大型供电企业绩效结构及其影响机理研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
随着电力体制改革的不断深化,电网企业正面临着前所未有的挑战与机遇。国家电网公司提出了“电网坚强、资产优良、服务优质、绩效优秀”现代公司的总体发展战略,大型供电企业做为作为国家电网公司的战略执行基本单元,全面推行和加强绩效管理已成为必然选择。
     基于以上目标,确定了研究的主要内容:
     1、构建了大型供电企业绩效形成的G-IPO-M系统框架。在充分文献研究的基础上,构建了绩效形成的G-IPO-M系统框架,明确了绩效形成过程,以及在此过程中的影响要素。并将影响要素总结归类为:绩效形成的投入要素、中间要素和调节要素。
     2、开发了大型供电企业绩效结构及其测量指标。基于战略生态系统,开发了大型供电企业绩效四维结构,即:市场绩效、潜力绩效、财务绩效和社会责任绩效。并通过访谈、问卷调查和实证分析,提出了绩效结构的测量指标体系。运用该绩效结构和测量指标,可以有效进行大型供电企业绩效评价,为绩效动态管理和绩效提升提供了路径参考。这对加强供电企业管理,促进国家电网公司战略的有效推进具有重要现实意义。
     3、探索分析了大型供电企业绩效的影响机理和绩效系统与企业价值的相关性。运用数量分析方法剖析了影响变量之间的驱动关系,发现不同的投入变量对绩效不同构面的作用存在差异性;学习创造能力、决策质量、敏捷力、质量管理这些中间变量对绩效的间接作用明显;领导力、组织气氛、企业文化、执行力等调节变量显著调节投入变量与绩效的关系。管理者可以籍此调节投入变量,注重中间变量和调节变量管理,改进提升企业绩效。研究进一步引入特征偏离程度,验证了大型供电企业绩效系统的内部适配度与企业价值之间呈现显著的负相关。该结论对于企业运营管理和投资决策具有较好的参考价值。
With the deepening of reform in electric power system, power supply enterprise are facing unprecedented challenges and opportunities. To fulfill State Grid Corporation's development strategy, i.e. "strong grid, superior assets, quality service and excellent performance", large-scale power supply enterprises urgently need to strengthen performance management.
     The purpose of this article is to develop scientific performance structure, analyze performance influencing mechanism and then provide effective resource distribution for large-scale power supply enterprises. Based on the above, the paper presents the following:
     1. G-IPO-M system framework is established. Based on former researches, the system framework expresses a casual chain relationship in the process of forming performance. All influential elements can be classified into three categories:input factors, mediate factors and moderator factors.
     2. Performance structure model is established based on ecological system theory. The structure of performance has 4-dimensions:market performance, potential performance, financial performance and corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance. Through interviewing probe, questionnaire survey and multiple statistical analysis method, the paper puts forward measuring index system of performance structure and performance influencing factors structure, which help to power supply enterprises appraise performance, thus providing pass reference for dynamic management and improvement of performance. The conclusion is of realistic significance for strengthening large-scale power supply enterprises management as well as effectively promoting State Grid Corporation's development strategy.
     3. The Influencing mechanism of performance and fit of input-regulation-performance system are analyzed. The driving relationship between influencing variables is explored through quantitative analysis. The result indicates that impact of different variables on different dimensions of performance does vary. Mediate variables such as creative ability, decisions quality, agility and quality management, have significantly indirect effect on performance. And moderator variables such as leadership, organizational climate, corporate culture and execution significantly moderate the relation between input factors and performance. The conclusions guide power supply enterprises to allocate input resources, manage intervening variables and improve enterprise performance. The studies further introduce features deviation degree to prove the significantly negative correlation between the fit of input-regulation-performance system and corporation value. These conclusions of the paper have somewhat positive reference values for enterprises' strategic investment and investment decision.
引文
1. Coleman V I, BormanW C. Investigating the Underlying Structure of the Citizenship Performance Domain[J].Human ResourcesManagementReview, 2000,7:25-44.
