企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效研究
|
摘要
知识经济背景下,创新与学习对组织的发展至关重要。在动态竞争的发展环境中,众多的企业深刻认识到不仅要根据自身的核心知识和能力制定相应的竞争战略,同样也需要不断地进行组织学习,通过组织学习建立自身的竞争优势。因而组织学习能力越来越成为组织最重要的核心能力之一,是组织生存与发展的关键。
相当多的研究表明社会资本是影响高新技术企业绩效(包括技术创新绩效)的关键因素。许多企业在努力构建社会资本,而且有关社会资本是否以及如何影响企业技术创新绩效的研究也逐渐被学者重视。目前的研究已经证实:高新技术企业的外部关系对于企业获取知识和进行学习至关重要。然而,关于企业社会资本如何影响企业组织学习和企业技术创新绩效的研究却很少。近些年来,通过在全国各地建立高新技术工业园,中国的高新技术企业通过技术研究与开发,或政府通过实行优惠的政策鼓励外商在工业园建立研究与开发基地,中国的技术创新取得了巨大的进步。通过考察我国高新技术企业的社会资本、组织学习的现状、我国高新技术企业的社会资本及组织学习是否影响以及如何影响企业的技术创新绩效,这些都成为我国企业实践过程中亟需解决的问题,是企业经营战略的理论和技术基础,其结论具有重要的理论和现实意义。
在研究方法方面,采用规范研究与实证研究相结合的方法,遵循“文献阅读与访谈——提出假设——形成问卷和调查数据——实证分析(证实或者证伪假设)——形成结论”的研究思路,具体包括两个方面:(1)结合研究主题,在对相关文献进行研究的基础上,通过逻辑推理和理论分析,建立相应的理论框架,并提出一系列待检验的假设。(2)在总结前人研究的基础上,设计合适的调查问卷。对通过问卷调研方式获取的第一手资料进行数据分析,在进行数据分析时,首先进行效度和信度检验;然后采用验证性因子分析、多元回归分析等方法,对理论框架和相应假设进行检验。
以山东的高新技术企业为研究对象,在提出和验证企业社会资本测量维度的基础之上,全面系统地研究了企业社会资本、组织学习与技术创新绩效的关系,运用模型构建和统计验证等一系列研究方法及SPSS计量统计工具。明晰了企业社会资本与组织学习和技术创新绩效的关系。研究发现,企业社会资本的三个维度(结构维度、关系维度和认知维度)对于企业的组织学习和技术创新绩效具有不同程度的影响,利用式学习和探索式学习对企业技术创新绩效有不同程度的影响,而且它们相互作用会影响技术创新绩效。
(1)企业社会资本的结构维度(包括权力、联系的稳定性、产业内管理者纽带和产业间管理者纽带)对于利用式学习和探索式学习具有不同的影响。权力与利用式学习和探索式学习都呈正相关的关系。联系的稳定性与利用式学习和探索式学习都呈正相关的关系。产业内管理者纽带与利用式学习和探索式学习都呈正相关的关系。产业间管理者纽带使得企业从产业外获得了与自己从事的领域根本不同的信息和考虑问题的视角,管理者从产业外部获得的多种多样的信息可能会干扰企业巩固和加强自己的主导产业,从而阻碍利用式学习,但是会促进探索式学习。(2)企业社会资本的关系维度(包括信任、义务和期望)对于利用式学习和探索式学习具有不同的影响。信任促进了利用式学习,同时也促进了探索式学习。至于义务和期望,企业成员在未来从事某项活动的承诺或责任可以促进企业的利用式学习,但是并不能明显地促进探索式学习。(3)企业社会资本的认知维度(包括一致性和共同愿景)对组织学习具有积极的或中性的关系。一致性通过促进资源交换和重组提高了企业的利用式学习,但一致性不足以影响到企业的探索式学习。共同愿景促进了企业的探索式学习。由于存在共同愿景,就可以减少企业内其他成员行为的不确定性,从而可以促使企业能够有更多的机会在新领域进行建设性的探索。(4)企业社会资本的结构维度、关系维度和认知维度对于技术创新绩效都有正向的影响关系。这说明企业社会资本的三个方面都有助于企业提高技术创新绩效。(5)研究发现,利用式学习和技术创新绩效之间呈U形关系。探索式学习和技术创新绩效之间的关系是正相关关系,而且随着企业探索式学习程度的增加,企业技术创新的收益增加得越来越快。利用式学习和探索式学习各自都会对技术创新绩效有越来越多的回报,这表明随着更多地进行利用式学习或探索式学习,高新技术企业在学习过程中变得更加有效率,从而有更好的技术创新绩效。(6)如果企业同时进行利用式学习和探索式学习,而且这两个学习过程结合得较为紧密,应该会给企业的技术创新绩效带来消极的影响。如果利用式学习层次较低,提高探索式学习的水平能够提高企业的技术创新绩效。然而,如果探索式学习层次已经在较高水平上,提高利用式学习的水平会降低企业的技术创新绩效。
企业社会资本和组织学习作为技术创新理论研究的新视野,在国内外的研究均已经具有一段历史,但是将企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效相结合进行研究目前还很少见。在梳理和继承现有研究成果的基础上,本研究在以下三个方面具有较大的创新性:(1)提出企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效概念模型。在对企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效之间关系研究的文献综述的基础上,构建了企业社会资本影响探索式学习和利用式学习、探索式学习和利用式学习影响技术创新绩效的概念模型,提出相应的理论假设,并进行了验证。(2)区分了不同组织学习方式对企业技术创新绩效的贡献。以往的研究从静态角度分析不同组织学习方式对技术创新绩效影响时,大多采用独立分析各组织学习方式对技术创新绩效影响的研究思路。但是,各种组织学习方式之间可能会存在相互影响,完全剔除各种组织学习方式的交互作用很难全面解释组织学习对技术创新绩效影响的实际情况。基于这一点,探讨了不同组织学习方式对技术创新绩效的联合影响,弥补了前人研究的不足。(3)以往研究就组织学习的过程、组织学习对于知识转移的影响路径以及组织学习影响企业技术创新分别进行了深入研究,解释了组织学习为什么会促进企业技术创新、增强竞争优势,但是却忽视了企业社会资本对于组织学习的影响研究。事实上,影响组织学习的最重要的原因是企业社会资本。本研究针对山东省的高新技术企业,系统阐释了企业社会资本的各个维度如何通过组织学习影响企业技术创新绩效的问题,从而实现了社会资本、组织学习与技术创新研究的融合,拓展了组织学习的研究领域,拓展了组织学习理论。
企业社会资本这一研究领域尚处于起步阶段,目前关于企业社会资本的研究理论分析居多,定量研究较少,对于企业社会资本与技术创新绩效关系的实证研究也较为缺乏。如何通过企业的社会资本建设来提高技术创新能力已成为学术界和企业界比较关心的话题。特别地,传统的创新方式已开始朝着开放、合作、网络和动态整合的方向迈进。从企业社会资本理论和组织学习理论的角度来系统而全面的研究企业的技术创新绩效,是本研究的一个尝试。研究证明:投资于企业内部和外部的社会资本,有助于企业提高技术创新绩效。为了促进企业的探索式学习和利用式学习,高新技术企业应该创造有利于组织学习的氛围。此外,企业应当努力建立企业内外的各种联系,包括产业内外各企业的联系,以促进本企业增加现有知识的掌握和新领域知识的开拓。最后,应该通过让企业员工加强社会互动、分享共同愿景和参与企业决策的制定,使他们提高相互信任的水平,促进意见和观念的一致。高新技术企业应该认识到探索式学习和利用式学习的重要性。为了能够使高新技术企业求得生存并能获得发展,企业应该有意识地促进探索式学习和利用式学习的平衡。如果一个高新技术企业的利用式学习水平比较低,该企业应该采取措施加大探索式学习,以使企业获得较高的技术创新绩效。与此相反,当一个高新技术企业的探索式学习和利用式学习的水平都挺高时,这样的组织学习可能不利于企业提高技术创新绩效,这是因为探索式学习和利用式学习之间存在着固有的差异,如果探索式学习和利用式学习的水平都超过了一定的界限,会使企业没法进行有效管理。所以,保持企业两类组织学习的平衡是必要的。
In the background of knowledge economy, innovation and organizational learning is essential. In the development environment of dynamic competition, a large number of enterprises begin to profoundly understand that enterprises should not only formulate corresponding competitive strategy according to their own core knowledge and ability, but also continue the organizational learning, create their own competitive advantage through organizational learning. Organizational learning ability has begun to formulate one of the most important core competencies, and is the key for organizations to survive and develop.
Quite a number of studies have shown that social capital is a key factor that affects the performance of enterprise (including the technological innovation performance). Many enterprises take their efforts to build social capital, and whether the social capital affects the technological innovation performance of enterprises and how it affect the technological innovation performance of enterprises has attract many scholars. Current research has confirmed that external relations of high-tech enterprises are essential for the enterprises to acquire knowledge and learning, thus affect the performance of enterprises. However, research about internal and external social capital and how they affect the different types of enterprise learning and technological innovation performance of enterprises are few. In recent years, throughout the country established high-tech industrial park, through their own technical research and development, and through the introduction of preferential policies to encourage foreign investment to establish bases in the industrial park for research and development, China's technological innovations have made tremendous progress. This study focused on the organizational learning of high-tech enterprises, the study could be to some extent make-up for these shortcomings of above research. Investigating the status quo of social capital, organizational learning of China's high-tech enterprises, and whether the social capital and organizational learning affect the technological innovation performance, and how the social capital and organizational learning affect the technological innovation performance of China's high-tech enterprises have become the serious problems to be solved during the practice of China's enterprises, and are the fundamentals of theory and technology infrastructure of business strategy, so the conclusions have important theoretical and practical significance.
This study used a combination of methods of normative research and empirical research, following the research procedure of "reading the literature and interviews -proposing hypothetical - the formation of a questionnaire and survey data - empirical analysis (to confirm or falsifications hypotheses) - the formation of the conclusions", including two areas (1) Combining the theme of this study and on the basis of the research of corresponding literature, this paper establishes the theoretical framework and proposing a series of hypotheses to be tested by logical reasoning and theoretical analysis. (2) Designing an appropriate questionnaire based on the conclusion of previous studies. This study obtains the first-hand information for data analysis by way of questionnaire survey, during the process of data analysis, we test the validity and reliability firstly; then used confirmatory factor analysis, multiple regression analysis and other analytical methods to test the theoretical framework and the corresponding hypotheses of this article.
Useing the high-tech enterprises in Shandong as the research object, based on the providing and testing of the measurement of corporate social capital dimensions, this paper studied the relationship of corporate social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation performance in a comprehensive and systematic way. Comprehensively using a series of research methodology such as modeling and statistics and SPSS statistical tools, this paper made the relationship of corporate social capital and organizational learning and technological innovation performance clear. The research found that three dimensions (structural dimension, relational dimension and cognitive dimension) of corporate social capital had different impact on the exploiting learning and exploration learning of enterprises, and the exploiting learning and exploration learning of enterprises had different impact on the technological innovation performance of enterprises, and corporate social capital will also affect the technological innovation performance in a different way.
(1) Structural dimensions of corporate social capital (including the power, the stability of link, intra-industry manager ties and extra-industry manager ties) have different impact on exploiting learning and exploration learning. Power is positively related to both exploitative and exploratory learning. The stability of link is positively related to both exploitative and exploratory learning. Intra-industry manager ties positively related to both exploitative and exploratory learning. Extra-industry manager ties help enterprises gain exposure to diverse information and perspectives from outside their domain of knowledge, the diverse information may interfere with abilities to solidify or reinforce dominant industry perspectives, thus hinder exploitative learning. (2) Relational dimensions of corporate social capital (including trust and obligations and expectations) have different impact on exploiting learning and exploration learning. Trust promoted exploiting learning, but did not promote exploration learning. About obligations and expectations, the commitment and responsibility of business members engaging in an activity can promote the exploiting learning, but not obvious to promote exploration learning. (3) Cognitive dimension of corporate social capital (including consistency and a common vision) have a positive or neutral relationship on organizational learning. Consistency improved the utilization of exploiting learning through the promotion of exchange and the reorganization of resources, but not enough to affect the consistency of enterprises to exploration learning. Common vision promoted the exploration learning. Because of a common vision, we can reduce the uncertainty of actions of other members, so that we can make enterprises have more opportunities in new areas to constructive exploration. (4) The structural dimension, the relational dimension and the cognitive dimension of corporate social capital all have a positive impact on technological innovation performance. This shows that corporate social capital will help enterprises to improve technological innovation performance in three areas. (5)This paper found that exploiting learning and technological innovation performance was the U-shaped relationship, rather than inverted U-shaped relationship. The relationship between exploration learning and technological innovation performance is positive, along with the increase of exploration learning of enterprises, the extent of the increase in enterprise technological innovation increased more and more rapidly. The exploiting learning and exploration learning will be an increasing number of returns of their technological innovation performance in respectively, which shows that by exploiting learning and exploration learning, high-tech enterprises becomes more efficient in the learning process, and thereby have a better technological innovation performance. (6) If the enterprise have exploiting learning and exploration learning at the same time, and this combination of two learning process more closely, it should be a negative impact on technological innovation performance. If the level of exploiting learning is lower, raising the level of exploration learning can improve the technological innovation performance of enterprises. However, if the level of exploration learning is higher, improve the exploiting learning will decrease the technical innovation performance of enterprise.
As the new vision of theoretical studies of technological innovation, the study of corporate social capital has a long history both at home and abroad, but the study integrating corporate social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation performance as a combination is very rare at present. On the basis of carding and inheritance in the existing research results, this study has three greater innovations as follows (1) Proposing the conceptual model of corporate social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation performance. On the basis of literature review of the study of corporate social capital, organizational learning, technological innovation performance, and their relationship, this paper build conceptual model of corporate social capital affecting the exploration learning and exploiting learning, and the exploration learning and exploiting learning affecting technological innovation performance, and corresponding theoretical hypotheses. (2) Distinguishing the different contributions of organizational learning modes on technological innovation performance. Most of previous studies that analyze the different impact on the technological innovation performance of organizational learning used a static perspective by an independent analysis of the impact of organizational learning on technical innovation performance. However, the various organizational learning modes may have mutual influence; completely removing all kinds of interactions between organizational learning is very difficult to explain on a comprehensive study on the impact of technological innovation performance of the actual situation. For this reason, this research on the different impact of organizational learning on technological innovation performance explored a integration to make up for the shortcomings of previous studies. (3) Previous studies deeply research the process of organizational learning, affecting path on knowledge transfer by organizational learning, and organizational learning affecting corporate technological innovation, explain why organizational learning promote technological innovation and enhance competitive advantage, but have been ignored the research of the impact on organizational learning by corporate social capital. In fact, the most important reason that affects organizational learning is corporate social capital. Use high-tech enterprises in Shandong Province as sample, this study explains how the various dimensions of corporate social capital affect enterprise technological innovation performance through the organizational learning in a systematic way, thus comes to the implementation of the integration of research on social capital, organizational learning and technological innovative, expands the research areas of organizational learning and expands the organizational learning theory.
Corporate social capital is still at the initial stage in this field of research, the current study of corporate social capital mostly focuses on theoretical analysis, the quantitative research is few, the empirical research of the relationship between corporate social capital and technological innovation performance are more rarely seen. How to enhance the ability of technological innovation by building corporate social capital has become more concerned both in the academic and business topics. In particular, the traditional innovation has started moving to the direction of the opening, cooperation, network and dynamic integration. Comprehensively and systematically studying of the technological innovation performance of enterprises from the perspective of social capital theory is the attempt of this paper. This paper found that investing in internal and external social capital would help enterprises to improve technological innovation performance. In order to facilitate enterprises to exploration learning and exploiting learning, high-tech enterprises should pay special attention to creating an atmosphere conducive to organizational learning. In addition, the enterprises should strive to establish a corporate culture and internal and external linkages, including the industry both inside and outside the enterprise in order to promote the enterprises to increase their existing knowledge and explore new areas of knowledge. Finally, it should be adopted to allow enterprises to enhance social interaction, sharing a common vision and participation in decision-making enterprises, so that the members of enterprises can improve the level of mutual trust, promote the consistency of views and ideas. High-tech enterprises should realize the importance of exploration learning and exploiting learning. In order to be able to survive and have access to the development, enterprises should consciously learn to promote the balance of exploration learning and exploiting learning. If a high-tech enterprise's exploiting learning level is low, the enterprises should take measures to exploration learning in order to enable enterprises to receive higher levels of technological innovation performance. On the contrary, when a high-tech enterprise's exploration learning and exploiting learning level are both high, this might not be conducive to organizational learning for enterprises to upgrade their technological innovation performance, this is because the exploration learning and exploiting learning have inherent differences, if the exploration learning and exploiting learning are more than a certain limits, enterprises will not be able to carry out effective business management. Therefore it is necessary for the enterprises to keep the balance of two types of organizational learning.
