西瓜枯萎病病原菌生物学特性及生物防治的初步研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
从雅安郊区西瓜地采集典型发病植株,剪取茎蔓病组织,采用组织分离法分离鉴定得到病原菌尖孢镰刀菌西瓜专化型(Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.niveum(E.F.Smith)Synder etHansen)菌株。
     病原菌生物学特性研究结果表明,病菌菌丝生长的适宜条件是:光照、PDA和燕麦培养基、25℃~30℃、PH5~8,且供试的营养中以蔗糖为最佳碳源,尿素为最佳氮源;适合产孢子的条件是:光照、查彼和PDA培养基、30℃~35℃、PH5~6,蔗糖为最佳碳源,硝酸钾为最佳氮源;适合分生孢子萌发的条件是:光照、25℃~35℃、PH5~8。
     温度,光照和PH是影响病菌生长和产孢以及孢子萌发的重要因素,故选3因素、3水平的L_9(3~3)来安排正交实验。试验结果表明:30℃、PH5、交替光的条件组合为尖孢镰刀菌西瓜专化型菌丝生长和产孢的最佳条件。
     同时病菌对供试药剂敏感性实验表明:烯唑醇对病菌的毒力最强,EC_(50)为4.7976ug.ml~(-1),甲基托布津、百菌清及多菌灵次之,EC_(50)分别为81.444lug.ml~(-1)、82.487ug.ml~(-1)、152.852ug.ml~(-1),714.5950ug.ml~(-1)的三唑酮对病菌的毒力较差。
     从雅安郊区不同生态土壤中分离得到41株木霉,并以这41株木霉作为生防菌株筛选的出发菌株。
     通过对41个木霉菌株的生长速度、对峙培养、非挥发性代谢产物和挥发性代谢产物的抑菌作用测定,筛选出T1、T3、T4、T24四个具有较强生防潜能的木霉菌株,经鉴定T1、T4为桔绿木霉Trichoderma citrinoviride;T3、T24为黄绿木霉Trichodermaaureoviride。
     用筛选出的生防活性好的木霉菌株T1、T3、T4、T24之麦麸砂土培养物做进一步的室内盆栽防病试验,结果表明:供试菌株T1、T3的防病效果显著,防效依次为64.60%、74.95%,明显高于多菌灵的58.50%的防效,较好地控制了西瓜枯萎病的发生。然而菌株T4的防效低于多菌灵,仅为50.25%,但T4处理的病指仍大大低于对照的68.58%。有意义的是,当T4与土壤杀菌剂联合应用时(T4+PCNB),其防效为56.00%,与多菌灵相当。木霉与杀菌剂联合应用可以减少杀菌剂的使用量。
(Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.niveum(E.F.Smith)Synder etHansen) was isolated from the infected caudexes of watermelon in suburb of Ya-an,Sichuan.
     The culture optimum conditions for hyphal growth of pathogen were light,PDA or OA medium,25℃to 30℃,PH5 to 8.And the optimal carbon source was sucrose and nitrogen source was urea.The optimum conditions for spore sporulation were light,PDA or Czapek cultures,30℃to 35℃,PH5 to 6.The optimal carbon for sporulation was sucrose and nitrogen sourcee was nitre as well as the optimum conditions for conidiophore germination were light,25℃to 35℃,PH5 to 8.
     Temperature,illumination and PH were the most important factors on hyphal growth rate and spore sporulation of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.niveum.The orthogonal test of three factors i.e.temperature,illumination and PH was designed.The result showed that the best conditions combination of hyphal growth rate and spore sporulation were 30℃,PH5,Alternate light.
     Virulence test of several pesticides to the pathogen showed that EC_(50) 4.7976ug.ml~(-1) of diniconazole against pathogen was best.triophanate-methyl、chlorothalonil and carbendazim subsequently and its EC_(50) respectively was 81.4441ug.ml~(-1),82.487ug.ml~(-1), 152.852ug.ml~(-1),effected of 714.5950ug.ml-1 of triadimefon on pathogen was weak.
     41 strains of Trichoderma.spp were isolated from the different ecotypic soil in surburb of Ya-an and Those strais were used in the screening experiment of biocontrol strains.
     4 strains,named T1,T3,T4 and T24 respectively,that possessed stronger potential ability for plant disease biocontrol,were chosed according to the hyphal growth rate,dual culture on PDA plates,effects of volatile and non-volatile metabolites.T1 and T4 was identified as T.citrinoviride;T3 and T24 was T.aureoviride.
