警察讯问话语批评分析
|
摘要
本研究属于法学和语言学交叉领域法律语言学的一个分支,是警察执法口语语言的动态、过程研究。本研究对警察讯问话语中权力关系进行了批评分析,目的是为展现警察讯问话语中的权力不对称现象,并提出若想达到警察讯问的机构目的,即在保障人权的基础上有效获得犯罪嫌疑人真实自愿地供述,警察就需要调整讯问话语中的不平衡权力关系,向着互动双方参与的“会话”方向转变,实现由“讯问(Interrogation)”向“询问(Interview)”的转变。
第一章导论综述法律语言学、警察讯问话语等相关研究,简要介绍了本研究的目的、内容和意义。
第二章是有关语言理论和研究方法的介绍。本章对权力的概念进行了解析,提出了适合本研究的权力操作概念,构建了以权力分析为问题中心的,综合批评话语分析工具的研究框架。本研究的研究方法和语料情况也在本章做了说明。
第三章分析警察讯问话语的机构特征。本章着重考察了机构话语研究的历史和概念,归纳了警察讯问话语的机构话语特征,分析了机构话语语境下的权力关系问题。
第四、五、六章运用会话分析方法对警察讯问话语的形式进行了描述。第四章主要对警察讯问话语进行了结构分析。借助参与角色理论,提出了警察讯问话语的理想参与框架。
第五章基于语料数据专门分析了警察讯问中的问话行为,展现了我国警察讯问的现状以及讯问中警察是如何利用问话来行使权力的。
第六章对警察所掌握的语言互动控制资源进行分析,进一步揭示讯问中的警察是如何使用这些语言形式控制和支配犯罪嫌疑人,实现自己交际目的的。
第七章考察警察讯问话语中的警察故事版本与犯罪嫌疑人故事版本的协商和斗争。通过展示在此过程中警察讯问者所采取的种种话语控制手段来说明警察讯问者在犯罪事实构建过程中表现出的强势话语权力。
第八章则对犯罪嫌疑人的答话行为进行了分析。在最低程度上遵守合作原则的基础上,犯罪嫌疑人会采用某些抵制策略来防御警察讯问者控制性问话。但这种权力抵制大都是被动的、防御性的,不能改变犯罪嫌疑人的弱势地位。
第九章总结全文,指出警察讯问话语中权力不对称会影响到机构目的的实现,由此提出“会话式”警察讯问模式。笔者还阐述了本研究对警察讯问实践的启示,指出了警察讯问语言使用中的不规范之处并研拟了中国警察讯问语言规范建议稿。最后指出了本研究的特色、局限和今后努力方向。
The present study belongs to a newly emerging and promising cross-disciplinary research, referred to as law and language (Forensic Linguistics). The present study explores the power indicators during police interrogation practice so as to evidence the claim that police interrogators override suspects in an all around way. Police interrogators undertake an“authoritative”discursive role in police-suspect confrontation. Police interrogators are accustomed to exerting this discursive power and never reflect on its barrier to the realization of institutional goals. Police officers, therefore, should lower figure to strike a better balance in the asymmetrical power relationship between the interrogators and suspects. They are advised to adapt a change in discursive roles and conduct“interview”instead of“interrogation”.
Chapter 1 introduces“forensic linguistics”and summarizes the recent study in police interrogation discourse so as to provide an academic background of the present study. It also conveys the purpose, contents and significance of the present research. Chapter 2 defines the working concept of“POWER”in the present study and introduces some basic ideas and approaches concerning critical discourse analysis on the basis of a generalization of relevant linguistic theories. It also reveals information about the language data and research methods. Chapter 3 analyzes the institutional features of police interrogation discourse, esp. power in institutional context as the starting point for the study.
Chapters 4, 5, and 6 analyze the form of police interrogation discourse by conversation analysis. Chapter 4 descries the overall structure of police interrogation discourse, and puts forward the ideal participant framework to attain institutional goals. Chapter 5 analyzes the“question speech act”of police interrogation discourse to display how police officers exert their power through coercive questions and throw light on the current situation of Chinese police interrogation practice. Chapter 6 proceeds to show police interrogators’dominant discursive power by presenting the various kinds of interaction control tools employed by police interrogators.
Chapter 7 shows the overwhelming dominance of police interrogators while in competing with suspects for different versions of event. Chapter 8 describes the“answer speech acts”of suspects. Some strategies are adopted by suspects in response to police interrogators’questions. Not making a list of those strategies, we examine suspects’answers to the coercive questions and to get the main strategies taken by suspects. However, these resistances seem vulnerable before the authoritative police.
Chapter 9 concludes the major discoveries of the study, describes implications for interrogation practice. The study advocates police interrogators to adapt a conversational style and make a transformation from“interrogation”to“interview”. In terms of the problems of language use in interrogation, the study offers a recommended version for the normalization of police interrogation language. At last, the strengths and limitations of the study are listed and domains for future study in police interrogation discourse are proposed.
第一章导论综述法律语言学、警察讯问话语等相关研究,简要介绍了本研究的目的、内容和意义。
第二章是有关语言理论和研究方法的介绍。本章对权力的概念进行了解析,提出了适合本研究的权力操作概念,构建了以权力分析为问题中心的,综合批评话语分析工具的研究框架。本研究的研究方法和语料情况也在本章做了说明。
第三章分析警察讯问话语的机构特征。本章着重考察了机构话语研究的历史和概念,归纳了警察讯问话语的机构话语特征,分析了机构话语语境下的权力关系问题。
第四、五、六章运用会话分析方法对警察讯问话语的形式进行了描述。第四章主要对警察讯问话语进行了结构分析。借助参与角色理论,提出了警察讯问话语的理想参与框架。
第五章基于语料数据专门分析了警察讯问中的问话行为,展现了我国警察讯问的现状以及讯问中警察是如何利用问话来行使权力的。
第六章对警察所掌握的语言互动控制资源进行分析,进一步揭示讯问中的警察是如何使用这些语言形式控制和支配犯罪嫌疑人,实现自己交际目的的。
第七章考察警察讯问话语中的警察故事版本与犯罪嫌疑人故事版本的协商和斗争。通过展示在此过程中警察讯问者所采取的种种话语控制手段来说明警察讯问者在犯罪事实构建过程中表现出的强势话语权力。
第八章则对犯罪嫌疑人的答话行为进行了分析。在最低程度上遵守合作原则的基础上,犯罪嫌疑人会采用某些抵制策略来防御警察讯问者控制性问话。但这种权力抵制大都是被动的、防御性的,不能改变犯罪嫌疑人的弱势地位。
第九章总结全文,指出警察讯问话语中权力不对称会影响到机构目的的实现,由此提出“会话式”警察讯问模式。笔者还阐述了本研究对警察讯问实践的启示,指出了警察讯问语言使用中的不规范之处并研拟了中国警察讯问语言规范建议稿。最后指出了本研究的特色、局限和今后努力方向。
The present study belongs to a newly emerging and promising cross-disciplinary research, referred to as law and language (Forensic Linguistics). The present study explores the power indicators during police interrogation practice so as to evidence the claim that police interrogators override suspects in an all around way. Police interrogators undertake an“authoritative”discursive role in police-suspect confrontation. Police interrogators are accustomed to exerting this discursive power and never reflect on its barrier to the realization of institutional goals. Police officers, therefore, should lower figure to strike a better balance in the asymmetrical power relationship between the interrogators and suspects. They are advised to adapt a change in discursive roles and conduct“interview”instead of“interrogation”.
Chapter 1 introduces“forensic linguistics”and summarizes the recent study in police interrogation discourse so as to provide an academic background of the present study. It also conveys the purpose, contents and significance of the present research. Chapter 2 defines the working concept of“POWER”in the present study and introduces some basic ideas and approaches concerning critical discourse analysis on the basis of a generalization of relevant linguistic theories. It also reveals information about the language data and research methods. Chapter 3 analyzes the institutional features of police interrogation discourse, esp. power in institutional context as the starting point for the study.
Chapters 4, 5, and 6 analyze the form of police interrogation discourse by conversation analysis. Chapter 4 descries the overall structure of police interrogation discourse, and puts forward the ideal participant framework to attain institutional goals. Chapter 5 analyzes the“question speech act”of police interrogation discourse to display how police officers exert their power through coercive questions and throw light on the current situation of Chinese police interrogation practice. Chapter 6 proceeds to show police interrogators’dominant discursive power by presenting the various kinds of interaction control tools employed by police interrogators.
Chapter 7 shows the overwhelming dominance of police interrogators while in competing with suspects for different versions of event. Chapter 8 describes the“answer speech acts”of suspects. Some strategies are adopted by suspects in response to police interrogators’questions. Not making a list of those strategies, we examine suspects’answers to the coercive questions and to get the main strategies taken by suspects. However, these resistances seem vulnerable before the authoritative police.
Chapter 9 concludes the major discoveries of the study, describes implications for interrogation practice. The study advocates police interrogators to adapt a conversational style and make a transformation from“interrogation”to“interview”. In terms of the problems of language use in interrogation, the study offers a recommended version for the normalization of police interrogation language. At last, the strengths and limitations of the study are listed and domains for future study in police interrogation discourse are proposed.
引文
1 Goodrich, Peter, 1987, Legal Discourse, Macmillan Press.
2(德)阿图尔·考夫曼,温弗里德·哈斯摩尔,郑永流译:《当代法哲学和法律理论导论》,北京:法律出版社,2002年,第291页。
13孙懿华,周广然:法律语言学.[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997年。
14杜金榜:法律语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2004年。
17孙懿华,周广然著:《法律语言学》[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997年。王洁著:《法律语言学教程》[M]北京:法律出版社,1997年。李振宇著:法律语言学初探. [M].北京:法律出版社,1998年。刘红樱著:《法律语言学》[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003年。
23 (美)吉(Gee,J.P.)著,杨信彰导读:《话语分析入门:理论与方法》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2008年。
24参见Judith N. Levi. 1990, The Study of Language in the Judicial Process. In Language in the Judicial Process.[C]. New York: Plenum Press. Olsson, John. 2004. Forensic Linguistics: an introduction to language, crime and law. [M] . New York: Continuum.; Coulthard, M. and Alison Johnson, 2007, An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence, Routledge: London and New York.吴伟平著:《语言与法律——司法领域的语言学研究》[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年。
25 Svartvik, J. 1968, The Evans Statements: A Case for forensic linguistics, Gothenburg: University of Gothernburg.
34魏鹏著:《侦查讯问》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003年。
35云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年,第271-272页。
36王传道著:《讯问学》,中国政法大学出版社,1999年,第41-47页。
37云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年6,第271-272。徐家庆,宣祎扬:姚健著,《讯问言语学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年6月第1版。
38王传道著:《讯问学》,中国政法大学出版社,1999年6月第1版,第41-47页。
39毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月第1版,第221-231页。
41毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月第1版,第237-238页。
42参见云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年6月第1版,第287-291。毕希茜:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月第1版,第250-257页。齐文祥、王洪林、王方著:《刑侦讯问方略》,中专列一章题为“反驳犯罪嫌疑人提出的若干问题”,中国人民公安大学出版社,2006年1月第1版第210-250页。
43陈望道著:《修辞学发凡》,上海教育出版社,1982年4月第二版,第11页。
44潘庆云著:《中国法律语言鉴衡》,汉语大辞典出版社,2004年12月第1版,第382-403页。潘庆云,“预审言语修辞伦略”,《吉林师院学报》,1987年第4期。潘庆云:“询问言辞修辞”简论,《语文论丛》第四辑,1988年版。
45丁世洁著:《警察语言艺术》,人民日报出版社,1993年。丁世洁著:《警察语言修辞》,河南人民出版社,2002年。
46潘庆云著:《法律语言艺术》,上海学林出版社,1989年;潘庆云著:《法律语体探索》,云南人民出版社,1991年;潘庆云著:《跨世纪的中国法律语言》,华东理工大学出版社,1997年。华尔庚著:《法律语言概论》中国政法大学出版社,1995年。王洁著:《法律语言学教程》,法律出版社,1997年;王洁著:《法律语言研究》,广东教育出版社,1999年。
47许娜:《讯问语言的特点》,[硕士学位论文],吉林大学,国家图书馆,2003年。
48陶锐敏:《衔接手段及其对警察询问阶段证人证言理解的关联性制约》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学,国家图书馆,2006年。尽管此文是针对警察询问语言的研究,但对讯问语言研究的相关意义是不言而喻的。
49李婷婷:《中国警察讯问中礼貌语言的顺应性研究》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学,2006年。
50沈璐:《警察讯问的提问策略》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学,2004年。
51阎俊杰等:《公安语用学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2002年。
52毕希茜,《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月,第1-72页。
55 (美)佛瑞德·英鲍原著,高忠义译:《刑事侦讯与自白》(Criminal Interrogation and Confessions),台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司。2000年版。(美)博等著,何家弘等译:《审讯与供述》,北京:群众出版社。1992年版。
57佛瑞德·英鲍原著,高忠义译:《刑事侦讯与自白》(Criminal Interrogation and Confessions),台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司。2000年版。第119-121页。
58 Shuy, R.W.,1998, The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications. Pp.69-71页。Cotterill, J. Reading the Rights: a cautionary of comprehension and comprehensibility [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000,7 (1),4-25. Gudjonsson, G. and I. Clare. The Proposed new police caution(England and Wales): How easy is to to understand? [J] Expert Evidence, 1994,3(3):109.12. Grisso, T. Instruments for Assessing Understading and Appreciation of Miranda Rights. [M] Sarasota FL: Professional Resources Press, 1998.
60 Berk-Seligson,S. 2009, Coerced Confessions: the discourse of bilingual police interrogations. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, New York. Berk-Seligson,S.“The Miranda Warnings and Lintuistic Coercion: the role of footing in the interrogation of a limited English-speaking murder.”in Janet Corterill, 2002, Language in the Legal Process. Palgram Mcmillan, Pp.127-143.
