基于自组织理论的企业进化机制研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
企业,作为国家经济发展的微观载体,其成长与壮大直接反映了一个国家经济发展的水平与规模。因此,企业成长是我国改革开放和发展中所面临的重大理论和实践问题。当前,我国部分企业盲目追求规模扩张,忽视企业自身素质的进步与提高,直接导致了某些企业的失败,这些企业的失败也让人们对企业寿命问题更加关注起来。本质上,企业作为一个生命体,不仅仅表现为其成长性与扩张性,更重要的是企业自身素质的提高、适应环境能力的增强。也就是说,应该更加关注企业进化的问题,而不仅仅是企业成长或规模扩张的问题。本文认为,企业成长与发展要想能够持续,就必须不断进化。企业作为一个系统,应该表现为企业系统的进化问题。而且,企业系统的进化还体现出系统的自组织特征。于是,本文运用系统科学中的自组织理论来研究企业进化机制的问题。具体来说,主要内容包括:
     1、论文对国内外有关研究现状进行了梳理与归纳。在此基础上,总结了与本文相关的基本理论。论文也对企业进化等基本概念进行了深入阐述。企业进化还表现出自组织系统特性,如开放性、远离平衡态、非线性相互作用、涨落现象、组织与自组织及其他自组织特性。
     2、论文分析了基于自组织理论的企业进化系统。首先,利用企业文化、企业战略、企业组织结构、管理制度与管理风格、人力资源及技能5个子系统构建了企业进化系统,构建了企业进化系统的结构模型。并分析了企业进化系统的环境、功能或价值。论文还阐述了企业系统本身表现出来的诸多进化规律。本文认为组织学习应该是企业进化的序参量。
     3、论文分析了基于自组织理论的企业进化系统。首先,构建了企业进化系统的结构模型,并对该模型的环境、功能、进化规律进行了阐述并确定了企业进化系统的序参量。
     4、企业进化离不开企业进化机制,论文分析了基于自组织理论的企业进化机制。首先,需要了解企业系统进化的动力源。企业发展与进化的动力可
Firms, as the micro carriers of national economic development, their growth and enlargement directly reflect the level and scale of national economic development. Therefore, firm growth is a tremendous problem in the reform and opening process for our country. Today, some firms pursue scale expansion madly, and neglect the promotion of their ability, which leads them to fail, so makes the life problem of firms more prominent. In essence, as a life, firms do not only pursue growth and expansion, but also the promotion of their ability and the increase of adapting for environment. We must focus on the evolution of firms. To get sustainable growth, firms must evolve, and the evolution of firms shows some self-organization impress. The dissertation researches on firm evolution mechanisms by self-organization theory. The contents are as follows:1. On the basis of research outputs all over the world, the basic theories and concepts were explained. Firm evolution expresses by some character of self-organization.2. In chapter 3, the firm evolution system based on self-organization theory was analyzed. First, the structure model of firm evolution system was established, including firms culture, strategy, organizational framework, management system and style, human resources and skills. And analyze the environment, functions. On the basis of all research outputs, the author argues the dominant element should be organizational learning gene.3. In chapter 4, the firm evolution mechanisms were analyzed. First, the firm evolution dynamics should be clear. The dynamics may come from the firm itself or the outer environment, the market pull or technology push, or the random factors. Then explains from two aspects, in the process of strategy setting and based on market opportunity. The evolution mechanisms in the process of strategy
    setting is discussed from inner and outer system dynamics, while evolution mechanisms based on the market opportunity is discussed from market pull or technology push. Lastly, the interaction model of firm evolution was established. The model expresses clearly that the firm evolution is a self-organization process by the interaction of inner system elements.4. In chapter 5, the synergic evolution mechanisms of business ecosystem was analyzed. First, the relationship of organization and environment was analyzed. Then, the synergic evolution mechanisms between firms and competitors, suppliers, and customs were analyzed deeply.5. In chapter 6, the firm evolution ability was evaluated. First, the shortcoming of the existed evaluation was discussed, then establishes the index system to evaluate evolution ability and simulates by BP NN model.6. In the chapter 7, the main problems and countermeasures were set forth in the firm evolution.
