我国不同类型商业银行稳健性与差异性研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
在现代经济体系中,金融业已经成为了发展的核心,对经济的增长起着巨大的推动作用,但与此同时,金融体系的动荡也会给经济运行带来负面影响,金融危机的爆发甚至会给实体经济带来毁灭性的冲击。银行业作为金融业的基础,在维护金融稳定方面具有至关重要的作用。大量的理论和实证研究已经充分证明,银行危机先于金融危机产生,并且银行业的危机程度决定了金融危机爆发的深度与广度,因此,维护银行稳健性是维护金融稳定的关键之一。现阶段,我国银行业正面临来自外部和内部的双重压力,一方面我国已全面允许外资银行进入中国市场,由于外资银行实力雄厚,服务、管理和风险控制水平较高,给我国本土银行业发展带来较大的外部压力;另一方面,我国当前宏观经济形式放缓,同时政府不断深化对银行业的改革,银行数量不断上升,本土竞争日趋激烈,给银行业带来了较大的内部压力。在此背景下,研究我国宏观经济运行与货币政策对银行稳健性的影响及银行间风险溢出效应的度量,均具有非常重要的理论和现实意义。
     本文以金融稳定的理论和国内外学者对银行领域的相关研究成果为基础,运用计量经济学的分析方法,对我国不同类型银行的稳健性、不同类型银行稳健性与宏观经济运行之间的关联、货币政策对银行稳健性影响的差异以及银行系统性风险溢出效应四个方面进行了系统深入的研究,具体内容如下:
     首先,本文在IMF(2006)颁布的《金融稳健指标》的基础上,结合我国央行提出的宏观审慎监管指标,从资本充足性,资产质量,银行盈利能力和流动性四个方面分别选取了银行的代表性指标,构建了我国银行稳健性指标体系,并利用该指标体系中的核心指标合成了我国银行稳健性指数BSI,以综合评价我国银行的稳健性水平。通过对我国三类商业银行稳健性指数的分析,指出我国银行业稳健性明显上升,并且均受到全球性金融危机的冲击影响。然而,这种冲击对三类银行的影响略有不同,城市商业银行受到影响的时期相对滞后于其他两类银行。此外,与大型商业银行相比,股份制商业银行稳健性更易受到宏观经济形式的影响。
     其次,本文通过构建PVAR模型对宏观经济运行与我国不同类型商业银行稳健性之间的冲击响应路径进行了分析。脉冲响应分析结果显示:信贷增长率在短期内有利于银行稳健性,并且对城市商业银行稳健性的影响最大,股份制商业银行次之,对大型商业银行的影响最小;股票市场指数的增长对银行稳健性有正向影响,对城市商业银行的稳健性影响更持久;经济τ增长在短期内对银行稳健性有正向影响,在长期对其影响为负;大型商业银行稳健性对信贷规模几乎没有影响,股份制商业银行稳健性对信贷规模增长具有正向影响,而城市商业银行稳健性的提高却不利于信贷规模增长。同时,方差分解结果显示:股票市场指数对股份制商业银行稳健性的影响小于其他两类银行,而信贷增长率和经济增长率对三类银行稳健性的贡献很小;从三类银行稳健性对宏观经济变量的影响来看,股份制商业银行稳健性对股票市场的影响比其他两类银行大;城市商业银行对信贷规模增长的影响明显超过其他两类银行;城市商业银行稳健性对经济增长的贡献度远不如其他两类银行。
     第三,本文利用面板分位数回归方法分析了货币政策对不同类型商业银行稳健性影响的差异,结果显示:三类银行稳健性与汇率均呈负相关关系,并且大型商业银行受汇率波动的影响明显高于其他两类银行,随着其自身稳健性的提高,影响程度逐渐变小;利率对三类银行稳健性的影响均为正,且对具有中等稳健性的城市商业银行作用更明显,随着银行稳健水平的提高,对银行稳健性的影响程度逐渐减弱。此外,利率对城市商业银行稳健性的影响小于其对股份制商业银行的影响。通过信贷增长率对三类银行稳健性的影响,可以看到信贷增长与大型商业银行稳健性呈负相关关系,但对城市商业银行的稳健性影响并不显著。而对于股份制商业银行来说,在其稳健性较差的情况下,信贷增长率不利于银行稳健性,在其稳健性较好的情况下,信贷增长率反而有助于提高稳健程度。
     第四,本文还通过建立CoVaR模型,利用分位数回归技术度量了我国三类十六家上市商业银行在极端分位数条件下(τ=0.05)的风险溢出效应。通过研究金融风险的各种状态变量对银行机构极端风险的影响,得出股票市场收益率与股票市场价格波动会增加银行的极端风险,并且股票市场波动率对城市商业银行极端风险的影响最大;流动性价差会减小银行的极端风险,且对股份制商业银行与城市商业银行效果更明显;期限利差也可以减小银行的极端风险,但对大多数商业银行影响效果不明显。在此基础上,通过计算单个银行在0.05分位点下的VaRit、CoVaRit以及C oVaRsystem|it值,发现CoVaR可以更好地度量银行的风险及其对系统的溢出效应,大型商业银行的C oVaR值明显大于另外两类商业银行。通过对C oVaRsystem|it进行排序,发现对系统性风险贡献最高的四个商业银行始终是大型商业银行,其他类型银行对系统性风险贡献的排序没有明显规律,但可以发现,城市商业银行对系统性风险的贡献受宏观因素的影响大于其他两类银行。
In modern economic system, finance has already become the core of development and it isplaying a very important role in economic growth. But at the same time, the turbulence offinancial system can also bring damage to economic, the outbreak of financial crisis can evenbring devastate impact. As the basis of financial system, banking plays a vital role in themaintenance of financial soundness. A lot of theoretical and empirical studies have proved that thefinancial crisis comes after the banking crisis, and the depth and breadth of banking crisisdetermines the depth and breadth of financial crisis. Therefore, to maintain the soundness ofbanking is one of the keys to maintain the soundness of financial soundness. At the present, thebanking in China is facing the pressure from both outside and inside. On the one hand, China hasopen the financial market to foreign banks, the abundant capital and the higher service,management, risk control skills of foreign banks have bring more and more external pressure tothe development of banking in China. On the other hand, our macroeconomic slowdown currently,the government deepens the reform of banking constantly, the number of commercial banks isgrowing steadily, these aspects all has brought big internal pressure to banking system. Based onthis background, to study the effects of macroeconomic and monetary policy on bankingsoundness and to measure the risk spillover effect between banks has very important theoreticaland practical significance.
     This paper based on the financial soundness theory and the research of domestic and foreignscholars on banking, using the econometric methods give a systematic and deep research on thesoundness of different types of banks, the relationship between the soundness of different types ofbanks and macro economy, the differences of the effect of monetary policy on bank soundness andthe banking systemic risk spillover effect. The main contents are as follows:
