松辽盆地岩性油气藏相对振幅保持处理关键技术研究
|
摘要
岩性油气藏作为大庆油田未来增储上产的主要目标,已经受到地质及地球物理学家们的关注。扶余、杨大城子油层的河道砂体是大庆油田岩性油气藏的主要类型之一。由于河道砂体具有阻抗差异小、波组特征变化快的特点,因此要在地震资料处理中注重相对振幅保持和提高分辨率处理,从而使地震波振幅能定性反映河道砂体反射系数的变化。为此,本文对松辽盆地相对振幅保持处理的关键技术(静校正、能量补偿及反褶积)进行了深入研究。
本文以各种静校正方法原理为基础,实现了综合建模静校正方法,建立了适合于松辽盆地岩性油气藏勘探的静校正处理方法。在常规大地吸收衰减分析的基础上,实现了一种时频定量分析方法和时频空间域球面发散和吸收衰减补偿方法;研究了一种激发能量定量分析方法以检验能量补偿效果;研究了一种激发子波定量分析方法以检验反褶积的效果。以上技术方法在松辽盆地岩性油气藏勘探中进行了实际应用,都取得了满意的效果。本论文的几个创新点如下:
(1)实现了一种综合建模静校正方法,解决了松辽盆地岩性油气藏地表复杂区和不同年度区块连片处理中存在的静校正问题。实际应用取得了明显的效果;
(2)针对球面发散与吸收衰减补偿方法只能补偿随时间增加导致的能量衰减,地表一致性振幅校正只能沿空间方向校正能量差异的问题,提出并实现了一种时频空间域球面发散和吸收衰减补偿方法,它可从时间、空间和频率域对地震波的衰减进行补偿,并在实际处理中见到了明显的效果;
(3)为了解决地震资料处理中只能对地震资料的大地吸收衰减分析做定性分析的问题,提出了一种时频定量分析方法,可对大地吸收衰减进行定量分析;为检验叠前相对振幅保持能量补偿的效果,提出并实现了一种激发能量定量分析方法;为检验叠前相对振幅保持反褶积的效果,提出了一种激发子波定量分析方法,使验证大地吸收衰减分析、能量补偿及反褶积效果的方式由定性分析方式向定量分析方式转变。
Because Lithological reservoirs will become main exploration area increasing oil reserves and stabilizing oil production in Daqing oil field,geologist and geophysicist pay more attention on lithological reservoirs. River channel sand body in Fuyu ,Yangdachengzi oil layer is the main kind of lithological reservoirs in Daqing oil field.Because the wave impedance difference is small,the wave group characteristic changes quickly in river channel sand body, we must pay more attention on relative amplitude preservation and enhancing resolution processing in order to make use of the seismic wave amplitude to analyse the change of reflection factor of river channel sand body qualitatively, This article has conducted the deep research on relative amplitude preservation processing key techniques (static correction, energy compensation and deconvolution) of lithological reservoirs in Songliao Basin.
The paper has presented one method of integrated modeling static correction based on every static correction method and established the static correction method which is suitable for lithological reservoirs exploration in Songliao Basin; In the light of analysis of traditional earth absorption attenuation, one method which is time-frequency quantitative analysis,and one method of spherical divergence and absorption attenuation compensation in time-frequency space field were presented;In order to examine the effectiveness of energy compensation, one method about excited energy quantitative analysis was realized; In order to examine deconvolution's effect, one method on excited wavelet quantitative analysis was realized.These methods have been applied to the lithological reservoirs exploration in Songliao Basin. The result is very good. The paper brings out several innovative points in the following areas:
(1)Integrated modeling static correction method has solved static correction problem with complex surface area and different exploration project joined processing in Songliao Basin. The application is satisfied for lithological reservoirs exploration in Songliao Basin.
(2)In order to solve the problem of which the method of spherical divergence and absorption attenuation compensation only compensates energy in time field,and of which the method of surface-consistent amplitude correction only correct energy difference in space field. In the paper,a method of spherical divergence and absorption attenuation compensation in time-frequency space field was presented. The application is satisfied for seismic data processing.
(3)In order to solve the problem with qualitative analysis of earth absorption attenuation in seismic data processing,a method of time-frequency quantitative analysis was presented,It could analyse earth absorption attenuation quantitatively. In order to examine the effectiveness of energy compensation processing in pre-stack relative amplitude preservation processing, an excited energy quantitative analysis method was realized; In order to examine deconvolution's effectiveness in pre-stack relative amplitude preservation processing,an excited wavelet quantitative analysis method was realized.The way of analysis of earth absorption attenuation, examining energy compensation processing and examining deconvolution processing is transformed from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis.
