马克思主义中国化与20世纪上半叶三大社会思潮问题研究
|
摘要
众所周知,在马克思主义中国化发展史上,自始至终贯穿着马克思主义与各种非马克思主义、反马克思主义思潮流派的纷争,这种纷争在20世纪上半叶救亡与启蒙、文化与政治的碰撞与纠缠中显得愈发激烈,同时也构成了马克思主义中国化的重要一环。当然,历史给出了它的结论,在20世纪的中国,没有什么思潮比马克思主义有更大的历史影响力,它根本上改变了中国近现代史的走向。中国马克思主义者把马克思主义基本原理进一步地和中国实践、中国历史、中国文化结合起来,使马克思主义在中国实现了民族化和具体化,实现了马克思主义中国化的两次历史性飞跃。应当说,当前学术界围绕马克思主义中国化的相关命题已经展开了多学科、多维度、多层次、多视角的研究,这些研究成果将有助于整体上构建马克思主义理论的当代形态和科学体系,有助于推动理论成果向现实转化。但相对而言学术界以社会思潮为视角来研究探讨马克思主义中国化相关问题则处于起步和探索阶段,很多命题还没有系统深入地展开,诸多方面还有进一步深入研究的空间、余地和必要。
本论文的研究就是以社会思潮为视角,选取了20世纪上半叶与马克思主义中国化有更为直接联系的且当今仍具有生命力的社会思潮作为研究对象,最终确立以三民主义、自由主义、文化保守主义这三大社会思潮与马克思主义中国化的关系为研究内容。围绕着“马克思主义中国化与20世纪上半叶三大社会思潮交流激荡”这一核心主题,加以展开论析。论文由引言、正文、结语三部分组成。
引言部分:主要是对论文选题的学术价值、应用价值及选题的国内外研究现状加以宏观阐述,并对选题的时间范围和空间范围加以明确界定。在此基础上对论文的研究内容、研究目标、研究方法及论文的创新之处进行了理论上的说明和阐释。
论文之正文部分有五章组成,各章节概述如下:
第一章主要是从纵向的中国历史文化背景和横向的中国时代文化背景对马克思主义中国化进程的近现代思想文化背景加以宏观理析。进而分析了20世纪上半叶社会思潮交流交融交锋的特点,引出马克思主义与三大社会思潮冲撞融合及中国先进知识分子选择马克思主义的必然性和合理性。
第二章主要是对马克思主义中国化进程中与20世纪上半叶三民主义的激荡与融合进行了比较全面的阐述,首先对孙中山三民主义的发展脉络进行了认真梳理,继而探讨了马克思主义中国化进程中马克思主义与三民主义的关系,在此基础上分析总结了中国马克思主义对三民主义合理思想资源的吸收与超越。
第三章主要是对马克思主义中国化进程中与20世纪上半叶自由主义的冲撞与融合进行了分析与阐释,首先认真梳理了自由主义思潮的思想演进脉络,继而探讨了马克思主义中国化进程中马克思主义与自由主义的关系,在此基础上论析中国马克思主义对自由主义合理思想资源的吸收与超越。
第四章主要是对马克思主义中国化进程中与20世纪上半叶文化保守主义的冲突与融合进行了论析,先是对文化保守主义的发展脉络进行了认真梳理,继而挖掘了马克思主义中国化进程中马克思主义与文化保守主义的关系,在此基础上分析总结了中国马克思主义对文化保守主义合理思想资源的吸收与超越。
第五章为全文论述重点即马克思主义中国化与20世纪上半叶三大社会思潮问题研究的理性思考,可以说第五章既是对前四章内容的理论升华,又是对马克思主义中国化经验的科学总结。
结语部分对整篇论文加以宏观提炼,基于以上五章的研究,用上述内容来阐述清楚下面两个观点,也是回答清楚下面两个问题:马克思主义与三大社会思潮交流激荡是不可避免的冲突融合;马克思主义中国化的必然性和合理性是不可抗拒的历史潮流,从中获得用马克思主义引领社会思潮的带有规律性的认识。
It is well known that one dispute existed among Marxism、all kinds of divisions of non-Marxisma and anti-Marxism from first to last during the developmental history of Marxism's Sinicization, which became more and more intense in the collision and perplexity of survival and initiation ,culture and politics, also it composed one important link of simultaneously.Of course, history got its conclusion ------ Marxism owned more greater historical influence than any thoughts in 20th century in China, which changed the trend of modern and contemporary Chinese history. Chinese Marxists further combined the basic principles of Marxism, practice in China, Chinese history and Chinese culture to make Marxism realize nationalization and embodiment in China, and realized two historical leaps of Marxism's Sinicization. It should be said that the current academia deploys a multi-disciplinary , multi-dimensional, multi-level, multi-perspective study that focus on the related propositions of Marxism's Sinicization, these research results will help to construct contemporary patterns and scientific system of Marxism theory on the whole , to propel the transformation from theoretical results to actuality. While, relatively speaking, the academia is at the preliminary and exploratory stage to study and explore relevant questions of Marxism's Sinicization based on the perspective of social thoughts . Many propositions haven’t been systematically deployed in-depth, and still there some more spaces, scopes and necessaries can be studied in great depth about these.
The study of this dissertation regards social thoughts as perspective, selects social thoughts which were relevant directly to Marxism's Sinicization of last half of 20th centenary and which still have the vitality as object of study , eventually establishes the relation between there major social thoughts(the Three People's Principles, liberalism, cultural conservatism)and Marxism's Sinicization as content of study. And then this dissertation discusses and analyzes its central theme ------the intercommunication and agitation between Marxism's Sinicization and there major social thoughts of last half of 20th centenary. The dissertation consists of three parts: introduction, body and conclusion.
The introduction expounds macroscopically about academic value, application value and current research status , and clearly defines the scope of time and space about choosing themes. Then this part explains and analyzes theoretically about research contents, research objectives, research methods , technical routes and expected innovation parts.
