子洲—清涧气区上古生界山_2～3段、盒_8段储集层及其地球化学成因初步研究
|
摘要
鄂尔多斯盆地是一个多旋回叠合型盆地,其形成历史早、演化时间长。油气资源非常丰富,油气勘探潜力很大,它已成为我国未来油气勘探最重要的战略地区之一,油气资源分布及其探明程度直接影响着中国石油工业的发展。
运用多学科理论,结合现代测试技术方法,注意宏观与微观相结合,区域资料与单井数据相结合,野外工作与室内工作相结合,对子洲—清涧气区山西组山_2~3段及下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段储层地质特征进行了分析。研究表明,山西组山_2~3段为曲流河三角洲沉积,下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段为辫状河三角洲沉积。储集层砂体主要为曲流河三角洲和辫状河三角洲前缘水下分流河道及浅湖滩砂。
研究区山西组山_2~3段储集层岩石类型主要为石英砂岩,下石盒子组盒_8~1段岩石类型主要为岩屑砂岩,盒_8~2段岩石类型几乎全为岩屑砂岩。山_2~3段成分和结构成熟度远远好于盒_8段。经历的成岩作用有机械压实作用、胶结作用、交代作用和溶蚀作用。依据自生矿物组合、分布及形成顺序、粘土矿物转化、孔隙类型及有机质成熟度等指标进行综合分析,认为山西组山_2~3段和下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段砂岩均已进入晚成岩A亚期,大部分位于晚成岩B期。
地球化学作用是子洲—清涧气区山西组山_2~3段和下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段成岩作用和孔隙演化重要的控制因素之一。研究区目的层位胶结作用以碳酸盐胶结、硅质胶结及自生黏土矿物胶结为主;交代作用以碳酸盐矿物交代和黏土矿物的交代为主:溶蚀作用以长石的溶蚀和碳酸盐矿物溶蚀为主,压实作用、胶结作用导致孔隙减少,而溶蚀作用和粘土矿物的相互转化等有利于次生孔隙的形成,使物性改善。
次生孔隙的形成主要与碳酸盐矿物、长石的溶蚀及粘土矿物的脱水作用相关,是无机成岩作用和有机热成熟演化产生的CO_2和有机酸溶蚀可溶组分的结果。地下流体作用是必要条件,可溶物质的存在是充分条件。研究区目的层位砂岩中
Ordos Basin is a polycyclic superposition basin that is formed in an earlier geological history and has experienced a longer evolution. It possesses abundant oil and gas resources and has bright prospects in oil and gas exploration. It has been becoming one of the important tactical areas in oil and gas exploration in China. The amount of oil-gas resources and the degree which is proven up will directly influence the Chinese petroleum industry.According to theory of multidisciplines, the reservoir characteristics and its preliminary geochemical geneses of the Shan_2~3 and He_8 Member in Upper Paleozoic of Zizhou-Qingjian have been studied by means of the combination macroexamination with microexamination and regional with well data as well as the investigation in the field with research indoors. The research as follows that Shan_2~3 Member is meandering stream delta facies, Heg and Heg are both braided stream delta facies. Main reservoir bodies include the subaqueous distributary channel sandbodies of the meandering stream delta, braided stream delta front and beach sandstones.The research shows that Shan_2~3, main reservoir rock type is quartzose standstone, that of He_8~1, is lithic sandstone and Heg_8~2, rock type is nearly single lithic sandstone. What's more, the maturation of composition and texture in Shan_2~3 is much better than that of in Heg. Those rocks have experienced diagenesis of mechanical compaction, cementation, metasomasis and dissolution. Based on synthesis analyses of autogenous minerals associations and clay minerals transform and pore types as well as evolution of organic matter etc, the Shan_2~3 and Heg Member have already entered into the late
diagenesis A subage and most have reached the late diagenesis B subage.Geochemical variation strongly controls the Shan23 and Heg Member' lithogenesis and pore evolution in Zizhou-Qingjian. Carbonate and siliceous and authigenic clay cementation, carbonate authigenic clay metasomatism, feldspthic and carbonate corrosion are typical and major diagenesis which is great influenced by geochemical variation. The mechanical compaction and cementation are major factors to make reservoir to lose porosity. The dissolution playing an important role to improve reservoir quality is favorable