下刚果盆地HauterA区块储层信息挖掘及勘探目标评价
|
摘要
本文主要通过分析下刚果盆地Hauter A区块下白垩碳酸盐储层的岩石地球物理响应特征,通过地震反射结构分析、正演模拟分析、分频处理、地震波形分类等手段研究储层发育有利相带、规模和范围,并通过叠前叠后反演、频谱吸收、地震多属性物性预测等手段建立了从相控反演(基本解决物性预测)→叠前反演(提高物性预测)→地震多属性+分频反演(物性定量预测)→LMR反演+吸收(烃类检测)等一套适合本区深层碳酸盐储层预测的技术流程。并针对本区碳酸盐储层埋藏较深、井少、储层薄、地震分辨率低等特点,在如何最大限度地挖掘地震资料的信息,提高反演可靠性方面取得以下成果:(1)本次将AVO属性处理和地震拓频技术进行结合,建立了适合本区储层地质特点的提高分辨率方法,为后续的精细反演提供了可靠的数据基础。(2)针对井少、储层横向变化快,为了减少反演的多解性,本研究将沉积相研究结果与三维地震建模和储层反演进行结合,利用沉积研究结果进行控制,建立了相控下的反演初始模型,减少了反演的多解性和模型化影响。(3)利用改进后的Fatti方程进行叠前联合反演,同时得到纵横波速度及密度三参数信息,这种方法在反演过程中考虑了Vp、Vs和密度之间的关系,使得反演结果更准确。大大提高了其岩性及物性预测的能力。(4)由于研究工区井少而且位于不同的构造带,加上深水钻探带来的经济风险,在储层研究的基础上,结合构造和有机地化等资料进行了成藏规律研究,并综合其研究成果对有利构造带进行综合评价,降低钻井风险。综合叠后、叠前反演、频谱吸收以及多属性分析等手段,利用概率法和信息融合法对有利储层分布规律进行综合评价。
In this paper, by analyzing rock geophysical response characteristics of Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoir in he Lower Congo Basin Hauter A block, the scale and scope of favorable macro-facies is researched by means of structural analysis of seismic reflection, forward modeling analysis, Spectral Decomposition processing, seismic waveform classification, and a suite of technology workflow for deep carbonate reservoir prediction is established through Poststack and Prestack inversion, spectral absorption properties etc. for the region buried deep carbonate reservoirs, less wells , thin reservoirs and low seismic resolution on how to maximize the information of seismic data and improve the reliability of inversion has done the following innovations: (1) This will combine AVO attribute seismic processing and frequency extension technology, a suitable geological characteristics of the reservoir to improve the resolution method is established, it provides a reliable data basis for subsequent inversion of the data. (2) for less wells and quick lateral reservoir change, in order to reduce the inversion of multiple solutions, this research will combine sedimentary facies study and reservoir modeling and seismic inversion to integrate inversion through the use of sediment control studies. (3) through the use of improved Fatti equation, prestack inversion simultaneously obstain P-wave velocity, shear wave velocity and density of information, this method is considered in the inversion process of Vp, Vs and density relationship, it make the inversion results more accurate and Greatly enhance the ability to predict lithology and physical properties. (4) Because of less well and a different belt, it couple with the economic risks of deep drilling, this study based on the research in the reservoir, other structural and organic geochemical data develop a comprehensive evaluation for reducing drilling risk. On this basis, a comprehensive evaluation of reservoir distribution is done by using the probability method and the information fusion method.
In this paper, by analyzing rock geophysical response characteristics of Lower Cretaceous carbonate reservoir in he Lower Congo Basin Hauter A block, the scale and scope of favorable macro-facies is researched by means of structural analysis of seismic reflection, forward modeling analysis, Spectral Decomposition processing, seismic waveform classification, and a suite of technology workflow for deep carbonate reservoir prediction is established through Poststack and Prestack inversion, spectral absorption properties etc. for the region buried deep carbonate reservoirs, less wells , thin reservoirs and low seismic resolution on how to maximize the information of seismic data and improve the reliability of inversion has done the following innovations: (1) This will combine AVO attribute seismic processing and frequency extension technology, a suitable geological characteristics of the reservoir to improve the resolution method is established, it provides a reliable data basis for subsequent inversion of the data. (2) for less wells and quick lateral reservoir change, in order to reduce the inversion of multiple solutions, this research will combine sedimentary facies study and reservoir modeling and seismic inversion to integrate inversion through the use of sediment control studies. (3) through the use of improved Fatti equation, prestack inversion simultaneously obstain P-wave velocity, shear wave velocity and density of information, this method is considered in the inversion process of Vp, Vs and density relationship, it make the inversion results more accurate and Greatly enhance the ability to predict lithology and physical properties. (4) Because of less well and a different belt, it couple with the economic risks of deep drilling, this study based on the research in the reservoir, other structural and organic geochemical data develop a comprehensive evaluation for reducing drilling risk. On this basis, a comprehensive evaluation of reservoir distribution is done by using the probability method and the information fusion method.
