经济学和管理学的哲学思考
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
马歇尔认为,经济学不仅是一门关于财富的学问,更是一门关于人的学问。现实经济活动既属于经济学范畴,又属于哲学范畴。在许多经济学大师的著作中,经济学是与哲学思维交融在一起的。哲学揭示的是事物发展的本质,哲学语言是最抽象也是最精炼的语言。用哲学的思维去理解经济学,去研究经济发展的规律,对经济理论的建构、发展和更新做出反思,能够提升和深化我们对经济学,特别是经济活动本质规律的认识。
     本文的第一个创新点是从哲学的视角阐明:经济学的基本前提和出发点是建立在主观因素而不是所谓客观因素的基础之上的,独立于人的主观意志之外的所谓客观经济规律是不存在的,所谓的经济规律就是以大多数人的意志为转移的规律。虽然卢卡斯本人并没有从哲学层面去研究理性预期,但是出于对这位大师的尊重,我们仍然把这一结论称为“卢卡斯推论”。这一结论并不妨碍经济学作为有效的工具用以分析现实经济的客观性和实用性。
     本文的第二个创新点是为上述理论寻找自然科学的依据,“卢卡斯推论”可以从自然科学特别是量子物理学中找到理论支持。现代量子物理学可以说是本文思想的自然科学基础,它给我们的启发是极其深刻而具有冲击力的:任何科学都不能排除主观性,科学实验和观测并不能完全排除人的意识的影响。我们头脑中根深蒂固的“客观实在性”以及“物质的实体观”在相对论和量子场论面前显得矛盾重重,不能自圆其说,甚至是谬误。人们之所以对此感到难以理解,是因为从某种程度上我们都是自己先入之见的俘虏。
     本文的第三个创新点是从中西方科学文化和经济管理思想的比较的角度对中西方科学实证主义的哲学思想以及实证体系进行了比较研究,指出了中国传统的经济管理思想的实证体系的精髓——“内证”的体系和方法。在此基础上,从多方面展开论述了中国传统经济管理思想的特色。
     论文分为六个部分:前两个部分主要介绍了论文的研究选题背景和意义,引出了本文的主体思想,并对现有的相关理论的研究成果和研究进展分几个方面进行了综合评述,为后面的展开做好了准备和铺垫;第三部分主要叙述了本文的自然科学基础——现代量子理论,并从哲学上讨论了其意义和价值;第四和第五部分是本文的重点。第四部分从多方面反复论证了我们的观点,不论从经济学基本假定上,还是理性预期学派与博弈论、行为经济学、实验经济学、心理学以及神经元经济学的观点上看,都可以印证我们的观点——独立于人的主观意志之外的所谓客观经济规律是不存在的,所谓的经济规律就是以大多数人的意志为转移的规律。第五部分从中西方科学文化的比较的角度上把中国的传统的经济管理思想体系与西方的实证主义体系加以分析,揭示了中国传统的经济管理思想的实证体系的特色和精髓是内证体系,中国传统管理思想的精华是首先管理好自己,然后再去管理别人,这一点又与内证体系和方法紧密联系。一个连自己都没有管好的人甚至没有管理别人的起码资格,而国外的管理理论绝大多数都是讲如何管理别人的;第六部分从现实的角度举例说明,经济发展乃至社会发展只有遵循和符合大多数人的心理预期,才有可能做到和谐。任何背离大多数人主观意志的政策都将导致社会的不和谐。因此,我们不仅应该按照大多数人的主观意志(预期)去制订经济政策、法规,对宏观经济进行调控,更应该按照大多数人的主观意志(预期)去构建和谐社会。
Marshal thought that economics is much more an art about human beings than a science about the wealth. The practical economic activities belong to both economics area and philosophy area. Economics and philosophy accrete together in many canons of famous economists. Philosophy illustrates the nature of development and the philosophic language is the most abstract and refined language. It can deepen and improve our understanding about economics, especially the essential rules of economic activities, if we use philosophic methods to comprehend economics, research the evolution rules of economics, and reconsider the structure and updating of economic theories.
     The first innovation of this paper is that it clarifies from the point of view of philosophy that, the fundamental precondition of economics is based on the factors that is not objective but subjective. Any objective economic rules independent from human beings' subjective thoughts does not exist. The so-called 'economic rules' are rules that are changeable according to the willing of majority of people. We still cal this conclusion 'Lucas deduction' for respect although he does not study rational expectation from the point of view of philosophy. However, this conclusion is not an obstacle for economics theory as an effective tool to analyze the objectivity and practicability of economy reality.
     The second innovation for this paper is finding out nature science evidence for the above theory. We can find out supports from natural science, especially quantum physics for ' Lucas deduction' . The quantum physics is the scientific foundation of this paper. Neither scientific experiments nor observations can perfectly remove the influence of mind. The rooted conception of 'objectivity' and 'substantiality', in people's mind is paradoxical even wrong when confronting relativism and quantum. The elicitation it gave us is quite profound and striking: no science can exclude the subjective factors, and no rule or area is independent from subjective factors. The reason that people feel hard to understand this is that we are all the captives of our first sight thoughts from some extent.
