樟树施肥及营养诊断的研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
樟树作为我国的珍贵的经济树种,具有很高的经济价值,本试验以厦门市牡丹公司一年生牡丹1#扦插苗为试验材料,运用三元二次通用旋转组合设计,对不同的施肥处理对樟树的生长、生物量积累、得油率、芳樟醇含量的影响开展研究;结合各个指标值建立数学模型,对其拟合方程进行最优求解,确定樟树最优生长的施肥配比,并应用DRIS图解法与指数法分别对樟树植株的营养元素进行诊断比较,得出不同处理的N、P、K需肥顺序;为樟树的科学施肥技术提供理论和实践依据。主要的研究结果如下:
     1.对樟树生物量、树高、地径的数学模型拟合的回归方程进行显著性检验,检验结果均达显著水平,表明氮、磷、钾肥的不同处理对樟树的生长的影响显著。得到生物量的数学模型拟合的回归方程为:Y=7.459+2.474X1-2.038X2+2.245X3-0.136X1X2-0.717X1X3-0.348X2X3+0.219X12+0.775X22-0.057X32,求得的最优生物量可达到29.739g,与之对应的氮,磷,钾的施肥量分别为:5.0g/盆,5.0g/盆,0g/盆;苗高的数学模型拟合的回归方程为:Y=20.997+5.971X1+1.083X2+4.034X3-0.451X1X2+0.134X1X3+0.167X2X3-1.185X12-0.229X22-0.872X32,求得的最优树高可达到43.16cm,与之对应的氮,磷,钾的施肥量分别为:3.64g/盆,5.00g/盆,3.07g/盆;地径的数学模型拟合的回归方程为:Y=4.283+0.695X1+0.495X2+0.182X3-0.003X1X2+0.019X1X3-0.035X2X3-0.12X12-0.065X22-0.0253X32,求得的最优地径可达到6.34mm,与之对应的氮,磷,钾的施肥量分别为:3.01g/盆,3.01g/盆,2.7g/盆。
     2.运用DRIS图解法与指数法对樟树的N、P、K养分营养诊断进行诊断,通过DRIS图解法得出N、P、K三元素最佳比值范围P/N=0.1414-0.0948、K/N=0.1744-0.1530、P/K=0.8367-0.5979,在所有处理中处理19、20的养分处于平衡状态。通过DRIS指数法,得出处理15~20的各营养指数与0最为接近,表明这6个处理的养分比较平衡,与图解法的结果一致。
     3.对樟树得油率和芳樟醇的数学模型拟合的回归方程进行显著性检验,检验结果均达显著水平,表明氮、磷、钾肥的不同处理对樟树叶油得油率以及成分含量的影响显著,得到得油率的数学模型拟合的回归方程为:Y=1.054+0.392X1-0.037X2+0.280X3+0.014X1X2-0.022X1X3+0.018X2X3-0.057X12+0.001X22-0.053X32,求得的最优得油率可达到2.22%,与之对应的氮,磷,钾的施肥量分别为:3.52g/盆,5g/盆,2.76g/盆。芳樟醇的数学模型拟合的回归方程为: Y=87.206+2.802X1-0.279X2+1.115X3+0.108X1X2-0.147X1X3+0.396X2X3-0.525X12-0.137X22-0.275X32,求得的最优芳樟醇含量可达到95.18%,与之对应的氮,磷,钾的施肥量分别为:2.84g/盆,5g/盆,4.87g/盆。
     4.樟树精油的合成、转化和积累,受其遗传性和环境条件所制约。试验结果表明各个处理樟树叶含油率均在1.53%以上,芳樟醇含量均在88.35%以上,说明优良芳香樟无性繁殖后代能够保留其母本的优良特性(含油率1.55%,芳樟醇含量为94.67%)。不同施肥处理对樟树叶含油率及其芳樟醇含量,也有显著的影响,说明科学的配方施肥对提高樟树叶精油及其芳樟醇产量有明显的促进作用。
The Cinnamomum camphora as our country's precious economic tree, had very high economic value,One-year-old cutting seedlings of Cinnamomum camphora from Xiamen Mudan Company, chosen as testing materials, and combinative design of three factors-quadratic rotations applied in this paper,the impacts of different fertilizer treatments on the growth of Cinnamomum camphora,biomass and the yield of essential oil, the linalool content in essential oil were studied;DRIS graphic methods and DRIS indices were respectively used to diagnose plant nutrition of Cinnamomum camphora, and then the order of requiring the fertilizer-N,P,and K was figured out;Combined with the results of nutrient diagnosis,providing theoretical and practical references for scientific fertilization of Acacia crassicarpa seedling.The results as followed:
     1.The results of significant test were reached significant level in the mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s biomass, height and diameter, and the results indicated that the impacts of different fertilization treatments had sinificant influence to Cinnamomum camphora’s different parts growth.The regression equation established with mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s biomass was: Y=7.459+2.474X1-2.038X2+2.245X3-0.136X1X2-0.717X1X3-0.348X2X3+0.219X12+0.775X22-0.057X32,the optimal biomass was 29.739g, and the corresponding application of N,P,and