针刺干预慢性疲劳综合征的临床及作用机理研究
摘要
背景
随著社会经济和科学技术的迅速发展,在快节奏的现代社会,激烈的竞争,越来越大的工作和学习压力和不规律的饮食作息习惯,临床上以慢性疲劳为主诉的患者日益增多。迄今为止对慢性疲劳综合征的病因病理和发病机制尚不明确,一般认为与病毒感染、免疫系统和内分泌系统活动异常有关。推测慢性疲劳综合征可能与包括心理压力、人际关系、下丘脑、垂体、肾上腺轴异常、激素紊乱、神经缺陷、免疫异常、感染等在内的多种因素相关。加上诊断又缺乏特异性指标,所以对于慢性疲劳综合征临床上还缺乏根本性的治疗方法,疗效也仍不理想。故此,寻找一种防治慢性疲劳综合征的有效而无副作用的方法具有积极的临床意义及社会意义。
目的
本研究以慢性疲劳综合征的患者为临床研究对象,探讨针刺对慢性疲劳综合征的临床疗效；实验部分,探讨针刺及电针对慢性疲劳综合征的干预作用机制,而为针灸方法干预慢性疲劳综合征的治疗提供理论依据。
方法
文献研究综述了古代及现代中医医家对慢性疲劳的病因病机及其治疗方法；针灸治疗慢性疲劳的临床研究进展及针灸对慢性疲劳的作用机制的研究进展；综述了现代医家对慢性疲劳及慢性疲劳综合征的发病机制、慢性疲劳综合征干预方法,在此基础上进行评述和展望。
临床研究以符合慢性疲劳综合征的诊断标准,根据纳入和排除标准选取符合病例60例,按照随机数字法进行分组,按照1：1的比例随机分配到针刺组(A组)、伪针刺组(B组),两组均每周治疗3天,休息2天后继续下一周治疗,共治疗2周,疗程14天。将世界卫生组织生存质量测定表(WHOQOL-BREF)总分变化、4类因子变化)、Chalder 14项疲劳量表总分变化(Fatigue Scale-14, FS-14)、中医证候评定量表评分作为临床评定指标,分别于治疗前、治疗后7天、14天、21天进行评定及治疗后21天进行中医证候疗效评定。
实验研究：将40只成年SD大鼠,随机分为正常组(A组)、模型组(B组)、针剌组(C组)及电针组(D组),共4组,每组10只。应用冷水(16±1)℃中游泳8 min及夹尾刺激10天,造成慢性疲劳大鼠模型。针刺组予以针刺足三里、太溪每日1次,连续10日；电针组(D组)针刺足三里、太溪后,针柄接WQ-6F型电针治疗仪,电压4.5V,疏密波型,频率2-20Hz,强度以局部皮肤肌肉轻微颤动为度,每日1次,连续10日。并于治疗前、治疗后5、10天观察CFS模型大鼠体重、Open-field旷场测试、竭力游泳时间及鼠尾悬挂实验的改变,应用针刺和电针的方法给予干预,以研究针剌和电针对CFS模型大鼠在行为学方面的影响。治疗结束后处死小鼠时称脾重并计算脾脏系数、心脏系数、肝脏系数。
结果
1临床研究结果
两组治疗前后WHOQOL-BREF总分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于7天、14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF总分均显著升高,与0天比较均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF总分均较伪针刺组总分升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于7天、14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子分均显著升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子分均较伪针刺组总分升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子分均显著升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子分均较伪针刺组评分升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于21天WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子分升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。伪针刺组于21天WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子分升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。两组均较治疗前WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子分升高。而两组于治疗前,7天、14天、21天之间作比较,均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于7天、14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子分均显著升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于21天WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子分均较伪针刺组升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
两组治疗前14项疲劳量表(FS-14)总分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组治疗7天后、14天后、21天后FS-14评分总分均明显下降,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。而两组于14天、21天之间作比较,针刺组总分均低于伪针刺组,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
两组治疗前中医证候评定量表评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组方面,治疗7天、14天、21天患者评分均显著降低,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。而两组于14天、21天之间作比较,针刺组评分均低于伪针刺组,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
根据两组中医证候疗效比较,针刺组显效共3例,有效共21例,无效3例,总有效率为88.89%。伪针刺组显效共0例,有效共5例,无效21例,总有效率为19.23%。针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
2实验研究结果
各组大鼠体重变化,在第1、5、10天,各组大鼠与正常组比较,体重无统计学差异(P>0.05),虽然随时间的延长,模型组的体重较正常组下降,但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
各组大鼠力竭游泳时间,4组治疗前大鼠力竭游泳时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的力竭时间于第5、10天明显缩短,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的力竭时间于第5、10天均明显缩短,与模型组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
Open-field旷场测试中,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试正中央格停留时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。模型组的正中央格停留时间于第10天明显增加,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的正中央格停留时间第10天均明显缩短,与模型组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠Open-field旷场测试水平运动次数比较,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试水平运动无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的水平运动次数于第5、10天明显减少,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组的次数于第5、10天均明显增加,但只有第10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。电针组的水平运动次数于第5、10天均明显增加,与模型组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动次数比较,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动次数无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的水平运动于第5天、10天明显减少,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的垂直运动次数于第5天、10天均明显增加,第5天、10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动时间比较,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的垂直运动时间于10天明显减少,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的垂直运动时间于第5天、10天均明显较长,但两组都是只有第10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠鼠尾悬挂实验时间比较,4组治疗前大鼠鼠尾悬挂时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的鼠尾悬挂时间于10天明显增加,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的时间于第10天均明显较短,两组都是于第10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
模型组的脾脏系数比针刺组与电针组较轻,两组与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。模型组的心脏系数比针刺组与电针组较重,两组与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。模型组的肝脏系数比针刺组与电针组略轻,但两组与模型组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
结论
针刺干预慢性疲劳综合征具有显著的临床疗效,为患者提供了一个良好的治疗方案。而针刺和电针干预慢性疲劳大鼠模型的作用机制体现在：改善其行为学异常；调节其脾脏系数及心脏系数。
Background
With the rapid socio-economic and technology developments in the modern society where competition, increasing work, study pressure and irregular eating habits which is increasing chronic fatigue in patients. The cause of chronic fatigue syndrome in pathology and pathogenesis is unclear, generally believed that is related to infection with the virus, the immune system and the endocrine system activity abnormalities. Speculated that chronic fatigue syndrome may include psychological stress, interpersonal relationships, hypothalamus and pituitary, adrenal axis abnormalities, hormone disorders, neurological defects, immunological abnormalities, and infection-related. Without specific diagnostic indicator for chronic fatigue syndrome is a main reason that is not effective in clinical treatment. Therefore, using acupuncture for prevention and treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome is an effective way in clinical significance.
