高校学位管理的法制化研究
摘要
上世纪末发生在首都北京的两起大学生状告母校,请求母校为其颁发相应的学位证书和毕业证书案件曾经轰动全国。这两个案件的审理与裁判在社会上引起了强烈反响,法学界、教育学界等学术界人士都围绕这两个案件所反映的各种问题展开了激烈的讨论和争辩。普通民众也对此表示了强烈关注。本文拟从这两个典型案件所反映的问题出发,对我国学位管理的法律制度作粗浅阐述。首先本文从本体论的角度对学位这一概念作出概述,内容包括学位的概念、学位的性质、学位的特征以及与学位相关的概念的厘清;文章第二部分从过程论的角度阐述了学位制度的由来和发展、发达国家学位制度和我国学位制度的历史发展过程,并对我国现行学位法律制度的二元化结构进行了分析;最后指出了我国现行学位管理中存在的问题并就学位法律制度的发展和完善提出了一些不太成熟的观点和建议。期望在不久的将来政府能够出台一部比较完善的学位法。
The origin of Degree came from two old universities, which are Bologna University and Paris University in Italy. Degree entered into our country in the end of Qing Dynasty, at that time our country was advocating“Western learning flows the east into”. With the development of society, the concept and connotation of Degree were developing and changing. Combining with the problem of Degree’s management system in our country, our manuscript discussed and analyzed the Degree’s management in colleges and universities using many methods, such as compare and analysis. This manuscript focused on the concept and theory of Degree, and based on the researched results of home and abroad.
This manuscript has three parts:
The part one is summarization of Degree in colleges and universities. First, according to China and foreign dictionaries, we gave a brief introduction on Degree’s concept. In this part, we gave eight explanations about Degree’s concept at first, five of them came from China dictionaries and three came from foreign dictionaries. From these explanations to Degree, we can find China and foreign have different understand about Degree’s connotation. Our country laid particular stress on criterion of grade and academic level. About grade, our country did not stress pass, but excellence. Grade stands for not only demonstration, but also honor and encourage. While western countries think that Degree stands for finishing one stage of higher education study, or stands for ratifying to academic level and achievement. They were choice condition rather than essential condition. Who possessed one of them could award corresponding degree. To define the legal problems researched in this manuscript, the author described Degree by drawing a few scholars’viewpoints. On practice, Degree existed in process as one kind of action. Degree was to appraise applicants’learning level, valuation of knowledge ability grade, cognize and award them. Law is a kind of norm precipitating in people’s behavior process. This meaning is more suitable to our manuscript if we want to spread out research into academic degree system from legal angle. Then we differentiated the concept of certificate, academic certificate and record of formal schooling. Whereafter, we expounded the character of Degree, and analyzed the binary-rization of Degree System in law. The basicest character of Degree is valuation, which contains applicant learning level, the ability to solve a problem and the creative ability. We regarded it as core valuation, because the standard of valuation is degree standard of a country academic degree. The less important character or form attribute of Degree is administration, supervision, examinations and approval. This appraisement pays more attention to procedure. It’s a kind of form valuation. There is community among stretching and connation of degree grade, situation of social development and people’s cognition to knowledge. That is the necessity of social and science development. So Degree has these characteristics such as occupation, basis, development, opening and so on.
