知识整合视角下企业动态能力对企业绩效影响的评价模型与实证研究
|
摘要
企业战略管理学在过去的十年发展很快,它是以企业作为研究对象,探讨了影响企业绩效的各种因素,其中对企业动态能力的研究使战略管理理论更加丰富。本研究基于知识观,从知识整合视角,通过对产业组织理论、资源基础理论、核心能力理论、商业生态系统理论、动态能力理论等理论地梳理,认为,企业在发展过程中企业可以通过知识吸收、知识转移、知识创新等手段更好地识别和发现环境中的机会和威胁,整合配置企业的资源和能力,提升企业动态能力,以适应不断变化的环境。
本研究在阐述了研究背景的基础上,梳理了动态能力的相关理论、分析了动态能力的内涵,比较了不同领域的动态能力的研究成果,探讨了知识整合对动态能力的影响、企业动态能力对企业绩效的影响以及如何提升企业动态能力。
首先,在研究方法方面,本研究运用统计学的相关理论知识,通过SPSS 13.0和AMOS 4.0软件进行统计分析,采用探索性和验证性因子分析、描述性统计分析、方差分析、相关分析以及利用基于最大似然估计法的结构方程模型,对整个模型的拟合优度和模型中的每条路径进行了分析和验证。在此基础上,构建企业绩效评价指标体系,并运用模糊综合评价法进行实证研究。
其次,验证了相关理论文献的“动态能力通过协调、整合能力提升绩效水平’的观点。基于知识整合视角分析动态能力对企业绩效影响程度、影响方式,赋予了该观点更加丰富具体的内容。
再次,各层次的显性知识和隐性知识通过知识整合促使企业动态能力呈螺旋式提升。运用结构方程论证了企业动态能力对企业绩效的正向影响都明显地源于企业知识整合。
最后,验证了企业动态能力对企业绩效的多层次影响机制。帮助企业在现有能力基础上通过知识创新、知识链接、运用知识等提升企业动态能力,以求适应不断变化的外部环境,培育持续的竞争优势。
本研究通过运用结构方程研究知识整合与动态能力相关关系；运用模糊层次综合评价测量企业动态能力和企业绩效,分析影响企业绩效的具体能力。提出从知识整合角度业研究企业动态能力,企业的管理水平。探讨动态能力的提升路径,以期对战略管理理论和实践有所借鉴。
Strategic Management takes enterprise as research object to explore the various factors on business performance. Based on knowledge-based view, from the perspective of knowledge management, industrial organization theory, resource-based theory, core competencies, business ecosystem theory, dynamic capabilities theory.We believe that the management behavior of companies in emerging countries (such as China, India) should based on knowledge absorption, knowledge transfer, knowledge innovation in the development process to identify and discover the opportunities and threats in the environment, enhancing the existing capacity. Re-integrate and reconstruct organizational resource.It It adapt to the changing environment by applying the "creative destruction".
This paper describes a realistic and theory background. From the origin of dynamic capabilities, the connotation of dynamic capabilities, the different areas of research about dynamic capabilities.Then summarized what we need further research to explore the formation of dynamic capabilities, the relationship between dynamic capabilities and performance and the use of dynamic capabilities
We employ the statistical theory and use the SPSS 13.0 and AMOS 7.0 software for statistical analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, variance analysis, correlation analysis, maximum likelihood estimate method of structural equation model, analysis and verification of each path. Based on a large sample of empirical research, we conclude the following results.
First, We verified that the relevant theoretical literature about coordination capacity, integration capabilities enhance the performance level through the view of knowledge management,we analysis long-term performance of the enterprise with dynamic capabilities,then give the extent view and specific contents.
Second, we verified the insight ability of dynamic capabilities, the integrated and reset ability of dynamic capabilities.Impact the organization's long-term performance. It is largely based on the transfer procedures of knowledge and techniques. Then the enterprise will get formation of experience and practice. The ideal knowledge structure transfer reasonable knowledge of the structure, and all of these are based on knowledge management.
Third, we verified the ideal knowledge structure and available knowledge structure spiral at all levels of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, thus knowledge management enhance coordination and integration capabilities. The mission and value proposition have positive effect on ideal knowledge structure.Available knowledge of the structure have positive effect on the formation of dynamic ability of the formation.Ideal knowledge structure have positive effect on the formation and enhance of dynamic ability. Knowledge management processes of the formation and enhance the significant positive correlation; knowledge management processes have positive effect on the formation and enhancement of dynamic capabilities.Knowledge absorb ability have positive effect on dynamic capabilities.Knowledge innovation have positive effect on dynamic capability. Dynamic capabilities have positive effect on firm long term performance. Not only f the path coefficient, but also significant, dynamic capabilities have positive effect on i the enterprise's long-term performance.
Fourth, we also verified the influencing factors of the dynamic capabilities with long-term performance in multi-level test. Insight on the environment dimension level, change and update capabilities level., technology flexible dimension. Use fuzzy hierarchy evaluation to determine the fuzzy weight vector, It helps firms use the specific capabilities including internal and external abilities. In order to adopt the changing environment and cultivate new competitive advantage.
In this paper, using structural equation to analyize the result of dynamic capabilities, using AHP to measure dynamic capabilities and business performance. Studying dynamic capabilities based on knowledge integration,expect to enhance strategic management theory.
