黑龙江寒地水稻负泥虫可持续控制技术研究
|
摘要
水稻负泥虫是黑水稻为害性较强害虫之一,在黑龙江省发生和危害程度呈逐渐上升趋势。长期的化学防治出现了农药残留、污染环境以及破坏生态系统等一系列问题。筛选高效、低毒、低残留杀虫剂和探求新的无污染的防治途径是目前和急待解决的问题。本文从水稻负泥虫的生态学及水稻对其抗性的关系入手,研究了温度对水稻负泥虫生长发育的影响、水稻不同品种对水稻负泥虫的抗性、水稻负泥虫胁迫下水稻不同品种生理响应、水稻负泥虫对水稻不同品种及次生物质的嗅觉反应及防治水稻负泥虫的杀虫剂筛选等内容,并初步提出了水稻负泥虫可持续控制策略,此研究将为为水稻负泥虫的综合治理提供理论依据。研究结果如下:
1.温度对水稻负泥虫生长发育的影响:温度为为14、18、22、26和30℃,光周期为14L:10D,相对湿度为85%条件下,研究了水稻负泥虫各虫态发育起点温度和有效积温。水稻负泥虫卵、幼虫、蛹的发育起点温度分别为8.39℃、7.20℃和7.23℃,有效积温分别为53.01、118.31和122.63日·度。建立了发育速度、发育历期的理论模型,同时得到水稻负泥虫各个虫龄发育起点温度和有效积温的拟合方程。
2.本研究选择黑龙江主栽的6个水稻品种,对水稻负泥虫进行抗性试验。结果表明,绥粳4号为抗虫品种;丰园2号和空育131为中抗品种;垦鉴5号和稻花香2号是感虫品种;05345为中感品种。
3.以水稻-水稻负泥虫为研究模式,通过测定水稻负泥虫取食和机械损伤情况下水稻叶片光合速率、蒸腾速率的变化特点,水稻植株体内叶绿素、蛋白质、游离脯氨酸、可溶性糖的时间变化及保护性酶活性的变化动态,分析寒地水稻抗虫、感虫品种对水稻负泥虫为害胁迫下的应答反应能力及其与机械损伤的异同。
结果表明,水稻负泥虫诱导和机械损伤水稻植株,96h后抗虫品种和感虫品种的光合速率均显著下降;虫害诱导下,抗虫品种和感虫品种的蒸腾速率与对照比并无显著变化;机械损伤后,抗虫品种和感虫品种蒸腾速率比对照显著增加;水稻负泥虫取食和机械损伤处理,水稻抗虫和感虫品种植株内蛋白质和可溶性糖的含量均比对照降低,游离脯氨酸的含量均比对照增加,蛋白质和游离脯氨酸的变化趋势均与水稻受害程度和时间成正相关。水稻可溶性糖的含量的变化波动较大。
水稻负泥虫取食和机械损伤情况下,不同抗性品种水稻植株内POD、SOD、CAT保护性酶活性和MDA的变化动态是:POD、CAT和MDA的变化呈现出先升高然后降低趋于一致,SOD活性持续增强。除抗虫品种MDA含量比对照降低外,水稻负泥虫取食为害导致抗、感水稻植株中3种酶的活性均比未处理对照增加,但达到显著差异水平的时间不尽相同。通过比较分析发现,水稻负泥虫取食24h和48h抗虫品种引起的CAT活性变化明显高于感虫品种,可以用来鉴定水稻对水稻负泥虫的抗性;另外供试的3种酶都不能界定虫害和机械伤害间的差异。本研究为水稻负泥虫抗、耐品种的筛选以及水稻负泥虫胁迫下水稻的生理应答机制研究提供了理论依据。
4.在实验室条件下用四臂嗅觉仪分别测定了水稻负泥虫对水稻不同品种及水稻不同品种三种不同处理下次生物质的趋性。结果表明,水稻负泥虫对2个水稻品种有明显的趋向反应。表现为600 s内,水稻负泥虫在各处理区的滞留时间比对照区的滞留时间明显延长,二者之间差异显著。试验测定了水稻负泥虫幼虫、成虫对不同品种的健康水稻叶片以及对机械损伤叶片、水稻负泥虫取食叶片的行为反应,机械损伤能诱导水稻叶片产生防御,明显的减少了幼虫的取食,感虫品种稻花香2号与抗虫品种绥粳4号差异极显著。
水稻次生物对水稻负泥虫成虫有较强的驱避作用,表现为300 s内,水稻负泥虫成虫在各处理区的滞留时间比对照区的滞留时间明显减少,且差异显著,且滞留时间随着次生物量的增加而延长,水稻次生物质对水稻负泥虫幼虫驱避效果不明显。
5.选用6种常用杀虫剂对水稻负泥虫进行了室内毒力测定和大田药效试验,结果表明: 6种药剂对水稻负泥虫的毒力为:0.3%印楝素乳油>4.5%氯氰菊酯>2.5%溴氰菊酯>1.5%阿维菌素>10%吡虫啉>90%敌百虫;田间防效均很稳定,6种药剂最高防效都达到80%以上。
In recent years, Oulema oryzae damage strong and damage degree of the ascendant trend in Heilongjiang.A single chemical control measure has little effect for long time,and result in many questions,such as:pesticide residues,environmental pollution,destruction between ecological blance and biological diversity.It cause many concers that sreening of low toxicity and low-residue pesticides,or finding of a new non-polluting,non-nusisance prevention and control method.In this article, From the ecology of Oulema oryzae and the relationship between its resistance to Oulema oryzae .Study the effects of temperature on the growth and development of Oulema oryzae, resistance of different rice by Oulema oryzae, changes of physiological response of different rice feeded by Oulema oryzae, selectivity of different rice and secondary compounds by Oulema oryzae, evaluation of several insecticides to control Oulema oryzae,and sustainable control tactics of Oulema oryzae are studied for comprehensive control of Oulema oryzae. Research results are as follows:
1.The developmental threshold temperature and effective accumulated temperature of Oulema oryzae was studied ,under the conditions of treatments of six levels of constant temperature(14, 18, 22, 26, 30℃)and photoperiod (14L:10D), relative humidity of 85%.Oulema oryzae egg, larva, pupa developmental threshold temperatures were 8.39℃, 7.20℃and 7.23℃, effective accumulated temperature, respectively 53.01,118.31 and 122.63 days·degree.The theoretical model of development speed and development duration was established,while get the fitting equation of developmental threshold temperature and effective accumulated temperature of Oulema oryzae.
2. This study 6 varieties of rice in heilongjiang.And make test for resistance by Oulema oryzae.Results that Suijing4 is resistance varieties. Fengyuan2 and Kongyun131 are intermediate resistance varieties. Kenjiandao5 and Daohuaxiang2 are sensibility varieties and no significant differences between them. 05345 is intermediate sensibility.
3. As a pattern of interaction between rice plants and Oulema oryzae, three physiological indexes were surveyed under Oulema oryzae feeding and simple mechanical damage to uncover physiological response of rice plants feed by Oulema oryzae and difference between two treatments, including total protein, free proline and soluble sugar.
Results that under the insect feeding and mechanical damage after 96h, photosynthetic rate greaterdropinyield between resistance varieties and sensibility varieties;Under herbivore stress, transpiration rate are non-significant change between resistance varieties and sensibility varieties;Under mechanical damage,transpiration rate are significant change between resistance varieties and sensibility varieties;Under herbivore stress and mechanical damage,protein and soluble sugar reduced than contrast,proline increased than contrast,change trend of protein and proline are positive correlated with time.The soluble sugar changes larger fluctuation.
As an object of the interaction between rice and Oulema oryzae, four enzymes activity of rice variety with different resistance to Oulema oryzae under the insect feeding and mechanical damages were investigated, including POD, SOD, CAT and MDA . Among them, SOD activity was gone up with continuous stages, others showed the similar change with weave crest in middle stage. Besides MDA in resistance rice was lower than the contrast, others were higher, however the significant difference of enzymes activity between treatment and contrast were achieved at different stages. Through the comparative analysis, CAT index could be used to identify the variety resistance to Oulema oryzae, because the activity was higher in the resistance variety than the sensitive variety in the course of insect feeding.All four enzymes were failed to distinguish difference between insect feeding and mechanical damage.
