3种野生地被植物绿化应用生态性能研究
|
摘要
本文以研究野生地被植物紫花地丁、车前和匍枝委陵菜在城市地被绿化中的生态应用为目的,通过用生理生态指标及光合参数、叶绿素荧光参数系统地分析了它们的耐践踏性、耐荫性及遮荫条件下紫花地丁对刈割的响应,测定了它们在天然群落中不同水分环境下的竞争力,并研究了紫花地丁和黑麦草在不同水分条件下的竞争关系。结果表明:3种野生地被植物的耐践踏性顺序为:车前＞紫花地丁＞匍枝委陵菜;车前耐践踏是因其纤维素含量高,紫花地丁耐践踏是因其在践踏受损后恢复较快。遮荫对车前的Fv/Fm没有显著影响,而紫花地丁的Fv/Fm在轻度遮荫水平比对照升高2.02%;二者的光饱和点和光补偿点随着遮荫程度加重不断降低,紫花地丁下降的幅度小于车前。说明紫花地丁耐荫性较强,在透光率为50.00%的光照条件下生长最好,在透光率为25.00%的光照条件下能正常生长;相比较而言,车前耐荫性较差,透光率为25.00%光照条件不利于其生长。在遮荫条件下,刈割使紫花地丁的单株叶片数升高,叶面积、地上生物量、比叶重降低,紫花地丁的叶绿素含量、可溶性总糖含量和MDA降低;对紫花地丁的净光合速率的影响不大,使Fv/Fm、Fv'/Fm'和qN降低,使qP升高。在同一水分条件下,匍枝委陵菜的竞争力、竞争强度显著(p＜0.05)高于紫花地丁和车前;竞争力与其在群落中的重要值呈正相关。紫花地丁属耐压力型植物,黑麦草属竞争型植物。当土壤水分条件为充裕的高梯度T_1时,紫花地丁对黑麦草的相对拥挤系数RCC为0.2122(根系分开的混植组合MI_1)和0.3064(根系不分开的混植组合MI_2),表明其竞争力弱于黑麦草,而在较低的水分梯度T_2时,其RCC为1.3732(MI_1)和1.4984(MI_2),表明紫花地丁的竞争力强于黑麦草。
In order to study the application of three wild groundcover plants:Viola yedoensis Makino,Plantago asiatica L.Potentilla flagellaris Willd ex Schlecht in the city virescence,the traffic tolerance,shade tolerance of them and response of Viola yedoensis Makino to mowing under shading were analysed with physiological and ecological indics,photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. The competitiveness was measured in the natural herbs community that developed from the degradated artificial turf under different water conditions by using perturbation experiment and the competition between Viola yedoensis Makino and Lolium perenne was studied under different water conditions.The results showed that their traffic tolerance order was as follows:Plantago asiatica L.＞Viola yedoensis Makino＞Potentilla flagellaris Willd ex Schlecht.Plantago asiatica L.is traffic tolerance because of its high cellulose content,Viola yedoensis Makino is traffic tolerance because of its rapid recovery after traffic.The Fv/Fm of Plantago asiatica L.did not change significantly(p＜0.05)under shading,that of Viola yedoensis Makino increased 2.02%compared with the control under light shading levels.As shading stress increased,the light saturation point and the light compensation point of the two plants decreased.The rate of decline in Viola yedoensis Makino was lower than Plantago asiatica L.By Comprehensive analysis,Viola yedoensis Makino is a strong shade-tolerant plant.It could grow well under the condition that light transmittance rate was 50.00%and grew normally under 25.00%.Compared with Viola yedoensis Makino,Plantago asiatica L.was poor shade-tolerant.It could not grow well under the condition that light transmittance rate was 25.00%.Under the shade conditions,mowing increased the number of leaves per plant of Viola yedoensis Makino,decreased the leaf area,aboveground biomass,leaf weight ratio of Viola yedoensis Makino,lowered chlorophyll content,total soluble sugar content and MDA, reduced Fv/Fm,Fv'/Fm' and qN and increased qP.But mowing had little impact on the net photosynthetic rate of Viola yedoensis Makino.Under the same water conditions,the competitiveness of Potentilla flagellaris Willd ex Schlecht is significantly(p＜0.05)higher than that of Viola yedoensis Makino and Planlago asiatica L.Their competitiveness was positively related to the important values in community.Viola yedoensis Makino is pressure-resistant plant and Lolium perenne is competitive plant.With high soil moisture(T_1),the RCC of Viola yedoensis Makino to Lolium perenne is 0.2122(MI_1)and 0.3064(MI_2),indicating competitiveness of Viola yedoensis Makino is poorer than that of Lolium perenne.With low soil moisture (T_2),the RCC of Viola yedoensis Makino to Lolium perenne is 1.3732(MI_1)and 1.4984(MI_2),indicating competitiveness of Viola yedoensis Makino is stronger than that of Lolium perenne.
In order to study the application of three wild groundcover plants:Viola yedoensis Makino,Plantago asiatica L.Potentilla flagellaris Willd ex Schlecht in the city virescence,the traffic tolerance,shade tolerance of them and response of Viola yedoensis Makino to mowing under shading were analysed with physiological and ecological indics,photosynthetic parameters and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. The competitiveness was measured in the natural herbs community that developed from the degradated artificial turf under different water conditions by using perturbation experiment and the competition between Viola yedoensis Makino and Lolium perenne was studied under different water conditions.The results showed that their traffic tolerance order was as follows:Plantago asiatica L.＞Viola yedoensis Makino＞Potentilla flagellaris Willd ex Schlecht.Plantago asiatica L.is traffic tolerance because of its high cellulose content,Viola yedoensis Makino is traffic tolerance because of its rapid recovery after traffic.The Fv/Fm of Plantago asiatica L.did not change significantly(p＜0.05)under shading,that of Viola yedoensis Makino increased 2.02%compared with the control under light shading levels.As shading stress increased,the light saturation point and the light compensation point of the two plants decreased.The rate of decline in Viola yedoensis Makino was lower than Plantago asiatica L.By Comprehensive analysis,Viola yedoensis Makino is a strong shade-tolerant plant.It could grow well under the condition that light transmittance rate was 50.00%and grew normally under 25.00%.Compared with Viola yedoensis Makino,Plantago asiatica L.was poor shade-tolerant.It could not grow well under the condition that light transmittance rate was 25.00%.Under the shade conditions,mowing increased the number of leaves per plant of Viola yedoensis Makino,decreased the leaf area,aboveground biomass,leaf weight ratio of Viola yedoensis Makino,lowered chlorophyll content,total soluble sugar content and MDA, reduced Fv/Fm,Fv'/Fm' and qN and increased qP.But mowing had little impact on the net photosynthetic rate of Viola yedoensis Makino.Under the same water conditions,the competitiveness of Potentilla flagellaris Willd ex Schlecht is significantly(p＜0.05)higher than that of Viola yedoensis Makino and Planlago asiatica L.Their competitiveness was positively related to the important values in community.Viola yedoensis Makino is pressure-resistant plant and Lolium perenne is competitive plant.With high soil moisture(T_1),the RCC of Viola yedoensis Makino to Lolium perenne is 0.2122(MI_1)and 0.3064(MI_2),indicating competitiveness of Viola yedoensis Makino is poorer than that of Lolium perenne.With low soil moisture (T_2),the RCC of Viola yedoensis Makino to Lolium perenne is 1.3732(MI_1)and 1.4984(MI_2),indicating competitiveness of Viola yedoensis Makino is stronger than that of Lolium perenne.