引文
[1] 黄津孚.企业发展潜力——评价、分析与挖掘、提升.经济管理出版社
    [2] 王树文.企业成长与矛盾管理.经济管理出版社
    [3] 李占祥等.矛盾管理学.经济管理出版社
    [4] Jensen, B. and R. H. McGuckin, Firm performance and evolution: empirical regulations in the U. S. microdata, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1997(6)
    [5] [日]木内多知、[美]比尔·舍尔曼.企业的自然课:从榆林中寻找持续盈利的商业法则.机械工业出版社
    [6] [美]塞思·戈丁.公司进化.中信出版社
    [7] Aldrich, H. Organizations evolving. Beverly Hills: Sage
    [8] Keld Laursen, Volker Mahnke and Per Vejrup-Hansen. Firm growth from a knowledge structure perspective. Paper prepared for DRUID's Summer Conference on National Innovation Systems 1999
    [9] 罗伯特A.伯格曼.技术与创新的战略管理.机械工业出版社
    [10] Probst, Raub and Romhardt. Managing Knowledge: Building Blocks for Success. Wiley
    [11] 王云峰,贾建.高技术企业成长制约因素分析.管理科学学报.1999(12)
    [12] 邬爱其等.企业持续成长决定因素理论综述.外国经济与管理.2003(5)
    [13] 王竹.企业成长性模型及评估体系研究.《工业企业管理》(人大复印资料).2003(4)
    [14] 邬爱其,贾生华.国外企业成长理论研究框架探析.外国经济与管理.2002(12)
    [15] 韩太祥.企业成长理论综述.经济学动态.2001(10)
    [16] 张琰.企业战略的生态透视.科学学与科学技术管理.2003(5)
    [17] 李维安.现代企业活力理论与评价.中国财政经济出版社
    [18] 谭力文.企业生命周期的比较分析.财贸经济.2001(7)
    [19] 罗长刚.论创新企业成长的生命与特征.理论月刊.2002(5)
    [20] 周晖.企业生命模型初探.中国软科学.2000(10)
    [21] 贺小刚.论业务退出与企业可持续成长.外国经济与管理.2001(9)
    [22] 贺小刚.企业战略业务退出的时机选择.经济管理.2003(4)
    [23] 郭斌.企业核心能力生命周期论.科研管理.2001(1)
    [24] 桂萍.企业核心竞争力的生命周期.科研管理.2002(5)
    [25] 刘泳、陈荣耀.能力本位与企业成长战略.经济与管理研究.2001(4)
    [26] 袁健红、吴利华.影响高新技术企业绩效的因素分析.中国科技论坛.2003(1)
    [27] 王慧芬.企业发展潜力的等级划分.中国科技论坛.2003(1)
    [28] Marc H Meyer; Robert Seliger. Product platforms in software development. Sloan Management Review; Fall 1998;
    [29] David Robertson, Karl Ulrich. Planning for product platforms. Sloan Management Review, Summer, 1998
    [30] LISA K. GUNDRY and HAROLD R WELSCH THE AMBITIOUS ENTREPRENEUR: HIGH GROWTH STRATEGIES OF WOMENOWNED ENTERPRISES. Journal of Business Venturing 16
    [31] C. W. Holsapplea, K. D. Joshi. An investigation of factors that influence the management of knowledge in organizations, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9 (2000) 235-261
    [32] Frederic Delmara, Per Davidssonb, William B. Gartner. Arriving at the high-growth firm, Journal of Business Venturing 18 (2003)189-216
    [33] Paul Geroski, Mariana Mazzucato. LEARNING AND THE SOURCES OF CORPORATE GROWTH,, June, 2001
    [34] Eugene Sadler-Smith, David E Spicer and Ian Chaston, Learning Orientations and Growth in Smaller Firms, Long Range Planning 34 (2001)
    [35] Anne Lorentzen, Knowledge, proximity and learning in the innovation of Polish companies, DRUID Summer Conference 2003
    [36] Keith Pavitt. Knowledge about knowledge since Nelson & Winter: a mixed record Electronic Working Paper Series Paper No. 83,June 2002
    [37] Patel, P. and K. Pavitt (1997) "The Technological Competencies of the World's Largest Firms: Complex and Path-Dependent, but not much Variety", Research Policy, 26: 141-156.
    [38] Pavitt, K. (1998) 'Technologies, products and organisation in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't, Industrial and Corporate Change, 7:433-51.
    [39] Pavitt, K (2002)"Innovating routines in the business firm: what corporate tasks should they be accomplishing", Industrial and Corporate Change, 11
    [40] Perkins, D. (2000) "The evolution of adaptive form" in, J. Ziman (ed.) Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process, Cambridge UP
    [41] Mahdi, S. (2002) "Search strategy on product innovation process: theory and evidence from the evolution of agrochemical lead discovery process." SPRU Electronic Working Paper Series, No. 79
    [42] Brusoni, S. Prencipe, A. and Pavitt, K. (2001), "Knowledge Specialization, Organizational Coupling, and the Boundaries of the Firm: Why Do Firms Know MoreThan They Make?", Administrative Science Quarterly, 46.
