对直拍反胶选手王皓、马琳有机和无机胶水条件技战术变化分析
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
直拍进攻型打法为我国的传统打法,为我国乒乓球的长盛不衰做出了突出贡献。随着该打法的不断创新,并创造性的引入了直拍横打技术,中国乒乓球队又培养出马琳、王皓两位世界顶尖选手。由于国际乒联宣布于2008年9月1日起,全面实行无机胶水,而无机胶水对击球的力量、速度、旋转均会产生较大影响,因此势必会对运动员技战术产生影响。所以,加深直拍选手在使用无机胶水情况下技战术变化的研究,已经成为一项急需解决的任务。文章的目的就是通过对马琳、王皓在使用有机胶水和无机胶水条件下技战术的使用情况进行统计和分析,总结出一些规律性问题,为马琳与王皓更快的适应无机胶水,而延续自身的运动辉煌提供科学的理论与参考依据。文章通过文献资料法、录像观察法、数理统计法、对比分析法以及逻辑分析法,就马琳、王皓使用无机胶水之前和之后的比赛进行深入的剖析和研究,并得出以下结论:
     1.使用无机胶水后,王皓的三段得分率都超过使用有机胶水时期,即使用无机胶水后,王皓的整体水平全面上升。综合胜负局可以看出,在胜局上,使用无机胶水比使用有机胶水从总体得分率上略有提高,在相持段上相对明显。再负局上,使用无机胶水后的接抢段得分率相对于使用有机胶水有明显提高,在接抢段和相持段上虽都有下降,但未产生明显的差距。
     2.王皓使用无机和有机胶水在发球轮上最大的区别在于,使用无机胶水,第一、三、五板以成为王皓一个稳定的得分链,由于这条得分链的存在,使得无机时代,王皓的整个发球轮的优势十分明显,而使用有机胶水,王皓发球轮中,除了发球以外,其余各项技术的表现都有起伏,从而导致整个发球轮都并不稳定。在接球轮王皓第二、八板及之后的整体能力都有一定的下降,但第四板整体实力提升较多。第六板的整体实力略有提高。
     3.使用无机胶水之后,马琳三段使用率略向相持转移,但得分率均处于全面下滑趋势,接抢段最为明显。
     4.马琳使用无机和有机胶水在发球轮上最大的区别在于,使用无机胶水后马琳的发球的威胁有所增加,第三、五板的威胁总体有所下降,第七板之后整体实力基本不受影响。接球轮中,实行无机胶水之后,马琳第二、四板都呈现出下降的趋势,第六、八板是其劣势,得分都低于失分,使用率增加,但是得分能力下降。
Pen-hold attacking style is traditional in China, making great contribution to the flourishing of our table tennis. With reverse pen-hold backhand being creatively introduced into this kind of playing, Chinese table tennis team has natured two world's top players, Ma Lin and Wang Hao. International Table Tennis Federation announced that inorganic glue must be put into comprehensive use on September 1st 2008. Inorganic glue can exert a profound influence on strength, speed and spin of stroke, which would influence players' technical and tactical performance. So, it becomes an emergent task to deepen the researches on technical and tactical changes with the use of inorganic glue. Set against this background, the article makes a technical and tactical analysis of Ma Lin and Wang Hao using organic and inorganic glue through methods like video observation, mathematical statistics and logical analysis etc. It aims at finding the patterns and features of the changes of tactics and moves with the use of inorganic glue, providing scientific theories and references for quicker adaptation to inorganic glue and for continuity of the glorious achievement in terms of sport. The results presented in this paper indicate that
     1) After the application of inorganic glue, the focus of Wang Hao's competition transferred, on the whole, to the final four. The using rate of serving stage and sustained-rally stage declined, the receiving stage raised, and the scoring rate also increased on the whole. In sets won, the whole scoring rate was higher than that in the era of organic glue, with the sustained-rally stage being the most outstanding. In sets lost, the scoring rate of receiving stage increases and that of serving stage and sustained-rally stage declined, although no obvious differences emerged.