Objective
In this study, patients with chronic fatigue syndrome are used by acupuncture for the clinical study. To explore acupuncture and electrical acupuncture for chronic fatigue syndrome of mechanism action, which provide a theoretical basis for a treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Methods
A literature review in an ancient and modern Chinese medicine practitioner focused on chronic fatigue pathogenesis and treatment. There was acupuncture treatment of chronic fatigue in clinical research and acupuncture in chronic fatigue mechanism of research. Meanwhile, modern physicians on chronic fatigue and chronic the pathogenesis of fatigue syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome intervention were also discussed.
The clinical study was performed on patients of chronic fatigue syndrome, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria selected cases of 60 cases by random were assigned to the acupuncture group (group A), sham acupuncture group (group B). Two groups were treated 3 days per week, and a total of 2 weeks of treatment. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Form (WHOQOL-BREF) and four factors, Chalder 14 fatigue total score (FS-14), Chinese Syndrome Rating Scale score were as a clinical assessment index, respectively before treatment and after 7 days,14 days,21 days for evaluation and treatment 21 days.
The experimental study was performed on 40 adult SD rats which were randomly divided into normal group (group A), model group (group B), acupuncture group (group C) and Electric Acupuncture group (group D). In A, B, C groups, the rats were swimming in cold water (16±1)℃about 8 mins and got a tail stimulation for 10 days, resulting in a rat model of chronic fatigue. Acupuncture group (group C) was using ZuSanLi and TaiXi in 10 days consecutively. EA group (group D) acupuncture was using ZuSanLi and TaiXi, which the needle handles accessing with WQ-6F of electric acupuncture apparatus of voltage 4.5V, density wave and frequency 2-20Hz, intensity of local skin and muscle to quiver slightly for 10 days consecutively. And the rats were observed on the 1st,5th,10th of weight, Open-field test, strive to swim and tail suspension test. After the treatment, the mice were killed, and calculate the spleen index, heart index and liver index.
Results
1. The clinical study
Before the treatment, there was no significant difference of WHOQOL-BREF score, WHOQOL-BREF physical score, WHOQOL-BREF psychological score, WHOQOL-BREF social relationships score, WHOQOL-BREF score in the field of environment, FS-14 score, Chinese Medicine syndromes rating scale score between two groups (P＞0.05).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF total score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And Acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference (P＜0.01).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF physical score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.01).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF psychological score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.05).
Two groups were observed before the treatment, and WHOQOL-BREF social relationship factor scores were increased. But there was no statistical significance at the 7th,14th and 21st day (P＞0.05).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF score in the field of environment comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.05).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of FS-14 score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.01).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th,14th,21st day of TCM syndrome rating score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.01).
According to TCM syndrome effective rate efficacy compared two groups; the effective rate of group A was 88.89%. And the effective rate of group B was 19.23%. There was a significant difference between Acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group (P＜0.01). 2. The Experimental results
There was no significant difference of weight, Open-field test, tail suspension test and exhaustive swimming time between four groups (P＞0.05).
The results of exhaustive swimming test showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field centre of retention time showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field number of horizontal movement showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field number of vertical movement showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field vertical movement of time showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at 10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of tail suspension time showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at 10th day (P＜0.05).
Conclusion
Acupuncture intervention in chronic fatigue syndrome had significant clinical efficacy for patients which were an ideal method. The mechanism of acupuncture and electro-acupuncture of chronic fatigue rat model includes in improving mice'abnormal behavior, regulating its spleen ratio and heart ratio.
随著社会经济和科学技术的迅速发展,在快节奏的现代社会,激烈的竞争,越来越大的工作和学习压力和不规律的饮食作息习惯,临床上以慢性疲劳为主诉的患者日益增多。迄今为止对慢性疲劳综合征的病因病理和发病机制尚不明确,一般认为与病毒感染、免疫系统和内分泌系统活动异常有关。推测慢性疲劳综合征可能与包括心理压力、人际关系、下丘脑、垂体、肾上腺轴异常、激素紊乱、神经缺陷、免疫异常、感染等在内的多种因素相关。加上诊断又缺乏特异性指标,所以对于慢性疲劳综合征临床上还缺乏根本性的治疗方法,疗效也仍不理想。故此,寻找一种防治慢性疲劳综合征的有效而无副作用的方法具有积极的临床意义及社会意义。
目的
本研究以慢性疲劳综合征的患者为临床研究对象,探讨针刺对慢性疲劳综合征的临床疗效；实验部分,探讨针刺及电针对慢性疲劳综合征的干预作用机制,而为针灸方法干预慢性疲劳综合征的治疗提供理论依据。
方法
文献研究综述了古代及现代中医医家对慢性疲劳的病因病机及其治疗方法；针灸治疗慢性疲劳的临床研究进展及针灸对慢性疲劳的作用机制的研究进展；综述了现代医家对慢性疲劳及慢性疲劳综合征的发病机制、慢性疲劳综合征干预方法,在此基础上进行评述和展望。
临床研究以符合慢性疲劳综合征的诊断标准,根据纳入和排除标准选取符合病例60例,按照随机数字法进行分组,按照1：1的比例随机分配到针刺组(A组)、伪针刺组(B组),两组均每周治疗3天,休息2天后继续下一周治疗,共治疗2周,疗程14天。将世界卫生组织生存质量测定表(WHOQOL-BREF)总分变化、4类因子变化)、Chalder 14项疲劳量表总分变化(Fatigue Scale-14, FS-14)、中医证候评定量表评分作为临床评定指标,分别于治疗前、治疗后7天、14天、21天进行评定及治疗后21天进行中医证候疗效评定。
实验研究：将40只成年SD大鼠,随机分为正常组(A组)、模型组(B组)、针剌组(C组)及电针组(D组),共4组,每组10只。应用冷水(16±1)℃中游泳8 min及夹尾刺激10天,造成慢性疲劳大鼠模型。针刺组予以针刺足三里、太溪每日1次,连续10日；电针组(D组)针刺足三里、太溪后,针柄接WQ-6F型电针治疗仪,电压4.5V,疏密波型,频率2-20Hz,强度以局部皮肤肌肉轻微颤动为度,每日1次,连续10日。并于治疗前、治疗后5、10天观察CFS模型大鼠体重、Open-field旷场测试、竭力游泳时间及鼠尾悬挂实验的改变,应用针刺和电针的方法给予干预,以研究针剌和电针对CFS模型大鼠在行为学方面的影响。治疗结束后处死小鼠时称脾重并计算脾脏系数、心脏系数、肝脏系数。
