基于熵的工业生产环境影响问题研究
|
摘要
作为对环境影响最大和最直接的经济活动,工业生产的环境保护问题对可持续发展目标的实现至关重要。按照可持续发展的要求,探索实现减少污染,使投入、生产过程、产品与人类提高生存环境质量的要求相适应的工业绿色化发展方式是当今发展的必然趋势。工业生产的环境影响问题研究作为工业环境保护决策的重要依据之一,是工业可持续化发展研究的关键和重要内容。
本文在结合系统热力学、经济学、环境学、生态学等相关理论的基础上,将工业生产系统作为对象,以工业生产对环境产生影响的熵增为研究手段,对工业生产过程中环境影响的相关问题展开研究。试图解决对工业可持续发展本质的认识问题;工业活动对自然环境破坏性影响的定量评价问题;工业生产环境保护的绩效评价问题;工业企业的环境经济行为问题;工业绿色化的模式选择问题等。在21世纪以可持续发展为主题的时期,不仅具有紧迫的现实意义,而且对可持续发展在不同领域的交叉研究提供了一种新思路。归纳起来,本文主要做了以下创新性工作:
首先,从工业环境影响特点的研究出发,提出将工业生产系统与自然生态系统作为一个统一体系——工业一环境系统进行研究,以熵作为研究工业生产对环境产生的综合影响的评价指标和手段。应用工业生产产生的熵增描述其对环境的影响,并依据工业生产对自然生态资源消耗和环境污染的不同情况,提出了工业生产资源熵和污染熵的概念。通过构建工业生产的熵增模型,环境承受阈限熵模型,从工业生产系统和自然生态环境系统两个方面,对工业生产造成的环境破坏的实质进行研究和分析。
其次,展开了工业生产环境综合影响度量的熵指标研究。在研究分析工业生产对环境的综合影响的基础上,提出并建立了工业生产环境综合影响熵指标的计算方法,主要包括资源熵和污染熵的计算方法,综合影响效应系数提出及其模糊神经网络的确定方法。用环境综合影响熵指标将工业生产对环境造成破坏的两类不同问题——资源消耗和环境污染有机结合起来,并简化了工业生产的环境影响综合评价,同时统一了量纲,具有对不同生产行业和部门环境影响比较的可公度性。
第三,工业生产环境保护绩效研究。针对目前工业环境保护绩效评价方
As an economic activity, industry production has the most and direct influence on the environment. The environmental protection of industry production is very important to the achievement of the sustainable development. It is the certaint trendency to pursue a green industrial development mode according to the requirement of sustainable development, of which the input, the production process and the products of industry correspond with the needs the living environment quality of human being. As one of the important bases for decisions of industrial environmental protection, the study on the environmental of industrial production is an importat key content of the studies of industrial sustainable development.This paper has made studies on the relevant subjects of environmental influence in the process of industrial production based on the relevant theoretical foundations of thermodynamics, economics, environics bionomics and so on taking the system of industrial production as the object and the entropy increase of the influence of industrial production on the environment as the method of study. It try to resolve the problems as follow: the problem of understanding to the essence of industrial sustainable development; the problem of the quantitative evaluation on the destructive influence of industrial activities on the environment; the problem of the evaluation of the performance effects of environmental protection on industrial production; the problem of the environmental economic activities of industrial enterprises; the problem of the decision of green industry and so on. The studies not only have practical value, but also have theoretical value to the intercrossing studies of sustainable development in different fields in the 21~(st) century that has the main subject of sustainable development. This paper has made the following creative studies:Firstly, according to the characters of industrial environmental influence, the paper takes the industrial production system and natural ecosystem as a uniform system of system-industry-environment. It use the entropy increase of industrial production to describe its influence to the environment and present the conception of resource entropy and pollution entropy of industrial production
according to the different situations of the consumption of natural ecologic resoureces and the environmental pollution of industrial production. In the paper, the essential of the destruction of industrial production to the environment has been analysed through the forming of entropy increase model of industrial production and the entropy model of the threshold of the nature environment system. Secondly, this paper made a study on the entropy index of the synthetical effect of industrial production system. Based on the analysis on the general influence of industrial production to the environment with the combination of theories such as thermodynamics and so on, the paper has persented and set up a calculation method of the entropy index of general environmental influence of industrial production, which includes calculation of resource entropy and pollution entropy, the persent of the effect coefficient of general influence and methods. The Fuzzy neural networks methodology used in it's calculation is discussed.Next, to the questions of complicated means and various indexs of the actual study on the performance effects of environmental protection of industry production, the paper has set up an industrial environmental effects model base on the conception frame presented by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and so on and with the combination of the study on the entropy index of the general environmental influence of industrial production system. Based the research above, the paper applies the above methods to evaluate and analyze the practice of green industry of an industry group.Finally, a study on the decision of green industry has been done. It mainly includes the comparative study on the environment influence of different industrial production pattern; the study on the internalization of the environment costs of green industry; and the gambling study on the external inspirit mechanism of green industry based on it; the conditions and methods to promotegreen industry in industrial enterprises has been persented.