引文
[1]Amy K.Hahs J.Mark J.Donnell M.Composition of the plant community in remnant patches of grassy woodland along an urban-rural gradient in Melbourne,Australia[J].Urban Ecosystems,2007,10(4):355-377
[2]Andrew H B.Restoring complex vegetation in urban settings:The case of tidal freshwater marshes[J].Urban Ecosystems,2004,7(2):125-137
[3]Albayrak S,Camas N.Effects of temperature and light intensity on growth of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.var.Crassa mansf.)[J].Bangladesh Journal of Botany,2007,36(1):1-12
[4]Aarssen L W.Competitive ability and species coexistence:a "plant's—eye" view[J].Oikos,1989,56:386-401
[5]Aarssen L W.Ecological combing ability and competitive in plants:towards a general evolutionary theory of coexistence insystems of competition[J].American Naturalist,1983,122:707-731
[6]Fu B J,Niu D,YuG R,ChenL D,Ma K M,Luo Y,LuY H,Zhao W W.Application of landscape ecology in long term ecological research case study in China[J].Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas,2007,(1):33-56
[7]Bruce D,Clarkson P M,Wehi L K,Brabyn.A spatial analysis of indigenous cover patterns and implications for ecological restoration in urban centers,New Zealand[J].Urban Ecosystems,2007,10(4):441-457
[8]Bornkamm R.Spontaneous development of urban woody vegetation on differing Soils [J].Flora,2007,202(8):695-704
[9]Bell G E,Danneberger T K.Temporal shade on creeping bent grass turf[J].Crop Science,1999,39(4):1142-1146
[10]Bertamini M.Muthuchelian K.Nedunchezhian N.Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce(Picea abies L.)grown under field conditions [J].Photosynthetica,2006,44(2):227-234
[11]Buchner O,Holzinger A,Lutz C.Effects of temperature and light on the formation of chloroplast protrusions in leaf mesophyll cells of high alpine plants[J].Plant Cell and Environment,2007,30(11):1347-1356
[12]Burton G W.The influence of light reduction upon the production persistence and chemical composition of Coastal Bermuda grass(Cynodon Dactylon)[J].Agronomy Journal,1994,51(5):534-542
[13]Beard J B.Turfgrass:science and culture[M].Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey:Prentice Hall Inc,1973,368-377
[14]Bender E A,Case T J,Giplin M E.Perturbation experiments in community ecology[J].Theory and Practice Ecology,1984,65:1-13
[15]Cattnni D J,Clark K W.Influence of wear stress onturfgrass growth components and viaual density ratings[J].Can J.Plant Science,1991,71:305-308
[16]Carrow R N.Influence of soil compaction on three turfgrass species[J].Agronomy Journal,1980,72:1038-1042
[17]Campball B D,Grime J P.An experimental test of plant strategies theory[J].Ecology,1992,73:15-29
[18]David J.Nowak J R.Bride M.Comparison of Monterey pine stress in urban and natural forests[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1991,32(4):383-395
[19]De Wit C T.On competition[J].Verslagen van Land ouwkundige Onderzoekingen,1960,66:1-82
[20]Ennik G C.The competition between white clover and perennial ryegrass under different conditions of light intensity and moisture supply[J].Mededeling Institute voor Biologisch en Scheikundig Onderzoek van Land bouwgewassen,1960,109:37-50
[21]Forman R T T.Land Mosaics:The ecology of landscape and regions [M].London:Cambridge University Press,1995
[22]Florincescu A,Wangner S,Zaharia D.Ecological roses a possible alternative for modern Romanian Landscape architecture[J].Notucae-Botanicae,Horti.Agrobotanici-Cluj-Napoca,1997,(26-27):93-98
[23]Feng J A,Hu X L,Mao X J.Application of chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics to plant physiology in adverse circumstance[J].Economic Forest Researches,2002,20(11):14-18
[24]Fan J W,Harris W.Effects on sell fertility and cutting frequency on interference among Hieracium piIosella,H.praerahum,Rumex acetosella and Festuca novae zeadandiae[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1996,36:1-36
[25]Genty B,Braintais J M,Baker N R.The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence[J].Biochemical Biophysical Acta,1989,(990):87-92
[26]Grubb P J.The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities:the importance of regeneration niche[J].Biology Rev,1977,52:107-145
[27]Grime J P.Evidence for the existence of the primary Strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological theory[J].American Naturalist,1977,111:1169-1194
[28]Grime J P.Competition exclusion in herbaceous vegetation[J].Nature,1973,242:335-344
[29]Goldberg D E,Landa K.Competitive effect and response:hierarchies and correlated,traits in the early stages of competition[J].Journal of Ecology,1991,79:1013-1030
[30]Grime J P.Vegetation classification by reference to strategies[J].Nature,1974,250:26-31
[31]Grace J P.On the measurement of plant competition intensity[J].Ecology,1994,76:305-308
[32]Grime J P.Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation[J].Nature,1973,242:344-347
[33]Grime J P.Plant strategies and vegetation processes[M].London:Willey,1997
[34]Han S,Fermanian T W,Juvik J A,Spomer L A.Total nonstructural carbohydrate storage in creeping Bentgrass treated with trinexapac-ethyl[J].Hortscience,2004,39(6):1461-1464
[35]Huston M,Smith T,Plant succession:life history and competition[J].American Naturalist,1987,130:168-198
[36]Harris W,Forde B J.Temperature and cutting effects on the growth and competitive interaction of ryegrass and paspalum.Ⅱ.Interspecies competition[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1981,24:309-320
[37]Harris W,Lazenby A.Competitive interaction of grasses with contrasting temperature responses and water stress tolerance[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1974,25:227-246
[38]Harris W.Shading,defoliation,temperature,growth stage,and residual fertility effects on competition between Rumex acetosella,THfolium repen,and Lolium (multiflorigin×perenne)[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1972,15(4):687-705
[39]Haizel K A,Harper J L.The effects of density and the timing of removal on interference between barley,white mustflrd and wild oats[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1973,10:23-31
[40]Harper J L.Population biology of plant[M].London:Academic Press,1977
[41]Hacker J W.Wear tolerance in amenity and sports turf:a review 1980-1985[J].Acta Horticulture,1987,195:35-41