61 Shuy, Roger W.,1998, The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications. Pp.75-93.
62 Coulthard, M.“Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of verbal Evidence Produced by the Police”in Janet Corterill, 2002, Language in the Legal Process. Palgram Mcmillan, Pp.19-34..
63 Leo, R. A. 2008, Police Interrogation and American Justice, Harvard University Press.
64 Shuy, Roger W.,1998, The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications.
65 Berk-Seligson,S. 2009, Coerced Confessions: the discourse of bilingual police interrogations. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, New York.
66 (美)吉本斯著,程朝阳、毛凤凡、秦明译:《法律语言学导论》,法律出版社,2003年,第17页。
67廖美珍:《法庭语言研究》,北京:法律出版社,2004年。
68廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,北京:法律出版社,2003年9月第一版,第30页。“Speaking a language is a purposed rule-governed action”.
74 Austin, J. L., 1980 (1962), How to Do things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 139.
75 Austin, J. L., 1980 (1962), How to Do things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 148.
76王得杏著:《英语话语分析与跨文化交际》,北京语言文化大学出版社,1998年2月第1版,第29页。
77 Austine, J. L. 1962, 1975, How to Do Things With Words, Oxford University Press, P14-15.
79 Searl, J. R. 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.38.
84参见Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976: Cohesion in English, Longman. Pp.22.
85 Hymes, D.H.,1962,“The Ethnology of Speaking,”In J.A. Fishman, Readings in the Society of Language. The Hague: Mouton,1968.Pp.99-138.
86 Lyons, J., 1977, Semantics, Cambridge University Press Pp.574-585.
87参见何兆熊:1988,语用、意义和语境,载束定芳:《中国语用学研究论文精选》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年,第661-670页。索振羽著:《语用学教程》,北京:北京大学出版社,2000年。裴文著:《现代英语语境学》,安徽大学出版社,2000年,第13页。
88 Schegloff, E.A. 1992,“In Another Context”, in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin(eds): Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.197
93 Connerton,P. (ed.), 1976, Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth:Penguin. Pp.18
94 Fowler, 1987, A Dictionary of Modern Critical Terms. London& New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pp.46
95 Fairclough, 1989, Language and Power. London: Longman.
96 Titscher et al. 2000, Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publication. Pp.144
97关于话语、意识形态、与权力将在下一节中详细论述。
98沈华柱著:《对话的妙悟——巴赫金语言哲学思想研究》,上海三联出版社,2005年,第20-21页。
99 Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., and Trew, T. 1979, Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
100 (美)萨皮尔著:《语言学作为科学的地位》,1929年,转引自刘润清,《西方语言学流派》,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年,第138页。
101刘润清:《西方语言学流派》,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年,第138页。
106 Weiss G. & Wodak R. 2003,“Introduction”.In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds), Theory, Interdisciplarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave.
107 Blackledge, A. 2005, Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. John Benjamins Punlishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Pp.2.
108 Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. 1997, Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. Van Dijk(ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage. Pp.258-84.
109 Titscher, Meyer, Wodak, & Vetter, 2000, Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. Pp.146.
110 Fairclough, 1989, Language and Power. London: Longman. Pp.25.
111 Fairclough, N.1989, Language and Power. London: Longman.
112 Fairclough, N. 1989, Language and Power. London: Longman. Pp. 110-138页。Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press. Pp.68.王晋军著:《会话中问句的批评性分析》,厦门大学出版社,2006年,第25页。
113 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press. Pp.138.
114 Fairclough, N.“Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research”in Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi. Pp73.
115转引自辛斌著:《批评语言学:理论与应用》,上海外语教育出版社,2005年,第60-64页。
116 van Dijk. Teun A., 2008, Discourse and Power, Palgrave: Macmillan. Pp.1-27.
117 Wodak, Ruth, The Discourse-historical approach. In Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi. Pp.63-94.
121本部分参照了史蒂芬?卢克斯著,林苇芸译:《权力——基进观点》,台北:商周出版社。2006年。(美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年。
122参见(美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。
123 (意)马士基维利著,潘汉典译:《君主论》,商务印书馆,1987年。
124参见(美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版第2页。
125 (德)马克斯韦伯著,林荣远译:《经济与社会》上卷,商务印书馆2004年,第81页。
126 Dahl, Robert A. 1957, The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science 2, 201-205.
127 Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education. Pp.19.
128 Bachrach, Peter &Morton S. Baratz, 1970, Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press. Pp.24
129 Lukes, Steven, 1974, Power, A Radical View. London: Macmillan. Pp.34.
130 Hall. S.,1982,The rediscovery of ideology: the return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, M. Curran and J, Woollacott (eds). Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen, Pp.56-90.
131转引自Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education. Pp.6.
133高宣扬著:《布迪厄的社会理论》[M],同济大学出版社,2004年,第166页。
134高宣扬著:《布迪厄的社会理论》[M],同济大学出版社,2004年,第166页。
135 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon. Pp.119.
136 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon.
137 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon. Pp.131.
138 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年,第10页。
139 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Pp. 152-168.
140 Van Dijk, 1993, Elite Discourse and Racism,Newbury Park,CA: Sage.
141 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon. Pp.131.
142 van Dijk. Teun A., 2008, Discourse and Power, Palgrave: Macmillan. Pp.1-27.
143 Fairclough, 1989, Language and Power, Longman: New York.
144 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。第14页。
145 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。第4页。
146 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。第9页。
147 Lakoff, R. 1975, Language and Weman’s Place. New York: Haper & Row.
148 Conley, John M. & William M. O’Barr. Just Words. The University of Chicago Press. 1998.
149 Harris,S. Questions as a model of control in magistrates’courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49-57.
150 Zimmerman, D. & West,C. 1975, Sex roles, interruptions and silence in conversation. In B. Thorne and N. Henley(eds) Language and Sex Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, PP. 105-29.
151高宣扬著:《布迪厄的社会理论》[M],同济大学出版社,2004年,第169页。
152诺曼·菲尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社,2003年,导言,第3页。
153 Diamond, J. 1996, Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: A study of discourse in a close-knit social network. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series 40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
154张唯,《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士学位论文],华中师范大学,2005年。
155 Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education. Pp.33.
156樊崇义著:《刑事审前程序改革实证研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2007年版。
157蔡海龙:参与观察法的特征及其在新闻传媒研究中的运用,《新闻界》2009年,第5期。
158 Sinclair, J.& Coulthard,M.1975: Towards and Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
159 Brown, G. & Yule, G., 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
160诺曼·菲尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社,2003年,第19页。
161诺曼·菲尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社,2003年。第53页。
162 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.).Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
163 Levinson, S. C. Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
164 Habermas, J. Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1.Reason and the Rationalization of Society [M]. (trans. T. McCarthy). London: Heinemann, 1984.
165 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.).Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
168 Thornborrow, J. Power Talk [M]. London: Pearson Education Limited, 2002.
173 Lyman, M. D., 1999. Criminal Investigation: the Art and the Science (2nd Ed.)New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. 227-228.
174胡关禄著:《侦查讯问学》,警官教育出版社1998年,第24-29页。
175徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年,第41-52页。
181参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第7-23页。
182参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第10页。
183参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第50页。
184参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第50页。
185 Baker W.E. and R. R. Faulkner, 1991, Role as Resources in the Hollywood Film Industry, American Journal of Sociology, 97: 279-309.
186郑杭生:《社会学概论新修》,中国人民大学出版社,2000年版,第138页。
187 Miller, S. 1938. Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 181-182.
188王德春、陈汝东:话语角色认知的修辞价值,《扬州大学学报·人文社会科学版》,1998年第4期。
189王德春著:《现代修辞学》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年第501页。
190陈汝东著:《社会心理修辞学导论》,北京大学出版社,1999年第157页。
191胡习之:话语角色定位及其语言表现,《毕节师范高等专科学校学报》,2004年12月。
192陈汝东著:《社会心理修辞学导论》,北京大学出版社,1999年第158页。
193 (英)耶夫·维索尔伦著,钱冠连、霍永寿(译):《语用学诠释》,清华大学出版社,2003年,第90页。
194俞东明:话语角色类型及其在言语交际中的转换,《外国语》,1996年第1期。
195转引自俞东明:话语角色类型及其在言语交际中的转换,《外国语》,1996年第1期。
196 Thornborrow, J. 2002, Power Talk:Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, London: Pearson Education Limited. Pp.4.
198 (英)拉德克利夫-布朗著,夏建中译:《社会人类学方法》,华夏出版社,2002年,第159页。
199 van. Dijk, Teun A. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process, Sage Publications.
200莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第286页。
201莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第284-370页。
202 Schegloff, E. 1987, Between Micro and Macro Contexts and other Connections, In J. Alexander et al. (eds), the Micro-Macro Link, University of California Press, P208.转引自Boden D. and Ziimmerman D.H.(ed.) Talk and Social Structure, Polity Press, P4.
203廖美珍著《:法庭问答及其互动研究》,北京:法律出版社,2003年,第32页。Teun A. Van Dijk. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage Publications.
204 Yule, G. Pragmatics, Blackwell, 1993, Pp.57.
205 Teun A. Van Dijk. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage Publications.
206 Sinclair, J.& Coulthard,M.1975: Towards and Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
207 Halliday, MAK, Categories of the theory of grammar, in: Word. 1961,17:241-292.
208 Halliday, MAK, Categories of the theory of grammar, in: Word. 1961,17:241-292.
209 Coutthard, Malcolm and Brazil David,1990, E×change Structures, In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, Mcolthard (ed.), Routledge.
210 Strenstrorm, Anna-Brita.1984. Questions and responses in English Conversation. Malmo: Liber Forlag.
211 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,. Pp. 43.
212徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年11月第96-100页。毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月,第269-270页。
213 Byrne, P. S. & B.E.L. Long1976, Doctors Talking to Patients: a Study of the Verbal Behaviors of Doctors in the Consultation. London: HMSO.
214莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第308页。
216 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). , 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
217 Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Pearson Education.
218 Sacks, H.1995, Lectures on Conversation. Vols.I.II.(G. Jefferson, ed.) Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.49-55.
219 Jesperson, O.1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Quirk,1972,R.,S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
220 Chomsky, N. 1957, Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.
221 Hamblin,C.L. 1973.“Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language (10):41-53.
222 Higginbotham, J. 1996.“The semantics of questions”. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. London: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
223廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版神。2003年第1版,第55页。
224廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版神。2003年第1版,第55页。问话虽然经常以问句的形式表达出来。我们这里的“问话”不同于“问句”。在英语中问话与“question”对应,与“问句”对应的英语是“interrogative sentences”。“问话”是话语(utterance),是在一定语境中,为一定的目的或效果而发出的,具有一定语力的言语行为(speech acts),属于语用范畴。而“疑问句”指脱离语境的,从句法分析角度归纳出的一种句类,属于语法范畴。
225程朝阳著:《法庭调解话语语用研究》,[博士论文],中国政法大学,2007年,第57页。
226廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版神。2003年第1版。
227 Ilie, Cornelia, 1999. Question-Response argumentation in talk show, Journal of Pragmatics 31:975-999.
228 Thornborrow, J. 2002, Power Talk:Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education
229 Edelsky, C. 1981, Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10: 383-421.
230张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
231张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
232 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
233廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,法律出版社,2002年第1版,序言。
235 Tsui, Amy, 1992, A functional description of questions, in Malcolm Courlthard ,1992,“Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis”Routledge: London and New York. Pp.89-101.
236 Jesperson, O.1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
237 Quirk,1972,R.,S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
238本部分主要参考廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2002年,第62-64页。廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第1-23页。张靖:讯问的问句用法,《四川公安管理学院学报》,1995年第2期。
239高名凯:《汉语语法论》,商务印书馆1980年版。
240吕叔湘:《吕叔湘文集》,商务印书馆1992年版。
241廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年第1版,第1-23页。
242 Benjamin, R., 1981. The Helping Interview. Third edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
243廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年第1版,第1-23页。
244 Duntan, R. Context of Coercion: Analyzing Properties of Courtroom Questions. British Journal of Law and Society 7:61-67.
245 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
246 Grice, H.P. (1975), Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan(eds), Speech Acts (New York: Academic Press). Pp. 41-58.
247 Sacks, H.1995, Lectures on Conversation. Vols.I.II.(G. Jefferson, ed.) Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.49-55.译文为作者翻译。
248廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第17页。
249廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第17页。
250 Loftus, E. 1979, Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp.77-79.
251 Stygall, G. 1994,Trial Language:Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp.146.
252 Loftus, E. 1979, Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp. 98.
253 Harris, S. 1984, Questions as a model of control in magistrates’courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, 5-27.
254廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2002年第1版,第127页。
255徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2003年,第59页。
256 Frankel, R. (1990),“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
257 M.康利、威廉M.、欧巴尔著,程朝阳译:《法律、语言与权力》,法律出版社,2008年,第10页。
258 Gibbons, J. , 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp75.
259张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
260张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
261 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Pp. 152-168.
262 Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
263 Atkinson, J. M. Heritage, J, 1984: Structure of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
264杨善华主编:《当代西方社会学理论》,北京大学出版社,1999年,第69页。
265 Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
266 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
267 Sacks, H. 1967. Mimeo lecture notes(1967-71).
268 Atkinson, J.M. & Drew, P. 1979. Order in Court. London: Macmillan.
269 Schegloff, E.A. 1972,“Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.”In Giglioli,P.
270 Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change. 1992, Polity Press.Pp.19.
271 Don H. Zimmerman and Beirdre Boden, Structure in Action: An Introduction. In Beirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
272 Heritage J. & Greatbatch D. On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews. In Beirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
273 Atkinson, J.M. & Drew, P. 1979. Order in Court. London: Macmillan.
274李悦娥,范宏雅著:《话语分析》,上海外语教育出版社,2002年,第14-21页。Sinclair, J. McH.and M.Coulthard,1975,Towards An Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
275 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17, 401-30.
276 Sinclair, J. McH.and M.Coulthard, 1975. Towards An Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
277 Mishler, Elliot G.., 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood. Pp. 68.
280廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社,2002年。
281 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp.25.