The body of this dissertation consists of five chapters, its summaries are as below:
The first chapter analyzes macroscopically modern ideological and cultural background of the process of Marxism's Sinicization based on vertical Chinese historical background and horizontal Chinese epochal cultural background,then analyzes the characteristics of communication , interjection and confrontation of social thoughts of last half of the 20th century,introduces the clash and integration between Marxism and three major social thoughts , and draws the inevitable choice and rationality that China's advanced Marxist intellectuals chose Marxism.
Chapter two is mainly expounds the agitation and integration of the Three People’s Principles of the last half of the 20th century in the course of Marxism's Sinicization in a comprehensive way. First,chapter two hackles carefully developmental contexts of the Three People's Principles of Sun Yat-sen. Then it probes into the relation between Marxism and the Three People's Principles in the course of Marxism's Sinicization. Last, on the basis of last step ,chapter two analyzes and concludes the absorption and transformation for Chinese Marxism which comes from rational idealistic resources of the Three People's Principles.
Chapter three mainly analyzes and expounds the clash and interjection of liberalism of the last half of the 20th century in the course of Marxism's Sinicization . In the first place, chapter three hackles developmental contexts of liberalism. In the second place, chapter three probes into the relation between Marxism and liberalism in the early course of Marxism's Sinicization. Last but not least, chapter three analyzes the absorption and transformation for Chinese Marxism which comes from rational idealistic resources of the liberalism on the basis of last step .
Chapter four mainly analyzes and expounds the clash and interjection of cultural conservatism of the last half of the 20th century in the course of Marxism's Sinicization . For one thing, chapter four hackles developmental contexts of cultural conservatism. For another, chapter four dredges up the relation between Marxism and cultural conservatism in the early course of Marxism's Sinicization. At last, chapter three analyzes and concludes the absorption and transformation for Chinese Marxism which comes from rational idealistic resources of the liberalism on the basis of last step.
Chapter five is key point of this dissertation. It can be said that Chapter five is theoretical sublimation for Chapter four, also it’s not only rational consideration for the influence and status for Marxism's Sinicization which comes from three major social thoughts of the last half of the 20th century, but also scientific summary of the experience of Marxism's Sinicization.
The conclusion part extracts the entire dissertation macrolly. Based on the study of above five chapters, and according to above contents, we can expound clearly two viewpoints and answer clearly two questions at the same time: the intercommunication and agitation between Marxism's Sinicization and there major social thoughts of last half of 20th centenary is unavoidable clash and integration; the inevitability and rationality of Marxism's Sinicization is an irresistible trend of history. Furthermore, we can explore and conclude the regularity of things in general from the perspective of the relation between Marxism's Sinicization and social thoughts, from which we can attain disciplinary cognition from social thoughts led by Marxism.
本论文的研究就是以社会思潮为视角,选取了20世纪上半叶与马克思主义中国化有更为直接联系的且当今仍具有生命力的社会思潮作为研究对象,最终确立以三民主义、自由主义、文化保守主义这三大社会思潮与马克思主义中国化的关系为研究内容。围绕着“马克思主义中国化与20世纪上半叶三大社会思潮交流激荡”这一核心主题,加以展开论析。论文由引言、正文、结语三部分组成。
引言部分:主要是对论文选题的学术价值、应用价值及选题的国内外研究现状加以宏观阐述,并对选题的时间范围和空间范围加以明确界定。在此基础上对论文的研究内容、研究目标、研究方法及论文的创新之处进行了理论上的说明和阐释。
论文之正文部分有五章组成,各章节概述如下:
第一章主要是从纵向的中国历史文化背景和横向的中国时代文化背景对马克思主义中国化进程的近现代思想文化背景加以宏观理析。进而分析了20世纪上半叶社会思潮交流交融交锋的特点,引出马克思主义与三大社会思潮冲撞融合及中国先进知识分子选择马克思主义的必然性和合理性。
第二章主要是对马克思主义中国化进程中与20世纪上半叶三民主义的激荡与融合进行了比较全面的阐述,首先对孙中山三民主义的发展脉络进行了认真梳理,继而探讨了马克思主义中国化进程中马克思主义与三民主义的关系,在此基础上分析总结了中国马克思主义对三民主义合理思想资源的吸收与超越。
第三章主要是对马克思主义中国化进程中与20世纪上半叶自由主义的冲撞与融合进行了分析与阐释,首先认真梳理了自由主义思潮的思想演进脉络,继而探讨了马克思主义中国化进程中马克思主义与自由主义的关系,在此基础上论析中国马克思主义对自由主义合理思想资源的吸收与超越。
第四章主要是对马克思主义中国化进程中与20世纪上半叶文化保守主义的冲突与融合进行了论析,先是对文化保守主义的发展脉络进行了认真梳理,继而挖掘了马克思主义中国化进程中马克思主义与文化保守主义的关系,在此基础上分析总结了中国马克思主义对文化保守主义合理思想资源的吸收与超越。
第五章为全文论述重点即马克思主义中国化与20世纪上半叶三大社会思潮问题研究的理性思考,可以说第五章既是对前四章内容的理论升华,又是对马克思主义中国化经验的科学总结。
结语部分对整篇论文加以宏观提炼,基于以上五章的研究,用上述内容来阐述清楚下面两个观点,也是回答清楚下面两个问题:马克思主义与三大社会思潮交流激荡是不可避免的冲突融合;马克思主义中国化的必然性和合理性是不可抗拒的历史潮流,从中获得用马克思主义引领社会思潮的带有规律性的认识。
It is well known that one dispute existed among Marxism、all kinds of divisions of non-Marxisma and anti-Marxism from first to last during the developmental history of Marxism's Sinicization, which became more and more intense in the collision and perplexity of survival and initiation ,culture and politics, also it composed one important link of simultaneously.Of course, history got its conclusion ------ Marxism owned more greater historical influence than any thoughts in 20th century in China, which changed the trend of modern and contemporary Chinese history. Chinese Marxists further combined the basic principles of Marxism, practice in China, Chinese history and Chinese culture to make Marxism realize nationalization and embodiment in China, and realized two historical leaps of Marxism's Sinicization. It should be said that the current academia deploys a multi-disciplinary , multi-dimensional, multi-level, multi-perspective study that focus on the related propositions of Marxism's Sinicization, these research results will help to construct contemporary patterns and scientific system of Marxism theory on the whole , to propel the transformation from theoretical results to actuality. While, relatively speaking, the academia is at the preliminary and exploratory stage to study and explore relevant questions of Marxism's Sinicization based on the perspective of social thoughts . Many propositions haven’t been systematically deployed in-depth, and still there some more spaces, scopes and necessaries can be studied in great depth about these.
