榕属(Ficus L.)隶属于桑科(Moraceae),包括4个亚属,全世界约1000种,是一类具有多种观赏价值的树木。目前,世界各地对于榕属植物的研究,主要集中在榕属植物与其专性寄生榕小峰的互惠共生关系以及部分榕属植物的生物学特性上,对于其细胞学方面的研究,国外未见报道,国内报道的也仅有少数几种。因此,本研究以高山榕(F. altissima)、菩提树(F. religiosa L)、小叶榕(F. microcarpa)三种榕属植物种子萌发的根尖为材料进行染色体常规压片后,对它们的核型进行了分析研究,以期为榕属植物的亲缘关系研究、杂交育种及分类鉴定等提供重要的参考价值,也为今后榕属的研究深入到基因水平、分子水平奠定基础,使榕属的研究更加科学而全面。主要结果如下:
1、高山榕、菩提树、小叶榕三种植物的种子都较小,实验特别分析了取材长度的不同对常规压片效果的影响。发现,所取根尖过长时,压片后分生区细胞较少,影响观察;根尖过短又不利于操作;合适的取材范围为0.3-0.5cm。
2、常规压片法阶段。高山榕、菩提树、小叶榕三种植物在预处理方法上比较一致:它们的最适预处理条件为0.05%秋水仙素和0.002mol·L-18-羟基喹啉体积比1:1混合液低温0-4℃处理24h,但菩提树在三种预处理后的差异不是特别显著,可以说用0.05%的秋水仙素溶液低温0-4℃处理24h与0.002mol·L-1的8-羟基喹啉溶液低温0-4℃处理24h这两种预处理方法对于菩提树也较适用。经卡诺固定液暗处固定18-24h。三种植物在解离时间上存在明显差异:高山榕根尖用lmol·L-1 HC1在60℃下处理1-2min为宜,菩提树根尖用lmol·L-1 HC1在60℃下处理约1min为宜,小叶榕根尖用lmol·L-1 HC1在60℃下处理2-3min为宜。用改良苯酚品红染色后压片。
3、高山榕、菩提树、小叶榕的体细胞染色体数目均为2n=30。
4、高山榕的核型公式为2n=2x=30=22m(2SAT)+6sm+2T,染色体平均长度为2.80μm,核型不对称系数为61.54%,核型类型为“2C”型。菩提树的核型公式为2n=2x=30=24m(2SAT)+6sm,染色体平均长度为3.30μm,核型不对称系数为60.28%,核型类型为“1B”型。小叶榕的核型公式为2n=2x=30=28m(2SAT)+2sm,染色体平均长度为3.44μm,核型不对称系数为58.16%,核型类型为“1B”型。三者均属于小型和中等大小染色体,均含有一对具随体染色体。高山榕与菩提树、小叶榕的核型差异较大,而菩提树与小叶榕的核型差异相对较小。
5、高山榕、菩提树、小叶榕三者的核型不对称程度为:小叶榕<菩提树<高山榕。从亲缘关系看,高山榕与菩提树、小叶榕的亲缘关系较远,为较进化的类型;菩提树和小叶榕亲缘关系较近,为较原始的类型。
Ficus L. which is belonging to Moraceae, includs 4 subgenus and about 1000 species, is a kind of trees possessing various ornamental value. At present, there are mang studies about Ficus L., which mainly centralized at figs-pollinators mutualism relation and biological feature of some fig trees. There are little of cytological studies about Ficus L.. Therefore, the chromosome karyotype of F. altissima, F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa were investigated with the conventional pressing plate method, by which, I wish to provide some import refence to relationship researches, cross breeding, classification and identification etc. of Ficus L., lay a foundation of another studies of Ficus L.. The results showed:
1、The seeds of F. altissima, F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa are very small. The effects of conventional squash with different length of root-tip were studied. The reselts showed that the cells of meristematic zone were fewer after squashing when the length of root-tip were longer, which affacted on observation. The length of root-tip which were shotter made against operation. The suitable length of root-tip were 0.3-0.5cm.