     First of all, on the basis of the “Financial Soundness Indicators” promulgated by IMF2006and the macro-prudential regulation targets raised by China’s central bank, we have selectedseveral representative indicators on capital adequacy, assets quality, profitability and liquidity of different banks to build the system of China’s bank soundness index system. And using the coreindicators of this system we have composed BSI, which can describe the soundness of differentbanks. Through the analysis of three different types of our commercial banks, we have found thatthe soundness of China’s banks increased significantly, and they were all affected by the globalfinancial crisis. However, the impact on different types of banks was a little different. The affectedperiod of city commercial banks was lagged behind the other two kinds of banks. In addition,compared with the large commercial banks, the joint-stock commercial banks were influenced bythe macroeconomic more remarkable. The trends of the banking soundness shows that the effectof our banking reform since2004is significant, the soundness of banking system increasedsteadily, but was seriously affected by the global financial crisis2008. Although there was noobvious crisis in China, the influence spread to the entire social economy through various ways.The crisis has also brought a shock to the banking system, and caused the decrease of the bankingsoundness. Facing the financial crisis, in order to maintain the steady and rapid economic growth,the Chinese government has carried out series of monetary policy and fiscal policy to stimulate theinvestment and employment in private sector, the soundness of banking system was also recoveredgradually.
     Secondly, this paper analyses the impact path of shock between macroeconomic and differenttypes of banks by constructing a PVAR model. The results of the impulse response shows that: thecredit growth is advantageous to the soundness of banks, and the effect on city commercial banksis the biggest, on joint-stock commercial banks comes the second, on large commercial banks isthe smallest. The stock market index has a positive effect on the bank soundness, and the impacton city commercial banks is more durable. The economic growth has a positive effect on banksoundness in the short term, but it change to negative in the long term. The soundness of largecommercial banks hardly has any influence on credit scale, and the soundness of joint-stockcommercial banks has positive impact on credit scale, while the raise of the soundness of citycommercial banks will decrease the credit scale. At the same time, the result of the variancedecomposition shows that: the stock market index impact the soundness of joint-stock commercialless than the other two types of banks. The contribution of credit growth and the economic growthto the soundness of all three types of bank is very small. From the view of the effect of the banksoundness to macroeconomic we can find that the joint-stock commercial banks impact the stock market more significant than the other two types of banks, the city commercial banks impact thecredit scale more than the other two types of banks, and the soundness of large commercial banksand joint-stock commercial banks impact the economic growth more significant than citycommercial banks.
     Thirdly, we analyze the impact of monetary policy on the soundness of different types ofcommercial banks by using the panel quantile regression method, and from the result we can findthat the relationship between the soundness of three types of banks and exchange rate are allnegative. Large commercial banks affected by exchange rate more significantly, and the effectdecrease gradually as the soundness of large banks increase. The relationship between interest rateand the soundness of all three types of banks are all positive. The influence of interest rate on citycommercial banks are more significantly, and the effect decrease while the soundness increase. Inaddition, the effect of interest rate on the soundness of joint-stock commercial more than citycommercial banks. Through the effect of credit growth, we can come to the conclusion that thesoundness of large commercial banks decrease while credit increase, but the soundness of citycommercial banks hardly has response to credit growth. But for the joint-stock commercial banks,when its soundness is in the low section, credit growth will bring negative effect, but when itssoundness is high, credit growth will bring positive effect.