本研究在阐述了研究背景的基础上,梳理了动态能力的相关理论、分析了动态能力的内涵,比较了不同领域的动态能力的研究成果,探讨了知识整合对动态能力的影响、企业动态能力对企业绩效的影响以及如何提升企业动态能力。
首先,在研究方法方面,本研究运用统计学的相关理论知识,通过SPSS 13.0和AMOS 4.0软件进行统计分析,采用探索性和验证性因子分析、描述性统计分析、方差分析、相关分析以及利用基于最大似然估计法的结构方程模型,对整个模型的拟合优度和模型中的每条路径进行了分析和验证。在此基础上,构建企业绩效评价指标体系,并运用模糊综合评价法进行实证研究。
其次,验证了相关理论文献的“动态能力通过协调、整合能力提升绩效水平’的观点。基于知识整合视角分析动态能力对企业绩效影响程度、影响方式,赋予了该观点更加丰富具体的内容。
再次,各层次的显性知识和隐性知识通过知识整合促使企业动态能力呈螺旋式提升。运用结构方程论证了企业动态能力对企业绩效的正向影响都明显地源于企业知识整合。
最后,验证了企业动态能力对企业绩效的多层次影响机制。帮助企业在现有能力基础上通过知识创新、知识链接、运用知识等提升企业动态能力,以求适应不断变化的外部环境,培育持续的竞争优势。
本研究通过运用结构方程研究知识整合与动态能力相关关系；运用模糊层次综合评价测量企业动态能力和企业绩效,分析影响企业绩效的具体能力。提出从知识整合角度业研究企业动态能力,企业的管理水平。探讨动态能力的提升路径,以期对战略管理理论和实践有所借鉴。
Strategic Management takes enterprise as research object to explore the various factors on business performance. Based on knowledge-based view, from the perspective of knowledge management, industrial organization theory, resource-based theory, core competencies, business ecosystem theory, dynamic capabilities theory.We believe that the management behavior of companies in emerging countries (such as China, India) should based on knowledge absorption, knowledge transfer, knowledge innovation in the development process to identify and discover the opportunities and threats in the environment, enhancing the existing capacity. Re-integrate and reconstruct organizational resource.It It adapt to the changing environment by applying the "creative destruction".
This paper describes a realistic and theory background. From the origin of dynamic capabilities, the connotation of dynamic capabilities, the different areas of research about dynamic capabilities.Then summarized what we need further research to explore the formation of dynamic capabilities, the relationship between dynamic capabilities and performance and the use of dynamic capabilities
We employ the statistical theory and use the SPSS 13.0 and AMOS 7.0 software for statistical analysis, exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, variance analysis, correlation analysis, maximum likelihood estimate method of structural equation model, analysis and verification of each path. Based on a large sample of empirical research, we conclude the following results.
First, We verified that the relevant theoretical literature about coordination capacity, integration capabilities enhance the performance level through the view of knowledge management,we analysis long-term performance of the enterprise with dynamic capabilities,then give the extent view and specific contents.
Second, we verified the insight ability of dynamic capabilities, the integrated and reset ability of dynamic capabilities.Impact the organization's long-term performance. It is largely based on the transfer procedures of knowledge and techniques. Then the enterprise will get formation of experience and practice. The ideal knowledge structure transfer reasonable knowledge of the structure, and all of these are based on knowledge management.
Third, we verified the ideal knowledge structure and available knowledge structure spiral at all levels of explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, thus knowledge management enhance coordination and integration capabilities. The mission and value proposition have positive effect on ideal knowledge structure.Available knowledge of the structure have positive effect on the formation of dynamic ability of the formation.Ideal knowledge structure have positive effect on the formation and enhance of dynamic ability. Knowledge management processes of the formation and enhance the significant positive correlation; knowledge management processes have positive effect on the formation and enhancement of dynamic capabilities.Knowledge absorb ability have positive effect on dynamic capabilities.Knowledge innovation have positive effect on dynamic capability. Dynamic capabilities have positive effect on firm long term performance. Not only f the path coefficient, but also significant, dynamic capabilities have positive effect on i the enterprise's long-term performance.
Fourth, we also verified the influencing factors of the dynamic capabilities with long-term performance in multi-level test. Insight on the environment dimension level, change and update capabilities level., technology flexible dimension. Use fuzzy hierarchy evaluation to determine the fuzzy weight vector, It helps firms use the specific capabilities including internal and external abilities. In order to adopt the changing environment and cultivate new competitive advantage.
In this paper, using structural equation to analyize the result of dynamic capabilities, using AHP to measure dynamic capabilities and business performance. Studying dynamic capabilities based on knowledge integration,expect to enhance strategic management theory.
