辽河油田补赔偿工作伦理案例研究
|
摘要
辽河油田是以石油、天然气勘探开发为主、油气深加工等多元开发为辅的大型联合企业,在勘探生产过程中经常遇到施工现场周围的群众、企业以生产设备、设施产生噪音震动影响休息、养殖等原因,向油田索要正常或非常的补赔偿,甚至个体或群体采取堵路等过激方式进行,严重阻碍油田生产,破坏了社会风气,影响社会和谐。
虽然政府、辽河油田坚持以人为本原则,采取各种措施减小影响,充分考虑受影响群众、企业的诉求,在合理合法的基础上,尽最大努力满足受影响群众、企业的愿望,争取和谐友好解决处理因补赔偿问题引起经济纠纷,但由于目前为止无论是企业、还是政府,没有符合油田补赔偿问题工作需要的、系统的、简洁明了的、权威的补赔偿标准与细则,且此类问题多是群体行为,致使在协调处理补赔偿问题时常常形成法不责众的局面。即使动用警力干预,也由于依据不足而使法律显得苍白无力。
因此,开展伦理道德教育,建立良好的社会道德秩序,建立适合辽河油田补赔偿工作的、权威的补赔偿标准或细则,完善补赔偿行为规范,加强法律制度约束机制,是高效快速、公平公正、合理合法解决油田生产的补赔偿问题的当务之急。通过建立标准和伦理道德教育,达到保护各方利益、保护国家能源安全和构建和谐社会的目的。这不仅是辽河油田生产经营的需要,亦是保护国家能源安全和构建和谐社会的需要。
本文从辽河油田补赔偿问题的产生及现状入手,采用案例分析的办法,找出辽河油田补赔偿工作中所涉及的伦理问题。探索运用伦理学理论,提出了相应的解决办法,指导辽河油田补赔偿工作。希望本文能对今后类似的问题起到参考、借鉴的作用。
全文共分四部分。第一部分引言,第二部分企业简介与案例,第三部分案例分析,最后是结论部分。
Liaohe Oilfield Company is a large integrated enterprise which puts effort into petroleum exploration, development and further procession as supplementary. There sometimes are of trouble that the citizens or companies surrounding the working field always ask normal or abnormal compensation for detrimental effect, which is mainly caused by the noise and shaking equipments and facilities during the procedures of drilling, to rest, cultivation and so on. What's more, taking radical action, such as blocking the road, will hinder the production of the oilfield, and bring serious influence to social morality which would undermine the harmony of our society.
Based on principles of human-oriented and laws, the government and Liaohe Oilfield Company adopt various measures to deal with the economic disputes which are caused by problems of compensation friendly, and make their great effort to satisfy the desire of the effected masses and companies in order to have a minimal impact. However, whether the government or company seems powerless because the lack of a set of systemic, brief, clear, and authoritative criterion. Furthermore, such issues are present in form of group behavior, and the law does not punish everybody.
As a matter of fact, the discussion of compensation is the process of reallocation of the interests. For the difference of inner quality, interest representation, working capability and credit among parties involving the procedure of handling the compensation trouble, various results will come out for a same problem without a set of authoritative compensation criterion, which leads to comparing of influenced masses and companies.
This article makes up the compensation question from the Liaohe Oilfield Company the production and present situation obtaining,Uses the case analysis the means, Discovers the Liaohe Oilfield Company to make up ethics question which in the compensation work involves. Exploration utilization ethics theory, Proposed the corresponding solution, Instructs the Liaohe Oilfield Company to make up the compensation work. Hoped this article will be able to play the reference to the next similar question, the model role.
This paper consists of four parts. Part one is introduction. The second part Company and Case ,The third part of case analysis, The last part is the conclusion.
虽然政府、辽河油田坚持以人为本原则,采取各种措施减小影响,充分考虑受影响群众、企业的诉求,在合理合法的基础上,尽最大努力满足受影响群众、企业的愿望,争取和谐友好解决处理因补赔偿问题引起经济纠纷,但由于目前为止无论是企业、还是政府,没有符合油田补赔偿问题工作需要的、系统的、简洁明了的、权威的补赔偿标准与细则,且此类问题多是群体行为,致使在协调处理补赔偿问题时常常形成法不责众的局面。即使动用警力干预,也由于依据不足而使法律显得苍白无力。
因此,开展伦理道德教育,建立良好的社会道德秩序,建立适合辽河油田补赔偿工作的、权威的补赔偿标准或细则,完善补赔偿行为规范,加强法律制度约束机制,是高效快速、公平公正、合理合法解决油田生产的补赔偿问题的当务之急。通过建立标准和伦理道德教育,达到保护各方利益、保护国家能源安全和构建和谐社会的目的。这不仅是辽河油田生产经营的需要,亦是保护国家能源安全和构建和谐社会的需要。
本文从辽河油田补赔偿问题的产生及现状入手,采用案例分析的办法,找出辽河油田补赔偿工作中所涉及的伦理问题。探索运用伦理学理论,提出了相应的解决办法,指导辽河油田补赔偿工作。希望本文能对今后类似的问题起到参考、借鉴的作用。
全文共分四部分。第一部分引言,第二部分企业简介与案例,第三部分案例分析,最后是结论部分。
Liaohe Oilfield Company is a large integrated enterprise which puts effort into petroleum exploration, development and further procession as supplementary. There sometimes are of trouble that the citizens or companies surrounding the working field always ask normal or abnormal compensation for detrimental effect, which is mainly caused by the noise and shaking equipments and facilities during the procedures of drilling, to rest, cultivation and so on. What's more, taking radical action, such as blocking the road, will hinder the production of the oilfield, and bring serious influence to social morality which would undermine the harmony of our society.