The part two is about the development of colleges and universities academic degree system. We discussed Degree from angle of processism. This process contains three aspects, which are the origins and development, the course of developed country academic degree system and our country’s academic degree system history development. The initial function of Degree was the voucher entering prelector, which was testified by the guild background produced from Degree. Then, with the development of capitalism, we had brought forward a crying need to person with ability that processed higher education. Higher education has a rapid development all over the world. Many countries have built themselves formal Degree system. The next, we introduced the developing process and their developing trend of developed countries academic degree system, especially England, the U.S.A., Japan and Russian. The degree system, putting in force currently, was brought into from Western countries at the modern time. With the development of homeland higher education, our country degree system was to break the ice, to improve and perfect gradually. At the end of Qing Dynasty, degree system of modern times was in bud; after setting up the Republic, the education began to reform in order to keep up with the development of society. Ministry of Education promulgated“Universities Decree”, which was the first decree Degree was listed in and this was the onset of Chinese degree system; the national government amended“degree confers law”on twelfth time of assemblies in Legislative Yuan. Then Ministry of Education promulgated a series gradually with the hereafter“Degree grades”and“Master’s degree examination detailed rules and regulations”on May, 1935 to suit the practice of“Degree confers law”. Then, Ministry of Education had worked out and promulgated notice, decree, law and regulation. So far, a set of entire academic degree system had formed. New China set up the queen, Communist Party of China and the People Government took high-level the professional personal culture and legislation of academic degree system seriously. Cause of education and science recovered and developed rapidly. In the field of academic degree system building-up and legislation, our country had carried out several times of trial, but that time“left”guiding ideology effect, all the efforts failed. On February 12, 1980 fifth National People’s Congress, Standing Committee third time conversation had passed“Academic Degree of the People’s Republic of China”. Herefrom, there was self academic degree system in new China. In order to carry out the Regulations Concerning Academic Degree better, State Council confirmed “Regulations Concerning Academic Degree of the People’s Republic of China on Provision”on May 20, 1981. Degree system was stipulated in“education law”,“higher education law”,“Regulations Concerning Academic Degrees”and“to put way into practice as well as Regulation Concerning Academic Degrees provisional”in our country. A formal system about degree manages was arranged. According to the formal system arrangement, we can know that degree legal system and academic appraisement system coexisted in one unit.
Part three was legalization of our country degree manage. We analyzed problems from two aspects in this part. First, we analyzed the problems existing in our country degree managing legal system which was carrying out currently. These problems included several the following aspects: currently Chinese academic degree system was short of concrete index regulation to weigh learning; in the condition of awarding degrees, the stipulation of thought morality aspect was excessively general, the applicability of it was not strong; the duty of the degree oral thesis defense committee and a committee for the conferment of academic degrees was equivocal, and was hard to practice; Degree law and regulation didn’t embody out the constraint working out corresponding implementing regulation to institution of colleges and universities; lacking procedure in degree law ignored the protection to rights and interests of educatee; the approaches to relief were not smooth. In this manuscript, we put forward some propositions to develop and perfect the degree’s management system finally. These propositions were the developing and perfecting on degree awards management system, authorizing, examining and verifying systems of degree, the mechanism of resolving dispute and degree legislation. And we expected that a perfect volume would be appeared as soon as possible.
The origin of Degree came from two old universities, which are Bologna University and Paris University in Italy. Degree entered into our country in the end of Qing Dynasty, at that time our country was advocating“Western learning flows the east into”. With the development of society, the concept and connotation of Degree were developing and changing. Combining with the problem of Degree’s management system in our country, our manuscript discussed and analyzed the Degree’s management in colleges and universities using many methods, such as compare and analysis. This manuscript focused on the concept and theory of Degree, and based on the researched results of home and abroad.
This manuscript has three parts:
The part one is summarization of Degree in colleges and universities. First, according to China and foreign dictionaries, we gave a brief introduction on Degree’s concept. In this part, we gave eight explanations about Degree’s concept at first, five of them came from China dictionaries and three came from foreign dictionaries. From these explanations to Degree, we can find China and foreign have different understand about Degree’s connotation. Our country laid particular stress on criterion of grade and academic level. About grade, our country did not stress pass, but excellence. Grade stands for not only demonstration, but also honor and encourage. While western countries think that Degree stands for finishing one stage of higher education study, or stands for ratifying to academic level and achievement. They were choice condition rather than essential condition. Who possessed one of them could award corresponding degree. To define the legal problems researched in this manuscript, the author described Degree by drawing a few scholars’viewpoints. On practice, Degree existed in process as one kind of action. Degree was to appraise applicants’learning level, valuation of knowledge ability grade, cognize and award them. Law is a kind of norm precipitating in people’s behavior process. This meaning is more suitable to our manuscript if we want to spread out research into academic degree system from legal angle. Then we differentiated the concept of certificate, academic certificate and record of formal schooling. Whereafter, we expounded the character of Degree, and analyzed the binary-rization of Degree System in law. The basicest character of Degree is valuation, which contains applicant learning level, the ability to solve a problem and the creative ability. We regarded it as core valuation, because the standard of valuation is degree standard of a country academic degree. The less important character or form attribute of Degree is administration, supervision, examinations and approval. This appraisement pays more attention to procedure. It’s a kind of form valuation. There is community among stretching and connation of degree grade, situation of social development and people’s cognition to knowledge. That is the necessity of social and science development. So Degree has these characteristics such as occupation, basis, development, opening and so on.