引文
[1]曹红军,赵剑波,王以华.动态能力的维度：基于中国企业的实证研究.科学学研究,2009,27(1)：36-44
[2]陈劲,邱嘉铭,沈海华.技术学习对企业创新绩效的影响因素分析.科学学研究,2007(6)
[3]陈萍.论企业并购后的知识资源整合.西北民族大学学报,2006(4)：124-128
[4]程蕾,程鹏.创意产业价值链知识整合初探.图书情报工作,2010(11)：121-125
[5]崔志,王吉发,冯晋.基于生命周期理论的企业转型路径模型研究.预测,2006(11)
[6]董俊武,黄江圳,陈震红.基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究.中国工业经济,2004(2)
[7]董俊武,黄江圳,陈震红.企业动态能力是否真的存在.经济,2006(8)
[8]贺小刚,李新春,方海鹰.动态能力的测量与功效：基于中国经验的实证研究.管理世界,2006(3)：94-103
[9]赫连志巍,巴特尔.基于战略意图的战略联盟绩效评价指标体系研究.价值工程,2006(6)：77-80
[10]黄江圳,谭力文.从能力到动态能力：企业战略观的转变.经济管理,2002(11)
[11]黄文川,路世昌.基于动态核心能力的战略联盟绩效评价体系研究.产业与科技论坛,2008,7(3)：107-109
[12]基于结构方程模型的虚拟企业合作绩效评价维度研究.科技进步与对策,2010,27(13)：108-111
[13]焦豪,魏江,崔瑜.企业动态能力构建路径分析：基于创业导向和组织学习的视角.管理世界,2008(4)：91-106
[14]焦豪.企业动态能力、环境动态性与绩效关系的实证研究.软科学,2008,22(4)：112-117
[15]李兴旺,王迎军.企业动态能力理论综述与前瞻.当代财经,2004(10)：103-106
[16]林嵩,姜彦福.结构方程模型理论及其在管理研究中的应用.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(2)
[17]刘东华,和金生.企业应急反应战略动态能力构建研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2011(1)：141-158
[18]刘井建.创业学习、动态能力与新创企业成长支持模式研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2011(2)：127-132
[19]刘明霞.动态能力研究述评、比较与展望.生产力研究,2004(10)：188-191
[20]卢锐,知识整合理论研究.情报杂志,2005(11)：85-87
[21]马卫东.基于企业生命周期的企业动态能力演变研究.价值工程,2008(6)：122-125
[22]荣良,王丙毅.新经济视角下的产业组织理论研究.知识产权出版社,2005：1-4
[23]芮明杰,邓少军.产业网络环境下企业跨组织知识整合的内在机理.当代财经,2009(1)：69-75
[24]沈克慧,王宗军,毛磊.动态联盟视角下动态能力理论研究.企业经济,2012(1)：28-30
[25]王国顺,杨昆.知识演进与动态能力构建,管理学报,2010(3)：395-399
[26]王铁骊,高阳.提示企业动态能力的“黑箱问题”.科技进步与对策,2009(2)：102-105
[27]王铁骊.复杂变革环境下动态能力的内涵演进分析.华东经济管理,2007(5)：74-77
[28]王铁男,陈涛,贾镕霞.战略柔性对企业绩效影响的实证研究.管理学报,2011(3)：388-395
[29]王铁男,贾榕霞,陈宁.组织学习能力对战略柔性影响作用的实证研究.中国软科学,2009(4)：164-174
[30]王文超,黄江圳.基于知识的动态能力维度与功能研究.生产力研究,2006(8)：218-221
[31]王迎军.企业资源与竞争优势.南开管理评论,1998(1)：33-39
[32]王永贵.对组织学习、核心竞争能力、战略柔性与企业竞争绩效的理论剖析与 实证研究.南开管理评论,2003(4)：54-61
[33]王子龙,谭清美,许箫迪.区域企业集群动态演化模型分析.科技进步与对策,2006(2)：103-105
[34]吴晓波,徐松屹,苗文斌.西方动态能力理论述评.国外社会科学,2006(2)：18-25
[35]吴晓波,徐松屹,苗文斌.西方动态能力理论述评.国外社会科学,2006(3)：18-25
[36]武常岐.中国战略管理学研究的发展述评.南开管理评论,2010(6)：25-40
[37]余光胜.企业竞争优势根源的理论演进.外国经济与管理,2002(10)：2-7
[38]余光胜.以知识为基础的企业理论的产生及其演进过程.上海管理科学,2005(4)：26-29
[39]曾萍.学习、创新与动态能力一华南地区企业的实证研究.管理评论,2011(1)：85-94
[40]张建东.企业动态能力与跨期绩效关系研究,2005
[41]张可军.基于知识离散性的团队知识整合途径研究.科技进步与对策,2011(12)：164-170
[42]张韬.市场导向、动态能力与组织绩效关系研究.华东经济管理,2010,24(4)：88-91
[43]赵修卫.组织学习与知识整合.科研管理,2003(5)：52-57
[44]郑刚,颜宏亮,王斌.动态能力的构成维度及特征研究.科技进步与对策,2007(3)：90-93
[45]郑胜华,芮明杰.动态能力的研究述评及其启示.自然辩证法通讯,2009(10)：56-64
[46]周敏,魏厚培,蒋国璋.企业设备管理知识网络分析.武汉大学学报,2007(10)：485-497
[47]Adner R, Helfat. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capababilities. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10):1011-1025
[48]Aveni. Strategic Supremacy through Disruption and Dominance. Sloan Management Review,1999,40(3):127
[49]Barney J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99-120
[50]Barton D. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(2):111-125
[51]Bontis N, Crossan M, Hull. Managing an Organizational. Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows. Journal of Management Studies,2002,39(4):435-469
[52]Bontis. Intellectual. Capital:An. Exploratory Study. that. Develops. Measures.and Models. Management Decision,1998,36(2):63-76
[53]Burgelman R A. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Insights from a Process Dtudy. Management Science,1983,12(13):49-64
[54]Burgleman R A. Intra-organizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation:Theory and Field Research. Organizational Science, 1991,2:239-262
[55]C Dougall PP, Covin JG, Robinson RB, et al. The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(7):537-554
[56]C K Prahalad, Gary hamel. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review May-June,1990:79-91
[57]Calantone R J, Cooper R G. A Discriminant Model for Identifying Scena- rios of Industrial new Product Failure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,1979, 7(3):163-183
[58]Caloghirou Y. Firm-specific Effects on Performance:Contrasting SMEs and Large-sized Firms. European Management Journal,2004,22(2):231-243
[59]Chen CC, Chen YR, Xin K. Guanxi practices and trust in management:a procedural justice perspective. Organization Science,2004,15(2):200-209
[60]Cheng L, Kwan. Y. What are the Determinants of the Location of Foreign Direct Investment?The Chinese Experience. Journal of International Economics,2000, 51(2):379-400
[61]Child J. Management in China During the Age of Reform. Cambridge Uni-vcrsity Press:Cambridge, U. K. Child J, Markoczy L.1993. Host country managerial behavior and learning in Chinese and Hungarian joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies,1994,30(4):611-631
[62]China Economic News. Implications of Yuxing Infotech's listing in Hong Kong,21 February 2000:6-7
[63]Choi CJ, Lee SH, Kim JB. A note on countertrade:contractual uncertainty and transaction governance in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies,1999,30(1):189-201
[64]Collis D J. Research Note:How Valuable are Organizational Competence. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:143-152
[65]Denis D, Sarin A. Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Corporate Diversifica-tion. Journal of Finance,1997,52:135-160
[66]Dunning J. The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production:A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies,1988,19:1-31
