IL-1β诱导肾小管上皮细胞转分化及其与细胞骨架的关系
|
摘要
肾小管间质纤维化(RIF)是多种原发和继发慢性肾脏疾病(包括慢性移植肾肾病)发展至终末期的共同表现。肾小管上皮细胞进行上皮-间充质转分化(epithelial- mesenchymal transition,EMT)形成肌成纤维细胞是RIF形成的重要原因之一。其中TGF-β1是RIF的核心作用因子,TGF-β1始动并调节肾小管上皮细胞发生EMT的全过程。IL-1β在RIF过程中亦有十分重要的作用。我们以永生化的正常大鼠肾小管上皮细胞株NRK52E细胞为研究对象,发现IL-1β和TGF-β1均可诱导NRK52E细胞发生转分化,并在促转分化的不同环节上存在一些异同之处,二者在整个EMT过程中所表现的相互作用以协同效应为主。最后我们发现,微丝解聚本身可在一定程度上抑制EMT的发生,并对IL-1β的促转分化作用具有复杂影响,对TGF-β1的促转分化作用具有抑制作用。上述结果丰富了肾小管上皮细胞转分化的理论基础并为RIF的治疗提供了理论依据。
Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis(RIF)is a common performance to end-stage renal failure occurring after a variety of primary and secondary chronic kidney disease (including chronic allograft nephropathy), is also the most important indicator to prognosis and the severity of renal function decline. As to the mechanism, now the excessive accumulation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is considered to be one of the main reasons leading to RIF. Myofibroblasts (MyoFb) located in renal interstitium are the main source of ECM, its quantity is considered to be the best indicator to renal prognosis. As to the sources of MyoFb, now epithelial- mesenchymal transition(EMT) is thought to be one main source.
Many factors can cause renal tubular epithelial cells undergo EMT, including injury, inflammation, a variety of cytokines act solo or in synergy,etc. TGF-β1 is found to be the most powerful factor leading to RIF, it is involved in all process of RIF. In recent years, numerous studies found that TGF-β1 initiates and regulates the whole process of EMT. IL-1βis a pro-inflammatory factor heavy secreted by macrophages who infiltrating in renal interstitium when RIF. IL-1βis participated in interstitial inflammation and fibrosis via various pathways. Even if some studies reports that IL-1βcan induce EMT on renal tubular epithelial cells, the results are different, the researches on the cytoskeleton are even rarer. As known,IL-1βand TGF-β1 are cytokines that have extensive functions, and effects on contrary at many times, in RIF, their expressions are significantly increased, although it has reported that both IL-1βand TGF-β1 could induce TECs undergoing EMT respectively in different degree, there potential interaction in the process of EMT still have not been reported.
Cytoskeleton is constituted by microfilament, microtubule and intermediate filament. Microfilaments and microtubules are able to polymerizate/ depolymerizate rapidly under different stimulations inside and outside the cells, thus educe its biological role and participate in cell signal transduction. In the process of EMT, microfilaments can be reorganized, on the contrary, as microfilaments depolymerize, its effects on EMT induced by IL-1βand TGF-β1 respectively have not been reported at present.
Objective Firstly, using TGF-β1 and IL-1βeffected on NRK52E cells respectively, observed and compared their effects on cell morphology, phenotypes of transition and cytoskeletons, analyzed the the similarities and differences in various links of EMT. Secondly, using TGF-β1 and IL-1βcombined effected on NRK52E cells,the aim was to observe the interaction between the factors in different sectors of the induction of EMT. Finally, we used cytochalasin B to damage microfilaments, aimed to observe its effects on EMT induced by IL-1βor TGF-β1 respectively. All of above works were aimed to enrich the theoretical basis of EMT on renal tubular epithelial cells and provide the theoretical basis for the therapy of RIF.
Methods and Results
1 The effects of TGF-β1 and IL-1βin EMT on NRK52E cells respectively Groups: (1) TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of TGF-β1was 10 ng / ml, control group: equal volume of 0.1M PBS; (2) IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of IL-1βwas 30 ng / ml, control group: equal volume of 0.1M PBS. Cultured continuously for 72h after divided into groups, then undertook the following experiments respectively, methods and results were as follows:
1.1 Morphology changes
Cells in control group showed typical cobblestone-like appearance all the time, the engagement between cells was tight. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h, cells were confluenced,the cells in the center were showed short spindle appearance, the cells in the edges were showed long spindle appearance, radial alignment. Under high power microscope, there were many protrusions of varying lengths in the cells edge. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h, cells were mainly changed in long spindle, some cells have several long processes, anchoring on or wrapping in the surrounding cells, the phenomen of cell processes overlapped and acrossed were common.
1.2 The mRNA expression of phenotype markers in NRK52E cells
RT-PCR results showed, after induced by TGF-β1 and IL-1βfor 72h, the mRNA expression of E-cadherin who was the marker of epithelial cells was significantly reduced; the mRNA expressions ofα-SMA and FN who were the markers of mesenchymal cells were significantly increased, suggested that TGF-β1 and IL-1βhad respectively induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT. Unexpectedly, TGF-β1 and IL-1βalso could increase the mRNA expression of desmoplakin-1 (DPI) who was another epithelial cell marker, the mechanism remained unclear.
1.3 The expression and distribution proteins of phenotype markers in NRK52E cells
The immunocytochemical staining showed, E-cadherin positive staining intensity was middle in control group, smoothly、linearly and uniformly distributed in the cell membrane. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h, E-cadherin protein expression was significantly reduced and interruptedly distributed in the cell membrane. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h, E-cadherin in the membrane was discontinuous distribution, the intensity of dyeing was increased in some area. Immunofluorescence staining showed, there was a weak positive staining about DPI protein, diffuse distribution in cell plasma. After induced by TGF-β1 and IL-1βfor 72h respectively, the fluorescence intensity of DPI was significantly increased, mainly clustered around the nucleus.
Immunofluorescence staining also showed,α-SMA and FN staining were weak positive in control group, dispersed in the cytoplasm. After induced by TGF-β1 and IL-1βfor 72h respectively, the expressions of the both were significantly increased, showed strong positive staining and mainly gathered around the nucleus. The results of immunostaining were consistent with RT-PCR, further confirmed that TGF-β1 and IL-1βhad induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT.
1.4β-actin andα-tubulin mRNA expressions and protein distribution and arrangement in NRK52E cells
RT-PCR results showed, TGF-β1 could increase the expression ofβ-actin mRNA, but had no significant effects onα-tubulin mRNA, while IL-1βcould increase the expression ofα-tubulin mRNA, had no impaction onβ-actin mRNA.
Immunofluorescence staining showed that: (1)β-actin positive staining mainly accumulated below the cell membrane in control group. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h,β-actin positive staining formed a large number of thick bundles of fiber-like structures in cytoplasm. the majority were arranged parallel to cell long axis. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h,β-actin positive staining formed filamentous fiber-like structures in the cytoplasm and cell processes and were arranged parallel to cell long axis.(2)α-tubulin positive fibers formed the microtubule organizing center in one side of the nucleus in control cells, and used it as the central, the fibers showed radial distribution reached the membrane. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h,α-tubulin positive fibers in some cells changed from the radial distribution into arrangement parallel to cell long axis. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h,α-tubulin positive fibers increased in most cells, changed from the radial alignment into bundles, parallelled to cell long axis. The results above showed that after induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT, IL-1βand TGF-β1 also could affect the distribution and arrangement of cytoskeletons, TGF-β1 focused on affecting microfilament, while IL-1βfocused on affecting microtubules. 2 The EMT induced by IL-1βand TGF-β1 combinedly on NRK52E cells Groups:①c ontrol group: 0.1 MPBS (instead of IL-1βor TGF-β1)②IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of IL-1βwas 30 ng / ml③TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of TGF-β1was 10 ng / ml④combinedly induced group: the final concentration of IL-1βand TGF-β1 was 30 ng / ml and 10 ng / ml respectively.
Cultured continuously for 48h after divided into groups, then undertook the following experiments respectively, methods and results were as follows:
2.1 Morphology changes
Control group, IL-1βand TGF-βalone induced group the cell morphologys were similar to which induced for 72h. After induced by the both the cells morpholology changes were similar with induced group of IL-1βalone.
2.2 The mRNA expression of phenotype markers: E-cadherin,α-SMA and FN
RT-PCR results showed, the mRNA expression of E-cadherin was the most strong in the control group, decreased slightly in IL-1βinduced group, completely disappeared in TGF-β1 induced group and the combinated induced group. The mRNA expressions ofα-SMA and FN were the most in the combinated induced group, significantly more than IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group. Demonstrated that IL-1βand TGF-β1 had synergistic effects on inducing NRK52E cells undergo EMT.
2.3β-actin andα-tubulin mRNA expressions and protein distribution and arrangement in NRK52E cells
RT-PCR results showed, the mRNA expression ofβ-actin in the combinedly induced group was significantly higher than IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group, the mRNA expression ofα-tubulin in the combinedly induced group was same with IL-1βalone induced group, higher than TGF-β1 induced group, suggested that the both factors had synergistic effect onβ-actin mRNA expression but had no synergistic effect on theα-tubulin mRNA expression. Immunofluorescence staining results showed,β-actin andα-tubulin positive staining, distribution and arrangement in control group, IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group were similar with which was induced for 72h. The distribution and arrangement ofβ-actin in combinedly induced group were similar with which in TGF-β1 alone induced group, The distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin in combinedly induced group were similar with which in IL-1βalone induced group. These results suggested, after IL-1βand TGF-β1 combinedly induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT, there was no obvious antagonism on the distribution and arrangement of the cytoskeleton.
