龙虎山丹霞地貌景观危岩特征及保护研究
|
摘要
我国山地风景区内普遍存在很多外形独特的危岩体。因其具有很强的形象性、感染性、独特性、神奇性等旅游观赏及美学欣赏价值而称为景观危岩。这些特殊的危岩体属于地质遗迹，具有稀有性、珍贵性、脆弱性及不可再生性。在风景区旅游开发及地质遗迹保护过程中，遇到了很多景观危岩，这凸显了景观危岩研究的紧迫性和重要性。而且，深入地研究景观危岩特性，使那些奇秀壮观、气峻形奇的危岩更好地发挥观赏价值而不影响游客安全，这符合我国风景名胜区开发建设的可持续性发展战略，并将产生较大社会效应。
丹霞地貌是我国重要的风景地貌，其理论研究及开发取得了丰硕的成果。丹霞地貌区往往地形复杂，坡面陡峭，岩性（砂岩、砾岩、泥岩等）力学强度较差，垂直节理较发育，发育较多危岩。危岩与地质景观的共存性在丹霞地貌中比较突出。丹霞地貌旅游发展过程中，存在对景观危岩的认识及保护问题，但目前尚未引起足够的重视。
龙虎山地处江西省东北部鹰潭市境内，据鹰潭市区10公里，是以丹霞地貌景观为特色的世界地质公园。龙虎山丹霞地貌主要以砂岩、砾岩、泥岩等岩层组成，岩壁陡峭，节理错综，发育众多外形奇特，有突出旅游观光及美学欣赏价值的不稳定岩体，即景观危岩。龙虎山景观危岩经历了漫长的地质演变过程，是多因素耦合作用的结果，其主要影响因素有地形地貌、地层岩性、构造应力及水文地质条件以及雕蚀作用（包括流水侵蚀溶蚀、温度差异风化、微观化学风化等），其中雕蚀作用是景观危岩形成的核心要素。
从可持续性开发的角度，根据稳定程度将丹霞地貌景观分为景观危岩和稳定景观，并依据规模大小、外观形态、失稳模式、旅游价值和灾害性，将景观危岩进行了简要分类。在龙虎山丹霞地貌景观特征和旅游开发现状调查的基础上，对该区景观危岩的类型进行了划分。
运用层次分析法建立景观危岩评价体系，包含危岩性和景观性两方面九个评价因子，并对评价因子赋值及划分等级。评价龙虎山丹霞地貌30处代表性景观，所得结果与实际调查吻合。
在实际调查基础上，结合定性和定量方法对各危岩体的稳定性进行评价，并根据野外实地地形判断景观危岩失稳的危害范围。进一步分析景观危岩灾害发生可能性及灾害易发程度，并采用多因素相互比较、专家打分的综合指数评判法对龙虎山丹霞地貌景观危岩灾害危险性分区。
龙虎山丹霞地貌景观危岩成为旅游开发的重要资源。但其稳定性较差，对旅游发展起了很大的阻碍作用，须加强保护。景观危岩保护须符合不破坏性、相近性、可逆性、无干扰性及如旧性五大原则。在分析现有危岩防治技术及景观危岩特殊性的基础上，本文提出吊索法保护景观危岩,即由绳索、钢索等能提供一定向上拉力，使得危岩体达到要求的稳定系数的一种方法。吊索法具有适用范围广，理论计算简单，能较好提高稳定系数，施工方便，后续维修方便和易监测等诸多优点，适用于各类岩质景观的保护。
Scenic spots in mountain area of China have universally pretty rockfall calledlandscape-rockfall, for its value of the visual, infectious, unique, magic value of tourismand aesthetic appreciation. These are the geological heritage obviously, as there are scarce,precious, fragility and non-renewable. However, some problems of landscape-rockfall existin tourism developing and protecting the geological heritage of scenic spot of mountainregion, so it is prominent that studying landscape-rockfall is increasingly urgent andimportant. Furthermore, depth studying unstable rock landscape features will be good forthe wonderful and elegant grand rockfall to play tour value and lessen danger, thismatching the strategy of sustainable development of every scenic spot and producing theenormous social effect in the future.
Danxia landform is one of major scenic landscape, and its theoretical research andexploitation had yielded fruitful achievement. There are often complex terrain, steep slope,(sandstone, conglomerate, mudstone, etc.) less mechanical strength of lithology (sandstone,conglomerate, mudstone, etc.), many vertical joints in the areas of Danxia landform, whichis prone to develop rockfall. It is especially obvious in Danxia landform that geologicallandscape coexist with dangerous rocks. In the process of Developing Danxia landformtourism, there are some issues in cognizing and protecting landscape-rockfall, but nowpeople pay insufficient attention to them.
Mt.Longhushan where Danxia landform landscape are a specially characteristic is alarge geo-park,10km far from Yingtan city, which located in northeast of Jiangxi Provincein China. The layer forming Danxia landscape in Mt.Longhushan mainly make up fromsandstone, conglomerate, mudstone. Because of steep cliffs, intricate joints, the areadeveloped a number of peculiar shape rock that have the value of prominent tourism andaesthetic appreciation. Landscape-rockfall undergo a long term revolution of geologicalprocess，and was caused by many internal and external geological actions. The mainfactors are topography, lithology, geological structure，hydrogeological conditions and thecarved-erosion action (including erosion and dissolution, the weathering in differenttemperature, micro-chemical weathering). Carved-erosion played the core role in theprocess of forming landscape-rockfall.
From the perspective of sustainable development, and according to the stability,Danxia landform landscapes are divided into landscape-rockfall and stable landscape.Based on size, morphology, instability mode, tourism value and risk, landscape-rockfall can be briefly classified many kinds. Surveying the features and tourism development ofMt.Longhushan Danxia landscape, the paper divides its types, and discusses thesustainability development of landscape-rockfall. Lastly, it analysis the development ofpotential threats and put forward some measures to protect landscape-rockfall.
Utilizing theory of the analytic hierarchy process, this paper establishes the evaluatingsystem of landscape-rockfall, containing two aspects of rockfall and landscape, and its nineappraisal factors. Besides, this evaluating system assigns value to factors and divides therank of landscape-rockfall. Utilizing the evaluating system of fragile geology landscape toevaluate the30representative landscape of Danxia-landform in Mt.Longhushan, the resultfits investigation.
