和谐视野下的公司职工思想政治教育研究
|
摘要
思想政治教育是党的工作的生命线,公司职工思想政治教育是公司的生命线。随着市场经济的发展,公民法律意识的增强,公司职工的思想政治教育面临着很多新情况,遇到了很多新问题。主要体现为,一是职工权理论和保护模式的缺乏；二是当前流行的企业文化与职工思想政治教育的整合问题,三是职工思想政治教育在经济全球化、信息网络化的现代社会中教育手段和方法的创新问题。这些问题的有效解决,是构建社会主义和谐社会的内在要求。中共中央提出了社会主义和谐社会的六大特征,即民主法治,公平正义,诚信友爱,充满活力,安定有序,人与自然和谐相处。从系统论的角度而言,和谐社会是由上述六大要素耦合而成,任何一个要素不能正常作用,则和谐社会难以实现。本文所讨论的正是适应和谐社会的问题,因为职工权的基础是民主法治、公平正义,企业文化的目标是诚信友爱、和谐相处,充满活力、安定有序需要手段方式的创新。
本文是以公司职工的思想政治教育为研究对象,遵循提出问题,分析问题和解决问题的思路：第一部分,提出问题,指出公司职工思想政治教育在和谐社会中所需要解决的三大问题,即职工权缺乏保障,与企业文化的整合及创新手段方式问题。第二部分,分析问题解决问题,提出公司职工权的理论和保护模式,企业文化对于思想政治教育的兼容和借鉴意义,以及和谐社会背景下如何创新公司职工思想政治教育的方式和手段。第三部分,在全文分析的基础之上,得出结论并提出研究的展望。
论文在写作过程中,试图从以下方面有所创新。第一,引入法律的视角看待公司职工思想政治教育,分析公司职工思想政治教育的权利基础。传统公司理论强调对股东负责,然而随着职工的人力资源性质开始逐渐被认识和重视,与此相适应,关于公司职工权的研究也在深入。公司职工权内容上具有双重性,即包含了财产性质的索取权和人身性质的参与管理权。对于职工权的保护,我国的法律规定还并不完善,文章提出可以通过以下方式细化和完善,如要明确规定职工董事、职工监事的法律地位、适用范围,职工董事、职工监事的人数比例必须由法律明确规定,建立健全职工董事、职工监事合法权益的保障机制,建立健全对职工董事、职工监事的监督制度,明确规定对公司职工权利造成损害时,要追究相关人员的民事或者刑事责任。第二,论文突破了传统的局限于职工思想政治教育的个体研究模式,而是将和谐社会视为由诸要素耦合的系统,主动考察思想政治教育与要素之间不相符合之处,力求探明完善路径,以弥补理论空白。第三,注重运用比较制度学的方法,对文章内容多角度多侧面论述。论述职工权时注意分析国外的职工权制度并作比较,由于国外思想政治教育提法罕见,在公司中往往盛行企业文化,故分析企业文化的内涵、外延,通过与思想政治教育的比较指出对思想政治教育的借鉴意义,论述方法手段创新时,以激励机制作为借鉴来完善论文深度。这些使得论文在研究方法上,采用多学科的研究方法,力图以思想政治教育为原理,以法律的目光来审视该课题,从管理学的角度指明其实用性,动态研究公司职工思想政治教育。这突破了以往单纯以思想政治教育研究思想政治教育的藩篱。
Ideological and political education is critic for the work of our party, and the Ideological and political education to employee is also very important to company. Nowadays,ideological and political education to employee is facing many new problems with the development of market-oriental economy and the strength of citizens'awareness of law. These questions mainly include:first of all, our country lacks theory and way to protect the labor's right; secondlly, how should we deal with the popular company's culture; last but not the least, how to innovate the method of education in mordern society. Sloving these questions effectively, will defintely be helpful to achieve the Harmonious Socialist Society. Harmonious Socialist Society consists of six characters, inculding democracy and rule by law, justice, honest, vitality, order, dealing harmoniously with nature. From the systematic view, ineffection of any character will hinder to achieve the Harmonious Socialist Society. This paper is discussing the questions of how to make the Ideological and political education to employee adapt to the Harmonious Socialisit Society, because, the basis of right to employee is democracy and rule by law, justice, the objective of company's cultrue is honest and dealing harmoniously with nature, vitality and order need innovation of ways.
