《太平圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点研究
|
摘要
近十几年来,证候源流角度的研究越来越受到重视。《太平圣惠方》(以下简称《圣惠方》)的证候学说在中医辨证论治学说的历史发展中具有一定的重要地位。脏腑辨证是《圣惠方》辨证论治有代表性的一个方面。本课题运用文献、理论研究方法,结合计量,系统研究《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候与现代脾脏相关证候比较的特点,并简要探讨其产生原因、分析其对现代证候学说的意义。以从一个角度反映《圣惠方》作为中医辨证论治学说发展的一个历史阶段的意义。
1《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候与现代脾脏相关证候比较的特点
1.1从证候名称角度
本部分从证候名称角度探讨《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点,以反映其对疾病病理机制主观性认识的特点。为此,分步骤进行了证候提取、证候名称形成、证候名称统一等工作,在此基础上,以现代脾脏相关证候为比较对象,从证候名称角度,总结了《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点。
1.1.1一些在现代层次较高的证候,在《圣惠方》中被作为具体证候。反映《圣惠方》的证候名称尚有概念化痕迹,所以上述证候概念的概括性不足。对虚证来说尚未分化。
1.1.2现代虚证多有气、血、阴、阳、精之分,而《圣惠方》虚证可直指“脾”、“脾胃”、“脾肺”、“心脾”、“脾肾”;且只有“气虚”,无“血、阴、阳、精”之虚。反映《圣惠方》的虚证尚未充分分化。
1.1.3《圣惠方》有相对较多的“脾气不和”、“脾胃不和”、“脾胃气不和”证,而“不和”的含义较为笼统,因此,反映《圣惠方》的证候尚未充分分化。
1.1.4《圣惠方》一些证候相关概念辨析不清。反映《圣惠方》对某些证候相关概念内涵的把握尚不完全确定。
1.1.5从《圣惠方》虚(频数260)/实(频数303)、寒(频数158)/热(频数119)证候(包括脾系证、脾与其它脏腑兼证)的比例,反映其实证、热证比例明显大于现代、可能与《圣惠方》五脏各性质证候基本对称的主观认识有关。
《圣惠方》实证中,涉及“湿”的证候的频数仅为7个,特别是无湿热证。涉及“痰”的证候的频数仅为7个。均明显少于现代。
1.1.6《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的实证中,外邪直接相犯者比例较大。反映《圣惠方》在对脾脏相关证候的病理机制认识中,外因占重要地位。
1.1.7《圣惠方》认为证候虚多兼寒、实多兼热。
1.1.8《圣惠方》脾与它脏兼证有明显的特点。
1.2从症状表现角度
本部分在前一部分证候提取、证候名称形成、证候名称统一等工作的基础上,选择《圣惠方》三个频数最高的脾脏相关证候(脾胃气虚证、脾胃虚冷证、脾胃虚弱证)作为代表,总结其症状表现,并与现代相关证候的症状表现进行比较。从症状表现角度,总结了《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点,以反映其对疾病病理机制客观性认识的特点。
1.2.1《圣惠方》每一脾脏相关证候各自的症状表现有较明显的集中趋势。
1.2.2《圣惠方》名称有明显差别的脾脏相关证候间,症状表现的差别有的不是很明显。
1.2.3《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候与现代同名证候比较,症状表现差别较大。
1.3《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门证候特点
《圣惠方》三～七卷分门比较系统地论述了脏腑证治,本部分对《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门的证候特点做较深入探讨,认为证候理论和经验的相分离是其主要特点。从另一角度完善对《圣惠方》证候特点的认识。
1.3.1脏虚补脏诸门的证候与现代各脏虚证比较有较大差别
(1)证候名称有较大差别。
(2)各脏总症状有较大差别。
(3)《圣惠方》各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较,也有较大差别。
1.3.2脏虚补脏诸门证候的特点是理论和经验的分离
脏虚补脏诸门各脏总症状尚有较强的独立性。但从同一脏内相同证候的角度看,脏虚补脏诸门的证候以理论(以证候名称为代表)和经验(以症状为代表)的分离为特点。表现在:
(1)同一脏内相同证候的不同条文间,相同症状频数与不同症状频数的比值较小。
(2)上述的“《圣惠方》各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较,也有较大差别”,也说明从同一脏内相同证候的角度看,脏虚补脏诸门的证候以理论(以证候名称为代表)和经验(以症状为代表)的分离为特点。
2《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候特点的产生原因
《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的上述特点,应是源于宋初辨证论治学说发展的初步性。
2.1由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,所以《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候中,证候名称尚有概念化痕迹、对某些证候相关概念内涵的把握也尚不完全确定、证候(包括虚证)也尚未充分分化、实证和热证的比例明显大于现代(具有五脏各性质证候基本对称的主观认识)。
由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,所以《圣惠方》在对脾脏相关证候病理机制的认识中,外因占重要地位;与现代同名证候比较,症状表现差别也较大。
由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,所以《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门的证候中,与现代各脏虚证比较证候名称有较大差别、各脏总症状有较大差别、各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较也有较大差别。
2.2《圣惠方》的理论和经验具有不同来源。理论方面以《内经》——《诸病源候论》为主要来源;经验方面来源于当时及以前各家验方。
由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,使不同来源的《圣惠方》的理论和经验未能完全统一,从而形成证候理论和经验相分离的特点。这表现在:
2.2.1《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候中,虽每一脾脏相关证候各自的症状表现有较明显的集中趋势(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的统一),但名称有明显差别的脾脏相关证候间,症状表现的差别有的不是很明显(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的分离)。
2.2.2《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门的证候中,虽各脏总症状尚有较强的独立性(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的统一),但同一脏内相同证候的不同条文间,相同症状频数与不同症状频数的比值较小;各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较,也有较大差别(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的分离)。
3《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候特点对现代证候学说的意义
脾脏相关证候的上述特点和产生原因,提示现代研究中医辨证论治学说:
3.1应有发展的观点,不可把数千年的资料等同视之。
3.2应有全面的观点,对古代的证候不可简单地按字面意义理解,而应根据其在当时整个证候体系中的位置以及所代表的临床信息(病因、症状表现、治疗方药等)准确了解其内涵。
4本研究的创新点
《圣惠方》的证候体系在中医证候学说的历史发展中具有一定的重要地位,对《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候特点的系统研究,有助于弥补目前对该书理论方面研究的不足,完善对中医辨证论治学说发展历史的认识,为现代证候学说提供借鉴。
5本研究的可行性
5.1《圣惠方》成书背景比较明确,版本比较单一;
5.2对《圣惠方》知识来源的看法比较明确。其理论性论述主要以隋·巢元方的《诸病源候论》为依据,故理论观点较为统一;而具体病证的诊疗经验则主要来自宋以前的各医家、医籍的经验医方,且来源广泛,资料丰富。
5.3《圣惠方》集宋以前医学之大成,充分反映了当时的医学发展(包括证候学说发展)状况。
In the recent several years,studies on origin and development of the syndrome have been paid more and more attention.The syndrome doctrine of The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae plays an important role in the development of the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory.And syndrome differentiation of the Zang-fu organs is quite typical among it.By using traditional literature,theoretical research methods,together with calculating,this research investigates features of spleen syndromes in this book comparing with that in modern times.Meanwhile,the reasons of the features and senses towards the contemporary syndrome doctrine are discussed.By means of this,it reflects its history staged significance in the development of the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory.