4. Under laboratory conditions, using four-arm olfactometer were determined in rice Oulema oryzae larvae, adults of different damage, different rice varieties of olfactory response. The results showed that rice oulema these three kinds of rice varieties tend to have a clear response. Performance for 600s, the rice Oulema oryzae treatment area at the retention time than that of the control area was significantly longer residence time,that significant differences between the two. Test rice Oulema oryzae larvae, adults of different species of rice leaf and cut leaf damage, insect feeding, such as inducible factor-treatment of leaves of different rice varieties behavioral responses. Mechanical damage can be induced in rice leaves defense, a clear decrease of the feeding larvae. Insect-resistant varieties of rice varieties and Suijing 4 significant difference to determine the varieties of rice varieties of Daohuaxiang 2 for the flu bug.
Under laboratory conditions, using four-arm olfactometer were determined in secondary compounds of four varieties and three kinds of damage of rice by Oulema oryzae.The results showed that preference or avoid of secondary compounds by Oulema oryzae for 300 s, Oulema oryzae adult in treatment retention more time than control, and significant difference, and as retention more time as more secondary compounds, that effect of larvae is not obvious. This research for resistance to rice variety screening of pesticides and the physiological responses under the stress of Oulema oryzae mechanism provides theory basis.
5. With six kinds of pesticides in cold region Oulema oryzae conducted a determination of toxicity and field efficacy tests.Results that: The six kinds of pesticides toxicity from high to low was 0.3% Azadirachta indica,4.5% Cypermethrin in, 2.5% Decamethrin, 1.5% Avermectins, 10% Imidacloprid, 90% Dipterex;The field efficacy tests is very stable,six kinds of pesticides achieves 80%.
1.温度对水稻负泥虫生长发育的影响:温度为为14、18、22、26和30℃,光周期为14L:10D,相对湿度为85%条件下,研究了水稻负泥虫各虫态发育起点温度和有效积温。水稻负泥虫卵、幼虫、蛹的发育起点温度分别为8.39℃、7.20℃和7.23℃,有效积温分别为53.01、118.31和122.63日·度。建立了发育速度、发育历期的理论模型,同时得到水稻负泥虫各个虫龄发育起点温度和有效积温的拟合方程。
2.本研究选择黑龙江主栽的6个水稻品种,对水稻负泥虫进行抗性试验。结果表明,绥粳4号为抗虫品种;丰园2号和空育131为中抗品种;垦鉴5号和稻花香2号是感虫品种;05345为中感品种。
3.以水稻-水稻负泥虫为研究模式,通过测定水稻负泥虫取食和机械损伤情况下水稻叶片光合速率、蒸腾速率的变化特点,水稻植株体内叶绿素、蛋白质、游离脯氨酸、可溶性糖的时间变化及保护性酶活性的变化动态,分析寒地水稻抗虫、感虫品种对水稻负泥虫为害胁迫下的应答反应能力及其与机械损伤的异同。
结果表明,水稻负泥虫诱导和机械损伤水稻植株,96h后抗虫品种和感虫品种的光合速率均显著下降;虫害诱导下,抗虫品种和感虫品种的蒸腾速率与对照比并无显著变化;机械损伤后,抗虫品种和感虫品种蒸腾速率比对照显著增加;水稻负泥虫取食和机械损伤处理,水稻抗虫和感虫品种植株内蛋白质和可溶性糖的含量均比对照降低,游离脯氨酸的含量均比对照增加,蛋白质和游离脯氨酸的变化趋势均与水稻受害程度和时间成正相关。水稻可溶性糖的含量的变化波动较大。
水稻负泥虫取食和机械损伤情况下,不同抗性品种水稻植株内POD、SOD、CAT保护性酶活性和MDA的变化动态是:POD、CAT和MDA的变化呈现出先升高然后降低趋于一致,SOD活性持续增强。除抗虫品种MDA含量比对照降低外,水稻负泥虫取食为害导致抗、感水稻植株中3种酶的活性均比未处理对照增加,但达到显著差异水平的时间不尽相同。通过比较分析发现,水稻负泥虫取食24h和48h抗虫品种引起的CAT活性变化明显高于感虫品种,可以用来鉴定水稻对水稻负泥虫的抗性;另外供试的3种酶都不能界定虫害和机械伤害间的差异。本研究为水稻负泥虫抗、耐品种的筛选以及水稻负泥虫胁迫下水稻的生理应答机制研究提供了理论依据。
4.在实验室条件下用四臂嗅觉仪分别测定了水稻负泥虫对水稻不同品种及水稻不同品种三种不同处理下次生物质的趋性。结果表明,水稻负泥虫对2个水稻品种有明显的趋向反应。表现为600 s内,水稻负泥虫在各处理区的滞留时间比对照区的滞留时间明显延长,二者之间差异显著。试验测定了水稻负泥虫幼虫、成虫对不同品种的健康水稻叶片以及对机械损伤叶片、水稻负泥虫取食叶片的行为反应,机械损伤能诱导水稻叶片产生防御,明显的减少了幼虫的取食,感虫品种稻花香2号与抗虫品种绥粳4号差异极显著。
水稻次生物对水稻负泥虫成虫有较强的驱避作用,表现为300 s内,水稻负泥虫成虫在各处理区的滞留时间比对照区的滞留时间明显减少,且差异显著,且滞留时间随着次生物量的增加而延长,水稻次生物质对水稻负泥虫幼虫驱避效果不明显。
5.选用6种常用杀虫剂对水稻负泥虫进行了室内毒力测定和大田药效试验,结果表明: 6种药剂对水稻负泥虫的毒力为:0.3%印楝素乳油>4.5%氯氰菊酯>2.5%溴氰菊酯>1.5%阿维菌素>10%吡虫啉>90%敌百虫;田间防效均很稳定,6种药剂最高防效都达到80%以上。
In recent years, Oulema oryzae damage strong and damage degree of the ascendant trend in Heilongjiang.A single chemical control measure has little effect for long time,and result in many questions,such as:pesticide residues,environmental pollution,destruction between ecological blance and biological diversity.It cause many concers that sreening of low toxicity and low-residue pesticides,or finding of a new non-polluting,non-nusisance prevention and control method.In this article, From the ecology of Oulema oryzae and the relationship between its resistance to Oulema oryzae .Study the effects of temperature on the growth and development of Oulema oryzae, resistance of different rice by Oulema oryzae, changes of physiological response of different rice feeded by Oulema oryzae, selectivity of different rice and secondary compounds by Oulema oryzae, evaluation of several insecticides to control Oulema oryzae,and sustainable control tactics of Oulema oryzae are studied for comprehensive control of Oulema oryzae. Research results are as follows:
1.The developmental threshold temperature and effective accumulated temperature of Oulema oryzae was studied ,under the conditions of treatments of six levels of constant temperature(14, 18, 22, 26, 30℃)and photoperiod (14L:10D), relative humidity of 85%.Oulema oryzae egg, larva, pupa developmental threshold temperatures were 8.39℃, 7.20℃and 7.23℃, effective accumulated temperature, respectively 53.01,118.31 and 122.63 days·degree.The theoretical model of development speed and development duration was established,while get the fitting equation of developmental threshold temperature and effective accumulated temperature of Oulema oryzae.
2. This study 6 varieties of rice in heilongjiang.And make test for resistance by Oulema oryzae.Results that Suijing4 is resistance varieties. Fengyuan2 and Kongyun131 are intermediate resistance varieties. Kenjiandao5 and Daohuaxiang2 are sensibility varieties and no significant differences between them. 05345 is intermediate sensibility.
3. As a pattern of interaction between rice plants and Oulema oryzae, three physiological indexes were surveyed under Oulema oryzae feeding and simple mechanical damage to uncover physiological response of rice plants feed by Oulema oryzae and difference between two treatments, including total protein, free proline and soluble sugar.
Results that under the insect feeding and mechanical damage after 96h, photosynthetic rate greaterdropinyield between resistance varieties and sensibility varieties;Under herbivore stress, transpiration rate are non-significant change between resistance varieties and sensibility varieties;Under mechanical damage,transpiration rate are significant change between resistance varieties and sensibility varieties;Under herbivore stress and mechanical damage,protein and soluble sugar reduced than contrast,proline increased than contrast,change trend of protein and proline are positive correlated with time.The soluble sugar changes larger fluctuation.
As an object of the interaction between rice and Oulema oryzae, four enzymes activity of rice variety with different resistance to Oulema oryzae under the insect feeding and mechanical damages were investigated, including POD, SOD, CAT and MDA . Among them, SOD activity was gone up with continuous stages, others showed the similar change with weave crest in middle stage. Besides MDA in resistance rice was lower than the contrast, others were higher, however the significant difference of enzymes activity between treatment and contrast were achieved at different stages. Through the comparative analysis, CAT index could be used to identify the variety resistance to Oulema oryzae, because the activity was higher in the resistance variety than the sensitive variety in the course of insect feeding.All four enzymes were failed to distinguish difference between insect feeding and mechanical damage.
