985高校管理学科投入产出效率评价研究
|
摘要
学科是培养人才的摇篮,是科学研究的基地,是高等学校得以存在和发展的基础,世界一流大学之所以著名,在很大程度上在于拥有一流的学科。高等学校的特色、竞争优势和学术声誉,是通过学科的水平来体现的,高等学校的人才培养、科学研究和社会服务这三大功能的实现也必须通过学科这个平台来完成。各个高等学校和高等学校中各个学科对科学发展趋势的关注,对研究制定学科发展规划的慎重,对人才培养质量的重视,对一流人才、经费及设备等资源的竞争,从根本上说,都是为了提高学科的投入产出效率。学科评价是学科科学管理、保证学科建设质量、提高投入产出效率的重要环节。本论文应用已在管理科学等多个领域成功运用的数据包络分析理论来探索高等学校管理学科投入产出效率评价方法,可以全面、客观的认识管理学科投入产出效率现状,发现被评单位管理学科的差距和优势,促进管理学科建设与发展,具有一定的现实意义。最后,结合一些具体学校的管理学科建设的实际数据,运用已建立的模型进行了评估分析,以检验该模型的实践应用情况。
Discipline is the cradle of personnel training, scientific research base, is the existence and development of colleges and universities can be the basis, the first-class disciplines contribute a lot to the outstanding of first-class universities around the world. The characteristics, competitive predominance, and academic reputation of a university are all exerted through its disciplines .The favorable operation of the three functions of a university, namely the talent cultivation, competitive predominance, and social service should be realized through a discipline platform. The ongoing concerns to the scientific development trend ,the caution to the discipline development plan, the emphasis to the personnel training quality, and the competition to various resources such as talents, outlay and equipment, are all targeted at the improvement of disciplinary of the efficiency of input-output. Discipline is the evaluation of scientific management disciplines to ensure that discipline construction quality, increase input and output efficiency of the important links. This paper has been applied in the management of scientific fields, such as the successful use of the DEA theory to explore colleges and universities management disciplines input and output efficiency assessment methodology. A comprehensive and objective understanding of the efficiency of input-output management disciplines Status, Management unit was found on the gap between the disciplines and advantages, promote the construction and development management disciplines, has a practical significance. Finally, with some specific school management discipline construction of the actual data, use of the model has conducted an assessment of analysis to examine the practical application of the model.
Discipline is the cradle of personnel training, scientific research base, is the existence and development of colleges and universities can be the basis, the first-class disciplines contribute a lot to the outstanding of first-class universities around the world. The characteristics, competitive predominance, and academic reputation of a university are all exerted through its disciplines .The favorable operation of the three functions of a university, namely the talent cultivation, competitive predominance, and social service should be realized through a discipline platform. The ongoing concerns to the scientific development trend ,the caution to the discipline development plan, the emphasis to the personnel training quality, and the competition to various resources such as talents, outlay and equipment, are all targeted at the improvement of disciplinary of the efficiency of input-output. Discipline is the evaluation of scientific management disciplines to ensure that discipline construction quality, increase input and output efficiency of the important links. This paper has been applied in the management of scientific fields, such as the successful use of the DEA theory to explore colleges and universities management disciplines input and output efficiency assessment methodology. A comprehensive and objective understanding of the efficiency of input-output management disciplines Status, Management unit was found on the gap between the disciplines and advantages, promote the construction and development management disciplines, has a practical significance. Finally, with some specific school management discipline construction of the actual data, use of the model has conducted an assessment of analysis to examine the practical application of the model.
引文
[1]罗云.中国重点大学与学科建设.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2005.
[2]鲍嵘.学科制度的起源及其走向初探.高等教育研究,2002,7(4):32-33.
[3]李建宁.高等学校学科竞争力评价研究:(博士学位论文).上海:华东师范大学,2004.
[4]邱均平,武夷山,刘永等.中国研究生教育评价报告(2006-2007).北京:科学出版社,2006.