引文
Andrew Dilay. Spectral analysis applied to seismic monitoring of thermal recovery,The Leading Edge,NOV.1995:1117～1122
Backus GE., Gilbert JF. Numerical application of a formulism for geophysical problem. Geophys.J.R.astr.Soc.,1967,13,247～276
Backus GE., Gilbert JF. The resolving power of gross earth data.Geophys.l.R.astr.Soc., 1968,16,169～205.
Behrens RA, Macleod MK,Tran TT,et al.Incorporating seismic attribute maps in 3D reservoir models.SPE Reservoir valuation&Engineering,1991.
Bian AF, Yu WH. Layer-stripping full waveform inversion with damped seismic reflection data. Journal of earth science, 2011, 22(2):241～249
Brenner M.Wavelet analyses of F/A-18 aeroelasticand aeroservoelastic flight test data.In: ssth AIAA Struetures, Struetural Dynamies and Materials Conferenee,1997.696～698
Bruce H., Marc AC.Understanding seismic attribute through forward modeling. The Leading Edge,2004,834～841
Cesteiro A, Ramos HM. Analysis of seismic actions in pipe infrastructures security. Environmental hydraulics: theoretical, experimental and computational solutions.
In: International Workshop on Environmental Hydraulics, OCT 29-30, 2009 Valencia, SPAIN, 2010,337-340
Colpaert A, Pickard N, Mienert J, et al. 3D seismic analysis of an upper palaeozoic carbonate succession of the Eastern Finnmark Platform area, Norwegian Barents Sea. Sedimentary geology, 2007, 197(1-2):79～98
Connolly P.Elastic impedance.The leading Edge,1999,18(4):438～453
Cukur D, Horozal S, Kim DC, et al. Seismic stratigraphy and structural analysis of the northern East China Sea Shelf Basin interpreted from multi-channel seismicreflection data and cross-section restoration. Marine and petroleum geology, 2011, 28(5):1003～1022
De Freitas JM. Recent developments in seismic seabed oil reservoir monitoring applications using fibre-optic sensing networks. Measurement science and technology,2011, 22
Donoho D.De-noising by soft-Thresholding. IEEE.Trans on Information Theory.1995.3:613～627
Graves RW, Aagaard BT. Testing Long-Period Ground-Motion Simulations of Scenario Earthquakes Using the M-w 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah Mainshock:
Evaluation of Finite-Fault Rupture Characterization and 3D Seismic Velocity Models. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 2011, 101(2):895～907
Haase AB, Ursenbach CP. Spherical-wave AVO modeling in elastic and anelastic two-layer media. Journal of seismic exploration, 2008, 17(1):85～101
Hampson DP, Schuelke JS, Quirein JA. Use of multiattribute transforms to predict log properties from seismic data.Geophysics, 2001, 66(1):220～236
Hart BS, Balch RS. Approaches to defining reservoir physical properties from 3-D seismic attributes with limited well control:An example from the Jurassic Smackover Formation,Alabama.Geophysics,2000(65):368～376
Hirsche K, Porter H, Mewhort L, et al. The use and abuse of geostatistics. The Leading Edge, 1997(16):253～260
Hunt L, Downton J, Reynolds S, et al. The effect of interpolation on imaging and AVO: A Viking case study.Geophysics, 2010, 75(6):265～274
Jackson DD. Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data.Geophys.J.R.astr.Soc., 1972,28,97～109.
