现代卫生填埋场平移滑动分析和垃圾土密度的室内试验研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
通过对填埋场垃圾土的成份分析,选择有代表性的垃圾组成配置试样,进行室内试验,研究垃圾组成、击实功、含水量和上覆压力对垃圾密度和干密度的影响。试验结果表明:对垃圾进行击实可以有效提高垃圾密度,垃圾的干密度与击实能的关系可以用对数函数表达,垃圾组成对对数函数表达式的影响主要体现在函数式的截距项上;垃圾土的最大干密度和最优含水量随击实能的变化规律与一般土相同;垃圾土的密度有随上覆压力增大的趋势,但上覆压力达到一定界限,密度的增长趋势明显减缓,该界限值与垃圾土的击实能有关;对于同一组成的垃圾土,干密度的初始值因压实能和含水量而异,且随上覆压力的增大而增大并趋于定值。
     填埋场边坡衬垫系统和最终覆盖系统的稳定性计算,目前有好几种方法,其中采用最多的是极限平衡分析法,包括双楔体法、无限边坡法和全平衡法等。通过对这几种方法的分析,寻找比较适合实际情况的计算方法。计算结果表明,无限边坡法的安全系数最小,因为它既没有考虑坡脚抗力,也没有考虑填埋场边坡土工防渗膜拉力对稳定性的影响;全平衡法的安全系数最大,因为该法考虑了坡脚抗力和边坡土工防渗膜的拉力对稳定性的影响;双楔体法的安全系数介于这两种方法之间,因为它只考虑坡脚的抗力,没有考虑土工防渗膜的拉力。
     本文着重研究填埋场的平移滑动破坏问题。在建立考虑垃圾坝与被动楔体间作用力方向的三角形垃圾坝的三楔体模型后,又建立了梯形垃圾坝的三楔体模型,此模型可以考虑垃圾坝与被动楔体之间摩擦角的作用,而且垃圾坝的断面为可以变化的梯形,根据该模型,求解填埋场沿衬垫和垃圾坝底部滑动的安全系数,并分析有关参数对稳定性的影响。分析结果表明,垃圾坝与被动楔体之间的摩擦角对填埋场的整体稳定性影响不大;填埋场安全系数随填埋场前坡倾角α和后坡倾角β的增大而减小,随主动楔体和被动楔体下复合衬垫各接触面中最小摩擦角的增大而增大,随垃圾土内摩擦角的增大而增大,随垃圾坝高度和垃圾坝底部与地基之间摩擦角δD的增大而明显增大;垃圾坝后背坡角对填埋场整体稳定性影响较大,后背坡角越小,安全系数越大;修筑垃圾坝能有效提高填埋场的稳定性;对于设有垃圾坝的填埋场,如果不考虑垃圾坝的作用,计算结果偏于保守。
     填埋场在运营过程中,因为填埋场的库容大,使用时间长,需要进行科学有效的管理和有步骤的垃圾分区填埋。分区填埋的单元稳定性是分区填埋设计的重要内容,填埋场在分区填埋时,只要每一分区的顶宽和高度的比值B/H在一定的数值范围内,便能保证分区填埋的安全稳定。
According to the analyzing the composition of refuse in landfills, the composition of refuse sample is determined and the experiments are carried out in lab to investigate the influence of composition, compaction effort, water content and pressure to density and dry density of refuse. The results show that the density and dry density are increasing with the increase of compaction effort. And the relationship between dry density and compaction effort can be expressed by a log function in which the interception indicates the influence of composition of refuse. The rule of the compaction curve of refuse is consistent with the general soil. The density is increasing with the increase of pressure, but the rate of increase slows down significantly after pressure reaches a certain value which is relevant with the initial density and compaction effort. Initial dry densities in a same composition are different with the compaction efforts and water contents, but the values tend to same with the increasing pressure.
     The stability on active wedge and final cover of landfill is impotent in construction of landfill. There are many methods for studying stability. The most used method is limit equilibrium analysis including two wedges analysis, infinite slope, full equilibrium methods and etc. The methods are compared to find the differences. The results show that the safety factor calculated by infinite slope is smallest because the resistance on slope feet is ignored due to the assumption of infinite slope and the geo-membranes tensile of slope isn’t considered. The safety factor calculated by full equilibrium method is a biggest one because the geo-membranes tensile on slope and the resistance of slope feet are both considered. The safety factor calculated by the method of two wedges is between the others because the geo-membranes tensile of slope is not considered while the resistance of slope feet is considered in the method.
