绿盲蝽与秋季蒿类寄主的化学通讯机制
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
1997年,我国开始商业化种植转Bt基因棉花,有效控制了棉铃虫Helicoverpa armigera(Hübner)等主要鳞翅目害虫的危害,但随之棉田化学农药使用量大幅度减少。棉田害虫地位发生了一系列演替,绿盲蝽Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür)种群发生数量剧增,危害加重,成为了Bt棉花上一类重要的害虫,并波及了枣树、葡萄等其他多种作物。本文对秋季绿盲蝽成虫在不同植物上的种群消长动态及其与蒿类寄主植物的化学通讯机制进行了全面研究,主要研究结果如下:
     秋季不同植物上绿盲蝽成虫的种群密度明显不同。在连续3年研究的119种植物中,秋季绿盲蝽成虫在艾蒿、野艾蒿、猪毛蒿、黄花蒿和藿香上的种群数量显著高于其他114种植物,此时这5种寄主植物均处于盛花期。进一步对菊科蒿类的艾蒿、野艾蒿和黄花蒿上绿盲蝽成虫在不同季节的寄主选择偏好行为研究发现,绿盲蝽成虫对三种蒿类寄主不同生育期的选择偏好性有明显差异,显著偏好花期的艾蒿、野艾蒿和黄花蒿,此时三种蒿类寄主上绿盲蝽成虫的种群密度和其对绿盲蝽成虫的相对吸引力均显著高于非花期。
     室内行为测定中,花期的艾蒿、野艾蒿和黄花蒿对绿盲蝽成虫的吸引性均显著强于非花期植物和对照。通过GC-EAD测试结合GC-MS分析与鉴定,发现花期三种蒿类寄主植物挥发物中能引起绿盲蝽雌雄成虫触角电生理反应的活性物质均为顺-3-己烯醇、间二甲苯、丙烯酸丁酯、丙酸丁酯、丁酸丁酯和乙酸顺式-3-己烯酯。同时,Y型嗅觉仪研究表明间二甲苯、丙烯酸丁酯、丙酸丁酯和丁酸丁酯对绿盲蝽雌雄成虫具有显著的吸引作用。田间粘板和桶型诱捕器诱捕效果研究表明,间二甲苯、丙烯酸丁酯、丙酸丁酯和丁酸丁酯对绿盲蝽雌雄成虫的诱捕作用与对照相比均差异显著。此外,桶型诱捕器研究也表明,4种活性组分中的任何一种对绿盲蝽雌虫和雄虫的诱捕效果间不存在显著差异。两种诱捕方式对比研究表明桶型诱捕器更加适用于绿盲蝽的田间诱捕。
     利用GC-EAD与GC-MS进一步比较分析发现,绿盲蝽早春寄主植物(枣树、葡萄、蚕豆和茼蒿)和夏季寄主植物(向日葵、葎草、罗勒和藿香)挥发物组分中分析鉴定出的绿盲蝽雌雄成虫具有电生理反应的活性物质与秋季三种蒿类寄主中分析鉴定出的活性物质基本相同。因此,秋季三种蒿类寄主中的活性物质在早春和夏季绿盲蝽寄主选择过程中同样起着关键的作用。
     在田间评价的186种活性物质类似物中,共有17种对绿盲蝽成虫具有较好的诱捕效果,分别是α-法呢烯、α-葎草烯、α-蒎烯、丁酸乙酯、丙酸异丁酯、丙烯酸己酯、莰醇、3-环己烯-1-甲醇、(-)-4-萜品醇、壬醛、癸醛、3,4-二甲基苯乙酮、3-丙基甲苯、十四烷、左旋樟脑、(±)-樟脑和D-樟脑。
     秋季绿盲蝽成虫在不同植物上种群消长动态的明确为解析多食性绿盲蝽的季节性寄主植物利用模式,以及构建绿盲蝽的环境友好型的综合治理策略等提供了重要的理论基础。同时,绿盲蝽与秋季三种蒿类寄主的化学通讯机制以及秋季三种蒿类寄主中的活性物质在早春和夏季绿盲蝽寄主选择过程中作用的研究为全面解析绿盲蝽与其寄主植物的互作关系,阐明绿盲蝽季节性寄主转换的内在机理,研发绿盲蝽的行为调控措施提供了重要的理论依据。
Since1997, wide-scale adoption of transgenic Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis) cotton has effectivelycontrolled the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), and subsequent reduction of insecticidesprays in Bt cotton has caused Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür)(Hemiptera: Miridae) to be major insectpest on Bt cotton in China. Additionally, this species has become a key pest of Chinese dates, grapesand other crops. In this study, we conduct comprehensive field trials on population abundance of A.lucorum adults on different plant species in autumn during2010-2012, and study the chemicalcommunication mechanism betwwen A. lucorum and its fall host plants of Artemisia spp. The mainresults were summarized as follows.
     Population density of A. lucorum adults on different plant species shows obviously difference inautumn. During2010-2012, among119plant species tested, population density of A. lucorum adults onflowering Artemisia argyi Lévl. et Vant., Artemisia lavandulaefolia DC., Artemisia scoparia Waldst. etKit., Artemisia annua L. and Agastache rugosus (Fisch. et Meyer) O. kuntze. was markedly higher thanother many plant species in autumn. Further study on host preference of A. lucorum adults on threewide-distribution Artemisia spp.(A. argyi, A. lavandulaefolia, and A. annua) during different seasonsindicated that A. lucorum adults more prefer to three flowering Artemisia species over non-floweingperiods, and the average density of A. lucorum adults and standard attraction of three Artemisia speciesat flowering periods for this pest are extraordinary higher than non-flowering periods.
