北京市公益林管护绩效及农户参与意愿研究
|
摘要
生态公益林作为北京生态建设的重要组成部分,在改善首都环境方面做出了重要的贡献,同时也为树立北京城市形象,提高人民生活环境质量提供了重要保证。因此,生态公益林的管护作为北京市生态建设的核心内容,成为当前的热点突出问题。本文在实证调研的基础上,首先从生态公益林的相关概念及理论基础出发,通过对北京市森林资源情况、公益林管护现状及特点进行了分析,进而利用北京市生态公益林管护的数据,对北京市各区县的管护状况进行绩效评价研究,得出了影响北京市生态公益林管护的主要因素,当前管护政策存在的主要问题,并分析了各区县生态公益林管护的绩效差异性。根据数据分析结论,本文总结了影响现有管护模式的因素,结合北京市林业发展的需求,有针对性的提出了具体的政策性意见。本文根据实证调查的数据,对样本村农户参与公益林管护的意愿及影响因素,进行了定性和定量的分析,探析了影响农户参与生态公益林管护的主要因素,提出了促进农户参与公益林管护和提高政府对农户生态补偿力度等政策建议。
As the important part of the ecological construction in Beijing, ecological public welfare forest played an important role in improving capital environment, also guaranteed the city image of Beijing and the improvement of people's living environment quality. So as the core content of the ecological construction, the ecological public welfare forest management problem became the hot spot of the current outstanding problems. Based on empirical investigation and related concepts and theoretical basis of ecological public welfare forest, this paper firstly focused on the characteristics of Beijing forest resources, non-commercial forest management status and characteristics, and then carried a research on the performance evaluation of the data of each district in Beijing and analyzed the performance differences between them, which came a conclusion of the main factors of Beijing ecological non-commercial forest management and the main problems of the management policy.According to the data analysis results, this paper summarized the influence factors of performance evaluation for the existing model, combining with the needs of the development of the Beijing forestry, this research put forward specific policy advice. According to the empirical survey data, this paper made qualitative and quantitative analysis of the willingness of sample village farmer participation in non-commercial forest and affecting factors, discussed the main factors that influenced farmer participation in the ecological non-commercial forest, put forward policy suggestions on promoting farmer participation in non-commercial forest and improving the ecological compensation status to farmers.
As the important part of the ecological construction in Beijing, ecological public welfare forest played an important role in improving capital environment, also guaranteed the city image of Beijing and the improvement of people's living environment quality. So as the core content of the ecological construction, the ecological public welfare forest management problem became the hot spot of the current outstanding problems. Based on empirical investigation and related concepts and theoretical basis of ecological public welfare forest, this paper firstly focused on the characteristics of Beijing forest resources, non-commercial forest management status and characteristics, and then carried a research on the performance evaluation of the data of each district in Beijing and analyzed the performance differences between them, which came a conclusion of the main factors of Beijing ecological non-commercial forest management and the main problems of the management policy.According to the data analysis results, this paper summarized the influence factors of performance evaluation for the existing model, combining with the needs of the development of the Beijing forestry, this research put forward specific policy advice. According to the empirical survey data, this paper made qualitative and quantitative analysis of the willingness of sample village farmer participation in non-commercial forest and affecting factors, discussed the main factors that influenced farmer participation in the ecological non-commercial forest, put forward policy suggestions on promoting farmer participation in non-commercial forest and improving the ecological compensation status to farmers.
引文
1. 北京市园林绿化局.生态公益林管护指南[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2006.
2. 北京市园林绿化局.北京市生态公益林建设与管理工作-有关政策文件汇编[R].2011.09.
3. 曹伟.基于外部性理论的经济可持续发展影响因素研究[J].中国科技博览,2009(27)
4. 车环平.我国生态补偿机制存在的问题及对策[J].重庆科技学院学报,2009(07)53-54
5. 陈蓬.建立管护经营承包制有效保护天然林[J].林业经济,2003(7)：24-27.
6. 褚正中.生态补偿理论研究述评[J].现代农业,2009(12).
7. 邓华锋.北京市生态林补偿机制若干问题的探讨[J].林业经济,2009(6)
8. 董文宇.集体林权制度改革后创新生态公益林管护机制[J].辽宁林业科技,2011(4).
9. 杜丽娟.生态补偿机制现状及发展趋势[J].中国水土保持科学,2008(6).