2.4 Changes to cell adhesion and migration
When cells were after cultured for 48h, CCK-8 test and cell scratch were used to assay the cell adhesion in Matrigel gel and cell migration respectively. The results showed: after inoculation for 2h, cell adhesion was the highest in the control group, secondly in IL-1βinduced group and TGF-β1 induced group, lowest in the combinedly inducted group. The results indicated that after IL-1βand TGF-β1 induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT respectively, IL-1βand TGF-β1 also could reduce the ability to cell adhesion, the both factor had synergistic effect.
The relative migration distance was same in control group and IL-1βinduced group, significant increased in TGF-β1 induced group and combinedly induced group, but there was no difference in the last two groups. Suggested that on cell migration IL-1βhad no significant effect, while TGF-β1 had significantly stimulated effect, the two combined application had no obvious antagonism.
3. The effect of microfilament depolymerization on IL-1βand TGF-β1 induced EMT in NRK52E cells
Groups:①control group: 0.1 MPBS (instead of IL-1βor TGF-β1).
②CB alone group: the final concentration of CB was 0.2μg/ml.
③IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of IL-1βwas 30 ng / ml.
④CB+IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of CB and IL-1βwas 0.2μg/ml and 30 ng / ml respectively,
⑤TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of TGF-β1 was 10 ng / ml.
⑥CB + TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of CB and TGF-β1 was 0.2μg/ml and 10 ng / ml.
Cultured continuously for 48h after divided into groups, then undertook the following experiments respectively, methods and results were as follows:
3.1 The distribution and arrangement ofβ-actin andα-tubulin protein in NRK52E cells (immunofluorescence staining)
3.1.1 (The distribution and arrangement ofβ-actin in control group, IL-1βinduced group, TGF-βinduced group was similar with which was induced for 72h).β-actin staining in the CB alone group was very weak, no significantβ-actin positive fibers, many dual-core cells could be seen. In CB + IL-1βinduced group,β-actin formed many filamentous fiber-like structures in the cytoplasm near the nuclei. In CB + TGF-β1 induced group,β-actin expression was weak, mainly near the nucleus, they were short-beam-shaped radially arranged, theβ-actin staining was significantly reduced near the membrane area. Suggested that CB had inhibited the microfilament polymerization and made the function of microfilament abnormal. IL-1βcould significantly antagonize the ability of CB which inhibites the microfilament polymerization, while TGF-β1 only could weakly antagonize it.
3.1.2 (The distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin in control group, IL-1βinduced group, TGF-βinduced group was similar with which was induced for 72h).α-tubulin positive staining in CB alone group was significantly increased compared with the control group, its distribution and arrangement was slightly disordered, but still radially arranged from the nucleus to the membrane, suggested that the distribution and arrangement of microtubules had not been obviously impacted after microfilament depolymerization. In CB + IL-1βinduced group, the distribution and arrangement of microtubules was similar with it in IL-1βinduced group, implied that the distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin induced by IL-1βwasn’t been significantly interfered by microfilament depolymerization. In CB + TGF-β1 induced group, the distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin was slightly disordered, but still radially arranged from the nucleus to the membrane,α-tubulin positive fibers paralleling to cell long axis were disappeared, indicated that microfilament depolymerization could mildly inhibit the effects induced by TGF-β1 on the distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin.
3.2 The mRNA expressions ofβ-actin andα-tubulin in NRK52E cell
RT-PCR results showed,β-actin mRNA expression in the CB, CB + IL-1βand CB + TGF-β1 induced group were significantly higher than it in the control group, IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group respectively.α-tubulin mRNA expression in the CB, CB + TGF-β1 induced group was significantly higher than it in the control group and the TGF-β1 alone induced group, there had no significant difference in the other groups.
3.3 Morphology changes
Cells in CB alone group still showed a typical cobblestone-like morphology. In CB + IL-1βinduced group the proportion of long axis and short axis was increased in the majority cells, some cells were spindle changed, but the cell processes were significantly reduced, cells were closely arranged. In CB + TGF-β1 induced group cells at the border although were radially arranged, they were closely arranged, had no long thin protuberances. Illustrated that the morphology changes induced by IL-1βand TGF-β1 were significantly interfered by microfilament depolymerization.
3.4 mRNA expressions of E-cadherin,α-SMA and FN
RT-PCR results showed: Compared with the control group, the E-cadherin mRNA expression was significantly increased,α-SMA mRNA expression was significantly decreased in CB alone group,suggested that microfilament depolymerization might be against the EMT. Compared with IL-1βinduced group, E-cadherin,α-SMA and FN mRNA expression in CB + IL-1βinduced group were all increased significantly, suggested that the effect of CB on IL-1βinduced NRK52E cells transition might be complex. Compared with TGF-β1 induced group, E-cadherin mRNA expression was increased,α-SMA mRNA expression was decreased in CB+TGF-β1 induced group, suggested that CB could significantly inhibited TGF-β1 induced cell transition.
3.5 Changes to cell adhesion and migration
The methods were as before, the results showed: CB could increase the adhesion of cells significantly after inhibited microfilament polymerization, and had the obvious antagonism on IL-1βand TGF-β1 induced reduction of cell adhesion respectively. Scratch test results showed: compared with IL-1βinduced group and CB alone group, the migration distance in CB+IL-1βinduced group was reduced significantly. Compared with TGF-β1 induced group, the relative migration distance in CB+TGF-β1 induced group reduced significantly and was similar with CB alone group, illustrated that after CB inhibited microfilament polymerization, cell migration promoted by TGF-β1 was inhibited completely.
Conclusions
1 Both TGF-β1 and IL-1βcould induce NRK52E cells undergo EMT respectively.
2 TGF-β1 had the synergistic effect with IL-1βon inducing NRK52E cells transition, affecting the cytoskeleton and inhibiting the cell adhesion.
3 After induced NRE52E cells transition, TGF-β1 might lead to cytoskeletal reorganization and focus on the microfilament, when microfilament polymerization was obstaclesd, the effects of TGF-β1 on EMT was significantly inhibited, on the same time, the effect of TGF-β1 on cell adhesion and migration was also significantly inhibited.Thus, we speculated that the structure and function of microfilament had an important impact on TGF-β1 induced NRE52E cells EMT.
4 After induced NRK52E cells transition, IL-1βfocused on effecting the microtubules, as well, When the cell microfilament polymerization was blocked, the effectes on IL-1βinduced EMT were also different from TGF-β1, suggested that the signal transduction to IL-1βwas different from TGF-β1.
Renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis(RIF)is a common performance to end-stage renal failure occurring after a variety of primary and secondary chronic kidney disease (including chronic allograft nephropathy), is also the most important indicator to prognosis and the severity of renal function decline. As to the mechanism, now the excessive accumulation of the extracellular matrix (ECM) is considered to be one of the main reasons leading to RIF. Myofibroblasts (MyoFb) located in renal interstitium are the main source of ECM, its quantity is considered to be the best indicator to renal prognosis. As to the sources of MyoFb, now epithelial- mesenchymal transition(EMT) is thought to be one main source.
Many factors can cause renal tubular epithelial cells undergo EMT, including injury, inflammation, a variety of cytokines act solo or in synergy,etc. TGF-β1 is found to be the most powerful factor leading to RIF, it is involved in all process of RIF. In recent years, numerous studies found that TGF-β1 initiates and regulates the whole process of EMT. IL-1βis a pro-inflammatory factor heavy secreted by macrophages who infiltrating in renal interstitium when RIF. IL-1βis participated in interstitial inflammation and fibrosis via various pathways. Even if some studies reports that IL-1βcan induce EMT on renal tubular epithelial cells, the results are different, the researches on the cytoskeleton are even rarer. As known,IL-1βand TGF-β1 are cytokines that have extensive functions, and effects on contrary at many times, in RIF, their expressions are significantly increased, although it has reported that both IL-1βand TGF-β1 could induce TECs undergoing EMT respectively in different degree, there potential interaction in the process of EMT still have not been reported.
Cytoskeleton is constituted by microfilament, microtubule and intermediate filament. Microfilaments and microtubules are able to polymerizate/ depolymerizate rapidly under different stimulations inside and outside the cells, thus educe its biological role and participate in cell signal transduction. In the process of EMT, microfilaments can be reorganized, on the contrary, as microfilaments depolymerize, its effects on EMT induced by IL-1βand TGF-β1 respectively have not been reported at present.
Objective Firstly, using TGF-β1 and IL-1βeffected on NRK52E cells respectively, observed and compared their effects on cell morphology, phenotypes of transition and cytoskeletons, analyzed the the similarities and differences in various links of EMT. Secondly, using TGF-β1 and IL-1βcombined effected on NRK52E cells,the aim was to observe the interaction between the factors in different sectors of the induction of EMT. Finally, we used cytochalasin B to damage microfilaments, aimed to observe its effects on EMT induced by IL-1βor TGF-β1 respectively. All of above works were aimed to enrich the theoretical basis of EMT on renal tubular epithelial cells and provide the theoretical basis for the therapy of RIF.