Jafari A, Babadagli T. Generating 3D Permeability Map of Fracture Networks Using Well, Outcrop, and Pressure-Transient Data. SPE reservoir evaluation and engineering, 2011, 14(2):215～224
Jin S, Madariaga R. Nonlinear velocity inversion by a two-step Monte Carlo method.Geophysics,1994,59(4):577～590
Kalkomey CT. Potential risks when using seismic attributes as predictors of reservoir properties. The Leading Edge, 1997(10):11～15
Kane DL, Prieto GA, Vernon FL, et al. Quantifying seismic source parameter uncertainties. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 2011, 101(2):535～543
Karimi O, Omre H, Mohammadzadeh M. Bayesian closed-skew Gaussian inversion of seismic AVO data for elastic material properties.Geophysics, 2010, 75(1):1～11
Kim JS, Kim WK, Ha HS, et al. AVO analysis using crossplot and amplitude polynomial methods for characterisation of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Exploration geophysics, 2011, 42(1):25～41
Klarner S, Ujetz B, Fontana RL. Enhanced depositional and AVO models for lithologically complex sandstones in the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. Petroleum geoscience, 2008, 14(3):235～243
Kusky TM. Comparison of results of recent seismic profiles with tectonic models of the North China craton. Journal of earth science, 2011, 22(2):250～259
Mallat SG, Hang WL.Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Trans on Information Theory,1992,38(2):617～643
Marfurt KJ, Kirlin RL, Farmer SL, et al. 3-D seismic attributes using a semblance-based coherency algorithm.Geophysics, 1998, 63(4):1150～1165
Nur A.Seismic and acoustic velocities in reservoir Rocks,Vol.2,Theoretical and model studies. Soc.Expl.Geophys Reprint Series,1992.457.
Ostrander W J.Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at nonnormal angles of incidence.Geophysics,1984,49(6):1637～1648
Parker RL. understanding inverse theory.Ann,Rev.Earth Planet,Sci., 1976,5,35～64.
Pearson RA, Hart BS. Convergence of 3-D seismic attribute-based reservoir property prediction and geologic interpretation as a risk reduction tool: A case study from a Permian intraslope basin.69th Ann.Internat.Mtg.,Soc.Expl.Geophys.,Expanded Abstracts,1999,896～899.
Portniaguine O,Castagna JP.Inverse spectral decomposition. Expanded Abstracts of 74th Annual Internat SEG Mtg, 2004,1786～1789
Rajput S, Thakur NK, Rao PP, et al. AVO response for a complex double bottom simulating reflectors model. Current science, 2010, 98(10):1354～1358
Ronen S., Schultz ES., Hattori M., et al. Seismic guided estimation of log properties, part1,2,3:Using artificial neural networks for nonlinear attribute calibration.The Leading Edge,1994(13):305～310
Rubino JG, Velis DR, Sacchi MD. Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: Application to monitoring of CO_2 storage at the Sleipner field. Journal of geophysical research-solid earth, 2011, 116.
Russell B., Hampson D., Schuelke J. , et al. Multiattribute seismic analysis. The Leading Edge,1997(16):1439～1443
Russell BH, Hampson DP. A comparison of post-stack seismic inversion. 61th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstraces,1991.876～878
Savic M, Masters R, Sena A, et al. Elastic impedance inversion in practice.70th SEG Annual Meeting,Expanded Abstracts,2000,119
Schuelke JS, Quirein JA.Validation: A technique for selecting seismic attributes and verifying results. 68th Ann.Internat.Mtg.,Soc.Expl.Geophys.,Expanded Abstracts,1998,936～939
Shimizu S. Behaviour of steel columns under 3-D seismic load. Thin-walled structures, 2011, 49(5):544～553
Sloan SD, Tsoflias GP, Steeples DW. Shallow seismic AVO variations related to partial water saturation during a pumping test. Geophysical research letters, 2007, 34
Tinivella U, Accaino F, Giustiniani M, et al. Petro-physical characterization of shallow aquifers by using AVO and theoretical approaches. Bollettino Di geofisica teprica ed applicata, 2009, 50(1):59～69
Trani M, Arts R, Leeuwenburgh O, et al. Estimation of changes in saturation and pressure from 4D seismic AVO and time-shift analysis.Geophysics, 2011, 76(2):1～17
Ursenbach CP, Haase AB, Downton JE. An efficient method for AVO modeling of reflected spherical waves. Journal of seismic exploration, 2007, 16(1):79～104
Veeken PCH, Priezzhev II, Shmaryan LE, et al. Nonlinear multitrace genetic nversion applied on seismic data across the Shtokman field, offshore northern Russia.Geophysics, 2009, 74(6):49～59
Vetterli M, Herley C.Wavelets and filter banks: theory and design.IEEE Transaetions on Signal Pro-eessiDg.1992.40(9):2207～2232
Walker C, Ulrych TJ.Auto regressive recovery of the acoustic impedance. Geophysics,1983,48(10):1338～1350
Wiggins RA. The generalized linear inverse problem:Implication of surface waves and free oscillations for earth structure.Rev.Geophys.Space Phys., 1972,10:251～285.
Yan J, Tsvankin I. AVO-sensitive semblance analysis for wide-azimuth data. Geophysics, 2008, 73(2):1～11
Zhang YF, Hong F.A method of improving seismic data resolution:comprehensive inversion of well logging and seismic data.Journal of China University of Geosciences,1996,(2):193～196
白彦彬,杨长春,井西利.地质规律约束下的波阻抗反演.石油物探,2002,41(1):61～64
贝智敏,周英,席敏红.AVO属性工作站处理及解释.海洋石油,2001,3.
