中国开放式基金FPR研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
基金业绩在投资者申购、赎回决策中具有重要作用,正常有序的基金FPR(Flow-performance-Relationship)是基金业健康持续发展的重要激励机制。但是相关研究发现,国外基金FPR机制对优秀业绩基金“激励过度”而对低劣业绩基金却“惩罚不足”,而国内基金FPR机制甚至产生“反向激励”与“劣胜优汰”的作用。国内外相关研究都存在很大不足,因而进一步研究中国开放式基金FPR具有重要理论意义。
     从现实角度看来,我国开放式基金近年来迅猛发展,己从2001年的3只基金剧增到2009年的533只,基金之间对投资流的争夺日益剧烈:一方面新发行基金面临申购不足,另一方面大多数优秀业绩的老基金面临净赎回。因而进一步研究中国开放式基金FPR,对于重新塑造竞争有序的基金FPR机制,促进开放式基金的健康持续发展,具有非常重要的现实意义。
     本文的正文共有8章,第1章是导论,第2章是相关文献综述,第3章到第8章是全文主体部分。
     第2章主要从标准金融理论与基金业绩持续性假说、行为金融理论、消费者行为理论等角度对基金FPR背后的理论机制,进行了综述。
     第3章对我国开放式基金投资者的基于业绩的申购、赎回机制进行了分析,并且对净赎回、申购、赎回与业绩的变动关系提出了一些理论假设。
     第4章比较了美国与中国开放式基金的发展沿革与基金投资者特征。在开放式基金投资者特征上,区分考察了投资者结构与投资者行为特征。
     第5章检验了中国开放式基金的业绩持续性,并根据标准金融理论对我国开放式基金FPR进一步进行理论预测。
     第6章从基金绝对业绩的角度,应用中国开放式基金面板数据对基金FPR进行实证。首先以普通面板数据模型估计基金FPR,以此作为基准。在此基础上进行稳健性检验与分阶段考察。主要发现是基金净赎回与业绩正相关,基金申购、赎回均与基金业绩负相关,基金“异常净赎回”由“异常申购”所致,并非“异常赎回”所致。申购与赎回高度正相关,短期投资者是国内基金异常FPR的主要原因。实证结果是稳健的。分阶段实证结果发现,第一个熊市阶段与总样本结论恰好相反,接下来的牛市与熊市阶段与总样本结论一致。
     控制投资流持续性影响后,基金FPR结论依然成立。应用门限面板模型考察基金FPR的非线性特征,发现基金净赎回与业绩凹形正相关,而申购、赎回与基金业绩凸性负相关。本章还进一步发现股票型基金投资者比混合型基金投资者对业绩更敏感;机构投资者对过去业绩敏感,而个人投资者对过去业绩与当期业绩都敏感。
     第7章进一步从基金相对业绩视角,考察开放式基金的FPR。首先,应用DEA方法计算各开放式基金年度投入、产出转化的相对效率得分,并考虑其对投资者净赎回、申购、赎回的影响。其次,应用非参数法与参数法考察年度与季度相对业绩排名对投资流的影响。
     第8章总结全文,主要结论是:基金季度绝对业绩不持续而且出现反转;基金季度相对业绩具有短期持续性。无论是年度评价期抑或是季度评价期,基金投资者净赎回与基金绝对业绩正相关,与基金相对业绩负相关;投资者申购、赎回与基金绝对业绩负相关,与基金相对业绩正相关,申购比赎回对基金业绩更敏感,短线操作投资者是其主要原因。实证结果稳健地适用各种业绩指标;剥离投资流影响后,结论依然成立;基金FPR存在非线性特征,净赎回与绝对业绩凹性正相关,而申购、赎回与绝对业绩凸性负相关。除此以外,本文还发现,经济阶段、基金风格、投资者特征对基金FPR也有重要影响。
     从绝对业绩角度来看,国内开放式基金确实存在“异常净赎回”现象,但并非由投资者“异常赎回”或“处置效应”所致,而是由投资者“异常申购”所致。从相对业绩角度来看,基金并不存在“异常净赎回”现象,投资者没有表现出“异常申购”,但表现出“异常赎回”或“处置效应”。
     结合基金季度业绩持续性的实证结果,本文进一步推断,无论是针对绝对业绩还是相对业绩,投资者申购行为都是理性行为,而赎回行为都是非理性行为。开放式基金净赎回与绝对业绩表现出“异常净赎回”,是因为基金绝对业绩不具有持续性而且显著反转,投资者对基金长期业绩失去信心,其风险规避心理非常严重,不敢申购业绩好净值高基金,甚至利用基金业绩短期反转信息进行短线操作,低买高卖。开放式基金净赎回与相对业绩之所以表现出“正反馈”关系,是因为基金相对业绩排名具有显著的持续性,理性投资者觉察到这种信息后即可通过选择相对业绩排名靠前的基金获得相对较高收益。除此以外,申购、赎回正相关,而且投资者申购比赎回对基金业绩更敏感,也是重要原因之一。
     投资者根据基金季度业绩进行的申购行为可以为投资者带来相对较高的收益,具有“聪明钱”效应;而投资者基于业绩的赎回行为,会遭致相对更多的损失。由于基金年度业绩排名不具有持续性,投资者申购、赎回与年度相对业绩排名正相关,因而投资者申购、赎回是无信息的投资,难以判断其申购、赎回行为是否带来收益或损失。
     最后,本文根据实证结果与理论解释,从政府、基金公司、投资者等角度提出了一些政策建议与进一步研究方向。
     本文主要创新之处是:
     第一,主要以标准金融理论与业绩持续性假说以及行为金融理论,为开放式基金投资者的申购、赎回选择行为奠定了理论基础,并且应用动态面板方法检验了基金绝对业绩与相对业绩的持续性。
     第二,应用中国开放式基金的面板数据对开放式基金FPR进行了比较全面的实证:区分了绝对业绩与相对业绩对投资流的不同影响;考察了基金净赎回与绝对业绩的互动关系;区分了基金短期投资者与长期投资者对业绩的不同反应;不仅考察了基金业绩对净赎回的影响,而且考察了基金业绩对申购、赎回的影响;考察了基金FPR在不同经济周期的变化;应用动态面板方法考察剥离投资流持续性影响后的基金FPR:应用门限面板方法考察了基金FPR的非线性特征。考察了DEA相对绩效得分、业绩排名等相对业绩对投资流的影响。
Fund performance plays significant roles in fund investor's purchase and redemption decision. Regular and orderly Flow-performance-Relationships(FPR) of open-end funds are important mechanisms to promote fund industry's persistent and healthy development. Related studies find that foreign fund FPR have over-incentive for better peoforming funds but insufficient-punishment for poorer performing funds,while domestic fund FPR have negative incentives for open-end funds. Abroad and domestic literatures are very few, thus further study of Chinese open-end funds FPR has important theoretical significance.
