可拓工程方法在鹰瑞高速公路地灾危险性评估中的应用
|
摘要
目前在高速公路地质灾害危险性评价中较常用的方法有灰色系统理论方法、地理信息系统方法、信息量法、层次分析法、模糊数学方法、神经网络方法、工程地质分析法等,但这些方法在实际运用过程中却不很尽如人意。比如信息量法、层次分析法和模糊数学的方法,对各参数如何分配权重或确定隶属度等问题有人为因素的参与,有欠客观性、科学性。基于可拓学理论的可拓工程方法与各个领域的专业知识相结合,可以解决原有方法未能解决的问题,或提出比原有方法更好的解决方法。
本文将可拓学理论与高速公路地质灾害危险性评价结合,在物元理论、可拓集合论和关联函数运算的基础上,建立了高速公路地质灾害危险性评价的可拓学模型。在掌握研究区岩土工程地质特征和地质灾害类型的基础上,确定历史灾害分布密度、历史灾害规模等12个影响地质灾害危险性的因素作为评价指标。将评估区划分为61个单元,按地质灾害危险性大、中、小三级危险性分级标准,通过工程建设适宜性等级的关联度的计算,对各单元进行地质灾害危险性可拓综合评估。
在建立可拓学模型的基础上,本文实现了可拓学评价的计算机程序化,利用javascript+html语言编制了可拓学评价程序,使评估单元计算更加简单、准确、快捷,得到了定量评价结果,并绘制了对研究区的区划与工程建设具有参考意义的危险性分区图。
最后,得到了可拓学在高速公路地质灾害危险性评估中应用的总结和讨论:
1、本文将可拓学应用在鹰潭至瑞金高速公路地质灾害危险性评价之中,建立了地质灾害危险性评价的可拓学模型并进行了研究区建设用地适宜性评价,评价结果和在本项目中得到实施并取得较好效果的工程地质分析评价方法的结果基本吻合,局部稍有差异。可知可拓学评价方法在高速公路地质灾害危险性评价中的应用是基本可行的。
2、本文利用javascript+html编制了可拓学评价程序,并在该研究区建设用地适宜性评价之中进行应用,简化了计算过程。
3、可拓学评价方法,不仅能从多角度、多因素出发,选取的评价参数种类和数量均不受限制,具有适用于不同区域的具体特点,而且能最大限度的合理利用地质调查的成果,克服以往固定因素评价的弊端,使评价更切合实际。但是由于本人基础资料、相关研究成果和研究经验的缺乏,在实例中对于关联度与参数指标的选取的关系方面尚待进一步研究。
4、本文将可拓学方法与高速公路地质灾害危险性评价相结合,拓展了可拓理论的应用领域,同时也为地质灾害危险性评估增添了新的方法。
5、本论文对可拓工程评价分区的问题,由于多方面的因素及搜集数据的限制,选取五公里的长度有些粗略,在研究中不能得到较精确的评价结果,以后的研究在评价单元长度划分上有待进一步细化,以便得到更精确的评价结果用于实际应用中。
6、论文对地质灾害危险性量化评估进行了探索,可拓工程方法是实现地质灾害危险性评价的定量化方法之一。
At present the the commonly used method of highway geologic hazard assessment are the approach of gray system theory, approach of geographic information systems, informational method, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy mathematics, neural network methods, but the practical application of these methods in the process is not very satisfied. Such as gray system theory approach, due to lacking of clear characteristics exists ambiguity; geographic information system's application of powerful spatial analysis capabilities due to some limitations, there are still poor in operability and applicability. The informational method, AHP and fuzzy mathematics method, on distributing the weight or determining the degree there are Artificial factor existing, lacking objectivity and scientific nature;neural network method can overcome the human factors involved, But the close relationship between training process and the length of time to the knowledge machine and the compatibility between the parameters in evaluation system. Therefore,there is no fitness due to the high Selection to evaluational index system. Extension engineering method which based on Extension Theory combineing with various areas of expertise can solve the problem that the original method does not or propose a better approach than the original solution.