4. Under laboratory conditions, using four-arm olfactometer were determined in rice Oulema oryzae larvae, adults of different damage, different rice varieties of olfactory response. The results showed that rice oulema these three kinds of rice varieties tend to have a clear response. Performance for 600s, the rice Oulema oryzae treatment area at the retention time than that of the control area was significantly longer residence time,that significant differences between the two. Test rice Oulema oryzae larvae, adults of different species of rice leaf and cut leaf damage, insect feeding, such as inducible factor-treatment of leaves of different rice varieties behavioral responses. Mechanical damage can be induced in rice leaves defense, a clear decrease of the feeding larvae. Insect-resistant varieties of rice varieties and Suijing 4 significant difference to determine the varieties of rice varieties of Daohuaxiang 2 for the flu bug.
Under laboratory conditions, using four-arm olfactometer were determined in secondary compounds of four varieties and three kinds of damage of rice by Oulema oryzae.The results showed that preference or avoid of secondary compounds by Oulema oryzae for 300 s, Oulema oryzae adult in treatment retention more time than control, and significant difference, and as retention more time as more secondary compounds, that effect of larvae is not obvious. This research for resistance to rice variety screening of pesticides and the physiological responses under the stress of Oulema oryzae mechanism provides theory basis.
5. With six kinds of pesticides in cold region Oulema oryzae conducted a determination of toxicity and field efficacy tests.Results that: The six kinds of pesticides toxicity from high to low was 0.3% Azadirachta indica,4.5% Cypermethrin in, 2.5% Decamethrin, 1.5% Avermectins, 10% Imidacloprid, 90% Dipterex;The field efficacy tests is very stable,six kinds of pesticides achieves 80%.
引文
[1] Awmack CS. and Leather SR.Host plant quality and fecundity in herbivorous insects.Ann. RevEntomol [J].2002,47: 817-844.
[2]虞国平.水稻在我国粮食安全中的战略地位分析[J].新西部.2009,(11):31-33.
[3]程式华,胡培松.中国水稻科技发展战略[J].中国水稻科学,2008,22(3):223-226.
[4]王艳青.近年来中国水稻病虫害发生及趋势分析[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(2): 343-347.
[5]中国农业科学院植物保护研究所.中国农作物病虫害[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995,124-132.
[6]王玉山,高俊全.中国北方水稻病虫草害防治[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996,43-56.
[7]古德祥,夏嫱,张古忍,等.稻田蜘蛛群落结构及营养关系[M].中国科学技术出版社,2002,199-206.
[8]程家安,祝增荣,娄永根.连作晚稻前期施药种类和时间对褐飞虱种群动态的影响[J].中国水稻科学,1995,9 (2): 108-114.
[9]金翠霞,吴亚,王冬兰.稻田节肢动物群落多样性[J].昆虫学报,1990,33(3): 287-295.
[10]刘向东,张孝羲.选择性农药对稻田蜘蛛群落的影响[J].昆虫知识,1999,36 (2): 67-70.
[11]刘雨芳,古德祥.稻田中性昆虫多样性及其生态功能分析[J].中国生物防治,2002,18 (4):149-152.
[12] Arise H,Motobayashi T and Saitou K,et al. The effect of no application of agricultural chemicals on rice [Oryza sativa] growth and yield of rice,arthropods and weeds community inpaddy field[J]. Japanese J. Farm Work Res,1999,101:231-241.
[13]吴进才,郭玉杰,束兆林,等.稻田节肢动物群落不同取样方法的比较[J].昆虫知识,1993,30(2):182-183.
[14]冯兰萍,张夕林,张建明,等.褐飞虱的主要捕食性天敌及农药对天敌的影响[J].昆虫天敌,1999,21(2):55-60.
[15] Settle WH,Ariawan H and Astuti ET.et al.Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alterative prey[J]. Ecology,1996,(7): 1975-1988.
[16]陈建明,俞晓平,吕仲贤,等.除草剂和杀菌剂对白背飞虱成虫的杀伤作用[J].浙江农业学报,1999a,111(2):293-296.
[17]陈建明,俞晓平,吕仲贤,等.除草剂和杀菌剂对褐飞虱及其天敌的影响[J].植物保护学报,1999b,26(2):162-166.
[18]徐建祥,吴进才,程遐年,等.两种杀虫剂对稻田捕食性天敌集团捕食功能的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(2): 145-149.
[19]左言龙,金美林.水稻负泥虫发生规律研究[J].昆虫知识,1995,32(1):8-10.
[20]张文会.日本宫城县水稻负泥虫发生调查及防治[J].吉林农业,1998,10:13.
[21]刘东宇.水稻负泥虫及防治[J].云南农业,2001(03):18.
[22]仝玉金.水稻负泥虫的防治[J].农村实用科技信息,2007(05):31.
[23]邓衡山.黑龙江省水稻冷害风险管理[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2006.
[24]戈峰,李典漠.可持续农业中的害虫管理问题[J].昆虫知识,1997,4(1):39-45.
[25]吴千红,邵则信,苏德明.昆虫生态学实验[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1991,3-10.
[26]顾云琴,林云彪,李宝福,等.简化有效积温法则预测稻水象甲发生期研究初报[J].植物保护,2003,29(6):43-45.
[27]谢成君.豌豆象卵发育起点温度和有效积温测定[J].植物检疫,2003,(4):220-223.
[28]程达武,张秀荣,刘建宏,等.温度对鸭跖草负泥虫发育、取食量影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(3):498-500.
[29]尹健,李志红,熊建伟,等.颠茄草主要食叶害虫枸杞负泥虫发生与防治的初步研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(8):212-215.
[30]杜玉宁,张宗山,沈瑞清.枸杞负泥虫的发育起点温度和有效积温[J].昆虫知识,2006,43(4):474-476.
[31]刘绍友.农业昆虫学[M].西安:天则出版社,1990,166-168.
[32]周弘春,南山.农业昆虫学[M].黑龙江:黑龙江人民出版社,2001,(3):123-125.
[33]徐来杰.稻负泥虫生物学特性与防治指标研究[J].植保技术与推广,1999,19(3):13-14.
[34]许传红.水稻负泥虫生物学特性及其防治[J].植物保护学报,2007,(01):50.
[35]孔凡明,左言龙,刘和祥,等.大别山区中稻负泥虫种群动态与为害损失及防治指标的研究[J].安徽农业科学,1992,20(4):357-359.
[36]孙强.密山地区水稻负泥虫种群动态及药剂防治指标研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2000,12(4):9-11.
[37]武德兰,王秀莉.麦田食蚜蝇幼虫空间分布型德初探[J].安徽农业科学,2002,30(2):250-251.
[38]夏基康.昆虫种群空间分布型与抽样调查[J].南京农学院学报,1982,3(1):42-49.
[39]丁岩钦.昆虫种群生态学原理与应用[J].科学出版社,1981,86-89.
[40]尹汝湛,赵善欢,王鉴明.稻田三化螟集团分布的初步调查及其在实用上的意义[J].昆虫学报,1954,4(4):337-362.
[41]李典谟.论计算机化的病虫害管理系统的原理[J].生态学报,1983,3(3):252-261.
[42]陈龙稳.二化螟田间种群生命表的初步研究[J].生态学报,1984,(4):145-147.
[43]孟和平,姚祥征,宋美廷.粘虫种群田间抽样技术初步研究[J].植物保护学报,1982,9(3):173-177.
[44]张永强,何波.稻田蜘蛛空间分布型及抽样技术初步研究[J].广西农学院学报,1983,(2):95-108.
[45]林志伟,王丽艳,杨凤军.寒地稻田水稻负泥虫空间分布型的研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2000,12(3):17-18.
[46]韦江.稻负泥虫幼虫空间分布型及抽样技术研究[J].昆虫知识,1986,(04):155-158.
[47]孔凡明,左言龙.大别山区中稻负泥虫种群与为害损失及防治[J].安徽农业科学,1992,20(4):357- 359.
[48]郑文静,刘志恒,张燕之,等.水稻的主要养分组成和显微结构对灰飞虱取食选择性的影响[J].植物保护学报,2009,36(3):203-206.
[49]柏丽华,王小奇,田春晖,等.水稻不同品种对稻水象甲取食选择性的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2005,36(5):562-565.
[50]罗海平,蔺万煌,刘建丰.水稻叶鞘3种氧化还原酶活性在褐飞虱胁迫中的变化[J].中国农业科学,2008,34(5):71-75.
[51]张金锋,薛庆中.稻飞虱为害胁迫对水稻植株内主要保护酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(10):1487-1491.