This paper pays attention to ideological and political education to company's employee, according to the way of raising questions,'analyzing questions and sloving questions. It consists of three parts:the first part puts forwards to the three questions, those are the lack of protecting right of employee, how to deal with company's culture, how to innovate the way of ideological education to company's culture. The second part analyses and sloves three questions, putting forward to the theory and model to protect the right of company's employee, analyzing the way of company's culture is to better the ideological and political education of company's employees, and posing idea to innovate the way of ideological and political education in the Harmonious Socialist Society. The third part, it comes to the conclusions and the possible further studies.
This paper trys to innovate in the following points. Firstly, viewing ideological and political education to company's employee from law, analyzing the right basis of the object. Traditional thoery of company puts the emphasis on the shareholders, however, the research of right of employee has been developed, in accordence with the development of human resource theory. The right of employee inculdes right of property and personal right. Our law lacks the way of protecting the right of employee, so this paper suggests to take actions as follows, for examole, law should definitely provide the status, range, rate of labor director and labor superviser,establishment of model to protect the right of labor director and labor superviser, and the civil and criminal punishment of violating their rights. Secodly, the paper breaks the limitation of individual research model of ideological and political education, regarding the Harmionious Socialist Society as the system that is composed by six factors, wondering on the unconsistence of ideological and political education with these factors, in order to better theory. Thirdly, this paper uses methods of systematic comparing way, social analyzing way by law and so on, illustrating the paper from many sides. For example, while discussing right of employee, the paper compares the foreign system, and it contrasts the popular company's culture with ideological and political education. These research methods collect the principles of law, ideological and political education, and management, breaking through the traditional limitation of researching ideological and political education by itself.
本文是以公司职工的思想政治教育为研究对象,遵循提出问题,分析问题和解决问题的思路：第一部分,提出问题,指出公司职工思想政治教育在和谐社会中所需要解决的三大问题,即职工权缺乏保障,与企业文化的整合及创新手段方式问题。第二部分,分析问题解决问题,提出公司职工权的理论和保护模式,企业文化对于思想政治教育的兼容和借鉴意义,以及和谐社会背景下如何创新公司职工思想政治教育的方式和手段。第三部分,在全文分析的基础之上,得出结论并提出研究的展望。
论文在写作过程中,试图从以下方面有所创新。第一,引入法律的视角看待公司职工思想政治教育,分析公司职工思想政治教育的权利基础。传统公司理论强调对股东负责,然而随着职工的人力资源性质开始逐渐被认识和重视,与此相适应,关于公司职工权的研究也在深入。公司职工权内容上具有双重性,即包含了财产性质的索取权和人身性质的参与管理权。对于职工权的保护,我国的法律规定还并不完善,文章提出可以通过以下方式细化和完善,如要明确规定职工董事、职工监事的法律地位、适用范围,职工董事、职工监事的人数比例必须由法律明确规定,建立健全职工董事、职工监事合法权益的保障机制,建立健全对职工董事、职工监事的监督制度,明确规定对公司职工权利造成损害时,要追究相关人员的民事或者刑事责任。第二,论文突破了传统的局限于职工思想政治教育的个体研究模式,而是将和谐社会视为由诸要素耦合的系统,主动考察思想政治教育与要素之间不相符合之处,力求探明完善路径,以弥补理论空白。第三,注重运用比较制度学的方法,对文章内容多角度多侧面论述。论述职工权时注意分析国外的职工权制度并作比较,由于国外思想政治教育提法罕见,在公司中往往盛行企业文化,故分析企业文化的内涵、外延,通过与思想政治教育的比较指出对思想政治教育的借鉴意义,论述方法手段创新时,以激励机制作为借鉴来完善论文深度。这些使得论文在研究方法上,采用多学科的研究方法,力图以思想政治教育为原理,以法律的目光来审视该课题,从管理学的角度指明其实用性,动态研究公司职工思想政治教育。这突破了以往单纯以思想政治教育研究思想政治教育的藩篱。
Ideological and political education is critic for the work of our party, and the Ideological and political education to employee is also very important to company. Nowadays,ideological and political education to employee is facing many new problems with the development of market-oriental economy and the strength of citizens'awareness of law. These questions mainly include:first of all, our country lacks theory and way to protect the labor's right; secondlly, how should we deal with the popular company's culture; last but not the least, how to innovate the method of education in mordern society. Sloving these questions effectively, will defintely be helpful to achieve the Harmonious Socialist Society. Harmonious Socialist Society consists of six characters, inculding democracy and rule by law, justice, honest, vitality, order, dealing harmoniously with nature. From the systematic view, ineffection of any character will hinder to achieve the Harmonious Socialist Society. This paper is discussing the questions of how to make the Ideological and political education to employee adapt to the Harmonious Socialisit Society, because, the basis of right to employee is democracy and rule by law, justice, the objective of company's cultrue is honest and dealing harmoniously with nature, vitality and order need innovation of ways.