K were:5.0g/pot, 5.0g/pot, and 0 g/pot respectively; the regression equation established with mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s height was: Y=20.997+5.971X1+1.083X2+4.034X3-0.451X1X2+0.134X1X3+0.167X2X3-1.185X12-0.229X22-0.872X32,the optimal biomass was 43.16cm, and the corresponding application of N,P,and K was:3.64g/pot,5.00g/pot,and 3.07g/pot respectively. the regression equation established with mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s diameter was:Y=4.283+0.695X1+0.495X2+0.182X3-0.003X1X2+0.019X1X3-0.035X2X3-0.12X12-0.065 X22-0.0253X32,the optimal diameter were 6.34mm, and the corresponding application of N,P,and K were:3.01g/pot,3.01g/pot,and 2.7g/pot respectively.
     2.The nutrients of N,P,and K in the Cinnamomum camphora were diagnosed by DRIS graphic and indices methods,the result by DRIS graphic method showed the best ratio ranges were P/N=0.1414-0.0948,K/N=0.1744-0.1530,P/K=0.8367-0.5979 respectively.The nutrients of treatment No.19 and 20 were in balance range,and The results by DRIS indices method showed that the nutrients of treatment No.15 to 20's nutrients indexes were most closer to 0, which indicated the nutrients of these treatments were relatively balanced,and the conclusion was In accordance with DRIS Graphic Method.
     3.The results of significant test were reached significant level in the mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s yield of essential oil and linalool content in essential oil, and the results indicated that the impacts of different fertilization treatments had sinificant influence to them.The regression equation established with mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s yield of essential oil was: Y=1.054+0.392X1-0.037X2+0.280X3+0.014X1X2-0.022X1X3+0.018X2X3-0.057X12+0.001X22-0.053X32,the optimal yield of essential oil was 2.22%, and the corresponding application of N,P,and K were: 3.52g /pot,5.0g/pot,and 2.76g g/pot respectively;the regression equation established with mathematical models of Cinnamomum camphora’s linalool content in essential oil was: Y=1.054+0.392X1-0.037X2+0.280X3+0.014X1X2-0.022X1X3+0.018X2X3-0.057X12+0.001X22-0.053X32,the optimal linalool content in essential oil was 95.18%, and the corresponding application of N,P,and K were: 2.84g /pot,5.0g/pot, and 4.87 g/pot respectively.
     4.Cinnamomum camphora's essential oil's synthesis, the accumulation and the transformation were restricted by its heredity and the environmental conditions, the results showed that each treatments's the yield of essential oil was above 1.53%, the linalool content was above 88.35%, which indicated that the camphor tree inherit characteristics of mother tree well in fertilization experiment, however the differences were significant among the yield of essential oil and the linalool content of different treatments, indicated that fertilization experiment had sinificant influence to the yield of essential oil and the linalool content, and the suitable fertilization treatments could promote Cinnamomum camphora's oil production.