本文以各种静校正方法原理为基础,实现了综合建模静校正方法,建立了适合于松辽盆地岩性油气藏勘探的静校正处理方法。在常规大地吸收衰减分析的基础上,实现了一种时频定量分析方法和时频空间域球面发散和吸收衰减补偿方法;研究了一种激发能量定量分析方法以检验能量补偿效果;研究了一种激发子波定量分析方法以检验反褶积的效果。以上技术方法在松辽盆地岩性油气藏勘探中进行了实际应用,都取得了满意的效果。本论文的几个创新点如下:
(1)实现了一种综合建模静校正方法,解决了松辽盆地岩性油气藏地表复杂区和不同年度区块连片处理中存在的静校正问题。实际应用取得了明显的效果;
(2)针对球面发散与吸收衰减补偿方法只能补偿随时间增加导致的能量衰减,地表一致性振幅校正只能沿空间方向校正能量差异的问题,提出并实现了一种时频空间域球面发散和吸收衰减补偿方法,它可从时间、空间和频率域对地震波的衰减进行补偿,并在实际处理中见到了明显的效果;
(3)为了解决地震资料处理中只能对地震资料的大地吸收衰减分析做定性分析的问题,提出了一种时频定量分析方法,可对大地吸收衰减进行定量分析;为检验叠前相对振幅保持能量补偿的效果,提出并实现了一种激发能量定量分析方法;为检验叠前相对振幅保持反褶积的效果,提出了一种激发子波定量分析方法,使验证大地吸收衰减分析、能量补偿及反褶积效果的方式由定性分析方式向定量分析方式转变。
Because Lithological reservoirs will become main exploration area increasing oil reserves and stabilizing oil production in Daqing oil field,geologist and geophysicist pay more attention on lithological reservoirs. River channel sand body in Fuyu ,Yangdachengzi oil layer is the main kind of lithological reservoirs in Daqing oil field.Because the wave impedance difference is small,the wave group characteristic changes quickly in river channel sand body, we must pay more attention on relative amplitude preservation and enhancing resolution processing in order to make use of the seismic wave amplitude to analyse the change of reflection factor of river channel sand body qualitatively, This article has conducted the deep research on relative amplitude preservation processing key techniques (static correction, energy compensation and deconvolution) of lithological reservoirs in Songliao Basin.
The paper has presented one method of integrated modeling static correction based on every static correction method and established the static correction method which is suitable for lithological reservoirs exploration in Songliao Basin; In the light of analysis of traditional earth absorption attenuation, one method which is time-frequency quantitative analysis,and one method of spherical divergence and absorption attenuation compensation in time-frequency space field were presented;In order to examine the effectiveness of energy compensation, one method about excited energy quantitative analysis was realized; In order to examine deconvolution's effect, one method on excited wavelet quantitative analysis was realized.These methods have been applied to the lithological reservoirs exploration in Songliao Basin. The result is very good. The paper brings out several innovative points in the following areas:
(1)Integrated modeling static correction method has solved static correction problem with complex surface area and different exploration project joined processing in Songliao Basin. The application is satisfied for lithological reservoirs exploration in Songliao Basin.
(2)In order to solve the problem of which the method of spherical divergence and absorption attenuation compensation only compensates energy in time field,and of which the method of surface-consistent amplitude correction only correct energy difference in space field. In the paper,a method of spherical divergence and absorption attenuation compensation in time-frequency space field was presented. The application is satisfied for seismic data processing.
(3)In order to solve the problem with qualitative analysis of earth absorption attenuation in seismic data processing,a method of time-frequency quantitative analysis was presented,It could analyse earth absorption attenuation quantitatively. In order to examine the effectiveness of energy compensation processing in pre-stack relative amplitude preservation processing, an excited energy quantitative analysis method was realized; In order to examine deconvolution's effectiveness in pre-stack relative amplitude preservation processing,an excited wavelet quantitative analysis method was realized.The way of analysis of earth absorption attenuation, examining energy compensation processing and examining deconvolution processing is transformed from qualitative analysis to quantitative analysis.
引文
[1]Ricker N. Wavelet contraction,wavelet expression,and the control of seismic resolution. Geophysics,1953,18(6):769～792
[2]Widess M A. How thin is a thin bed?. Geophysics,1973,38(8):1176～1180
[3]Sheriff R E. Limitations on resolution of seismic reflection and geologic detail derivable from them. AAPG Memoir 26,1977,3～14
[4]Denham L R, Sheriff R E. What is horizontal resolution? Expanded Abstract of 50th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1980 Session G17
[5]Kallweit R S, Wood L C. The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets. Geophysics,1982,47(7):1035～1046
[6]Widess M B. Quantifying resolution power of seismic systems Geophysics,1982, 47(8):1160～1173
[7]Sheriff R E, Geldart L P. Exploration seismology. Camtridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.152～155
[8]Knapp R W. Vertical resolution of thick beds,thin beds,and bed cyclothems. Geophysics,1990,55(9):1183～1190
[9]Beylkin G, Oristaglio M, Miller D. Spatial resolution of migration algorithms. Proceeding of 14th International Symposium on Accoustical Imaging,1985,155～167
[10]Safar M H. On the lateral resolution achieved by Kirchhoff migration. Geophysics,1985,50(8):1091～1099
[11]Vermeer G J O. Factors affecting spatial resolution. The Leading Edge,1998, 17(10):1025～1030
[12]von Seggern D. Depth-imaging resolution of 3-D seismic recording patterns. Geophysics,1994,59(5):564～576
[13]俞寿朋.高分辨率地震勘探.北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[14]李庆忠.走向精确勘探的道路.北京:石油工业出版社,1991
[15]云美厚.地震分辨力新认识.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(5):603～608
[16]Mateker E J Jr,Wu C. Relative amplitude preservation and hydrocarbon Detection:Presented at the 43rd Annual International SEG Meeting,October 23,in Mexico City.