for secondary pores.The formation of secondary pore contributes to feldspthic and carbonate corrosion as well as dehydration reaction of clay mineral, resulting of CO2 and organic acid, providing by inorganic diagenesis and organic thermal mature evolution, corroding soluble components. The dissolution of aluminosilicate and carbonate cement result in organic acid contributed by kerogen before or during it's mature stage in the source rocks and coal seams nearby, and that of silica is straightly related with alkali water in the pores. Secondary pore in Shan23 are much more than those in Heg and Heg1 is more than Heg2.In another hand, high value of porosity and permeability in Shan23 having rough pore and tunnels is usually closed to the paleochannel sandbodies, high value of porosity with low value of permeability in Heg having slim pore and tunnels represents tight reservoir.On the studying basis of depositional facies belt and sandstone body distribution with the reservoir quality as well as logging, porosity, permeability and so on, the most gas-producting favorable blocks include Yu30-Drill~Yu55-Drill, Yu29-Drill, Yu69-Drill and the more gas-producting favorable blocks include Yu68-Drill~ Yu48-Drill, Yu40-Drill, Pu2-Drill~Yu69-Drill.
运用多学科理论,结合现代测试技术方法,注意宏观与微观相结合,区域资料与单井数据相结合,野外工作与室内工作相结合,对子洲—清涧气区山西组山_2~3段及下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段储层地质特征进行了分析。研究表明,山西组山_2~3段为曲流河三角洲沉积,下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段为辫状河三角洲沉积。储集层砂体主要为曲流河三角洲和辫状河三角洲前缘水下分流河道及浅湖滩砂。
研究区山西组山_2~3段储集层岩石类型主要为石英砂岩,下石盒子组盒_8~1段岩石类型主要为岩屑砂岩,盒_8~2段岩石类型几乎全为岩屑砂岩。山_2~3段成分和结构成熟度远远好于盒_8段。经历的成岩作用有机械压实作用、胶结作用、交代作用和溶蚀作用。依据自生矿物组合、分布及形成顺序、粘土矿物转化、孔隙类型及有机质成熟度等指标进行综合分析,认为山西组山_2~3段和下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段砂岩均已进入晚成岩A亚期,大部分位于晚成岩B期。
地球化学作用是子洲—清涧气区山西组山_2~3段和下石盒子组盒_8~2段、盒_8~1段成岩作用和孔隙演化重要的控制因素之一。研究区目的层位胶结作用以碳酸盐胶结、硅质胶结及自生黏土矿物胶结为主;交代作用以碳酸盐矿物交代和黏土矿物的交代为主:溶蚀作用以长石的溶蚀和碳酸盐矿物溶蚀为主,压实作用、胶结作用导致孔隙减少,而溶蚀作用和粘土矿物的相互转化等有利于次生孔隙的形成,使物性改善。
次生孔隙的形成主要与碳酸盐矿物、长石的溶蚀及粘土矿物的脱水作用相关,是无机成岩作用和有机热成熟演化产生的CO_2和有机酸溶蚀可溶组分的结果。地下流体作用是必要条件,可溶物质的存在是充分条件。研究区目的层位砂岩中
Ordos Basin is a polycyclic superposition basin that is formed in an earlier geological history and has experienced a longer evolution. It possesses abundant oil and gas resources and has bright prospects in oil and gas exploration. It has been becoming one of the important tactical areas in oil and gas exploration in China. The amount of oil-gas resources and the degree which is proven up will directly influence the Chinese petroleum industry.According to theory of multidisciplines, the reservoir characteristics and its preliminary geochemical geneses of the Shan_2~3 and He_8 Member in Upper Paleozoic of Zizhou-Qingjian have been studied by means of the combination macroexamination with microexamination and regional with well data as well as the investigation in the field with research indoors. The research as follows that Shan_2~3 Member is meandering stream delta facies, Heg and Heg are both braided stream delta facies. Main reservoir bodies include the subaqueous distributary channel sandbodies of the meandering stream delta, braided stream delta front and beach sandstones.The research shows that Shan_2~3, main reservoir rock type is quartzose standstone, that of He_8~1, is lithic sandstone and Heg_8~2, rock type is nearly single lithic sandstone. What's more, the maturation of composition and texture in Shan_2~3 is much better than that of in Heg. Those rocks have experienced diagenesis of mechanical compaction, cementation, metasomasis and dissolution. Based on synthesis analyses of autogenous minerals associations and clay minerals transform and pore types as well as evolution of organic matter etc, the Shan_2~3 and Heg Member have already entered into the late