     The translation failure is studied in this paper. A limit equilibrium analysis is used to calculate the factor of safety for landfill translation failure along the underlying liner system. The landfill is divided into three parts: an active wedge lying on the back slope that tended to cause failure, a passive wedge and waste dam resting on the foundation or liner system that helped to resist movement. In addition, we set a mode of three parts wedge of trapezia, the friction between passive and waste dam can be considered in this mode, and the shape of waste dam is able to change, solution the factor of safety, the influence on stability is studied in this mode. With the increasing of the back slope angle of waste dam, the factor of safety FS was decreased; There is a little variety on the factor of safety FS with the change of friction angle between waste dam and passive wedge; The factor of safety FS was increased with the increasing of height of waste dam; It was found that the retaining wall significantly affected the stability of landfill,the calculate result were be conservative if the effect of waste dam weren’t considered.
     Because of landfill is always big and used in a long time, so landfill needs to be filled in sequence and needs to be manage effectively. It is important to assure the stability of cell. When cell of landfill is designed, every cell will be save if make sure the value about B/H in a acceptable range, and some parameter likeα,β,γSW,θ,δis no change.
引文
[1]钱学德,郭志平,施建勇等.现代卫生填埋场的设计与施工[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版, 2001.(QIAN Xuede, GUO Zhiping, SHI Jianyong. Design and construction of landfill [M]. Beijing: Industry of China Construction Press, 2001)
    [2] CJJ17—2004生活垃圾卫生填埋技术规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2004.(CJJ17—2004 Technical code for municipal solid waste sanitary landfill [S].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press, 2004.(in Chinese))
    [3]冯世进.城市固体废弃物静动力特性及填埋场的稳定性分析[博士学位论文][D].杭州:浙江大学,2005.(FENG Shijin.Static and dynamic strength properties of municipal solid waste and stability analysis of landfill[Ph.D.Thesis][D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.(in Chinese))
    [4] Foose G., et al.(1996),“Sand reinforced with shredded waste tires”, J. Geotech. Engrg. Div.,ASCE, 122(9),P760-767
    [5] Grisolia M., Napoleoni. Et al. (1995)“The use of triaxial tests for the mechanical characterization of MSW”. Proc. Sardinia 95 , Fifth International Landfill Symposium,S.Margherita di Pula, Cagliari, Italy,P761-768
    [6]锁志文.中国城市生活垃圾的现状及对策.环境保护,1997(4):46-47.
    [7] Giroud J.P., Darrasse J.,Bachus R.C.(1993)“Hyperbolic expression for soil-geosynthetic or geosynthetic- geosynthetic interface shear strength.”Geotextiles and Geomembranes,12(3), p275-286
    [8] Thiel,R.S.and Stewart, M. G.(1993)”Geosynthetic Landfill Cover Design Methodology and Construction Experience in the Pacific Northwest,”Geosynthetics’93 Conference Proceedings, Volume 3, Vancouver, Canda, pp.1131-1144.
    [9]徐敏,周乃杰,陆正明.堆肥处置城市生活垃圾的可行性分析.环境卫生工程,2001,9(2):56-61.
    [10]屈志云,王敬民,刘涛等.我国城市生活垃圾处理技术方式的选择.环境卫生工程,2006,14(3):58-60.
    [11]马洪儒,林聪,张运真.城市垃圾处理技术应用探讨.中国沼气,2006,24(3):36-42.
    [12]严树,吴文.城市固体废弃物(MSW)的填埋处置[J].土工基础,2003,17(2):36-39
    [13]唐家富,李国建.垃圾填埋场渗沥液回灌处理的影响因素研究[J].1997,1:14-18.
    [14]冀桂梅,王艳明.垃圾填埋场建设的新理念及其工程应用[J].城市道桥与防洪,2005,5:130-132.
    [15]黄鹏.浅谈垃圾填埋二次污染的防治[J].环境科学与技术,2005,28(增刊):145-147.
    [16]唐永銮.深圳市垃圾及其处理的研究[J].重庆环境科学,19(2):30-32.
    [17]岳东北,刘建国,聂永丰,等.生活垃圾填埋场渗沥液处理技术研究[J].环境污染处理技术与设备, 2004,5(6):59-63
    [18]乔辉,黄俊,周申范.美国的城市固体废弃物填埋标准[J].环境卫生工程,1999,7(4):133-137.
    [19]周北海,松藤康司.中国垃圾填埋场的问题与改善方法[J].1998,11(3):22-25.