    2. D.Arvey, Murphy. Performance Evaluation in Work Settings [J]. Annual Review Psychology,1998 (49):141-168.
    3. Brumbrach. Performance Management [M]. London:The Cronwell Press.1988 (6):48
    4. Jensen, Meckling. Theory of the firm, Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,1976 (3):305-360.
    5. Hamel QPrahaled C K. Competing for the Future [M]. Cambridge:Harvard Business School Press,1994:49-76.
    6. Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., Hofer, C. W. The Determinants of New Venture Performance:An Extended Model [J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice Fall,1998 (2):5-29.
    7. Eric M.Olson,Stanley F.Slater,and GTomas M.Hult:The Performance Implications of Fit among Business Strategy,Marketing Organization Structure, and Strategic Behavior[J]. Journal of Marketing,2005.7 (69):49-65.
    8. Baron,R.M.,Kenny,D.A..The Moderator-mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research Conceptual,Strategic,and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personalityand Social Psychology,1986,51 (6):1173-1182.
    9. McNair, C.J., Lynch, R.L. and Cross, K.L. Do financial and nonfinancial performance measures have to agree?Management Accounting 1990,75.
    10. Jaw, B.S. Liu, W. Promoting Organizational Learning and Self-renewal in Taiwanese Companies:The Role of HRM[J]. Human Resource Management, 2003.42 (3):223-241.
    11. Sun·L·,Aryee·S·Law,K High performance human resource practices,citizenship behavior,and organizational performance:A relational perspective[J].Academy of Management Journal,2007,21 (3):558-577·
    12. Wang, D·,Tsui,A·S·,Zhang,Y,& Ma,L·Employment relationships and firm performance:Evidence from an emerging economy[J] Journal of Organizational Behavior,2003,24:511-535·
    13. Snow, C. Hambrick, D. Measuring Organizational Strategies:Some Theoretical and Methodological Problems [J]. Academy Of Management Review,1980 (5): 527-538.
    14. Grant, R.M. The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage:Implications for Strategy Formulation [J].California Management Review,1991.33 (3): 114-135.
    15. Rejc,A. Toward Contingency Theory of Performance Measurement[J] Journal for East European Management Studies,2004.9(3):243-264.
    16. Bharadwaj A. A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance:An Empirical Investigation [J].MIS Quarterly, 2000.24 (1):169-196.
    17. Jones, G., W. J. Schneider. Intelligence, Human Capital, and Economic Growth:A Bayesian Averaging of Classical Estimates (BACE) Approach[J],Journal of Economic Growth,2006.11 (1):71-93
    18. Bredrup,H. Developing a Performance Management System, Performance Management:A Business Process Bench-marking Approach[M],England: Chapman Hall.2005:84-87.
    19. Child, J. Organizational Structure, Environment, and Performance:The Role of Strategic Choice. Sociology,1972 (6):1-22.
    20. Dess G Davis. Porter's Generic Strategies As Determinants of Strategic Group Membership And Organizational Performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal,1984 (27):467-488.
    21. Venkatraman, N. Grant, N. Construct Measurement In Organizational Strategy Research:Critique And Proposal [J]. Academy of Management Review.1986(2): 71-87.
    22. Kaplan, R., David P. Norton, Having Trouble With Your Strategy? Then Map It[J]. Harvard Business Review,2000 (5):19.
    23. Bassi,L.J.,Harnessing the Power of Intellectual Capital [J]. Training Development,1997.51 (12):25-30.
    24. Bassi, L. J. and Van Buren, M. E. Valuing investment in intellectual capital, International Journal of Technology Management,1999,18 (5/6/7/8):414-432.
    25. Bertalanffy,Von L. General System Theory:a New Approach to Unity of Science[J].Human Biology,1965 (12):302-361.
    26. Bukh,P. N.,Larsen,H. T. Mouritsen,J. Constructing Intellectual Capital Statements [J]. Journal of Management,2001 (17):87-108.
    27. Bukh, P. N. The relevance of intellectual capital disclosure:A paradox Accounting [J], Auditing & Accountability Journal,2003.16 (1):49-56.