This paper pays attention to ideological and political education to company's employee, according to the way of raising questions,'analyzing questions and sloving questions. It consists of three parts:the first part puts forwards to the three questions, those are the lack of protecting right of employee, how to deal with company's culture, how to innovate the way of ideological education to company's culture. The second part analyses and sloves three questions, putting forward to the theory and model to protect the right of company's employee, analyzing the way of company's culture is to better the ideological and political education of company's employees, and posing idea to innovate the way of ideological and political education in the Harmonious Socialist Society. The third part, it comes to the conclusions and the possible further studies.
This paper trys to innovate in the following points. Firstly, viewing ideological and political education to company's employee from law, analyzing the right basis of the object. Traditional thoery of company puts the emphasis on the shareholders, however, the research of right of employee has been developed, in accordence with the development of human resource theory. The right of employee inculdes right of property and personal right. Our law lacks the way of protecting the right of employee, so this paper suggests to take actions as follows, for examole, law should definitely provide the status, range, rate of labor director and labor superviser,establishment of model to protect the right of labor director and labor superviser, and the civil and criminal punishment of violating their rights. Secodly, the paper breaks the limitation of individual research model of ideological and political education, regarding the Harmionious Socialist Society as the system that is composed by six factors, wondering on the unconsistence of ideological and political education with these factors, in order to better theory. Thirdly, this paper uses methods of systematic comparing way, social analyzing way by law and so on, illustrating the paper from many sides. For example, while discussing right of employee, the paper compares the foreign system, and it contrasts the popular company's culture with ideological and political education. These research methods collect the principles of law, ideological and political education, and management, breaking through the traditional limitation of researching ideological and political education by itself.
引文
[1]彭卫东、凌水明.思想政治工作在构建和谐社会中的地位和作用[J].求实.2005(8).
[2]孙文伟.浅论企业文化建设与思想政治工作的关系[J].中国科技信息,2007(1) ： 151.
[3]刘兆峰,燕晓晶.企业文化建设与企业思想政治工作的异同与操作[J].中外企业文化,2006(1)：66.
[4][美]特雷斯·迪尔,阿伦·肯尼迪.企业文化[M].唐铁军译.上海：上海科学技术文献出版社,1989.12—14.
[5][美]威廉·大内.Z理论[M].孙耀君,王祖融译.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1984.169.
[6]罗长海.企业文化学[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2006：410.
[7][美]彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼[M],郭进隆译.上海：三联书店,1998.4.
[8][美]托马斯·彼得斯,小罗伯特·沃特曼.追求卓越[M].北京天下风经济研究所译.北京：中央编译出版社,2003.12.
[9][德]沃尔夫冈·多伊普勒.德国雇员权益的维护[M].唐伦亿,谢立斌译.北京：中国工人出版社,2009.9.
[10]梅慎实.现代公司权力构造论—公司治理结构的法律分析.北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996.
[11][美]A·A·阿尔饮,H·登姆塞茨.刘守英,等译.生产、信息费用和经济组织.载[美]R·科斯等：财产权利与制度变迁：产权学派与新制度学派译文集.上海人民出版社,三联书店,1994.
[12]姜燕,王琳琳.自然人人格财产性解读[J].当代法学.2008,(2).
[13]Taina Savolainen. Towards a new workplace culture:development strategies for employer-employee relations. Journal of Workplace Learning, Volume 12. Number 8.2000.
[14][美]大卫·P·艾勒曼.李大光译.民主的公司制[M].新华出版社,1998.
[15]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社,2002.
[16]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].北京：法律出版社,1999.
[17]刘连煜.公司监控与公司社会责任[M].台北：五南图书出版公司,1995.
[18]王显勇.论劳动力权—兼评职工持股制度[J].法学论坛,2004(3).
[19][德]乌韦·安德森.晏小宝,等译.德意志联邦共和国经济政策及实践[A].上海：上海翻译出版公司,1992.
[20][德]托马斯·莱塞尔等.德国资合公司法[M].高旭军等译.北京：法律出版社,2005.
[21]梅慎实.现代公司机关权力构造论(修订本)[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[22][德]罗伯特·霍恩.德国民商法导论[M].楚建译.北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
[23]J.Kay. Foundations of Corporate Success:How Business Strategies Add Value,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1993.78.