     From the practical view, China's open-end funds have witnessed rapid development in recent years,with fund number soaring from 3 funds in 2001 to 533 in 2009. Open-end funds increasingly have to compete for fund investor flows between fund peers:on the one hand,new issues of fund lack of fund subscription,on the other hand, most old funds face net redemption. Thus further research funds'FPR, has also very important practical significance in re-shaping the competitive and orderly fund FPR mechanism, and promoting the healthy and sustainable development of open-end fund.
     The body of this article total of 8 chapters.ChapterⅠis Introduction, and ChapterⅡis about literature review. ChapterⅢto ChapterⅧare the main part of the full text.
     ChapterⅡmainly reviewed the theory mechanism behind the fund FPR, including standard finance theory and Fund Performance Persistence, behavioral finance theory, consumer behavior theory.
     ChapterⅢanalysized purchase and redemption machanism of open-end fund's invsetors respectively, and made some theoretical assumptions on the relationship between China's open-end fund net redemptions, purchase, redemption and fund performance.
     ChapterⅣcompared the reform and development of open-end fund investors, and fund characteristics of United States and China. on Characteristics of open-end fund investors,I investigate investors'structure and investor's behavior respectively.
     ChapterⅤtested empirically open-end fund's performance persistence of China,and further make theory hypothesis on the FPR of China's open-end funds.
     ChapterⅥempirically investigated FPR of China's open-end funds from the view of absolute performance with China's open-end fund panel data. First of all, I applied an ordinary panel model to estimate Fund FPR as a benchmark. On this basis, the robust test was conducted and the FPR were further investgated in diferrent economic stages. Major finding is that the net fund redemptions are positively related to performance, and fund purchase, redemption are negatively correlated with fund performance, and "abnormal net redemption" is due to "abnormal purchase,", not due to "abnormal Redemption". Purchase and redemption is highly positively correlated with each other, and short-term investors is the main reason for fund's abnormal FPR. The empirical results are robust. Empirical results in the first bear market is just opposite to that of the total sample,while the conclusion of the next bull and bear market phase are consistant with that of total sample. After Controlling the persistence impact of investment flows, the fund FPR conclusion is still valid. The nonlinear characteristics of the fund FPR were founded in the threshold panel model. The relationship between net redemption of the Fund and fund performance is convex and positive correlated, while the relationship between purchase or redemption and fund performance are concave and negatively correlated. This chapter also further found that equity fund investors is more sensitive than the mixed performance of the Fund; institutional investors is sensitive to past performance, while individual investors are sensitive both to the past performance and to current performance.
     ChapterⅦfurther empirically investigated FPR of China's open-end funds from the view of relative performance with China's open-end fund panel data. First,I applied DEA method and got conversion efficiency scores from annual inputs, outputs data of open-end funds, and considered the effects of relative performance of DEA on investors'net redemption, purchase, redemption. Second, I applied both non-parameter method and parameter method examines the impact of yearly and quarterly relative performance ratings on investment flows. Empirical results indicate that, whether holding period is a quarter or a year, the fund net redemption is negatively correlated with the relative performance,while purchase and redemption are positiely correlated with relative performance.
     ChapterⅧsummarized the main conclusions of the text as follows:the fund-quarter absolute performance is not sustainable but significantly reversal; fund-quarter relative performance is sustainable.Whether assessment period is a quarter or a year, the net redemption of fund investors is positively related to fund's absolute performance and negatively related to Fund relative performance; investors' purchase and redemption is negatively related to absolute performance,but positively correlated with fund relative performance, and purchase is more sensitive to fund performance than redemption; short-term operation investors is the main motivation.The empirical results are robust to various performance indicators; the conclusion is still valid after stripping impact of investment flows; fund FPR have nonlinear characteristics, the relationship between net redemption and absolute performance is concave and positively correlated;purchase and redemption are convex and negatively correlated with absolute performance. In addition, this paper also found that stages of economic development, fund style, investors'characteristics, also have significant impact on Fund FPR.
     From the point of view of absolute performance, there do exist "abnormal net redemption" phenomenon in open-end funds, however it isn't caused by investors' "abnormal Redemption" or "disposition effect", but caused by fund investors' "abnormal purchase" result. From the perspective of relative performance, there is no "abnormal net redemption" phenomenon in open-end funds, and no "abnormal purchase," but there is "abnormal Redemption" or " disposition effect".
     Conbined with Fund Performance Persistence results, it can be concluded that investors'purchase behavior is rational, and investors'redemption behavior are non-rational,whether they are based on absolute performance or relative performance. "abnormal net redemption" between fund net redemptions and absolute performance, is because absolute performance of open-end funds can't persist but significantly reverse,thus investors gradually losed confidence in fund's future performance; the "positive feedback" relationship between net redemptions and relative performance,is because fund relative performance ranking has significant sustainability,and sophsicated investors will get higher yield through fund information about relative performance. In addition, that purchase positively correlated with redemption, and investors purchase is more sensitive than redemption to Fund's performance, is also an important reason.
     Investors performance-based purchase behavior quarterly can earn relatively high income with "smart money" effect; while investors'performance-based redemption behavior will be confronted with relatively greater loss. Since the Fund does not have sustainable annual performance rating, investor's purchase and redemption are positively correlated with annual relative performance rankings, so investors'purchase or redemption are informationless invest, it is difficult to judge whether their purchase, redemption will bring benefit or loss.