    28. Kline, R.B.Latent variable path analysis in clinical research:Abeginners tour guide [J]. Journal of Clinical Psychology,1991,47:471-484.
    29. Kline,R.B., Structural Equation Modeling,New York:The Guilford Press.1998.
    30. BuvikA., GronhaugK. Inter-firm Dependence, Environmental Uncertainty and Vertical Coordination in Industrial Buyer-seller Relationships [J]. Omega,2000, 28:445-454.
    31. Subramaniam M., Watson S. How Interdependence Affects Subsidiary Performance [J]. Journal of Business Research,2006,59:916-924.
    32. YilmazC., SezenB., OzdemirO. Joint and Interactive Effects of Trust and (inter) Dependence on Relationalbehaviors in Long-term Channel Dyads [J]. Industrial Marketing Management,2005,34:235-248.
    33. Beneito P. The Innovative Performance of in-house and Contracted R&D in Terms of Patents and Utility Models [J]. Research Policy,2006,35:502-517
    34. DeLong,D.W. Fahey,L. Diagnosing Culture Barriers to Knowledge Management [J]. The Academy of Management Executive,2000.14 (4):113-127.
    35. Dzinkowski,R. The Measurement and Management of Intellectual Capital:an Introduction [J]. Management Accounting,2000 (2):32-36.
    36. Edvinsson,L. Some Perspectives on Intangibles and Intellectual Capital 2000[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2000 (1):12-16.
    37. Grantham,C. E., Nichols,L. D., A Framework for the Management of Intellectual Capital in the Health Care Industry [J] Journal of Health Care Finance,1997.23 (3):1-19.
    38. Hage,J.T. Organizational Innovation and Organizational Change[J]. Annual Reviews,1999:597-622.
    39. Hair,J. F., Anderson,R. E.,Tatham,R. L., Black,W. C. Multivariate Data Analysis[M].Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice-Hall,1995.132.
    40. Hair J, F., Tatham, R. K., Anderson, R. E., Black, W. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New York:Prentice Hall. Hedges, B. J.1998.
    41. Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., and W. C. Black, Multivariate Data Analysis (3rd) N.Y.:Macmillan Publishing Company.1992.
    42. Howell,J.P.,Dorfman, P.W. Kerr,S. Moderator Variables in Leadership Research[J]. Academy of Management Review,1986.11 (1):88-102.
    43. Johnson, J., Mattson, L. G.,Marketing Investments,and Market Investment in Industrial Market [J].International Journal of Research in Marketing,1985 (2):185-195.
    44. Mabert. V. A.. SonI, A., and Venkataramanan, M. A. Enterprise Resource Planning Survey of U.S. Manufacturing Firms[J]. Production and Inventory Management Journal.2000,4 (2):52-58.
    45. KaulTman, R. J.and Kricbel. C. H. Modeling and Measuring the Business Value of Infomiation Technology,in Measuring the Business Value of Information Technologies, P. Strassmann, P.Berger. E. B. Swanson. C. H. Kriebel, and R. J. Kauffman (eds.),ICIT Press. Washington DC.1988:134-147.
    46. Zhixiong Du.Yoichi Izumida. Does Property Right Transformation Improve Township and Village Enterprises Performance [J].China & World Economy,2006,01:45-47.
    47. Kaplan Rober, S., David, PN.,The Balanced Scorecard:Translating Strategy Into Action[M].Boston,Massachusetts:Harvard Business School Press,1996:129-133
    48. Lynn,B. E. Culture and Intellectual Capital Management:A key Factor in Successful ICM [J]. International Journal of Technology Management,1999.18 (2):590-603.
    49. Lynn,B.E. Performance Evaluation in the New Economy:Bringing the Measurement and Eevaluation of Intellectual Capital into the Management Planning and Control System[J]. International Journal of Technology Management,1998.16 (3):162-176.
    50. Martensen,A., Dahlgaard,J. Strategy and Planning for Innovation Management-Supported by Creative and Learning Organizations[M]. The International Journal of Quality Reliability Management,Bradford,1999:878-891.