结果
1临床研究结果
两组治疗前后WHOQOL-BREF总分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于7天、14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF总分均显著升高,与0天比较均有显著性差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF总分均较伪针刺组总分升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于7天、14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子分均显著升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF生理领域因子分均较伪针刺组总分升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子分均显著升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF心理领域因子分均较伪针刺组评分升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于21天WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子分升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。伪针刺组于21天WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子分升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。两组均较治疗前WHOQOL-BREF社会关系因子分升高。而两组于治疗前,7天、14天、21天之间作比较,均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子评分比较,治疗前两组间WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组于7天、14天、21天WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子分均显著升高,与0天比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。针刺组于21天WHOQOL-BREF环境领域因子分均较伪针刺组升高,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
两组治疗前14项疲劳量表(FS-14)总分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组治疗7天后、14天后、21天后FS-14评分总分均明显下降,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。而两组于14天、21天之间作比较,针刺组总分均低于伪针刺组,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
两组治疗前中医证候评定量表评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。针刺组方面,治疗7天、14天、21天患者评分均显著降低,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。而两组于14天、21天之间作比较,针刺组评分均低于伪针刺组,针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
根据两组中医证候疗效比较,针刺组显效共3例,有效共21例,无效3例,总有效率为88.89%。伪针刺组显效共0例,有效共5例,无效21例,总有效率为19.23%。针刺组与伪针刺组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
2实验研究结果
各组大鼠体重变化,在第1、5、10天,各组大鼠与正常组比较,体重无统计学差异(P>0.05),虽然随时间的延长,模型组的体重较正常组下降,但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
各组大鼠力竭游泳时间,4组治疗前大鼠力竭游泳时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的力竭时间于第5、10天明显缩短,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的力竭时间于第5、10天均明显缩短,与模型组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
Open-field旷场测试中,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试正中央格停留时间无明显差异(P>0.05)。模型组的正中央格停留时间于第10天明显增加,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的正中央格停留时间第10天均明显缩短,与模型组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠Open-field旷场测试水平运动次数比较,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试水平运动无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的水平运动次数于第5、10天明显减少,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组的次数于第5、10天均明显增加,但只有第10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。电针组的水平运动次数于第5、10天均明显增加,与模型组比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动次数比较,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动次数无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的水平运动于第5天、10天明显减少,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的垂直运动次数于第5天、10天均明显增加,第5天、10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动时间比较,4组治疗前大鼠Open-field旷场测试垂直运动时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的垂直运动时间于10天明显减少,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的垂直运动时间于第5天、10天均明显较长,但两组都是只有第10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。
各组大鼠鼠尾悬挂实验时间比较,4组治疗前大鼠鼠尾悬挂时间无统计学差异(P>0.05)。模型组的鼠尾悬挂时间于10天明显增加,与治疗前比较均有统计学差异(P<0.01)。与模型组比较,针刺组与电针组的时间于第10天均明显较短,两组都是于第10天与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。
模型组的脾脏系数比针刺组与电针组较轻,两组与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。模型组的心脏系数比针刺组与电针组较重,两组与模型组比较有统计学差异(P<0.05)。模型组的肝脏系数比针刺组与电针组略轻,但两组与模型组比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
结论
针刺干预慢性疲劳综合征具有显著的临床疗效,为患者提供了一个良好的治疗方案。而针刺和电针干预慢性疲劳大鼠模型的作用机制体现在：改善其行为学异常；调节其脾脏系数及心脏系数。
Background
With the rapid socio-economic and technology developments in the modern society where competition, increasing work, study pressure and irregular eating habits which is increasing chronic fatigue in patients. The cause of chronic fatigue syndrome in pathology and pathogenesis is unclear, generally believed that is related to infection with the virus, the immune system and the endocrine system activity abnormalities. Speculated that chronic fatigue syndrome may include psychological stress, interpersonal relationships, hypothalamus and pituitary, adrenal axis abnormalities, hormone disorders, neurological defects, immunological abnormalities, and infection-related. Without specific diagnostic indicator for chronic fatigue syndrome is a main reason that is not effective in clinical treatment. Therefore, using acupuncture for prevention and treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome is an effective way in clinical significance.
Objective
In this study, patients with chronic fatigue syndrome are used by acupuncture for the clinical study. To explore acupuncture and electrical acupuncture for chronic fatigue syndrome of mechanism action, which provide a theoretical basis for a treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Methods
A literature review in an ancient and modern Chinese medicine practitioner focused on chronic fatigue pathogenesis and treatment. There was acupuncture treatment of chronic fatigue in clinical research and acupuncture in chronic fatigue mechanism of research. Meanwhile, modern physicians on chronic fatigue and chronic the pathogenesis of fatigue syndrome, chronic fatigue syndrome intervention were also discussed.
The clinical study was performed on patients of chronic fatigue syndrome, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria selected cases of 60 cases by random were assigned to the acupuncture group (group A), sham acupuncture group (group B). Two groups were treated 3 days per week, and a total of 2 weeks of treatment. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Form (WHOQOL-BREF) and four factors, Chalder 14 fatigue total score (FS-14), Chinese Syndrome Rating Scale score were as a clinical assessment index, respectively before treatment and after 7 days,14 days,21 days for evaluation and treatment 21 days.
