人教版高中物理新课标教材的比较分析与调查研究
|
摘要
根据《普通高中物理课程标准》,各省区根据实际情况编排或采用了不同版本的物理教材,比如人教版、司南版、沪科版、鲁科版、粤教版、苏教版等等。这些教材在内容编排与选择、组织呈现方式等方面,都各有特色。但是,课改以来的很多问题,如：新教材在具体的使用中是否发挥了新课改的作用,是否体现了新课改的理念和目标,新教材是否对教与学起到了促进作用,新教材的实际使用情况以及各群体(教研员、教师、学生)对新教材的评价等等,都值得我们进行调查分析与研究。
本文首先将人教版高中物理教材和其他版本的高中物理教材进行了比较。为了搞好比较,论文先对高中物理课程标准及其对教材的要求进行了分析；接着将人教版与司南版高中物理教材分别从栏目设置和知识结构设置做了相关比较,比较中可看出两种版本教材各自的特点,同时,也建议物理教育工作者应因地制宜、取长补短的利用教材；然后,本文将人教版高中物理教材与美国理科生常用的的高中物理教材做了比较,从中可看出美国高中物理教材的特点和对我国高中物理教材编写的启示。
接着,本文着重对高中物理新课标实验教科书(人教版)在湖北省的使用情况做了具体的调查研究,并进行了数据统计与分析。从数据统计分析中,可看出各群体(教研员、教师、学生)对现行高中物理教材的看法；也了解了教科书的实际使用情况,以及影响其使用的因素,同时也分析了新教科书对教与学的促进作用。
最后,论文针对上述的调查研究分析,给出了人教版高中物理教材(必修1和必修2)部分内容的编写建议。
According to the ordinary high school physics course standard and the actual situation, every province has arranged the different versions of textbook as the physics teaching materials, such as the PEP version, SiNan version, Shanghai version, Shandong version, Guangdong version, SuE version and so on. Each of these textbook has it's own features in the content arrangement and selection, as well as in organization to present, and so on. But, many problem of the curriculum reform, such as whether the use of new version textbook play a role in the curriculum reform, whether new version textbook reflect the idea and goal of the new curriculum reform, and whether the new textbooks do a favorable work on the teaching and learning, the actual using situation of the new textbook, as well as the appraise of different group (such as teaching research member, teacher, student) to the new teaching material view, and so on, are worth while studied.
First of all, this thesis compares the senior high school physics teaching materials (PEP) with other versions. In order to do a good work on the comparison, we firstly analyze the new curriculum standard and the edition requirement to the new version of textbook. Then, we compare the senior high school physics teaching materials(PEP) with physics teaching materials(SiNa) separately from the column settings and knowledge structure,from which we can see the features in two versions teaching material. At the same time, the author also suggested that physical education teachers should adjust measures to local conditions and use teaching materials from each other. Next, we also compared the senior high school physics teaching material of PEP version in China with the main senior high school physics teaching material of United States. From which we could see characteristics of American high school physics teaching material and the enlightenment of our senior high school physics teaching material preparation.
Then, this thesis emphasizes on the survey and analysis of the using situation of the textbook of Senior High School Physics with New Curriculum Standards (PEP) in Hubei province. And the statistic analysis has been down from the surveying data. From these, we can see the group (research member, teacher, student) to the current high school physics teaching material view, and we also know the actual use of the textbooks and the factors which affects the use, as well as the promoting role of teaching and learning from the new textbook.
Finally, focusing on the above survey and analysis, we propose some writing advice for the senior high school physics teaching material (compulsory1compulsory2) of the PEP version.
本文首先将人教版高中物理教材和其他版本的高中物理教材进行了比较。为了搞好比较,论文先对高中物理课程标准及其对教材的要求进行了分析；接着将人教版与司南版高中物理教材分别从栏目设置和知识结构设置做了相关比较,比较中可看出两种版本教材各自的特点,同时,也建议物理教育工作者应因地制宜、取长补短的利用教材；然后,本文将人教版高中物理教材与美国理科生常用的的高中物理教材做了比较,从中可看出美国高中物理教材的特点和对我国高中物理教材编写的启示。
接着,本文着重对高中物理新课标实验教科书(人教版)在湖北省的使用情况做了具体的调查研究,并进行了数据统计与分析。从数据统计分析中,可看出各群体(教研员、教师、学生)对现行高中物理教材的看法；也了解了教科书的实际使用情况,以及影响其使用的因素,同时也分析了新教科书对教与学的促进作用。
最后,论文针对上述的调查研究分析,给出了人教版高中物理教材(必修1和必修2)部分内容的编写建议。
According to the ordinary high school physics course standard and the actual situation, every province has arranged the different versions of textbook as the physics teaching materials, such as the PEP version, SiNan version, Shanghai version, Shandong version, Guangdong version, SuE version and so on. Each of these textbook has it's own features in the content arrangement and selection, as well as in organization to present, and so on. But, many problem of the curriculum reform, such as whether the use of new version textbook play a role in the curriculum reform, whether new version textbook reflect the idea and goal of the new curriculum reform, and whether the new textbooks do a favorable work on the teaching and learning, the actual using situation of the new textbook, as well as the appraise of different group (such as teaching research member, teacher, student) to the new teaching material view, and so on, are worth while studied.