On the basic of practical investigation, we evaluated the stability of rockfall with thequalitative and quantitative method, and according to field topography, judged the riskscope of the instability of Landscape-rockfall. Furthermore, we analyzed the happeningpossibility and easy-happening degree of Landscape-rockfall hazards, and then thecomprehensive exponential evaluation methods of multivariate intercomparison and expertestimation were adopted to devise the risk of Landscape-rockfall of Danxia Landform inLonghushan.
Landscape-rockfall of Danxia Landform in Longhushan has become importmentresources for tourism, but as their poor stability can restrict the tourism development, weshould strengthen the protection of them.Landscape-rockfall disaster prevention ought tofollows the five principles of nondestructibility, approximability, reversibility, nointerference and compatibility. According to the present technology of preventing rockfalland the particularity of landscape-rockfall, the text proposed a hang-pull method that madeby the rope, cable, etc. to provide some upward pull to make the unstable rock meet therequired coefficient of stability. The hang-pull method has many advantages of wideapplication, simple theoretical calculation, better improving stability coefficient,convenient construction, easy maintenance and easy follow-up monitoring, etc，and it issuitable for protecting rock landscape.
丹霞地貌是我国重要的风景地貌，其理论研究及开发取得了丰硕的成果。丹霞地貌区往往地形复杂，坡面陡峭，岩性（砂岩、砾岩、泥岩等）力学强度较差，垂直节理较发育，发育较多危岩。危岩与地质景观的共存性在丹霞地貌中比较突出。丹霞地貌旅游发展过程中，存在对景观危岩的认识及保护问题，但目前尚未引起足够的重视。
龙虎山地处江西省东北部鹰潭市境内，据鹰潭市区10公里，是以丹霞地貌景观为特色的世界地质公园。龙虎山丹霞地貌主要以砂岩、砾岩、泥岩等岩层组成，岩壁陡峭，节理错综，发育众多外形奇特，有突出旅游观光及美学欣赏价值的不稳定岩体，即景观危岩。龙虎山景观危岩经历了漫长的地质演变过程，是多因素耦合作用的结果，其主要影响因素有地形地貌、地层岩性、构造应力及水文地质条件以及雕蚀作用（包括流水侵蚀溶蚀、温度差异风化、微观化学风化等），其中雕蚀作用是景观危岩形成的核心要素。
从可持续性开发的角度，根据稳定程度将丹霞地貌景观分为景观危岩和稳定景观，并依据规模大小、外观形态、失稳模式、旅游价值和灾害性，将景观危岩进行了简要分类。在龙虎山丹霞地貌景观特征和旅游开发现状调查的基础上，对该区景观危岩的类型进行了划分。
运用层次分析法建立景观危岩评价体系，包含危岩性和景观性两方面九个评价因子，并对评价因子赋值及划分等级。评价龙虎山丹霞地貌30处代表性景观，所得结果与实际调查吻合。
在实际调查基础上，结合定性和定量方法对各危岩体的稳定性进行评价，并根据野外实地地形判断景观危岩失稳的危害范围。进一步分析景观危岩灾害发生可能性及灾害易发程度，并采用多因素相互比较、专家打分的综合指数评判法对龙虎山丹霞地貌景观危岩灾害危险性分区。
龙虎山丹霞地貌景观危岩成为旅游开发的重要资源。但其稳定性较差，对旅游发展起了很大的阻碍作用，须加强保护。景观危岩保护须符合不破坏性、相近性、可逆性、无干扰性及如旧性五大原则。在分析现有危岩防治技术及景观危岩特殊性的基础上，本文提出吊索法保护景观危岩,即由绳索、钢索等能提供一定向上拉力，使得危岩体达到要求的稳定系数的一种方法。吊索法具有适用范围广，理论计算简单，能较好提高稳定系数，施工方便，后续维修方便和易监测等诸多优点，适用于各类岩质景观的保护。
Scenic spots in mountain area of China have universally pretty rockfall calledlandscape-rockfall, for its value of the visual, infectious, unique, magic value of tourismand aesthetic appreciation. These are the geological heritage obviously, as there are scarce,precious, fragility and non-renewable. However, some problems of landscape-rockfall existin tourism developing and protecting the geological heritage of scenic spot of mountainregion, so it is prominent that studying landscape-rockfall is increasingly urgent andimportant. Furthermore, depth studying unstable rock landscape features will be good forthe wonderful and elegant grand rockfall to play tour value and lessen danger, thismatching the strategy of sustainable development of every scenic spot and producing theenormous social effect in the future.
Danxia landform is one of major scenic landscape, and its theoretical research andexploitation had yielded fruitful achievement. There are often complex terrain, steep slope,(sandstone, conglomerate, mudstone, etc.) less mechanical strength of lithology (sandstone,conglomerate, mudstone, etc.), many vertical joints in the areas of Danxia landform, whichis prone to develop rockfall. It is especially obvious in Danxia landform that geologicallandscape coexist with dangerous rocks. In the process of Developing Danxia landformtourism, there are some issues in cognizing and protecting landscape-rockfall, but nowpeople pay insufficient attention to them.
Mt.Longhushan where Danxia landform landscape are a specially characteristic is alarge geo-park,10km far from Yingtan city, which located in northeast of Jiangxi Provincein China. The layer forming Danxia landscape in Mt.Longhushan mainly make up fromsandstone, conglomerate, mudstone. Because of steep cliffs, intricate joints, the areadeveloped a number of peculiar shape rock that have the value of prominent tourism andaesthetic appreciation. Landscape-rockfall undergo a long term revolution of geologicalprocess，and was caused by many internal and external geological actions. The mainfactors are topography, lithology, geological structure，hydrogeological conditions and thecarved-erosion action (including erosion and dissolution, the weathering in differenttemperature, micro-chemical weathering). Carved-erosion played the core role in theprocess of forming landscape-rockfall.
