CYP3A4*1G多态性对女性健康志愿者静脉注射芬太尼药动学及痛阈的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
背景与目的
     芬太尼在我国临床麻醉、术后静脉镇痛以及临床疼痛治疗中已广泛应用,但临床发现应用相同剂量芬太尼后其镇痛效果及不良反应发生如术后呕吐、呼吸抑制等存在明显的个体差异,研究显示静脉注射芬太尼后体内药动学个体差异导致血药浓度的个体差异可能是造成这种现象的重要原因。有研究表明芬太尼主要代谢途径为经肝脏内细胞色素P450(cytochrome P450, CYP)3A4代谢,CYP3A4酶活性在不同个体差异明显,且CYP3A4酶的编码基因存在多态性。研究提示CYP3A4基因多态性可能是造成芬太尼药动学个体差异,进而导致临床药效学差异的原因。CYP3A4*1G是中国人新近发现的突变位点,也是中国人中所有的CYP3A4单核苷酸多态性中突变频率最高的一个位点。既往研究表明该多态性可影响CYP3A4酶活性,并间接造成术后芬太尼静脉镇痛需要量的差异,推测原因是CYP3A4*1G多态性引起芬太尼药动学个体差异所致。本研究拟通过研究女性健康志愿者静脉注射芬太尼后体内药动学、痛阈和CYP3A4*1G多态性的关系,探讨芬太尼个体药效学差异的遗传学因素,为临床芬太尼的个体化用药提供参考。
     材料与方法
     1.研究对象与分组
     女性健康志愿者166人中进行CYP3A4*1G基因型筛选,按照基因型分为野生纯合型组(CYP3A4*1/*1)、突变杂合型组(CYP3A4*1/*1G)、突变纯合型组(CYP3A4*1G/*1G)。依照基因型随机挑选28名志愿者,野生纯合子组10名、突变杂合子组10名、突变纯合子组8名。年龄18-25岁,体重指数在正常范围(1±20%)。所有受试者均无肝肾疾病史及药物过敏史,精神状态良好,全面体格检查均健康(包括心电图、血压、血常规、肝肾功能等),无烟酒嗜好,受试前4周及试验期间未服用过肝脏CYP3A4酶诱导剂或抑制剂。试验方案经郑州大学第一附属医院医学伦理委员会批准,受试者对试验方案和与受试药物有关的可能不良反应表示理解,并签署知情同意书。
     2.基因型检测
     受试者抽取外周静脉血2 m1,基因组DNA采用酚-氯仿法提取;CYP3A4*1G多态性位点采用聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性分析(polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism, PCR-RFLP)技术进行检测分析。直接测序法验证基因型检测方法的可靠性。
     3.试验方法
     28名受试者给药前一天夜12点后开始禁饮食,给药当日早晨入实验室,受试者入室后监测生命体征BP、HR、SPO2等,开放左右上肢静脉通路,置入套管针备用,一侧用于注射药物,一侧用于采集血样。所有受试者予以芬太尼(宜昌人福药业,090903)5μg/kg静脉注射,1分钟注射完毕。注射完毕后予以面罩吸氧并密切观察患者生命体征,若患者出现严重呼吸抑制等不良反应,则予以纳洛酮(北京华素制药,100812)拮抗并剔除出本实验。给药4h、8h后给予统一低脂肪、低蛋白标准餐并予以适量饮水,试验当天及试验前两天严禁饮用茶、酒精、咖啡、可乐以及葡萄柚汁。分别于给药后即刻、2、5、10、15、30、60、90、120、180、300、420、720分钟取静脉血4mL,EDTA抗凝,低温离心10min (4℃,4 OOOr·min- 1),取血浆-80℃保存待测。给药前及给药后45分钟、2.5、4小时时间点采用电刺激法进行痛阈测定。
     4.芬太尼血药浓度分析
     芬太尼血药浓度检测采用液相色谱一质谱法进行检测(LC-MS/MS)。
     5.统计学分析
     芬太尼的药时曲线用3P97药动学软件作参数估算,采用梯形法计算曲线下面积(AUC)。采用SPSS10.0软件进行数据处理,计量资料以x±s表示,等位基因和基因型分布是否符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡采用χ2检验检测;多组间药动学参数数据比较采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA),各组间两两比较采用LSD法;多组间痛阈资料采用重复测量设计的方差分析;计量资料变量之间的关系采用直线相关分析。检验水准为α=0.05。
     结果
     1中国女性CYP3A4*1G等位基因频率
     166例女性健康志愿者中,97例为野生纯合子组(CYP3A4*1/*1),60例为突变杂合子组(CYP3A4*1/*1G),9例为突变纯合子组(CYP3A4*1G/*1G)CYP3A4*1G等位基因突变率为23.5%。CYP3A4*1G等位基因的野生型纯合子、突变型纯合子、杂合子的分布符合Hardy-Weinberg平衡(P>0.05),表明本研究人群CYP3A4*1G基因型分布已达到遗传平衡,具有群体代表性。
     2受试者基本情况
     28例受试者中CYP3A4*1G野生纯合子组(10名)、CYP3A4*1G突变杂合子组(10名)、CYP3A4*1G突变纯合子组(8名)。年龄为19.2±1.4岁,体重指数20.4±2.6 kg/m2。三组受试者间年龄、体重指数及给药前痛阈比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
     3 CYP3A4*1G基因多态性对静脉注射芬太尼药动学的影响
     将三个不同基因型组各时相点芬太尼血药浓度的测定值经3p97药代动力学软件程序处理,得到三组受试者芬太尼药动学相关参数。突变纯合子组的终末消除半衰期t1/2β长于野生纯合子组和突变杂合子组(P<0.05);AUC 0~∞突变纯合子组高于野生纯合子组和突变杂合子组(P<0.05),但在野生纯合子组和突变杂合子组之间差异无统计学意义。
     4 CYP3A4*1G基因多态性对静脉注射芬太尼后受试者痛阈的影响