[52]涂巨民,卢兴映,徐运启,彭仲明.水稻对褐飞虱的抗性与过氧化物酶同工酶的关系[J].湖北农业科学,1988,(7):11-13.
[53]丁岩,钦戈峰.中国昆虫生态学五十年(1949～1999)[J].昆虫学报,2000,37(1):18-23.
[54]汪茂卿,吴荣宗,张良佑.光照因素对水稻品种苗期褐稻虱抗性的影响[J].中国水稻科学,1991,5(3):97-103.
[55]张良佑,吴荣宗,陈璧.光温条件影响稻种对褐稻虱抗性的研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1990,11(3):64-70.
[56]刘媛媛.高温胁迫对水稻生理生化特性的影响研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2008.
[57]刘春茂,吴荣宗.光照强度和氮肥对水稻品种抗褐稻虱的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,1992,13(2):27-33.
[58]赵伟春,程家安,娄永根,等.褐飞虱和白背飞虱对不同飞虱取食后稻株的选择性[J].植物保护学报,2000,27(3):193-198.
[59]俞晓平,巫国瑞,胡萃.水稻品种对白背飞虱的抗性及其与稻株营养成分的关系[J].中国水稻科学, 1989,3(2):56-61.
[60]曾玲,吴荣宗,冯成,等.水稻品种游离氨基酸含量与抗褐稻虱的关系[J].华南农业大学学报,1992,13(4):69-76.
[61]许跃,俞晓平.水稻品系“9101”对白背飞虱产卵的抗性及植株游离氨基酸含量与抗性的关系[J].植物保护学报,1988,15(1):61-62.
[62]陈建明,俞晓平,葛秀春,等.水稻植株防御白背飞虱为害的某些生理反应[J].中国水稻科学,2000, 14(1):43-47.
[63]刘光杰,Wilkins R M,Saxena R C.白背飞虱对不同抗虫性稻株糖类物质的利用[J].昆虫学报,1995,38(4):421-427.
[64]巫国瑞,俞晓平,Saxena R C.水稻品种对白背飞虱的抗性表现[J].植物保护,1991,17(4):15-16.
[65]娄永根.信息化合物在稻虱缨小蜂寄主选择行为中的作用[D].杭州:浙江大学,1999.
[66]仵均祥.农业昆虫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2002,(7):30-32.
[67] Painter R.H. Insect Resistance In Crop Plants[J]. Macmillan Co., New York .1951,202.
[68]李广京,刘栋.作物抗虫性的反应类型及抗虫效果的提高[J].牡丹江师范学院学报,2005,(1):5-8.
[69]姚英娟,薛东,杨长举.作物抗虫性在害虫综合治理中的地位和作用[J].湖北植保,2004,(2):38-40.
[70]陈明.作物抗虫性利用概况及其在害虫综合治理中的地位[J].甘肃农业科技,1985,(03):27-30.
[71]田际榕.对水稻主要害虫综合治理的认识与实践[J].湖南农业科学,1987,(4):34-37.
[72]俞晓平,再国瑞,陶林勇,等.水稻抗虫品种对褐飞虱和白背飞虱种群增长的影响[J].中国水稻科学,1993,7(2):88-94.
[73]巫国瑞,陶林勇,陈福云.多抗性晚籼浙丽1号(6202)对几种主要病虫的抗性[J].植物保护学报, 1986,13(1):17-21.
[74]魏子生,李友荣,侯小华,等.多抗、优质、丰产、中熟早籼稻新品种的选育[J].植物保护学报,1988,15(3):191-194.
[75]何明,顾正远.水稻主要病虫害综合防治技术体系的新发展[J].西南农业学报,1995,8(增):1-6.
[76]李西明,刘光杰,马良勇,等.水稻抗白背飞虱的资源发掘及其抗性遗传分析[J].中国水稻科学,1996,10(3): 173-176.
[77]叶正襄,秦厚国,黄荣华.水稻新品种“赣早籼28号”对白背飞虱的抗性研究[J].江西农业学报,1993,5(1):44-48.
[78]刘光杰,沈君辉,寒川一成.中国水稻抗虫性的研究及其应用:回顾与展望[J].中国水稻科学,2003,17(增刊):1-6.
[79]覃伟权,凌冰,彭正强,等.3种热带植物次生物质对小菜蛾的干扰作用[J].植物保护学报,2004,31(3):269-275.
[80]覃伟权.植物次生物质研究进展[J].热带农业科学,2002,22(6):60-68.
[81]黄继光,徐汉虹,周利娟,等.非洲山毛豆叶片中鱼藤酮的提取方法[J].华南农业大学学报,2001,22(4):29-33.
[82]张永清.植物次生物质的抗虫作用[J].生物学通报,1991,(5):8-9.
[83] Turlings T C J,Tumlinson J H,Heath R R,et al.Isolation and identification of all elochemcals that attract the larval prasitoid,cotesia marginiventris,to the microhabitat of one of its , host [J] . J. Chen. Ecol.,1991,(17): 2235-2251.
[84]娄永根,程家安.植物-植食性昆虫-天敌三级营养层次的相互作用及其研究方法[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(3):325-331.
[85]周强,徐涛,张古忍,等.虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱的驱避作用[J].昆虫学报,2003,46(6): 739-744.
[86]陈华才,娄永根,程家安.寄主昆虫及被害水稻的挥发物对螟蛉绒茧蜂寄主选择行为的影响[J].浙江大学学报,2003,29(1): 18-23.
[87]陈华才,沈群超,娄永根,等.水稻挥发物对二化螟幼虫趋性行为的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2004,18(5):473-475.
[88]焦懿.植物次生物质对十字花科蔬菜害虫的控制作用[D].广东:华南农业大学,2000.
[89]高勇.小麦次生物质的生态管理功能在害虫生态治理项目中的应用[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2008.
[90]杨朗,梁广文,黄凤宽,等.水稻抗性品种IR36甲醇提取物不同极性组分对褐飞虱的活性[J].植物保护学报,2007,34(3):296-300.
[91]王登元.新疆棉区主要病虫害综合防治技术体系[J].新疆农业大学学报,1999,22(4):270-275.
[92]丁岩钦.论昆虫种群的生态控制[J].生态学报,1993,13(2):99-105.
[93] Odum H T.(孙儒泳等译).生态学基础[J].北京:人民教育出版社,1981,37-60.
[94]戈峰,苏建伟.21世纪害虫管理的一些特征展望[J].昆虫知识,2002,39(4):241-246.
[95] Kogan,Integrated pest anagement:Historical perspectives and contemporary developments [J].Ann. Rev, Entomol,1998,(43):243-270.
[96]姜海燕,汪志红.试论害虫综合治理(IPM)战略思想[J].辽宁林业科技,2000,(4):18-20.
[97]王登元,于江南.新疆棉花生产可持续发展与害虫综合治理[J].新疆农业科学,1999,(6):257-260.
[98]马祁,李号宾,汪飞,等.新疆棉花害虫综合防治技术体系研究[J].新疆农业科学,2000,(1):1-5.
[99]贺福德.生物防治是害虫综合防治的必由之路[J].新疆农垦科技,2001(增刊),20-25.
[100]王洪亮,王丙丽,李朝伟.害虫综合治理研究进展[J].河南科技学院学报,2006,9(3):4-42.
[101]张永军,吴孔明,彭于发,等.转抗虫基因植物生态安全性研究进展[J].昆虫知识,2002,39(5):321-327.
[102]贾士荣.转基因作物的安全性争论及其对策[J].生物技术通报,1999(6):127.
[103]龚和.我国昆虫分子生物学研究的回顾和展望[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(1):32-36.
[104]张宗炳,曹骥.害虫防治:策略与方法[J].科学技术出版社,1990,504-562.
[105]丁锦华,尹楚道,林冠伦,等.农业昆虫学[J].江苏科学技术出版社,1991,131-132.
[106]蒋杰贤,刘劲军,曾爱平.农业有害生物的可持续控制[J].上海农业学报,2003,19(4):93-97.
[107] National Academy of Science.Report of the research of briefing panelon biological control in managed ecosystem[M].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1998,101.
[108]广东省水稻害虫生物防治大会战工作队.利用赤眼蜂防治稻纵卷叶螟[J].昆虫学报,1974,17(3):269-280.
[109]郭明.稻螟赤眼蜂TrichogrammajaponicumAshmead与其他赤眼蜂种类对寄主的辨别及种间竞争的研究[J].昆虫天敌,1985,7(4):192-200.