陈丽虹,孙建国,吴燕冈,等.地球物理反演的拟线性近似方法综述.地球物理学进展,2002,17(3):464～471
陈习峰,张海洋,应用AVO属性识别含油砂体.小型油气藏,2005,10(1):20～23
陈遵德,祝文亮,王卫华,等.孔隙度预测中的地震特征优化方法及应用.石油学报,1999,20(l):50～55
程冰洁,张玉芬.AVO简化方程的物理意义及其在油气识别中的应用.物探化探计算技术,2003, 25(1):89～93
崔炯成,赵煜.波阻抗剖面处理中的新技术.中国海上油气(地质),1994,8(3):204～209
窦易升.薄层厚度定量解释的振幅谱评比方法.石油物探信息,1995,30(增刊2):57～64
高喜龙,孙希瑞,李顺玲,等.测井约束反演在埕岛油田储层预测中的应用.石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(3):334～338
贺振华,黄德济.复杂油气藏地震波场特征方法理论与应用.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1999
胡光岷,贺振华,黄德济.广义非线性反演及其应用.石油物探,2000,39(2):44～51
黄捍东,贺振华,刘洪昌.测井一构造约束地震资料目标反演.石油地球物理勘探,1999,34(5):595～600
姜秀清,于建国.波阻抗剖面在砂层解释中的应用.石油物探,1997,36(1):53～60
李明,侯连华,邹才能,等.岩性地层油气藏地球物理勘探技术与应用.北京:石油工业出版社,2005,74～145
李庆忠.论地震约束反演的策略.石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(4):423～438
李庆忠.走向精确的勘探道路—高分辨率三维地震勘探系统工程剖析.北京:石油工业出版社,1994
李艳玲.AVO叠前反演技术研究.大庆石油地质与开发.2006,25(5):103～105
李正文,李琼,唐建明.油气储集层线性与非线性联合预测方法技术及应用.石油物探,2000,39(2):15～23
李正文.地震数据多参数约束反演及应用.石油地球物理勘探,1994,29(5):581～587
李正文.高分辨率地震勘探:成都科技大学出版社,1993
刘春成,赵立,王春红,等.测井约束波阻抗反演及应用.中国海上油气(地质),2000,14(1):64～67
刘全新.储层预测与地震反演.俄罗斯地球物理勘探前沿技术文集.北京:石油厂业出版社,2000:203～208
刘希强,李红,郑建常,等.非线性方法在地球物理研究中的应用综述和展望.国际地震动态,2000,1(5):5～12.
刘宪斌,林金逞,韩春明,等.地震储层研究的现状及展望.地球学报,2002,23(1):73～78
卢占武,韩立国.波阻抗反演技术研究进展.世界地质,2002,21(4):372～377
马劲风,王学军,贾春环,等.波阻抗约束反演中的约束方法研究.石油物探,2000,39(2):52～63
马劲风,王学军,钟俊,等.测井资料约束的波阻抗反演中的多解性问题.石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):7～10
马劲风,许升辉,王桂水,等.地震道反演面临的问题与进展.石油物探,2000,39(1):321-325
孟宪军,杜世通.地震资料的测井约束多项式拟合外推反演.石油地球物理勘探,1995,30(3):363～372
潘仁芳.AVO的内涵与外延.石油天然气学报.2006,28(2):50～55
宋宗平.应用AVO属性数据进行波阻抗反演处理.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(4):465～467
孙春岩,章明显,牛滨华,等.天然气水合物地震似海底反射现象AVO正演模型研究.现代地质,2003,17(3):337～343
孙翠娟,李维新,张文.AVO交汇图分析技术的应用.中国海上油气(地质),2002, 16 (4):286～290
孙鹏远,孙建国,卢秀丽.PP波AVO多属性交会图分析.天然气工业,2004,24(2):44～47
孙鹏远,孙建国,卢秀丽.P-P波AVO近似对比研究:定量分析.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(4):172～179
孙振涛,孟宪军.高精度合成地震记录制作技术研究.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(6):640～643
唐建明.AVO纵横波反演.物探化探计算技术,2002,24 (1):27～30
王家映,地球物理反演理论.中国地质大学出版社,1998.