相当多的研究表明社会资本是影响高新技术企业绩效(包括技术创新绩效)的关键因素。许多企业在努力构建社会资本,而且有关社会资本是否以及如何影响企业技术创新绩效的研究也逐渐被学者重视。目前的研究已经证实:高新技术企业的外部关系对于企业获取知识和进行学习至关重要。然而,关于企业社会资本如何影响企业组织学习和企业技术创新绩效的研究却很少。近些年来,通过在全国各地建立高新技术工业园,中国的高新技术企业通过技术研究与开发,或政府通过实行优惠的政策鼓励外商在工业园建立研究与开发基地,中国的技术创新取得了巨大的进步。通过考察我国高新技术企业的社会资本、组织学习的现状、我国高新技术企业的社会资本及组织学习是否影响以及如何影响企业的技术创新绩效,这些都成为我国企业实践过程中亟需解决的问题,是企业经营战略的理论和技术基础,其结论具有重要的理论和现实意义。
在研究方法方面,采用规范研究与实证研究相结合的方法,遵循“文献阅读与访谈——提出假设——形成问卷和调查数据——实证分析(证实或者证伪假设)——形成结论”的研究思路,具体包括两个方面:(1)结合研究主题,在对相关文献进行研究的基础上,通过逻辑推理和理论分析,建立相应的理论框架,并提出一系列待检验的假设。(2)在总结前人研究的基础上,设计合适的调查问卷。对通过问卷调研方式获取的第一手资料进行数据分析,在进行数据分析时,首先进行效度和信度检验;然后采用验证性因子分析、多元回归分析等方法,对理论框架和相应假设进行检验。
以山东的高新技术企业为研究对象,在提出和验证企业社会资本测量维度的基础之上,全面系统地研究了企业社会资本、组织学习与技术创新绩效的关系,运用模型构建和统计验证等一系列研究方法及SPSS计量统计工具。明晰了企业社会资本与组织学习和技术创新绩效的关系。研究发现,企业社会资本的三个维度(结构维度、关系维度和认知维度)对于企业的组织学习和技术创新绩效具有不同程度的影响,利用式学习和探索式学习对企业技术创新绩效有不同程度的影响,而且它们相互作用会影响技术创新绩效。
(1)企业社会资本的结构维度(包括权力、联系的稳定性、产业内管理者纽带和产业间管理者纽带)对于利用式学习和探索式学习具有不同的影响。权力与利用式学习和探索式学习都呈正相关的关系。联系的稳定性与利用式学习和探索式学习都呈正相关的关系。产业内管理者纽带与利用式学习和探索式学习都呈正相关的关系。产业间管理者纽带使得企业从产业外获得了与自己从事的领域根本不同的信息和考虑问题的视角,管理者从产业外部获得的多种多样的信息可能会干扰企业巩固和加强自己的主导产业,从而阻碍利用式学习,但是会促进探索式学习。(2)企业社会资本的关系维度(包括信任、义务和期望)对于利用式学习和探索式学习具有不同的影响。信任促进了利用式学习,同时也促进了探索式学习。至于义务和期望,企业成员在未来从事某项活动的承诺或责任可以促进企业的利用式学习,但是并不能明显地促进探索式学习。(3)企业社会资本的认知维度(包括一致性和共同愿景)对组织学习具有积极的或中性的关系。一致性通过促进资源交换和重组提高了企业的利用式学习,但一致性不足以影响到企业的探索式学习。共同愿景促进了企业的探索式学习。由于存在共同愿景,就可以减少企业内其他成员行为的不确定性,从而可以促使企业能够有更多的机会在新领域进行建设性的探索。(4)企业社会资本的结构维度、关系维度和认知维度对于技术创新绩效都有正向的影响关系。这说明企业社会资本的三个方面都有助于企业提高技术创新绩效。(5)研究发现,利用式学习和技术创新绩效之间呈U形关系。探索式学习和技术创新绩效之间的关系是正相关关系,而且随着企业探索式学习程度的增加,企业技术创新的收益增加得越来越快。利用式学习和探索式学习各自都会对技术创新绩效有越来越多的回报,这表明随着更多地进行利用式学习或探索式学习,高新技术企业在学习过程中变得更加有效率,从而有更好的技术创新绩效。(6)如果企业同时进行利用式学习和探索式学习,而且这两个学习过程结合得较为紧密,应该会给企业的技术创新绩效带来消极的影响。如果利用式学习层次较低,提高探索式学习的水平能够提高企业的技术创新绩效。然而,如果探索式学习层次已经在较高水平上,提高利用式学习的水平会降低企业的技术创新绩效。
企业社会资本和组织学习作为技术创新理论研究的新视野,在国内外的研究均已经具有一段历史,但是将企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效相结合进行研究目前还很少见。在梳理和继承现有研究成果的基础上,本研究在以下三个方面具有较大的创新性:(1)提出企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效概念模型。在对企业社会资本、组织学习和技术创新绩效之间关系研究的文献综述的基础上,构建了企业社会资本影响探索式学习和利用式学习、探索式学习和利用式学习影响技术创新绩效的概念模型,提出相应的理论假设,并进行了验证。(2)区分了不同组织学习方式对企业技术创新绩效的贡献。以往的研究从静态角度分析不同组织学习方式对技术创新绩效影响时,大多采用独立分析各组织学习方式对技术创新绩效影响的研究思路。但是,各种组织学习方式之间可能会存在相互影响,完全剔除各种组织学习方式的交互作用很难全面解释组织学习对技术创新绩效影响的实际情况。基于这一点,探讨了不同组织学习方式对技术创新绩效的联合影响,弥补了前人研究的不足。(3)以往研究就组织学习的过程、组织学习对于知识转移的影响路径以及组织学习影响企业技术创新分别进行了深入研究,解释了组织学习为什么会促进企业技术创新、增强竞争优势,但是却忽视了企业社会资本对于组织学习的影响研究。事实上,影响组织学习的最重要的原因是企业社会资本。本研究针对山东省的高新技术企业,系统阐释了企业社会资本的各个维度如何通过组织学习影响企业技术创新绩效的问题,从而实现了社会资本、组织学习与技术创新研究的融合,拓展了组织学习的研究领域,拓展了组织学习理论。
企业社会资本这一研究领域尚处于起步阶段,目前关于企业社会资本的研究理论分析居多,定量研究较少,对于企业社会资本与技术创新绩效关系的实证研究也较为缺乏。如何通过企业的社会资本建设来提高技术创新能力已成为学术界和企业界比较关心的话题。特别地,传统的创新方式已开始朝着开放、合作、网络和动态整合的方向迈进。从企业社会资本理论和组织学习理论的角度来系统而全面的研究企业的技术创新绩效,是本研究的一个尝试。研究证明:投资于企业内部和外部的社会资本,有助于企业提高技术创新绩效。为了促进企业的探索式学习和利用式学习,高新技术企业应该创造有利于组织学习的氛围。此外,企业应当努力建立企业内外的各种联系,包括产业内外各企业的联系,以促进本企业增加现有知识的掌握和新领域知识的开拓。最后,应该通过让企业员工加强社会互动、分享共同愿景和参与企业决策的制定,使他们提高相互信任的水平,促进意见和观念的一致。高新技术企业应该认识到探索式学习和利用式学习的重要性。为了能够使高新技术企业求得生存并能获得发展,企业应该有意识地促进探索式学习和利用式学习的平衡。如果一个高新技术企业的利用式学习水平比较低,该企业应该采取措施加大探索式学习,以使企业获得较高的技术创新绩效。与此相反,当一个高新技术企业的探索式学习和利用式学习的水平都挺高时,这样的组织学习可能不利于企业提高技术创新绩效,这是因为探索式学习和利用式学习之间存在着固有的差异,如果探索式学习和利用式学习的水平都超过了一定的界限,会使企业没法进行有效管理。所以,保持企业两类组织学习的平衡是必要的。
In the background of knowledge economy, innovation and organizational learning is essential. In the development environment of dynamic competition, a large number of enterprises begin to profoundly understand that enterprises should not only formulate corresponding competitive strategy according to their own core knowledge and ability, but also continue the organizational learning, create their own competitive advantage through organizational learning. Organizational learning ability has begun to formulate one of the most important core competencies, and is the key for organizations to survive and develop.
Quite a number of studies have shown that social capital is a key factor that affects the performance of enterprise (including the technological innovation performance). Many enterprises take their efforts to build social capital, and whether the social capital affects the technological innovation performance of enterprises and how it affect the technological innovation performance of enterprises has attract many scholars. Current research has confirmed that external relations of high-tech enterprises are essential for the enterprises to acquire knowledge and learning, thus affect the performance of enterprises. However, research about internal and external social capital and how they affect the different types of enterprise learning and technological innovation performance of enterprises are few. In recent years, throughout the country established high-tech industrial park, through their own technical research and development, and through the introduction of preferential policies to encourage foreign investment to establish bases in the industrial park for research and development, China's technological innovations have made tremendous progress. This study focused on the organizational learning of high-tech enterprises, the study could be to some extent make-up for these shortcomings of above research. Investigating the status quo of social capital, organizational learning of China's high-tech enterprises, and whether the social capital and organizational learning affect the technological innovation performance, and how the social capital and organizational learning affect the technological innovation performance of China's high-tech enterprises have become the serious problems to be solved during the practice of China's enterprises, and are the fundamentals of theory and technology infrastructure of business strategy, so the conclusions have important theoretical and practical significance.
This study used a combination of methods of normative research and empirical research, following the research procedure of "reading the literature and interviews -proposing hypothetical - the formation of a questionnaire and survey data - empirical analysis (to confirm or falsifications hypotheses) - the formation of the conclusions", including two areas (1) Combining the theme of this study and on the basis of the research of corresponding literature, this paper establishes the theoretical framework and proposing a series of hypotheses to be tested by logical reasoning and theoretical analysis. (2) Designing an appropriate questionnaire based on the conclusion of previous studies. This study obtains the first-hand information for data analysis by way of questionnaire survey, during the process of data analysis, we test the validity and reliability firstly; then used confirmatory factor analysis, multiple regression analysis and other analytical methods to test the theoretical framework and the corresponding hypotheses of this article.
Useing the high-tech enterprises in Shandong as the research object, based on the providing and testing of the measurement of corporate social capital dimensions, this paper studied the relationship of corporate social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation performance in a comprehensive and systematic way. Comprehensively using a series of research methodology such as modeling and statistics and SPSS statistical tools, this paper made the relationship of corporate social capital and organizational learning and technological innovation performance clear. The research found that three dimensions (structural dimension, relational dimension and cognitive dimension) of corporate social capital had different impact on the exploiting learning and exploration learning of enterprises, and the exploiting learning and exploration learning of enterprises had different impact on the technological innovation performance of enterprises, and corporate social capital will also affect the technological innovation performance in a different way.
(1) Structural dimensions of corporate social capital (including the power, the stability of link, intra-industry manager ties and extra-industry manager ties) have different impact on exploiting learning and exploration learning. Power is positively related to both exploitative and exploratory learning. The stability of link is positively related to both exploitative and exploratory learning. Intra-industry manager ties positively related to both exploitative and exploratory learning. Extra-industry manager ties help enterprises gain exposure to diverse information and perspectives from outside their domain of knowledge, the diverse information may interfere with abilities to solidify or reinforce dominant industry perspectives, thus hinder exploitative learning. (2) Relational dimensions of corporate social capital (including trust and obligations and expectations) have different impact on exploiting learning and exploration learning. Trust promoted exploiting learning, but did not promote exploration learning. About obligations and expectations, the commitment and responsibility of business members engaging in an activity can promote the exploiting learning, but not obvious to promote exploration learning. (3) Cognitive dimension of corporate social capital (including consistency and a common vision) have a positive or neutral relationship on organizational learning. Consistency improved the utilization of exploiting learning through the promotion of exchange and the reorganization of resources, but not enough to affect the consistency of enterprises to exploration learning. Common vision promoted the exploration learning. Because of a common vision, we can reduce the uncertainty of actions of other members, so that we can make enterprises have more opportunities in new areas to constructive exploration. (4) The structural dimension, the relational dimension and the cognitive dimension of corporate social capital all have a positive impact on technological innovation performance. This shows that corporate social capital will help enterprises to improve technological innovation performance in three areas. (5)This paper found that exploiting learning and technological innovation performance was the U-shaped relationship, rather than inverted U-shaped relationship. The relationship between exploration learning and technological innovation performance is positive, along with the increase of exploration learning of enterprises, the extent of the increase in enterprise technological innovation increased more and more rapidly. The exploiting learning and exploration learning will be an increasing number of returns of their technological innovation performance in respectively, which shows that by exploiting learning and exploration learning, high-tech enterprises becomes more efficient in the learning process, and thereby have a better technological innovation performance. (6) If the enterprise have exploiting learning and exploration learning at the same time, and this combination of two learning process more closely, it should be a negative impact on technological innovation performance. If the level of exploiting learning is lower, raising the level of exploration learning can improve the technological innovation performance of enterprises. However, if the level of exploration learning is higher, improve the exploiting learning will decrease the technical innovation performance of enterprise.
As the new vision of theoretical studies of technological innovation, the study of corporate social capital has a long history both at home and abroad, but the study integrating corporate social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation performance as a combination is very rare at present. On the basis of carding and inheritance in the existing research results, this study has three greater innovations as follows (1) Proposing the conceptual model of corporate social capital, organizational learning and technological innovation performance. On the basis of literature review of the study of corporate social capital, organizational learning, technological innovation performance, and their relationship, this paper build conceptual model of corporate social capital affecting the exploration learning and exploiting learning, and the exploration learning and exploiting learning affecting technological innovation performance, and corresponding theoretical hypotheses. (2) Distinguishing the different contributions of organizational learning modes on technological innovation performance. Most of previous studies that analyze the different impact on the technological innovation performance of organizational learning used a static perspective by an independent analysis of the impact of organizational learning on technical innovation performance. However, the various organizational learning modes may have mutual influence; completely removing all kinds of interactions between organizational learning is very difficult to explain on a comprehensive study on the impact of technological innovation performance of the actual situation. For this reason, this research on the different impact of organizational learning on technological innovation performance explored a integration to make up for the shortcomings of previous studies. (3) Previous studies deeply research the process of organizational learning, affecting path on knowledge transfer by organizational learning, and organizational learning affecting corporate technological innovation, explain why organizational learning promote technological innovation and enhance competitive advantage, but have been ignored the research of the impact on organizational learning by corporate social capital. In fact, the most important reason that affects organizational learning is corporate social capital. Use high-tech enterprises in Shandong Province as sample, this study explains how the various dimensions of corporate social capital affect enterprise technological innovation performance through the organizational learning in a systematic way, thus comes to the implementation of the integration of research on social capital, organizational learning and technological innovative, expands the research areas of organizational learning and expands the organizational learning theory.
Corporate social capital is still at the initial stage in this field of research, the current study of corporate social capital mostly focuses on theoretical analysis, the quantitative research is few, the empirical research of the relationship between corporate social capital and technological innovation performance are more rarely seen. How to enhance the ability of technological innovation by building corporate social capital has become more concerned both in the academic and business topics. In particular, the traditional innovation has started moving to the direction of the opening, cooperation, network and dynamic integration. Comprehensively and systematically studying of the technological innovation performance of enterprises from the perspective of social capital theory is the attempt of this paper. This paper found that investing in internal and external social capital would help enterprises to improve technological innovation performance. In order to facilitate enterprises to exploration learning and exploiting learning, high-tech enterprises should pay special attention to creating an atmosphere conducive to organizational learning. In addition, the enterprises should strive to establish a corporate culture and internal and external linkages, including the industry both inside and outside the enterprise in order to promote the enterprises to increase their existing knowledge and explore new areas of knowledge. Finally, it should be adopted to allow enterprises to enhance social interaction, sharing a common vision and participation in decision-making enterprises, so that the members of enterprises can improve the level of mutual trust, promote the consistency of views and ideas. High-tech enterprises should realize the importance of exploration learning and exploiting learning. In order to be able to survive and have access to the development, enterprises should consciously learn to promote the balance of exploration learning and exploiting learning. If a high-tech enterprise's exploiting learning level is low, the enterprises should take measures to exploration learning in order to enable enterprises to receive higher levels of technological innovation performance. On the contrary, when a high-tech enterprise's exploration learning and exploiting learning level are both high, this might not be conducive to organizational learning for enterprises to upgrade their technological innovation performance, this is because the exploration learning and exploiting learning have inherent differences, if the exploration learning and exploiting learning are more than a certain limits, enterprises will not be able to carry out effective business management. Therefore it is necessary for the enterprises to keep the balance of two types of organizational learning.
引文
[1]人民日报:中共中央国务院关于实施科技规划纲要增强自主创新能力的决定,2006年02月10日第1版。
[2]Yli-Renko,Helena,Erkko Autio & Harry J.Sapienza(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),587-613.
[3]孙永风,廖貅武,李垣:转型背景下中国企业基于社会资本的知识管理研究[J].北京:中国工业经济,2008(3):第118-126页。
[1]Wu,X.B.,Xu,G.N.& Wang,W.B.(2006),Technology Innovation of Developing Country in the Context of Globalization:A Case Study[A].Proceedings of International Technology and Innovation Conference(ITIC),(3):90-95.
[2]Huber,G.P.(1991),Organization Learnins:the Contributing Processes and the Literatures[J].Organization Science,2(1):88-115.
[1]Luo,Y.& Peng,M.W.(1999),Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy:Experience,Environment and Performance[J].Journal of International Business Studies,30(2),269-296.
[2]孙永风,廖貅武,李垣:转型背景下中国企业基于社会资本的知识管理研究[J].北京:中国工业经济,2008(3):第118-126页。
[3]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[4]王晓晖:学习型组织文化的差异与影响研究[J].北京:管理世界,2007(11):第76-86页。
[5]Kale,P.,Singh,H.& Perlmutter,H.(2000),Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances:Building Relational Capital[J].Strategic Management Journal,21:217-238.
[1]周小虎:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势[J].北京:中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
[2]Walfish,Daniel(2001),P&G China Lab Has Global Role[J].Research Technology Management,44(5),4-5.
[3]Buderi,Robert(2005),Microsoft:Getting from "R" to "D"[J].Technology Review,108(March),28-30.
[4]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[5]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[1]Teece,D.J.,Pisano,G.& Shuen,A.(1997),Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.[J],Srtategic Management,18:509-533.
[2]蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
[3]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[1]G.C.Loury(1997),Intergeneration Transfer and the Distribution of Earnings[J].Econometrical,176-179.
[2]Bourdieu P.(1985),The Forms of Capital[A].J.G.Richardson.Hand-book of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education[M].New York:Greenwood Inc.,241-258.
[3]Baker,W.(1990),Market Networks and Corporate Behavior[J].American Journal of Sociology(96):589-625.
[4]Bourdieu P.(1985),The Forms of Capital[A].J.G.Richardson.Hand-book of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education[M].New York:Greenwood Inc.,241-258.
[5]Putnam,R.D.(1993),Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press:36
[1]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press:66-69.
[2]LIN N.(1952),Social Resources and Instrumental Action[M].MARSDEN P,LIN N.Social Structure and Network Analysis.Beverly Hills,CA:Sage Publications,Inc.:131-145.
[3]LIN N.(2001),Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press:25.
[4]朱国宏:经济社会学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999:第84页。
[5]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[6]韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页.
[7]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Leenders R.Th.A.J.(1999),Gabbay S.M.Corporate Social Capital and Liability[M].Boston:Kluwer Inc.,3:98-103.
[1]Leenders R.Th.A.J.(1999),Gabbay S.M.Corporate Social Capital and Liability[M].Boston:Kluwer Inc.,3:98-103.
[2]边燕杰,丘海雄:企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):第87-99页。
[3]许萍:企业社会资本和环境适应[J].经济研究,2007(3):第51-52页。
[4]徐延辉:企业家的伦理行为与企业社会资本积累——一个经济学和社会学的比较框架分析[J].社会学研究,2002(6):第73-75页。
[5]武志伟:企业社会资本的内涵和功能研究[J].软科学,2003(5):第19-21页。
[6]王勇:企业社会资本对技术创新的影响[J].改革,2006(2):第13-15页。
[7]宇红:信任与企业家社会资本[J].社会科学辑刊,2006(5):第49-53页。
[8]韦影:企业社会资本与技术创新——基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(9):第119-126页。
[1]Landry,R.,Amara,N.,et al.(2002),Does Social Capital Determine Innovation?To What Extent?[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,69,681-701.