The part two is about the development of colleges and universities academic degree system. We discussed Degree from angle of processism. This process contains three aspects, which are the origins and development, the course of developed country academic degree system and our country’s academic degree system history development. The initial function of Degree was the voucher entering prelector, which was testified by the guild background produced from Degree. Then, with the development of capitalism, we had brought forward a crying need to person with ability that processed higher education. Higher education has a rapid development all over the world. Many countries have built themselves formal Degree system. The next, we introduced the developing process and their developing trend of developed countries academic degree system, especially England, the U.S.A., Japan and Russian. The degree system, putting in force currently, was brought into from Western countries at the modern time. With the development of homeland higher education, our country degree system was to break the ice, to improve and perfect gradually. At the end of Qing Dynasty, degree system of modern times was in bud; after setting up the Republic, the education began to reform in order to keep up with the development of society. Ministry of Education promulgated“Universities Decree”, which was the first decree Degree was listed in and this was the onset of Chinese degree system; the national government amended“degree confers law”on twelfth time of assemblies in Legislative Yuan. Then Ministry of Education promulgated a series gradually with the hereafter“Degree grades”and“Master’s degree examination detailed rules and regulations”on May, 1935 to suit the practice of“Degree confers law”. Then, Ministry of Education had worked out and promulgated notice, decree, law and regulation. So far, a set of entire academic degree system had formed. New China set up the queen, Communist Party of China and the People Government took high-level the professional personal culture and legislation of academic degree system seriously. Cause of education and science recovered and developed rapidly. In the field of academic degree system building-up and legislation, our country had carried out several times of trial, but that time“left”guiding ideology effect, all the efforts failed. On February 12, 1980 fifth National People’s Congress, Standing Committee third time conversation had passed“Academic Degree of the People’s Republic of China”. Herefrom, there was self academic degree system in new China. In order to carry out the Regulations Concerning Academic Degree better, State Council confirmed “Regulations Concerning Academic Degree of the People’s Republic of China on Provision”on May 20, 1981. Degree system was stipulated in“education law”,“higher education law”,“Regulations Concerning Academic Degrees”and“to put way into practice as well as Regulation Concerning Academic Degrees provisional”in our country. A formal system about degree manages was arranged. According to the formal system arrangement, we can know that degree legal system and academic appraisement system coexisted in one unit.
Part three was legalization of our country degree manage. We analyzed problems from two aspects in this part. First, we analyzed the problems existing in our country degree managing legal system which was carrying out currently. These problems included several the following aspects: currently Chinese academic degree system was short of concrete index regulation to weigh learning; in the condition of awarding degrees, the stipulation of thought morality aspect was excessively general, the applicability of it was not strong; the duty of the degree oral thesis defense committee and a committee for the conferment of academic degrees was equivocal, and was hard to practice; Degree law and regulation didn’t embody out the constraint working out corresponding implementing regulation to institution of colleges and universities; lacking procedure in degree law ignored the protection to rights and interests of educatee; the approaches to relief were not smooth. In this manuscript, we put forward some propositions to develop and perfect the degree’s management system finally. These propositions were the developing and perfecting on degree awards management system, authorizing, examining and verifying systems of degree, the mechanism of resolving dispute and degree legislation. And we expected that a perfect volume would be appeared as soon as possible.