     Fourthly, we establish a CoVaR model, measure the risk spillover effect of the three types ofsixteen commercial banks in extreme quantile (=0.05) by using quantile regression technique.Though the effect that variety of financial risk made to the extreme risk of banking institutions, wecan find out that the fluctuation of stock market profit and stock market price can raise theextreme risk of banks, and this kind of effect plays most significantly on city commercial banks.The difference of interbank interest rate and yield rate to maturity can reduce the extreme risk, andthe effect is more significant on joint-stock commercial banks and city commercial banks. Termspread can also reduce the extreme risk, but the effect is not obvious on most of the banks. On thisbasis, we calculatedVaRti,CoVaRti, and CoVaRtsystem|iof each bank under quantile0.05, foundthat CoVaR can measure the risk of each bank and its spillover effect on the system better.CoVaR of large commercial banks are larger than those of joint-stock commercial banks and citycommercial banks. By sorting the CoVaRtsystem|iwe can find that the top four contributors to thesystemic risk are all from large commercial banks, other banks’ contribution didn’t show regular rules. But we can find that city commercial banks’ contribution to systemic risk is influenced bymacroeconomic more significantly than the other two types.
引文
[1] A.M.M. Masih and R. Masih. Energy consumption, real income and temporal causality:results from a multi-country study based on cointegration and error-correction modelingtechniques [J]. Journal of Energy Economics,1996,18(3):165-183.
    [2] Acharya V, Philippon T, Richardson M, et al. The Financial Crisis of2007‐2009: Causes andRemedies [J]. Financial Markets, Institutions&Instruments,2009,18(2):89-137.
    [3] Adams, Renee B., Mehran, Hamid. Corporate Performance, Board Structure and itsDeterminants in the Banking Industry [C]. EFA2005Moscow Meetings,2005(8).
    [4] Adrian T, Brunnermeier M K. CoVaR[R]. National Bureau of Economic Research,2011.
    [5] Adrian T, Shin H S. Liquidity and leverage [J]. Journal of financial intermediation,2010,19(3):418-437.
    [6] Albareto G.. Monetary Policy and Banking Stability: A Survey.University di Genova [R],Working Paper,2004, No.5.
    [7] Allen F, Babus A, Carletti E. Financial connections and systemic risk[R]. National Bureau ofEconomic Research,2010.
    [8] Allen F, Gale D. Financial contagion [J]. Journal of political economy,2000,108(1):1-33.
    [9] Allen F., Gale D.. Bubbles and Crises [J]. The Economic Joumal,2000(8):3-28.
    [10] Allen, Franklin and Douglas Gale.Financial Fragility, Liquidity and Asset Prices [J]. Journalof the European Economic Association, Decembg2,2004(6):1015-1048.
    [11] Allen, Franklin and Douglas Gale.Optimal Financial Crises [J]. Journal of Finance,1998,53(4):1245-1284.
    [12] Andress and Vallelado.corporate governance in banking: the role of the board of directors[J].Journal of Banking and Finance,2008,(32).
    [13] Andrew Sheng etc.银行业重组——从20世纪80年代银行危机中得到的经验教训[M].袁纯清等译,北京:中国金融出版社,2001.
    [14] Anne Vilal. Asset price crises and banking crises: some empirical evidence [C]. BIS,Conference Papers,2000.
    [15] Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber J M, et al. Coherent measures of risk [J]. Mathematical finance,1999,9(3):203-228.
    [16] Asli Demirg-Kunt, Enrica Detragiache.Financial Liberalization and Financial Fragility [R],IMF, WP/98/83,1998.
    [17] Barry Eichengreen and Carlos Arteta. Banking crises in emerging markets: presumptions andevidence [R]. Center for International and Development Economics Research working paper,2000(8):C00-115.
    [18] Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. Overview of the New Basel Capital Accord. Bankfor International Settlements, April,2003.
    [19] Berkowitz J, O`Brien J. How Accurate Are Value‐at‐Risk Models at Commercial Banks?[J].The Journal of Finance,2002,57(3):1093-1111.
    [20] Bernanke Ben·S, Blinder. The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of MonetaryTransmission [J]. American Economic Review,1992(9):901-921
    [21] Bernanke, Ben and Cara Lown. The Credit Cnmch [C].Brookings Papers on EconomicActivity,1991(2):205-239.
    [22] Bernanke, Ben S. Alternative Explanations of the Money-Income Correlation [J]. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy,1986(25):49-99·
    [23] Bhagat, S., Black B.. Do independent directors matter?[J]. Working paper. ColumbiaUniversity, New York,1996.
    [24] Bhattacharya S, Boot A W A, Thakor A V. The economics of bank regulation [J]. Journal ofMoney, Credit and Banking,1998:745-770.