     T1,T3,T4,T24 were selected for pot experiment.The result of pot experiment showed that the efficacies of solid culture of T1 and T3 against watermelon Fusarium Wilt were 64.60%,74.95%,respectively,that were better than those of carbendazim(58.50%). However,the efficacies of isolate T4 was only 50.25%,lower than those of the solid culture,but lower than disease exponential of comparison.it is significance that effect of T4 combines soil bactericide were 56.00%,as same as carbendazim.Trichoderma combines bactericide can reduce dosages of antiseptics.
引文
1 丁新天,邓曹仁,杜龙君等.缙云县西瓜主要病害及其优化防治技术.农药,2001,40(1):35-36.
    2 肖光辉,郑素秋.西瓜枯萎病的发生及药剂防治研究[J].北方圆艺,1997,3:54-561.
    3 苏成军.西瓜枯萎病的发生与防治[J].中国瓜菜,2006,2:37-38.
    4 杨秀云.西瓜枯萎病的发生特点及防治措施[J].现代农业科技,2005,8:16.
    5 王德旭,李兵川.西瓜枯萎病的诊断与防治[J].农机安全监理,2002,1:13.
    6 周增强,候珲,冯桂馨等.6种药剂对西瓜枯萎病病原菌的抑制作用[J].中国西瓜甜瓜,2004,5:13-14.
    7 C.布斯著,陈其瑛译.镰刀菌属[M].农业出版社,1971,1-3,167-172.
    8 刑来君,李明春.普通真菌学[M].高等教育出版社,1998,426-427.
    9 郭雷,曲喜云等.西瓜枯萎病的防治方法[J].吉林种业,2003,40.
    10 Cirulli M.Variation of pathogenicity in Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.niveum and resistance in watermelon cultivars.Actas do Ⅲ Congre de Uniao Fitopatol Mediter[M].Oeiras:[s.n],1972,491-500.
    11 Netzer D.Physiological races and soil population level of Fusarium wilt of watermelon[J].Phytoparasitcia,1976,4:131-136.
    12 Martyn R D,Netzer D.Resistance to race 0,1 and 2 of Fusarium wilt of watermelon in Citrullus sp.P1296341-FR[J].Hort Science,1991,26(4):429-432.
    13 Nepa D A,Rhodes B B,Witcher W.Interaction of commercial watermelon cultivars with regional isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.niveum[J].Plant Breeding Abstract,1986,327.
    14 王浩波,王鸣.西瓜枯萎病生理小种分化研究[J].西北农学报,1993,2(4):67-70.
    15 顾卫红,王燕华,宋容浩.上海地区西瓜枯萎病病原菌生理小种初报[J].上海农业学报,1994,10(3):63-67.
    16 王浩波,戴祖云,杨坤等.合肥地区西瓜枯萎病菌分化鉴定及部分西瓜材料抗病鉴定[J].安徽农业科学,2001,29(4):520-521,524.
    17 Ben D M.The effect of grafting watermelon(Citrullus vulgaris shr.) on several rootstocks,on plant growth,fruit production,quality and resistance to Fusarium wilt[J].Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Meditenaneennes,1994,130.
    18 Amore R D,Mona L,Parisi B.Grafted watermelon:production results[J].Colture Protette,1996,25(9):29-31.
    19 Armengol J,Jose C M,Moya M J,et al.Fusarium solani f.sp.cucurbitaerace 1,a potential pathogen of grafted watermelon production in Spain[J].Bulletin OEPP,2000,30(2):179-183.
    20 Hopkins D L,Lobinske R J,Larkin R P.Selection for fusarium oxysporum f.sp.niveum race 2 in monocultures of watermelon cultivars resistant to Fusarium wilt[J].Phytopathology,1992,82(3):290-293.
    21 Ioannou N,Poullis C A,Heale J B.Fusarium wilt of watermelon in Cyprus and its management with soil solarization combined with fumigation or ammonium fertilizers[J].Bulletin OEEP,2000,30(2):223-230.
    22 孔庆国,于喜艳.浅谈西瓜育种成就和展望[J].长江蔬菜,2001,8:26-27.
    23 李敏,刘润进,李晓林.大田条件下丛枝菌根真菌对西瓜生长和枯萎病的影响[J].植物病理报,2004,34(5):472-473.
    24 李敏,孟祥霞,姜吉强等.AM真菌与西瓜枯萎病关系初探[J].植物病理学报,2000,30(4),327-331.
    25 李敏,王维华,盖京萍等.丛枝菌根对西瓜枯萎病的影响[J].山东农业科学,1997,增刊:43-45.
    26 李君彦,张硕成.提前接种非致病尖孢镰刀菌防治西瓜枯萎病试验[J].生物防治通报,1990,6(4)165-169.