[2]王利晓,惠宁:企业社会资本研究文献综述[J].西安邮电学院学报,2007(6):第79-82页。
[3]韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页。
[4]张其仔:社会资本与国有企业绩效研究[J].当代财经,2000.182(1):第53-58页。
[1]边燕杰,丘海雄:企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):第87-99页。
[2]Cooke,P.& Clifton,N.(2002),Social Capital,and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom,Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-Economy:Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives[R].Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht Amsterdam,122-167.
[3]陈劲,李飞宇:社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001.19(3):第103-107页。
[4]张方华:知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2004:第13页。
[5]郑胜利,陈国智:企业社会资本积累与企业竞争优势[J].生产力研究,2002(1):第133-137页。
[1]Westlund,H.(2003),Implications of Social Capital for Business in the Knowledge Economy:Theoretical Considerations[C].International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital,Tokyo,Japan:75.
[2]Putnam,R.D.(1993),Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press:36.
[3]格鲁特尔特,贝斯特纳尔:社会资本在发展中的作用[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004:第34-78页。
[4]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,22,587-613.
[5]Landry,R.,Amara,N.,et al.(2002),Does Social Capital Determine Innovation? To What Extent?[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,69,681-701.
[1]Nahapiet J.,Ghoshal S.(1997),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital and the Creation of Value in Firms[J].Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings:35-39.
[2]Tsai,Wanpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Managemant Journal,41(4),464-476.
[3]王霄,胡军:社会资本结构与中小企业创新[J].管理世界,2005(7):第116-122页。
[1]王勇:企业社会资本的国内研究进展与趋势展望[J].当代经济管理,2008(10):第14-18页。
[2]韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页。
[3]Cohen,D.& Prusak,L.(2000),In Good Company:How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work[M].Harvard MA:Harvard Business School Press:65-77.
[4]Todeva,E.& Knoke,D.(2002),Strategic Alliance and Corporate Social Capital[A].Allmendinger,J.and Hinz,T.Sociology of Organizations[M].K,lner Zeitschrift:Sociology and Social psychologies:46-99.
[5]赵延东:社会资本理论的新进展[J].国外社会科学,2003(3):第54-59页。
[1]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[2]泰勒:科学管理原理[M].上海科学技术出版社,1982:第45-55页。
[3]郭咸纲:西方管理思想史[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004:第56-87页。
[4]Match J,Simon H.(1958),Organizational learning[M].New York:Wiley:54-79.
[5]Cangelosi V.E.,Dill W.R.(1965),Organizational Lemming:Observation toward a Theory[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,10:175-203.
[1]Argyris,Schon(1978),Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Reading,MA:Addiong -Wesley:15-42.
[2]Fulmer R.M,Gibbs P.,Keys J.B.(1998),The Second Generation Learning Organizations.Organizational Dynamics[J].27(3):7-19.
[3]谢洪明,韩子天:组织学习与绩效的关系:创新是中介变量吗?——珠三角地区企业的实证研究及其启示[J].科研管理,2005(5):第1-10页。
[4]March J,Simon H.(1958),Organizational Learning[M].New York:Wiley:54-79.
[5]Argyris,Schon(1978),Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Reading,MA:Addiong -Wesley:15-42.
[6]Hedberg,R.(1981),How Organizations Learn and Unlearn[M].in Handbook of Organizational Design,Vol.1.1,P.C.Nystrom and W.H.Starbuck(eds.),3-27,Oxford.
[7]Fiol,C.& Mlyles,M.(1985),Organizational Learning[J].Academy of Management Review,10(4):132-133.
[8]Nonaka L.,Takenchi H.(1995),The Knowledge-Creating Company:How Japanese Companies Creating the Dynamics of Innovation[M].Oxford University Press:57-88.
[9]Levitt,B.& March,J.(1988),Organizational Learning[J].Annual Review of Sociology,14,157-163.
[1]Gherardi,S.& Nicolini,D.(2000),The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice[J].Journal of Management Inquiry.9(1),7.
[2]蒋天颖,施放:企业组织学习维度结构的实证分析[J].浙江社会科学,2008(5):第87-93页。
[3]Meister J C.(2000),The CEO Driven Leaning Culture?[J].the Internal Auditor,58(5):38-45.
[4]Nevis E.C,Dibella A.J,Gould J.M.(1995),Understanding Organizations as Learning System[J].Sloan Management Review,36(2):73-95.
[5]Marquardt,M.J.(1996),Building the Learning Organization:a Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success[M].New York:McGraw-Hill:156-168.
[6]Swee Goh(1998),Toward a Learning Organization:the Strategic Building Blocks[J].Sam Advanced Management Journal,spring:15-22.
[1]Sinkula,Baker & Noordewier(1997),A Framework for Market-based Organizational Learning:Linking Values,Knowledge and Behavior[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2(5):305-318.
[2]Watkins Marsick(1993),Sculpting the Learning Organization[M].San Francisco.CA:Jossey-bass:43-55.
[3]Watkins Marsick(2003),Demonstrating the Value of an Organization's Learning Culture:The Dimensions of the Learning Orsanization Questionnaire[J].Advances in Developing Human Resources,5(2):132-151.
[5]Hult G.Tomas M & Ferrell O.C.A.(1997),Global Learning Organization Structure and Market Information Processing[J].Journal of Business Research,2:155-166.
[6]Ariede Geus(1997),The Living Company[M].Harvard Business School Press:56.
[1]March,James G & J.P.Olsen(1975),The Uncertainty of the Past:Organizational Learning under Ambiguity[J].European Journal of Political Research,3,147-171.
[2]Hedberg,R.(1981),How Organizations Learn and Unlearn[M].in Handbook of Organizational Design,Vol.1.1,P.C.Nystrom and W.H.Starbuck(eds.),3-27,Oxford.
[1]Lyles,M.A.(1988),Learning Among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms[J].MIR Special Issue,85-97.
[2]Meyers,P.W.(1990),Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms[J].Research Policy,Vol.19,97-115.
[1]Fulmer,R.M.(1994),A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn[J].Planning Review,Vol.22,Iss.3,20-24.
[2]March,J.G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2:71-87.
[3]Knott,A.M(2002),Exploration and Exploitation as Complements[M].In N.Bontis & C.W.Choo(eds.),The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge:A Collection of Readings,Oxford University Press,New York,339-358.
[1]于小涵:组织学习过程模型的比较研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(1):第85-86页。
[1]许冠南:关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于探索型学习的中介机制[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2008:第49页。
[1]Crossan,M.M.,Lane,H.W.& White,R.E.(1999),An Organizational Learning Framework:From Intuition to Institution[J].Academy of Management Review,24(3),522-537.
[2]Bontis,N.,Crossan,M.M.,& Hulland,J.(2002),Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows[J].Journal of Management Studies,39(4),437-469.
[3]Lewm,A.Y.,Long,C.P.& Carroll,T.N.(1999),The Co-evolution of New Organizational Forms[J].Organization Science,10,535-550.
[4]Zahra,S.A.,Nielsen,A.P.& Bogner,W.C.(1999),Corporate Entrepreneurship,Knowledge and Competence Development[J].Entreprenenrship Theory and Practice,24,169-159.
[5]Van Wijk,R.,Van den Bosch,F.A.J.& Volberda,H.W.(2003),Knowledge and Networks[M].In M.Easter by-Smith,et al.(eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management,428-453,Malden,MA,Blackwell Pub.
[1]March,J.G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2:71-87.
[2]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第2-4页。
[3]亚当·斯密:国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988,第243页。
[1]N.Rosenberg(1982),Inside the Black Box:Technology and Economics[M],Cambridge University Press:3,34,106.
[2]马克思:资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:第410页。
[3]马克思:资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:第533-535页。
[4]柳卸林:技术创新经济学[M].中国经济出版社,1993:第55-57页。
[5]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第2-74页。
[1]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第3页。
[2]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第73-74页。
[3]罗斯托(Rostow,W.N.):从起飞进入持续增长的经济学[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1988:第34-57页。
[4]http://www.chineseall.net/chineseall/BookDisplay,external.html.
[1]http://www.chineseall.net/chineseall/BookDisplay.external.html.
[2]Chris Freeman:工业创新经济学[J].北京:北京大学出版社,2004年7月,第42页。
[3]傅家骥,仝允桓,高建:技术创新学[J].北京:清华大学出版社,1998,第78页。
[4]彭玉冰,白国红:谈企业技术创新与政府行为[J].经济问题,1999(7),第35-36页。
[5]Werker,Claudia(2001),Knowledse and Organization Strategy in Innovation System[J].International Journal of Innovation Management,Mar.(Vol.5 Issue):105-106.
[6]Janszen F.H.A.(2002),Dynamic Business Modeling as a Management Tool that Support the Development and Testing of Innovation Strategies,IE MC'98 Proceedings[D].International Conference 11-13.408-412.
[1]Rothwell.R.et al.(1974),SAPPHO Updated[J].Research Policy,November:57-98.
[2]陈伟:创新管理[M].科学出版社,1998:第47-78页。
[3]Cooper,R.G.& Kleinschmidt,E.J.(1987),Success Factors in Product Innovation[J].Industrial Marketing Management,Vol.16 No.3,215-223.
[4]Rothwell,R.(1992),Successful Industrial Innovation:Critical Factors for the 1990's[J].R&D Management 22:221-239.
[5]高建,傅家骥:中国企业技术创新的关键问题:1051家企业技术创新调查分析[J].中外科技政策与管理,1996(1):第24-33页。
[1]路应金等:技术创新风险分析[M].电子科技大学社科版,2003年6月,第101-105页。
[2]方新:过渡经济条件下的中国企业技术创新研究[J].中国科技论坛,1998(2):第37-40页。
[3]赵曙东:高新企业技术创新和发展的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999(12):第63-65页。
[1]周庄,王宏达:国有大中型工业企业技术创新影响因素的调查分析[J].天津经济,2001(5):第56-62页。
[2]许小东:技术创新的成败归因及其对创新行为的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(2):第28-30页。
[3]高洪深,丁娟娟:企业知识管理[M].清华大学出版社,2003年11月,第200-207页。
[4]官建成:中欧工业创新的比较分析《中国创新管理前沿》(柳卸林主编)[M].北京理工大学出版社,2004年5月,第215-230页。
[1]朱有为:中国制造业的技术创新绩效研究[D].东南大学博士学位论文,2007:第18-22页。
[2]Hagedoorn,J.,Cloodt,M.(2003),Measuring Innovative Performance:Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple in Dictators?[J].Research Policy,32,1365-1379.
[1]高建,汪剑飞,魏平:企业技术创新绩效指标:现状、问题和新概念模型[J].科研管理,2004(5):第45-47页。
[2]Hagedoorn,J.,Cloodt,M.(2003),Measuring Innovative Performance:Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple in Dictators?[J].Research Policy,32,1365-1379.
[3]Gem(u|¨)den,H.G.,Riter,T.,& Heydebreck,F.(1996),Network Configuration and Innovation Success:an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(5):449-462.
[4]Hagedoorn,J.,Cloodt,M.(2003),Measuring Innovative Performance:Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple in Dictators?[J].Research Policy,32,1365-1379.
[5]韦影:企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于吸收能力的视角[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006:第54-57页。
[1]Gem(u|¨)den,H.G.,Riter,T.,&Heydebreck,F.(1996),Network Configuration and Innovation Success:an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(5):449-462.
[2]陈劲,陈钰芬:企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):第86-91页。
[1]Cooper,R.G.(1984),New Product Strategies:What Distinguishes the Top Performers?[J].Journal of product Innovation Manage,1(2):151-64.
[2]Gem(u|¨)den,H.G.,Riter,T.,&Heydebreck,F.(1996),Network Configuration and Innovation Success:an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(5):449-462.
[3]Ritter,T,Gem(u|¨)den H.G.(2003),Network Competence:its Impact on Innovation Success and its Antecedents.Journal of Business Research[J],56:1437-1458.
[1]陈学光:网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007:第48-52页。
[2]陈学光:网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007:第52页。
[1]王国进,王其藩:企业技术创新能力评价研究的新进展[J].科研管理,2004(2):第32-38页。
[2]陈劲,陈钰芬:企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):第86-91页。
[1]尹建海,杨建华:基于加强型平衡记分法的企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科研管理,2008(1):第1-7页。
[2]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[1]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,66-69.
[2]Coleman,J.(1988),Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J].The American Journal of Sociology,94(Supplement):95-120.
[3]Uzzi,B.(1996),The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations:the Network Effect[J].American Sociological Review,61:674-698.
[4]Granovetter,M.S.(1973),The Strength of Weak Ties[J].American Journal of Sociology,78:1360-1380.
[5]Leana,C.R.,Buren,H.J.(1999),Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices[J].Academy of Management Review,24:538-555.
[6]Dyer,J.H.(2000),Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,21:345-367.
[1]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,66-69.
[1]Kale,P.,Singh,H.& Perimutter,H.(2000),Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances:Building Relational Capital[J].Strategic Management Journal,21:217-238.
[2]Kang,S.C.,Morris,& S.S.,Snell,S.A.(2007),Relational Archetypes,Organizational Learning,and Value Creation:Extending the Human Resource Architecture[J].Academy of Management Review,32:236-256.
[3]Kang,S.C.,Morris,& S.S.,Snell,S.A.(2007),Relational Archetypes,Organizational Learning,and Value Creation:Extending the Human Resource Architecture[J].Academy of Managemant Review,32:236-256.
[4]Jones,G.R.George,J.M(1998),The Experience and Evolution of Trust:Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork[J].Academy of Management Review,23:531-546.
[1]Leana,C.R.,Buren,H.J.(1999),Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices[J].Academy of Management Review,24:538-555.
[2]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[3]Gant,J.,Ichniowski,C.& Shaw,K.(2002),Social Capital and Organizational Change in High Involvement and Traditional Work Organizations[J].Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,11:289-328.
[4]Henderson,R.M.,Clark,K.B.(1990),Architectural Innovation:the Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,35:9-30.
[5]Dyer,J.H.(2000),Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,21:345-367.
[1]Nonaka,I.(1991),The Knowledge-creating Company[J].Harvard Business Review,69(6):96-104
[2]Lane,P.J.& Lubatkin,M.(1998),Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,19:461-477
[3]谢洪明,蓝海林:动态竞争与战略网络[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004,第4页。
[4]方世杰:在台外商研发投资与台湾知识流通体系之影响[M].(台湾)管理学报,2002,19(1):第147-174 页。
[1]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[2]Drucker,P.(1993),Post Capitalist Society[M].London:Butter worth Heinemann,25-27.
[3]吴翠花等:联盟网络社会资本对知识转移影响路径研究[J].科学学研究,2008(5):第57-63页。
[4]Wu X,Wei Y.(2004),The Analysis on Competitive Advantage of Firms in the Context of Synergic Development:Based on the Perspective of Social Capital[C].Singapore:International Engineering Management Conference,78-97.
[5]吴翠花:联盟网络环境下科技型中小企业知识创造能力与组织绩效关系实证研究[D].西安交通大学博士学位论文,2006:第44-47页。
[1]林健,李焕荣:战略网络对企业绩效影响分析[J].科研管理,2003(4):第87-92页。
[2]Hamel G.(1991),Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal,12:83-103.
[3]西格法德·哈里森:日本的技术与创新管理:从寻求技术诀窍到寻求合作者[M].北京:北京大学出版社.2004,第1-7页。
[4]李惠斌,杨冬雪:社会资本与社会发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000,第56-73页。
[5]Uzzi,B.(1996),The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations:the Network Effect[J].American Sociological Review,61:674-698.
[6]Coleman,J.(1988),Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J].The American Journal of Sociology,94(Supplement):95-120.
[7]方世杰:在台外商研发投资与台湾知识流通体系之影响[M].(台湾)管理学报,2002,19(1):第147-174页。
[8]Uzzi,B.(1996),The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations:the Network Effect[J].American Sociological Review,61:674-698.
[1]Morgan,R M.& Hunt,S D.(1994),The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing[J].Journal of Marketing,58(3):20-38.
[2]Dyer,J.H.(2000),Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,21:345-367.
[3]谢洪明等:社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究[J].管理工程学报,2008(1):第5-10页。
[4]Prahalad,C.K.,Hamel,G.(1990),The Core Competence of the Organization[J].Harvard Business Review,68:79-91.
[1]Benncr,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[2]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,66-69.
[3]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[4]蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与缋效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
[1]曹亚东等:先进制造技术与创新能力;组织学习的视角[J].现代管理科学,2008(7):第56-62页。
[2]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[1]谢洪明等:市场导向与组织绩效的关系:组织学习与创新的影响[J].管理世界,2006(2):第80-97页。
[1]吕毓芳:论领导行为、组织学习、创新与绩效间相关性研究[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2005:第67-69页。
[2]Stinchcombe,Arthur L.(1965),Social Structure in Organizations[M],Handbook of Organizations,J.G.March,ed.Chicago:Rand McNally,142-193.
[3]Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
[1]Dubini,Paola & Howard Aldrich(1991),Personal and Extended Networks Are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process[J].Journal of Business Venturing,6(5),305-313.
[2]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[3]谢洪明等:社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究[J].管理工程学报,2008(1):第5-10页。
[1]Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[1]Pablos,P O.D.(2005),Western and Eastern Views on Social Networks[J].The Learning Organization,12(5):436-456.
[1]Pablos,P O.D.(2005),Western and Eastern Views on Social Networks[J].The Learning Organization,12(5):136-456.
[2]Bolino,M.C.,Tumley,W.H.& Bloodgood,J.M.(2002),Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organizations[J].Academy of Management Review,27(4):505-522.
[3]Edelman,L.F.,Bresnen,M.,Newell,S.,et al.(2002),The Darker Side of Social Capital[C].Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge,Learning and Capabilities,Athens,57-89
[1]周小虎,陈传明:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势闭[J].中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
[1]蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[3]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[4]Lawrence,Thomas B.,Michael K.Mauws,Bruno Dyck,& Robert F.Kleysen(2005),The Politics of Organizational Learning:Integrating Power into the 41 Framework[J].Academy of Management Review,30(1),180-191.
[5]Nahapiet,Jauine & Sumautra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[6]Atuahene-Gima,Kwaku(1995),The Influence of New Product Factors on Export Propensity and Performance:An Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of International Marketing,3(2),9-26.
[1]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[2]Rowley,Tim,Dean Behrens,& David Krackhardt(2000),Redundant Governance Structures:An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries[J].Strategic Management Journal,21(3),369-386.
[3]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[4]He,Zi-Lin & Poh-Kam Wong(2004),Exploration vs.Exploitation:An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J].Organization Science,15(4),481-494.
[5]Levinthal,Daniel A.& James G.March(1993),The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,14(Winter Special Issue),95-112.
[6]Yli-Renko,Helena,Erkko Autio,& Harry J.Sapienza(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),587-613.
[7]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[1]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[1]Lawrence,Thomas B.,Michael K.Mauws,Bruno Dyck,& Robert F.Kleysen(2005),The Politics of Organizational Learning:Integrating Power into the 4I Framework[J].Academy of Management Review,30(1),180-191.