    [25] Billio M, Pelizzon L. Value-at-risk: a multivariate switching regime approach [J]. Journal ofEmpirical Finance,2000,7(5):531-554.
    [26] Borio C.. Disyatat P. Unconventional monetary policies: an appraisal [J]. The Manchester School,2010,78(s1):53-89.
    [27] Borio C.. Implementing a macroprudential framework: Blending boldness and realism [J].Capitalism and Society,2010,6(1).
    [28] Borio C.. Lowe P. Asset prices, financial and monetary stability: exploring the nexus [J].2002.
    [29] Borio C.. The macroprudential approach to regulation and supervision: where do we stand?[J].Experiences and Challenges Kredittilsynet1986,2006:108-120.
    [30] Borio, Claudio and Philip Lowe. Asset price Financial and Monetary Stability: Exploring ofthe Nexus [R]. Bank of International Settlements Working Paper,2002, No.114.
    [31] Brenda Gonzalez-Hermosillo. Banking Sector Fragility and Systemic Sources of Fragility [R].IMF Working Paper,12February,1996.
    [32] Brunnermeier M K, Pedersen L H. Market liquidity and funding liquidity [J]. Review of Financialstudies,2009,22(6):2201-2238.
    [33] Carl-Johan Lindgren etc.银行稳健经营与宏观经济政策[R].潘康等译,北京:中国金融出版社,1997.
    [34] Conyonm, Peck S.Board Size and Corporate Performance: Evidence from EuropeanCountries [J].European Journal of Finance,1998,4(5):291-304.
    [35] Cornforth, Chris. What Makes Boards Effective? An examination of the relationshipsbetween board inputs, structures, processes and effectiveness in non-profit organisations[J].Corporate Governance: An International Review,2001,9(3):217–227.
    [36] Cover, J·P·Asymmetric Effects of Positive and Negative Money-supply Shocks [J]. QuarterlyJournal of Economics,1992(17):1261-1282.
    [37] Crockett A. Marrying the micro-and macro-prudential dimensions of financial stability [J]. BISspeeches,2000,21.
    [38] David S.Hoelscher etc.系统性银行危机的管理[R]. IMF,北京:中国金融出版社,2004.
    [39] Demirguc-Kunt and Detragiache. The Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing andDeveloped Countries [R], IMF Staff Papers,1998,45(1):81-109.
    [40] Denis, D. J., and Sarin, A. Ownership and Board Structures in Publicly Traded Firms[R].Working Paper,1997.
    [41] Deniz Igan, Marcelo Pinheiro. Credit Growth and Bank Soundness: Fast and Furious?[R].IMF Working Paper,2011(11).
    [42] Diamond,Douglas W and Philip Dybvig.Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity [J].Journal of Political Economy,1983,91(3):1-19.
    [43] Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Whitney Newey, Harvey S. Rosen. Estimating Vector Autoregressionswith Panel Data [J].Econometrica, Vol.56(6),1988,11:1371-1395.
    [44] Dowd.Re-examining the Case for Government Deposit Insurance [J].Southern EconomicJournal,1992(8):43-56.
    [45] Eisenbergt,Sundgren S,Wellsm.Larger Board Size and Decredasing Firm Value in SmallFirms [J].Journal of Financial Economics,1998,48(9):35-54.
    [46] Elizabeth Webb. Regulator Scrutiny and Bank CEO Incentives [J].Journal of FinancialServices Research,2008,33(1):5-20.
    [47] Enria A, Cappiello L, Dierick F, et al. Fair value accounting and financial stability [J].2005.
    [48] Eralp Bektas, Turhan Kaymak. Governance Mechanisms and Ownership in an EmergingMarket: The Case of Turkish Banks [J]. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade,2009,45(6):20-32.
    [49] Fisher, Irving, The debt-deflation theory of great depressions [J]. Econometrica,1933,1(4):337-357.
    [50] G. Gorton. Bank suspension of Convertibility [J].Journal of Monetary Economics,1985,15(2):177-193.
    [51] Gauthier C, Lehar A, Souissi M. Macroprudential capital requirements and systemic risk [J].Available at SSRN1663993,2010.
    [52] Geanakoplos J, Polemarchakis H M.. Existence, regularity and constrained suboptimality ofcompetitive allocations when the asset market is incomplete [J]. Uncertainty, information andcommunication: essays in honor of KJ Arrow,1986,3:65-96.
    [53] Giancarlo Corsetti, Paolo Pesenti, Nouriel Roubini. What Caused the Asian Currency andFinancial Crisis? Part I: A Macroeconomic Overview [R]. NBER Working Paper No.6833,1998(12).
    [54] Giuliano Iannotta, Giacomo Nocera. Ownership Structure, Risk and Performance in theEuropean Banking Industry [J].Journal of Banking and Finance,2007,(7).
    [55] González-Hermosillo, Brenda. Determinants of Ex-Ante Banking System Distress: AMacro-Micro Empirical Exploration of Some Recent Episodes [R]. IMF Working Paper,1999:1-114.
