苏南滨水旅游整合开发模式研究
|
摘要
亲水性是人与生俱来的特性,滨水带对于人类有着一种内在的持久的吸引力。而滨水区域分布了众多旅游资源均具有跨区域的特质。然而,目前,滨水旅游资源开发各自为政,形成开发无序、竞争无序和管理无序的局面。现有旅游资源评价体系主要侧重于对资源现状评估,对旅游资源整合条件关注较少,往往导致区域滨水旅游实际合作开发缺乏科学依据,区域滨水旅游资源的整体竞争力难以得到有效的提升。因此,有必要基于如何评价滨水旅游资源的整合条件展开相关深入研究。
滨水旅游资源整合条件是开展滨水旅游整合开发活动的基础,科学地评价滨水旅游资源整合条件是滨水旅游整合开发的关键。对滨水旅游资源的整合条件作分析评价,对该地区滨水旅游整合开发模式和产品体系进行研究,对促进区域滨水旅游资源整合、滨水产品开发、滨水旅游业的发展、以及滨水带资源、经济、环境和社会的协调、可持续发展等具有十分重要的理论和实践意义。
苏南地区作为水乡的典型代表,水域风光资源丰富,滨水区域内也都具有一定数量和价值的旅游资源,使本地区形成滨水旅游资源的富集区。本文以苏南地区为例,对科学整合开发我国滨水旅游资源,促进滨水旅游业发展有着一定的参考与示范价值。
论文共五章,第一章介绍本文的研究背景、研究目标、意义、内容、方法、思路及创新点。第二章回顾国内外滨水旅游开发的研究进展:对滨水旅游、滨水旅游整合开发的相关概念进行界定;总结滨水旅游整合开发依据及方法;并进行基础理论研究。第三章,构建了滨水旅游资源整合条件评价指标体系,运用“层次分析法”对评价体系中各指标权数分配问题进行思考;阐述了苏南研究区概况,并且基于整合条件评价模型对苏南地区34个滨水旅游区进行资源整合条件的定性与定量评价,发现苏南地区主要滨水旅游资源整合条件等级集中于Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ级,资源整合开发空间大。第四章,确立苏南滨水旅游整合开发的内容体系,提出苏南滨水旅游整合开发模式,苏南地区滨水旅游整合开发的举措。根据苏南地区滨水旅游资源整合条件的等级评定结果,提出苏南地区滨水旅游发展的“两带、三区”的空间格局。“两带”即苏南运河旅游带、苏南滨江旅游带;“三区”为环太湖旅游区、水乡古镇旅游区、千年古城风貌区。第五章,对论文的内容进行了总结和讨论,提出了未来进一步研究的方向。
With an innate preference for water, human beings have developed an intimate relationship with water ever since they were born. Waterfront areas, therefore, have a natural and lasting appeal to humankinds. Waterfront areas, where some tourism resources congregated, are usually cross-regionally located. This leads to the separate operation of tourism resources exploration, which in turn brings about the disorder in exploration, in competition and in management. The current appraisal system of tourism resources mainly deals with the current situation of tourism resources and less attention is paid to their integration conditions. This costs the scientific foundation of the cooperative exploration and the competitiveness of integrated tourism resources. Therefore, it's necessary to conduct an in-depth research on how to evaluate the integration conditions of waterfront tourism resources.
To investigate the integration conditions is prerequisite to the integration and exploration of waterfront tourism resources. The key to the integration and exploration of waterfront tourism is to evaluate waterfront tourism resources scientifically. The analysis and evaluation of the integration conditions in waterfront areas and the research on the exploration mode as well as on the spectrum of tourism products of waterfront tourism are good for suitable use of waterfront tourism resources. It is also of vital significance, theoretical and practical, for promoting the harmonious and sustained development in terms of tourism resources, economy, environment and society, at the same time, it acts as a reference with demonstration value with regard to the exploration of our country's waterfront tourism resources and the promotion of waterfront tourism development.
As a typical example of waterside town, the South of Jiangsu Province is rich in tourism resources of qualities and quantities because it boasts many sites of the waterfront landscape. This thesis takes the South of Jiangsu Province as a study case and it is expected that this thesis has referential and demonstrative value for scientifically integrating and exploring the waterfront tourism resources of China and for accelerating the development of waterfront tourism
This thesis comprises five chapters. The first chapter reviews the research background and introduces the goal, significance, content and methods of the research. Chapter 2 reviews the research progress and defines the concepts of waterfront tourism, tourism integration and some other relevant terms. After that, this thesis summarizes the categories of integrated development and its categorical methods and undertakes the research of some basic theories.