[17]Taner M T,Koehler F. Surface consistent reflection amplitudes: Presented at the 44th Annual International SEG Meeting,November 14,in Dallas.
[18]杜世通.地震技术识别与描述超薄储层的潜力与局限.石油地球物理勘探,2005, 40(6): 652～662
[19]王捷主编.油藏描述技术---勘探阶段.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[20]张昕,郑晓东.裂隙发育带地震识别预测技术研究进展.石油地球物理勘探,2005, 40(6):724～730
[21]鲍祥生,尹成,赵伟,等.储层预测的地震属性优选技术研究.石油物探,2006,45(1): 28～33
[22]季玉新,欧钦.优选地震属性预测储层参数方法与应用研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003, 38(增刊):57～62
[23]谢占安,周锦明.提高隐蔽油气藏勘探能力的新思路.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(5):609～615
[24]凌云研究组.基本地震属性在沉积环境解释中的应用研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003, 38(6):642～653
[25]凌云研究组.应用振幅调谐探测小于1/4波长的地质目标.石油地球物理勘探,2003, 38(3):268～274
[26]凌云研究组.地震分辨率极限问题的研究.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(4):435～442
[27]凌云研究组.叠前相对保持振幅、频率、相位和波形的地震数据处理与评价研究.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(5):543～552
[28]凌云研究组.三维地震数据的分析和监控方法研究.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(5): 433～440
[29]凌云研究组.叠后相对振幅保持处理研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(5): 501～506
[30]师永民.高分辨率砂泥岩薄互层储层综合预测技术.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(5): 661～668
[31]陈树民,于晶.松辽盆地北部储层预测技术发展历程及岩性油藏地震识别技术.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):103～106
[32]郭栋,韩文功.高分辨率地震资料综合解释技术及其应用.勘探地球物理进展,2004, 27(4):290～296
[33]陈佳梁,胡润苗.高分辨率三维地震勘探隐蔽油气藏的效果.石油地球物理勘探,2005, 40(4):451～453
[34]Farr J B. High-resolution seismic methods improve stratigraphic exploration. Oil&Gas Journal,1977,75(48):182～188
[35]T MMcGEE. The use of marine seismic profiling for environmental assessment. Geoph Prospecting,1990,38:861～880
[36]唐建业,汤英侠.淮南煤田刘庄区地质勘探经验.煤田地质与勘探,1989年专刊
[37]杜世通主编.地震波动力学.山东东营:石油大学出版社,1996
[38]杜世通.地震层序模型与地震资料高分辨率处理.勘探家(石油与天然气)---油气勘探进展丛书.北京:石油工业出版社,1998,17～23
[39]刘雯林著.油气田开发地震技术.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[40]Brian Russell et al. Multiattribute seismic analysis. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(10):1439～1443
[41]Quincy C, Steve S. Seismic attribute technology for reservoir forecasting and monitoring. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(5):445～456
[42]Catherine L. Seismic attribute for reservoir monitoring. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(5):459～469
[43]Maria Angela Capello de P, Michael B. Rock physics in seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(9):1255～1260
[44]Wayne D P. Seismic petrophysics: An applied science for reservoir geophysics. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(3):241～244
[45]Cynthia T K. Potential risks when using seismic attributes as predictors of reservoir properties. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(3):247～251
[46]Steven C, Paul f. 3-D reservoir characterization with horizon visualization and inversion animation. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(12):1744～1748
[47]Rijks E J H, Jauffred J C E M. Attribute extraction: An important applicationin any detailed 3-D interpretation study. Seismic interpretation series 29, Published by SEG, 1990～1992
[48]渥·伊尔马滋著.地震资料分析(,刘怀山等).北京:石油工业出版社,2006
[49]牟永光.地震勘探资料数字处理方法.北京:石油工业出版社,1981
[50]王彦春,苑春芳著.静校正及神经网络处理技术.北京:地质出版社,2000
[51]童思友,尚新民,石林光,等.三维折射波静校正方法及应用.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(增刊):79～82
[52]王彦春,余钦范,段云卿,等.三维折射波静校正.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(1):15～21
[53]林伯香,孙晶梅,徐颖,等.几种常见静校正方法的探讨.石油物探,2006,41(4):367～372
[54]李福中,邢国栋,白旭明,等.初至波层析反演静校正方法研究.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(6):710～718
[55]李录明,罗省贤.复杂三维表层模型层析反演与静校正.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(6): 636～641
[56]李录明,罗省贤,赵波,等.初至波表层模型层析反演.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(5): 559～564
[57]张翠兰.低松弛层析成像反演二维、三维折射静校正.国外油气勘探,1995,7(5): 564～578
[58]李家康,余云英.层析速度反演静校正.复杂地表与复杂构造条件下的地球物理勘探技术研讨会(会议论文、兰州),1999.08:139～142
[59]张荣忠,单联瑜.层析成像技术在静校正中的应用.国外油气勘探,1998,10(4):460～469
[60]华勇.折射层析静校正方法及其应用效果.勘探地球物理进展,2002,5
[61]杨飚,尹天奎,刘连升,等.层析静校正成功解决吐哈胜北三维地震长波长问题.勘探地球物理进展,2002,2
[62]刘伊克,常旭,王辉,李福中,等.三维复杂地形近地表速度估算及地震层析静校正.地球物理学报,2001,2
[63]井西利.大剩余静校正量求解的两步法.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(1):22～26
[64]林伯香.RG值应是等效低速带的静校正量.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(6):656～660
[65]Hagedoorn J G. The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophys Prosp, 1959,7:158～182