From the perspective of sustainable development, and according to the stability,Danxia landform landscapes are divided into landscape-rockfall and stable landscape.Based on size, morphology, instability mode, tourism value and risk, landscape-rockfall can be briefly classified many kinds. Surveying the features and tourism development ofMt.Longhushan Danxia landscape, the paper divides its types, and discusses thesustainability development of landscape-rockfall. Lastly, it analysis the development ofpotential threats and put forward some measures to protect landscape-rockfall.
Utilizing theory of the analytic hierarchy process, this paper establishes the evaluatingsystem of landscape-rockfall, containing two aspects of rockfall and landscape, and its nineappraisal factors. Besides, this evaluating system assigns value to factors and divides therank of landscape-rockfall. Utilizing the evaluating system of fragile geology landscape toevaluate the30representative landscape of Danxia-landform in Mt.Longhushan, the resultfits investigation.
On the basic of practical investigation, we evaluated the stability of rockfall with thequalitative and quantitative method, and according to field topography, judged the riskscope of the instability of Landscape-rockfall. Furthermore, we analyzed the happeningpossibility and easy-happening degree of Landscape-rockfall hazards, and then thecomprehensive exponential evaluation methods of multivariate intercomparison and expertestimation were adopted to devise the risk of Landscape-rockfall of Danxia Landform inLonghushan.
Landscape-rockfall of Danxia Landform in Longhushan has become importmentresources for tourism, but as their poor stability can restrict the tourism development, weshould strengthen the protection of them.Landscape-rockfall disaster prevention ought tofollows the five principles of nondestructibility, approximability, reversibility, nointerference and compatibility. According to the present technology of preventing rockfalland the particularity of landscape-rockfall, the text proposed a hang-pull method that madeby the rope, cable, etc. to provide some upward pull to make the unstable rock meet therequired coefficient of stability. The hang-pull method has many advantages of wideapplication, simple theoretical calculation, better improving stability coefficient,convenient construction, easy maintenance and easy follow-up monitoring, etc，and it issuitable for protecting rock landscape.
引文
[1]胡厚田.崩塌与落石[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,1989,11.
[2]曾廉编著.崩塌与防治[M].峨眉山:西南交通大学出版社,1990,12.
[3]刘国明.三峡链子崖危岩体静力稳定性有限元分析[J].河海大学学报,1996,24(4):95-101.
[4]陈明东.链子崖危岩体变形破坏机制及整治对策[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1999,2(1):33-42.
[5]刘卫华等.危岩体调查与稳定性工程地质分类方法探讨[J].地下空间与工程学报,2007,3(7):1269-1273.
[6]赵允辉.危岩崩塌地质灾害调查评价与防治[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15:33-38.
[7]李思海.危岩滑坡地质灾害原因分析与对策[J].凉山大学学报,2001,3(3):22-25.
[8]熊高.重庆市某危岩的稳定性评价与治理[J].中国水运,2009,2:121-124.
[9]杨转运等.危岩体发育的典型环境条件分析[J].公路交通技术,2005,6:106-110.
[10]姚文莉.考虑波动效应的碰撞回弹系数研究[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004,23(2):83-86.
[11] G.B.Crosta and F.Agliardj. Parametric evaluation of3D dispersion of rockfall trajectorie[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Science,2004,4:583-598.
[12] Lawrence A.Pierson, C.Fed gullixion. Ronald G.Chassic. Rockfall catchement area design guide(Final report spr-3).2001:26-35.
[13]贾绮平,夏选朋.邯郸路基室内回弹模量研究[J].辽宁交通科技,2005,8:44-46.
[14]赵思,刘汉东.水电站高边坡滚石防护计算研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,12(2):79-84.
[15]吕庆,孙红月.边坡滚石运动防护的计算模型[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(2):79-84.
[16] Keylock.C.K, Dormas U. Evaluation of topographic models of rockfall travel distance for use inhazard applications[J]. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research,1999,31(3):312-320.
[17] Dorren L K. A review of rockfall mechanics and modeling approaches progress[J]. PhysicalGeography,2003,27(1):69-87.
[18] Chen Guang-qi. Numerical modeling of rockfall using extended DDA[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(6):926-931.
[19]陈洪凯等.三峡库区危岩发育链式机理及失稳运动路径研究[J].第八届全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集.北京:科学出版社,2004:820-825.
[20]陈洪凯等著.危岩防治对策[M].北京:地震出版社,2006,1.
[21]黄润秋.滚石在平台上的运动特征分析[J].地球科学发展,2008,23(5):517-522.
[22]黄润秋等.滚石运动特征实验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(9):1296-1302.
[23]常中华,陈厚军,张乐中,等.奎屯河龙口右岸山体崩塌原因及再次失稳可能性分析[J].工程地质学报,2005,13(1):76-80.
[24]何应强,宋根才,马跃刚.索风营水电站Dr2危岩体稳定性研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2005,(5):87-90.
[25]谭继文,李润伟,马志强,等.江口水电站拱坝左岸1号危岩体稳定分析[J].东北水利水电,2005,23(1):9-10.
[26]陈洪凯,唐红梅,王蓉.三峡库区危岩稳定性计算方法及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(4):614-619.
[27]杜时贵.岩体结构面的工程性质[M].北京:地震出版社,1999.
[28] Kulatilake P.H.S.W, Balasingam P, Jinyong Park, et al. Natural rock joint roughness quantificationthrough fractal techniques[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2006,24(5):1181-1202.
[29] Kulatilake P.H.S.W, Shou G, Huang T H. Spectral-based Peak-shear-strength criterion for rockjoints[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1995,121(11):789-796.
[30] Hammah R.E, Curran J.H. Fuzzy cluster algorithm for the automatic identification of joint sets [J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,1998,35(7):889-905.
[31]王鹏,赵学亮,万林海,等.基于GA和FCM的岩体结构面的混合聚类方法[J].北京科技大学学报,2004,26(3):227-232.
[32]陈洪凯,唐红梅.危岩主控结构面疲劳断裂寿命计算方法[J].应用数学,2007,28(5):575-580.
[33]陈洪凯,唐红梅.危岩主控结构面强度参数计算方法[J].工程地质学报,2007,16(1):37-41.