引文
[1]任晓光,张士俊,才巨峰等.红皮云杉人工幼林施肥试验研究[J],吉林林业科技2005.34(5):26-29.
    [2]龙光远,彭招兰,郭德选等.龙脑樟矮林基地施肥试验研究[J],江西林业科技,2000,5(14):14-16.
    [3]徐明岗,马路军.林地施肥试验与实践[J],陕西林业科技,1993,2:54-57.
    [4]蒋云东,王达明,邱琼等.7种热带阔叶树种的苗木施肥试验[J],云南林业科技,2003.2(6):11-15.
    [5]李徐.樟树栽培管护[J],湖南林业2006.8:18.
    [6]聂英奇.樟树育苗技术[J],安徽林业科技,2005,3:41.
    [7]李泽相.樟树的采种育苗及造林[J],湖南林业,2006.5:16.
    [8]王红花.樟树大树移栽技术试验[J],福建林业科技,2005.9:143-145.
    [9]张英,袁建康.樟树害虫的研究进展[J],上海农业科技,2006,3:110.
    [10]施敏益,徐志刚.香樟树的病虫害与防治[J],上海农业科技,2005,3:117-118.
    [11]田大伦,闫文德,康文星等.樟树林地土壤多环芳烃的含量及其分布特征[J],林业科学,2006,42(11):12-16.
    [12]张国防,陈存及,邢建宏等.芳樟工业原料林营建中的若干问题[J],林业科技开发,2004,18(3):7-10.
    [13]张国防,陈存及.福建樟树叶油的化学成分及其含量分析[J],植物资源与环境学报2006:15(4):69-70.
    [14]张国防,陈存及.樟树RAPD反应体系的优化[J],江西农业大学学报,2006,28(3):373-376.
    [15]张国防,陈存及.樟树干叶DNA提取方法的研究[J],江西农业大学学报,2006,28(1):111-114.
    [16]张国防,陈存及.樟树叶油地理变异的研究[J],植物资源与环境学报,2006,15(1):22-26.
    [17]Doyle J J,Dickson E.Preservation of plant samples for DNA restriction endonuclease analysis[J].Taxson,1987,36(4):715-722.
    [18]Chase M W,Hills H H.Silicagel:An ideal material for field preservation of leaf samples for DNA STUDIES[J].Taxon,l99l,4O:215-220.
    [19]王怀青.樟树叶精油成分的初步研究[J],江苏林业科技,2006,2:(8-11).
    [20]苏远波,李清彪,姚传义等.芳樟树叶乙醇提取物的抗癌作用[J],化工进展,2006.25(2):200-204.
    [21]孙敬,陈会,陈利霞等.樟树叶片水溶液抗茵活性的研究[J],江西医学检验,2005,23(5):427-428.
    [22]Pino-JA,Fuentes-V. Leaf oil of Cinnamomum camphora(L.)J.Presl.from Cuba[J].Journal of Essential oil Researeh, 1998,10(5):531-532.
    [23]Dung-NX,Khien-Pv,Chien-HT,etal.The essential oil of Cinnamomum camphora(L.) sieb. Var linaloolifera from vietnam[J]. Journal of Essential oil Researeh,1993,5(4):451-453.
    [24]Ansari- MA,Razdan-RK.Relative efficacy of various 0il in repelling mosquitoes[J],Indian Journal of Malariology,1995,32(3):104-111.
    [25]Jagjit-Bhandari,Shiva- MP,Mehra-SN,et.al.Prospects of camphor and camphor oil Productionfrom the leaves of Pollarded bushes of Cinnamomum camphora. Today&Tomorrow’s Printers&Publishers:New Delhi;India[j] Recent advances in medieinal, aromatic and spiece crops(Volume 2). International conference held on. 28-31January 1989,at New Delhi,India.1992,441-447.