[66]Palmer D. The generalized reciprocal method of refraction seismic interpretation. Geophysics, 1981,46(11):1508～1518
[67]Schneider W A, Kuo S. Refraction modeling for statics corrections.Presented at the 55th Annual Internat SEG.Mtg
[68]Hampson D, Russell B. First-break interpretation using generalized inversion. J. Can. Soc. Explor. Geophys, 1984,20:40～54
[69]Baixas F, Du Pont R. Practica view of 3-D refraction statics. Expanded Abstracts of 58th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1988:787～790
[70]De Amorim W N, Hubral P, Tygel M. Computing field statics with the help of seismic tomography. Geophys Prospecting, 1987,35:907～919
[71]Farrell R C and Euwema R N. Refraction Statics. Proc. Inst. Eleetr. Electron. Eng, 1984,72:1316～1329
[72]Hileman J A, Embree P, Pfleuger J C. Automated static corrections. Geophys Prospecting, 1968,16:326～358
[73]Hill R N. Downward continuation of refracted arrivals to determine shallowstructure. Geophysics, 1987,52(9):1188～1198
[74]Hill R N, Wuenschel P C. Numerical modeling of refraction arrivals in complex areas. Geophysics, 1985,50(1):90～98
[75]Kircheimer F. 3-D Refraction statics by weighted least-squares inversion. Expanded Abstracts of 59th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1988:794～797
[76]Schneider W A, Kuo S. Refraction modeling for statics corrections. Expanded Abstracts of 55th Annual Internat SEG Mtg, 1985:295～299
[77]Taner M T, Koehler F, Alhilali K A. Estimation and correction of near-surface time anomalies. Geophysics, 1974,39(4):441～463
[78]Taner M T, Wagner D E, Baysal E, et al. A unified method for 2-D and 3-D refraction statics.Geophysics,1998.63(1):260～274
[79]李明亮. EGRM折射静校正方法及处理效果分析.物探科技通报,1987,第2期
[80]陈广思.相对折射静校正方法.石油地球物理勘探,1990,25(4):407～428
[81]陈祖传. LVL折射新方法.石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(1):55～62
[82]郑鸿明.折射波法相对静校正.石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(3):430～441
[83]李录明.动校正前初至波自动剩余静校正.石油地球物理勘探,1996,24(2):179～186
[84]Taner M T, Koehler F. Surface-consistent corrections.Geophysics,1981,46(1): 17～22
[85]Ronen J, Claerbout J F. Surface-consistent residual statics estimation by stack-power-maximization. Geophysics, 1985,50(11):2759～2767
[86]Wiggins R A, Larner K L, Wisecup R D. Residual statics analysis as a general linear inverse problem.Geophysics,1976,41(5):922～928
[87]Gulunay N. A new method for the surface-consistent decomposition of statics using diminishing residual matrices(DRM). Expanded Abstracts of 55th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985:293～295
[88]耿建华.Kirchhoff积分波场延拓基准面静校正方法研究.同济大学学报,1996,24(6): 665-669
[89]凌云.大地吸收衰减分析.石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(1):1～8
[90]舒德新,凌云.地表一致性统计振幅补偿.物探科技通报,1991,9(2):155～164
[91]高军,凌云,周兴元,等.时频域球面发散和吸收补偿.石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(6): 856～866
[92]高军,凌云,吴琳.时频空间域球面发散与吸收补偿.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(2): 176～182
[93]刘喜武,刘洪.基于广义S变换的吸收衰减补偿方法.石油物探,2006,45(1):9～14 [89]
[94]张宇.振幅保真的单程波方程偏移理论.地球物理学报,2006,49(5):1410～1430
[95]Claerbout J F. Fundamentals of geophysical data processing.McGraw-Hill Book Co,1976
[96]Claerbut J F, Robinson E A. The error in least square inverse filtering. Geophysics,1964,29(1):118～120
[97]Treitel S, Lines L R. Linear inverse theory and deconvolution.Geophysics,1982, 47(8):1153～1159
[98]Pusey L C. Band-limited spikiness deconvolution.Expanded Abstracts of 58th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985:715～717
[99]Backus M M. Water reverberations: their nature and elimination. Geophysics,1959,24(2),233～261
[100]Robinson E A. Predictive decomposition of seismic traces.Geophysics,1957, 22(4):767～778
[101]Ulrych T J, Milton Porsani J T, Fokkema, et al. Predictive deconvolution in the frequency domain.Geophysics,1988,53(11): 727～730
[102]Peacock K L, Treitel S. Predictive deconvolution theory and practice.1969, 34(2):155～169
[103]Toshifumi Matsuoka, Ulrych T J. The output of predicitive deconvolution. Expanded Abstracts of 55th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985
[104]Morley L, Claerbout J F. Predictive deconvolution in shot-reciever space. Geophysics,1983,48(5):515～531
[105]Levin S A. Surface-consistent deconvolution.Geophysics,1989,54(9):1123～1133