    [56] Gorton G, Metrick A, Shleifer A, et al. Regulating the shadow banking system-with commentsand discussion [J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,2010:261-312.
    [57] Gorton, G., Huang, L.. Bank Panics and the Endogeneity of Central Banking [R], NBERWorking Paper9102,2002.
    [58] Guttentag.Herring.D.Some Reflections on Financial Fragility in Banking and Finance [J].Journal of Banking and Insurance,1984(2):31-47.
    [59] Hanson S, Kashyap A, Stein J. A macroprudential approach to financial regulation [J]. ChicagoBooth Research Paper,2010(10-29).
    [60] Hermalin B, Weisbach M.Board of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution:Survey of the Economic Literature [J]. FRBNY Economic Policy Review,2003,21(9):7-26.
    [61] Hermalin B, Weisbach M.The effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentives on FirmPerformance [J]. Financial Management,1991,20(12):101-112.
    [62] Honohan, Patrick. Banking System Failures in Developing and Transition Countries:Diagnosis and Prediction [R], BIS, Working Papers No.39,1997.
    [63] Houben, A., Kakes, J., and G..Schinasi. Towards a Famework for Safeguarding Financialstability [R], IMF Woking Paper,2004, No.101(4):11-12.
    [64] Hsiao Frank S.T. and Mei-Chu W Hsiao. FDI, exports, and GDP in East and Southeast Asia:panel data versus time-series causality analysis [J].Journal of Asian Economics,2006,17:1082-1106.
    [65] Huang X, Zhou H, Zhu H. Systemic risk contributions[J]. Journal of financial services research,2012,42(1-2):55-83.
    [66] Ilkerdome.Maria Soleclad.Banking Crises and Exchange Rate Regine-Is the Real Link?[R].World Bank Working Paper,2000(4):24-38.
    [67] Inessa Love, Lea Zicchino. Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behaviour:evidence from Panel VAR [J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2006,46,190-210.
    [68] Jacklin and Bhattacharya, S. Distinguishing Panics and information-based Bankmpts:Welfare and Political Implication [J].Journal of Political Economy,1996(8):68~92.
    [69] Jakobsen S. Measuring value-at-risk for mortgage backed securities [M]. Springer US,1996.
    [70] Jensen M. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal ControlSystems [J]. Journal of Finance,1993,48(5):831-880.
    [71] Joseph E, Stiglitz, Andrew Weiss.Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information[J].TheAmerican Economic Review. June1981(6):393-410.
    [72] Kaminsky, Graciela and Carmen M.Reinhart.The Twin Crises:The Causes of Banking andBalance of Payments Problems [J].TheAmerican Economic Review, Vo1.89, No.3,1999:475.
    [73] Kaminsky, Graciela, Saul Lizondo and Garmen Reinhart.Leading Indicators of CurrencyCrises [R].IMF Staf Papers,1998,45:1-48.
    [74] Keeley, M..Deposit Insurance, Risk and Market Power in Banking [J].American EconomicReview,1990,(8):1183~1200.
    [75] Klein, A. Firm Performance and Board Committee Structure [J]. Journal of Law andEconomics,1998,(41).
    [76] Koenker, R. and G. Bassett, Regression Quantiles [J]. Econometrica,1978(46):33–50.
    [77] Koenker, R. Quantile Regression for Longitudinal Data, Journal of Multivariate Analysis [J].2004(91):74–89.
    [78] Kose Johna, Lemma W Senbet. Corporate governance and board effectiveness [J]. Journal ofBanking and Finance,1998,22(4):371-403.
    [79] Kregel J. A., Margins of Safety and Weight of The Argument in Generating FinancialFragility[J].Journal of Economics Issues, Vol.31(2),1997, p.543-548.
    [80] Krugman. The Determinants of Banking Crises in Developing and Developed Countries [J].Staff Papers,1998(1):45-58.
    [81] Krugman. What happen to Asia?[M]. MIT mimeo,1998.
    [82] Lakonishok J, Shleifer A, Vishny R W. The impact of institutional trading on stock prices[J].Journal of financial economics,1992,32(1):23-43.
    [83] Lindgren, Garcia and Saal. Bank Soundness and Macroeconomic Policy [M]. IMF,1996.
    [84] Lipton, Lorsch. AModest Proposal for Improved Corporate Governance [J]. Business Lawyer,1992,48(1):59-77.
    [85] Luc Laeven, RossLevine. Bank governance, regulation and risk taking [J].Journal ofFinancial Economics,2009(93):259–275.
    [86] Lynn Pi, S.G. Timme. Corporate control and bank efficiency [J]. Journal of banking andFinance,1993(17):515-530.
    [87] M. Giannetti. Bank-firm relationships and contagious banking crises [J]. Money Credit Bank,2003(35):239-261.
    [88] Maksimovic V, Zechner J. Debt, agency costs, and industry equilibrium[J]. The Journal ofFinance,1991,46(5):1619-1643.