1 Features of spleen syndromes in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae comparing with that in modern times
1.1 From the view point of syndrome name
In this part,features of spleen syndromes in this book from the view of syndrome name are discussed,which reflects the subjectivity view points.Therefore,syndrome extraction, syndrome name formation and unification have been done step by step.Then,summarize the features of spleen syndromes comparing with that in modern times.
1.1.1 Certain syndromes,which are believed in higher layer in modern times,are seen as concrete ones in this book.It reflects that syndrome names in this book have some conceptualization trails.
1.1.2 Modern deficient syndrome are devided into Qi,blood,Yin,Yang and essence deficiency,while there's only qi deficiency in this book which are referred to spleen,spleen and stomach,spleen and lung,spleen and heart,spleen and kidney.
1.1.3 There are quite a lot of disorder of spleen Qi,incoordination between the spleen and stomach,disorder of spleen-stomach Qi and so on.But the significance of the "disorder" is not very clear.
1.1.4 Some syndrome concepts are not quite clear in this book,which means the connotation of the concepts are not completely sure.
1.1.5 From the syndrome ratio:deficiency(260)/excess(303),cold(158)/heat(119),it can be seen that there are more excess syndromes and heat syndromes in this book.
And among the excess syndromes,there are only 7 related to "damp",6 related to "sputum",while there are no damp-heat.
1.1.6 Among the excess syndromes,there are a large number of exopathogens which invade humans directly.It reflects that exopathic causes are quite important in the pathomechanism of the spleen syndrome.
1.1.7 It's believed that cold is connected with deficiency syndromes,while heat with excess ones in this book.
1.1.8 It's shown that there are evident features about spleen with other Zang organs.
1.2 From the view point of symptom
In this part,three spleen syndromes(syndrome of spleen-stomach Qi deficiency, syndrome of spleen-stomach deficiency-cold,syndrome of spleen-stomach deficiency) which appear the most often in this book are selected.Summary their symptoms,then compare with that in modern times.Therefore,it's shown the objectivity features of the pathomechanism.
1.2.1 Each spleen syndrome has its own pathomechanism apparente central tendency.
1.2.2 There are significant differences between some syndrome names,yet the symptoms differences are not very clear.
1.2.3 Compared with modern syndromes,smptoms about spleen are quite different.
1.3 Syndrome feature about the deficiency of Zang-organs(three to seven volumes) in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae
As three to seven volumes of this book describes syndromes and treatment of Zang-fu organs,in this part,we discuss the features more deeply.And the separation between theory and experience of the syndrome is its chief characteristic.
1.3.1 Compared with modern deficiency,syndromes of the Zang-organs deficiency are quite different:
(1) The syndrome name are quite different.
(2) The total symptoms are quite different.
(2) The total symptoms are quite different.
(3)The concrete symptoms are also quite different comparing with modern apprehension.
1.3.2 Syndrome features about the deficiency of Zang-organs result from the separation of theory and experience of the syndrome is its chief characteristic.
Though the total symptoms are separate,this feature is refected in the same syndromes of the same organ.It's to show in two aspects.
2 The reasons of the spleen syndrome features in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae
The features induced above are origining from the rudiment of the reatment with syndrome differentiation theory in the beginning of the Song Dynasty.
2.1 Because of the rudiment,some syndrome concepts are not quite clear,more excess syndromes and heat syndromes are appeared in this book,there are a large number of exopathogens which invade humans directly,and so on.
2.2 The theory and experience in this book have different sources.The former comes from The Yellow Emperor's Internal Classic and The General Treatise on the Pathogeneses and Symptoms of All Diseases,while the later is from all effective formulas at that time and before.
2.2.1 Though each spleen syndrome has its own pathomechanism apparente central tendency, symptom differences are not quite clear about the syndrome whose names are different obviously.
2.2.2 The total symptoms of the Zang-organs deficiency syndromes are separate. But different articles in the same syndromes of the same organ,the ratio between the same and different symptoms is low.And the concrete symptoms are also quite different with modern apprehension.
3 The significance of the spleen syndrome feature in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae
As its shown above,when we study on the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory,we should:
3.1 own development viewpoint,not look on all traditional data as the same.
3.2 own allround viewpoint,not comprehend the ancient syndrome according to the words simply.Instead,we should grasp its connotation by its position in the whole syndrome system(the pathogenisis,the symptom,the prescription,and so on).
4 Innovation of the topic
The syndrome system of The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae plays an important role in the development of the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory.So,by studying on the syndrome feature,it can retrieve the theory research deficiency,develop the history of this theory,and provide a model for the syndrome doctrine in modern times.
5 Feasibility about the topic
5.1 The writing background of the work is quite clear,and the edition is single.
5.2 The opinion of the knowledge resource is identify.It's theory is according to The General Treatise on the Pathogeneses and Symptoms of All Diseases,while the concrete syndromes are from all effective formulas at that time and before which are quite abundant.
5.3 The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae sums up the medical science before Song Dynasty,which reflects the whole development of the TCM thoroughly(including the syndrome doctrine development).