This text made the extenics theory and risk assessment of geological disasters in highway and set up the Geological Hazard Evaluational Extenics model based on the matter-element theory, extension set theory and correlation functions of computing. Distributional density, scale of historical disaster, distribution density of faults, peak acceleration of ground motion,the nature and structure of rock and soil, terrainal elevation difference, slope, the average annual rainfall in years, development of river valley, forest (vegetation) cover, the activity level of karst collapse and the impact of human activities,the 12 geological disasters risk factors are decided in mastering the geotechnical engineering geological characteristics and types of geological disasters in study area . the assessment was divided into 61 units according to the risk grading standards for the evaluation index which owes large, medium and small three division in risk of geological disasters.
This text realized the computer programs in Extenics evaluation based on establishment of Extenics, using javascript + html language developed extenics evaluation process, so that calculations are more simple, accurate, fast,geting quantitative evaluation and drawing on the study area zoning and construction are useful in the risk of zoning plans.
In the establishment of Extenics Based on the model, this paper realized Extenics evaluation of computer programs, using javascript + html language developed extenics evaluation process, so that assessment unit calculations are more simple, accurate, fast, quantitative evaluation has been results and drawing on the study area zoning and construction are useful in the risk of zoning plans.
Finally,I got the summary and discussion of Extenics application in risk assessment of geological disasters:
1, This text applied Extenics to highway assessment of geological hazards in Yingtan to Ruijin and established risk assessment of geological hazards extenics model, carring out suitability evaluation in study area. Results of evaluation were basically consistent with engineering geological analysis and evaluational methods in this project which has been implemented and achieved good results, just slightly different. We can see Extenics evaluation method is a fundamental feasible on the highway Geological Hazard Assessment.
2, In this text, javascript + html was used to preparated extenics evaluation procedures and applied in construction land suitability evaluation in the study, which simplify the calculation process.
3, Extenics evaluation method, not only can select unrestricted type and quantity of the evaluation parameters from multi-angle, multi-factor starting, having applied to the specific characteristics of different regions, but also can use geological survey results to maximize rationally. Overcoming the the drawbacks of the previous evaluation to the fixed factors, so that is a more realistic assessment. However, due to the lack of my basic information, relevant research results and research experience , parameters for the selection of indicators for the relationship will be further studied in the instances.
4, This text expand the application of the theory in extension fields when the combing of Extenics methods and risk assessment of geological disasters highway, but also added a new method for risk assessment of geological disasters.
5. Due to a number of factors and collection of data limitations,there are some rough in selecting five kilometers when I used the partition extension engineering problems in evaluation,there is no accurate evaluation in the study, in future research the evaluation unit length need to be further refined in order to obtain a more accurate evaluation results forpractical application.
6.There is some quqntifical geological scourge fatelness quest in the text, thesie Extenics evaluation method is one of the methods in realizing quqntifical geological scourge fatelness quest.