282 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
283 Mishler, Elliot G. 1984, The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood.
284 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
285 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
286 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
287 (英)莱文逊(Levinson S. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第341页。
288 Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
288 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
289 Jefferson,G.(1984a),“On stepwise transition form talk about a trouble to in appropriately next-positioned matters.”, In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage(eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis.(Pp.191-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
290 Brown,G. & Yule, G. 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
291 Fishman, P.M.1983, Interaction: the work women do, In B. Thonem C, Kramarae and T. Bloor(eds), Language. Gender and Society, Rowley Mass..Newbury House.
292 Sacks, H. (1992),“Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.”
293廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社。2003年,第175页。
294 Gibbons, J. , 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp93.
295详细请参照廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社。2003年,第172-223页。
296 Shuy, R. W., 1998,The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications. Pp.177.
297 Thomas, J. 1988: Discourse control in confrontation interaction. Lancaster Papers in Linguistics, 50. University of Lancaster.
298 Frankel, R. (1990),“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in psysician-patient encounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
299廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社,2003年。
300 Sacks, H. (1992),“Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.”
301 Frankel, R. (1990),“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in physician-patient ncounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
302 Kassin Saul, 2005, On the Psychology of confessions: Does Innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychology, 60, 215-228.
303 Heydon, G. 2005. The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. [M]. Palgrave Macmillan. Pp.116.
304 Toolan, M. J. 1988, Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, Routledge: London and New York. Preface.
305 Walter R. Fisher, Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action 64 (U. S.C. 1989).
306 James Boyd White, Heracles’Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and the Poetics of the Law 168 ( U. Wis. Press 1985).
307 W. Lance Bennett & Martha S. Feldman, Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture (Rutgers U. Press 1981). Pp.3.
308 Nancy Pennington & Reid Hastie, A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. (1991). Pp.519-520.
309 A symposium in the mid-1990s was dedicated to storytelling in law practice. See Lawyers as Storytellers and Storytellers as Lawyers: An Interdisciplinary Symposium Exploring the Uses of Storytelling in the Practice of Law, 18 Vermont L. Rev. 567 (1994).
310 Rideout, J. Christopher, (2008), Storytelling, Narrative Rationality and Legal Persuasion. In The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute [Vol. 14, 2008], Pp.54-86.
311 M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing Liao, eds (2003), The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 3 Vol. boxed set, Sage.
312 Mishler, Elliot G., & Jack A. Clark etl., 1989,“The Language of Attentative Patient Care: A Comparison of Two Medical Interviews”, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Volume 4, Number 4, Pp. 325-335.
313转引自,M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing Liao, eds (2003), The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 3 Vol. boxed set, Sage.
314 Hinchman, L.P. and Hinchman, S.K. (eds) (1997) Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, Albany NY, State University of NY Press.
315 A. Pejlert et al., 1999. Narrative and Narrative Analysis, Blackwell Science Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 663-674.
316周光明、王成荣:语言哲学与司法公正,《探索》,2003年,第6期。
317 Gibbons, J., 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp93.
318 Kassin Saul, 2005, On the Psychology of confessions: Does Innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychology, 60, 215-228.
319 Jackall, Robert (2005), Street stories: The world of police detectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
320 Gibbons, J., 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing.
321 Gibbons, J., 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing.
322 Leo, R. A. 2008, Police Interrogation and American Justice, Harvard University Press. Pp.168.
324 Lubet, S. 2002,. Nothing but the truth: Why Trial Lawyers don’t, can’t, and shouldn’t have to tell the whole truth. New York: new York University Press. Pp.5.
325公安部五局,2006,《刑警办案须知》。
326 Atkinson J.M. and Drew, P. 1979, Order in Court, the organization of verbal interaction in Judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
327 Blimes, J. 1988, the concept of Preference in Conversation analysis. Language in Society, 17, 161-81.
328 Pomerantz, A. 1980,“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4),186-98.
329 Have, ten, P.2002, Sequential structures and categorical implications in doctor-patient interaction: ethno-methodology and history. http://www2.fmg.uva.nl/emca/seqstruct.htm.
330 Bergmann, J.R. 1992,‘Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry.’in P. Drew and J, Heritage (eds), Talk at Work(pp.137-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
331 Pomerantz, A. 1980,“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4),190..
332 Pomerantz, A. 1980,“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4), Pp.198.
334 Driver, E.D.1968, Confessions and the Social Psychology of Coercion. Hardvard Law Review82, 42-61.
335 Heritage, J. 1985,‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T.A.V. Dijk, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, PP 95-117). London: Academic Press.
336 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Pp. 152-168.
337 Heritage, J. 1985,‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T.A.V. Dijk, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, PP 95-117). London: Academic Press.
338 Auburn, T. Drake,S. and Willig,C. 1995,“You punched him, didn’t you?”: versions of violence in accusatory interview. Discourse and Society, 6(3),353-86.
339 Heritage and Waston 1979,‘Formulations as conversational objects’. In G. Psathas(ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (PP. 123-62).New York: Ivrington Publishers.
340 Mey, Jacob L. 1985,Whose Language, a Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdan/Philidelphia: John Benjams.Pp.173-174.
343 Liberman, Kenneth, 1981, Understanding Aborigines in Australian Courts of law. Human Organization 40, 247-255.
344 Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter M. Tiersma, 2005, Speaking of Crime: The language of Criminal Justice. University of Chicargo Press.
345 Eades, D.1994,A Case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English. In Gibbons, John(ed.) Language and the Law. London/New York, 234-264.
346 Gudjonsson, G.H. 2003, The Psychology of Interrogations Confessions. London: Wiley.
347 Fairclough,N. & Wodak,(1997),‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (pp。258-84). London: Sage.
348 Fairclough,N. & Wodak,(1997),‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (pp.258-84). London: Sage.
349 Halliday, M.A.K. 1994, Introduction to Functional Grammar,2nd, edn. London: Edward Arnold.
350 Zimmerman, D.H. 1998,‘Identity, Context and Interaction’In C. Antaki ans S. Widdicombe (eds), Identities in Talk (pp. 87-166). London: Sage Publications.
351 Bergmann,J.R.1992,‘Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry’. In P.Drew and J. Heritage(eds), Talk at work(pp 137-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
356廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
357程朝阳:《法庭调解话语语用研究》, [博士论文],中国政法大学,2007年,第57页。
358 Baumert, Michael,1977,Classification of English Question-Answer Structures. Journal of Pragmatics: 85-92.转引自廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年。
359(1)对知识的正确再现,被认为是正确的,(2)同时又要是对确切问话的确切答话。因此答话可以分为:(a)不正确的回答,(b)正确而又完整的回答,(c)正确但是不完整的回答,(d)答话部分正确,但又有一些不正确或者不相关的话,(e)答话完全正确但是有添加的无关的信息。转引自廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2002年第1版。
360廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
361转引自廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
362 Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). (1975), Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
363 Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). (1975), Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
364 Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). (1975), Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
365莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第101-102页。
368廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第434-462页。
369王得杏著:《英语话语分析与跨文化交际》,北京语言文化大学出版社,1998年,第80页。
370廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
371廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第437页。
374廖美珍著,《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年第1版,第444页。
375 Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eades, D. (1994)‘A case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law. Harlow: Longman, 234–64. Harris, S. (1984)‘Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’courts’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49: 5–27.
376 Newbury,Phillip and Alison Johnson,“Suspects’resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview”, The international journal of speech, language and the law,2006, Pp.215-239.
377 Drew, P. (1990)‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process. London: Plenum Press, 39–64.
378 Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
379 Clayman, S. E. (2001)‘Answers and evasions’, Language in Society 30(3): 403–42.Pp.403.
384 Gibbons, J., 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.95.
385 Gibbons, J., 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.36.
386Maley, Y., 1994.‘The language of the law’, in J. Gibbons, Language and the Law. Essex: Longman, 11–50. Pp.
390 Tsui, A. (1992)‘A functional description of questions’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 89–110.Pp.92.
391 Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
392 Drew, P. (1990)‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process. London: Plenum Press, 39–64.
393 Drew, P. (1992)‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 470–520.Pp.483.
394 Pomerantz, A. (1984)‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes’, in J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–112. Pp.64.
395 Clayman, S. E. (2001)‘Answers and evasions’, Language in Society 30(3): 403–42.Pp.403.
396 Drew, P. (1990)‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A.
397 Gibbons, J. (2003) Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.Pp.101.
398 TED是英语“Tell”(讲一讲),“explain”(解释一下),“describe”(描述一下)的首字母。
399 Ehrlich, S. (2002)‘(Re)Contextualizing complainants’accounts of sexual assault’, Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(2): 193–212. Pp.196.
399 Ehrlich, S. (2002)‘(Re)Contextualizing complainants’accounts of sexual assault’, Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(2): 193–212. Pp.196.
402 Raymond, G. (2000)‘The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts’, Discourse Studies, 2(3): 354–79. Pp.355.
403 Conklin, William E, 1998,“The Phenomenology of Modern Legal Discourse: the juridical production and the disclosure of suffering”, Dartmouth publishing company, Ashgate.
404孙长永著:《侦查程序与人权—比较法考察》,中国方正出版社2000年版,序言第5页。
406转引自John Gibbons(ed.)1994, Language and Law. London: Lonman.
407毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年,第63页。
408徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2003年,第59页。
409本小节中有关无罪推定的理论主要参考了樊崇义:《刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2001年。
410 (意)贝卡利亚著,黄风译:《犯罪与刑罚》,中国大百科全书出版社,1993年,第45页。
411樊崇义著:《刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2001年,第67页。
416李立,赵洪芳著:《法律语言实证研究》,群众出版社,2009年,第76页。
417陈卫东:论犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼主体地位及其权利保障,中国民商法律网,2006年12月10日。
418徐国桢著:《揭开侦讯的神秘面纱》(暴力篇),台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2008年,序言第5页。
419 Brown,P. & S. Levinson. 1978, Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomenon. In Good, E, N. (ed). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press.
420 Leech, G..N. Principles of Pragmatics, Longman, 1983.
422陈融,面子、留面子、丢面子——介绍Brown和Levinson的礼貌原则,原载《外国语》1986年第4期。载束定芳,《中国语用学研究论文精选》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年10月第一版,第493页。
425李婷婷:“面子理论”与“顺应论”在警察业务中的应用研究,《广东技术师范学院学报》,2008年第8期。
428 Cook, M. 1996,“A different story: narrative versus‘question-answer’in Aboriginal evidence”. Forensic Linguistics: the International Journal of Speech, Language and Law, 3(2),73-88.
430Oxburgh, G.E. & Trond Myklebust & Tim Grant, 2010, The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. The international journal of specch, language and the law. Vol.17,Pp.45-66.
434徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年,第219页。
435“当庭播放警方讯问录像还了民警清白”,《青年时报》2006年05月24,http://news.sohu.com/20060524/n243389005.shtml。
436陈卫东主编:《刑事诉讼法实施问题调研报告》,中国方正出版社,2001年第176页。
438毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年,第142-145页。
441贺卫方:法言法语的意义,法律评论网www.fatianxia.com/paper_list.asp?id=3128.
442刘红婴著:《法律语言学》[M],北京:北京大学出版社,2003年,第123页。
446廖美珍著,《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第106-123页。
448袁传有:“由美、英、中警察告知语言分析看中国警察告知体系的建构”. [J].《修辞学习》,2005年第1期。
449王鑫:讯问犯罪嫌疑人时诉讼权利告知,《河南公安学刊》2000年第1期,第39页。
450 Cotterill, J. Reading the Rights: a cautionary of comprehension and comprehensibility [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000,7 (1),4-25. Gudjonsson, G. and I. Clare. The Proposed new police caution(England and Wales): How easy is to to understand? [J] Expert Evidence, 1994,3(3):109.12.
451 Grisso, T. Instruments for Assessing Understading and Appreciation of Miranda Rights. [M] Sarasota FL: Professional Resources Press, 1998.
452 Shuy, R.W. 1998. The language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Shuy, Roger W. Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda[J]. Forensic Linguisitcs, 1997,4(2)175-196. Shuy, Roger W. etal, Review of Grisso, Thomas Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreation of Miranda Rights[J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000,7(1)131-136.
453徐盈雁:高检院出台《检察机关文明用语规则》违反文明用语规范造成不良影响将被问责http://llzw.spp.gov.cn/zybs/201007/t20100701_380836.shtml 2010-06-3新闻来源:检察日报。
454廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第121页。
1. Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., 1984. Structure of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Auburn, T. Drake, S. and Willig, C. 1995.“You punched him, didn’t you?”versions of violence in accusatory interview. Discourse and Society, 6 (3), 353-86.
3. Austin, J.L., 1980. How to Do things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P.148.
4. Baumert, Michael, 1977.Classification of English Question-Answer Structures. Journal of Pragmatics: Pp. 85-92.
5. Blackledge, A., 2005, Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. John Benjamins Punlishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
6. Blimes, J. 1988. The concept of Preference in Conversation analysis. Language in Society, (17), Pp. 161-81.
7. Brown, G. & Yule, G., 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brown, P. & S. Levinson., 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomenon. In Good, E, N. (ed). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press.
9. Byrne, P. S. & B.E.L. Long, 1976.Doctors Talking to Patients: a Study of the Verbal Behaviors of Doctors in the Consultation. London: HMSO.
10. Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.
11. Clayman, S. E., 2001.‘Answers and Evasions’, Language in Society 30(3): 403–42.
12. Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). 1975, Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
13. Conley, John M., & William M. O’Barr, 1998, Just Words. The University of Chicago Press.
14. Connerton, P. (ed.), 1976. Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Pp.18.
15. Cotterill, J. Reading the Rights: a cautionary of comprehension and comprehensibility [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000, 7 (1), 4-25.
16. Coutthard, M. & Brazil D., 1990. Exchange Structures, In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, Mcolthard (ed.), Routledge.
17. Coulthard, M. & Alison Johnson, 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence, Routledge: London and New York.