First of all, this thesis compares the senior high school physics teaching materials (PEP) with other versions. In order to do a good work on the comparison, we firstly analyze the new curriculum standard and the edition requirement to the new version of textbook. Then, we compare the senior high school physics teaching materials(PEP) with physics teaching materials(SiNa) separately from the column settings and knowledge structure,from which we can see the features in two versions teaching material. At the same time, the author also suggested that physical education teachers should adjust measures to local conditions and use teaching materials from each other. Next, we also compared the senior high school physics teaching material of PEP version in China with the main senior high school physics teaching material of United States. From which we could see characteristics of American high school physics teaching material and the enlightenment of our senior high school physics teaching material preparation.
Then, this thesis emphasizes on the survey and analysis of the using situation of the textbook of Senior High School Physics with New Curriculum Standards (PEP) in Hubei province. And the statistic analysis has been down from the surveying data. From these, we can see the group (research member, teacher, student) to the current high school physics teaching material view, and we also know the actual use of the textbooks and the factors which affects the use, as well as the promoting role of teaching and learning from the new textbook.
Finally, focusing on the above survey and analysis, we propose some writing advice for the senior high school physics teaching material (compulsory1compulsory2) of the PEP version.
引文
[1]乔继平、邢红军.物理教育心理学.广西教育出版社.2002.
[2]王孝玲教育统计学[M]华东师范大学出版社.2008,10.
[3]乔继平、邢红军.物理学习心理学.广西教育出版社.2002.
[4]教育部 普通高中物理课程标准(实验)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2003
[5]普通高中物理课程标准实验教科书人民教育出版社.2009
[6]普通高中物理课程标准实验教科书山东科学技术出版社.2007
[7]王较过、马亚鹏.普通高中物理教科书特色对比研究一以“人教版”和“司南版”物理1为例内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版).2008,8
[8]美国国家教育委员会美国国家科学教育标准(中译本).1996
[9]物理原理与问题(physics principles and problems)浙江教育出版社钱振华译.
[10]祁映宏中美物理教材学生实验的比较研究物理教师2007,3
[11]Bernard Barber. Sc i ence and the Socia 1 O rder. New York:Free Press,1962
[12]何润伟关于我国中学物理课程改革的思考物理教学探讨2001,3
[13]刘贺平高中物理新课程标准实验教科书(人教版)使用情况调查研究与分析第23卷第6期2011年《大学物理教育专刊》
[14]刘贺平高中物理新课标实验教科书(人教版)使用情况调查研究(已接收)物理通报2012,09
[15]彭征、许桂清.普通高中物理课程标准实验教材使用情况调查研究中学物理2010,11
[16]陈永平轮新课程理念下的教材重构及其能力时代经贸2010
[17]黄莉鸿浅析新课程标准下高中物理教师的教材重构能力资治文摘(教改漫谈)
[18]朱伟华能量教学的基本线--功能关系(对人教版高中物理教材处理功能关 系的探讨)实验教学与仪器 2010,6
[19]徐萍华物理解题中几个思维问题的研究苏州大学学位论文2007
[20]何利华高中物理不同版本新教材习题设计的比较研究新课程研究(基础教育) 2010
[21]沈国强中美两套高中物理教材栏目设置的比较研究物理教师2010
[22]彭前程 高中物理新课程改革的时间与探索——普通高中课程标准物理教材整体设计 课程教材教法 2005
[2]王孝玲教育统计学[M]华东师范大学出版社.2008,10.
[3]乔继平、邢红军.物理学习心理学.广西教育出版社.2002.
[4]教育部 普通高中物理课程标准(实验)[M].北京：人民教育出版社,2003
[5]普通高中物理课程标准实验教科书人民教育出版社.2009
[6]普通高中物理课程标准实验教科书山东科学技术出版社.2007
[7]王较过、马亚鹏.普通高中物理教科书特色对比研究一以“人教版”和“司南版”物理1为例内蒙古师范大学学报(教育科学版).2008,8
[8]美国国家教育委员会美国国家科学教育标准(中译本).1996
[9]物理原理与问题(physics principles and problems)浙江教育出版社钱振华译.
[10]祁映宏中美物理教材学生实验的比较研究物理教师2007,3
[11]Bernard Barber. Sc i ence and the Socia 1 O rder. New York:Free Press,1962
[12]何润伟关于我国中学物理课程改革的思考物理教学探讨2001,3
[13]刘贺平高中物理新课程标准实验教科书(人教版)使用情况调查研究与分析第23卷第6期2011年《大学物理教育专刊》
[14]刘贺平高中物理新课标实验教科书(人教版)使用情况调查研究(已接收)物理通报2012,09
[15]彭征、许桂清.普通高中物理课程标准实验教材使用情况调查研究中学物理2010,11
[16]陈永平轮新课程理念下的教材重构及其能力时代经贸2010
[17]黄莉鸿浅析新课程标准下高中物理教师的教材重构能力资治文摘(教改漫谈)
[18]朱伟华能量教学的基本线--功能关系(对人教版高中物理教材处理功能关 系的探讨)实验教学与仪器 2010,6
[19]徐萍华物理解题中几个思维问题的研究苏州大学学位论文2007
[20]何利华高中物理不同版本新教材习题设计的比较研究新课程研究(基础教育) 2010
[21]沈国强中美两套高中物理教材栏目设置的比较研究物理教师2010
[22]彭前程 高中物理新课程改革的时间与探索——普通高中课程标准物理教材整体设计 课程教材教法 2005