     In Y-tube olfactometer bioassays, The results indicated that A. lucorum adults significantly morepreferred to the direction of the olfactometer where flowering plants of three Artemisia species werepresent compared to control or non-flowering plants. Coupled gaschromatography-electroantennography (GC-EAD) revealed the presence of totally sixelectrophysiologically active volatile compounds from flowering plants of three Artemisia species.These were identified by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) as (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol,m-xylene, butyl acrylate, butyl propionate, butyl butyrate and (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate. However, A.lucorum of both sexes only exhibited a significantly behavioral response to m-xylene, butyl acrylate,butyl propionate, butyl butyrate. Furthermore, the results obtained from sticky traps and bucket-shapedtraps showed that m-xylene, butyl acrylate, butyl propionate and butyl butyrate captured more A.lucorum adults than control in the field during2011-2012. Moreover, the bucket-shaped traps alsorevealed that the trap effect of each volatile was no difference in gender. In addition, the comparativestudy of two trap pattern found that bucket-shaped traps may be more appropriate for field attraction ofA. lucorum adults.
     Additionally, by use of GC-EAD and GC-MS, further study indicated that, active compoundsidentified from early-season host plants (Ziziphus jujuba Mill., Vitis vinifera L., Vicia faba L. andChrysanthemum coronarium L.) and summer host plants (Helianthus annuus L., Humulus scandens(Lour.) Merr., Ocimum basilicum L. and Agastache rugosus (Fisch. et Meyer) O. kuntze.) that can elicit female and male A. lucorum adults electroantennogram (EAG) responses were basically the same asthose identified from three flowering Artemisia plant species. Therefore, active compounds emittedfrom autumn Artemisia spp. play an important role in the host location of A. lucorum for early-seasonand summer host plants.
     Among186plant volatiles evaluated in the field in2011, there are totally17plant volatiles displaybetter trap effect to A. lucorum adults, that are α-farnesene, α-humulene, α-pinene, ethyl butyrate,propionic acid isobutyl ester, hexyl acrylate, borneol,3-cyclohexene-1-methanol,(-)-terpinen-4-ol,nonanal, decanal,3,4-dimethylacetophenone,3-propyltoluene, tetradecane,(1S)-(-)-camphor,(±)-camphor and (+)-camphor.
     Our results provide groundwork for analysing the patterns of host plant use of polyphagous insectpest such as A. lucorum, and construction of integrated pest management of this pest. Additionally,research on chemical communication mechanism between A. lucorum and its fall host plants ofArtemisia spp., as well as function of active compounds emitted from autumn Artemisia spp. play in thehost location of A. lucorum for early-season and summer host plants shed light on overall analysing therelationship between A. lucorum and its hosts, clarification of host switching of A. lucorum duringdifferent seasons, and the development of environmentally sound and sustainable management tactics ofthis polyphagous mirid bug.
引文
1.蔡晓明,孙晓玲,董文霞,陈宗懋.2008.虫害诱导植物挥发物(HIPVs):从诱导到生态功能.生态学报,28:3969~3980.
    2.曹赤阳,万长寿.1983.棉盲蝽的防治.上海科学技术出版社.
    3.陈展册,苏丽,戈峰,苏建伟.2010.绿盲蝽对性信息素类似物和植物挥发物的触角电位反应.昆虫学报,53:47~54.
    4.戴建青,韩诗畴,杜家纬.2010.植物挥发性信息化学物质在昆虫寄主选择行为中的作用.环境昆虫学报,32:407~414.
    5.丁红建,吴才宏,郭予元.1995.棉铃虫成虫对寄主植物挥发性它感信息物的嗅觉行为研究[A].植物病虫害生物学研究进展[C].北京:中国农业科技出版社,163~167.
    6.董吉卫.2012.寄主植物花对绿盲蝽种群发生的调控作用.[硕士学位论文].江苏:扬州大学.
    7.杜家纬.2001.植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制.植物生理学报,27:193~200.
    8.杜永均,严福顺.1994.植物挥发性次生物质在植食性昆虫、寄主植物和昆虫天敌关系中的作用机理.昆虫学报,37:233~249.
    9.樊慧,金幼菊,李继泉,陈华君.2004.引诱植食性昆虫的植物挥发性信息化合物的研究进展.北京林业大学学报,26:76~81.
    10.冯成玉,李昌华.1990.盲蝽象寄主转移及种群动态调查初探.昆虫知识,27:210~212.
    11.耿辉辉.2012.绿盲蝽对绿豆的偏好选择行为机制.[硕士学位论文].江苏:扬州大学.
    12.耿辉辉,陆宴辉,杨益众.2012.绿盲蝽成虫的田间活动规律.应用昆虫学报,49:601~604.
    13.李欣,白素芬.2003.寄主植物-植食性昆虫-天敌三重营养关系中化学生态学的研究进展.河南农业大学学报,37:224~232.
    14.李耀发,党志红,高占林,王吉强,袁立兵,申妍妍,袁文龙,潘文亮.2009.河北省沧州棉区绿盲蝽在不同寄主上的动态分布.植物保护,35:118~121.
    15.陆宴辉,吴孔明.2008.棉花盲椿象及其防治[M].北京:金盾出版社.
    16.陆宴辉.2008.盲蝽蟓生态适应性研究.[博士学位论文].北京:中国农业科学院.
    17.陆宴辉,吴孔明,蔡晓明,刘仰青.2008.利用四季豆饲养盲蝽的方法.植物保护学报,35:215~219.