    [20]刘荣,施建勇,彭功勋.垃圾土力学性质的室内试验研究[J].岩土力学,2005,26(1):108-112.
    [21]张振营,吴世明,陈云敏.城市生活垃圾土性参数的室内试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2000,22(1):35-39.
    [22]胡敏云,陈云敏,温振统.城市垃圾填埋场垃圾土压缩变形的研究[J].岩土工程学报,2001,23(1):123-126
    [23]孟海燕,王琳.关于我国垃圾土工程性质的探讨[J].有色金属设计,2005,32(3):58-61.
    [24] QIAN Xue-de, KOERNER R M, et. al. Effect of apparent cohesion on translational failure analysis of landfills [J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004,30(1):71-80
    [25] Byrne, J.R.(1994).“Design issues with displacement-softening interfaces in landfill liners.”Proc. Waste Tech’94.Charleston,S.C
    [26] Filz G. M. Esterhuizen J.B.Duncan J.M,(2001)”Progressive Failure of Lined Waste Impoundments”[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvirmental Engineering,127(10):841-848
    [27]陆士强,王钊,刘祖德.土工合成材料应用原理[M].北京:水利电力出版,1984.
    [28]戴鹏飞,卢延浩,袁磊,朱珍德.土工织物反滤层结构在垃圾填埋场中的应用[J].西部探矿工程,2002,77(4):121-122.
    [29]刘建国,聂永丰.填埋场粘土衬里破坏机理分析[J].城市环境与城市生态,2000,13(6):51-54.
    [30] Qian Xuede.Geotechnical aspects on landfill design. The University of Michigan, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,Ann Arbor, Michigan,USA, May 1995
    [31]施有志,马时冬.垃圾填埋场中的土工聚合物膨润土衬垫[J].华侨大学学报,2002,23(2):151-156
    [32]罗春泳.粘土的环境土工特性及垃圾填埋场衬垫性状研究[博士学位论文][D].杭州:浙江大学,2004.
    [33]白庆中,刘阳生,李强,等.新型人工合成膨润土防渗卷材的研制及其渗透性能[J].环境科学,2000,11:56-60.
    [34] SEED R B, MITCHELL J K, SEED H B. Kettleman Hills waste landfill slope failure(Ⅱ):stability analyses[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(4):669-690
    [35] MITCHELL J K, SEED R B. Kettleman Hills waste landfill slope failure(I): liner-system properties[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990,116(4):647-668.
    [36]杨良斌,李丽,刘玉强,董路,赵娜娜.各国生活垃圾填埋场防渗结构标准研究[J].环境工程,2007,25(4):62-69.
    [37]李锐,陶玉花.HDPE膜在生活垃圾填埋场中应用[J].低温建筑技术,2007,118(4):87-89.
    [38]谢焰,陈云敏.城市生活垃圾若干土工试验方法[J].工程勘察,2006,11:61-65.
    [39] QIAN X D, KOERNER R M, GRAY D H. Translational failure analysis of landfills[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 506-519.
    [40] Howland,J.D., and Landva,A.O.(1992).“Stability analysis of a landfills,”Geotech.Spec.Publ.54, ASCE, New York, p73-82.
    [41] Duncan J.M(1994).“State of the art: limit equilibrium and finite element analysis of slopes.”J.Geotech. Engrg., ASCE,122(7),477-496
    [42]姚晓,徐得潜.山谷型垃圾填埋场设计[J].工程设计,2006,20(1):31-33.
    [43]刘建中.卫生填埋场结构稳定性问题分析[J].重庆环境科学,2001,23(1):62-66.
    [44]钱学德,郭志平.填埋场最终覆盖(封顶)系统[J].水利水电科技进展,1997,17(3):62-65.
    [45]康建郝,张宁.山谷型填埋场垃圾坝的稳定性[J].环境卫生工程,2006,14(5):12-13.
    [46]刘建国,聂永丰,白庆中.卫生填埋场结构稳定性问题分析[J].重庆环境科学,2001,23(1):62-66.
    [47]孙继军,曾照明,卢继强,等.城市垃圾填埋场安全稳定性分析[J].重庆环境科学,2003, 25(12):30-33
    [48]刘元元,王里奥,黄川,林建伟,等.城市垃圾处理技术模糊综合评价[J].重庆大学学报,2002,25(7):111-114.
    [49] Jessberger, H.L., and Kockel, R.(1993)”Determination and assessment of the mechanical properties of waste materials.”Proc., Sardinia 93, 4th int. Landfill Symp., San Margherita di Pula,CISA, Cagliari, Italy, p1383-1392.