     三组间给药前痛阈差异无统计学意义,给药后痛阂突变纯合子组高于突变杂合子组和野生纯合子组(P<0.05);突变杂合子组与野生纯合子组间痛阈差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)
     5芬太尼血药浓度与受试者电刺激痛阈的相关性
     三组受试者电刺激痛阈在静脉注射芬太尼后均较给药前增高,且随着芬太尼血药浓度的下降而下降,具有良好的相关性(r1=0.87;r2=0.92;r3=0.91;P均小于0.05)。
     结论
     1.CYP3A4*1G突变可导致芬太尼代谢减弱和静脉注射芬太尼后电刺激痛阈增
     强,可能是引起芬太尼药效学个体差异的原因之一;
     2.受试者电刺激痛阈与芬太尼血药浓度具有良好的相关性。
Background and Objective
     Fentanyl is a opioid widely used for clinical anaesthesia、patient controlled analgesia and therapy for pain. The fentanyl's analgesia effect varies in different patients, which makes it difficult to have the appropriate dose for a patient. Some studies contribute this to the variation of fetanyl pharmacokinetics after intravenous administration. Fentanyl is metabolized predominantly by hepatic cytochrome P4503A4 (CYP3A4) after intravenous administration. CYP3A4 protein expression varies up to 40-folds in liver. The CYP3A4 gene's polymorphism may contribute to interindividual variability in fentanyl metabolism and leading to variability of clinical effect. CYP3A4*1G was found rencently and is a high-frequency allele in Chinese. Previous study show that the CYP3A4*1G allele can decrease the activity of CYP3A4 and then decrease patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl consumption.They speculated variation of fentanyl pharmacokinetics changed by CYP3A4*1G allele maybe the possible reason.Due to the importance of CYP3A4 in the metabolism of fentanyl, we conducted this study to observe the influence of CYP3A4*1G polymorphism on fentanyl pharmacokinetics and pain threshold after injection in female healthy volunteers. The present study provides an important theoretical evidence and foundation for individualization of fentanyl clinical administration.
     Materials and Methods
     1. Subjects
     Total one hundred and sixty-six female students of zheng zhou university, aged 18-25 yr, within±20% of ideal body weight were enrolled for gene analysis. Twenty-eight volunteers were assigned to three groups according to their genotypes: wild homozygote group(10), mutation heterozygote group(10) and mutation homozygote group(8). Before entering the study, all volunteers were ascertained to be in good health by medical history, standard hematological and blood-chemistry tests, clinical examination. None of the volunteers suffered hepatic or renal dysfunction, gastrointestinal disease, volunteers who have consumed drugs known to induce or inhibit the expression of CYP3A enzymes in four weeks were also excluded. The study design was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of the first affiliated hospital of Zheng zhou University and Written informed consent was obtained from all 28 healthy volunteers.
