偏远地区乡土建筑风貌维护与社区旅游
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
旅游业大发展将有传统乡土建筑留存的偏远地区纳入到旅游开发的热潮当中。然而,在传统开发模式下的这些偏远地区的发展现状,让我们不得不意识到,这些地区在面临经济文化发展机遇的同时,面临着前所未有的危机。因此,探索这类地区旅游开发、发展的新模式和在此之下的规划和设计方法,有重要的现实意义。
     全文共分6章。第1章说明了研究的现实意义、阐述了研究的理论背景、界定了本文所涉及的几个基本概念。第2章简要回顾了国内对偏远地区乡土建筑旅游开发的历史;并从经济、居民生活、专业规划和设计及其管理、文化保护和环境保护等几个方面对这类旅游当中存在的问题进行分析。第3章简要介绍了社区旅游理论的产生、发展及其在国内外的实践及经验,得出社区旅游开发模式适应于偏远地区的旅游开发和发展的结论。第4章分析了偏远地区大力发展旅游业的社会经济背景,并通过对现有的此类旅游开发模式的剖析,提出了偏远地区“利益共同体”新模式的设想。第5章界定了“保护”及其与之相关的概念;深入分析了旅游的介入对于偏远地区乡土建筑整体性的影响;并将其放在历史大背景中进行考察;对中西方建筑遗产保护观念进行了深入的剖析和比较;在此基础上,引入旅游发展模式下的偏远地区乡土建筑的“风貌维护”这一概念。第6章分析了社区旅游模式下的规划建筑专家的角色转变,指出社区居民参与是社区旅游的核心;探讨社区旅游模式下目的地规划层次、景观规划层次、建筑设计层次中应考虑的问题和居民参与的内容。
     在实践中发现问题,并引发对问题深层次的分析,然后提出解决的方法,是理论研究的终极目的和意义。本文引入了适应偏远地区乡土建筑旅游开发和发展的“社区旅游”新模式,并以此作为解决现实问题的方法,有重要的理论意义。
The very development of tourism will have the remote areas that traditional vernacular buildings subsist into the fever of the tourism development.Howerer.the status of the development of these remote areas after the traditional exploiting models makes us indispensably be aware of that these areas are facing the unprecedented crisis, while facing the economic and cultural developing opportunities.Therefore.it will be an important and realistic meaning to explore the new models of tourism exploitation and development, and after which the methods of the planning and the design.
    The full thesis is divided into 6 chapters. In chapter l,it explains the realistic meaning of the research, expatiates the theoretical background of which, and defines several basic concepts involved in this thesis. In chapter 2,It looks back briefly the history of the tourism exploitation of vernacular building in these remote areas in China,meanwhile,the existent problems in this type of tourism are analyzed from several aspects, such as economy, residential life cultural protection and environmental protection etc.In chapter 3,It introduces briefly the beginning of the community tourism theory, and its development, international fulfillments and experiences, which comes to a conclusion that the model of community tourism exploitation is fit for the development of the vernacular building in these remote areas. In chapter 4,it analyses the social economic background of developing strongly the tourism in the remote areas, and putts forward the new model "community in benefits" by analyzing the current exploi
    ting models of this type of tourism. In chapter 5,It defines the "protection" and its related concepts; analyses thoroughly the entire influence of the intervention of the tourism to the vernacular building in the remote areas; investigates it under the background of the history; compares and analyses the conceptions of the architectural inheritance protection in China and the west; On this basis, it leads the concept "feature maintenance" of the vernacular building in the remote areas after the model of the tourism development. In chapter 6,it analyses the changes of roles of the planning experts and architects, pointing out it is the core the participation of the community residents, meanwhile it discusses the problems have to be considered and the contents of residential participation at the levels of destination planning landscape programming and building design after the model of community tourism.
    
    
    
    It is the ultimate purpose and meaning of theoretical research to find out the practical problems, analyses them thoroughly and then put forward the solutions. This thesis leads to the new model "community tourism" that fits the exploitation and development of the vernacular building in the remote areas, and makes it the method to resolve the realistic problems, which have significant theoretical meanings.
引文
[1] 周建明.借鉴与创新:形成中国特色的旅游发展之路.国外城市规划,201:1
    [2] Banister Fletcher. Sir. Banisrer Fletcher's A History of Architecture. The Royal institute of British Architects and The University of London, 1996, 1-4
    [3] Bernard Rudofsky. Architecture without Architects. London: Academy Edition, 1964, 1-3
    [4] 赵辰.从“建筑之树”到“文化之河”.建筑师,93:86-87
    [5] Peter E. Murphy. Tourism: a community approach. New York: Methuen Inc, 1985, 155-176
    [6] Frederick W. Lange. The Impact of Tourism on Cultural Patrimony: A Costa Rican Example. Annals of Tourism Research, 1980, 7 (1) : 56-68
    [7] 文彤.社区旅游发展研究述评.www.tourism-research.com(广东省旅游发展研究中心),2003-12-16
    [8] 张晓春,李翔宁.建筑与民俗——建筑空间的文化人类学探讨.华中建筑,1998,16(4):28
    [9] 张晓春.建筑人类学研究框架初探.新建筑,1999,6:28
    [10] 范业正,陶伟,刘锋.国外旅游规划研究进展及主要思想方法.地理科学进展,1998,17(3):89
    [11] 中国社会科学院预言研究所词典编辑室编.现代汉语词典.北京:商务印书馆,1978,238、872
    [12] 辞海.1979年版.上海:上海辞书出版社,1980,256、1042、1529
    [13] 陈志华.说说乡土建筑研究.建筑师,1997,4:78-79
    [14] 叶南客.都市社会的微观再造——中外城市社区比较新论.南京:东南大学出版社,2003,2-7
    [15] 黎洁,赵西萍.社区参与旅游发展理论的若干经济学质疑.旅游学,2001,16(4):45
    [16] 庄军,张靓.旅游社区发展模式及其经济效益探讨.高等函授学报(自然科学版),2002,15(4):49
    [17] 魏小安.国内旅游热点频出(中).www.yzdsb.com.cn.(燕赵都市报网络版),2004-01-13
    [18] 张帆.少了人文多了市侩,周庄能火多久?.中国经济时报.2003-09-30
    