Methods and Results
1 The effects of TGF-β1 and IL-1βin EMT on NRK52E cells respectively Groups: (1) TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of TGF-β1was 10 ng / ml, control group: equal volume of 0.1M PBS; (2) IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of IL-1βwas 30 ng / ml, control group: equal volume of 0.1M PBS. Cultured continuously for 72h after divided into groups, then undertook the following experiments respectively, methods and results were as follows:
1.1 Morphology changes
Cells in control group showed typical cobblestone-like appearance all the time, the engagement between cells was tight. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h, cells were confluenced,the cells in the center were showed short spindle appearance, the cells in the edges were showed long spindle appearance, radial alignment. Under high power microscope, there were many protrusions of varying lengths in the cells edge. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h, cells were mainly changed in long spindle, some cells have several long processes, anchoring on or wrapping in the surrounding cells, the phenomen of cell processes overlapped and acrossed were common.
1.2 The mRNA expression of phenotype markers in NRK52E cells
RT-PCR results showed, after induced by TGF-β1 and IL-1βfor 72h, the mRNA expression of E-cadherin who was the marker of epithelial cells was significantly reduced; the mRNA expressions ofα-SMA and FN who were the markers of mesenchymal cells were significantly increased, suggested that TGF-β1 and IL-1βhad respectively induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT. Unexpectedly, TGF-β1 and IL-1βalso could increase the mRNA expression of desmoplakin-1 (DPI) who was another epithelial cell marker, the mechanism remained unclear.
1.3 The expression and distribution proteins of phenotype markers in NRK52E cells
The immunocytochemical staining showed, E-cadherin positive staining intensity was middle in control group, smoothly、linearly and uniformly distributed in the cell membrane. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h, E-cadherin protein expression was significantly reduced and interruptedly distributed in the cell membrane. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h, E-cadherin in the membrane was discontinuous distribution, the intensity of dyeing was increased in some area. Immunofluorescence staining showed, there was a weak positive staining about DPI protein, diffuse distribution in cell plasma. After induced by TGF-β1 and IL-1βfor 72h respectively, the fluorescence intensity of DPI was significantly increased, mainly clustered around the nucleus.
Immunofluorescence staining also showed,α-SMA and FN staining were weak positive in control group, dispersed in the cytoplasm. After induced by TGF-β1 and IL-1βfor 72h respectively, the expressions of the both were significantly increased, showed strong positive staining and mainly gathered around the nucleus. The results of immunostaining were consistent with RT-PCR, further confirmed that TGF-β1 and IL-1βhad induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT.
1.4β-actin andα-tubulin mRNA expressions and protein distribution and arrangement in NRK52E cells
RT-PCR results showed, TGF-β1 could increase the expression ofβ-actin mRNA, but had no significant effects onα-tubulin mRNA, while IL-1βcould increase the expression ofα-tubulin mRNA, had no impaction onβ-actin mRNA.
Immunofluorescence staining showed that: (1)β-actin positive staining mainly accumulated below the cell membrane in control group. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h,β-actin positive staining formed a large number of thick bundles of fiber-like structures in cytoplasm. the majority were arranged parallel to cell long axis. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h,β-actin positive staining formed filamentous fiber-like structures in the cytoplasm and cell processes and were arranged parallel to cell long axis.(2)α-tubulin positive fibers formed the microtubule organizing center in one side of the nucleus in control cells, and used it as the central, the fibers showed radial distribution reached the membrane. After induced by TGF-β1 for 72h,α-tubulin positive fibers in some cells changed from the radial distribution into arrangement parallel to cell long axis. After induced by IL-1βfor 72h,α-tubulin positive fibers increased in most cells, changed from the radial alignment into bundles, parallelled to cell long axis. The results above showed that after induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT, IL-1βand TGF-β1 also could affect the distribution and arrangement of cytoskeletons, TGF-β1 focused on affecting microfilament, while IL-1βfocused on affecting microtubules. 2 The EMT induced by IL-1βand TGF-β1 combinedly on NRK52E cells Groups:①c ontrol group: 0.1 MPBS (instead of IL-1βor TGF-β1)②IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of IL-1βwas 30 ng / ml③TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of TGF-β1was 10 ng / ml④combinedly induced group: the final concentration of IL-1βand TGF-β1 was 30 ng / ml and 10 ng / ml respectively.
Cultured continuously for 48h after divided into groups, then undertook the following experiments respectively, methods and results were as follows:
2.1 Morphology changes
Control group, IL-1βand TGF-βalone induced group the cell morphologys were similar to which induced for 72h. After induced by the both the cells morpholology changes were similar with induced group of IL-1βalone.
2.2 The mRNA expression of phenotype markers: E-cadherin,α-SMA and FN
RT-PCR results showed, the mRNA expression of E-cadherin was the most strong in the control group, decreased slightly in IL-1βinduced group, completely disappeared in TGF-β1 induced group and the combinated induced group. The mRNA expressions ofα-SMA and FN were the most in the combinated induced group, significantly more than IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group. Demonstrated that IL-1βand TGF-β1 had synergistic effects on inducing NRK52E cells undergo EMT.
2.3β-actin andα-tubulin mRNA expressions and protein distribution and arrangement in NRK52E cells
RT-PCR results showed, the mRNA expression ofβ-actin in the combinedly induced group was significantly higher than IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group, the mRNA expression ofα-tubulin in the combinedly induced group was same with IL-1βalone induced group, higher than TGF-β1 induced group, suggested that the both factors had synergistic effect onβ-actin mRNA expression but had no synergistic effect on theα-tubulin mRNA expression. Immunofluorescence staining results showed,β-actin andα-tubulin positive staining, distribution and arrangement in control group, IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group were similar with which was induced for 72h. The distribution and arrangement ofβ-actin in combinedly induced group were similar with which in TGF-β1 alone induced group, The distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin in combinedly induced group were similar with which in IL-1βalone induced group. These results suggested, after IL-1βand TGF-β1 combinedly induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT, there was no obvious antagonism on the distribution and arrangement of the cytoskeleton.
2.4 Changes to cell adhesion and migration
When cells were after cultured for 48h, CCK-8 test and cell scratch were used to assay the cell adhesion in Matrigel gel and cell migration respectively. The results showed: after inoculation for 2h, cell adhesion was the highest in the control group, secondly in IL-1βinduced group and TGF-β1 induced group, lowest in the combinedly inducted group. The results indicated that after IL-1βand TGF-β1 induced NRK52E cells undergo EMT respectively, IL-1βand TGF-β1 also could reduce the ability to cell adhesion, the both factor had synergistic effect.
The relative migration distance was same in control group and IL-1βinduced group, significant increased in TGF-β1 induced group and combinedly induced group, but there was no difference in the last two groups. Suggested that on cell migration IL-1βhad no significant effect, while TGF-β1 had significantly stimulated effect, the two combined application had no obvious antagonism.
3. The effect of microfilament depolymerization on IL-1βand TGF-β1 induced EMT in NRK52E cells
Groups:①control group: 0.1 MPBS (instead of IL-1βor TGF-β1).
②CB alone group: the final concentration of CB was 0.2μg/ml.
③IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of IL-1βwas 30 ng / ml.
④CB+IL-1βinduced group: the final concentration of CB and IL-1βwas 0.2μg/ml and 30 ng / ml respectively,
⑤TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of TGF-β1 was 10 ng / ml.
⑥CB + TGF-β1 induced group: the final concentration of CB and TGF-β1 was 0.2μg/ml and 10 ng / ml.
Cultured continuously for 48h after divided into groups, then undertook the following experiments respectively, methods and results were as follows:
3.1 The distribution and arrangement ofβ-actin andα-tubulin protein in NRK52E cells (immunofluorescence staining)
3.1.1 (The distribution and arrangement ofβ-actin in control group, IL-1βinduced group, TGF-βinduced group was similar with which was induced for 72h).β-actin staining in the CB alone group was very weak, no significantβ-actin positive fibers, many dual-core cells could be seen. In CB + IL-1βinduced group,β-actin formed many filamentous fiber-like structures in the cytoplasm near the nuclei. In CB + TGF-β1 induced group,β-actin expression was weak, mainly near the nucleus, they were short-beam-shaped radially arranged, theβ-actin staining was significantly reduced near the membrane area. Suggested that CB had inhibited the microfilament polymerization and made the function of microfilament abnormal. IL-1βcould significantly antagonize the ability of CB which inhibites the microfilament polymerization, while TGF-β1 only could weakly antagonize it.
3.1.2 (The distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin in control group, IL-1βinduced group, TGF-βinduced group was similar with which was induced for 72h).α-tubulin positive staining in CB alone group was significantly increased compared with the control group, its distribution and arrangement was slightly disordered, but still radially arranged from the nucleus to the membrane, suggested that the distribution and arrangement of microtubules had not been obviously impacted after microfilament depolymerization. In CB + IL-1βinduced group, the distribution and arrangement of microtubules was similar with it in IL-1βinduced group, implied that the distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin induced by IL-1βwasn’t been significantly interfered by microfilament depolymerization. In CB + TGF-β1 induced group, the distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin was slightly disordered, but still radially arranged from the nucleus to the membrane,α-tubulin positive fibers paralleling to cell long axis were disappeared, indicated that microfilament depolymerization could mildly inhibit the effects induced by TGF-β1 on the distribution and arrangement ofα-tubulin.
