. Main results were as follow:
     1 Stipa bungeana, S. grandis, Aneurolepidium dasystaehys, Artemisa vestita, Thymus mongolicus, Heteropappus altaicus and Elsholtzia ciliate were dominant and hypo-dominant species in Yuwushan Reservation in terms of higher important value than other species. The proportion of life form of the vegetation was: Perennial herbaceous plant>Annual herbaceous plant>Shrub. Comparing with the grazing measure, fencing had changed community structure remarkably, and notablely improved the number of species, the coverage, the height, the biomass and the diversity. Caragana microphylla had high important value in fencing grassland. The important value of A. vestita, Euphorbia fischeriana, A.dasystaehys, Potentilla acaulis, Carex rigescens and A. frigida were higher in grazing grassland than the fencing grassland.
     2 The characteristics of soil seed bank in Yunwushan Reservation were that: 37 species, which belong to 11 families germinated in the plots. In the species of seed bank, Gramineae, Compositea, Labiatae, Leguminosae and Panunculaceae occupied dominant positions; From spring to autumn, the percent of Leguminosae, Gramineae and Violaceae decreased, however, the percent of Compositea and Labiatae increased greatly; densities of the soil seed banks increased significantly; On the vertical distribution, the number of seeds took on a decreasing trend with the depth of soil increasing; The level distribution of soil seed banks followed the order of fencing>grazing, lunar slope > solar slope and top >middle > bottom; The results of the study indicated that the Margalef and the Shannon-Wiener diversity indexes of the soil seed banks were higher in the enclosed grassland, and Pielou evenness indexes were higher in the grazed grassland. From spring to autumn, they all decreased.
     3 The niche breadth of T. mongolicus, Dracocephalum heterophyllum and Androsace umbellate in soil seed bank reached more than 3.0, and we could said they were generation species of soil seed bank in Yunwushan Reservation. To some extent, what a degree of evenness of resources used by species was to decide the niche breadth. In the same resources space, there was no positive correlation between niche breadth and niche overlap of a species counterpart. The niche overlap was higher in the same class, which showed that, to a certain degree, the niche reflected genetic relationship between species far or close.
     4 In Yunwushan Reservation,fencing measure, the soil water of 0~20cm depth, slope direction and slope level were dominant factors affecting species distribution. The influence order was: slope direction> fencing measure =the soil water of 0~20cm depth> slope level. 5 The species similarity of the vegetation and soil seed bank was low in Yunwushan Reservation. In fencing plot, the species similarity of the vegetation and soil seed bank was higher than in grazing plot.
引文
[1] 李博,雍世鹏,李瑶,等.中国的草原[M].北京:科学出版社,1990.
    [2] 陈佐忠.沙尘暴的发生与草地生态治理[M].中国草地,2001,(3):73-81.
    [3] 杜青林.中国草业发展战略[M].北京,中国农业出版社,2006,5.
    [4] 程积民,万惠娥.中国黄土高原植被建设与水土保持[M].北京,中国林业出版社, 2001.
    [5] 黄河水利委员会,黄河中游治理局.黄河水土保持志[M].郑州,河南人民出版社, 1993,42.
    [6] 郭跃.试论农业耕作对土地侵蚀的影响[J].水土保持学报,1995,9(4):94-99.
    [7] 王佑民,郭培才,高维森.黄土高原土壤抗蚀性研究[J].水土保持学报,1994,8(4):11-16.
    [8] 朱显谟.抢救“土壤水库”实为黄土高原生态环境综合治理与可持续发展的关键[J].水土保持学报,2000,14(1):1-6.
    [9] 景可,陈永宗,李凤新.黄河泥沙与环境[M].北京,科学出版社,1993.
    [10] 陈永宗,景可,蔡国强.黄土高原现代侵蚀与治理[M].北京,科学出版社,1988.
    [11] 黄志霖,傅伯杰,陈利顶.恢复生态学与黄土高原生态系统的恢复与重建问题[J].水土保持学报,2002,16(3):122-125.
    [12] 张金屯.黄土高原植被恢复与重建的理论和技术问题[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(5):120-124.
    [13] 唐克丽.黄土高原生态环境建设关键性问题的研讨[J].水土保持通报,1998,18(1):1-7.