本文在结合系统热力学、经济学、环境学、生态学等相关理论的基础上,将工业生产系统作为对象,以工业生产对环境产生影响的熵增为研究手段,对工业生产过程中环境影响的相关问题展开研究。试图解决对工业可持续发展本质的认识问题;工业活动对自然环境破坏性影响的定量评价问题;工业生产环境保护的绩效评价问题;工业企业的环境经济行为问题;工业绿色化的模式选择问题等。在21世纪以可持续发展为主题的时期,不仅具有紧迫的现实意义,而且对可持续发展在不同领域的交叉研究提供了一种新思路。归纳起来,本文主要做了以下创新性工作:
首先,从工业环境影响特点的研究出发,提出将工业生产系统与自然生态系统作为一个统一体系——工业一环境系统进行研究,以熵作为研究工业生产对环境产生的综合影响的评价指标和手段。应用工业生产产生的熵增描述其对环境的影响,并依据工业生产对自然生态资源消耗和环境污染的不同情况,提出了工业生产资源熵和污染熵的概念。通过构建工业生产的熵增模型,环境承受阈限熵模型,从工业生产系统和自然生态环境系统两个方面,对工业生产造成的环境破坏的实质进行研究和分析。
其次,展开了工业生产环境综合影响度量的熵指标研究。在研究分析工业生产对环境的综合影响的基础上,提出并建立了工业生产环境综合影响熵指标的计算方法,主要包括资源熵和污染熵的计算方法,综合影响效应系数提出及其模糊神经网络的确定方法。用环境综合影响熵指标将工业生产对环境造成破坏的两类不同问题——资源消耗和环境污染有机结合起来,并简化了工业生产的环境影响综合评价,同时统一了量纲,具有对不同生产行业和部门环境影响比较的可公度性。
第三,工业生产环境保护绩效研究。针对目前工业环境保护绩效评价方
As an economic activity, industry production has the most and direct influence on the environment. The environmental protection of industry production is very important to the achievement of the sustainable development. It is the certaint trendency to pursue a green industrial development mode according to the requirement of sustainable development, of which the input, the production process and the products of industry correspond with the needs the living environment quality of human being. As one of the important bases for decisions of industrial environmental protection, the study on the environmental of industrial production is an importat key content of the studies of industrial sustainable development.This paper has made studies on the relevant subjects of environmental influence in the process of industrial production based on the relevant theoretical foundations of thermodynamics, economics, environics bionomics and so on taking the system of industrial production as the object and the entropy increase of the influence of industrial production on the environment as the method of study. It try to resolve the problems as follow: the problem of understanding to the essence of industrial sustainable development; the problem of the quantitative evaluation on the destructive influence of industrial activities on the environment; the problem of the evaluation of the performance effects of environmental protection on industrial production; the problem of the environmental economic activities of industrial enterprises; the problem of the decision of green industry and so on. The studies not only have practical value, but also have theoretical value to the intercrossing studies of sustainable development in different fields in the 21~(st) century that has the main subject of sustainable development. This paper has made the following creative studies:Firstly, according to the characters of industrial environmental influence, the paper takes the industrial production system and natural ecosystem as a uniform system of system-industry-environment. It use the entropy increase of industrial production to describe its influence to the environment and present the conception of resource entropy and pollution entropy of industrial production
according to the different situations of the consumption of natural ecologic resoureces and the environmental pollution of industrial production. In the paper, the essential of the destruction of industrial production to the environment has been analysed through the forming of entropy increase model of industrial production and the entropy model of the threshold of the nature environment system. Secondly, this paper made a study on the entropy index of the synthetical effect of industrial production system. Based on the analysis on the general influence of industrial production to the environment with the combination of theories such as thermodynamics and so on, the paper has persented and set up a calculation method of the entropy index of general environmental influence of industrial production, which includes calculation of resource entropy and pollution entropy, the persent of the effect coefficient of general influence and methods. The Fuzzy neural networks methodology used in it's calculation is discussed.Next, to the questions of complicated means and various indexs of the actual study on the performance effects of environmental protection of industry production, the paper has set up an industrial environmental effects model base on the conception frame presented by the World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and so on and with the combination of the study on the entropy index of the general environmental influence of industrial production system. Based the research above, the paper applies the above methods to evaluate and analyze the practice of green industry of an industry group.Finally, a study on the decision of green industry has been done. It mainly includes the comparative study on the environment influence of different industrial production pattern; the study on the internalization of the environment costs of green industry; and the gambling study on the external inspirit mechanism of green industry based on it; the conditions and methods to promotegreen industry in industrial enterprises has been persented.
引文
1. A. Fricker., Waste reduction in focus, Futures [J], 2003, 35: 509-519.
2. Ayres K., Industrial metabolism, The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems. National Academy Press [M], 1994: 23～37.
3. A. Blanc, H. Metivier-Pignon, R. Gourdon, P. Rousseaux., Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur. Advances in Environmental Research [J]. 2004, 8: 613-627.
4. Ayres R U., L W Ayres and K. Martinas, Exergy waste accounting and lifecycle analysis., Energy International Journal [J] 1998, 23(5): 355-363.
5. Carson. R. T., Y. Jeon, D.R. McCubbin, The Relationship between Air Pollution Emissions and Income: US data. Environment and Development Economics[J]. 1997(2): 433-450.
6. Cave S R and D W Edwards, Chemical process route selection based on assessment of inherent environmental hazard, Computers Chem Engng [J], 1997, 21: 965-970.
7. Chu hailin, Li jun, The EKC analysis about Environment-Economy Coordination degree of Chengdu City based on FNN, Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering[R], USA: ATLANTA, 2003, 8:1455-1459
8. Cole, M.A., A.J. Rayner, J.M. Bates, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: an Empirical Analysis, Environment and Development Economics [J], 1997, 2(4): 433-450.
9. Cole R J, Building environmental assessment methods: assessing construction practices, Construct Manage Economics [J], 2000, 18(8): 949-57.
10. De GrootS, MazurRP. Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics [M]. Amsterdan: North-Holland Publishing company, 1962:102-110.
11. Douglas B. Reynolds, Entropy ,and diminishing elasticity of substitution, Resources Policy [J]. 1999(25): 51-58.
12. Editorial, Cleaner production tools: LCA and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production [J], 2002, 10: 403-406.
13. Ekvall T. Cleaner Production Tools: LCA and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production [J], 2002, 10: 403-406.
14. E N Pistikopoulos, Minimizing the environmental impact of process plants: a process systems methodology. Computers Chem. Engng [J], 1995, 19: 39-44
15. Farag W A, Germano L-T. A genetic-based neuro-fuzzy approach for modeling and control of dynamical systems. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks [J], 1998,9(5): 756-767.