王家映.地球物理反演理论.第一版.北京:中国地质大学出版社,1998,21～58
王兴谋,韩文功,李红梅,等.浅层岩性气藏地震检测的陷阱分析.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003, 27(1):19～22
王延光.储层地震反演方法以及应用中的关键问题与对策.石油物探,2002,41(3):299～303
王云专,李素华,朱伦,等.基于AVO正演模拟的泊松比反演.大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(1):7～15
王云专,杨立伟,李素华.剩余时差校正及泊松比反演.地球物理学进展,2006,21(1):214～218
王云专,张宝金,王秀娟,等.储层参数对AVO响应的影响.大庆石油学院学报,1999,23(3):12～15
熊定钰,钱忠平,赵波.拟合AVO属性反演.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(6):646～651
杨辉,戴世坤,宋海斌,等.综合地球物理联合反演综述.地球物理学进展,2002,17(2):262～270
杨绍国,杨长春.一种基于模型的波阻抗反演方法.物探化探计算技术,1999,21(4):338～341
杨文采.波动方程的逆散射与迭代线性化反演.石油物探,1995,34(3):114～121
杨文采.地球物理反演的理论与方法.第一版.北京:地质出版社,1997,112～156
杨文采.地球物理反演的遗传算法.石油物探,1995.34(1):116～122
杨文采.非线性地球物理反演方法:回顾与展望.地球物理学进展,2002,17(2):255～261
杨文采.非线性反演方法的补充及比较.石油物探,1995,34(4):109～116
杨文采.神经网络算法在地球物理反演中的应用.石油物探,1995.34(2):116～120
杨小萍,董春荣.地震反演技术在储层建模中的作用.西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2000,15(6):9～12
姚逢昌,李宏兵,周学先,等.测井约束地震反演技术在油田开发中的应用.见:北京石油学会青年科技论文选.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
姚姚,詹正彬,钱绍湖.地震勘探新技术与新方法.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,45～79
殷八斤,曾灏,杨在岩.AVO技术的理论与实践.北京:石油工业出版社,1995,191～217
张宝金,成谷,王云专,等.去噪强度,去噪效率与振幅保真.石油地球物理勘探, 2002,37(1):1～5
周丽清,赵丽敏等.高分辨率地震约束相建模.石油勘探与开发, 2002 ,29(3).115
朱广生.地震资料储层预测方法.北京:石油工业出版社,1995
邹才能,张颖.油气勘探开发实用地震新技术.北京:石油工业出版社,2003,275～325
Backus GE., Gilbert JF. Numerical application of a formulism for geophysical problem. Geophys.J.R.astr.Soc.,1967,13,247～276
Backus GE., Gilbert JF. The resolving power of gross earth data.Geophys.l.R.astr.Soc., 1968,16,169～205.
Behrens RA, Macleod MK,Tran TT,et al.Incorporating seismic attribute maps in 3D reservoir models.SPE Reservoir valuation&Engineering,1991.
Bian AF, Yu WH. Layer-stripping full waveform inversion with damped seismic reflection data. Journal of earth science, 2011, 22(2):241～249
Brenner M.Wavelet analyses of F/A-18 aeroelasticand aeroservoelastic flight test data.In: ssth AIAA Struetures, Struetural Dynamies and Materials Conferenee,1997.696～698
Bruce H., Marc AC.Understanding seismic attribute through forward modeling. The Leading Edge,2004,834～841
Cesteiro A, Ramos HM. Analysis of seismic actions in pipe infrastructures security. Environmental hydraulics: theoretical, experimental and computational solutions.
In: International Workshop on Environmental Hydraulics, OCT 29-30, 2009 Valencia, SPAIN, 2010,337-340
Colpaert A, Pickard N, Mienert J, et al. 3D seismic analysis of an upper palaeozoic carbonate succession of the Eastern Finnmark Platform area, Norwegian Barents Sea. Sedimentary geology, 2007, 197(1-2):79～98
Connolly P.Elastic impedance.The leading Edge,1999,18(4):438～453
Cukur D, Horozal S, Kim DC, et al. Seismic stratigraphy and structural analysis of the northern East China Sea Shelf Basin interpreted from multi-channel seismicreflection data and cross-section restoration. Marine and petroleum geology, 2011, 28(5):1003～1022
De Freitas JM. Recent developments in seismic seabed oil reservoir monitoring applications using fibre-optic sensing networks. Measurement science and technology,2011, 22
Donoho D.De-noising by soft-Thresholding. IEEE.Trans on Information Theory.1995.3:613～627
Graves RW, Aagaard BT. Testing Long-Period Ground-Motion Simulations of Scenario Earthquakes Using the M-w 7.2 El Mayor-Cucapah Mainshock:
Evaluation of Finite-Fault Rupture Characterization and 3D Seismic Velocity Models. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 2011, 101(2):895～907
Haase AB, Ursenbach CP. Spherical-wave AVO modeling in elastic and anelastic two-layer media. Journal of seismic exploration, 2008, 17(1):85～101
Hampson DP, Schuelke JS, Quirein JA. Use of multiattribute transforms to predict log properties from seismic data.Geophysics, 2001, 66(1):220～236
Hart BS, Balch RS. Approaches to defining reservoir physical properties from 3-D seismic attributes with limited well control:An example from the Jurassic Smackover Formation,Alabama.Geophysics,2000(65):368～376
Hirsche K, Porter H, Mewhort L, et al. The use and abuse of geostatistics. The Leading Edge, 1997(16):253～260
Hunt L, Downton J, Reynolds S, et al. The effect of interpolation on imaging and AVO: A Viking case study.Geophysics, 2010, 75(6):265～274
Jackson DD. Interpretation of inaccurate, insufficient and inconsistent data.Geophys.J.R.astr.Soc., 1972,28,97～109.