1《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候与现代脾脏相关证候比较的特点
1.1从证候名称角度
本部分从证候名称角度探讨《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点,以反映其对疾病病理机制主观性认识的特点。为此,分步骤进行了证候提取、证候名称形成、证候名称统一等工作,在此基础上,以现代脾脏相关证候为比较对象,从证候名称角度,总结了《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点。
1.1.1一些在现代层次较高的证候,在《圣惠方》中被作为具体证候。反映《圣惠方》的证候名称尚有概念化痕迹,所以上述证候概念的概括性不足。对虚证来说尚未分化。
1.1.2现代虚证多有气、血、阴、阳、精之分,而《圣惠方》虚证可直指“脾”、“脾胃”、“脾肺”、“心脾”、“脾肾”;且只有“气虚”,无“血、阴、阳、精”之虚。反映《圣惠方》的虚证尚未充分分化。
1.1.3《圣惠方》有相对较多的“脾气不和”、“脾胃不和”、“脾胃气不和”证,而“不和”的含义较为笼统,因此,反映《圣惠方》的证候尚未充分分化。
1.1.4《圣惠方》一些证候相关概念辨析不清。反映《圣惠方》对某些证候相关概念内涵的把握尚不完全确定。
1.1.5从《圣惠方》虚(频数260)/实(频数303)、寒(频数158)/热(频数119)证候(包括脾系证、脾与其它脏腑兼证)的比例,反映其实证、热证比例明显大于现代、可能与《圣惠方》五脏各性质证候基本对称的主观认识有关。
《圣惠方》实证中,涉及“湿”的证候的频数仅为7个,特别是无湿热证。涉及“痰”的证候的频数仅为7个。均明显少于现代。
1.1.6《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的实证中,外邪直接相犯者比例较大。反映《圣惠方》在对脾脏相关证候的病理机制认识中,外因占重要地位。
1.1.7《圣惠方》认为证候虚多兼寒、实多兼热。
1.1.8《圣惠方》脾与它脏兼证有明显的特点。
1.2从症状表现角度
本部分在前一部分证候提取、证候名称形成、证候名称统一等工作的基础上,选择《圣惠方》三个频数最高的脾脏相关证候(脾胃气虚证、脾胃虚冷证、脾胃虚弱证)作为代表,总结其症状表现,并与现代相关证候的症状表现进行比较。从症状表现角度,总结了《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的特点,以反映其对疾病病理机制客观性认识的特点。
1.2.1《圣惠方》每一脾脏相关证候各自的症状表现有较明显的集中趋势。
1.2.2《圣惠方》名称有明显差别的脾脏相关证候间,症状表现的差别有的不是很明显。
1.2.3《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候与现代同名证候比较,症状表现差别较大。
1.3《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门证候特点
《圣惠方》三～七卷分门比较系统地论述了脏腑证治,本部分对《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门的证候特点做较深入探讨,认为证候理论和经验的相分离是其主要特点。从另一角度完善对《圣惠方》证候特点的认识。
1.3.1脏虚补脏诸门的证候与现代各脏虚证比较有较大差别
(1)证候名称有较大差别。
(2)各脏总症状有较大差别。
(3)《圣惠方》各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较,也有较大差别。
1.3.2脏虚补脏诸门证候的特点是理论和经验的分离
脏虚补脏诸门各脏总症状尚有较强的独立性。但从同一脏内相同证候的角度看,脏虚补脏诸门的证候以理论(以证候名称为代表)和经验(以症状为代表)的分离为特点。表现在:
(1)同一脏内相同证候的不同条文间,相同症状频数与不同症状频数的比值较小。
(2)上述的“《圣惠方》各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较,也有较大差别”,也说明从同一脏内相同证候的角度看,脏虚补脏诸门的证候以理论(以证候名称为代表)和经验(以症状为代表)的分离为特点。
2《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候特点的产生原因
《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候的上述特点,应是源于宋初辨证论治学说发展的初步性。
2.1由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,所以《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候中,证候名称尚有概念化痕迹、对某些证候相关概念内涵的把握也尚不完全确定、证候(包括虚证)也尚未充分分化、实证和热证的比例明显大于现代(具有五脏各性质证候基本对称的主观认识)。
由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,所以《圣惠方》在对脾脏相关证候病理机制的认识中,外因占重要地位;与现代同名证候比较,症状表现差别也较大。
由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,所以《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门的证候中,与现代各脏虚证比较证候名称有较大差别、各脏总症状有较大差别、各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较也有较大差别。
2.2《圣惠方》的理论和经验具有不同来源。理论方面以《内经》——《诸病源候论》为主要来源;经验方面来源于当时及以前各家验方。
由于辨证论治学说发展的初步性,使不同来源的《圣惠方》的理论和经验未能完全统一,从而形成证候理论和经验相分离的特点。这表现在:
2.2.1《圣惠方》脾脏相关证候中,虽每一脾脏相关证候各自的症状表现有较明显的集中趋势(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的统一),但名称有明显差别的脾脏相关证候间,症状表现的差别有的不是很明显(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的分离)。
2.2.2《圣惠方》三～七卷脏虚补脏诸门的证候中,虽各脏总症状尚有较强的独立性(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的统一),但同一脏内相同证候的不同条文间,相同症状频数与不同症状频数的比值较小;各脏具体虚证的症状与其现代理解比较,也有较大差别(反映证候理论和经验一定程度的分离)。
3《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候特点对现代证候学说的意义
脾脏相关证候的上述特点和产生原因,提示现代研究中医辨证论治学说:
3.1应有发展的观点,不可把数千年的资料等同视之。
3.2应有全面的观点,对古代的证候不可简单地按字面意义理解,而应根据其在当时整个证候体系中的位置以及所代表的临床信息(病因、症状表现、治疗方药等)准确了解其内涵。
4本研究的创新点
《圣惠方》的证候体系在中医证候学说的历史发展中具有一定的重要地位,对《圣惠方》中脾脏相关证候特点的系统研究,有助于弥补目前对该书理论方面研究的不足,完善对中医辨证论治学说发展历史的认识,为现代证候学说提供借鉴。
5本研究的可行性
5.1《圣惠方》成书背景比较明确,版本比较单一;
5.2对《圣惠方》知识来源的看法比较明确。其理论性论述主要以隋·巢元方的《诸病源候论》为依据,故理论观点较为统一;而具体病证的诊疗经验则主要来自宋以前的各医家、医籍的经验医方,且来源广泛,资料丰富。
5.3《圣惠方》集宋以前医学之大成,充分反映了当时的医学发展(包括证候学说发展)状况。
In the recent several years,studies on origin and development of the syndrome have been paid more and more attention.The syndrome doctrine of The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae plays an important role in the development of the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory.And syndrome differentiation of the Zang-fu organs is quite typical among it.By using traditional literature,theoretical research methods,together with calculating,this research investigates features of spleen syndromes in this book comparing with that in modern times.Meanwhile,the reasons of the features and senses towards the contemporary syndrome doctrine are discussed.By means of this,it reflects its history staged significance in the development of the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory.
1 Features of spleen syndromes in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae comparing with that in modern times
1.1 From the view point of syndrome name
In this part,features of spleen syndromes in this book from the view of syndrome name are discussed,which reflects the subjectivity view points.Therefore,syndrome extraction, syndrome name formation and unification have been done step by step.Then,summarize the features of spleen syndromes comparing with that in modern times.
1.1.1 Certain syndromes,which are believed in higher layer in modern times,are seen as concrete ones in this book.It reflects that syndrome names in this book have some conceptualization trails.
1.1.2 Modern deficient syndrome are devided into Qi,blood,Yin,Yang and essence deficiency,while there's only qi deficiency in this book which are referred to spleen,spleen and stomach,spleen and lung,spleen and heart,spleen and kidney.
1.1.3 There are quite a lot of disorder of spleen Qi,incoordination between the spleen and stomach,disorder of spleen-stomach Qi and so on.But the significance of the "disorder" is not very clear.