[42]Harris W,Lazenby A.Competitive interaction of grasses with contrasting temperature responses and water stress tolerance[J].Australian Journal of AgriculturalResearch,1974,25:227-246
[43]Jiang Y W,Carrow R N,Duncan R R.Effects of morning and afternoon shade in combination with traffic stress on seashore paspalum[J].Hortscience,2003,38(6):1218-1222
[44]Jiang Y W,Carrow R N,Duncan R R.Correlation analysis procedures for canopy spectral reflectance data of seashore Paspalum under traffic stress[J].Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2003,128(3):343-348
[45]Jeong H H,Kim K.Efects of shading on the growth of Hedera rhombea Bean and Pachysandra tenninalis sieb.Et.Zucc[J].Korean Journal of Horticultural Science&Technology,1999,17:1,2932
[46]Klaus H.On the Way to A Sustainable city environment policy in freiburg[C].Internet Conference on Eco-city Development.2003,2,16
[47]Kerstin E,Stefan S.Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and Collembola:effects on root structure of competing plant species[J].Biology and Fertility of soils,2006,109:317-324
[48]Lee J,Jeong S J,Heo J A,Kang H J,Hwang S Y,Kim Y K.Light intensity levels and growth inhibitors On growth of shade tolerant Japanese spurge(Pachysandra terminalis)[J].Journal of the Korean society for Horticultural science,2002,43:2,137-142
[49]Lonsdale W M.Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invisibility[J].Ecology,1999,80:1522-1536
[50]Lichtenthaler H K,Babani F L.Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of photosynthetic activity in sun and shade leaves of trees[J].Photosynthesis research,2007,93(1-3):235-244
[51]Li L,Staden J V,Jager A K.Effects of plant growth regulators on the antioxidant system in seedlings oftwo maize cultivars subjected to water stress[J].Plant Growth Regulation,1998,25(2):81-87
[52]Law R,Watkinson A R.Competition In:Cherrett J M,ed.Ecological concepts[M].Oxford:Blackwell Scientific Publications,1989,243-284
[53]Martin R A,William K L,Debrap P P.Intensity of intra- and interspecies competition in coexisting shortgrass species[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,89:40-47
[54]McNitt A S,Landschoot P J.Effects of soil reinforcing materials on the surface hardness,soil bulk density,and water content of a sand root zone[J].Crop Science,2003,43(3):957-966
[55]Newman E.Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation[J].Nature,1973,244:310
[56]Philip A,Knapp A K.Response to short-term reductions in light in soybean leaves[J].Plant Science,1998,59(5):801-805
[57]Quigley M F.Reducing weeds in ornamental groundcovers under shade trees through mixed species installation[J].Hort Technology,2003,13(1):85-89
[58]Rai R C,Sundriyal R C.Tourism and bio-diversty conservation:the Sikkim Himalaya[J].A Journal of the Human Environment,1997,26(2):235-242
[59]Renae N S.Local Government conservation and management of native vegetation in urban Australia[J].Earth and Environmental,2004,34(2):209-222
[60]Runk K,Zobel K.Phenotypic plasticity and biomass allocation pattern in three Dryopteris (Dryopteridaceae)species on an experimental light-availability gradient[J].Plant Ecology,2007,193(1):85-99
[61]Res M,Condit R,Crawley M.Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics[J].Science,2001,293:650-655
[62]Shery B W.and Jianguo W.Modeling urban landscape dynamics:A review[J].UrbanEcosystems,2004,19(1):119-129
[63]Semple W S,Cole I A,Koen T B.Native couch grasses for revegetating severely salinised sites on the inland slopes of NSW[J].Rangeland Journal,2004,26(1):88-101
[64]Shearman R C,Beard J R.Turfgrass wear tolerance mechanisms 1 wear tolerance of seven turfgrass species and quantitative methods for determining turfgrass wear tolerance[J].Agronomy journal,1975,67:208-211
[65]Susanne W,Reinhayd L,Stefan S.Do endogeic earthworms change plant competition? A a)microcosm study[J].Plant and soil,2005,27(1):1-12
[66]Sundar D,Perianayaguy B,Reddy A R.Localization of antioxidant enzymes in the cellular compartments of sorghum leaves[J].Plant Growth Regulation,2004,44(2):157-163
[67]Silander J A.Anlonovics J.Analysis of interspecies competition in coastal plant community-a perturbation experiment[J].Nature,1982,298:557-560
[68]Snaydon R W,Satore E H.Bivariate diagrams for plant competition data:modification and interpretation[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1989,26:1043-1057
[69]Stern W R,Donald C M.Light relationships in grass-clover swards[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1962,13:599-614
[70]Sim Y G,Hart Y Y,Woo J H,Choi K S,Choi B.Efect of shading treatment on ground coveting by native cover plants[Korean][J].Rda Journal of Agro～Environment science,1998,40:2,118-125
[71]Schreiber U,Bll G W,Neubauer C.Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-destructive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo pho non-destructive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo pho-tosynthesis[J].Ecologi cal Studies,1994,100:49-70.
[72]Turner M C.Landscape ecology:the effect of patternon process[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1989,20:171-197
[73]Trenholm L E,Carrow R N,Duncan R R,Mechanism of wear tolerance in seashore Paspalum and Bermudergrass[J].Crop Science,2000,40(5):135-137
[74]Tan Z,Qian Y.Light intensity affects gibberellic acid content in Kentucky bluegrass[J].Hortscience,2003,38:113-116
[75]Tilman D.Resource competition and community structure[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1982
[76]Tilman D,Pacala S.The maintenance of species richness in plant communities.Species diversity in ecological communities[A].In:Ricklefs R E,eds.Historical and Geographical Perspectives[C].Chicago:University of Chicago,1993,13-21
[77]Tilman D.Resource competition between planktonic algae:an experimental and theoretical approach[J].Ecology,1977,57:338-348
[78]Tilman D.Resources:a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and preelation[J].American Naturalist,1980,116:362-393
[79]Tilman D.Plant strategies and the Dynamics and structure of plant Communities[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1988
[80]Tilman D.Plant strategies and the dynamics and the structure of plant communities [M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1980