The study of this dissertation regards social thoughts as perspective, selects social thoughts which were relevant directly to Marxism's Sinicization of last half of 20th centenary and which still have the vitality as object of study , eventually establishes the relation between there major social thoughts(the Three People's Principles, liberalism, cultural conservatism)and Marxism's Sinicization as content of study. And then this dissertation discusses and analyzes its central theme ------the intercommunication and agitation between Marxism's Sinicization and there major social thoughts of last half of 20th centenary. The dissertation consists of three parts: introduction, body and conclusion.
The introduction expounds macroscopically about academic value, application value and current research status , and clearly defines the scope of time and space about choosing themes. Then this part explains and analyzes theoretically about research contents, research objectives, research methods , technical routes and expected innovation parts.
The body of this dissertation consists of five chapters, its summaries are as below:
The first chapter analyzes macroscopically modern ideological and cultural background of the process of Marxism's Sinicization based on vertical Chinese historical background and horizontal Chinese epochal cultural background,then analyzes the characteristics of communication , interjection and confrontation of social thoughts of last half of the 20th century,introduces the clash and integration between Marxism and three major social thoughts , and draws the inevitable choice and rationality that China's advanced Marxist intellectuals chose Marxism.
Chapter two is mainly expounds the agitation and integration of the Three People’s Principles of the last half of the 20th century in the course of Marxism's Sinicization in a comprehensive way. First,chapter two hackles carefully developmental contexts of the Three People's Principles of Sun Yat-sen. Then it probes into the relation between Marxism and the Three People's Principles in the course of Marxism's Sinicization. Last, on the basis of last step ,chapter two analyzes and concludes the absorption and transformation for Chinese Marxism which comes from rational idealistic resources of the Three People's Principles.
Chapter three mainly analyzes and expounds the clash and interjection of liberalism of the last half of the 20th century in the course of Marxism's Sinicization . In the first place, chapter three hackles developmental contexts of liberalism. In the second place, chapter three probes into the relation between Marxism and liberalism in the early course of Marxism's Sinicization. Last but not least, chapter three analyzes the absorption and transformation for Chinese Marxism which comes from rational idealistic resources of the liberalism on the basis of last step .
Chapter four mainly analyzes and expounds the clash and interjection of cultural conservatism of the last half of the 20th century in the course of Marxism's Sinicization . For one thing, chapter four hackles developmental contexts of cultural conservatism. For another, chapter four dredges up the relation between Marxism and cultural conservatism in the early course of Marxism's Sinicization. At last, chapter three analyzes and concludes the absorption and transformation for Chinese Marxism which comes from rational idealistic resources of the liberalism on the basis of last step.
Chapter five is key point of this dissertation. It can be said that Chapter five is theoretical sublimation for Chapter four, also it’s not only rational consideration for the influence and status for Marxism's Sinicization which comes from three major social thoughts of the last half of the 20th century, but also scientific summary of the experience of Marxism's Sinicization.
The conclusion part extracts the entire dissertation macrolly. Based on the study of above five chapters, and according to above contents, we can expound clearly two viewpoints and answer clearly two questions at the same time: the intercommunication and agitation between Marxism's Sinicization and there major social thoughts of last half of 20th centenary is unavoidable clash and integration; the inevitability and rationality of Marxism's Sinicization is an irresistible trend of history. Furthermore, we can explore and conclude the regularity of things in general from the perspective of the relation between Marxism's Sinicization and social thoughts, from which we can attain disciplinary cognition from social thoughts led by Marxism.
引文
[1]梁启超.清代学术概论[M].梁启超论清学史二种.上海:复旦大学出版社,1985.1.
[2]葛兆光.中国思想史导论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.64.
[3]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.33.
[4] [207] (美)林毓生.中国意识的危机[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.37. 45.
[5] [17]陈独秀文章选编[M].上册,北京:三联书店,1984.107.138.
[6]姜林祥.中国儒学史[M].近代卷.广州:广东教育出版社,1998.272.
[7][8][24][146][239]李大钊.李大钊文集[M].下卷.北京:人民出版社, 1984.447.557—558.151.547.50.
[9]叶晓青.中国传统文化在近代[J].历史研究,1985.1.
[10] [180] [201] [203] [251]李泽厚.中国现代思想史论[M].天津:天津社会科学院出版社,2003. 26.261. 51. 59. 67.
[11]金冲及.救亡唤起启蒙[N].人民日报,1988-12-5.
[12]胡适先生谈五四[J].学风,1947.3.
[13] [137] [138] [139]胡适口述唐德刚译注.胡适口述自传[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005. 183.194.189.189—190.
[14] [151] [245]“从五四运动到人民共和国成立”课题组.胡绳论“从五四运动到人民共和国成立”[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001.83.5. 32.
[15]谢安民.“五四”启蒙的终结与马克思主义[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2008.10.
[16] [230 ] [267]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第4卷.北京:人民出版社,1995. 603.457. 742—743.
[18] [98] [110]欧阳哲生.自由主义之累—胡适思想的现代阐释[M].上海:人民出版社,1993.69.16.204.
[19]杜亚泉.静的文明与动的文明[J].东方杂志,第14卷第4号,1916.10. [20 ] [181](美)艾恺著.王宗昱等译.最后的儒家—梁漱溟与中国现代化的两难[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2003. 52—53.78.
[21]庞卓恒.尚和与尚争:中西传统文化主导价值歧异和现代交融趋势[J].社会科学战线,2008.2.
[22]江泽民.江泽民在乔治·布什总统图书馆的演讲[N].人民日报,2002—10—24.
[23]王跃,高力克.五四:文化的阐释与评价—西方学者论五四[M].太原:山西人民出版社,1989.11.
[25][67][83][89][91][92][93][94][155][156][157][159][215][226][227][238][240][241][249][252]毛泽东选集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1991.698. 677.689. 733. 688. 678—679. 678. 678.732. 735—736.733.529.534.610.611.626.666.685.534.633.