[106]Cambois G, Stoffa P L. Surface-consistent deconvolution in the log-Fourier domain.Geophysics, 1992,57(6):823～840
[107]Cary P W, Lorentz G A. Four-component surface-consistent deconvolution. Geophysics,1993,58(3):383～392
[108]Taner M T and Coburn k. surface-consistent deconvolution. Expanded Abstracts of 51th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,
[109]Levin Rothwan. Deconvolution with spatial constraints-the surface consistent. SEP54,1987
[110]Huang X J, Chen H B. Least-squares deconvolution of the mixed-phase unknown pulse. Expanded Abstracts of 58th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985:734～737
[111]伊振林,王润秋.一种新的混合相位反褶积方法.石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(3): 266～270
[112]Ulrych T J. Application of homomorphic deconvolution to seismology.Geophysics, 1971, 36(4):650～660
[113]Stoffa P L, Buhl P, Bryan G M. The Application of homomorphic deconvolution To shallow water marine seismology-part 1:models.Geophysics,1974,39(4): 401～416
[114]Wiggins R A. Minimim entropy deconvolution in computer aided seismic analysis and destrimination.Geoexploration,1978,16
[115]Claerbout J F. Minimum entropy source waveform estimation-deconvolution non gaussian.SEP7,1995
[116]Kormylo J, Mendel J M. Maximum liklihood detection and estimation of bernoulli-gaussian processes. IEEE Trans.On Info.theory,V28,1982
[117]Loup G E, Loup J W. Iterative deconvolution.Geophysics,1983,48(9):1287～1290
[118]Todoeschuck J P, Jensen O G. Joseph geology and seismic deconvolution. Geophysics,1988,53(11):1410～1414
[119]Taylor H l, Banks S C, Meloy T F. Deconvolution with the L1 norm.Geophysics, 1979,44(1):39～52
[120]李凤林,王承曙.L_1模反褶积的一种矩阵求逆迭代方法.石油地球物理勘探,1988, 23(5):523～532
[121]Burg J P. Maximum entropy spectral analysis.SEP6,1975
[122]Gibson B, Larner K L. Comparison of spectral flattening techniques. Unpublishedtechnical document, Western Geophysical Company,1982.
[123]Goupillaud P L. An approach to inverse filtering of near-surface layer effects from seismic records.Geophysics,1961,26(6):754～760
[124]Hargreaves N D, Calvert A J. Inverse Q filtering by Fourier transform. Geophysics,1991,56(4):519～527
[125]Kjartansson E. Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation. J. Geophys. Res, 1979,84:4737～4748
[126]Hale I D.Q-adaptive deconvolution.Standford Exploration Project,Rep,No.30: 133～158
[127]Robinson E A,Treitel S.Geophysical signal analysis.Prentice-Hall Book Co.
[128]张永刚,付才芳.物探科技通报,1987,第3期
[129]程乾生.信号数字处理的数学原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1979
[130]黄绪德.反褶积与地震道反演.北京:石油工业出版社,1992
[131]陆基孟.地震勘探原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1982
[132]Milton J Porsani,Bjorn Ursin. Mixed-phase deconvolution. Geophysics,1998: 63(2):637～647
[2]Widess M A. How thin is a thin bed?. Geophysics,1973,38(8):1176～1180
[3]Sheriff R E. Limitations on resolution of seismic reflection and geologic detail derivable from them. AAPG Memoir 26,1977,3～14
[4]Denham L R, Sheriff R E. What is horizontal resolution? Expanded Abstract of 50th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1980 Session G17
[5]Kallweit R S, Wood L C. The limits of resolution of zero-phase wavelets. Geophysics,1982,47(7):1035～1046
[6]Widess M B. Quantifying resolution power of seismic systems Geophysics,1982, 47(8):1160～1173
[7]Sheriff R E, Geldart L P. Exploration seismology. Camtridge:Cambridge University Press,1982.152～155
[8]Knapp R W. Vertical resolution of thick beds,thin beds,and bed cyclothems. Geophysics,1990,55(9):1183～1190
[9]Beylkin G, Oristaglio M, Miller D. Spatial resolution of migration algorithms. Proceeding of 14th International Symposium on Accoustical Imaging,1985,155～167
[10]Safar M H. On the lateral resolution achieved by Kirchhoff migration. Geophysics,1985,50(8):1091～1099
[11]Vermeer G J O. Factors affecting spatial resolution. The Leading Edge,1998, 17(10):1025～1030
[12]von Seggern D. Depth-imaging resolution of 3-D seismic recording patterns. Geophysics,1994,59(5):564～576
[13]俞寿朋.高分辨率地震勘探.北京:石油工业出版社,1993
[14]李庆忠.走向精确勘探的道路.北京:石油工业出版社,1991
[15]云美厚.地震分辨力新认识.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(5):603～608
[16]Mateker E J Jr,Wu C. Relative amplitude preservation and hydrocarbon Detection:Presented at the 43rd Annual International SEG Meeting,October 23,in Mexico City.