     Finally, based on the results of this empirical and theoretical interpretation, the paper put forward some policy recommendations from government, fund companies and investors respectively.
     Innovations of this paper are as follows:
     Firstly, this paper constructed theory base for open-end fund's FPR, and studied Fund's absolute and relative performance persistence using dynamic panel method.
     Secondly,this paper conducted comprehensive empirical test on FPR of China's open-end fund with panel data.I examined different effects of both absolute performance and relative performance on investment flows.I also investigated the interaction between net fund redemptions and absolute performance of the Fund,and distincted between the Fund's short-term investors and long-term investors's different reaction to fund performance. This paper not only examined the impact of fund performance on net redemption, but also examined the impact of fund performance on Fund's purchase, redemption. Fund FPR at different economic cycles stages are also examined. Besides,dynamic panels were conducted to investigate fund FPR after controling the continuing impact of investment flows,and threshold panels are applied to investigate the nonlinear characteristics of Fund's FPR. Moreover, this paper investigated effects of relative performance such as DEA relative performance scores, performance rankings on the investment flows.
引文
1. Aditya Kaul and Blake Phillips, Flight to Quality and Canadian Mutual Fund Flows [R].workingpaper,2007:1-29.
    2. Albert S. Kyle, Hui Ou-Yang, and Wei Xiong, Prospect Theory and Liquidation Decisions[R]. working paper.2005,2-22.
    3. Alex Frino,Andrew Lepone, Brad Wong, Derivative use, fund flows and investment manager performance[J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2009, 33:925-933.
    4. Alexander Kempf, Stefan Ruenzi, Family Matters:The Performance Flow Relationship in the Mutual Fund Industry[R]. SSRN workingpaper,2004:1-26.
    5. Allen D E,ML Tan. A Test of the Persistence in the Performance of UKManaged Funds [J]. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,1999,26:559-595.
    6. Aneel Keswani, David Stolin, Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance Persistence:A Cross-Sector Analysis[R].2004:1-27.
    7. Arrow, K., "Le Role Des Valeurs Boursieres PourLa Repartition La Meilleure Des Risques[R].1954:1-20.
    8. Barber, Brad, and Terrance Odean, Trading is hazardous to your wealth:The common stock investment performance of individual investors [J] Journal of Finance,2000,55:773-806.
    9. Barber, Brad, Terrance Odean, and Lu Zheng, Out of Sight, Out of Mind:The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows,Journal of Business,2005,78: 2095-2119.
    10. Barber,BradM.,Terrance Odean and Lu Zheng, The Behaviour of Mutual Fund investors[R].SSRN working paper,2000:1-49.
    11. Bergstresser, Dan, and James Poterba, Do After-Tax Returns Affect Mutual Fund Inflows[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2002,63,381-414.
    12. Berk A. Sensoy,Performance Evaluation and Self-Designated Benchmark Indexes in the Mutual Fund Industry[R]. Working Paper,2008:1-37.
    13. Berk, Jonathan B., and Ian Tonks, Return persistence and fund flows in the worst performing mutual funds[R]. Working Paper No.13042, NBER 2007:1-22.
    14. Berk, Jonathan B., and Richard C. Green, Mutual fund flows and performance in rational markets[J]. Journal of Political Economy,2004,112:1269-1295.
    15. Bhargava R. and D. A. Dubofsky, A Note on Fair Value Pricing of Mutual Funds[J].Journal of Banking and Finance.2001,25:339-354.
    16. Bill Ding, Mila Getmansky, Bing Liang, and Russ Wermers. Investor Flows and Share Restrictions in the Hedge Fund Industry[R].SSRN working paper,2008: 8-15.
    17. Blake, David, and Allan Timmermann,Mutual fund performance:Evidence from the UK[J].European Finance Review,1998,2:57-77.
    18. Brad M. Barber, Terrance Odean,Lu Zheng.Out of Sight, Out of Mind:The Effects of Expenses on Mutual Fund Flows[R].SSRN working paper,2003:1-36.
    19. Brad M. Barber,Yi-Tsung Lee,Yu-Jane Liu. Is the Aggregate Investor Reluctant to Realize Losses? Evidence from Taiwan[R].SSRN working paper,2006:1-20.
    20. Brian D. Adams, The Effect of Investor Flows on Hedge Fund Manager Performance and the Decision to Invest[R]. SSRN working paper,2007,4:2-77.
    21. Brown S J,W N Goetzmann.Performance Persistence[J].Journal of Finance, 1995,50:679-698.
    22. Brown, Keith C., W. V. Harlow, and Laura T. Starks, Of Tournaments and Temptations:An Analysis of Managerial Incentives in the Mutual Fund Industry[J]. Journal of Finance,1996,51(1):85-110.
    23. Capon, Noel, Gavan J. Fitzsimmons and Russ Alan Prince. "An Individual Level. Analysis of the Mutual Fund Investment Decision[R]. SSRN 1996:1-20.
    24. Carhart, Marc M., On persistence in mutual fund performance [J]. Journal of Finance,1997,52:57-82.
    25. Carpenter, Jennifer N., and Anthony W. Lynch, Survivorship bias and attrition effects in measures of performance persistence,Journal of Financial Economics[J].1999,54:337-374.
    26. Chalmers, John M. R, Roger M. Edelen and Gregory B. Kadlec,On the perils of Financial Intermediaries Setting Securities Prices:The Mutual Fund Wild Card Option[J].The Journal of Finance,2001,56:2209-2236.
    27. Chevalier, Judith and Glenn Ellison, Risk Taking by Mutual Funds as a Response to Incentives[J].Journal of Political Economy,1997,105:1167-1200.
    28. Chevalier, Judith, and Glenn Ellison,Career concerns of mutual fund managers[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1999,114:389-432.
    29. Chih-Hsten Yu, Wang-Tsung Tzeng, The Spillover and Crowding-out Effects of Mutual Funds[J]. Journal of Financial Studies,2003,2(11):1-38.