[2]Pfeffer,Jeffrey(1981),Power in Organizations.Marshfield[D].MA:Pitman:87.
[3]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[4]Hofstede,Geert(1991),Culture and Organizations:Software of the Mind[M].London:McGraw-Hill:56-89.
[5]Atuahene-Gima & Felicitas Evangelista(2000),Cross-Functional Influence in New Product Development:An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R&D Perspectives[J].Management Science,46(October),1269-1284.
[6]Eisenhardt,Kathleen M.(1989),Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments[J].Academy of Management Journal,32(3),543-576.
[7]Edmondson,Amy C.(1999),The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations:A Group-Level Perspective[J].Organization Science,13(2),128-146.
[1]Fiol,C.Marlene(1994),Consensus,Diversity,and Learning in Organization[J].Organization Science,5(3),403-420.
[2]Eisenhardt,Kathleen M.(1989),Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments[J].Academy of Management Journal,32(3),543-576.
[3]Edmondson,Amy C.(1999),The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations:A Group-Level Perspective[J].Organization Science,13(2),128-146.
[4]Hurst,David K.,James C.Rush,& Roderick E.White(1989),Top Management Teams and Organizational Renewal[J].Strategic Management Journal,10(Special Issue),87-105.
[5]Hambrick,Donald C.& Phyllis A.Mason(1984),Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J].Academy of Management Review,9(2),193-206.
[6]Inkpen,A.C&Tsang,E.W.K.(2005),Social Capital,Networks,and Knowledge Transfer[J].Academy of Management Review,30(1):146-165.
[7]Lu,J.W.(2001),Network Development for Competitive Advantage:A Study of Subsidiary Networks and Alliance Networks[D].The University of Western Ontario,London,Ontario,143-167.
[1]Gulati,R.(1999),The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation[J].Strategic Management Journal,20:397-420.
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[3]Geletkanycz,Marta A.& Donald D.Hambrick(1997),The External Ties of Top Executives:Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4),654-681.
[4]Peng,Mike W.& Yadong Luo(2000),Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy:The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(3),486-501.
[5]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[1]Geletkanycz,Marta A.& Donald D.Hambrick(1997),The External Ties of Top Executives:Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4),654-681.
[2]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[3]Fukuyama,Francis(1995),Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity[M].New York:The Free Press:67-112.
[4]Tsai,Wenpin(2000),Social Capital,Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intra-organizational Linkages [J].Strategic Management Journal,21(9),925-939.
[5]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[1]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[2]Dooley,Robert S.& Gerald E.Fryxell(1999),Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent:The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams[J].Academy of Management Journal,42(4),389-402.
[3]Ford,Cameron M.& Dennis A.Gioia(2000),Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making[J].Journal of Management,26(4),705-732.
[4]Edmondson,Amy C.(1999),The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations:A Group-Level Perspective[J].Organization Science,13(2),128-146.
[5]Ford,Cameron M & Dennis A.Ginia(2000),Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making[J].Journal of Management,26(4),705-732.
[6]Coleman,J.(1990),Foundation of Social Theory[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,35-78.
[1]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghnshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[2]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[3]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[4]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[5]Hofstede,Geert(1991),Culture and Organizations:Software of the Mind[M].London:McGraw-Hill:56-89.
[6]Triandis,Harry C.(1995),Individualism and Collectivism[M].Boulder,CO:West view Press:78-112.
[7]Triandis,Harry C.(1995),Individualism and Collectivism[M].Boulder,CO:West view Press:78-112.
[8]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Iaquinto,Anthoy L.& James W.Fredrickson(1997),Top Management Team Agreement about the Strategic Decision Process:A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences[J].Strategic Management Journal,18(1),63-75.
[2]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[3]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1995),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,22,587-613.
[2]Cooke,P.& Clifton,N.(2002),Social Capital,and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom,Entreprenenrship in the Modern Space-economy:Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives[R].Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht Amsterdam,122-167.
[3]陈劲,李飞宇:社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001.19(3):第103-107页。
[4]张方华:知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2004:第154-163页。
[1]Shane,Scott(2000),Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunism[J].Organization Science,11(4),448-469.
[2]Cert.,Richard M.& James G.March(1963),A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs[M].NJ:Prentice Hall:56-122.
[3]Levinthal,Daniel A.& James G.March(1993),The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,14(Winter Special Issue),95-112.
[4]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[5]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[6]Ahuja,Gautam & Curba Morris Lampert(2001),Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation:A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),521-543.
[1]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[2]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[3]Levinthal,Daniel A.& James G.March(1993),The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,14(Winter Special Issue),95-112.
[4]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[5]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[6]Stinchcombe,Arthur L.(1965),Social Structure in Organizations[M].Handbook of Orgainzations,J.G.March,ed.Chicago:Rand McNally,142-193.
[7]Nerkar,Atul(2003),Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge[J].Management Science,49(2),211-229.
[1]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[2]Shane,Scott(2000),Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunism[J].Organization Science,11(4),448-469.
[3]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[4]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[5]Nerkar,Atul(2003),Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge[J].Management Science,49(2),211-229.
[6]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[1]Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
[2]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,22,587-613.
[1]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Iaquinto,Anthoy L.& James W.Fredrickson(1997),Top Management Team Agreement about the Strategic Decision Process:A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences[J].Strategic Management Journal,18(1),63-75.
[2]Nerkar,Atul(2003),Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge[J].Management Science,49(2),211-229.
[1]Katila,Riitta & Gantam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[2]Cert.,Richard M.& James G.March(1963),A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs[M].NJ:Prentice Hall:56-122.
[3]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
1. Adler, Paul S. & Seok-Woo Kwon (2002), Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept [J]. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ahuja, Gautam & Curba Morris Lampert (2001), Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 521-543.
3. Aiken, Leona S. & Stephen G. West (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions [M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Argyris, Schon (1978), Organizational Learning: A theory of Action Perspective [M]. Reading, MA: Addiong -Wesley: 15-42.
5. Ariede Geus (1997), The Living Company [M]. Harvard Business School Press:56.
6. Atuahene-Gima & Felicitas Evangelista (2000), Cross-Functional Influence in New Product Development: An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R&D Perspectives [J]. Management Science, 46(October), 1269-1284.
7. Atuahene-Gima (2003), The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? [J].Academy of Management Journal, 46 (3), 359-73.
8. Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku (1995), The Influence of New Product Factors on Export Propensity and Performance: An Empirical Analysis [J]. Journal of International Marketing, 3(2), 9-26.
9. Autio, Erkko, Harry J. Sapienza &James G. Almeida (2000), Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth [J].Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 909-924.
10. Baker, W. (1990), Market Networks and Corporate Behavior [J].American Journal of Sociology (96): 589-625.
11. Benner, Mary J. & Michael L. Tushman (2003), Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited [J]. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.
12. Bolino, M. C., Tumley, W. H. & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002), Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organizations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 505-522.
13. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. (2002), Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437-469.
14. Bourdieu P. (1985), The Forms of Capital [A]. J. G. Richardson. Hand-book of theory and research for the sociology of education [M]. New York: Greenwood Inc., 241-258.
15. Brown, Shona L. and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt (1995), Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions [J]. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 343-78.
16. Buderi, Robert (2005), Microsoft: Getting from "R" to "D" [J]. Technology Review, 108 (March), 28-30.
17. Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition [M].Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 66-69.
18. Cangelosi V. E., Dill W. R. (1965), Organizational Lemming: Observation Toward a Theory [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10: 175-203.
19. Cert., Richard M. & James G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs [M]. NJ: Prentice Hall: 56-122.
20. Chris Freeman: 工业创新经济学[J] .北京:北京大学出版社,2004年7月,第42页。
21. Cohen, D. & Prusak, L. (2000), In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work [M]. Harvard MA: Harvard Business School Press: 65-77.
22. Cohen, W.M & Levinthal, D.A. (1989), Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D [J]. The Economic Journal, 99(937), 569-586.
23. Coleman, J. (1988), Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): 95-120.
24. Coleman, J. (1990), Foundation of Social Theory [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 35-78.
25. Cooke, P. & Clifton, N. (2002), Social cCapital, and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom, Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-economy: Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives [R]. Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht Amsterdam, 122-167.
26. Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987), Success Factors in Product Innovation [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.16 No.3, 215-223.
27. Cooper, R. G. (1984), New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Top Performers? [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Manage, 1(2): 151-64.
28. Cortina, Jose M. (1993), What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1), 98-104.
29. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999), An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution [J]. Academy of Management Review,24(3), 522-537.
30. Cyert, Richard M. and James G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Dooley, Robert S. & Gerald E. Fryxell (1999), Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4),389-402.
32. Drucker, P. (1993), Post Capitalist Society [M]. London: Butter worth Heinemann, 25-27.
33. Dubini, Paola & Howard Aldrich (1991), Personal and Extended Networks Are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (5),305-313.
34. Dyer, J. H. (2000), Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyota Case [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345-367.
35. E, Rapoport J, Romeo A, Wagner S, Beardsley G. (1997), Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovation [J]. Quart J. Economics, May, 91:221-241.
36. Edelman, L .F., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., et al. (2002), The Darker Side of Social Capital [C]. Paper Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Athens, 57-89.
37. Edmondson, Amy C. (1999), The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective [J]. Organization Science, 13(2),128-146.
38. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3),543-576.
39. Ensley, Michael D., Allison W. Pearson, and Allen C. Amason (2002),Understanding the Dynamics of New Venture Top Management Teams:Cohesion, Conflict, and New Venture Performance [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365-386.
40. Evans, M.G. (1985), A Monte Carlo Study of the Effects on Correlated Method Variance in Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305-323.
41. Feeser, Henry R. and Gary E. Willard (1990), Founding Strategy and Performance: A Comparison of High and Low Growth High Tech Firms [J].Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2), 87-98.
42. Fiol, C. & Mlyles, M. (1985), Organizational Learning [J]. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 132-133.
43. Fiol, C. Marlene (1994), Consensus, Diversity, and Learning in Organization [J].Organization Science, 5(3), 403-420.
44. Ford, Cameron M. & Dennis A. Gioia (2000), Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making [J]. Journal of Management, 26(4),705-732.
45. Foss, Nicolai Juul & Torben Pedersen (2004), Organizing Knowledge Processes in the Multinational Corporation: An Introduction [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5), 340-349.
46. Fukuyama, Francis (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity [M]. New York: The Free Press: 67-112.
47. Fulmer R. M, Gibbs P., Keys J. B. (1998), The Second Generation Learning Organizations. Organizational Dynamics [J]. 27(3): 7-19.
48. Fulmer, R. M. (1994), A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn [J].Planning Review, Vol.22, Iss.3,20-24.
49. G. C. Loury (1997), Intergeneration Transfer and the Distribution of Earnings [J].Econometrical, 176-179.
50. Gant, J., Ichniowski, C. & Shaw, K. (2002), Social Capital and Organizational Change in High Involvement and Traditional Work Organizations [J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11: 289-328.
51. Geletkanycz, Marta A. & Donald D. Hambrick (1997), The External Ties of Top Executives: Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654-681.
52. Gemiiden, H.G., Riter, T., & Heydebreck, F. (1996), Network Configuration and Innovation Success: an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries [J].International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(5): 449-462.
53. Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2000), The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice [J]. Journal of Management Inquiry. 9(1), 7.
54. Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2001), The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice [J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1), 7.
55. Gimeno, J. (2004), Competition within and Between Networks: The Contingent Effect of Competitive Embeddedness on Alliance Formation [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 820-842.
56. Granovetter M. (1992), Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology [A].Nohria N, Eccles RG (Eds).Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 25-56.
57. Granovetter, M. S. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
58. Granovetter, M. S. (2000), The Economic Sociology of Firms and Entrepreneurs [A]. Swedberg, R. (Ed.) Entrepreneurship: The social science view. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 244-275.
59. Granovetter, M. (1992), The Sociological and Economic Approach to Labor Market Analysis: A Social Structural View [A]. Granovetter and Swedberg (Eds.).The sociology of economic life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 233-263.
60. Grant, R. M. (1991), The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation [J].California Management Review,3:114-135.
61. Grant, Robert M. (1996), Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm [J].Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Special Issue), 109-122.
62. Gulati, R. (1999), The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420.
63. Gulati, R. (1995), Social Structural and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-652.
64. Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, M. (2003), Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple in dictators? [J]. Research Policy, 32,1365-1379.
65. Hakansson, H, Johanson, J. (1993), The Network as a Governance Structure:Inter-firm Cooperation beyond Markets and Hierarchies [A]. In Grabher, G (Eds).The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks.London:Routledge.
66. Hakansson. (1994), Networks as a Mechanism to Develop Resources [A]. In P.Beijie, J. Groenebegen, & O. Nuys (Eds.).Networking in Dutch industries.Amsterdam: Garant Uitgivers.
67. Hambrick, Donald C. & Phyllis A. Mason (1984), Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers [J]. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
68. Hamel G. (1991), Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances [J].Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.
69. Hankinson, Johansson. (1988), Formal and Informal Cooperation Strategies in International Industrial Networks [A]. Contractor, F.J., Lorange, P. (Eds).Cooperative Strategies in International Business. Lexington: Lexington Books,369-379.
70. Hanna Toiviainen (2003), Learning Across Levels: Challenges of Collaboration in a Small-Firm Network [D]. Helsinki :University of Helsinki.
71. He, Zi-Lin & Poh-Kam Wong (2004), Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis [J]. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
72. Hedberg, R. (1981), How Organizations Learn and Unlearn [M]. in Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol.1.1, P. C. Nystrom and W .H .Starbuck(eds.), 3-27,Oxford.
73. Henderson, R. M., Clark, K. B. (1990), Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
74. Hofstede, Geert (1991), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind [M].London: McGraw-Hill: 56-89.
75. http://www.chineseall.net/chineseall/BookDisplay.external.html.
76. Huber, G. P. (1991), Organization Learning: the Contributing Processes and the Literatures [J]. Organization Science, 2(1): 88-115.
77. Hult G. Tomas M. & Ferrell O. C. A. (1997), Global Learning Organization Structure and Market Information Processing [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2:155-166.
78. Hurst, David K., James C. Rush, & Roderick E. White (1989), Top Management Teams and Organizational Renewal [J]. Strategic Management Journal,10(Special Issue), 87-105.
79. Iaquinto, Anthoy L. & James W. Fredrickson (1997), Top Management Team Agreement about the Strategic Decision Process: A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1),63-75.
80. Inkpen, A. C&Tsang, E. W.K. (2005), Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146-165.
81. Janszen, F. H.A. (2002), Dynamic Business Modeling as a Management Tool that Support the Development and Testing of Innovation Strategies, IE MC'98 Proceedings [M]. International Conference 11-13. 408-412.
82. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli (1993), Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences [J]. Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 53-70.
83. Jones, G. R. George, J. M. (1998), The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork [J]. Academy of Management Review, 23: 531-546.
84. Kale, P., Singh, H. & Perlmutter, H. (2000), Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital [J].Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217-238.
85. Kang, S. C, Morris, & S. S., Snell, S. A. (2007), Relational Archetypes, Organizational Learning, and Value Creation: Extending the Human Resource Architecture [J]. Academy of Management Review, 32: 236-256.
86. Katila, Riitta & Gautam Ahuja (2002), Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction [J].Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
87. Knott, A. M. (2002), Exploration and Exploitation as Complements [M]. In N.Bontis & C.W.Choo (eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge: A Collection of Readings, Oxford University Press,New York, 339-358.
88. Landry, R., Amara, N., et al. (2002), Does Social Capital Determine Innovation? To What Extent? [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69,681-701.
89. Lane, P. J., Lubatkin, M. (1998), Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477
90. Lawrence, Thomas B., Michael K. Mauws, Bruno Dyck, & Robert F. Kleysen (2005), The Politics of Organizational Learning: Integrating Power into the 41 Framework [J]. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 180-191.
91. Leana, C. R., Buren, H. J. (1999), Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices [J]. Academy of Management Review, 24: 538-555.
92. Leenders R. Th. A. J. (1999), Gabbay S. M. Corporate Social Capital and Liability [M]. Boston: Kluwer Inc., 3:98-103.
93. Levinthal, Daniel A. & James G. March (1993), The Myopia of Learning [J].Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter Special Issue), 95-112.
94. Levitt, B. & March, J. (1988), Organizational Learning [J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 14,157-163.
95. Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. & Carroll, T. N. (1999), The Co-evolution of New Organizational Forms [J]. Organization Science, 10, 535-550.
96. Li, Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima (2001), Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.
97. LIN N. (1982), Social Resources and Instrumental Action [M]. MARSDEN P,LIN N. Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.: 131 -145.
98. LIN N. (2001), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 25.
99. Lu, J. W. (2001), Network Development for Competitive Advantage: A Study of Subsidiary Networks and Alliance Networks [D].The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 143-167.
100.Luo, Y. & Peng, M. W. (1999), Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy:Experience, Environment and Performance [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 269-296.
101.Lyles, M. A. (1988). Learning Among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms [J].MIR Special Issue, 85-97.
102.March J, Simon H. (1958), Organizational Learning [M]. New York: Wiley:54-79.
103.March, J. G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J].Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
104.March, James G & J. P. Olsen (1975), The Uncertainty of the Past:Organizational Learning under Ambiguity [J]. European Journal of Political Research, 3,147-171.
105.March, James G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J]. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
106.Marquardt, M. J. (1996), Building the Learning Organization: a Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill: 156-168.
107.Mazzonis and Shaw. Small Firm Networking, Cooperation, and Innovation in Italy: Viewed by An Agency Engaged in Actions for Stimulating The Technological Upgrading of Industry[J].Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1989, 1(1):61-74.
108.McGrath, R. (2001), Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity and the Role of Managerial Oversight [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-133
109.Meister J C. (2000), The CEO Driven Leaning Culture? [J]. the Internal Auditor,58(5): 38-45.
110.Meyers, P.W. (1990), Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms [J]. Research Policy, Vol. 19,97-115.
111 .Miller, C. Chet., Linda M. Burke & William H. Glick (1998), Cognitive Diversity Among Upper-Echelon Executives: Implications for Strategic Decision Processes [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1), 39-58.
112.Mitchell, J. C.The Concept and Use of Social Networks [A]. Mitchell (ed.),Social networks in urban situations [C]. Manchester: Manchester University Press,1969.
113.Morgan, R M. & Hunt, S D. (1994), The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing [J]. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 20-38.
114.N. Rosenberg (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics [M],Cambridge University Press: 3, 34,106.
115.Nadel, SF.The Theory of Social Structure [M]. London: Cohen and West, 1957:16.
116.Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1997), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Creation of Value in Firms [J]. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings:35-39.
117.Nahapiet, Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal (1998), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 23(2),242-266.
118.Nerkar, Atul (2003), Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge [J]. Management Science, 49(2), 211-229.