[67]Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB. Organizational growth:linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U. S. semiconductor ventures,1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(3):504-529
[68]Eisenhardt K M, Martin M. Dynamic Capabilities:What are They. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10):1105-1121
[69]Fligstein N. The Spread of the Multidivisional Form among Large Firms. 1919-1979. American Sociological Review,1985,50:377-391
[70]Granovetter MS. Economic action and social structure:the problem of social embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510
[71]Grossman S, Hart O. Costs and Benefits of Ownership:Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94:691-719
[72]Grossman G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy,2005,21(1):78-104
[73]Guillen M. Structural Inertia, Imitation, and Foreign Expansion:South Korean Firms and Business Groups in China,1987-95. Academy of Management Journal, 2002,45(3):509-525
[74]Guillen M, Garcia-canal E. The American Model of the Multinational Firm and the"New" Multinationals from Emerging Economics. The Academy of Management Perspectives,2009,23(2):23-35
[75]Gulati R, Singh H. The architecture of cooperation:managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998,43(4):781-814
[76]Habemras J. Knowledge and Human Interests, trnas. J. ShaPiro, Boston, 1971/Lodon,1972
[77]Hannan MT, Freeman J. The PoPulation ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology,1977,82(5):929-964
[78]Hart O Firms. Contracts and Financial Structure. Clarendon Lectures in Economics. Oxford University Press,1995
[79]Hart O, Holmstrom B. A Theory of firm Scope. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2010,125(2):483-513
[80]Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. Product Sequencing:Co-evolution of know- ledge, Capability and Products. Strategic Management Journal, Winier Special Issue,2000, 21(10-11):955-959
[81]Hirsch P. From Ambushes to Golden Parachutes:Corporate Takeovers as an Instance of Cultural Framing and Institutional Integration American Journal of Sociology,1986,91(4)
[82]Holbrook D, Cohen WM, Hounshell DA, et al. The Nature Sources and Consequences of Firm Differences in The Early History of The Semi-conductor Industry. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10-11):1017-1041
[83]Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, et al. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):249-267
[84]Hwang KK. Face and favor:the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology,1987,92(4):944-974
[85]Jeffrey T Macher, David C Mowery. Measuring Dynamic Capabilities:Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing, British Journal of Management, March 2009,20:41-62
[86]Karim S, Mitchell W. Path-dependent and Path-breaking Change:Recon-figuring Business Resources Following Acquisitions in the U. S. Medical Sector,1978-1995. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10-11):1061-1081
[87]Keeley RH, Roure JB. Management, strategy, and industry structure as influences on the success of new firms:a structural model. Management Science,1990,36(10): 1256-1267
[88]Khana T, Palepu. K. Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups. Journal of Finance,2000,55: 867-91
[89]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm:combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science,1992,3(3):383-397
[90]Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ.. How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments:theory and evidence. Organization Science, 2001,12(5):632-657
[91]Levinthal D A, March J. The Myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14:95-112
[92]Levinthal D, Myatt J. Co-evolution of capabilities and Industry:The evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:45-62
[93]Li H, Atuahene-Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(6): 1123-1134
[94]Li H, Atuahene-Gima K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6):469-490
[95]Liebenberg A, Sommer D. Effects of Corporate Diversification:Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry. The Journal of Risk Insurance,2008,75(4): 839-919
[96]Lieberman M, Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue,1988,9:41-58
[97]Lippman S, McCall J. The economics of job search:a survey. Economic Inquiry, 1976,14:155-187
[98]Lu J, Liu X, Wang H. Motives for Outward FDI of Chinese Private Firms:Firm Resources, Industry Dynamics, and Government Policies. Management and Organization Review,2010,6(3):313-477
[99]Lubatkin M. Towards reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research. Academy of Management Review,1986,11(3):497-512
[100]Luo. China's Leap into the Information Age:Innovation and Organization in the Computer Industry. Oxford University Press:Oxford, U. K. Luo Y.2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market:the case of China. Strategic Management Journal,2000,24(13):1315-1327
[101]Luo Y, Tung R. International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises:A Springboard Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38: 481-498
[102]March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,1991(2):1-13
[103]McGahan A, Porter M. The emergence and sustainability of abnormal profits. Harvard Business School Working Paper; 1997b:97-103