    30. Chin-Horng Chan, Zen-You Yang, Value Function and the Behavior of Mutual Funds Investors[J]. Review of Financial Risk Management,2006,1(2):59-82.
    31. Christopher R. Blake and Matthew R. Morey, Morningstar Ratings and Mutual Fund Performance[J].The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2000,Vol.35, No.3 (Sep.,):451-483.
    32. Cooper, Michael J., Huseyin Gulen, and P. Raghavendra Rau, Changing names with style:Mutual fund name changes and their effects on fund flows [J]. Journal of Finance,2005,60:2825-2858.
    33. Dan Bernhardt,Ryan J. Davies,Smart Fund Managers?Stupid Money?[R].SSRN workingpaper,2008:1-37.
    34. David G. Shrider,Does Size Matter? An Analysis of Mutual Fund Transaction Size[J] Journal of Money, Investment and Banking,2009,7:29-42.
    35. David Nanigian, Michael S. Finke and William Waller. Redemption Fees: Reward for Punishment[R].SSRN working paper,2008:1-30.
    36. David Rakowskia, Xaioxin Wang.The dynamics of short-term mutual fund flows and returns:A time-series and cross-sectional investigation[J].Journal of Banking & Finance,2009,may,2:1-20.
    37. Del Guercio, Diane and Paula A. Tkac,The determinants of the flow of funds of managed portfolios:Mutual funds vs. pension funds[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,2002,37:523-557.
    38. Dilip K.Patro,International Mutual Fund Flows[R].SSRN workingpaper,2006: 1-49.
    39. Ding Du,Zhaodan Huang,Peter J. Blanchfield,Do fixed income, mutual fund managers have managerial skills?[J].The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance,2009,49:378-397.
    40. Donald L.Santini, Jack W. Aber, Determinants of Net New Money Flows to the Equity Mutual Fund Industry[J].Journal of Economics and Business,1998, 50:419-429.
    41. Doron Avramov, Russ Wermers,Investing in mutual funds when returns are Predictable [J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2006,81:339-377.
    42. Doron Kliger,Ori Levy, Doron Sonsino.On absolute and relative performance and the demand for mutual funds—experimental evidence[J].Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,2003,Vol.52:341-363.
    43. Droms W G, D A W alker. Investment Performance of International Mutual Funds[J]. Journal of Financial Research,1994,17:1-14.
    44. Dunn,D.,and T.Wilson,When the Stakes are High-A Limit to the Illusion-of-Control Effect[J]. Social Cognition,1990,8:305-323.
    45. Econometrie, Securities in the Optimal Allocation of Risk-bearing"[J]. Review of Economic Studies,1953,31:91-96.
    46. Edelen, Roger, Investor Flows and the Assessed Performance of Open-End Mutual Funds [J].Journal of Financial Economics,1999,53;439-466.
    47. Elton,Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, and Christopher R. Blake,Incentive fees and mutual funds[J].Journal of Finance.2003,58:779-804.
    48. Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, and Christopher R. Blake, Survivorship bias and mutual fund performance[J].Review of Financial Studies,1996b,9: 1097-1120.
    49. Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, and Christopher R. Blake,The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance [J].Journal of Business,1996a,69: 133-157.
    50. Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, Das Sanjiv, and Matthew Hvlaka, Efficiency with costly information:A reinterpretation of evidence from managed portfolios [J]. Review of Financial Studies,1993,6:1-22.
    51. Elton, Edwin J., Martin J. Gruber, JEFFREY A.BUSSE, are invsetors rational? Choices among index funds[J].the journal of finance,2004,1:261-288.
    52. Fabian Niebling,Steffen Meyer,Andreas Hackethal, Whose money is smart? Mutual fund purchases of private investors [R].SSRN workingpaper,2009:1-29.
    53. Fama Eugene, "Efficient Capital Markets:A Re-view of Theory and Empirical Work" [J]. Journal of Finance,1970,25:383-417.
    54. Fletcher, Jonathan,The Evaluation of the Performance of UK American Unit Trusts[J]. International Review of Economics and Finance,1997,8:455-466.
    55. Fong, C., and K. McCabe, Are Decisions Under Risk Malleable?, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences[J].1999,96:10927-10932.
    56. Gallagher, Shifali Mudumba,Madhu Veeraraghavan, How smart is money? An investigation into investor behaviour in the Australian managed fund industry [J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2007,(15):494-513.
    57. Geogrey C. Friesen, Travis R.A. Sapp. Mutual fund flows and investor returns: An empirical examination of fund investor timing ability [J]. Journal of Banking & Finance,2007:2796-2816.
    58. George D.Cashman, Daniel N. Deli, Federico Nardari and Sriram V. Villupuram, Investor Behavior in the Mutual Fund Industry:Evidence from Gross Flows [R].SSRN working paper,2008:1-22.
    59. George D.Cashman, Daniel N. Deli, Federico Nardari, and Sriram V. Villupuram.On Monthly Mutual Fund Flows[R].2006:1-52,workingpaper.
    60. George D.Cashman,Daniel N.Deli,Federico Nardari, Sriram V. Villupuram, Understanding the Non-linear Relation between Mutual Fund Performance and Flows[R].SSRN workingpaper,2007:1-45.
    61. Gerasimos Georgiou Rompotis.Performance,Expenses and Cash Flows: Evidence from Greek Equity Funds[R].SSRN working paper,2007:12-20.
    62. Gervais, Simon, Anthony W. Lynch, and David K. Musto, Fund families as delegated monitors of money managers[J].Review of Financial Studies,2005, 18:1139-1169.
    63. Goetzmann,Ibbotson.Do Winners Repeat?Patterns in Mutual Fund Performance [J]. Journal of Portfolio Management 1994,20 (2):9-18.
    64. Goetzmann,William N., Zoran Ivkovic and K.Geert Rouwenhorst,Day Trading International Mutual Funds [J] Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2001,36:287-309.
    65. Goetzmann, William N., and Roger G. Ibbotson, Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance [J]. Journal of Portfolio Management.1994,20(2):9-18.