119.Nevis E. C, Dibella A. J, Gould J. M. (1995), Understanding Organizations as Learning System [J]. Sloan Management Review, 36(2): 73 -95.
120.Nonaka L., Takeuchi H. (1995), The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Creating the Dynamics of Innovation [M]. Oxford University Press: 57-88.
121.Nonaka, I. (1991), The Knowledge-creating Company [J]. Harvard Business Review, 69(6): 96-104
122.Pablos, P O. D. (2005), Western and Eastern Views on Social Networks [J]. The Learning Organization, 12(5): 436-456.
123 .Peng, Mike W. & Yadong Luo (2000), Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486-501.
124.Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1981), Power in Organizations. Marshfield [D]. MA: Pitman: 87.
125.Podsakoff, Philip M. and Dennis W. Organ (1986), Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
126.Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. (1990), The Core Competence of the Organization [J].Harvard Business Review, 68: 79-91.
127.Putnam, R. D. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 36
128.Ritter, T, Gem(?)den H. G. (2003), Network Competence: Its Impact on Innovation Success and Its Antecedents. Journal of Business Research [J], 56: 1437-1458.
129.Romanelli, Elaine (1987), New Venture Strategies in the Minicomputer Industry [J]. California Management Review, 30 (1), 160-175.
130.Rothwell, R. (1992), Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990's [J]. R&D Management 22: 221-239.
131.Rothwell, R. et al. (1974), SAPPHO Updated [J]. Research Policy, November:57-98.
132.Rowley, Tim, Dean Behrens, & David Krackhardt (2000), Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries [J]. Strategic Management Journal,21(3), 369-386.
133.Schoonhoven, Claudia Bird (1981), Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden Within the Language of Contingency "Theory" [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (3), 349-377.
134. Shane, Scott (2000), Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunism [J]. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
135.Sinkula, Baker & Noordewier (1997), A Framework for Market-based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge and Behavior [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2(5): 305-318.
136.Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1965), Social Structure in Organizations [M]. Handbook of Organizations, J.G. March, ed. Chicago: Rand McNally, 142-193.
137.Swee Goh (1998), Toward a Learning Organization: the Strategic Building Blocks [J]. Sam Advanced Management Journal, spring: 15-22.
138.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. [J], Srtategic Management, 18: 509-533.
139.Todeva, E. & Knoke, D. (2002), Strategic Alliance and Corporate Social Capital [A]. Allmendinger, J. and Hinz, T. Sociology of Organizations [M]. K, lner Zeitschrift: Sociology and Social psychologies: 46-99.
140.Triandis, Harry C. (1995), Individualism and Collectivism [M]. Boulder, CO:West view Press: 78-112.
141.Tsai, Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal (1998), Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4),464-476.
142.Tsai, Wenpin (2000), Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intra-organizational Linkages [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939.
143.Uzzi B. (1996), Social Structure and Competition in Inter-firm Networks: the Paradox of Embeddedness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 674-698.
144.Uzzi, B. (1996), The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: the Network Effect [J]. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
145.Van Wijk, R., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2003), Knowledge and Networks [M]. In M. Easter by-Smith, et al.(eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 428-453, Maiden, MA,Blackwell Pub.
146.Walfish, Daniel (2001), P&G China Lab Has Global Role [J]. Research Technology Management, 44 (5), 4-5.
147.Watkins Marsick (1993), Sculpting the Learning Organization [M]. San Francisco.CA: Jossey-bass: 43-55.
148.Watkins Marsick (2003), Demonstrating the Value of an Organization's Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire [J].Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2): 132-151.
149.Werker, Claudia (2001), Knowledge and Organization Strategy in Innovation System [J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, Mar. (Vol. 5 Issue):105-106.
150.Westlund, H. (2003), Implications of Social Capital for Business in the Knowledge Economy: Theoretical Considerations [C]. International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital, Tokyo, Japan: 75.
151.Wu X, Wei Y. (2004), The Analysis on Competitive Advantage of Firms in the Context of Synergic Development: Based on the Perspective of Social Capital [C].Singapore: International Engineering Management Conference,78-97.
152.Wu, X. B., Xu, G. N. & Wang, W. B. (2006), Technology Innovation of Developing Country in the Context of Globalization: A Case Study [A].Proceedings of International Technology and Innovation Conference (ITIC),(3):90-95.
153.Yli -Renko, H., Autio, E., et al. (2001), Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms [J]. Strategy Management Journal, 22, 587-613.
154.Yli-Renko,Helena,Erkko Autio,& Harry J.Sapienza(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),587-613.
155.Zahra,S.A.,Nielsen,A.P.& Bogner,W.C.(1999),Corporate Entrepreneurship,Knowledge and Competence Development[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,24,169-189.
156.Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
157.阿吉瑞斯,舍恩:组织学习:行为透视理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990。
158.安娜·格兰多里主编:企业网络,组织和产业竞争力[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005。
159.奥利弗·威廉姆森:交易费用经济学:契约关系的规制、企业制度与市场组织[M].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1996:24。
160.边燕杰,丘海雄:企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):第87-99页。
161.蔡宇:企业技术创新的风险分析与防范[J].科技管理研究,2005(9):第43-48页。
162.曹亚东等:先进制造技术与创新能力:组织学习的视角[J].现代管理科学,2008(7):第56-62页。
163.陈和,隋广军:产业演进下的企业间组织研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(8):第149-154页。
164.陈劲,陈钰芬:企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):第86-91页。
165.陈劲,李飞宇:社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001.19(3):第103-107页。
166.陈伟:创新管理[M].科学出版社,1998:第47-78页。
167.陈学光:网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007:第48-52页。
168.程工:企业技术创新论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005年1月。
169.单伟建:交易费用经济学的理论:应用及偏颇,现代经济学前沿专题(1)[J].商务印书馆,1993年版。
170.杜占元,刘东:中小企业技术创新及其政策研究[J].科技进步与对策,1997(5):第19-21页。
171.方世杰:在台外商研发投资与台湾知识流通体系之影响[M].(台湾)管理学报,2002,19(1):第147-174页。
172.方新:过渡经济条件下的中国企业技术创新研究[J].中国科技论坛,1998(2):第37-40页。
173.傅家骥,仝允桓,高建:技术创新学[J].北京:清华大学出版社,1998,第78页。
174.高洪深,丁娟娟:企业知识管理[M].清华大学出版社,2003年11月,第200-207页。
175.高建,傅家骥:中国企业技术创新的关键问题:1051家企业技术创新调查分析[J].中外科技政策与管理,1996(1):第24-33页。
176.高建,汪剑飞,魏平:企业技术创新绩效指标:现状、问题和新概念模型[J].科研管理,2004(5):第45-47页。
177.格鲁特尔特,贝斯特纳尔:社会资本在发展中的作用[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004:第34-78页。
178.官建成:中欧工业创新的比较分析《中国创新管理前沿》(柳卸林主编)[M].北京理工大学出版社,2004年5月,第215-230页。
179.郭咸纲:西方管理思想史[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004:第56-87页。
180.韩辉:中小企业技术创新的影响因素和路径的选择[J].中小企业,2005(9):第43-46页。
181.贺盛瑜:虚拟企业中伙伴信任关系的建立与发展[J].软科学,2003(4):第34-39页。
182.姜平:日本中小企业问题及政策研究[J].济学家,2001(5):第56-68页。
183.蒋长流、纵玲玲:基于动态博弈的政府与中小企业技术创新行为分析[J].技术经济,2007(3):第16-18页。
184.蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
185.蒋天颖,施放:企业组织学习维度结构的实证分析[J].浙江社会科学,2008(5):第87-93页。
186.李惠斌,杨冬雪:社会资本与社会发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000,第56-73页。
187.林健,李焕荣:战略网络对企业绩效影响分析[J].科研管理,2003(4):第87-92页.
188.柳卸林:技术创新经济学[M].中国经济出版社,1993:第55-57页。
189.路应金等:技术创新风险分析[M].电子科技大学社科版,2003年6月,第101-105页。
190.吕卫文:隐性知识和编码知识[J].科研管理,2007(6):第23-28页。
191.吕毓芳:论领导行为、组织学习、创新与绩效间相关性研究[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2005:第67-69页。
192.罗斯托(Rostow,W.N.):从起飞进入持续增长的经济学[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1988:第34-57页。
193.马克思:资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:第533-535页。
194.潘旭明:战略联盟的信任机制:基于社会网络的视角[J].财经科学,2006(5):第34-40页。
195.彭宇文、吴林海:我国中小企业技术创新支持体系研究[J].科学管理研究,2007(2):第7-11页。
196.彭玉冰,白国红:谈企业技术创新与政府行为[J].经济问题,1999(7),第35-36页。
197.人民日报:中共中央国务院关于实施科技规划纲要增强自主创新能力的决定,2006年02月10日第1版。
198.孙永风,廖貅武,李垣:转型背景下中国企业基于社会资本的知识管理研究[J].北京:中国工业经济,2008(3):第118-126页。
199.泰勒:科学管理原理[M].上海科学技术出版社,1982:第45-55页。
200.万青云:高技术产业区域理论研究[M].北京:中国国家图书馆,2002年。
201.王国进,王其藩:企业技术创新能力评价研究的新进展[J].科研管理,2004(2):第32-38页。
202.王利晓,惠宁:企业社会资本研究文献综述[J].西安邮电学院学报,2007(6):第79-82页。
203.王霄,胡军:社会资本结构与中小企业创新[J].管理世界,2005(7):第116-122页。
204.王晓晖:学习型组织文化的差异与影响研究[J].北京:管理世界,2007(11):第76-86页。
205.王勇:企业社会资本的国内研究进展与趋势展望[J].当代经济管理,2008(10):第14-18页。
206.王勇:企业社会资本对技术创新的影响[J].改革,2006(2):第13-15页。
207.韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页。
208.韦影:企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于吸收能力的视角[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006:第54-57页。
209.韦影:企业社会资本与技术创新——基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(9):第119-126页。
210.吴翠花:联盟网络环境下科技型中小企业知识创造能力与组织绩效关系实证研究[D].西安交通大学博士学位论文,2006:第44-47页。
211.吴翠花等:联盟网络社会资本对知识转移影响路径研究[J].科学学研究,2008(5):第57-63页。
212.吴贵生:技术创新管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000。
213.武志伟:企业社会资本的内涵和功能研究[J].软科学,2003(5):第19-21页。
214.西格法德·哈里森:日本的技术与创新管理:从寻求技术诀窍到寻求合作者[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004,第1-7页。
215.谢洪明,韩子天:组织学习与绩效的关系:创新是中介变量吗?——珠三角地区企业的实证研究及其启示[J].科研管理,2005(5):第1-10页。
216.谢洪明,蓝海林:动态竞争与战略网络[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004,第4页。
217.谢洪明等:社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究[J].管理工程学报,2008(1):第5-10页。
218.谢洪明等:市场导向与组织绩效的关系:组织学习与创新的影响[J].管理世界,2006(2):第80-97页。
219.谢伟:技术学习过程的新模式[J].科研管理,1999(4):1-7。
220.谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
221.熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第2-74页。
222.徐延辉:企业家的伦理行为与企业社会资本积累——一个经济学和社会学的比较框架分析[J].社会学研究,2002(6):第73-75页。
223.许冠南:关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于探索型学习的中介机制[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2008:第49页。
224.许萍:企业社会资本和环境适应[J].经济研究,2007(3):第51-52页。
225.许小东:技术创新的成败归因及其对创新行为的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(2):第28-30页。
226.亚当·斯密:国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988,第243页。
227.杨瑞龙、周业安:交易费用与企业所有权分配和约的选择[J].经济研究,1998(9):第12-23页。
228.杨瑞龙等:产业组织能力与企业竞争优势[J].教学与研究,2001(4):第34-37页。
229.杨瑞龙主编:企业理论:现代观点[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005。
230.尹建海,杨建华:基于加强型平衡记分法的企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科研管理,2008(1):第1-7页。
231.于小涵:组织学习过程模型的比较研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(1):第85-86页。
232.余琛,蒋伟军:企业资源观理论综述[J].经济师,2000(8):第56-58页。
233.宇红:信任与企业家社会资本[J].社会科学辑刊,2006(5):第49-53页。
234.詹正华:中小企业未来技术创新路径选择[J].企业经济,2004(5):第83-85页。
235.张方华:知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2004:第154-163页。
236.张其仔:社会资本与国有企业绩效研究[J].当代财经,2000.182(1):第53-58页。
237.赵曙东:高新企业技术创新和发展的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999(12):第63-65页。
238.赵延东:社会资本理论的新进展[J].国外社会科学,2003(3):第54-59页。
239.郑胜利,陈国智:企业社会资本积累与企业竞争优势[J].生产力研究,2002(1):第133-137页。
240.中国社会科学院工业经济研究所:中国工业发展报告——中国工业经济创新[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004。
241.周小虎,陈传明:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势闭[J].中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
242.周小虎:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势[J].北京:中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
243.周庄,王宏达:国有大中型工业企业技术创新影响因素的调查分析[J].天津经济,2001(5):第56-62页。
244.朱国宏:经济社会学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999:第84页。
245.朱有为:中国制造业的技术创新绩效研究[D].东南大学博士学位论文,2007:第18-22页。
246.朱泽,徐金发:R&D中的知识管理[J].科学管理研究,2000(1):第41-43页。
[2]Yli-Renko,Helena,Erkko Autio & Harry J.Sapienza(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),587-613.
[3]孙永风,廖貅武,李垣:转型背景下中国企业基于社会资本的知识管理研究[J].北京:中国工业经济,2008(3):第118-126页。
[1]Wu,X.B.,Xu,G.N.& Wang,W.B.(2006),Technology Innovation of Developing Country in the Context of Globalization:A Case Study[A].Proceedings of International Technology and Innovation Conference(ITIC),(3):90-95.
[2]Huber,G.P.(1991),Organization Learnins:the Contributing Processes and the Literatures[J].Organization Science,2(1):88-115.
[1]Luo,Y.& Peng,M.W.(1999),Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy:Experience,Environment and Performance[J].Journal of International Business Studies,30(2),269-296.
[2]孙永风,廖貅武,李垣:转型背景下中国企业基于社会资本的知识管理研究[J].北京:中国工业经济,2008(3):第118-126页。
[3]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[4]王晓晖:学习型组织文化的差异与影响研究[J].北京:管理世界,2007(11):第76-86页。
[5]Kale,P.,Singh,H.& Perlmutter,H.(2000),Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances:Building Relational Capital[J].Strategic Management Journal,21:217-238.
[1]周小虎:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势[J].北京:中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
[2]Walfish,Daniel(2001),P&G China Lab Has Global Role[J].Research Technology Management,44(5),4-5.
[3]Buderi,Robert(2005),Microsoft:Getting from "R" to "D"[J].Technology Review,108(March),28-30.
[4]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[5]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[1]Teece,D.J.,Pisano,G.& Shuen,A.(1997),Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management.[J],Srtategic Management,18:509-533.
[2]蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
[3]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[1]G.C.Loury(1997),Intergeneration Transfer and the Distribution of Earnings[J].Econometrical,176-179.
[2]Bourdieu P.(1985),The Forms of Capital[A].J.G.Richardson.Hand-book of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education[M].New York:Greenwood Inc.,241-258.
[3]Baker,W.(1990),Market Networks and Corporate Behavior[J].American Journal of Sociology(96):589-625.
[4]Bourdieu P.(1985),The Forms of Capital[A].J.G.Richardson.Hand-book of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education[M].New York:Greenwood Inc.,241-258.
[5]Putnam,R.D.(1993),Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press:36
[1]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press:66-69.
[2]LIN N.(1952),Social Resources and Instrumental Action[M].MARSDEN P,LIN N.Social Structure and Network Analysis.Beverly Hills,CA:Sage Publications,Inc.:131-145.
[3]LIN N.(2001),Social Capital:A Theory of Social Structure and Action[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press:25.
[4]朱国宏:经济社会学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999:第84页。
[5]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[6]韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页.
[7]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Leenders R.Th.A.J.(1999),Gabbay S.M.Corporate Social Capital and Liability[M].Boston:Kluwer Inc.,3:98-103.
[1]Leenders R.Th.A.J.(1999),Gabbay S.M.Corporate Social Capital and Liability[M].Boston:Kluwer Inc.,3:98-103.
[2]边燕杰,丘海雄:企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):第87-99页。
[3]许萍:企业社会资本和环境适应[J].经济研究,2007(3):第51-52页。
[4]徐延辉:企业家的伦理行为与企业社会资本积累——一个经济学和社会学的比较框架分析[J].社会学研究,2002(6):第73-75页。
[5]武志伟:企业社会资本的内涵和功能研究[J].软科学,2003(5):第19-21页。
[6]王勇:企业社会资本对技术创新的影响[J].改革,2006(2):第13-15页。
[7]宇红:信任与企业家社会资本[J].社会科学辑刊,2006(5):第49-53页。
[8]韦影:企业社会资本与技术创新——基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(9):第119-126页。
[1]Landry,R.,Amara,N.,et al.(2002),Does Social Capital Determine Innovation?To What Extent?[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,69,681-701.
[2]王利晓,惠宁:企业社会资本研究文献综述[J].西安邮电学院学报,2007(6):第79-82页。
[3]韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页。
[4]张其仔:社会资本与国有企业绩效研究[J].当代财经,2000.182(1):第53-58页。
[1]边燕杰,丘海雄:企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):第87-99页。
[2]Cooke,P.& Clifton,N.(2002),Social Capital,and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom,Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-Economy:Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives[R].Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht Amsterdam,122-167.
[3]陈劲,李飞宇:社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001.19(3):第103-107页。
[4]张方华:知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2004:第13页。
[5]郑胜利,陈国智:企业社会资本积累与企业竞争优势[J].生产力研究,2002(1):第133-137页。
[1]Westlund,H.(2003),Implications of Social Capital for Business in the Knowledge Economy:Theoretical Considerations[C].International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital,Tokyo,Japan:75.
[2]Putnam,R.D.(1993),Making Democracy Work:Civic Traditions in Modern Italy[M].Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press:36.
[3]格鲁特尔特,贝斯特纳尔:社会资本在发展中的作用[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004:第34-78页。
[4]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,22,587-613.
[5]Landry,R.,Amara,N.,et al.(2002),Does Social Capital Determine Innovation? To What Extent?[J].Technological Forecasting & Social Change,69,681-701.
[1]Nahapiet J.,Ghoshal S.(1997),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital and the Creation of Value in Firms[J].Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings:35-39.
[2]Tsai,Wanpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Managemant Journal,41(4),464-476.
[3]王霄,胡军:社会资本结构与中小企业创新[J].管理世界,2005(7):第116-122页。
[1]王勇:企业社会资本的国内研究进展与趋势展望[J].当代经济管理,2008(10):第14-18页。
[2]韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页。
[3]Cohen,D.& Prusak,L.(2000),In Good Company:How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work[M].Harvard MA:Harvard Business School Press:65-77.
