三种眼科常见病南北地域的辨证论治差异
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
岭南医学是研究岭南地区自然气候、地理环境、人群体质对该地区疾病发生发展的影响和防治规律的一个学术流派,包括岭南温病、岭南内科、岭南儿科、岭南疫病、岭南瘴疟等。至今,我国还没有南北地域中医眼科的辨证论治差异的研究,本课题选择三种眼科常见疾病:病毒性角膜炎(HSK)、葡萄膜炎、中心性浆液性视网膜脉络膜炎(CSC)为研究对象。
     目的:通过统计分析病毒性角膜炎、葡萄膜炎、中心性浆液性视网膜脉络膜炎的相关论文资料及病例资料,对比此三种常见眼病的南北辨证论治的差异,来了解、分析岭南地域中医眼科的辩证论治特色。
     方法:采用回顾性分析,收集资料包括1980年至今的南北方的论文资料271篇,以及1980年后从广州中医药大学第一附属医院病案室及眼科门诊激光室的病例资料325例,将收集的资料按北方(北京、天津、河北、河南、山西、安徽、山东、江苏、上海)及南方(广东、广西、海南)分为南北两组,比较此三种常见病的南北辨证论治用药的差异。
     结果:1.证型分析:①病毒性角膜炎前组湿热蕴伏证南方较北方为多,肝胆火炽证、正虚邪留证北方较南方多;后组肝经风热、湿热蕴伏证南方较北方为多,正虚邪留证、肝胆火炽证北方较南方多,后组南方论文和北方论文证型对比无统计学意义;南方前后组证型对比无统计学意义。②葡萄膜炎前组阴虚火旺证北方较南方多,后组南北方证型对比无统计学意义;南方后组阴虚火旺证较前组多,前组脾肾阳虚较后组多。③中浆湿浊上泛证南方较北方为多,肝肾阴虚证北方较南方为多;南方前后组证型对比无统计学意义。2.治疗用药分析:①HSK药物比较:南北方用药前十名药物比较,P<0.05,有统计学意义。②葡萄膜炎药物比较:南北方用药前十名药物比较,P<0.05,有统计学意义。③CSC药物比较:南北方用药前十名药物比较,P<0.05,有统计学意义。
     结论:1.证型差异:①岭南地域多见湿热痰湿证候。②病毒性角膜炎的病因病机与肝经风热密切相关。③葡萄膜炎的病因病机与肝胆湿热密切相关。④北方地区病毒性角膜炎肝胆火炽证较多,葡萄膜炎阴虚火旺证较多,中浆肝肾阴虚证较多。2.论治特点:①南方用药多使用祛瘀凉血之品。②南方用药多用轻省之品,缓和之剂。③南方多顾护脾胃。④南方重视疏肝理气,宣畅气机。⑤北方多用力量相对较峻之药。⑥北方用通阳化气,利水渗湿之品。⑦北方重益阴滋阴之品。3.南方辨证论治的特点与岭南的气候特点、人的体质特点密切相关,而与时间推移、网络发展等相关性不大。
Medical science in South China is an academic school by studying the occurrence and development of the disease in the influence of the natural climate, the circumstances and the group constitution, and by studying the rule of prevention and cure.It includes seasonal febrile disease, internal medicine, pediatrics, plague, malignant malaria and so on. To this day, there is no the study on the difference of treatment by differentiation of syndromes (TDS) in ophthalmology between in South China and North China. We select 3 ophthalmocaces as the research objects, It includes herpes simplex keratitis(HSK), uveitis and central serous chorioretinopathy(CSC).
     Objective:By statistical analyzing the data of thesis and cases of HSK, uveitis and CSC, by contrasting the difference of TDS in ophthalmology between in South China and North China, to understand the special feature of TDS in ophthalmology.
     Method:Using retrospective analysis , collecting 271 thesis in the library of Guanghzou University of TCM and 325 cases in the medical record library and the laser-room in the first of affiliated hospital of Guangzhou University of TCM after 1980, we divided these data into two groups:the north group (Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Henan, Shanxi, Anhui, Shandong, Jiangsu, Shanghai) and the south group (Guangdong, Guangxi, Hainan) , to contrast TDS between in the South and North group, to conclude the difference between in the South North group.