本文将可拓学理论与高速公路地质灾害危险性评价结合,在物元理论、可拓集合论和关联函数运算的基础上,建立了高速公路地质灾害危险性评价的可拓学模型。在掌握研究区岩土工程地质特征和地质灾害类型的基础上,确定历史灾害分布密度、历史灾害规模等12个影响地质灾害危险性的因素作为评价指标。将评估区划分为61个单元,按地质灾害危险性大、中、小三级危险性分级标准,通过工程建设适宜性等级的关联度的计算,对各单元进行地质灾害危险性可拓综合评估。
在建立可拓学模型的基础上,本文实现了可拓学评价的计算机程序化,利用javascript+html语言编制了可拓学评价程序,使评估单元计算更加简单、准确、快捷,得到了定量评价结果,并绘制了对研究区的区划与工程建设具有参考意义的危险性分区图。
最后,得到了可拓学在高速公路地质灾害危险性评估中应用的总结和讨论:
1、本文将可拓学应用在鹰潭至瑞金高速公路地质灾害危险性评价之中,建立了地质灾害危险性评价的可拓学模型并进行了研究区建设用地适宜性评价,评价结果和在本项目中得到实施并取得较好效果的工程地质分析评价方法的结果基本吻合,局部稍有差异。可知可拓学评价方法在高速公路地质灾害危险性评价中的应用是基本可行的。
2、本文利用javascript+html编制了可拓学评价程序,并在该研究区建设用地适宜性评价之中进行应用,简化了计算过程。
3、可拓学评价方法,不仅能从多角度、多因素出发,选取的评价参数种类和数量均不受限制,具有适用于不同区域的具体特点,而且能最大限度的合理利用地质调查的成果,克服以往固定因素评价的弊端,使评价更切合实际。但是由于本人基础资料、相关研究成果和研究经验的缺乏,在实例中对于关联度与参数指标的选取的关系方面尚待进一步研究。
4、本文将可拓学方法与高速公路地质灾害危险性评价相结合,拓展了可拓理论的应用领域,同时也为地质灾害危险性评估增添了新的方法。
5、本论文对可拓工程评价分区的问题,由于多方面的因素及搜集数据的限制,选取五公里的长度有些粗略,在研究中不能得到较精确的评价结果,以后的研究在评价单元长度划分上有待进一步细化,以便得到更精确的评价结果用于实际应用中。
6、论文对地质灾害危险性量化评估进行了探索,可拓工程方法是实现地质灾害危险性评价的定量化方法之一。
At present the the commonly used method of highway geologic hazard assessment are the approach of gray system theory, approach of geographic information systems, informational method, analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy mathematics, neural network methods, but the practical application of these methods in the process is not very satisfied. Such as gray system theory approach, due to lacking of clear characteristics exists ambiguity; geographic information system's application of powerful spatial analysis capabilities due to some limitations, there are still poor in operability and applicability. The informational method, AHP and fuzzy mathematics method, on distributing the weight or determining the degree there are Artificial factor existing, lacking objectivity and scientific nature;neural network method can overcome the human factors involved, But the close relationship between training process and the length of time to the knowledge machine and the compatibility between the parameters in evaluation system. Therefore,there is no fitness due to the high Selection to evaluational index system. Extension engineering method which based on Extension Theory combineing with various areas of expertise can solve the problem that the original method does not or propose a better approach than the original solution.
This text made the extenics theory and risk assessment of geological disasters in highway and set up the Geological Hazard Evaluational Extenics model based on the matter-element theory, extension set theory and correlation functions of computing. Distributional density, scale of historical disaster, distribution density of faults, peak acceleration of ground motion,the nature and structure of rock and soil, terrainal elevation difference, slope, the average annual rainfall in years, development of river valley, forest (vegetation) cover, the activity level of karst collapse and the impact of human activities,the 12 geological disasters risk factors are decided in mastering the geotechnical engineering geological characteristics and types of geological disasters in study area . the assessment was divided into 61 units according to the risk grading standards for the evaluation index which owes large, medium and small three division in risk of geological disasters.
This text realized the computer programs in Extenics evaluation based on establishment of Extenics, using javascript + html language developed extenics evaluation process, so that calculations are more simple, accurate, fast,geting quantitative evaluation and drawing on the study area zoning and construction are useful in the risk of zoning plans.
In the establishment of Extenics Based on the model, this paper realized Extenics evaluation of computer programs, using javascript + html language developed extenics evaluation process, so that assessment unit calculations are more simple, accurate, fast, quantitative evaluation has been results and drawing on the study area zoning and construction are useful in the risk of zoning plans.
Finally,I got the summary and discussion of Extenics application in risk assessment of geological disasters:
1, This text applied Extenics to highway assessment of geological hazards in Yingtan to Ruijin and established risk assessment of geological hazards extenics model, carring out suitability evaluation in study area. Results of evaluation were basically consistent with engineering geological analysis and evaluational methods in this project which has been implemented and achieved good results, just slightly different. We can see Extenics evaluation method is a fundamental feasible on the highway Geological Hazard Assessment.
2, In this text, javascript + html was used to preparated extenics evaluation procedures and applied in construction land suitability evaluation in the study, which simplify the calculation process.