    51. Petty,R.,Guthrie,J. Intellectual Ccapital Literature Review:Measurement, Reporting and Management[J]. Journal of Intellectual Capital,2000.1 (2):155-176.
    52. Porter,Steers,Mowday and Boulian,Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Turnover among Psychiatric Technicians[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1974.59:603-609.
    53. Mowday, R. T., Porter, L. W.,& Steer, R. M. Employee-organization linkages: The psychology of commitment, absenteeism, and turnover. New York:Academic Press,1982.
    54. Roos,J. and von Krogh,G. The Epistemological Challenge:Managing Knowledge and Intellectual Capital[J].European Management Journal,1996 (8):333-337.
    55. Venkatraman,N. The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research:toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence [M]. Academy of Management Review,JAI Press, 1989.14:333-365.
    56. David.H Peters,Ayan Ahmed Noor,Lakhwinder P Singh,et al·A Balanced Scorecard for Health Services[J]. Afghanistan Bulletin of the World Health Organization,2007.85 (2):146-151.
    57. Bollen K. A. Structural Equations with Latent Variables [M]. New York:Wiley, 1989.
    58. Robert S.Kaplan, David P.Norton. The Balanced Scorecard:Measures that Drive Performance [J]. Harvard Business Review,1992.1 (70):71-79.
    59. E. Ciavolino, J.J. Dahlgaard. Simultaneous Equation Model based on the generalized maximum entropy for studying the effect of management factors on enterprise performance [J]. Journal of Applied Statistics 2009.7 (36):801-815.
    60. Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, Using Balance Scorecard as Strategy Management System [J].Harvard Business Review, Jan/Feb 1996.74 (1):75-86.
    61. Ackoff, R.L. Science in the Systems Age:Beyond IE, OR, and MS [J].Operations Research,1972.21 (3):661-671.
    62. Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., and C. A. Smith Commitment to Organizations and Occupations [M]. Extension and Test of a Three-Component Conceptualization, Journal of Applied Psychology,1993 (78):538-551.
    63. Meyer, J. P., Allen. A Three-Component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment [J].Human Resource Management Review,1991 (1):61-89.
    64. Mobley, W. H. Intermediate Linkages in the Relationship between Job Satisfaction and Employee Turnover [J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1977 (62):237-240.
    65. Michael Pollitt. Benchmarking and Regulation:International Electricity Experience[J]. Utilities Policy,2001 (3):107-130.
    66. Lubatkin,M.H.,Zeki S.,Ling Y.,Veiga,J.F..Ambidexterity and Performance in Small-to Medium-Sized Firms:The Pivotal Role of Top Management Team Behavioral Integration.Journal of Management,2006, (5):646-672.
    67. Kim SK., Hsieh PH. Interdependence and ItsConsequencesin Distributor-Supplier Relationships:ADistributorPerspective Through Response Surface Approach [J]. Journal of MarketingResearch,2003, XL:101-112.
    68. Anderson P W,Arrow K J,Pinesd. the Economy as an Evolving Complex System [M]. Boulder, CO:Westview Press,2006:122-268.
    69. Cohen Wesley M.,Levinthal Daniel A.Absorptive Capacity:a New Perspective on Learning and Innovation [J].Administrative Science Quarterly.2007,35 (1):128-152.
    70. Slaski,M.,Cartwright,S..Health,Performance and Emotional Intelligence:An Exploratory Study of Retail Managers.Stress and Health,2002, (18):63-68.
    71. Menguc,B.,Auh,S..The Asymmetric Moderating Role of Market Orientation on the Ambidexterity-firm Performance Relationship for Prospectors and Defenders.Industrial Marketing Management,2008,37 (4):455-470.
    72. Shiyong Zhao. Government Policies and Private Enterprise Development in China:2003-2006 [J]. China & World Economy.2009,4 (17):36-5.
    73. Collins,C.J.,Smith,K.G..Knowledge Exchange and Combination:The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-technology Firms.Academy of Management Journal,2006,49 (3).544-560.