16. Frangopoulos C A, Introduction to environomics, Second Law Analysis Industrial and Environment Applications, Advanced Energy System[J], 1991, 25:49-54.
17. Fritz Sollner, A reexamination of the role of thermodynamics for environmental economics. Ecological Economics [J] 1997, 22: 175-201.
18. G. Rebitzera, T. Ekvall, et al. Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications Environment International. 2004(30): 701-720
19. Gibson RB. From Wreck Cove to Voisey's Bay: the evolution of federal environmental assessment in Canada. Impact Assessment and Project" Appraisal [J], 2002; 20(3): 15-19
20. Goedkoop, M. and R. Spriensma. The Eco-indicator99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology Report [R]. The Netherlands: Preconsultants, 1999.
21. Grossman G. M., A. B kreuger., Economic Growth and the Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 1995, 110(2): 333-337.
22. Haberl H. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long period of time. Ecological Economics [J], 2001; 38: 25-45
23. Hard P, Barg S, Hodge T, et al. Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practices [R]. Occasional paper number 17,1997: 49-51.
24. H. T. Odum, Environment and Society in Florida [M], Gainesville Lewis Publishers, 1998: 105-112
25. Huesemann, Michael H. Can Pollution Problems be Effectively Solved by Environmental Scienceand Technology? Ecological Economics [J], 2001, 37(2): 271-287.
26. Ibrahim. Dincer, Marc A. Rosen. Thermodynamic aspects of renewables and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews [J]. 2005(9): 169-189
27. Jacguetta J Lee et al. Conservation and Recycling, Resources [J], 1995, 13: 37-56
28. Jasch C, Environmental performance evaluation and indicators, Cleaner Product [J], 2000, 8(1): 79-88.
29. Joosten, LA. J.; Hekkert, M. P.; Worrell, E.; Turkenburg, W. C. STREAMS: a new method for analyzing material flows through society. Resource. Conserve. Recycle[J]. 1999, 27 (3): 249-266.
30. Jones A, Pecchenino R, An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment, The Economic Journal[J], 1994, 104: 1393-1410.
31. J0rgensen, S.-E.,. Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 1992:383
32. Kaberger, T. Measuring instrumental value in energy terms. In: Folke, C. Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy [M]: Essays from the Eco-Eco Group. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 1991: 61-75.
33. Kaufmann, R.K., B. Davidsdottir, S. Garnham, P. Pauly, The Determinants of Atmospheric SO2 Concentrations: Reconsidering the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics[J], 1998(25): 209-220.
34. Klippel, A., Muller. I. Plant growth — a thermodynamics' view. Contin. Mech. Thermodynam. 1997(9): 127-142.
35. Kuznets, S. Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review [J], 1955(49): 1-28.
36. Lenzen, M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 1998, 26 (6): 495-506.
37. Li CP, Hui IK. Environmental impact evaluation model for industrial processes. Environmental Manage 2001, 27(5): 729-37.
38. LI li-feng, CHENNG Sheng-kui. Ecological footprint: a new indicator for sustainability. Resources Science. 2000, 15(4) :375-382.
39. Lowenthal, Micah D., Kastenberg, william E. Industrial Ecology and Energy Systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1998, 24(1):51-63
40. Lopez, R. The Environment as a Factor of Production: The Effects of Economic Growth and Trade Liberalization, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 1994, 27:163-84.
41. Marcio M C, Roberto, Ernst. Exergy accounting of energy and materials flows in steel production systems, Energy[J], 2001, 26: 363-384.
42. Mathis Wackernagel, Lillemor Lewan, Carina Borgstrom Honsson. Evaluation the use of national capital with the ecological footprint—Applications in Sweden and subregions, Ambio - A Journal of the Human Environment [J], 1999, 28(7): 604-612.
43. Marano J, Rogers S, Process system optimization for life cycle improvement, Environmental Progress [J], 1999,18(4): 267~272
44. Moore III B, Braswell Jr H. Planetary Metabolism: Understanding the Carbon Cycle, Ambio - A Journal of the Human Environment [J].1994, 23(3): 442
45. Munasinghe, M, Is Environmental Degradation an Inevitable Consequence of Economic Growth: Tunneling through the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics [J], 1999(29): 89-109.
46. O Brien, D.M.,. A yardstick for global entropy-flux. Meteorol [J]. 1997, 123: 243-260.
47. Olusegun A. Ogunba, EIA systems in Nigeria: evolution, current practice and shortcomings, Environmental Impact Assessment Review [J], 2004, 24: 643-660.
48. Panayotou. T, Economic Growth and the Environment. CID Working Paper[M] Center for International Development at Harvaral University, 2000: 132-144
49. Panayotou. T. Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Department, The Environmental Crisis and Sustainable Livelihoods in the Third World [M], London: Macmillan Press, 1995
50. Prigogine I. Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes [M]. New York: Interscience Pub., 1967: 112
51. Rechberger H, Graedel T.E. The Contemporary European Copper Cycle: Statistical Entropy Analysis. Ecological Economics [J], 2002, 42(1-2): 59-72.
52. Ree W E, Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out, Environmental and Unbanization [J], 1992, 4(2): 142-151.
53. Robert U Ayres, Eco-thermodynamics and the second law, Ecological Economics [J], 1998, 26: 189-209.
54. Rosen M A,I Dincer, On exergy and environmental impact, Int. J. Energy Res[J], 1997, 21: 643-654.
55. Rosen M A, Second-law: Approaches and implications, Int. J. Energy Res[J], 1999, 23:415-429
56. Rosen M A, I Dincer, Exergy analysis of waste emissions, Int. J. Energy Res 1999, 21: 1153-1163.
57. Schneider. E. D., Kay. J.J, 1994. complexity and Thermodynamics: Towards a New Ecology. Futures. 24. 6
58. Steen, B. A systematic approach to environmental priority setting in product development (EPS). [R] CPM Report. Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology. 1999:328-231
59. Selden. T. M. and D. Song, Environment Qeality and Development:Is There a kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emission? Journal of Environmental Economic and Management[J], 1994, 27:147-162
60. Selden T M, Song D., Environmental quality and development is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emission., Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 1994, 29(2):162-169.