     2) After the application of inorganic glue, on the first, third and fifth strokes of Wang Hao's service, he brought his skill into full play with the obvious advantage which had become a stable score point and also a remarkable feature differentiating that in the era of organic glue. In opponent's service, the focus was on the second and fourth strokes. His overall level and capacity declined on the second and eighth strokes whereas his comprehensive techniques increased on the fourth and sixth strokes, especially the fourth one. In sets won, the core of the competition transferred to the former six strokes. His scoring abilities declined on the second, eighth strokes and later time, especially the second one, but increased obviously on the fourth stroke. In sets lost, his scoring abilities increased on the second stroke but declined on the sixth, eighth strokes and later time, especially the sixth one. And his stability declined on the fourth strokes.
     3) After using inorganic glue, Ma Lin had longer sustained rally. However, the scoring rate in the stage of attack after serve, attack on serve and sustained rally declined; among them the decline in attack on serve stage was most obvious. In sets won, the using rate of attack after serve, attack on serve and sustained rally had slight variation; but the scoring rates in attack on serve declined while the scoring rates increased in the sustained-rally stage. In sets lost, the using rate of attack after serve and the scoring rate remained about the same; both rates declined to some extend in the attack on serve stage; as for sustained-rally stage, the using rate increased but the scoring rate dropped further.
     4) After the application of inorganic glue, in Ma Lin's service, the threat from his serving to the opponent increased in general but declined on the third and fifth strokes His techniques was not affected since the seventh stroke. In sets won, the threat from his serving declined, his scoring abilities increased on the third and fifth strokes and the ability to protracting with his opponent declined since the seventh stroke. In opponent's service, there was a downtrend of Ma Lin's overall capability on the second and fourth strokes. And he was reduced to inferiority since the sixth stroke with increasing using rate and decreasing scoring rate.
引文
[1]米多多.你好.无机元年[J]乒乓世界.2007(11).:107.
    [2]苏丕仁论直拍快攻打法.北京体育大学学报1996-1-76
    [3]蔡振华.直拍进攻型打法之我见.乒乓世界1999—10—2t1
    [4]赵霞.我国直拍进攻型打法的现状和未来.
    [5]吴敬平发球抢攻新体系与接发球“一体化”.乒乓世界2002—2—32
    [6]苏丕任.论直拍快攻打法(续完).北京体育大学学报.1996.6
    [7]兰彤.我国直拍反胶打法及创新.武汉体育学院学报.2008.8
    8 吴焕群李振彪乒乓球运动员技术诊断方法的研究.乒乓世界.990—2—38
    [9]中央电视台播出的录像.2009.5.5
    [1].吴焕群秦志峰张晓蓬.为中国队准备25届奥运会科研攻关的成果及效益.北京:乒坛竞技科学诊断.
    [2].苏王仁.乒乓球教学与训练.北京:人民体育出版社1995.
    [3].蔡振华.蔡振华同志在2002年全国乒乓球工作会议上的发言.天津:2002.
    [4].蔡振华.直拍进攻型打法之我见.乒乓世界:1999(9)—28,(10升24.
    [5].苏丕仁.论直拍快攻打法.北京体育大学学报.19%(1)—76,(2)—86.
    [6].吴敬平.直拍反胶训练法.乒乓世界:2000(7)—28,(8)—28,(9)—26,(10)—25.
    [7].吴敬平.发球抢攻新体系与接发球“一体化”.乒乓世界:2002(2)—32.
    [8].吴敬平.“直板横打”怎么练.乒乓世界:2001(3)32,(4)—34.
    [9].吴敬平.直板反胶怎么练.乒乓世界:2002(7)—30,(8)—32.
    [10].尹霄.直拍:横打化生存?.乒乓世界:2002(10)—54
    [11].尹霄.直拍反面进攻单个技术的动作要领与运用.乒乓世界:1992(3)—42
    [12].张晓蓬.1992—2002直拍横打十年志.乒乓世界:2002(10)—52
    [13].许绍发.不能把直板正胶打入冷宫.中国乒乓网:2003
    [14].唐建军.第43届世乒赛中国及欧洲优秀男双选手技术分析.北京体育大学学报.1997(2)—85
    [15].张辉.直拍反面拉弧圈球技术的运动学分析.北京体育大学学报:1998(1)—“
    [16].李惠芬(译).金泽沫步法解析.乒乓世界:2001(12)—30
    [17].李惠芬.马林推挡和直板横打技术解析.乒乓世界:2002(8)—34
    [18].麻志刚.对直拍正胶快攻打法创新发思考[J].南京体育学院学报,2004,(2)
    [19]于庆川,金晓辉.对乒乓球直拍快攻技术改进之看法[J].南都学坛,1998,(3)
    [20].李江,姜仁屏.关于加强直拍快攻打法的思考[J].哈尔滨体育学院学报,2001,(1)
    [21].王书明.论直拍反打[J].中国体育科技,1998,(7)
    [22].吴焕群,朱先敢.论直拍反胶快攻打法的可行性[J].天津体育学院学报,2001,(1)
    [23]唐成.乒乓球创新技术——直拍反打[J].山东体育学院学报,1995,(4)
    [24].李今亮,苏不仁.对部分世界优秀男子乒乓球进攻型技术实力的评估[J]
    [25]K.基一冯.对韩国竞技运动体制利弊的分析[J].国外体育科技,1997,3:29—32.