    [89] Marcia Millon Cornetta, Jamie John McNuttb, Hassan Tehranian. Corporate Governance andEarnings Management at Large U.S. Bank Holding Companies [J]. Journal of CorporateFinance,2009,15(4):412-430.
    [90] Marco Egoavil. The Intersection of Corporate Governance and Operational Risk [J]. BankAccounting and Finance,2003,(8).
    [91] Mckinnon and Huw Pill. Credible liberalizations and International Capital Flows: Theoverborrowing Syndrome in Financial Deregulation and Integration in East Asia [M], ed. byTakatoshi Ito and Anne O. Kruger, University of Chicago Press,1996.
    [92] Minsky and Reinhart. The Twin Crises: The Causes of Banking and Balance of PaymentsProblems [J]. International Finance Discussion Paper,1996:544.
    [93] Minsky Hyman. The Financial Fragility Hypothesis: Capitalist Process and Behavior of theEconomy, in Financial Crisis [M]. ed. Kindlberger, C. P., and Laffargue, J. P., Cambrige:Cambrige University Press.1982.
    [94] Mishkin, Frederic. Global Financial Instability: Framework, Events, Issues [J]. Joumal ofEconomic Perspectives,1999(13):3-20.
    [95] Nikos, Vafeas. Board Meeting Frequency and Firm Performance [J]. Journal of FinancialEconomics,1999(52):113-142.
    [96] Pablo de Andre, Eleuterio Vallelado. Corporate governance in banking: the role of the boardof directors [J]. Journal of Banking and Finance,2008,32(12):2570-2580.
    [97] Padoa-Schioppa. Central Banks and Finaneial Stability: ExPloring a Land in between, thetransformation of the European Financial System [M], ECB, Frankfut,2003.
    [98] Panetta F, Angelini P, Albertazzi U, et al. Financial sector pro-cyclicality: lessons from thecrisis[R]. Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area,2009.
    [99] Paul Hilbers, Russell Krueger and Marina Moretti. New Tools for Assessing FinaneialSystem Soundness [J]. Finance and Development,2000,37(9).
    [100] Petersen M A. et RG Rajan [1994], The effect of credit market competition on lendingrelationships [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,110:406-443.
    [101] Radelet R., Sachs J.. The onset of theeast Asian financial crisis [M].Harvard Institute forInternational Development, mimeo,1998.
    [102] Rothschild M, Stiglitz J E. A model of employment outcomes illustrating the effect of thestructure of information on the level and distribution of income [J]. Economics Letters,1982,10(3):231-236.
    [103] Saibal Ghosh. Credit Growth, Bank Soundness and Financial Fragility: Evidence fromIndian Banking Sector [J].SouthAsia Economic Journal,2010(6):69-98.
    [104] Sebastian Edwards. Financial Openness, Sudden Stops and Current Account Reversals [R],NBER Working Paper,10277,2004.
    [105] Shams Pathan, Michael Skully, J. Wickramanayake. Board Size, Independence andPerformance: An Analysis of Thai Banks [J]. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets,2007,14(3):211-227.
    [106] Steven Radelet and Jeffrey D. Sachs. The East Asian Financial Crisis: Diagnosis, Remedies,Prospects [R]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity,1998(1):1-74.
    [107] Stiglitz, J..Sound finance and sustainable development in Asia: Keynote address to the Asiadevelopment forum [M].mimeo,1998.
    [108] Stiglitz. Credit Rationing in Markets with Imperfect Information [J].American EconomicReview,1992(6):93-110.
    [109] Sundararajan&J.T.Balino Banking Financial Policy [J].Journal of Banking and Financial,1984(5):57-65.
    [110] T. Veblen. The Theory of Business Enterprises [M], New York: Charles Scribners andSens.1904.
    [111] Tobias C., Michalak, André Uhde.Credit risk securitization and bank soundness in Europe[J]. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2012,(52):272-285.
    [112] Vincent A Warther. Board effectiveness and board dissent: A model of the board'srelationship to management and shareholders [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance,1998,4(1):53-70.
    [113] Wahyoe Soedarmono, Fouad Machrouh, Amine Tarazi. Bank market power, economicgrowth and financial stability: Evidence fromAsian banks [J].2011(22):460-470.
    [114] Wintoki, M. B., Linck, J. S., and Netter, J. M. Endogeneity and the Dynamics of InternalCorporate Governance[R]. Working Paper,2010.
    [115] Yener Altunbas, Leonardo Gambacorta, David Marques-Ibanez.Bank risk and monetarypolicy [J]. Journal of Financial Stability,2010,(6):121-129.
    [116] Yermark, D. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors [J].Journal of Financial Economics,1996,40(3):185-211.
    [117]陈飞,赵昕东,高铁梅.我国货币政策工具变量效应的实证分析[J].金融研究,2002(10):25-30.
    [118]陈华,伍志文.银行体系脆弱性:理论及基于中国的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2004(9):120-135.
    [119]陈华.转轨时期国有银行脆弱性的分析与实证研究[D].苏州大学,2004.