引文
[1] 参见孙大廷、杨有林:《论学位的本质属性》,《北方论丛》2003 年第 4 期,第 127 页。
[2] 参见骆四铭:《学位的起源、发展及其特征》,《比较教育研究》2006年第 4 期,第 35 页。
[3] 黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第 4 卷第 4 期,第 45 页。
[4] 参见刘旺洪主编:《教育法教程》,南京师范大学出版社、河海大学出版社 2006 年第 1 版,第 46 页。
[5] 参见湖南省教育厅组织编写:《高等教育法规概论》,湖南大学出版社 2005 年第 1 版,第 62-63 页。
[6] 湛中乐主编:《高等教育与行政诉讼》,北京大学出版社 2003 年第 1版,第 299-300 页。
[7] 贾招仙:《学历学位之规范管理》,《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2002 年第 6 期,第 118 页。
[8] 许仁良:《浅谈我国高等教育的学历和学位制度》,《淮阴工学院学报》2002 年第 6 期,第 51 页。
[9] 常军胜:《浅谈我国的学位和研究生教育制度》,《广西教育》2001年第 18 期,第 9 页。
[10] 参见孙大廷、胡英娣:《论学位的法律监督》,《长春工业大学学报(高教研究版)》2003 年第 2 期,第 20 页。
[11] 参见骆四铭:《学位的起源、发展及其特征》,《比较教育研究》2006年第 4 期,第 39-40 页。
[12] 程悦云:《学位制度的由来及发展》,《辽宁大学学报》1994 年第 1期,第 67-68 页。
[13] 王璞:《国外学位制度的发展历史、现状及启示》,《煤炭高等教育》2002 年第 3 期,第 25 页。
[14] 参见梁忠义、饶从满:《日本学位制度的历史与发展(续)》,《外国教育研究》1995 年第 2 期,第 37 页。
[15] 参见杨保田、程丽君:《发达国家学位制度的历史沿革及对我们的启迪》,《黑龙江高教研究》1997 年第 1 期,第 97-98 页。
[16] 参见许德雅:《近代中国科举制度向学位制度演进的历史轨迹》,《商丘师范学院学报》2007 年第 8 期,第 53 页。
[17] 参见周谷平、吴静:《近代中国学位制度的历史演变》,《高等教育研究》2002 年第 4 期,第 99-100 页。
[18] 程悦云:《学位制度的由来及发展》,《辽宁大学学报》1994 年第 1期,第 68 页。
[19] 参见黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第4 期,第 45-46 页。
[20] 程同顺、高飞:《试论当前中国的学位制度改革》,《江苏高教》2007年第 4 期,第 63 页。
[21] 毛祥成:《高校学位制度的法律缺失探讨》,《高等农业教育》2005年第 4 期,第 76 页。
[22] 毛祥成:《高校学位制度的法律缺失探讨》,《高等农业教育》2005年第 4 期,第 77 页。
[23] 彭雯:《学位纠纷引发的若干法律思考》,《株洲工学院学报》2006年第 5 期,第 47 页。
[24] 姜明安主编:《行政法与行政诉讼法》,北京大学出版社、高等教育出版社 1999 年第 1 版,第 87 页。
[25] 石正义:《论学位授予权——法理学的视角》,《咸宁学院学报》2005年第 1 期,第 90 页。
[26] 周光礼:《论学位授予行为的法律性质》,《科技进步理论与管理》2004 年 3 月号,第 58 页。
[27] 参见湛中乐:《进一步改革与完善学位法律制度》,《中国高等教育》2005 年第 2 期,第 28 页。
[28] 黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第 4 期,第 51 页。
[29] 参见谢圣华:《谁是谁非,焦点何在——北大博士生状告母校》,《人民法院报》2000 年 1 月 18 日第 3 版。
[30] 参见《最高人民法院公报》1999 年第 4 期,第 139-143 页。
[31] 参见周光礼:《论学位授予行为的法律性质》,《科技进步理论与管理》2004 年 3 月号,第 59 页。