    66. Goetzmann, William, and Nadav Peles, Cognitive Dissonance and Mutual Fund Investors[J]. Journal of Financial Research,1997,20,145-158.
    67. Goriaev, Alexei, Theo E. Nijman, and Bas J. M. Werker, Performance information dissemination in the mutual fund industry[J].Journal of Financial Markets.2008,11:144-159.
    68. Greene, Jason, and C.Hodges,The dilution impact of daily fund flows on open-end mutual funds[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2002,65:131-158.
    69. Grinblatt, Mark, and Matti Keloharju,What Makes Investors Trade? [J].Journal of Finance.2001,56:589-616.
    70. Grinblatt, Mark, and Sheridan Titman, The persistence of mutual fund performance[J].Journal of Finance.1992,42:1977-1984.
    71. Grinblatt,Mark,and Sheridan Titman,Performance measurement without benchmarks:An examination of mutual fund returns [J].Journal of Business, 1993,66:47-68.
    72. Gruber, Martin. J., Another puzzle:the growth in actively managed funds [J]. Journal of Finance 1996,51:783-810.
    73. Gruber, Martin J., Another puzzle:The growth in actively managed mutual funds[J]. Journal of Finance,1996,51:783-810.
    74. Guercio, Diane Del & Tkac, Paula A., "Star Power:The Effect of Monrningstar Ratings on Mutual Fund Flow[J]." Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press,2008, vol.43(04):907-936.
    75. Guillermo Baquero, Marno Verbeek, A Portrait of Hedge Fund Investors:Flows, Performance and Smart Money[R].2007:1-73.
    76. Guillermo Baquero, Marno Verbeek,Do Sophisticated Investors Believe in the Law of Small Numbers?[R].the American Finance Association meetings papers,2008:1-40.
    77. Guillermo Baquero.On Hedge Fund Performance,Capital Flows and Investor Psychology[R].2006:1-213,workingpaper.
    78. Hal R. Arkes,David Hirshleifer,Danling Jiang,Sonya Lim, Prospect Theory and Reference Point Adaptation:Evidence from the US, China,and Korea[R]. working paper.2007,3-16.
    79. Hansen B. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels:Estimation, testing and inference[J]. Journal of Econometrics,1999,93 (2):345-368.
    80. Hendricks D,J Patel.The JO shape of Performance Persistence Given Survivorship Bias[J]. Review of Econom ics and Statistics,1997,79:161-166.
    81. Hendricks, Darryll, Jayendu Patel, and Richard Zeckhauser, Hot hands in mutual funds:Short-run persistence of relative performance:1974-1988[J] Journal of Finance,1993:48-93.
    82. Hsee C K, Loewenstein G F, Blount S, et al. Preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of options:A review and theoretical analysis[J].Psychological Bulletin,1999,125 (5):76-91.
    83. Hu, Fan, Alastair R. Hall, and Campbell R. Harvey,Promotion or demotion? An empirical investigation of the determinants of top mutual fund manager change [R]. Working paper, Duke University,2000:1-22.
    84. Huang, Jennifer, Kelsey D. Wei and Hong Yan, Participation Costs and the Sensitivity of Fund Flows to Past Performance [J].Journal of Finance,2007, 62:1273-1311.
    85. Huij, Joop, and Marno Verbeek, Cross-sectional learning and short-run persistence in mutual fund performance[J].Journal of Banking and Finance.2007, 31:973-997.
    86. Investment Company Institute,1993, Understanding Shareholder Redemption Decisions.
    87. Investment Company Institute,1994, Distribution Channels for Mutual Funds: Understanding Shareholder Choices.
    88. Investment Company Institute,1997, Understanding Shareholders'Use of Information and Advisers.
    89. Investment Company Institute,2001, Redemption Activity of Mutual Fund Owners, Fundamentals 10(1).
    90. Investment Company Institute,2008, Mutual Fund Factbook.
    91. Investment Company Institute,2009, Mutual Fund Factbook.
    92. Investment Company Institute,Fact Book, Investment Company Institute, Washington, D.C. Investors, Working paper,2006:1-47.
    93. Ippolito, R. A. Consumer Reaction to Measures of Poor Quality:Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry[J].Journal of Law and Economics,1992,35:45-70.
    94. Ivkovic, Zoran and Scott Weisbenner, "Old" Money Matters:The sensitivity of Mutual Fund Redemption Decisions to Past Performance[R].working paper, University of Illinois,2006:1-43.
    95. Ivkovic, Zoran, James Poterba, and Scott Weisbenner, Tax-Motivated Trading by Individual Investors [J]. American Economic Review,2005,95(5):1605-1630.
    96. Jacquelyn E. Humphrey,Karen L. Benson,Timothy J. Brailsford, Determinants of Aggregate Flow in the Retail Funds Market[R].workingpaper,2007:1-23.
    97. Jain, Prem C., and Joanna Shuang Wu, Truth in Mutual Fund Advertising: Evidence on Future[R].workingpaper,2000:1-20.
    98. James D. Peterson, Paul A. Pietranico, Mark W. Riepe, Fran Xu,Explaining After-Tax Mutual Fund Performance [J]. Financial Analysts Journal,2002, 1(58):75-86.
    99. James L.Davis,Mutual Fund Performance and Manager Style[J].Financial Analysts Journal,2001,1 (57):19-27.
    100. Jason Karceski,Returns-Chasing Behavior, Mutual Funds, and Beta's Death[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysi,2002,4 (37):559-596.
    101. Jason T. Greene, Charles W. Hodges, David A.Rakowski,Daily mutual fund flows and redemption policies [J] Journal of Banking & Finance,2007, 31:3822-3842.
    102. Jason T. Greene,Charles WHodges,The Dilution Impact of Daily Fund Flows on Open-End Mutual Funds[J].JournalofFinancial Economics,2002,65:131-158.
    103. Jenke ter Horst and Marno Verbeek,Fund liquidation,self-selection and look-ahead bias in the hedge fund industry[R].SSRN working paper, 2004,12:1-28.