2、The stage of conventional squashing. The pretreatments of F. altissima, F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa were unanimous basically. The best pretreatment method was mixture (0.05% colchicine and 0.002 mol·L-1 8-hydroxyquinoline by volume ratio 1:1) with lower temperature at 4℃for 24h. But the differences of three pretreatments of F. religiosa L. were not significant, what is the other two pretreatments(0.05% colchicine with lower temperature at 4℃for 24h and 0.002 mol·L-1 8-hydroxyquinoline with lower temperature at 4℃for 24h) were relatively suitable for F. religiosa L.. The root-tips were fixed with Camoy solution for 18-24 h in the dark. The differences of dissociation methods of three plants were significant. The best dissociation method of F. religiosa L. was 1 mol·L-1HCl with 60℃lasted 1-2 min. The best dissociation method of F. altissima was 1 mol·L-1HC1 with 60℃lasted about 1 min. The best dissociation method of F. altissima was 1 mol·L-1HCl with 60℃lasted 2-3 min. The stained with modified Carbol fuchsin solution.
3、The number of chromosome of F. altissima, F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa are 2n=30.
4、The karyotype formulae of F. altissima was 2n=2x=30=22m(2SAT)+6sm+2T, the average length of chromosome was 2.80μm, belonging to "2C" type. Its index of Asymmetric was 61.54%. The karyotype formulae of F. religiosa L. was 2n=2x=30=24m(2SAT)+6sm, the average length of chromosome was 3.30μm, belonging to "1B" type. Its index of Asymmetric was 60.28%. The karyotype formulae of F. microcarpa was 2n=2x=30=28m(2SAT)+2sm, the average length of chromosome was 3.44μm, belonging to "1B" type. Its index of Asymmetric was 58.16%. The chromosome of three plants were belonging to miniature or medium type chromosome, and all of them included a pair of satellite chromosomes. F. altissima is significantly different from F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa in karyotype, but the differences between F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa is not significant.
5、The order of asymmetry index of F. altissima, F. religiosa L. and F. microcarpa is F. microcarpa
引文
[1]洪德元.植物细胞分类学[M].北京科学出版社.1990.
[2]郭运玲等.大麻核型分析[J].中国麻作.1999,(2):21-23.
[3]郭运玲等.亚麻核型分析[J].中国麻作.2001,(3):9-11.
[4]Chi C Y, Lai M L. Producing new varieties through mutation by colcicine[J]. Proc S oil SciFla.24:405-408.
[5]葛荣朝等.普那菊苣的核型分析和C-分带研究[J].草地学报.2002,10(9):190-193.
[6]郭运玲.苎麻(Boehmeria nivea)核型分析与应用研究[D].中国农业科学研究院研究生院麻类研究所硕士毕业论文.2002.
[7]徐炳声等.染色体研究进展与植物分类学(上)[J].武汉植物学研究,1996(2):177-187,1996(3):261-268
[8]徐炳声等.染色体研究的进展与植物分类学(下)[J].武汉植物学研究,1996,14(3):261-268
[9]Kuo S R, Wang T T, Huang T C. Karyotype analysis of some fromosan gymnosperms [J].Taiwania.1972,17(1):66-80.
[10]Kenton A. Giemsa C-banding in Gibasis (Commelinaceae) Chromosoma[J].1978,65:309-324.
[11]Linde-Laursen I.Linkage map of the long arm of barely chromosome 3 usimg C-band s and marker genes[J]. Heredit.1982,49:27-35.
[12]Levan A. Nomen clature for centromeric position on chromosome[J]. Herditas.1960,5 2:201-220.
[13]Jones, G.H. Chromosoma[M].1978:47-57.
[14]Pudir, R.P.S. an sigh, R.B. Karytypic anaylsis of Cajanus, Atylosia, and Rhynchosia s pecies[J]. Theor. Appl. Genet.1986,72:307-313.