The experimental study was performed on 40 adult SD rats which were randomly divided into normal group (group A), model group (group B), acupuncture group (group C) and Electric Acupuncture group (group D). In A, B, C groups, the rats were swimming in cold water (16±1)℃about 8 mins and got a tail stimulation for 10 days, resulting in a rat model of chronic fatigue. Acupuncture group (group C) was using ZuSanLi and TaiXi in 10 days consecutively. EA group (group D) acupuncture was using ZuSanLi and TaiXi, which the needle handles accessing with WQ-6F of electric acupuncture apparatus of voltage 4.5V, density wave and frequency 2-20Hz, intensity of local skin and muscle to quiver slightly for 10 days consecutively. And the rats were observed on the 1st,5th,10th of weight, Open-field test, strive to swim and tail suspension test. After the treatment, the mice were killed, and calculate the spleen index, heart index and liver index.
Results
1. The clinical study
Before the treatment, there was no significant difference of WHOQOL-BREF score, WHOQOL-BREF physical score, WHOQOL-BREF psychological score, WHOQOL-BREF social relationships score, WHOQOL-BREF score in the field of environment, FS-14 score, Chinese Medicine syndromes rating scale score between two groups (P＞0.05).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF total score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And Acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference (P＜0.01).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF physical score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.01).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF psychological score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.05).
Two groups were observed before the treatment, and WHOQOL-BREF social relationship factor scores were increased. But there was no statistical significance at the 7th,14th and 21st day (P＞0.05).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of WHOQOL-BREF score in the field of environment comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.05).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th day,14th day,21st day of FS-14 score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.01).
There was a significant difference in Acupuncture group at 7th,14th,21st day of TCM syndrome rating score comparing with 0 day (P＜0.01). And acupuncture group compared with sham acupuncture group had a significant difference at 14th and 21st day (P＜0.01).
According to TCM syndrome effective rate efficacy compared two groups; the effective rate of group A was 88.89%. And the effective rate of group B was 19.23%. There was a significant difference between Acupuncture group and the sham acupuncture group (P＜0.01). 2. The Experimental results
There was no significant difference of weight, Open-field test, tail suspension test and exhaustive swimming time between four groups (P＞0.05).
The results of exhaustive swimming test showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field centre of retention time showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field number of horizontal movement showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field number of vertical movement showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at the 5th,10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of Open-field vertical movement of time showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at 10th day (P＜0.01).
The results of tail suspension time showed that there was a significant difference comparing with the model group and two other groups which were acupuncture and EA group at 10th day (P＜0.05).
Conclusion
Acupuncture intervention in chronic fatigue syndrome had significant clinical efficacy for patients which were an ideal method. The mechanism of acupuncture and electro-acupuncture of chronic fatigue rat model includes in improving mice'abnormal behavior, regulating its spleen ratio and heart ratio.
引文
[1]Kalz BZAudiman W A. Chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Pediatrics,1988,113(5): 944.
[2]Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, et al. The chronic fatigue syndrome:a comprehensive approach to its definition and study [J]. Ann Intern Med,1994, 121:953-955.
[3]王永炎.中医内科学.人民卫生出版社：313-314.
[4]刘继芳.慢性疲劳综合征病因病机分析[J].中医杂志,2000,41(2)：124.
[5]邹卓成,李雁,庞勇.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征的研究进展.云南中医中药杂志.2006.27(1)：61.
[6]张铁军,陈常青.延缓衰老和抗疲劳中药现代研究与应用.人民卫生出版社2007.3：3-8.
[7]阎虹,李忠仁.针灸辨证治疗慢性疲劳综合征的临床研究[J].中国针灸,2003,4(23)；197-199.
[8]张蓉,李军,李峰,等.慢性疲劳综合征证候分布规律研究[J].山东中医药大学学报,2004,2(28)：90-91.
[9]Lee MH. Overview of the diagnosis and treatment of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome according to Traditional Chinese medicine-Am J A cupunctrue,1992,20(10):337.
[10]Vichers EM. Treatment of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome with Chinese medicine. Interment Journal of Oriental Medicine,1994,19:143.
[11]师丽岩.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征56例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2001,28(5)：304.
[12]陈幸生.针刺治疗慢性疲劳综合征45例.中国针灸,2004,24(2)：110.
[13]张越林.针刺治疗慢性疲劳综合征38例临床观察.中国针灸,2002,22(1)：17.
[14]唐琴漪.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征39例.上海针灸杂志,2005,24(1)：11
[15]王京京,孟宏,崔承斌,等.论四关穴在慢性疲劳综合征中的治疗作用.中国针灸.2006,26(2)：116.
[16]高洁.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征2例.辽宁中医药杂志,1998·25(5)：224
[17]王天芳,王琳,张翠珍.慢性疲劳综合征的研究进展.中国公共卫生,2002, 18(8)：1006.
[18]王卫红,吴士杰,卢永江,等.针罐并用治疗慢性疲劳综合征临床分析[J].中国针灸,2001：21(8)；481.
[19]罗敏然.针刺拔罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征30例[J].广西中医学院学报,2002,5(2)；24.
[20]王鹰雷,王君,杨玲.按摩配合针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征[J].中医友好医院学报,2003,4(17)：252.
[21]曾征,刘雨星.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征38例[J].上海针灸杂志,1999.,18(3)：24.
[22]倪克茜.针药并用治疗慢性疲劳综合征35例[J].福建中医学院学报,2002,4(12)：22-23.
[23]熊芳丽、肖亚乎.黄芪注射液定位注射治疗慢性疲劳综合征32例[J].广西中医药,2000,(6)：30-31.
[24]潘长青,唐植钢,谭光波.电针配合穴位注射治疗慢性疲劳综合征35例总结[J].湖南中医杂志,2005,11(6)：22.
[25]王倩,熊家轩.电针背俞穴治疗慢性疲劳综合征疗效观察.中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(9)：834.
[26]李月梅,刘红萍,冯淑元.等.电针配合耳穴贴压治疗慢性疲劳综合征32例疗效观察.新中医,2005.37(1)：61.
[27]苗茂,阿古拉,何金柱.体针结合耳针贴压治疗慢性疲劳综合征64例.中国针灸,2005,25(4)：292.
[28]艾正海.敷脐治疗慢性疲劳综合征36例[J].中国中医药科技,2001,8(2)：93.