Based on principles of human-oriented and laws, the government and Liaohe Oilfield Company adopt various measures to deal with the economic disputes which are caused by problems of compensation friendly, and make their great effort to satisfy the desire of the effected masses and companies in order to have a minimal impact. However, whether the government or company seems powerless because the lack of a set of systemic, brief, clear, and authoritative criterion. Furthermore, such issues are present in form of group behavior, and the law does not punish everybody.
As a matter of fact, the discussion of compensation is the process of reallocation of the interests. For the difference of inner quality, interest representation, working capability and credit among parties involving the procedure of handling the compensation trouble, various results will come out for a same problem without a set of authoritative compensation criterion, which leads to comparing of influenced masses and companies.
This article makes up the compensation question from the Liaohe Oilfield Company the production and present situation obtaining,Uses the case analysis the means, Discovers the Liaohe Oilfield Company to make up ethics question which in the compensation work involves. Exploration utilization ethics theory, Proposed the corresponding solution, Instructs the Liaohe Oilfield Company to make up the compensation work. Hoped this article will be able to play the reference to the next similar question, the model role.
This paper consists of four parts. Part one is introduction. The second part Company and Case ,The third part of case analysis, The last part is the conclusion.
引文
[1]中央社会治安综合治理委员会办公室等十三家部、委、局、办、公司联合下发的综治办[EB].关于印发《关于开展平安油区建设的实施意见》的通知,[2007]73号.
[2]辽宁省地震研究所大民屯地区人工地震震动试验[R].报告2005.
[3]辽宁省地震研究所钻机作业震动对建筑物的影响监测研究[R].报告1993
[4]东北农学院主编.家畜环境卫生学[M].北京:农业出版社,1990.
[5]大庆油田物探公司.人工地震效应与环境影响试验研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[6]孙耀,姜尚亮.钻井噪声与振动对鲤鱼生长的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21,12.
[7]翟文明,李冶威主编.现代汉语辞海[M].北京:光明日报出版社.2002,1.
[8]魏英敏.新理论教程[M].北京:大学出版社,2003.
[9]周中之.伦理学[M].北京:人民出版社,2004
[10]杨明伟.我国当前制度伦理建设问题初探[J/OL].陕西行政学院学报,2008,2.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2420
[11]余凯成,组织行为学[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2006.
[12]闫伟.区域生态补偿体系研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2008.
[13]杨山.家禽生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
[14]陈润生.猪生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.
[15]山西农业大学编.兽医学[M].北京:农业出版社,1992.
[16]何樵登.地震勘探原理与方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.
[17]贾忠杰,刘桂和.钻井工程实训指导[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007.
[18]李继志,陈荣振.石油钻采机械概论[M].北京:石油大学出版社,2006.
[19]宋希仁.西方伦理学思想史[M].中国人民大学出版社,1985.
[20]朱贻庭.伦理学大辞典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2002.
[21]Jacques P.Thiroux.Ethics:Theory and Practice[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[22]Al Gini.商业伦理学案例(英文版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社第八版,2005.
[23]罗国杰.中国传统道德简编本[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1995.
[24]王钰译,约翰.布鲁木.伦理的经济学诠释[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[25]彼得(Peter,F.).Great Traditions in Ethics Denise White Peterfreund,Tenth Edition [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[26]罗国杰.中国伦理思想史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[27]孙喜林.管理心理学[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2006.
[28]金镝,孙立旭.经济学[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2006.
[29]余凯成,程文文,陈维政.人力资源管理[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2006.
[30]余凯成,陈维政,张丽华.组织行为学·人力资源管理案例与练习[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2001.
[31]罗建文,王霞.中国特色的民生伦理论纲[J/OL].重庆大学学报:2008,1. http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2411.
[32]曹刚,徐新.法伦理学研究论纲[J/OL].伦理学研究:2008,3.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2434.
[33]陆晓禾.和谐社会、市场经济与伦理规范[J/OL].理论与现代化:(2008.1)[2009,06/,10].http://www.cqvip.com/onlineread/onlineread.asp?ID=1000188749&SUID=EGBNBFDHDNCB COPIBOLGEMCBCDOIPNFP.