     The third innovation of this paper is to comparatively study the philosophy idea and system of demonstration of positivism in China and West from the point of view of culture of science and management of economy in the two sides. It points out the system and method of inner demonstration, which is the soul of the Chinese traditional system of demonstration in the idea of management of economy. Based on this, this paper discusses the feature of Chinese traditional idea of management of economy from multiple aspects.
     This paper has six parts: the first two parts introduce primarily the background of the topic and the meanings of this paper, derivate the principal ideas of this paper, summarize the research achievements and the developments of the related theory from several aspects, and prepare for the deeper discussions later. The third part describes the scientific foundation of the paper—the quantum theory, reflects it from the philosophical point of view and analyzes its philosophical meanings and values. The forth and fifth parts are the highlights. The forth part proves our hypothesis from multiple aspects, and we can claim from the basic hypothesis of classical economics, the dissertations of rational anticipation and game theory, the views of behavioral economics, experimental economics, psychological economics and nerve cell economics to confirm the philosophical aspects that the objective economic rules independent from subjective factors do not exist. The fifth part analyzes the Chinese traditional idea and system of management of economy from the point of view of the comparison of culture of science in China and the West. It proves that the system of inner demonstration is the feature and the soul of the Chinese traditional system of demonstration in the idea of management of economy. The prime of Chinese traditional idea of management is that we should first supervise ourselves and then supervise others, this in turn connect tightly with the system and method inner demonstration. Anyone who cannot supervise himself/herself does not have the minimum qualification to supervise other people, while most of the theories of management in the West propose how to supervise others. The sixth part gives us some practical examples which indicate that economy, even society, can develop harmoniously only when it follows most people's anticipation. Any economic guide that does not obey most people's anticipation will cause inharmoniousness. We should build harmonious society according to most people's anticipation. Therefore, we should not only make policies and rules but also build harmonious society according to the subjective will (anticipation) of the majority people.
引文
1 《马克思恩格斯选集》第3卷第186页。
    2 马歇尔《经济学原理》第8版第1页。
    3 Muth,John E 1961.Rational expectations and the theory of price movements.Econometrica 29(July):p315-35.
    5 Forges,F.,1997,Self- Fulfilling Mechanisms and Rational Expectations.Journal of Economic Theory 75,p388-406.
    6 Aumann,R.J.,1976,Agreeing to Disagree,Annals of Statistics4:p1236-1239.
    7 Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica,1979,(47).
    8 Tversky A,Kahneman D.Rational Choice and framing of decisions[J].Journal of Business,1986,(59).
    9 赵红军,尹伯成.经济学发展新方向:心理学发现对经济学的影响.南开经济研究.2003(6).
    11 Kahneman D,Tversky A.Prospect theory:An an.alysis of decision under risk[J].Econometrica,1979,(47).
    13 李约瑟,《中国科学技术史》第2卷
    14 L.A.Zadeh,Fuzzy Sets,Inform and Control,1965(8):338-353.
    [1]阿马蒂亚·森.1996.经济行为与道德情感[J].经济学动态(8):66-70.
    [2]贝克尔.1996.人类行为经济分析.上海三联书店.
    [3]陈宇峰.2005.有限理性实现程度的新古典批判——兼评何大安《行为经济人有限理性的实现程度》.经济学家(4).
    [4]厄姆森.1989.贝克莱.中国社会科学出版社.
    [5]胡代光.1998.西方经济学说的演变及其影响[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
    [6]赖恩·坎特等.1983.合理预期理论与经济思想.商务印书馆.