diagenesis A subage and most have reached the late diagenesis B subage.Geochemical variation strongly controls the Shan23 and Heg Member' lithogenesis and pore evolution in Zizhou-Qingjian. Carbonate and siliceous and authigenic clay cementation, carbonate authigenic clay metasomatism, feldspthic and carbonate corrosion are typical and major diagenesis which is great influenced by geochemical variation. The mechanical compaction and cementation are major factors to make reservoir to lose porosity. The dissolution playing an important role to improve reservoir quality is favorable for secondary pores.The formation of secondary pore contributes to feldspthic and carbonate corrosion as well as dehydration reaction of clay mineral, resulting of CO2 and organic acid, providing by inorganic diagenesis and organic thermal mature evolution, corroding soluble components. The dissolution of aluminosilicate and carbonate cement result in organic acid contributed by kerogen before or during it's mature stage in the source rocks and coal seams nearby, and that of silica is straightly related with alkali water in the pores. Secondary pore in Shan23 are much more than those in Heg and Heg1 is more than Heg2.In another hand, high value of porosity and permeability in Shan23 having rough pore and tunnels is usually closed to the paleochannel sandbodies, high value of porosity with low value of permeability in Heg having slim pore and tunnels represents tight reservoir.On the studying basis of depositional facies belt and sandstone body distribution with the reservoir quality as well as logging, porosity, permeability and so on, the most gas-producting favorable blocks include Yu30-Drill~Yu55-Drill, Yu29-Drill, Yu69-Drill and the more gas-producting favorable blocks include Yu68-Drill~ Yu48-Drill, Yu40-Drill, Pu2-Drill~Yu69-Drill.
引文
[1]周鼎武,李文厚,张云翔等.区域地质综合研究的方法与实践.北京:科学出版社.2002.
[2]贺自新等.鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气.北京:石油工业出版社.2003.
[3]李阳.河道砂储层非均质模型.科学出版社.2001,2.
[4]杨俊杰等.鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律.北京:石油工业出版社.2002.
[5]陈骏,王鹤年.地球化学.北京:科学出版社.2004.
[6]于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学.北京:石油工业出版社.2002.
[7]毛凤鸣,张金亮,许正龙.高邮凹陷油气成藏地球化学.北京:石油工业出版社.2002.
[8]夏新宇.碳酸盐岩生烃与长庆气田气源.北京:石油工业出版社.2000.
[9]张厚福等.石油地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1999,9.
[10]周荣安等.长庆油田产能建设生产测井解释及方法研究.1999,12.
[11]夏卫荣等.油气田开发地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1999,7.
[12]李文厚.沉积学教程.西安:西北大学出版社.1998.
[13]赵澄林等.储层沉积学.北京:石油工业出版社.1998.
[14]吴胜和.储层地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1998.
[15]黄荣辉,叶大年,章申等.高等地球化学.北京:科学出版社.1998.
[16]田在艺,张庆春.中国含油气盆地岩相古地理与油气.北京:地质出版社.1997.
[17]张文昭.中国陆相大油田.北京:石油工业出版社.1997.
[18]裘亦楠,薛叔浩等.油气储层评价技术.北京:石油工业出版社.1997,59-64
[19]张金亮,王良忱等.沉积环境和沉积相.北京:石油工业出版社.1996.