     2. Genotyping assays
     Venous blood samples (2 ml) were collected from all volunteers in this study. The standard phenol/chloroform procedure was used to extracted DNA from leukocytes. Genotype of CYP3A4*1G allele was conducted by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). The results for each genotype were confirmed in randomly selected individuals by direct sequence analysis.
     3. Study design
     Centre early in the morning with vital sign monitored after an over night(12h) fast. Subjects had intravenous catheters placed in both forearms, one for drug administration and the other in the opposite arm for blood sampling. All volunteers received 5 u g/kg of intravenous fentanyl(Fentanyl 0.05 mg/ml injection, Yi-chang ren fu,090903.) in 1 min. Naloxone(Narcanti 1 mg/ml, Beijing Hua su,100812) was used if needed to counteract the side effects of fentanyl. The volunteers who used naloxone were also excluded.The volunteers were given standard meals 4 h and 8 h after fentanyl administration. The drinking of alcohol, coffee, tea, grapefruit juice, or cola was forbidden on the test days and for 2 days prior to the study. A baseline blood sample was drawn into a ethylenediaminetetraacetate (EDTA) tube before fentanyl administration, and timed blood samples (4 ml each) were drawn 0,2,5,10,15,30, 60,90,120,180,300,420,720 min after fentanyl administration. Plasma was separated within 30 min by centrifugation (10 min.4 OOOr·min-1) and stored at-80℃until analysis. Pain threshold was measured using electrical stimulation at the time before and 45 minutes^ 2.5 hours^ 4 hours after fentanyl administration.
     5. Bioanalysis of fentanyl
     Plasma concentrations of fentanyl was quantified by use of an liquid chroma-tography system coupled to tandem mass spectrometry(LC-MS/MS).
     6. Statistical analysis
     The pharmacokinetics parameters of fentanyl were evaluated by 3p97 software.SPSS 10.0 software was used for statistical analyses. Values were reported as x±s. Chi-square test was used to verify Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; One-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) was used to assess whether significant differences exist in the three genotypes;Linear correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between fentanyl concentration and pain threshold;The a was set at 0.05.
     Results
     1. Frequency of CYP3A4*1G allele
     The frequency of CYP3A4*1G allele in female healthy volunteers was 0.235. The allele frequency of CYP3A4*1G was in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (P>0.05).
     2. General information of volunteers
     Twenty-eight volunteers were assigned to three groups according to their genotypes:wild homozygote group(10), mutation heterozygote group(10) and mutation homozygote group(8). Aged 18-25 yr, within±20% of ideal body weight. There was no significant difference in age, Body Mass Index and pain threshold before fentanyl injectionCP>0.05).
     3. Association of CYP3A4*1G gene polymorphism with fentanyl pharmacokinetics
     Fentanyl AUC 0~∞, t 1/2βin mutation homozygote group were significantly increased than those in mutation heterozygote group and Wild homozygote group (P <0.05),but there is no difference between mutation heterozygote group and wild homozygote group(P>0.05).
     4. Association of CYP3A4*1G gene polymorphism with pain threshold
     Mutation homozygote group has higher pain threshold than mutation heterozygote group and Wild homozygote group after fentanyl injection(P< 0.05),but there is no difference between mutation heterozygote group and wild homozygote group(P>0.05).
     5. correlation between fentanyl concentration and pain threshold
     The pain threshold increased in all three groups after fentanyl administration,and then decreased with fentanyl concentration decreasing.There was a good correlation between fentanyl concentration and pain threshold.
     Conclusions
     1. CYP3A4*1G polymorphism is related to the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl, and people with CYP3A4*1G variant A allele have a lower metabolic rate of fentanyl and higher pain tolerance. The specific CYP3A4*1G polymorphism may predict the individual requirement of fentanyl.
     2. There was a good correlation between fentanyl concentration and pain threshold.
引文
[1]Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Rosenberg J, et al. Characteristics and prediction of early pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Pain 2001,90:261-269.