Chapter 3 builds models correspondingly to analyze every influential factor. Then the index system for the integration conditions of waterfront tourism resources is constructed. "Principal Component Analysis" is used to confirm the index. Theoretical explanation is given in reconsidering the distribution of weighting factors to discuss the general conditions of the South of Jiangsu Province. Then, quantitative evaluation is used in appraising the integration conditions of 34 waterfront tourism attractions in the South of Jiangsu Province on the basis of qualitative research. The conclusion is that there is much room for the integration and exploration of the waterfront tourism resources because the integration conditions are rated mainly at the levels of I , II, III.
Chapter 4 establishes the content system of and puts forward the mode and measures for integrating and exploring the waterfront resources of the South of Jiangsu Province. According to the result of integration appraisal, the waterfront tourism of the South of Jiangsu Province takes the spatial pattern of "Two Belts" and "Three Areas". "Two Belts" are the Cannel Tourism Belt and the Yangzi River Tourism Belt of the South of Jiangsu Province; "Three Areas" are the Tai Lake Rim Area, the Riverside Town Area and the Ancient City Area.
The last chapter reaches the conclusion after discussing of the paper's content and proposes the direction of future research.
滨水旅游资源整合条件是开展滨水旅游整合开发活动的基础,科学地评价滨水旅游资源整合条件是滨水旅游整合开发的关键。对滨水旅游资源的整合条件作分析评价,对该地区滨水旅游整合开发模式和产品体系进行研究,对促进区域滨水旅游资源整合、滨水产品开发、滨水旅游业的发展、以及滨水带资源、经济、环境和社会的协调、可持续发展等具有十分重要的理论和实践意义。
苏南地区作为水乡的典型代表,水域风光资源丰富,滨水区域内也都具有一定数量和价值的旅游资源,使本地区形成滨水旅游资源的富集区。本文以苏南地区为例,对科学整合开发我国滨水旅游资源,促进滨水旅游业发展有着一定的参考与示范价值。
论文共五章,第一章介绍本文的研究背景、研究目标、意义、内容、方法、思路及创新点。第二章回顾国内外滨水旅游开发的研究进展:对滨水旅游、滨水旅游整合开发的相关概念进行界定;总结滨水旅游整合开发依据及方法;并进行基础理论研究。第三章,构建了滨水旅游资源整合条件评价指标体系,运用“层次分析法”对评价体系中各指标权数分配问题进行思考;阐述了苏南研究区概况,并且基于整合条件评价模型对苏南地区34个滨水旅游区进行资源整合条件的定性与定量评价,发现苏南地区主要滨水旅游资源整合条件等级集中于Ⅰ,Ⅱ,Ⅲ级,资源整合开发空间大。第四章,确立苏南滨水旅游整合开发的内容体系,提出苏南滨水旅游整合开发模式,苏南地区滨水旅游整合开发的举措。根据苏南地区滨水旅游资源整合条件的等级评定结果,提出苏南地区滨水旅游发展的“两带、三区”的空间格局。“两带”即苏南运河旅游带、苏南滨江旅游带;“三区”为环太湖旅游区、水乡古镇旅游区、千年古城风貌区。第五章,对论文的内容进行了总结和讨论,提出了未来进一步研究的方向。
With an innate preference for water, human beings have developed an intimate relationship with water ever since they were born. Waterfront areas, therefore, have a natural and lasting appeal to humankinds. Waterfront areas, where some tourism resources congregated, are usually cross-regionally located. This leads to the separate operation of tourism resources exploration, which in turn brings about the disorder in exploration, in competition and in management. The current appraisal system of tourism resources mainly deals with the current situation of tourism resources and less attention is paid to their integration conditions. This costs the scientific foundation of the cooperative exploration and the competitiveness of integrated tourism resources. Therefore, it's necessary to conduct an in-depth research on how to evaluate the integration conditions of waterfront tourism resources.