[20]李道品.低渗透砂岩油田开发.北京:石油工业出版社.1997.
[21]杨俊杰等.中国天然气地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1996.
[22]朱家祥,李淑贞等.超深井成烃成岩体系研究.同济大学出版社.1995,98-119.
[23]程克明,王铁冠,钟宁宁等.烃源岩地球化学.北京:科学出版社.1995.
[24]冯增昭.沉积岩石学.北京:石油工业出版社.1994.
[25]吴崇筠,薛叔浩等.中国含油气盆地沉积学.石油工业出版社.1993,5.
[26]邸世祥.中国碎屑岩储集层的孔隙结构.西北大学出版社.1991,5.
[27]周书欣等.湖泊沉积体系与油气.科学出版社.1991,5
[28]赵杏媛,张有瑜等.粘土矿物与粘土矿物分析.海洋出版社.1990,5.
[29]张福礼等.鄂尔多斯盆地天然气地质.地质出版社,1994
[30]陆荣生,赵春元,陈树文等.中国石油地质志.北京:石油工业出版社.1993.
[31]李思田,程守田,杨士恭等.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部层序地层及沉积体系分析.北京:地质出版社.1992.
[32]苗建宇,周立发等.吐鲁番拗陷二叠系烃源岩地球化学与沉积环境的关系.中国地质.2004年,第31卷,第4期:423-430.
[33]王少依,王行信,韩守华等.影响我国陆相碎屑岩储集层粘土矿物组合和分布的因素.石油勘探与开发.2002,29(6):19-21.
[34]陈丽华,赵澄林,纪友亮等.碎屑岩天然气储集层次生孔隙的三种成因机理.石油勘探与开发.1999,6(5):77-79.
[35]张洪安,李继东.白庙构造油气成藏特征.石油与天然气地质.2003,24(1):45—49
[36]汪正江,陈洪德,张锦泉.物源分析的研究与展望.沉积与特提斯地质,2000,20(4)
[37]沈传波,陈少平.流体包裹体在含油气系统成藏研究中的应用.新疆石油学院学报,2002.9
[38]张士亚.鄂尔多斯盆地天然气气源及勘探方向.天然气工业,1994:(3)
[39]覃建雄,陈洪德,田景春.层序地层作为沉积盆地识别标志的研究.古地理学报,2001,3(2):72-81
[40]苗建宇,周立发等.新疆北部中二叠统烃源岩有机质与沉积环境的关系.地球化学.2004年,第33卷,第6期:551-560.
[41]刘家铎,吴富强.深部储层储集空间类型划分方案探讨.成都理工学院学报.2001,28(3):255-259.
[42]苗建宇,祝总祺.济阳坳陷下第三系温度、压力与深部储层次生孔隙的关系.石油学报.2000,21(3):36-40
[43]苗建宇,祝总祺,刘文荣等.济阳坳陷砂岩次生孔隙的基本特征及控制因素.西北大学学报(自然科学版).2000,30(2):154-158
[44]杨华,张军,王飞雁等.鄂尔多斯盆地古生界含气系统特征.天然气工业.2000,20 (6):7-11
[45]邓宏文,王洪亮,翟爱军等.中国陆源碎屑盆地层序地层与储层展布.石油与天然气 地质.1999,20(2):108-114
[46]樊太亮,郭齐军,吴贤顺.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界层序地层特征与储层发育规律现代地质.1999,13(1):32-36
[47]钟大康,朱筱敏,周新源等.塔里木盆地中部泥盆系东河砂岩成岩作用与储集性能控制因素.古地理学报.2003,(3):378-390.
[48]史基安,王金鹏,毛明陆等.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田二叠系延长组长6-9段储层砂岩成岩作用研究.沉积学报.2003,(3):373-380.
[49]刘锐娥,孙粉锦,张满郎.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界储集性评价.天然气地球科学.2003,14(3):196-199.