     Result:1. Analysis of type of syndrome:①There are more ratio of syndrome of accumulated damp-heat in south than north, more syndrome of excessive fire of liver-gallbladder and remaining of pathogens due to deficiency of vital QI in north than south in front group of HSK. There are more ratio of syndrome of accumulated damp-heat and wind-heat of liver channel in south than north, more syndrome of excessive fire of liver-gallbladder and remaining of pathogens due to deficiency of vital QI in North than South in post group of HSK. There is the same ratio of type of syndrome in thesis in South as North, the same ratio of type of syndrome in the front group as the post group in South.②There are more ratio of syndrome of hyperactivity of fire due to deficiency of YIN in north than south in the front group of uveitis. There is the same ratio of type of syndrome in South as North. There are more ratio of syndrome of hyperactivity of fire due to deficiency of YIN in the post group than front , more syndrome of asdthenic splenonephro-yang in the front group than post. ?There are more ratio of syndrome of damp stagnancy in the South group of CSC than North, more hepatic and renal yin deficiency in north than south. There is the same ratio of type of syndrome in the front group as the post group in south. 2. Analysis of determination of treatment:①Contrast of medicine of HSK: Contrast ing the top of ten medicine in the South and North group , it has statistical significance. (P<0.05)②Contrast of medicine of uveitis: Contrasting the top of ten medicine in the South and North group , it has statistical significance. (P<0. 05)③Contrast of medicine of CSC Contrasting the top of ten medicine in the South and North group , it has statistical significance. (P<0.05)
     Conclusion:1. Difference of type of syndrome:①There is more ratio of syndrome of damp-heat or damp in South China.②The cause and pathogenesis of HSK are closely correlated with syndrome of wind-heat of liver channel.③The cause and pathogenesis of uveitis are closely correlated with syndrome of hepatochlic hygropyrexia.④There are more ratio of syndrome of excessive fire of liver-gallbladder of HSK, more ratio of syndrome of hyperactivity of fire due to deficiency of YIN of uveitis, more ratio of syndrome of hepatic and renal yin deficiency of CSC in North China. 2. Characteristic of treatment:①Medication in South China is more medicine of removing blood stasis and cooling the blood.②Medication in South China is more slight and bland medicine.③Medication of protecting the spleen and stomach is more applied in South China.④Medication of dispersing stagnated liver-qi for relieving qi stagnation is more applied in South China.⑤Drastic relatively medicine is more applied in North China.⑥Medication of activating yang and removing dampness and promoting diuresis is more applied in North China.⑦Medication of tonifying YIN is more applied in North China. 3.The feature of TDS is closely correlated with climate and body constitution in South China, but not much closely correlated with time-lapse and development of network.
引文
[1]彭胜权.发挥岭南医学优势提高中医学术水平.广州中医药大学学报,1996;13(1):1-4
    [2]姚芳蔚.辨证分型为主治疗单疙病毒性角膜炎48例.上海中医杂志,1990;(3):10.
    [3]张健.辨证治疗角膜炎50例.湖北中医杂志,1986;(1):25.
    [4]刘凤仙,桑孝义.中西医结合治疗单疙病毒性角膜炎87例.山东中医杂志,1992;(6):36.
    [5]陈丽芳.中医治疗顽固性单纯疱疹病毒性角膜炎104例疗效观察.中医杂志,1990;(2):46.
    [6]彭清华.辨证治疗病毒性角膜炎50例.陕西中医,1991;(4):158.
    [7]郭瑞林.自拟清肝复明汤治疗病毒性角膜炎15例.陕西中医,1990;11(5):225.
    [8]俞庆福.金黄汤治单疙病毒性角膜炎62例报告.江西中医药,1988:(1):19.
    [9]詹育和.自拟消翳汤治疗聚星障30例.湖南中医杂志,1999;15(4):36.
    [10]张长银.中药为主治疗单纯疱疹性角膜炎20例.四川中医,1995;(3):52-53.
    [11]钱爱华.清肝解毒汤治疗单疱病毒性角膜炎.湖北中医杂志,1998;20(1):39.
    [12]曹宪勇.中西医结合治疗单疱病毒性角膜炎的抗复发疗效.眼科新进展,1993;(4):31.
    [13]王诗侠.普济消毒饮加减治疗单纯疱疹性角膜炎26例.安徽中医学院学报,1997;16(5):276.