[32] 参见湛中乐主编:《高等教育与行政诉讼》,北京大学出版社 2003年第 1 版,第 158 页。
[33] 参见王立峰:《试析我国学位法制建设的体系化》,《中国高等教育》2007 年第 12 期,第 39 页。
1. 叶必丰主编:《应申请行政行为判解》,武汉大学出版社 2000 年第 1版。
2. 崔卓兰主编:《行政复议法学》,吉林大学出版社 2001 年第 1 版。
3. 张步洪:《中国行政法学前沿问题报告》,中国检察出版社 2003 年第1 版。
4. 叶必丰主编:《行政法与行政诉讼法》,中国人民大学出版社 2003 年第 1 版。
5. 李连宁著:《依法治教的探索》,法律出版社 2003 年第 1 版。
6. 湛中乐主编:《高等教育与行政诉讼》,北京大学出版社 2003 年第 1版。
7. 劳凯声主编:《中国教育法制评论》(第 2 辑),教育科学出版社 2003年第 1 版。
8. 劳凯声主编:《中国教育法制评论》(第 3 辑),教育科学出版社 2004年第 1 版。
9. 郑贤君主编:《公民受教育权的法律保护》,人民法院出版社 2004 年第 1 版。
10. 应松年主编:《行政法学新论》,中国方正出版社 2004 年第 3 版。
11. 湖南省教育厅组织编写《:高等教育法规概论》,湖南大学出版社2005年第 1 版。
12. 张树义主编:《行政程序法教程》,中国政法大学出版社 2005 年第 1版。
13. 赵庆典等编著《:学校管理中的法律问题》,北京邮电大学出版社2005年第 1 版。
14. 刘旺洪主编:《教育法教程》,南京师范大学出版社、河海大学出版社 2006 年第 1 版。
1. 程悦云:《学位制度的由来及发展》,《辽宁大学学报》1994 年第 1 期。
2. 梁忠义、饶从满:《日本学位制度的历史与发展(续)》,《外国教育研究》1995 年第 1 期。
3. 杨保田、程丽君:《发达国家学位制度的历史沿革及对我们的启迪》,《黑龙江高教研究》1997 年第 1 期。
4. 常军胜:《浅谈我国的学位和研究生教育制度》,《广西教育》2001 年第 18 期。
5. 贾招仙:《学历学位之规范管理》,《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2002 年第 6 期。
6. 许仁良:《浅谈我国高等教育的学历和学位制度》,《淮阴工学院学报》2002 年第 6 期。
7. 王璞:《国外学位制度的发展历史、现状及启示》,《煤炭高等教育》2002 年第 3 期。
8. 周谷平、吴静:《近代中国学位制度的历史演变》,《高等教育研究》2002 年第 4 期。
9. 孙大廷、胡英娣:《论学位的法律监督》,《长春工业大学学报(高教研究版)》2003 年第 2 期。
10. 孙大廷、杨有林:《论学位的本质属性》,《北方论丛》2003 年第 4期。
11. 周光礼:《论学位授予行为的法律性质》,《科技进步与对策》2004年 3 月号。
12. 石正义:《论学位授予权——法理学的视角》,《咸宁学院学报》2005年第 1 期。
13. 湛中乐:《进一步改革与完善学位法律制度》,《中国高等教育》2005年第 2 期。
14. 毛祥成:《高校学位制度的法律缺失探讨》,《高等农业教育》2005年第 4 期。
15. 李玉梅:《论学位的功能——质疑高校管理中不授予学位处罚的运用》,《学位与研究生教育》2005 年第 5 期。
16. 王燕平:《学业证书制度与学位证书制度冲突研究》,《学位与研究生教育》2005 年第 11 期。
17. 李兴业:《法国高等教育文凭与学位制度改革》,《比较教育研究》 2006 年第 1 期。
18. 张书占:《高校自主权与学位纠纷》,《中州大学学报》2006 年第 4期。
19. 骆四铭:《学位的起源、发展及其特征》,《比较教育研究》2006 年第 4 期。
20. 黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第 4 期。
21. 彭雯:《学位纠纷引发的若干法律思考》,《株洲工学院学报》2006年第 5 期。
22. 朱志辉:《试论撤销学位的行政行为性质》,《高教探索》2006 年第 6期。