[29]粱建新.足部反射疗法治疗慢性疲劳综合征50例[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2003,7(10)：74.
[30]郭君华.针灸配合心理治疗慢性疲劳综合征310例[J].四川中医,2005,23(3)：93.
[31]陈文,陈利东.针刺推拿合心理疗法治疗疲劳综合征60例[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,9(9)：26.
[32]单秋华,孙健.慢性疲劳综合征针灸治疗的思路和方法[J].山东中医杂志, 2003,22(4)：198.
[33]王重新,宋秋珍.梅花针叩刺背俞穴治疗慢性疲劳综合征34例疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(2)：52.
[34]赵蓉.针灸和拔罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)35例临床观察[J].天津中医药,2004,8(4)：280.
[35]黄泳.背部走罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征30例临床观察[J].四川中医,2001,19(6)：70.
[36]郑兆俭.背部走罐与中药外敷治疗慢性疲劳综合征35例.中医外治杂志,2002,11(1)：31.
[37]廖辉.点刺放血治疗慢性疲劳综合征32例临床观察.中国针灸,2004,24(2)：91.
[38]曹鎏,李信梅.鳖甲两种不同取法对实验大鼠肝纤维化预防保护作用的比较.南通医学院学报,2003,23(1)：46.
[39]张大旭,张娅婕,甘振威,等.鳖甲提取物抗疲劳及免疫调节作用研究.中国公共卫生,2004,20(7)：834.
[40]谢云峰,龙盛京.5种中药注射液对脂质过氧化及活性氧自由基作用的影响.海峡药学,1999.11(3)：29.
[41]盂宏,王京京,姜亨圭,等.电针对慢性应激致疲劳模型大鼠下丘脑-内啡肽的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,7(19)：59-60.
[42]李永杰.慢性疲劳综合征中的病毒感染研究进展.国外医学·神经病变神经外科分册,2003.30(6)：526.
[43]王富春,洪杰.经穴治病明理.北京：科学技术文献出版社,2000.8
[44]赵建明.张枢.针刺抗运动性生理心理疲劳作用研究.中国针灸,2004,24(8)：519.
[45]Chaocc, DelahuntM, HuS. Immunological mediated fatigue:am urine model. Clinlimmunol-Immunophathal,1992; 62(2):161-165
[46]王洪彬,李峰.元气精华调节情绪的实验研究[J].海北中医,2002；24(3)：234-236
[47]王天芳,陈易新,季绍良,等.慢性束缚致慢性疲劳动物模型的研制及其行为学观察[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1999；5(5)：25.
[48]王琳,王天芳,康纯洁,等.消疲怡神口服液对应激大鼠神经-内分泌-免疫系统的影响[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2000,6(3)：22
[49]张建斌,等.针刺对抑郁征模型大鼠行为学的影响[J].南京中医药大学学报,2005,21(1)：36-39.
[50]孙华,等.针灸百会和足三里穴对抑郁模型小鼠和大鼠行为的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(2)：47-49.
[51]贾宝辉,等.电针对慢性应激模型大鼠行为学及HPA轴相关激素的影响[J].针刺研究,2004,2(94)：252-256.
[52]韩毳,等.电针对抑郁大鼠中枢及我周单胺类神经递质的影响[J].中医药学刊,2004,1：185-188.
[53]唐照亮,等.艾灸对寒凝血瘀证大鼠活血化瘀作用的实验研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2000,6(4)：43-46.
[54]孟宏,王京京,姜亨圭,等.电针对慢性应激致疲劳模型大鼠下丘脑β-内啡肽的影响.针灸临床杂志,2003,19(7)：59-60.
[55]马其江,冯树军,毕秀英.慢性疲劳综合征的中医机制探讨.山东中医杂志,2001,11(23)：652-653.
[56]姜淑云,严敏,房敏.慢性疲劳综合征的研究进展[J].中西医结合学报,2004,2(6)：459-463
[57]张蓉,李峰,陈洁,等.慢性疲劳综合征流行特征的研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(4)：296-297.
[58]Kawakami N, et al. [J]. Tohoku J Exp Med,1998,186:33.
[59]Holmes C,P, et al. [J]. Ann Item Med,1988,108(3):387-389.
[60]Jason LA, et al. [J]. Arch Item Med,1999,159(18):2129-2137.
[61]Loyd AR, et al. [J]. Med J Aust,1990,153:522-528.
[62]姚韧敏,丘明义.香港地区慢性疲劳综合征的初步调查与中医病机探讨[J].中西医结合学报,2005,3(5)：359-362
[63]Bates DW, et al. [J] Arch Item Med,1993,153(24):2759-2765.
[64]Buchwald D, et al. [J]. Ann Intern Med 1995,123(2):81-88
[65]王天芳,等.[J].中国行为医学科学,2000,9(2)：84-86.
[66]宋莉娟,赵继军.美英澳国家青少年慢性疲劳综合征健康教育管理计划介绍及 启示.现代护理2007,3(13)：880-881
[67]蔡明德.云南中医学院学报[J],1999,3：32-33.
[68]Steele L, et al. [J]. Am J Med,1998,105 (3):83S-90S.
[69]Lawrie SM, Pelosi AJ. [J]. Br J Psychiatry,1995.166:793-797.
[70]Richman JA, et al. [J]. Am J Public. Healnl,1994.84:282-284.
[71]Harlow BL, et al. [J]. Am J Med,1998,105 (suppl):94S-99S.
[72]Glaser R, Kiecolt Glaser JK. [J]. Am J Med,1998,105:35-42.
[73]傅京丽.辽宁医学杂志[J],1999,13：68-69.
[74]袁苹.健康心理学杂志[J],2001,9(5)：375-376.
[75]彭寿君,等.中华护理杂志[J],1996,31(4)：220-222.
[76]袁萍,梁伯衡.慢性疲劳综合征的流行病学特征.国外医学卫生学分册2003,30(2)：70-74
[77]Demitrack MA, Crofford. Evidence for pathophysiologic implications of hypo thalamic pituitary'adrenal axis dysregulation in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci,1998.840:684-697.
[78]Cleare AJ. Miel J. Heap E, et al. Hypo thalamopituitaryadrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome, and the effects of low dose hydrocortisone therapy[J]. J Clin Endocrinal Metab.2001 Aug,86(8):3545-3554.