[104]McGahan A. The performance of U. S. corporations:1981-1994. Journal of Industrial Economics,1999(47):373-395
[105]McGee JE, Dowling MJ, Megginson WL. Cooperative strategy and new venture performance:the role of business strategy and management experience. Strategic Management Journal,1995,16(7):565-580
[106]Meyer, H Utterback. Core Competencies, Product Families and Sustained Business SucCess, Working Paper. Sloan School of Management,1992:3410-92
[107]Meyer K. Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe. Journnal of International Business Studies,2001,32(2):357-367
[108]Meyer K, Mudambi R, Narula R. Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(4):1-18
[109]Mezias S, Eisner A. Competition, imitation, and innovation:an organizational learning approach. In Advances in Strategic Management,1997(14):261-294
[110]Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glick WH. Retrospective reports in organizational research:a reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(1):189-204
[111]Nee V. A theory of market transition:from redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review,1989 (54):663-681
[112]Nee V. Organizational dynamics of market transition:hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly,1992,37(1):1-27
[113]North D. Institutions. Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press,1990
[114]Oviatt BM, McDougall PP. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies,1994,25(1):45-64
[115]Palich L, Cardinal L, Miller C. Curvilinearity in the Diversification-Performance Linkage:An Examination of over Three Decades of Research. Strategic Management Journal,2000(21):155-174
[116]Peng MW, Heath PS. The Growth of the Frm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice. Academy of Management Review, 1996,21(2):492-528
[117]Peng MW, Luo Y. Managerial ties and firm Performance in a Transition Economy: the Nature of a Micro-macro Link. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3): 486-501
[118]Peng MW. Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices. Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296
[119]Peng M, Lee S, Wang D. What Determines the Scope of the Firm over Time? A Focus on Institutional Relatedness. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(3): 622-633
[120]Penrose ET. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford:Blackwell,1959
[121]Podsakoff P, Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research:problems and prospects. Journal of Management,1986,12(12):531-544
[122]Porter ME. Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12):95-118
[123]Powell TC. Strategy without ontology, Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(3): 285-291
[124]Prahalad CK, G Hamel. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review,1990(3):79-91
[125]Prahalad CK, Bettis RA. The Dominant Logic:A New linkage Between Diversity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal,1986(7):485-501
[126]Priem RL, Butler JE. Is the resource-based'view'a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(1):22-40
[127]Rosenbloom RS. Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change:The Transformation of NCR in The Electronic Era. Strategic Management Journal,2000, 21(10-11):1083-1103
[128]Teece DJ. Profiting from Technological Innovation:Implications for Integration, Collaboration, licensing, and Public Policy. Research Policy,1986,15(6):285-305
[129]Teeee D J, Pisano G. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms:an Introdu-Ction. Industrial and Corporate,1994(3):37-56
[130]Teeee D J, Rumelt R, Dosi G, et al. Understanding Corporate Coherence Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1994(23):1-30
[131]Wernerfelt B. A resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1984(5):171-180
[132]Wernerfelt B. From Critical Resources to Corporate Strategy. Journal of General Management,1989(40):171-188
[133]Wiersema M, Bowen H. Corporate Diversification:The Impact of Foreign Competition. Industry Globalization. and Product Diversification. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29 (2):115-132
[134]Williams J R. How Sustainable is Your Competitive Advantage. California Management Review Spring,1992(5):29-51
[135]Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York:The Free Press, 1985
[136]Williamson O, Ouchi W. The Markets and Hierarchies Program of Research: Origins, Implications, Prospects, in Perspectives in Organizational Design and Behavior. New York:Wiley,1981:347-370
[137]Winter SG. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(10):991-995
[138]Xu D, Shenkar O. Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(4):608-618
[139]Zahra SA, Covin JG. Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(6):451-478
[140]Zollo M, Winter SG. Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science,2002,13(3):339-351
[141]Zott C. Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intraindustry Differential Firm Performance:Insights from a Simulation Study. Strategic Management Journal, 2002,24(2):97-125
[2]陈劲,邱嘉铭,沈海华.技术学习对企业创新绩效的影响因素分析.科学学研究,2007(6)
[3]陈萍.论企业并购后的知识资源整合.西北民族大学学报,2006(4)：124-128
[4]程蕾,程鹏.创意产业价值链知识整合初探.图书情报工作,2010(11)：121-125
[5]崔志,王吉发,冯晋.基于生命周期理论的企业转型路径模型研究.预测,2006(11)
[6]董俊武,黄江圳,陈震红.基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究.中国工业经济,2004(2)
[7]董俊武,黄江圳,陈震红.企业动态能力是否真的存在.经济,2006(8)