    18.娄永根,程家安.2000.虫害诱导的植物挥发物:基本特性、生态学功能及释放机制.生态学报,20:1079~1106.
    19.孟祥玲,韩运发.1957.常见八种棉盲蝽的识别.昆虫知识,3:73~79.
    20.莫圣书,赵冬香,陈青.2007.植物挥发物与昆虫行为关系研究进展.热带农业科学,26:84~89.
    21.穆丹,付建玉,刘守安,韩宝瑜.2010.虫害诱导的植物挥发物代谢调控机制研究进展.生态学报,30:4221~4233.
    22.吴国强,肖留斌,谭永安,孙洋,柏立新.2012.绿盲蝽成虫对六种寄主及其挥发物的选择趋势.应用昆虫学报,49:641~647.
    23.徐德良.1993.绿盲蝽发生规律及防治.昆虫知识,30:82~84.
    24.严善春,张丹丹,迟德富.2003.植物挥发性物质对昆虫作用的研究进展.应用生态学报,14:310~313.
    25.于惠林,张永军,孙国军,郭予元,高希武.2006.棉铃虫天敌中红侧沟茧蜂Microplitismediator对不同处理棉花的趋性行为反应.应用与环境生物学报,12:809~813.
    26.于惠林,张永军,潘文亮,郭予元,高希武.2007.田间条件下不同诱导棉花挥发性物质的鉴定.应用生态学报,18:859~864.
    27.张涛.2011.绿盲蝽(Apolygus lucorum)性信息素的提取鉴定及应用研究.[博士学位论文].北京:中国农业科学院.
    28.张治.1989.绿盲蝽产卵习性及其在测报上的应用.昆虫知识,26:84~86.
    29.朱弘复,孟祥玲.1958.三种棉盲蝽的研究.昆虫学报,8:97~117.
    30. Agerbirk N, Chew F S, Olsen C E, J rgensen K.2010. Leaf and floral parts feeding by orange tipbutterfly larvae depends on larval position but not on glucosinolate profile or nitrogen level.Journal of Chemical Ecology,36:1335~1345.
    31. Alborn H T, Turlings T C J, Jones T H, Stenhagen G, Loughrin J H, Tumlinson J H.1997. Anelicitor of plant volatiles from beet armyworm oral secretion. Science,276:945~949.
    32. Al-Munshi D M, Scott D R, Smith H W.1982. Some host plant effects on Lygus hesperus(Hemiptera: Miridae). Journal of Economic Entomology,75:813~815.
    33. Assad M T.2002. Inheritance of resistance to the Russian wheat aphid in an Iranian durum wheatline. Plant Breeding,121:180~181.
    34. Barbosa P, Martinet P, Waldvogel M.1986. Development, fecundity and survival of the herbivoreLymantria dispar and the number of plant species in its diet. Ecological Entomology,11:1~6.
    35. Barman A K, Parajulee M N, Carroll S C.2010. Relative preference of Lygus hesperus (Hemiptera:Miridae) to selected host plants in the field. Insect Science,17:542~548.
    36. Bech R.1965. Licht-und Farbreaktionen der Lygus-Arten. Biol. Zentbl.,84:635~640.
    37. Behmer S T, Joern A.1993. Diet choice by a grass-feeding grasshopper based on the need for alimiting nutrient. Functional Ecology,7:522~527.
    38. Behmer S T, Simpson S J, Raubenheimer D.2002. Herbivore foraging in chemicallyheterogeneous environments: nutrients and secondary metabolites. Ecology,83:2489~2501.
    39. Bernays E A, Bright K L.1993. Mechanisms of dietary mixing in grasshoppers: a review.Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology,104:125~131.
    40. Bernays E A, Bright K L, Gonzalez N, Angel J.1994. Dietary mixing in a generalist herbivore:tests of two hypotheses. Ecology,75:1997~2006.
    41. Bernays E A, Angel J E, Augner M.1997. Foraging by a generalist grasshopper: the distancebetween food resources influences diet mixing and growth rate (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Journal ofInsect Behavior,10:829~840
    42. Berner D, Blanckenhorn W U, Korner C.2005. Grasshoppers cope with low host plant quality bycompensatory feeding and food selection: N limitation challenged. Oikos,111:525~533.
    43. Birkett M A, Bruce T J A, Martin J L, Smart L E, Oakley J, Wadhams L J.2004. Responses offemale orange wheat blossom midge, Sitodiplosis mosellana, to wheat panicle volatiles. Journal ofChemical Ecology,30:1319~1328.
    44. Blackmer J L, Byrne D N.1993a. Flight behaviour of Bemisia tabaci in a vertical flight chamber:effect of time of day, sex, age and host quality. Physiological Entomology,18:223~232.
    45. Blackmer J L, Byrne D N.1993b. Environmental and physiological factors influencing phototacticflight of Bemisia tabaci. Physiological Entomology,18:336~342.
    46. Blackmer J L, Ca as L A.2005. Visual cues enhance the response of Lygus hesperus (Heteroptera:Miridae) to volatiles from host plants. Environmental Entomology,34:1524~1533.
    47. Blight M M, Pickett J A, Smith M C, Wadhams L J.1984. An aggregation pheromone of Sitonalineatus-identification and initial field studies. Naturwissenschaften,71:480~480.
    48. Blight M M, Lemetayer M, Delegue M H P, Pickett J A, Marionpoll F, Wadhams L J.1997.Identification of floral volatiles involved in recognition of oilseed rape flowers, Brassica napus byhoneybees, Apis mellifera. Journal of Chemical Ecology,23:1715~1727.