Jafari A, Babadagli T. Generating 3D Permeability Map of Fracture Networks Using Well, Outcrop, and Pressure-Transient Data. SPE reservoir evaluation and engineering, 2011, 14(2):215～224
Jin S, Madariaga R. Nonlinear velocity inversion by a two-step Monte Carlo method.Geophysics,1994,59(4):577～590
Kalkomey CT. Potential risks when using seismic attributes as predictors of reservoir properties. The Leading Edge, 1997(10):11～15
Kane DL, Prieto GA, Vernon FL, et al. Quantifying seismic source parameter uncertainties. Bulletin of the seismological society of America, 2011, 101(2):535～543
Karimi O, Omre H, Mohammadzadeh M. Bayesian closed-skew Gaussian inversion of seismic AVO data for elastic material properties.Geophysics, 2010, 75(1):1～11
Kim JS, Kim WK, Ha HS, et al. AVO analysis using crossplot and amplitude polynomial methods for characterisation of hydrocarbon reservoirs. Exploration geophysics, 2011, 42(1):25～41
Klarner S, Ujetz B, Fontana RL. Enhanced depositional and AVO models for lithologically complex sandstones in the Santos Basin, offshore Brazil. Petroleum geoscience, 2008, 14(3):235～243
Kusky TM. Comparison of results of recent seismic profiles with tectonic models of the North China craton. Journal of earth science, 2011, 22(2):250～259
Mallat SG, Hang WL.Singularity detection and processing with wavelets. IEEE Trans on Information Theory,1992,38(2):617～643
Marfurt KJ, Kirlin RL, Farmer SL, et al. 3-D seismic attributes using a semblance-based coherency algorithm.Geophysics, 1998, 63(4):1150～1165
Nur A.Seismic and acoustic velocities in reservoir Rocks,Vol.2,Theoretical and model studies. Soc.Expl.Geophys Reprint Series,1992.457.
Ostrander W J.Plane-wave reflection coefficients for gas sands at nonnormal angles of incidence.Geophysics,1984,49(6):1637～1648
Parker RL. understanding inverse theory.Ann,Rev.Earth Planet,Sci., 1976,5,35～64.
Pearson RA, Hart BS. Convergence of 3-D seismic attribute-based reservoir property prediction and geologic interpretation as a risk reduction tool: A case study from a Permian intraslope basin.69th Ann.Internat.Mtg.,Soc.Expl.Geophys.,Expanded Abstracts,1999,896～899.
Portniaguine O,Castagna JP.Inverse spectral decomposition. Expanded Abstracts of 74th Annual Internat SEG Mtg, 2004,1786～1789
Rajput S, Thakur NK, Rao PP, et al. AVO response for a complex double bottom simulating reflectors model. Current science, 2010, 98(10):1354～1358
Ronen S., Schultz ES., Hattori M., et al. Seismic guided estimation of log properties, part1,2,3:Using artificial neural networks for nonlinear attribute calibration.The Leading Edge,1994(13):305～310
Rubino JG, Velis DR, Sacchi MD. Numerical analysis of wave-induced fluid flow effects on seismic data: Application to monitoring of CO_2 storage at the Sleipner field. Journal of geophysical research-solid earth, 2011, 116.