    74. Collins D. W., Maydew E. L., Weiss I. S.. Changes in the Value-relevance of Earnings and Book Values over the Past Forty Years, Journal of Accounting and Economics,1997 (24):39-67.
    75. Aguinis,H.,Pierce,C.A..Enhancing the Relevance of Organizational Behavior by Embracing Performance Management Research.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2008,29 (1):139-145.
    76. Griffin M.A.,Neal A.,Parker S.K..A New Model of Work Role Performance:Positive Behaviors in Uncertain and Interdependent Contexts. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50 (2):327-347.
    77. Paulin,M.,Ronald J.F.,Jasmin,B..Service Climate and Organizational Commitment:The Importance of Customer Link ages[J] Journal of Business Research,2006,59 (8):906-915.
    78. Sun L.,Samuel A.,Law,K.S..High-performance Human Resource Practice,Citizenship Behavior and Organization Performance:A Relational Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50 (3):558-577.
    79. S.M. Dahlgaard-Park and J.J. Dahlgaard, In Search of Excellence-Past, Present and Future[J], J. Manag. Hist.13.2007.
    80. Marr, B. (Ed.), (2005). Perspectives on intellectual capital:Multidisciplinary insights into management, measurement and reporting. London:Elsevier.
    81. Ilsoon Shin. Adoption of Enterprise Application Software and Firm Performance[J]. Small Business Economics,2006 (26):241-256
    82. Jana P. Fidrmuc and Jan Fidrmuc. Fire the manager to improve performance?[J]. Economics of Transition.2007,15 (3):505-533.
    83. Ash M. Genaidy, Reynold Sequeira, Magda M. Rinderb and Amal D. A-Rehim. Determinants of business sustainability:A.n ergonomics perspective [J]. Ergonomics.2009.3 (52):273-301.
    84. Adrian Payne,Sue Holt andPennie Frow. Relationship Value Management:Exploring the Integration of Employee,Customer and Shareholder Value and Enterprise Performance Models[J]. Journal of Marketing Management, 2001,17,785-817.
    85. Dyer, L.and Reeves, T. Human resource strategies and firm performance:what do we know and where do we need to go[A].The 10th World Congress of the International Industrial Relations Association, Washington, DC.1995.5 (31)
    86. Knight,D. J. Performance Measure for Increasing Intellectual Capital[J].Strategy & Leadership,1999.27 (3):22-27.
    87. Amabile, T.M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazen by, J., Herron, M. Assessing the Work Environment for Creativity [J]. Academy of Management Journal,1996,39 (1): 1154-1184.
    88. Korsgaard, A. M., Schweiger, D. M., Sapienza, H. J. Building commitment, attachment,and trust in strategic decision-making teams:The role of procedural justice[J].Academy of Management Journal,1995,38 (1):60-84.
    89. Amos J W, Gibson D V. An Exploratory Model of Agility:Key Facilitators a nd Performance Metrics[A].4th Annual Agility Forum Conf. Proc[C]. Atlant a, 1995.
    90. Biddle,G. C., G. S. Seow,and A. Siegel. Relative versus incremental information content [J]. Contemporary accounting research,1995,12:1-23
    91.(美)Moore, J.F(著),梁骏等译,竞争的衰亡:商业生态系统时代的领导与战略,北京出版社,1999。
    92.马君,王玉.绩效评价系统的内在驱动机制及其影响效应研究[J].科研管理,2010,6(31):169-181.
    93.赵俏姿.供电企业绩效管理的构建与实施[J].华东电力,2006(1):74-76.
    94.刘勇.品牌社群融入的测量、影响因素及其对品牌忠诚的影响研究[D].浙江大学博士论文,2009(12):
    95.张晓芹.电力企业绩效管理体系的构建与研究[D].西南财经大学,2008:31-53.
    96.张燚、张锐.战略理论研究与新发展[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2005(2):83-85.
    97.田金玉,林妍.基于BSC的绩效评价的复合方法研究[J].中国管理信息化,2008(5):74-76.
    98.张蕾.基于多维互动质量的服务品牌资产驱动模型研究[D].暨南大学博士学位论文,2010(10):36-48.