    
    [19] 吴晓萍,何彪.民族地区旅游开发与民族社区的可持续发展.贵州民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2000,63:77
    [20] 邹容,卢瑞生.“老司城”一个王朝远去的背影.三湘人文地理,2003-04-17
    [21] 翟明磊.宏村之痛.南方周末,2002-3-21
    [22] 住在文物里的烦恼.www.east-law.com, 2004-3-10
    [23] 李星明,赵良艺.旅游者对发展中国家的旅游地社会文化影响研究.华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2002,36(2):254-255
    [24] 陈志华.由《关于乡土建筑遗产的宪章》引起的话.时代建筑,2000,1:21-23
    [25] 谢彦君.关于中国旅游规划操作问题的几点思考.东北财经大学学报,2001,4:41
    [26] Maria Kousis. Tourism and the Family in a Rural Cretan Community. Annals Of Tourism Research, 1989, 16 (3) : 318-332
    [27] 陶国伟.漓江旅游环境承载力研究.www.tourism-research.com(广东省旅游发展研究中心),2003-12-16
    [28] 唐顺铁.旅游目的地的社区化及社区旅游研究.地理研究,1998,17(2):148
    [29] 周玉翠,欠发达地区社区旅游研究——以湖南省邵阳市为例,地域研究与开发,第18卷第3期,1999年9月:74
    [30] Rita-Jean Browne, Mary Lee Nolan. Western Indian Reservation Tourism Development. Annals Of Tourism Research, 1989, 16 (3): 360-376
    [31] 何艺玲.如何发展社区生态旅游?——泰国HuayHee村社区生态旅游(CBET)的经验.旅游学刊,2002,17(6):57-60
    [32] 李小建.经济地理学.北京:高等教育出版社,1999,12-23
    [33] 我国为什么习惯用“老、少、边、穷”来代称贫困地区.www.baibaofp.com2004-2-29
    [34] 吴忠军.文化人类学方法在旅游规划中的应用.桂林旅游高等专科学校学报,2002,13(1):43
    [35] 李凡,金忠民.旅游对皖南古村落影响的比较研究——以西递、宏村和南屏为例.人文地理,2002,17(5):18-19
    [36] Juanita C. Liu, Pauline J. Sheldon, Turgut Var. Resident Perception of the Environmental Impacts of Tourism. Annals of Tourism Research, 1987, 14 (1): 17-37
    [37] 诸葛仁,陈挺舫,特里·德拉西.武夷山自然保护区资源管理中社区参与机制的探讨.农村生态环境,2000,16(1):47-52
    
    
    [38] UNESCO. Conservation for the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage. Paris, 1972
    [39] 董卫.城市更新中的历史遗产保护——对城市历史地段/街区保护的思考.建筑师,2000,6:32
    [40] 陆地.建筑的生与死——历史性建筑再利用研究.南京:东南大学出版社,2004,30-33
    [41] 邹统钎.体验经济时代的旅游景区开发与管理模式.www.sohu.com.2003-9-3
    [42] Paul Brunt. Paul Courtney. Host Percetions of Sociocultural Impacts. Annals of Tourism Research, 1999, 26 (3) : 493-515
    [43] 陈薇.文物建筑保护与文化学.东南大学建筑历史与理论研究文集.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1997,134-135
    [44] 吴人韦.旅游规划的基本功能.地理学与国土研究,2000,16(2):54
    [45] 李蕾蕾编译.介绍西方旅游规划的一种新趋势.人文地理,1998,13(1):64
    [46] 彭多意.发展民族社区经济方法探索——以可邑彝族生态文化旅游村项目为例.云南大学人文社会科学学报.200l,27(6):115
    [47] Janes William Jordan. The Summer People and the Natives: Some effects of Tourism in a Vermont Vacation Village. Annals of Tourism Research, 1980, 7 (11): 34-55
    [48] Wolfgang Haider, Margaret Johnston. Tourism and Community Development. Annals of Tourism Research, 1992, 19 (3): 580-583
    [49] 范业正.旅游地社区的规划与管理.社区规划与管理,2000年,16(1):25
    [50] 王春雷,周霄.从人类学视角探析区域旅游规划的社区参与.规划师,2003,19(3):72

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700