1.1.4 Some syndrome concepts are not quite clear in this book,which means the connotation of the concepts are not completely sure.
1.1.5 From the syndrome ratio:deficiency(260)/excess(303),cold(158)/heat(119),it can be seen that there are more excess syndromes and heat syndromes in this book.
And among the excess syndromes,there are only 7 related to "damp",6 related to "sputum",while there are no damp-heat.
1.1.6 Among the excess syndromes,there are a large number of exopathogens which invade humans directly.It reflects that exopathic causes are quite important in the pathomechanism of the spleen syndrome.
1.1.7 It's believed that cold is connected with deficiency syndromes,while heat with excess ones in this book.
1.1.8 It's shown that there are evident features about spleen with other Zang organs.
1.2 From the view point of symptom
In this part,three spleen syndromes(syndrome of spleen-stomach Qi deficiency, syndrome of spleen-stomach deficiency-cold,syndrome of spleen-stomach deficiency) which appear the most often in this book are selected.Summary their symptoms,then compare with that in modern times.Therefore,it's shown the objectivity features of the pathomechanism.
1.2.1 Each spleen syndrome has its own pathomechanism apparente central tendency.
1.2.2 There are significant differences between some syndrome names,yet the symptoms differences are not very clear.
1.2.3 Compared with modern syndromes,smptoms about spleen are quite different.
1.3 Syndrome feature about the deficiency of Zang-organs(three to seven volumes) in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae
As three to seven volumes of this book describes syndromes and treatment of Zang-fu organs,in this part,we discuss the features more deeply.And the separation between theory and experience of the syndrome is its chief characteristic.
1.3.1 Compared with modern deficiency,syndromes of the Zang-organs deficiency are quite different:
(1) The syndrome name are quite different.
(2) The total symptoms are quite different.
(2) The total symptoms are quite different.
(3)The concrete symptoms are also quite different comparing with modern apprehension.
1.3.2 Syndrome features about the deficiency of Zang-organs result from the separation of theory and experience of the syndrome is its chief characteristic.
Though the total symptoms are separate,this feature is refected in the same syndromes of the same organ.It's to show in two aspects.
2 The reasons of the spleen syndrome features in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae
The features induced above are origining from the rudiment of the reatment with syndrome differentiation theory in the beginning of the Song Dynasty.
2.1 Because of the rudiment,some syndrome concepts are not quite clear,more excess syndromes and heat syndromes are appeared in this book,there are a large number of exopathogens which invade humans directly,and so on.
2.2 The theory and experience in this book have different sources.The former comes from The Yellow Emperor's Internal Classic and The General Treatise on the Pathogeneses and Symptoms of All Diseases,while the later is from all effective formulas at that time and before.
2.2.1 Though each spleen syndrome has its own pathomechanism apparente central tendency, symptom differences are not quite clear about the syndrome whose names are different obviously.
2.2.2 The total symptoms of the Zang-organs deficiency syndromes are separate. But different articles in the same syndromes of the same organ,the ratio between the same and different symptoms is low.And the concrete symptoms are also quite different with modern apprehension.
3 The significance of the spleen syndrome feature in The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae
As its shown above,when we study on the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory,we should:
3.1 own development viewpoint,not look on all traditional data as the same.
3.2 own allround viewpoint,not comprehend the ancient syndrome according to the words simply.Instead,we should grasp its connotation by its position in the whole syndrome system(the pathogenisis,the symptom,the prescription,and so on).
4 Innovation of the topic
The syndrome system of The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae plays an important role in the development of the TCM reatment with syndrome differentiation theory.So,by studying on the syndrome feature,it can retrieve the theory research deficiency,develop the history of this theory,and provide a model for the syndrome doctrine in modern times.
5 Feasibility about the topic
5.1 The writing background of the work is quite clear,and the edition is single.
5.2 The opinion of the knowledge resource is identify.It's theory is according to The General Treatise on the Pathogeneses and Symptoms of All Diseases,while the concrete syndromes are from all effective formulas at that time and before which are quite abundant.
5.3 The Peaceful Holy Benevolence Formulae sums up the medical science before Song Dynasty,which reflects the whole development of the TCM thoroughly(including the syndrome doctrine development).
引文
[1]宋·王怀隐,等.太平圣惠方.北京:人民卫生出版社,1958:内容简介,出版说明.
[2]严菱舟.关于《太平圣惠方》.中医杂志,1962,(8):31-32.
[3]林娜.《太平圣惠方》阙文辑补.广州中医学院学报,1987,4(2):40.
[4]赵璞珊.《大平圣惠方》《圣济总录》《太平惠民和剂局方》介绍.中医杂志,1989,(12):56-57.
[5]严世芸.中医学术发展史.上海:上海中医药大学出版社,2004:(241,264,270,271,292,275).
[6]田文敬.略论《太平圣惠方》编著特点.陕西中医,2006,26(9):1136.
[7]李林.北宋官刻雕版医书浅谈.中医发展论坛——中医药发展与人类健康,525-528.
[8]李成文,倪世美.论宋金元时期基础理论发展特点及对后世的影响.浙江中医学院学报2003,27(2):11-13.
[9]俞慈韵,俞敏.中医病源学说发展概论.中国中医基础医学杂志,2006,12(3):214-215.
[10]方肇勤.《太平圣惠方》有关辨证论治的特点和贡献.河南中医,2006,26(6):80-82.
[11]赵立宇.活血行气法纠正阴阳偏胜偏衰——《太平圣惠方》有关证治初探.上海中医药杂志,1998(4):7-9.
[12]赵立宇,黄朝,洪庆祥.和法亦贵阴阳互用——《备急千金要方》、《太平圣惠方》中有关证治初探.河北中医,2001,23(3):231-232.
[13]王莉.《太平圣惠方》甘寒法举要.浙江中医杂志,2005(6):236-238.
[14]王莉.《太平圣惠方》论治中风的特点和成就.上海中医药大学学报,2004,18(1):8.
[15]王莉.五脏中风病机证候探源.上海中医药大学学报,2000,14(4):10-12.
[16]王莉.唐宋“五脏中风”证治特色探析.上海中医药杂志,2001(9):40-42.
[17]王莉.《太平圣惠方》滋润治劳论.浙江中医杂志,2004(6):250-251.
[18]梁钊.中西医防治糖尿病浅识.光明中医,2004,19(3):18-19.
[19]靳丽珍.探讨古医籍对消渴病的认识.黑龙江中医药,1997(5):5-7.
[20]赵进喜,王世东.糖尿病肾病及糖尿病足中医临床举隅.中国临床医生,2005,33(6):43-44.
[21]张山广,王金荣.《太平圣惠方》消渴证方药分析.河南中医,1994,14(4):236.
[22]朱清静,盛国光.阴黄理论的形成与证治探讨.中医研究,2006,19(2):1-3.