    [14] 候庆春,黄旭,韩世峰,等.关于黄土高原地区小老树成因及其改造途径的研究:I.小老树的成因及其改造途径[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(4):80-86.
    [15] 候庆春,黄旭,韩世峰,等.关于黄土高原地区小老树成因及其改造途径的研究:I.土壤水分和养分状况及其与小老树生长的关系[J].水土保持学报,1991,5(2):75-83.
    [16] 攀军,郝明德,邵明安.黄土高原沟壑区草地土壤深层干燥化与氮素消耗[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(2):201-206.
    [17] 程 积 民 , 万 惠 娥 , 王 静 , 等 . 黄 土 丘 陵 区 沙 打 旺 草 地 土 壤 水 分 过 耗 与 恢 复 [J]. 生 态 学报,2004,24(12):2979-2983.
    [18] 于顺利,高明.土壤种子库的研究进展及若干研究热点[J].植物生态学报.20003,2(4):552-560.
    [19] 杨允菲,祝玲.松嫩平原两种盐碱植物群落种子库的比较分析[J].植物生态学报,1995, 19(2):144-148.
    [20] Harper J L. Population biology of plant[M]. Landon: Amercia Press. 1977, 256-263.
    [21] 邓自发,周兴民,王启基.青藏高原矮嵩草草甸种子库的初步研究[J].生态学杂志,1997, 16(5):19-23.
    [22] 杨小波,陈明智,吴庆书.热带地区不同土地利用系统土壤种子库的研究 [J]. 土壤学报,1999,36(3):327-332.
    [23] 杨跃军,李向阳,王保平.森林种子库与天然更新[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):304-308.
    [24] 王明玖.内蒙古贝尔加针茅草原群落植物繁殖[J].生态学研究,2000,9:16-21.
    [25] 杨允菲,祝廷成.草本植物群落种子群落种子雨的初步研究[J].植物学通报,1991,6(1):48-51.
    [26] Thompson K. The occurrence of buried viable seeds in relation to environmental gradiet [J]. J. Biogeogr, 1978, 5: 425-430.
    [27] Silvertown J W. Introduction to plant population ecology [M]. London press: Longman, 1982.
    [28] Bigwood D W, Inouye D W. Spatial pattern analysis of seed banks: an improved method and optimized sampling [J]. Ecology, 1988, 69(2): 497-507.
    [29] 刘 济 明 , 钟 章 成 . 梵 净 山 拷 树 群 落 的 种 子 雨 、 种 子 库 及 更 新 [J]. 植 物 生 态 学 学 报 , 2000,24(4):402-407.
    [30] Houle G. The soil seed bank of granite outcrop plant communities [J]. Oikos, 1988, 52: 87-93.
    [31] 唐 勇 , 曹 敏 , 张 建 侯 , 等 . 刀 耕 火 种 对 山 黄 麻 林 土 壤 种 子 库 的 影 响 [J]. 云 南 植 物 研究.1997,19(4):423-428.
    [32] 唐勇,曹敏,张建侯,等.西双版纳热带森林土壤种子库与地上植被的关系[J].应用生态学报,1999,l0(3):279-282.
    [33] 曹敏,唐勇,张建侯,等.西双版纳热带森林的土壤种子库储量及优势成分[J].云南植物研究, 1997,19(2):177-183.
    [34] 周先叶,李鸣光,王伯荪,等.广东黑石顶自然保护区森林次生演替不同阶段土壤种子库的研究[J].植物生态学报,2000,24(2):222-230.
    [35] 安 树 青 , 林 向 阳 , 洪 必 恭 . 宝 华 山 主 要 植 被 类 型 土 壤 种 子 库 初 探 [J]. 植 物 生 态 学报,1996,20(1):41-50.
    [36] 黄忠良.孔国辉,魏平,等.南亚热带森林不同演替阶段土壤种子库的初步研究[J].热带亚热带植物学报,1996,4(4):42-49.
    [37] 彭军,李旭光,董鸣,等.重庆四面山亚热带常绿阔叶林种子库研究[J].植物生态学报, 2000a,24(2):209-214.