[81]Witte W T.Best ground cover ivies from our trials[J].Between-the vines Newsletter,1996,8(3):1,7
[82]安渊,陈丽君,孟慧琳,孙明,杨晓光,胡雪.不同践踏强度对沟叶结缕草坪用性状的影响[J].草地学报,2005,13(4):299-303
[83]白伟岚,任建武,苏雪痕.八种植物耐荫性比较研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):46-51
[84]陈雅君.黑龙江省野生园林地被植物资源及其利用[J].北方园艺,2003,(2):46-47
[85]陈启洁,吴姝菊,李君霞,赵宁.紫花地丁的开发利用与栽培技术研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2004,(1):94-95
[86]陈卫群,王晓春,钟飞.车前草、车前籽抗氧自由基作用的比较研究[J].实用预防医学,2004,11(3):481-482
[87]陈发棣,陈索梅,房伟民,等.五个小菊品种(或种)的耐热性鉴定[J].上海农业学报,2001,17(3):80-82.
[88]戴其根,周兰胜,陈后庆,张洪程,霍中洋,许轲.践踏强度对不同坪床结构狗牙根地上部生长的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2006,27(2):86-90
[89]戴其根,周兰胜,许轲.耐践踏草坪草研究进展[J].福建林学院学报,2004,24(3):270-273
[90]邓俊涛.城市绿化应注重生物多样性保护[J].湖南林业,2007,(7):12
[91]段新玲,段黄金,任东岁.塔里木河流域野生观赏植物资源[J].西北农业学报,2000,9(4):96-97
[92]段春燕,李连芳,侯小改.野生紫花地丁和早开堇菜的栽培表现[J].中国种业,2006,07:21-23
[93]董乙文,胡玉涛.紫花地丁的研究概况[J].中国林副特产,2006,(3):78-80
[94]杜鸿云,刘桂林,刘兴菊,郑辉.两种地被植物的抗旱性研究[J].河北林果研究,2007,22(2):203-206
[95]樊江文.在不同压力和干扰条件下鸭茅和黑麦草的竞争研究[J].草业学报,1997,6(3):23-31
[96]樊江文,钟华平,梁飚,等.在不同压力和干扰条件下黑麦草与其他6种植物的竞争研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(4):522-530
[97]冯学华,林爵平.南岭国家级自然保护区野生观赏植物资源[J].林业科技通讯,2001,(3):32-34
[98]冯娟,张浪,胡丰林.几种地被植物清除自由基活性比较研究[J].安徽农学通报, 2007,13(7):21-22
[99]谷颐.吉林省野生地被植物资源及园林应用价值研究[J].北方园艺,2006(3):105-106
[100]高政平,秦越华,沙俊松.地被菊引种栽培试验报告[J].林业科技通讯,2001,(9):30-31
[101]高文芳.5种彩叶地被植物抗寒机制研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(15):4430-4431
[102]耿世磊,赵晟,吴鸿.三种草坪草的茎、叶解剖结构及其坪用性状[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2002,10(2):145-151
[103]郝庆云,张英丽,乔建国,聂庆娟,张涛.匍枝委陵菜引种驯化试验[J].河北林果研究,2005,20(4):407-410
[104]韩玉林,黄苏珍,孙桂弟.5种鸢尾属观赏地被植物的抗旱性研究[J].江苏农业科学,2007,(2):79-82
[105]何开跃.3种含笑耐寒生理机制研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(4):62-64
[106]何文华,董丽,孙震.几种野生地被植物高温半致死温度的确定[J].西南园艺,2006,34(3):10-11
[107]Holmes W.草地生产与利用[M].唐文青译.乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,1982
[108]胡小三,王川才,朱雪志.野生地被植物——聚花过路黄的人工驯化栽培及在园林布景中的应用[J].草业科学,2007,24(10):98-101
[109]胡监,张婉如,王振权.动物饲养学实验指导[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1990,45-46
[110]蔺银鼎,王有拴,武小刚.6种开花地被植物坪用价值的比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(2):307-312
[111]雷晓,强继业.60Co-y射线辐射对车前草六项生理指标的影响[J].种子,2005,24(1):17-18,69
[112]李宗梅,王祖伟,刘树春.廊坊市城市生活用水全成本定价模式的研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,23(2):80-83
[113]李树华.建造以乡土植物为主体的园林绿地[J].中国园林,2005,(1):47
[114]李阳春,吴天德,邵新庆,等.甘肃野生草坪及地被植物种质资源的调查[J].草原与草坪,2001,(3):26-30
[115]李建强.北方优良地被植物在北京的应用[J].北京园林,2007,23(2):39-42
[116]李房英,陈忠伟.福建园林地被植物的应用[J].福建水土保持,2004,(3):67-69
[117]李小平,朱培林,曾志斌,许军.车前栽培技术及相关研究进展[J].江西林业科技,2006,(4):44-48
[118]李贵友,刘长青,董学军.地被植物葡枝委陵菜垫状草块技术研究[J].北方园艺,2007,(5):162-163
[119]李君.马蹄金抗性生理、微形态和繁殖生物学特性研究[D].合肥:安徽师范大学,2005
[120]李晓,冯伟,曾晓春.叶绿素荧光分析技术及应用进展[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(10):2186-2196
[121]廖东.青藏高原几种优良野生地被植物的引种驯化试验研究[J].北方园艺,2007,(4):179-182
[122]柳建军,吴德芳.野生地被植物在园林绿化中的应用[J].山东省农业管理干部学院报,2004,20(1):122-123
[123]刘金荣,谢晓蓉.河西走廊野生地被草坪植物的开发与利用[J].林业实用技术,2002,(8):40
[124]刘会超,孙振元.三种野生堇菜属植物引种及其园林应用[J].中国园林,2006,2:93-94
[125]刘艳玲,倪学明,徐立铭,赵家荣.3种野生耐荫地被植物的调查与评价[J].草业科学,2004,21(2):77-79
[126]刘慧民,王蓖.五叶地锦低温处理条件下与抗寒相关的部分生理生化指标的变化规[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(4):74-75
[127]林雪苹.厦门地区几种常见优良地被植物的栽培与应用[J].福建水土保持,2001,13(4):35-37
[128]林世程,周文培,邱亦维,朱燕琳,吴仕军.林下微生境对草坪草叶绿素含量的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2004,24(1):12-15,38
[129]吕东梅.保护城市生物多样性的意义和途径[J].福建热作科技,2005,30(3):35-37,41
[130]陆引罡,黄建国,滕应,罗永水.重金属富集植物车前草对镍的响应[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):108-110,114
[131]马成亮.地丁的栽培及利用价值[J].特种经济动植物,2002,(2):19
[132]马武昌,王雁,彭镇华.车前和紫花地丁对水分胁迫的生理反应[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(5):633-637
[133]潘远智,江明艳.遮荫对盆栽一品红光合特性及生长的影响[J].园艺学报,2006,33(1):95-10
[134]邵燕,汤庚国.南京老山地区地被植物资源调查与应用[J].江苏林业科技,2007,34(4):28-31
[135]史燕山,骆建霞.5种草本地被植物抗旱性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,5(5):130-133
[136]孙卫邦.乡土植物与现代城市园林景观建设[J].中国园林,2003,07,63-65
[137]孙震,高大伟,何文华,董丽.野生地被植物蛇莓和甘野菊的抗旱性研究[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(5):322-325
[138]宋桂龙,韩烈保.层次分析法在草坪耐践踏性研究中的应用[J].福建林学院学报,2005,25(3):274-278
[139]孙吉雄.草坪绿地实用技术指南[M].北京:金盾出版社,2002
[140]施双艳,华珞,郑海金等.浅析北京草坪业的发展、问题及解决途径[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,24(2):81-85
[141]石爱平,王红利,郭睿.紫花地丁几种抗逆指标研究初探[J].北京农学院报,1997,12(1):48-53
[142]汤章成.现代植物生理学指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:127
[143]王俊亮,向林.伏芳藤嫩枝扦插育苗技术[J].林业实用技术,2002,(8):27
[144]王晖,周守标.践踏对野生假俭草和结缕草叶几项生理指标的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(1):89-91
[145]王清玲,苏建华.天宝岩自然保护区观赏植物资源调查[J].林业科技开发,2000,14(5):21-23
[146]王艳,张绵,张学勇.结缕草与草地早熟禾的弹性与耐磨性对比研究[J].草业科学,2002,19(2):56-59
[147]王小君,宋桂龙.践踏胁迫对三种草坪草地下生物量及土壤物理性质的影响[J].园林科技,2007,104(2):10-12
[148]王雁,马武昌.扶芳藤、紫藤等7种藤本植物光能利用特性及耐荫性比较研究[J].林业科学研究,2004,17(3):305-307
[149]王晓玲,石雷,孙吉雄,张金政,刘立安,鲁韧强,姜闯道.遮荫对山麦冬生长特性和生物量分配的影响[J].植物研究,2006,26(2):226-228
[150]王静,程积民,万惠娥,方锋.刈割对芨芨草生长的影响[J].草业科学,2005,22(6):58-62
[151]韦海建,杨惠敏,赵亮.遮荫环境对白三叶草气孔和光合特性的影响[J].草业科学,2007,24(10):94-97
[152]温明章,郭断勋.李建东.退化白三叶草坪的复壮研究[J].草业科学,1997,11(5):50-54
[153]翁殊斐,苏志尧,钟哲.广东乡土地被植物资源及园林应用潜力[J].中国园林,2007,(8):05-09
[154]吴玲,朱红,卢毅军,高亚红.杭州市地被植物资源及开发利用潜力分析[J].林业科学,2007,43(8):60-64
[155]吴梅,聂捷夫,娄义龙,冷枫,周静,龙皎.野扇花与儿种耐荫性植物光和作用的比较[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(4):100-101
[156]伍世平,王君健.11种地被植物的耐荫性研究[J].武汉植物学研究,1994,(11):360-364
[157]魏胜利,王文全,秦淑英,樊仲亮.桔梗、射干的耐阴性研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2004,27(1:52-57
[158]魏胜利,王文全,陈秀华,秦淑英,陈秀田.甘草的耐阴性研究[J].中国中草药杂志,2005,30(2):100-104
[159]夏玉宇,朱丹.饲料质量分析检验[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1994:185
[160]萧运峰,高洁.耐荫湿的草坪地被值物——蛇莓的研究[J].四川草原,1995(3):20-23.
[161]萧运峰,高洁.耐荫保健地被值物——绞股蓝的研究[J].四川草原,1995(3):10-13
[162]徐敏,张江里.地被植物马蹄金在昆明的栽培应用[J].云南农业科技,2003,(1):22-23
[163]徐本美,孙运涛,孙超,魏玉凝,郭琛.紫花地丁种子的萌发性状及其栽培繁殖[J].种子,2003,(5):24-25,28
[164]许岳飞,毕玉芬,涂旭川,王鑫玉.王草不同刈割次数、留茬高度与生理性状和产量关系的研究[J].四川草原,2006,(1):23-27
[165]谢恒星,张振华,刘继龙,谭春英,李清翠.苹果园土壤含水量测定取样点数目及插值方法研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,2005,22(4):298-302,
[166]杨灵珍.浅析城市绿地建设存在的问题及其对策[J].科技情报开发与经济,2007,17(2):98
[167]杨胜.饲料分析及饮料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1999
[168]杨渺.四川两种野生假俭草耐荫性研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2002
[169]尹擎,但国丽,吕元林.昆明市园林绿化乡土植物选择初探[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2001,23(2):52-56
[170]尹美善.紫花地丁的分株移植与推广利用[J].中国林副特产,2004,4):22
[171]元合玲.紫花地丁的栽培及应用[J].林业实用技术,2007,(2):39-407.