To investigate the integration conditions is prerequisite to the integration and exploration of waterfront tourism resources. The key to the integration and exploration of waterfront tourism is to evaluate waterfront tourism resources scientifically. The analysis and evaluation of the integration conditions in waterfront areas and the research on the exploration mode as well as on the spectrum of tourism products of waterfront tourism are good for suitable use of waterfront tourism resources. It is also of vital significance, theoretical and practical, for promoting the harmonious and sustained development in terms of tourism resources, economy, environment and society, at the same time, it acts as a reference with demonstration value with regard to the exploration of our country's waterfront tourism resources and the promotion of waterfront tourism development.
As a typical example of waterside town, the South of Jiangsu Province is rich in tourism resources of qualities and quantities because it boasts many sites of the waterfront landscape. This thesis takes the South of Jiangsu Province as a study case and it is expected that this thesis has referential and demonstrative value for scientifically integrating and exploring the waterfront tourism resources of China and for accelerating the development of waterfront tourism
This thesis comprises five chapters. The first chapter reviews the research background and introduces the goal, significance, content and methods of the research. Chapter 2 reviews the research progress and defines the concepts of waterfront tourism, tourism integration and some other relevant terms. After that, this thesis summarizes the categories of integrated development and its categorical methods and undertakes the research of some basic theories.
Chapter 3 builds models correspondingly to analyze every influential factor. Then the index system for the integration conditions of waterfront tourism resources is constructed. "Principal Component Analysis" is used to confirm the index. Theoretical explanation is given in reconsidering the distribution of weighting factors to discuss the general conditions of the South of Jiangsu Province. Then, quantitative evaluation is used in appraising the integration conditions of 34 waterfront tourism attractions in the South of Jiangsu Province on the basis of qualitative research. The conclusion is that there is much room for the integration and exploration of the waterfront tourism resources because the integration conditions are rated mainly at the levels of I , II, III.
Chapter 4 establishes the content system of and puts forward the mode and measures for integrating and exploring the waterfront resources of the South of Jiangsu Province. According to the result of integration appraisal, the waterfront tourism of the South of Jiangsu Province takes the spatial pattern of "Two Belts" and "Three Areas". "Two Belts" are the Cannel Tourism Belt and the Yangzi River Tourism Belt of the South of Jiangsu Province; "Three Areas" are the Tai Lake Rim Area, the Riverside Town Area and the Ancient City Area.
The last chapter reaches the conclusion after discussing of the paper's content and proposes the direction of future research.
引文
[1]翁奕城.论城市滨水区的可持续性城市设计[J].新建筑,2000,(4):30-32.).
[2]王建国,吕志鹏.世界城市滨水区开发建设的历史进程及其经验[J].城市规划2001,25(7):43-46.
[3][16][17]吴必虎,贾佳.城市滨水区旅游·游憩功能开发研究--以武汉市为例[J]地理学与国土研究.222,(5):99-102.
[4]徐永键,介绍几本有关滨水区开发规划的专著阴.规划师,2000,16(3):16.
[5]曾茂蔚.城市滨水区景观规划设计研究[D].中央美术学院硕士毕业论文,2004.
[6]Danyll Kilina,Belnada Dodson.Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea:Functional Conflicts in Cape Town's Victoria and Alfred Wateffront[JI.Geoforum,1996,27(4):495-507.
[7]DavidL.A,Godron.ImPlementing urban waterfront redevelopment in an historic context:A case study of the Boston Naval ShiPyard[J].Ocean and Coastal Management,1999,42(10):901-931.
[8]Gearld H.Krausse.Tourism and waterfront assessing residential perception in Newport,Rhode Island,USA[J].Ocean and Coastal Management,1995,26(3):179-203.
[9]Brian Hoyle.Scale and sustainability the role of community groups in Canadian port-city waterfront change[J].Journal of Transport Geography,1999,26(1):65-78.
[10]Ann Breen,Dick Rigby.The New Waterfront[M].Thames and Hudson,1996.
[11]张庭伟.滨水地区的开发与规划[J].城市规划,1999,23(2):50-54.
[12]张,于志光,顾永清.城市滨水区景观设计初探[J].城市研究,1999,(2):24-23.
[13]徐永建,阎小培.北美城市滨水区开发经验及其中国的启示[J].经济地理,2000,36(5):681-686.
[14]吴俊勤,何梅.城市滨水空间规划模式探析[J].城市规划,2000,24(9):40-44.
[15]王建国,吕志鹏.世界城市滨水区开发建设的历史进程及其经验[J].城市规划,2001,25(7):43-46.