61. Seppala Jyri, Hamalainen Raimo P., On the meaning of the Distance-to-Target weighting method and normalization in life cycle impact assessment., International Journal of LCA [J], 2001, 6(4): 211-218.
62. Sieniutycz, Stanislaw. Thermodynamic Limits on Production or Consumption of Mechanical Energy in Practical and Industrial Systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science [J], 2003, 29(3): 193-246.
63. Stigland, W. M, Anderberg, S. Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustaina- ble Development [M]. U.E. (Eds.) United Nations University Press. 1993:357-359.
64. Stigland, W. M., Anderberg, S. 莱茵河流域中积累的化学品的工业代谢与长期风险.产业与环境[J], 1994, 16(3): 30～35
65. Suri V., Chapman D., Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve., Ecological Economics [J], 1998, 25(2): 195-208.
66. Stokey N L., Are there limits to growth., Intemational Economics Review [J], 1989,39(1): 1-31.
67. STUART ROSS, DAVID EVANS., Use of life cycle assessment in environmental management., Environmental Management [J], 2002, 29(1):
68. Tomas Kaberger, Bengt Mansson., Entropy and economic processes—physics perspectives., Ecological Economics [J], 2001, 36: 65-79.
69. Torras. M, K. Boyce. Income, Inequality, and Pollution: A Reassessment of The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics [J], 1998(25): 147-160.
70. U. S. Interagency Working Group on Industrial Ecology. Material and Energy Flows: Indutrial Ecology Material and Energy Flows in the United State [R]. Waswiugton D. C. 2000
71. Vasile Lavric, Danielle Baetens, et al., Entropy generation reduction through chemical pinch analysis, Applied Thermal Engineering [J], 2003, 23: 1837-1845.
72. Wofl Steinborn, Yuri Svirezhev, Entropy as an indicator of sustainability in agro-eeosystems: North Germany ease study, Ecological Modelling [J], 2000, 133: 247-257.
73. Wolfgang Fratzscher, Karl Stephan., Waste energy usage and entropy economy., Energy [J], 2003: 1281-1302.
74. Wolkenstein, M.W. Entropie and Information [M]. Verlag Harry Deutsch. 1990: 224.
75. Weber, B.H., Depew, D.J., Entropy, Information and Evolution: New Perspectives on Physical and Biological Evolution [M]. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988: 173.
76. YANG Kai-zhong, YANG Yong, CHEN jie. Ecological footprint analysis: concept, method and case. Advanee in Earth Sciences[J], 2000, 15(6): 630-636.
77. Yuri M, Svirezhev A, Svirejeva-Hopkins Sustainable biosphere: critical overview of basic concept of Sustainability, Ecological Modeling. [J]. 1998, 106: 47-61
78. Yuri M, Svirezhev A, Thermodynamics and ecology, Ecological Modelling[J], 2000,132:11-22
79.曹东 中国工业污染经济学.北京:环境科学出版社,1999
80.曹新向,梁留科,丁圣彦.可持续发展定量评价的生态足迹分析方法.自然杂志[J].2003,25(6):335-339.
81.陈履安.生产、污染及其治理过程中物资能量转化的热力学分析.中国环境科学[J].1985,5(1):14-18.
82.陈清硕.生态环境污染熵的研究方法.环境保护[J].1981,2:22-27.
83.陈业材.环境容量与环境自净[M].贵州:贵州人民出版社,1985.
84.***,**.基于熵的工业生产模式环境影响比较研究,中国工程科学[J],2005(10),43-46.
85.***,**.基于FNN协调度预测的环境库兹尼茨曲线分析.西南交通大学学报[J],2004,6,725-729.
86.[日]槌田敦著.资源物理学[M].朴昌根译.上海:华东化工学院出版社,1991,
87.[日]槌田敦.资源物理学的历史与现状.大自然探索[J],1990,32(9):70-75.
88.丁任重.经济可持续发展:增长、资源与极限问题之争.重庆工商大学学报[J],2004,66(4):10-15
89.GB/T 24041—2000.环境管理 生命周期评价目的与范围的确定和清单分析.
90.高峰,孙成权,曲建升编译.地球科学进展.2001,16(3):442
91.国家工业污染源调查办公室编 全国工业污染源调查评价与研究.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.10
92.合田健[日]编著.水环境指标[M].全浩等译.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1989.
93.华贲.炼油过程用能技术经济分析.炼油设计[J],1982,7(5):54-66.
94.(美)杰里米·里夫金,特德·霍华德著.熵:一种新的世界观[M].吕明,袁舟译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987年.
95.李崇阳,王龙妹.试论经济社会系统不可逆熵增与可持续发展.宁夏工学院学报[J],1997,4:1-4.
96.李德虎,李顺祺.资源及资源消耗的生态价值系数评价.自然资源学报[J],1994,9(1):27-35.
97.李慧明.熵律、生态平衡与环境资源合理利用.南开经济研究[J],1999, 4:7-12.
98.李慧明.环境与经济如何双赢——环境库兹涅茨曲线引发的思考,南开学报[J].2003(1):58-64.
99.李景平,朱楚珠,李树茁.非平衡态企业危机及其管理.中国软科学[J],2002,2:47-50.
100.李克国.环境经济学[M].北京:科技文献出版社,1993.
101.李如生.非平衡态热力学和耗散结构[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1992:76-81.
102.李优树.我国现行排污收费制度存在的问题.价格月刊[J],1999,6:21-24.