3.2 The mRNA expressions ofβ-actin andα-tubulin in NRK52E cell
RT-PCR results showed,β-actin mRNA expression in the CB, CB + IL-1βand CB + TGF-β1 induced group were significantly higher than it in the control group, IL-1βand TGF-β1 alone induced group respectively.α-tubulin mRNA expression in the CB, CB + TGF-β1 induced group was significantly higher than it in the control group and the TGF-β1 alone induced group, there had no significant difference in the other groups.
3.3 Morphology changes
Cells in CB alone group still showed a typical cobblestone-like morphology. In CB + IL-1βinduced group the proportion of long axis and short axis was increased in the majority cells, some cells were spindle changed, but the cell processes were significantly reduced, cells were closely arranged. In CB + TGF-β1 induced group cells at the border although were radially arranged, they were closely arranged, had no long thin protuberances. Illustrated that the morphology changes induced by IL-1βand TGF-β1 were significantly interfered by microfilament depolymerization.
3.4 mRNA expressions of E-cadherin,α-SMA and FN
RT-PCR results showed: Compared with the control group, the E-cadherin mRNA expression was significantly increased,α-SMA mRNA expression was significantly decreased in CB alone group,suggested that microfilament depolymerization might be against the EMT. Compared with IL-1βinduced group, E-cadherin,α-SMA and FN mRNA expression in CB + IL-1βinduced group were all increased significantly, suggested that the effect of CB on IL-1βinduced NRK52E cells transition might be complex. Compared with TGF-β1 induced group, E-cadherin mRNA expression was increased,α-SMA mRNA expression was decreased in CB+TGF-β1 induced group, suggested that CB could significantly inhibited TGF-β1 induced cell transition.
3.5 Changes to cell adhesion and migration
The methods were as before, the results showed: CB could increase the adhesion of cells significantly after inhibited microfilament polymerization, and had the obvious antagonism on IL-1βand TGF-β1 induced reduction of cell adhesion respectively. Scratch test results showed: compared with IL-1βinduced group and CB alone group, the migration distance in CB+IL-1βinduced group was reduced significantly. Compared with TGF-β1 induced group, the relative migration distance in CB+TGF-β1 induced group reduced significantly and was similar with CB alone group, illustrated that after CB inhibited microfilament polymerization, cell migration promoted by TGF-β1 was inhibited completely.
Conclusions
1 Both TGF-β1 and IL-1βcould induce NRK52E cells undergo EMT respectively.
2 TGF-β1 had the synergistic effect with IL-1βon inducing NRK52E cells transition, affecting the cytoskeleton and inhibiting the cell adhesion.
3 After induced NRE52E cells transition, TGF-β1 might lead to cytoskeletal reorganization and focus on the microfilament, when microfilament polymerization was obstaclesd, the effects of TGF-β1 on EMT was significantly inhibited, on the same time, the effect of TGF-β1 on cell adhesion and migration was also significantly inhibited.Thus, we speculated that the structure and function of microfilament had an important impact on TGF-β1 induced NRE52E cells EMT.
4 After induced NRK52E cells transition, IL-1βfocused on effecting the microtubules, as well, When the cell microfilament polymerization was blocked, the effectes on IL-1βinduced EMT were also different from TGF-β1, suggested that the signal transduction to IL-1βwas different from TGF-β1.
引文
[1] Becker GJ,Hewitson TD. The role of tubulointerstitial injury in chronic renal failure[J]. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens,2000,9(2):133-138.
[2] Elmer F,Floege J.Novel insight into renal fibrosis[J].Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2003,12(3):227-232
[3] Nath KA. Tubulointerstitial changes as a major determinant in the progression of renal damage[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1992, 20(1): 1-17.
[4] Norman UT, Fine LG. Progressive renal disease: fibroblasts, extracellular matrix and integrins[J]. Exp Nephrol, 1999, 7(2): 167-177.
[5] Zeisberg M, Maeshima Y, Mosterman B, et a1. Rena1 fibrosis: Extracellular matrix microenvironment regulates migratory behavior of activated tubular epithelial cells[J]. Am J Patho1, 2002, 160 (6): 2001-2008.
[6] Eddy AA. Molecular basis of renal fibrosis[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2000, 15(3-4): 290-301.
[7] Johnwon DW, Saunders HJ, Baxter RC, et al. Paracrine stimulation of human renal fibroblasts by proximal tubuler cells [J]. Kidney Int , 1998 , 54(3): 747 - 757.
[8] Vilafranca M, Wohlsein P, Trautwein G. Expression of class II major histocompatibility complex molecules in renal tubular epithelial cells of canine kidneys affected with tubulointerstitial nephritis[J]. Res Vet Sci, 1995, 59(2): 114-117.
[9] Rui ML, Kara AU, Sinniah R. Dysregulation of cytokine expression in tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with murine malaria[J]. Kidney Int, 1998, 53(4) : 845 - 852.
[10] Strutz F, Müller GA, Neilson EG. Transdifferentiation: a new angle on renal fibrosis[J]. Exp Nephrol, 1996, 4(5): 267-70
[11] Wardle EN. Modulatory proteins and processes in alliance with immune cells, mediators and extracellular proteins in renal interstitial fibrosis[J]. Ren Fail, 1999, 21(2):121- 133.
[12] Gonzalez CS, Bustos C, Ruiz OM, et al. Expression of leukocyte chemoattractants by interstitial renal fibroblasts : up - regulation by drugs associated with interstitial fibrosis [J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 1996 , 106(3) : 518 - 522.
[13] chimura T, Maier JA, Maciag T, et al. FGF-1 in normal and regenerating kidney: expression in mononuclear, interstitial and regenerating epithelial cells [J]. Am J Physiol, 1995, 269(5 Pt 2): F653 - F662.
[14] Alpers CE, Pichler R, Johnson RJ. Phenotypic features of cortical interstitial cells potentially important in fibrosis[J]. Kidney Int, 1996, Suppl 54: S28 - S31.
[15] Yu XQ, Nikolic Paterson DJ, Mu W, et al. A functional role for osteopontin inexperimental crescentic glomerulonephritis in the rat[J]. Proc Assoc Am Physicians, 1998, 110(1): 50 -64.
[16] Yamate J, Okado A , Kuwamura M, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of macrophages, myofibroblasts and transforming growth factor-beta localization during rat renal interstitial fibrosis following long - term unilateral ureteral obstruction[J]. Toxicol Pathol, 1998, 26(6) : 793 - 801.
[17]蔡松敏,李惊子,王海燕.Lifylline对肾炎鼠肾小球巨噬细胞白介素-1表达的影响[J].中国病理生理杂志, 1999, 15(9): 948 - 950.
[18] Kelly CJ,Neilson EG. Tubulointerstitial diseases [A]. In: Brenner BM , Rector FC. eds. The kidney[M]. Philadelphia. WB Saunders Com , 1999, 1513 - 1514.
[19] Goumenos DS,Tsamandas AC,Oldroyd S,et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and myofibroblasts: a potential pathway towards renal scarring in human glomerular disease[J]. Nephron,2001,87(3):240.
[20] Wang S, Denichilo M, Brubaker C, et al. Connective tissue growth factor in tubulointerstitial injury of diabetic nephropathy[J]. Kidney Int, 2001, 60 (1): 96-105.
[21] Frazier K, Williams S, Kothapalli D, et al. Stimulation of fibroblast cell growth, matrix production and granulation tissue formation by connective tissue growth factor[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1996,107(3):404-411
[22] Guo G, Morrissery J, McCracken R, et al. Contributions of angiotensin II and tumor necrosis factor alpha to the development of renal fibrosis[J]. Am J physiol, 2001, 280 (5): 777-785.
[23]张军,陶立坚.肾脏纤维化的研究进展[J].国外医学生理、病理科学与临床分册, 2002, 22(6): 593-595.
[24] Jones LK,O'Sullivan KM,Semple T, et al. IL-1RI deficiency ameliorates early experi- menttal renal interstitial fibrosis[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant,2009,24(10):3024-3032.
[25] Hou CC, Wang W, Huang XR, et al. Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated gene transfer of inducible Smad7 blocks transforming growth factor-βsignaling and fibrosis in rat remnant kidney[J]. Am J Pathol, 2005, 166(3): 761-771.
[26] Liu Y. Hepatocyte growth factor in kidney fibrosis: therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action [J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2004, 287(1):F7- F16.
[27]陈楠,李娅,刘峰,等.骨形成蛋白7对人肾小管上皮细胞增殖和转分化的影响[J].中华肾脏病杂志, 2004, 20(5):343- 346.
[28]李娅,陈楠,俞海瑾,等.骨形成蛋白-7基因转染对人肾小管上皮细胞外基质分泌的影响[J].中华医学杂志, 2006, 86(8): 544- 548.
[29] Zhou T, Zhang Y, Sun G, et al. Anti-P-selectin-EGF domain monoclonal antibody inhibits the maturation of human immature dendritic cells. 2006, 80(2):171-176.
[30] Ponticelli C,Villa M, Cesana B, et al. Risk factors for late kidney allograft failure[J]. Kedney Int, 2002, 62(5) : 1848-1854.