    [7]马克思恩格斯选集(第3卷).1995.北京:人民出版社.
    [8]马克思.2000.经济学哲学手稿.北京:人民出版社.
    [9]马克思.资本论.第一卷第47页。
    [10]马歇尔.经济学原理[M].商务印书馆.
    [11]海德格尔.1995.形而上学导论.商务印书馆,132-147.
    [12]海德格尔.1987.存在与时间.上海三联书店,68-79.
    [13]赫伯特·西蒙.1989.现代决策理论的基础[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,49-51.
    [14]何大安.2004.行为经济人有限理性的实现程度.中国社会科学(4).
    [15]加里.s.贝克尔[美].1985.人类行为的经济分析[M].上海:三联出版社.104-108.
    [16]李洪芳.2006.量子实在与“薛定谔猫佯谬”.清华大学出版社。
    [17]李约瑟.中国科学技术史.第2卷.科学出版社.
    [18]梁洪学.2003.“经济人”假定理论的演进与发展[J].江汉论坛(7).
    [19]刘骏民、王国忠.2004.行为经济学的发展.东岳沦丛(25卷1期).
    [20]鲁明学、纪明山.1990.西方经济学说史概沦[M].天津:南开大学出版社.
    [21]卢瑟福.2000.经济学中的制度:老制度主义与新制度主义.中国社会科学出版社.
    [22][美]B.霍夫曼著.马元德译.1979.量子史话.科学出版社.
    [23]钱颖一.2002.理解现代经济学[J].经济社会体制比较(2).
    [24]彭刚.1998.经济发展理论与实践中的心理因素分析.教学与研究(7):p55 57.
    [25]沈湘平.2000.理性范式、人的发展阶段与“理性经济人”假设[J].社会科学(2).
    [26]史蒂文.M·谢弗林.1990.理性预期[M].商务印书馆.
    [27]史金艳、李凯、李亚宁.2005.行为经济学对经济人假设的重新审视.商业研究(5).
    [28]宋承先.1994.现代西方经济学.复旦大学出版社.
    [29]孙健、朱金叶.2006.是否存在独立于人的主观意志之外的客观经济规律?——关于经济学的出发点和经济规律的思考.文史哲(6):142-145.
    [30]汪浩瀚.2003.经济分析中的基本假设与方法论意义[J].当代财经(3).
    [31]西蒙.2002.理性选择行为模型.《西蒙选集》,首都经贸大学出版社.
    [32]薛求知、黄佩燕、鲁直、张晓蓉.2003.行为经济学——理沦与应用[M].上海:复旦大学出版社.
    [33]晏智杰.1998.古典经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社.
    [34]杨春学.1997.“经济人”的三次大论争及其反思[J].经济学动态(5).
    [35]杨春学.1998.经济人与社会经济分析[M].上海:三联出版社,28-31.
    [36]杨玉生.1995.理性预期学派[M].武汉:武汉出版社.
    [37]杨正.1996.论行为经济学的创新.南开经济研究(5).
    [38]王博伦.2001.财富与精神—关于经济学基本问题的哲学思考.广东人民出版社.
    [39]王善平.2006.现代性:资本与理性形而上学的联姻.哲学研究(1):37-41.
    [40]汪丁丁.1996.卢卡斯批判以及批判的批判.经济研究(3):69-78.
    [41]叶焕庭、贾裕泉.2000.关于经济学研究方法论的几点思考.清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版)第5期.
    [42]湛志伟.2002.坎内曼与塞勒对行为经济学的贡献[J].经济学动态(9).
    [43]张跃平.2000.“维农.史密斯对实验经济学的贡献”,经济学动态(10).
    [44]张圣平.2002.偏好、信念、信息与证券价格[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社.
    [45]张维迎.1997.博弈论与信息经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,上海人民出版社.
    [46]张雄.1999.哲学理性概念与经济学理性概念辨析.江海学刊(6).
    [47]张延.1998.对西方经济学基本前提架设的研究[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版)第5期:45-48.
    [48]赵红军,尹伯成.2003.经济学发展新方向:心理学发现对经济学的影响.南开经济研究(6).
    [49]郑也夫.2000.新古典经济学“理性”概念之批判.社会学研究(4).
    [50]朱清时.2007.物理学步入禅境.待发表.
    [51]朱清时.2007.心念与大脑,佛学与科学.待发表.
    [52]Allais,M.,1953,Le Comportement de L'homme Rationnel Devant le Risque:Critique des Postulats et Axiomes de L'ecole Americane,Econometrica 21,PP503-546.
    [53]Aumann,R.J.,1964,Markets with a Continuum of Traders,Econometrica 32.
    [54]Aumann,R.J.and Shapley,L.S.,1974,Values of NonAtomic Games,Princeton:Princeton University Press.
    [55]Aumann R.J."Values of Market with a Continuum of Traders",1975,Econometrica,611-646.
    [56]Aumann,R.J.,1976,Agreeing to Disagree,Annals of Statistics 4,1236-1239.
    [57]Aumann,R.J.,1985,Notes and Comments on the Nontransferable Utility Value:A Comment On The Roth-Shafer Examples,Econometrica 53.
    [58]Aumann,R.J.,1987,Value,Symmetry,and Equal Treatment:A Comment On Scafuri And Yannelis,Econometrica 55,1-18.
    [59]Aumann,R.J.,1995,Epistemic Conditions For Nash Equilibrium,Econometrica 63.
    [60]Barro,Robert J,1977,Unanticipated money growth and unemployment in the United States.American Economic Review 67(March):101-15.
    [61]Cooley,Thomas F.,ed,1995,Frontiers of business cycle research.Princeton,N.J.:Princeton University Press.
    [62]David Laibson,2000,A Cue—Theory of Consume Current Draft[J],Psychological Science(5):19-27.
    [63]Debreu,Gerard.,1959,Theory of value:An axiomatic analysis of economic equilibrium.New Haven,Conn.:Yale University Press.
    [64]Delong,B.,A.Shleifer,Summers,L.&R.Waldman,1990,Noistrader Risk in Financial Markets. Journal of Political Economy98(4).
    