[8]贺小刚,李新春,方海鹰.动态能力的测量与功效：基于中国经验的实证研究.管理世界,2006(3)：94-103
[9]赫连志巍,巴特尔.基于战略意图的战略联盟绩效评价指标体系研究.价值工程,2006(6)：77-80
[10]黄江圳,谭力文.从能力到动态能力：企业战略观的转变.经济管理,2002(11)
[11]黄文川,路世昌.基于动态核心能力的战略联盟绩效评价体系研究.产业与科技论坛,2008,7(3)：107-109
[12]基于结构方程模型的虚拟企业合作绩效评价维度研究.科技进步与对策,2010,27(13)：108-111
[13]焦豪,魏江,崔瑜.企业动态能力构建路径分析：基于创业导向和组织学习的视角.管理世界,2008(4)：91-106
[14]焦豪.企业动态能力、环境动态性与绩效关系的实证研究.软科学,2008,22(4)：112-117
[15]李兴旺,王迎军.企业动态能力理论综述与前瞻.当代财经,2004(10)：103-106
[16]林嵩,姜彦福.结构方程模型理论及其在管理研究中的应用.科学学与科学技术管理,2006(2)
[17]刘东华,和金生.企业应急反应战略动态能力构建研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2011(1)：141-158
[18]刘井建.创业学习、动态能力与新创企业成长支持模式研究.科学学与科学技术管理,2011(2)：127-132
[19]刘明霞.动态能力研究述评、比较与展望.生产力研究,2004(10)：188-191
[20]卢锐,知识整合理论研究.情报杂志,2005(11)：85-87
[21]马卫东.基于企业生命周期的企业动态能力演变研究.价值工程,2008(6)：122-125
[22]荣良,王丙毅.新经济视角下的产业组织理论研究.知识产权出版社,2005：1-4
[23]芮明杰,邓少军.产业网络环境下企业跨组织知识整合的内在机理.当代财经,2009(1)：69-75
[24]沈克慧,王宗军,毛磊.动态联盟视角下动态能力理论研究.企业经济,2012(1)：28-30
[25]王国顺,杨昆.知识演进与动态能力构建,管理学报,2010(3)：395-399
[26]王铁骊,高阳.提示企业动态能力的“黑箱问题”.科技进步与对策,2009(2)：102-105
[27]王铁骊.复杂变革环境下动态能力的内涵演进分析.华东经济管理,2007(5)：74-77
[28]王铁男,陈涛,贾镕霞.战略柔性对企业绩效影响的实证研究.管理学报,2011(3)：388-395
[29]王铁男,贾榕霞,陈宁.组织学习能力对战略柔性影响作用的实证研究.中国软科学,2009(4)：164-174
[30]王文超,黄江圳.基于知识的动态能力维度与功能研究.生产力研究,2006(8)：218-221
[31]王迎军.企业资源与竞争优势.南开管理评论,1998(1)：33-39
[32]王永贵.对组织学习、核心竞争能力、战略柔性与企业竞争绩效的理论剖析与 实证研究.南开管理评论,2003(4)：54-61
[33]王子龙,谭清美,许箫迪.区域企业集群动态演化模型分析.科技进步与对策,2006(2)：103-105
[34]吴晓波,徐松屹,苗文斌.西方动态能力理论述评.国外社会科学,2006(2)：18-25
[35]吴晓波,徐松屹,苗文斌.西方动态能力理论述评.国外社会科学,2006(3)：18-25
[36]武常岐.中国战略管理学研究的发展述评.南开管理评论,2010(6)：25-40
[37]余光胜.企业竞争优势根源的理论演进.外国经济与管理,2002(10)：2-7
[38]余光胜.以知识为基础的企业理论的产生及其演进过程.上海管理科学,2005(4)：26-29
[39]曾萍.学习、创新与动态能力一华南地区企业的实证研究.管理评论,2011(1)：85-94
[40]张建东.企业动态能力与跨期绩效关系研究,2005
[41]张可军.基于知识离散性的团队知识整合途径研究.科技进步与对策,2011(12)：164-170
[42]张韬.市场导向、动态能力与组织绩效关系研究.华东经济管理,2010,24(4)：88-91
[43]赵修卫.组织学习与知识整合.科研管理,2003(5)：52-57
[44]郑刚,颜宏亮,王斌.动态能力的构成维度及特征研究.科技进步与对策,2007(3)：90-93
[45]郑胜华,芮明杰.动态能力的研究述评及其启示.自然辩证法通讯,2009(10)：56-64
[46]周敏,魏厚培,蒋国璋.企业设备管理知识网络分析.武汉大学学报,2007(10)：485-497
[47]Adner R, Helfat. Corporate effects and dynamic managerial capababilities. Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(10):1011-1025
[48]Aveni. Strategic Supremacy through Disruption and Dominance. Sloan Management Review,1999,40(3):127
[49]Barney J. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99-120
[50]Barton D. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities:A Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal,1992,13(2):111-125
[51]Bontis N, Crossan M, Hull. Managing an Organizational. Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows. Journal of Management Studies,2002,39(4):435-469
[52]Bontis. Intellectual. Capital:An. Exploratory Study. that. Develops. Measures.and Models. Management Decision,1998,36(2):63-76
[53]Burgelman R A. Corporate Entrepreneurship and Strategic Management Insights from a Process Dtudy. Management Science,1983,12(13):49-64
[54]Burgleman R A. Intra-organizational Ecology of Strategy Making and Organizational Adaptation:Theory and Field Research. Organizational Science, 1991,2:239-262
[55]C Dougall PP, Covin JG, Robinson RB, et al. The effects of industry growth and strategic breadth on new venture performance and strategy content. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15(7):537-554
[56]C K Prahalad, Gary hamel. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review May-June,1990:79-91
[57]Calantone R J, Cooper R G. A Discriminant Model for Identifying Scena- rios of Industrial new Product Failure. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,1979, 7(3):163-183
[58]Caloghirou Y. Firm-specific Effects on Performance:Contrasting SMEs and Large-sized Firms. European Management Journal,2004,22(2):231-243
[59]Chen CC, Chen YR, Xin K. Guanxi practices and trust in management:a procedural justice perspective. Organization Science,2004,15(2):200-209
[60]Cheng L, Kwan. Y. What are the Determinants of the Location of Foreign Direct Investment?The Chinese Experience. Journal of International Economics,2000, 51(2):379-400
[61]Child J. Management in China During the Age of Reform. Cambridge Uni-vcrsity Press:Cambridge, U. K. Child J, Markoczy L.1993. Host country managerial behavior and learning in Chinese and Hungarian joint ventures. Journal of Management Studies,1994,30(4):611-631
[62]China Economic News. Implications of Yuxing Infotech's listing in Hong Kong,21 February 2000:6-7
[63]Choi CJ, Lee SH, Kim JB. A note on countertrade:contractual uncertainty and transaction governance in emerging economies. Journal of International Business Studies,1999,30(1):189-201
[64]Collis D J. Research Note:How Valuable are Organizational Competence. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:143-152
[65]Denis D, Sarin A. Agency Problems, Equity Ownership and Corporate Diversifica-tion. Journal of Finance,1997,52:135-160
[66]Dunning J. The Eclectic Paradigm of International Production:A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions. Journal of International Business Studies,1988,19:1-31
[67]Eisenhardt KM, Schoonhoven CB. Organizational growth:linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U. S. semiconductor ventures,1978-1988. Administrative Science Quarterly,1990,35(3):504-529
[68]Eisenhardt K M, Martin M. Dynamic Capabilities:What are They. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10):1105-1121