    [120]陈守东,王鲁非.上证综合指数VaR的度量[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002,4:103-106.
    [121]陈守东,王淼.我国银行体系的稳健性研究——基于面板VAR的实证分析[J].数量经济技术研究,2011(10):64-77.
    [122]陈守东,王妍.金融压力指数与工业一致合成指数的动态关联研究[J].财经问题研究,2011,10:008.
    [123]陈守东,王寅,王婷.系统性金融风险及其防范对策研究[J].社会科学战线,2013(12):226-228.
    [124]陈守东,杨东亮,田艳芬.基于平滑区制转移模型的银行体系脆弱性动态变化研究[J].数量经济研究,2011,2(1):1-13.
    [125]陈守东,俞世典.基于GARCH模型的VaR方法对中国股市的分析[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2002(4):11-17.
    [126]丁庭栋,赵晓慧.不同行业与金融系统的波动溢出效应分析[J].统计与决策,2012,3:048.
    [127]方雯.我国财政政策传导机制与动态有效性的计量研究[D].吉林大学,2010.
    [128]高国华,潘英丽.银行系统性风险度量——基于动态CoVaR方法的分析[J].上海交通大学学报,2011,45(12):1753-1759.
    [129]高新宇.银行体系脆弱性理论及中国的实证研究[D].东北财经大学,2007.
    [130]国际货币基金组织.金融稳健指标编制指南[M].中国金融出版社,2002.
    [131]韩俊.银行体系稳定性研究[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2000.
    [132]何浚.上市公司治理结构的实证分析[J].经济研究,1998(5):50-57.
    [133]黄金老.论金融脆弱性[J].金融研究,2001(3):41-49.
    [134]黄泽华.我国货币政策信贷传导机制研究[J].理论探索,2010(3):73-76.
    [135]蒋瑛琨,刘艳武,赵振全.货币渠道与信贷渠道传导机制有效性的实证分析[J].金融研究,2005(5):70-79.
    [136]阚珍珍,王一惠.我国国有商业银行稳健性的实证分析[J].统计与咨询,2009(4):22-23.
    [137]李斌.中国货币政策有效性的实证研究[J].金融研究,2001(7):10-17.
    [138]李春琦,王文龙.货币供给量作为货币政策中介目标适应性研究[J].财经研究,2007(2):47-57.
    [139]李心丹,傅浩.国外金融体系风险理论综述[J].经济学动态,1998(1):66-72.
    [140]李玉贤.我国上市商业银行风险溢出效应的测度及分析研究——基于CoVar模型的分析[J].陕西科技大学学报(自然科学版),2012,2:027.
    [141]刘斌.货币政策冲击的识别及我国货币政策有效性的实证分析[J].金融研究,2001(7):1-9.
    [142]刘慧悦,刘金全,张小宇.金融危机前后我国货币政策传导机制的检验与识别[J].上海经济研究,2012(11):3-12.
    [143]刘金全,刘兆波.我国货币政策的中介目标与宏观经济波动的关联性[J].金融研究,2008(10):37-47.
    [144]刘金全,王雄威.我国货币政策周期与经济周期之间的关联性研究[J].上海经济研究,2012(1):3-9.
    [145]刘明志.货币供应量和利率作为货币政策中介目标的适应性[J].金融研究,2006(1):51-63.
    [146]刘卫江.中国银行体系脆弱性问题的实证研究[J].管理世界,2002(7):3-10.
    [147]刘锡良,曾欣.中国金融体系的脆弱性与道德风险[J].财贸经济,2003(1):43-51.
    [148]卢荻,张强,蒋盛君,艾思.金融不稳定性是外生冲击引起的吗[J].当代经济科学,2011(7):44-53.
    [149]马君潞,范小云,曹元涛.中国银行间市场双边传染的风险估测及其系统性特征分析[J].经济研究,2007,1:68-78.
    [150]马昕田,刘金全.基于波动率的货币与产出关系检验——来自分位数回归模型的新证据[J].企业经济,2012(8):177-180.
    [151]莫万贵,王立元.货币供应量和贷款仍是当期合适的货币政策调控目标[J].经济学动态,2008(5):50-54.
    [152]欧文.伊文斯.金融体系稳健性的宏观审慎指标[M].北京:中国金融出版社,2001.
    [153]潘康.银行稳健经营与宏观经济政策[M].北京:中国金融出版社,1997.
    [154]秦宛顺,靳云汇,卜永祥.从货币政策规则看货币政策中介目标选择[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002(6):14-16.
    [155]曲洪建,孙明贵,张相贤.特许权价值、公司治理和银行稳健性——基于特许权价值和公司治理交互作用的视角[J].财贸研究.2013(5):120-130.
    [156]曲洪建,张相贤,王宇明.政府监管对银行稳健性的影响研究——基于中国上市商业银行的实证检验[J].当代经济管理.2014(1):79-84.
    [157]曲建红.银行特许权价值和稳健性的关系研究[D].东华大学,2011.
