产业的转移、升级、整合与中国经济
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本文在全球化、工业化、城市化的背景下,在内生增长理论的框架中,思考改革开放以来中国经济的快速增长、当前外部经济的失衡、中国产业结构的升级、以及经济圈的产业整合等问题。这些问题之间关系密切,其形成与全球化进程中世界范围内的产业转移、中国的要素禀赋特征、以及中国内部的结构性缺陷等因素息息相关。
     改革开放以来中国经济高速发展的主要推动力是产业和劳动力的“双转移”:一方面是全球产业尤其是制造业向中国的转移,另一方面是中国城乡之间的劳动力转移。中国大量的劳动力从农村转移到城市,其实质就是进入全球产业分工链,发挥比较优势,参与国际分工。在这个产业与劳动力“双转移”的过程中,由于中国的技术创新能力较差、金融市场效率较低、投资领域存在行政壁垒等结构性问题,中国经济面临严重的外部失衡。本文利用内生技术创新(R&D)的框架,在开放宏观的条件下把上述机制形式化,分析像中国这样的人口庞大的发展中国家加入全球分工体系,对世界产业转移、技术进步和经济增长的影响,并在这个框架中分析了外部经济失衡出现的机制。作者发现,外部经济失衡是由于内部结构性问题所导致的均衡结果。
     产业结构水平较低、升级缓慢的背后是技术水平较低、进步缓慢。本文以珠三角为例分析技术进步缓慢的原因,作者发现技术水平较低、进步缓慢的关键原因是在厂商技术采用和劳动力人力资本投资之间存在互补性,一定条件下这会导致多重均衡:一种是“高技术均衡”,即厂商的技术进步较快,劳动力的人力资本水平较高;另一种是”低技术均衡”,即厂商的技术进步较慢,劳动力的人力资本水平较低。本文利用人力资本(Human Capital)和干中学(Learning by Doing)的框架,对这一机制进行了刻画。作者认为,中国产业结构水平较低、升级缓慢的根本原因是我国劳动力绝对数量较大和相对素质较差,由于在技术采用和人力资本之间存在互补性,因此我们长期处于全球产业分工链的低端。这是由我国要素禀赋的特征决定的均衡结果。因此推进产业结构的升级可以从两个方而着手,分别是对企业的技术创新和劳动力的人力资本投资进行补贴。由于人力资本投资的外部性更强,因此政策的着重点应是提高劳动力的人力资本水平。
     产业整合是产业结构优化升级的重要方面,经济圈产业整合的关键是中心城市和其他城市之间如何进行专业化分工。专业化分工的原则应是充分发挥各类城市的比较优势。中心城市和其他城市之间主要有两种专业化分工形式,分别是部门分工和功能分工。从发达国家的历史经验看,随着通讯和交通技术的进步,经济圈的中心城市与其他城市之间出现了从部门分工向功能分工的演变趋势:中心城市更多的发挥管理、研发和服务的功能,生产功能则主要由经济圈其他城市承担。数据表明,近年来我国的长三角也出现了这种趋势。本文在内生技术进步(R&D)的框架内,分析了经济圈专业化分工形式演变的机制。发现无论是技术层面的企业异地管理成本的减少,还是制度层面的针对产业转移的行政壁垒的降低,均衡时都会使经济圈中心城市和其他城市之间的部门分工程度降低,功能分工程度上升,并且这个过程有利于经济圈整体的技术进步。
Under the circumstances of globalization, industrialization and urbanization, the present paper investigates several topics of China's economy in the light of endogenous economic growth theory, which includes the high-speed economic growth after the reform, current-account imbalance, and industry upgrade and integration.
     The most important impetus of China's economic growth includes industry transfer and labor force mobility. After the reform and opening up of China, many industries especially manufacturing transfer from advanced countries to China. At the same time, more and more rural labor force moves into the cities and enter non-agricultural industries. In this process, China's comparative advantage has been fully displayed. During the two-way transfer, China is confronted with severe current account imbalance because of structural problems, which include poor technology innovation capability, low efficiency of financial market, and investment barriers. According to the endogenous technology R&D model, the present paper constructs a formal analytical framework to investigate the mechanism of these issues. This paper rationalizes current account imbalance as an equilibrium outcome when different regions of the world differ in their economic structure.