[15]金飚等.琼花染色体核型分析[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版).2007,28(1):92-94.
[16]图力古尔,刘立波.吉林省产5种百合的核型分析[J].武汉植物学研究.1996,14(1):6-12.
[17]何丽君,周小燕.三色堇染色体核型分析[J].内蒙古农业大学学报.2007,28(2):200-204.
[18]张彬彬,张兰.合欢的核型分析[J].武汉植物学研究.2007,25(2):203-204.
[19]李国泰.美人蕉核型研究[J].亚热带植物科学.2005,34(2):39-40.
[20]黄珊珊,廖景平.狭叶薰衣草与羽叶薰衣草核型分析[J].园艺学报2007,34(3):735-738.
[21]吴一民.荚蒾属两个种的核型研究[J].南京林业大学学报,1997,21(2):89-91.
[22]权俊萍等.百里香属植物染色体分析[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版).2010,28(1):18-22.
[23]王玉梅,李懋学,尤瑞麟.银杏非根尖细胞的染色体观察[J].林业科学.1999,35(5):2-4.
[24]孙敬三,钱迎倩.植物细胞学研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社.1987.
[25]陈家宽,杨继.植物进化生物学[M].武汉:武汉大学出版社.1994.
[26]李雅轩.植物细胞核型的进化[J].生物学通报.2001,36(2),16-17.
[27]Weimark A.. Heterochromatin polymorphism in the rye karyotype as detected by Gie msa C-banding technique[J]. Hereditas.1975,79:293-300.
[28]Levitzky, GA. The morphology of chromosomes[J]. Bull Appl Bot Genet. Plant Breed. 1931,27:19-24.
[29]Levitzky, GA. The karyotype in systematics[J]. Bull Appl Bot Genet. Plant Breed.19 31,27:220-240
[30]李集临,徐香玲.细胞遗传学[M].北京:科学出版社.2006.
[31]李国珍.染色体及其研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社.1985.
[32]曾小鲁.实用生物学制片技术[M].北京:教育出版社.1989.
[33]朱徵.植物染色体及染色体技术[M].北京:科学出版社.1982.
[34]ZHU C. Plant Chromosome and Chromosome Technique[M].Peiking:Science Press.19 82:120-145.
[35]李懋学,张教方.植物染色体研究技术[M].哈尔滨:东北林业大学出版社.1991.
[36]刘文献,陈佩度,刘大钧.将大赖草种质转移给普通小麦的研究V三个普通小麦2大赖草二体异附加系的选育与鉴定[J].南京农业大学学报,1997,20(2):6-10.
[37]邱爱军,魏凌基,吴玲,等.粗柄独尾草染色体核型分析[J].石河子大学学报(自然科学版),2004,22(5):415-416.
[38]杨起简,周禾,孙彦,等.二倍体新麦草染色体核型分析[J].北京农学院学报,2001,16(2):124.
[39]张玉玲.薏苡和薏米的染色体倍数鉴定及核型分析[J].辽宁农业职业技术学院学报.2003,5(4):14-16.
[40]高卫华,支中生,张恩厚,等.蜀黍属两个杂交种与其亲本染色体核型分析[J].中国草地.2002,24(4):68-71.
[41]范淑英,吴才君,董得坤.江西野葛的核型分析[J].江西农业大学学报.2004,26(2):239-241.
[42]杨德奎.林泽兰的核型分析[J].山东科学,2002,15(2):32-34.
[43]吴玲,张霞,马淼,等.新疆独尾草属植物核型分析[A].全国第二届甘草学术讨论会第二届植物资源开发、利用与保护学术讨论会会议论文摘要集[C].北京:中国植物学会,2004,72-78.
[44]隆有庆,傅华龙,苏静娟.春兰的核型分析[J].四川大学学报(自然科学版).2000,37(4):578-581.
[45]Darlington,C.D. and L.F.LaCour, The Handling of Chromosomes[M].George Allen & Unwin Ltd.London.1960.