10.杜受枯.参与式管理与农民权益保护[J].农村经济,2004.
11.高彤.国际生态补偿政策对中国的借鉴意义[J].环境保护,2006.
12.葛亲红.福建省生态公益林经营管理模式探讨[J].江西林业科技,2005.
13.郭建卿,靳乐山,等.中国生态补偿研究综述[J].林业经济问题,2008,28(4)：371-376.
14.何桂梅.北京森林生态效益补偿机制探索与实践[J].林业经济,2011(3)
15.何俊,何丕坤.参与式方法在集体林权制度改革中的应用思考[J].林业经济,2007(2)：72-76.
16.黄富祥,康慕谊,张新时,等.退耕还林还草过程中的经济补偿问题探讨[J].生态学报,2002.22(4)：471—-478.
17.黄鹤羽.中国林情[M].开明出版社,2000.
18.黄勇.基于参与式理论的湖南林业合作组织发展对策探讨[J].林业经济问题,2010(5)
19.姜春前,沈月琴,刘德弟,等.社区水平可持续经营的社会目标评价[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,23(4)：455459.
20.李克国.生态环境补偿政策的理论与实践[J].环境科学动态,2000(2)：8-11.
21.李团民.基于生态资本权益的生态补偿基本内涵研究[J].林业经济,2010(4).
22.刘春江,薛惠锋,王海燕,杨养锋,等.生态补偿研究现状与进展[J].环境保护科学,2009(1)：77-78
23.刘东华,商延军,等.浅谈森林资源管护承包责任制及其发展战略[J].林业勘查设计,2002,122(2)：6-8.
24.李婷,欧盟生态标签制度评析及启示[J].海南大学学报.2008,26(5)：507-511.
25.刘新宇.森林培育质量管理和参与是林业经营发展现状及趋势[J].湖南林业科技,2010(37).
26.刘岩松.探析参与式管理在生态公益林管护中的应用[J].民营科技,2010(6).
27.鲁春燕,孙娟.浅析C/S模式和B/S模式的优缺点[J].福建电脑,2008(5)：87.
28.鲁绍伟,刘凤芹,余新晓,等.北京市八达岭林场森林生态系统健康性评价[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3)：79-83.
29.陆维福.国内外流域生态效益补偿差异解析[J].环境保护,2009(13).
30.吕忠梅.超越与保守——可持续发展视野下的环境法创新[M].北京：法律出版社,2003：56-68.
31.毛显强,钟瑜,张胜,等.生态补偿的理论探讨[J].中国人口资源与环境,2002.12(4)：38-
41.
32.秦艳红,康慕谊,等.国内外生态补偿现状及完善措施[J].自然资源学报,2007.22(4)：557-567.
33.孙学斌.北京山区生态公益林管护模式研究[A].北京林业大学,2007.
34.唐敏.论生态公益林的界定[J].四川农场,2010(1)
35.王春峰.应用参与式方法开展国内造林工作的若干思考[J].林业经济,2006(7)：66-69.
36.王格芳.现代生态补偿研究综述[J].资源开发与市场,2010(5)
37.王贵华.流域生态补偿途径研究进展[J].浙江万里学院学报,2010(2)
38.王静波.生态公益林管护的问题以及对策分析[J].绿色科技,2011(7)
39.王彤,王留锁,等.水库流域生态补偿标准测算方法研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(26)：14555-14557.
40.王严.云南省林业发展战略研究[J].西南林学院,2005
41.吴伟光,徐秀英,王传昌,等.生态公益林“外部性”特征及解决途径[J].林业经济,2003(12)：40-42.
42.徐永田.生态补偿理论研究进展综述及发展趋势[J].中国水利,2011,4：29-31.
43.许芬.生态补偿——观点综述与理性选择[J].开发研究,2010(5)
44.阳文华,钟全林,程栋梁,等.重要生态功能区生态补偿研究综述[J].华东森林经理.2010,24(1)：1-6.
45.张建肖：安树伟,.等.国内外生态补偿研究综述[J].西安石油大学学报：社会科学版,2009,18(1)：23-28.
46.张丽霞,顾凯平,等.森林资源可持续发展综合评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2005,27(1)：52-58.
47.张守攻,肖文发,江泽平,等.中国森林可持续经营标准与指标[M].北北京：中国标准出版社,2002：1-25.