103.刘培哲等著.可持续发展理论与中国21世纪议程[M].北京:气象出版社,2001,2.
104.刘思华.可持续发展经济学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1997:34-36.
105.陆雍森.环境评价[M].第2版.上海:同济大学出版社,1999,82.
106.毛文承等.资源环境数据手册[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992.
107.苗东升.系统科学原理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.
108.苗启明.熵理思维方式与可持续发展.学术月刊[J],1998,11.
109.尼科里斯,普利高津.探索复杂性[M].四川:四川教育出版社,1992.
110.欧阳培主编.排泄资源经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1997.
111.潘玉君.人地关系地域系统协调共生应用理论初步研究.人文地理[J].1997,12(3):18-23.
112.邱菀华著.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
113.全桂玲.首席科学家牛文元教授谈中国可持续发展战略.北京观察[J],2002,(3).
114.任佩瑜,宋勇,张莉.论管理熵、管理耗散结构与我国企业文化的重塑[J].四川大学学报,2000,4:45-49.
115.沈满洪.环境经济手段研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2001:76-130.
116.孙炳彦.世纪之交的中国污染损失估算、预测和思考[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997:3-29.
117.宋华岭.广义与狭义管理熵理论——管理学的新研究领域.中国煤炭经济学院学报[J],2002,16(1):45-50.
118.世界资源研究所等编,国家环保总局国际司译.世界资源报告(1994-1995)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,1999:53.
119.汤万金,李祥仪,李仲学.矿产资源的熵与自然价值及其模型.黄金[J],1997,18(11):22-24
120.唐剑武等.环境承载力及其在环境规划中的初步应用[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(1).
121. 唐孝炎, Madronich S. Effects of Increased Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Tropospheric Composition and Air Quality. Ambio-A Journal of the Human Environment. 1995, 24(3): 187.
122.童苑书,黄裕侃.环境经济问题[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1983:173～177.
123.王金南编著.环境经济学:理论·方法·政策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994:43-45.
124.王承阳.环境污染末端治理的热力学认识.冶金能源[J],2003,22(6):52-54.
125.王虹,朱远程,崔风暴.从中国环境治理数据看创建循环经济的必要性.环境保护[J].2004,324(10):24-28.
126.王书华,毛汉英,王忠静.生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展[J].2002,17(6):776-782.
127.汪晶,和德科,汪尧衢编译.环境评价数据手册——有毒物质鉴定值[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1988:424-426.
128.汪应洛,刘旭.清洁生产[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1998:39-41.
129.邬建国.耗散结构、等级系统理论与生态系统.应用生态学报[J],1992,2(2):181-186.
130.席德立,彭小燕.LCA环境影响分析新探.环境科学[J].1997,18(6):76-80.
131.许涤新主编.生态经济学[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1987.
132.夏光著.环境污染与经济机制[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1992:1～3.
133.肖忠东,孙林岩,吕坚.经济系统与生态系统的比较研究.管理工程学报[J],2003,17(4):23-27.
134.薛国良.依据资源物理学原理重新考虑可持续发展战略实施中的某些技术方案.河北大学学报(自然科学版)[J],2002,22(3):294-299.
135.谢振华.树立和落实科学发展观 推动环保工作再上新台阶.保护环境[J],2004,318(4):1-5
136.徐大伟,王子彦,郭莉.工业生态系统演化的耗散结构理论分析,管理科学[J].2004,17(6):51-56
137.颜幼平,康新宇等.建立环境新指标——量热熵MHS.青岛大学学报[J],1998,10:85-89.
138.杨爱去,刘士荣.熵及其应用[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,1995.5.
139.杨东华.分析与能级分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.
140.叶文虎,栾胜基编著.环境质量评价学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994.
141.于伟佳.试论熵与经济学的结合点.农金纵横[J].1995,1:32-36.
142.中国环境统计公告(2003)(http://www.zhb.gov.cn/eic/649371567364505600/index.shtml,1995—2003)
143.中国科学院可持续发展研究组.2002年中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:16-248.
144.中国科学院可持续发展研究组.中国可持续发展战略报告(2001)[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
145.中国环境与发展合作委员会.中国自然资源定价研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
146.张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999:56-111.
2. Ayres K., Industrial metabolism, The Greening of Industrial Ecosystems. National Academy Press [M], 1994: 23～37.
3. A. Blanc, H. Metivier-Pignon, R. Gourdon, P. Rousseaux., Life cycle assessment as a tool for controlling the development of technical activities: application to the remediation of a site contaminated by sulfur. Advances in Environmental Research [J]. 2004, 8: 613-627.
4. Ayres R U., L W Ayres and K. Martinas, Exergy waste accounting and lifecycle analysis., Energy International Journal [J] 1998, 23(5): 355-363.
5. Carson. R. T., Y. Jeon, D.R. McCubbin, The Relationship between Air Pollution Emissions and Income: US data. Environment and Development Economics[J]. 1997(2): 433-450.
6. Cave S R and D W Edwards, Chemical process route selection based on assessment of inherent environmental hazard, Computers Chem Engng [J], 1997, 21: 965-970.
7. Chu hailin, Li jun, The EKC analysis about Environment-Economy Coordination degree of Chengdu City based on FNN, Proceedings of 2003 International Conference on Management Science & Engineering[R], USA: ATLANTA, 2003, 8:1455-1459
8. Cole, M.A., A.J. Rayner, J.M. Bates, The Environmental Kuznets Curve: an Empirical Analysis, Environment and Development Economics [J], 1997, 2(4): 433-450.
9. Cole R J, Building environmental assessment methods: assessing construction practices, Construct Manage Economics [J], 2000, 18(8): 949-57.
10. De GrootS, MazurRP. Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics [M]. Amsterdan: North-Holland Publishing company, 1962:102-110.
11. Douglas B. Reynolds, Entropy ,and diminishing elasticity of substitution, Resources Policy [J]. 1999(25): 51-58.
12. Editorial, Cleaner production tools: LCA and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production [J], 2002, 10: 403-406.