    49. Boness M.1963. Biologisch-ok logische Untersuchungen an Exolygus Wagner (Heteroptera,Miridae)(ein Beitrag zur Agra kologie). Z. Wiss. Zool.,168:376~420.
    50. Bouwmeester H J, Verstappen F W A, Posthumus M A, Dicke M.1999. Spider mite-induced (3S)-(E)-nerolidol synthase activity in cucumber and lima bean. The first dedicated step in acyclicC11-homoterpene biosynthesis. Plant Physiology,121:173~180.
    51. Bruce T J A, Wadhams L J, Woodcock C M.2005. Insect host location: a volatile situation. Trendsin Plant Science,10:269~274.
    52. Cardinale B J, Harvey C T, Gross K, Ives A R.2003. Biodiversity and biocontrol: emergentimpacts of a multi-enemy assemblage on pest suppression and crop yield in an agroecosystem.Ecology Letters,6:857~865.
    53. Carroll M J, Schmelz E A, Meagher R L.2006. Attraction of Spodoptera frugiperda larvae tovolatiles from herbivore-damaged maize seedlings. Journal of Chemical Ecology,32:1911~1924.
    54. Chen H H, Zhao Y X, Kang L.2004. Comparison of the olfactory sensitivity of two sympatricsteppe grasshopper species (Orthoptera: Acrididae) to plant volatile compounds. Science in ChinaSeries C-Life Sciences,47:115~123.
    55. Chenier J V R, Philogene B J R.1989. Field responses of certain forest coleoptera to conifermonoterpenes and ethanol. Journal of Chemical Ecology,15:1729~1746.
    56. Colazza S, Mcelfresh J S, Millar J G.2004. Identification of volatile synomones, induced byNezara viridula feeding and oviposition on bean spp., that attract the egg parasitoid Trissolcusbasalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology,30:945~964.
    57. Coombe P E.1982. Visual behaviour of the greenhouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum.Physiological Entomology,7:243~251.
    58. De Moraes C M, Lewis W J, Paré P W, Alborn H T, Tumlinson J H.1998. Herbivore-infestedplants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature,393:570~573.
    59. Dicke M, Baldwin I T.2010. The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles:beyond the ‘cry for help’. Trends in Plant Science,15:167~175.
    60. Dixon A F G.1998. Aphid Ecology. London, UK: Chapman&Hall.
    61. Dixon A F G.1987. The way of life of aphids: host specificity, speciation and distribution. InAphids. Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Vol. A (A. K. Minks and P. Harrewijn eds.).Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp.197~207.
    62. Drosopoulos S.1977. Biosystematic studies on the Muellerianella complex (Dephacidae,Homoptera, Auchenorrhyncha). Mededelingen Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen,77~14,1~133.
    63. Du J W.2000. Current and future prospects for insect behavior modify infochemicals in China.Agric. Chem. Biotech.,43:222~229.
    64. Duan J J, Prokopy R J.1994. Apple maggot fly response to red sphere traps in relation to fly ageand experience. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,73:279~287.
    65. Dudareva N, Negre F, Nagegowda D A, Orlova I.2006. Plant volatiles: Recent advances andfuture perspectives. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences,25:417~440.
    66. Fein B L, Reissig W H, Roelofs W L.1982. Identification of apple volatiles attractive to the applemaggot, Rhagoletis pomonella. Journal of Chemical Ecology,8:1473~1487.
    67. Fleischer S J, Gaylor M J.1987. seasonal abundance of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae)and selected predators in early season uncultivated hosts: Implications for managing movementinto cotton. Environmental Entomology,16:379~389.
    68. Fleischer S J, Gaylor M J, Hue N V.1988. Dispersal of Lygus lineolaris (Heteroptera: Miridae)adults through cotton following nursery host destruction. Environmental Entomology,17:533~541.
    69. Franzke A, Unsicker S B, Specht J, K hler G, Weisser W W.2010. Being a generalist herbivore ina diverse world: how do diets from different grasslands influence food plant selection and fitnessof the grasshopper Chorthippus parallelus? Ecological Entomology,35:126~138.
    70. Freeland W J, Janzen D H.1974. Strategies in herbivory by mammals, the role of plant secondarycompounds. American Naturalist,108:269~289.
    71. Grant G G, Ryall K L, Lyons D B, Abou-Zaid M M.2010. Differential response of male andfemale emerald ash borers (Col., Buperstidae) to (Z)-3-hexenol and manuka oil. Journal of AppliedEntomology,134:26~33.
    72. Griffiths D W, Robertson G W, Shepherd T, Ramsay G.1999. Epicuticular waxes and volatilesfrom faba bean (Vicia faba) flowers. Phytochemistry,52:607~612.
    73. Gu S H, Wang S Y, Zhang X Y, Ji P, Liu J T, Wang G R, Wu K M, Guo Y Y, Zhou J J, Zhang Y J.2012. Functional characterizations of chemosensory proteins of the alfalfa plant bug Adelphocorislineolatus indicate their involvement in host recognition. PLoS ONE,7: e42871.
    74. Haegele B F, Rowell-Rahier M.1999. Dietary mixing in three generalist herbivores: nutrientcomplementation or toxin dilution? Oecologia,119:521~533.
    75. Halitschke R, Kessler A, Kahl J, Lorenz A, Baldwin I T.2000. Ecophysiological comparison ofdirect and indirect defenses in Nicotiana attenuata. Oecologia,124:408~417.
    76. Heath R R, Landolt P J, Dueben R.1992. Identification of floral compounds in night-bloomingjassemine attractive to cabbage looper moths. Environmental Entomology,21:854~859.