48.郑恩生.森林在实现可持续发展中的作用[J].民营科技,2009(6)
49.中国林业可持续发展战略研究组.林业可持续发展研究总论[M].北京：林业出版社,2003.
50.周冰冰,李忠魁,等.北京市森林资源价值[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2000：34.
51.周雪玲.国内外流域生态补偿研究进展[J].生态经济学术报,2010(1)
52.宗臻铃,欧名豪,董元华,等.长江上游地区生态重建的经济补偿机制探析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001(1)：22—27.
53. Acemoglu Daron, Simon Johnson, Unbundling Institutions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2005,113 (5):949—96.
54. Agus C·, Karyanto O·, Hardiwinoto S·, et. al· Legume cover crop as soil amelioration at a short-rotation plantation in a tropical region [J]. ForestEnviron·2003,45(1):13-19.
55. Anderson James E., Oriana Bandiera, Private Enforcement and Social Efficiency [J].Journal of Development Economics,2005, (77):341—66.
56. Asquith NM, Vargas MT, Wunder S. Selling two environmental services:In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics 2008,65 (4): 675-84.
57. Bellmann, K. Towards to a system analytical and modelling approach for integration of ecological,
hydrological, economical and social components of disturbed regions. Landscape Urban Plan.2000. 51,75-87.
58. Castro R, Tattenbach F, Gamez L,et al. The Costa Rican Experience with Market Instruments to Mitigate Climate Change and Conserve Biodiversity[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2000,61:75-92.
59. Co-well R. Environmental compensation and the mediation of environmental change:making capital out of Cardiff Bay. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2000,43 (5): 689-710.
60. Daily G C. Nature's Service:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosys—tems [M].Washington DC:Island Press,1997:392.
61. Dixit Avinash K., Lawlessness and Economics-Alternative Modes of Governance [M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2004.
62. Furubotn Eirik G., Rudolf Richter, Institutions and Economic Theory:The Contribution of the Newlnstitutional Economic [M].Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1997.
63. Haber Stephen, Armando Razo, Noel Maurer, The Politics of Property Rights:Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico,1876—1929 [M].NewYork:Cambridge University Press,2003.
64. Huang C S. Geng L H, Wang S Y. Ecological Compensation Policy in Water Source Area. Ecological Environment,2009,3:169-172.
65. Jenkins M, Scherr S, Inbar M.Markets for biodiversity services:potential roles and challenges [J].Environment,2004,46 (6):32-42.
66. Johnson Simon, John McMillan, Christopher Woodruff, Property Rights and Finance [J].TheAmerican Economic Review,2002,92 (5):1335—56.
67. Julia Martin-Ortega, Roy Brouwer, Harry Aiking, Application of a value-based equivalency method to assess environmental [J] Journal of Environmental Management.2011, (92):1461-147O.Lee D·K·and Park Y·K·Degradation issues in South east and North east Asia* Proceedings of 10th International work-shop of BIO-REFOR [M]·The University of Tokyo, Tokyo,2001:3-24.
68. Matthias Albrecht,Bernhard Schmid,Martin K. Obrist et al.Effects of ecological compensation meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland. Biological Conservation.2010,143:642-649.
69. N kuffer, B Senn-Irlet. Influence of forest management on the species richness and composition of wood-inhabiting ba-sidiomycetes in Swiss forests [J]. Biodiversity and Conser-vation,2005,14: 2419-2435.
70. Pagiola S,Areenas A,Platais G.Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty an exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development,2005, 33 (2):237-253.
71. Reddy M· V · Introduction·In:Reddy M· V·(ed) Management of Tropical Plantation-Forests and their Soil Litter System · Litter, Biota and Soil-Nutrient Dynamics [M].Science Publisher Inc, USA,2002:1-40.
2. 北京市园林绿化局.北京市生态公益林建设与管理工作-有关政策文件汇编[R].2011.09.
3. 曹伟.基于外部性理论的经济可持续发展影响因素研究[J].中国科技博览,2009(27)
4. 车环平.我国生态补偿机制存在的问题及对策[J].重庆科技学院学报,2009(07)53-54
5. 陈蓬.建立管护经营承包制有效保护天然林[J].林业经济,2003(7)：24-27.
6. 褚正中.生态补偿理论研究述评[J].现代农业,2009(12).