    [38] 彭军,李旭光,付永川,等.重庆四面山常绿阔叶林建群种种子雨、种子库研究[J].植物生态学报,2000b,11(1):22-24.
    [39] 熊利民,钟章成,李旭光.等.亚热带常绿阔叶林不同演替阶段土壤种子库的初步研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1992,16(3):249-257.
    [40] 程积民,万惠娥,胡相明.黄土高原土壤种子库与草地更新[J].土壤学报,2006,43(4): 679-683.
    [41] Chen Z Y, Lei Z X, Zhou J, et al. A preliminary study of winter seed bank of dominant submerged macrophytes in Lake Liangzi [J]. Acta Hydrob logical Sinca, 200l, 25(2):152-l58.
    [42] Forcella F. Prediction of weed seedling densities from buried seed reserves [J]. Weed Research, 1992, 32:29-38.
    [43] Gross K L. A comparison of methods for estimating seed numbers in the soil [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1990, 78: 1079-1093.
    [44] Warr S J., Kent M., Thompson J.P.Seed bank composition and variability in five woodlands in southwest England [J].Journal of Biogeography.1994,21:152-168.
    [45] Grime J P. Seed bank in ecological perspective. In Leck M A., Parker V T., Simpson R L. eds.Ecologyof soil seed bank. San Diego: Academic Press. 1989: X VI-XXI.
    [46] Nakagoshi N. Buried viable seeds in temperate forests. In White J.ed. The populationstructure of vegetation. Dordrecht: Dr. W. Junk Publishers. 1985: 551-570.
    [47] Thomas P. et-hedging germination of desert annuals: beyond the first year[J]. American Naturalist, 1993, 142:474-487.
    [48] Thompson K., Grime J P. Seasonal variation in the seed bank of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1979, 67:893-921.
    [49] Poschlod P, Jackel A K. The dynamics of the generative diaspore bank of calcareous grassland plants.Seasonal dynamics of diaspore rain and diaspore bank in two calcareous grassland sites of the Suebian Alb[J].Flora Jena, 1993,188: 49-71.
    [50] Garwood N C. Tropical soil seed bank: a review. In Leck M A, Parker V T, Simpson R L, eds. Ecology of soil seed bank. San Diego: Academic Press. 1989, 1-5.
    [51] Hodgson J G, Grime J P., Thompson K.The electronic comparative plant ecology. London: Chapman & Hall. 1995.
    [52] Rees M. Trade–offs among dispersal strategies in British plants. Nature, 1993, 366: 150-152.
    [53] Thompson K., Band S R, Hodgson J G. Seed size and shape predict persistence in soil [J]. Functional Ecology, 1993:236-241.
    [54] Rees M. Evolutionary ecology of seed dormancy and seed size [J]. Philosophy Transport of Royal Botany Society in London. 1996, 351: 1299-1308.
    [55] Leishman M R., Westoby M. Seed size and shape are not related to persistence in soil in Australia in the same way as in Britain [J]. Functional Ecology, 1998, 12: 480-485.
    [56] Paker C E., Venable D L. Seed bank in desert annuals: implications for persistence and coexistence in variable environments [J].Ecology, 1996, 77: 1427-1435.
    [57] Guo Q. F., Rundel P W., Goodall D W. Horizontal and vertical distribution of desert seed bank: patterns, causes, and implications [J]. Journal of Arid Environments, 1998, 38:465-478.
    [58] Smith L M, Kadlec J A. Seed banks and their role during drawdown of a North American marsh [J]. Journal of Applied Ecdogy,1983, 20: 673-684.
    [59] Grelssort G., Nilssoa C.Vegetation and seed bank relationships on a lakeshore [J]. Freshwater Biology, 1991, 26:199-207.
    [60] Wilson A D. Relationships of marsh seed banks to vegetation patterns along environmental gradients [J]. Freshwater Biology, 1993, 29: 361-370.
    [61] Hall J B., Swaine M D. Seed stocks in Ghanaian forest soil [J]. Biotropica, 1980, 12: 256-263.
    [62] Vnder Valk A G., Davis C B. A reconstruction of the recent vegetational history of prairie marsh. Eagle Lake,Iowa, from its seed bank[J]. Aquatic Botany, 1979, 6: 29-51.