[50]王多云,郑希民,李凤杰.低孔渗透油气富集区优质储层形成条件及相关问题.天然气地球科学.2003,14(2):87-91
[51]陈孟晋,刘锐娥,孙粉锦.鄂尔多斯盆地西北部上古生界碎屑岩储层的孔隙结构特征初探.沉积学报.2002,20(4):639-643.
[52]金爱民,楼章华,朱荣.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界储层现今地下水动力场及流体特征.高校地质学报.2002,8(3):334-343.
[53]肖建喜.鄂尔多斯盆地西缘北段上古生界储集层研究.西北大学学报(自然科学版).2003,33(2):201-204.
[54]许书堂,张洪波,张同周等.白音查干凹陷储层成岩作用及其纵向分带特征.大庆石油地质与开发.2005年8月,4(24):4-8
[55]代金友,张一伟,熊琦华等.成岩作用对储集层物性贡献比率研究.石油勘探与开发.2003,8,4(30):54-71
[56]刘斌,黄郑,龙国清等.低渗透储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响.特种油气藏.2005,6,3(12):18-21
[57]李克明.鄂尔多斯盆地北部晚古生化的深盆气气藏.石油与天然气地质.2002,23 (2):190-193
[58]朱宏权,张哨楠.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界储层成岩作用.天然气工业.2004,2 (24):29-32
[59]蒋国豪,胡瑞忠,方维萱.镜质体反射率(Ro)推算古地温研究进展.地质地球化学.2001,29(4):40-45.
[60]惠宽洋,张哨楠,李德敏等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部下石盒子组—山西组储层岩石学和成 岩作用.成都理工学院学报.2002,6,3(29):272-278
[61]罗静兰,张晓莉,张云翔.成岩作用对河流—三角洲相砂岩储层物性演化的影响.沉积学报.2001,19(4):541-547
[62]罗静兰,Morad S,阎世可.河流—湖泊三角洲相砂岩成岩作用的重建及其对储层物性演化的影响.中国科学(D辑).2001,31(12):1006-1016
[63]何东博,贾爱林,田昌炳等.郭建林苏里格气田储集层成岩作用及有效储集层成因.石油勘探与开发.2004,6,3(31):69-71
[64]鲜本忠,吴战国,姜在兴等.早期成岩作用研究进展及发展方向.石油大学学报.2004,6(28):133-139
[65]程晓玲.粘土矿物成岩作用对油气储集性和产能的影响.石油试验地质.2003,4,2 (25):164-168
[66]李士祥,胡明毅,李霞.天然气地质学榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化天然气地球科学.2005,4,2(16):200-205
[67]Cross, T.A. and Lessenger, M.A. Construction and application ofa stratigraphic inverse model, in J. W. Harbaugh, W.L. Watney, E. C. Rankey,R. Slingerland,R. H. Goldstein, E. K. Franseen, eds. SEPM Special Publication 62 Numerical Experiments in Stratigraphy: Recent Advances in Stratigraphic and Sedimentologic Computer Simulations: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) . 1999: 69-83.
[68]Eschard R, Lemouzy P, Bacchiuna, et al. Combining sequence stratigraphy, geostatistical simulations and production data for modeling a fluvial reservoir in the chauchoy field (Triassic, France).AAPGBulletin. 1998, 82 (4): 545-568
[69]Galloway W E. Geologic Column-Clastic Depositional Systems and Sequences: Applications to Reservoir Prediction, Delineation, and Characterizatoion. The Leading Edge. 1998, 17 (2): 173-176, 178-180
[70]ME YS MAN F J R, MIDDELBURG J J, HERMAN P M J, et al. Reactive transportin suface sediments. Computers & Geosciences, 2003, 29 (3): 291-300
[71]Mclenna, S. M., Hemming, S., McDaniel, D. K., Hanson, G. N., Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 1993, 284:21-340
[72]Salman Bloch, Robert H. Lander, and Linda Bonnell. Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs origin and predictability. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86 (2): 301-3328
[73] S.Kolonic, Geochemical characterization of Cenomanian/Turonian black shales from the Tarfaya Basin. Journal of Petroleum Geology. 2002, 25 (3): 325-350.
