中国进口贸易、技术扩散与技术进步
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
由于发展中国家技术基础和研发能力相对薄弱,因此通过技术扩散从先进国家获得技术知识正成为他们技术进步的重要源泉。进口贸易作为技术扩散的主要渠道之一,对于创新能力不足而贸易规模巨大的中国尤其值得重视。本文旨在研究改革开放以来,基于进口贸易的国际技术扩散对中国的实际效果及其影响因素,据此探索中国应该如何在政策方面加以引导和改进。
     本文先从理论上讨论技术差异、国际贸易和技术扩散之间的内在逻辑关系,并探讨了基于进口贸易途径的国际技术扩散机制和影响因素,从而建立了一个关于进口贸易、技术扩散与发展中国家技术进步的基本分析框架,为之后的实证研究提供了理论基石。
     评价国际技术扩散对于进口国国内技术进步的重要性、进而作出鼓励或者限制的政策建议,必须以该国当时的技术发展阶段为背景进行研究。因此本文接下来从产业技术基础、R&D投入水平和科技产出水平等方面考察了中国目前所处的技术发展阶段,然后利用中国的数据实证检验了进口贸易技术扩散对中国技术进步和经济增长的作用,以及相关因素对于技术进步效果的影响。通过上述分析,我们得出了一些有意义的结论:(1)进口贸易总体上通过国际技术扩散对中国技术进步有显著而积极的影响。(2)通过改变进口贸易的结构可以促进国际技术扩散效应的增加。(3)加快人力资本培育是技术扩散吸收的关键。从理论上分析,就中国现阶段的国内技术背景而言,国外研发贡献应该是中国技术进步的主要来源,但是经验结果却正好相反,这很大程度上是由于中国吸收能力的低下阻碍了国际技术的吸收。而通过人力资本和国内研发分别作为吸收变量的系数比较,发现目前人力资本水平低下对中国技术扩散吸收的阻碍更大。(4)国内研发对于中国技术进步非常重要。它不仅是技术创新的直接源泉,而且是提高吸收能力、提升国际技术扩散效果的关键因素。无论是出于提高技术吸收能力的考虑,还是出于技术吸收能力不足时国内研发贡献较大的考虑,加强国内研发投入都是促进技术进步的关键。(5)由于进口贸易对技术进步的贡献大部分来自知识的扩散,因此就不得不考虑知识产权保护的影响。知识产权保护的强弱直接决定了技术扩散能在多大范围和程度上发生。从机制分析中我们看出,知识产权保护的加强对进口贸易技术扩散有着正反两方面的影响,其综合结果如何随国家和国内技术背景不同而变化。从经验分析的结论看出,不管具体的作用机制如何,知识产权保护的加强在总体上对中国技术进步有显著而积极的影响。
Because of the weak base of technology and the shortage in R&D capability, the improvement of technology level in developing countries mainly comes from the international technology diffusion from developed countries. As one of the main channels of technology diffusion, import is very important to China who is short in innovation and imports much. This dissertation focuses on the effect of import-oriented international technology diffusion in China and explores how to induce and improve it by making proper policy.
     Firstly, we discuss the inherent logical relation in technology difference, international trade and technology diffusion. Then we analyze the mechanism of international technology diffusion in the channel of import and some factors that affect. Through these, we build a basic analysis frame of import, technology and the technology progress in developing countries to provide theory basis to the later empirical study.
     We must appraise the international technology diffusion and make suggestion to promote it or restrict it in the background of technology development phase of that country. So, at first, we study on the technology development phase of China through the respect of industry technology base, R&D input and output capability. Then, we carry on the empirical study of China. On the basis of the above research, we find that: (1) the effect of import through technology diffusion on China’s TFP is positive and significant. (2)We may change the structure of China’s import to promote the effect of international technology diffusion. (3)It is essential for China to step on the juice of human capital cultivating. Foreign R&D should have mattered more than the domestic R&D in the technology progress of China theoretically. But we see an opposite result in empirical study. It is mainly because that China is lack of capability to absorb the technology diffusion. We use human capital and domestic R&D as variable that measure the absorptive capability, and compare the results. We find that the low human capital level baffle the absorption of technology diffusion more. (4)The domestic R&D activities are very important. They are not only the immediate sources of domestic innovations, but also the essential factor of promoting the capability to absorb and use the technology diffusion. Now that China is lack of the absorptive capability, domestic R&D matters much to the technology progress of China. (5)Because most contribution of import to technology progress comes from the knowledge diffusion, it is impossible to ignore the affection of intellectual property right protection. The condition of intellectual property right protection immediately determines the possible extension and degree of technology diffusion. From mechanism analysis, we can see that the strong intellectual property right protection will affect the import-oriented technology diffusion in two opposite ways. The total effect changes from countries and domestic technology background. From the empirical study we can see that the effect of strengthening intellectual property right protection on China’s TFP is positive and significant.