    27 Martyn R D.Differential cross protection of watermelon to Fusarium wilt by related formae special[J].Phytopathology,1955,75:1304.
    28 严叔平.哈茨木霉防治西瓜枯萎病试验初报[J].中国西瓜甜瓜,1999,2:18.
    29 赵国其,林福呈,陈卫良.绿色木霉对西瓜枯萎病苗期的控制作用[J].浙江农业学报,1998,10(4):206-209.
    30 Dc Cal,Pascual S,Melgarejo EInvolvement of resistance induction by penicillium oxalicum in the biocontrol of tomato wilt[J].Plant pathol,1997,46:72-79.
    31 王明祖,周华众等.36-1菌对植物真菌病害的拮抗性[J].中国生物防治,1996,12(1):20-23.
    32 黎起秦,陈永宁,林维等.西瓜枯萎病生防细菌的筛选[J].广西农业生物科学,2000,19(2):81-84.
    33 Boer M de,et al.Control of Fusarium wilt of radish by combining Pseudomonas putida strains that have different disease-suppressive mechanisms[J]Phytopathology,2003,93:5,59,626-623.
    34 Van peer R,Niemann G J,Schippers B.Induced and phytoalexin accumulation in biological control of Fusarium wilt of carnstion by Pseudomonas sp.Strain WCS417[J].Phytop -athology,1991,81:728-734.
    35 Vanamala Anjaiah,et al.Effect of genotype and root colonization in biological control of Fusarium wilts in pigeonpea and chickpea by Pseudomonas aerugmosa PNA1[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology,2003,49(2):85-91.
    36 Pajand N.Endophytic Bacteria Induce Growth Promotion and Wilt Disease Suppression in Oilseed Rape and Tomato[J].Canadian Journal of Microbiology,2001,8(3):208-215.
    37 纪明山,王英姿等.西瓜枯萎病拮抗菌株筛选及田间防效试验[J].中国生物防治,2002, 18(2):71-74.
    38 蒋细良等.中生菌素对真菌作用机理的研究[J].中国生物防治,1997,13(2):69-71.
    39 徐同.木霉分子生物学研究进展[J].真菌学报,1996,15(2):143-148.
    40 Ahmad,J.S.,Baker R.Rhizosphere competence of Trichoderma harzianum[J].Phytopathology,1987,77:182-189.
    41 徐耀波,谭小琴,文成敬.平菇培养料中的污染真菌调查[J].食用菌,2005,27(5):48-49.
    42 侯卫玲.食用菌生产中常见的杂菌及防治[J].农村实用科技,2004,12:18.
    43 Weindling R.Studies on a lethal principle effective in the parasite action of Trichoderma lignorum on Rhizoctonia solani and other soil fungi[J].Phytopathology,1932,22:837-845.
    44 Bhuyan S A.Antagonistic effect of T.virid,T.harzianum and Asperigillus vearea on Rhizoctonia solani causing sheath blight of rice[J].Journal of the Agricultural Science Society of Northeast lodia,1994,7(1):125-127.
    45 Harman G E.Myths and Dogmas of Biocontrol-Changes in Perceptions Derived from Research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22[J].Plant Disease,2000,84(4):377-393.
    46 Zirnand G,Elad Y.Effect of Trichoderma harzianum on Botrytis cinerea pathogenicity[J].Phytopathology,1996,86:945-956.
    47 龚明波.木霉厚垣孢子制剂的防病促生机制研究.北京.中国农业科学院硕士论文,2004.
    48 杨合同,唐文化,M.Ryder.木霉菌与植物病害的生物防治[J].山东科学,1999,12(4):11-12.
    49 Harman G.E.Myths and dogmas of biocontrol:Changes in perceptions derived from research on Trichoderma harzianum T-22[J].Plant dis,2000,84:337-393.
    50 高克祥,刘晓光,郭润芳.木霉菌对五种植物病原真菌的重寄生作用[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版),2002,33(1):37-42.
    51 Elad Y.Reasons for the delay in development of biological control of foliarpathogens[J].Phytoparasitica,1990,18(2):99-104.
    52 HarmanG.E.Vanconver.Canada:5thInternational Mycological congress(Abstracts).1994,4.
    53 蔡芷荷,吴清平等.木霉和粘帚霉的生物防治研究进展[J].微生物学通报,1998,25(5):284-286.
    54 柳良好.哈茨木霉对水稻纹枯病的拮抗能力.浙江农业大学硕士论文,1999.