    [26]张博.对直拍快攻打法可持续发展的研究[J].沈阳体育学院学报,2003,3:97-99.
    [20]张晓蓬.柳承敏:韩国特色反手技术[J].乒乓世界,2003,11:60-61.
    [21]张小玲.对乒乓球先发制人的技术:“前三板”的认识与操作[J].浙江体育科学,2002,3:38-41.
    [22]吴敬平.直拍反胶怎么练正手拉球(上)[J].乒乓世界,2002,7:30-31.
    [23]吴敬平.直拍反胶怎么练正手拉球(中)[J].乒乓世界,2002,8:32-33.
    [24]吴敬平.直拍反胶怎么练正手拉球(下)[J].乒乓世界,2002,9:29.
    [25]吴敬平.发球抢攻体系与接发球“一体化”:关于11分制新发球规则的思考[J].乒乓世界,2002,2:32-33.
    [26]王吉生.乒乓球拍拍柄形状与击球用力[J].文体用品与科技,2001,4:26-27.
    [27]李惠芬.马琳的发球抢攻技术[J].乒乓世界,2003,6:54-55.
    [28]尹霄等.新时代制胜十大秘诀[J].乒乓世界,2004,6:60-63.
    [29]张秋芬.第47届世界乒乓球锦标赛男团决赛击球落点分析[J].中国体育科技.2004(6):64—66.
    [30]宿磊.浅谈乒乓球直拍反胶打法的训练[J].内蒙古体育科技,2004,2,40—46.
    [31]房杰.乒乓球技术五大要素及现状的研究[J].中国体育教练员,2004,4,30—31。
    [32]黄诚.乒乓球直拍横打攻弧圈球技术动作的运动参数[J].体育科研(上海),2004,5,38-41.
    [33]杨杰峰.中国乒乓球运动的创新与发展[J].辽宁体育科技,2004,6,12—13.
    [34]宋绍兴.我国乒乓球理论发展现状研究[J].中国体育科技,2004,5,79—80.
    [35]唐建军,苏丕仁.中国乒乓球技术体系构建的科学认识及操作过程[J].体育科学.2001.(6):38—40.
    [36]绍斌.大赛前高水平运动员心理压力的成因研究[J].上海体育学院学报,2003(3):49—53.
    [37]张力为.赛前情绪生活满意感及注意指向的相关[J].北京体育大学学报,2003(3):53—55.
    [38]陈玉霞.竞技运动心理学发展研究[J].北京体育大学学报,2003,3,328—330.
    [39]庄则栋.庄则栋平乒乓球手法打“三段法”[J].乒乓世界,2003(12):45.
    [40]李慧芬.马琳推挡和直拍横打技术解析[J].乒乓世界,2002,8,34—35.
    [41]吴焕群.论直拍反胶快攻打法的可行性[M].乒乓长盛的训练学探索,340-348.
    [42]戴临中.实行新规则后对乒乓球基础训练的思考[J].体育科学,2005,25(7):84—86.
    [43]马为民等.对波尔乒乓球技战术发展趋势的评析[J].北京体育大学学报,2006(29):692—694.
    [44]唐建军.乒乓球技术学习:理论解释与实际运用[J].北京体育大学学报,2006(29):259—261.
    [45]Techeng Wu等.举国体制下中国乒乓球对成功的秘诀分析[J].体育科研,2005(26):44—48.
    [46]张辉等.球类比赛数学模拟竞技诊断的理论与实践—以乒乓球比赛分析位例[J].体育科学,2005(25):39—44.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700