    [158]邵英昕.银行业稳健经营与宏观经济政策[J].世界经济,1999(5):21-23.
    [159]盛朝晖.中国货币政策传导渠道效应分析:1994一2004[J].金融研究,2006(7):22-29.
    [160]盛松成,吴培新.中国货币政策的二元传导机制[J].经济研究,2008(10):37-51.
    [161]孙明华.我国货币政策传导机制的实证分析[J].财经研究,2004(3):19-30.
    [162]谭中,粟芳.货币政策、市场约束与银行风险承担行为的实证分析[J].上海财经大学学报.2011(5):57-65.
    [163]唐建伟,李明扬,史智宇.资产价格波动与银行系统稳定[J].财贸经济,2006(12):3-10.
    [164]万军,谢敏,熊正德.金融市场间波动溢出效应研究[J].统计与决策,2007,18:038.
    [165]万晓莉.中国1987~2006年金融体系脆弱性的判断和测度[J].金融研究,2008(6):80-93.
    [166]王国松.通货紧缩下我国货币政策传导的信贷渠道实证分析[J].统计研究,2004(5):6-11.
    [167]王淼,陈守东.董事会治理对银行稳健性的影响[J].经济与管理研究,2013(3):82-87.
    [168]王千红.金融体系的稳健与宏观调控的有效性[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2002.
    [169]王振山,王志强.我国货币政策传导途径的实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2000(12):60-63.
    [170]伍志文.金融脆弱性:理论及基于中国的经验分析(1991-2000)[J].经济评论,2003(2):96-100.
    [171]伍志文.我国银行体系脆弱性的理论分析及实证考察[J].金融论坛,2003(1):2-9.
    [172]伍志文.中国银行体系脆弱性状况及其成因实证分析(1978-2000)[J].金融研究,2002(12):21-37.
    [173]夏斌,廖强.货币供应量已不宜作为当前我国货币政策的中介目标[J].经济研究,2001(8):33-43.
    [174]夏德仁,张洪武,程智军.货币政策传导的信贷渠道述评[J].金融研究,2003(5):36-42.
    [175]谢福座.基于GARCH-Copula-CoVaR模型的风险溢出测度研究[J].金融发展研究,2010,12:004.
    [176]邢天才,孙进,汪川.从金融危机到经济危机——基于“金融加速器”理论的视角[J].国际金融研究,2011(11):21-29.
    [177]徐明东,陈学彬.货币环境、资本充足率与商业银行风险承担[J].金融研究.2012(7):48-62.
    [178]杨璐,刘金全.货币政策与长期利率之间关系的实证研究[J].现代管理科学,2013(12):21-23.
    [179]尤启明,殷世贵.银行体系脆弱性的理论文献回顾[J].产业与科技论坛,2009(1):131-133.
    [180]于一,何维达.货币政策、信贷质量与银行风险偏好的实证检验[J].国际金融研究.2011(12):59-68.
    [181]虞伟荣,胡海鸥.论金融风险监控指标体系的最新发展—IMF金融稳健性指标评价体系评介[J].外国经济与管理,2004(5):32-37.
    [182]袁芳英.银行体系稳定性的宏观压力测试研究[D].上海社会科学院,2010.
    [183]曾爱婷.资产价格波动、银行体系稳定与我国货币政策的完善[J].上海金融,2009(1):48-51.
    [184]张桂霞.国际资本流动背景下我国银行体系稳定机制研究[D].河海大学.2007.
    [185]张洪涛,段小茜.金融稳定有关问题研究综述[J].国际金融研究,2006(5):65-74.
    [186]张荔.论过度的金融自由化对金融体系脆弱性的助推作用[J],经济评论,2001(1):125-128.
    [187]张荣峰.开放经济下宏观经济政策与银行稳定[J].金融纵横,2007(23):38-41.
    [188]张荣峰.利率超调对银行稳定的冲击效应[J].广西金融研究,2008(5):25-27.
    [189]张瑞锋.金融市场协同波动外溢分析及实证研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2006(10):142-148.
    [190]张雪兰,何德旭,李睿.宏观经济波动与中国银行体系的稳定[J].宏观经济研究,2010(12):15-23.
    [191]张雪兰,何德旭.货币政策立场与银行风险承担——基于中国银行业的实证研究(2000—2010)[J].经济研究.2012(5):31-44.
    [192]赵留彦,王一鸣. AB股之间的信息流动与波动外溢[J].金融研究,2003(10):39-51.
    [193]郑鸣.我国银行体系的脆弱性与市场化改革[J].中国经济问题,2003(3):45-52.
    [194]周小川.金融政策对金融危机的响应——宏观审慎政策框架的形成背景,内在逻辑和主要内容[J].金融研究,2011(1):1-14.
    [195]周英章,蒋振声.货币渠道、信用渠道与货币政策有效性——中国1993-2001年的实证分析和政策含义[J].金融研究,2002(9):34-43.
    [196]邹薇.银行体系稳定性——理论及基于中国的实证研究[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2005.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700