13. Ekvall T. Cleaner Production Tools: LCA and beyond, Journal of Cleaner Production [J], 2002, 10: 403-406.
14. E N Pistikopoulos, Minimizing the environmental impact of process plants: a process systems methodology. Computers Chem. Engng [J], 1995, 19: 39-44
15. Farag W A, Germano L-T. A genetic-based neuro-fuzzy approach for modeling and control of dynamical systems. IEEE Trans on Neural Networks [J], 1998,9(5): 756-767.
16. Frangopoulos C A, Introduction to environomics, Second Law Analysis Industrial and Environment Applications, Advanced Energy System[J], 1991, 25:49-54.
17. Fritz Sollner, A reexamination of the role of thermodynamics for environmental economics. Ecological Economics [J] 1997, 22: 175-201.
18. G. Rebitzera, T. Ekvall, et al. Part 1: Framework, goal and scope definition, inventory analysis, and applications Environment International. 2004(30): 701-720
19. Gibson RB. From Wreck Cove to Voisey's Bay: the evolution of federal environmental assessment in Canada. Impact Assessment and Project" Appraisal [J], 2002; 20(3): 15-19
20. Goedkoop, M. and R. Spriensma. The Eco-indicator99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Methodology Report [R]. The Netherlands: Preconsultants, 1999.
21. Grossman G. M., A. B kreuger., Economic Growth and the Environment, Quarterly Journal of Economics [J], 1995, 110(2): 333-337.
22. Haberl H. How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long period of time. Ecological Economics [J], 2001; 38: 25-45
23. Hard P, Barg S, Hodge T, et al. Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practices [R]. Occasional paper number 17,1997: 49-51.
24. H. T. Odum, Environment and Society in Florida [M], Gainesville Lewis Publishers, 1998: 105-112
25. Huesemann, Michael H. Can Pollution Problems be Effectively Solved by Environmental Scienceand Technology? Ecological Economics [J], 2001, 37(2): 271-287.
26. Ibrahim. Dincer, Marc A. Rosen. Thermodynamic aspects of renewables and sustainable development. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews [J]. 2005(9): 169-189
27. Jacguetta J Lee et al. Conservation and Recycling, Resources [J], 1995, 13: 37-56
28. Jasch C, Environmental performance evaluation and indicators, Cleaner Product [J], 2000, 8(1): 79-88.
29. Joosten, LA. J.; Hekkert, M. P.; Worrell, E.; Turkenburg, W. C. STREAMS: a new method for analyzing material flows through society. Resource. Conserve. Recycle[J]. 1999, 27 (3): 249-266.
30. Jones A, Pecchenino R, An overlapping generations model of growth and the environment, The Economic Journal[J], 1994, 104: 1393-1410.
31. J0rgensen, S.-E.,. Integration of Ecosystem Theories: A Pattern. Kluwer, Dordrecht: 1992:383
32. Kaberger, T. Measuring instrumental value in energy terms. In: Folke, C. Linking the Natural Environment and the Economy [M]: Essays from the Eco-Eco Group. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 1991: 61-75.
33. Kaufmann, R.K., B. Davidsdottir, S. Garnham, P. Pauly, The Determinants of Atmospheric SO2 Concentrations: Reconsidering the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics[J], 1998(25): 209-220.
34. Klippel, A., Muller. I. Plant growth — a thermodynamics' view. Contin. Mech. Thermodynam. 1997(9): 127-142.
35. Kuznets, S. Economic Growth and Income Inequality, American Economic Review [J], 1955(49): 1-28.
36. Lenzen, M. Primary energy and greenhouse gases embodied in Australian final consumption: an input-output analysis. Energy Policy, 1998, 26 (6): 495-506.
37. Li CP, Hui IK. Environmental impact evaluation model for industrial processes. Environmental Manage 2001, 27(5): 729-37.
38. LI li-feng, CHENNG Sheng-kui. Ecological footprint: a new indicator for sustainability. Resources Science. 2000, 15(4) :375-382.
39. Lowenthal, Micah D., Kastenberg, william E. Industrial Ecology and Energy Systems. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 1998, 24(1):51-63
40. Lopez, R. The Environment as a Factor of Production: The Effects of Economic Growth and Trade Liberalization, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 1994, 27:163-84.
41. Marcio M C, Roberto, Ernst. Exergy accounting of energy and materials flows in steel production systems, Energy[J], 2001, 26: 363-384.
42. Mathis Wackernagel, Lillemor Lewan, Carina Borgstrom Honsson. Evaluation the use of national capital with the ecological footprint—Applications in Sweden and subregions, Ambio - A Journal of the Human Environment [J], 1999, 28(7): 604-612.
43. Marano J, Rogers S, Process system optimization for life cycle improvement, Environmental Progress [J], 1999,18(4): 267~272
44. Moore III B, Braswell Jr H. Planetary Metabolism: Understanding the Carbon Cycle, Ambio - A Journal of the Human Environment [J].1994, 23(3): 442
45. Munasinghe, M, Is Environmental Degradation an Inevitable Consequence of Economic Growth: Tunneling through the Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics [J], 1999(29): 89-109.
46. O Brien, D.M.,. A yardstick for global entropy-flux. Meteorol [J]. 1997, 123: 243-260.
47. Olusegun A. Ogunba, EIA systems in Nigeria: evolution, current practice and shortcomings, Environmental Impact Assessment Review [J], 2004, 24: 643-660.
48. Panayotou. T, Economic Growth and the Environment. CID Working Paper[M] Center for International Development at Harvaral University, 2000: 132-144
49. Panayotou. T. Environmental Degradation at Different Stages of Economic Department, The Environmental Crisis and Sustainable Livelihoods in the Third World [M], London: Macmillan Press, 1995
50. Prigogine I. Introduction to Thermodynamics of Irreversible Processes [M]. New York: Interscience Pub., 1967: 112
51. Rechberger H, Graedel T.E. The Contemporary European Copper Cycle: Statistical Entropy Analysis. Ecological Economics [J], 2002, 42(1-2): 59-72.