18. Drew, P., 1990.‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process. London: Plenum Press, 39–64.
19. Drew, P., 1992.‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.)., 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Driver, E.D.1968. Confessions and the Social Psychology of Coercion. Hardvard Law Review82, 42-61.
22. Duntan, R. Context of Coercion: Analyzing Properties of Courtroom Questions. British Journal of Law and Society 7:61-67.
23. Eades, D., 1994.‘A case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law. Harlow: Longman.
24. Eades, D., 1994. Forensic Linguistics in Austrilia: an overview, Forensic Linguistics, 1, ii, 113-22.
25. Edelsky, C., 1981. Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10: 383-421.
26. Ehrlich, S., 2002.‘(Re) contextualizing complainants’accounts of sexual assault’, Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(2): 193–212. Pp.196.
27. Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
28. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R., 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
29. Fairclough, N., 1992. Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press.
30. Fairclough, N.“Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research”in Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi.
31. Frankel, R., 1990.“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in psysician-patient encounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
32. Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., and Trew, T., 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33. Garfinkel, H.,1967.Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
34. Gibbons, J., 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp75.
35. Goodrich, P., 1987, Legal Discourse, Macmillan Press.
36. Greatbatch, C., 1988. A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17, 401-30.
37. Grice, H.P., 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Speech Acts (New York: Academic Press).
38. Grisso, T., 1998. Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation of Miranda Rights. [M] Sarasota FL: Professional Resources Press.
39. Gudjonsson, G. and I. Clare. The Proposed new police caution (England and Wales): How easy is to to understand? [J] Expert Evidence, 1994,3(3):109.12.
40. Gudjonsson, G.H., 2003. The Psychology of Interrogations Confessions. London: Wiley.
41. Habermas, J., 1984. Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1.Reason and the Rationalization of Society [M]. (Trans. T. McCarthy). London: Heinemann.
42. Halliday, M.A.K., 1985, An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
43. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R., 1976, Cohesion in English, Longman.
44. Halliday, MAK, Categories of the theory of grammar, In: Word. 1961,17:241-292.
45. Hamblin, C.L. 1973.“Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language (10):41-53.
46. Harris, S. 1984, Questions as a model of control in magistrates’courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, 5-27.
47. Heritage, J. 1985.‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T.A.V. Dijk, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, PP 95-117). London: Academic Press.
48. Heritage J. & Greatbatch D., 1991. On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews. In Beirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
49. Heritage and Waston 1979. Formulations as conversational objects’. In G. Psathas(ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (PP. 123-62).New York: Ivrington Publishers.
50. Heydon, G. 2005. The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. Pp.116.
51. Higginbotham, J., 1996.“The semantics of questions”. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. London: Blackwell.
52. Hill, M., 2003.‘Identifying the source of critical details in confessions’, The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law: Forensic Linguistics, 10(1): 23–61.
53. Hinchman, L.P. and Hinchman, S.K. (eds) , 1997. Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, Albany NY, State University of NY Press.
54. Hymes, D.H., 1962.“The Ethnology of Speaking,”In J. A. Fishman, Readings in the Society of Language. The Hague: Mouton,1968. Pp.99-138.
55. Ilie, C., 1999. Question-Response argumentation in talk show, Journal of Pragmatics 31:975-999.
56. Jefferson, G., 1984.“On stepwise transition form talk about a trouble to in appropriately next-positioned matters.”, In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage(eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Kassin Saul, 2005. On the Psychology of confessions: Does Innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychology, 60,215-228.
58. Kassin, Saul M. and K. McNall, 1991. Police Interrogations and Confessions. Law ans Human Behaviour 21, 469-83.
59. Kress, G (ed.), 1976. Halliday: System and Fucntion in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Bennett W.and S. Feldman, 1981. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture. Rutgers U. Press.
61. Leech, G. N., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics, Longman.
62. Leo, R. A., 2008. Police Interrogation and American Justice, Harvard University Press. Pp.168.
63. Levi, Judith N., 1990. Language in the judicial process. New York: Plenum Press.
64. Levinson, S. C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Liberman, Kenneth, 1981. Understanding Aborigines in Australian Courts of law.Human Organization 40, 247-255.
66. Locher, Miriam A., 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication, Mouton de Gruyter, Pp.28.
67. Loftus, E., 1979. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Lukes, S., 1974. Power, A Radical View. London: Macmillan. Pp.34.
69. Lyons, J., 1977. Semantics, Cambridge University Press Pp.574-585.
70. Maley, Y., 1994.‘The language of the law’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law. Essex: Longman, 11–50. Pp. 36.
71. Mellincoff, David, 1963. The Language of the Law. [M]. Boston: Little, Brown and company. Preface.
72. Mey, Jacob L., 1985.Whose Language, a Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdan/Philidelphia: John Benjams.Pp.173-174.
73. Meyer, M., 2001. Between theory. Method, and Politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi. Pp. 25.
74. Lyman, Michael D., 1999.“Criminal Investigation: the Art and the Science”(2nd Ed.)New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. Pp.227-228.
75. Miller, S., 1938. Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 181-182.
76. Mishler, Elliot G., 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood. Pp. 68.
77. Nancy Pennington & Reid Hastie. A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. (1991). Pp.519. 520.
78. Newbury, P. & Alison J.“Suspects’resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview”. The international journal of speech, language and the law, 2006, Pp.215-239.
79. O’Barr, W., 1982. Linguistic evidence: language, power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
80. Olsson, J., 2004. Forensic Linguistics: an introduction to language, crime and law. [M]. New York: Continuum.
81. Pomerantz, A., 1980.“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4), 186-98.
82. Quirk, R.S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik., 1972, A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
83. Raymond, G., 2000.‘The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts’, Discourse Studies, 2(3): 354–79. Pp.355.
84. Robinson, W. P. & Rackstraw, S. 1972. A Question of Answers. Vols. I and II. London: Routledge.
85. Sacks, H., 1992, Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
86. Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
87. Schegloff, E.,1987. Between Micro and Macro Contexts and other Connections, In J. Alexander et al. (eds), the Micro-Macro Link, University of California Press, P208.
88. Searl, John R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.38.
89. Shuy, R. W. Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda . Forensic Linguisitcs, 1997, 4(2)175-196.
90. Shuy, R.W., 1998. The language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
91. Shuy, R.W., 1993. Language Crimes: the use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. [M] Blackwell Publishers.
92. Shuy, R.W., 2002. Linguistic Battles in Trademark Disputes, New York: Palgrave.
93. Silverman, D., 1997. Discourses of Counseling HIV: Counseling as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
94. Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard, 1975. Towards An Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
95. Solan, Lawrence M., & Peter Tiersma, 2005. Speaking of Crime: the Language of criminal Justice, Chicago: University of Chicago.
96. Stygall, G., 1994. Trial Language: Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp.146.
97. Svartvic, Jan.,1968. The Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic Linguistics, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg University.
98. Thomas, J., 1988. Discourse control in confrontation interaction. Lancaster Papers in Linguistics, 50. University of Lancaster.
99. Thornborrow, J., 2002. Power Talk: Language Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Pearson Education.
100. Tiersma, Peter M., 1999. Legal Language. The University of Chicago Press.
101. Toolan, M. J., 1988. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, Routledge: London and New York. Preface.
102. Tsui, A., 1992. A functional description of questions, in Malcolm Courlthard, 1992,“Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis”Routledge: London and New York. Pp.89-101.
103. Van. Dijk. Teun A., 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process, Sage Publications.
104. Van. Dijk. Teun A., 2008. Discourse and Power, Palgrave: Macmillan. Pp.1-27.
105. Wodak, R. & Michael Meyer, 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi.
106. Yule, G., 1993. Pragmatics, Blackwell, Pp.57.
107. Zimmerman, D. H. & Beirdre Boden., 1987, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
108. (德)阿图尔考夫曼等主编,郑永流译:《当代法哲学与法律理论导论》,法律出版社,2002年。
143.毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年。
144.布赖恩·比克斯著,邱昭继译:《法律、语言与法律的确定性》,法律出版社, 2007年。
145.布莱恩·肯尼迪著,郭乃嘉译:《证人询问的技巧》,元照出版社,2002年。
146.束定芳,《中国语用学研究论文精选》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年。
147.陈汝东:《社会心理修辞学导论》,北京大学出版社,1999年。
148.程荣斌:《刑事诉讼法》,中国人民大学出版社,1999年。
149.杜金榜:《法律语言学》,上海外语教育出版社,2004年。
150. (美)丹尼斯·朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社, 2001年。
151.樊崇义:《刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2001年。
152.樊崇义:《刑事审前程序改革实证研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2007年。
153.佛瑞德·英鲍原著,高忠义译:《刑事侦讯与自白》,台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司,2000年。
154. (美)英博等著,何家弘等译:《审讯与供述》,群众出版社,1992年。
155.胡关禄:《侦查讯问学》,警官教育出版社,1998年。
156.胡壮麟、朱永生、张德禄:《系统功能语法概论》,湖南教育出版社,1989年。
157.何家弘:《证据的语言》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009年。
158.华尔庚:《法律语言概论》中国政法大学出版社,1995年。
159.姜望琪:《语用学:理论与应用》,北京大学出版社,2000年。
160. (美)M.康利,威廉、M.欧巴尔著,程朝阳译:《法律、语言与权力》,法律出版社,2007年。
161. (英)拉德克利夫·布朗著,夏建中译:《社会人类学方法》,华夏出版社, 2002年。
162.李立,赵洪芳著:《法律语言实证研究》,群众出版社,2009年。
163.李悦娥、范宏雅编:《话语分析》,上海外语教育出版社,2002年。
164.廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社,2003年。
165.廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》法律出版社,2004年。
166.刘高岑著:《从语言分析到语境重建——分析哲学意向性理论的科学语境论构建》,山西科学技术出版社,2003年。
167.刘红樱著:《法律语言学》,北京大学出版社,2003年。
168.刘润清著:《西方语言学流派》,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年。
169.刘蔚铭著:《法律语言学研究》,中国经济出版社,2003年。
170.梅(Mey, J.)著,徐盛桓导读:《语用学导论》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年。
171. (英)诺曼·费尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社, 2003年。
172.索振羽著:《语用学教程》,北京大学出版社,2000年。
173.沈华柱著:《对话的妙悟——巴赫金语言哲学思想研究》,三联出版社,2005年。
174.沈开木著:《现代汉语话语语言学》,商务印书馆,1996年。
175. (美)史蒂芬·卢克斯著,林苇芸译:《权力——基进观点》,台北:商周出版社,2006年。
176.舒国滢著:《在法律的边缘》,中国法制出版社,2000年。
177.潘庆云著:《中国法律语言鉴衡》,汉语大辞典出版社,2004年。
178.潘庆云著:《法律语体探索》,云南人民出版社,1991年。
179.潘庆云著:《跨世纪的中国法律语言》,华东理工大学出版社,1997年。
180.裴文著,《现代英语语境学》,安徽大学出版社,2000年。
181.齐文祥,王洪林等著:《刑侦讯问方略》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2006年。
182. (美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社, 2001年。
183.邱大仁著:《语言识别》,群众出版社,1985年。
184.邱大仁著:《侦查语言学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,1995年。
185.孙长永著:《沉默权制度研究,北京:法律出版社,2001年。
186.孙长永著:《侦查程序与人权——比较法考察》,中国方正出版社2000年。
187.孙懿华,周广然著:《法律语言学》,中国政法大学出版社,1997年。
188.童世骏著:《批判与实践——论哈贝马斯的批判理论》,三联书店,2007年。
189.王传道编:《刑事侦查学》,中国政法大学出版社,1999年。
190.王得杏著:《英语话语分析与跨文化交际》,北京语言文化大学出版社,1998年。
191.王洁著:《法律语言研究》,广东教育出版社,1999年版。
192.王晋军著:《会话中问句的批评性分析》,厦门大学出版社,2006年。
193.吴伟平著:《语言与法律——司法领域的语言学研究》,上海外语教育出版社,2002年。
194.夏锦尧,黄富成著:《侦查语言》,中国人民公安大学,1993年。
195.辛斌著:《批评语言学:理论与应用》,上海外语教育出版社,2005年。
196.徐国桢著,《揭开侦讯的神秘面纱》(暴力篇),台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2008年。
197.徐家庆,宣祎扬,姚健著:《讯问言语学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年。
198.徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年。
199.杨善华编:《当代西方社会学理论》,北京大学出版社,1999年。
200.云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年。
201.张钧,张洁著:《预审精选案例评析》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1995年。
202.周忠伟著:《预审讯问案评析》,南昌:江西人民出版社。1996年版。
203.朱永生、严世清著:《系统功能语言学多维思考》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年。
204.朱永生、严世清、苗兴伟著:《功能语言学导论》,上海外语教育出版社,2003年。
205.蔡海龙:参与观察法的特征及其在新闻传媒研究中的运用,《新闻界》,2009年,第5期。
206.陈融:面子、留面子、丢面子—介绍Brown和Levinson的礼貌原则,《外国语》1986年第4期。
207.胡习之:话语角色定位及其语言表现,《毕节师范高等专科学校学报》,2004年,第6期。
208.廖美珍:中国法庭问答互动对应结构研究,《语言科学》,2003年,第5期。
209.廖美珍:目的原则与法庭互动话语合作问题研究,《外语学刊》,2004年,第5期。
210.廖美珍:目的原则与目的分析(上、下),《修辞学习》,2005年,第3、4期。
211.廖美珍:论法律语言的通俗化和大众化,《修辞学习》,2006年,第4期。
212.廖美珍:中国法律语言规范化若干问题之我见,《修辞学习》,2008年,第5期。
213.谌洪果:通过语言体察法律现象:哈特与日常语言分析哲学,《比较法研究》, 2006年,第5期。
214.潘庆云:预审言语修辞伦略,《吉林师院学报》,1987年,第4期。
215.邱昭继:奥斯汀的言语行为理论与法理学,《法制与社会发展》,2008年,第2期。
216.王晋军:医生和病人会话中的问句与权势关系,《解放军外国语学院学报》, 2002年,第5期。
217.王鑫:讯问犯罪嫌疑人时诉讼权利告知,《河南公安学刊》,2000年,第1期。
218.吴伟平:法律语言学:会议,机构与刊物,《国外语言学》,1994年,第2期。
219.薛炳尧、马志鹏:论侦查讯问学的学科建设,《中国人民公安大学学报》,1999年,第2期。
220.袁传有:由美、英、中警察告知语言分析看中国警察告知体系的建构,《修辞学习》,2005年,第1期。
221.张靖:讯问的问句用法,《四川公安管理学院学报》,1995年,第2期。
222.周光明、王成荣:语言哲学与司法公正,《探索》,2003年,第6期。
223.朱明新:“法学的语言学转向”及其对我国法律语言学研究的方法论启示,《琼州大学学报》,2003年,第3期。
224.程朝阳:《法庭调解话语语用研究》,[博士论文],中国政法大学图书馆,2007年。
225.李婷婷:《中国警察讯问中礼貌语言的顺应性研究》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学, 2006年。
226.沈璐:《警察讯问的提问策略》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学, 2004年。
227.陶锐敏:《衔接手段及其对警察询问阶段证人证言理解的关联性制约》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学, 2006年。
228.许娜:《讯问语言的特点》,[硕士论文],吉林大学,2003年。
229.杨贝:《论佩雷尔曼新修辞学法哲学及其论证理论》[博士论文],中国政法大学,2009年。
230.张唯:《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士论文],华中师范大学,2005年。
2(德)阿图尔·考夫曼,温弗里德·哈斯摩尔,郑永流译:《当代法哲学和法律理论导论》,北京:法律出版社,2002年,第291页。
13孙懿华,周广然:法律语言学.[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997年。
14杜金榜:法律语言学[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2004年。
17孙懿华,周广然著:《法律语言学》[M]北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997年。王洁著:《法律语言学教程》[M]北京:法律出版社,1997年。李振宇著:法律语言学初探. [M].北京:法律出版社,1998年。刘红樱著:《法律语言学》[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2003年。
23 (美)吉(Gee,J.P.)著,杨信彰导读:《话语分析入门:理论与方法》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2008年。
24参见Judith N. Levi. 1990, The Study of Language in the Judicial Process. In Language in the Judicial Process.[C]. New York: Plenum Press. Olsson, John. 2004. Forensic Linguistics: an introduction to language, crime and law. [M] . New York: Continuum.; Coulthard, M. and Alison Johnson, 2007, An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence, Routledge: London and New York.吴伟平著:《语言与法律——司法领域的语言学研究》[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2000年。