[46]闫素丽等.染色体核型分析及染色体显微分离技术研究进展[J].生物技术通报.2008,(4):70-74.
[47]张贵友.普通遗传学实验指导[M].北京:清华大学出版社.2003.
[48]卢宝荣.一种新的染色体制片永久封片法[J].遗传.1991,3(1):39—40.
[49]Alexopoulis C J.and E.S.Beneke,Laboratory Manual for Louroduction Myclogy Burges s Publ.Co.Mooneapolis,Mion.1952
[50]王敏琴,彭振英,蔡雁峰,夏光敏.一种获得分散良好的植物染色体压片技术[J].生物学通报.2007,42(4):50.
[51]李懋学,张赞平.作物染色体及其研究技术[M].北京:中国农业出版社.1996.
[52]孙敬三,钱迎倩.植物细胞学研究方法[M].北京:科学出版社.1987.
[53]Levan, A.K. Fredga and A. Sandberg. Nomenclature for Centromeric Position on Chr omosome. Hereditas.1964,52:197-200.
[54]Stebbins,G.L. Chromosomal Evolution in Higher Plants. Edward Arnold. London.1971.
[55]李懋学,陈瑞阳.关于植物核型分析的标准化问题[J].武汉植物学研究.1985,3(4):297-302.
[56]陈瑞阳等.《中国主要经济植物基因组染色体图谱》[M].北京:科学出版社.2003.
[57]陈瑞阳等.《中国主要经济植物基因组染色体图谱》第三册:中国园林花卉植物染色体图谱[M].北京:科学出版社.2003.
[58]王恒昌等,乐昌含笑(木兰科)的核型研究[J].武汉植物学研究.2004,22(5):469-472.
[59]王慷林,谢静,张挺,顾志建.省藤属四种植物的核型分析[J].云南植物研究.2005,27(1):87-91.
[60]高进红,刑世岩.银杏观赏品种染色体核型分析[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版).2005,36(1):19-24.
[61]蔡华,王荣富.加拿大一枝黄花的核型分析及B染色体初报[J].激光生物学报.2006,15(3):245-248.
[62]王瑞,陈林姣,赵玉辉,武剑,田惠桥.中国水仙的核型分析和小孢子发生中的细胞学研究[J].细胞生物学杂志.2007,29:140-146.
[63]申彦晶,赵树进.白木香核型与Giemsa C-带带型研究[J].中药材.2007,30(7):762-765.
[64]胡蓉,徐华伟,王凯,唐正义.红花芋染色体核型分析[J].重庆教育学院学报.2008,21(6):16-18.
[65]冷青云,邓自豪,莫饶.金钱树的核型分析[J].福建林业科技.2008,9(3):70-71.
[66]傅立国,洪涛.中国高等植物(第四卷)[M].青岛:青岛出版社.2000,42.
[67]中国科学院中国植物志编委会.中国植物志(第二十三卷第一分册)[M].北京:科学出版社.1978,66-91.
[68]庄雪影.园林树木学[M].文州:华南理工大学出版社.2002,157-159.
[69]马炜梁,陈勇,李宏庆.榕树及其传粉者研究综述[J].生态学报.1997,17(2):209-215.
[70]陈勇,李宏庆,马炜梁.榕树-传粉者共生体系的研究[J].生物多样性.1997,5(1):31-35.
[71]何坤耀.爱玉授粉小蜂之生态及其平地立足之可能性调查[J].中华昆虫(台湾).1987,7:37-44.
[72]Galil J et al. On the pollination ecology of Ficus sycomorus in East Africa[J].Ecolog y.1968,49(2):69-259.
[73]Gald J et al. Pollination of Ficus costaricana and F. hemsleyana by Blastophga ester ae and B. tonduzi in Cosca Rica (Hymenoprera:Chalcidoldae, Agaonidae). Tijdschr. E ntomol.1973,116L:83-175.