[34]罗永忠,徐志文,祝世强.达县城区石子危岩形成机制分析及稳定性评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2004,15(2):32-36.
[35]唐伟,魏兴丽.佛图关车站危岩带工程地质特征[J].山西建筑,2004,30(13):62-63.
[36]谢全敏,朱瑞赓,池秀文.危岩块体稳定性分析的蒙特卡罗边界法[J].灾害学,1998,l3(2):37-41.
[37]张奇华.链子崖危岩体变形破坏系统辨识[J].岩石力学与工程报,1998,17(5):544-551.
[38] Pierson L A, Davis S A, Van Vickle. Rockfall Hazard Rating System: ImplementationManual[R].Federal Highway Administration Publication SA-93-057,1990:172.
[39] Cancelli A, Crosta G.Hazard and risk assessment in rockfall prone areas[C]//ProceedingsConference on Risk and Reliability in GroundEngineering.1993:177-190.
[40] Azzoni A, La Barbera G, Zaninetti A. Analysis and prediction of rock falls using a mathematicalmodel [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences&Geomechanical,1995,32(7):709-724.
[41] Crosta G B, Agliardi F. A new methodology for physically based rockfall hazard assessment[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2003,3:407-422.
[42] Guzzetti F. Rockfall hazard and risk assessment along a transportation corridor in the Nera Valley,central Italy[J]. Environmental Management,2004,34(2):191-208.
[43] Bunce C M, Cruden D M,Morgenstern N R. Assessment of the hazard from rockfall on a highway[J]. Can. Geotech. J,1997,34:344–356.
[44] Canuti P, Casagli N, Tarchiani U. Rockfall hazard and risk assessment in coastal cliffs[A]. In:Proceedings of the8th International IAEG Congress[C]. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema,1998,p:1585–1592.
[45] Hungr O, Beckie R D. Assessment of the hazard from rock fall on a highway: discussion [J]. Can.Geotech. J,1998,35:409-422.
[46] Abbott B,Bruce I, Savigny W, et al. Application of a new methodology for the management ofrockfall risk along a railway[A].In Proceedings of the8th International IAEG Congress [C].Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema,1998.1201–1208.
[47] McClung D M. The encounter probability for mountain slope hazards [J]. Can. Geotech.J,1999,36:1195–1196.
[48]张慧昕,王鹏.模糊综合评判法在危岩危险性评价研究中的应用[J].公路交通技术,2009,4:36-44.
[49]张路青,杨志法,张英俊.公路沿线遭遇滚石的风险分析方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24:5544-5548.
[50]许强,陈伟.单体危岩崩塌灾害风险评价方法[J].地质通报,2009,28(9):1039-1046.
[51]陈洪凯,唐红梅.危岩支撑计算方法探讨[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(2).
[52]唐红梅.危岩拦石墙计算方法研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2005,16(3):12-25.
[53]郭映忠.锚杆最优锚固方向和最小锚固力的确定[J].凉山大学学报,2001,7(2):87-93.
[54] Bozzolo D, Pamini R-Simulation of rockfalls down a valleyside[J]. Acta Mech,1986,63,113-130.
[55] Day R W. Case studies of rockfall in soft versus hard rock[J]. Enviromental and EngineeningGeoscience,1997,3(1):133-140.
[56] Chau K T, Wong R H C, Wu J J. Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfallimpacts[J]. Int. J Rock Mech. Min Sci,2002,39:69-77.
[57] Chau K T, Wong R H C, Liu J et al. Shape effects on the coefficient of restitution during rockfallimpacts[J]. Ninth International Congress on Rock Mechanics, ISRM Congress, Paris,1999,541-544.
[58] Fausto Guzzentti, Giovanni Crosta, Riccardo Detti, et al. Stone: a computer program for the threedimensional simulation of rockfalls[J].Computers&Geoscience,2002,28:1079-1093.
[59]阳友奎,周迎庆,姜瑞琪等.坡面地质灾害柔性防护的理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2005,24-39.
[60]贺咏梅,阳友奎.崩塌落石SNS柔性防护系统的设计选型与布置[J].公路,2001,11:14-19.
[61]贺咏梅,阳友奎.SNS边坡柔性防护系统的标准化问题[J].路基工程,2002,3:18-23.
[62]周迎庆,阳友奎.治理边坡地质灾害的SNS防护系统[J].滑坡文集.北京:中国铁道出版社,2004,14:121-132.
[63]陈国达,刘辉泗.江西贡水流域地质.江西地质汇刊[J],1939,(2):164页图版3,图C说明.
[64]郭国林,郭福生,刘晓东等.丹霞地貌砂岩的微观化学风化作用电子探针研究[J].中国岩溶,2006,25(2):172-176.
[65]刘林清,郭福生,曾晓华.丹霞地貌景观调查的遥感技术应用研究[J].东华理工学院学报(自然科学版),2007,30(3):247-251.
[66]邱尧荣,徐德成,姜建国.福建金湖丹霞地貌TM影响特征、旅游资源开发利用研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(增):99-204.
[67]黄进.丹霞地貌发育几个重要问题的定量测算[J].热带地理,2004,24(2):123-126.
[68]姜勇彪,郭福生,刘林清,等.龙虎山丹霞地貌区河流阶地地貌面的热释光测年研究[J].东华理工学院学报(自然科学版),2006,29(3):225-228.
[69]徐行,葛同明,肖晖.丹霞盆地红层时代的初探-古地磁研究的新证据[J].成都地质学院学报,1990,17(2):79–86.
[70]陈国能,梁百和,朱素琳.粤北金鸡岭丹霞地貌发育与地质构造的关系[J].第四纪研究,1991,3:229-236.
[71] Ma Chunmei, Zhu Cheng, Peng Hua, et al. Danxia Landform genesis of the Qiyun Mountain,Anhui Province[J]. J Geographical Sciences,2006,16(1):45-56.
[72]朱诚,彭华,李世成,等.安徽齐云山丹霞地貌成因[J].地理学报,2005,60(3):445-455.
[73]朱诚,彭华,李中轩,等.浙江江郎山丹霞地貌发育的年代与成因[J].地理学报,2009,64(1):21-32.