25 Svartvik, J. 1968, The Evans Statements: A Case for forensic linguistics, Gothenburg: University of Gothernburg.
34魏鹏著:《侦查讯问》,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2003年。
35云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年,第271-272页。
36王传道著:《讯问学》,中国政法大学出版社,1999年,第41-47页。
37云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年6,第271-272。徐家庆,宣祎扬:姚健著,《讯问言语学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年6月第1版。
38王传道著:《讯问学》,中国政法大学出版社,1999年6月第1版,第41-47页。
39毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月第1版,第221-231页。
41毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月第1版,第237-238页。
42参见云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年6月第1版,第287-291。毕希茜:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月第1版,第250-257页。齐文祥、王洪林、王方著:《刑侦讯问方略》,中专列一章题为“反驳犯罪嫌疑人提出的若干问题”,中国人民公安大学出版社,2006年1月第1版第210-250页。
43陈望道著:《修辞学发凡》,上海教育出版社,1982年4月第二版,第11页。
44潘庆云著:《中国法律语言鉴衡》,汉语大辞典出版社,2004年12月第1版,第382-403页。潘庆云,“预审言语修辞伦略”,《吉林师院学报》,1987年第4期。潘庆云:“询问言辞修辞”简论,《语文论丛》第四辑,1988年版。
45丁世洁著:《警察语言艺术》,人民日报出版社,1993年。丁世洁著:《警察语言修辞》,河南人民出版社,2002年。
46潘庆云著:《法律语言艺术》,上海学林出版社,1989年;潘庆云著:《法律语体探索》,云南人民出版社,1991年;潘庆云著:《跨世纪的中国法律语言》,华东理工大学出版社,1997年。华尔庚著:《法律语言概论》中国政法大学出版社,1995年。王洁著:《法律语言学教程》,法律出版社,1997年;王洁著:《法律语言研究》,广东教育出版社,1999年。
47许娜:《讯问语言的特点》,[硕士学位论文],吉林大学,国家图书馆,2003年。
48陶锐敏:《衔接手段及其对警察询问阶段证人证言理解的关联性制约》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学,国家图书馆,2006年。尽管此文是针对警察询问语言的研究,但对讯问语言研究的相关意义是不言而喻的。
49李婷婷:《中国警察讯问中礼貌语言的顺应性研究》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学,2006年。
50沈璐:《警察讯问的提问策略》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学,2004年。
51阎俊杰等:《公安语用学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2002年。
52毕希茜,《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月,第1-72页。
55 (美)佛瑞德·英鲍原著,高忠义译:《刑事侦讯与自白》(Criminal Interrogation and Confessions),台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司。2000年版。(美)博等著,何家弘等译:《审讯与供述》,北京:群众出版社。1992年版。
57佛瑞德·英鲍原著,高忠义译:《刑事侦讯与自白》(Criminal Interrogation and Confessions),台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司。2000年版。第119-121页。
58 Shuy, R.W.,1998, The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications. Pp.69-71页。Cotterill, J. Reading the Rights: a cautionary of comprehension and comprehensibility [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000,7 (1),4-25. Gudjonsson, G. and I. Clare. The Proposed new police caution(England and Wales): How easy is to to understand? [J] Expert Evidence, 1994,3(3):109.12. Grisso, T. Instruments for Assessing Understading and Appreciation of Miranda Rights. [M] Sarasota FL: Professional Resources Press, 1998.
60 Berk-Seligson,S. 2009, Coerced Confessions: the discourse of bilingual police interrogations. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, New York. Berk-Seligson,S.“The Miranda Warnings and Lintuistic Coercion: the role of footing in the interrogation of a limited English-speaking murder.”in Janet Corterill, 2002, Language in the Legal Process. Palgram Mcmillan, Pp.127-143.
61 Shuy, Roger W.,1998, The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications. Pp.75-93.
62 Coulthard, M.“Whose Voice Is It? Invented and Concealed Dialogue in Written Records of verbal Evidence Produced by the Police”in Janet Corterill, 2002, Language in the Legal Process. Palgram Mcmillan, Pp.19-34..
63 Leo, R. A. 2008, Police Interrogation and American Justice, Harvard University Press.
64 Shuy, Roger W.,1998, The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications.
65 Berk-Seligson,S. 2009, Coerced Confessions: the discourse of bilingual police interrogations. Mouton de Gruyter: Berlin, New York.
66 (美)吉本斯著,程朝阳、毛凤凡、秦明译:《法律语言学导论》,法律出版社,2003年,第17页。
67廖美珍:《法庭语言研究》,北京:法律出版社,2004年。
68廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,北京:法律出版社,2003年9月第一版,第30页。“Speaking a language is a purposed rule-governed action”.
74 Austin, J. L., 1980 (1962), How to Do things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 139.
75 Austin, J. L., 1980 (1962), How to Do things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 148.
76王得杏著:《英语话语分析与跨文化交际》,北京语言文化大学出版社,1998年2月第1版,第29页。
77 Austine, J. L. 1962, 1975, How to Do Things With Words, Oxford University Press, P14-15.
79 Searl, J. R. 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.38.
84参见Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. 1976: Cohesion in English, Longman. Pp.22.
85 Hymes, D.H.,1962,“The Ethnology of Speaking,”In J.A. Fishman, Readings in the Society of Language. The Hague: Mouton,1968.Pp.99-138.
86 Lyons, J., 1977, Semantics, Cambridge University Press Pp.574-585.
87参见何兆熊:1988,语用、意义和语境,载束定芳:《中国语用学研究论文精选》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年,第661-670页。索振羽著:《语用学教程》,北京:北京大学出版社,2000年。裴文著:《现代英语语境学》,安徽大学出版社,2000年,第13页。
88 Schegloff, E.A. 1992,“In Another Context”, in A. Duranti and C. Goodwin(eds): Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.197
93 Connerton,P. (ed.), 1976, Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth:Penguin. Pp.18
94 Fowler, 1987, A Dictionary of Modern Critical Terms. London& New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Pp.46
95 Fairclough, 1989, Language and Power. London: Longman.
96 Titscher et al. 2000, Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage Publication. Pp.144
97关于话语、意识形态、与权力将在下一节中详细论述。
98沈华柱著:《对话的妙悟——巴赫金语言哲学思想研究》,上海三联出版社,2005年,第20-21页。
99 Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., and Trew, T. 1979, Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
100 (美)萨皮尔著:《语言学作为科学的地位》,1929年,转引自刘润清,《西方语言学流派》,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年,第138页。
101刘润清:《西方语言学流派》,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年,第138页。
106 Weiss G. & Wodak R. 2003,“Introduction”.In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds), Theory, Interdisciplarity and Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Palgrave.
107 Blackledge, A. 2005, Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. John Benjamins Punlishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Pp.2.
108 Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R. 1997, Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. Van Dijk(ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage. Pp.258-84.
109 Titscher, Meyer, Wodak, & Vetter, 2000, Methods of Text and Discourse Analysis. London: Sage. Pp.146.
110 Fairclough, 1989, Language and Power. London: Longman. Pp.25.
111 Fairclough, N.1989, Language and Power. London: Longman.
112 Fairclough, N. 1989, Language and Power. London: Longman. Pp. 110-138页。Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press. Pp.68.王晋军著:《会话中问句的批评性分析》,厦门大学出版社,2006年,第25页。
113 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press. Pp.138.
114 Fairclough, N.“Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research”in Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi. Pp73.
115转引自辛斌著:《批评语言学:理论与应用》,上海外语教育出版社,2005年,第60-64页。
116 van Dijk. Teun A., 2008, Discourse and Power, Palgrave: Macmillan. Pp.1-27.
117 Wodak, Ruth, The Discourse-historical approach. In Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi. Pp.63-94.
121本部分参照了史蒂芬?卢克斯著,林苇芸译:《权力——基进观点》,台北:商周出版社。2006年。(美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年。
122参见(美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。
123 (意)马士基维利著,潘汉典译:《君主论》,商务印书馆,1987年。
124参见(美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版第2页。
125 (德)马克斯韦伯著,林荣远译:《经济与社会》上卷,商务印书馆2004年,第81页。
126 Dahl, Robert A. 1957, The Concept of Power. Behavioral Science 2, 201-205.
127 Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education. Pp.19.
128 Bachrach, Peter &Morton S. Baratz, 1970, Power and Poverty: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press. Pp.24
129 Lukes, Steven, 1974, Power, A Radical View. London: Macmillan. Pp.34.
130 Hall. S.,1982,The rediscovery of ideology: the return of the repressed in media studies. In M. Gurevitch, M. Curran and J, Woollacott (eds). Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen, Pp.56-90.
131转引自Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education. Pp.6.
133高宣扬著:《布迪厄的社会理论》[M],同济大学出版社,2004年,第166页。
134高宣扬著:《布迪厄的社会理论》[M],同济大学出版社,2004年,第166页。
135 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon. Pp.119.
136 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon.
137 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon. Pp.131.
138 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年,第10页。
139 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Pp. 152-168.
140 Van Dijk, 1993, Elite Discourse and Racism,Newbury Park,CA: Sage.
141 Foucault, M. 1980, Power/Knowledge (Trans. C. Gordon). New York: Pantheon. Pp.131.
142 van Dijk. Teun A., 2008, Discourse and Power, Palgrave: Macmillan. Pp.1-27.
143 Fairclough, 1989, Language and Power, Longman: New York.
144 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。第14页。
145 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。第4页。
146 (美)丹尼斯朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社,2001年第三版引言。第9页。
147 Lakoff, R. 1975, Language and Weman’s Place. New York: Haper & Row.
148 Conley, John M. & William M. O’Barr. Just Words. The University of Chicago Press. 1998.
149 Harris,S. Questions as a model of control in magistrates’courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49-57.
150 Zimmerman, D. & West,C. 1975, Sex roles, interruptions and silence in conversation. In B. Thorne and N. Henley(eds) Language and Sex Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, PP. 105-29.
151高宣扬著:《布迪厄的社会理论》[M],同济大学出版社,2004年,第169页。
152诺曼·菲尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社,2003年,导言,第3页。
153 Diamond, J. 1996, Status and Power in Verbal Interaction: A study of discourse in a close-knit social network. Pragmatics and Beyond, New Series 40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
154张唯,《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士学位论文],华中师范大学,2005年。
155 Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education. Pp.33.
156樊崇义著:《刑事审前程序改革实证研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2007年版。
157蔡海龙:参与观察法的特征及其在新闻传媒研究中的运用,《新闻界》2009年,第5期。
158 Sinclair, J.& Coulthard,M.1975: Towards and Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
159 Brown, G. & Yule, G., 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
160诺曼·菲尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社,2003年,第19页。
161诺曼·菲尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社,2003年。第53页。
162 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.).Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
163 Levinson, S. C. Pragmatics [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.
164 Habermas, J. Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1.Reason and the Rationalization of Society [M]. (trans. T. McCarthy). London: Heinemann, 1984.
165 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.).Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
168 Thornborrow, J. Power Talk [M]. London: Pearson Education Limited, 2002.
173 Lyman, M. D., 1999. Criminal Investigation: the Art and the Science (2nd Ed.)New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. 227-228.
174胡关禄著:《侦查讯问学》,警官教育出版社1998年,第24-29页。
175徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年,第41-52页。
181参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第7-23页。
182参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第10页。
183参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第50页。
184参见(美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社,2001年,第50页。
185 Baker W.E. and R. R. Faulkner, 1991, Role as Resources in the Hollywood Film Industry, American Journal of Sociology, 97: 279-309.