    [63] Schneider R L., Sharitz R R.Seed bank dynamics in Southeastern riverine swamp[J].American Journal of Botany, 1986, 73:1022-1030.
    [64] Leck M A, Simpson R L.Tidal freshwater wetland zonation: seed andseedling dynamics [J].Aquatic Botany, 1994, 47:61-75.
    [65] Wilson S D, Keddy P A.P Lant zonation on a shoreline gradient: physiologi cal response curves of component species [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1985, 73: 85l-860.
    [66] 李伟,刘贵华,周进等.淡水湿地种子库研究综述[J].生态学报,2002,22(3):395-402.
    [67] Augusto L, Dupouey J L, Picard J F, Ranger J. Potential contribution of the seed bank in coniferous plantations to the restoration of native deciduous forest vegetation [J]. Acta Oecol, 2001, 22:87-98.
    [68] Halpern C B, Evans S A, Nielson S. Soil seed banks in young, close canopy forests of the Olympic Peninsula, Washington: potential contributions to understory reinitiation [J]. Can J Bot, 1999, 77: 922-955.
    [69] Hill M O. The development of a flora in even - aged plantations. In Ford E D, Malcom D C, Anderson J, eds. The ecology of even–aged plantations. Intitute of Trrestrial Ecology, Cambridge, 1979.
    [70] Moles A T, Drake D R. Potential of the seed rain and seed bank to regeneration of native forest under plantation pine in New Zealand [J]. N Z J Bot, 1999, 7: 8-9.
    [71] Marks P L. The role of pin cherry (Prunus pensylanica L.) in the maintenance of stability in northern hardwood ecosystems [J]. Ecol Monogr, 1974, 44: 73-88.
    [72] Johnson E A. Buried seed populations in the subarctic forest east of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories [J]. Can. J. Bot, 1975, 53:2933-2941.
    [73] Kalamees R, Zobel M. Soil seed bank composition in different successional stages of a species rich wooded meadow in Laelatu, western Estonia [J]. Acta Oecol, 1998, 19 (2): 175-180.
    [74] Bakker J P, Bakker E S, Rosen E,et al. Soil seed bank composition along a gradient from dryalvar grassland to Juniperus shrubland [J]. J Veg Sci, 1996, 7: 166-176.
    [75] Donelan M, Thompson K. Distribution of buried viable seeds along successional series [J].Biol Conservation, 1980, 17: 297-311.
    [76] McDonald A W, Bakker J P, Vegelin K. Seed bank classification and its importance for the restortation of species-rich flood-meadows [J]. J Veg Sci, 1996, 7: 157-164.
    [77] 熊利民,钟章成,李旭光,等.亚热带常绿阔叶林不同演替阶段土壤种子库的初步研究[J].植物生态学与地植物学学报,1992,16(3):249-256.
    [78] 杨晓波,陈明智,吴庆书.热带地区不同土地利用系统土壤种子库的研究[J].土壤学报, 1999,36(3):327-333.
    [79] Zhan X M, Li L H, Li X, et al. Effects of grazing on the soil seed bank of a stipa krylovii steppe community[J]. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 2005, 29 (5): 747-752.
    [80] Holmes P M. Depth distribution and co- mposition of seed banks in alien-invaded and uni- nvaded fynbos vegetation [J]. Austral Ecology, 2002, 27: 110-120.
    [81] Bai W M, Bao X M, Li L H. Effects of Agriophyllum squarrosum seed banks on its coloniza- tion in a moving sand dune in Hunshandake Sand Land of China [J]. Journal of Ari Envirodments, 2004,59:151-157.
    [82] 张玲,李广贺,张旭.土壤种子库研究综述[J].生态学杂志,2004,23(2): 114-120.
    [83] Thompson K, Bakker J P, Bekker R M. The soil seed banks of North West Europe: Methodology, Density and Longevity [M]. London: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
    [84] 苏德毕力格,李永宏,雍世鹏,等.冷蒿草原土壤可萌发种子库特征及其对放牧的响应[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):43-48.
    [85] 尚占环,龙瑞军,马玉寿,等.黄河源区退化高寒草地土壤种子库:种子萌发的数量和动态[J].应用与环境生物学报,2006,12(3):313-317.