[26]中国大百科全书[M].哲学卷Ⅱ.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1987.765.
[27] [125]高瑞泉.中国近代社会思潮导论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996.5. 231.
[28]〔美〕费正清,刘广京.剑桥中国晚清史[M].下卷.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.340—341.
[29] [276]梅荣政.用马克思主义引领社会思潮[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.63. 42.
[30] [236] [264] [269] [272]邓小平文选[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1993.45. 205.46. 284. 44.
[31]张国祚.论多样化社会思潮的引领[J].求是,2007.7.
[32]张金荣.从历史上三次文化交流看马克思主义中国化[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2002. 5.
[33]陈旭麓.五四以来政派及其思想[M].序.上海:上海人民出版社,1987.5.
[34]方克立.关于当前大陆新儒学问题的三封信[J].学术探索,2006 .2.
[35] [44] [75]孙中山全集[M].第2卷.北京:中华书局,1982.359. 319. 506.
[36]贺渊.三民主义与中国政治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.134.
[37]李光灿.论孙中山的民族主义[J].新建设,1956.12.
[38]国父全集[M].第二册.台北:近代中国出版社,1989.181.
[39] [45] [55]孙中山全集[M].第5卷.北京:中华书局,1985.393. 394. 480.
[40] [42]孙中山全集[M].第1卷.北京:中华书局,1981.319. 297.
[41]张磊.试论孙中山的社会经济思想—关于民生主义的研究[J].近代史研究,1980 .2.
[43] [53] [78]列宁选集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1995. 292—293. 293. 296.
[46]张磊.孙中山思想研究[M].北京:中华书局,1981.39.
[47]邓文仪.中山先生全集[M].南京:新中国出版社,1947.825.
[48]陈旭麓、郝盛潮.孙中山集外集[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1990.35.
[49] [51] [52] [81] [84]孙中山选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1981.765. 386. 436. 802. 591—593.
[50]廖仲恺,何香凝.双清文集[M].上卷.北京:人民出版社,1985.136.
[54]李泽厚.论孙中山的“民生主义”思想[J].历史研究,1956.11.
[56] [82]陈锡祺.孙中山年谱长编[M].下册.北京:中华书局,1991.1748. 1472.
[57][58][59][60][61][62][86]孙中山全集[M].第9卷.北京:中华书局,1986.118.324.350.120.399. 399—400.114.
[63]孙中山全集[M].第10卷.北京:中华书局,1986.558.
[64] [147] [244] [247] [253] [258] [259] [260]毛泽东选集[M].第1卷.北京:人民出版社,1991.16. 111—112. 295. 16.115.109.110—111.110.
[65] [70]毛泽东文集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1996. 321—324. 290.
[66]恽代英.恽代英文集[M].下卷.北京:人民出版社,1984.745—748.
[68]潘公展.近代社会主义及其批评[J].东方杂志18卷4号,1921.2.25.
[69]汪青松.马克思主义中国化与中国化的马克思主义[J].安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版),2003.1.
[71]孙中山全集[M].第7卷.北京:中华书局,1985.60.
[72]万国公报文选[M].北京:三联书店. 1998.620.
[73]梁启超.进化论革命者颉德之学说[J].新民丛报,第18号,1902—9—15.
[74]朱执信.朱执信集[M].上集.北京:中华书局,1977.11.
[76]姚锡长.孙中山的三民主义与马克思主义中国化[J].许昌学院学报,2005.3.
[77]何萍、李维武.马克思主义中国化探论[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.173.
[79]周恩来.周恩来选集[M].上卷.北京:人民出版社,1980.112.
[80]建设杂志[M].第1卷.第5号.
[85]三民主义与共产主义[M].自修出版社印行,1900.19.
[87]中国人民大学中国革命史教研室.中国革命史参考资料之一[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1956.30.
[88]毛泽东.论新阶段[M].中共中央统战部,民族问题文献汇编.595.
[90] [95] [198]毛泽东选集[M].第4卷.北京:人民出版社,1991. 1477—1478. 1253. 1471.
[96]李慎之.顾准日记[M].序.北京:经济日报出版社,1998.
[97] [136](美)格里德.胡适与中国的文艺复兴[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1989.340.377—378.
[99]宝成关,潘晓斌.严复与西方自由主义[J].社会科学战线,1999. 1.
[100] [101] [102] [106] [108]李泽厚.中国近代思想史论[M].北京:人民出版社,1979. 282.267.267. 475. 284.
[103]欧阳哲生.自由主义之累[J].开放时代,1999. 4.
[104]许纪霖.现代中国的自由主义传统[J].二十一世纪,香港,1997.8.
[105]胡适文集[M].第1册.北京:北大出版社,1998 .320—321.
[107]吕希晨,王育民.中国现代哲学史[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1989.572.
[109](美)柯文.雷颐等译.在传统与现代性之间—王韬与晚清革命[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1998.215.
[111] [118] [162]胡适文集[M].第5册.北京:北大出版社,448.451—452. 453.
[112]新文化运动与国民党[J].新月.2卷.4号.
[113] [115] [130] [237]胡适文集[M].第2册.北京:北大出版社,1998 . 487. 14. 566. 277.
[114]梁启超.饮冰室合集·文集之三十九[M].北京:中华书局,1989.45.
[116]鲁迅.三闲集·无声的中国[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2006.12.1.
[117] [254] [262] [268]毛泽东选集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1991. 831.791.801.815.
[119]胡适.胡适全集[M].卷二十二.合肥:安徽教育出版社,1998.323.
[120]胡适.胡适文集[M].第3册.北京:北大出版社,1998 . 364.
[121]宋惠昌.论胡适政治哲学的历史价值[J].学术月刊,1996.2.
[122]争自由的宣言[N].晨报,1920—8—1.
[123]胡适.胡适全集[M].卷二十一.合肥:安徽教育出版社,1998.440.
[124] [132]胡颂平.胡适之先生晚年谈话录[M].北京:中国友谊出版社,1993.299. 11.
[126]胡明.胡适传论[M].下.北京:人民文学出版社,1996.235.