[23]齐向华,梅彤.解表药在肝病中的应用.中国中医药信息杂志,1997,4(3):28-29.
[24]娄峰,魏瑞河.北宋时期中国皮肤科的发展.开封医专学报,2000,19(4):79-80.
[25]梁文学,周建辉.痃证究属何病.国医论坛,1998,13(5):19.
[26]冯翔.关于宋代至明代南方的瘴病及其历史的研究.广西民族大学学报(自然科学版),2007,13(2):28-34.
[27]陈美南,李富玉.从痰毒辨治疾病初探.中医药临床杂志,2006,18(6):625-627.
[28]毛以林.动物类药治疗关节痹流源探究.中医药通报,2004,3(6):10-12.
[29]肖林榕.《太平圣惠方》从肝论治骨关节疼痛的探讨.中医文献杂志,2002(3):24-25).
[30]卢跃卿,任小巧.五心烦热辨治体会.河南中医,2000,20(1):64.
[31]刘承,张海燕.汉以来中医防治健忘的主要理论与经验.陕西中医学院学报,2004,27(1):68-69.
[32]潘海燕,吴荣华.口苦之非热辨.河北中医,2007,29(6):520-521.
[33]谷杰法.压舌疗法揭密.中国民间疗法,1999(2):30.
[34]黄霞.浅谈宋代自然药汁的运用.江西中医药,2007,8(4):15-16.
[35]薛广成,杨冬青等.浅谈五善七恶与疡科疾病.中医药学报,1999(6):11.
[36]金永健.浅谈中医皮肤病治疗.临床和实验医学杂志,2006,11(5):1841.
[37]宋业强.《太平圣惠方》白癜风论治浅析.四川中医,2006,24(12):33-34.
[38]陈惠英,许爱娥.隋至清代中医医籍中白癜风相关论治简析.中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志,2006,5(1):57-59.
[39]吴翠秀.从“松香治癞”谈起.家庭中医药,2006,(9):11.
[40]叶新苗.宋金元时期的中医骨伤科文献概论.浙江中医学院学报,2001,25(5):7.
[41]丁继华.伤科分类的探讨.中国中医骨伤科杂志,2004,12(1):59-60.
[42]康建华,许少健.古代中医治疗骨肿瘤的方法浅析.中医正骨,2006,18(2):62-64.
[43]费振钟.江南女科及薛已在明清的文化潜影.书屋.2007(7):70-74.
[44]鲍健欣,张玉萍,等.《太平圣惠方》妇科同证异病的组方特色.山东中医杂志,2007,26(7):435-436.
[45]李铮,孙涛.独活寄生汤加味治疗产后关节痛.内蒙古中医药,1982,(7):22.
[46]苗晋.《太平圣惠方》对儿科学的贡献.陕西中医,1984,5(7):48.
[47]陈达理.烙脐法始于《太平圣惠方》·,中华医史杂志,1984,14(3):190-193.
[48]陈代斌.脐风病源流考.浙江中医杂志,1987,22(9):421.
[49]陈代斌.《太平圣惠方》儿科学思想探要.光明中医,2004(2):4-6.
[50]刘书奎.小儿疳证源流考.中华医史杂志,1997,27(4):219.
[51]唐彦.中医调理小儿脾胃的特色.河北中医,2003,25(11):826-827.
[52]李复峰,张丽君.宋元明清代针灸眼科学简史.针灸学报,1989(2):42-44.
[53]董泽洪.《太平圣惠方》对内障眼病的贡献.陕西中医学院学报,1993,16(4):30.
[54]王丽云.中医治疗结晶样视网膜变性的初探.中国社区医师,2005,7(8):52-53.
[55]魏稼.《太平圣惠方》的针灸学成就.安徽中医学院学报,1982,(试(1)刊):34-36.
[56]冯禾昌.从《太平圣惠方·针经》看唐代针灸医学.中华医史杂志,1997,27(3):140-143.
[57]林树才,冯禾昌.略谈《太平圣惠方·针经》对针灸学的贡献.中医文献杂志,1992(2):11-13.
[58]马树田,方晓阳.灸法衰落原因的探讨与思考.医学与哲学(人文社会医学版),2006,27(9):60-62.
[59]诸毅晖,李静等.腧穴定位法研究现状.成都中医药大学学报,1999,22(3):59-61.
[60]王广军,郭义等.刺络放血疗法临床应用总结.天津中医药,2003,20(4):43-45.
[61]王亚渭,益志凯.膏摩的起源与发展.陕西中医学院学报,2004,27(5):15-16.
[62]季远,刘爱华.膏摩初探.按摩与导引,1999,15(3):5-7.
[63]裴晶,季寒梅.浅淡中医饮食护理.中国民间疗法,2007,15(4):49.
[64]杨冰.浅谈乳腺癌的预防和护理.中国中医基础医学杂志,2007,13(1):80.
[65]胡凤媛.略论《内经》“谨和五味”养生观.国医论坛,2007,22(1):17.
[66]于维萍.药膳的渊源.山东食品科技,1999(1):8-9.
[67]柴玉花.食疗佳品话药粥.药膳食疗,2005(12):4-6.
[68]周俭.发热的食疗.中国民间疗法,2005,13(6):58-59.
[69]赵广兰.黄精传说神,益寿驻颜奇.药膳食疗,2005(12):42.
[70]梁兆松.柏仁传说神,养心驻颜奇.药膳食疗,2005(9):20.
[71]胡龙才,陈可冀.《太平圣惠方》抗老经验举隅.浙江中医杂志,1988,23(1):39-40.
[72]王均容.古籍中的延龄抗衰粥.东方药膳,2006(5):26.
[73]杨方尧,黄坚.《太平圣惠方》中抗衰延寿方药研究.贵阳中医学院学报,1998,20(1)7-8.
[74]蒋力生.道教服食方的传承演变.江西中医学院学报,2004,16(1):21-22.
[75]王红松.《千金方》对中医美容的贡献.中国美容医学,2006,15(8):954-955.
[76]王萍.古方“七白膏”新用.甘肃中医学院学报,2007,24(4):31-33.
[77]胡献国.杏脸含春说杏花.东方药膳,2006(11):4-5.
[78]程磐基.宋元明清药物剂量的考证与研究.上海中医药杂志,2004,38(7):6-8.
[79]陶晓华.中医文献中的专病通治方.江西中医药,1997,28(1):44-45.
[80]李孝刚.良方荟萃,其功至伟——宋代医家方书初探,上海中医药杂志,1995(8):1-4.
[81]章健.宋代官刊方书和个人方书特点探讨.中华医史杂志,2001,31(2):75-77.
[82]王维姣.中药炮制与疗效的关系.辽宁药物与临床,1998,1(4):174-175.