Russell B., Hampson D., Schuelke J. , et al. Multiattribute seismic analysis. The Leading Edge,1997(16):1439～1443
Russell BH, Hampson DP. A comparison of post-stack seismic inversion. 61th SEG Annual Meeting, Expanded Abstraces,1991.876～878
Savic M, Masters R, Sena A, et al. Elastic impedance inversion in practice.70th SEG Annual Meeting,Expanded Abstracts,2000,119
Schuelke JS, Quirein JA.Validation: A technique for selecting seismic attributes and verifying results. 68th Ann.Internat.Mtg.,Soc.Expl.Geophys.,Expanded Abstracts,1998,936～939
Shimizu S. Behaviour of steel columns under 3-D seismic load. Thin-walled structures, 2011, 49(5):544～553
Sloan SD, Tsoflias GP, Steeples DW. Shallow seismic AVO variations related to partial water saturation during a pumping test. Geophysical research letters, 2007, 34
Tinivella U, Accaino F, Giustiniani M, et al. Petro-physical characterization of shallow aquifers by using AVO and theoretical approaches. Bollettino Di geofisica teprica ed applicata, 2009, 50(1):59～69
Trani M, Arts R, Leeuwenburgh O, et al. Estimation of changes in saturation and pressure from 4D seismic AVO and time-shift analysis.Geophysics, 2011, 76(2):1～17
Ursenbach CP, Haase AB, Downton JE. An efficient method for AVO modeling of reflected spherical waves. Journal of seismic exploration, 2007, 16(1):79～104
Veeken PCH, Priezzhev II, Shmaryan LE, et al. Nonlinear multitrace genetic nversion applied on seismic data across the Shtokman field, offshore northern Russia.Geophysics, 2009, 74(6):49～59
Vetterli M, Herley C.Wavelets and filter banks: theory and design.IEEE Transaetions on Signal Pro-eessiDg.1992.40(9):2207～2232
Walker C, Ulrych TJ.Auto regressive recovery of the acoustic impedance. Geophysics,1983,48(10):1338～1350
Wiggins RA. The generalized linear inverse problem:Implication of surface waves and free oscillations for earth structure.Rev.Geophys.Space Phys., 1972,10:251～285.
Yan J, Tsvankin I. AVO-sensitive semblance analysis for wide-azimuth data. Geophysics, 2008, 73(2):1～11
Zhang YF, Hong F.A method of improving seismic data resolution:comprehensive inversion of well logging and seismic data.Journal of China University of Geosciences,1996,(2):193～196
白彦彬,杨长春,井西利.地质规律约束下的波阻抗反演.石油物探,2002,41(1):61～64
贝智敏,周英,席敏红.AVO属性工作站处理及解释.海洋石油,2001,3.
陈丽虹,孙建国,吴燕冈,等.地球物理反演的拟线性近似方法综述.地球物理学进展,2002,17(3):464～471
陈习峰,张海洋,应用AVO属性识别含油砂体.小型油气藏,2005,10(1):20～23
陈遵德,祝文亮,王卫华,等.孔隙度预测中的地震特征优化方法及应用.石油学报,1999,20(l):50～55
程冰洁,张玉芬.AVO简化方程的物理意义及其在油气识别中的应用.物探化探计算技术,2003, 25(1):89～93
崔炯成,赵煜.波阻抗剖面处理中的新技术.中国海上油气(地质),1994,8(3):204～209
窦易升.薄层厚度定量解释的振幅谱评比方法.石油物探信息,1995,30(增刊2):57～64
高喜龙,孙希瑞,李顺玲,等.测井约束反演在埕岛油田储层预测中的应用.石油地球物理勘探,2001,36(3):334～338
贺振华,黄德济.复杂油气藏地震波场特征方法理论与应用.成都:四川科学技术出版社,1999
胡光岷,贺振华,黄德济.广义非线性反演及其应用.石油物探,2000,39(2):44～51
黄捍东,贺振华,刘洪昌.测井一构造约束地震资料目标反演.石油地球物理勘探,1999,34(5):595～600
姜秀清,于建国.波阻抗剖面在砂层解释中的应用.石油物探,1997,36(1):53～60
李明,侯连华,邹才能,等.岩性地层油气藏地球物理勘探技术与应用.北京:石油工业出版社,2005,74～145
李庆忠.论地震约束反演的策略.石油地球物理勘探,1998,33(4):423～438
李庆忠.走向精确的勘探道路—高分辨率三维地震勘探系统工程剖析.北京:石油工业出版社,1994
李艳玲.AVO叠前反演技术研究.大庆石油地质与开发.2006,25(5):103～105
李正文,李琼,唐建明.油气储集层线性与非线性联合预测方法技术及应用.石油物探,2000,39(2):15～23
李正文.地震数据多参数约束反演及应用.石油地球物理勘探,1994,29(5):581～587
李正文.高分辨率地震勘探:成都科技大学出版社,1993
刘春成,赵立,王春红,等.测井约束波阻抗反演及应用.中国海上油气(地质),2000,14(1):64～67
刘全新.储层预测与地震反演.俄罗斯地球物理勘探前沿技术文集.北京:石油厂业出版社,2000:203～208
刘希强,李红,郑建常,等.非线性方法在地球物理研究中的应用综述和展望.国际地震动态,2000,1(5):5～12.