[127]胡适.宪政问题[J].独立评论,1932.1.
[128] [129]胡适.我们能行的宪政与宪法[J].独立评论,1937.(242):12. 12—13.
[131]胡适.自由主义[N].北平.世界日报,1948—9—5.
[133]伯林.市场逻辑与国家观念[M].北京:三联书店,1995. 227.
[134]胡适.胡适文存[M].第1集.第4卷.合肥:黄山书社,1996. 247.
[135]胡适.胡适文集[M].第12册.北京:北大出版社,1998 .807—808.
[140]胡适.胡适文存[M].卷二.亚东图书馆,1928.148—149.
[141] [142] [145] [222]李大钊.李大钊文集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1999. 6. 7. 2—3. 140.
[143]王素莉.“问题”与“主义”之争在马克思主义中国化中的地位[N].学习时报,2006—04—17.
[144]何历宇.“结合”就是创造—论马克思主义中国化的理论意义[J].云梦学刊,1998.1.
[148]瞿秋白.瞿秋白选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1985.310—311.
[149]吴玉章.吴玉章回忆录[M].北京:中国青年出版社,1978.115.
[150]瞿秋白.伯伯尔之泛劳动主义观[J].新社会,第18号,1920.4.21.
[152]钱穆.中国历代政治得失[M].北京:三联书店,2005.57.
[153]王人博.中国近代宪政思潮研究[J].中国知网博士论文期刊库,2001.3.
[154]召开国民大会与实施宪政的先决条件[N].新华日报,1939—9—22.
[158]陈小平.党权政治的兴起及对中国宪政的影响.公共论丛[M].第6期.北京:三联书店,2000.318.
[160]毛泽东.毛泽东文集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1993.335.
[161]毛泽东年谱[M].中卷.北京:人民出版社、中央文献出版社,1993.609—610.
[163]史记[M].卷83.北京:中华书局,1959.2456.
[164]艾恺.世界范围内的反现代化思潮—论文化守成主义[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1991.76-77.
[165]欧阳哲生.中国近代文化流派之比较[J].中州学刊,1991. 6.
[166] [210]何晓明.返本与开新—近代中国文化保守主义新论[M].北京:商务印书馆出版,2006.94. 203.
[167]罗福惠.概论近代以来我国文化传统主义的演化[J].华中师范大学学报,1987.6.
[168] [199] [209] [218]胡逢祥.社会变革与文化传统—中国近代文化保守主义思潮研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000.3—4. 112. 112. 112.
[169]章太炎.辛亥革命前十年间时论选集[M].第二卷.上册.北京:三联书店,1977.446—455.
[170]刘师培.刘申叔先生遗书[M].65册.伦理教科书.1936.
[171]邓实.国学保存论[J].政艺通报,甲辰3期.
[172]邓实.国学通论[J].国粹学报,1905.3.
[173]鸡鸣风雨楼独立书·学术独立第三.光绪癸卯(甘九年)政艺丛书[M].上篇(一).文海出版社影印本,176—177.
[174]郑师渠.晚清国粹派文化思想研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000.330.
[175]郑大华.论“东方文化派”[J].社会科学战线,1993.3.
[176]梅光迪.梅光迪文录[M].沈阳:辽宁万有图书发行有限责任公司出版,2001.26.
[177]梅光迪.评新文化运动[J].甲寅第1卷第9号,1925.9.
[178]吴宓.吴宓日记[M].第1册.北京:三联书店,1998.331.
[179]方克立.现代新儒学的发展历程[M].现代新儒家学案所作代序.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995.
[182] [183]梁漱溟.梁漱溟全集[M].第1卷.济南:山东人民出版社,1989.24.352—353.
[184]熊十力.论六经[M].上海:上海大众书店,1951.113.
[185]冯友兰.新事论[M].北京:三联书店,2007.228—229.
[186] [220]贺麟.儒家思想的新开展.文化与人生[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988.134.6.
[187]余英时.钱穆与新儒家[M].中国文化,第六期.23.
[188]崔龙水,马振铎.马克思主义与儒学[M].北京:当代中国出版社,1996 .1.
[189]牟宗三.生命的学问[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005.58.
[190]牟宗三.当代新儒学[M].从儒家的当前使命说中国文化的现代意义.三联书店,1989.178.
[191]李泽厚.世纪新梦[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1998.127.
[192]国粹学报[N].第13期.附录.
[193]章太炎.诂经精舍课艺第八集,书首·俞樾序.1896.
[194] [195]邓实.政艺通报[N].癸卯年第二号,1903—2—27.
[196]天义报[N].第六卷,一九O七年九月.
[197]林茂生自选集[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.288.
[200]王平陵.科学与人生观[M].“科哲之战”的尾声.济南:山东人民出版社,1997.302.
[202]邓中夏.中国现在的思想界[J].中国青年,第6期. 1923—1—24.
[204]新青年季刊[J].第2期,1923—12—20.
[205] [208]李方祥.二十世纪三四十年代“学术中国化”与“马克思主义中国化”的思潮互动[J].中共党史研究,2008.2.
[206] [250]侯外庐.韧的追求[M].生活.读书.新知三联书店,1985.224—225. 222.
[211]张静如.关于“中国化”[J].党史研究与教学,2006 .5.
[212]许性初.从五四运动说到一十宣言[J].文化建设,第1卷.第5期.1935.
[213]郭齐勇.试论文化保守主义思潮[J].学习与探索,1990.1.
[214]许全兴.“马克思主义中国化”提出的文化背景[J].西南民族大学学报,2008.2.
[216]陈伯达.我们继续历史的事业前进[J].解放第43、44期合刊,1938.7.1.
[217]礼记·中庸.
[219]汤一介.中国文化书院讲演录第二集·中外文化比较研究[M].从印度佛教的传入中国看当今中国文化发展的若干问题.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,1988.48.
[221]陈崧.五四前后东西文化问题论战文选[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1985.403.
[223]方克立.现代新儒学与中国现代化[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1997.498—499.
[224] [234]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.719. 765.
[225]彭明,程歗.近代中国的思想历程(1840—1949)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.685.