    [43] JORDI CANALS, How to Think About Corporate Growth? European Management Journal Vol. 19, No. 6, pp. 587-598, 2001
    [44] Geroski, P.A. (1999) The growth of firms in theory and practice. Centre for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper no. 2092.
    [45] DRUID Working Paper No 01-14, Patterns and Dependencies of Firms Growth, Toke Reichstein & Michael S. Dahl, December, 2001
    [46] J. Eng. Technol. Manage. 19 (2002) 141-165, Software firm evolution and innovation-orientation, Satish Nambisan
    [47] Penrose, E., 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Wiley.
    [50] Towards a Knowledge Perspective on Organisation, Karl-Erik Sveiby
     Doctoral Dissertation 1994 University of Stockholm S-106 91 Stockholm
    [51] DRUID Working Paper No. 98-4, The Dynamics of the Diversified Corporation and the Role of Central Management of Technology, Jens Froslev Christensen.1998
    [52] SOME RUDE THOUGHTS ON THE GROWTH OF FIRMS, Neil Kay, 20, 1998
    [53] Towards a Dynamic Resource-Based Analysis of the Interaction between Technological Resources, Corporate Diversification, and Performance. Evidence from Spanish Manufacturing Firms, Paper presented at the Nelson and Winter Conference.June 2001
    [54] Geringer, J.M.; Tallman, S.; Olsen, D. (2000).- "Product and International Diversification among Japanese Multinational Firms", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.21, 51-80.
    [55] Dosi, G; Nelson, R.R.; Winter, S.G. (eds.) (2000).- The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, OUP, NY.
    [56] Paper to be presented at the DRUID Summer Conference 2003 on CREATING, SHARING AND TRANSFERRING KNOWLEDGE. The role of Geography, Institutions and Organizations. Copenhagen June 12-14, 2003 THE ECONOMICS OF GOVERNANCE: TRANSACTIONS,RESOURCES AND KNOWLEDGE, Cristiano Antonelli
    [57] Antonelli, C. (2004), The governance of localized technological knowledge and the evolution of intellectual property rights, in Colombatto, E. (ed.), The Elgar companion to property rights economics, Edward Elgar.
    [58] Antonelli, C. (2003), Knowledge complementarity and fungeability: Implications for regional strategy, Regional Studies, forthcoming
    [59] Antonelli, C. (2004), The economics of governance: The role of localized knowledge in the interdependence among transaction, coordination and production, Metroeconomica (submitted)
    [60] Thomas Grebel, Andreas Pyka, An Evolutionary Approach to the Theory of Entrepreneurship, June 2001
    [61] Institut, Working Paper 2000-2 Learning in Firms: Knowledge-Based and Property Rights Perspectives, Kirsten Foss and Nicolai Foss
    [62] DRUID Working Paper No. 98-19, Firms and the Coordination of Knowledge: Some Austrian Insights, Nicolai J Foss
    [63] Sanchez, R., & Heene, A. (1997). Strategic Learning and Knowledge Management. John Wiley; Brusoni, S., & Prencipe, A. (2001). Managing knowledge in loosely coupled networks: Exploring the links between product and knowledge dynamics. Journal of Management Studies, 38.
    [64] Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12, 198-213.
    [65] Evolution of Organizational Structure and Strategy of the Automobile industry, R.I. Wibbelink, M.S.H. Heng, Research Memorandum 2000-1 2
    [66] DRUID Working Paper No 02-01, Heterogeneous Capital, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Organization, Kirsten Foss, Nicolai Foss, Peter G. Klein & Sandra K. Klein. December 2001
    [67] Foss, Nicolai J. 1994. "The Theory of the Firm: The Austrians as Precursors and Critics of Contemporary Theory," Review of Austrian Economics 7.
    [68] Foss, Nicolai J. 1997 "Austrian Insights and the Theory of the Firm", Advances in Austrian Economics 4: 175-198.
    [69] Foss, Kirsten and Nicolai Foss. 2000a. "Theoretical Isolation in Contract Economics,"Journal of Economic Methodology 7: 313-339.