52. Ree W E, Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out, Environmental and Unbanization [J], 1992, 4(2): 142-151.
53. Robert U Ayres, Eco-thermodynamics and the second law, Ecological Economics [J], 1998, 26: 189-209.
54. Rosen M A,I Dincer, On exergy and environmental impact, Int. J. Energy Res[J], 1997, 21: 643-654.
55. Rosen M A, Second-law: Approaches and implications, Int. J. Energy Res[J], 1999, 23:415-429
56. Rosen M A, I Dincer, Exergy analysis of waste emissions, Int. J. Energy Res 1999, 21: 1153-1163.
57. Schneider. E. D., Kay. J.J, 1994. complexity and Thermodynamics: Towards a New Ecology. Futures. 24. 6
58. Steen, B. A systematic approach to environmental priority setting in product development (EPS). [R] CPM Report. Sweden: Chalmers University of Technology. 1999:328-231
59. Selden. T. M. and D. Song, Environment Qeality and Development:Is There a kuznets Curve for Air Pollution Emission? Journal of Environmental Economic and Management[J], 1994, 27:147-162
60. Selden T M, Song D., Environmental quality and development is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emission., Journal of Environmental Economics and Management [J], 1994, 29(2):162-169.
61. Seppala Jyri, Hamalainen Raimo P., On the meaning of the Distance-to-Target weighting method and normalization in life cycle impact assessment., International Journal of LCA [J], 2001, 6(4): 211-218.
62. Sieniutycz, Stanislaw. Thermodynamic Limits on Production or Consumption of Mechanical Energy in Practical and Industrial Systems. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science [J], 2003, 29(3): 193-246.
63. Stigland, W. M, Anderberg, S. Industrial Metabolism: Restructuring for Sustaina- ble Development [M]. U.E. (Eds.) United Nations University Press. 1993:357-359.
64. Stigland, W. M., Anderberg, S. 莱茵河流域中积累的化学品的工业代谢与长期风险.产业与环境[J], 1994, 16(3): 30～35
65. Suri V., Chapman D., Economic growth, trade and energy: implications for the environmental Kuznets curve., Ecological Economics [J], 1998, 25(2): 195-208.
66. Stokey N L., Are there limits to growth., Intemational Economics Review [J], 1989,39(1): 1-31.
67. STUART ROSS, DAVID EVANS., Use of life cycle assessment in environmental management., Environmental Management [J], 2002, 29(1):
68. Tomas Kaberger, Bengt Mansson., Entropy and economic processes—physics perspectives., Ecological Economics [J], 2001, 36: 65-79.
69. Torras. M, K. Boyce. Income, Inequality, and Pollution: A Reassessment of The Environmental Kuznets Curve, Ecological Economics [J], 1998(25): 147-160.
70. U. S. Interagency Working Group on Industrial Ecology. Material and Energy Flows: Indutrial Ecology Material and Energy Flows in the United State [R]. Waswiugton D. C. 2000
71. Vasile Lavric, Danielle Baetens, et al., Entropy generation reduction through chemical pinch analysis, Applied Thermal Engineering [J], 2003, 23: 1837-1845.
72. Wofl Steinborn, Yuri Svirezhev, Entropy as an indicator of sustainability in agro-eeosystems: North Germany ease study, Ecological Modelling [J], 2000, 133: 247-257.
73. Wolfgang Fratzscher, Karl Stephan., Waste energy usage and entropy economy., Energy [J], 2003: 1281-1302.
74. Wolkenstein, M.W. Entropie and Information [M]. Verlag Harry Deutsch. 1990: 224.
75. Weber, B.H., Depew, D.J., Entropy, Information and Evolution: New Perspectives on Physical and Biological Evolution [M]. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1988: 173.
76. YANG Kai-zhong, YANG Yong, CHEN jie. Ecological footprint analysis: concept, method and case. Advanee in Earth Sciences[J], 2000, 15(6): 630-636.
77. Yuri M, Svirezhev A, Svirejeva-Hopkins Sustainable biosphere: critical overview of basic concept of Sustainability, Ecological Modeling. [J]. 1998, 106: 47-61
78. Yuri M, Svirezhev A, Thermodynamics and ecology, Ecological Modelling[J], 2000,132:11-22
79.曹东 中国工业污染经济学.北京:环境科学出版社,1999
80.曹新向,梁留科,丁圣彦.可持续发展定量评价的生态足迹分析方法.自然杂志[J].2003,25(6):335-339.
81.陈履安.生产、污染及其治理过程中物资能量转化的热力学分析.中国环境科学[J].1985,5(1):14-18.
82.陈清硕.生态环境污染熵的研究方法.环境保护[J].1981,2:22-27.
83.陈业材.环境容量与环境自净[M].贵州:贵州人民出版社,1985.
84.***,**.基于熵的工业生产模式环境影响比较研究,中国工程科学[J],2005(10),43-46.
85.***,**.基于FNN协调度预测的环境库兹尼茨曲线分析.西南交通大学学报[J],2004,6,725-729.
86.[日]槌田敦著.资源物理学[M].朴昌根译.上海:华东化工学院出版社,1991,
87.[日]槌田敦.资源物理学的历史与现状.大自然探索[J],1990,32(9):70-75.
88.丁任重.经济可持续发展:增长、资源与极限问题之争.重庆工商大学学报[J],2004,66(4):10-15
89.GB/T 24041—2000.环境管理 生命周期评价目的与范围的确定和清单分析.
90.高峰,孙成权,曲建升编译.地球科学进展.2001,16(3):442
91.国家工业污染源调查办公室编 全国工业污染源调查评价与研究.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1999.10
92.合田健[日]编著.水环境指标[M].全浩等译.北京:中国环境科学出版社,1989.