[172]于金平,刘金秀,韩福贵等.几种优良药用观赏地被植物及其应用[J].中国野生植物资源,2003(6):22-26
[173]岳桦,孙颖.三种室内观花值物的耐荫性研究[J].北方园艺,2004(2):39
[174]赵世杰,许长成,邹琦.植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J].植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-210
[175]张新民,孙新章,胡林.北京地区常用草坪草的耗水规律及适宜灌溉量研究[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(6):77-80
[176]张艳敏.地被植物连线草在北方城市中的应用[J].北方园艺,2001,(5):53
[177]张林青.二月兰耐阴性的研究[J].现代园艺,2006,(8):42
[178]张玲慧.地被植物耐荫性研究及园林配置探讨[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004
[179]张庆良,陈秀红,张仁富,张凤霞,唐文煜.匍枝委陵菜的园林应用研究[J].山东林业科技,2006,(2):25-26
[180]张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导.北京:高等教育出版社,2003
[181]张林青,周青,肖程岭.园林植物耐荫性研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(19):4851-4853
[182]张守仁.叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J].植物学通报,1999,16(4):444-448
[183]张文惠,呼天明.低温胁迫对马蹄金抗性生理生化指标的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2002,(5):39 41.
[184]郊伟,徐晓丹,陈龙清.华中地区野生乡土地被植物资源及其利用评价[J].中国园林,2007,(8):01-04
[185]周兴元,曹福亮.遮荫对假俭草抗氧化酶系统及光合作用的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(3):32-36
[186]周兰胜,戴其根,张洪程,张旭,许露生.不同践踏强度对草坪坪床理化性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2005,(5):64-68
[187]周守标,王晖.践踏胁迫对两种暖地型草坪草叶片形态及生理的影响[J].草业学报,2004,13(5):70-74.
[188]庄志勇,李卫东.城市绿化节水技术的应用[J].节水灌溉,2007,(5):63-64
[189]朱建宁.城市绿化,因地制宜是最大的节约[J].中州建设,2007,(2):53
[190]朱小春,孙吉雄,安渊.践踏胁迫对上海“JD-1结缕草”生长及生理的影响[J].草原与草坪,2006,119:38-42
[191]朱小春,孙吉雄,安渊.氮磷钾复合肥对上海“JD-1结缕草”草坪耐践踏性的影响[J].草业科学,2007,24(7):96-100
[192]朱云华,朱生树,徐友新,芦建国.11种观赏地被植物引种栽培和耐荫性试验[J].金陵科技学院学报,2007,23(2):78-83
[193]赵海新,黄晓群,朱占林,贾娟霞.刈割对无芒雀麦、苜蓿混播草层根体积根重含糖量的影响[J].草原与草坪,2007,(4):50-54
[2]Andrew H B.Restoring complex vegetation in urban settings:The case of tidal freshwater marshes[J].Urban Ecosystems,2004,7(2):125-137
[3]Albayrak S,Camas N.Effects of temperature and light intensity on growth of fodder beet (Beta vulgaris L.var.Crassa mansf.)[J].Bangladesh Journal of Botany,2007,36(1):1-12
[4]Aarssen L W.Competitive ability and species coexistence:a "plant's—eye" view[J].Oikos,1989,56:386-401
[5]Aarssen L W.Ecological combing ability and competitive in plants:towards a general evolutionary theory of coexistence insystems of competition[J].American Naturalist,1983,122:707-731
[6]Fu B J,Niu D,YuG R,ChenL D,Ma K M,Luo Y,LuY H,Zhao W W.Application of landscape ecology in long term ecological research case study in China[J].Landscape Ecological Applications in Man-Influenced Areas,2007,(1):33-56
[7]Bruce D,Clarkson P M,Wehi L K,Brabyn.A spatial analysis of indigenous cover patterns and implications for ecological restoration in urban centers,New Zealand[J].Urban Ecosystems,2007,10(4):441-457
[8]Bornkamm R.Spontaneous development of urban woody vegetation on differing Soils [J].Flora,2007,202(8):695-704
[9]Bell G E,Danneberger T K.Temporal shade on creeping bent grass turf[J].Crop Science,1999,39(4):1142-1146
[10]Bertamini M.Muthuchelian K.Nedunchezhian N.Shade effect alters leaf pigments and photosynthetic responses in Norway spruce(Picea abies L.)grown under field conditions [J].Photosynthetica,2006,44(2):227-234
[11]Buchner O,Holzinger A,Lutz C.Effects of temperature and light on the formation of chloroplast protrusions in leaf mesophyll cells of high alpine plants[J].Plant Cell and Environment,2007,30(11):1347-1356
[12]Burton G W.The influence of light reduction upon the production persistence and chemical composition of Coastal Bermuda grass(Cynodon Dactylon)[J].Agronomy Journal,1994,51(5):534-542
[13]Beard J B.Turfgrass:science and culture[M].Englewood Cliffs,New Jersey:Prentice Hall Inc,1973,368-377
[14]Bender E A,Case T J,Giplin M E.Perturbation experiments in community ecology[J].Theory and Practice Ecology,1984,65:1-13
[15]Cattnni D J,Clark K W.Influence of wear stress onturfgrass growth components and viaual density ratings[J].Can J.Plant Science,1991,71:305-308
[16]Carrow R N.Influence of soil compaction on three turfgrass species[J].Agronomy Journal,1980,72:1038-1042
[17]Campball B D,Grime J P.An experimental test of plant strategies theory[J].Ecology,1992,73:15-29
[18]David J.Nowak J R.Bride M.Comparison of Monterey pine stress in urban and natural forests[J].Journal of Environmental Management,1991,32(4):383-395
[19]De Wit C T.On competition[J].Verslagen van Land ouwkundige Onderzoekingen,1960,66:1-82
[20]Ennik G C.The competition between white clover and perennial ryegrass under different conditions of light intensity and moisture supply[J].Mededeling Institute voor Biologisch en Scheikundig Onderzoek van Land bouwgewassen,1960,109:37-50
[21]Forman R T T.Land Mosaics:The ecology of landscape and regions [M].London:Cambridge University Press,1995
[22]Florincescu A,Wangner S,Zaharia D.Ecological roses a possible alternative for modern Romanian Landscape architecture[J].Notucae-Botanicae,Horti.Agrobotanici-Cluj-Napoca,1997,(26-27):93-98
[23]Feng J A,Hu X L,Mao X J.Application of chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics to plant physiology in adverse circumstance[J].Economic Forest Researches,2002,20(11):14-18
[24]Fan J W,Harris W.Effects on sell fertility and cutting frequency on interference among Hieracium piIosella,H.praerahum,Rumex acetosella and Festuca novae zeadandiae[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1996,36:1-36
[25]Genty B,Braintais J M,Baker N R.The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence[J].Biochemical Biophysical Acta,1989,(990):87-92
[26]Grubb P J.The maintenance of species-richness in plant communities:the importance of regeneration niche[J].Biology Rev,1977,52:107-145
[27]Grime J P.Evidence for the existence of the primary Strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological theory[J].American Naturalist,1977,111:1169-1194
[28]Grime J P.Competition exclusion in herbaceous vegetation[J].Nature,1973,242:335-344
[29]Goldberg D E,Landa K.Competitive effect and response:hierarchies and correlated,traits in the early stages of competition[J].Journal of Ecology,1991,79:1013-1030
[30]Grime J P.Vegetation classification by reference to strategies[J].Nature,1974,250:26-31
[31]Grace J P.On the measurement of plant competition intensity[J].Ecology,1994,76:305-308
[32]Grime J P.Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation[J].Nature,1973,242:344-347