[228]“一大”前后[M].(二).北京:人民出版社,1980.53.
[229]熊十力.十力语要[M].卷三.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1997.
[231]罗荣渠.从‘西化’到现代化(代序)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990.20.
[232]贾红莲.马克思主义与儒学关系研究的现状[J].求是学刊,2003.4.
[233]胡适.胡适文存[M].卷四.我们走那条路?亚东图书馆,1928.
[235]列宁.列宁选集[M].第42卷.北京:人民出版社,1987.369.
[242]江泽民.论“三个代表”[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2002.61—62.
[243] [274]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第1卷.北京:人民出版社,681—684. 98.
[246]张国焘.我的回忆[M].第1册.现代史料编刊社,1980.294.
[248]丁守和.瞿秋白思想研究[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1985.251.
[255]雒树刚.不断推进马克思主义中国化[N].人民日报,2001—11—8.
[256] [257](美)埃德加·斯诺著董乐山译.西行漫记[M].北京:解放军文艺出版社,2002.107.59.
[261]张静如,丁晓强.关于毛泽东思想发展史研究中的几个问题[J].中共党史研究,1988.2.
[263] [266] [271]毛泽东.毛泽东文集[M].第7卷.北京:人民出版社,1999. 42. 230. 281.
[265]谢泳.逝去的年代:中国自由知识分子的命运[M].文化艺术出版社,1999.257.
[270]毛泽东.毛泽东文集[M].第8卷.北京:人民出版社,1999.109.
[273]陈奎元.繁荣发展中国特色的哲学社会科学[N].人民日报,2004—4—20.
[275]吴易风.马克思主义经济学和新自由主义经济学(序)[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006.2.
[277]江泽民.江泽民文选[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,2006.399—400.
[2]葛兆光.中国思想史导论[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.64.
[3]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.33.
[4] [207] (美)林毓生.中国意识的危机[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1986.37. 45.
[5] [17]陈独秀文章选编[M].上册,北京:三联书店,1984.107.138.
[6]姜林祥.中国儒学史[M].近代卷.广州:广东教育出版社,1998.272.
[7][8][24][146][239]李大钊.李大钊文集[M].下卷.北京:人民出版社, 1984.447.557—558.151.547.50.
[9]叶晓青.中国传统文化在近代[J].历史研究,1985.1.
[10] [180] [201] [203] [251]李泽厚.中国现代思想史论[M].天津:天津社会科学院出版社,2003. 26.261. 51. 59. 67.
[11]金冲及.救亡唤起启蒙[N].人民日报,1988-12-5.
[12]胡适先生谈五四[J].学风,1947.3.
[13] [137] [138] [139]胡适口述唐德刚译注.胡适口述自传[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005. 183.194.189.189—190.
[14] [151] [245]“从五四运动到人民共和国成立”课题组.胡绳论“从五四运动到人民共和国成立”[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2001.83.5. 32.
[15]谢安民.“五四”启蒙的终结与马克思主义[J].山西高等学校社会科学学报,2008.10.
[16] [230 ] [267]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第4卷.北京:人民出版社,1995. 603.457. 742—743.
[18] [98] [110]欧阳哲生.自由主义之累—胡适思想的现代阐释[M].上海:人民出版社,1993.69.16.204.
[19]杜亚泉.静的文明与动的文明[J].东方杂志,第14卷第4号,1916.10. [20 ] [181](美)艾恺著.王宗昱等译.最后的儒家—梁漱溟与中国现代化的两难[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2003. 52—53.78.
[21]庞卓恒.尚和与尚争:中西传统文化主导价值歧异和现代交融趋势[J].社会科学战线,2008.2.
[22]江泽民.江泽民在乔治·布什总统图书馆的演讲[N].人民日报,2002—10—24.
[23]王跃,高力克.五四:文化的阐释与评价—西方学者论五四[M].太原:山西人民出版社,1989.11.
[25][67][83][89][91][92][93][94][155][156][157][159][215][226][227][238][240][241][249][252]毛泽东选集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1991.698. 677.689. 733. 688. 678—679. 678. 678.732. 735—736.733.529.534.610.611.626.666.685.534.633.
[26]中国大百科全书[M].哲学卷Ⅱ.北京:中国大百科全书出版社,1987.765.
[27] [125]高瑞泉.中国近代社会思潮导论[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,1996.5. 231.
[28]〔美〕费正清,刘广京.剑桥中国晚清史[M].下卷.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1993.340—341.
[29] [276]梅荣政.用马克思主义引领社会思潮[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社,2008.63. 42.
[30] [236] [264] [269] [272]邓小平文选[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1993.45. 205.46. 284. 44.
[31]张国祚.论多样化社会思潮的引领[J].求是,2007.7.
[32]张金荣.从历史上三次文化交流看马克思主义中国化[J].湖南师范大学社会科学学报,2002. 5.
[33]陈旭麓.五四以来政派及其思想[M].序.上海:上海人民出版社,1987.5.
[34]方克立.关于当前大陆新儒学问题的三封信[J].学术探索,2006 .2.
[35] [44] [75]孙中山全集[M].第2卷.北京:中华书局,1982.359. 319. 506.
[36]贺渊.三民主义与中国政治[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2002.134.
[37]李光灿.论孙中山的民族主义[J].新建设,1956.12.
[38]国父全集[M].第二册.台北:近代中国出版社,1989.181.
[39] [45] [55]孙中山全集[M].第5卷.北京:中华书局,1985.393. 394. 480.
[40] [42]孙中山全集[M].第1卷.北京:中华书局,1981.319. 297.
[41]张磊.试论孙中山的社会经济思想—关于民生主义的研究[J].近代史研究,1980 .2.
[43] [53] [78]列宁选集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1995. 292—293. 293. 296.
[46]张磊.孙中山思想研究[M].北京:中华书局,1981.39.
[47]邓文仪.中山先生全集[M].南京:新中国出版社,1947.825.
[48]陈旭麓、郝盛潮.孙中山集外集[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1990.35.
[49] [51] [52] [81] [84]孙中山选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1981.765. 386. 436. 802. 591—593.
[50]廖仲恺,何香凝.双清文集[M].上卷.北京:人民出版社,1985.136.