    [65]Fehr, Schmidt, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114.
    
    [66]Fehr et al, 2004, The Neural Basis of Altruistic Punishment, Science, Vol.305, 27 August.
    
    [67]Flood, M. ,1952, Some Experimental Games, Research Memorandum, RM-789, RAND Corporation.
    
    [68]Flood, M., 1954, On Game-Learning Theory and some Decision-Making Experiments, Decision Processes, New York, 139-158.
    
    [69]Forges, F., 1997, Self- Fulfilling Mechanisms and Rational Expectations. Journal of Economic Theory 75:388-406.
    
    [70]Gurley, John G, 1961, Review of A program for monetary stability by Milton Friedman. Review of Economics and Statistics 43 (August): 307-8.
    
    [71]Friedman, Milton, 1957, A theory of the consumption function. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
    
    [72]Friedman,M., 1968, The Role of Monetary Policy[J].American Economic Review,Vol.58:1-17.
    
    [73]Grossman, S., 1976, On the Efficiency of the Competitive Stock Markets Where Traders Have Diverse Information. Journal of Finance 31:573 - 585.
    
    [74]Grossman, S., 1977, The Existence of Futures Markets, Noisy Rational Expectations and Informational Externalities. Review of Economic Studies 64: 431 - 449.
    
    [75]Grossman, S., Stiglitz, J.E., 1980, On the Impossibility of Informationa! ly Efficient Markets. The American Economic Review 70: 393 - 408.
    
    [76]Grossman, S., 1981, An Introduction to the Theory of Rational Expectation Under Asymmetric Information. Review of Economics Studies 48:541 - 559.
    
    [77]J Slovic, P&S. Lidatemteln, 1983, Preference reversals: A broader perspective, American economic review, 73(4): 596-605.
    
    [78]Kahneman D, Tversky A., 1972, Subjective Probability: A Judgment of Representativeness[J]. Cognitive Psychology(3).
    
    [79]Kahneman D, Tversky A., 1973, On The Psychology of Prediction[J]. Psychological Review(80).
    [80]Kahneman D, Tversky A., 1979, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica(47).
    
    [81]Kahneman D, Tversky A., 1986, Choice, Values, and Frames[J]. American Psychologist(4).
    
    [82]Kahneman D, Knetseh J, Thaler R., 1990, Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem[J], Journal of Political Economy(2).
    
    [83]Kydland, Finn E., and Prescott,Edward C, 1977, Rules rather than discretion: The inconsistency of optimal plans. Journal of Political Economy 85 (June): 473-91.
    
    [84]L. A. Zadeh, 1965, Fuzzy Sets, Inform and Control, (8):338-353.
    
    [85]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., 1972, Expectations and the neutrality of money. Journal of Economic Theory 4 (April): 103-24.
    
    [86]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., 1973, Some international evidence on output-inflation tradeoffs. American Economic Review 63 (June): 326-34.
    
    [87]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., 1976, Econometric policy evaluation: A critique. In The Phillips curve and labor markets, ed. Karl Brunner and Allan H. Meltzer. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 1: 19- 46. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    
    [88]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., 1978, Asset prices in an exchange economy. Econometrica 46 (November): 1429-45.
    
    [89]Lucas, Robert E., 1980a, Equilibrium in a pure currency economy. Economic Inquiry 18 (April): 203-20.
    
    [90]Lucas, Robert E., 1980b, Methods and problems in business cycle theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 12 (November, part 2): 696-715.
    