     Industry upgrade is in fact technology upgrade. The present paper analyzes the mechanism of slow technology upgrade taking the Zhujiang delta as an example. The key reason is the complementation between technology adoption and human capital investment. This will lead to multi-equilibrium in some circumstances. One is the high-technology equilibrium, which refers to high-speed technology upgrade and high-level human capital; the other is the low-technology equilibrium, which refers to low-speed technology upgrade and low-level human capital. The present paper constructs a formal analytical framework to investigate this mechanism on the basis of human capital model and learning by doing model. China has been in the low-end of global industrial division chain since the reform and opening up, which is an equilibrium outcome of China's factor endowment. To promote industry upgrade, the government had better subsidize technology innovation and human capital investment. Because the externality of human capital investment is larger, the government should focus financial support on human capital accumulation.
     Industry integration is an important aspect of metropolitan area's optimization and upgrading of industrial structure. The principle of industry integration is to exploit comparative advantage of all the cities, and the pivot is the mode of industry integration between the central city and the other cities. There are two paths of industry integration between the central city and the other cities, respectively are sector specialization and function specialization. From the experiences of developed countries, along the advancement of communication technology, there has been a shift in the main dimension along which cities specialize, from a specialization by sector to a specialization by function. In fact, the Yangzi delta has also shown this transformation. The current paper investigates the mechanism behind this phenomenon in the light of endogenous technology innovation.
引文
[1]Acemoglu, Daron.1996.A Microfoundation for Social Increasing Returns in Human Capital Accumulation[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111(3), 779-804.
    [2]Acemoglu, Daron.1997.Training and Innovation in an Imperfect Labour Market [J].Review of Economic Studies, 64(3), 445-464.
    [3]Acemoglu, Daron and Zilibotti, Fabrizio.2001.Productivity Differences [J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 563-606.
    [4]Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt.1992.A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction[J].Econometrica, 60(2), 323-351.
    [5]Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt.1998.Endogenous Growth Theory [J].Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [6]Aghion Philippe, Christopher Harris, Peter Howitt and John Vickers.2001.Competition, Imitation and Growth with Step-by-Step lnnovation[J].Review of Economic Studies, 68, 467-492.
    [7]Aghion Philippe, Nicholas Bloom, Richard Blundell, Rachel Griffith and Peter Howitt.2003.Competition and Innovation: An Inverted U Relationship.Unpublished.
    [8]Antras Pol and Helpman Elhanan.2004.Global Sourcingp].Journal of Political Economy, 112(3), 552-580.
    [9]Arrow, Kenneth J.1962.The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing [J].Review of Economic Studies, 29, 155-173.
    [10]Barro, R.J.and Sala-i-Martin, X.1992.Convergence[J].Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223-251.
    [11]Benhabib, Jess and Mark M.Spiegel.1994.The Role of Human Capital in Economic Development: Evidence from Aggregate Cross-Country Data[J].Journal of Monetary Economics, 34(2), 143-173.
    [12]Berman Eli, John Bound and Stephen Machin.1998.Implications of Skill-Biased Technological Change: International Evidence[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113,1245-1280.
    [13]Bhagwati, J.1996.The miracle that did happen: understanding East Asia in comparative perspective.Unpublished.
    [14]Blomstrom, Magnus and Kokko, Ari.1998.Multinational Corporations and Spillovers [J].Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(2), 1-31.
    [15]Blundell Richard, Rachel Griffith and John Van Reenen.1995.Dynamic Count Data Models of Technological lnnovation[J].Economic Journal, 105,333-344.
    [16]Boyreau-Debray, Genevieve and Shang-Jin Wei.2004.Pitfalls of a State-Dominated Financial System: Evidence from China [J].CEPR Discussion Paper, No.4471.