186郑杭生:《社会学概论新修》,中国人民大学出版社,2000年版,第138页。
187 Miller, S. 1938. Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 181-182.
188王德春、陈汝东:话语角色认知的修辞价值,《扬州大学学报·人文社会科学版》,1998年第4期。
189王德春著:《现代修辞学》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年第501页。
190陈汝东著:《社会心理修辞学导论》,北京大学出版社,1999年第157页。
191胡习之:话语角色定位及其语言表现,《毕节师范高等专科学校学报》,2004年12月。
192陈汝东著:《社会心理修辞学导论》,北京大学出版社,1999年第158页。
193 (英)耶夫·维索尔伦著,钱冠连、霍永寿(译):《语用学诠释》,清华大学出版社,2003年,第90页。
194俞东明:话语角色类型及其在言语交际中的转换,《外国语》,1996年第1期。
195转引自俞东明:话语角色类型及其在言语交际中的转换,《外国语》,1996年第1期。
196 Thornborrow, J. 2002, Power Talk:Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, London: Pearson Education Limited. Pp.4.
198 (英)拉德克利夫-布朗著,夏建中译:《社会人类学方法》,华夏出版社,2002年,第159页。
199 van. Dijk, Teun A. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process, Sage Publications.
200莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第286页。
201莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第284-370页。
202 Schegloff, E. 1987, Between Micro and Macro Contexts and other Connections, In J. Alexander et al. (eds), the Micro-Macro Link, University of California Press, P208.转引自Boden D. and Ziimmerman D.H.(ed.) Talk and Social Structure, Polity Press, P4.
203廖美珍著《:法庭问答及其互动研究》,北京:法律出版社,2003年,第32页。Teun A. Van Dijk. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage Publications.
204 Yule, G. Pragmatics, Blackwell, 1993, Pp.57.
205 Teun A. Van Dijk. 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process. Sage Publications.
206 Sinclair, J.& Coulthard,M.1975: Towards and Analysis of Discourse: the English used by teachers and pupils. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
207 Halliday, MAK, Categories of the theory of grammar, in: Word. 1961,17:241-292.
208 Halliday, MAK, Categories of the theory of grammar, in: Word. 1961,17:241-292.
209 Coutthard, Malcolm and Brazil David,1990, E×change Structures, In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, Mcolthard (ed.), Routledge.
210 Strenstrorm, Anna-Brita.1984. Questions and responses in English Conversation. Malmo: Liber Forlag.
211 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,. Pp. 43.
212徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年11月第96-100页。毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年5月,第269-270页。
213 Byrne, P. S. & B.E.L. Long1976, Doctors Talking to Patients: a Study of the Verbal Behaviors of Doctors in the Consultation. London: HMSO.
214莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第308页。
216 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). , 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
217 Thornborrow, J. 2002. Power Talk: Language Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Pearson Education.
218 Sacks, H.1995, Lectures on Conversation. Vols.I.II.(G. Jefferson, ed.) Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.49-55.
219 Jesperson, O.1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. Quirk,1972,R.,S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
220 Chomsky, N. 1957, Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.
221 Hamblin,C.L. 1973.“Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language (10):41-53.
222 Higginbotham, J. 1996.“The semantics of questions”. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. London: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
223廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版神。2003年第1版,第55页。
224廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版神。2003年第1版,第55页。问话虽然经常以问句的形式表达出来。我们这里的“问话”不同于“问句”。在英语中问话与“question”对应,与“问句”对应的英语是“interrogative sentences”。“问话”是话语(utterance),是在一定语境中,为一定的目的或效果而发出的,具有一定语力的言语行为(speech acts),属于语用范畴。而“疑问句”指脱离语境的,从句法分析角度归纳出的一种句类,属于语法范畴。
225程朝阳著:《法庭调解话语语用研究》,[博士论文],中国政法大学,2007年,第57页。
226廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版神。2003年第1版。
227 Ilie, Cornelia, 1999. Question-Response argumentation in talk show, Journal of Pragmatics 31:975-999.
228 Thornborrow, J. 2002, Power Talk:Language and interaction in Institutional Discourse, Person Education
229 Edelsky, C. 1981, Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10: 383-421.
230张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
231张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
232 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
233廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,法律出版社,2002年第1版,序言。
235 Tsui, Amy, 1992, A functional description of questions, in Malcolm Courlthard ,1992,“Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis”Routledge: London and New York. Pp.89-101.
236 Jesperson, O.1933. Essentials of English Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
237 Quirk,1972,R.,S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
238本部分主要参考廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2002年,第62-64页。廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第1-23页。张靖:讯问的问句用法,《四川公安管理学院学报》,1995年第2期。
239高名凯:《汉语语法论》,商务印书馆1980年版。
240吕叔湘:《吕叔湘文集》,商务印书馆1992年版。
241廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年第1版,第1-23页。
242 Benjamin, R., 1981. The Helping Interview. Third edition, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
243廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年第1版,第1-23页。
244 Duntan, R. Context of Coercion: Analyzing Properties of Courtroom Questions. British Journal of Law and Society 7:61-67.
245 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
246 Grice, H.P. (1975), Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan(eds), Speech Acts (New York: Academic Press). Pp. 41-58.
247 Sacks, H.1995, Lectures on Conversation. Vols.I.II.(G. Jefferson, ed.) Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.49-55.译文为作者翻译。
248廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第17页。
249廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第17页。
250 Loftus, E. 1979, Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp.77-79.
251 Stygall, G. 1994,Trial Language:Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp.146.
252 Loftus, E. 1979, Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Pp. 98.
253 Harris, S. 1984, Questions as a model of control in magistrates’courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, 5-27.
254廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2002年第1版,第127页。
255徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2003年,第59页。
256 Frankel, R. (1990),“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in physician-patient encounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
257 M.康利、威廉M.、欧巴尔著,程朝阳译:《法律、语言与权力》,法律出版社,2008年,第10页。
258 Gibbons, J. , 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp75.
259张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
260张唯著:《法庭话语中的权力研究》[硕士论文],华中师范大学,国家图书馆,2005年。
261 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Pp. 152-168.
262 Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
263 Atkinson, J. M. Heritage, J, 1984: Structure of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
264杨善华主编:《当代西方社会学理论》,北京大学出版社,1999年,第69页。
265 Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
266 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
267 Sacks, H. 1967. Mimeo lecture notes(1967-71).
268 Atkinson, J.M. & Drew, P. 1979. Order in Court. London: Macmillan.
269 Schegloff, E.A. 1972,“Notes on a Conversational Practice: Formulating Place.”In Giglioli,P.
270 Fairclough, N. Discourse and Social Change. 1992, Polity Press.Pp.19.
271 Don H. Zimmerman and Beirdre Boden, Structure in Action: An Introduction. In Beirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
272 Heritage J. & Greatbatch D. On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews. In Beirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
273 Atkinson, J.M. & Drew, P. 1979. Order in Court. London: Macmillan.
274李悦娥,范宏雅著:《话语分析》,上海外语教育出版社,2002年,第14-21页。Sinclair, J. McH.and M.Coulthard,1975,Towards An Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
275 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17, 401-30.
276 Sinclair, J. McH.and M.Coulthard, 1975. Towards An Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
277 Mishler, Elliot G.., 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood. Pp. 68.
280廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社,2002年。
281 Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.). 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp.25.
282 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
283 Mishler, Elliot G. 1984, The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood.
284 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
285 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
286 Greatbatch, C. 1988, A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17,401-30.
287 (英)莱文逊(Levinson S. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第341页。
288 Garfinkel, H. 1967: Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
288 Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Orgnization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
289 Jefferson,G.(1984a),“On stepwise transition form talk about a trouble to in appropriately next-positioned matters.”, In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage(eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis.(Pp.191-222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
290 Brown,G. & Yule, G. 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
291 Fishman, P.M.1983, Interaction: the work women do, In B. Thonem C, Kramarae and T. Bloor(eds), Language. Gender and Society, Rowley Mass..Newbury House.
292 Sacks, H. (1992),“Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.”
293廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社。2003年,第175页。
294 Gibbons, J. , 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp93.
295详细请参照廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社。2003年,第172-223页。
296 Shuy, R. W., 1998,The Language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception.London: Sage Publications. Pp.177.
297 Thomas, J. 1988: Discourse control in confrontation interaction. Lancaster Papers in Linguistics, 50. University of Lancaster.
298 Frankel, R. (1990),“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in psysician-patient encounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
299廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社,2003年。
300 Sacks, H. (1992),“Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.”
301 Frankel, R. (1990),“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in physician-patient ncounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
302 Kassin Saul, 2005, On the Psychology of confessions: Does Innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychology, 60, 215-228.
303 Heydon, G. 2005. The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. [M]. Palgrave Macmillan. Pp.116.
304 Toolan, M. J. 1988, Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, Routledge: London and New York. Preface.
305 Walter R. Fisher, Human Communication as Narration: Toward a Philosophy of Reason, Value, and Action 64 (U. S.C. 1989).
306 James Boyd White, Heracles’Bow: Essays on the Rhetoric and the Poetics of the Law 168 ( U. Wis. Press 1985).
307 W. Lance Bennett & Martha S. Feldman, Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture (Rutgers U. Press 1981). Pp.3.
308 Nancy Pennington & Reid Hastie, A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. (1991). Pp.519-520.
309 A symposium in the mid-1990s was dedicated to storytelling in law practice. See Lawyers as Storytellers and Storytellers as Lawyers: An Interdisciplinary Symposium Exploring the Uses of Storytelling in the Practice of Law, 18 Vermont L. Rev. 567 (1994).
310 Rideout, J. Christopher, (2008), Storytelling, Narrative Rationality and Legal Persuasion. In The Journal of the Legal Writing Institute [Vol. 14, 2008], Pp.54-86.
311 M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing Liao, eds (2003), The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 3 Vol. boxed set, Sage.
312 Mishler, Elliot G., & Jack A. Clark etl., 1989,“The Language of Attentative Patient Care: A Comparison of Two Medical Interviews”, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Volume 4, Number 4, Pp. 325-335.
313转引自,M.S. Lewis-Beck, A. Bryman and T. Futing Liao, eds (2003), The Sage Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods, 3 Vol. boxed set, Sage.
314 Hinchman, L.P. and Hinchman, S.K. (eds) (1997) Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, Albany NY, State University of NY Press.
315 A. Pejlert et al., 1999. Narrative and Narrative Analysis, Blackwell Science Ltd, Journal of Clinical Nursing, 8, 663-674.
316周光明、王成荣:语言哲学与司法公正,《探索》,2003年,第6期。
317 Gibbons, J., 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp93.
318 Kassin Saul, 2005, On the Psychology of confessions: Does Innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychology, 60, 215-228.
319 Jackall, Robert (2005), Street stories: The world of police detectives. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
320 Gibbons, J., 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing.
321 Gibbons, J., 2003, Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing.
322 Leo, R. A. 2008, Police Interrogation and American Justice, Harvard University Press. Pp.168.
324 Lubet, S. 2002,. Nothing but the truth: Why Trial Lawyers don’t, can’t, and shouldn’t have to tell the whole truth. New York: new York University Press. Pp.5.
325公安部五局,2006,《刑警办案须知》。
326 Atkinson J.M. and Drew, P. 1979, Order in Court, the organization of verbal interaction in Judicial settings. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.
327 Blimes, J. 1988, the concept of Preference in Conversation analysis. Language in Society, 17, 161-81.
328 Pomerantz, A. 1980,“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4),186-98.
329 Have, ten, P.2002, Sequential structures and categorical implications in doctor-patient interaction: ethno-methodology and history. http://www2.fmg.uva.nl/emca/seqstruct.htm.
330 Bergmann, J.R. 1992,‘Veiled morality: Notes on discretion in psychiatry.’in P. Drew and J, Heritage (eds), Talk at Work(pp.137-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
331 Pomerantz, A. 1980,“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4),190..
332 Pomerantz, A. 1980,“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4), Pp.198.
334 Driver, E.D.1968, Confessions and the Social Psychology of Coercion. Hardvard Law Review82, 42-61.
335 Heritage, J. 1985,‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T.A.V. Dijk, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, PP 95-117). London: Academic Press.
336 Fairclough, N. 1992, Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press, Pp. 152-168.
337 Heritage, J. 1985,‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T.A.V. Dijk, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, PP 95-117). London: Academic Press.
338 Auburn, T. Drake,S. and Willig,C. 1995,“You punched him, didn’t you?”: versions of violence in accusatory interview. Discourse and Society, 6(3),353-86.
339 Heritage and Waston 1979,‘Formulations as conversational objects’. In G. Psathas(ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (PP. 123-62).New York: Ivrington Publishers.
340 Mey, Jacob L. 1985,Whose Language, a Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdan/Philidelphia: John Benjams.Pp.173-174.
343 Liberman, Kenneth, 1981, Understanding Aborigines in Australian Courts of law. Human Organization 40, 247-255.
344 Solan, Lawrence M. and Peter M. Tiersma, 2005, Speaking of Crime: The language of Criminal Justice. University of Chicargo Press.
345 Eades, D.1994,A Case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English. In Gibbons, John(ed.) Language and the Law. London/New York, 234-264.
346 Gudjonsson, G.H. 2003, The Psychology of Interrogations Confessions. London: Wiley.
347 Fairclough,N. & Wodak,(1997),‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (pp。258-84). London: Sage.
348 Fairclough,N. & Wodak,(1997),‘Critical Discourse Analysis.’In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction (pp.258-84). London: Sage.
349 Halliday, M.A.K. 1994, Introduction to Functional Grammar,2nd, edn. London: Edward Arnold.
350 Zimmerman, D.H. 1998,‘Identity, Context and Interaction’In C. Antaki ans S. Widdicombe (eds), Identities in Talk (pp. 87-166). London: Sage Publications.