[74]刘方农.垂叶榕的生物学习性及栽培管理技术[J].西昌师范高等专科学校校报.2003,15(2):120-121.
[75]相辉,张玲,陈进.介质中不同Ca2+浓度对五种榕树幼苗钙含量的影响[J].2003,23(2):165-168.
[76]刘承泽,吴月华,孙玉生.重庆市黄葛树过氧化物酶同工酶研究[J].重庆师范学院学报(自然科学版).1996,12(3):12-15.
[77]向平等.厦门园林植物园10种榕属植物叶热值与灰分含量的研究[J].林业科学.2003,39(专刊1):68-73.
[78]和太平,李运贵.广西榕属观赏树木资源及其利用[J].广西科学院学报.1998,14(2):7-10.
[79]黄碧丽.福建泉州榕属植物园林应用调查及介理利用对策[J].亚热带植物科学.2009,38(3)63-68.
[80]蒋谦才,黄悦朝,李增祥.广东榕属观赏植物资源及其开发利用[J].亚热带植物科学.2004,33(4):48-51.
[81]韦丽媛.榕树家族-南方城市生态园林中的佼佼者[J].国土绿化.2003,2:39.
[82]肖珍泉,郑明琴,龙青云.五种野生榕属植物的开发利用[J].广东园林.2003(增刊):74-76.
[83]孔国辉等.大气污染与植物[M].北京:中国林业出版社.1988.
[84]陈笑玲.福州市3种主要园林树种抗重金属与酸雨胁迫能力研究[D].福建农林大学硕士学位论文.2008.
[85]陈仁利,周铁锋.菩提树的主要特征及其栽培技术[J].林业实用技术.2008,5:53-54.
[86]任全进,于金平.健脾益胃无花果[J].植物与保健,冬末版:43-44.
[87]孙永泰.无花果的开发价值[J].四川农业科技.2007,7:17.
[88]姜波,从艳霞,万建春.无花果代乳饮料研究[J].试验报告与理论研究.2008,11(6):29-30.
[89]张福平.粤东地区野生桑科果树资源[J].食品研究与开发.2003,12(6):95-96.
[90]谭忠奇,丁印龙,林益明.福建榕树资源及其保护[J].亚热带植物科学.2002,31(3):41-44.
[91]江苏植物研究所,中国医学科学院药物研究所,中国科学院昆明植物研究所等.新华本草纲要(Ⅱ)[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社.1991.
[92]林强.榕属植物在福建省园林中的应用[J].福建林业科技.2004,31(4):129-133.
[93]郭英.六个无花果(Ficus carica L.)品种的系统学研究[D].西南农业大学二零零三届硕士学位论文.2003.
[94]商宏莉,郭英,梁国鲁.6个无花果品种的染色体组型研究[J].西南农业大学学报(自然科学版).2004,26(3):264-269
[95]杨俊年,黄隆为,徐丽兰.黄葛树染色体核型分析[J].安徽农业科学.2009,37(32):15767-15768.
[96]Arano H. Cytological studies in subfamily carduoideae(Compositae) of Japan, IX. The karyotype analysis and phylogenetic consideration on pertya and ainsliea(2)[J]. Botma g Tokyo.1963,76:32-39.
[97]岳爱琴,李贵全,杜维俊,孔照胜.豆类植物三种类型染色体核型分析方法研究[J].山西农业大学学报.2001,21(2):118-121.
[98]张赞平,侯小改.杨山牡丹的核型分析[J]遗传.1996,18(5):3-6.
[99]Berg C C. Classificantion and distribution of Ficus[J], Experientia.1989,45;605-611.
[100]Berg C C. Flora Malesiana precursor for the treatment of Moraceaea 1:The main su bdivision of Ficus:the subgenera[J]. Blume.2003,48:167-178.
[101]Corner E J H, Check List Of Ficus In Asia And A ustralasia, With Keys To Identif ication[M]. Garden's Bulletin:Singapore.1965,21:1-186.