[79]Scott LV, Teh J, Reznek R, et al. Small adrenal glands in chronic fatigue syndrome:a prdiminary computer tomography study[J]. Psychoneurotic endocrinology,1999 Oct.24(7):759-68.
[80]Dinan T G. Majeed T, LaveHe E, et al. Serotonin mediated activation of the hypothalamic pituitary axis in chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. Psycho neuro endocrinology,1997,22:261-268.
[81]Vassallo CM, Feldman E, Peto T, et al. Decreased tryptophan availability but normal postsynaptic 5HT2c receptor sensitivity in chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Psycho Med,2001,31(4):585-91.
[82]Korszun A, Young EA, Engleberg NC, et al. Fonicular phase hypo thalamic pituitary-gonad lax is function in women with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. J Rheumatol.2000.27(6):26-30.
[83]Moorkens G. Berwaerts J, W ynants H, Abs R. Characterization of pituitary function with emphasis on G H secretion in chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. Clin Endocrinol(Oxf),2000,53(1):99-106.
[84]Conti F, Pittoni V, Sacerdote P, et al. Decreased immune reactive beta-endorphin in mononuclear leucocytes from patients with chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol,1998,16(6):729-732.
[85]Gupta S, Aggarwal S. See D, et al. Cytokine Production by adherent and non-adherent mononuclear cells in chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. J Psychiatrist, 1997,31:149-156.
[86]Pall M LI Elevated. sustained per-oxynitfite levels as the cause of chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Med Hypotheses,2000 Jun.54(1):115-125.
[87]Castel LM, Yamamoto T, Phoenix J, Newsholme EA. The role of tryptophan in fatigue in different conditions of stress[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol.1999.467: 697-704.
[88]Richards RS, Roberts TK, McGregor NR. et al. Blood parameters indicative of oxidative stress are associated with symptom expression in chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Redox Rep,2000,5(1):35-41.
[89]Chaudhur A. Watson W S, Pearn J. Behan PO. The symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome are related to abnormal in channel function[J].Med Hypotheses.2000 Jun,54(1):58-63.
[90]Machale SM. Lawrie SM, Cavanagh JT. et al. Cerebral perfusion in chronic fatigue syndrome and depression [J]. Br J Psychiatry,2000 Jun.176:550-556.
[91]Rimes KA, Chalder T. Treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Occup Med(Lond),2005,55(1):32-39.
[92]d'Ella G. Chronic fatigue syndrome in a cognitive perspective [J]. Lakartidningen.2004,101(5):358-364.
[93]Stulemeijer M, de Jong LW, Fiselier TJ, el al. Cognitive behavior therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome[J] 2005,330(7481):14.
[94]Whiteside A, Hann S, Chaudhuri A, et al. Exercised lowers pain threshold in chronic fatigue syndrome[J] Pain,2004,109(3):497-499.
[95]Edmonds M, McGuire H, Price J, et al. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Cxzhrane Database Sym Rev,2004 (3):CD003200.
[96]Puri BK. The use of eicopentaenoie acid in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Prostaglandins Leukot Esent Fatty Acids,2004.70(4):399 401
[97]Santaella ML, Font I, Disdier OM. el al. Comparing of oral nicotnamide adenine dinucleotide(NADH)versus conventional therapy for chronic fatigue Syndrome[J]. PRHealth Sci J,2004,23(2):89 93.
[98]Dotsenko VA,Mosiichuk LV,Paramonov AE. Biologically active food additives for correction of the chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. Vopr Pitan,2004,73(2): 17-21.
[99]Orfei MD, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G. The evaluation of ascogonia in stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis,2009,27(3):280-289.
[100]Jackson D, Turner Stokes L, Murray J, et al. Validation of the memory and behavior problems checklist-1990R for use in acquired brain injury. Brain Inj,2007,21 (8):817-824.
[101]Streitberger K, Kleinhenz J. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research[J]. Lancet,1998,352(9125):364-365.
[102]李忠仁.实验针灸学.北京.中国中医药出版社,2003.329
[103]郑筱萸.中药新药临床指导原则.北京.中国中医药科技出版社,2002(5)：378-382.
[2]Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, et al. The chronic fatigue syndrome:a comprehensive approach to its definition and study [J]. Ann Intern Med,1994, 121:953-955.
[3]王永炎.中医内科学.人民卫生出版社：313-314.
[4]刘继芳.慢性疲劳综合征病因病机分析[J].中医杂志,2000,41(2)：124.
[5]邹卓成,李雁,庞勇.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征的研究进展.云南中医中药杂志.2006.27(1)：61.
[6]张铁军,陈常青.延缓衰老和抗疲劳中药现代研究与应用.人民卫生出版社2007.3：3-8.
[7]阎虹,李忠仁.针灸辨证治疗慢性疲劳综合征的临床研究[J].中国针灸,2003,4(23)；197-199.
[8]张蓉,李军,李峰,等.慢性疲劳综合征证候分布规律研究[J].山东中医药大学学报,2004,2(28)：90-91.
[9]Lee MH. Overview of the diagnosis and treatment of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome according to Traditional Chinese medicine-Am J A cupunctrue,1992,20(10):337.
[10]Vichers EM. Treatment of chronic fatigue immune dysfunction syndrome with Chinese medicine. Interment Journal of Oriental Medicine,1994,19:143.
[11]师丽岩.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征56例[J].辽宁中医杂志,2001,28(5)：304.
[12]陈幸生.针刺治疗慢性疲劳综合征45例.中国针灸,2004,24(2)：110.
[13]张越林.针刺治疗慢性疲劳综合征38例临床观察.中国针灸,2002,22(1)：17.
[14]唐琴漪.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征39例.上海针灸杂志,2005,24(1)：11
[15]王京京,孟宏,崔承斌,等.论四关穴在慢性疲劳综合征中的治疗作用.中国针灸.2006,26(2)：116.
[16]高洁.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征2例.辽宁中医药杂志,1998·25(5)：224
[17]王天芳,王琳,张翠珍.慢性疲劳综合征的研究进展.中国公共卫生,2002, 18(8)：1006.