[24][25] BRIAN R. CHEFFINS.Company Law:Theory, Structure, And Operation, CLARENDON PRESS,1997.586.
[26]刘光明.企业文化(第四版)[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004.6.
[27]魏杰.企业文化塑造企业生命常青藤[M].北京：中国发展出版社,2002.12-16.
[28]李宗江,朱株.企业文化：胜敌于无形[M].北京：中国纺织出版社,2003.84-89.
[29]邱伟光.思想政治教育学原理[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2001.
[30]张耀灿等.思想政治教育学原理[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[31]黄静.以人为本的企业文化[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,2003.
[32]李建军.企业文化与制度创新[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004.
[33]易法建.心理医生[M].重庆：重庆大学出版社,2000.9.
[34]弗·舒斯特.A战略：人与效益的关系[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社,1986.
[1]张耀灿.思想政治教育学前沿[M].北京：人民出版社,2006.
[2][美]特雷斯·迪尔和阿伦·肯尼迪,企业文化—现代企业的精神支柱[M].唐铁军译.上海：上海科学技术文献出版社,1989.
[3]刘晓燕.论企业文化在企业思想政治工作中的载体功能[J].理论界,2005(1).
[4]伍秋艳.企业文化建设与企业思想政治工作[J].思想政治工作,2004(3).
[5]谢秋萍.企业文化与企业思想政治工作初探[J].求实,2005(1).
[6]周施恩.企业文化理论与实务[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2006.
[7][美]约翰科特.企业文化与经营业绩[M].曾中等译.北京：华夏出版社,1997.
[8]戴刚书.思想政治教育统计研究方法论[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[9]李辉.现代思想政治教育环境研究[M].广州：广东人民出版社,2005.
[10]刘劲哲.我国企业文化反思[J].经营管理者,2006(2).
[.11]石书臣.现代思想政治教育主导性研究[M].上海：学林出版社,2004.
[12]王成荣.企业文化大视野[M].北京：人民出版社,2004.
[13]李君如.社会主义和谐社会论[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[14]胡振民.思想政治工作创新论[M].北京：学习出版社,2005
[15]江泽民.江泽民文选[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[16]傅治平.和谐社会导论[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[17]崔立勇.构建社会主义和谐社会与思想政治工作创新[J].理论观察,2005(6).
[18]夏红霞.诚信友爱——构建和谐社会的道德基础[J].前沿,2006(6).
[19]程言君.保障社会公平正义是构建社会主义和谐社会的必然选择[J].马克思主义研究,2007(4).
[20]苏东水.管理心理学[M].上海：复旦大学出版社,2004.
[21]王祖成.世界上最有效的管理：激励[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2002.
[22]张岱之.高效激励的17个方法[M].北京：九州出版社,2005.
[23]杨芷英.经济全球化条件下思想政治教育面临的挑战和应对[J].教学与研究,2004(3).
[2]孙文伟.浅论企业文化建设与思想政治工作的关系[J].中国科技信息,2007(1) ： 151.
[3]刘兆峰,燕晓晶.企业文化建设与企业思想政治工作的异同与操作[J].中外企业文化,2006(1)：66.
[4][美]特雷斯·迪尔,阿伦·肯尼迪.企业文化[M].唐铁军译.上海：上海科学技术文献出版社,1989.12—14.
[5][美]威廉·大内.Z理论[M].孙耀君,王祖融译.北京：中国社会科学出版社,1984.169.
[6]罗长海.企业文化学[M].北京：中国人民大学出版社,2006：410.
[7][美]彼得·圣吉.第五项修炼[M],郭进隆译.上海：三联书店,1998.4.
[8][美]托马斯·彼得斯,小罗伯特·沃特曼.追求卓越[M].北京天下风经济研究所译.北京：中央编译出版社,2003.12.
[9][德]沃尔夫冈·多伊普勒.德国雇员权益的维护[M].唐伦亿,谢立斌译.北京：中国工人出版社,2009.9.
[10]梅慎实.现代公司权力构造论—公司治理结构的法律分析.北京：中国政法大学出版社,1996.
[11][美]A·A·阿尔饮,H·登姆塞茨.刘守英,等译.生产、信息费用和经济组织.载[美]R·科斯等：财产权利与制度变迁：产权学派与新制度学派译文集.上海人民出版社,三联书店,1994.