    99.刘俊英.组织学习、战略变革与组织绩效关系的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2010(10):46-48.
    100.侯杰泰.结构方程模型及其应用[M].教育科学出版社,2004,112-120.
    101.于伟.消费者品牌知识形成及后向影响机制研究[D].山东大学博士论文,2008:64-126.
    102.仲建兰,陈雪琼.企业质量要素分类研究评述[J].经济研究,2011(5):113-114.
    103.沈灏,李垣.联盟关系、环境动态性对创新绩效的影响研究[J].科研管理,2010,1(31):77-85.
    104.陈刚,谢科范,郭伟.创业团队结构对决策行为和决策质量的影响[J].软科学,2011(11):84-88.
    105.王化成、刘俊勇.企业业绩评价模式研究——兼论中国企业业绩评价模式选择[J].管理世界,2004(4):82-91.
    106.倪慧君.高科技企业品牌资产价值测量模型研究[D].中国博士学位论文全文数据库,2009,05:6-74.
    107.胡健,李向阳,孙金花.中小企业环境绩效评价理论与方法研究[J].科研管理,2009,2(30):151-157.
    108.张辉华、李爱梅、凌文辁、徐波.管理者情绪智力与绩效的关系:直接和中介效应研究[J].南开管理评论,2009,3(12):104-116.
    109.杨杰,方俐洛,凌文铨.关于绩效评价若干基本问题的思考[J].自然辩证法通讯,2001(2):40-51.
    110.李艺,钟柏昌.绩效结构理论述评[J].技术与创新管理,2009(3):299—302.
    111.张美华.企业绩效:复杂科学管理和协同学视角[J].科技管理研究,2010(19):196-200.
    112.张晓芹.我国电力企业绩效管理体系的构建与研究[D].西南财经大学硕士学位论文,2008(11)
    113.郑佳.重庆市企业员工沟通满意度研究[D].重庆大学硕士学位论文,2008(11):22-41.
    114.王永丽,邓静怡,任荣伟.授权型领导、团队沟通对团队绩效的影响[J].管理世界2009(4):119-127..
    115.任胜钢.企业网络能力结构的测评及其对企业创新绩效的影响机制研究[J].南开商业评论,2010,1(13):69-80.
    116.熊志军.论超越还原论[J].系统科学学报,2006(3):34-35.
    117.邹晓华.电力企业绩效评价的现状分析及建议[J].电力技术经济,2001,13(6):55-57.
    118.张丽萍,刘静.基于平衡计分卡的企业绩效管理研究述评[J].会计之友,2009(6):15-16.
    119.祁世芳,阎东.将平衡计分卡导入战略管理[J].施工企业管理,2009(12):66-68.
    120.郭亚辉.EVA综合平衡计分卡业绩评价体系研究[J].财会通讯,2010(2):70-72.
    121.向宇,胡力.大型企业建立基于流程的绩效评价体系研究[J].管理观察,2009(36):78-80.
    122.杨薇薇.平衡计分卡的战略实践[J].现代组织文化,2009(23):86-87.
    123.姚宝燕.平衡计分卡在非营利组织绩效评价中的应用[J].财会通讯,2007(1):78-79.
    124.贾春峰.企业战略创新中的八个问题[J].电力技术经济,2000,12(5):62-64.程卓蕾,孟溦等(2010).构建测量组织战略绩效的指标体系方法研究[J]科研管理,2010,5(13):106-112.
    125.刘夏清,李树丞,杨泽洲.供电企业战略实施绩效评价研究[J].电力技术经济,2002,14(5):5-9.
    126.孟溦,李强,刘文斌.基于3E理论构建科研机构评价指标体系[J].科学学研究,2007,25(5):908-914.
    127.王勇军,曹荣辉.平衡计分卡一实施企业战略的有效工具[J].电力技术经济,2004,16(6):50-52.
    128.李东阳,曾奕.中国上市公司战略因素与绩效关系的研究[J].东北大学学报,2009,(1):7-50.