刘宪斌,林金逞,韩春明,等.地震储层研究的现状及展望.地球学报,2002,23(1):73～78
卢占武,韩立国.波阻抗反演技术研究进展.世界地质,2002,21(4):372～377
马劲风,王学军,贾春环,等.波阻抗约束反演中的约束方法研究.石油物探,2000,39(2):52～63
马劲风,王学军,钟俊,等.测井资料约束的波阻抗反演中的多解性问题.石油与天然气地质,1999,20(1):7～10
马劲风,许升辉,王桂水,等.地震道反演面临的问题与进展.石油物探,2000,39(1):321-325
孟宪军,杜世通.地震资料的测井约束多项式拟合外推反演.石油地球物理勘探,1995,30(3):363～372
潘仁芳.AVO的内涵与外延.石油天然气学报.2006,28(2):50～55
宋宗平.应用AVO属性数据进行波阻抗反演处理.石油地球物理勘探,2004,39(4):465～467
孙春岩,章明显,牛滨华,等.天然气水合物地震似海底反射现象AVO正演模型研究.现代地质,2003,17(3):337～343
孙翠娟,李维新,张文.AVO交汇图分析技术的应用.中国海上油气(地质),2002, 16 (4):286～290
孙鹏远,孙建国,卢秀丽.PP波AVO多属性交会图分析.天然气工业,2004,24(2):44～47
孙鹏远,孙建国,卢秀丽.P-P波AVO近似对比研究:定量分析.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(4):172～179
孙振涛,孟宪军.高精度合成地震记录制作技术研究.石油地球物理勘探,2002,37(6):640～643
唐建明.AVO纵横波反演.物探化探计算技术,2002,24 (1):27～30
王家映,地球物理反演理论.中国地质大学出版社,1998.
王家映.地球物理反演理论.第一版.北京:中国地质大学出版社,1998,21～58
王兴谋,韩文功,李红梅,等.浅层岩性气藏地震检测的陷阱分析.石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003, 27(1):19～22
王延光.储层地震反演方法以及应用中的关键问题与对策.石油物探,2002,41(3):299～303
王云专,李素华,朱伦,等.基于AVO正演模拟的泊松比反演.大庆石油学院学报,2006,30(1):7～15
王云专,杨立伟,李素华.剩余时差校正及泊松比反演.地球物理学进展,2006,21(1):214～218
王云专,张宝金,王秀娟,等.储层参数对AVO响应的影响.大庆石油学院学报,1999,23(3):12～15
熊定钰,钱忠平,赵波.拟合AVO属性反演.石油地球物理勘探,2005,40(6):646～651
杨辉,戴世坤,宋海斌,等.综合地球物理联合反演综述.地球物理学进展,2002,17(2):262～270
杨绍国,杨长春.一种基于模型的波阻抗反演方法.物探化探计算技术,1999,21(4):338～341
杨文采.波动方程的逆散射与迭代线性化反演.石油物探,1995,34(3):114～121
杨文采.地球物理反演的理论与方法.第一版.北京:地质出版社,1997,112～156
杨文采.地球物理反演的遗传算法.石油物探,1995.34(1):116～122
杨文采.非线性地球物理反演方法:回顾与展望.地球物理学进展,2002,17(2):255～261
杨文采.非线性反演方法的补充及比较.石油物探,1995,34(4):109～116
杨文采.神经网络算法在地球物理反演中的应用.石油物探,1995.34(2):116～120
杨小萍,董春荣.地震反演技术在储层建模中的作用.西安石油学院学报(自然科学版),2000,15(6):9～12
姚逢昌,李宏兵,周学先,等.测井约束地震反演技术在油田开发中的应用.见:北京石油学会青年科技论文选.北京:石油工业出版社,1996
姚姚,詹正彬,钱绍湖.地震勘探新技术与新方法.武汉:中国地质大学出版社,1991,45～79
殷八斤,曾灏,杨在岩.AVO技术的理论与实践.北京:石油工业出版社,1995,191～217
张宝金,成谷,王云专,等.去噪强度,去噪效率与振幅保真.石油地球物理勘探, 2002,37(1):1～5
周丽清,赵丽敏等.高分辨率地震约束相建模.石油勘探与开发, 2002 ,29(3).115
朱广生.地震资料储层预测方法.北京:石油工业出版社,1995
邹才能,张颖.油气勘探开发实用地震新技术.北京:石油工业出版社,2003,275～325