[74]朱诚,俞锦标,赵宁曦,等.福建冠豸山丹霞地貌成因及旅游景观特色[J].地理学报,2000,55(6):279-288.
[75]姜勇彪,郭福生,孙传敏等.江西弋阳县龟峰丹霞地貌景观特征与形成机制探讨[J].山地学报,2008,26(1):120-126.
[76]周学军.中国丹霞地貌的南北差异及其旅游价值[J].山地学报,2003,21(2):180-186.
[77]齐德利,于蓉,张忍顺等.中国丹霞地貌空间格局[J].地理学报,2005,60(1):41-52.
[78]彭华.丹霞地貌分类系统研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(增):28-35
[79]罗成德.关于丹霞地貌学体系的探讨[J].经济地理,2002,22(增):16-17.
[80]罗成德.关于建立丹霞地貌学体系的几个问题的思考[J].经济地理,2003,23(增):2-4.
[81]明庆忠.关于建立丹霞地貌学的思考.经济地理[J],2002,22(增):20-23
[82]齐德利,张忍顺.丹霞美学的建立及丹霞山水美学特征研究[J].经济地理,2006,26(增):39-47.
[83]郭康,张聪,马志正.嶂石岩地貌与丹霞地貌对比研究[J].经济地理,1994,14(增):200-204.
[84]明庆忠,刘丽娜,等.丹霞地貌-土林地貌与旅游开发[J].云南师人学报.2000,20(3):63-68.
[85]刘恒福,陈丽娟.丹霞地貌与雅丹地貌[J].青海国土经略,2004,(3):47-48.
[86]郭建强,杨俊义,杨更,等.剑门地貌特征、成因与丹霞地貌之比较[J].四川地质学报,2006,6(4):228-233.
[87]陈洪凯等.危岩研究现状及趋势综述[J].重庆交通学院学报,2003,22(3):18-22.
[88]罗成德.丹霞地貌区域的自然灾害研究[J].乐山师范学院学报,2009,24(2):89-91.
[89]贾永刚.崂山旅游区地质灾害类型、成因及分布研究[J].海洋科学,1995,1:64-6.
[90]曾玉清,邱业惠,文晓惠.武陵源风景区地质灾害类型及其成因分析[J].湖南地质,2000,19(3):191-194.
[91]冯义.峨眉山景区地质灾害调查与评估[J].科技创新导报,2006,NO.11.
[92]阮珏等.高密度电法在玉溪市九龙池公园西侧山体地质灾害调查中的应用[J].工程地球物理学报,2008,5(4):475-479.
[93]王慧,曹炳兰.长白山旅游区崩滑形成影响因素研究[J].世界地质,2004,23(1):56-59.
[94]何思明.乐山大佛景区景云亭危岩灾害分析及其防治研究[J].灾害学报,2009,24(3):39-45.
[95]刘芳珍.彬县大佛寺石窟危岩加固设计与施工[J].岩土工程学报,1998,20(5):12-115.
[96]陈伟.蔡永祥烈士纪念馆南侧边坡危岩治理[J].浙江建筑,2009,26(2):23-27.
[97]方云等.宁明花山岩画区危岩体稳定性研究[J].文物保护与考古科学,2007,19(3):36-39.
[98] M C Tunusluoglu. Rockfall hazard assessment in a cultural and natural heritage (Ortahisar Castle,Cappadocia, Turkey)[J]. Environ Geol,2009,56:963–972.
[99] Topal, T., Akin, M, and Ozden, U.A. Assessment of rockfall hazard around Afyon Castle, Turkey[J]. Environmental Geology,2007,53, p:191200.
[100] Yosoon Choi. Engineering geological investigation into rockfall problem: A case study of theSeated Seokgayeorae Image carved on a rock face at the UNESCO World Heritage site inKorea[J].,Geosciences Journal Vol.13,2009, No.1, p.6978.
[101] Fuwei Jiang, Fusheng Guo. Research protecting methods to perilous rock landscape: taking anexample of protecting Elephant Trunk Hill in Dragon Tiger Mountain, China [J]. AdvancedMaterials Research Vols.250-253(2011), p:2107-2111.
[102]姜伏伟,郭福生,姜勇彪等.龙虎山丹霞地貌危岩景观成因及保护研究[J].山地学报,2011,29(2):202-209.
[103]姜伏伟,郭福生,姜勇彪等.风景区景观危岩灾害研究刍议[J].东华理工大学学报,2011,34(2):30-35.
[104]姜勇彪,郭福生,等.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞地貌特征、成因及其国内对比[J].山地学报,2009,27(3):353-360.
[105]陈安泽.中国国家地质公园建设的若干问题[J].资源·产业.2003,5(1):58-6.
[106]鄢志武,卜永喜.中国国家地质公园建设与管理对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005(9):52-53.
[107]赵汀,赵逊.世界地质遗迹保护和地质公园建设的现状和展望[J].地质论评,2005,51(3):301-310.
[108]潘健.论国家地质公园建设[J].国土资源导刊,2006(3):157-160.
[109]李双应等.论国家地质公园在旅游业发展中的地位与作用[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,18(1):52-55.
[110]郭福生,周佐明等.江西龙虎山丹霞地貌景观特色及成因研究[C].第一届世界地质公园大会论文集.北京:地质出版社,2004:437-439.
[111] DZ0238—2004.地质灾害分类分级[S].
[112]齐德利等.沿海生态旅游资源评价指标及尺度研究—以江苏沿海为例[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):508-518.
[113]蒋勇军等.基于GIS的重庆市旅游资源评价、分析与规划研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(1):38-46.
[114]张广胜等.区域地质旅游资源评价与可持续发展对策研究--以安徽省巢湖市为例[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(3):290-293.
[115]赵文清等.多因子分层模糊评价法的算法设计探讨--模糊综合评价方法在旅游资源评价中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(7):8-14.
[116]张红珍,李云辉.粗集理论在旅游资源评价中的应用[J].环境与可持续发展,2006,6:1-3.
[117]徐涛.基于遗传算法的旅游资源评价的优化方法[J].三明学院学报,2006,23(2):198-201.