[31] ColvinRB, ohenAH, aiontzC, et al. Valuation of pathologic criteria for acute renal allograft rejection: reproducibility, sensitivity, and clinical correlation[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1997, 8(12):1930-1941.
[32] Mason DW, Morris PJ. Effector mechanisms in allograft rejection[J]. Ann Rev Immunol, 1986, 4: 119-145.
[33] Yates PJ, Nicholson ML. The aetiology and pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy[J]. Transpl Immunol, 2006, 16(3-4):148-157.
[34] Morrissey PE, Flynn ML, Lin S. Medication noncompliance and its implications in transplant recipients[J]. Drugs, 2007, 67(10):1463-1481.
[35] Cai J, Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation: mechanism, prevention and treatment[J]. Hum Immunol, 2005, 66(4): 334-342.
[36] Mroz A, Lewandowski Z, Cieciura T, et al. C4d complement split product indiagnosis of immunological activity of chronic allograft nphropathy[J]. Transplant Proc, 2006, 38(1): 97-100.
[37] Tullius SG, Heemann U, Azuma H, et al. Early ischemic injury leads to long-term functional and morphologic deterioration of naive rat kidneys and may contribute to changes of chronic allograft rejection[J]. Transplant Proc, 1994, 26(4): 2041-2042.
[38] Azuma H, Nadeau K, Takada M, et al. Cellular and molecular predictors of chronic renal dysfunction after initial ischemia/reperfusion injury of a single kidney[J]. Transplantation, 1997, 64(2): 190-197.
[39] Chandraker A, Takada M, Nadeau KC, et al. CD28-b7 blockade in organ dysfunction secondary to cold ischemia/reperfusion injury[J]. Kidney Int, 1997, 52(6):1678-1684.
[40] Land W, Zweler JL. Prevention of reperfusion-induced, free radical-mediated acute endothelial injury by superoxide dismutase as an effective tool to delay/prevent chronic renal allograft failure: a review[J]. Transplant Proc, 1997, 29(6):2567-2568.
[41] Womer KL, Vella JP, Sayegh MH. Chronic allograft dysfunction: mechanisms and new approaches to therapy[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2000, 20(2):126-147.
[42] Fellstrom B. Nonimmune risk factors for chronic renal allograft disfunction[J]. Transplantation, 2001,71(11 Suppl):SS10-16.
[43] Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Benigni A. Understanding the nature of renal disease progression[J]. Kidney Int, 1997, 51(1): 2-15.
[44] Ozdemir BH, Ozdemir FN, Haberal N, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and cyclosporine toxicity in renal allograft rejection[J]. Am J Transpl, 2005, 5(4Pt1):766-774.
[45] Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s[J]. Nature, 1993, 362(6423): 801-809.
[46] Fuggle SV, Koo DD. Cell adhesion molecules in clinical renal transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 65(6): 763-769.
[47] Xu J,Lamouille S,Derynck R. TGF-beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition [J]. Cell Research, 2009, 19(2):156-172.
[48] Lan HY. Tubular epithelial - myofibroblast transdifferentiation mechanisms in proximal tubule cells[J]. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2003, 12(1): 25 - 29.
[49] Iwano M, Plieth D, Danoff TM, et al. Evidence that fibroblasts derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis[J]. J Clin Invest, 2002, 110(3): 341 - 350.
[50]陆海英,张悦.肾小管上皮细胞转分化及逆转的分子机制.国际病理科学与临床杂志,2006,26(1):63-66.
[51] Strutz F, Okada H, Lo CW, et al. Identitification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1 [J]. J Cell Biol, 1995, 130 (2) : 393-405.
[52] Ng YY, Huang TP, Yang WC, et al. Tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in progressive tubulointerestitial fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats[J]. Kidney Int, 1998, 54(3): 864-876.
[53] Yang J, Liu Y. Blockage of tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition by hepatocyte growth factor prevents renal interstitial fibrsis[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002, 13(1):96-107.
[54] Savagner P. Leaving the neighborhood: molecular mechanisms involved during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. [J] Bio Essays, 2001, 23(10):912-923.
[55] Masszi A, Di Ciano C, Sirokmány G, et al. Central role for Rho in TGF-beta l-induced alpha-smooth muscle actin expression during epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2003, 284(5):F911-F924.
[56] Sperry RB,Bishop NH,Bramwell J, et al. Zyxin controls migration in epithelial-mesen- chymal transition by mediating actin-membrane linkages at cell-cell junctions[J]. J CellPhysiol,2010,222(3):612-624.
[57] Humphries MJ, Newham P. The structure of cell adhesion molecules[J].Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8(2): 78-83.
[58] Regen CM, Horwitz AF. Dynamics of beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesive contacts in motile fibroblasts[J]. J Cell Biol, 1992, 119(5):1347- 1359.
[59] Yang J, Shultz RW, Mars WM, et al. Disruption of tissue type plasm inogen activator gene in mice reduces renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. J Clin Invest, 2002, 110(10): 1525-1538.
[60] Roberts AB, Tian F, Byfield SD, et al. Smad3 is key to TGF- beta- mediated epithelial- to- mesenchymal transition, fibrosis, tumor suppression and metastasis[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2006, 17(1- 2): 19- 27.
[61] Li Y, Yang J, Dai C, et al. Role for integrin-linked kinase inmediating tubula repithelial to mesenchymal transition and renal interstitial fibrogenesis. J Clin Invest, 2003, 112(4): 503-516.
[62] Zhang C, Meng X, Zhu Z, et al. Connective tissue growth factor regulates the key events in tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition in vitro [J]. Cell Biol Int, 2004, 28 (12): 863- 873.
[63] Strutz F, Zeisberg M, Ziyadeh FN, et al. Role of basic fibroblast growth factor-2 in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation[J]. Kidney Int, 2002, 61(5): 1714-1728.
[64] Fan JM, Huang XR, Ng YY, et al. Interleukin-1 induces tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation through a transforming growth factor-beta1-dependentmechanism in vitro[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2001, 37(4): 820-831.
[65] Zeisberg M, Bonner G, Maeshima Y, et al. Renal fibrosis: collagen composition and assembly regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation[J]. Am J Pathol, 2001, 159(4):1313- 1321.
[66] Liu Y. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal fibrogenesis: pathologic significance, molecular mechanism, and therapeutic intervention[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(1):1-12.
[67] Kobayashi E, Sasamura H, Mifune M, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor regulates proteoglycan synthesis in interstitial fibroblasts[J]. Kidney Int, 2003, 64(4): 1179- 1188.
[68] Mou S,Wang Q,Shi BL, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor ameliorates progression of interstitial injuries in tubular epithelial cells[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010,44(2):121-128.
[69] Fukumoto H, Tennis M, Locascio JJ, et al. Age but not diagnosis is the main predictor of plasma amyloid beta-protein levels[J]. Arch Neurol, 2003, 60(7): 958-964.
[70] Zeisberg M, Hanai J, Sugimoto H, et al. BMP-7 counteracts TGF-beta1 induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reverses chronic renal injury[J]. Nat Med, 2003, 9(7): 964-968.
[71]王洪涛,周建华.小G蛋白Rho与肾间质纤维化[J].国际内科学杂志, 2009, 36(7): 410-416.
[72] Piek E, Heldin CH, Ten Dijke P. Specificity , diversity and regulation in TGF-βsuperfamily signaling[J]. FASEB J, 1999, 13(15): 2105-2124.
[73] Dnnl S, Itoh S,Viven D, et al. Directin binding lf Smd3 and Smd4 to critical TGF beta-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene[J]. EMBO J, 1998, 17(11): 3091- 3100.
[74] Poncelet AC,Schnaper HW. Sp1 and Smad proteins cooperate to mediate transforming growth factor-beta l-indueed alpha2 (I) collagen expression in human glomerular mesangial cells[J]. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276(10): 6953-6992.
[75] Jankmecht R, Wells NJ, Hunter T. TGF-beta stimulated cooperation of smad proteins with the coactivators CBP/p300[J]. Genes Dev, 1998, 12(14): 2114-2119.
[76] Sano Y,Harada J,Tashiro S,et al. ATF-2 is a common nuelear target of Smad and TAK1 pathways intransforming growth factor- beta signaling[J]. J Biol Chem 1999, 274(13): 8949-8957.
[77] Dennler S,Prunier C,Ferrand N,et al. c-Jun inhibits transforming growth factor beta-mediated transcription by repressing Smad3 transcriptional activity[J]. J Biol Chem 2000: 275(37): 28858-28865.
[78] Akiyoshi S, Inoue H,Hanai J,et al. c-Ski acts as a transcriptional co-repressor intransforming growth factor-beta signaling through interaction with smads[J]. J Biol Chem, 1999: 274(49): 35269-35277.
[79] Strosehein SL,Wang W,Zhou S,et al. Negative feedbaek regulation of TGF-beta signaling by the SnoN oncoprotein[J]. Seienee, 1999, 286(5440): 771-774.
[80] Cano E, Mahadevan LC. Parallel signal processing among mammalian MAPKs[J]. Trends Biochem Sci, 1996, 20(3): 117-122.
[81] Gupta S, Bartett T, Whitmarsh AJ, et al. Selective interaction of JNK protein kinase isoforms with transcription factors[J]. EMBO J, 1996,15(11): 2760-2770.