[110]刘志诚,孙姒纫,王志勇.利用人工卵繁殖拟澳洲赤眼蜂防甘蔗螟[J].生物防治通报,1985,(3):2-9.
[111]佘春仁,潘蓉英,古德祥等.利用平腹小蜂防治荔枝蝽若干技术问题探讨[J].福建农业大学学报,1997,26(4):441-445.
[112]卢爱平,杨球英.平腹小蜂个体发育研究[J].昆虫天敌,1983,5(4):215-221.
[113]包建中,陈修浩.中国赤眼蜂的研究与应用[M].北京:学术书刊出版社,1998,5-33.
[114]万方浩,王韧,叶正楚.我国天敌昆虫产品产业化的前景分析[J].中国生物防治,1999,15(3):135-138.
[115]孟和生,王开运,姜兴印.二斑叶螨发生危害特点及防治对策[J].昆虫知识,2001,38(1):52-55.
[116]董淑敏.防治害虫新技术“以肥治虫”[J].北京农业,1997,(1):18.
[117]蒋志胜,苏胜忠,尚稚珍.昆虫生长调节剂的发展与应用[J].世界农业,1997,(1): 46-51.
[118]邓望喜.储藏物害虫的生物防治技术[J].粮食储藏,1994,23(增刊):80-90.
[119]张宗炳.正确认识与发挥化学农药在害虫综合治理中的作用[J].世界农业,1982,6(2) :37-40.
[120]张孝羲.昆虫生态及预测预报[M].中国农业出版社,1985,218-219.
[121]马世骏,丁岩钦.东亚飞蝗种群数量中的调节机制[J].动物学报,1965,17(3):261-277.
[122]张秀荣,沈萍,王瑞玲.盾负泥虫发育起点温度和有效积温的研究[J].昆虫知识,1995,32(6):359-360.
[123]张孝羲.昆虫生态及预测预报[M].北京:农业出版社,1985,320-324.
[124]程达武,张秀荣,刘建宏,等.温度对鸭跖草负泥虫发育、取食量和繁殖力的影响[J].生态学报,2001,23(3):498-501.
[125]李艳茹.作物抗虫育种进展[J].延边大学农学学院,2005,27(4):306-310.
[126]周明牂.作物抗虫原理[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1991,76.
[127] CoPaiaSV,Nieol D,WrattenSD.Accumulation of hydroxam-ic acids during wheat germination[J].Phytoehemistry,1999,(50):17-24.
[128] WebsterJA,PorterDR.Plant resistance components of two greenbng (HomoPtera: APhididae) resistant wheats[J].J EconEn-entomol,2000,93:1000-1004.
[129] Jena K K,K hushG S.Intrngression of genes from Oryza officinalis Wall.ex watt to cultivated rice.O.sativa L[J].Theori APPL Genet,1990,80:737-745.
[130]李桂英,许新萍.转GNA+SBTi双价基因抗虫水稻的遗传分析及抗虫性研究[J].中山大学学报:自然科学报,2003,42(1):125-126.
[131]李广京,刘栋.作物抗虫性的反应类型及抗虫效果的提高[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:自然科学版,2005(1):5-6.
[132]殷灿星,王晓鸣,朱振东.作物抗虫育种资源的研究与利用[J].植物遗传资源学报,2003,4(4):360-364.
[133]王恩彦.水稻不同品种和药剂对稻负泥虫控制技术研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007,12.
[134]张启贵,闫秀兰,李巍,等.测定物质对蟑螂引诱力的试验方法研究[J].中华卫生杀虫药械,2006,12(2):113-115.
[135]吴业春.大豆对植食性害虫抗性的鉴定及对斜纹夜蛾抗生性的遗传研究[D] .南京:南京农业大学,2003.
[136]徐春晓.大豆对植食性害虫抗性的植株反应和虫体反应及其在资源鉴定、遗传与选育中的应用[D] .南京:南京农业大学,2000.
[137]黄炳超,张扬,肖汉祥,等.水稻重大病虫害可持续控制技术的优化集成及应用[J] .广东农业科学, 2006,(5):31-37.
[138]四川农业大学,西南农业大学,云南农业大学主编.农业试验与统计分析[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1993,9-137.
[139]娄永根,程家安.植物的诱导抗虫性[J].昆虫学报,1997,40(3): 320-331.
[140]陈威,周强,李欣,等.水稻不同品种对虫害胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2161-2163.
[141]陈建明,俞晓平.水稻不同品种受褐飞虱危害后体内生理指标的变化[J].植物保护学报,2003,30(3):224-231.
[142]吕仲贤,俞晓平,郑许松,等.褐飞虱致害性变异过程及其体内酶的变化[J].昆虫学报,1997,40(增):122-127.
[143] Chen J M,Yu X P,Lu Z X,et al.Studies on tolerance and compensations of rice varities to the brown Planthopper,Nilaparata lugens,attacking[J].CRRN, 2002,10(3-4):19-20.
[144] Ryan C A,and Pearce G. Systemin: a polypeptide signal for plant defensive genes[J]. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,1998,(14): 1-17.
[145]娄永根,程家安.虫害诱导的植物挥发物:基本特性、生态学功能及释放机制[J].生态学报,2000,20(6):1097-1106.
[146]张宪政.作物生理研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1992,208-245.
[147]袁晓华,杨中汉.植物生理生化实验[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1983,1-31.
[148]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000,202-204.
[149]张殿忠,汪沛洪,赵会贤.测定小麦叶片游离脯氨酸含量的方法[J].植物生理学通讯,1990,(4):62-65.
[150]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006,186-187.
[151]曹骥,孙德寿.浅谈害虫的农业防治[J].昆虫知识,1984,(04):41.
[152]陈威,周强,李欣,等.水稻不同品种对虫害胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2163-2166.
[153] Karban R. & Baldwin I.T. Induced Responses to Herbivory[J]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997,145.
[154]刘媛媛,滕中华,王三根,等.高温胁迫对水稻可溶性糖及膜保护酶的影响研究[J].西南大学学报,2008,30(2):59-63.
[155]石顺唯,周爱平,陈红,等.杂交水稻蛋白质含量配合力和遗传力分析[J].西南农业学报,2000,13(2):19-24.
[156]李矩华,余勤,豆志杰.水稻生育前期游离脯氨酸的低温效应[J].华中师范大学学报,1985(3): 81-84.
[157]汤章城.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的累积及其可能的意义[J].植物生理学通讯,1984,17(1):15-21.
[158]俞晓平,巫国瑞,胡萃.水稻品种对白背飞虱耐虫性和抗生性的研究[J].植物保护学报,1990,17(4):327-330.
[159]钦俊德.昆虫与植物关系[J].科学出版社,1987,1-15.
[160]阎凤鸣.信息化学物质[J].科学出版社,2003,94-109.
[161]殷海娣,黄翠虹等.昆虫唾液成分在昆虫与植物关系中的作用[J].昆虫学报,2006,49(5):843-849.
[162] Merkx Y M,BaerheimSvendsen A. Glycosidically bound volatile aliphatic and aromatic alcohols:a common feature in the vegetable kingdom[J]. Journal of Essential Oil Research 1990,(2):207-208.
[163] Kalberer NM,Turlings TCJ, Rahier M.Attraction of a leaf beetle (Oreina cacaliae) to damaged host plants[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology.2001,(27):647-663.
[164]程家安,唐振华.昆虫与植物相互关系的分子基础[J].科学技术出版社,2001,139-165.
[165]张瑛,严福顺.虫害诱导的植物挥发性次生物质及其在植物防御中的作用[J].昆虫学报,1998,22.
[166]孙爱东.天然植物次生代谢产物的提取[J].生物杂志,1998,(5):4-7.
[167] Vet L E M, van Lenteren J C,Heymans M, Meelis E.1983. An air2 flow olfactometer for easuring olfactory responses of hym2 enopterous parasitoids and other small insects[J]. Physiol. Entomol, 8: 97-106.
[168]徐涛,周强,夏嫱,等.虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱寄主选择行为的影响[J].科学通报,2002,11:47.
[169]慕立义.植物化学保护研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994,110.
[170]覃伟权.热带植物次生物质对小菜蛾种群的控制作用[D].广州:华南热带农业大学,2004.
[171]王艳青.近年来中国水稻病虫害发生及趋势分析[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(2): 343-347.
[172]张宗炳.杀虫剂的毒力测定[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1985,388-391.
[173]吴刚.小菜蛾抗性稳定性及抗性治理对策研究[J].农药学学报,2001,3(1):83-86.
[174]唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其计算机处理平台[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1997,254-297.
[175]王恩彦.水稻不同品种和药剂对稻负泥虫控制技术研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007,13-102.