[118]邱云美.基于价值工程的生态旅游资源评价研究—以浙江省丽水市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(12):2158-2168.
[119]刘细元等.江西三清山花岗岩峰林地质公园特征及评价[J].资源调查与环境,2005,26(4):297-304.
[120]姜勇彪等.龙虎山世界地质公园地学旅游资源及其特征分析[J].东华理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,28(1):23-28.
[121]胡中华,郭福生.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞景观特征及其科学价值[J].资源调查与环境,2010,31(1):138-144.71-78.
[122]江以平.龙虎山国家地质公园旅游资源特征与评价[J].江苏地质,2003,27(2):103-106.
[123]李力.龙虎山旅游资源评价[J].江西农业大学学报,2001,23(2):283-288.
[2]曾廉编著.崩塌与防治[M].峨眉山:西南交通大学出版社,1990,12.
[3]刘国明.三峡链子崖危岩体静力稳定性有限元分析[J].河海大学学报,1996,24(4):95-101.
[4]陈明东.链子崖危岩体变形破坏机制及整治对策[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1999,2(1):33-42.
[5]刘卫华等.危岩体调查与稳定性工程地质分类方法探讨[J].地下空间与工程学报,2007,3(7):1269-1273.
[6]赵允辉.危岩崩塌地质灾害调查评价与防治[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15:33-38.
[7]李思海.危岩滑坡地质灾害原因分析与对策[J].凉山大学学报,2001,3(3):22-25.
[8]熊高.重庆市某危岩的稳定性评价与治理[J].中国水运,2009,2:121-124.
[9]杨转运等.危岩体发育的典型环境条件分析[J].公路交通技术,2005,6:106-110.
[10]姚文莉.考虑波动效应的碰撞回弹系数研究[J].山东科技大学学报(自然科学版),2004,23(2):83-86.
[11] G.B.Crosta and F.Agliardj. Parametric evaluation of3D dispersion of rockfall trajectorie[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Science,2004,4:583-598.
[12] Lawrence A.Pierson, C.Fed gullixion. Ronald G.Chassic. Rockfall catchement area design guide(Final report spr-3).2001:26-35.
[13]贾绮平,夏选朋.邯郸路基室内回弹模量研究[J].辽宁交通科技,2005,8:44-46.
[14]赵思,刘汉东.水电站高边坡滚石防护计算研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,12(2):79-84.
[15]吕庆,孙红月.边坡滚石运动防护的计算模型[J].自然灾害学报,2003,12(2):79-84.
[16] Keylock.C.K, Dormas U. Evaluation of topographic models of rockfall travel distance for use inhazard applications[J]. Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research,1999,31(3):312-320.
[17] Dorren L K. A review of rockfall mechanics and modeling approaches progress[J]. PhysicalGeography,2003,27(1):69-87.
[18] Chen Guang-qi. Numerical modeling of rockfall using extended DDA[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2003,22(6):926-931.
[19]陈洪凯等.三峡库区危岩发育链式机理及失稳运动路径研究[J].第八届全国岩石力学与工程学术大会论文集.北京:科学出版社,2004:820-825.
[20]陈洪凯等著.危岩防治对策[M].北京:地震出版社,2006,1.
[21]黄润秋.滚石在平台上的运动特征分析[J].地球科学发展,2008,23(5):517-522.
[22]黄润秋等.滚石运动特征实验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2007,29(9):1296-1302.
[23]常中华,陈厚军,张乐中,等.奎屯河龙口右岸山体崩塌原因及再次失稳可能性分析[J].工程地质学报,2005,13(1):76-80.
[24]何应强,宋根才,马跃刚.索风营水电站Dr2危岩体稳定性研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2005,(5):87-90.
[25]谭继文,李润伟,马志强,等.江口水电站拱坝左岸1号危岩体稳定分析[J].东北水利水电,2005,23(1):9-10.
[26]陈洪凯,唐红梅,王蓉.三峡库区危岩稳定性计算方法及应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2004,23(4):614-619.
[27]杜时贵.岩体结构面的工程性质[M].北京:地震出版社,1999.
[28] Kulatilake P.H.S.W, Balasingam P, Jinyong Park, et al. Natural rock joint roughness quantificationthrough fractal techniques[J]. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering,2006,24(5):1181-1202.
[29] Kulatilake P.H.S.W, Shou G, Huang T H. Spectral-based Peak-shear-strength criterion for rockjoints[J].Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1995,121(11):789-796.
[30] Hammah R.E, Curran J.H. Fuzzy cluster algorithm for the automatic identification of joint sets [J].International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences,1998,35(7):889-905.
[31]王鹏,赵学亮,万林海,等.基于GA和FCM的岩体结构面的混合聚类方法[J].北京科技大学学报,2004,26(3):227-232.
[32]陈洪凯,唐红梅.危岩主控结构面疲劳断裂寿命计算方法[J].应用数学,2007,28(5):575-580.
[33]陈洪凯,唐红梅.危岩主控结构面强度参数计算方法[J].工程地质学报,2007,16(1):37-41.
[34]罗永忠,徐志文,祝世强.达县城区石子危岩形成机制分析及稳定性评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护,2004,15(2):32-36.
[35]唐伟,魏兴丽.佛图关车站危岩带工程地质特征[J].山西建筑,2004,30(13):62-63.
[36]谢全敏,朱瑞赓,池秀文.危岩块体稳定性分析的蒙特卡罗边界法[J].灾害学,1998,l3(2):37-41.
[37]张奇华.链子崖危岩体变形破坏系统辨识[J].岩石力学与工程报,1998,17(5):544-551.
[38] Pierson L A, Davis S A, Van Vickle. Rockfall Hazard Rating System: ImplementationManual[R].Federal Highway Administration Publication SA-93-057,1990:172.
[39] Cancelli A, Crosta G.Hazard and risk assessment in rockfall prone areas[C]//ProceedingsConference on Risk and Reliability in GroundEngineering.1993:177-190.
[40] Azzoni A, La Barbera G, Zaninetti A. Analysis and prediction of rock falls using a mathematicalmodel [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences&Geomechanical,1995,32(7):709-724.