[82] Han J, Lee J-D, Bibbs L, et al. AMAP kinase targeted by endotoxin and hyperosmolarity inmammalian cells[J]. Science, 1994, 265(5137): 808-811.
[83] Boyer B, Roche S, Denoyelle M, et al. Src and Ras are involved in separate pathways in epithelial cell scattering[J]. EMBO J, 1997, 16(19): 5904-5913.
[84] Peinado H, Quintanilla M, Cano A. Transforming growth factor beta-1 induces snail transcription factor in epithelial cell lines: mechanisms for epithelial mesenchymal transitions[J]. J Biol Chem, 2003, 278(23): 21113-21123.
[85]王玉,李晓玫,王海燕.白介素-1β通过JNK/P38信号转导通路调控肾系膜细胞表达α-平滑肌肌动蛋白.生理学报, 2001, 54: 244-250.
[86] Nagatoya K, Moriyama T, Kawada N, et al. Y - 27632 prevents tubulointerstitial fibrosis in mouse kidneys with unilateral ureteral obstruction[J]. Kidney Int, 2002, 61 (5) : 1684 - 1695.
[87] Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M, et al. Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) [J]. Science, 1996, 273 (5272): 245 - 248.
[88] Bhowmick NA, Ghiassi M, Bakin A, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism[J]. Mol Biol Cell, 2001, 12(1): 27-36.
[89] Hutchison N,Hendry BM,Sharpe CC. Rho isoforms have distinct and specific functions in the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal proximal tubular cells [J]. Cellelar Signalling, 2009, 21(10): 1522-1531.
[90] Kim JT, Joo CK. Involvement of cell-cell interactions in the rapid stimulation of Cas tyrosine phosphoyrlation and Src kinase activity by transforming growth factor-beta1[J]. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277(35): 31938-31948.
[91]张梅,李晓玫.上皮细胞转分化的信号转导研究进展及其在肾小管的研究现状[J].生理科学进展, 2004, 35(3): 219-223.
[92] Peron P, Rahmani M, Zagar Y, et al. Potentiation of Smad transactivation by Jun proteins during a combined treatment with epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta in rat hepatocytes. role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinae-induced AP-1 activation[J]. J Biol Chem,2001, 276(13): 10524-10531.
[93] Razzaque MS, Taguchi T. Cellular and molecular events leading to renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis[J]. Med Electron Microse, 2002, 35(2) :68– 80.
[94] Struz F, Neilson EG. New insight into mechanisms of fibrosis in immune renal injury. Springer Semin Immunopathol, 2003, 24(4) : 459– 476.
[95] Jinder K, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Huang XR, et al. Tubular phenotypic change in progressivetubulointerstital fibrosis in human glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis, 2001, 38: 761-769.
[96] Liu Y. Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int, 2006,69(2): 213-217.
[97]赵霞,刘全宏,王筱冰.细胞骨架纤维间的相互联系.细胞生物学杂志, 2008, 30: 191-195.
[98] Zavadil J, B?ttinger EP. TGF-beta and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Oncogene, 2005, 24(37): 5764-5774.
[99] Gallicano GI, Kouklis P, Bauer C, et al. Desmoplakin is required early in development for assembly of desmosomes and cytoskeletal linkage[J]. J Cell Biol, 1998, 143(7): 2009–2022.
[100] Amar LS, Shabana al-HM, Oboeuf M, et al. Desmosomes are regulated by protein kinase C in primary rat epithelial cells[J]. Cell Adhes Commun, 1998, 5(1): 1-12.
[101]夏伟,周建伟.细胞骨架与细胞凋亡及细胞内信息通路的关系[J].细胞生物学杂志,2001,23(4):205-209.
[102] Keshamouni VG,Jagtap P,Michailidis G, et al. Temporal quantitative proteomics by iTRAQ 2D-LC-MS/Ms and corresponding mRNA expression analysis identify post-transcriptional modulation of actin-cytoskeleton regulators during TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J]. J Proteome Res, 2009, 8(1): 35-47.
[103] Sedor JR, Nakazato Y, Konieczkowaski M.Interleukin-1 and mesangial cell[J]. Kidney Int, 1992, 41(3):595-599.
[104] Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Main IW, Tesch GH, Lan HY, Atkins RC.Interleukin-1 in renal fibrosis[J]. Kidney Int Suppl, 1996, 54: S88-90.
[105] Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY, Atkins RC. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonism[J]. Semin Nephrol 1996;54(16):S88-90.
[106] Doerner AM, Zuraw BL.TGF-β1 induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human bronchial epithelial cells is enhanced by IL-1βbut notabrogated by corticosteroids[J]. Respiratory Research, 2009, 10:100.
[107] Chaudhuri V, Zhou L, Karasek M.Inflammatory cytokines induce the transformation of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells into myofibroblasts: a potential role in skin fibrogenesis[J]. J Cutan Pathol, 2007, 34(2): 146-53.
[108] Verdier MP, Seite S, Guntzer K, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of transforminggrowth factor beta isoforms and their receptors in human cartilage from normal and osteoarthritic femoral heads[J]. Rheumatol Int, 2005, 25 (2):118-124.
[109] Takahashi N, Rieneck K, van PM. Elucidation of IL-1/TGF-b interactions in mouse chondrocyte cell line by genome-wide gene expression[J]. OsteoArthritis and Cartilage, 2005, 13(5): 426-438.
[110] Luna E J, Hitt A L. Cytoskelelon-plasma memhrame interactions[J].Science. 1992, 258(5084): 955-964.
[111] Newman ME, Ben-Zeev A, Lerer B. Chloroamphetamine did not prevent the effects of chronic antidepressants on 5-hydroxytryptamine inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase in rat hippocampus[J]. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991, 207(3): 209-213.
[112]马小明,冯若飞,邹文辉.微管功能的研究进展[J].西北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 27(62): 66-69.
[2] Elmer F,Floege J.Novel insight into renal fibrosis[J].Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2003,12(3):227-232
[3] Nath KA. Tubulointerstitial changes as a major determinant in the progression of renal damage[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1992, 20(1): 1-17.
[4] Norman UT, Fine LG. Progressive renal disease: fibroblasts, extracellular matrix and integrins[J]. Exp Nephrol, 1999, 7(2): 167-177.
[5] Zeisberg M, Maeshima Y, Mosterman B, et a1. Rena1 fibrosis: Extracellular matrix microenvironment regulates migratory behavior of activated tubular epithelial cells[J]. Am J Patho1, 2002, 160 (6): 2001-2008.
[6] Eddy AA. Molecular basis of renal fibrosis[J]. Pediatr Nephrol, 2000, 15(3-4): 290-301.
[7] Johnwon DW, Saunders HJ, Baxter RC, et al. Paracrine stimulation of human renal fibroblasts by proximal tubuler cells [J]. Kidney Int , 1998 , 54(3): 747 - 757.
[8] Vilafranca M, Wohlsein P, Trautwein G. Expression of class II major histocompatibility complex molecules in renal tubular epithelial cells of canine kidneys affected with tubulointerstitial nephritis[J]. Res Vet Sci, 1995, 59(2): 114-117.
[9] Rui ML, Kara AU, Sinniah R. Dysregulation of cytokine expression in tubulointerstitial nephritis associated with murine malaria[J]. Kidney Int, 1998, 53(4) : 845 - 852.
[10] Strutz F, Müller GA, Neilson EG. Transdifferentiation: a new angle on renal fibrosis[J]. Exp Nephrol, 1996, 4(5): 267-70
[11] Wardle EN. Modulatory proteins and processes in alliance with immune cells, mediators and extracellular proteins in renal interstitial fibrosis[J]. Ren Fail, 1999, 21(2):121- 133.
[12] Gonzalez CS, Bustos C, Ruiz OM, et al. Expression of leukocyte chemoattractants by interstitial renal fibroblasts : up - regulation by drugs associated with interstitial fibrosis [J]. Clin Exp Immunol, 1996 , 106(3) : 518 - 522.
[13] chimura T, Maier JA, Maciag T, et al. FGF-1 in normal and regenerating kidney: expression in mononuclear, interstitial and regenerating epithelial cells [J]. Am J Physiol, 1995, 269(5 Pt 2): F653 - F662.
[14] Alpers CE, Pichler R, Johnson RJ. Phenotypic features of cortical interstitial cells potentially important in fibrosis[J]. Kidney Int, 1996, Suppl 54: S28 - S31.
[15] Yu XQ, Nikolic Paterson DJ, Mu W, et al. A functional role for osteopontin inexperimental crescentic glomerulonephritis in the rat[J]. Proc Assoc Am Physicians, 1998, 110(1): 50 -64.
[16] Yamate J, Okado A , Kuwamura M, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of macrophages, myofibroblasts and transforming growth factor-beta localization during rat renal interstitial fibrosis following long - term unilateral ureteral obstruction[J]. Toxicol Pathol, 1998, 26(6) : 793 - 801.
[17]蔡松敏,李惊子,王海燕.Lifylline对肾炎鼠肾小球巨噬细胞白介素-1表达的影响[J].中国病理生理杂志, 1999, 15(9): 948 - 950.
[18] Kelly CJ,Neilson EG. Tubulointerstitial diseases [A]. In: Brenner BM , Rector FC. eds. The kidney[M]. Philadelphia. WB Saunders Com , 1999, 1513 - 1514.