    [17]Caselli, Francesco and Wilbur, Coleman.2001.Cross-country Technology Diffusion: The Case of Computers[J].American Economic Review, 91(2), 328-335.
    [18]Caselli, Francesco and Wilbur Coleman.2006.The World Technology Frontier[J].American Economic Review, 96(3), 499-522.
    [19]Caballe, Jordi and Manuel S.Santos.1993.On Endogenous Growth with Physical and Human Capital[J].Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 1042-1067.
    [20]Caballero Ricardo J., Emmanuel Farhi, and Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas.2008.An Equilibrium Model of Global Imbalances and Low Interest Rates [J].American Economic Review, 98(1), 358-393.
    [21]Campa Jose M., Linda S.Goldberg.1997.The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing [J].Fed Reserve Bank New York Economic Policy Review, 3, 53-81.
    [22]Cheung, K.Y., and P.Lin.2004.Spillover effects of FDI on innovation in China: Evidence from the provincial data [J].China Economic Review, 15(1), 25-44.
    [23]Coe, David T.and Elhanan Helpman.1995.International R&D Spilloversp].European Economic Review, 39, 859-887.
    [24]Davis J.C.and J.Henderson.2004.The agglomeration of headquarters.Unpublished.
    [25]Dinopoulos, E.and Thompson, P.1998.Schumpeterian Growth without Scale Effects[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 3, 313-335.
    [26]Duranton Gilles and Diego Puga.2005.From sectoral to functional urban specializationp].Journal of Urban Economics, 57, 343-370.
    [27]Eaton, Jonathan and Samuel Kortum.1996.Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD[J].Journal of International Economics, 40, 251-278.
    [28]Evans, P.1996.Using Cross-Country Variances to Evaluate Growth Theories[J].Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 20,1027-1049.
    [29]Fare R., Grosskopf S.and Lovell C.A.K.1994.Production Frontiers [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    [30]Feenstra Robert C, Gordon H.Hanson.1996.Globalization Outsourcing and Wage lnequality[J].American Economic Review, 86, 240-245.
    [31]Frankel, M.1962.The production function in allocation and growth: a synthesisp].American Economic Review, 52, 995-1022.
    [32]Fujita Masahisa.1997.Regional growth in postwar Japan[J].Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27, 643-670.
    [33]Fung, K.C, lizaka, H., Lee, J.and Parker, S.2000.Determinants of U.S.and Japanese foreign investment in China[R].MA: Asian Development Bank Institute.
    [34]Fung, K.C, lizaka, H., Lin, C.and Siu, A.2002.An econometric estimation of locational choices of foreign direct investment: The case of Hong Kong and U.S.firms in China[R].MA: Asian Development Bank Institute.
    [35]Gerschenkron, A.1952.Economic backwardness in historical perspective.Unpublished.
    [36]Giaeser Edward.2003.Reinventing Boston: 1640-2003U].Discussion Paper Number 2017, Harvard Institute of Economic Research.
    [37]Giaeser Edward, Giacomo A.M.Ponzetto.2007.Did the Death of Distance Hurt Detroit and Help New York[J].Discussion Paper Number 2132, Harvard Institute of Economic Research.
    [38]Glass Amy Jocelyn and Saggi Kamal.2002.Multinational Firms and Technology Transfer[J].The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4), 495-513.
    [39]Goldin, C, Katz, L.1996.Technology skill and the wage structure: insights from the past[J].American Economic Review, 86, 252- 257.
    [40]Gordon Robert J.2003.Exploding Productivity Growth: Context, Causes, and Implications[J].Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2,112-147.
    [41]Griffith Rachel, Stephen Redding and John VanReenen.2001.Mapping the Two Faces of R&D: Productivity Growth in a Panel of OECD Industries.Unpublished.
    [42]Grossman Gene M.and Rossi-Hansberg Esteban.2006.The Rise of Offshoring: It is Not Wine for Cloth Anymore.Unpublished.
    [43]Grossman, Gene M.and Helpman, Elhanan.1991.Quality Ladders and Product Cyclesp].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 557-586.