    [86] 吴征镒.中国植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1980,55-57.
    [87] 杨跃军,李向阳,王保平.森林种子库与天然更新[J].应用生态学报,2001,12(2):304-308.
    [88] 马克平.生物群落多样性的测度方法I.a多样性的测度方法(上)[J].生物多样性,1994,2(3):162-168.
    [89] 郭逍宇,张金屯,宫辉力,等.安太堡矿区植被恢复过程主要种生态位梯度变化研究[J].西北植物学报,2004,24(12):2329-2334.
    [90] 曹同,郭水良,高谦.应用排序分析藓类植物分类群分布与气候因素的关系[J].应用生态学报,2000,11(5):680-686.
    [91] 杨利民,韩梅,李建东.中国东北样带草地群落放牧干扰植物多样性的变化[J].植物生态学报,2001,25(1):110-114.
    [92] 张继义,赵哈林,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地植被恢复系列上群落演替与物种多样性的恢复动态[J].植物生态学报,2004,28(1):86-92.
    [93] 谢 晋 阳 , 陈 灵 芝 . 中 国 暖 温 带 若 干 灌 丛 群 落 多 样 性 问 题 的 研 究 [J]. 植 物 生 态 学 报 , 1997,21(3):197-207.
    [94] 曲仲湘,吴玉树,王焕校,等.植物生态学[M].北京:高等教育出社,1983:80-90.
    [95] 周会萍,牛德奎,张继红,等.湿地松人工林群落下植被物种多样性研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2006,8(1):79-81.
    [96] 程积民.封禁、刈割、对草地植被的影响[J].水土保持研究,1998, (1):1-67.
    [97] Naughton S J. Grazing as an optimization process grass ungulate relationships in the Serengeti [J]. Amer. Nat., 1979, 113:91-703.
    [98] 刘萍萍.黄土高原半干旱区退化长芒草草地群落结构特征的研究[D].杨陵:中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所,2000.
    [99] 周纪伦,郑师章,杨持.植物种群生态学[M].高等教育出版社,1992.
    [100] 王正文,邢福,祝廷成,等.松嫩平原羊草草地植物功能群组成及多样性特征对水淹干扰的响应[J].植物生态学报,2002,26(6):708-716.
    [101] 王仁忠,李建东.放牧对松嫩平原羊草草地植物种群分布的影响[J].草业科学,1993,10(3):27-30.
    [102] Margalef R. On ertain unifying principles in ecology. Am. N at., 1963, 97:357-374.
    [103] Odum E P. The strategy of ecosystem development. Science, 1969, 64: 262-270.
    [104] 李永宏.内蒙古典型草原地带退化草原的恢复动态[J].生物多样性,1995,3(3):125-130.
    [105] Reichman J. Spatial and temporal variation of seed distribution in Sonoran desert soils [J]. Journal of Biogeography, 1984, 11:1-11.
    [106] Thompson K. Small-scale heterogeneity in the seed bank of an acid grassland [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1986, 74: 733-738.
    [107] Izhaki I, Neˊeman G. Soil seed bank in Mediterranean pine forest. In: Neˊeman G, Traud L, eds. Ecology, biogeography and management of Pinus halepensis and P.brutica forest ecosystems in the Mediterranean Basin. Leiden, the Netherlands: Backhuys Publishers, 2000.
    [108] 余军 , 马红彬 , 王宁 . 宁夏盐池荒漠草原土壤种子库动态变化研究 [J]. 农业科学研究 , 2007,28(2):36-38.
    [109] Russi L, Cooks P S, Roberts E H. Seed bank dynamics in a Mediterranean grassland[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 1992, 29:763-771.
    [110] Thompson K, Grime J P. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in the contrasting habitats [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1979, 67: 893-921.
    [111] Li Qingfeng.Soil seed bank in a Sandy Land Vegetation in the Ordos Plateau of Inner Monfolia [J].International Symposium on Grassland Management in the Mongolia Plateau.1997,8-13.
    [112]Baskinm J M, BaskinC C.Dormancy breaking and germination requirements of nimble will (Muhlenbergia schreberi Gmel)seed[J]. Journal of Range Management. 1985, 38, (6): 513-515.