    129.尹子民,王春蕊.基于因子分析建立上市公司财务战略模型[J].中国管理信息化,2008,(11):65-67.
    130.薛忠花,余艳.构建一种新的企业绩效评价体系—基于EVA和平衡计分卡的企业绩效评价体系[J].电力技术经济,2004,16(2):49-50.
    131.胡亮,马志杰.浅议基于组织文化战略的电力企业绩效管理体系[J].电力技术经济,2009,16(2):257-259.
    132.李国强.电力企业部门绩效考核浅析[J].电力技术经济,2007,19(3):57-6
    133.蒋丽春.浅析我国企业绩效管理存在的问题及对策[J].中国集体经济,2010,18:64-68.
    134.张丹.电力企业绩效管理初探[J].现代商业,2010,14:194-196.
    135.陈华燕.低碳经济下的企业绩效评价体系及应用——基于五维模式的平衡计分卡[J].中外企业家,2010,5:72-74.
    136.刘杰,蒋听.经营者薪酬与企业绩效的关系[J].合作经济与科技.2010(12):38-41.
    137.王化成,刘俊勇.企业绩效评价模式研究——兼论中国企业业绩评价模式选择[J].管理世界,2004(4):82-91.
    138.杨跃琼褚景春吴良器.电力企业绩效管理存在的问题及对策研究[J].中国电力教育,2010(9):226-228.
    139.温素彬,薛恒新.基于科学发展观的企业三重绩效评价模型[J].会计研究,2005(4):60-64.
    140.李志刚,汤书昆.用层次分析法改进的平衡记分法及其应用[J].价值工程,2004(7):52-54.
    141.袁欣,邸杨.交易型领导、团队授权氛围和心理授权影响下属创新绩效的跨层次研究[J].管理世界,2009(4):135-142.
    142.唐翌.团队心理安全、组织公民行为和团队创新——一个居间传导模型的实证分析.南开管理评论,2005,8(6):24-29.
    143.吴培冠、陈婷婷.绩效管理的取向对团队绩效影响的实证研究[J].南开管理评论.2009,6(12):51-59.
    144.苏渺.基于核心节点的战略网络管理机制研究[J].经济论坛,2008(9):85-87.
    145.李焕荣.基于共生观的战略网络关系进化动因研究[J].科技进步与对策,2007(6)
    146.王光映.企业绩效评估方法综述[J].科技和产业,2005.5(1):43-45.
    147.盛运华、赵宏中.绩效管理作用及绩效考核体系研究[J].武汉理工大学学报,2007,24(2):93-98.
    148.彼得F.德鲁克等.公司绩效测评[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999:23-41
    149.潘淑满.质性研究理论与应用[M].台北市:心理出版社,2003:367-383
    150.财政部统计评价司.企业效绩评价问答[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2000:2-10
    151.乔艳洁,史丹·试述标杆管理在公共部门人力资源大型供电企业绩效考核中的应用[J]·当代经理人,2006(21):930-931.
    152.陈毅.企业业绩评价系统综述(上、下)[J].外国经济与管理,2000(4、5):7-10
    153.卢凤君,苏文凤.企业集团内部效绩评价体系模式研究[J].会计研究,2003(3):28-34
    154.苏文凤,卢凤君.省级电力企业效绩系统改进的若干建议[J].财经理论与实践,2002(6):82-84
    155.张若勇、刘新梅等(2010).资源外包网络的进化:一个社会网络的分析方法[J].南开商业评论,2005(9):75-79.
    156.苏文凤,卢凤君.我国电力企业效绩评价模式研究[J].湖南社会科学,2003(1):105-107
    157.芮明杰、李鑫、任红波.高技术企业知识创新模式研究[J].外国经济与管理,2004(5):8-12.
    158.李宁,严进.组织信任氛围对任务绩效的作用途径[J].心理学报,2007,39(6)1111-1121.
    159.吴隆增、简兆权:组织学习、知识创造与新产品开发绩效的关系研究[J].科技进步与对策,2008(1):110-113.