引文
2参见查理·辛格,《技术史》,王平(译),成都科技出版社,1995年:第六卷。
    [1] Acemoglu, Daron and Fabrizio Zilibotti. Productivity Differences. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001(116): 563~606
    [2] Alfaro et al.. FDI and Economic Growth: The Role of Local Markets. OECD Working Paper, 2000
    [3] Atkinson, Anthony B. and Joseph E. Stiglitz. A New View of Technological Change. Economic Journal, 1969(79): 573~598
    [4] Azaris Costas, Allan Drazen. Threshold Externlities in Economic Development. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990(105): 501~526
    [5] Bardhan, Pranab K. Economic Growth, Development, and Foreign Trade: a Study of Pure Theory. Wiley- Interscience, 1970
    [6] Barro, R. and X.Sala-I-Martin. Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 1992(2): 223~251
    [7] Barro Robert J. Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1991(106): 407~443
    [8] Basu, Susanto and David N. Weil. Appropriate Technology and Growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1988(103): 1025~1054
    [9] Ben-David, D. and Loewy, M.B. Free Trade, Growth, and Convergence? Journal of Economic Growth, 1998(3): 143~170
    [10] Blaug, M. The Empirical Status of Human Capital Theory: A Slightly Jaundiced Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 1976(14): 827~855
    [11] Boldrin, Michele and J.A. Scheinkman. Learning-by-doing, International Trade and Growth: A Note. in Philip W. Anderson, Kenneth J. Arrow, and David Pines, eds. The Economy as an Evolving Complex System. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1988. 285~300
    [12] Braga, H. and Willmore, L. Technological Imports and Technological Effort: an Analysis of Their Determinants in Brazilian Firms. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1991(39): 421~432
    [13] Braga, Primo C.A. and Fink, Carsten and Sepulveda, C.P. Intellectual PropertyRights and Economic Development. World Bank Working Paper, 2000
    [14] B. Xu. Multinational Enterprises, Technology Diffusion, and Host Country Productivity Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 2000(62): 477~493
    [15] Chin. Judith C. and Gene M.Grossman. Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade. in: Ronald W.Jones and Anne O.Kruger. eds: Essays in Honor of Robert E.Baldwin. Blacwell, Cambridge, MA, 1990
    [16] Chuang, Yih-chyi. Learning by Doing, the Technology Gap, and Growth. International Economic Review, 1998(39): 697~721
    [17] Coe, David T. and Elhanan Helpman. International R&D Spillovers. European Economic Reviews, 1995(39): 859~887
    [18] Coe, D.T., Helpman, E. and Hoffmaister. North-South R&D Spillovers. European Economic Review, 1997(107): 134~149
    [19] Cohen W. and Levinthal D. Innovation and Learing: The Two Faces of R&D. Journal, 1989(99): 569~596
    [20] Dahlman, C and Nelson, R. Social absorption capability, national innovation systems and economic development, Social capability and long - term growth. Basingstoke, Macmillan Press, 1995
    [21] David M. Gould and William C.Gruben. The Role of Intellectual Property Right in Economic Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 1996(48): 323~350
    [22] David, Paul. Technical Choice, Innovation and Economic Growth: Essays on American and British Experience in the Nineteenth Century. London: Cambridge University Press, 1975
    [23] Davis, D.R. Intra-industry Trade: A Hecksher-Ohlin-Ricardo Approach. Journal International Economics, 1995(39): 201~226
    [24] Deardoff, A.V. Welfare Effects of Globle Patent Protection. Economic, 1992(59): 35~59
    [25] Diwan, I., Rodrik, D. Patents, Appropriate Technology, and North-South Trade. Journal of International Economics, 1991(30): 27~47
    [26] Dixit A. and J. Stiglitz. Monopolistic Competition and Optimal Product Diversity. American Economic Review, 1977(67): 297~308
    [27] Dodzin, S. and Athanasions Vamvakidis. Trade and Industrialization in DevelopingAgricultural Economics. IMF Working Papers. WP/99/145, 1999
    [28] Dowrick S.J, Gemmell N. Industrialization, Catch-up, and Economic Growth. A Comparative Study Accross the Capitalist Countries. Economic Journal, 1911(101): 263~275
    [29] Dunning, J.H. Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1993. 56~65
    [30] Eaton, J.Kortum. Trade in Ideas: Patenting and Productivity in the OECD. Journal of International Economics, 1996(40): 251~278
    [31] E. Borensztein, J.D. Gregorio and J.W. Lee. How Does Foreign Direct Investment Affect Economic Growth? Journal of International Econoics, 1998(45): 115~135
    [32] Falvey,R.E. , Kierzkowski,H..Product Quality, lntra- IndustryTrade and Imperfect Competition.in edited by Kierzkowski, H..Protectionend Competition in International Trade: Essays in Hononr of W. M. Corden.Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1987
    [33] Ferrantino, Michael J. The Effect of Intellectual Property Rights on International Trade and Investment. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 1993(129): 300~319
    [34] Frankel, D. Romer. Does trade cause growth? American Economic Review, 1999(89): 379~399