[12]姜燕,王琳琳.自然人人格财产性解读[J].当代法学.2008,(2).
[13]Taina Savolainen. Towards a new workplace culture:development strategies for employer-employee relations. Journal of Workplace Learning, Volume 12. Number 8.2000.
[14][美]大卫·P·艾勒曼.李大光译.民主的公司制[M].新华出版社,1998.
[15]杨瑞龙,周业安.企业的相关者理论及其应用[M].经济科学出版社,2002.
[16]刘俊海.公司的社会责任[M].北京：法律出版社,1999.
[17]刘连煜.公司监控与公司社会责任[M].台北：五南图书出版公司,1995.
[18]王显勇.论劳动力权—兼评职工持股制度[J].法学论坛,2004(3).
[19][德]乌韦·安德森.晏小宝,等译.德意志联邦共和国经济政策及实践[A].上海：上海翻译出版公司,1992.
[20][德]托马斯·莱塞尔等.德国资合公司法[M].高旭军等译.北京：法律出版社,2005.
[21]梅慎实.现代公司机关权力构造论(修订本)[M].北京：中国政法大学出版社,2000.
[22][德]罗伯特·霍恩.德国民商法导论[M].楚建译.北京：中国大百科全书出版社,1996.
[23]J.Kay. Foundations of Corporate Success:How Business Strategies Add Value,Oxford:Oxford University Press,1993.78.
[24][25] BRIAN R. CHEFFINS.Company Law:Theory, Structure, And Operation, CLARENDON PRESS,1997.586.
[26]刘光明.企业文化(第四版)[M].北京：经济管理出版社,2004.6.
[27]魏杰.企业文化塑造企业生命常青藤[M].北京：中国发展出版社,2002.12-16.
[28]李宗江,朱株.企业文化：胜敌于无形[M].北京：中国纺织出版社,2003.84-89.
[29]邱伟光.思想政治教育学原理[M].北京：高等教育出版社,2001.
[30]张耀灿等.思想政治教育学原理[M].北京：高等教育出版社,1999.
[31]黄静.以人为本的企业文化[M].武汉：武汉大学出版社,2003.
[32]李建军.企业文化与制度创新[M].北京：清华大学出版社,2004.
[33]易法建.心理医生[M].重庆：重庆大学出版社,2000.9.
[34]弗·舒斯特.A战略：人与效益的关系[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社,1986.
[1]张耀灿.思想政治教育学前沿[M].北京：人民出版社,2006.
[2][美]特雷斯·迪尔和阿伦·肯尼迪,企业文化—现代企业的精神支柱[M].唐铁军译.上海：上海科学技术文献出版社,1989.
[3]刘晓燕.论企业文化在企业思想政治工作中的载体功能[J].理论界,2005(1).
[4]伍秋艳.企业文化建设与企业思想政治工作[J].思想政治工作,2004(3).
[5]谢秋萍.企业文化与企业思想政治工作初探[J].求实,2005(1).
[6]周施恩.企业文化理论与实务[M].北京：中国经济出版社,2006.
[7][美]约翰科特.企业文化与经营业绩[M].曾中等译.北京：华夏出版社,1997.
[8]戴刚书.思想政治教育统计研究方法论[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[9]李辉.现代思想政治教育环境研究[M].广州：广东人民出版社,2005.
[10]刘劲哲.我国企业文化反思[J].经营管理者,2006(2).
[.11]石书臣.现代思想政治教育主导性研究[M].上海：学林出版社,2004.
[12]王成荣.企业文化大视野[M].北京：人民出版社,2004.
[13]李君如.社会主义和谐社会论[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[14]胡振民.思想政治工作创新论[M].北京：学习出版社,2005
[15]江泽民.江泽民文选[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[16]傅治平.和谐社会导论[M].北京：人民出版社,2005.
[17]崔立勇.构建社会主义和谐社会与思想政治工作创新[J].理论观察,2005(6).
[18]夏红霞.诚信友爱——构建和谐社会的道德基础[J].前沿,2006(6).
[19]程言君.保障社会公平正义是构建社会主义和谐社会的必然选择[J].马克思主义研究,2007(4).
[20]苏东水.管理心理学[M].上海：复旦大学出版社,2004.
[21]王祖成.世界上最有效的管理：激励[M].北京：中国统计出版社,2002.
[22]张岱之.高效激励的17个方法[M].北京：九州出版社,2005.
[23]杨芷英.经济全球化条件下思想政治教育面临的挑战和应对[J].教学与研究,2004(3).