23. 牛风蕊:《高校学位纠纷的法理学分析》,《中国高教研究》2006 年第 7 期。
[2] 参见骆四铭:《学位的起源、发展及其特征》,《比较教育研究》2006年第 4 期,第 35 页。
[3] 黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第 4 卷第 4 期,第 45 页。
[4] 参见刘旺洪主编:《教育法教程》,南京师范大学出版社、河海大学出版社 2006 年第 1 版,第 46 页。
[5] 参见湖南省教育厅组织编写:《高等教育法规概论》,湖南大学出版社 2005 年第 1 版,第 62-63 页。
[6] 湛中乐主编:《高等教育与行政诉讼》,北京大学出版社 2003 年第 1版,第 299-300 页。
[7] 贾招仙:《学历学位之规范管理》,《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2002 年第 6 期,第 118 页。
[8] 许仁良:《浅谈我国高等教育的学历和学位制度》,《淮阴工学院学报》2002 年第 6 期,第 51 页。
[9] 常军胜:《浅谈我国的学位和研究生教育制度》,《广西教育》2001年第 18 期,第 9 页。
[10] 参见孙大廷、胡英娣:《论学位的法律监督》,《长春工业大学学报(高教研究版)》2003 年第 2 期,第 20 页。
[11] 参见骆四铭:《学位的起源、发展及其特征》,《比较教育研究》2006年第 4 期,第 39-40 页。
[12] 程悦云:《学位制度的由来及发展》,《辽宁大学学报》1994 年第 1期,第 67-68 页。
[13] 王璞:《国外学位制度的发展历史、现状及启示》,《煤炭高等教育》2002 年第 3 期,第 25 页。
[14] 参见梁忠义、饶从满:《日本学位制度的历史与发展(续)》,《外国教育研究》1995 年第 2 期,第 37 页。
[15] 参见杨保田、程丽君:《发达国家学位制度的历史沿革及对我们的启迪》,《黑龙江高教研究》1997 年第 1 期,第 97-98 页。
[16] 参见许德雅:《近代中国科举制度向学位制度演进的历史轨迹》,《商丘师范学院学报》2007 年第 8 期,第 53 页。
[17] 参见周谷平、吴静:《近代中国学位制度的历史演变》,《高等教育研究》2002 年第 4 期,第 99-100 页。
[18] 程悦云:《学位制度的由来及发展》,《辽宁大学学报》1994 年第 1期,第 68 页。
[19] 参见黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第4 期,第 45-46 页。
[20] 程同顺、高飞:《试论当前中国的学位制度改革》,《江苏高教》2007年第 4 期,第 63 页。
[21] 毛祥成:《高校学位制度的法律缺失探讨》,《高等农业教育》2005年第 4 期,第 76 页。
[22] 毛祥成:《高校学位制度的法律缺失探讨》,《高等农业教育》2005年第 4 期,第 77 页。
[23] 彭雯:《学位纠纷引发的若干法律思考》,《株洲工学院学报》2006年第 5 期,第 47 页。
[24] 姜明安主编:《行政法与行政诉讼法》,北京大学出版社、高等教育出版社 1999 年第 1 版,第 87 页。
[25] 石正义:《论学位授予权——法理学的视角》,《咸宁学院学报》2005年第 1 期,第 90 页。
[26] 周光礼:《论学位授予行为的法律性质》,《科技进步理论与管理》2004 年 3 月号,第 58 页。
[27] 参见湛中乐:《进一步改革与完善学位法律制度》,《中国高等教育》2005 年第 2 期,第 28 页。
[28] 黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第 4 期,第 51 页。
[29] 参见谢圣华:《谁是谁非,焦点何在——北大博士生状告母校》,《人民法院报》2000 年 1 月 18 日第 3 版。
[30] 参见《最高人民法院公报》1999 年第 4 期,第 139-143 页。
[31] 参见周光礼:《论学位授予行为的法律性质》,《科技进步理论与管理》2004 年 3 月号,第 59 页。