3, Extenics evaluation method, not only can select unrestricted type and quantity of the evaluation parameters from multi-angle, multi-factor starting, having applied to the specific characteristics of different regions, but also can use geological survey results to maximize rationally. Overcoming the the drawbacks of the previous evaluation to the fixed factors, so that is a more realistic assessment. However, due to the lack of my basic information, relevant research results and research experience , parameters for the selection of indicators for the relationship will be further studied in the instances.
4, This text expand the application of the theory in extension fields when the combing of Extenics methods and risk assessment of geological disasters highway, but also added a new method for risk assessment of geological disasters.
5. Due to a number of factors and collection of data limitations,there are some rough in selecting five kilometers when I used the partition extension engineering problems in evaluation,there is no accurate evaluation in the study, in future research the evaluation unit length need to be further refined in order to obtain a more accurate evaluation results forpractical application.
6.There is some quqntifical geological scourge fatelness quest in the text, thesie Extenics evaluation method is one of the methods in realizing quqntifical geological scourge fatelness quest.
引文
[1]罗元华,张梁,张业成.地质灾害风险评估方法[M].北京:地质出版社,1998,1
[2]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典[M].商务印书馆,1979
[3]刘希林,唐川.泥石流危险性评价[M].北京:科学出版社,1995,3
[4]Varnes D.J..Landslide hazard zonation:a review of principles and practice[M].UNESCO,Paris,1984,63.
[5]Einstein H.H.Special lecture:landslide risk assessment procedure[C].Pro.Fifth Int.Symo on Landslide,Lausann,Switzerland,1988
[6]张梁.地质灾害风险评价理论与方法[J].中国地质矿产经济,1996(4)
[7]D.R.布里林格,片山恒雄,黄玮琼,等.地震危险性评定与地震区划[M].北京:地震出版社,1988
[8]张梁,张业成,罗元华等.地质灾害灾情评估理论与实践.北京:地质出版社,1998.12
[9]罗元华,张梁,张业成等.地质灾害风险评估方法.北京:地质出版社,1998.8
[10]陈君.公路建设用地地质灾害危险性评估实践与认识[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2001,12(1)
[11]李泳.泥石流危险性评价的问题[J].山地学报,1999,17(4)
[12]L.A.Zadch.Fuzzy Set.Iformation and control.1965.8
[13]A.Kaufman.Introduction to the theory of Fuzzy Subsets.vol 1.New York.1975
[14]殷坤龙、张桂荣,地质灾害风险区划与综合防治对策,安全与环境工程,2003,10(1)
[15]Mario Mejia-navarro,Postdoctoarl Fellow.1996.Natural hazard and risk assessment using decision support systems,application:Glenwood Springs,Colorado.Environmental and Engineering Geosicence,1996,Ⅱ:299-324.
[16]P.Aleotti,R.Chowdhury.1999.Lnadslide hazard assessment:summary reviewand new perspectives.Bull Eng Geol Env,1999,58:21-44.
[17]朱济成.我国地质灾害概说.北京地质,1994(3)
[18]我国因地质灾害每年损失200亿元.四川环境,1995(1)
[19]柳源,中国地质灾害(以崩滑流为主)危险性分析与区划,中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(1)
[20]唐川、刘洪江,泥石流堆积扇危险度分区定量评价研究,土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(3)
[21]许信旺,地理信息系统支持下泥石流灾害危险度评估研究,安庆师范学院学报,1997,3(1)
[22]阮沈勇等,基于GIS的信息量法模型字地质灾害危险性区划中的应用,成都理工学院学报,2001,28(1):45-49
[23]向喜琼、黄润秋,基于GIS的人工神经网络模型在地质灾害危险性区划中的应用,中国地质灾害与防治学报,2000,11(3)
[24]朱良峰、殷坤龙等,GIS支持下的地质灾害风险分析,长江科学院院报,2002,19(5)
[25]范文等,主成分分析法在地质灾害危险性综合评价中的应用,西安工程学院学报,2001,23(4):53-57
[26]张春山、吴满路、张业成,地质灾害风险评价方法及展望,自然灾害学报,2003,12(1)
[27]吴亚子.山区公路地质灾害危险性评估方法研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2005.