[83]郭雪申,刘军等.从中药材探讨中药临床药学.中医药管理杂志,2006,14(12):64-65.
[84]叶新美,马志舜.浅谈中药调剂工作的重要意义.时珍国药研究,1998,9(2):173.
[85]崔箭.炭药源流论.辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(10):816-817.
[86]彭国平,欧阳斌等.人尿在医药中的应用.湖南中医药导报,2004,10(4):57-58.
[87]赖荣,刘晓文等.何首乌炮制沿革与现代研究.中国中医药信息杂志,1999,6(9):19-20.
[88]张锁庆.麻黄的临症应用经验.甘肃中医,2006,19(12):34.
[89]张锁庆.芍药利尿通便说.实用中西医结合临床,2004,4(5):79.
[90]夏小军.童便止血刍议.中医药学刊,2005,23(12):2155.
[91]项育民.略谈《太平圣惠方》中丸剂的赋形剂.中国药学杂志,1992,27(3):179-181.
[92]田思胜.宋本《伤寒论》与宋金时期《伤寒论》传本的比较研究.国医论坛,1998,13(2):6.
[93]史兰华.《伤寒论》传本、佚文考略.山东中医学院学报,1996,20(1):60-62.
[94]米鹂.《伤寒论》《金匮要略方论》外仲景遗方考.中华医史杂志,2006,36(3):137-141.
[95]章碧明.从《太平圣惠方》谈中医药发展中值得关注的问题.中医发展论坛——中医药发展与人类健康,506-508.
[96]郑曙光,戎志斌.中苗医熏蒸疗法述略.中国民族医药杂志,2007(7):27-28.
[97]刘柏龄,邓福树.中医骨伤科各家学说.北京:人民卫生出版社,1991.7,9.
[98]张晓峰,杨志新.《脾胃论》阴火探析.辽宁中医学院学报,2002,4(2):102-103.
[99]程科,唐勇,姜杰,等.《血证论》对脾阴的论述初探.辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(9):1100-1101.
[100]崔震霞.朱丹溪阳有余阴不足论新探.湖南中医学院学报,1996,16(2):14-16.
[101]金丽阳.有余阴不足论与阳不足阴无余论探微.天津中医学院学报,2001,20(1):6-7.
[102]闫平,朱文玲.朱丹溪《格致余论》学术思想探析.辽宁中医药大学学报,2006,8(4):32-33.
[103]魏江磊.中风热毒论.北京中医药大学学报,2003,26(1):7-11.
[104]孙中堂.中医内科史略.北京:中国古籍出版社,1994.103.
[105]马继兴.中医文献学.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.173.
[106]中国中医研究院图书馆编.全国中医图书联合目录.北京:中国古籍出版社,1991.211.
[107]中华人民共和国国家标准·中医临床诊疗术语证候部分(GB/T16751.2-1997).中国标准出版社,1997.28.
[108]朱文锋.中医诊断学.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1995.149,151.
[109]杨辉.泻心汤治心下痞之我见.光明中医,2006,21(12):18.
[110]李浩然.癌肿化疗反应之中医证治.天津中医,1987(3):5-6.
[111]肖晖.半夏泻心汤临床应用举.湖南中医杂志,1993,9(3):6-7.
[112]韩先知.中成药临床应用体会点滴.四川中医,1899,(12):21-22.
[113]尹春喜.脾病证治刍议.中国现代药物应用,2007,1(4):47-48.
[114]李淑萍,李玲.《内经》脾病证候规律初探.辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(1):20-21.
[115]孙阳,刘国轩.脾虚发病之我见.黑龙江中医药,1996,(6):1-3.
[116]钱会南.论脾虚证现代研究特点与存在问题及对策.中国中医基础医学杂志,2002,8(12):63-64.
[117]谭展望.吴效科.脾虚证的病机演化规律.黑龙江中医药,2006,(1):3-4.
[118]吉保民,刘士敬.脾气虚证概念的内涵和外延浅析.中医药信息,1996,(4):3.
[119]钱静华.脾胃病辨证论治探微.浙江中医药大学学报,2006,30(6):594-595.
[120]潘森,袁红霞.寒热并用法调治脾胃病浅析.新中医,2007,39(11):93-94.
[121]田丙坤.脾主运化的机理及意义浅析.陕西中医函授,1996(2):23-24.
[122]吴敦序.中医诊断学基础理论.上海:上海科技出版社,1995.62.
[123]张博生,陈静.脾胃病临证研究.浙江中医学院学报,2005,29(1):8-9.
[124]杨春波,柯晓,李秀娟等.脾胃湿热证的临床研究.福建中医学院学报,1999,9(4):1-6.
[125]劳绍贤,陈更新.脾胃湿热证研究中几个关键问题的探讨.广州中医药大学学报,2004,21(5):361-364.
[126]汪美荣.苦辛法治疗脾胃湿热证.河南中医学院学报,2004,(1):61-62.
[127]段东印.脾胃病治疗初探.河南中医,2003,23(12):52-53.
[128]杨雪梅,李巧芬,李德杏,等.晋唐时期脏腑辨证学说的发展特点.中华医史杂志,2007,37(2):67-70.
[129]赵瑞珍.晋隋唐时期脏腑辨证方法学研究.天津中医学院2000级硕士论文:30.
[130]李经纬,等主编.中医大辞典.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,第2版,1753.
[131]翟书正.《诸病源候论》略论.信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),1995;8(2):208-216.
[132]陈小野.中医学发展史的渐成论观点.浙江中医学院学报,2000;24(3):1.
[2]严菱舟.关于《太平圣惠方》.中医杂志,1962,(8):31-32.
[3]林娜.《太平圣惠方》阙文辑补.广州中医学院学报,1987,4(2):40.
[4]赵璞珊.《大平圣惠方》《圣济总录》《太平惠民和剂局方》介绍.中医杂志,1989,(12):56-57.
[5]严世芸.中医学术发展史.上海:上海中医药大学出版社,2004:(241,264,270,271,292,275).
[6]田文敬.略论《太平圣惠方》编著特点.陕西中医,2006,26(9):1136.
[7]李林.北宋官刻雕版医书浅谈.中医发展论坛——中医药发展与人类健康,525-528.
[8]李成文,倪世美.论宋金元时期基础理论发展特点及对后世的影响.浙江中医学院学报2003,27(2):11-13.
[9]俞慈韵,俞敏.中医病源学说发展概论.中国中医基础医学杂志,2006,12(3):214-215.
[10]方肇勤.《太平圣惠方》有关辨证论治的特点和贡献.河南中医,2006,26(6):80-82.
[11]赵立宇.活血行气法纠正阴阳偏胜偏衰——《太平圣惠方》有关证治初探.上海中医药杂志,1998(4):7-9.
[12]赵立宇,黄朝,洪庆祥.和法亦贵阴阳互用——《备急千金要方》、《太平圣惠方》中有关证治初探.河北中医,2001,23(3):231-232.