    [50]朱向荣,王朝晖,方鹏飞.杭州天子岭垃圾填埋场扩容可行性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2002,24(3):281-284.
    [51]吴健.垃圾填埋场固体废弃物沉降计算与稳定分析[硕士学位论文][D].杭州:武汉大学,2005.
    [52]彭小红,郑泽根,丁文川,等.垃圾填埋场的污染与防治[J].重庆建筑大学学报,2007,29(4):140-143.
    [53]陈云敏,柯瀚.城市固体废弃物的压缩性及填埋场容量分析[J].环境科学学报,2003,23(5):694-698.
    [54]彭功勋.卫生填埋场边坡防渗膜应力计算的全平衡法[J].西部探矿工程,2005,11(612):280-283.(PENG Gong Xun. Full-equilibrium method and safety of geomembranes in shape designation of sanitary landfill's slope [J].West-china exploration engineering,2005,116(12):280-283.)
    [55]彭功勋.全平衡法在填埋场边坡坡形设计中的应用[J].广东工业大学学报,2006,23(1):31-35.(PENG Gong Xun. Application of Full-equilibrium Method to Shape Design of Slope in Landfill [J] .journal of Guangdong university of technical,2006,23(1):31-35.)
    [56]孟云伟,汪洋.垃圾土的工程性质研究现状[J].重庆交通学院学报,2006,25(增刊1):150-153
    [57]冯世进,陈云敏,高广运,等.垃圾坝和界面强度对填埋场沿底部衬垫系统滑动的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(1):149-155.(FENG Shijin,CHEN Yunmin,GAO Guangyun, et al. Effects of retaining wall and interface strength on transnational failure of landfill along underlying liner system[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(1):149–155.(in Chinese))
    [58]冯世进,陈云敏,高广运.垃圾填埋场沿底部衬垫系统破坏的稳定性分析[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(1):20-25.(FENG Shijin,CHEN Yunmin,GAO Guangyun,et al.Analysis on translational failure of landfill along the underlying liner system[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Enginnering,2007,29(1):20-25.
    [1]钱学德,郭志平,施建勇等.现代卫生填埋场的设计与施工[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版, 2001.(QIAN Xuede, GUO Zhiping, SHI Jianyong. Design and construction of landfill [M]. Beijing: Industry of China Construction Press, 2001)
    [2]涂帆,钱学德,中美垃圾填埋场垃圾土的重度、含水量和比重[J].岩石力学与工程学报,增刊1,2008,27(TU Fan,QIAN Xuede. Unit weight, water content and specific gravity of municipal solid waste in china and the United States[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering.2008,27(S1).)
    [3]朱向荣,王朝晖,方鹏飞等,杭州天子岭垃圾填埋场扩容可行性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2002, 24(3): 281–285. (Zhu Xiangrong, Wang Zhaohui, Fang Pengfei, et al. (2002)“Study on feasibility of enlarging capacity in Tianziling waste landfill.”[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 24(3): 281–285. (in Chinese))
    [4]张振营,吴世明,陈云敏.城市生活垃圾土性参数的室内试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2000 ,22 (1) :35~39. (ZHANG Zhenying, WU Shiming, CHEN Yunming. Experimental research on the parameter of life rubbish in city[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2000,22(1):35~39.)