[18]梁王月琳,张捷,章锦河,李娜。城市滨水区休闲旅游产品开发研究--以苏州市沿江地区为例[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(10):43-46
[19]王景波.区域旅游整合开发研究[D]顾士学位论文,2003,6:5-7.
[20]郑耀星.区域旅游合作是旅游业持续发展的新路--制订《闽西南五市旅游合作发展规划纲要》的深层思考[J].福建师范大学学报(哲社版),1999,(2):29-32.
[21]唐俊雅.建立多元化的闽台区域旅游协作体系[J].世界地理研究,2002(1):55-57.
[22]刘学华,王绪传.深化川西山地旅游开发:基于空间竞争的分化与整合-以四川省九顶山自然风景区为例[J].四川师范大学学报(社科版)增刊,2005:146-147.
[23][24]刘战慧.韶关市旅游资源的整合开发与旅游业的深度发展[J].特区经济,2005,(1):49-51.
[25]杨培玉.城市旅游资源空间整合研究[J].海淀走读大学学报,2004,(4):65-69.
[26]杨效忠,陆林,张光生等.舟山群岛旅游资源空间结构研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004,(5):88-89.
[27]汪宇明.广西桂林旅游资源的可持续利用[J].自然资源学报,2002,(5):362-364.
[28]董观志,杨凤影.区域节庆旅游资源的整合模式研究[J].商场现代化,2005,(13):129-130.
[29]李亚兵,肖星.区域旅游产品结构优化设计研究--以甘肃省为例[J].旱区资源与环,2005,(4):130-133.
[30]董丽萍.南海市旅游市场定位[J].热带地理,2000,(4):302-303.
[31]王文丽.刘继生赤峰市旅游市场定位与营销策略研究[J].人文地理,2003,(3):66-67.
[32]郭英之.入境旅游客源市场与营销策略研究-以徐州市的入境旅游为例[J].商业研究,2002(11):32-34.
[33]陆建伟,沈晓艳.略论江南水乡古镇旅游市场中的旅游整合[J].市场周刊,2004,(7):30.
[34]朱龙.旅游景区市场营销策略探微[J].湛江海洋大学学报,2004,(4):52-55.
[35]周静.旅游企业的营销策略[J].特区经济,2005,(6):191-192.
[36]马莹.旅游市场营销趋势分析[J].山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报,2005,(2):69-71.
[37]李文兵.西狭文化旅游形象三重结构整合[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,(3):118-119.
[38]王凯.旅游开发中的“边界共生”现象及其区域整合机制[J].开发研究,2004(1):42-43。
[39]涂人猛.区域旅游理论研究[J].社会科学家,1994(5):86-88.
[40]黄其新.华中旅游圈的空间结构模式及发展战略研究[J].经济地理(增刊),2001,275-276.
[41]吴晋峰,包浩生.旅游系统的空间结构模式研究[J].地理科学,2002,(1):96-98.
[42]黄金火,吴必虎.区域旅游系统空间结构的模式与优化--以西安地区为例[J].地理科学 进展,2005,(1):116-125..
[43]郭康.构建我国最大的区域旅游协作系统一北方旅游协作区[J].地理学与国土研究,1995,(3):61-64.
[44]孙志刚等.武汉市大旅游圈网络建设研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,1997,6(3):208-210.
[45]马勇,董观志.武汉大旅游圈的构建与发展模式研究[J].经济地理,1996,(2):99-104.
[46]邓爱民,中国大城市旅游圈的构建与发展[J].财贸经济,2003,(12):26-28.
[47]张振国,贾铁飞.长江三角洲地区旅游圈的构建[J].人文地理,2005,(2):72-76.
[48]李并成.论丝绸之路沿线古城遗址旅游资源的开发[J].地理学与国土研究,1998,(4):52-54.
[49]贾铁飞,张振国.大上海旅游圈旅游资源配置研究[J].人文地理,2004,(5):89.
[50]魏垂沛,赵瑜.青藏铁路开展交通旅游问题的探讨[J].中国铁路,2005,(4):58-60
[51]张述林,罗光华.长江沿岸旅游联合开发研究[J].重庆师院学报(哲社版),2000,(1):73-78.
[52]黄震方,李芸,京勋.京杭大运河旅游产品体系的构建及其旅游开发-以京杭大运河江苏段为例[J].地域研究与开发,2000,19(1):70-72
[53]镇列评.汉口沿江滨水区亲水空间研究[J].华中建筑,2001,(3):32-36.