    [2]Cepeda MS, Carr DB. Women experience more pain and require more morphine than men to achieve a similar degree of analgesia. Anesth Analg 2003,97:1464-1468.
    [3]Tan EC, Lim Y, Teo YY, et al. Ethnic differences in pain perception and patient-controlled analgesia usage for postoperative pain. J Pain 2008,9:849-855.
    [4]Wei Zhang, Yan-Zi Chang, Quan-Cheng Kan. CYP3A4*1G genetic polymorphism influences CYP3A activity and response to fentanyl in Chinese gynecologic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2010) 66:61-66.
    [5]Bentley J,Betal H. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients of different ages. Anesth Analg.1992,61 (12):968.
    [6]Lotsch J, Geisslinger G. Are mu-opioid receptor polymorphisms important for clinical opioid therapy? Trends Mol Med 2005,11:82-89.
    [7]Nagashima M, Katoh R, Sato Y, et al. Is there genetic polymorphism evidence for individual human sensitivity to opiates? Curr Pain Headache Rep 2007,11:115-123.
    [8]Samer CF,Dayer D, et al. Genetic polymorphism and drug interactions:their importance in the treatment of pain. Can J Anaesth 2005,52:806-821.
    [9]Abood ME. Molecular biology of cannabinoid receptors. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2005, 168:81-115.
    [10]Labroo RB, Paine MF, Thummel KE, et al. Fentanyl metabolism by human hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P4503A4:implications for interindividual variability in disposition, efficacy, and drug interactions. Drug Metab Dispos 1997,25:1072-1080.
    [11]舒炎,周宏灏.细胞色素P450药物氧化代谢酶的遗传药理学进展.见:王永铭,苏定冯,主编.药理学进展.第1版.北京:科学出版社,2000.19.
    [12]Zhu B, Liu ZQ, Chen GL, et al. The distribution and gender difference of CYP3A activity in Chinese subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2003,55:264-269.
    [13]Eiselt R, DomanskiTL, ZibatA, etal. Identification and functional characterization of eight CYP3A4 protein variants. Pharmacogenetics,2001,11:447-458.
    [14]Hsieh KP, Lin YY, Cheng CL, et al. Novel mutations of CYP3A4 in Chinese. Drug Metab Dispos 2001,29:268-273.
    [15]Dai D, Tang J, Rose R, et al. Identification of variants of CYP3A4 and characterization of their abilities to metabolize testosterone and chlorpyrifos. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001,299: 825-831.
    [16]Du J, Xing Q, Xu L, et al. Systematic screening for polymorphisms in the CYP3A4 gene in the Chinese population. Pharmacogenomics 2006,7:831-841
    [17]Du J, Yu L, Wang L, et al. Differences in CYP3A4*1G genotype distribution and haplotypes of CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 in 3 Chinese populations. Clin Chim Acta 2007,383:172-174.
    [18]Gao Y, Zhang LR, Fu Q. CYP3A4*1G polymorphism is associated with lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin but not of simvastatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008,64:877-882.
    [19]Camu F, Van Aken H, Bovill JG, et al. Postoperative analgesic effects of three demand-dose sizes of fentanyl administered by patient-controlled analgesia. Anesth Analg 1998,87:890-895.
    [20]Kristin Moksnes & Olav M. Fredheim. Early pharmacokinetics of nasal fentanyl:
    [21]is there a significant arterio-venous difference? Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2008) 64:497-502
    [22]Harukuni I, Yamaguchi H, Sato S, Naito H.The comparison of epidural fentanyl, epidural lidocaine and intravenous fentanyl in patients undergoing gastrectomy. Anesth Analg 1995;81:1169-74.
    [23]Hu YF, He J, Chen GL, et al. CYP3A5*3 and CYP3A4*18 single nucleotide polymorphismsin a Chinese population. Clinica Chimica Acta 2005,353:187-192.
    [24]Fukushima-Uesaka H, Saito Y, Watanabe H, et al. Haplotypes of CYP3A4 and their close linkage with CYP3A5 haplotype in a Japanese population. Human Mutation 2008,26:100-108.
    [25]成碟,徐为人,刘昌孝.细胞色素P450(CYP450)遗传多态性研究进展.中国药理学通报.2006,12:1409-1414.