[34]徐贲.承诺、信任和制度秩序:当今中国的信任匮缺和转化[J/OL].学术中国:2005,1http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2290.
[35]苏勇,陈小平.管理伦理学教学案例精选[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
[36]童建军,李萍.德性论与规范论比较研究-目的与手段的视角[J/OL].道德与文明:2009,3.http://www.cqvip.com/qk/80457X/200903/30602707.html.
[37]詹世友.伦理实体:道德教化的社会环境支持[J/OL].甘肃理论学刊:2001,1.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2576.
[38]李萍.论日常道德与理想道德[J/OL].玉溪师范学院学报:2003,5.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2558.
[39]陈秀萍.试论当代中国法律与道德的冲突及其限制[J/OL].南京社会科学:2008,7.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2465.
[40]曹凤月.企业社会责任:法律责任还是道德责任[J/OL].现代企业文化:2008,12.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2488.
[2]辽宁省地震研究所大民屯地区人工地震震动试验[R].报告2005.
[3]辽宁省地震研究所钻机作业震动对建筑物的影响监测研究[R].报告1993
[4]东北农学院主编.家畜环境卫生学[M].北京:农业出版社,1990.
[5]大庆油田物探公司.人工地震效应与环境影响试验研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1999.
[6]孙耀,姜尚亮.钻井噪声与振动对鲤鱼生长的影响[J].生态学报,2001,21,12.
[7]翟文明,李冶威主编.现代汉语辞海[M].北京:光明日报出版社.2002,1.
[8]魏英敏.新理论教程[M].北京:大学出版社,2003.
[9]周中之.伦理学[M].北京:人民出版社,2004
[10]杨明伟.我国当前制度伦理建设问题初探[J/OL].陕西行政学院学报,2008,2.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2420
[11]余凯成,组织行为学[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2006.
[12]闫伟.区域生态补偿体系研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2008.
[13]杨山.家禽生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
[14]陈润生.猪生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1999.
[15]山西农业大学编.兽医学[M].北京:农业出版社,1992.
[16]何樵登.地震勘探原理与方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1986.
[17]贾忠杰,刘桂和.钻井工程实训指导[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2007.
[18]李继志,陈荣振.石油钻采机械概论[M].北京:石油大学出版社,2006.
[19]宋希仁.西方伦理学思想史[M].中国人民大学出版社,1985.
[20]朱贻庭.伦理学大辞典[M].上海:上海辞书出版社,2002.
[21]Jacques P.Thiroux.Ethics:Theory and Practice[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2008.
[22]Al Gini.商业伦理学案例(英文版)[M].北京:北京大学出版社第八版,2005.
[23]罗国杰.中国传统道德简编本[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1995.
[24]王钰译,约翰.布鲁木.伦理的经济学诠释[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2008.
[25]彼得(Peter,F.).Great Traditions in Ethics Denise White Peterfreund,Tenth Edition [M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
[26]罗国杰.中国伦理思想史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2008.
[27]孙喜林.管理心理学[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2006.
[28]金镝,孙立旭.经济学[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2006.
[29]余凯成,程文文,陈维政.人力资源管理[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2006.
[30]余凯成,陈维政,张丽华.组织行为学·人力资源管理案例与练习[M].大连:大连理工大学出版社,2001.
[31]罗建文,王霞.中国特色的民生伦理论纲[J/OL].重庆大学学报:2008,1. http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2411.
[32]曹刚,徐新.法伦理学研究论纲[J/OL].伦理学研究:2008,3.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2434.
[33]陆晓禾.和谐社会、市场经济与伦理规范[J/OL].理论与现代化:(2008.1)[2009,06/,10].http://www.cqvip.com/onlineread/onlineread.asp?ID=1000188749&SUID=EGBNBFDHDNCB COPIBOLGEMCBCDOIPNFP.
[34]徐贲.承诺、信任和制度秩序:当今中国的信任匮缺和转化[J/OL].学术中国:2005,1http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2290.
[35]苏勇,陈小平.管理伦理学教学案例精选[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
[36]童建军,李萍.德性论与规范论比较研究-目的与手段的视角[J/OL].道德与文明:2009,3.http://www.cqvip.com/qk/80457X/200903/30602707.html.
[37]詹世友.伦理实体:道德教化的社会环境支持[J/OL].甘肃理论学刊:2001,1.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2576.
[38]李萍.论日常道德与理想道德[J/OL].玉溪师范学院学报:2003,5.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2558.
[39]陈秀萍.试论当代中国法律与道德的冲突及其限制[J/OL].南京社会科学:2008,7.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2465.
[40]曹凤月.企业社会责任:法律责任还是道德责任[J/OL].现代企业文化:2008,12.http://www.aecna.com/dispArticle.Asp?ID=2488.