[54]Ann Breen,Dick Rigby.The New Waterfront[M].Thames and Hudson,1996.
[55]胡平.整合:长三角旅游的“共赢”之路[J].城市管理.2003(4》
[56]BarblerE.B.Economics,Natural-ResourcesScarcit velopment Conventional and Alternative[M].London:Earth-scan,1989.
[57]Ricardo,David.The Principles of Political Economy[M].Lon-don:J.M.Dent&Sons,1973.
[58]蔡宁,郭斌.从环境资源稀缺性到可持续发展:西方环境经济理论的发展变迁[J].经济科学,1996,(6).
[59]杨昌明,成金华,邵赤平.资源环境经济学[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2002.
[60]成金华,吴巧生.中国自然资源经济学研究综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(3):47-55.
[6l]谷树忠.资源经济学的学科性质、地位与思维[J]..资源科学,1998,20(1):16-22.
[62]马乃喜.我国生态旅游资源的评价问题[J].西北大学学报,1996,26(2):171-175.
[63]王勖成,邵敏.有限元法基本原理与数值方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988.
[2]王建国,吕志鹏.世界城市滨水区开发建设的历史进程及其经验[J].城市规划2001,25(7):43-46.
[3][16][17]吴必虎,贾佳.城市滨水区旅游·游憩功能开发研究--以武汉市为例[J]地理学与国土研究.222,(5):99-102.
[4]徐永键,介绍几本有关滨水区开发规划的专著阴.规划师,2000,16(3):16.
[5]曾茂蔚.城市滨水区景观规划设计研究[D].中央美术学院硕士毕业论文,2004.
[6]Danyll Kilina,Belnada Dodson.Between the Devil and the Deep Blue Sea:Functional Conflicts in Cape Town's Victoria and Alfred Wateffront[JI.Geoforum,1996,27(4):495-507.
[7]DavidL.A,Godron.ImPlementing urban waterfront redevelopment in an historic context:A case study of the Boston Naval ShiPyard[J].Ocean and Coastal Management,1999,42(10):901-931.
[8]Gearld H.Krausse.Tourism and waterfront assessing residential perception in Newport,Rhode Island,USA[J].Ocean and Coastal Management,1995,26(3):179-203.
[9]Brian Hoyle.Scale and sustainability the role of community groups in Canadian port-city waterfront change[J].Journal of Transport Geography,1999,26(1):65-78.
[10]Ann Breen,Dick Rigby.The New Waterfront[M].Thames and Hudson,1996.
[11]张庭伟.滨水地区的开发与规划[J].城市规划,1999,23(2):50-54.
[12]张,于志光,顾永清.城市滨水区景观设计初探[J].城市研究,1999,(2):24-23.
[13]徐永建,阎小培.北美城市滨水区开发经验及其中国的启示[J].经济地理,2000,36(5):681-686.
[14]吴俊勤,何梅.城市滨水空间规划模式探析[J].城市规划,2000,24(9):40-44.
[15]王建国,吕志鹏.世界城市滨水区开发建设的历史进程及其经验[J].城市规划,2001,25(7):43-46.
[18]梁王月琳,张捷,章锦河,李娜。城市滨水区休闲旅游产品开发研究--以苏州市沿江地区为例[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(10):43-46
[19]王景波.区域旅游整合开发研究[D]顾士学位论文,2003,6:5-7.
[20]郑耀星.区域旅游合作是旅游业持续发展的新路--制订《闽西南五市旅游合作发展规划纲要》的深层思考[J].福建师范大学学报(哲社版),1999,(2):29-32.
[21]唐俊雅.建立多元化的闽台区域旅游协作体系[J].世界地理研究,2002(1):55-57.
[22]刘学华,王绪传.深化川西山地旅游开发:基于空间竞争的分化与整合-以四川省九顶山自然风景区为例[J].四川师范大学学报(社科版)增刊,2005:146-147.
[23][24]刘战慧.韶关市旅游资源的整合开发与旅游业的深度发展[J].特区经济,2005,(1):49-51.
[25]杨培玉.城市旅游资源空间整合研究[J].海淀走读大学学报,2004,(4):65-69.
[26]杨效忠,陆林,张光生等.舟山群岛旅游资源空间结构研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2004,(5):88-89.
[27]汪宇明.广西桂林旅游资源的可持续利用[J].自然资源学报,2002,(5):362-364.