[69]Fligstein N. The Spread of the Multidivisional Form among Large Firms. 1919-1979. American Sociological Review,1985,50:377-391
[70]Granovetter MS. Economic action and social structure:the problem of social embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510
[71]Grossman S, Hart O. Costs and Benefits of Ownership:Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Political Economy,1986,94:691-719
[72]Grossman G, Humphrey J, Sturgeon T. The Governance of Global Value Chains. Review of International Political Economy,2005,21(1):78-104
[73]Guillen M. Structural Inertia, Imitation, and Foreign Expansion:South Korean Firms and Business Groups in China,1987-95. Academy of Management Journal, 2002,45(3):509-525
[74]Guillen M, Garcia-canal E. The American Model of the Multinational Firm and the"New" Multinationals from Emerging Economics. The Academy of Management Perspectives,2009,23(2):23-35
[75]Gulati R, Singh H. The architecture of cooperation:managing coordination costs and appropriation concerns in strategic alliances. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1998,43(4):781-814
[76]Habemras J. Knowledge and Human Interests, trnas. J. ShaPiro, Boston, 1971/Lodon,1972
[77]Hannan MT, Freeman J. The PoPulation ecology of organizations. American Journal of Sociology,1977,82(5):929-964
[78]Hart O Firms. Contracts and Financial Structure. Clarendon Lectures in Economics. Oxford University Press,1995
[79]Hart O, Holmstrom B. A Theory of firm Scope. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2010,125(2):483-513
[80]Helfat CE, Raubitschek RS. Product Sequencing:Co-evolution of know- ledge, Capability and Products. Strategic Management Journal, Winier Special Issue,2000, 21(10-11):955-959
[81]Hirsch P. From Ambushes to Golden Parachutes:Corporate Takeovers as an Instance of Cultural Framing and Institutional Integration American Journal of Sociology,1986,91(4)
[82]Holbrook D, Cohen WM, Hounshell DA, et al. The Nature Sources and Consequences of Firm Differences in The Early History of The Semi-conductor Industry. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10-11):1017-1041
[83]Hoskisson RE, Eden L, Lau CM, et al. Strategy in emerging economies. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3):249-267
[84]Hwang KK. Face and favor:the Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology,1987,92(4):944-974
[85]Jeffrey T Macher, David C Mowery. Measuring Dynamic Capabilities:Practices and Performance in Semiconductor Manufacturing, British Journal of Management, March 2009,20:41-62
[86]Karim S, Mitchell W. Path-dependent and Path-breaking Change:Recon-figuring Business Resources Following Acquisitions in the U. S. Medical Sector,1978-1995. Strategic Management Journal,2000,21(10-11):1061-1081
[87]Keeley RH, Roure JB. Management, strategy, and industry structure as influences on the success of new firms:a structural model. Management Science,1990,36(10): 1256-1267
[88]Khana T, Palepu. K. Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups. Journal of Finance,2000,55: 867-91
[89]Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm:combinative capabilities and the replication of technology. Organization Science,1992,3(3):383-397
[90]Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ.. How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments:theory and evidence. Organization Science, 2001,12(5):632-657
[91]Levinthal D A, March J. The Myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14:95-112
[92]Levinthal D, Myatt J. Co-evolution of capabilities and Industry:The evolution of mutual fund processing. Strategic Management Journal,1994,15:45-62
[93]Li H, Atuahene-Gima K. Product innovation strategy and the performance of new technology ventures in China. Academy of Management Journal,2001,44(6): 1123-1134
[94]Li H, Atuahene-Gima K. The adoption of agency business activity, product innovation, and performance in Chinese technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(6):469-490
[95]Liebenberg A, Sommer D. Effects of Corporate Diversification:Evidence from the Property-Liability Insurance Industry. The Journal of Risk Insurance,2008,75(4): 839-919
[96]Lieberman M, Montgomery D. First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue,1988,9:41-58
[97]Lippman S, McCall J. The economics of job search:a survey. Economic Inquiry, 1976,14:155-187
[98]Lu J, Liu X, Wang H. Motives for Outward FDI of Chinese Private Firms:Firm Resources, Industry Dynamics, and Government Policies. Management and Organization Review,2010,6(3):313-477
[99]Lubatkin M. Towards reconciliation of market performance measures to strategic management research. Academy of Management Review,1986,11(3):497-512
[100]Luo. China's Leap into the Information Age:Innovation and Organization in the Computer Industry. Oxford University Press:Oxford, U. K. Luo Y.2003. Industrial dynamics and managerial networking in an emerging market:the case of China. Strategic Management Journal,2000,24(13):1315-1327
[101]Luo Y, Tung R. International Expansion of Emerging Market Enterprises:A Springboard Perspective. Journal of International Business Studies,2007,38: 481-498
[102]March JG. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science,1991(2):1-13
[103]McGahan A, Porter M. The emergence and sustainability of abnormal profits. Harvard Business School Working Paper; 1997b:97-103