    77. Hedin P A, McKibben G H, Mitchell E B, Johnson W L.1979. Identification and field evaluationof the compounds comprising the sex pheromone of the female boll weevil. Journal of ChemicalEcology,5:617-627.
    78. Hibbard B E, Randolph T L, Bemkdau E J.1997. Electroantennogram active components of maizesilk for the western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Environmental Entomology,42:285~295.
    79. Hildebrand D F, Brown G C, Jackson D M, Hamiltonkemp T R.1993. Effects of Someleaf-emitted volatile compounds on aphid population increase. Journal of Chemical Ecology,19:1875~1887.
    80. Hirota T, Kato Y.1999. Influence of visual stimuli on host location in the butterfly, Euremahecabe. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,101:199~206.
    81. Huang C H, Yan F M, Byers J A, Wang R J, Xu C R.2009. Volatiles induced by the larvae of theAsian corn borer (Ostrinia furnacalis) in maize plants affect behavior of conspecific larvae andfemale adults. Insect Science,16:311~320.
    82. Ishikawa Y, Matsumoto Y, Tsutsumi M, Mitsui Y.1984. Mixture of2-phenylethanol and n-valericacid, a new attractant for the onion and seed-corn flies, Hylemya antiqua and H. platura (Diptera:Anthomyiidae). Applied Entomology and Zoology,19:448~455.
    83. Ishiwari H, Suzuki T, Maeda T.2007. Essential compounds in herbivore-induced plant volatilesthat attract the predatory mite Neoseiulus womersleyi. Journal of Chemical Ecology,33:1670~1681.
    84. Johnson M W, Stinner R E, Rabb R L.1975. Ovipositional response of Heliothis zea (Boddie) toits major hosts in North Carolina. Environmental Entomology,4:291~297.
    85. J nsson M.2005. Responses to oilseed rape and cotton volatiles in insect herbivores andparasitoids. PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
    86. Jones W A Jr., Brewer F D.1987. Suitability of various host plant seeds and artificial diets forrearing Nezara viridula (L.). Journal of Agricultural Entomology,4:223~232.
    87. Kennedy G G, Storer N P.2000. Life systems of polyphagous arthropod pests in temporallyunstable cropping systems. Annual Review of Entomology,45:467~493.
    88. Kessler D, Diezel C, Baldwin I T.2010. Changing pollinators as a means of escaping herbivores.Current Biology,20:237~242.
    89. Kester K M, Smith C M.1984. Effect of diet on growth, fecundity and duration of tethered flightof Nezara viridula. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,35:75~81.
    90. Kundu R, Dixon A F G.1995. Evolution of complex life cycles in aphids. Journal of AnimalEcology,64:245~255.
    91. Landis B J, Fox L.1972. Lygus bugs in eastern Washington: Color preference and winter activity.Environmental Entomology,1:464~465.
    92. Layton M B.2000. Biology and damage of the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris, in cotton.Southwest Entomology,23:7~20.
    93. Lee K P, Behmer S T, Simpson S J, Raubenheimer D.2002. A geometric analysis of nutrientregulation in the generalist caterpillar Spodoptera littoralis (Boisduval). Journal of InsectPhysiology,48:655~665.
    94. Lee K P, Raubenheimer D, Simpson S J.2004. The effects of nutritional imbalance oncompensatory feeding for cellulosemediated dietary dilution in a generalist caterpillar.Physiological Entomology,29:108~117.
    95. Liu Z D, Scheirs J, Heckel D G.2010. Host plant flowering increases both adult ovipositionpreference and larval performance of a generalist herbivore. Environmental Entomology,39:552~560.
    96. Lombaert E, Boll R, Lapchin L.2006. Dispersal strategies of phytophagous insects at a local scale:adaptive potential of aphids in an agricultural environment. BMC Evolutionary Biology,6:75.
    97. Lopes O J, Link D, Basso I V.1974. Pentatomídeos de Santa Maria-lista preliminar de plantashospedeiras. Rev. Cent.Ciênc. Rurais,4:317~322.
    98. Lu Y H, Wu K M, Guo Y Y.2007. Flight potential of the green plant bug, Lygus lucorumMeyer-Dür (Heteroptera: Miridae). Environmental Entomology,36:1007~1013.
    99. Lu Y H, Qiu F, Feng H Q, Li H B, Yang Z C, Wyckhuys K A G, Wu K M.2008. Speciescomposition and seasonal abundance of pestiferous plant bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cottonin China. Crop Protection,27:465~472.
    100. Lu Y H, Wu K M, Wyckhuys K A G, Guo Y Y.2009. Potential of mungbean, Vigna radiatus as atrap crop for managing Apolygus lucorum (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton. Crop Protection,28:77~81.
    101. Lu Y H, Wu K M, Jiang Y Y, Xia B, Li P, Feng H Q, Wyckhuys K A G, Guo Y Y.2010a. Miridbug outbreaks in multiple crops correlated with wide-scale adoption of Bt cotton in China. Science,328:1151~1154.
    102. Lu Y H, Wu K M, Wyckhuys K A G, Guo Y Y.2010b. Overwintering hosts of Apolygus lucorum(Hemiptera: Miridae) in northern China. Crop Protection,29:1026~1033.
    103. Lu Y H, Wu K M.2011. Mirid bugs in China: pest status and management strategies. Outlooks onPest Management,22:248~252.
    104. Lu Y H, Jiao Z B, Wu K M.2012. Early-season host plants of Apolygus lucorum (Heteroptera:Miridae) in northern China. Journal of Economic Entomology,105:1603~1611.