    [113] Comins H N. Evolutionarily stable strategies for localized dispersal in two dimensions.Journal of Theoretical Biology, 1982, 94(3): 579-606.
    [114] 赵哈林,赵学勇,张铜会,等.科尔沁沙地沙漠化过程及恢复机理[M].北京:海洋出版社,2003.
    [115] 白文娟,焦菊英,张振国.安塞黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地土壤种子库特征[J].中国水土保持科学, 2007, 5(2):65-72.
    [116] 李毅,朱金兆,朱清科.生态位理论及其测度研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,2003,25(1):10-15.
    [117] 林思祖,黄世国,洪伟,等.杉阔混交林主要种群多维生态位特征[J].生态学报, 2002,22(6):962-968.
    [118] 张桂莲,张金屯.关帝山神尾沟优势种生态位分析[J].武汉植物学研究,2002,20(3):203-208.
    [119] 李博.生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社.2001,103-107.
    [120] 胡建忠 , 郑佳丽 , 沈晶玉 . 退耕地人工植物群落根系生态位及其分布特征 [J]. 生态学报,2005,25(3):481-490.
    [121] 王刚.植物群落中生态位重叠的计测[J].植物生态学报与地植物学学报,1984,8(4):329-334.
    [122] 杨效文,马继盛.生态位有关术语的定义及公式评述[J].生态学杂志,1992,11(2):44-49.
    [123] 张金屯.植被数量生态学方法[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1995,90-93.
    [124] Colwell R K, Futuyma D J. On the measurement of niche breadth and overlap [J]. Ecology, 1971, 52: 567–576.
    [125] Cody M L. Competition and the structure of bird communities[M]. Monographs in Population Biology. USA:Princeton University Press,1974.
    [126] Levins R. Evolution in changing environments: some theoretical explorations[M]. USA: PrincetonUniversity Press, 1968.
    [127] Smith E P. Niche breadth, resources availability and inference[J]. Ecology, 1982, 63(6): 1675-1681.
    [128] 林思组,黄世国,洪伟,等.杉阔混交林主要种群多维生态位特征[J],生态学报,2002, 22(6):962-968
    [129] 刘金福,洪伟.格氏栲群落生态学研究[J].生态学报,1999,19(3):347-352.
    [130] Ter braak, CJ F. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis [J].Ecology, 1986, 67: 1167-1179.
    [131] Thompson K, Basterm K. Establishment from seed of selected umbelliferae in unmanged grassland [J]. Functional Ecology, 1992, 6: 346-352.
    [132] Roach D A. Buried seed bank standing vegetation in two adjacent tundra hatitats, northern Alaska [J].Ocellogica, 1983,60,359-364.
    [133] 唐勇,曹敏,盛余才.西双版纳热带森林土壤种子库的季节变化[J].广西植物, 2000, 20(4):371-376.
    [134] 彭少麟.鼎湖山森林植物优势种群生态位重叠的研究[J].热带亚热带森林生态系统研究.1990,(6):19-27.
    [135] 余世孝.鼎湖山厚壳群落植物优势种生态位宽度与重叠之研究[J].热带亚热带森林生态系统研究.1985,(6):32-41.
    [136] 李锋瑞,赵丽娅,王树芳,等.封禁对退化沙质草地土壤种子库与地上群落结构的影响[J].草业学报,2003,12(4):90-99.
    [137] Peco B, Ortega M, Levassor C. Similarity between seed bank and vegetation in Mediterranean grassland: a predictive mode [M]. J.Veg.Sci., 1998,815-828.
    [138] Thompson K, Grime J P. Seasonal variation in the seed banks of herbaceous species in ten contrasting habitats [J].Journal of Ecology, 1979,67:893-921.
    [139] Champness S S., Morros K. The population of buried variable seeds in relation to contrasting pasture and soil types [J]. Journal of Ecology, 1948, 36:149-173.
    [140] 唐勇,曹敏,张建候,等.西双版纳热带森林土壤种子库与地上植被的关系[J].应用生态学报,1999,10(3):279-282.
    [141] 赵萌莉 , 许志信 . 内蒙古乌兰察布西部温性荒漠草地土壤种子库初探 [J]. 中国草地 , 2000,(2):44-46.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700