[18]王卫红,吴士杰,卢永江,等.针罐并用治疗慢性疲劳综合征临床分析[J].中国针灸,2001：21(8)；481.
[19]罗敏然.针刺拔罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征30例[J].广西中医学院学报,2002,5(2)；24.
[20]王鹰雷,王君,杨玲.按摩配合针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征[J].中医友好医院学报,2003,4(17)：252.
[21]曾征,刘雨星.针灸治疗慢性疲劳综合征38例[J].上海针灸杂志,1999.,18(3)：24.
[22]倪克茜.针药并用治疗慢性疲劳综合征35例[J].福建中医学院学报,2002,4(12)：22-23.
[23]熊芳丽、肖亚乎.黄芪注射液定位注射治疗慢性疲劳综合征32例[J].广西中医药,2000,(6)：30-31.
[24]潘长青,唐植钢,谭光波.电针配合穴位注射治疗慢性疲劳综合征35例总结[J].湖南中医杂志,2005,11(6)：22.
[25]王倩,熊家轩.电针背俞穴治疗慢性疲劳综合征疗效观察.中国中西医结合杂志,2005,25(9)：834.
[26]李月梅,刘红萍,冯淑元.等.电针配合耳穴贴压治疗慢性疲劳综合征32例疗效观察.新中医,2005.37(1)：61.
[27]苗茂,阿古拉,何金柱.体针结合耳针贴压治疗慢性疲劳综合征64例.中国针灸,2005,25(4)：292.
[28]艾正海.敷脐治疗慢性疲劳综合征36例[J].中国中医药科技,2001,8(2)：93.
[29]粱建新.足部反射疗法治疗慢性疲劳综合征50例[J].中国中医药信息杂志,2003,7(10)：74.
[30]郭君华.针灸配合心理治疗慢性疲劳综合征310例[J].四川中医,2005,23(3)：93.
[31]陈文,陈利东.针刺推拿合心理疗法治疗疲劳综合征60例[J].上海针灸杂志,2005,9(9)：26.
[32]单秋华,孙健.慢性疲劳综合征针灸治疗的思路和方法[J].山东中医杂志, 2003,22(4)：198.
[33]王重新,宋秋珍.梅花针叩刺背俞穴治疗慢性疲劳综合征34例疗效观察[J].针灸临床杂志,2005,21(2)：52.
[34]赵蓉.针灸和拔罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征(CFS)35例临床观察[J].天津中医药,2004,8(4)：280.
[35]黄泳.背部走罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征30例临床观察[J].四川中医,2001,19(6)：70.
[36]郑兆俭.背部走罐与中药外敷治疗慢性疲劳综合征35例.中医外治杂志,2002,11(1)：31.
[37]廖辉.点刺放血治疗慢性疲劳综合征32例临床观察.中国针灸,2004,24(2)：91.
[38]曹鎏,李信梅.鳖甲两种不同取法对实验大鼠肝纤维化预防保护作用的比较.南通医学院学报,2003,23(1)：46.
[39]张大旭,张娅婕,甘振威,等.鳖甲提取物抗疲劳及免疫调节作用研究.中国公共卫生,2004,20(7)：834.
[40]谢云峰,龙盛京.5种中药注射液对脂质过氧化及活性氧自由基作用的影响.海峡药学,1999.11(3)：29.
[41]盂宏,王京京,姜亨圭,等.电针对慢性应激致疲劳模型大鼠下丘脑-内啡肽的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,7(19)：59-60.
[42]李永杰.慢性疲劳综合征中的病毒感染研究进展.国外医学·神经病变神经外科分册,2003.30(6)：526.
[43]王富春,洪杰.经穴治病明理.北京：科学技术文献出版社,2000.8
[44]赵建明.张枢.针刺抗运动性生理心理疲劳作用研究.中国针灸,2004,24(8)：519.
[45]Chaocc, DelahuntM, HuS. Immunological mediated fatigue:am urine model. Clinlimmunol-Immunophathal,1992; 62(2):161-165
[46]王洪彬,李峰.元气精华调节情绪的实验研究[J].海北中医,2002；24(3)：234-236
[47]王天芳,陈易新,季绍良,等.慢性束缚致慢性疲劳动物模型的研制及其行为学观察[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,1999；5(5)：25.
[48]王琳,王天芳,康纯洁,等.消疲怡神口服液对应激大鼠神经-内分泌-免疫系统的影响[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2000,6(3)：22
[49]张建斌,等.针刺对抑郁征模型大鼠行为学的影响[J].南京中医药大学学报,2005,21(1)：36-39.
[50]孙华,等.针灸百会和足三里穴对抑郁模型小鼠和大鼠行为的影响[J].针灸临床杂志,2003,19(2)：47-49.
[51]贾宝辉,等.电针对慢性应激模型大鼠行为学及HPA轴相关激素的影响[J].针刺研究,2004,2(94)：252-256.
[52]韩毳,等.电针对抑郁大鼠中枢及我周单胺类神经递质的影响[J].中医药学刊,2004,1：185-188.
[53]唐照亮,等.艾灸对寒凝血瘀证大鼠活血化瘀作用的实验研究[J].中国中医基础医学杂志,2000,6(4)：43-46.
[54]孟宏,王京京,姜亨圭,等.电针对慢性应激致疲劳模型大鼠下丘脑β-内啡肽的影响.针灸临床杂志,2003,19(7)：59-60.
[55]马其江,冯树军,毕秀英.慢性疲劳综合征的中医机制探讨.山东中医杂志,2001,11(23)：652-653.
[56]姜淑云,严敏,房敏.慢性疲劳综合征的研究进展[J].中西医结合学报,2004,2(6)：459-463
[57]张蓉,李峰,陈洁,等.慢性疲劳综合征流行特征的研究[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(4)：296-297.
[58]Kawakami N, et al. [J]. Tohoku J Exp Med,1998,186:33.
[59]Holmes C,P, et al. [J]. Ann Item Med,1988,108(3):387-389.
[60]Jason LA, et al. [J]. Arch Item Med,1999,159(18):2129-2137.
[61]Loyd AR, et al. [J]. Med J Aust,1990,153:522-528.