[28]王莲芬、许树柏.层次分析法引论.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990
[29]Harker,P.T.,Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the Analytic Hierarehy Process,Report 85-03-01,Department of Decision Sciences.The Wharton School,University of Permsylvania.1985
[30]Devogele T.On spatial database integration.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,1998,12(4):335-352.
[31]滕继东,任兴伟,刘永林.基于AHP法的地质灾害影响因素权重的确定[J].中国水运,2007,5(4):128-131
[32]曹恺,李春贵,陈亮等.信息量模型在地质灾害调查与区划中的应用研究.安全与环境工程:11(1):38-41
[33]Wadge G.The potential of GIS modeling of gravity flows and slope instabilities.International Journal of Geographical Information systems:1998,2(2):143-152
[34]Neaupane K M,Achet S H.Use of back propagation neural network for landslide monitoring:a case study in the higher Himalaya[J].Engineering Geolog:2004,74:213-226
[35]董义革.模糊数学模型评价.电脑编程技巧与维护,2006.9:15-18
[36]任鲁川.1999b.自然灾害综合区划的基本类别及量化方法.自然灾害学报,1999,8(4):4148
[37]陈佩佩、武强,基于人工神经网络的地裂缝危险性评价系统,煤田地质与勘探,2001,29(3)
[38]邓聚龙.灰理论基础.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002
[39]刘思峰,郭天榜.灰色系统理论及其应用.郑州:河南大学出版社,1991
[40]陈植华,等.地理信息系统与水资源系统分析、模拟、决策[A].水文地质工程地质论文集[C].武汉:中国大学出版社,1992
[41]褚洪斌,母海东等.层次分析法在太行山区地质灾害危险性分区中的应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(3):125-129
[42]张俊峰.天山公路地质灾害危险性评价与决策支持系统设计与实现.成都:成都理工大学,2008
[43]晓林,基于公路环境保护的GIS应用与开发[J].中国公路学报,1998,11(4):33 37
[44]李晔,姚祖康.基于地理信息系统的公路设施空间数据库概念模型[J].中国公路学报,2000,13(3),9-11
[45]立琼.基于GIS的铁路工程地质信息系统的构建[J].四川地质学报,2001,21(1):44-47
[46]卓宝熙.铁路部门GIS进展情况及思考[J].铁路航测,1997,21(2):1-6
[47]朱良峰,殷坤龙.基于GIS技术的区域地质灾害信息分析系统研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报.2001,12(3),79-83
[48]唐川,朱大奎.基于GIS技术的泥石流风险评价研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(3):300-304
[49]蔡文.物元模型及其应用[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1994
[50]蔡文,杨春燕,何斌.可拓逻辑初步[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
[51]蔡文.可拓集合和不相容问题[J],科学探索学报,1983,1
[52]蔡文,杨春燕,林伟初.可拓工程方法[M],北京:科学出版社,1997
[53]蔡文,孙弘安,杨益民.从物元分析到可拓学[J],北京:科学技术文献出版社,1995
[54]Cai Wen.The Extension Set and Non-compatible Problems Editor Chien Weizang,Advances Mathmatics and Mechanics in China,International Academic Publishers,1990
[55]David K.W.Ng and CaiWen.Treating Non--compatible Problem from Matter element Analysis to extenics ACM SIGICE Bulletin,1997,22(3):1-9
[56]B.He and J.Chen,Research outline on Extension Mathematics,ACM SIGICE Bulletin,1997,22(3):10-16
[57]Liu Wei,YeJian.,Extension information,Proceedings of 96 International Conference on Management Seience & Engineering,1996
[58]He Xulian,Liu Wei and YeJian.Extension Information And Its Application to Criminal Investigation,Proceedings of 98 International Conference on Management Seience& Engineering,1998
[59]杨春燕,张拥军,蔡文.可拓集合及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识.2002,32(2):301-308