    55 Bailey B.A,Lumsden R.D.Trichoderma and Gliocladium[J].1998,2:185-204.
    56 Howell C R,Hansori L E.Stipanovic R D,el al.Phytopathology,1999,89:248-252.
    57 Amand J S,Baker R.Growth of Rhizosphere-competence mutants of Trichoderma harzianum on cabon substrates[J].can.J.Microbiol,1988,34:807-814.
    58 Dean J F.D,Gamble H R and Anderson J D.The ethylence piosynthesis-inducin,xyganase:its induction in Trichoderma viride and certain plant pathogens[J],Phytopathology,1989,79:1071-1078.
    59 Chang Y C,Baker R.Increased growth of plants in the presence of the biological control agent Trichoderma harzianum[J],plant Dis,1986,70:145-148.
    60 Windham M T,Elad Y,Baker R.A mechanism for increased plant growth induced by Trichoderma spp[J].phytopathology,1986,76:518-521.
    61 Wright J M.Phytotoxic effects of some antibioties[J].Ann.Bot,1951,15:493-499.
    62 Wright J M.Biological control of a soil-borne pythium infection by seed inoculation[J].Plant soil,1956,8:132-140.
    63 Haraguchi H,Hamatani Y,Hamada M,et al.Effect of gliotoxin on growth and branched-chain amino acid biosynthesis in plant[J].Phytochemistry,1996,42:645-648.
    64 Van der pyl d,Inokoshi J,Shiomi K Yang H,et al.Inhibition of farnesyl-protein yransferase by gliotoxin and acetylgliotoxin[J].Antibiot,1992,45:1802-1805.
    65 De clercq E,Billiau A,Ottenheijm H C J,er al.antireverse teansciptions activity of gliotoxin analogs[J].Biochem Pharmacol,1978,27:635-639.
    66 宗北锋,钮绪燕,李君彦.西瓜枯萎病颉颃菌的筛选研究[J].西南农业大学学报,1995,23(2):60-64.
    67 Domsch K H,Gains W,Trautev.Compendium of the soil fungi[M].Heidi Anderson Academic press,1980:1580-1593.
    68 Martin JP.Use of acid,rose Bengal and streptomycin in the plate method for estimating soil fungi[J].Soil Science,1950,69:215-232.
    69 Rifai M A.A revision of the genus Trichoderma[J].Mycol.Pap.,1969,116:1-561.
    70 Bissett J.A revision of the genus Trichodermav.Ⅰ[J].Section longibrachiatumsect.Nov.Canad.J.Bot.,1984,62(5):924-931.
    71 Bissett J.A revision of the genus Trichoderm.Ⅱ[J].Infrageneric classification.Canad.J.Bot.,1991,69(11):2357-2372.
    72 Bissett J.A revision of the genus Trichoderma.Ⅲ[J].Section pachybasium.Canad.J.Bot.,1991,69(11):2373-2417.
    73 Bissett J.A revision of the genus Trichoderma.Ⅳ[J].Additional notes on section Longibrachiatum.Canad.J.Bot.,1991,69(11):2418-2420.
    74 文成敬,陶家凤,陈文瑞.中国西南地区木霉属分类研究[J].真菌学报,1993,12(2):118-130.
    75 高克祥,刘晓光。木霉菌对杨树泡溃疡病菌的拮抗作用[J].安徽农业大学学报,1999,26(增刊):80-84.
    76 朱天辉,邱德勋.Trichoderma harzianum对Rhizoctonia solani的抗生现象[J].四川农业大学学报,1994,12(1):11-15.
    77 Dennis C.Antagonistic properties of species groups of Trichoderma(Ⅱ)[J].Tran.Br.Mycol.soc.,1971,157:41-52.
    78 Whipps J M.Effect of nutrient status and water potential of media on fungal growth and antagonist-pathogen interactions[J].Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin.1987,17:581-591.
    79 张广志.木霉对玉米纹枯病(Rhizoctonia solani Kuhn)生物防治的初步研究.四川农业大学硕士论文,2005,5.
    80 方中达.植病研究方法[M].北京.中国农业出版社,1996,125.
    81 郑肖兰,崔昌华,冯慧丽等.尖孢镰刀菌西瓜专化型菌株的生物学特性[J].热带作物学报,2006,27:1.
    82 燕嗣皇,吴石平,陆德清.三唑酮对木霉根际竞争定殖的影响[J].植物病理学报,2000,30(3):266-270.
    83 Mihuta-Grimm L and Rowe R C.Trichoderma spp.As Biocontrol Agents of Rhizoctonia Damping-off of Radish in Organic Soil and Comprison of Four Delivery Systems[J].Phytopathology,1986,76(3):306-312.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700