    105. Lucas-Barbosa D, van Loon J J A, Dicke M.2011. The effects of herbivore-induced plant volatileson interactions between plants and flower-visiting insects. Phytochemistry,72:1647~1654.
    106. Ma R, Reese J C, Black W C, Bramel-Cox P.1990. Detection of pectinesterase andpolygalacturonase from salivary secretions of living greenbugs, Schizaphis graminum (Homoptera:Aphididae). Journal of Insect Physiology,36:507~512.
    107. Marsh K J, Wallis I R, Andrew R L, Foley W J.2006. The detoxification limitation hypothesis:where did it come from and where is it going? Journal of Chemical Ecology,32:1247~1266.
    108. Matsui K, Kurishita S, Hisamitsu A, Kajiwara T.2000. A lipid-hydrolysing activity involved inhexenal formation. Biochemical Society Transactions,28:857~860.
    109. Matsui K.2006. Green leaf volatiles: hydroperoxide lyase pathway of oxylipin etabolism. CurrentOpinion in Plant Biology,9:274~280.
    110. Mattiacci L, Dicke M, Posthumus M A.1995. β-glucosidase: an elicitor of herbivore-induced plantodor that attracts host-searching parasitic wasps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesof the United States of America,92:2036~2040.
    111. Mayer M S, Mankin R W, Lemire G F.1984. Quantitation of the insect electroantennogram:measurement of sensillar contributions, elimination of background potentials, and relationship toolfactory sensation. Journal of Insect Physiology,30:757~763.
    112. Mazzi D, Dorn S.2012. Movement of insect pests in agricultural landscapes. Annals of AppliedBiology,160:97~113.
    113. McPherson R M, Newsom L D.1984. Trap crops for control of stink bugs in soybean. J. Ga.Entomol. Soc.19:470~480.
    114. Mitchell E R, Tingle F C, Heath R R.1990. Ovipostional responses of three Heliothis species(Lepidoptrea: Noctuidae) to alleochemicals from cultivated and wild host plants. Journal ofChemical Ecology,16:1817~1827.
    115. Miura K, Ohsaki N.2004. Diet mixing and its effect on polyphagous grasshopper nymphs.Ecological Research,19:269~274.
    116. Miura K, Ohsaki N.2006. Examination of the food processes on mixed inferior host plants in apolyphagous grasshopper. Population Ecology,48:239~243.
    117. Mody K, Unsicker S B, Linsenmair K E.2007. Fitness related diet-mixing by intraspecifichost-plant-switching of specialist insect herbivores. Ecology,88:1012~1020.
    118. Moericke V.1969. Host plant specific colour behaviour by Hyalopterus pruni (Aphididae).Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,12:524~534.
    119. Molina G A, Trumper E V.2012. Selection of soybean pods by the stink bugs, Nezara viridula andPiezodorus guildinii. Journal of Insect Science,12:1~16.
    120. Mueller A J, Stern V M.1974. Timing of pesticide treatments on safflower to prevent Lygus fromdispersing to cotton. Journal of Economic Entomology,67:77~80.
    121. Müller C B, Williams I S, Hardie J.2001. The role of nutrition, crowding and interspecificinteractions in the development of winged aphids. Ecological Entomology,26:330~340.
    122. Murai T, Imai T, Maekawa M.2000. Methyl anthranilate as an attractant for two thrips species andthe thrips parasitoid Ceranisus menes. Journal of Chemical Ecology,26:2557~2565.
    123. Natale D, Mattiacci L, Hern A, Pasqualini E, Dorn S.2003. Response of female Cydia molesta(Lepidoptera:Tortricidae)to plant derived volatiles. Bulletin of Entomological Research,93:335~342.
    124. NIST2005. NIST mass spectral search for the NIST/EPA/NIH mass spectral library version2.0.Office of the Standard Reference Data Base, National Institute of Standards and Technology,Gaithersburg, Maryland.
    125. Nojima S, Linn C, Morris B, Zhang A J, Roelofs W.2003. Identification of host fruit volatilesfrom hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) attractive to hawthorn-origin Rhagoletis pomonella flies. Journalof Chemical Ecology,29:321~336.
    126. Painter R H.1929. The tarnished plant bug Lygus pratensis L.: A progress report.16thAnnu.Rep.Entomol. Soc. Ont.,102~107.
    127. Pang H S, Lu Y H, Wyckhuys K A G.2013a. Summer host plants of the polyphagous mirid bugApolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür)(Hemiptera: Miridae) in China.(under review)
    128. Pan H S, Lu Y H, Wyckhuys K A G. Wu K M.2013b. Preference of a polyphagous mirid bug,Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür) for flowering host plants. PLoS ONE,(accepted)
    129. Panizzi A R, Slansky F Jr.1985. Review of phytophagous pentatomids (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae)associated with soybean in the Americas. Florida Entomologist,68:184~214.
    130. Panizzi A R.1997. Wild hosts of pentatomids: ecological significance and role in their pest statuson crops. Annual Review of Entomology,42:99~122.
    131. Papaj D R, Prokopy R J.1989. Ecological and evolutionary aspects of learning in phytophagousinsects. Annual Review of Entomology,34:315~350.
    132. Paré P W, Tumlinson J H.1997. De novo biosynthesis of volatiles induced by insect herbivory incotton plants. Plant Physiology,114:1161~1167.
    133. Paré P W, Tumlinson J H.1999. Plant volatiles as a defense against insect herbivores. PlantPhysiology,121:325~331.
    134. Powell G, Hardie J.2001. The chemical ecology of aphid host alternation: How do return migrantsfind the primary host plant? Applied Entomology and Zoology,36:259~267.