[60]江西省地质局912地质大队.抚州幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.12
[61]江西省地质局水文地质大队.南城幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.12
[62]江西省地质局水文地质大队.广昌幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.08
[63]江西省地质局水文地质大队.会昌幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1981.05
[64]江西省地质局水文地质大队.兴国幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.08
[65]江西省地质局908探矿工程大队.赣州地区瑞金县农业商品粮基地供水水文地质评价报告(1/10万).1993.3
[66]江西省气象局
[67]江西省地质局区域地质测量大队.东乡幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1963
[68]江西省地质局区域地质测量大队.南城幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1970
[69]江西省地质局区域地质调查大队.广昌幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1973
[70]福建省地质局区域地质测量队.宁化幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1972
[71]江西省地质局区域地质调查大队.兴国幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1974
[72]江西省地质局区域地质测量大队.于都幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1968
[73]福建省重工业局区域地质测量大队.长汀幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1970
[74]江西省地质矿产局.江西省区域地质志.1984.04
[75]江西省地震办公室.江西省历史地震目录(初稿).1974.06
[76]江西省建设厅、江西省地震局.江西省地震动参数区划工作用图(2003).2003.01
[77]曹恺,孟高头等.浙江省仙居县地质灾害调查与区划[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2002,27(2):217-221
[78]中华人民共和国国土资源部.国土资源部关于加强地质灾害危险性评估工作的通知[Z].2004
[79]刘加龙,吕希奎.模糊综合评判法在泥石流灾度评价中的应用[J].地质科技情报,2001020(004):86-88
[80]毛同夏,石宏仁等.区域地质环境的定量评价和预测[J].地学前缘,1996,3(1-2):141-146
[81]乔彦肖,李密文.基于遥感技术支持的地质灾害及孕灾环境综合评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2002,13(4):83-87
[82]钟荫乾.地质灾害易发性评价[J].湖北地矿,2002,16(4):81-86
[83]黄秀凤.模糊数学在地质灾害易发程度分区评价中的应用[J].南方国土资源,2004,11:95-96,98
[84]赵海卿,李广杰等.吉林省东部山区地质灾害危害性评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(1):119-124
[85]杨冬英,滕伟福.兴洲项目建设用地地质灾害危险性评估[J].西部探矿工程,2005,112(8):196-198
[86]中国地质调查局.地质灾害调查技术要求(比例尺1:250000、1:50000)[S].2001
[2]中国社会科学院语言研究所词典编辑室.现代汉语词典[M].商务印书馆,1979
[3]刘希林,唐川.泥石流危险性评价[M].北京:科学出版社,1995,3
[4]Varnes D.J..Landslide hazard zonation:a review of principles and practice[M].UNESCO,Paris,1984,63.
[5]Einstein H.H.Special lecture:landslide risk assessment procedure[C].Pro.Fifth Int.Symo on Landslide,Lausann,Switzerland,1988
[6]张梁.地质灾害风险评价理论与方法[J].中国地质矿产经济,1996(4)
[7]D.R.布里林格,片山恒雄,黄玮琼,等.地震危险性评定与地震区划[M].北京:地震出版社,1988
[8]张梁,张业成,罗元华等.地质灾害灾情评估理论与实践.北京:地质出版社,1998.12
[9]罗元华,张梁,张业成等.地质灾害风险评估方法.北京:地质出版社,1998.8
[10]陈君.公路建设用地地质灾害危险性评估实践与认识[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2001,12(1)
[11]李泳.泥石流危险性评价的问题[J].山地学报,1999,17(4)
[12]L.A.Zadch.Fuzzy Set.Iformation and control.1965.8
[13]A.Kaufman.Introduction to the theory of Fuzzy Subsets.vol 1.New York.1975
[14]殷坤龙、张桂荣,地质灾害风险区划与综合防治对策,安全与环境工程,2003,10(1)
[15]Mario Mejia-navarro,Postdoctoarl Fellow.1996.Natural hazard and risk assessment using decision support systems,application:Glenwood Springs,Colorado.Environmental and Engineering Geosicence,1996,Ⅱ:299-324.