[4]Todeva,E.& Knoke,D.(2002),Strategic Alliance and Corporate Social Capital[A].Allmendinger,J.and Hinz,T.Sociology of Organizations[M].K,lner Zeitschrift:Sociology and Social psychologies:46-99.
[5]赵延东:社会资本理论的新进展[J].国外社会科学,2003(3):第54-59页。
[1]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[2]泰勒:科学管理原理[M].上海科学技术出版社,1982:第45-55页。
[3]郭咸纲:西方管理思想史[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004:第56-87页。
[4]Match J,Simon H.(1958),Organizational learning[M].New York:Wiley:54-79.
[5]Cangelosi V.E.,Dill W.R.(1965),Organizational Lemming:Observation toward a Theory[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,10:175-203.
[1]Argyris,Schon(1978),Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Reading,MA:Addiong -Wesley:15-42.
[2]Fulmer R.M,Gibbs P.,Keys J.B.(1998),The Second Generation Learning Organizations.Organizational Dynamics[J].27(3):7-19.
[3]谢洪明,韩子天:组织学习与绩效的关系:创新是中介变量吗?——珠三角地区企业的实证研究及其启示[J].科研管理,2005(5):第1-10页。
[4]March J,Simon H.(1958),Organizational Learning[M].New York:Wiley:54-79.
[5]Argyris,Schon(1978),Organizational Learning:A Theory of Action Perspective[M].Reading,MA:Addiong -Wesley:15-42.
[6]Hedberg,R.(1981),How Organizations Learn and Unlearn[M].in Handbook of Organizational Design,Vol.1.1,P.C.Nystrom and W.H.Starbuck(eds.),3-27,Oxford.
[7]Fiol,C.& Mlyles,M.(1985),Organizational Learning[J].Academy of Management Review,10(4):132-133.
[8]Nonaka L.,Takenchi H.(1995),The Knowledge-Creating Company:How Japanese Companies Creating the Dynamics of Innovation[M].Oxford University Press:57-88.
[9]Levitt,B.& March,J.(1988),Organizational Learning[J].Annual Review of Sociology,14,157-163.
[1]Gherardi,S.& Nicolini,D.(2000),The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice[J].Journal of Management Inquiry.9(1),7.
[2]蒋天颖,施放:企业组织学习维度结构的实证分析[J].浙江社会科学,2008(5):第87-93页。
[3]Meister J C.(2000),The CEO Driven Leaning Culture?[J].the Internal Auditor,58(5):38-45.
[4]Nevis E.C,Dibella A.J,Gould J.M.(1995),Understanding Organizations as Learning System[J].Sloan Management Review,36(2):73-95.
[5]Marquardt,M.J.(1996),Building the Learning Organization:a Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success[M].New York:McGraw-Hill:156-168.
[6]Swee Goh(1998),Toward a Learning Organization:the Strategic Building Blocks[J].Sam Advanced Management Journal,spring:15-22.
[1]Sinkula,Baker & Noordewier(1997),A Framework for Market-based Organizational Learning:Linking Values,Knowledge and Behavior[J].Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,2(5):305-318.
[2]Watkins Marsick(1993),Sculpting the Learning Organization[M].San Francisco.CA:Jossey-bass:43-55.
[3]Watkins Marsick(2003),Demonstrating the Value of an Organization's Learning Culture:The Dimensions of the Learning Orsanization Questionnaire[J].Advances in Developing Human Resources,5(2):132-151.
[5]Hult G.Tomas M & Ferrell O.C.A.(1997),Global Learning Organization Structure and Market Information Processing[J].Journal of Business Research,2:155-166.
[6]Ariede Geus(1997),The Living Company[M].Harvard Business School Press:56.
[1]March,James G & J.P.Olsen(1975),The Uncertainty of the Past:Organizational Learning under Ambiguity[J].European Journal of Political Research,3,147-171.
[2]Hedberg,R.(1981),How Organizations Learn and Unlearn[M].in Handbook of Organizational Design,Vol.1.1,P.C.Nystrom and W.H.Starbuck(eds.),3-27,Oxford.
[1]Lyles,M.A.(1988),Learning Among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms[J].MIR Special Issue,85-97.
[2]Meyers,P.W.(1990),Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms[J].Research Policy,Vol.19,97-115.
[1]Fulmer,R.M.(1994),A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn[J].Planning Review,Vol.22,Iss.3,20-24.
[2]March,J.G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2:71-87.
[3]Knott,A.M(2002),Exploration and Exploitation as Complements[M].In N.Bontis & C.W.Choo(eds.),The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge:A Collection of Readings,Oxford University Press,New York,339-358.
[1]于小涵:组织学习过程模型的比较研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(1):第85-86页。
[1]许冠南:关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于探索型学习的中介机制[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2008:第49页。
[1]Crossan,M.M.,Lane,H.W.& White,R.E.(1999),An Organizational Learning Framework:From Intuition to Institution[J].Academy of Management Review,24(3),522-537.
[2]Bontis,N.,Crossan,M.M.,& Hulland,J.(2002),Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows[J].Journal of Management Studies,39(4),437-469.
[3]Lewm,A.Y.,Long,C.P.& Carroll,T.N.(1999),The Co-evolution of New Organizational Forms[J].Organization Science,10,535-550.
[4]Zahra,S.A.,Nielsen,A.P.& Bogner,W.C.(1999),Corporate Entrepreneurship,Knowledge and Competence Development[J].Entreprenenrship Theory and Practice,24,169-159.
[5]Van Wijk,R.,Van den Bosch,F.A.J.& Volberda,H.W.(2003),Knowledge and Networks[M].In M.Easter by-Smith,et al.(eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management,428-453,Malden,MA,Blackwell Pub.
[1]March,J.G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2:71-87.
[2]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第2-4页。
[3]亚当·斯密:国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988,第243页。
[1]N.Rosenberg(1982),Inside the Black Box:Technology and Economics[M],Cambridge University Press:3,34,106.
[2]马克思:资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:第410页。
[3]马克思:资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:第533-535页。
[4]柳卸林:技术创新经济学[M].中国经济出版社,1993:第55-57页。
[5]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第2-74页。
[1]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第3页。
[2]熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第73-74页。
[3]罗斯托(Rostow,W.N.):从起飞进入持续增长的经济学[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1988:第34-57页。
[4]http://www.chineseall.net/chineseall/BookDisplay,external.html.
[1]http://www.chineseall.net/chineseall/BookDisplay.external.html.
[2]Chris Freeman:工业创新经济学[J].北京:北京大学出版社,2004年7月,第42页。
[3]傅家骥,仝允桓,高建:技术创新学[J].北京:清华大学出版社,1998,第78页。
[4]彭玉冰,白国红:谈企业技术创新与政府行为[J].经济问题,1999(7),第35-36页。
[5]Werker,Claudia(2001),Knowledse and Organization Strategy in Innovation System[J].International Journal of Innovation Management,Mar.(Vol.5 Issue):105-106.
[6]Janszen F.H.A.(2002),Dynamic Business Modeling as a Management Tool that Support the Development and Testing of Innovation Strategies,IE MC'98 Proceedings[D].International Conference 11-13.408-412.
[1]Rothwell.R.et al.(1974),SAPPHO Updated[J].Research Policy,November:57-98.
[2]陈伟:创新管理[M].科学出版社,1998:第47-78页。
[3]Cooper,R.G.& Kleinschmidt,E.J.(1987),Success Factors in Product Innovation[J].Industrial Marketing Management,Vol.16 No.3,215-223.
[4]Rothwell,R.(1992),Successful Industrial Innovation:Critical Factors for the 1990's[J].R&D Management 22:221-239.
[5]高建,傅家骥:中国企业技术创新的关键问题:1051家企业技术创新调查分析[J].中外科技政策与管理,1996(1):第24-33页。
[1]路应金等:技术创新风险分析[M].电子科技大学社科版,2003年6月,第101-105页。
[2]方新:过渡经济条件下的中国企业技术创新研究[J].中国科技论坛,1998(2):第37-40页。
[3]赵曙东:高新企业技术创新和发展的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999(12):第63-65页。
[1]周庄,王宏达:国有大中型工业企业技术创新影响因素的调查分析[J].天津经济,2001(5):第56-62页。
[2]许小东:技术创新的成败归因及其对创新行为的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(2):第28-30页。
[3]高洪深,丁娟娟:企业知识管理[M].清华大学出版社,2003年11月,第200-207页。
[4]官建成:中欧工业创新的比较分析《中国创新管理前沿》(柳卸林主编)[M].北京理工大学出版社,2004年5月,第215-230页。
[1]朱有为:中国制造业的技术创新绩效研究[D].东南大学博士学位论文,2007:第18-22页。
[2]Hagedoorn,J.,Cloodt,M.(2003),Measuring Innovative Performance:Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple in Dictators?[J].Research Policy,32,1365-1379.
[1]高建,汪剑飞,魏平:企业技术创新绩效指标:现状、问题和新概念模型[J].科研管理,2004(5):第45-47页。
[2]Hagedoorn,J.,Cloodt,M.(2003),Measuring Innovative Performance:Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple in Dictators?[J].Research Policy,32,1365-1379.
[3]Gem(u|¨)den,H.G.,Riter,T.,& Heydebreck,F.(1996),Network Configuration and Innovation Success:an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(5):449-462.
[4]Hagedoorn,J.,Cloodt,M.(2003),Measuring Innovative Performance:Is There an Advantage in Using Multiple in Dictators?[J].Research Policy,32,1365-1379.
[5]韦影:企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于吸收能力的视角[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006:第54-57页。
[1]Gem(u|¨)den,H.G.,Riter,T.,&Heydebreck,F.(1996),Network Configuration and Innovation Success:an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(5):449-462.
[2]陈劲,陈钰芬:企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):第86-91页。
[1]Cooper,R.G.(1984),New Product Strategies:What Distinguishes the Top Performers?[J].Journal of product Innovation Manage,1(2):151-64.
[2]Gem(u|¨)den,H.G.,Riter,T.,&Heydebreck,F.(1996),Network Configuration and Innovation Success:an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries[J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,13(5):449-462.
[3]Ritter,T,Gem(u|¨)den H.G.(2003),Network Competence:its Impact on Innovation Success and its Antecedents.Journal of Business Research[J],56:1437-1458.
[1]陈学光:网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007:第48-52页。
[2]陈学光:网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007:第52页。
[1]王国进,王其藩:企业技术创新能力评价研究的新进展[J].科研管理,2004(2):第32-38页。
[2]陈劲,陈钰芬:企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):第86-91页。
[1]尹建海,杨建华:基于加强型平衡记分法的企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科研管理,2008(1):第1-7页。
[2]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[1]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,66-69.
[2]Coleman,J.(1988),Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J].The American Journal of Sociology,94(Supplement):95-120.
[3]Uzzi,B.(1996),The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations:the Network Effect[J].American Sociological Review,61:674-698.
[4]Granovetter,M.S.(1973),The Strength of Weak Ties[J].American Journal of Sociology,78:1360-1380.
[5]Leana,C.R.,Buren,H.J.(1999),Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices[J].Academy of Management Review,24:538-555.
[6]Dyer,J.H.(2000),Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,21:345-367.
[1]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,66-69.
[1]Kale,P.,Singh,H.& Perimutter,H.(2000),Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances:Building Relational Capital[J].Strategic Management Journal,21:217-238.
[2]Kang,S.C.,Morris,& S.S.,Snell,S.A.(2007),Relational Archetypes,Organizational Learning,and Value Creation:Extending the Human Resource Architecture[J].Academy of Management Review,32:236-256.
[3]Kang,S.C.,Morris,& S.S.,Snell,S.A.(2007),Relational Archetypes,Organizational Learning,and Value Creation:Extending the Human Resource Architecture[J].Academy of Managemant Review,32:236-256.
[4]Jones,G.R.George,J.M(1998),The Experience and Evolution of Trust:Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork[J].Academy of Management Review,23:531-546.
[1]Leana,C.R.,Buren,H.J.(1999),Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices[J].Academy of Management Review,24:538-555.
[2]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[3]Gant,J.,Ichniowski,C.& Shaw,K.(2002),Social Capital and Organizational Change in High Involvement and Traditional Work Organizations[J].Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,11:289-328.
[4]Henderson,R.M.,Clark,K.B.(1990),Architectural Innovation:the Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,35:9-30.
[5]Dyer,J.H.(2000),Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,21:345-367.
[1]Nonaka,I.(1991),The Knowledge-creating Company[J].Harvard Business Review,69(6):96-104
[2]Lane,P.J.& Lubatkin,M.(1998),Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,19:461-477
[3]谢洪明,蓝海林:动态竞争与战略网络[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004,第4页。
[4]方世杰:在台外商研发投资与台湾知识流通体系之影响[M].(台湾)管理学报,2002,19(1):第147-174 页。
[1]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[2]Drucker,P.(1993),Post Capitalist Society[M].London:Butter worth Heinemann,25-27.
[3]吴翠花等:联盟网络社会资本对知识转移影响路径研究[J].科学学研究,2008(5):第57-63页。
[4]Wu X,Wei Y.(2004),The Analysis on Competitive Advantage of Firms in the Context of Synergic Development:Based on the Perspective of Social Capital[C].Singapore:International Engineering Management Conference,78-97.
[5]吴翠花:联盟网络环境下科技型中小企业知识创造能力与组织绩效关系实证研究[D].西安交通大学博士学位论文,2006:第44-47页。
[1]林健,李焕荣:战略网络对企业绩效影响分析[J].科研管理,2003(4):第87-92页。
[2]Hamel G.(1991),Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances[J].Strategic Management Journal,12:83-103.
[3]西格法德·哈里森:日本的技术与创新管理:从寻求技术诀窍到寻求合作者[M].北京:北京大学出版社.2004,第1-7页。
[4]李惠斌,杨冬雪:社会资本与社会发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000,第56-73页。
[5]Uzzi,B.(1996),The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations:the Network Effect[J].American Sociological Review,61:674-698.
[6]Coleman,J.(1988),Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital[J].The American Journal of Sociology,94(Supplement):95-120.
[7]方世杰:在台外商研发投资与台湾知识流通体系之影响[M].(台湾)管理学报,2002,19(1):第147-174页。
[8]Uzzi,B.(1996),The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations:the Network Effect[J].American Sociological Review,61:674-698.
[1]Morgan,R M.& Hunt,S D.(1994),The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing[J].Journal of Marketing,58(3):20-38.
[2]Dyer,J.H.(2000),Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network:The Toyota Case [J].Strategic Management Journal,21:345-367.
[3]谢洪明等:社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究[J].管理工程学报,2008(1):第5-10页。
[4]Prahalad,C.K.,Hamel,G.(1990),The Core Competence of the Organization[J].Harvard Business Review,68:79-91.
[1]Benncr,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[2]Burt,R.S.(1992),Structural Holes:The Social Structure of Competition[M].Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press,66-69.
[3]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[4]蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与缋效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
[1]曹亚东等:先进制造技术与创新能力;组织学习的视角[J].现代管理科学,2008(7):第56-62页。
[2]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[1]谢洪明等:市场导向与组织绩效的关系:组织学习与创新的影响[J].管理世界,2006(2):第80-97页。
[1]吕毓芳:论领导行为、组织学习、创新与绩效间相关性研究[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2005:第67-69页。
[2]Stinchcombe,Arthur L.(1965),Social Structure in Organizations[M],Handbook of Organizations,J.G.March,ed.Chicago:Rand McNally,142-193.
[3]Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
[1]Dubini,Paola & Howard Aldrich(1991),Personal and Extended Networks Are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process[J].Journal of Business Venturing,6(5),305-313.
[2]谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
[3]谢洪明等:社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究[J].管理工程学报,2008(1):第5-10页。
[1]Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[1]Pablos,P O.D.(2005),Western and Eastern Views on Social Networks[J].The Learning Organization,12(5):436-456.
[1]Pablos,P O.D.(2005),Western and Eastern Views on Social Networks[J].The Learning Organization,12(5):136-456.
[2]Bolino,M.C.,Tumley,W.H.& Bloodgood,J.M.(2002),Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organizations[J].Academy of Management Review,27(4):505-522.
[3]Edelman,L.F.,Bresnen,M.,Newell,S.,et al.(2002),The Darker Side of Social Capital[C].Paper presented at the 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge,Learning and Capabilities,Athens,57-89
[1]周小虎,陈传明:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势闭[J].中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
[1]蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[3]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[4]Lawrence,Thomas B.,Michael K.Mauws,Bruno Dyck,& Robert F.Kleysen(2005),The Politics of Organizational Learning:Integrating Power into the 41 Framework[J].Academy of Management Review,30(1),180-191.
[5]Nahapiet,Jauine & Sumautra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[6]Atuahene-Gima,Kwaku(1995),The Influence of New Product Factors on Export Propensity and Performance:An Empirical Analysis[J].Journal of International Marketing,3(2),9-26.
[1]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[2]Rowley,Tim,Dean Behrens,& David Krackhardt(2000),Redundant Governance Structures:An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries[J].Strategic Management Journal,21(3),369-386.
[3]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[4]He,Zi-Lin & Poh-Kam Wong(2004),Exploration vs.Exploitation:An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis[J].Organization Science,15(4),481-494.
[5]Levinthal,Daniel A.& James G.March(1993),The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,14(Winter Special Issue),95-112.
[6]Yli-Renko,Helena,Erkko Autio,& Harry J.Sapienza(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),587-613.
[7]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[1]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[1]Lawrence,Thomas B.,Michael K.Mauws,Bruno Dyck,& Robert F.Kleysen(2005),The Politics of Organizational Learning:Integrating Power into the 4I Framework[J].Academy of Management Review,30(1),180-191.
[2]Pfeffer,Jeffrey(1981),Power in Organizations.Marshfield[D].MA:Pitman:87.
[3]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[4]Hofstede,Geert(1991),Culture and Organizations:Software of the Mind[M].London:McGraw-Hill:56-89.
[5]Atuahene-Gima & Felicitas Evangelista(2000),Cross-Functional Influence in New Product Development:An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R&D Perspectives[J].Management Science,46(October),1269-1284.
[6]Eisenhardt,Kathleen M.(1989),Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments[J].Academy of Management Journal,32(3),543-576.
[7]Edmondson,Amy C.(1999),The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations:A Group-Level Perspective[J].Organization Science,13(2),128-146.
[1]Fiol,C.Marlene(1994),Consensus,Diversity,and Learning in Organization[J].Organization Science,5(3),403-420.
[2]Eisenhardt,Kathleen M.(1989),Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments[J].Academy of Management Journal,32(3),543-576.
[3]Edmondson,Amy C.(1999),The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations:A Group-Level Perspective[J].Organization Science,13(2),128-146.