    135. Powell G, Tosh C R, Hardie J.2006. Host plant selection by aphids: behavioral, evolutionary, andapplied perspectives. Annual Review of Entomology,51:309~330.
    136. Prokopy R J, Adams R G, Hauschild K I.1979. Visual responses of tarnished bug adults on apple.Environmental Entomology,8:202~205.
    137. Prokopy R J, Johnson S A, OpBrien M T.1990. Second-stage integrated management of applearthropod pests. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,54:9~19.
    138. Pulliam H R.1975. Diet optimization with nutrient constraints. American Naturalist,109:765~768.
    139. Quiroz A, Pettersson J, Pickett J A, Wadhams L J, Niemeyer H M.1997. Semiochemicalsmediating spacing behaviour of bird cherry-oat aphid, Rhopalosi phumpadi feeding on cereals.Journal of Chemical Ecology,23:2599~2607.
    140. R mert B, Hellqvist S, Ekbom B, Banks J E.2001. Assessment of trap crops for Lygus spp. inlettuce. International Journal of Pest Management,47:273~276.
    141. Rapport D J.1980. Optimal foraging for complementary resources. American Naturalist,116:324~346
    142. Reisenman C E, Riffell J A, Bernays E A, Hildebrand J G.2010. Antagonistic effects of floralscent in an insect-plant interaction. Proc. R. Soc. Lond.277:2371~2379.
    143. Riley D G, Ciomperlik M A.1997. Regional population dynamics of whitefly (Homoptera:Aleyrodidae) and associated parasitoids (Hymenoptera: Aphelinidae). Environmental Entomology,26:1049~1055.
    144. Rizzo H F E.1971. Aspectos morfológicosy biológicos de Edessa meditabunda (F.)(Hemiptera,Pentatomidae). Rev. Peruana. Entomol.14:272~281.
    145. Rojas J C, Wyatt T D.1999. Role of visual cues and interaction with host odour during thehost-finding behaviour of the cabbage moth. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,91:59~65.
    146. Rull J, Prokopy R J.2003. Trap position and fruit presence affect visual responses of apple maggotflies (Dipt., Tephritidae) to different trap types. Journal of Applied Entomology,127:85~90.
    147. Rull J, Prokopy R J.2005. Interaction between natural and synthetic fruit odor influences responseof apple maggot flies to visual traps. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,114:79~86.
    148. SAS Institute.2005. SAS/STAT user’s guide. SAS Institute.
    149. Scherer C, Kolb G.1987. Behavioral experiments on the visual processing of color stimuli inPieris brassicae L.(Lepidoptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology A,160:645~656.
    150. Schmelz E A, Alborn H T, Tumlinson J H.2001. The influence of intact-plant and excised-leafbioassay designs on volicitin-and jasmonic acid-induced sesquiterpene volatile release in Zea mays.Planta,214:171~179.
    151. Schoohoven L M, Jermy T, Van Loon J J A.1998. Insect-plant Biology: from Physiology toEvolution. Cambridge: University Press,136~138.
    152. Schoonhoven L M, van Loon J J A, Dicke M.2005. Insect-Plant Biology. Oxford University Press,Oxford.
    153. Schumann F W, Todd J W.1982. Population dynamics of southern green stink bug (Heteroptera:Pentatomidae) in relation to soybean phenology. Journal of Economic Entomology,75:748~753.
    154. Sevacherian V, Stern V M.1975. Movements of lygus bugs between alfalfa and cotton.Environmental Entomology,4:163~165.
    155. Shulaev V, Silverman P, Raskin I.1997. Airborne signalling by methyl salicylate in plant pathogenresistance. Nature,385:718~721.
    156. Simpson C L, Chyb S, Simpson S J.1990. Changes in chemoreceptor sensitivity in relation todietary selection by adult Locusta migratoria. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,56:259~268.
    157. Singer M S, Bernays E A, Carriere Y.2002. The interplay between nutrient balancing and toxindilution in foraging by a generalist insect herbivore. Animal Behavior,64:629~643.
    158. Slansky F. Jr., Panizzi A R.1988. Nutritional ecology of seed-sucking insects, pp.283~319. In F.Slansky, Jr., and J. G. Rodriguez [eds.], Nutritional ecology of insects, mites, spiders and relatedinvertebrates. Wiley, New York.
    159. Smallegange R C, van Loon J J A, Blatt S E, Harvey J A, Agerbirk N, Dicke M.2007. Flower vs.leaf feeding by Pieris brassicae: Glucosinolate-rich flower tissues are preferred and sustain highergrowth rate. Journal of Chemical Ecology,33:1831~1844.
    160. Spiteller D, Boland W.2003. N-(17-acyloxy-acyl)-glutamines: novel surfactants from oralsecretions of lepidopteran larvae. The Journal of Organic Chemistry,68:8743~8749.
    161. Stockoff B A.1993. Ontogenetic change in dietary selection for protein and lipid by gypsy mothlarvae. Journal of Insect Physiology,39:677~686.
    162. Stoyenoff J L, Witter J A, Montgomery M E, Chilcote C A.1994. Effects of host switching ongypsy moth (Lymantria dispar (L.)) under field conditions. Oecologia,97:143~157.
    163. Suckling D M, Karg G, Gibb A R, Bradley S J.1996. Electroantennogram and ovipositionresponses of Epiphyas postvittana (Lepidoptera: Torticidae) to plant volatiles. New ZealandJournal of Crop and Horticultural Science,24:323~333.