7. 邓华锋.北京市生态林补偿机制若干问题的探讨[J].林业经济,2009(6)
8. 董文宇.集体林权制度改革后创新生态公益林管护机制[J].辽宁林业科技,2011(4).
9. 杜丽娟.生态补偿机制现状及发展趋势[J].中国水土保持科学,2008(6).
10.杜受枯.参与式管理与农民权益保护[J].农村经济,2004.
11.高彤.国际生态补偿政策对中国的借鉴意义[J].环境保护,2006.
12.葛亲红.福建省生态公益林经营管理模式探讨[J].江西林业科技,2005.
13.郭建卿,靳乐山,等.中国生态补偿研究综述[J].林业经济问题,2008,28(4)：371-376.
14.何桂梅.北京森林生态效益补偿机制探索与实践[J].林业经济,2011(3)
15.何俊,何丕坤.参与式方法在集体林权制度改革中的应用思考[J].林业经济,2007(2)：72-76.
16.黄富祥,康慕谊,张新时,等.退耕还林还草过程中的经济补偿问题探讨[J].生态学报,2002.22(4)：471—-478.
17.黄鹤羽.中国林情[M].开明出版社,2000.
18.黄勇.基于参与式理论的湖南林业合作组织发展对策探讨[J].林业经济问题,2010(5)
19.姜春前,沈月琴,刘德弟,等.社区水平可持续经营的社会目标评价[J].浙江林学院学报,2006,23(4)：455459.
20.李克国.生态环境补偿政策的理论与实践[J].环境科学动态,2000(2)：8-11.
21.李团民.基于生态资本权益的生态补偿基本内涵研究[J].林业经济,2010(4).
22.刘春江,薛惠锋,王海燕,杨养锋,等.生态补偿研究现状与进展[J].环境保护科学,2009(1)：77-78
23.刘东华,商延军,等.浅谈森林资源管护承包责任制及其发展战略[J].林业勘查设计,2002,122(2)：6-8.
24.李婷,欧盟生态标签制度评析及启示[J].海南大学学报.2008,26(5)：507-511.
25.刘新宇.森林培育质量管理和参与是林业经营发展现状及趋势[J].湖南林业科技,2010(37).
26.刘岩松.探析参与式管理在生态公益林管护中的应用[J].民营科技,2010(6).
27.鲁春燕,孙娟.浅析C/S模式和B/S模式的优缺点[J].福建电脑,2008(5)：87.
28.鲁绍伟,刘凤芹,余新晓,等.北京市八达岭林场森林生态系统健康性评价[J].水土保持学报,2006,20(3)：79-83.
29.陆维福.国内外流域生态效益补偿差异解析[J].环境保护,2009(13).
30.吕忠梅.超越与保守——可持续发展视野下的环境法创新[M].北京：法律出版社,2003：56-68.
31.毛显强,钟瑜,张胜,等.生态补偿的理论探讨[J].中国人口资源与环境,2002.12(4)：38-
41.
32.秦艳红,康慕谊,等.国内外生态补偿现状及完善措施[J].自然资源学报,2007.22(4)：557-567.
33.孙学斌.北京山区生态公益林管护模式研究[A].北京林业大学,2007.
34.唐敏.论生态公益林的界定[J].四川农场,2010(1)
35.王春峰.应用参与式方法开展国内造林工作的若干思考[J].林业经济,2006(7)：66-69.
36.王格芳.现代生态补偿研究综述[J].资源开发与市场,2010(5)
37.王贵华.流域生态补偿途径研究进展[J].浙江万里学院学报,2010(2)
38.王静波.生态公益林管护的问题以及对策分析[J].绿色科技,2011(7)
39.王彤,王留锁,等.水库流域生态补偿标准测算方法研究[J].安徽农业科学,2010,38(26)：14555-14557.
40.王严.云南省林业发展战略研究[J].西南林学院,2005
41.吴伟光,徐秀英,王传昌,等.生态公益林“外部性”特征及解决途径[J].林业经济,2003(12)：40-42.
42.徐永田.生态补偿理论研究进展综述及发展趋势[J].中国水利,2011,4：29-31.
43.许芬.生态补偿——观点综述与理性选择[J].开发研究,2010(5)
44.阳文华,钟全林,程栋梁,等.重要生态功能区生态补偿研究综述[J].华东森林经理.2010,24(1)：1-6.