    160.张若勇,刘新梅,王海珍.服务氛围对顾客知识获取影响路径的实证研究,科学学研究,2008,(2):350-357.
    161.魏钧,张勉,杨百寅.组织认同受传统文化影响吗——中国员工认同感知途径分析[J].中国工业经济,2008,(6):118-126.
    162.张奇,陈劲,李小红.绩效评估公平感与组织承诺的关系研究[J].科研管理,2009,2(30):111-138.
    163.尹建华,王玉荣.服务氛围与一线员工服务绩效:工作压力和组织认同的调节效应研究[J].南开商业评论,2009.12(3):4-11.
    164.冯海龙.组织学习量表的开发[J].商业经济与管理,2009(3):27-30.
    165.温忠麟,侯杰泰,张雷.调节效应和居间效应的比较与应用[J].心理学报,,2004,36(5):614-620.
    166.乔恩.沃纳着.双面神绩效管理系统[M].徐联仓等译.北京:电子工业出版社,2005:500-512.
    167.陈志刚.员工公平感与人力资源薪酬决策以及组织承诺的关系研究[D].浙江大学硕士论文,2003:66-87.
    168.刘亚.组织公平感的结构及其与组织效果变量的关系[D].华中师范大学硕士论文,2002:32-68.
    169.沈超红.创业绩效结构与绩效形成机制研究[M].浙江大学博士论文,2006:61-160.
    170.韩小芸,汪纯孝.服务性企业顾客满意感与忠诚感关系[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2007:61-130.
    171.赵化利.甘肃省电力公司供电企业绩效管理创新对策研究[D].兰州大学,2009:6-20.
    172.冯海龙.企业战略变革的定义比较、测量述评与量表开发:兼对《经济管理》07年5期战略变革定义的完善与操作化[J].管理学报,2010(4):499-508.
    173.于海波.组织学习及其作用机制的实证研究[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(5):48-61.
    174.芮明杰,胡金星,张良森.企业战略转型中组织学习的效用分析[J].研究与发展管理,2005(2):99-103.
    175.李忆、司有和.探索式创新、利用式创新与绩效:战略和环境的影响[J].南开管理评论.2008,5(11):4-12.
    176.王东清,罗新星.基于能力观的企业IT能力阶层概念模型的构建研究[J].科技管理研究,2009(7):38-54.
    177.王东清,罗新星.基于企业能力理论的IT投资绩效贡献研究[J].南开管理评论.2010,2(31):137-153.
    178.郑颖.电网经营企业的规制研究[D].重庆大学硕士论文.2008,(5)
    179.彭灿,杨玲.技术能力、创新战略与创新绩效的关系研究[J].科研管理.2009,2(30):26-32.
    180.陈建勋,潘昌才,吴隆增.知识创造能否提升组织绩效?一项实证研究[J].科研管理.2009,1(30):107-115.
    181.朱学冬,陈雅兰.创新型企业创新绩效评价研究——以福建省为例[J].中国科技论坛.2010(9):77-79.
    182.郭亚辉.EVA综合平衡计分卡业绩评价体系研究[J].财会通讯.2010(2):70-72.
    183.周晓宏,孙元.基于判别分析的R&D项目中止决策[J].技术经济,2007,26(04):66-69.
    184.张新立,杨德礼.风险资本联合投资的激励契约设计[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(01):106-111.
    185.刘冰.企业家行为激励及报酬机制的改进[J].经济管理,2002(12):32-34
    186.陈东升等.管理者经营业绩三种评价方法的比较研究[J].决策借鉴,2000(2):60-62
    187.孙婧,王普查·企业绩效评价的绩效棱柱法初论[J]·财会月刊,2005:31-32.
    188.郑立群,王佳.企业综合绩效评价方法研究一基于ANP、平衡计分卡和绩效棱柱理论[J].西安电子科技大学学报,2007.17(4):1-7,
    189.常青.FN电力公司本部绩效管理体系设计研究[D].华北电力大学,2007:24-50.
    190.卢松.电力企业二级单位绩效指标体系构建[D].华北电力大学,2008:31-51.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700