    [44]Grossman, Gene M.and Helpman, Elhanan.2005.Outsourcing in a Global Economy[J].Review of Economic Studies, 72,135-159.
    [45]Helpman Elhanan.1993.Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights [J]. Econometrica, Vol.61, No.6,1247-1280.
    [46]Howitt, P.1999.Steady Endogenous Growth with Population and R&D Inputs Growing[J].Journal of Political Economy, 107, 715-730.
    [47]Howitt, P.2000.Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences [J].American Economic Review, 90, 829-846.
    [48]Howitt, Peter and David Mayer-Foulkes.2002.R&D Implementation and Stagnation: A Schumpeterian Theory of Convergence Clubs [J].NBER Working Paper, No.9104.
    [49]Howitt, Peter and Philippe Aghion.1998.CapitalAccumulation and Innovation as Complementary Factors in Long-Run Growth[J].Journal of Economic Growth, 3,111-130.
    [50]Huang, J.T.2004.Spillovers from Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Macau investment and from other foreign investment in Chinese industries [J].Contemporary Economic Policy, 22(1), 13-25.
    [51]Huang, Yasheng.2003.Selling China-Foreign Direct Investment During the Reform Era[M].CA: Cambridge University Press.
    [52]Hummels David, Jun Ishii, Kei-Mu Yi.2001.The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade[J].Journal of International Economy, 54, 75-96.
    [53]Javorcik Beata Smarzynska.2004.Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages[J].American Economic Review, 94(3), 605-627.
    [54]Jefferson G.2001.FDI Technological Innovation and Spillover: Evidence from Large and Medium Size Chinese Enterprises.Unpublished.
    [55]Jones, C.I.1995.R&D based models of economic growth[J].Journal of Political Economy, 103, 759-784.
    [56]Jovanovic, Boyan and Nyarko, Yaw.1996.Learning by Doing and the Choice of Technology[J].Econometrica, 64(6), 1299-1310.
    [57]Ju Jiandong and Shang-Jin Wei.2007.Domestic Institutions and the Bypass Effect of Financial Globalization[J].NBER Working Paper, No.13148.
    [58]Kaldor, N.1957.A Model of Economic Growth[J].Economic Journal, 57, 591-624 .
    [59]Khan V.Strauss and X.Vives.2004.Why and where do headquarters move? Unpublished.
    [60]Koiko J.1999.Can I get some service here? Information technologies, service industries and the future of cities.Unpublished.
    [61]Koopman Robert, Zhi Wang, Shang-Jin Wei.2008.How Much of Chinese Exports Is Really Made in China? Assessing Domestic Value-added When Processing Trade Is Pervasive[J].NBER Working Paper, No.14162.
    [62]Krugman Paul.1979.A Model of Innovation Technology Transfer and the World Distribution of Incomep].Journal of Political Economy, 86,1253-1266.
    [63]Krusell, P., Ohanian, L.E., Rios-Rull, J.-V., Violante, 6.L.2000.Capital skill complementarity and inequality: a macroeconomic analysis[J].Econometrica,68(5), 1029- 1053.
    [64]Learner Edward.2007.A Flat World, a Level Playing Field, a Small World After All, or None of the Above? A Review of Thomas L.Friedman's The World is Flat[J].Journal of Economic Literature, 45, 83-126.
    [65]Lucas Robert E.1988.On the Mechanics of Economic Development[J].Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3-42.
    [66]Lucas Robert E.Jr.1993.Making a Miracle[J].Econometrica, 61(2), 251-272.
    [67]Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D.and Weil, D.N.1992.A contribution to the empirics of economic growthp].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 407-437.
    [68]Mendoza, Enrique G., Vincenzo Quadrini, and Jos(?) Victor R(?)os Rull.2007.Financial Integration Financial Deepness and Global Imbalances.Unpublished.
    [69]Mulligan, Casey B.and Sala-I-Martin Xavier.1993.Transitional Dynamics in Two Sector Models of Endogenous Growth[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3),737-773.