93.华贲.炼油过程用能技术经济分析.炼油设计[J],1982,7(5):54-66.
94.(美)杰里米·里夫金,特德·霍华德著.熵:一种新的世界观[M].吕明,袁舟译.上海:上海译文出版社,1987年.
95.李崇阳,王龙妹.试论经济社会系统不可逆熵增与可持续发展.宁夏工学院学报[J],1997,4:1-4.
96.李德虎,李顺祺.资源及资源消耗的生态价值系数评价.自然资源学报[J],1994,9(1):27-35.
97.李慧明.熵律、生态平衡与环境资源合理利用.南开经济研究[J],1999, 4:7-12.
98.李慧明.环境与经济如何双赢——环境库兹涅茨曲线引发的思考,南开学报[J].2003(1):58-64.
99.李景平,朱楚珠,李树茁.非平衡态企业危机及其管理.中国软科学[J],2002,2:47-50.
100.李克国.环境经济学[M].北京:科技文献出版社,1993.
101.李如生.非平衡态热力学和耗散结构[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1992:76-81.
102.李优树.我国现行排污收费制度存在的问题.价格月刊[J],1999,6:21-24.
103.刘培哲等著.可持续发展理论与中国21世纪议程[M].北京:气象出版社,2001,2.
104.刘思华.可持续发展经济学[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社,1997:34-36.
105.陆雍森.环境评价[M].第2版.上海:同济大学出版社,1999,82.
106.毛文承等.资源环境数据手册[M].北京:中国科学技术出版社,1992.
107.苗东升.系统科学原理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990.
108.苗启明.熵理思维方式与可持续发展.学术月刊[J],1998,11.
109.尼科里斯,普利高津.探索复杂性[M].四川:四川教育出版社,1992.
110.欧阳培主编.排泄资源经济学[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1997.
111.潘玉君.人地关系地域系统协调共生应用理论初步研究.人文地理[J].1997,12(3):18-23.
112.邱菀华著.管理决策与应用熵学[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
113.全桂玲.首席科学家牛文元教授谈中国可持续发展战略.北京观察[J],2002,(3).
114.任佩瑜,宋勇,张莉.论管理熵、管理耗散结构与我国企业文化的重塑[J].四川大学学报,2000,4:45-49.
115.沈满洪.环境经济手段研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2001:76-130.
116.孙炳彦.世纪之交的中国污染损失估算、预测和思考[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997:3-29.
117.宋华岭.广义与狭义管理熵理论——管理学的新研究领域.中国煤炭经济学院学报[J],2002,16(1):45-50.
118.世界资源研究所等编,国家环保总局国际司译.世界资源报告(1994-1995)[M].北京:中国环境出版社,1999:53.
119.汤万金,李祥仪,李仲学.矿产资源的熵与自然价值及其模型.黄金[J],1997,18(11):22-24
120.唐剑武等.环境承载力及其在环境规划中的初步应用[J].中国环境科学,1997,17(1).
121. 唐孝炎, Madronich S. Effects of Increased Solar Ultraviolet Radiation on Tropospheric Composition and Air Quality. Ambio-A Journal of the Human Environment. 1995, 24(3): 187.
122.童苑书,黄裕侃.环境经济问题[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1983:173～177.
123.王金南编著.环境经济学:理论·方法·政策[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1994:43-45.
124.王承阳.环境污染末端治理的热力学认识.冶金能源[J],2003,22(6):52-54.
125.王虹,朱远程,崔风暴.从中国环境治理数据看创建循环经济的必要性.环境保护[J].2004,324(10):24-28.
126.王书华,毛汉英,王忠静.生态足迹研究的国内外近期进展[J].2002,17(6):776-782.
127.汪晶,和德科,汪尧衢编译.环境评价数据手册——有毒物质鉴定值[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1988:424-426.
128.汪应洛,刘旭.清洁生产[M].北京:机械工业出版社,1998:39-41.
129.邬建国.耗散结构、等级系统理论与生态系统.应用生态学报[J],1992,2(2):181-186.
130.席德立,彭小燕.LCA环境影响分析新探.环境科学[J].1997,18(6):76-80.
131.许涤新主编.生态经济学[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1987.
132.夏光著.环境污染与经济机制[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1992:1～3.
133.肖忠东,孙林岩,吕坚.经济系统与生态系统的比较研究.管理工程学报[J],2003,17(4):23-27.
134.薛国良.依据资源物理学原理重新考虑可持续发展战略实施中的某些技术方案.河北大学学报(自然科学版)[J],2002,22(3):294-299.
135.谢振华.树立和落实科学发展观 推动环保工作再上新台阶.保护环境[J],2004,318(4):1-5
136.徐大伟,王子彦,郭莉.工业生态系统演化的耗散结构理论分析,管理科学[J].2004,17(6):51-56
137.颜幼平,康新宇等.建立环境新指标——量热熵MHS.青岛大学学报[J],1998,10:85-89.
138.杨爱去,刘士荣.熵及其应用[M].长沙:湖南师范大学出版社,1995.5.
139.杨东华.分析与能级分析[M].北京:科学出版社,1986.
140.叶文虎,栾胜基编著.环境质量评价学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1994.
141.于伟佳.试论熵与经济学的结合点.农金纵横[J].1995,1:32-36.
142.中国环境统计公告(2003)(http://www.zhb.gov.cn/eic/649371567364505600/index.shtml,1995—2003)
143.中国科学院可持续发展研究组.2002年中国可持续发展战略报告[M].北京:科学出版社,2002:16-248.
144.中国科学院可持续发展研究组.中国可持续发展战略报告(2001)[M].北京:科学出版社,2001.
145.中国环境与发展合作委员会.中国自然资源定价研究[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,1997.
146.张维迎.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1999:56-111.