45.张建肖：安树伟,.等.国内外生态补偿研究综述[J].西安石油大学学报：社会科学版,2009,18(1)：23-28.
46.张丽霞,顾凯平,等.森林资源可持续发展综合评价研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2005,27(1)：52-58.
47.张守攻,肖文发,江泽平,等.中国森林可持续经营标准与指标[M].北北京：中国标准出版社,2002：1-25.
48.郑恩生.森林在实现可持续发展中的作用[J].民营科技,2009(6)
49.中国林业可持续发展战略研究组.林业可持续发展研究总论[M].北京：林业出版社,2003.
50.周冰冰,李忠魁,等.北京市森林资源价值[M].北京：中国林业出版社,2000：34.
51.周雪玲.国内外流域生态补偿研究进展[J].生态经济学术报,2010(1)
52.宗臻铃,欧名豪,董元华,等.长江上游地区生态重建的经济补偿机制探析[J].长江流域资源与环境,2001(1)：22—27.
53. Acemoglu Daron, Simon Johnson, Unbundling Institutions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 2005,113 (5):949—96.
54. Agus C·, Karyanto O·, Hardiwinoto S·, et. al· Legume cover crop as soil amelioration at a short-rotation plantation in a tropical region [J]. ForestEnviron·2003,45(1):13-19.
55. Anderson James E., Oriana Bandiera, Private Enforcement and Social Efficiency [J].Journal of Development Economics,2005, (77):341—66.
56. Asquith NM, Vargas MT, Wunder S. Selling two environmental services:In-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics 2008,65 (4): 675-84.
57. Bellmann, K. Towards to a system analytical and modelling approach for integration of ecological,
hydrological, economical and social components of disturbed regions. Landscape Urban Plan.2000. 51,75-87.
58. Castro R, Tattenbach F, Gamez L,et al. The Costa Rican Experience with Market Instruments to Mitigate Climate Change and Conserve Biodiversity[J].Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2000,61:75-92.
59. Co-well R. Environmental compensation and the mediation of environmental change:making capital out of Cardiff Bay. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management,2000,43 (5): 689-710.
60. Daily G C. Nature's Service:Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosys—tems [M].Washington DC:Island Press,1997:392.
61. Dixit Avinash K., Lawlessness and Economics-Alternative Modes of Governance [M].Princeton:Princeton University Press,2004.
62. Furubotn Eirik G., Rudolf Richter, Institutions and Economic Theory:The Contribution of the Newlnstitutional Economic [M].Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press,1997.
63. Haber Stephen, Armando Razo, Noel Maurer, The Politics of Property Rights:Political Instability, Credible Commitments, and Economic Growth in Mexico,1876—1929 [M].NewYork:Cambridge University Press,2003.
64. Huang C S. Geng L H, Wang S Y. Ecological Compensation Policy in Water Source Area. Ecological Environment,2009,3:169-172.
65. Jenkins M, Scherr S, Inbar M.Markets for biodiversity services:potential roles and challenges [J].Environment,2004,46 (6):32-42.
66. Johnson Simon, John McMillan, Christopher Woodruff, Property Rights and Finance [J].TheAmerican Economic Review,2002,92 (5):1335—56.
67. Julia Martin-Ortega, Roy Brouwer, Harry Aiking, Application of a value-based equivalency method to assess environmental [J] Journal of Environmental Management.2011, (92):1461-147O.Lee D·K·and Park Y·K·Degradation issues in South east and North east Asia* Proceedings of 10th International work-shop of BIO-REFOR [M]·The University of Tokyo, Tokyo,2001:3-24.
68. Matthias Albrecht,Bernhard Schmid,Martin K. Obrist et al.Effects of ecological compensation meadows on arthropod diversity in adjacent intensively managed grassland. Biological Conservation.2010,143:642-649.
69. N kuffer, B Senn-Irlet. Influence of forest management on the species richness and composition of wood-inhabiting ba-sidiomycetes in Swiss forests [J]. Biodiversity and Conser-vation,2005,14: 2419-2435.
70. Pagiola S,Areenas A,Platais G.Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty an exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development,2005, 33 (2):237-253.
71. Reddy M· V · Introduction·In:Reddy M· V·(ed) Management of Tropical Plantation-Forests and their Soil Litter System · Litter, Biota and Soil-Nutrient Dynamics [M].Science Publisher Inc, USA,2002:1-40.