    [70]Nelson, Richard R.and Edmund S.Phelps.1966.Investment in Humans Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth[J].American Economic Review, 56(2), 69-75.
    [71]Nicholson, Peter J.2003.The Growth Story: Canada's Long-run Economic Performance and Prospects[J].International Productivity Monitor, 7, 3-23.
    [72]Nickell, Stephen J.1996.Competition and Corporate Performance [J].Journal of Political Economy, 104, 724-746.
    [73]Owen C.H.Ho.2004.Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment in China: A Sectoral Analysis.Unpublished.
    [74]Parente Stephen L.and Prescott Edward C.1994.Barriers to Technology Adoption and Development[J].Journal of Political Economy, 102(2), 298-321.
    [75]Porter, Michael.1990.The Competitive Advantage of Nations[M].New York: The Free Press.
    [76]Prasad Eswar, Raghuram Rajan, and Arvind Subramanian.2006.Patterns of International Capital Flows and Their Implication for Economic Development.Unpublished.
    [77]Qian Sun, Wilson Tong, Qiao Yu.2002.Determinants of foreign direct investment across China[J].Journal of International Money and Finance, 21, 79-113.
    [78]Rebelo, Sergio.1991.Long-Run Policy Analysis and Long-Run Growth[J].Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 500-521.
    [79]Rodriguez Clare Andres.1996.Multinationals, Linkages, and Economic Development[J].American Economic Review, 86(4), 852-873.
    [80]Romer, Paul M.1986.Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth[J].Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002-1037.
    [81]Romer, Paul M.1987.Growth Based on Increasing Returns due to Specialization[J].American Economic Review, 77(2), 56-62.
    [82]Romer, Paul M.1990.Endogenous Technological Change[J].Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
    [83]Segerstrom, P.S., Anant, T.C.A.and Dinopoulos, E.1990.A Schumpeterian model of the product life cycle[J].American Economic Review, 80,1077-1091.
    [84]United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD).2005.World Investment Report[R].New York and Geneva.
    [85]Uzawa, Hirofumi.1965.Optimal Technical Change in an Aggregative Model of Economic Growth[J].International Economic Review, 6,18-31.
    [86]Vernon Raymond.1966.International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207.
    [87]Wei Shang-Jin.1993.The Open Door Policy and China's Rapid Growth: Evidence from City-level Data[J].NBER Working Paper, No.4602.
    [88]Wei Shang-Jin.2006.Connecting Two Views on Financial Globalization: Can We Make Further Progress[J]? Journal of Japanese and International Economics, 20, 459-481.
    [89]Whalley John and Xian Xin.2006.China's FDI and Non-FDI Economies and the Sustainability of Future High Chinese Growth[J].NBER Working Paper, No.12249.
    [90]Young, Alwyn.1993.Invention and Bounded Learning by Doing[J].Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 443-472.
    [91]Young, A.1998.Growth without Scale Effects [J].Journal of Political Economy, 106,41-63.Young Alwyn.2000.
    [92]The Razor's Edge:Distortions and Incre mental Reform in the People's Republic of China[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,115(4),1091-1135.
    [93]Zhang,K.H.2000.Why is direct investment in China so small[J]? Contempora ry Economic Policy,18(1),82-94.
    [94]陈洪.我国珠三角产业升级面临的难点及政策选择[J].宏观经济管理,2008,5.
    [95]陈建军.长江三角洲地区的产业同构及产业定位[J].中国工业经济,2004,2.
    [96]陈建军.长江三角洲地区产业结构与空间结构的演变[J].浙江大学学报,2007,37(2).
    [97]陈建军,姚先国.上海建设国际经济中心与长江三角洲地区的产业经济关系研究[J].管理世界,2003,5.
    [98]范剑勇.长三角一体化地区专业化与制造业空间转移[J].管理世界,2004,11.
    [99]郭庆旺,贾俊雪.积极财政政策的全要素生产率增长效应[J].中国人民大学学报,2005,4.