    104. Jennifer C. Huang, Kelsey D. Wei and Hong Yan. Volatility of Performance and Mutual Fund Flows[R].SSRN working paper,2007:5-25.
    105.Jonathan B. Berk, Richard C. Green,Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets [R].NBER workingpaper,2002:1-37.
    106.Jonathan B. Berk,Ian Tonks. Return persistence and fund flows in the worst performing mutual funds[R].NBER workingpaper,2007:1-26.
    107. Joseph Charles Smolira, taxes and performance persistence [R]. Doctor Dissertation,1999,5:290.
    108.Kahn, Ronald N. and Andrew Rudd, Does historical performance predict future performance? [J]. Financial Analysts Journal,1995:43-52.
    109.Kahneman,D.,A.Tversky.Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk[J]. Econometrica,1979,47:263-292.
    110.Karen L. Benson,Robert W. Faff,Tom Smith. Endogeneity in Fund Flow and Return:Evidence from Individual Funds[R].SSRN working paper,2008:1-36.
    111.Kari Sigurdsson. The Effect of New Money Inflows on the Flow-Performance Relationship in the U.S. Mutual Fund Industry[R].SSRN working paper, 2004:1-31.
    112.Keith Cuthbertson,Dirk Nitzsche, Niall O'Sullivan,UK mutual fund performance: Skill or luck? [J]. Journal of Empirical Finance,2008,15:613-634.
    113.Laura T.Starks,Michael Yates,Reputation and Mutual Fund Choice[R]. workingpaper,2007:1-39.
    114.Laurie Prather, William J.Bertin,Thomas Henker, Mutual fund characteristics, managerial attributes,and fund performance [J]. Review of Financial Economics 2004,13:305-326.
    115.Lintner,J.,"TheValuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets"[J].Review of Economics and Statistics, 1965,2:13-37.
    116.Lynch, Anthony W. and David K. Musto, How Investors Interpret Past Fund Returns[J].Journal of Finance,2003,58:2033-2058.
    117.M1 Grinblatt,S1 Titman,The Persistence of Mutual Fund Performance [J].Journal of Finance,1992,47(5):1977-1984.
    118.Malkiel B G. Returns from Investing in Equity Equal Funds 1971 to 1991 [J]. Journal of Finance,1995,50:549-572.
    119.Marcin Kacperczyk, Clemens Sialm,Lu Zheng, Unobserved Actions of Mutual Funds[R].workingpaper,2006:1-49.
    120.Marco Pagani,The Determinants of the Convexity in the Flow-Performance Relationship[R].workingpaper,2006:1-55.
    121.Markowitz, H.Z.,"Portfolio Selection",Journal of Finance[J].1952a,vol.7:77-91.
    122.Massa, Massimo, Jonathan Reuter, and Eric Zitzewitz,Why should firms share credit with employees?Evidence from anonymously managed mutual funds [J]. Working paper, INSEAD.2007:1-20.
    123.Massa, Massimo,How Do Family Strategies Affect Fund Performance?When Performance-Maximization Is Not the Only Game in Town[J].Journal of Financial Economics 2002,67(2):249-304.
    124.Matthew R.Morey, Mutual Fund Age and Morningstar Ratings[R].SSRN working paper,2000:1-29.
    125.Michael J.cooper,Huseyin Gulen, Rraghavendra Rau, Changing names with style:Mutual fund name changes and their effects on fund flows[J].Forthcoming, Journal of Finance,2004:1-52.
    126.Miranda Lam Detzler,The Value of Mutual Fund Rankings to the Individual Investor[R].1999:1-37.
    127.Nanda, Virkam, Z. Jay Wang, and Lu Zheng,2003, The ABCs of mutual funds: A natural experiment on fund flows and performance [R].working paper, University of Michigan.
    128.Nicolas P. B.Bollen, and Jeffrey A.Busse, Short-term persistence in mutual fund performance [J].Review of Financial Studies,2005,18:569-597.
    129.Nicolas P.B. Bollen Jeffrey A. Busse. Short-Term Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance[J]. The Review of Financial Studies,2004, v(18) n2:1-30.
    130.Noel Amenc, Sina El Bied, and Lionel Martellini,Predictability in Hedge Fund Returns[J]. Financial Analysts Journal,2003,5(59):32-46.
    131.O'Neal,Edward,Purchase and redemption patterns of US Equity mutual funds [J].Financial Management, Spring 2004,63-90.
    132.Paolo Gualtieri,Giovanni Petrella,Does Visibility Affect Mutual Fund Flows? [R].2005:1-25.
    133 Pei-Gi Shu, Yin-Hua Yeh, Takeshi Yamada. The behavior of Taiwan mutual fund investors—performance and fund flows[J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal,2002, 10:583-600.
    134.Philip Gharghori, Shifali Mudumba, Madhu Veeraraghavan.How smart is money?An investigation into investor behaviour in the Australian managed fund industry[J].Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 2007,15:494-513.
    135.Quigley, Garrett and Rex A. Sinquefield, Performance of UK equity unit trusts[J]. Published,1998:1-20.
    136.Rajeeva Sinha, Vijay Jog, Fund Flows and Performance:A Study of Canadian Equity Funds[R].workingpaper,2007:1-48.
    137.Rhodes, M.2000, Past imperfect? The performance of UK equity managed funds[J]. FSA Occasional Paper 9,1-58.
    138.Richard Deaves,Data-conditioning biases,performance, persistence and flows: The case of Canadian equity funds[J].Journal of Banking & Finance, 2004,28:673-694.
    139.Roberto Steri, Marco Giorgino, Diego Viviani,The Italian hedge funds industry: An empirical analysis of performance and persistence[J].J.of Multi. Fin. Manag. 2009,19:75-91.
    140.Roberts,J.,Past Performance can be a guide,Conference and internal paper, 2001:1-20.
    141.Roger M. Edelen.Investor flows and the assessed performance of open-end mutual funds [J].Journal of Financial Economics,1999,53:439-466.
    142.Ross,S.The Determination of Financial Structure:The Incentives Signaling Approach[J].The Bell Journal of Economics,1977,(1):156-187.