[4]Hurst,David K.,James C.Rush,& Roderick E.White(1989),Top Management Teams and Organizational Renewal[J].Strategic Management Journal,10(Special Issue),87-105.
[5]Hambrick,Donald C.& Phyllis A.Mason(1984),Upper Echelons:The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers[J].Academy of Management Review,9(2),193-206.
[6]Inkpen,A.C&Tsang,E.W.K.(2005),Social Capital,Networks,and Knowledge Transfer[J].Academy of Management Review,30(1):146-165.
[7]Lu,J.W.(2001),Network Development for Competitive Advantage:A Study of Subsidiary Networks and Alliance Networks[D].The University of Western Ontario,London,Ontario,143-167.
[1]Gulati,R.(1999),The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation[J].Strategic Management Journal,20:397-420.
[2]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[3]Geletkanycz,Marta A.& Donald D.Hambrick(1997),The External Ties of Top Executives:Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4),654-681.
[4]Peng,Mike W.& Yadong Luo(2000),Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy:The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(3),486-501.
[5]Li,Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima(2001),Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China[J].Academy of Management Journal,44(6),1123-1134.
[1]Geletkanycz,Marta A.& Donald D.Hambrick(1997),The External Ties of Top Executives:Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,42(4),654-681.
[2]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[3]Fukuyama,Francis(1995),Trust:The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity[M].New York:The Free Press:67-112.
[4]Tsai,Wenpin(2000),Social Capital,Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intra-organizational Linkages [J].Strategic Management Journal,21(9),925-939.
[5]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[1]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[2]Dooley,Robert S.& Gerald E.Fryxell(1999),Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent:The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams[J].Academy of Management Journal,42(4),389-402.
[3]Ford,Cameron M.& Dennis A.Gioia(2000),Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making[J].Journal of Management,26(4),705-732.
[4]Edmondson,Amy C.(1999),The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations:A Group-Level Perspective[J].Organization Science,13(2),128-146.
[5]Ford,Cameron M & Dennis A.Ginia(2000),Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making[J].Journal of Management,26(4),705-732.
[6]Coleman,J.(1990),Foundation of Social Theory[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,35-78.
[1]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghnshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[2]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[3]Adler,Paul S.& Seok-Woo Kwon(2002),Social Capital:Prospects for a New Concept[J].Academy of Management Review,27(1),17-40.
[4]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[5]Hofstede,Geert(1991),Culture and Organizations:Software of the Mind[M].London:McGraw-Hill:56-89.
[6]Triandis,Harry C.(1995),Individualism and Collectivism[M].Boulder,CO:West view Press:78-112.
[7]Triandis,Harry C.(1995),Individualism and Collectivism[M].Boulder,CO:West view Press:78-112.
[8]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Iaquinto,Anthoy L.& James W.Fredrickson(1997),Top Management Team Agreement about the Strategic Decision Process:A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences[J].Strategic Management Journal,18(1),63-75.
[2]Nahapiet,Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital,Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage[J].Academy of Management Review,23(2),242-266.
[3]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1995),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,22,587-613.
[2]Cooke,P.& Clifton,N.(2002),Social Capital,and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom,Entreprenenrship in the Modern Space-economy:Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives[R].Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht Amsterdam,122-167.
[3]陈劲,李飞宇:社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001.19(3):第103-107页。
[4]张方华:知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2004:第154-163页。
[1]Shane,Scott(2000),Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunism[J].Organization Science,11(4),448-469.
[2]Cert.,Richard M.& James G.March(1963),A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs[M].NJ:Prentice Hall:56-122.
[3]Levinthal,Daniel A.& James G.March(1993),The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,14(Winter Special Issue),95-112.
[4]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[5]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[6]Ahuja,Gautam & Curba Morris Lampert(2001),Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation:A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),521-543.
[1]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[2]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[3]Levinthal,Daniel A.& James G.March(1993),The Myopia of Learning[J].Strategic Management Journal,14(Winter Special Issue),95-112.
[4]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[5]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[6]Stinchcombe,Arthur L.(1965),Social Structure in Organizations[M].Handbook of Orgainzations,J.G.March,ed.Chicago:Rand McNally,142-193.
[7]Nerkar,Atul(2003),Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge[J].Management Science,49(2),211-229.
[1]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[2]Shane,Scott(2000),Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunism[J].Organization Science,11(4),448-469.
[3]Katila,Riitta & Gautam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[4]March,James G.(1991),Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning[J].Organization Science,2(1),71-87.
[5]Nerkar,Atul(2003),Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge[J].Management Science,49(2),211-229.
[6]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
[1]Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
[2]Yli-Renko,H.,Autio,E.,et al.(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms[J].Strategy Management Journal,22,587-613.
[1]Tsai,Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal(1998),Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J].Academy of Management Journal,41(4),464-476.
[1]Iaquinto,Anthoy L.& James W.Fredrickson(1997),Top Management Team Agreement about the Strategic Decision Process:A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences[J].Strategic Management Journal,18(1),63-75.
[2]Nerkar,Atul(2003),Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge[J].Management Science,49(2),211-229.
[1]Katila,Riitta & Gantam Ahuja(2002),Something Old,Something New:A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction[J].Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1183-1194.
[2]Cert.,Richard M.& James G.March(1963),A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs[M].NJ:Prentice Hall:56-122.
[3]Benner,Mary J.& Michael L.Tushman(2003),Exploitation,Exploration,and Process Management:The Productivity Dilemma Revisited[J].Academy of Management Review,28(2),238-256.
1. Adler, Paul S. & Seok-Woo Kwon (2002), Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept [J]. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ahuja, Gautam & Curba Morris Lampert (2001), Entrepreneurship in the Large Corporation: A Longitudinal Study of How Established Firms Create Breakthrough Inventions [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 521-543.
3. Aiken, Leona S. & Stephen G. West (1991), Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions [M]. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Argyris, Schon (1978), Organizational Learning: A theory of Action Perspective [M]. Reading, MA: Addiong -Wesley: 15-42.
5. Ariede Geus (1997), The Living Company [M]. Harvard Business School Press:56.
6. Atuahene-Gima & Felicitas Evangelista (2000), Cross-Functional Influence in New Product Development: An Exploratory Study of Marketing and R&D Perspectives [J]. Management Science, 46(October), 1269-1284.
7. Atuahene-Gima (2003), The Effects of Centrifugal and Centripetal Forces on Product Development Speed and Quality: How Does Problem Solving Matter? [J].Academy of Management Journal, 46 (3), 359-73.
8. Atuahene-Gima, Kwaku (1995), The Influence of New Product Factors on Export Propensity and Performance: An Empirical Analysis [J]. Journal of International Marketing, 3(2), 9-26.
9. Autio, Erkko, Harry J. Sapienza &James G. Almeida (2000), Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth [J].Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 909-924.
10. Baker, W. (1990), Market Networks and Corporate Behavior [J].American Journal of Sociology (96): 589-625.
11. Benner, Mary J. & Michael L. Tushman (2003), Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited [J]. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256.
12. Bolino, M. C., Tumley, W. H. & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002), Citizenship Behavior and the Creation of Social Capital in Organizations [J]. Academy of Management Review, 27(4): 505-522.
13. Bontis, N., Crossan, M. M., & Hulland, J. (2002), Managing an Organizational Learning System by Aligning Stocks and Flows [J]. Journal of Management Studies, 39(4), 437-469.
14. Bourdieu P. (1985), The Forms of Capital [A]. J. G. Richardson. Hand-book of theory and research for the sociology of education [M]. New York: Greenwood Inc., 241-258.
15. Brown, Shona L. and Kathleen M. Eisenhardt (1995), Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions [J]. Academy of Management Review, 20 (2), 343-78.
16. Buderi, Robert (2005), Microsoft: Getting from "R" to "D" [J]. Technology Review, 108 (March), 28-30.
17. Burt, R. S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition [M].Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 66-69.
18. Cangelosi V. E., Dill W. R. (1965), Organizational Lemming: Observation Toward a Theory [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10: 175-203.
19. Cert., Richard M. & James G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm Englewood Cliffs [M]. NJ: Prentice Hall: 56-122.
20. Chris Freeman: 工业创新经济学[J] .北京:北京大学出版社,2004年7月,第42页。
21. Cohen, D. & Prusak, L. (2000), In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work [M]. Harvard MA: Harvard Business School Press: 65-77.
22. Cohen, W.M & Levinthal, D.A. (1989), Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D [J]. The Economic Journal, 99(937), 569-586.
23. Coleman, J. (1988), Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital [J]. The American Journal of Sociology, 94 (Supplement): 95-120.
24. Coleman, J. (1990), Foundation of Social Theory [M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 35-78.
25. Cooke, P. & Clifton, N. (2002), Social cCapital, and Small and Medium Enterprise Performance in the United Kingdom, Entrepreneurship in the Modern Space-economy: Evolutionary and Policy Perspectives [R]. Tinbergen Institute,Keizersgracht Amsterdam, 122-167.
26. Cooper, R. G. & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987), Success Factors in Product Innovation [J]. Industrial Marketing Management, Vol.16 No.3, 215-223.
27. Cooper, R. G. (1984), New Product Strategies: What Distinguishes the Top Performers? [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Manage, 1(2): 151-64.
28. Cortina, Jose M. (1993), What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78 (1), 98-104.
29. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999), An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution [J]. Academy of Management Review,24(3), 522-537.
30. Cyert, Richard M. and James G. March (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
31. Dooley, Robert S. & Gerald E. Fryxell (1999), Attaining Decision Quality and Commitment from Dissent: The Moderating Effects of Loyalty and Competence in Strategic Decision-Making Teams [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4),389-402.
32. Drucker, P. (1993), Post Capitalist Society [M]. London: Butter worth Heinemann, 25-27.
33. Dubini, Paola & Howard Aldrich (1991), Personal and Extended Networks Are Central to the Entrepreneurial Process [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 6 (5),305-313.
34. Dyer, J. H. (2000), Creating and Managing a High-performance Knowledge-sharing Network: The Toyota Case [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 21: 345-367.
35. E, Rapoport J, Romeo A, Wagner S, Beardsley G. (1997), Social and Private Rates of Return from Industrial Innovation [J]. Quart J. Economics, May, 91:221-241.
36. Edelman, L .F., Bresnen, M., Newell, S., et al. (2002), The Darker Side of Social Capital [C]. Paper Presented at the 3rd European Conference on Organizational Knowledge, Learning and Capabilities, Athens, 57-89.
37. Edmondson, Amy C. (1999), The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective [J]. Organization Science, 13(2),128-146.
38. Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High-Velocity Environments [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3),543-576.
39. Ensley, Michael D., Allison W. Pearson, and Allen C. Amason (2002),Understanding the Dynamics of New Venture Top Management Teams:Cohesion, Conflict, and New Venture Performance [J]. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(4), 365-386.
40. Evans, M.G. (1985), A Monte Carlo Study of the Effects on Correlated Method Variance in Moderated Multiple Regression Analysis [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 36(3), 305-323.
41. Feeser, Henry R. and Gary E. Willard (1990), Founding Strategy and Performance: A Comparison of High and Low Growth High Tech Firms [J].Strategic Management Journal, 11 (2), 87-98.
42. Fiol, C. & Mlyles, M. (1985), Organizational Learning [J]. Academy of Management Review, 10(4): 132-133.
43. Fiol, C. Marlene (1994), Consensus, Diversity, and Learning in Organization [J].Organization Science, 5(3), 403-420.
44. Ford, Cameron M. & Dennis A. Gioia (2000), Factors Influencing Creativity in the Domain of Managerial Decision Making [J]. Journal of Management, 26(4),705-732.
45. Foss, Nicolai Juul & Torben Pedersen (2004), Organizing Knowledge Processes in the Multinational Corporation: An Introduction [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (5), 340-349.
46. Fukuyama, Francis (1995), Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity [M]. New York: The Free Press: 67-112.
47. Fulmer R. M, Gibbs P., Keys J. B. (1998), The Second Generation Learning Organizations. Organizational Dynamics [J]. 27(3): 7-19.
48. Fulmer, R. M. (1994), A Model for Changing the Way Organizations Learn [J].Planning Review, Vol.22, Iss.3,20-24.
49. G. C. Loury (1997), Intergeneration Transfer and the Distribution of Earnings [J].Econometrical, 176-179.
50. Gant, J., Ichniowski, C. & Shaw, K. (2002), Social Capital and Organizational Change in High Involvement and Traditional Work Organizations [J]. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 11: 289-328.
51. Geletkanycz, Marta A. & Donald D. Hambrick (1997), The External Ties of Top Executives: Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 654-681.
52. Gemiiden, H.G., Riter, T., & Heydebreck, F. (1996), Network Configuration and Innovation Success: an Empirical Analysis in German High-tech Industries [J].International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(5): 449-462.
53. Gherardi, S. & Nicolini, D. (2000), The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice [J]. Journal of Management Inquiry. 9(1), 7.
54. Gherardi, S. and Nicolini, D. (2001), The Organizational Learning of Safety in Community of Practice [J]. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(1), 7.
55. Gimeno, J. (2004), Competition within and Between Networks: The Contingent Effect of Competitive Embeddedness on Alliance Formation [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 820-842.
56. Granovetter M. (1992), Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology [A].Nohria N, Eccles RG (Eds).Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 25-56.
57. Granovetter, M. S. (1973), The Strength of Weak Ties [J]. American Journal of Sociology, 78: 1360-1380.
58. Granovetter, M. S. (2000), The Economic Sociology of Firms and Entrepreneurs [A]. Swedberg, R. (Ed.) Entrepreneurship: The social science view. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 244-275.
59. Granovetter, M. (1992), The Sociological and Economic Approach to Labor Market Analysis: A Social Structural View [A]. Granovetter and Swedberg (Eds.).The sociology of economic life. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 233-263.
60. Grant, R. M. (1991), The Resource-based Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation [J].California Management Review,3:114-135.
61. Grant, Robert M. (1996), Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm [J].Strategic Management Journal, 17 (Special Issue), 109-122.
62. Gulati, R. (1999), The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 20: 397-420.
63. Gulati, R. (1995), Social Structural and Alliance Formation Patterns: A Longitudinal Analysis [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 619-652.
64. Hagedoorn, J., Cloodt, M. (2003), Measuring innovative performance: Is there an advantage in using multiple in dictators? [J]. Research Policy, 32,1365-1379.
65. Hakansson, H, Johanson, J. (1993), The Network as a Governance Structure:Inter-firm Cooperation beyond Markets and Hierarchies [A]. In Grabher, G (Eds).The Embedded Firm: On the Socioeconomics of Industrial Networks.London:Routledge.
66. Hakansson. (1994), Networks as a Mechanism to Develop Resources [A]. In P.Beijie, J. Groenebegen, & O. Nuys (Eds.).Networking in Dutch industries.Amsterdam: Garant Uitgivers.
67. Hambrick, Donald C. & Phyllis A. Mason (1984), Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers [J]. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206.
68. Hamel G. (1991), Competition for Competence and Inter-partner Learning within International Strategic Alliances [J].Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103.
69. Hankinson, Johansson. (1988), Formal and Informal Cooperation Strategies in International Industrial Networks [A]. Contractor, F.J., Lorange, P. (Eds).Cooperative Strategies in International Business. Lexington: Lexington Books,369-379.
70. Hanna Toiviainen (2003), Learning Across Levels: Challenges of Collaboration in a Small-Firm Network [D]. Helsinki :University of Helsinki.
71. He, Zi-Lin & Poh-Kam Wong (2004), Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis [J]. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-494.
72. Hedberg, R. (1981), How Organizations Learn and Unlearn [M]. in Handbook of Organizational Design, Vol.1.1, P. C. Nystrom and W .H .Starbuck(eds.), 3-27,Oxford.
73. Henderson, R. M., Clark, K. B. (1990), Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 9-30.
74. Hofstede, Geert (1991), Culture and Organizations: Software of the Mind [M].London: McGraw-Hill: 56-89.
75. http://www.chineseall.net/chineseall/BookDisplay.external.html.
76. Huber, G. P. (1991), Organization Learning: the Contributing Processes and the Literatures [J]. Organization Science, 2(1): 88-115.
77. Hult G. Tomas M. & Ferrell O. C. A. (1997), Global Learning Organization Structure and Market Information Processing [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2:155-166.
78. Hurst, David K., James C. Rush, & Roderick E. White (1989), Top Management Teams and Organizational Renewal [J]. Strategic Management Journal,10(Special Issue), 87-105.
79. Iaquinto, Anthoy L. & James W. Fredrickson (1997), Top Management Team Agreement about the Strategic Decision Process: A Test of Some of Its Determinants and Consequences [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1),63-75.
80. Inkpen, A. C&Tsang, E. W.K. (2005), Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer [J]. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146-165.
81. Janszen, F. H.A. (2002), Dynamic Business Modeling as a Management Tool that Support the Development and Testing of Innovation Strategies, IE MC'98 Proceedings [M]. International Conference 11-13. 408-412.
82. Jaworski, Bernard J. and Ajay K. Kohli (1993), Market Orientation: Antecedents and Consequences [J]. Journal of Marketing, 57 (July), 53-70.
83. Jones, G. R. George, J. M. (1998), The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork [J]. Academy of Management Review, 23: 531-546.
84. Kale, P., Singh, H. & Perlmutter, H. (2000), Learning and Protection of Proprietary Assets in Strategic Alliances: Building Relational Capital [J].Strategic Management Journal, 21: 217-238.
85. Kang, S. C, Morris, & S. S., Snell, S. A. (2007), Relational Archetypes, Organizational Learning, and Value Creation: Extending the Human Resource Architecture [J]. Academy of Management Review, 32: 236-256.
86. Katila, Riitta & Gautam Ahuja (2002), Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction [J].Academy of Management Journal, 45(6), 1183-1194.
87. Knott, A. M. (2002), Exploration and Exploitation as Complements [M]. In N.Bontis & C.W.Choo (eds.), The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge: A Collection of Readings, Oxford University Press,New York, 339-358.
88. Landry, R., Amara, N., et al. (2002), Does Social Capital Determine Innovation? To What Extent? [J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 69,681-701.
89. Lane, P. J., Lubatkin, M. (1998), Relative Absorptive Capacity and Inter-organizational Learning [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 19: 461-477
90. Lawrence, Thomas B., Michael K. Mauws, Bruno Dyck, & Robert F. Kleysen (2005), The Politics of Organizational Learning: Integrating Power into the 41 Framework [J]. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 180-191.
91. Leana, C. R., Buren, H. J. (1999), Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices [J]. Academy of Management Review, 24: 538-555.
92. Leenders R. Th. A. J. (1999), Gabbay S. M. Corporate Social Capital and Liability [M]. Boston: Kluwer Inc., 3:98-103.
93. Levinthal, Daniel A. & James G. March (1993), The Myopia of Learning [J].Strategic Management Journal, 14(Winter Special Issue), 95-112.