[104]McGahan A. The performance of U. S. corporations:1981-1994. Journal of Industrial Economics,1999(47):373-395
[105]McGee JE, Dowling MJ, Megginson WL. Cooperative strategy and new venture performance:the role of business strategy and management experience. Strategic Management Journal,1995,16(7):565-580
[106]Meyer, H Utterback. Core Competencies, Product Families and Sustained Business SucCess, Working Paper. Sloan School of Management,1992:3410-92
[107]Meyer K. Institutions, Transaction Costs, and Entry Mode Choice in Eastern Europe. Journnal of International Business Studies,2001,32(2):357-367
[108]Meyer K, Mudambi R, Narula R. Multinational Enterprises and Local Contexts: The Opportunities and Challenges of Multiple Embeddedness. Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(4):1-18
[109]Mezias S, Eisner A. Competition, imitation, and innovation:an organizational learning approach. In Advances in Strategic Management,1997(14):261-294
[110]Miller CC, Cardinal LB, Glick WH. Retrospective reports in organizational research:a reexamination of recent evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 1997,40(1):189-204
[111]Nee V. A theory of market transition:from redistribution to markets in state socialism. American Sociological Review,1989 (54):663-681
[112]Nee V. Organizational dynamics of market transition:hybrid forms, property rights, and mixed economy in China. Administrative Science Quarterly,1992,37(1):1-27
[113]North D. Institutions. Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press,1990
[114]Oviatt BM, McDougall PP. Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies,1994,25(1):45-64
[115]Palich L, Cardinal L, Miller C. Curvilinearity in the Diversification-Performance Linkage:An Examination of over Three Decades of Research. Strategic Management Journal,2000(21):155-174
[116]Peng MW, Heath PS. The Growth of the Frm in Planned Economies in Transition: Institutions, Organizations, and Strategic Choice. Academy of Management Review, 1996,21(2):492-528
[117]Peng MW, Luo Y. Managerial ties and firm Performance in a Transition Economy: the Nature of a Micro-macro Link. Academy of Management Journal,2000,43(3): 486-501
[118]Peng MW. Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices. Academy of Management Review,2003,28(2):275-296
[119]Peng M, Lee S, Wang D. What Determines the Scope of the Firm over Time? A Focus on Institutional Relatedness. Academy of Management Review,2005,30(3): 622-633
[120]Penrose ET. The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford:Blackwell,1959
[121]Podsakoff P, Organ D. Self-reports in organizational research:problems and prospects. Journal of Management,1986,12(12):531-544
[122]Porter ME. Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 1991(12):95-118
[123]Powell TC. Strategy without ontology, Strategic Management Journal,2003,24(3): 285-291
[124]Prahalad CK, G Hamel. The Core Competence of the Corporation. Harvard Business Review,1990(3):79-91
[125]Prahalad CK, Bettis RA. The Dominant Logic:A New linkage Between Diversity and Performance. Strategic Management Journal,1986(7):485-501
[126]Priem RL, Butler JE. Is the resource-based'view'a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research. Academy of Management Review,2001,26(1):22-40
[127]Rosenbloom RS. Leadership, Capabilities, and Technological Change:The Transformation of NCR in The Electronic Era. Strategic Management Journal,2000, 21(10-11):1083-1103
[128]Teece DJ. Profiting from Technological Innovation:Implications for Integration, Collaboration, licensing, and Public Policy. Research Policy,1986,15(6):285-305
[129]Teeee D J, Pisano G. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms:an Introdu-Ction. Industrial and Corporate,1994(3):37-56
[130]Teeee D J, Rumelt R, Dosi G, et al. Understanding Corporate Coherence Theory and Evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization,1994(23):1-30
[131]Wernerfelt B. A resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 1984(5):171-180
[132]Wernerfelt B. From Critical Resources to Corporate Strategy. Journal of General Management,1989(40):171-188
[133]Wiersema M, Bowen H. Corporate Diversification:The Impact of Foreign Competition. Industry Globalization. and Product Diversification. Strategic Management Journal,2008,29 (2):115-132
[134]Williams J R. How Sustainable is Your Competitive Advantage. California Management Review Spring,1992(5):29-51
[135]Williamson O. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York:The Free Press, 1985
[136]Williamson O, Ouchi W. The Markets and Hierarchies Program of Research: Origins, Implications, Prospects, in Perspectives in Organizational Design and Behavior. New York:Wiley,1981:347-370
[137]Winter SG. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 2003,24(10):991-995
[138]Xu D, Shenkar O. Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(4):608-618
[139]Zahra SA, Covin JG. Business Strategy, Technology Policy and Firm Performance. Strategic Management Journal,1993,14(6):451-478
[140]Zollo M, Winter SG. Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science,2002,13(3):339-351
[141]Zott C. Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intraindustry Differential Firm Performance:Insights from a Simulation Study. Strategic Management Journal, 2002,24(2):97-125