[33]Grime J P.Plant strategies and vegetation processes[M].London:Willey,1997
[34]Han S,Fermanian T W,Juvik J A,Spomer L A.Total nonstructural carbohydrate storage in creeping Bentgrass treated with trinexapac-ethyl[J].Hortscience,2004,39(6):1461-1464
[35]Huston M,Smith T,Plant succession:life history and competition[J].American Naturalist,1987,130:168-198
[36]Harris W,Forde B J.Temperature and cutting effects on the growth and competitive interaction of ryegrass and paspalum.Ⅱ.Interspecies competition[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1981,24:309-320
[37]Harris W,Lazenby A.Competitive interaction of grasses with contrasting temperature responses and water stress tolerance[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1974,25:227-246
[38]Harris W.Shading,defoliation,temperature,growth stage,and residual fertility effects on competition between Rumex acetosella,THfolium repen,and Lolium (multiflorigin×perenne)[J].New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research,1972,15(4):687-705
[39]Haizel K A,Harper J L.The effects of density and the timing of removal on interference between barley,white mustflrd and wild oats[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1973,10:23-31
[40]Harper J L.Population biology of plant[M].London:Academic Press,1977
[41]Hacker J W.Wear tolerance in amenity and sports turf:a review 1980-1985[J].Acta Horticulture,1987,195:35-41
[42]Harris W,Lazenby A.Competitive interaction of grasses with contrasting temperature responses and water stress tolerance[J].Australian Journal of AgriculturalResearch,1974,25:227-246
[43]Jiang Y W,Carrow R N,Duncan R R.Effects of morning and afternoon shade in combination with traffic stress on seashore paspalum[J].Hortscience,2003,38(6):1218-1222
[44]Jiang Y W,Carrow R N,Duncan R R.Correlation analysis procedures for canopy spectral reflectance data of seashore Paspalum under traffic stress[J].Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2003,128(3):343-348
[45]Jeong H H,Kim K.Efects of shading on the growth of Hedera rhombea Bean and Pachysandra tenninalis sieb.Et.Zucc[J].Korean Journal of Horticultural Science&Technology,1999,17:1,2932
[46]Klaus H.On the Way to A Sustainable city environment policy in freiburg[C].Internet Conference on Eco-city Development.2003,2,16
[47]Kerstin E,Stefan S.Interactions between mycorrhizal fungi and Collembola:effects on root structure of competing plant species[J].Biology and Fertility of soils,2006,109:317-324
[48]Lee J,Jeong S J,Heo J A,Kang H J,Hwang S Y,Kim Y K.Light intensity levels and growth inhibitors On growth of shade tolerant Japanese spurge(Pachysandra terminalis)[J].Journal of the Korean society for Horticultural science,2002,43:2,137-142
[49]Lonsdale W M.Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invisibility[J].Ecology,1999,80:1522-1536
[50]Lichtenthaler H K,Babani F L.Chlorophyll fluorescence imaging of photosynthetic activity in sun and shade leaves of trees[J].Photosynthesis research,2007,93(1-3):235-244
[51]Li L,Staden J V,Jager A K.Effects of plant growth regulators on the antioxidant system in seedlings oftwo maize cultivars subjected to water stress[J].Plant Growth Regulation,1998,25(2):81-87
[52]Law R,Watkinson A R.Competition In:Cherrett J M,ed.Ecological concepts[M].Oxford:Blackwell Scientific Publications,1989,243-284
[53]Martin R A,William K L,Debrap P P.Intensity of intra- and interspecies competition in coexisting shortgrass species[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,89:40-47
[54]McNitt A S,Landschoot P J.Effects of soil reinforcing materials on the surface hardness,soil bulk density,and water content of a sand root zone[J].Crop Science,2003,43(3):957-966
[55]Newman E.Competition and diversity in herbaceous vegetation[J].Nature,1973,244:310
[56]Philip A,Knapp A K.Response to short-term reductions in light in soybean leaves[J].Plant Science,1998,59(5):801-805
[57]Quigley M F.Reducing weeds in ornamental groundcovers under shade trees through mixed species installation[J].Hort Technology,2003,13(1):85-89
[58]Rai R C,Sundriyal R C.Tourism and bio-diversty conservation:the Sikkim Himalaya[J].A Journal of the Human Environment,1997,26(2):235-242
[59]Renae N S.Local Government conservation and management of native vegetation in urban Australia[J].Earth and Environmental,2004,34(2):209-222
[60]Runk K,Zobel K.Phenotypic plasticity and biomass allocation pattern in three Dryopteris (Dryopteridaceae)species on an experimental light-availability gradient[J].Plant Ecology,2007,193(1):85-99
[61]Res M,Condit R,Crawley M.Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics[J].Science,2001,293:650-655
[62]Shery B W.and Jianguo W.Modeling urban landscape dynamics:A review[J].UrbanEcosystems,2004,19(1):119-129
[63]Semple W S,Cole I A,Koen T B.Native couch grasses for revegetating severely salinised sites on the inland slopes of NSW[J].Rangeland Journal,2004,26(1):88-101
[64]Shearman R C,Beard J R.Turfgrass wear tolerance mechanisms 1 wear tolerance of seven turfgrass species and quantitative methods for determining turfgrass wear tolerance[J].Agronomy journal,1975,67:208-211
[65]Susanne W,Reinhayd L,Stefan S.Do endogeic earthworms change plant competition? A a)microcosm study[J].Plant and soil,2005,27(1):1-12
[66]Sundar D,Perianayaguy B,Reddy A R.Localization of antioxidant enzymes in the cellular compartments of sorghum leaves[J].Plant Growth Regulation,2004,44(2):157-163
[67]Silander J A.Anlonovics J.Analysis of interspecies competition in coastal plant community-a perturbation experiment[J].Nature,1982,298:557-560
[68]Snaydon R W,Satore E H.Bivariate diagrams for plant competition data:modification and interpretation[J].Journal of Applied Ecology,1989,26:1043-1057
[69]Stern W R,Donald C M.Light relationships in grass-clover swards[J].Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1962,13:599-614
[70]Sim Y G,Hart Y Y,Woo J H,Choi K S,Choi B.Efect of shading treatment on ground coveting by native cover plants[Korean][J].Rda Journal of Agro～Environment science,1998,40:2,118-125
[71]Schreiber U,Bll G W,Neubauer C.Chlorophyll fluorescence as a non-destructive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo pho non-destructive indicator for rapid assessment of in vivo pho-tosynthesis[J].Ecologi cal Studies,1994,100:49-70.