[28]董观志,杨凤影.区域节庆旅游资源的整合模式研究[J].商场现代化,2005,(13):129-130.
[29]李亚兵,肖星.区域旅游产品结构优化设计研究--以甘肃省为例[J].旱区资源与环,2005,(4):130-133.
[30]董丽萍.南海市旅游市场定位[J].热带地理,2000,(4):302-303.
[31]王文丽.刘继生赤峰市旅游市场定位与营销策略研究[J].人文地理,2003,(3):66-67.
[32]郭英之.入境旅游客源市场与营销策略研究-以徐州市的入境旅游为例[J].商业研究,2002(11):32-34.
[33]陆建伟,沈晓艳.略论江南水乡古镇旅游市场中的旅游整合[J].市场周刊,2004,(7):30.
[34]朱龙.旅游景区市场营销策略探微[J].湛江海洋大学学报,2004,(4):52-55.
[35]周静.旅游企业的营销策略[J].特区经济,2005,(6):191-192.
[36]马莹.旅游市场营销趋势分析[J].山东行政学院山东省经济管理干部学院学报,2005,(2):69-71.
[37]李文兵.西狭文化旅游形象三重结构整合[J].干旱区资源与环境,2004,(3):118-119.
[38]王凯.旅游开发中的“边界共生”现象及其区域整合机制[J].开发研究,2004(1):42-43。
[39]涂人猛.区域旅游理论研究[J].社会科学家,1994(5):86-88.
[40]黄其新.华中旅游圈的空间结构模式及发展战略研究[J].经济地理(增刊),2001,275-276.
[41]吴晋峰,包浩生.旅游系统的空间结构模式研究[J].地理科学,2002,(1):96-98.
[42]黄金火,吴必虎.区域旅游系统空间结构的模式与优化--以西安地区为例[J].地理科学 进展,2005,(1):116-125..
[43]郭康.构建我国最大的区域旅游协作系统一北方旅游协作区[J].地理学与国土研究,1995,(3):61-64.
[44]孙志刚等.武汉市大旅游圈网络建设研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,1997,6(3):208-210.
[45]马勇,董观志.武汉大旅游圈的构建与发展模式研究[J].经济地理,1996,(2):99-104.
[46]邓爱民,中国大城市旅游圈的构建与发展[J].财贸经济,2003,(12):26-28.
[47]张振国,贾铁飞.长江三角洲地区旅游圈的构建[J].人文地理,2005,(2):72-76.
[48]李并成.论丝绸之路沿线古城遗址旅游资源的开发[J].地理学与国土研究,1998,(4):52-54.
[49]贾铁飞,张振国.大上海旅游圈旅游资源配置研究[J].人文地理,2004,(5):89.
[50]魏垂沛,赵瑜.青藏铁路开展交通旅游问题的探讨[J].中国铁路,2005,(4):58-60
[51]张述林,罗光华.长江沿岸旅游联合开发研究[J].重庆师院学报(哲社版),2000,(1):73-78.
[52]黄震方,李芸,京勋.京杭大运河旅游产品体系的构建及其旅游开发-以京杭大运河江苏段为例[J].地域研究与开发,2000,19(1):70-72
[53]镇列评.汉口沿江滨水区亲水空间研究[J].华中建筑,2001,(3):32-36.
[54]Ann Breen,Dick Rigby.The New Waterfront[M].Thames and Hudson,1996.
[55]胡平.整合:长三角旅游的“共赢”之路[J].城市管理.2003(4》
[56]BarblerE.B.Economics,Natural-ResourcesScarcit velopment Conventional and Alternative[M].London:Earth-scan,1989.
[57]Ricardo,David.The Principles of Political Economy[M].Lon-don:J.M.Dent&Sons,1973.
[58]蔡宁,郭斌.从环境资源稀缺性到可持续发展:西方环境经济理论的发展变迁[J].经济科学,1996,(6).
[59]杨昌明,成金华,邵赤平.资源环境经济学[M].武汉:湖北人民出版社,2002.
[60]成金华,吴巧生.中国自然资源经济学研究综述[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2004,(3):47-55.
[6l]谷树忠.资源经济学的学科性质、地位与思维[J]..资源科学,1998,20(1):16-22.
[62]马乃喜.我国生态旅游资源的评价问题[J].西北大学学报,1996,26(2):171-175.
[63]王勖成,邵敏.有限元法基本原理与数值方法[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1988.