[41] Crosta G B, Agliardi F. A new methodology for physically based rockfall hazard assessment[J].Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences,2003,3:407-422.
[42] Guzzetti F. Rockfall hazard and risk assessment along a transportation corridor in the Nera Valley,central Italy[J]. Environmental Management,2004,34(2):191-208.
[43] Bunce C M, Cruden D M,Morgenstern N R. Assessment of the hazard from rockfall on a highway[J]. Can. Geotech. J,1997,34:344–356.
[44] Canuti P, Casagli N, Tarchiani U. Rockfall hazard and risk assessment in coastal cliffs[A]. In:Proceedings of the8th International IAEG Congress[C]. Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema,1998,p:1585–1592.
[45] Hungr O, Beckie R D. Assessment of the hazard from rock fall on a highway: discussion [J]. Can.Geotech. J,1998,35:409-422.
[46] Abbott B,Bruce I, Savigny W, et al. Application of a new methodology for the management ofrockfall risk along a railway[A].In Proceedings of the8th International IAEG Congress [C].Rotterdam: A. A. Balkema,1998.1201–1208.
[47] McClung D M. The encounter probability for mountain slope hazards [J]. Can. Geotech.J,1999,36:1195–1196.
[48]张慧昕,王鹏.模糊综合评判法在危岩危险性评价研究中的应用[J].公路交通技术,2009,4:36-44.
[49]张路青,杨志法,张英俊.公路沿线遭遇滚石的风险分析方法研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24:5544-5548.
[50]许强,陈伟.单体危岩崩塌灾害风险评价方法[J].地质通报,2009,28(9):1039-1046.
[51]陈洪凯,唐红梅.危岩支撑计算方法探讨[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2004,15(2).
[52]唐红梅.危岩拦石墙计算方法研究[J].中国地质灾害与防治学报,2005,16(3):12-25.
[53]郭映忠.锚杆最优锚固方向和最小锚固力的确定[J].凉山大学学报,2001,7(2):87-93.
[54] Bozzolo D, Pamini R-Simulation of rockfalls down a valleyside[J]. Acta Mech,1986,63,113-130.
[55] Day R W. Case studies of rockfall in soft versus hard rock[J]. Enviromental and EngineeningGeoscience,1997,3(1):133-140.
[56] Chau K T, Wong R H C, Wu J J. Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfallimpacts[J]. Int. J Rock Mech. Min Sci,2002,39:69-77.
[57] Chau K T, Wong R H C, Liu J et al. Shape effects on the coefficient of restitution during rockfallimpacts[J]. Ninth International Congress on Rock Mechanics, ISRM Congress, Paris,1999,541-544.
[58] Fausto Guzzentti, Giovanni Crosta, Riccardo Detti, et al. Stone: a computer program for the threedimensional simulation of rockfalls[J].Computers&Geoscience,2002,28:1079-1093.
[59]阳友奎,周迎庆,姜瑞琪等.坡面地质灾害柔性防护的理论与实践[M].北京:科学出版社,2005,24-39.
[60]贺咏梅,阳友奎.崩塌落石SNS柔性防护系统的设计选型与布置[J].公路,2001,11:14-19.
[61]贺咏梅,阳友奎.SNS边坡柔性防护系统的标准化问题[J].路基工程,2002,3:18-23.
[62]周迎庆,阳友奎.治理边坡地质灾害的SNS防护系统[J].滑坡文集.北京:中国铁道出版社,2004,14:121-132.
[63]陈国达,刘辉泗.江西贡水流域地质.江西地质汇刊[J],1939,(2):164页图版3,图C说明.
[64]郭国林,郭福生,刘晓东等.丹霞地貌砂岩的微观化学风化作用电子探针研究[J].中国岩溶,2006,25(2):172-176.
[65]刘林清,郭福生,曾晓华.丹霞地貌景观调查的遥感技术应用研究[J].东华理工学院学报(自然科学版),2007,30(3):247-251.
[66]邱尧荣,徐德成,姜建国.福建金湖丹霞地貌TM影响特征、旅游资源开发利用研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(增):99-204.
[67]黄进.丹霞地貌发育几个重要问题的定量测算[J].热带地理,2004,24(2):123-126.
[68]姜勇彪,郭福生,刘林清,等.龙虎山丹霞地貌区河流阶地地貌面的热释光测年研究[J].东华理工学院学报(自然科学版),2006,29(3):225-228.
[69]徐行,葛同明,肖晖.丹霞盆地红层时代的初探-古地磁研究的新证据[J].成都地质学院学报,1990,17(2):79–86.
[70]陈国能,梁百和,朱素琳.粤北金鸡岭丹霞地貌发育与地质构造的关系[J].第四纪研究,1991,3:229-236.
[71] Ma Chunmei, Zhu Cheng, Peng Hua, et al. Danxia Landform genesis of the Qiyun Mountain,Anhui Province[J]. J Geographical Sciences,2006,16(1):45-56.
[72]朱诚,彭华,李世成,等.安徽齐云山丹霞地貌成因[J].地理学报,2005,60(3):445-455.
[73]朱诚,彭华,李中轩,等.浙江江郎山丹霞地貌发育的年代与成因[J].地理学报,2009,64(1):21-32.
[74]朱诚,俞锦标,赵宁曦,等.福建冠豸山丹霞地貌成因及旅游景观特色[J].地理学报,2000,55(6):279-288.
[75]姜勇彪,郭福生,孙传敏等.江西弋阳县龟峰丹霞地貌景观特征与形成机制探讨[J].山地学报,2008,26(1):120-126.
[76]周学军.中国丹霞地貌的南北差异及其旅游价值[J].山地学报,2003,21(2):180-186.
[77]齐德利,于蓉,张忍顺等.中国丹霞地貌空间格局[J].地理学报,2005,60(1):41-52.
[78]彭华.丹霞地貌分类系统研究[J].经济地理,2002,22(增):28-35
[79]罗成德.关于丹霞地貌学体系的探讨[J].经济地理,2002,22(增):16-17.
[80]罗成德.关于建立丹霞地貌学体系的几个问题的思考[J].经济地理,2003,23(增):2-4.