[72]Turner M C.Landscape ecology:the effect of patternon process[J].Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1989,20:171-197
[73]Trenholm L E,Carrow R N,Duncan R R,Mechanism of wear tolerance in seashore Paspalum and Bermudergrass[J].Crop Science,2000,40(5):135-137
[74]Tan Z,Qian Y.Light intensity affects gibberellic acid content in Kentucky bluegrass[J].Hortscience,2003,38:113-116
[75]Tilman D.Resource competition and community structure[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1982
[76]Tilman D,Pacala S.The maintenance of species richness in plant communities.Species diversity in ecological communities[A].In:Ricklefs R E,eds.Historical and Geographical Perspectives[C].Chicago:University of Chicago,1993,13-21
[77]Tilman D.Resource competition between planktonic algae:an experimental and theoretical approach[J].Ecology,1977,57:338-348
[78]Tilman D.Resources:a graphical-mechanistic approach to competition and preelation[J].American Naturalist,1980,116:362-393
[79]Tilman D.Plant strategies and the Dynamics and structure of plant Communities[M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1988
[80]Tilman D.Plant strategies and the dynamics and the structure of plant communities [M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,1980
[81]Witte W T.Best ground cover ivies from our trials[J].Between-the vines Newsletter,1996,8(3):1,7
[82]安渊,陈丽君,孟慧琳,孙明,杨晓光,胡雪.不同践踏强度对沟叶结缕草坪用性状的影响[J].草地学报,2005,13(4):299-303
[83]白伟岚,任建武,苏雪痕.八种植物耐荫性比较研究[J].北京林业大学学报,1999,21(3):46-51
[84]陈雅君.黑龙江省野生园林地被植物资源及其利用[J].北方园艺,2003,(2):46-47
[85]陈启洁,吴姝菊,李君霞,赵宁.紫花地丁的开发利用与栽培技术研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2004,(1):94-95
[86]陈卫群,王晓春,钟飞.车前草、车前籽抗氧自由基作用的比较研究[J].实用预防医学,2004,11(3):481-482
[87]陈发棣,陈索梅,房伟民,等.五个小菊品种(或种)的耐热性鉴定[J].上海农业学报,2001,17(3):80-82.
[88]戴其根,周兰胜,陈后庆,张洪程,霍中洋,许轲.践踏强度对不同坪床结构狗牙根地上部生长的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2006,27(2):86-90
[89]戴其根,周兰胜,许轲.耐践踏草坪草研究进展[J].福建林学院学报,2004,24(3):270-273
[90]邓俊涛.城市绿化应注重生物多样性保护[J].湖南林业,2007,(7):12
[91]段新玲,段黄金,任东岁.塔里木河流域野生观赏植物资源[J].西北农业学报,2000,9(4):96-97
[92]段春燕,李连芳,侯小改.野生紫花地丁和早开堇菜的栽培表现[J].中国种业,2006,07:21-23
[93]董乙文,胡玉涛.紫花地丁的研究概况[J].中国林副特产,2006,(3):78-80
[94]杜鸿云,刘桂林,刘兴菊,郑辉.两种地被植物的抗旱性研究[J].河北林果研究,2007,22(2):203-206
[95]樊江文.在不同压力和干扰条件下鸭茅和黑麦草的竞争研究[J].草业学报,1997,6(3):23-31
[96]樊江文,钟华平,梁飚,等.在不同压力和干扰条件下黑麦草与其他6种植物的竞争研究[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(4):522-530
[97]冯学华,林爵平.南岭国家级自然保护区野生观赏植物资源[J].林业科技通讯,2001,(3):32-34
[98]冯娟,张浪,胡丰林.几种地被植物清除自由基活性比较研究[J].安徽农学通报, 2007,13(7):21-22
[99]谷颐.吉林省野生地被植物资源及园林应用价值研究[J].北方园艺,2006(3):105-106
[100]高政平,秦越华,沙俊松.地被菊引种栽培试验报告[J].林业科技通讯,2001,(9):30-31
[101]高文芳.5种彩叶地被植物抗寒机制研究[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(15):4430-4431
[102]耿世磊,赵晟,吴鸿.三种草坪草的茎、叶解剖结构及其坪用性状[J].热带亚热带植物学报,2002,10(2):145-151
[103]郝庆云,张英丽,乔建国,聂庆娟,张涛.匍枝委陵菜引种驯化试验[J].河北林果研究,2005,20(4):407-410
[104]韩玉林,黄苏珍,孙桂弟.5种鸢尾属观赏地被植物的抗旱性研究[J].江苏农业科学,2007,(2):79-82
[105]何开跃.3种含笑耐寒生理机制研究[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(4):62-64
[106]何文华,董丽,孙震.几种野生地被植物高温半致死温度的确定[J].西南园艺,2006,34(3):10-11
[107]Holmes W.草地生产与利用[M].唐文青译.乌鲁木齐:新疆人民出版社,1982
[108]胡小三,王川才,朱雪志.野生地被植物——聚花过路黄的人工驯化栽培及在园林布景中的应用[J].草业科学,2007,24(10):98-101
[109]胡监,张婉如,王振权.动物饲养学实验指导[M].长春:吉林科学技术出版社,1990,45-46
[110]蔺银鼎,王有拴,武小刚.6种开花地被植物坪用价值的比较研究[J].中国农学通报,2007,23(2):307-312
[111]雷晓,强继业.60Co-y射线辐射对车前草六项生理指标的影响[J].种子,2005,24(1):17-18,69
[112]李宗梅,王祖伟,刘树春.廊坊市城市生活用水全成本定价模式的研究[J].重庆师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,23(2):80-83
[113]李树华.建造以乡土植物为主体的园林绿地[J].中国园林,2005,(1):47
[114]李阳春,吴天德,邵新庆,等.甘肃野生草坪及地被植物种质资源的调查[J].草原与草坪,2001,(3):26-30
[115]李建强.北方优良地被植物在北京的应用[J].北京园林,2007,23(2):39-42
[116]李房英,陈忠伟.福建园林地被植物的应用[J].福建水土保持,2004,(3):67-69
[117]李小平,朱培林,曾志斌,许军.车前栽培技术及相关研究进展[J].江西林业科技,2006,(4):44-48
[118]李贵友,刘长青,董学军.地被植物葡枝委陵菜垫状草块技术研究[J].北方园艺,2007,(5):162-163
[119]李君.马蹄金抗性生理、微形态和繁殖生物学特性研究[D].合肥:安徽师范大学,2005
[120]李晓,冯伟,曾晓春.叶绿素荧光分析技术及应用进展[J].西北植物学报,2006,26(10):2186-2196
[121]廖东.青藏高原几种优良野生地被植物的引种驯化试验研究[J].北方园艺,2007,(4):179-182
[122]柳建军,吴德芳.野生地被植物在园林绿化中的应用[J].山东省农业管理干部学院报,2004,20(1):122-123
[123]刘金荣,谢晓蓉.河西走廊野生地被草坪植物的开发与利用[J].林业实用技术,2002,(8):40
[124]刘会超,孙振元.三种野生堇菜属植物引种及其园林应用[J].中国园林,2006,2:93-94
[125]刘艳玲,倪学明,徐立铭,赵家荣.3种野生耐荫地被植物的调查与评价[J].草业科学,2004,21(2):77-79
[126]刘慧民,王蓖.五叶地锦低温处理条件下与抗寒相关的部分生理生化指标的变化规[J].东北林业大学学报,2003,31(4):74-75