351 Bergmann,J.R.1992,‘Veiled morality: notes on discretion in psychiatry’. In P.Drew and J. Heritage(eds), Talk at work(pp 137-62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
356廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
357程朝阳:《法庭调解话语语用研究》, [博士论文],中国政法大学,2007年,第57页。
358 Baumert, Michael,1977,Classification of English Question-Answer Structures. Journal of Pragmatics: 85-92.转引自廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年。
359(1)对知识的正确再现,被认为是正确的,(2)同时又要是对确切问话的确切答话。因此答话可以分为:(a)不正确的回答,(b)正确而又完整的回答,(c)正确但是不完整的回答,(d)答话部分正确,但又有一些不正确或者不相关的话,(e)答话完全正确但是有添加的无关的信息。转引自廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2002年第1版。
360廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
361转引自廖美珍:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
362 Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). (1975), Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
363 Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). (1975), Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
364 Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). (1975), Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
365莱文森(Levison, Stephen. C.)著;何兆熊导读:《语用学》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年,第101-102页。
368廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第434-462页。
369王得杏著:《英语话语分析与跨文化交际》,北京语言文化大学出版社,1998年,第80页。
370廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第76页。
371廖美珍著:《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年,第437页。
374廖美珍著,《法庭问答与互动研究》,北京:法律出版社。2003年第1版,第444页。
375 Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1992) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Eades, D. (1994)‘A case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law. Harlow: Longman, 234–64. Harris, S. (1984)‘Questions as a mode of control in magistrates’courts’, International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49: 5–27.
376 Newbury,Phillip and Alison Johnson,“Suspects’resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview”, The international journal of speech, language and the law,2006, Pp.215-239.
377 Drew, P. (1990)‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process. London: Plenum Press, 39–64.
378 Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis. The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.
379 Clayman, S. E. (2001)‘Answers and evasions’, Language in Society 30(3): 403–42.Pp.403.
384 Gibbons, J., 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.95.
385 Gibbons, J., 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell. Pp.36.
386Maley, Y., 1994.‘The language of the law’, in J. Gibbons, Language and the Law. Essex: Longman, 11–50. Pp.
390 Tsui, A. (1992)‘A functional description of questions’, in M. Coulthard (ed.) Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis. London: Routledge, 89–110.Pp.92.
391 Halliday, M. A. K. (1985) An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
392 Drew, P. (1990)‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process. London: Plenum Press, 39–64.
393 Drew, P. (1992)‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 470–520.Pp.483.
394 Pomerantz, A. (1984)‘Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn-shapes’, in J. M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 79–112. Pp.64.
395 Clayman, S. E. (2001)‘Answers and evasions’, Language in Society 30(3): 403–42.Pp.403.
396 Drew, P. (1990)‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A.
397 Gibbons, J. (2003) Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Oxford: Blackwell.Pp.101.
398 TED是英语“Tell”(讲一讲),“explain”(解释一下),“describe”(描述一下)的首字母。
399 Ehrlich, S. (2002)‘(Re)Contextualizing complainants’accounts of sexual assault’, Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(2): 193–212. Pp.196.
399 Ehrlich, S. (2002)‘(Re)Contextualizing complainants’accounts of sexual assault’, Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(2): 193–212. Pp.196.
402 Raymond, G. (2000)‘The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts’, Discourse Studies, 2(3): 354–79. Pp.355.
403 Conklin, William E, 1998,“The Phenomenology of Modern Legal Discourse: the juridical production and the disclosure of suffering”, Dartmouth publishing company, Ashgate.
404孙长永著:《侦查程序与人权—比较法考察》,中国方正出版社2000年版,序言第5页。
406转引自John Gibbons(ed.)1994, Language and Law. London: Lonman.
407毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年,第63页。
408徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2003年,第59页。
409本小节中有关无罪推定的理论主要参考了樊崇义:《刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2001年。
410 (意)贝卡利亚著,黄风译:《犯罪与刑罚》,中国大百科全书出版社,1993年,第45页。
411樊崇义著:《刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社。2001年,第67页。
416李立,赵洪芳著:《法律语言实证研究》,群众出版社,2009年,第76页。
417陈卫东:论犯罪嫌疑人的诉讼主体地位及其权利保障,中国民商法律网,2006年12月10日。
418徐国桢著:《揭开侦讯的神秘面纱》(暴力篇),台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2008年,序言第5页。
419 Brown,P. & S. Levinson. 1978, Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomenon. In Good, E, N. (ed). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press.
420 Leech, G..N. Principles of Pragmatics, Longman, 1983.
422陈融,面子、留面子、丢面子——介绍Brown和Levinson的礼貌原则,原载《外国语》1986年第4期。载束定芳,《中国语用学研究论文精选》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年10月第一版,第493页。
425李婷婷:“面子理论”与“顺应论”在警察业务中的应用研究,《广东技术师范学院学报》,2008年第8期。
428 Cook, M. 1996,“A different story: narrative versus‘question-answer’in Aboriginal evidence”. Forensic Linguistics: the International Journal of Speech, Language and Law, 3(2),73-88.
430Oxburgh, G.E. & Trond Myklebust & Tim Grant, 2010, The question of question types in police interviews: A review of the literature from a psychological and linguistic perspective. The international journal of specch, language and the law. Vol.17,Pp.45-66.
434徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年,第219页。
435“当庭播放警方讯问录像还了民警清白”,《青年时报》2006年05月24,http://news.sohu.com/20060524/n243389005.shtml。
436陈卫东主编:《刑事诉讼法实施问题调研报告》,中国方正出版社,2001年第176页。
438毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年,第142-145页。
441贺卫方:法言法语的意义,法律评论网www.fatianxia.com/paper_list.asp?id=3128.
442刘红婴著:《法律语言学》[M],北京:北京大学出版社,2003年,第123页。
446廖美珍著,《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第106-123页。
448袁传有:“由美、英、中警察告知语言分析看中国警察告知体系的建构”. [J].《修辞学习》,2005年第1期。
449王鑫:讯问犯罪嫌疑人时诉讼权利告知,《河南公安学刊》2000年第1期,第39页。
450 Cotterill, J. Reading the Rights: a cautionary of comprehension and comprehensibility [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000,7 (1),4-25. Gudjonsson, G. and I. Clare. The Proposed new police caution(England and Wales): How easy is to to understand? [J] Expert Evidence, 1994,3(3):109.12.
451 Grisso, T. Instruments for Assessing Understading and Appreciation of Miranda Rights. [M] Sarasota FL: Professional Resources Press, 1998.
452 Shuy, R.W. 1998. The language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Shuy, Roger W. Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda[J]. Forensic Linguisitcs, 1997,4(2)175-196. Shuy, Roger W. etal, Review of Grisso, Thomas Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreation of Miranda Rights[J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000,7(1)131-136.
453徐盈雁:高检院出台《检察机关文明用语规则》违反文明用语规范造成不良影响将被问责http://llzw.spp.gov.cn/zybs/201007/t20100701_380836.shtml 2010-06-3新闻来源:检察日报。
454廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》,法律出版社,2004年,第121页。
1. Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J., 1984. Structure of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Auburn, T. Drake, S. and Willig, C. 1995.“You punched him, didn’t you?”versions of violence in accusatory interview. Discourse and Society, 6 (3), 353-86.
3. Austin, J.L., 1980. How to Do things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P.148.
4. Baumert, Michael, 1977.Classification of English Question-Answer Structures. Journal of Pragmatics: Pp. 85-92.
5. Blackledge, A., 2005, Discourse and Power in a Multilingual World. John Benjamins Punlishing Company: Amsterdam/Philadelphia.
6. Blimes, J. 1988. The concept of Preference in Conversation analysis. Language in Society, (17), Pp. 161-81.
7. Brown, G. & Yule, G., 1983, Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. Brown, P. & S. Levinson., 1978. Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomenon. In Good, E, N. (ed). Questions and Politeness: Strategies in Social Interaction, Cambridge University Press.
9. Byrne, P. S. & B.E.L. Long, 1976.Doctors Talking to Patients: a Study of the Verbal Behaviors of Doctors in the Consultation. London: HMSO.
10. Chomsky, N., 1957. Syntactic Structures. Mouton: The Hague.
11. Clayman, S. E., 2001.‘Answers and Evasions’, Language in Society 30(3): 403–42.
12. Cole, P. & Morgan, J. L. (eds). 1975, Syntax and Sematics3: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press. Pp.41-58.
13. Conley, John M., & William M. O’Barr, 1998, Just Words. The University of Chicago Press.
14. Connerton, P. (ed.), 1976. Critical Sociology. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Pp.18.
15. Cotterill, J. Reading the Rights: a cautionary of comprehension and comprehensibility [J]. Forensic Linguistics, 2000, 7 (1), 4-25.
16. Coutthard, M. & Brazil D., 1990. Exchange Structures, In Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis, Mcolthard (ed.), Routledge.
17. Coulthard, M. & Alison Johnson, 2007. An Introduction to Forensic Linguistics: Language in Evidence, Routledge: London and New York.
18. Drew, P., 1990.‘Strategies in the contest between lawyer and witness in cross-examination’, in J. Levi and A. Walker (eds) Language in the Judicial Process. London: Plenum Press, 39–64.
19. Drew, P., 1992.‘Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: the case of a trial for rape’, in P. Drew and J. Heritage (eds) Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Drew, P. & J. Heritage (eds.)., 1992. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Setting[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Driver, E.D.1968. Confessions and the Social Psychology of Coercion. Hardvard Law Review82, 42-61.
22. Duntan, R. Context of Coercion: Analyzing Properties of Courtroom Questions. British Journal of Law and Society 7:61-67.
23. Eades, D., 1994.‘A case of communicative clash: Aboriginal English and the legal system’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law. Harlow: Longman.
24. Eades, D., 1994. Forensic Linguistics in Austrilia: an overview, Forensic Linguistics, 1, ii, 113-22.
25. Edelsky, C., 1981. Who’s got the floor? Language in Society, 10: 383-421.
26. Ehrlich, S., 2002.‘(Re) contextualizing complainants’accounts of sexual assault’, Forensic Linguistics: The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 9(2): 193–212. Pp.196.
27. Fairclough, N., 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
28. Fairclough, N. & Wodak, R., 1997. Critical Discourse Analysis. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
29. Fairclough, N., 1992. Discourse and Social Change, Polity Press.
30. Fairclough, N.“Critical discourse analysis as a method in social scientific research”in Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi.
31. Frankel, R., 1990.“Talking in interviews: a dispreference for Patient-initiated questions in psysician-patient encounters”. In G. Psathas(ed), Interaction Competence (Pp231-62.) Washington, DC: University Press of America.
32. Fowler, R., Hodge, R., Kress, G., and Trew, T., 1979. Language and Control. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
33. Garfinkel, H.,1967.Studies in Ethonomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
34. Gibbons, J., 2003. Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language in the Justice System. Blackwell publishing. Pp75.
35. Goodrich, P., 1987, Legal Discourse, Macmillan Press.
36. Greatbatch, C., 1988. A Turning Taking System for British News Interview. Language in Society, 17, 401-30.
37. Grice, H.P., 1975. Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds), Speech Acts (New York: Academic Press).
38. Grisso, T., 1998. Instruments for Assessing Understanding and Appreciation of Miranda Rights. [M] Sarasota FL: Professional Resources Press.
39. Gudjonsson, G. and I. Clare. The Proposed new police caution (England and Wales): How easy is to to understand? [J] Expert Evidence, 1994,3(3):109.12.
40. Gudjonsson, G.H., 2003. The Psychology of Interrogations Confessions. London: Wiley.
41. Habermas, J., 1984. Theory of Communicative Action, Vol.1.Reason and the Rationalization of Society [M]. (Trans. T. McCarthy). London: Heinemann.
42. Halliday, M.A.K., 1985, An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
43. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R., 1976, Cohesion in English, Longman.
44. Halliday, MAK, Categories of the theory of grammar, In: Word. 1961,17:241-292.
45. Hamblin, C.L. 1973.“Questions in Montague English”. Foundations of Language (10):41-53.
46. Harris, S. 1984, Questions as a model of control in magistrates’courts. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 49, 5-27.
47. Heritage, J. 1985.‘Analyzing news interviews: aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience’. In T.A.V. Dijk, Handbook of Discourse Analysis (Vol. 3, PP 95-117). London: Academic Press.
48. Heritage J. & Greatbatch D., 1991. On the Institutional Character of Institutional Talk: The Case of News Interviews. In Beirdre Boden and Don H. Zimmerman, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
49. Heritage and Waston 1979. Formulations as conversational objects’. In G. Psathas(ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (PP. 123-62).New York: Ivrington Publishers.
50. Heydon, G. 2005. The Language of Police Interviewing: A Critical Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan. Pp.116.
51. Higginbotham, J., 1996.“The semantics of questions”. In S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. London: Blackwell.
52. Hill, M., 2003.‘Identifying the source of critical details in confessions’, The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law: Forensic Linguistics, 10(1): 23–61.
53. Hinchman, L.P. and Hinchman, S.K. (eds) , 1997. Memory, Identity, Community: The Idea of Narrative in the Human Sciences, Albany NY, State University of NY Press.
54. Hymes, D.H., 1962.“The Ethnology of Speaking,”In J. A. Fishman, Readings in the Society of Language. The Hague: Mouton,1968. Pp.99-138.
55. Ilie, C., 1999. Question-Response argumentation in talk show, Journal of Pragmatics 31:975-999.
56. Jefferson, G., 1984.“On stepwise transition form talk about a trouble to in appropriately next-positioned matters.”, In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage(eds), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Kassin Saul, 2005. On the Psychology of confessions: Does Innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychology, 60,215-228.
58. Kassin, Saul M. and K. McNall, 1991. Police Interrogations and Confessions. Law ans Human Behaviour 21, 469-83.
59. Kress, G (ed.), 1976. Halliday: System and Fucntion in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
60. Bennett W.and S. Feldman, 1981. Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture. Rutgers U. Press.
61. Leech, G. N., 1983. Principles of Pragmatics, Longman.
62. Leo, R. A., 2008. Police Interrogation and American Justice, Harvard University Press. Pp.168.
63. Levi, Judith N., 1990. Language in the judicial process. New York: Plenum Press.
64. Levinson, S. C., 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65. Liberman, Kenneth, 1981. Understanding Aborigines in Australian Courts of law.Human Organization 40, 247-255.