    [26] Bhandari-J.Comparative chromatographic tudies of Cinnamomum camphora(Linn.) Nees&fberm.young pollarded bushes and trees of essential oil [J].Journal of Eeonomic and TaxonomicBotany,1995,19(2):287-292.
    [27]周林.杨树早期施肥试验初报[J],江苏林业科,1996.6:19-22.
    [28]汪琼琼,戴苍峰,周志书等.板栗林地配方施肥试验[J],浙江亚热带作物通讯2004.26(2):34-37.
    [29]朱炜.红锥人工幼林施肥试验研究[J],河南科技大学学报(农学版),2004.24(2):24-27.
    [30]朱剑云,叶永昌,张方秋等.厚荚相思施肥试验[J],广东林业科技,2004,20(1):8-11.
    [31]许信玲,黄力,黄家彬等.木麻黄幼林施肥试验研究[J],福建林业科技,1991,18(4):37-41.
    [32]蒋云东,李思广,李明等,思茅松人工林幼林期施肥试验研究[J],林业科技,2005.30(3):16-19.
    [33]张学武.福建柏幼林施肥试验的研究[J],江西农业大学学报(自然科学版)2002.10:631-634.
    [34]黄春玉.银杏采叶林N、P、K施肥试验[J],广西林业科学,2001.6:34-38.
    [35]闵安民,王宇,费楠.油橄榄幼树期施肥试验初报[J],西部林业科学,2004.33(4):61-64.
    [36]覃开展,杨章旗.马尾松种子园施肥试验[J]广西林业科学,2001.12:195-198.
    [37]苏建荣,邓疆,罗香等.元宝槭幼树施肥研究Ⅱ对叶内黄酮、绿原酸及养分的影响[J],林业科学研究,2OO5,18(3):255-529.
    [38]Guan S-Y.et a1.1986.Soil Enzyme and Its Research Method.Beijing:Agriculture Press.(in Chinese):36-40.
    [39]陈立新.落叶松人工林施肥对土壤酶和微生物的影响[J],应用生态学报.2004,15(6):1000-1004.
    [40]Zhou X.M(邹晓明).1992.Effect of tree biogeochemistry on soil fertility.In:Liu J-G(刘建国)ed.Great Ecology Theory at PrEsent Generation.Beijing:China Science and Technology Pres.65-72.
    [41]杨爱平,李洁荣.合理施肥对银杏园土壤肥力和酶活性的影响[J],广西植物26(5):557-560.
    [42]吴家胜,张往祥.氮磷钾对银杏苗生长和生理特性的影响[J],南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)2003.14(5):63-66.
    [43]赵中华,郭晓敏,李发凯等.不同施肥处理对油茶光合生理特性的影响[J],江西农业大学报,2007.29(4):576-581.
    [44]Microbe Section of Nanjing Soil Institute of CAS.1985.Research Method About Soil Microbe.Beijing:Agriculture Press.(in Chinese):18-25.
    [45]王力,侯庆春.林木施肥与水肥效益.西北林学院学报,2000,15(2):844-88.
    [46]竹之下纯一郎.日本林地施肥[J].罗晓花译.福建林业科技,1993,20(3):47-51.
    [47]A.Bematzky,陈自新.许慈安译.林木生态与养护[M].中国建筑工业出版社,1987:180-189.
    [48]杨志敏.法国杨树良种选育与短轮伐期林培育及其研究方向[J].世界林业研究,1992,5(2):76.
    [49]Blaekmon BG.Cottonwood response to nitrogen related to plantation age and site[M].USDA For.Sery.Res,Notes SO-229,South.For.ExP.Stn,1977:40-45.