[13]王莉.《太平圣惠方》甘寒法举要.浙江中医杂志,2005(6):236-238.
[14]王莉.《太平圣惠方》论治中风的特点和成就.上海中医药大学学报,2004,18(1):8.
[15]王莉.五脏中风病机证候探源.上海中医药大学学报,2000,14(4):10-12.
[16]王莉.唐宋“五脏中风”证治特色探析.上海中医药杂志,2001(9):40-42.
[17]王莉.《太平圣惠方》滋润治劳论.浙江中医杂志,2004(6):250-251.
[18]梁钊.中西医防治糖尿病浅识.光明中医,2004,19(3):18-19.
[19]靳丽珍.探讨古医籍对消渴病的认识.黑龙江中医药,1997(5):5-7.
[20]赵进喜,王世东.糖尿病肾病及糖尿病足中医临床举隅.中国临床医生,2005,33(6):43-44.
[21]张山广,王金荣.《太平圣惠方》消渴证方药分析.河南中医,1994,14(4):236.
[22]朱清静,盛国光.阴黄理论的形成与证治探讨.中医研究,2006,19(2):1-3.
[23]齐向华,梅彤.解表药在肝病中的应用.中国中医药信息杂志,1997,4(3):28-29.
[24]娄峰,魏瑞河.北宋时期中国皮肤科的发展.开封医专学报,2000,19(4):79-80.
[25]梁文学,周建辉.痃证究属何病.国医论坛,1998,13(5):19.
[26]冯翔.关于宋代至明代南方的瘴病及其历史的研究.广西民族大学学报(自然科学版),2007,13(2):28-34.
[27]陈美南,李富玉.从痰毒辨治疾病初探.中医药临床杂志,2006,18(6):625-627.
[28]毛以林.动物类药治疗关节痹流源探究.中医药通报,2004,3(6):10-12.
[29]肖林榕.《太平圣惠方》从肝论治骨关节疼痛的探讨.中医文献杂志,2002(3):24-25).
[30]卢跃卿,任小巧.五心烦热辨治体会.河南中医,2000,20(1):64.
[31]刘承,张海燕.汉以来中医防治健忘的主要理论与经验.陕西中医学院学报,2004,27(1):68-69.
[32]潘海燕,吴荣华.口苦之非热辨.河北中医,2007,29(6):520-521.
[33]谷杰法.压舌疗法揭密.中国民间疗法,1999(2):30.
[34]黄霞.浅谈宋代自然药汁的运用.江西中医药,2007,8(4):15-16.
[35]薛广成,杨冬青等.浅谈五善七恶与疡科疾病.中医药学报,1999(6):11.
[36]金永健.浅谈中医皮肤病治疗.临床和实验医学杂志,2006,11(5):1841.
[37]宋业强.《太平圣惠方》白癜风论治浅析.四川中医,2006,24(12):33-34.
[38]陈惠英,许爱娥.隋至清代中医医籍中白癜风相关论治简析.中国中西医结合皮肤性病学杂志,2006,5(1):57-59.
[39]吴翠秀.从“松香治癞”谈起.家庭中医药,2006,(9):11.
[40]叶新苗.宋金元时期的中医骨伤科文献概论.浙江中医学院学报,2001,25(5):7.
[41]丁继华.伤科分类的探讨.中国中医骨伤科杂志,2004,12(1):59-60.
[42]康建华,许少健.古代中医治疗骨肿瘤的方法浅析.中医正骨,2006,18(2):62-64.
[43]费振钟.江南女科及薛已在明清的文化潜影.书屋.2007(7):70-74.
[44]鲍健欣,张玉萍,等.《太平圣惠方》妇科同证异病的组方特色.山东中医杂志,2007,26(7):435-436.
[45]李铮,孙涛.独活寄生汤加味治疗产后关节痛.内蒙古中医药,1982,(7):22.
[46]苗晋.《太平圣惠方》对儿科学的贡献.陕西中医,1984,5(7):48.
[47]陈达理.烙脐法始于《太平圣惠方》·,中华医史杂志,1984,14(3):190-193.
[48]陈代斌.脐风病源流考.浙江中医杂志,1987,22(9):421.
[49]陈代斌.《太平圣惠方》儿科学思想探要.光明中医,2004(2):4-6.
[50]刘书奎.小儿疳证源流考.中华医史杂志,1997,27(4):219.
[51]唐彦.中医调理小儿脾胃的特色.河北中医,2003,25(11):826-827.
[52]李复峰,张丽君.宋元明清代针灸眼科学简史.针灸学报,1989(2):42-44.
[53]董泽洪.《太平圣惠方》对内障眼病的贡献.陕西中医学院学报,1993,16(4):30.
[54]王丽云.中医治疗结晶样视网膜变性的初探.中国社区医师,2005,7(8):52-53.
[55]魏稼.《太平圣惠方》的针灸学成就.安徽中医学院学报,1982,(试(1)刊):34-36.
[56]冯禾昌.从《太平圣惠方·针经》看唐代针灸医学.中华医史杂志,1997,27(3):140-143.
[57]林树才,冯禾昌.略谈《太平圣惠方·针经》对针灸学的贡献.中医文献杂志,1992(2):11-13.
[58]马树田,方晓阳.灸法衰落原因的探讨与思考.医学与哲学(人文社会医学版),2006,27(9):60-62.
[59]诸毅晖,李静等.腧穴定位法研究现状.成都中医药大学学报,1999,22(3):59-61.
[60]王广军,郭义等.刺络放血疗法临床应用总结.天津中医药,2003,20(4):43-45.
[61]王亚渭,益志凯.膏摩的起源与发展.陕西中医学院学报,2004,27(5):15-16.
[62]季远,刘爱华.膏摩初探.按摩与导引,1999,15(3):5-7.
[63]裴晶,季寒梅.浅淡中医饮食护理.中国民间疗法,2007,15(4):49.
[64]杨冰.浅谈乳腺癌的预防和护理.中国中医基础医学杂志,2007,13(1):80.
[65]胡凤媛.略论《内经》“谨和五味”养生观.国医论坛,2007,22(1):17.
[66]于维萍.药膳的渊源.山东食品科技,1999(1):8-9.
[67]柴玉花.食疗佳品话药粥.药膳食疗,2005(12):4-6.
[68]周俭.发热的食疗.中国民间疗法,2005,13(6):58-59.
[69]赵广兰.黄精传说神,益寿驻颜奇.药膳食疗,2005(12):42.
[70]梁兆松.柏仁传说神,养心驻颜奇.药膳食疗,2005(9):20.
[71]胡龙才,陈可冀.《太平圣惠方》抗老经验举隅.浙江中医杂志,1988,23(1):39-40.
[72]王均容.古籍中的延龄抗衰粥.东方药膳,2006(5):26.