[19] Goumenos DS,Tsamandas AC,Oldroyd S,et al. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 and myofibroblasts: a potential pathway towards renal scarring in human glomerular disease[J]. Nephron,2001,87(3):240.
[20] Wang S, Denichilo M, Brubaker C, et al. Connective tissue growth factor in tubulointerstitial injury of diabetic nephropathy[J]. Kidney Int, 2001, 60 (1): 96-105.
[21] Frazier K, Williams S, Kothapalli D, et al. Stimulation of fibroblast cell growth, matrix production and granulation tissue formation by connective tissue growth factor[J]. J Invest Dermatol, 1996,107(3):404-411
[22] Guo G, Morrissery J, McCracken R, et al. Contributions of angiotensin II and tumor necrosis factor alpha to the development of renal fibrosis[J]. Am J physiol, 2001, 280 (5): 777-785.
[23]张军,陶立坚.肾脏纤维化的研究进展[J].国外医学生理、病理科学与临床分册, 2002, 22(6): 593-595.
[24] Jones LK,O'Sullivan KM,Semple T, et al. IL-1RI deficiency ameliorates early experi- menttal renal interstitial fibrosis[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant,2009,24(10):3024-3032.
[25] Hou CC, Wang W, Huang XR, et al. Ultrasound-microbubble-mediated gene transfer of inducible Smad7 blocks transforming growth factor-βsignaling and fibrosis in rat remnant kidney[J]. Am J Pathol, 2005, 166(3): 761-771.
[26] Liu Y. Hepatocyte growth factor in kidney fibrosis: therapeutic potential and mechanisms of action [J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2004, 287(1):F7- F16.
[27]陈楠,李娅,刘峰,等.骨形成蛋白7对人肾小管上皮细胞增殖和转分化的影响[J].中华肾脏病杂志, 2004, 20(5):343- 346.
[28]李娅,陈楠,俞海瑾,等.骨形成蛋白-7基因转染对人肾小管上皮细胞外基质分泌的影响[J].中华医学杂志, 2006, 86(8): 544- 548.
[29] Zhou T, Zhang Y, Sun G, et al. Anti-P-selectin-EGF domain monoclonal antibody inhibits the maturation of human immature dendritic cells. 2006, 80(2):171-176.
[30] Ponticelli C,Villa M, Cesana B, et al. Risk factors for late kidney allograft failure[J]. Kedney Int, 2002, 62(5) : 1848-1854.
[31] ColvinRB, ohenAH, aiontzC, et al. Valuation of pathologic criteria for acute renal allograft rejection: reproducibility, sensitivity, and clinical correlation[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1997, 8(12):1930-1941.
[32] Mason DW, Morris PJ. Effector mechanisms in allograft rejection[J]. Ann Rev Immunol, 1986, 4: 119-145.
[33] Yates PJ, Nicholson ML. The aetiology and pathogenesis of chronic allograft nephropathy[J]. Transpl Immunol, 2006, 16(3-4):148-157.
[34] Morrissey PE, Flynn ML, Lin S. Medication noncompliance and its implications in transplant recipients[J]. Drugs, 2007, 67(10):1463-1481.
[35] Cai J, Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation: mechanism, prevention and treatment[J]. Hum Immunol, 2005, 66(4): 334-342.
[36] Mroz A, Lewandowski Z, Cieciura T, et al. C4d complement split product indiagnosis of immunological activity of chronic allograft nphropathy[J]. Transplant Proc, 2006, 38(1): 97-100.
[37] Tullius SG, Heemann U, Azuma H, et al. Early ischemic injury leads to long-term functional and morphologic deterioration of naive rat kidneys and may contribute to changes of chronic allograft rejection[J]. Transplant Proc, 1994, 26(4): 2041-2042.
[38] Azuma H, Nadeau K, Takada M, et al. Cellular and molecular predictors of chronic renal dysfunction after initial ischemia/reperfusion injury of a single kidney[J]. Transplantation, 1997, 64(2): 190-197.
[39] Chandraker A, Takada M, Nadeau KC, et al. CD28-b7 blockade in organ dysfunction secondary to cold ischemia/reperfusion injury[J]. Kidney Int, 1997, 52(6):1678-1684.
[40] Land W, Zweler JL. Prevention of reperfusion-induced, free radical-mediated acute endothelial injury by superoxide dismutase as an effective tool to delay/prevent chronic renal allograft failure: a review[J]. Transplant Proc, 1997, 29(6):2567-2568.
[41] Womer KL, Vella JP, Sayegh MH. Chronic allograft dysfunction: mechanisms and new approaches to therapy[J]. Semin Nephrol, 2000, 20(2):126-147.
[42] Fellstrom B. Nonimmune risk factors for chronic renal allograft disfunction[J]. Transplantation, 2001,71(11 Suppl):SS10-16.
[43] Remuzzi G, Ruggenenti P, Benigni A. Understanding the nature of renal disease progression[J]. Kidney Int, 1997, 51(1): 2-15.
[44] Ozdemir BH, Ozdemir FN, Haberal N, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor expression and cyclosporine toxicity in renal allograft rejection[J]. Am J Transpl, 2005, 5(4Pt1):766-774.
[45] Ross R. The pathogenesis of atherosclerosis: a perspective for the 1990s[J]. Nature, 1993, 362(6423): 801-809.
[46] Fuggle SV, Koo DD. Cell adhesion molecules in clinical renal transplantation[J]. Transplantation, 65(6): 763-769.
[47] Xu J,Lamouille S,Derynck R. TGF-beta-induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition [J]. Cell Research, 2009, 19(2):156-172.
[48] Lan HY. Tubular epithelial - myofibroblast transdifferentiation mechanisms in proximal tubule cells[J]. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens, 2003, 12(1): 25 - 29.
[49] Iwano M, Plieth D, Danoff TM, et al. Evidence that fibroblasts derive from epithelium during tissue fibrosis[J]. J Clin Invest, 2002, 110(3): 341 - 350.
[50]陆海英,张悦.肾小管上皮细胞转分化及逆转的分子机制.国际病理科学与临床杂志,2006,26(1):63-66.
[51] Strutz F, Okada H, Lo CW, et al. Identitification and characterization of a fibroblast marker: FSP1 [J]. J Cell Biol, 1995, 130 (2) : 393-405.
[52] Ng YY, Huang TP, Yang WC, et al. Tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation in progressive tubulointerestitial fibrosis in 5/6 nephrectomized rats[J]. Kidney Int, 1998, 54(3): 864-876.
[53] Yang J, Liu Y. Blockage of tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition by hepatocyte growth factor prevents renal interstitial fibrsis[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2002, 13(1):96-107.
[54] Savagner P. Leaving the neighborhood: molecular mechanisms involved during epithelial-mesenchymal transition. [J] Bio Essays, 2001, 23(10):912-923.
[55] Masszi A, Di Ciano C, Sirokmány G, et al. Central role for Rho in TGF-beta l-induced alpha-smooth muscle actin expression during epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J]. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, 2003, 284(5):F911-F924.
[56] Sperry RB,Bishop NH,Bramwell J, et al. Zyxin controls migration in epithelial-mesen- chymal transition by mediating actin-membrane linkages at cell-cell junctions[J]. J CellPhysiol,2010,222(3):612-624.
[57] Humphries MJ, Newham P. The structure of cell adhesion molecules[J].Trends Cell Biol. 1998, 8(2): 78-83.
[58] Regen CM, Horwitz AF. Dynamics of beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesive contacts in motile fibroblasts[J]. J Cell Biol, 1992, 119(5):1347- 1359.
[59] Yang J, Shultz RW, Mars WM, et al. Disruption of tissue type plasm inogen activator gene in mice reduces renal interstitial fibrosis in obstructive nephropathy. J Clin Invest, 2002, 110(10): 1525-1538.
[60] Roberts AB, Tian F, Byfield SD, et al. Smad3 is key to TGF- beta- mediated epithelial- to- mesenchymal transition, fibrosis, tumor suppression and metastasis[J]. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev, 2006, 17(1- 2): 19- 27.
[61] Li Y, Yang J, Dai C, et al. Role for integrin-linked kinase inmediating tubula repithelial to mesenchymal transition and renal interstitial fibrogenesis. J Clin Invest, 2003, 112(4): 503-516.
[62] Zhang C, Meng X, Zhu Z, et al. Connective tissue growth factor regulates the key events in tubular epithelial to myofibroblast transition in vitro [J]. Cell Biol Int, 2004, 28 (12): 863- 873.
[63] Strutz F, Zeisberg M, Ziyadeh FN, et al. Role of basic fibroblast growth factor-2 in epithelial-mesenchymal transformation[J]. Kidney Int, 2002, 61(5): 1714-1728.
[64] Fan JM, Huang XR, Ng YY, et al. Interleukin-1 induces tubular epithelial-myofibroblast transdifferentiation through a transforming growth factor-beta1-dependentmechanism in vitro[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2001, 37(4): 820-831.
[65] Zeisberg M, Bonner G, Maeshima Y, et al. Renal fibrosis: collagen composition and assembly regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transdifferentiation[J]. Am J Pathol, 2001, 159(4):1313- 1321.
[66] Liu Y. Epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal fibrogenesis: pathologic significance, molecular mechanism, and therapeutic intervention[J]. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2004, 15(1):1-12.