[176]赵洪臣,宋亚男.水稻负泥虫的防治方法[J].农村实用科技信息,2008,(12):37.
[177]徐船波,杜德印.水稻负泥虫的防治方法[J].农家医院,2009,(4):6.
[178]冯启超,兰鹏飞.水稻负泥虫的防治[J].农村实用科技信息,2009,(08):34.
[179]郭卜,黄爱斌,史峰,等.AA级绿色稻米生产中水稻负泥虫的综合防治[J].垦殖与稻作,2003,(05):20-21.
[2]虞国平.水稻在我国粮食安全中的战略地位分析[J].新西部.2009,(11):31-33.
[3]程式华,胡培松.中国水稻科技发展战略[J].中国水稻科学,2008,22(3):223-226.
[4]王艳青.近年来中国水稻病虫害发生及趋势分析[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(2): 343-347.
[5]中国农业科学院植物保护研究所.中国农作物病虫害[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1995,124-132.
[6]王玉山,高俊全.中国北方水稻病虫草害防治[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1996,43-56.
[7]古德祥,夏嫱,张古忍,等.稻田蜘蛛群落结构及营养关系[M].中国科学技术出版社,2002,199-206.
[8]程家安,祝增荣,娄永根.连作晚稻前期施药种类和时间对褐飞虱种群动态的影响[J].中国水稻科学,1995,9 (2): 108-114.
[9]金翠霞,吴亚,王冬兰.稻田节肢动物群落多样性[J].昆虫学报,1990,33(3): 287-295.
[10]刘向东,张孝羲.选择性农药对稻田蜘蛛群落的影响[J].昆虫知识,1999,36 (2): 67-70.
[11]刘雨芳,古德祥.稻田中性昆虫多样性及其生态功能分析[J].中国生物防治,2002,18 (4):149-152.
[12] Arise H,Motobayashi T and Saitou K,et al. The effect of no application of agricultural chemicals on rice [Oryza sativa] growth and yield of rice,arthropods and weeds community inpaddy field[J]. Japanese J. Farm Work Res,1999,101:231-241.
[13]吴进才,郭玉杰,束兆林,等.稻田节肢动物群落不同取样方法的比较[J].昆虫知识,1993,30(2):182-183.
[14]冯兰萍,张夕林,张建明,等.褐飞虱的主要捕食性天敌及农药对天敌的影响[J].昆虫天敌,1999,21(2):55-60.
[15] Settle WH,Ariawan H and Astuti ET.et al.Managing tropical rice pests through conservation of generalist natural enemies and alterative prey[J]. Ecology,1996,(7): 1975-1988.
[16]陈建明,俞晓平,吕仲贤,等.除草剂和杀菌剂对白背飞虱成虫的杀伤作用[J].浙江农业学报,1999a,111(2):293-296.
[17]陈建明,俞晓平,吕仲贤,等.除草剂和杀菌剂对褐飞虱及其天敌的影响[J].植物保护学报,1999b,26(2):162-166.
[18]徐建祥,吴进才,程遐年,等.两种杀虫剂对稻田捕食性天敌集团捕食功能的影响[J].生态学报,2000,20(2): 145-149.
[19]左言龙,金美林.水稻负泥虫发生规律研究[J].昆虫知识,1995,32(1):8-10.
[20]张文会.日本宫城县水稻负泥虫发生调查及防治[J].吉林农业,1998,10:13.
[21]刘东宇.水稻负泥虫及防治[J].云南农业,2001(03):18.
[22]仝玉金.水稻负泥虫的防治[J].农村实用科技信息,2007(05):31.
[23]邓衡山.黑龙江省水稻冷害风险管理[D].北京:中国农业科学院,2006.
[24]戈峰,李典漠.可持续农业中的害虫管理问题[J].昆虫知识,1997,4(1):39-45.
[25]吴千红,邵则信,苏德明.昆虫生态学实验[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,1991,3-10.
[26]顾云琴,林云彪,李宝福,等.简化有效积温法则预测稻水象甲发生期研究初报[J].植物保护,2003,29(6):43-45.
[27]谢成君.豌豆象卵发育起点温度和有效积温测定[J].植物检疫,2003,(4):220-223.
[28]程达武,张秀荣,刘建宏,等.温度对鸭跖草负泥虫发育、取食量影响[J].生态学报,2001,21(3):498-500.
[29]尹健,李志红,熊建伟,等.颠茄草主要食叶害虫枸杞负泥虫发生与防治的初步研究[J].中国农学通报,2010,26(8):212-215.
[30]杜玉宁,张宗山,沈瑞清.枸杞负泥虫的发育起点温度和有效积温[J].昆虫知识,2006,43(4):474-476.
[31]刘绍友.农业昆虫学[M].西安:天则出版社,1990,166-168.
[32]周弘春,南山.农业昆虫学[M].黑龙江:黑龙江人民出版社,2001,(3):123-125.
[33]徐来杰.稻负泥虫生物学特性与防治指标研究[J].植保技术与推广,1999,19(3):13-14.
[34]许传红.水稻负泥虫生物学特性及其防治[J].植物保护学报,2007,(01):50.
[35]孔凡明,左言龙,刘和祥,等.大别山区中稻负泥虫种群动态与为害损失及防治指标的研究[J].安徽农业科学,1992,20(4):357-359.
[36]孙强.密山地区水稻负泥虫种群动态及药剂防治指标研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2000,12(4):9-11.
[37]武德兰,王秀莉.麦田食蚜蝇幼虫空间分布型德初探[J].安徽农业科学,2002,30(2):250-251.
[38]夏基康.昆虫种群空间分布型与抽样调查[J].南京农学院学报,1982,3(1):42-49.
[39]丁岩钦.昆虫种群生态学原理与应用[J].科学出版社,1981,86-89.
[40]尹汝湛,赵善欢,王鉴明.稻田三化螟集团分布的初步调查及其在实用上的意义[J].昆虫学报,1954,4(4):337-362.
[41]李典谟.论计算机化的病虫害管理系统的原理[J].生态学报,1983,3(3):252-261.
[42]陈龙稳.二化螟田间种群生命表的初步研究[J].生态学报,1984,(4):145-147.
[43]孟和平,姚祥征,宋美廷.粘虫种群田间抽样技术初步研究[J].植物保护学报,1982,9(3):173-177.
[44]张永强,何波.稻田蜘蛛空间分布型及抽样技术初步研究[J].广西农学院学报,1983,(2):95-108.
[45]林志伟,王丽艳,杨凤军.寒地稻田水稻负泥虫空间分布型的研究[J].黑龙江八一农垦大学学报,2000,12(3):17-18.
[46]韦江.稻负泥虫幼虫空间分布型及抽样技术研究[J].昆虫知识,1986,(04):155-158.
[47]孔凡明,左言龙.大别山区中稻负泥虫种群与为害损失及防治[J].安徽农业科学,1992,20(4):357- 359.
[48]郑文静,刘志恒,张燕之,等.水稻的主要养分组成和显微结构对灰飞虱取食选择性的影响[J].植物保护学报,2009,36(3):203-206.
[49]柏丽华,王小奇,田春晖,等.水稻不同品种对稻水象甲取食选择性的影响[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2005,36(5):562-565.
[50]罗海平,蔺万煌,刘建丰.水稻叶鞘3种氧化还原酶活性在褐飞虱胁迫中的变化[J].中国农业科学,2008,34(5):71-75.
[51]张金锋,薛庆中.稻飞虱为害胁迫对水稻植株内主要保护酶活性的影响[J].中国农业科学,2004,37(10):1487-1491.
[52]涂巨民,卢兴映,徐运启,彭仲明.水稻对褐飞虱的抗性与过氧化物酶同工酶的关系[J].湖北农业科学,1988,(7):11-13.
[53]丁岩,钦戈峰.中国昆虫生态学五十年(1949～1999)[J].昆虫学报,2000,37(1):18-23.
[54]汪茂卿,吴荣宗,张良佑.光照因素对水稻品种苗期褐稻虱抗性的影响[J].中国水稻科学,1991,5(3):97-103.
[55]张良佑,吴荣宗,陈璧.光温条件影响稻种对褐稻虱抗性的研究[J].华南农业大学学报,1990,11(3):64-70.
[56]刘媛媛.高温胁迫对水稻生理生化特性的影响研究[D].重庆:西南大学,2008.
[57]刘春茂,吴荣宗.光照强度和氮肥对水稻品种抗褐稻虱的影响[J].华南农业大学学报,1992,13(2):27-33.
[58]赵伟春,程家安,娄永根,等.褐飞虱和白背飞虱对不同飞虱取食后稻株的选择性[J].植物保护学报,2000,27(3):193-198.