[74] Grunau. H. R. , A worldwide look at the caprock problem. J. petro. Geol. 1987, 10: 245-266.
[75] Mangelsdorf Kai. Natural supply of oil-derived hydrocarbons into marine sediments along the California continental margin during the late Quaternary. Organic Geochemistry. 2003, August, 34 (8): 145-1159.
[76] Murray, R. W., Buchholtz ten Brink, M. R., Jones, D. L., Gerlach, D. C., RussIII, G. P. Rare earth elements as indicators of different marine depositional environments in chert and shale. Geology. 1990, 18: 268-271.
[77] COOK C C, ANDERSEN M A , HALLE G, GISLEROS S E, BOWER G R. An approach to simulating the effect of water induced compaction in a North Sea reservoir. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 2001, 4 (2): 121-127.
[78] Amthor J E and Okkerman J. Influence of early diagenesis on reservoir quality of Roliegende Sandstone, Northern Nerherlands. AAPG Bulletin. 1998, 82 (12): 2246-2265.
[2]贺自新等.鄂尔多斯盆地演化与油气.北京:石油工业出版社.2003.
[3]李阳.河道砂储层非均质模型.科学出版社.2001,2.
[4]杨俊杰等.鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律.北京:石油工业出版社.2002.
[5]陈骏,王鹤年.地球化学.北京:科学出版社.2004.
[6]于兴河.碎屑岩系油气储层沉积学.北京:石油工业出版社.2002.
[7]毛凤鸣,张金亮,许正龙.高邮凹陷油气成藏地球化学.北京:石油工业出版社.2002.
[8]夏新宇.碳酸盐岩生烃与长庆气田气源.北京:石油工业出版社.2000.
[9]张厚福等.石油地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1999,9.
[10]周荣安等.长庆油田产能建设生产测井解释及方法研究.1999,12.
[11]夏卫荣等.油气田开发地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1999,7.
[12]李文厚.沉积学教程.西安:西北大学出版社.1998.
[13]赵澄林等.储层沉积学.北京:石油工业出版社.1998.
[14]吴胜和.储层地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1998.
[15]黄荣辉,叶大年,章申等.高等地球化学.北京:科学出版社.1998.
[16]田在艺,张庆春.中国含油气盆地岩相古地理与油气.北京:地质出版社.1997.
[17]张文昭.中国陆相大油田.北京:石油工业出版社.1997.
[18]裘亦楠,薛叔浩等.油气储层评价技术.北京:石油工业出版社.1997,59-64
[19]张金亮,王良忱等.沉积环境和沉积相.北京:石油工业出版社.1996.
[20]李道品.低渗透砂岩油田开发.北京:石油工业出版社.1997.
[21]杨俊杰等.中国天然气地质学.北京:石油工业出版社.1996.
[22]朱家祥,李淑贞等.超深井成烃成岩体系研究.同济大学出版社.1995,98-119.
[23]程克明,王铁冠,钟宁宁等.烃源岩地球化学.北京:科学出版社.1995.
[24]冯增昭.沉积岩石学.北京:石油工业出版社.1994.
[25]吴崇筠,薛叔浩等.中国含油气盆地沉积学.石油工业出版社.1993,5.
[26]邸世祥.中国碎屑岩储集层的孔隙结构.西北大学出版社.1991,5.
[27]周书欣等.湖泊沉积体系与油气.科学出版社.1991,5
[28]赵杏媛,张有瑜等.粘土矿物与粘土矿物分析.海洋出版社.1990,5.
[29]张福礼等.鄂尔多斯盆地天然气地质.地质出版社,1994
[30]陆荣生,赵春元,陈树文等.中国石油地质志.北京:石油工业出版社.1993.
[31]李思田,程守田,杨士恭等.鄂尔多斯盆地东北部层序地层及沉积体系分析.北京:地质出版社.1992.
[32]苗建宇,周立发等.吐鲁番拗陷二叠系烃源岩地球化学与沉积环境的关系.中国地质.2004年,第31卷,第4期:423-430.