[17]Taner M T,Koehler F. Surface consistent reflection amplitudes: Presented at the 44th Annual International SEG Meeting,November 14,in Dallas.
[18]杜世通.地震技术识别与描述超薄储层的潜力与局限.石油地球物理勘探,2005, 40(6): 652～662
[19]王捷主编.油藏描述技术---勘探阶段.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[20]张昕,郑晓东.裂隙发育带地震识别预测技术研究进展.石油地球物理勘探,2005, 40(6):724～730
[21]鲍祥生,尹成,赵伟,等.储层预测的地震属性优选技术研究.石油物探,2006,45(1): 28～33
[22]季玉新,欧钦.优选地震属性预测储层参数方法与应用研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003, 38(增刊):57～62
[23]谢占安,周锦明.提高隐蔽油气藏勘探能力的新思路.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(5):609～615
[24]凌云研究组.基本地震属性在沉积环境解释中的应用研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003, 38(6):642～653
[25]凌云研究组.应用振幅调谐探测小于1/4波长的地质目标.石油地球物理勘探,2003, 38(3):268～274
[26]凌云研究组.地震分辨率极限问题的研究.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(4):435～442
[27]凌云研究组.叠前相对保持振幅、频率、相位和波形的地震数据处理与评价研究.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(5):543～552
[28]凌云研究组.三维地震数据的分析和监控方法研究.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(5): 433～440
[29]凌云研究组.叠后相对振幅保持处理研究.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(5): 501～506
[30]师永民.高分辨率砂泥岩薄互层储层综合预测技术.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(5): 661～668
[31]陈树民,于晶.松辽盆地北部储层预测技术发展历程及岩性油藏地震识别技术.大庆石油地质与开发,2004,23(5):103～106
[32]郭栋,韩文功.高分辨率地震资料综合解释技术及其应用.勘探地球物理进展,2004, 27(4):290～296
[33]陈佳梁,胡润苗.高分辨率三维地震勘探隐蔽油气藏的效果.石油地球物理勘探,2005, 40(4):451～453
[34]Farr J B. High-resolution seismic methods improve stratigraphic exploration. Oil&Gas Journal,1977,75(48):182～188
[35]T MMcGEE. The use of marine seismic profiling for environmental assessment. Geoph Prospecting,1990,38:861～880
[36]唐建业,汤英侠.淮南煤田刘庄区地质勘探经验.煤田地质与勘探,1989年专刊
[37]杜世通主编.地震波动力学.山东东营:石油大学出版社,1996
[38]杜世通.地震层序模型与地震资料高分辨率处理.勘探家(石油与天然气)---油气勘探进展丛书.北京:石油工业出版社,1998,17～23
[39]刘雯林著.油气田开发地震技术.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
[40]Brian Russell et al. Multiattribute seismic analysis. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(10):1439～1443
[41]Quincy C, Steve S. Seismic attribute technology for reservoir forecasting and monitoring. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(5):445～456
[42]Catherine L. Seismic attribute for reservoir monitoring. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(5):459～469
[43]Maria Angela Capello de P, Michael B. Rock physics in seismic monitoring. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(9):1255～1260
[44]Wayne D P. Seismic petrophysics: An applied science for reservoir geophysics. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(3):241～244
[45]Cynthia T K. Potential risks when using seismic attributes as predictors of reservoir properties. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(3):247～251
[46]Steven C, Paul f. 3-D reservoir characterization with horizon visualization and inversion animation. The Leading Edge, 1997, 16(12):1744～1748
[47]Rijks E J H, Jauffred J C E M. Attribute extraction: An important applicationin any detailed 3-D interpretation study. Seismic interpretation series 29, Published by SEG, 1990～1992
[48]渥·伊尔马滋著.地震资料分析(,刘怀山等).北京:石油工业出版社,2006
[49]牟永光.地震勘探资料数字处理方法.北京:石油工业出版社,1981
[50]王彦春,苑春芳著.静校正及神经网络处理技术.北京:地质出版社,2000
[51]童思友,尚新民,石林光,等.三维折射波静校正方法及应用.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(增刊):79～82
[52]王彦春,余钦范,段云卿,等.三维折射波静校正.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(1):15～21
[53]林伯香,孙晶梅,徐颖,等.几种常见静校正方法的探讨.石油物探,2006,41(4):367～372
[54]李福中,邢国栋,白旭明,等.初至波层析反演静校正方法研究.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(6):710～718
[55]李录明,罗省贤.复杂三维表层模型层析反演与静校正.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(6): 636～641
[56]李录明,罗省贤,赵波,等.初至波表层模型层析反演.石油地球物理勘探,2000,35(5): 559～564
[57]张翠兰.低松弛层析成像反演二维、三维折射静校正.国外油气勘探,1995,7(5): 564～578