[67] Kobayashi E, Sasamura H, Mifune M, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor regulates proteoglycan synthesis in interstitial fibroblasts[J]. Kidney Int, 2003, 64(4): 1179- 1188.
[68] Mou S,Wang Q,Shi BL, et al. Hepatocyte growth factor ameliorates progression of interstitial injuries in tubular epithelial cells[J]. Scand J Urol Nephrol, 2010,44(2):121-128.
[69] Fukumoto H, Tennis M, Locascio JJ, et al. Age but not diagnosis is the main predictor of plasma amyloid beta-protein levels[J]. Arch Neurol, 2003, 60(7): 958-964.
[70] Zeisberg M, Hanai J, Sugimoto H, et al. BMP-7 counteracts TGF-beta1 induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and reverses chronic renal injury[J]. Nat Med, 2003, 9(7): 964-968.
[71]王洪涛,周建华.小G蛋白Rho与肾间质纤维化[J].国际内科学杂志, 2009, 36(7): 410-416.
[72] Piek E, Heldin CH, Ten Dijke P. Specificity , diversity and regulation in TGF-βsuperfamily signaling[J]. FASEB J, 1999, 13(15): 2105-2124.
[73] Dnnl S, Itoh S,Viven D, et al. Directin binding lf Smd3 and Smd4 to critical TGF beta-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene[J]. EMBO J, 1998, 17(11): 3091- 3100.
[74] Poncelet AC,Schnaper HW. Sp1 and Smad proteins cooperate to mediate transforming growth factor-beta l-indueed alpha2 (I) collagen expression in human glomerular mesangial cells[J]. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276(10): 6953-6992.
[75] Jankmecht R, Wells NJ, Hunter T. TGF-beta stimulated cooperation of smad proteins with the coactivators CBP/p300[J]. Genes Dev, 1998, 12(14): 2114-2119.
[76] Sano Y,Harada J,Tashiro S,et al. ATF-2 is a common nuelear target of Smad and TAK1 pathways intransforming growth factor- beta signaling[J]. J Biol Chem 1999, 274(13): 8949-8957.
[77] Dennler S,Prunier C,Ferrand N,et al. c-Jun inhibits transforming growth factor beta-mediated transcription by repressing Smad3 transcriptional activity[J]. J Biol Chem 2000: 275(37): 28858-28865.
[78] Akiyoshi S, Inoue H,Hanai J,et al. c-Ski acts as a transcriptional co-repressor intransforming growth factor-beta signaling through interaction with smads[J]. J Biol Chem, 1999: 274(49): 35269-35277.
[79] Strosehein SL,Wang W,Zhou S,et al. Negative feedbaek regulation of TGF-beta signaling by the SnoN oncoprotein[J]. Seienee, 1999, 286(5440): 771-774.
[80] Cano E, Mahadevan LC. Parallel signal processing among mammalian MAPKs[J]. Trends Biochem Sci, 1996, 20(3): 117-122.
[81] Gupta S, Bartett T, Whitmarsh AJ, et al. Selective interaction of JNK protein kinase isoforms with transcription factors[J]. EMBO J, 1996,15(11): 2760-2770.
[82] Han J, Lee J-D, Bibbs L, et al. AMAP kinase targeted by endotoxin and hyperosmolarity inmammalian cells[J]. Science, 1994, 265(5137): 808-811.
[83] Boyer B, Roche S, Denoyelle M, et al. Src and Ras are involved in separate pathways in epithelial cell scattering[J]. EMBO J, 1997, 16(19): 5904-5913.
[84] Peinado H, Quintanilla M, Cano A. Transforming growth factor beta-1 induces snail transcription factor in epithelial cell lines: mechanisms for epithelial mesenchymal transitions[J]. J Biol Chem, 2003, 278(23): 21113-21123.
[85]王玉,李晓玫,王海燕.白介素-1β通过JNK/P38信号转导通路调控肾系膜细胞表达α-平滑肌肌动蛋白.生理学报, 2001, 54: 244-250.
[86] Nagatoya K, Moriyama T, Kawada N, et al. Y - 27632 prevents tubulointerstitial fibrosis in mouse kidneys with unilateral ureteral obstruction[J]. Kidney Int, 2002, 61 (5) : 1684 - 1695.
[87] Kimura K, Ito M, Amano M, et al. Regulation of myosin phosphatase by Rho and Rho-associated kinase (Rho-kinase) [J]. Science, 1996, 273 (5272): 245 - 248.
[88] Bhowmick NA, Ghiassi M, Bakin A, et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transdifferentiation through a RhoA-dependent mechanism[J]. Mol Biol Cell, 2001, 12(1): 27-36.
[89] Hutchison N,Hendry BM,Sharpe CC. Rho isoforms have distinct and specific functions in the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition in renal proximal tubular cells [J]. Cellelar Signalling, 2009, 21(10): 1522-1531.
[90] Kim JT, Joo CK. Involvement of cell-cell interactions in the rapid stimulation of Cas tyrosine phosphoyrlation and Src kinase activity by transforming growth factor-beta1[J]. J Biol Chem, 2002, 277(35): 31938-31948.
[91]张梅,李晓玫.上皮细胞转分化的信号转导研究进展及其在肾小管的研究现状[J].生理科学进展, 2004, 35(3): 219-223.
[92] Peron P, Rahmani M, Zagar Y, et al. Potentiation of Smad transactivation by Jun proteins during a combined treatment with epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor-beta in rat hepatocytes. role of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinae-induced AP-1 activation[J]. J Biol Chem,2001, 276(13): 10524-10531.
[93] Razzaque MS, Taguchi T. Cellular and molecular events leading to renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis[J]. Med Electron Microse, 2002, 35(2) :68– 80.
[94] Struz F, Neilson EG. New insight into mechanisms of fibrosis in immune renal injury. Springer Semin Immunopathol, 2003, 24(4) : 459– 476.
[95] Jinder K, Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Huang XR, et al. Tubular phenotypic change in progressivetubulointerstital fibrosis in human glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis, 2001, 38: 761-769.
[96] Liu Y. Renal fibrosis: new insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics. Kidney Int, 2006,69(2): 213-217.
[97]赵霞,刘全宏,王筱冰.细胞骨架纤维间的相互联系.细胞生物学杂志, 2008, 30: 191-195.
[98] Zavadil J, B?ttinger EP. TGF-beta and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Oncogene, 2005, 24(37): 5764-5774.
[99] Gallicano GI, Kouklis P, Bauer C, et al. Desmoplakin is required early in development for assembly of desmosomes and cytoskeletal linkage[J]. J Cell Biol, 1998, 143(7): 2009–2022.
[100] Amar LS, Shabana al-HM, Oboeuf M, et al. Desmosomes are regulated by protein kinase C in primary rat epithelial cells[J]. Cell Adhes Commun, 1998, 5(1): 1-12.
[101]夏伟,周建伟.细胞骨架与细胞凋亡及细胞内信息通路的关系[J].细胞生物学杂志,2001,23(4):205-209.
[102] Keshamouni VG,Jagtap P,Michailidis G, et al. Temporal quantitative proteomics by iTRAQ 2D-LC-MS/Ms and corresponding mRNA expression analysis identify post-transcriptional modulation of actin-cytoskeleton regulators during TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition[J]. J Proteome Res, 2009, 8(1): 35-47.
[103] Sedor JR, Nakazato Y, Konieczkowaski M.Interleukin-1 and mesangial cell[J]. Kidney Int, 1992, 41(3):595-599.
[104] Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Main IW, Tesch GH, Lan HY, Atkins RC.Interleukin-1 in renal fibrosis[J]. Kidney Int Suppl, 1996, 54: S88-90.
[105] Nikolic-Paterson DJ, Lan HY, Atkins RC. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonism[J]. Semin Nephrol 1996;54(16):S88-90.
[106] Doerner AM, Zuraw BL.TGF-β1 induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) in human bronchial epithelial cells is enhanced by IL-1βbut notabrogated by corticosteroids[J]. Respiratory Research, 2009, 10:100.
[107] Chaudhuri V, Zhou L, Karasek M.Inflammatory cytokines induce the transformation of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells into myofibroblasts: a potential role in skin fibrogenesis[J]. J Cutan Pathol, 2007, 34(2): 146-53.
[108] Verdier MP, Seite S, Guntzer K, et al. Immunohistochemical analysis of transforminggrowth factor beta isoforms and their receptors in human cartilage from normal and osteoarthritic femoral heads[J]. Rheumatol Int, 2005, 25 (2):118-124.
[109] Takahashi N, Rieneck K, van PM. Elucidation of IL-1/TGF-b interactions in mouse chondrocyte cell line by genome-wide gene expression[J]. OsteoArthritis and Cartilage, 2005, 13(5): 426-438.
[110] Luna E J, Hitt A L. Cytoskelelon-plasma memhrame interactions[J].Science. 1992, 258(5084): 955-964.
[111] Newman ME, Ben-Zeev A, Lerer B. Chloroamphetamine did not prevent the effects of chronic antidepressants on 5-hydroxytryptamine inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase in rat hippocampus[J]. Eur J Pharmacol. 1991, 207(3): 209-213.
[112]马小明,冯若飞,邹文辉.微管功能的研究进展[J].西北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 27(62): 66-69.