[33]王少依,王行信,韩守华等.影响我国陆相碎屑岩储集层粘土矿物组合和分布的因素.石油勘探与开发.2002,29(6):19-21.
[34]陈丽华,赵澄林,纪友亮等.碎屑岩天然气储集层次生孔隙的三种成因机理.石油勘探与开发.1999,6(5):77-79.
[35]张洪安,李继东.白庙构造油气成藏特征.石油与天然气地质.2003,24(1):45—49
[36]汪正江,陈洪德,张锦泉.物源分析的研究与展望.沉积与特提斯地质,2000,20(4)
[37]沈传波,陈少平.流体包裹体在含油气系统成藏研究中的应用.新疆石油学院学报,2002.9
[38]张士亚.鄂尔多斯盆地天然气气源及勘探方向.天然气工业,1994:(3)
[39]覃建雄,陈洪德,田景春.层序地层作为沉积盆地识别标志的研究.古地理学报,2001,3(2):72-81
[40]苗建宇,周立发等.新疆北部中二叠统烃源岩有机质与沉积环境的关系.地球化学.2004年,第33卷,第6期:551-560.
[41]刘家铎,吴富强.深部储层储集空间类型划分方案探讨.成都理工学院学报.2001,28(3):255-259.
[42]苗建宇,祝总祺.济阳坳陷下第三系温度、压力与深部储层次生孔隙的关系.石油学报.2000,21(3):36-40
[43]苗建宇,祝总祺,刘文荣等.济阳坳陷砂岩次生孔隙的基本特征及控制因素.西北大学学报(自然科学版).2000,30(2):154-158
[44]杨华,张军,王飞雁等.鄂尔多斯盆地古生界含气系统特征.天然气工业.2000,20 (6):7-11
[45]邓宏文,王洪亮,翟爱军等.中国陆源碎屑盆地层序地层与储层展布.石油与天然气 地质.1999,20(2):108-114
[46]樊太亮,郭齐军,吴贤顺.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界层序地层特征与储层发育规律现代地质.1999,13(1):32-36
[47]钟大康,朱筱敏,周新源等.塔里木盆地中部泥盆系东河砂岩成岩作用与储集性能控制因素.古地理学报.2003,(3):378-390.
[48]史基安,王金鹏,毛明陆等.鄂尔多斯盆地西峰油田二叠系延长组长6-9段储层砂岩成岩作用研究.沉积学报.2003,(3):373-380.
[49]刘锐娥,孙粉锦,张满郎.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界储集性评价.天然气地球科学.2003,14(3):196-199.
[50]王多云,郑希民,李凤杰.低孔渗透油气富集区优质储层形成条件及相关问题.天然气地球科学.2003,14(2):87-91
[51]陈孟晋,刘锐娥,孙粉锦.鄂尔多斯盆地西北部上古生界碎屑岩储层的孔隙结构特征初探.沉积学报.2002,20(4):639-643.
[52]金爱民,楼章华,朱荣.鄂尔多斯盆地上古生界储层现今地下水动力场及流体特征.高校地质学报.2002,8(3):334-343.
[53]肖建喜.鄂尔多斯盆地西缘北段上古生界储集层研究.西北大学学报(自然科学版).2003,33(2):201-204.
[54]许书堂,张洪波,张同周等.白音查干凹陷储层成岩作用及其纵向分带特征.大庆石油地质与开发.2005年8月,4(24):4-8
[55]代金友,张一伟,熊琦华等.成岩作用对储集层物性贡献比率研究.石油勘探与开发.2003,8,4(30):54-71
[56]刘斌,黄郑,龙国清等.低渗透储层成岩作用及其对物性的影响.特种油气藏.2005,6,3(12):18-21
[57]李克明.鄂尔多斯盆地北部晚古生化的深盆气气藏.石油与天然气地质.2002,23 (2):190-193
[58]朱宏权,张哨楠.鄂尔多斯盆地北部上古生界储层成岩作用.天然气工业.2004,2 (24):29-32
[59]蒋国豪,胡瑞忠,方维萱.镜质体反射率(Ro)推算古地温研究进展.地质地球化学.2001,29(4):40-45.