[58]李家康,余云英.层析速度反演静校正.复杂地表与复杂构造条件下的地球物理勘探技术研讨会(会议论文、兰州),1999.08:139～142
[59]张荣忠,单联瑜.层析成像技术在静校正中的应用.国外油气勘探,1998,10(4):460～469
[60]华勇.折射层析静校正方法及其应用效果.勘探地球物理进展,2002,5
[61]杨飚,尹天奎,刘连升,等.层析静校正成功解决吐哈胜北三维地震长波长问题.勘探地球物理进展,2002,2
[62]刘伊克,常旭,王辉,李福中,等.三维复杂地形近地表速度估算及地震层析静校正.地球物理学报,2001,2
[63]井西利.大剩余静校正量求解的两步法.石油地球物理勘探,2003,38(1):22～26
[64]林伯香.RG值应是等效低速带的静校正量.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(6):656～660
[65]Hagedoorn J G. The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections. Geophys Prosp, 1959,7:158～182
[66]Palmer D. The generalized reciprocal method of refraction seismic interpretation. Geophysics, 1981,46(11):1508～1518
[67]Schneider W A, Kuo S. Refraction modeling for statics corrections.Presented at the 55th Annual Internat SEG.Mtg
[68]Hampson D, Russell B. First-break interpretation using generalized inversion. J. Can. Soc. Explor. Geophys, 1984,20:40～54
[69]Baixas F, Du Pont R. Practica view of 3-D refraction statics. Expanded Abstracts of 58th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1988:787～790
[70]De Amorim W N, Hubral P, Tygel M. Computing field statics with the help of seismic tomography. Geophys Prospecting, 1987,35:907～919
[71]Farrell R C and Euwema R N. Refraction Statics. Proc. Inst. Eleetr. Electron. Eng, 1984,72:1316～1329
[72]Hileman J A, Embree P, Pfleuger J C. Automated static corrections. Geophys Prospecting, 1968,16:326～358
[73]Hill R N. Downward continuation of refracted arrivals to determine shallowstructure. Geophysics, 1987,52(9):1188～1198
[74]Hill R N, Wuenschel P C. Numerical modeling of refraction arrivals in complex areas. Geophysics, 1985,50(1):90～98
[75]Kircheimer F. 3-D Refraction statics by weighted least-squares inversion. Expanded Abstracts of 59th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1988:794～797
[76]Schneider W A, Kuo S. Refraction modeling for statics corrections. Expanded Abstracts of 55th Annual Internat SEG Mtg, 1985:295～299
[77]Taner M T, Koehler F, Alhilali K A. Estimation and correction of near-surface time anomalies. Geophysics, 1974,39(4):441～463
[78]Taner M T, Wagner D E, Baysal E, et al. A unified method for 2-D and 3-D refraction statics.Geophysics,1998.63(1):260～274
[79]李明亮. EGRM折射静校正方法及处理效果分析.物探科技通报,1987,第2期
[80]陈广思.相对折射静校正方法.石油地球物理勘探,1990,25(4):407～428
[81]陈祖传. LVL折射新方法.石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(1):55～62
[82]郑鸿明.折射波法相对静校正.石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(3):430～441
[83]李录明.动校正前初至波自动剩余静校正.石油地球物理勘探,1996,24(2):179～186
[84]Taner M T, Koehler F. Surface-consistent corrections.Geophysics,1981,46(1): 17～22
[85]Ronen J, Claerbout J F. Surface-consistent residual statics estimation by stack-power-maximization. Geophysics, 1985,50(11):2759～2767
[86]Wiggins R A, Larner K L, Wisecup R D. Residual statics analysis as a general linear inverse problem.Geophysics,1976,41(5):922～928
[87]Gulunay N. A new method for the surface-consistent decomposition of statics using diminishing residual matrices(DRM). Expanded Abstracts of 55th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985:293～295
[88]耿建华.Kirchhoff积分波场延拓基准面静校正方法研究.同济大学学报,1996,24(6): 665-669
[89]凌云.大地吸收衰减分析.石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(1):1～8
[90]舒德新,凌云.地表一致性统计振幅补偿.物探科技通报,1991,9(2):155～164
[91]高军,凌云,周兴元,等.时频域球面发散和吸收补偿.石油地球物理勘探,1996,31(6): 856～866
[92]高军,凌云,吴琳.时频空间域球面发散与吸收补偿.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(2): 176～182
[93]刘喜武,刘洪.基于广义S变换的吸收衰减补偿方法.石油物探,2006,45(1):9～14 [89]
[94]张宇.振幅保真的单程波方程偏移理论.地球物理学报,2006,49(5):1410～1430
[95]Claerbout J F. Fundamentals of geophysical data processing.McGraw-Hill Book Co,1976
[96]Claerbut J F, Robinson E A. The error in least square inverse filtering. Geophysics,1964,29(1):118～120