    [50]Xu G-H.1986.Handbook of Analysis Method About Soil Microbe.Beijing:Agriculture Pres.(in Chinese):35-46.
    [51]汤章城.现代植物生理学实验指南[M].北京:科学出版社,1999:20-26.
    [52]李健,李美桂.DRIS理论缺陷与方法重建中国农业科学2004,37(7):1000-1007.
    [53]Beaufils E R.Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system(DRIS).Soil Science.Bulletin(University of Natal,Pieter maritzburg,South Africa),1973,(1):132.
    [54]林德喜,陈辉.锥栗人工林营养综合诊断DRIS研究[J],林业科学,2001,37(1):116-125.
    [55]李继承,李先信,彭俊彩等.五种矿质元素对脐橙树体营养状况的影响[J],湖南农业大学学报1999,25(1):36-39.
    [56]李国良,姚丽贤,付长营等.香蕉营养诊断的DRIS标准的初步研究[J],中国土壤与肥料2008,(3):74-78.
    [57]王春枝,李东晶,齐宝利等,基于DRIS法的南果梨“叶病养”况诊断[J],土壤肥料科学2008,5(24):261-264.
    [58]李旭辉,李瑛,刘军等,DRIS在关中地区冬小麦施肥中的应用研究[J],植物营养与肥料学报2005,11(2):174-178.
    [59]董小平,张玉萍,孙专红等.应用综合诊断施肥法(DIRS)进行棉花营养诊断[J],新疆农业科学2000,(4):184-186.
    [60]张旭东,董林水,周金星等.珍稀乡土树种福建柏苗期DRIS营养诊断[J],生态学,2005,5(11):65-1170.
    [61]陈礼光,陆小静,蔡月琴等.柳杉苗木综合营养诊断I.田间DRIS图解法[J],福建林学院学报2005,25,(4):318-322.
    [62]谢安强,陆小静,杨榕等.柳杉苗木综合营养诊断Ⅱ.研究田间DRIS指数法[J],福建林学院学报2006,26(2):111-116.
    [63]冯茂松,张健.巨桉叶片营养DRIS诊断研究[J],四川农业大学学报,2003,21(4):303-307.
    [64]张克建.桉树营养状况与诊断方法综述[J],桉树科技,2000,2:17-20.
    [65]杜燕星.山苍子施肥及其营养诊断的研究[D].福建农林大学,2008,:11-19.
    [66]洪伟,吴承祯.试验设计与分析原理操作案例[M].中国林业出版社,2004:184-191.
    [67]庄作峰,郭衡.应用DRIS法对1年生苗木壤营养诊断及对策.[J],辽宁林业科技.1996,1(1):8-11.
    [68]范少辉,俞新妥.杉木苗期施氮的田间试验研究[J].福建林学院学报,1990,10(4):334-343.
    [69]彭志平,潘汝忠.紫花芒果N、P、K、Ca、Mg叶片诊断的DRIS标准初步研究[J].热带亚热带土壤科学,1998,7(1):36-40.
    [70]卫茂荣,张新华.应用诊断施肥综合法(DRIS)进行日本落叶松苗木营养诊断的研究[J].土壤通报,1994,25(5):227-229.
    [71]于亮,陆莉.冬小麦氮素营养诊断的研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2007,35(10):2861-2863.
    [72]连楚楚,沈润平,吴细平等.棉花叶片营养综合诊断参数的研究[J].江西农业大学学报,1999,21(1):13-16.
    [73]耿增超,张立新,赵二龙等.陕西红富士苹果矿质营养DRIS标准研究[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(8):1422-1428.
    [74]李辉桃,周建斌.应用DRIS法评价苹果树营养状况初探[J].陕西农业科学,1994,(4):15-17.
    [75]黄宗玉.诊断施肥综合法(DRIS)的原理与应用问题[J].土壤学进展,1990,18(1):22-26.
    [76]郑家基,陈雪金.DRIS诊断法在柑桔施肥中应用研究[J].福建省农科院学报,1996,11(4): 39-42.