[16]P.Aleotti,R.Chowdhury.1999.Lnadslide hazard assessment:summary reviewand new perspectives.Bull Eng Geol Env,1999,58:21-44.
[17]朱济成.我国地质灾害概说.北京地质,1994(3)
[18]我国因地质灾害每年损失200亿元.四川环境,1995(1)
[19]柳源,中国地质灾害(以崩滑流为主)危险性分析与区划,中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(1)
[20]唐川、刘洪江,泥石流堆积扇危险度分区定量评价研究,土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报,1997,3(3)
[21]许信旺,地理信息系统支持下泥石流灾害危险度评估研究,安庆师范学院学报,1997,3(1)
[22]阮沈勇等,基于GIS的信息量法模型字地质灾害危险性区划中的应用,成都理工学院学报,2001,28(1):45-49
[23]向喜琼、黄润秋,基于GIS的人工神经网络模型在地质灾害危险性区划中的应用,中国地质灾害与防治学报,2000,11(3)
[24]朱良峰、殷坤龙等,GIS支持下的地质灾害风险分析,长江科学院院报,2002,19(5)
[25]范文等,主成分分析法在地质灾害危险性综合评价中的应用,西安工程学院学报,2001,23(4):53-57
[26]张春山、吴满路、张业成,地质灾害风险评价方法及展望,自然灾害学报,2003,12(1)
[27]吴亚子.山区公路地质灾害危险性评估方法研究[D].成都:成都理工大学,2005.
[28]王莲芬、许树柏.层次分析法引论.北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990
[29]Harker,P.T.,Incomplete pairwise comparisons in the Analytic Hierarehy Process,Report 85-03-01,Department of Decision Sciences.The Wharton School,University of Permsylvania.1985
[30]Devogele T.On spatial database integration.International Journal of Geographical Information Science,1998,12(4):335-352.
[31]滕继东,任兴伟,刘永林.基于AHP法的地质灾害影响因素权重的确定[J].中国水运,2007,5(4):128-131
[32]曹恺,李春贵,陈亮等.信息量模型在地质灾害调查与区划中的应用研究.安全与环境工程:11(1):38-41
[33]Wadge G.The potential of GIS modeling of gravity flows and slope instabilities.International Journal of Geographical Information systems:1998,2(2):143-152
[34]Neaupane K M,Achet S H.Use of back propagation neural network for landslide monitoring:a case study in the higher Himalaya[J].Engineering Geolog:2004,74:213-226
[35]董义革.模糊数学模型评价.电脑编程技巧与维护,2006.9:15-18
[36]任鲁川.1999b.自然灾害综合区划的基本类别及量化方法.自然灾害学报,1999,8(4):4148
[37]陈佩佩、武强,基于人工神经网络的地裂缝危险性评价系统,煤田地质与勘探,2001,29(3)
[38]邓聚龙.灰理论基础.武汉:华中科技大学出版社,2002
[39]刘思峰,郭天榜.灰色系统理论及其应用.郑州:河南大学出版社,1991
[40]陈植华,等.地理信息系统与水资源系统分析、模拟、决策[A].水文地质工程地质论文集[C].武汉:中国大学出版社,1992
[41]褚洪斌,母海东等.层次分析法在太行山区地质灾害危险性分区中的应用[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2003,14(3):125-129
[42]张俊峰.天山公路地质灾害危险性评价与决策支持系统设计与实现.成都:成都理工大学,2008
[43]晓林,基于公路环境保护的GIS应用与开发[J].中国公路学报,1998,11(4):33 37
[44]李晔,姚祖康.基于地理信息系统的公路设施空间数据库概念模型[J].中国公路学报,2000,13(3),9-11
[45]立琼.基于GIS的铁路工程地质信息系统的构建[J].四川地质学报,2001,21(1):44-47
[46]卓宝熙.铁路部门GIS进展情况及思考[J].铁路航测,1997,21(2):1-6
[47]朱良峰,殷坤龙.基于GIS技术的区域地质灾害信息分析系统研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报.2001,12(3),79-83
[48]唐川,朱大奎.基于GIS技术的泥石流风险评价研究[J].地理科学,2002,22(3):300-304
[49]蔡文.物元模型及其应用[M].北京:科学技术文献出版社,1994
[50]蔡文,杨春燕,何斌.可拓逻辑初步[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
[51]蔡文.可拓集合和不相容问题[J],科学探索学报,1983,1