    [14]张邓民.八味大发散为主治疗单疤病毒性角膜炎.光明中医杂,1995;(1):19-20.
    [15]颜林产,李贵裕.“柴芩消炎饮”治疗病毒性角膜炎61例.江苏中医,1999;20(3):33-34.
    [16]葛惠玲.海藏地黄散治疗单纯疱疹性角膜炎的临床观察.长治医学院学报,1995;9(2):164-165.
    [17]赖锦端.中西医结合分期治疗葡萄膜炎36例40只眼疗效观察.安徽中医临床杂志,1998;10(6):357.
    [18]张先楠.中西医治疗葡萄膜炎的疗效观察.现代中西医结合杂志,2004;13(12):1560-1561.
    [19]詹宇坚,古继红.辨证分型论治葡萄膜炎及其对免疫功能的影响.中国中医眼科杂志,2000;10(2):77-80.
    [20]庞朝善.前葡萄膜炎的治疗经验.中国中医眼科杂志,2004:14(3):172-173.
    [21]刘红娣.中西医结合治疗葡萄膜炎.中国中医眼科杂志,2003;13(2):111.
    [22]夏根.柴胡白虎汤治疗急性红膜睫状体炎.河南中医,1997;17(2):101-102.
    [23]钱爱华.龙胆泻肝汤治疗急性虹膜睫状体炎42例.湖北中医杂志,1997;19(1):10.
    [24]徐大梅,吕海江.清肝利湿汤治疗急性前葡萄膜炎100例.中医研究,1998;11(5):22.
    [25]李菊.疏肝化浊汤治疗虹膜睫状体炎168例.山东中医杂志,1997;16(11):501.
    [26]张起会,陈淑文,李瑞峰.中西医结合治疗Vogt-小柳-原田综合征40例报告.中国中医眼科杂志,1992;2(2):74-76.
    [27]徐伟华.中药对中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的疗效.中国中医眼科杂志,2000;10(3):168-169.
    [28]王蓉.中药治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的疗效观察.山西中医学院学报2001;2(1):38-39
    [29]章淑华.辨证治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变42例.南京中医药大学学报,1997:13(3):170-171.
    [30]曾平.中医治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变.湖北中医杂志,1999;21(9):420.
    [31]阎清琴.中西医结合治疗中心性浆液性视网膜脉络膜病变220例.中原医刊,1994,21(5):45-46.
    [32]王锡夫.黄斑复原汤治疗中心性浆液性视网膜脉络膜病变的临床观察.中国中医药科技,1996;3(1):39-40.
    [33]潘家权.参苓自术散治疗中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变34例43眼.中医药临床杂志,2006;18(3):273.
    [34]罗建国.活血利水明目汤辨证治疗中心性浆液性视网膜病变66例.湖南中医药导报,2000;6(10):27-28.
    [35]丁倩.消液明目汤治疗中心性浆液性视网膜炎.湖北中医杂志,2000;22(9):26.
    [36]郝德业.利水活血为主治疗中心性浆液性视网膜脉络膜病变60例.辽宁中医杂志,2004;31(7):583.
    [37]廖品正,陆绵绵等.中医眼科学,上海:上海科技出版社,2000,17:87,101,119.
    [38]王侃,秦霖.气候因素对中医学形成和发展的影响.中华医史杂志,2004;34(2):93-96
    [39]吴智兵,彭胜权.从医学地理学角度试论岭南温病学的发展方向.广州中医药大学学报,1999;16(3):9-12
    [40]章淑华.陆绵绵治疗葡萄膜炎的经验.湖北中医杂志,2000;22(6):3-4.
    [41]王卫红.中西医结合治疗葡萄膜炎30例.江苏中医,1999;20(3):32.
    [42]杨胜天,刘昌明,孙睿.黄河流域干旱状况变化的气候与植被特征分析.自然资源学报,2003;18(2):136-140
    [43]陆木兴.江南与岭南地区湿邪特性与证治差异.浙江中医杂志,2002;(8):327.
    [44]郭绞,赖远征.试论岭南外感热病的几个特点.中医药学报,1999;(1):5.
    [45]孔炳耀.岭南湿邪致病特点及其论治.新中医,1998;30(5):3-5.
    [46]黄志杰.试论南北地域病证特点与因地制宜治则.中国中医基础医学杂志.2001;7(3):8-9

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700