    [26]Eiselt R, Domanski TL, Zibat A, et al. Identification and functional characterization of eight CYP3A4 protein variants. Pharmacogenetics 2001,11:447-458.
    [27]储小曼,曹文,闵佩清等.肾移植病人中CYP3A4基因多态性对环孢素A代谢的影响.中国临床药理学杂志.2003,19:421-425.
    [28]Sata F, Sapone A, Elizondo G, et al. CYP3A4 allelic variants with amino acid substitutions in exon 7 and 12:evidence for an allelic variant with altered catalvtic activity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2000,67:48-56.
    [29]杨敏,姚树桥,张长杰.痛阈的检测及影响因素.中国康复理论与实践.2009,7(15):603-604.
    [30]Lund I, Lundeberg T, Kowalski J, et al. Evaluation of variations in sensory and pain t hreshold assessment s by elect rocutaneous stimulation[J]. Physiot her Theory Pract,2005, 21 (2):81-92.
    [31]Irene Lund, Thomas Lundeberg. Evaluation of variations in sensory and pain threshold assessments by electrocutaneous stimulation. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice,2005 21(2):81-92.
    [32]Schafer E, Finkensiep H, Kaup M. Effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain perception threshold of human teeth:a double blind, placebo controlled study [J]. Clin Oral Investig,2000,4 (2):81-86.
    [33]徐凯智,岳静玲,陈树强.中华麻醉学杂志,芬太尼在腹部手术不同年龄患者的药代动力学研究.2001,21(1):18-20.
    [34]Teijo I. Saari & Kari Laine. Effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2008) 64:25-30..
    [1]Stevenson IH,张佩谨.老年药动学.国外医药.合成药.生化药.制剂分册.1997,22-25.
    [2]O' Mally,Waddington.Therapeutics in the elderly.1993,34-41.
    [3]徐凯智,岳静玲,陈树强.芬太尼在腹部手术不同年龄患者的药代动力学研究.中华麻醉学杂志.2001,1:18-20.
    [4]Bentley J,Betal H. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in patients of different ages. Anesth Analg.1992,61(12):968.
    [5]Kochntop DE et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in newborn babies. Anesth Analg.1986,65(3):227.
    [6]Scott JC, Stanski DR. Decreased fentanyl and alfentanil dose requirements with age. A simultaneous pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluation.J Pharmacol Exp Ther.1987; 240:159-166
    [7]Coffey L. Domanski TL,Zibat A.et al. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in Patients with Different Hepatic Function. Pharmacogenetics,2006,11:447-458.
    [8]Sarah J, Johnson. Opioid Safety in Patients With Renal or Hepatic Dysfunction. Pain Treatment Topics.2007,30
    [9]徐凯智,岳静玲,胡小琴.心内直视手术不同用药方法对芬太尼药代动力学的影响.中华麻醉学杂志.2003,7:538-540.
    [10]Kristin Moksnes & Olav M. Fredheim. Early pharmacokinetics of nasal fentanyl:is there a significant arterio-venous difference? Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2008) 64:497-502
    [11]Harukuni I, Yamaguchi H, Sato S, Naito H.The comparison of epidural fentanyl, epidural lidocaine and intravenous fentanyl in patients undergoing gastrectomy. Anesth Analg 1995;81:1169-74.
    [12]Eiselt R, Domanski TL,Zibat A, et al. Identification and functional characterization of eight CYP3A4 protein variants.Pharmacogenetics,2001,11:447^-58.
    [13]Rowland M, Tozer TN (1995) Elimination. In:Rowland M, TozerTN (eds) Clinical pharmacokinetics:concepts and applications.3rd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 156-183
    [14]Olkkola KT, Palkama V, Neuvonen PJ (1999) Ritonavir's role inreducing fentanyl clearance and prolonging its half-life. Anesthesiology 91(3):681-685
    [15]Kharasch ED, Whittington D, Hoffer C (2004) Influence of hepatic and intestinal cytochrome P4503A activity on the acute disposition and effects of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate. Anesthesiology 101(3):729-737
    [16]Teijo I. Saari & Kari Laine. Effect of voriconazole and fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous fentanyl. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2008) 64:25-30.
    [17]Adil Virani, Angela Mailis,Lori E. Drug interactions in human neuropathic pain pharmacotherapy. Pain 73 (1997) 3-13.