94. Levitt, B. & March, J. (1988), Organizational Learning [J]. Annual Review of Sociology, 14,157-163.
95. Lewin, A. Y., Long, C. P. & Carroll, T. N. (1999), The Co-evolution of New Organizational Forms [J]. Organization Science, 10, 535-550.
96. Li, Haiyang & Kwaku Atuahene-Gima (2001), Product Innovation Strategy and the Performance of New Technology Ventures in China [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1123-1134.
97. LIN N. (1982), Social Resources and Instrumental Action [M]. MARSDEN P,LIN N. Social Structure and Network Analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.: 131 -145.
98. LIN N. (2001), Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action [M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 25.
99. Lu, J. W. (2001), Network Development for Competitive Advantage: A Study of Subsidiary Networks and Alliance Networks [D].The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, 143-167.
100.Luo, Y. & Peng, M. W. (1999), Learning to Compete in a Transition Economy:Experience, Environment and Performance [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 269-296.
101.Lyles, M. A. (1988). Learning Among Joint Venture Sophisticated Firms [J].MIR Special Issue, 85-97.
102.March J, Simon H. (1958), Organizational Learning [M]. New York: Wiley:54-79.
103.March, J. G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J].Organization Science, 2: 71-87.
104.March, James G & J. P. Olsen (1975), The Uncertainty of the Past:Organizational Learning under Ambiguity [J]. European Journal of Political Research, 3,147-171.
105.March, James G. (1991), Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning [J]. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
106.Marquardt, M. J. (1996), Building the Learning Organization: a Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill: 156-168.
107.Mazzonis and Shaw. Small Firm Networking, Cooperation, and Innovation in Italy: Viewed by An Agency Engaged in Actions for Stimulating The Technological Upgrading of Industry[J].Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1989, 1(1):61-74.
108.McGrath, R. (2001), Exploratory Learning, Innovative Capacity and the Role of Managerial Oversight [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-133
109.Meister J C. (2000), The CEO Driven Leaning Culture? [J]. the Internal Auditor,58(5): 38-45.
110.Meyers, P.W. (1990), Non-linear Learning in Technological Firms [J]. Research Policy, Vol. 19,97-115.
111 .Miller, C. Chet., Linda M. Burke & William H. Glick (1998), Cognitive Diversity Among Upper-Echelon Executives: Implications for Strategic Decision Processes [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 19 (1), 39-58.
112.Mitchell, J. C.The Concept and Use of Social Networks [A]. Mitchell (ed.),Social networks in urban situations [C]. Manchester: Manchester University Press,1969.
113.Morgan, R M. & Hunt, S D. (1994), The Commitment Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing [J]. Journal of Marketing, 58(3): 20-38.
114.N. Rosenberg (1982), Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics [M],Cambridge University Press: 3, 34,106.
115.Nadel, SF.The Theory of Social Structure [M]. London: Cohen and West, 1957:16.
116.Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1997), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Creation of Value in Firms [J]. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings:35-39.
117.Nahapiet, Janine & Sumantra Ghoshal (1998), Social Capital, Intellectual Capital,and the Organizational Advantage [J]. Academy of Management Review, 23(2),242-266.
118.Nerkar, Atul (2003), Old Is Gold? The Value of Temporal Exploration in the Creation of New Knowledge [J]. Management Science, 49(2), 211-229.
119.Nevis E. C, Dibella A. J, Gould J. M. (1995), Understanding Organizations as Learning System [J]. Sloan Management Review, 36(2): 73 -95.
120.Nonaka L., Takeuchi H. (1995), The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Creating the Dynamics of Innovation [M]. Oxford University Press: 57-88.
121.Nonaka, I. (1991), The Knowledge-creating Company [J]. Harvard Business Review, 69(6): 96-104
122.Pablos, P O. D. (2005), Western and Eastern Views on Social Networks [J]. The Learning Organization, 12(5): 436-456.
123 .Peng, Mike W. & Yadong Luo (2000), Managerial Ties and Firm Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro-Macro Link [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486-501.
124.Pfeffer, Jeffrey (1981), Power in Organizations. Marshfield [D]. MA: Pitman: 87.
125.Podsakoff, Philip M. and Dennis W. Organ (1986), Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects [J]. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
126.Prahalad, C. K., Hamel, G. (1990), The Core Competence of the Organization [J].Harvard Business Review, 68: 79-91.
127.Putnam, R. D. (1993), Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy [M]. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press: 36
128.Ritter, T, Gem(?)den H. G. (2003), Network Competence: Its Impact on Innovation Success and Its Antecedents. Journal of Business Research [J], 56: 1437-1458.
129.Romanelli, Elaine (1987), New Venture Strategies in the Minicomputer Industry [J]. California Management Review, 30 (1), 160-175.
130.Rothwell, R. (1992), Successful Industrial Innovation: Critical Factors for the 1990's [J]. R&D Management 22: 221-239.
131.Rothwell, R. et al. (1974), SAPPHO Updated [J]. Research Policy, November:57-98.
132.Rowley, Tim, Dean Behrens, & David Krackhardt (2000), Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries [J]. Strategic Management Journal,21(3), 369-386.
133.Schoonhoven, Claudia Bird (1981), Problems with Contingency Theory: Testing Assumptions Hidden Within the Language of Contingency "Theory" [J].Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (3), 349-377.
134. Shane, Scott (2000), Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunism [J]. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
135.Sinkula, Baker & Noordewier (1997), A Framework for Market-based Organizational Learning: Linking Values, Knowledge and Behavior [J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2(5): 305-318.
136.Stinchcombe, Arthur L. (1965), Social Structure in Organizations [M]. Handbook of Organizations, J.G. March, ed. Chicago: Rand McNally, 142-193.
137.Swee Goh (1998), Toward a Learning Organization: the Strategic Building Blocks [J]. Sam Advanced Management Journal, spring: 15-22.
138.Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen, A. (1997), Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. [J], Srtategic Management, 18: 509-533.
139.Todeva, E. & Knoke, D. (2002), Strategic Alliance and Corporate Social Capital [A]. Allmendinger, J. and Hinz, T. Sociology of Organizations [M]. K, lner Zeitschrift: Sociology and Social psychologies: 46-99.
140.Triandis, Harry C. (1995), Individualism and Collectivism [M]. Boulder, CO:West view Press: 78-112.
141.Tsai, Wenpin & Sumantra Ghoshal (1998), Social Capital and Value Creation:The Role of Interafirm Networks [J]. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4),464-476.
142.Tsai, Wenpin (2000), Social Capital, Strategic Relatedness and the Formation of Intra-organizational Linkages [J]. Strategic Management Journal, 21(9), 925-939.
143.Uzzi B. (1996), Social Structure and Competition in Inter-firm Networks: the Paradox of Embeddedness [J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 674-698.
144.Uzzi, B. (1996), The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organizations: the Network Effect [J]. American Sociological Review, 61: 674-698.
145.Van Wijk, R., Van den Bosch, F. A. J. & Volberda, H. W. (2003), Knowledge and Networks [M]. In M. Easter by-Smith, et al.(eds.) The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management, 428-453, Maiden, MA,Blackwell Pub.
146.Walfish, Daniel (2001), P&G China Lab Has Global Role [J]. Research Technology Management, 44 (5), 4-5.
147.Watkins Marsick (1993), Sculpting the Learning Organization [M]. San Francisco.CA: Jossey-bass: 43-55.
148.Watkins Marsick (2003), Demonstrating the Value of an Organization's Learning Culture: The Dimensions of the Learning Organization Questionnaire [J].Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2): 132-151.
149.Werker, Claudia (2001), Knowledge and Organization Strategy in Innovation System [J]. International Journal of Innovation Management, Mar. (Vol. 5 Issue):105-106.
150.Westlund, H. (2003), Implications of Social Capital for Business in the Knowledge Economy: Theoretical Considerations [C]. International Forum on Economic Implication of Social Capital, Tokyo, Japan: 75.
151.Wu X, Wei Y. (2004), The Analysis on Competitive Advantage of Firms in the Context of Synergic Development: Based on the Perspective of Social Capital [C].Singapore: International Engineering Management Conference,78-97.
152.Wu, X. B., Xu, G. N. & Wang, W. B. (2006), Technology Innovation of Developing Country in the Context of Globalization: A Case Study [A].Proceedings of International Technology and Innovation Conference (ITIC),(3):90-95.
153.Yli -Renko, H., Autio, E., et al. (2001), Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology Based Firms [J]. Strategy Management Journal, 22, 587-613.
154.Yli-Renko,Helena,Erkko Autio,& Harry J.Sapienza(2001),Social Capital,Knowledge Acquisition,and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms[J].Strategic Management Journal,22(6-7),587-613.
155.Zahra,S.A.,Nielsen,A.P.& Bogner,W.C.(1999),Corporate Entrepreneurship,Knowledge and Competence Development[J].Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,24,169-189.
156.Zahra,Shaker A.,R.Duane Ireland,and Michael A.Hitt(2000),International Expansion by New Venture Firms:International Diversity,Mode of Entry,Technological Learning,and Performance[J].Academy of Management Journal,43(5),925-950.
157.阿吉瑞斯,舍恩:组织学习:行为透视理论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1990。
158.安娜·格兰多里主编:企业网络,组织和产业竞争力[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005。
159.奥利弗·威廉姆森:交易费用经济学:契约关系的规制、企业制度与市场组织[M].上海三联书店,上海人民出版社,1996:24。
160.边燕杰,丘海雄:企业的社会资本及其功效[J].中国社会科学,2000(2):第87-99页。
161.蔡宇:企业技术创新的风险分析与防范[J].科技管理研究,2005(9):第43-48页。
162.曹亚东等:先进制造技术与创新能力:组织学习的视角[J].现代管理科学,2008(7):第56-62页。
163.陈和,隋广军:产业演进下的企业间组织研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2007(8):第149-154页。
164.陈劲,陈钰芬:企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2006(3):第86-91页。
165.陈劲,李飞宇:社会资本:对技术创新的社会学诠释[J].科学学研究,2001.19(3):第103-107页。
166.陈伟:创新管理[M].科学出版社,1998:第47-78页。
167.陈学光:网络能力、创新网络及创新绩效关系研究——以浙江高新技术企业为例[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2007:第48-52页。
168.程工:企业技术创新论[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2005年1月。
169.单伟建:交易费用经济学的理论:应用及偏颇,现代经济学前沿专题(1)[J].商务印书馆,1993年版。
170.杜占元,刘东:中小企业技术创新及其政策研究[J].科技进步与对策,1997(5):第19-21页。
171.方世杰:在台外商研发投资与台湾知识流通体系之影响[M].(台湾)管理学报,2002,19(1):第147-174页。
172.方新:过渡经济条件下的中国企业技术创新研究[J].中国科技论坛,1998(2):第37-40页。
173.傅家骥,仝允桓,高建:技术创新学[J].北京:清华大学出版社,1998,第78页。
174.高洪深,丁娟娟:企业知识管理[M].清华大学出版社,2003年11月,第200-207页。
175.高建,傅家骥:中国企业技术创新的关键问题:1051家企业技术创新调查分析[J].中外科技政策与管理,1996(1):第24-33页。
176.高建,汪剑飞,魏平:企业技术创新绩效指标:现状、问题和新概念模型[J].科研管理,2004(5):第45-47页。
177.格鲁特尔特,贝斯特纳尔:社会资本在发展中的作用[M].成都:西南财经大学出版社,2004:第34-78页。
178.官建成:中欧工业创新的比较分析《中国创新管理前沿》(柳卸林主编)[M].北京理工大学出版社,2004年5月,第215-230页。
179.郭咸纲:西方管理思想史[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004:第56-87页。
180.韩辉:中小企业技术创新的影响因素和路径的选择[J].中小企业,2005(9):第43-46页。
181.贺盛瑜:虚拟企业中伙伴信任关系的建立与发展[J].软科学,2003(4):第34-39页。
182.姜平:日本中小企业问题及政策研究[J].济学家,2001(5):第56-68页。
183.蒋长流、纵玲玲:基于动态博弈的政府与中小企业技术创新行为分析[J].技术经济,2007(3):第16-18页。
184.蒋春燕,赵曙明:社会资本和公司企业家精神与绩效的关系:组织学习的中介作用[J].北京:管理世界,2006(10):第90-99页。
185.蒋天颖,施放:企业组织学习维度结构的实证分析[J].浙江社会科学,2008(5):第87-93页。
186.李惠斌,杨冬雪:社会资本与社会发展[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2000,第56-73页。
187.林健,李焕荣:战略网络对企业绩效影响分析[J].科研管理,2003(4):第87-92页.
188.柳卸林:技术创新经济学[M].中国经济出版社,1993:第55-57页。
189.路应金等:技术创新风险分析[M].电子科技大学社科版,2003年6月,第101-105页。
190.吕卫文:隐性知识和编码知识[J].科研管理,2007(6):第23-28页。
191.吕毓芳:论领导行为、组织学习、创新与绩效间相关性研究[D].复旦大学博士学位论文,2005:第67-69页。
192.罗斯托(Rostow,W.N.):从起飞进入持续增长的经济学[M].成都:四川人民出版社,1988:第34-57页。
193.马克思:资本论(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975:第533-535页。
194.潘旭明:战略联盟的信任机制:基于社会网络的视角[J].财经科学,2006(5):第34-40页。
195.彭宇文、吴林海:我国中小企业技术创新支持体系研究[J].科学管理研究,2007(2):第7-11页。
196.彭玉冰,白国红:谈企业技术创新与政府行为[J].经济问题,1999(7),第35-36页。
197.人民日报:中共中央国务院关于实施科技规划纲要增强自主创新能力的决定,2006年02月10日第1版。
198.孙永风,廖貅武,李垣:转型背景下中国企业基于社会资本的知识管理研究[J].北京:中国工业经济,2008(3):第118-126页。
199.泰勒:科学管理原理[M].上海科学技术出版社,1982:第45-55页。
200.万青云:高技术产业区域理论研究[M].北京:中国国家图书馆,2002年。
201.王国进,王其藩:企业技术创新能力评价研究的新进展[J].科研管理,2004(2):第32-38页。
202.王利晓,惠宁:企业社会资本研究文献综述[J].西安邮电学院学报,2007(6):第79-82页。
203.王霄,胡军:社会资本结构与中小企业创新[J].管理世界,2005(7):第116-122页。
204.王晓晖:学习型组织文化的差异与影响研究[J].北京:管理世界,2007(11):第76-86页。
205.王勇:企业社会资本的国内研究进展与趋势展望[J].当代经济管理,2008(10):第14-18页。
206.王勇:企业社会资本对技术创新的影响[J].改革,2006(2):第13-15页。
207.韦影:企业社会资本的概念与研究维度综述[J].科技进步与对策,2008(2):第197-200页。
208.韦影:企业社会资本对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于吸收能力的视角[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2006:第54-57页。
209.韦影:企业社会资本与技术创新——基于吸收能力的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2007(9):第119-126页。
210.吴翠花:联盟网络环境下科技型中小企业知识创造能力与组织绩效关系实证研究[D].西安交通大学博士学位论文,2006:第44-47页。
211.吴翠花等:联盟网络社会资本对知识转移影响路径研究[J].科学学研究,2008(5):第57-63页。
212.吴贵生:技术创新管理[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2000。
213.武志伟:企业社会资本的内涵和功能研究[J].软科学,2003(5):第19-21页。
214.西格法德·哈里森:日本的技术与创新管理:从寻求技术诀窍到寻求合作者[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2004,第1-7页。
215.谢洪明,韩子天:组织学习与绩效的关系:创新是中介变量吗?——珠三角地区企业的实证研究及其启示[J].科研管理,2005(5):第1-10页。
216.谢洪明,蓝海林:动态竞争与战略网络[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2004,第4页。
217.谢洪明等:社会资本、组织学习与组织创新的关系研究[J].管理工程学报,2008(1):第5-10页。
218.谢洪明等:市场导向与组织绩效的关系:组织学习与创新的影响[J].管理世界,2006(2):第80-97页。
219.谢伟:技术学习过程的新模式[J].科研管理,1999(4):1-7。
220.谢竹云,茅宁:社会资本、组织学习与企业的价值创造[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2008(9):第136-141页。
221.熊彼特:经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997,第2-74页。
222.徐延辉:企业家的伦理行为与企业社会资本积累——一个经济学和社会学的比较框架分析[J].社会学研究,2002(6):第73-75页。
223.许冠南:关系嵌入性对技术创新绩效的影响研究——基于探索型学习的中介机制[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2008:第49页。
224.许萍:企业社会资本和环境适应[J].经济研究,2007(3):第51-52页。
225.许小东:技术创新的成败归因及其对创新行为的影响研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(2):第28-30页。
226.亚当·斯密:国民财富的性质和原因的研究(下卷)[M].北京:商务印书馆,1988,第243页。
227.杨瑞龙、周业安:交易费用与企业所有权分配和约的选择[J].经济研究,1998(9):第12-23页。
228.杨瑞龙等:产业组织能力与企业竞争优势[J].教学与研究,2001(4):第34-37页。
229.杨瑞龙主编:企业理论:现代观点[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005。
230.尹建海,杨建华:基于加强型平衡记分法的企业技术创新绩效评价指标体系研究[J].科研管理,2008(1):第1-7页。
231.于小涵:组织学习过程模型的比较研究[J].科技管理研究,2005(1):第85-86页。
232.余琛,蒋伟军:企业资源观理论综述[J].经济师,2000(8):第56-58页。
233.宇红:信任与企业家社会资本[J].社会科学辑刊,2006(5):第49-53页。
234.詹正华:中小企业未来技术创新路径选择[J].企业经济,2004(5):第83-85页。
235.张方华:知识型企业的社会资本与技术创新绩效的关系研究[D].浙江大学博士学位论文,2004:第154-163页。
236.张其仔:社会资本与国有企业绩效研究[J].当代财经,2000.182(1):第53-58页。
237.赵曙东:高新企业技术创新和发展的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,1999(12):第63-65页。
238.赵延东:社会资本理论的新进展[J].国外社会科学,2003(3):第54-59页。
239.郑胜利,陈国智:企业社会资本积累与企业竞争优势[J].生产力研究,2002(1):第133-137页。
240.中国社会科学院工业经济研究所:中国工业发展报告——中国工业经济创新[M].北京:经济管理出版社,2004。
241.周小虎,陈传明:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势闭[J].中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
242.周小虎:企业社会资本与持续竞争优势[J].北京:中国工业经济,2004(5):第90-96页。
243.周庄,王宏达:国有大中型工业企业技术创新影响因素的调查分析[J].天津经济,2001(5):第56-62页。
244.朱国宏:经济社会学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1999:第84页。
245.朱有为:中国制造业的技术创新绩效研究[D].东南大学博士学位论文,2007:第18-22页。
246.朱泽,徐金发:R&D中的知识管理[J].科学管理研究,2000(1):第41-43页。