[32] 参见湛中乐主编:《高等教育与行政诉讼》,北京大学出版社 2003年第 1 版,第 158 页。
[33] 参见王立峰:《试析我国学位法制建设的体系化》,《中国高等教育》2007 年第 12 期,第 39 页。
1. 叶必丰主编:《应申请行政行为判解》,武汉大学出版社 2000 年第 1版。
2. 崔卓兰主编:《行政复议法学》,吉林大学出版社 2001 年第 1 版。
3. 张步洪:《中国行政法学前沿问题报告》,中国检察出版社 2003 年第1 版。
4. 叶必丰主编:《行政法与行政诉讼法》,中国人民大学出版社 2003 年第 1 版。
5. 李连宁著:《依法治教的探索》,法律出版社 2003 年第 1 版。
6. 湛中乐主编:《高等教育与行政诉讼》,北京大学出版社 2003 年第 1版。
7. 劳凯声主编:《中国教育法制评论》(第 2 辑),教育科学出版社 2003年第 1 版。
8. 劳凯声主编:《中国教育法制评论》(第 3 辑),教育科学出版社 2004年第 1 版。
9. 郑贤君主编:《公民受教育权的法律保护》,人民法院出版社 2004 年第 1 版。
10. 应松年主编:《行政法学新论》,中国方正出版社 2004 年第 3 版。
11. 湖南省教育厅组织编写《:高等教育法规概论》,湖南大学出版社2005年第 1 版。
12. 张树义主编:《行政程序法教程》,中国政法大学出版社 2005 年第 1版。
13. 赵庆典等编著《:学校管理中的法律问题》,北京邮电大学出版社2005年第 1 版。
14. 刘旺洪主编:《教育法教程》,南京师范大学出版社、河海大学出版社 2006 年第 1 版。
1. 程悦云:《学位制度的由来及发展》,《辽宁大学学报》1994 年第 1 期。
2. 梁忠义、饶从满:《日本学位制度的历史与发展(续)》,《外国教育研究》1995 年第 1 期。
3. 杨保田、程丽君:《发达国家学位制度的历史沿革及对我们的启迪》,《黑龙江高教研究》1997 年第 1 期。
4. 常军胜:《浅谈我国的学位和研究生教育制度》,《广西教育》2001 年第 18 期。
5. 贾招仙:《学历学位之规范管理》,《浙江师范大学学报(社会科学版)》2002 年第 6 期。
6. 许仁良:《浅谈我国高等教育的学历和学位制度》,《淮阴工学院学报》2002 年第 6 期。
7. 王璞:《国外学位制度的发展历史、现状及启示》,《煤炭高等教育》2002 年第 3 期。
8. 周谷平、吴静:《近代中国学位制度的历史演变》,《高等教育研究》2002 年第 4 期。
9. 孙大廷、胡英娣:《论学位的法律监督》,《长春工业大学学报(高教研究版)》2003 年第 2 期。
10. 孙大廷、杨有林:《论学位的本质属性》,《北方论丛》2003 年第 4期。
11. 周光礼:《论学位授予行为的法律性质》,《科技进步与对策》2004年 3 月号。
12. 石正义:《论学位授予权——法理学的视角》,《咸宁学院学报》2005年第 1 期。
13. 湛中乐:《进一步改革与完善学位法律制度》,《中国高等教育》2005年第 2 期。
14. 毛祥成:《高校学位制度的法律缺失探讨》,《高等农业教育》2005年第 4 期。
15. 李玉梅:《论学位的功能——质疑高校管理中不授予学位处罚的运用》,《学位与研究生教育》2005 年第 5 期。
16. 王燕平:《学业证书制度与学位证书制度冲突研究》,《学位与研究生教育》2005 年第 11 期。
17. 李兴业:《法国高等教育文凭与学位制度改革》,《比较教育研究》 2006 年第 1 期。
18. 张书占:《高校自主权与学位纠纷》,《中州大学学报》2006 年第 4期。
19. 骆四铭:《学位的起源、发展及其特征》,《比较教育研究》2006 年第 4 期。
20. 黄平:《语境中的学位法律制度》,《复旦教育论坛》2006 年第 4 期。
21. 彭雯:《学位纠纷引发的若干法律思考》,《株洲工学院学报》2006年第 5 期。
22. 朱志辉:《试论撤销学位的行政行为性质》,《高教探索》2006 年第 6期。
23. 牛风蕊:《高校学位纠纷的法理学分析》,《中国高教研究》2006 年第 7 期。