[54]李泽厚.论孙中山的“民生主义”思想[J].历史研究,1956.11.
[56] [82]陈锡祺.孙中山年谱长编[M].下册.北京:中华书局,1991.1748. 1472.
[57][58][59][60][61][62][86]孙中山全集[M].第9卷.北京:中华书局,1986.118.324.350.120.399. 399—400.114.
[63]孙中山全集[M].第10卷.北京:中华书局,1986.558.
[64] [147] [244] [247] [253] [258] [259] [260]毛泽东选集[M].第1卷.北京:人民出版社,1991.16. 111—112. 295. 16.115.109.110—111.110.
[65] [70]毛泽东文集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1996. 321—324. 290.
[66]恽代英.恽代英文集[M].下卷.北京:人民出版社,1984.745—748.
[68]潘公展.近代社会主义及其批评[J].东方杂志18卷4号,1921.2.25.
[69]汪青松.马克思主义中国化与中国化的马克思主义[J].安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版),2003.1.
[71]孙中山全集[M].第7卷.北京:中华书局,1985.60.
[72]万国公报文选[M].北京:三联书店. 1998.620.
[73]梁启超.进化论革命者颉德之学说[J].新民丛报,第18号,1902—9—15.
[74]朱执信.朱执信集[M].上集.北京:中华书局,1977.11.
[76]姚锡长.孙中山的三民主义与马克思主义中国化[J].许昌学院学报,2005.3.
[77]何萍、李维武.马克思主义中国化探论[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.173.
[79]周恩来.周恩来选集[M].上卷.北京:人民出版社,1980.112.
[80]建设杂志[M].第1卷.第5号.
[85]三民主义与共产主义[M].自修出版社印行,1900.19.
[87]中国人民大学中国革命史教研室.中国革命史参考资料之一[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1956.30.
[88]毛泽东.论新阶段[M].中共中央统战部,民族问题文献汇编.595.
[90] [95] [198]毛泽东选集[M].第4卷.北京:人民出版社,1991. 1477—1478. 1253. 1471.
[96]李慎之.顾准日记[M].序.北京:经济日报出版社,1998.
[97] [136](美)格里德.胡适与中国的文艺复兴[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1989.340.377—378.
[99]宝成关,潘晓斌.严复与西方自由主义[J].社会科学战线,1999. 1.
[100] [101] [102] [106] [108]李泽厚.中国近代思想史论[M].北京:人民出版社,1979. 282.267.267. 475. 284.
[103]欧阳哲生.自由主义之累[J].开放时代,1999. 4.
[104]许纪霖.现代中国的自由主义传统[J].二十一世纪,香港,1997.8.
[105]胡适文集[M].第1册.北京:北大出版社,1998 .320—321.
[107]吕希晨,王育民.中国现代哲学史[M].长春:吉林人民出版社,1989.572.
[109](美)柯文.雷颐等译.在传统与现代性之间—王韬与晚清革命[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,1998.215.
[111] [118] [162]胡适文集[M].第5册.北京:北大出版社,448.451—452. 453.
[112]新文化运动与国民党[J].新月.2卷.4号.
[113] [115] [130] [237]胡适文集[M].第2册.北京:北大出版社,1998 . 487. 14. 566. 277.
[114]梁启超.饮冰室合集·文集之三十九[M].北京:中华书局,1989.45.
[116]鲁迅.三闲集·无声的中国[M].北京:人民文学出版社,2006.12.1.
[117] [254] [262] [268]毛泽东选集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1991. 831.791.801.815.
[119]胡适.胡适全集[M].卷二十二.合肥:安徽教育出版社,1998.323.
[120]胡适.胡适文集[M].第3册.北京:北大出版社,1998 . 364.
[121]宋惠昌.论胡适政治哲学的历史价值[J].学术月刊,1996.2.
[122]争自由的宣言[N].晨报,1920—8—1.
[123]胡适.胡适全集[M].卷二十一.合肥:安徽教育出版社,1998.440.
[124] [132]胡颂平.胡适之先生晚年谈话录[M].北京:中国友谊出版社,1993.299. 11.
[126]胡明.胡适传论[M].下.北京:人民文学出版社,1996.235.
[127]胡适.宪政问题[J].独立评论,1932.1.
[128] [129]胡适.我们能行的宪政与宪法[J].独立评论,1937.(242):12. 12—13.
[131]胡适.自由主义[N].北平.世界日报,1948—9—5.
[133]伯林.市场逻辑与国家观念[M].北京:三联书店,1995. 227.
[134]胡适.胡适文存[M].第1集.第4卷.合肥:黄山书社,1996. 247.
[135]胡适.胡适文集[M].第12册.北京:北大出版社,1998 .807—808.
[140]胡适.胡适文存[M].卷二.亚东图书馆,1928.148—149.
[141] [142] [145] [222]李大钊.李大钊文集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1999. 6. 7. 2—3. 140.
[143]王素莉.“问题”与“主义”之争在马克思主义中国化中的地位[N].学习时报,2006—04—17.
[144]何历宇.“结合”就是创造—论马克思主义中国化的理论意义[J].云梦学刊,1998.1.
[148]瞿秋白.瞿秋白选集[M].北京:人民出版社,1985.310—311.
[149]吴玉章.吴玉章回忆录[M].北京:中国青年出版社,1978.115.
[150]瞿秋白.伯伯尔之泛劳动主义观[J].新社会,第18号,1920.4.21.
[152]钱穆.中国历代政治得失[M].北京:三联书店,2005.57.
[153]王人博.中国近代宪政思潮研究[J].中国知网博士论文期刊库,2001.3.
[154]召开国民大会与实施宪政的先决条件[N].新华日报,1939—9—22.
[158]陈小平.党权政治的兴起及对中国宪政的影响.公共论丛[M].第6期.北京:三联书店,2000.318.
[160]毛泽东.毛泽东文集[M].第2卷.北京:人民出版社,1993.335.
[161]毛泽东年谱[M].中卷.北京:人民出版社、中央文献出版社,1993.609—610.
[163]史记[M].卷83.北京:中华书局,1959.2456.
[164]艾恺.世界范围内的反现代化思潮—论文化守成主义[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1991.76-77.