[52]蔡文,杨春燕,林伟初.可拓工程方法[M],北京:科学出版社,1997
[53]蔡文,孙弘安,杨益民.从物元分析到可拓学[J],北京:科学技术文献出版社,1995
[54]Cai Wen.The Extension Set and Non-compatible Problems Editor Chien Weizang,Advances Mathmatics and Mechanics in China,International Academic Publishers,1990
[55]David K.W.Ng and CaiWen.Treating Non--compatible Problem from Matter element Analysis to extenics ACM SIGICE Bulletin,1997,22(3):1-9
[56]B.He and J.Chen,Research outline on Extension Mathematics,ACM SIGICE Bulletin,1997,22(3):10-16
[57]Liu Wei,YeJian.,Extension information,Proceedings of 96 International Conference on Management Seience & Engineering,1996
[58]He Xulian,Liu Wei and YeJian.Extension Information And Its Application to Criminal Investigation,Proceedings of 98 International Conference on Management Seience& Engineering,1998
[59]杨春燕,张拥军,蔡文.可拓集合及其应用研究[J].数学的实践与认识.2002,32(2):301-308
[60]江西省地质局912地质大队.抚州幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.12
[61]江西省地质局水文地质大队.南城幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.12
[62]江西省地质局水文地质大队.广昌幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.08
[63]江西省地质局水文地质大队.会昌幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1981.05
[64]江西省地质局水文地质大队.兴国幅区域水文地质普查(1/20万).1980.08
[65]江西省地质局908探矿工程大队.赣州地区瑞金县农业商品粮基地供水水文地质评价报告(1/10万).1993.3
[66]江西省气象局
[67]江西省地质局区域地质测量大队.东乡幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1963
[68]江西省地质局区域地质测量大队.南城幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1970
[69]江西省地质局区域地质调查大队.广昌幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1973
[70]福建省地质局区域地质测量队.宁化幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1972
[71]江西省地质局区域地质调查大队.兴国幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1974
[72]江西省地质局区域地质测量大队.于都幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1968
[73]福建省重工业局区域地质测量大队.长汀幅区域地质调查(1/20万).1970
[74]江西省地质矿产局.江西省区域地质志.1984.04
[75]江西省地震办公室.江西省历史地震目录(初稿).1974.06
[76]江西省建设厅、江西省地震局.江西省地震动参数区划工作用图(2003).2003.01
[77]曹恺,孟高头等.浙江省仙居县地质灾害调查与区划[J].地球科学-中国地质大学学报,2002,27(2):217-221
[78]中华人民共和国国土资源部.国土资源部关于加强地质灾害危险性评估工作的通知[Z].2004
[79]刘加龙,吕希奎.模糊综合评判法在泥石流灾度评价中的应用[J].地质科技情报,2001020(004):86-88
[80]毛同夏,石宏仁等.区域地质环境的定量评价和预测[J].地学前缘,1996,3(1-2):141-146
[81]乔彦肖,李密文.基于遥感技术支持的地质灾害及孕灾环境综合评价[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2002,13(4):83-87
[82]钟荫乾.地质灾害易发性评价[J].湖北地矿,2002,16(4):81-86
[83]黄秀凤.模糊数学在地质灾害易发程度分区评价中的应用[J].南方国土资源,2004,11:95-96,98
[84]赵海卿,李广杰等.吉林省东部山区地质灾害危害性评价[J].吉林大学学报(地球科学版),2004,34(1):119-124
[85]杨冬英,滕伟福.兴洲项目建设用地地质灾害危险性评估[J].西部探矿工程,2005,112(8):196-198
[86]中国地质调查局.地质灾害调查技术要求(比例尺1:250000、1:50000)[S].2001