    [77]洪顺山,庄珍珍.湿地松幼林营养的DRIS诊断[J].林业科学研究,1995,8(4):360-366.
    [78]周全连.高峰林.场厚荚相思幼林营养诊断[J].广西科学院学报,2006,22(03):178-179.
    [79]曾银花.防护林树种厚荚相思_AcaciaCrassicarpa_苗期施肥效应研究[D].福建农林大学,2009:16-19.
    [80]韦翔华.银杏磷素营养及其营养诊断方法的研究初探[J].广西农业大学学报,1998,17(3):247-253.
    [81]赵刚.福建樟树精油生化类型与优良单株选择的研究[D].福建农林大学,2005:8-11.
    [82]李爱民,唐永勤,卿玉波.樟油的提取及其抑菌性研究[J].福建林业科技,2006,33(4):121-123.
    [83]刘咏,张宗贤.香樟叶出油最佳提取条件的实验研究[J].天然产物研究与开发,2005,17(2):203-205.
    [84]占春瑞.毛细管气相色谱法测定黄樟油中樟脑[J].化检验一化学分册,2003,39(3):164-165.
    [85]陶光复.湖北樟油化学资源[J].长江流域资源与环境,2003,12(2):124-126.
    [86]孙凌峰."杂樟油”前馏分化学成份的研究[J].香料香精化妆品,2005,1(1):16-21.
    [87]朱亮锋.我国樟属精油资源研究近况[J].植物资源与环境,237.1994,3(2):5l-55.
    [88]Yukawa Y,Sho I.Spectral Atlas of Terpenes and the Relate Compounds[M].Tokyo:Hirokawa Publishing Company,1973:26-209.
    [89]Beaufils E R.Diagnosis and recommendation integrated system(DRIS)[J].Soil Science Bulletin-University of Natal(Sudafrica).1973.
    [90]E S.Application of Beaufils diagnostic indices to maize data published in the literatureirrespective of age and conditions[J].plant and soil,1977,46(2):359-369.
    [91]Elwali A M O,Gascho G J.Sugarcane response to P,K,and DRIS corrective treatments on Florida Histosols[J].Agronomy Journal,1983,75(1):79.
    [92]Sumner M E.Preliminary NPK foliar diagnostic norms for wheat[J].Communications in SoilScience and Plant Analysis,1977,8(2):149-167.
    [93]Sumner M E.Interpretation of foliar analyses for diagnostic purposes[J].Agronomy Journal,1979,71(2):343.
    [94]Bouma D.Diagnosis of mineral deficiencies using plant tests[J].Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology,New series Ed Lauchi A and RL Bieleski Springer-Verlag,Berlín and N York, 1983,15:241-285.
    [95]Raven K P,Loeppert R H.Trace element composition of fertilizers and soil amendments[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,1997,26(2):551.
    [96]Van Den Deiessehe.predietion of mineral mutrient status of tree by foliar analysis[J].Bot.Rev.1974,(40),347-385.
    [97]刘虹,沈美英,何正洪.广西樟树叶油的五种生化类型[J],广西林业科技,1992,21(82):181-186.
    [98]刘咏,张宗贤.香樟叶出油最佳提取条件的实验研究[J],天然产物研究与开发,2005.17(2):203-205.
    [99]A1ain Goossens, Suvi T. Hakkinen, Into Laakso, Tuulikki Seppanen-Laakso, Stefania Biondi, Valerie De Suffer, Freya Lammertyn, Anna Maria Nuutila, Hans Soderlund, Marc Zabeau, Dirk Inze, and Kirsi-Marja Oksman-Caldentey. A functional genomics approach toward the understanding of secondary metabolism in plant cells PNAS 2003 100:8595-8600.
    [100]张国防.樟树精油主成分变异与选择的研究[D],福建农林大学,2006.19-26.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700