    143.Russ Wermers, Robert H. Smith, Is Money Really "Smart"?New Evidence on the Relation Between Mutual Fund Flows, Manager Behavior,and Performance Persistence[R].2003:1-56.
    144.S1J1Brown,W1 N1 Goetzmann, Performance Persistence[J]. Journal of Finance, 1995,50 (2):679-6981
    145.Samuelson Paul,"Proof That Properly Antici-pated Prices Fluctuate Randomly"[J]. Industrial Management Review,1965,6:41-49.
    146.Sauer, D. A., Information Content of Prior Period Mutual Fund Performance Rankings[R].SSRN workingpapers,1997:1-20.
    147.Sawicki,Julian,and Frank Finn, Smart money and small funds [J].Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,2002,29:825-846.
    148.Scott Cederburg,Mutual Fund Investor Behavior across the Business Cycle[R]. SSRN workingpaper,2008:1-31.
    149.Sharp, "Capital Asset Prices:A Theory of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions of Risk" [J]. Journal of Finance,1964,9:425-422.
    150.Shefrin, H., M. Statman. The disposition to sell winners too early and ride losers too long:Theory and evidence[J]. Journal of Finance,1985,40:777-790.
    151.Sirri, Erik R. and Peter Tufano,Costly Search and Mutual Fund Flows[J].Journal of Finance,1998,53:1589-1622.
    152.Steve Birnbaum,Jarl G. Kallberg,Nicholas Koutsoftas,and Keith Schwartz, A Closer Examination of Mutual Fund Flows and Performance[R].SSRN workingpaper,2004:1-14.
    153.TH.FIOTAKIS and N. PHILIPPAS,Chasing trend and losing money:open end mutual fund investors'trading behaviour in Greece[J]. Applied Economics Letters,2004,11,117-121
    154.Thaler, Richard, Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman, and Alan Schwartz, The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking:An Experimental Tes[J].Quarterly Journal of Economics,1997,112:647-661.
    155.Thaler, Richard, Mental accounting and consumer choice[J]. Marketing Science, 1985:199-214.
    156.Tzu-Wei KUO,Cesario MATEUS.The Performance and Persistence of Exchange-Traded Funds:Evidence for iShares MSCI country-specific ETFs[R]. 2006:1-59, workingpaper.
    157.Vassilios Babalos,Guglielmo Maria Caporale, Alexandros Kostakis and Nikolaos Philippas, Testing for persistence in mutual fund performanceand the ex post verification problem:Evidence from the Greek market[R].2009:1-41.
    158.Vikas Agarwal,Naveen D. Daniel,Narayan Y. Naik, Flows, Performance,and Managerial Incentives in Hedge Funds[R].2005:1-44.
    159.Vikram Nanda, M.P. Narayanan, Vincent A. Warther Liquidity, investment ability, and mutual fund structure[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2000,57:417-443.
    160.Vincent Glode, Burton Hollifield, Marcin Kacperczyk, and Shimon Kogan,Is Investor Rationality Time Varying?Evidence from the Mutual Fund Industry[R].2009:1-51.
    161.Volkman,David A. and Mark E.Wohar, Determinants of persistence in relative performance of mutual funds[J].The Journal of Financial Research,1995,18: 415-430.
    162.W1 N1 Goetzmann, R1.G1 Ibbotson,Do Winners Repeat?[J].Journal of Portfolio Management,1994,20(2):9-181.
    163.Warren Bailey, Alok Kumar, David Ng,Why Do Individual Investors Hold Stocks and High Expense Funds Instead of Index Funds? [R].workingpaper, 2006:1-34.
    164.Wermers, Russ, Mutual fund performance:An empirical decomposition into stock-picking talent,style,transactions costs, and expenses[J].Journal of Finance, 2000,55:1655-1695.
    165.Wermers, Russ, Predicting Mutual Fund Returns[R].Working Paper, Robert H. Smith School,2001:3-10.
    166.Wermers,Russ,1997,Momentum investment strategies of mutual funds, performance persistence, and survivorship bias[R].Working paper, Graduate school of Business and Administration, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Col.
    167.William G. Droms, David A. Walker,Performance persistence of international mutual funds[J]. Global Finance Journal,2001,12:237-248.
    168.William N. Goetzmann, Massimo Massa, INSEAD K. Geert Rouwenhorst, Behavioral Factors in Mutual Fund Flows[R].SSRN working paper,2008:3-23.
    169.WM Company, Company report for Virgin Direct.1999:1-20.
    170.Wolfgang Bessler, David Blake, Peter Luckoff and Ian Tonks.Why is Persistent Mutual Fund Performance so Difficult to Achieve? The Impact of Fund Flows and Manager Turnover[R]. workingpaper,2009:1-44.
    171.Wolfgang Breuer and Olaf Stotz. Mutual Fund Flows and Extrapolative Investors'Expectations:The German Case[R].SSRN working paper,2007:4-18.
    172.Yan (Albert) Wang,Mutual Fund Flows, Performance Persistence, and Manager Skill[R].SSRN working paper,2006:1-44.
    173.Zhao Xiu-juan, WANG Shou-yang.Empirical Study on Chinese Mutual Funds' Performance[J].Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice.2007,27(3):1-11,27. References.
    174.Zhaojin Xu.Selling Winners, Holding Losers:Effect on Mutual Fund Performance and Flows[R].2007:1-98,workingpaper.
    175.Zitzewitz, Eric, How widespread was late trading in mutual funds? [J].American Economic Review,2006,96:284-289.
    176.Zoran Ivkovic',Scott Weisbenner,Individual investor mutual fund flows[J]. Journal of Financial Economics,2009,92:223-237.