    164. Sudbrink D L Jr., Grant J F.1995. Wild host plants of Helicoverpa zea and Heliothis virescens(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in eastern Tennessee. Environmental Entomology,24:1080~1085.
    165. Takeuchi M, Kjshikawa H, Tamura M.2005. Host use in relation to food availability and larvaldevelopment in the specialist herbivore Epilachna admirabilis (Coleoptera: Coccinelidae). AppliedEntomology and Zoology,40:177~184.
    166. Tasin M, Backman A C, Coracini M, Casado D, Ioriatti C, Witzgall P.2007. Synergism andredundancy in a plant volatile blend attracting grapevine moth females. Phytochemistry,68:203~209.
    167. Teulon D A J, Hollister B, Butler R D, Cameron A.1999. Colour and odour responses of flyingwestern flower thrips: wind tunnel and greenhouse experiments. Entomologia Experimentalis etApplicata,93:9~19.
    168. Tillman P, Northfield T D, Mizell R F, Riddle T C.2009. Spatiotemporal patterns and dispersal ofstink bugs (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) in peanut-cotton farmscapes. Environmental Entomology,38:1038~1052.
    169. Todd J W, Herzog D C.1980. Sampling phytophagous Pentatomidae in soybean. In SamplingMethods in Soybean Entomology, ed. M Kogan, DC Herzog,1:438~78. New York:Springer-Verlag.587pp.
    170. Todd J W.1989. Ecology and behavior of Nezara viridula. Annual Review of Entomology,34:273~292.
    171. Tuttle A F, Ferro D N, Idoine K.1988. Role of visual and olfactory stimuli in host finding of adultcabbage root flies, Delia radicum. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,47:37~44.
    172. Unsicker S B, Oswald A, K hler G, Weisser W W.2008. Complementarity effects through dietarymixing enhance the performance of a generalist insect herbivore. Oecologia,156:313~324.
    173. Velasco L R I, Walter G H.1992. Availability of different host plant species and the changingabundance of the polyphagous bug Nezara viridula L.(Pentatomidae, Hemiptera). EnvironmentalEntomology,21:751~759.
    174. Velasco L R I, Walter G H.1993. Potential of host-switching in Nezara viridula (Hemiptera:Pentatomidae) to enhance survival and reproduction. Environmental Entomology,22:326~333.
    175. Visser J H.1986. Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annual Review of Entomology,31:121~144.
    176. W ckers F L, Romeis J, van Rijn P.2007. Nectar and pollen feeding by insect herbivores andimplications for multitrophic interactions. Annual Review of Entomology,52:301~323.
    177. Wallbank B E, Wheatley G A.1979. Some responses of cabbage root fly to allyl isothiocyanateand other volatile constituents of crucifers. Annals of Applied Biology,91:1~12.
    178. Webster B, Bruce T, Dufour S, Birkemeyer C, Birkett M, Hardie J, Pickett J.2008. Identificationof volatile compounds used in host location by the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Journal ofChemical Ecology,34:1153~1161.
    179. Wee S, El-Sayed A M, Gibb A R, Mitchell V, Suckling D M.2008. Behavioural andelectrophysiological responses of Pantomorus cervinus (Boheman)(Coleoptera: Curculionidae) tohost plant volatiles. Australia Journal of Entomology,47:24~31.
    180. Wei, J N, Zhu J W, Kang L.2006. Volatiles released from bean plants in response to agromyzidflies. Planta,224:279~287.
    181. Wheeler Jr. A G.2001. Biology of the Plant Bugs (Hemiptera: Miridae). Cornell University Press,Ithaca, NY.
    182. Williams III L, Blackmer J L, Rodriguez-Saona C, Zhu S.2010. Plant volatiles influenceelectrophysiological and behavioral responses of Lygus hesperus. Journal of Chemical Ecology,36:467~478.
    183. Wood D L.1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection andcolonization behavior of bark beetles. Annual Review of Entomology,27:411-446.
    184. Wu K M, Li W, Feng H Q, Guo Y Y.2002. Seasonal abundance of the mirids, Lygus lucorum andAdelphocoris spp.(Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton in northern China. Crop Protection,21:997~1002.
    185. Wu K M, Guo Y Y, Lv N, Greenplate J T, Deaton R.2003. Efficacy of transgenic cotton containinga cry1Ac gene from Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae)in northern China. Journal of Economic Entomology,96:1322~1328.
    186. Wynde F J H, Port G R.2012. The use of olfactory and visual cues in host choice by the capsidbugs Lygus rugulipennis Poppius and Liocoris tripustulatus Fabricius. PloS one,7: e46448.
    187. Yin H D, Huang C H, Xue K, Wang R J, Yan F M.2006. Roles of insect salivary components ininsect-plant interactions. Acta Entomologica Sinica,49:843~849.
    188. Yu H L, Zhang Y J, Wyckhuys K A G, Wu K M, Gao X W, Guo Y Y.2010. Electrophysiologicaland behavioral responses of Microplitis mediator (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) tocaterpillar-induced volatiles from cotton. Environmental Entomology,39:600~609.
    189. Zhao Y X, Kang L.2002. Role of plant volatiles in host plant location of the leafminer, Liriomyzasativae (Diptera: Agromyzidae). Physiology Entomology,27:103-111.
    190. Zohren E.1968. Laboruntersuchungen zu Massenanzucht, Lebensweise, Eiablage undEiablageverhalten der Kohlfliege, Chortophila brassicae (Bouché)(Diptera: Anthomyiidae).Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie,62:139~188.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700