[62]姚韧敏,丘明义.香港地区慢性疲劳综合征的初步调查与中医病机探讨[J].中西医结合学报,2005,3(5)：359-362
[63]Bates DW, et al. [J] Arch Item Med,1993,153(24):2759-2765.
[64]Buchwald D, et al. [J]. Ann Intern Med 1995,123(2):81-88
[65]王天芳,等.[J].中国行为医学科学,2000,9(2)：84-86.
[66]宋莉娟,赵继军.美英澳国家青少年慢性疲劳综合征健康教育管理计划介绍及 启示.现代护理2007,3(13)：880-881
[67]蔡明德.云南中医学院学报[J],1999,3：32-33.
[68]Steele L, et al. [J]. Am J Med,1998,105 (3):83S-90S.
[69]Lawrie SM, Pelosi AJ. [J]. Br J Psychiatry,1995.166:793-797.
[70]Richman JA, et al. [J]. Am J Public. Healnl,1994.84:282-284.
[71]Harlow BL, et al. [J]. Am J Med,1998,105 (suppl):94S-99S.
[72]Glaser R, Kiecolt Glaser JK. [J]. Am J Med,1998,105:35-42.
[73]傅京丽.辽宁医学杂志[J],1999,13：68-69.
[74]袁苹.健康心理学杂志[J],2001,9(5)：375-376.
[75]彭寿君,等.中华护理杂志[J],1996,31(4)：220-222.
[76]袁萍,梁伯衡.慢性疲劳综合征的流行病学特征.国外医学卫生学分册2003,30(2)：70-74
[77]Demitrack MA, Crofford. Evidence for pathophysiologic implications of hypo thalamic pituitary'adrenal axis dysregulation in fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Ann N Y Acad Sci,1998.840:684-697.
[78]Cleare AJ. Miel J. Heap E, et al. Hypo thalamopituitaryadrenal axis dysfunction in chronic fatigue syndrome, and the effects of low dose hydrocortisone therapy[J]. J Clin Endocrinal Metab.2001 Aug,86(8):3545-3554.
[79]Scott LV, Teh J, Reznek R, et al. Small adrenal glands in chronic fatigue syndrome:a prdiminary computer tomography study[J]. Psychoneurotic endocrinology,1999 Oct.24(7):759-68.
[80]Dinan T G. Majeed T, LaveHe E, et al. Serotonin mediated activation of the hypothalamic pituitary axis in chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. Psycho neuro endocrinology,1997,22:261-268.
[81]Vassallo CM, Feldman E, Peto T, et al. Decreased tryptophan availability but normal postsynaptic 5HT2c receptor sensitivity in chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Psycho Med,2001,31(4):585-91.
[82]Korszun A, Young EA, Engleberg NC, et al. Fonicular phase hypo thalamic pituitary-gonad lax is function in women with fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. J Rheumatol.2000.27(6):26-30.
[83]Moorkens G. Berwaerts J, W ynants H, Abs R. Characterization of pituitary function with emphasis on G H secretion in chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. Clin Endocrinol(Oxf),2000,53(1):99-106.
[84]Conti F, Pittoni V, Sacerdote P, et al. Decreased immune reactive beta-endorphin in mononuclear leucocytes from patients with chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol,1998,16(6):729-732.
[85]Gupta S, Aggarwal S. See D, et al. Cytokine Production by adherent and non-adherent mononuclear cells in chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. J Psychiatrist, 1997,31:149-156.
[86]Pall M LI Elevated. sustained per-oxynitfite levels as the cause of chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Med Hypotheses,2000 Jun.54(1):115-125.
[87]Castel LM, Yamamoto T, Phoenix J, Newsholme EA. The role of tryptophan in fatigue in different conditions of stress[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol.1999.467: 697-704.
[88]Richards RS, Roberts TK, McGregor NR. et al. Blood parameters indicative of oxidative stress are associated with symptom expression in chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Redox Rep,2000,5(1):35-41.
[89]Chaudhur A. Watson W S, Pearn J. Behan PO. The symptoms of chronic fatigue syndrome are related to abnormal in channel function[J].Med Hypotheses.2000 Jun,54(1):58-63.
[90]Machale SM. Lawrie SM, Cavanagh JT. et al. Cerebral perfusion in chronic fatigue syndrome and depression [J]. Br J Psychiatry,2000 Jun.176:550-556.
[91]Rimes KA, Chalder T. Treatment for chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Occup Med(Lond),2005,55(1):32-39.
[92]d'Ella G. Chronic fatigue syndrome in a cognitive perspective [J]. Lakartidningen.2004,101(5):358-364.
[93]Stulemeijer M, de Jong LW, Fiselier TJ, el al. Cognitive behavior therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome[J] 2005,330(7481):14.
[94]Whiteside A, Hann S, Chaudhuri A, et al. Exercised lowers pain threshold in chronic fatigue syndrome[J] Pain,2004,109(3):497-499.
[95]Edmonds M, McGuire H, Price J, et al. Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Cxzhrane Database Sym Rev,2004 (3):CD003200.
[96]Puri BK. The use of eicopentaenoie acid in the treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome[J]. Prostaglandins Leukot Esent Fatty Acids,2004.70(4):399 401
[97]Santaella ML, Font I, Disdier OM. el al. Comparing of oral nicotnamide adenine dinucleotide(NADH)versus conventional therapy for chronic fatigue Syndrome[J]. PRHealth Sci J,2004,23(2):89 93.
[98]Dotsenko VA,Mosiichuk LV,Paramonov AE. Biologically active food additives for correction of the chronic fatigue syndrome [J]. Vopr Pitan,2004,73(2): 17-21.
[99]Orfei MD, Caltagirone C, Spalletta G. The evaluation of ascogonia in stroke patients. Cerebrovasc Dis,2009,27(3):280-289.
[100]Jackson D, Turner Stokes L, Murray J, et al. Validation of the memory and behavior problems checklist-1990R for use in acquired brain injury. Brain Inj,2007,21 (8):817-824.
[101]Streitberger K, Kleinhenz J. Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research[J]. Lancet,1998,352(9125):364-365.
[102]李忠仁.实验针灸学.北京.中国中医药出版社,2003.329
[103]郑筱萸.中药新药临床指导原则.北京.中国中医药科技出版社,2002(5)：378-382.