    177.白春宇,蔡春平,开放式股票型基金业绩持续性实证研究[J].湖南财经高等专科学校学报,2008,2:107-110。
    178.冯金余,开放式基金赎回与业绩的内生性-基于中国动态面板数据的分析[J].证券市场导报,2009,3:28-34。
    179.冯金余,基于DCC—MVGARCH模型的证券组合VaR测度与拓展模型[J].统计与信息论坛,2009,2:64-71。
    180.冯金余,开放式基金业绩与投资者的选择——基于中国动态面板数据对申购、赎回的分析[J].商业经济与管理,2009,5:72-80。
    181.冯金余,开放式基金投资者的处置效应——基于中国面板数据的门限回归分析,统计与信息论坛,2009,7:57-63。
    182.冯金余,中国开放式基金投资管理效率研究[J].证券市场导报,2010,2:042-049。
    183.宫颖华,黄瑞芬.股票型开放式基金业绩持续性经济价值分析[J].证券经纬.2008,6:146-149.
    184.龚亚萍,开放式基金的业绩持续性检验[J].新西部,2007,24:27-33.
    185.何军耀,蒲勇健,证券投资基金业绩的持续性研究[J].金融教学与研究,2004,3(95):38-39.
    186.何晓群,郝燕梅.开放式基金业绩持续性检测的实证研究[J].经济理论与经济管理,2008,5:46-50.
    187.胡金焱,冯金余,相对绩效与开放式基金投资者流动[R].“第六届中国金融学年会”会议论文。
    188.胡畏,聂曙光,张明,中国证券投资基金业绩的中短期持续性[J].系统工程,2004,4:44-48。
    189.解学成;张龙斌,基金持有人赎回行为研究[J].证券市场导报,2009,9:1-9。
    190.李德辉,方兆本,余雁,扫描统计量——检测基金业绩持续性的新方法[J].运筹与管理,2006,(2):82-871.
    191.李德辉,方兆本,证券投资基金业绩持续性研究综述[J].证券市场导报,2005,8:38-43.
    192.李昆.封闭式基金业绩持续性研究[J].商业研究,2005(18):83-86。
    193.李敏,封闭式基金业绩持续性的统计分析[J].财经问题研究.2008,12(301):123-127.
    194.李宪立,吴光伟,唐衍伟.多期基金业绩持续性评价新模型及实证研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2007,39(10):1673-1676.
    195.李学峰,陈曦,茅勇峰.我国开放式基金业绩持续性及其影响因素研究[J].当代经济管理,2007,29(6):97-102
    196.李曜,从行为金融学看基金的赎回现象、分红及基金经理选.南京大学2003年行为金融学国际研讨会入选论文,2003:1-10.
    197.李曜、于进杰,开放式基金赎回机制的外部效应[J].财经研究.2004,30(12):111-121。
    198.林树,汤震宇,李翔,潘哲盛,基金投资者的行为方式及其合理性——基于我国证券基金市场的经验证据[J]。证券市场导报,2009,8:23-28。
    199.刘建和,郭清亮,基于波动率的开放式基金业绩持续性检验商业研究[J].商业研究,2008,2(370):184:187.
    200.刘建和,韦凯升.封闭式基金的业绩持续性检验[J].商业研究,2007(2):129-132.
    201.刘翔,我国基金业绩持续性研究—对基金市场有效性的启示[J].北京机械工业学院学报,2008,12(23):65-70.
    202.刘永利,薛强军,货币市场基金申购赎回的实证研究[J].数理统计与管理,2007,6(26):1111-1117。
    203.刘志远,姚颐,开放式基金的“赎回困惑”现象研究[J].证券市场导报,2004,2:37-40.
    204.刘志远,姚颐,我国开放式基金赎回行为的实证研究[J].经济科学,2004,5:48-57.
    205.陆蓉,陈百助,徐龙炳,谢新厚,基金业绩与投资者的选择——中国开放式基金赎回异常现象的研究[J].经济研究,2007,6:39-50.
    206.任杰,陈权宝.中国开放式基金业绩持续性实证研究[J].浙江金融,2007(11):1-2.
    207.申晓航,白玉娜,中国证券投资基金业绩持续性研究综述[J].管理观察,2008,7:120-121.
    208.时希杰,吴育华,李亚瑞,基于业绩持续性的证券投资基金聚类与实证研究[J].数理统计与管理,2005,7:66-117.
    209.宋文光,宫颖华,基于多元回归方法的基金业绩持续性影响因素分析[J].统计与决策,2009,1:127-128.
    210.王思为,对开放式基金业绩持续性的实证研究[J].武汉金融,2007,9:19-52。
    211.王向阳,袁定[J].开放式基金业绩持续性的实证研究[J].财经论坛,2006,1(205):137-138.
    212.吴启芳,陈收,雷辉.基金业绩持续性的回归实证[J].系统工程,2003,21(1):33-37.
    213.吴启芳,汪寿阳,黎建强,中国证券投资基金业绩的持续性检验[J].管理评论,2003,(11):23-281
    214.吴遵,陶震安,王巧玲,证券投资基金业绩的持续性之综述[J].技术经济与管理研究,2007,3:33-35.
    215.肖奎喜,杨义群.我国开放式基金的业绩持续性研究[J].财贸研究,2005(4).
    216.肖燕飞,宁光荣,我国证券投资基金业绩的持续性研究[J].湖南财经高等专 科学校学报,2005,8(21):32-34.
    217.徐琼,赵旭,封闭式基金业绩持续性实证研究[J].金融研究.2006,5:92-97.
    218.薛泽庆,张冬,我国开放式基金业绩持续性影响因素探析[J].金融理论与实践,2009,9:85-88.
    219.杨华蔚,开放式基金业绩与VaR风险持续性比较研究[J].价格月刊,2008,9:71-73.
    220.虞红霞,基金业绩评价和持续性实证研究[J].深圳职业技术学院学报,2005,2:66-70.
    221.赵旭、吴冲锋,开放式基金流动性赎回风险实证分析与评价[J].运筹与管理.2003,12(6):1-6.
    222.周泽炯,我国开放式基金业绩持续性的实证分析[J].经济问题探索,2004,(9):19-271.
    223.朱宏泉,马晓维,李亚静,段妮妮,朱宏志,基金投资者投资行为影响因素研究[J].管理评论,2009,10:86-94。
    224.庄云志,唐旭.基金业绩持续性的实证研究[J].金融研究,2004(5):20-27.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700