    [70] Foss, Kirsten and Nicolai Foss. 2000b. "Learning in Firms: Knowledge Based and Property Rights Perspectives," European Journal of Social and Economic Systems 14
    [71] Foss, Kirsten and Nicolai Foss. 2001. "Assets, Attributes, and Ownership,"
     Intemational, Journal of the Economics of Business 8: 19-37.
    [72] Foss, Kirsten and Nicolai Foss. 2002a."Organizing Economic Experiments: the Role of Firms," forthcoming in Review of Austrian Economics.
    [73] Foss, Kirsten and Nicolai Foss. 2002b. "Economic Organization and Productive and Destructive Entrepreneurship," in Foss, Nicolai and Peter G. Klein, eds. 2002.
    [74] Entrepreneurship and The Firm: Austrian Perspectives on Economic Organization. Aldershott, U. K.: Edward Elgar.
    [75] THE KNOWLEDGE-BASED APPROACH AND ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMICS: HOW MUCH DO THEY REALLY DIFFER? AND HOW DOES IT MATTER? KIRSTEN FOSS and NICOLAI FOSS
    [76] 盛昭瀚、朱乔、吴广谋,DEA理论方法与应用,科学出版社,1996
    [77] 盛昭瀚、蒋德鹏.演化经济学.上海三联书店,2002
    [78] (美)詹姆斯奎恩、乔丹巴洛奇、卡伦兹恩著,惠永正、靳晓明等译.创新爆炸——通过智力和软件实现增长战略.吉林人民出版社,1999
    [79] (美)保罗·S·麦耶斯主编.蒋惠工等译.知识管理与组织设计.珠海出版社.1998
    [80] (美)鲁迪·拉各斯、丹·霍尔特休斯主编.吕巍、吴韵华、蒋安奕译.知识优势:新经济时代市场制胜之道.机械工业出版社,2002
    [81] 余光胜.企业发展的知识分析.上海财经大学出版社,2000
    [82] [美]马克弗鲁因著、余昌楷译,知识工厂:东芝公司智力资本管理,华夏出版社,2001年
    [83] [德]迈络尔夫迪尔克斯,组织学习与知识创新,上海人民出版社,2001年
    [84] [美]托马斯卡明斯,组织发展与变革,清华大学出版社,2003年
    [85] 王西麟,高技术企业成长论,经济管理出版社,2000年
    [86] 杨杜,企业成长论,中国人民大学出版社,1996年
    [87] 东方赢,企业超速成长,企业管理出版社,1997年
    [88] [美]劳伦斯·托勒,企业成长策略,吉林人民出版社,1998年
    [89] 斯大林全集,第一卷,人民出版社,1953年
    [90] 李朝霞,企业进化机制研究,北京图书馆出版社,2001年
    [91] 刘洪、周健,企业系统演化的一般规律,系统辩证学学报2002(1)
    [92] 许国志,系统科学,上海科技教育出版社,2000(9)
    [93] 范明,企业可持续成长的自组织研究,管理世界,2004(10)
    [94] 杨忠直,企业生态学引论,北京:科学出版社,2003年4月
    [95] 刘刚,企业成长之谜——一个演化经济学解释,南开经济研究,2003.5
    [96] 詹姆斯.C.柯林斯,基业常青,中信出版社,2003年6月
    [97] 张兵等,基于CAS理论的企业可持续发展的动态支撑机制研究,科学学与科学技术管理,2004.1
    [98] 陈国权,组织与环境的关系及组织学习,管理科学学报,2001(10):43-49页
    [99] 赵伟,企业的竞争战略,中外管理,2005(1)
    [100] 朱嘉红、邬爱其,基于焦点企业成长的集群演进机理与模仿失败,外国经济与管理,2004(2)
    [101] 王满仓、闫奕荣,柔性组织:企业组织结构的战略性创新,西北大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1999(3)
    [102] 吴涛、李必强,机会企业快速成长的复杂性分析,科学学研究,2002(8)
    [103] 黄卫伟、吴春波.走出混沌[M].人民邮电出版社,1999
    [104] 陈家贵、黄速建等.企业经济学[M].经济科学出版社,1998
    [105] 李必强.系统论讲义[M].武汉理工大学,2001
    [106] 吴涛、李必强、叶建木.基于核心能力的产品机会窗效益[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2002(5)
    [107] 吴涛、潘慧明、李必强.企业产品机会窗探讨[J].工业工程与管理,2002(3)
    [108] 吴彤.自组织方法论研究[M].清华大学出版社,2001
    [109] 赫尔曼·哈肯.协同学[M].上海译文出版社,2001

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700