[5]Accreditation Standards.http://www.aaesb.edu/accreditation/standards.asp.
[6]徐绪松,吴强,马莉莉.管理科学前沿问题研究.光明日报,2005-9-20.
[7]乌家培.论管理科学的发展.南开管理评论,2000,6(3):6-8.
[8]徐飞,高隆昌.二象对偶空间与管理学二象论:管理科学基础探索.北京:科学出版社,2005.
[9]芮明杰.管理学:现代的观点.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[10]赵纯均.中国管理教育报告.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[11]蒋石梅.河北省管理学科发展现状评价研究:(硕士学位论文).天津:河北工业大学,2003.
[12]西安交通大学研究生院.工科院校重点学科评估方案研究.学位与研究生教育,1991,6(3):14-18.
[13]刘裕品.美国高等教育的认可和评估体系.学位与研究生教育,2002,12(6):24-26.
[14]About ACICS.http://www.acies.org/content.cfm?LI=6
[15]Accreditation.http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/
[16]吴世农.中国MBA教育实践与探索.北京:机械工程出版社,2001.
[17]EQUIS The European Quality Improvement System.http://www.efmd.be/equis/5menuequis.htm
[18]America's Best Graduate Sehool2003:Top Business Schools.http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/mba/brief/mbarank.
[19]EMBA Rankings & Profiles.http://www.businessweek.eom/bschools/01/emba_rank.htm
[20]FINANCIAL TIMES MBA2002.http://news.ft.eom/jobs/mba.
[21]Top Universities by subject Business Studies http://www.times-arehive.co.uk/onlinespecials/education/business.html
[22]王战军.学位与研究生教育评估技术与实践.北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[23]国务院学位办公室[2002]14号.关于开展全国一级学科整体水平评估试点工作的通知.http://www.cdgdc.edu.en/yjxk/xwzx200214.htm
[24]Cave Martin,Hanny Stephen,Kogan Mauric.The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education:A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice.Jessica Kingsleg Publishing Ltd,1988:19-20,40-41,118-119.
[25]Ian Winkworth's.Performance Indicators in Graham McKenzie and Ray Prychirch.Librarianship and Information Work Worldwide,London,Bower Saur,1993.
[26]代蕊华.高校办学效益研究:(博士学位论文).上海:华东师范大学,1999.
[27]张远增.高等教育评价中的线性规划方法.中国高等教育评估,2002,1(2):9-12.
[28]Levin,H.M.Measuring efficiency in educational production Public Finance Quarterly,1974.
[29]黄朝峰.基于模糊DEA的高校办学效益评价方法及应用研究:(博士学位论文).长沙:国防科技大学,2005.
[30]丁小浩.中国高等院校规模效益的实证研究.北京:教育科学出版社,2000.
[31]顾建民.大学职能的分析及其结构意义.全球教育展望,2001,8(8):68-72.
[32]莫光政,李忠云.高等学校社会服务实证分析研究.中国农业教育,2001,8(4):21-23.
[33]盛昭瀚,朱乔,吴广谋.DEA理论、方法、与应用.北京:科学出版社,1996.
[34]龚放,袁仁宽.关于中国高等学校质量评估的认识.中国高等教育评估,1997,8(4):24-26.
[35]蔡言厚,田金山,吴厚平.大学科研定量评价指标体系的探讨.中国高等教育评估,2002,4(2):21-24.
[36]黄朝峰.高教评估中人才产出数量的计算.中国高等教育评估,2003,1(1):27-29.
[37]中国研究生招生信息网.http://yz.chsi.com.cn/
[38]李振格.Excel 2002入门与提高.北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
[39]许建钺.高等教育鉴定与水平评估.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992.
[2]鲍嵘.学科制度的起源及其走向初探.高等教育研究,2002,7(4):32-33.
[3]李建宁.高等学校学科竞争力评价研究:(博士学位论文).上海:华东师范大学,2004.