[127]林雪苹.厦门地区几种常见优良地被植物的栽培与应用[J].福建水土保持,2001,13(4):35-37
[128]林世程,周文培,邱亦维,朱燕琳,吴仕军.林下微生境对草坪草叶绿素含量的影响[J].浙江林业科技,2004,24(1):12-15,38
[129]吕东梅.保护城市生物多样性的意义和途径[J].福建热作科技,2005,30(3):35-37,41
[130]陆引罡,黄建国,滕应,罗永水.重金属富集植物车前草对镍的响应[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):108-110,114
[131]马成亮.地丁的栽培及利用价值[J].特种经济动植物,2002,(2):19
[132]马武昌,王雁,彭镇华.车前和紫花地丁对水分胁迫的生理反应[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(5):633-637
[133]潘远智,江明艳.遮荫对盆栽一品红光合特性及生长的影响[J].园艺学报,2006,33(1):95-10
[134]邵燕,汤庚国.南京老山地区地被植物资源调查与应用[J].江苏林业科技,2007,34(4):28-31
[135]史燕山,骆建霞.5种草本地被植物抗旱性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2005,5(5):130-133
[136]孙卫邦.乡土植物与现代城市园林景观建设[J].中国园林,2003,07,63-65
[137]孙震,高大伟,何文华,董丽.野生地被植物蛇莓和甘野菊的抗旱性研究[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(5):322-325
[138]宋桂龙,韩烈保.层次分析法在草坪耐践踏性研究中的应用[J].福建林学院学报,2005,25(3):274-278
[139]孙吉雄.草坪绿地实用技术指南[M].北京:金盾出版社,2002
[140]施双艳,华珞,郑海金等.浅析北京草坪业的发展、问题及解决途径[J].首都师范大学学报(自然科学版),2003,24(2):81-85
[141]石爱平,王红利,郭睿.紫花地丁几种抗逆指标研究初探[J].北京农学院报,1997,12(1):48-53
[142]汤章成.现代植物生理学指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:127
[143]王俊亮,向林.伏芳藤嫩枝扦插育苗技术[J].林业实用技术,2002,(8):27
[144]王晖,周守标.践踏对野生假俭草和结缕草叶几项生理指标的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,28(1):89-91
[145]王清玲,苏建华.天宝岩自然保护区观赏植物资源调查[J].林业科技开发,2000,14(5):21-23
[146]王艳,张绵,张学勇.结缕草与草地早熟禾的弹性与耐磨性对比研究[J].草业科学,2002,19(2):56-59
[147]王小君,宋桂龙.践踏胁迫对三种草坪草地下生物量及土壤物理性质的影响[J].园林科技,2007,104(2):10-12
[148]王雁,马武昌.扶芳藤、紫藤等7种藤本植物光能利用特性及耐荫性比较研究[J].林业科学研究,2004,17(3):305-307
[149]王晓玲,石雷,孙吉雄,张金政,刘立安,鲁韧强,姜闯道.遮荫对山麦冬生长特性和生物量分配的影响[J].植物研究,2006,26(2):226-228
[150]王静,程积民,万惠娥,方锋.刈割对芨芨草生长的影响[J].草业科学,2005,22(6):58-62
[151]韦海建,杨惠敏,赵亮.遮荫环境对白三叶草气孔和光合特性的影响[J].草业科学,2007,24(10):94-97
[152]温明章,郭断勋.李建东.退化白三叶草坪的复壮研究[J].草业科学,1997,11(5):50-54
[153]翁殊斐,苏志尧,钟哲.广东乡土地被植物资源及园林应用潜力[J].中国园林,2007,(8):05-09
[154]吴玲,朱红,卢毅军,高亚红.杭州市地被植物资源及开发利用潜力分析[J].林业科学,2007,43(8):60-64
[155]吴梅,聂捷夫,娄义龙,冷枫,周静,龙皎.野扇花与儿种耐荫性植物光和作用的比较[J].贵州农业科学,2006,34(4):100-101
[156]伍世平,王君健.11种地被植物的耐荫性研究[J].武汉植物学研究,1994,(11):360-364
[157]魏胜利,王文全,秦淑英,樊仲亮.桔梗、射干的耐阴性研究[J].河北农业大学学报,2004,27(1:52-57
[158]魏胜利,王文全,陈秀华,秦淑英,陈秀田.甘草的耐阴性研究[J].中国中草药杂志,2005,30(2):100-104
[159]夏玉宇,朱丹.饲料质量分析检验[M].北京:化学工业出版社,1994:185
[160]萧运峰,高洁.耐荫湿的草坪地被值物——蛇莓的研究[J].四川草原,1995(3):20-23.
[161]萧运峰,高洁.耐荫保健地被值物——绞股蓝的研究[J].四川草原,1995(3):10-13
[162]徐敏,张江里.地被植物马蹄金在昆明的栽培应用[J].云南农业科技,2003,(1):22-23
[163]徐本美,孙运涛,孙超,魏玉凝,郭琛.紫花地丁种子的萌发性状及其栽培繁殖[J].种子,2003,(5):24-25,28
[164]许岳飞,毕玉芬,涂旭川,王鑫玉.王草不同刈割次数、留茬高度与生理性状和产量关系的研究[J].四川草原,2006,(1):23-27
[165]谢恒星,张振华,刘继龙,谭春英,李清翠.苹果园土壤含水量测定取样点数目及插值方法研究[J].莱阳农学院学报,2005,22(4):298-302,
[166]杨灵珍.浅析城市绿地建设存在的问题及其对策[J].科技情报开发与经济,2007,17(2):98
[167]杨胜.饲料分析及饮料质量检测技术[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1999
[168]杨渺.四川两种野生假俭草耐荫性研究[D].雅安:四川农业大学,2002
[169]尹擎,但国丽,吕元林.昆明市园林绿化乡土植物选择初探[J].云南大学学报(自然科学版),2001,23(2):52-56
[170]尹美善.紫花地丁的分株移植与推广利用[J].中国林副特产,2004,4):22
[171]元合玲.紫花地丁的栽培及应用[J].林业实用技术,2007,(2):39-407.
[172]于金平,刘金秀,韩福贵等.几种优良药用观赏地被植物及其应用[J].中国野生植物资源,2003(6):22-26
[173]岳桦,孙颖.三种室内观花值物的耐荫性研究[J].北方园艺,2004(2):39
[174]赵世杰,许长成,邹琦.植物组织中丙二醛测定方法的改进[J].植物生理学通讯,1994,30(3):207-210
[175]张新民,孙新章,胡林.北京地区常用草坪草的耗水规律及适宜灌溉量研究[J].农业工程学报,2004,20(6):77-80
[176]张艳敏.地被植物连线草在北方城市中的应用[J].北方园艺,2001,(5):53
[177]张林青.二月兰耐阴性的研究[J].现代园艺,2006,(8):42
[178]张玲慧.地被植物耐荫性研究及园林配置探讨[D].杭州:浙江大学,2004
[179]张庆良,陈秀红,张仁富,张凤霞,唐文煜.匍枝委陵菜的园林应用研究[J].山东林业科技,2006,(2):25-26
[180]张志良,瞿伟菁.植物生理学实验指导.北京:高等教育出版社,2003
[181]张林青,周青,肖程岭.园林植物耐荫性研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2006,34(19):4851-4853
[182]张守仁.叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J].植物学通报,1999,16(4):444-448
[183]张文惠,呼天明.低温胁迫对马蹄金抗性生理生化指标的影响[J].吉林农业大学学报,2002,(5):39 41.
[184]郊伟,徐晓丹,陈龙清.华中地区野生乡土地被植物资源及其利用评价[J].中国园林,2007,(8):01-04
[185]周兴元,曹福亮.遮荫对假俭草抗氧化酶系统及光合作用的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2006,30(3):32-36
[186]周兰胜,戴其根,张洪程,张旭,许露生.不同践踏强度对草坪坪床理化性状的影响[J].江苏农业科学,2005,(5):64-68
[187]周守标,王晖.践踏胁迫对两种暖地型草坪草叶片形态及生理的影响[J].草业学报,2004,13(5):70-74.
[188]庄志勇,李卫东.城市绿化节水技术的应用[J].节水灌溉,2007,(5):63-64
[189]朱建宁.城市绿化,因地制宜是最大的节约[J].中州建设,2007,(2):53
[190]朱小春,孙吉雄,安渊.践踏胁迫对上海“JD-1结缕草”生长及生理的影响[J].草原与草坪,2006,119:38-42
[191]朱小春,孙吉雄,安渊.氮磷钾复合肥对上海“JD-1结缕草”草坪耐践踏性的影响[J].草业科学,2007,24(7):96-100
[192]朱云华,朱生树,徐友新,芦建国.11种观赏地被植物引种栽培和耐荫性试验[J].金陵科技学院学报,2007,23(2):78-83
[193]赵海新,黄晓群,朱占林,贾娟霞.刈割对无芒雀麦、苜蓿混播草层根体积根重含糖量的影响[J].草原与草坪,2007,(4):50-54