[59]俞晓平,巫国瑞,胡萃.水稻品种对白背飞虱的抗性及其与稻株营养成分的关系[J].中国水稻科学, 1989,3(2):56-61.
[60]曾玲,吴荣宗,冯成,等.水稻品种游离氨基酸含量与抗褐稻虱的关系[J].华南农业大学学报,1992,13(4):69-76.
[61]许跃,俞晓平.水稻品系“9101”对白背飞虱产卵的抗性及植株游离氨基酸含量与抗性的关系[J].植物保护学报,1988,15(1):61-62.
[62]陈建明,俞晓平,葛秀春,等.水稻植株防御白背飞虱为害的某些生理反应[J].中国水稻科学,2000, 14(1):43-47.
[63]刘光杰,Wilkins R M,Saxena R C.白背飞虱对不同抗虫性稻株糖类物质的利用[J].昆虫学报,1995,38(4):421-427.
[64]巫国瑞,俞晓平,Saxena R C.水稻品种对白背飞虱的抗性表现[J].植物保护,1991,17(4):15-16.
[65]娄永根.信息化合物在稻虱缨小蜂寄主选择行为中的作用[D].杭州:浙江大学,1999.
[66]仵均祥.农业昆虫学[M].北京:中国农业出版社.2002,(7):30-32.
[67] Painter R.H. Insect Resistance In Crop Plants[J]. Macmillan Co., New York .1951,202.
[68]李广京,刘栋.作物抗虫性的反应类型及抗虫效果的提高[J].牡丹江师范学院学报,2005,(1):5-8.
[69]姚英娟,薛东,杨长举.作物抗虫性在害虫综合治理中的地位和作用[J].湖北植保,2004,(2):38-40.
[70]陈明.作物抗虫性利用概况及其在害虫综合治理中的地位[J].甘肃农业科技,1985,(03):27-30.
[71]田际榕.对水稻主要害虫综合治理的认识与实践[J].湖南农业科学,1987,(4):34-37.
[72]俞晓平,再国瑞,陶林勇,等.水稻抗虫品种对褐飞虱和白背飞虱种群增长的影响[J].中国水稻科学,1993,7(2):88-94.
[73]巫国瑞,陶林勇,陈福云.多抗性晚籼浙丽1号(6202)对几种主要病虫的抗性[J].植物保护学报, 1986,13(1):17-21.
[74]魏子生,李友荣,侯小华,等.多抗、优质、丰产、中熟早籼稻新品种的选育[J].植物保护学报,1988,15(3):191-194.
[75]何明,顾正远.水稻主要病虫害综合防治技术体系的新发展[J].西南农业学报,1995,8(增):1-6.
[76]李西明,刘光杰,马良勇,等.水稻抗白背飞虱的资源发掘及其抗性遗传分析[J].中国水稻科学,1996,10(3): 173-176.
[77]叶正襄,秦厚国,黄荣华.水稻新品种“赣早籼28号”对白背飞虱的抗性研究[J].江西农业学报,1993,5(1):44-48.
[78]刘光杰,沈君辉,寒川一成.中国水稻抗虫性的研究及其应用:回顾与展望[J].中国水稻科学,2003,17(增刊):1-6.
[79]覃伟权,凌冰,彭正强,等.3种热带植物次生物质对小菜蛾的干扰作用[J].植物保护学报,2004,31(3):269-275.
[80]覃伟权.植物次生物质研究进展[J].热带农业科学,2002,22(6):60-68.
[81]黄继光,徐汉虹,周利娟,等.非洲山毛豆叶片中鱼藤酮的提取方法[J].华南农业大学学报,2001,22(4):29-33.
[82]张永清.植物次生物质的抗虫作用[J].生物学通报,1991,(5):8-9.
[83] Turlings T C J,Tumlinson J H,Heath R R,et al.Isolation and identification of all elochemcals that attract the larval prasitoid,cotesia marginiventris,to the microhabitat of one of its , host [J] . J. Chen. Ecol.,1991,(17): 2235-2251.
[84]娄永根,程家安.植物-植食性昆虫-天敌三级营养层次的相互作用及其研究方法[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(3):325-331.
[85]周强,徐涛,张古忍,等.虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱的驱避作用[J].昆虫学报,2003,46(6): 739-744.
[86]陈华才,娄永根,程家安.寄主昆虫及被害水稻的挥发物对螟蛉绒茧蜂寄主选择行为的影响[J].浙江大学学报,2003,29(1): 18-23.
[87]陈华才,沈群超,娄永根,等.水稻挥发物对二化螟幼虫趋性行为的影响[J].中国水稻科学,2004,18(5):473-475.
[88]焦懿.植物次生物质对十字花科蔬菜害虫的控制作用[D].广东:华南农业大学,2000.
[89]高勇.小麦次生物质的生态管理功能在害虫生态治理项目中的应用[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2008.
[90]杨朗,梁广文,黄凤宽,等.水稻抗性品种IR36甲醇提取物不同极性组分对褐飞虱的活性[J].植物保护学报,2007,34(3):296-300.
[91]王登元.新疆棉区主要病虫害综合防治技术体系[J].新疆农业大学学报,1999,22(4):270-275.
[92]丁岩钦.论昆虫种群的生态控制[J].生态学报,1993,13(2):99-105.
[93] Odum H T.(孙儒泳等译).生态学基础[J].北京:人民教育出版社,1981,37-60.
[94]戈峰,苏建伟.21世纪害虫管理的一些特征展望[J].昆虫知识,2002,39(4):241-246.
[95] Kogan,Integrated pest anagement:Historical perspectives and contemporary developments [J].Ann. Rev, Entomol,1998,(43):243-270.
[96]姜海燕,汪志红.试论害虫综合治理(IPM)战略思想[J].辽宁林业科技,2000,(4):18-20.
[97]王登元,于江南.新疆棉花生产可持续发展与害虫综合治理[J].新疆农业科学,1999,(6):257-260.
[98]马祁,李号宾,汪飞,等.新疆棉花害虫综合防治技术体系研究[J].新疆农业科学,2000,(1):1-5.
[99]贺福德.生物防治是害虫综合防治的必由之路[J].新疆农垦科技,2001(增刊),20-25.
[100]王洪亮,王丙丽,李朝伟.害虫综合治理研究进展[J].河南科技学院学报,2006,9(3):4-42.
[101]张永军,吴孔明,彭于发,等.转抗虫基因植物生态安全性研究进展[J].昆虫知识,2002,39(5):321-327.
[102]贾士荣.转基因作物的安全性争论及其对策[J].生物技术通报,1999(6):127.
[103]龚和.我国昆虫分子生物学研究的回顾和展望[J].昆虫知识,2000,37(1):32-36.
[104]张宗炳,曹骥.害虫防治:策略与方法[J].科学技术出版社,1990,504-562.
[105]丁锦华,尹楚道,林冠伦,等.农业昆虫学[J].江苏科学技术出版社,1991,131-132.
[106]蒋杰贤,刘劲军,曾爱平.农业有害生物的可持续控制[J].上海农业学报,2003,19(4):93-97.
[107] National Academy of Science.Report of the research of briefing panelon biological control in managed ecosystem[M].Washington,D.C.:National Academy Press,1998,101.
[108]广东省水稻害虫生物防治大会战工作队.利用赤眼蜂防治稻纵卷叶螟[J].昆虫学报,1974,17(3):269-280.
[109]郭明.稻螟赤眼蜂TrichogrammajaponicumAshmead与其他赤眼蜂种类对寄主的辨别及种间竞争的研究[J].昆虫天敌,1985,7(4):192-200.
[110]刘志诚,孙姒纫,王志勇.利用人工卵繁殖拟澳洲赤眼蜂防甘蔗螟[J].生物防治通报,1985,(3):2-9.
[111]佘春仁,潘蓉英,古德祥等.利用平腹小蜂防治荔枝蝽若干技术问题探讨[J].福建农业大学学报,1997,26(4):441-445.
[112]卢爱平,杨球英.平腹小蜂个体发育研究[J].昆虫天敌,1983,5(4):215-221.
[113]包建中,陈修浩.中国赤眼蜂的研究与应用[M].北京:学术书刊出版社,1998,5-33.
[114]万方浩,王韧,叶正楚.我国天敌昆虫产品产业化的前景分析[J].中国生物防治,1999,15(3):135-138.
[115]孟和生,王开运,姜兴印.二斑叶螨发生危害特点及防治对策[J].昆虫知识,2001,38(1):52-55.