[81]明庆忠.关于建立丹霞地貌学的思考.经济地理[J],2002,22(增):20-23
[82]齐德利,张忍顺.丹霞美学的建立及丹霞山水美学特征研究[J].经济地理,2006,26(增):39-47.
[83]郭康,张聪,马志正.嶂石岩地貌与丹霞地貌对比研究[J].经济地理,1994,14(增):200-204.
[84]明庆忠,刘丽娜,等.丹霞地貌-土林地貌与旅游开发[J].云南师人学报.2000,20(3):63-68.
[85]刘恒福,陈丽娟.丹霞地貌与雅丹地貌[J].青海国土经略,2004,(3):47-48.
[86]郭建强,杨俊义,杨更,等.剑门地貌特征、成因与丹霞地貌之比较[J].四川地质学报,2006,6(4):228-233.
[87]陈洪凯等.危岩研究现状及趋势综述[J].重庆交通学院学报,2003,22(3):18-22.
[88]罗成德.丹霞地貌区域的自然灾害研究[J].乐山师范学院学报,2009,24(2):89-91.
[89]贾永刚.崂山旅游区地质灾害类型、成因及分布研究[J].海洋科学,1995,1:64-6.
[90]曾玉清,邱业惠,文晓惠.武陵源风景区地质灾害类型及其成因分析[J].湖南地质,2000,19(3):191-194.
[91]冯义.峨眉山景区地质灾害调查与评估[J].科技创新导报,2006,NO.11.
[92]阮珏等.高密度电法在玉溪市九龙池公园西侧山体地质灾害调查中的应用[J].工程地球物理学报,2008,5(4):475-479.
[93]王慧,曹炳兰.长白山旅游区崩滑形成影响因素研究[J].世界地质,2004,23(1):56-59.
[94]何思明.乐山大佛景区景云亭危岩灾害分析及其防治研究[J].灾害学报,2009,24(3):39-45.
[95]刘芳珍.彬县大佛寺石窟危岩加固设计与施工[J].岩土工程学报,1998,20(5):12-115.
[96]陈伟.蔡永祥烈士纪念馆南侧边坡危岩治理[J].浙江建筑,2009,26(2):23-27.
[97]方云等.宁明花山岩画区危岩体稳定性研究[J].文物保护与考古科学,2007,19(3):36-39.
[98] M C Tunusluoglu. Rockfall hazard assessment in a cultural and natural heritage (Ortahisar Castle,Cappadocia, Turkey)[J]. Environ Geol,2009,56:963–972.
[99] Topal, T., Akin, M, and Ozden, U.A. Assessment of rockfall hazard around Afyon Castle, Turkey[J]. Environmental Geology,2007,53, p:191200.
[100] Yosoon Choi. Engineering geological investigation into rockfall problem: A case study of theSeated Seokgayeorae Image carved on a rock face at the UNESCO World Heritage site inKorea[J].,Geosciences Journal Vol.13,2009, No.1, p.6978.
[101] Fuwei Jiang, Fusheng Guo. Research protecting methods to perilous rock landscape: taking anexample of protecting Elephant Trunk Hill in Dragon Tiger Mountain, China [J]. AdvancedMaterials Research Vols.250-253(2011), p:2107-2111.
[102]姜伏伟,郭福生,姜勇彪等.龙虎山丹霞地貌危岩景观成因及保护研究[J].山地学报,2011,29(2):202-209.
[103]姜伏伟,郭福生,姜勇彪等.风景区景观危岩灾害研究刍议[J].东华理工大学学报,2011,34(2):30-35.
[104]姜勇彪,郭福生,等.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞地貌特征、成因及其国内对比[J].山地学报,2009,27(3):353-360.
[105]陈安泽.中国国家地质公园建设的若干问题[J].资源·产业.2003,5(1):58-6.
[106]鄢志武,卜永喜.中国国家地质公园建设与管理对策研究[J].科技进步与对策,2005(9):52-53.
[107]赵汀,赵逊.世界地质遗迹保护和地质公园建设的现状和展望[J].地质论评,2005,51(3):301-310.
[108]潘健.论国家地质公园建设[J].国土资源导刊,2006(3):157-160.
[109]李双应等.论国家地质公园在旅游业发展中的地位与作用[J].合肥工业大学学报(社会科学版),2004,18(1):52-55.
[110]郭福生,周佐明等.江西龙虎山丹霞地貌景观特色及成因研究[C].第一届世界地质公园大会论文集.北京:地质出版社,2004:437-439.
[111] DZ0238—2004.地质灾害分类分级[S].
[112]齐德利等.沿海生态旅游资源评价指标及尺度研究—以江苏沿海为例[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(4):508-518.
[113]蒋勇军等.基于GIS的重庆市旅游资源评价、分析与规划研究[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(1):38-46.
[114]张广胜等.区域地质旅游资源评价与可持续发展对策研究--以安徽省巢湖市为例[J].安徽师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006,29(3):290-293.
[115]赵文清等.多因子分层模糊评价法的算法设计探讨--模糊综合评价方法在旅游资源评价中的应用[J].数学的实践与认识,2008,38(7):8-14.
[116]张红珍,李云辉.粗集理论在旅游资源评价中的应用[J].环境与可持续发展,2006,6:1-3.
[117]徐涛.基于遗传算法的旅游资源评价的优化方法[J].三明学院学报,2006,23(2):198-201.
[118]邱云美.基于价值工程的生态旅游资源评价研究—以浙江省丽水市为例[J].自然资源学报,2009,24(12):2158-2168.
[119]刘细元等.江西三清山花岗岩峰林地质公园特征及评价[J].资源调查与环境,2005,26(4):297-304.
[120]姜勇彪等.龙虎山世界地质公园地学旅游资源及其特征分析[J].东华理工大学学报(社会科学版),2009,28(1):23-28.
[121]胡中华,郭福生.龙虎山世界地质公园丹霞景观特征及其科学价值[J].资源调查与环境,2010,31(1):138-144.71-78.
[122]江以平.龙虎山国家地质公园旅游资源特征与评价[J].江苏地质,2003,27(2):103-106.
[123]李力.龙虎山旅游资源评价[J].江西农业大学学报,2001,23(2):283-288.