    [18]Nagashima M, Katoh R, Sato Y, et al. Is there genetic polymorphism evidence for individual human sensitivity to opiates? Curr Pain Headache Rep 2007,11:115-23.
    [19]Wandel C, Kim R, Wood M, et al. Interaction of morphine, fentanyl, sufen-tanil,alfentanil and loperamide with the efflux drug transporter P-glycoprotein. Anesthesiology 2002, 96(4):913-920.
    [20]Wielandt AM, Vollrath V, Chianale J. Polymorphisms of the MDR1 gene in Mapuche, Mestizo and Maori populations in Chile. Rev Med Chil.2004,132:1061-1068.
    [21]Patel NH, Rothenberg ML. Multidrug resistance in cancer chemotherapy. [J] Invest New Drugs,1994,12(1):1-13.
    [22]张卫,赵二贤,阐全程等.MDR1基因多态性对妇科病人芬太尼静脉镇痛药效学的影响.中国药学杂志.2010,45(5):379-381.
    [23]Park HJ, Shinn HK, Ryu SH, et al. Genetic Polymorphisms in the ABCB1 Gene and he Effects of Fentanyl in Koreans.Clin Pharmacol Ther.2007,84:539-546.
    [24]Hamabe W, Maeda T, Fukazawa Y, et al. P-glycoprotein ATPase activating effect of opioid analgesics and their P-glycoprotein-dependent antinociception in mice.Pharmacol Biochem Behav.2006,84:1022-33.
    [25]Jounaidi Y, Guzelian PS, Maurel P et al. Sequence of the 5-flanking region of CYP3A5: comparative analysis with CYP3A4 and CYP3A7.[J] Biochem Res Commun, 1994,205(5):1741-7.
    [26]Peyronneau MA, Renaud J P, Jaouen M et al. Expression in yeast of three allelic cDNAs coding for human liver P4503A4 different stabilities, binding properties and catalytic activites of the yeast-produced enzymes.Eur J Biochem,2006,218(11):355-61.
    [27]Hsieh KP, Lin YY, Cheng CL, et al. Novel mutations of CYP3A4 in Chinese. Drug Metab Dispos 2001,29:268-273.
    [28]储小曼,曹文,闵佩清等.肾移植病人中CYP3A4基因多态性对环孢素A代谢的影响.中国临床药理学杂志.2003,19:421-425.
    [29]Hu YF, Tu JH, Tan ZR, et al. Association of CYP3A4*18B polymorphisms with the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in healthy subjects. Xenobiotica 2007,37:315-27.
    [30]Gao Y, Zhang LR, Fu Q. CYP3A4*1G polymorphism is associated with lipid-lowering efficacy of atorvastatin but not of simvastatin. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2008,64:877-882.
    [31]Wei Zhang & Yan-Zi Chang & Quan-Cheng Kan. CYP3A4*1G genetic polymer-phism influences CYP3A activity and response to fentanyl in Chinese gynecologic patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol (2010) 66:61-66
    [32]Jin M, Gock SB, Jannetto PJ, et al. Pharmacogenomics as molecular autopsy for forensic toxicology:genotyping cytochrome P4503A4*1B and 3A5*3 for25 fentanyl cases. J Anal Toxicol 2005,29:590-598.
    [33]张卫 袁静静 阚全程.CYP3A5*3基因多态性对病人芬太尼镇痛效应的影响.中华麻醉学杂志.2009,12:1083-1086.
    [34]董庆龙温晓晖欧阳葆怡.急性高容量血液稀释对血液动力学及血液流变学的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志2001 21(5)265-8..
    [35]陈启旭,林学武.心内手术中急性血液稀释对芬太尼药代动力学的影响.蚌埠医学院院报.2007,4:416418.
    [36]Shoemaker WC:Circulatory mechanisms of shock and their mediators.Crit Care Med 1987; 15:787-94
    [37]Talmage D. Egan,Suma Kuramkote. Fentanyl Phamacokinetics in Hemorrhagic Shock Anesthesiology 1999; 91:156-66
    [38]廖琴.影响疼痛敏感性和芬太尼镇痛剂量的遗传和非遗传因素研究.中南大学博士毕业论文.2008年.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700