    [100]江苏无锡市长三角发展研究中心.从长三角、珠三角的消长看无锡产业的取向[J].江南论坛,2004,1.
    [101]蒋殿春,夏良科.外商直接投资对中国高技术产业技术创新作用的经验分析[J].世界经济,2005,8.
    [102]靖学青.长三角主要城市产业发展的区域定位和协调互动[J].上海经济研究,2004,3.
    [103]劳动和社会保障部课题组.关于民工短缺的调查报告[R].中国劳动和社会保障网,2004.
    [104]李善同,侯永志,刘云中,陈波.中国国内地方保护问题的调查与分析[J].经济研究,2004,11.
    [105]刘卓平,杨英.珠三角承接国际产业转移面临的困境及解决对策[J].经济研究导刊.2006,5.
    [106]路江涌.外商直接投资对内资企业效率的影响和渠道[J].经济研究,2008,6.
    [107]农业部课题组.农村劳动力转移就业:现状问题及对策[J].农村经济文摘,2005,5.
    [108]潘文卿.外商投资对中国工业部门的外溢效应:基于面板数据的分析[J].世界经济,2003,6.
    [109]彭连清,詹向阳.我国农村剩余劳动力的地域流向和产业分布特征[J].农村经济,2007,9.
    [110]邱风,张国平,郑恒.对长三角地区产业结构问题的再认识[J].中国工业经济, 2005,4.
    [111]任永菊,张岩贵.跨国公司地区总部的特征类型及其来华情况分析[J].世界经济,2005,1.
    [112]沈坤荣.外国直接投资的外溢效应分析[J].金融研究,2000,3.
    [113]史蒂芬,罗奇.后泡沫世界的陷阱[J].财经,2008,21.
    [114]世界银行.2020年的中国:新世纪的发展挑战[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,1998.
    [115]王红领,李稻葵,冯俊新.FDI与自主研发:基于行业数据的经验研究[J].经济研究,2006,2.
    [116]冼国明,严兵.FDI对中国创新能力的溢出效应[J].世界经济,2005,10.
    [117]徐毅,张二震.FDI外包与技术创新:基于投入产出表数据的经验研究[J].世界经济,2008,9.
    [118]颜鹏飞,王兵.技术效率技术进步与生产率增长:基于DEA的实证分析[J].经济研究,2004,12.
    [119]姚树沽,冯根福,韦开蕾.外商直接投资和经济增长的关系研究[J].经济研究,2006,12.
    [120]银温泉,才婉如.我国地方市场分割的成因与治理.经济研究,2001,1.
    [121]于良春,付强.地区行政垄断与区域产业同构互动关系分析[J].中国工业经济,2008,6.
    [122]喻世友,万欣荣,史卫.论跨国公司R & D投资的国别选择[J].管理世界,2004,1.
    [123]袁志刚,宋铮.高级宏观经济学[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2001.
    [124]袁志刚.20世纪90年代以来中国经济的动态效率[J].经济研究,2003,7.
    [125]袁志刚.新的历史起点:中国经济的非均衡表现与走势[J].学术月刊,2008,11.
    [126]袁志刚.全球金融风暴与中国经济[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2009.
    [127]余永定.全球不平衡条件下中国经济增长模式的调整[J].国际经济评论,2007,1.
    [128]张建武,王自成.制度缺陷珠三角地区普工短缺的根本原因[J].开放导报,2005,4.
    [129]张若雪,张涛.经济增长和收入差距缩小何以兼得[J].经济学家,2008,5.
    [130]张涛,张若雪.人力资本与技术采用:对珠三角技术进步缓慢的解释[J].管理世界,2009,2.
    [131]张为民,马京奎,于弘文.我国劳动力迁移流动的特征[J].统计研究,2004,6.
    [132]钟昌标.外商直接投资的横向和纵向溢出:对中国电子行业的分析[J].世界 经济,2006,11.
    [133]中国经济增长与宏观稳定课题组.劳动力供给效应与中国经济增长路径转换[J].经济研究,2007,10.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700