[60]惠宽洋,张哨楠,李德敏等.鄂尔多斯盆地北部下石盒子组—山西组储层岩石学和成 岩作用.成都理工学院学报.2002,6,3(29):272-278
[61]罗静兰,张晓莉,张云翔.成岩作用对河流—三角洲相砂岩储层物性演化的影响.沉积学报.2001,19(4):541-547
[62]罗静兰,Morad S,阎世可.河流—湖泊三角洲相砂岩成岩作用的重建及其对储层物性演化的影响.中国科学(D辑).2001,31(12):1006-1016
[63]何东博,贾爱林,田昌炳等.郭建林苏里格气田储集层成岩作用及有效储集层成因.石油勘探与开发.2004,6,3(31):69-71
[64]鲜本忠,吴战国,姜在兴等.早期成岩作用研究进展及发展方向.石油大学学报.2004,6(28):133-139
[65]程晓玲.粘土矿物成岩作用对油气储集性和产能的影响.石油试验地质.2003,4,2 (25):164-168
[66]李士祥,胡明毅,李霞.天然气地质学榆林气田山西组2段砂岩成岩作用及孔隙演化天然气地球科学.2005,4,2(16):200-205
[67]Cross, T.A. and Lessenger, M.A. Construction and application ofa stratigraphic inverse model, in J. W. Harbaugh, W.L. Watney, E. C. Rankey,R. Slingerland,R. H. Goldstein, E. K. Franseen, eds. SEPM Special Publication 62 Numerical Experiments in Stratigraphy: Recent Advances in Stratigraphic and Sedimentologic Computer Simulations: SEPM (Society for Sedimentary Geology) . 1999: 69-83.
[68]Eschard R, Lemouzy P, Bacchiuna, et al. Combining sequence stratigraphy, geostatistical simulations and production data for modeling a fluvial reservoir in the chauchoy field (Triassic, France).AAPGBulletin. 1998, 82 (4): 545-568
[69]Galloway W E. Geologic Column-Clastic Depositional Systems and Sequences: Applications to Reservoir Prediction, Delineation, and Characterizatoion. The Leading Edge. 1998, 17 (2): 173-176, 178-180
[70]ME YS MAN F J R, MIDDELBURG J J, HERMAN P M J, et al. Reactive transportin suface sediments. Computers & Geosciences, 2003, 29 (3): 291-300
[71]Mclenna, S. M., Hemming, S., McDaniel, D. K., Hanson, G. N., Geochemical approaches to sedimentation, provenance, and tectonics. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 1993, 284:21-340
[72]Salman Bloch, Robert H. Lander, and Linda Bonnell. Anomalously high porosity and permeability in deeply buried sandstone reservoirs origin and predictability. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86 (2): 301-3328
[73] S.Kolonic, Geochemical characterization of Cenomanian/Turonian black shales from the Tarfaya Basin. Journal of Petroleum Geology. 2002, 25 (3): 325-350.
[74] Grunau. H. R. , A worldwide look at the caprock problem. J. petro. Geol. 1987, 10: 245-266.
[75] Mangelsdorf Kai. Natural supply of oil-derived hydrocarbons into marine sediments along the California continental margin during the late Quaternary. Organic Geochemistry. 2003, August, 34 (8): 145-1159.
[76] Murray, R. W., Buchholtz ten Brink, M. R., Jones, D. L., Gerlach, D. C., RussIII, G. P. Rare earth elements as indicators of different marine depositional environments in chert and shale. Geology. 1990, 18: 268-271.
[77] COOK C C, ANDERSEN M A , HALLE G, GISLEROS S E, BOWER G R. An approach to simulating the effect of water induced compaction in a North Sea reservoir. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering. 2001, 4 (2): 121-127.
[78] Amthor J E and Okkerman J. Influence of early diagenesis on reservoir quality of Roliegende Sandstone, Northern Nerherlands. AAPG Bulletin. 1998, 82 (12): 2246-2265.