[4]邱均平,武夷山,刘永等.中国研究生教育评价报告(2006-2007).北京:科学出版社,2006.
[5]Accreditation Standards.http://www.aaesb.edu/accreditation/standards.asp.
[6]徐绪松,吴强,马莉莉.管理科学前沿问题研究.光明日报,2005-9-20.
[7]乌家培.论管理科学的发展.南开管理评论,2000,6(3):6-8.
[8]徐飞,高隆昌.二象对偶空间与管理学二象论:管理科学基础探索.北京:科学出版社,2005.
[9]芮明杰.管理学:现代的观点.上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
[10]赵纯均.中国管理教育报告.北京:清华大学出版社,2005.
[11]蒋石梅.河北省管理学科发展现状评价研究:(硕士学位论文).天津:河北工业大学,2003.
[12]西安交通大学研究生院.工科院校重点学科评估方案研究.学位与研究生教育,1991,6(3):14-18.
[13]刘裕品.美国高等教育的认可和评估体系.学位与研究生教育,2002,12(6):24-26.
[14]About ACICS.http://www.acies.org/content.cfm?LI=6
[15]Accreditation.http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/
[16]吴世农.中国MBA教育实践与探索.北京:机械工程出版社,2001.
[17]EQUIS The European Quality Improvement System.http://www.efmd.be/equis/5menuequis.htm
[18]America's Best Graduate Sehool2003:Top Business Schools.http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/mba/brief/mbarank.
[19]EMBA Rankings & Profiles.http://www.businessweek.eom/bschools/01/emba_rank.htm
[20]FINANCIAL TIMES MBA2002.http://news.ft.eom/jobs/mba.
[21]Top Universities by subject Business Studies http://www.times-arehive.co.uk/onlinespecials/education/business.html
[22]王战军.学位与研究生教育评估技术与实践.北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[23]国务院学位办公室[2002]14号.关于开展全国一级学科整体水平评估试点工作的通知.http://www.cdgdc.edu.en/yjxk/xwzx200214.htm
[24]Cave Martin,Hanny Stephen,Kogan Mauric.The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education:A Critical Analysis of Developing Practice.Jessica Kingsleg Publishing Ltd,1988:19-20,40-41,118-119.
[25]Ian Winkworth's.Performance Indicators in Graham McKenzie and Ray Prychirch.Librarianship and Information Work Worldwide,London,Bower Saur,1993.
[26]代蕊华.高校办学效益研究:(博士学位论文).上海:华东师范大学,1999.
[27]张远增.高等教育评价中的线性规划方法.中国高等教育评估,2002,1(2):9-12.
[28]Levin,H.M.Measuring efficiency in educational production Public Finance Quarterly,1974.
[29]黄朝峰.基于模糊DEA的高校办学效益评价方法及应用研究:(博士学位论文).长沙:国防科技大学,2005.
[30]丁小浩.中国高等院校规模效益的实证研究.北京:教育科学出版社,2000.
[31]顾建民.大学职能的分析及其结构意义.全球教育展望,2001,8(8):68-72.
[32]莫光政,李忠云.高等学校社会服务实证分析研究.中国农业教育,2001,8(4):21-23.
[33]盛昭瀚,朱乔,吴广谋.DEA理论、方法、与应用.北京:科学出版社,1996.
[34]龚放,袁仁宽.关于中国高等学校质量评估的认识.中国高等教育评估,1997,8(4):24-26.
[35]蔡言厚,田金山,吴厚平.大学科研定量评价指标体系的探讨.中国高等教育评估,2002,4(2):21-24.
[36]黄朝峰.高教评估中人才产出数量的计算.中国高等教育评估,2003,1(1):27-29.
[37]中国研究生招生信息网.http://yz.chsi.com.cn/
[38]李振格.Excel 2002入门与提高.北京:清华大学出版社,2002.
[39]许建钺.高等教育鉴定与水平评估.北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992.