66. Locher, Miriam A., 2004. Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication, Mouton de Gruyter, Pp.28.
67. Loftus, E., 1979. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
68. Lukes, S., 1974. Power, A Radical View. London: Macmillan. Pp.34.
69. Lyons, J., 1977. Semantics, Cambridge University Press Pp.574-585.
70. Maley, Y., 1994.‘The language of the law’, in J. Gibbons (ed.) Language and the Law. Essex: Longman, 11–50. Pp. 36.
71. Mellincoff, David, 1963. The Language of the Law. [M]. Boston: Little, Brown and company. Preface.
72. Mey, Jacob L., 1985.Whose Language, a Study in Linguistic Pragmatics. Amsterdan/Philidelphia: John Benjams.Pp.173-174.
73. Meyer, M., 2001. Between theory. Method, and Politics: Positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Wodak, Ruth. & Michael Meyer, 2001, Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi. Pp. 25.
74. Lyman, Michael D., 1999.“Criminal Investigation: the Art and the Science”(2nd Ed.)New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Inc. Pp.227-228.
75. Miller, S., 1938. Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Pp. 181-182.
76. Mishler, Elliot G., 1984. The Discourse of Medicine: Dialectics of Medical Interviews, Ablex Publishing Corporation. Norwood. Pp. 68.
77. Nancy Pennington & Reid Hastie. A Cognitive Theory of Juror Decision Making: The Story Model, 13 Cardozo L. Rev. (1991). Pp.519. 520.
78. Newbury, P. & Alison J.“Suspects’resistance to constraining and coercive questioning strategies in the police interview”. The international journal of speech, language and the law, 2006, Pp.215-239.
79. O’Barr, W., 1982. Linguistic evidence: language, power and strategy in the courtroom. New York: Academic Press.
80. Olsson, J., 2004. Forensic Linguistics: an introduction to language, crime and law. [M]. New York: Continuum.
81. Pomerantz, A., 1980.“Telling my side:“limited access”as a“fishing device”. Sociological Enquiry, 50(3-4), 186-98.
82. Quirk, R.S. Greenbaum, G. Leech and J. Svartvik., 1972, A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.
83. Raymond, G., 2000.‘The voice of authority: the local accomplishment of authoritative discourse in live news broadcasts’, Discourse Studies, 2(3): 354–79. Pp.355.
84. Robinson, W. P. & Rackstraw, S. 1972. A Question of Answers. Vols. I and II. London: Routledge.
85. Sacks, H., 1992, Lectures on Conversation. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
86. Sacks H, A. Schegloff & Jefferson, 1974. A Simplest Systematic for the Organization of Turning-taking for Conversation. Language, Vol.50, No.4.
87. Schegloff, E.,1987. Between Micro and Macro Contexts and other Connections, In J. Alexander et al. (eds), the Micro-Macro Link, University of California Press, P208.
88. Searl, John R., 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp.38.
89. Shuy, R. W. Ten unanswered language questions about Miranda . Forensic Linguisitcs, 1997, 4(2)175-196.
90. Shuy, R.W., 1998. The language of Confession, Interrogation, and Deception. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
91. Shuy, R.W., 1993. Language Crimes: the use and abuse of language evidence in the courtroom. [M] Blackwell Publishers.
92. Shuy, R.W., 2002. Linguistic Battles in Trademark Disputes, New York: Palgrave.
93. Silverman, D., 1997. Discourses of Counseling HIV: Counseling as Social Interaction. London: Sage.
94. Sinclair, J. and M. Coulthard, 1975. Towards An Analysis of Discourse the English Used by Teachers and Pupils. Oxford University Press.
95. Solan, Lawrence M., & Peter Tiersma, 2005. Speaking of Crime: the Language of criminal Justice, Chicago: University of Chicago.
96. Stygall, G., 1994. Trial Language: Differential Discourse Processing and Discursive Formation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins. Pp.146.
97. Svartvic, Jan.,1968. The Evans Statements: A Case for Forensic Linguistics, Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg University.
98. Thomas, J., 1988. Discourse control in confrontation interaction. Lancaster Papers in Linguistics, 50. University of Lancaster.
99. Thornborrow, J., 2002. Power Talk: Language Interaction in Institutional Discourse. Pearson Education.
100. Tiersma, Peter M., 1999. Legal Language. The University of Chicago Press.
101. Toolan, M. J., 1988. Narrative: A Critical Linguistic Introduction, Routledge: London and New York. Preface.
102. Tsui, A., 1992. A functional description of questions, in Malcolm Courlthard, 1992,“Advances in Spoken Discourse Analysis”Routledge: London and New York. Pp.89-101.
103. Van. Dijk. Teun A., 1997. Discourse as Structure and Process, Sage Publications.
104. Van. Dijk. Teun A., 2008. Discourse and Power, Palgrave: Macmillan. Pp.1-27.
105. Wodak, R. & Michael Meyer, 2001. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, SAGE: London, Thousands Oaks, New Delhi.
106. Yule, G., 1993. Pragmatics, Blackwell, Pp.57.
107. Zimmerman, D. H. & Beirdre Boden., 1987, Talk and Social Structrure, Polity Press.Pp. 95.
108. (德)阿图尔考夫曼等主编,郑永流译:《当代法哲学与法律理论导论》,法律出版社,2002年。
143.毕希茜著:《侦查讯问理论与实务探究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年。
144.布赖恩·比克斯著,邱昭继译:《法律、语言与法律的确定性》,法律出版社, 2007年。
145.布莱恩·肯尼迪著,郭乃嘉译:《证人询问的技巧》,元照出版社,2002年。
146.束定芳,《中国语用学研究论文精选》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年。
147.陈汝东:《社会心理修辞学导论》,北京大学出版社,1999年。
148.程荣斌:《刑事诉讼法》,中国人民大学出版社,1999年。
149.杜金榜:《法律语言学》,上海外语教育出版社,2004年。
150. (美)丹尼斯·朗著,陆震纶、郑明哲译:《权力论》,中国社会科学出版社, 2001年。
151.樊崇义:《刑事诉讼法实施问题与对策研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2001年。
152.樊崇义:《刑事审前程序改革实证研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2007年。
153.佛瑞德·英鲍原著,高忠义译:《刑事侦讯与自白》,台北:商业周刊出版股份有限公司,2000年。
154. (美)英博等著,何家弘等译:《审讯与供述》,群众出版社,1992年。
155.胡关禄:《侦查讯问学》,警官教育出版社,1998年。
156.胡壮麟、朱永生、张德禄:《系统功能语法概论》,湖南教育出版社,1989年。
157.何家弘:《证据的语言》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2009年。
158.华尔庚:《法律语言概论》中国政法大学出版社,1995年。
159.姜望琪:《语用学:理论与应用》,北京大学出版社,2000年。
160. (美)M.康利,威廉、M.欧巴尔著,程朝阳译:《法律、语言与权力》,法律出版社,2007年。
161. (英)拉德克利夫·布朗著,夏建中译:《社会人类学方法》,华夏出版社, 2002年。
162.李立,赵洪芳著:《法律语言实证研究》,群众出版社,2009年。
163.李悦娥、范宏雅编:《话语分析》,上海外语教育出版社,2002年。
164.廖美珍著:《法庭问答及其互动研究》,法律出版社,2003年。
165.廖美珍著:《法庭语言技巧》法律出版社,2004年。
166.刘高岑著:《从语言分析到语境重建——分析哲学意向性理论的科学语境论构建》,山西科学技术出版社,2003年。
167.刘红樱著:《法律语言学》,北京大学出版社,2003年。
168.刘润清著:《西方语言学流派》,外语教学与研究出版社,2002年。
169.刘蔚铭著:《法律语言学研究》,中国经济出版社,2003年。
170.梅(Mey, J.)著,徐盛桓导读:《语用学导论》,外语教学与研究出版社,2001年。
171. (英)诺曼·费尔克拉夫著,殷晓蓉译:《话语与社会变迁》,华夏出版社, 2003年。
172.索振羽著:《语用学教程》,北京大学出版社,2000年。
173.沈华柱著:《对话的妙悟——巴赫金语言哲学思想研究》,三联出版社,2005年。
174.沈开木著:《现代汉语话语语言学》,商务印书馆,1996年。
175. (美)史蒂芬·卢克斯著,林苇芸译:《权力——基进观点》,台北:商周出版社,2006年。
176.舒国滢著:《在法律的边缘》,中国法制出版社,2000年。
177.潘庆云著:《中国法律语言鉴衡》,汉语大辞典出版社,2004年。
178.潘庆云著:《法律语体探索》,云南人民出版社,1991年。
179.潘庆云著:《跨世纪的中国法律语言》,华东理工大学出版社,1997年。
180.裴文著,《现代英语语境学》,安徽大学出版社,2000年。
181.齐文祥,王洪林等著:《刑侦讯问方略》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2006年。
182. (美)乔纳森·特纳著,邱泽奇译:《社会学理论的结构》(下),华夏出版社, 2001年。
183.邱大仁著:《语言识别》,群众出版社,1985年。
184.邱大仁著:《侦查语言学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,1995年。
185.孙长永著:《沉默权制度研究,北京:法律出版社,2001年。
186.孙长永著:《侦查程序与人权——比较法考察》,中国方正出版社2000年。
187.孙懿华,周广然著:《法律语言学》,中国政法大学出版社,1997年。
188.童世骏著:《批判与实践——论哈贝马斯的批判理论》,三联书店,2007年。
189.王传道编:《刑事侦查学》,中国政法大学出版社,1999年。
190.王得杏著:《英语话语分析与跨文化交际》,北京语言文化大学出版社,1998年。
191.王洁著:《法律语言研究》,广东教育出版社,1999年版。
192.王晋军著:《会话中问句的批评性分析》,厦门大学出版社,2006年。
193.吴伟平著:《语言与法律——司法领域的语言学研究》,上海外语教育出版社,2002年。
194.夏锦尧,黄富成著:《侦查语言》,中国人民公安大学,1993年。
195.辛斌著:《批评语言学:理论与应用》,上海外语教育出版社,2005年。
196.徐国桢著,《揭开侦讯的神秘面纱》(暴力篇),台北:五南图书出版股份有限公司,2008年。
197.徐家庆,宣祎扬,姚健著:《讯问言语学》,中国人民公安大学出版社,1992年。
198.徐美君著:《侦查讯问程序正当性研究》,中国人民公安大学出版社,2003年。
199.杨善华编:《当代西方社会学理论》,北京大学出版社,1999年。
200.云山城著:《侦查讯问学原理》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,2004年。
201.张钧,张洁著:《预审精选案例评析》,北京:中国人民公安大学出版社,1995年。
202.周忠伟著:《预审讯问案评析》,南昌:江西人民出版社。1996年版。
203.朱永生、严世清著:《系统功能语言学多维思考》,上海外语教育出版社,2001年。
204.朱永生、严世清、苗兴伟著:《功能语言学导论》,上海外语教育出版社,2003年。
205.蔡海龙:参与观察法的特征及其在新闻传媒研究中的运用,《新闻界》,2009年,第5期。
206.陈融:面子、留面子、丢面子—介绍Brown和Levinson的礼貌原则,《外国语》1986年第4期。
207.胡习之:话语角色定位及其语言表现,《毕节师范高等专科学校学报》,2004年,第6期。
208.廖美珍:中国法庭问答互动对应结构研究,《语言科学》,2003年,第5期。
209.廖美珍:目的原则与法庭互动话语合作问题研究,《外语学刊》,2004年,第5期。
210.廖美珍:目的原则与目的分析(上、下),《修辞学习》,2005年,第3、4期。
211.廖美珍:论法律语言的通俗化和大众化,《修辞学习》,2006年,第4期。
212.廖美珍:中国法律语言规范化若干问题之我见,《修辞学习》,2008年,第5期。
213.谌洪果:通过语言体察法律现象:哈特与日常语言分析哲学,《比较法研究》, 2006年,第5期。
214.潘庆云:预审言语修辞伦略,《吉林师院学报》,1987年,第4期。
215.邱昭继:奥斯汀的言语行为理论与法理学,《法制与社会发展》,2008年,第2期。
216.王晋军:医生和病人会话中的问句与权势关系,《解放军外国语学院学报》, 2002年,第5期。
217.王鑫:讯问犯罪嫌疑人时诉讼权利告知,《河南公安学刊》,2000年,第1期。
218.吴伟平:法律语言学:会议,机构与刊物,《国外语言学》,1994年,第2期。
219.薛炳尧、马志鹏:论侦查讯问学的学科建设,《中国人民公安大学学报》,1999年,第2期。
220.袁传有:由美、英、中警察告知语言分析看中国警察告知体系的建构,《修辞学习》,2005年,第1期。
221.张靖:讯问的问句用法,《四川公安管理学院学报》,1995年,第2期。
222.周光明、王成荣:语言哲学与司法公正,《探索》,2003年,第6期。
223.朱明新:“法学的语言学转向”及其对我国法律语言学研究的方法论启示,《琼州大学学报》,2003年,第3期。
224.程朝阳:《法庭调解话语语用研究》,[博士论文],中国政法大学图书馆,2007年。
225.李婷婷:《中国警察讯问中礼貌语言的顺应性研究》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学, 2006年。
226.沈璐:《警察讯问的提问策略》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学, 2004年。
227.陶锐敏:《衔接手段及其对警察询问阶段证人证言理解的关联性制约》,[硕士论文],广东外语外贸大学, 2006年。
228.许娜:《讯问语言的特点》,[硕士论文],吉林大学,2003年。
229.杨贝:《论佩雷尔曼新修辞学法哲学及其论证理论》[博士论文],中国政法大学,2009年。
230.张唯:《法庭话语中的权力研究》,[硕士论文],华中师范大学,2005年。