[116]董淑敏.防治害虫新技术“以肥治虫”[J].北京农业,1997,(1):18.
[117]蒋志胜,苏胜忠,尚稚珍.昆虫生长调节剂的发展与应用[J].世界农业,1997,(1): 46-51.
[118]邓望喜.储藏物害虫的生物防治技术[J].粮食储藏,1994,23(增刊):80-90.
[119]张宗炳.正确认识与发挥化学农药在害虫综合治理中的作用[J].世界农业,1982,6(2) :37-40.
[120]张孝羲.昆虫生态及预测预报[M].中国农业出版社,1985,218-219.
[121]马世骏,丁岩钦.东亚飞蝗种群数量中的调节机制[J].动物学报,1965,17(3):261-277.
[122]张秀荣,沈萍,王瑞玲.盾负泥虫发育起点温度和有效积温的研究[J].昆虫知识,1995,32(6):359-360.
[123]张孝羲.昆虫生态及预测预报[M].北京:农业出版社,1985,320-324.
[124]程达武,张秀荣,刘建宏,等.温度对鸭跖草负泥虫发育、取食量和繁殖力的影响[J].生态学报,2001,23(3):498-501.
[125]李艳茹.作物抗虫育种进展[J].延边大学农学学院,2005,27(4):306-310.
[126]周明牂.作物抗虫原理[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1991,76.
[127] CoPaiaSV,Nieol D,WrattenSD.Accumulation of hydroxam-ic acids during wheat germination[J].Phytoehemistry,1999,(50):17-24.
[128] WebsterJA,PorterDR.Plant resistance components of two greenbng (HomoPtera: APhididae) resistant wheats[J].J EconEn-entomol,2000,93:1000-1004.
[129] Jena K K,K hushG S.Intrngression of genes from Oryza officinalis Wall.ex watt to cultivated rice.O.sativa L[J].Theori APPL Genet,1990,80:737-745.
[130]李桂英,许新萍.转GNA+SBTi双价基因抗虫水稻的遗传分析及抗虫性研究[J].中山大学学报:自然科学报,2003,42(1):125-126.
[131]李广京,刘栋.作物抗虫性的反应类型及抗虫效果的提高[J].牡丹江师范学院学报:自然科学版,2005(1):5-6.
[132]殷灿星,王晓鸣,朱振东.作物抗虫育种资源的研究与利用[J].植物遗传资源学报,2003,4(4):360-364.
[133]王恩彦.水稻不同品种和药剂对稻负泥虫控制技术研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007,12.
[134]张启贵,闫秀兰,李巍,等.测定物质对蟑螂引诱力的试验方法研究[J].中华卫生杀虫药械,2006,12(2):113-115.
[135]吴业春.大豆对植食性害虫抗性的鉴定及对斜纹夜蛾抗生性的遗传研究[D] .南京:南京农业大学,2003.
[136]徐春晓.大豆对植食性害虫抗性的植株反应和虫体反应及其在资源鉴定、遗传与选育中的应用[D] .南京:南京农业大学,2000.
[137]黄炳超,张扬,肖汉祥,等.水稻重大病虫害可持续控制技术的优化集成及应用[J] .广东农业科学, 2006,(5):31-37.
[138]四川农业大学,西南农业大学,云南农业大学主编.农业试验与统计分析[M].成都:四川科学技术出版社,1993,9-137.
[139]娄永根,程家安.植物的诱导抗虫性[J].昆虫学报,1997,40(3): 320-331.
[140]陈威,周强,李欣,等.水稻不同品种对虫害胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2161-2163.
[141]陈建明,俞晓平.水稻不同品种受褐飞虱危害后体内生理指标的变化[J].植物保护学报,2003,30(3):224-231.
[142]吕仲贤,俞晓平,郑许松,等.褐飞虱致害性变异过程及其体内酶的变化[J].昆虫学报,1997,40(增):122-127.
[143] Chen J M,Yu X P,Lu Z X,et al.Studies on tolerance and compensations of rice varities to the brown Planthopper,Nilaparata lugens,attacking[J].CRRN, 2002,10(3-4):19-20.
[144] Ryan C A,and Pearce G. Systemin: a polypeptide signal for plant defensive genes[J]. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol,1998,(14): 1-17.
[145]娄永根,程家安.虫害诱导的植物挥发物:基本特性、生态学功能及释放机制[J].生态学报,2000,20(6):1097-1106.
[146]张宪政.作物生理研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1992,208-245.
[147]袁晓华,杨中汉.植物生理生化实验[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1983,1-31.
[148]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000,202-204.
[149]张殿忠,汪沛洪,赵会贤.测定小麦叶片游离脯氨酸含量的方法[J].植物生理学通讯,1990,(4):62-65.
[150]王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术(第二版)[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006,186-187.
[151]曹骥,孙德寿.浅谈害虫的农业防治[J].昆虫知识,1984,(04):41.
[152]陈威,周强,李欣,等.水稻不同品种对虫害胁迫的生理响应[J].生态学报,2006,26(7):2163-2166.
[153] Karban R. & Baldwin I.T. Induced Responses to Herbivory[J]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1997,145.
[154]刘媛媛,滕中华,王三根,等.高温胁迫对水稻可溶性糖及膜保护酶的影响研究[J].西南大学学报,2008,30(2):59-63.
[155]石顺唯,周爱平,陈红,等.杂交水稻蛋白质含量配合力和遗传力分析[J].西南农业学报,2000,13(2):19-24.
[156]李矩华,余勤,豆志杰.水稻生育前期游离脯氨酸的低温效应[J].华中师范大学学报,1985(3): 81-84.
[157]汤章城.逆境条件下植物脯氨酸的累积及其可能的意义[J].植物生理学通讯,1984,17(1):15-21.
[158]俞晓平,巫国瑞,胡萃.水稻品种对白背飞虱耐虫性和抗生性的研究[J].植物保护学报,1990,17(4):327-330.
[159]钦俊德.昆虫与植物关系[J].科学出版社,1987,1-15.
[160]阎凤鸣.信息化学物质[J].科学出版社,2003,94-109.
[161]殷海娣,黄翠虹等.昆虫唾液成分在昆虫与植物关系中的作用[J].昆虫学报,2006,49(5):843-849.
[162] Merkx Y M,BaerheimSvendsen A. Glycosidically bound volatile aliphatic and aromatic alcohols:a common feature in the vegetable kingdom[J]. Journal of Essential Oil Research 1990,(2):207-208.
[163] Kalberer NM,Turlings TCJ, Rahier M.Attraction of a leaf beetle (Oreina cacaliae) to damaged host plants[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology.2001,(27):647-663.
[164]程家安,唐振华.昆虫与植物相互关系的分子基础[J].科学技术出版社,2001,139-165.
[165]张瑛,严福顺.虫害诱导的植物挥发性次生物质及其在植物防御中的作用[J].昆虫学报,1998,22.
[166]孙爱东.天然植物次生代谢产物的提取[J].生物杂志,1998,(5):4-7.
[167] Vet L E M, van Lenteren J C,Heymans M, Meelis E.1983. An air2 flow olfactometer for easuring olfactory responses of hym2 enopterous parasitoids and other small insects[J]. Physiol. Entomol, 8: 97-106.
[168]徐涛,周强,夏嫱,等.虫害诱导的水稻挥发物对褐飞虱寄主选择行为的影响[J].科学通报,2002,11:47.
[169]慕立义.植物化学保护研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994,110.
[170]覃伟权.热带植物次生物质对小菜蛾种群的控制作用[D].广州:华南热带农业大学,2004.
[171]王艳青.近年来中国水稻病虫害发生及趋势分析[J].中国农学通报,2006,22(2): 343-347.
[172]张宗炳.杀虫剂的毒力测定[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1985,388-391.
[173]吴刚.小菜蛾抗性稳定性及抗性治理对策研究[J].农药学学报,2001,3(1):83-86.
[174]唐启义,冯明光.实用统计分析及其计算机处理平台[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1997,254-297.
[175]王恩彦.水稻不同品种和药剂对稻负泥虫控制技术研究[D].武汉:华中农业大学,2007,13-102.
[176]赵洪臣,宋亚男.水稻负泥虫的防治方法[J].农村实用科技信息,2008,(12):37.
[177]徐船波,杜德印.水稻负泥虫的防治方法[J].农家医院,2009,(4):6.
[178]冯启超,兰鹏飞.水稻负泥虫的防治[J].农村实用科技信息,2009,(08):34.
[179]郭卜,黄爱斌,史峰,等.AA级绿色稻米生产中水稻负泥虫的综合防治[J].垦殖与稻作,2003,(05):20-21.