[97]Treitel S, Lines L R. Linear inverse theory and deconvolution.Geophysics,1982, 47(8):1153～1159
[98]Pusey L C. Band-limited spikiness deconvolution.Expanded Abstracts of 58th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985:715～717
[99]Backus M M. Water reverberations: their nature and elimination. Geophysics,1959,24(2),233～261
[100]Robinson E A. Predictive decomposition of seismic traces.Geophysics,1957, 22(4):767～778
[101]Ulrych T J, Milton Porsani J T, Fokkema, et al. Predictive deconvolution in the frequency domain.Geophysics,1988,53(11): 727～730
[102]Peacock K L, Treitel S. Predictive deconvolution theory and practice.1969, 34(2):155～169
[103]Toshifumi Matsuoka, Ulrych T J. The output of predicitive deconvolution. Expanded Abstracts of 55th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985
[104]Morley L, Claerbout J F. Predictive deconvolution in shot-reciever space. Geophysics,1983,48(5):515～531
[105]Levin S A. Surface-consistent deconvolution.Geophysics,1989,54(9):1123～1133
[106]Cambois G, Stoffa P L. Surface-consistent deconvolution in the log-Fourier domain.Geophysics, 1992,57(6):823～840
[107]Cary P W, Lorentz G A. Four-component surface-consistent deconvolution. Geophysics,1993,58(3):383～392
[108]Taner M T and Coburn k. surface-consistent deconvolution. Expanded Abstracts of 51th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,
[109]Levin Rothwan. Deconvolution with spatial constraints-the surface consistent. SEP54,1987
[110]Huang X J, Chen H B. Least-squares deconvolution of the mixed-phase unknown pulse. Expanded Abstracts of 58th Annual Internat SEG Mtg,1985:734～737
[111]伊振林,王润秋.一种新的混合相位反褶积方法.石油地球物理勘探,2006,41(3): 266～270
[112]Ulrych T J. Application of homomorphic deconvolution to seismology.Geophysics, 1971, 36(4):650～660
[113]Stoffa P L, Buhl P, Bryan G M. The Application of homomorphic deconvolution To shallow water marine seismology-part 1:models.Geophysics,1974,39(4): 401～416
[114]Wiggins R A. Minimim entropy deconvolution in computer aided seismic analysis and destrimination.Geoexploration,1978,16
[115]Claerbout J F. Minimum entropy source waveform estimation-deconvolution non gaussian.SEP7,1995
[116]Kormylo J, Mendel J M. Maximum liklihood detection and estimation of bernoulli-gaussian processes. IEEE Trans.On Info.theory,V28,1982
[117]Loup G E, Loup J W. Iterative deconvolution.Geophysics,1983,48(9):1287～1290
[118]Todoeschuck J P, Jensen O G. Joseph geology and seismic deconvolution. Geophysics,1988,53(11):1410～1414
[119]Taylor H l, Banks S C, Meloy T F. Deconvolution with the L1 norm.Geophysics, 1979,44(1):39～52
[120]李凤林,王承曙.L_1模反褶积的一种矩阵求逆迭代方法.石油地球物理勘探,1988, 23(5):523～532
[121]Burg J P. Maximum entropy spectral analysis.SEP6,1975
[122]Gibson B, Larner K L. Comparison of spectral flattening techniques. Unpublishedtechnical document, Western Geophysical Company,1982.
[123]Goupillaud P L. An approach to inverse filtering of near-surface layer effects from seismic records.Geophysics,1961,26(6):754～760
[124]Hargreaves N D, Calvert A J. Inverse Q filtering by Fourier transform. Geophysics,1991,56(4):519～527
[125]Kjartansson E. Constant Q-wave propagation and attenuation. J. Geophys. Res, 1979,84:4737～4748
[126]Hale I D.Q-adaptive deconvolution.Standford Exploration Project,Rep,No.30: 133～158
[127]Robinson E A,Treitel S.Geophysical signal analysis.Prentice-Hall Book Co.
[128]张永刚,付才芳.物探科技通报,1987,第3期
[129]程乾生.信号数字处理的数学原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1979
[130]黄绪德.反褶积与地震道反演.北京:石油工业出版社,1992
[131]陆基孟.地震勘探原理.北京:石油工业出版社,1982
[132]Milton J Porsani,Bjorn Ursin. Mixed-phase deconvolution. Geophysics,1998: 63(2):637～647