[73]杨方尧,黄坚.《太平圣惠方》中抗衰延寿方药研究.贵阳中医学院学报,1998,20(1)7-8.
[74]蒋力生.道教服食方的传承演变.江西中医学院学报,2004,16(1):21-22.
[75]王红松.《千金方》对中医美容的贡献.中国美容医学,2006,15(8):954-955.
[76]王萍.古方“七白膏”新用.甘肃中医学院学报,2007,24(4):31-33.
[77]胡献国.杏脸含春说杏花.东方药膳,2006(11):4-5.
[78]程磐基.宋元明清药物剂量的考证与研究.上海中医药杂志,2004,38(7):6-8.
[79]陶晓华.中医文献中的专病通治方.江西中医药,1997,28(1):44-45.
[80]李孝刚.良方荟萃,其功至伟——宋代医家方书初探,上海中医药杂志,1995(8):1-4.
[81]章健.宋代官刊方书和个人方书特点探讨.中华医史杂志,2001,31(2):75-77.
[82]王维姣.中药炮制与疗效的关系.辽宁药物与临床,1998,1(4):174-175.
[83]郭雪申,刘军等.从中药材探讨中药临床药学.中医药管理杂志,2006,14(12):64-65.
[84]叶新美,马志舜.浅谈中药调剂工作的重要意义.时珍国药研究,1998,9(2):173.
[85]崔箭.炭药源流论.辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(10):816-817.
[86]彭国平,欧阳斌等.人尿在医药中的应用.湖南中医药导报,2004,10(4):57-58.
[87]赖荣,刘晓文等.何首乌炮制沿革与现代研究.中国中医药信息杂志,1999,6(9):19-20.
[88]张锁庆.麻黄的临症应用经验.甘肃中医,2006,19(12):34.
[89]张锁庆.芍药利尿通便说.实用中西医结合临床,2004,4(5):79.
[90]夏小军.童便止血刍议.中医药学刊,2005,23(12):2155.
[91]项育民.略谈《太平圣惠方》中丸剂的赋形剂.中国药学杂志,1992,27(3):179-181.
[92]田思胜.宋本《伤寒论》与宋金时期《伤寒论》传本的比较研究.国医论坛,1998,13(2):6.
[93]史兰华.《伤寒论》传本、佚文考略.山东中医学院学报,1996,20(1):60-62.
[94]米鹂.《伤寒论》《金匮要略方论》外仲景遗方考.中华医史杂志,2006,36(3):137-141.
[95]章碧明.从《太平圣惠方》谈中医药发展中值得关注的问题.中医发展论坛——中医药发展与人类健康,506-508.
[96]郑曙光,戎志斌.中苗医熏蒸疗法述略.中国民族医药杂志,2007(7):27-28.
[97]刘柏龄,邓福树.中医骨伤科各家学说.北京:人民卫生出版社,1991.7,9.
[98]张晓峰,杨志新.《脾胃论》阴火探析.辽宁中医学院学报,2002,4(2):102-103.
[99]程科,唐勇,姜杰,等.《血证论》对脾阴的论述初探.辽宁中医杂志,2006,33(9):1100-1101.
[100]崔震霞.朱丹溪阳有余阴不足论新探.湖南中医学院学报,1996,16(2):14-16.
[101]金丽阳.有余阴不足论与阳不足阴无余论探微.天津中医学院学报,2001,20(1):6-7.
[102]闫平,朱文玲.朱丹溪《格致余论》学术思想探析.辽宁中医药大学学报,2006,8(4):32-33.
[103]魏江磊.中风热毒论.北京中医药大学学报,2003,26(1):7-11.
[104]孙中堂.中医内科史略.北京:中国古籍出版社,1994.103.
[105]马继兴.中医文献学.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1990.173.
[106]中国中医研究院图书馆编.全国中医图书联合目录.北京:中国古籍出版社,1991.211.
[107]中华人民共和国国家标准·中医临床诊疗术语证候部分(GB/T16751.2-1997).中国标准出版社,1997.28.
[108]朱文锋.中医诊断学.上海:上海科学技术出版社,1995.149,151.
[109]杨辉.泻心汤治心下痞之我见.光明中医,2006,21(12):18.
[110]李浩然.癌肿化疗反应之中医证治.天津中医,1987(3):5-6.
[111]肖晖.半夏泻心汤临床应用举.湖南中医杂志,1993,9(3):6-7.
[112]韩先知.中成药临床应用体会点滴.四川中医,1899,(12):21-22.
[113]尹春喜.脾病证治刍议.中国现代药物应用,2007,1(4):47-48.
[114]李淑萍,李玲.《内经》脾病证候规律初探.辽宁中医杂志,2004,31(1):20-21.
[115]孙阳,刘国轩.脾虚发病之我见.黑龙江中医药,1996,(6):1-3.
[116]钱会南.论脾虚证现代研究特点与存在问题及对策.中国中医基础医学杂志,2002,8(12):63-64.
[117]谭展望.吴效科.脾虚证的病机演化规律.黑龙江中医药,2006,(1):3-4.
[118]吉保民,刘士敬.脾气虚证概念的内涵和外延浅析.中医药信息,1996,(4):3.
[119]钱静华.脾胃病辨证论治探微.浙江中医药大学学报,2006,30(6):594-595.
[120]潘森,袁红霞.寒热并用法调治脾胃病浅析.新中医,2007,39(11):93-94.
[121]田丙坤.脾主运化的机理及意义浅析.陕西中医函授,1996(2):23-24.
[122]吴敦序.中医诊断学基础理论.上海:上海科技出版社,1995.62.
[123]张博生,陈静.脾胃病临证研究.浙江中医学院学报,2005,29(1):8-9.
[124]杨春波,柯晓,李秀娟等.脾胃湿热证的临床研究.福建中医学院学报,1999,9(4):1-6.
[125]劳绍贤,陈更新.脾胃湿热证研究中几个关键问题的探讨.广州中医药大学学报,2004,21(5):361-364.
[126]汪美荣.苦辛法治疗脾胃湿热证.河南中医学院学报,2004,(1):61-62.
[127]段东印.脾胃病治疗初探.河南中医,2003,23(12):52-53.
[128]杨雪梅,李巧芬,李德杏,等.晋唐时期脏腑辨证学说的发展特点.中华医史杂志,2007,37(2):67-70.
[129]赵瑞珍.晋隋唐时期脏腑辨证方法学研究.天津中医学院2000级硕士论文:30.
[130]李经纬,等主编.中医大辞典.北京:人民卫生出版社,2006,第2版,1753.
[131]翟书正.《诸病源候论》略论.信阳师范学院学报(自然科学版),1995;8(2):208-216.
[132]陈小野.中医学发展史的渐成论观点.浙江中医学院学报,2000;24(3):1.