    [91]Lucas, Robert E., 1981, Studies in business-cycle theory. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
    
    [92]Lucas, Robert E., 1982, Interest rates and currency prices in a two-currency world. Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (November): 335 -59.
    
    [93]Lucas, Robert E., 1988, On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics 22 (July): 3 -42.
    
    [94]Lucas, Robert E., 1996, Nobel lecture: Monetary neutrality. Journal of Political Economy 104 (August): 661-82.
    
    [95]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., and Prescott, Edward C., 1971, Investment under uncertainty. Econometrica 39 (September): 659- 81.
    
    [96]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., and Sargent, Thomas J., eds., 1981, Rational expectations and econometric practice. 2 vols. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    
    [97]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., and Stokey, Nancy L., 1983, Optimal fiscal and monetary policy in an economy without capital. Journal of Monetary Economics 12 (July): 55-93.
    
    [98]Lucas, Robert E., Jr., and Stokey, Nancy L., 1987, Money and interest in a cash-in-advance economy. Econometrica 55 (May): 491-513.
    
    [99]Muth, John F., 1960, Optimal properties of exponentially weighted forecasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association 55 (June): 299-306.
    
    [100]Muth, John F., 1961, Rational expectations and the theory of price movements. Econometrica 29 (July): 315-35.
    
    [101]Nash, John F., 1950, Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 36 (January): 48 -49.
    
    [102]Phelps, Edmund S., 1968, Money-wage dynamics and labor-market equilibrium. Journal of Political Economy 76 (July/August): 678 -711.
    
    [103]Phelps, Edmund S. ed., 1970, Microeconomic foundations of employment and inflation theory. New York: Norton.
    
    [104]Pheips,Edmund S., 1967, Phillips curves,Expectations of Inflation and Optimal Unemployment over Time[J].Economica,Vol.34,254-281.
    
    [105]Phelps,Edmund S., 1968, Money-Wage Dynamics and Labor-Market Equilibrium[J].Journal of Political Economy,Vol.76,678-711.
    
    [106]Phelps,Edmund S., 1970, Microeconomic Foundations of Employment and Inflation Theory[M].W.W.Norton,Macmillan.
    
    [107]Phelps,Edmund S., 1995, The Structuralist Theory of Employment[J]. American Economic Review, vol.85, issue 2,226-31.
    
    [108]Phillips,A.W., 1958, The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom[J].Economica,Vol.25,283-289.
    
    [109]Rabin, 1998, Matthew,Psychology and Economics[J]. Journal of Econonucs Literature(1).
    
    [110]Rotwein, Eugene, ed., 1970, Writings on economics by David Hume, 1711-1776. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
    [111]Samuelson, Paul A., 1958, An exact consumption-loan model of interest with or without the social contrivance of money. Journal of Political Economy 66 (December):467-82.
    
    [112]Sargent, Thomas J., 1993, Bounded rationality in macroeconomics: The ArneRyde memorial lectures. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
    
    [113]Sargent, Thomas J., 1996, Expectations and the nonneutrality of Lucas. Journal of Monetary Economics 37 (June): 535 -48.
    
    [114] Sendhil Mullainthan, Richard Thaler, 2000, Behavioral Economics[Z], Working Paper.
    
    [115]Siegel, S. & Fouraker, E. , 1960, Bargaining and Group Decision Making: Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly, McGraw-Hill, New York.
    
    [116]Simon, 1955, Behavioral Model of Rational Choice[J]. Journal of Economic(1).
    
    [117]Taylor, John B., 1979, Estimation and control of a macroeconomic model with rational expectations. Econometrica 47 (September): 1267-86.
    
    [118]Tinbergen, Jan., 1952, On the theory of economic policy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
    
    [119]Thaler R., 1985, Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice[J]. Marketing Science(3).
    
    [120]Thaler,R.H., 1987, The January effect. Journal of Economic Perspective(1).
    
    [121]Tvemky A, Kahneman D., 1971, Belief in the law of small numbers [J], Psychological Bulletin(76).
    
    [122]Tvemky A, Kahneman D., 1974, Judgment Under Unceaainty: Heuristic And Biases[J], Science (185).
    
    [123]Tvemky A, Kahneman D., 1981, The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice[J], Science(4).
    
    [124]Tvemky A, Kahneman D., 1986, Rational Choice and framing of decisions[J], Journal of Business(59).
    
    [125]Tversky A, Thaler R.H., 1990, Anomalies: Preference reversals, Journal of economic perspectires4(2):201-221.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700