    [5]张季如,陈超敏,城市生活垃圾抗剪强度参数的测试与分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003, 22(1): 110-114. (Zhang Jiru, Chen Chaomin. (2003)“Measurement and analysis on shearstrength parameters of municipal solid waste.”[J] Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 22(1): 110-114. ( in Chinese ))
    [6]陈云敏,王力忠,胡亚云等.城市固体垃圾填埋场边坡稳定分析[J].土木工程学报,2000(6):92-97.(Chen Yunmin, Wang Lizhong,Hu yayun. Stability analysis of a solid waste landfill slope [J]. Chinese journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2000(6):92-97)
    [7]骆行文,杨明亮,姚海林等,陈垃圾土的工程力学特性试验研究[J].岩土工程学报, 2000, 28(5): 622-625. (Luo Xingwen, Yang Mingliang, Yao Hailin,et al. (2000)“Testing and research of engineering behavior for old solid waste.”[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 28(5): 622-625. (in Chinese))
    [8]廖智强.卫生填埋场降解试验研究及沉降机理分析[博士学位论文] [D],南京:河海大学,2006.(Liao Zhiqiang (2006)“Degradation testing and research and settlement mechanism analysis for solid waste landfills.”Ph.D. Thesis, [D]. Nanjing: Hohai University, (in Chinese))
    [9]吴忠良,涂帆,高培卿.城市生活垃圾土密度影响因素的室内试验研究[J].环境污染与防治,2008,6.(待刊)
    [10]南京水利科学研究院土工研究所.土工试验技术手册[M].北京:人民交通出版社,2003.( Geotechnical institute of Nanjing hydraulic research institute. Technical notebook of geotechnical test[M]. Beijing: China Communications Press, 2003)
    [11]杨先海,吕传毅.城市生活垃圾特性与变化趋势研究[A].2003年全国固体废弃物处理及综合利用技术与设备交流研讨会[C]:环境工程,2003(YANG Xianhai, LV Chuanyi. Investigation on properties and trend of variety of life waste in city [A]. 2003 Proceedings of disposing and integrate utilizing the solid waste [C]: Geoenvironment Engineering,2003)
    [1]冯世进,陈云敏,高广运.垃圾填埋场沿底部衬垫系统破坏的稳定性分析[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(1):20-25.(FENG Shijin,CHEN Yunmin,GAO Guangyun,et al.Analysis on translational failure of landfill along the underlying liner system[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Enginnering,2007,29(1):20-25.
    [2] QIAN X D, KOERNER R M, GRAY D H. Translational failure analysis of landfills[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 506-519.
    [3]钱学德,郭志平.填埋场最终覆盖(封顶)系统[J].水利水电科技进展,1997,17(3):62-65.
    [4]黎青松,郭祥信,张进锋.城市生活垃圾填埋场封场技术[J].环境卫生工程,1999,7(2):53-56.
    [5]施有志,马时冬.垃圾填埋场中的土工聚合物膨润土衬垫[J].华侨大学学报,2002,23(2):151-156
    [6]戴鹏飞,卢延浩,袁磊,朱珍德.土工织物反滤层结构在垃圾填埋场中的应用[J].西部探矿工程,2002,77(4):121-122.
    [7]彭功勋.全平衡法在填埋场边坡坡形设计中的应用[J].广东工业大学学报,2006,23(1):31-35.(PENG Gong Xun. Application of Full-equilibrium Method to Shape Design of Slope in Landfill[J].journal of Guangdong university of technical,2006, 23 (1):31-35.)
    [1]冯世进.城市固体废弃物静动力特性及填埋场的稳定性分析[博士学位论文][D].杭州:浙江大学,2005.(FENG Shijin.Static and dynamic strength properties of municipal solid waste and stability analysis of landfill[Ph.D.Thesis][D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2005.(in Chinese))
    [2] MITCHELL J K, SEED R B. Kettleman Hills waste landfill slope failure(I): liner-system properties[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990,116(4):647-668.
    [3] SEED R B, MITCHELL J K, SEED H B. Kettleman Hills waste landfill slope failure(Ⅱ):stability analyses[J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1990, 116(4):669-690
    [4] QIAN X D, KOERNER R M, GRAY D H. Translational failure analysis of landfills[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(6): 506-519.
    [5]冯世进,陈云敏,高广运,等.垃圾坝和界面强度对填埋场沿底部衬垫系统滑动的影响[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(1):149-155.(FENG Shijin,CHEN Yunmin,GAO Guangyun, et al. Effects of retaining wall and interface strength on transnational failure of landfill along underlying liner system[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(1):149–155.(in Chinese))
    [6]高登,朱斌,陈云敏.设垃圾坝填埋场的三楔体滑动分析[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2007,26(增2):4378-4385.(GAO Deng, ZHU Bin, CHEN Yunmin. Three-part wedge method for translational sliding analysis of landfills retained by a toe dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2007,26(add 2):4378-4385.(in Chinese)).
    [7] JONES D R V, DIXON N. Landfill lining stability and integrity: the role of waste settlement[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2005,23(1):27-53.
    [1] Xuede Qian,Robert M.Koerner.Effect of apparent cohesion on translational failure analyses of landfills[J].Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering:2004,71-80.
    [2]杨一清.高密度聚乙烯(HDPE)膜在垃圾填埋场基底防渗层中的应用[J].环境卫生工程. 2001,9(3):116-119
    [3]黄仁华.垃圾填埋场用(HDPE)膜灭绳的试验[J].环境卫生工程,2003,11(1):28-30.
    [4]李启彬,刘丹,欧阳峰.城市垃圾处理的新动向—生物反应器填埋场技术[J].城市环境与城市生态. 2001,14(1):24-25

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700