[165]欧阳哲生.中国近代文化流派之比较[J].中州学刊,1991. 6.
[166] [210]何晓明.返本与开新—近代中国文化保守主义新论[M].北京:商务印书馆出版,2006.94. 203.
[167]罗福惠.概论近代以来我国文化传统主义的演化[J].华中师范大学学报,1987.6.
[168] [199] [209] [218]胡逢祥.社会变革与文化传统—中国近代文化保守主义思潮研究[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2000.3—4. 112. 112. 112.
[169]章太炎.辛亥革命前十年间时论选集[M].第二卷.上册.北京:三联书店,1977.446—455.
[170]刘师培.刘申叔先生遗书[M].65册.伦理教科书.1936.
[171]邓实.国学保存论[J].政艺通报,甲辰3期.
[172]邓实.国学通论[J].国粹学报,1905.3.
[173]鸡鸣风雨楼独立书·学术独立第三.光绪癸卯(甘九年)政艺丛书[M].上篇(一).文海出版社影印本,176—177.
[174]郑师渠.晚清国粹派文化思想研究[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2000.330.
[175]郑大华.论“东方文化派”[J].社会科学战线,1993.3.
[176]梅光迪.梅光迪文录[M].沈阳:辽宁万有图书发行有限责任公司出版,2001.26.
[177]梅光迪.评新文化运动[J].甲寅第1卷第9号,1925.9.
[178]吴宓.吴宓日记[M].第1册.北京:三联书店,1998.331.
[179]方克立.现代新儒学的发展历程[M].现代新儒家学案所作代序.北京:中国社会科学出版社,1995.
[182] [183]梁漱溟.梁漱溟全集[M].第1卷.济南:山东人民出版社,1989.24.352—353.
[184]熊十力.论六经[M].上海:上海大众书店,1951.113.
[185]冯友兰.新事论[M].北京:三联书店,2007.228—229.
[186] [220]贺麟.儒家思想的新开展.文化与人生[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988.134.6.
[187]余英时.钱穆与新儒家[M].中国文化,第六期.23.
[188]崔龙水,马振铎.马克思主义与儒学[M].北京:当代中国出版社,1996 .1.
[189]牟宗三.生命的学问[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2005.58.
[190]牟宗三.当代新儒学[M].从儒家的当前使命说中国文化的现代意义.三联书店,1989.178.
[191]李泽厚.世纪新梦[M].合肥:安徽文艺出版社,1998.127.
[192]国粹学报[N].第13期.附录.
[193]章太炎.诂经精舍课艺第八集,书首·俞樾序.1896.
[194] [195]邓实.政艺通报[N].癸卯年第二号,1903—2—27.
[196]天义报[N].第六卷,一九O七年九月.
[197]林茂生自选集[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2007.288.
[200]王平陵.科学与人生观[M].“科哲之战”的尾声.济南:山东人民出版社,1997.302.
[202]邓中夏.中国现在的思想界[J].中国青年,第6期. 1923—1—24.
[204]新青年季刊[J].第2期,1923—12—20.
[205] [208]李方祥.二十世纪三四十年代“学术中国化”与“马克思主义中国化”的思潮互动[J].中共党史研究,2008.2.
[206] [250]侯外庐.韧的追求[M].生活.读书.新知三联书店,1985.224—225. 222.
[211]张静如.关于“中国化”[J].党史研究与教学,2006 .5.
[212]许性初.从五四运动说到一十宣言[J].文化建设,第1卷.第5期.1935.
[213]郭齐勇.试论文化保守主义思潮[J].学习与探索,1990.1.
[214]许全兴.“马克思主义中国化”提出的文化背景[J].西南民族大学学报,2008.2.
[216]陈伯达.我们继续历史的事业前进[J].解放第43、44期合刊,1938.7.1.
[217]礼记·中庸.
[219]汤一介.中国文化书院讲演录第二集·中外文化比较研究[M].从印度佛教的传入中国看当今中国文化发展的若干问题.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店出版社,1988.48.
[221]陈崧.五四前后东西文化问题论战文选[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1985.403.
[223]方克立.现代新儒学与中国现代化[M].天津:天津人民出版社,1997.498—499.
[224] [234]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,1995.719. 765.
[225]彭明,程歗.近代中国的思想历程(1840—1949)[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.685.
[228]“一大”前后[M].(二).北京:人民出版社,1980.53.
[229]熊十力.十力语要[M].卷三.沈阳:辽宁教育出版社,1997.
[231]罗荣渠.从‘西化’到现代化(代序)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990.20.
[232]贾红莲.马克思主义与儒学关系研究的现状[J].求是学刊,2003.4.
[233]胡适.胡适文存[M].卷四.我们走那条路?亚东图书馆,1928.
[235]列宁.列宁选集[M].第42卷.北京:人民出版社,1987.369.
[242]江泽民.论“三个代表”[M].北京:中央文献出版社,2002.61—62.
[243] [274]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯选集[M].第1卷.北京:人民出版社,681—684. 98.
[246]张国焘.我的回忆[M].第1册.现代史料编刊社,1980.294.
[248]丁守和.瞿秋白思想研究[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1985.251.
[255]雒树刚.不断推进马克思主义中国化[N].人民日报,2001—11—8.
[256] [257](美)埃德加·斯诺著董乐山译.西行漫记[M].北京:解放军文艺出版社,2002.107.59.
[261]张静如,丁晓强.关于毛泽东思想发展史研究中的几个问题[J].中共党史研究,1988.2.
[263] [266] [271]毛泽东.毛泽东文集[M].第7卷.北京:人民出版社,1999. 42. 230. 281.
[265]谢泳.逝去的年代:中国自由知识分子的命运[M].文化艺术出版社,1999.257.
[270]毛泽东.毛泽东文集[M].第8卷.北京:人民出版社,1999.109.
[273]陈奎元.繁荣发展中国特色的哲学社会科学[N].人民日报,2004—4—20.
[275]吴易风.马克思主义经济学和新自由主义经济学(序)[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2006.2.
[277]江泽民.江泽民文选[M].第3卷.北京:人民出版社,2006.399—400.