    [35] Geroski P.A. Do Spillovers Undermine the Incentive to Innovate? Economic Approaches to Innovation. In S. Dowrick(ed.). Aldershot UK, Edwar Elgar, 1995: 76~97
    [36] Ginarte, Carlos and Walter G. Park. Determinants of Patent Rights: A Cross National Study. Res. Pol’Y, 1997(26): 226~283
    [37] Gob A.T. and J. Olivier. Learning by Doing, Trade in Capital Goods and Growth. Journal of International Economics, 2002(56): 411~444
    [38] Gouranga Gopal Das, Alan A.Powell. Absorption Capacity, Structural Similiarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in A“Macro”Model: an Implementation within the GTAP Framework. http://www.gtap.agecon.purdue.edu, 2000-11-08
    [39] Granstrand. O. The Economic and Management of Intellectual Property: Towards Intellectual Capitalism, Massachusetts, Northampton: Edward Eglar Publishing, Inc., 1999
    [40] Grossman, Gene M. and Krueger, Alan B. Environmental Impacts of a NorthAmerican Free Trade Agreement. In Peter Garber(ed.). The US-Mexico Free Trade Agreement, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993: 193~226
    [41] Grossman, Gene M. and Lai, Edwin L.-C. International Protection of Intellectual Property. NBER Working Paper No.8704, 2002
    [42] Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman. Quality Ladders in the Theory of Growth. Review of Economic Studies, 1991(58): 43~61
    [43] Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman. Trade, Knowledge Spillovers and Growth. European Economic Review, 1991(35): 517~526
    [44] Grossman, G.M. and E. Helpman. Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. The MIT Press. Cambridge, MA., 1991
    [45] Grundmann H.E. The Economic Arguments for Patents and Their Validity for Developing Countries. Indian Economic Journal, 1993(19): 193~207
    [46] Grupp, H. Foundations of the Economics of Innovation: Theory, Measurement and Practice, England; Northampton, Mass: E. Elgar, 1998
    [47] Guellec, Van Pottelsberghe. R&D and Productivity Growth: Panel Data Analysis of 16 OECD Countries. OECD/DSTI Working Paper, 2001
    [48] Heckscer, Eli F., 1919. The Effect of Foreign Trade on the Distribution of Income, in Harry Flam and M. June Flanders, Heckscher-Ohlin Trade Theory. MIT Press, 1991. 48~90
    [49] Helpman, Elhanan. Innovation, Imitation and Intellectual Property Rights. Econometrica, 1993(61): 1247~1280
    [50] Hendricks, Lutz. Equipment Investment and Growth in Developing Countries. Journal of Development Economics, 2000(61): 335~364
    [51] Keller, Wolfgang. Absorptive Capacity: On the Creation and Acquisition of Tecnology in Development. Journal of Development Economics, 1996(49): 199~227
    [52] Keller, Wolfgang. Are International R&D Spillovers Trade-related? Analyzing Spillovers among Randomly Matched Trade Partners. European Economic Revies, 1998(42): 1469~1481
    [53] Kim, Linsu. Technology Transfer and Intellectual Property Rights: Lessons from Koreas’s Experience. UNCTAD Working Paper, 2002
    [54] Kokko, Zejan. Local technological capability and productivity spillovers from FDIin the Uruguayan manufacturing sector. Journal of Development Studies, 1994(32): 602~611
    [55] Krugman, P.R. A Model of Innovation, Technology Transfer, and the World Distribution of Income. Journal of Political Economy, 1979(87): 253~266
    [56] Krugman, P.R. Increasing Returns, Monopolistic Competition and International Trade. Journal of International Econoics, 1979(9): 469~479
    [57] Lawrence, R.Z. and David E. Weinstein. Trade and Growth: Import-led or Export-led? Evidence From Japan and Korea. NBER Working Paper 7264, 1999
    [58] Lee, Jong-Wha. Capital Goods Imports and Long Run Growth. Journal of Development Economics, 1995(48): 91~110
    [59] Lichtenberg. F. and B. Van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie. International R&D Spillovers: A Re-examination. NBER Working Paper. No.5668, 1996
    [60] Long, Ngo Van and Wong, Kar-yiu. Endogenous Growth and International Trade: A Survey. Dynamics, Economic Growth and International Trade. University of Michigan Press, 1997. 407~425
    [61] Lucas, Robert E. Jr. On the Mechanism of Economic Development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1988(22): 3~22
    [62] M. Abramovitz. Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind. Journal of Economic History, 1986(46): 385~406
    [63] Mansfield, Edwin. Intellectual Property Protection, Foreign Direct Investment, and Technology Transfer. International Finance Corporation. Discussion Paper19, 1994
    [64] Mansfield, Edwin. Intellectual Property Protection, Direct Investment and Technology Transfer: Germany, Japan and USA. International Journal of Technology Management, 2000(19): 22~34
    [65] Mansfield Edwin, Schwartz, Mark and Wagner, Smuel. Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study. The Economic Journal, 1981(91): 907~918
    [66] Markusen, James. Contracts, Intellectual Property Rights and Multinational Investment in Developing Countries. Journal of International Economics, 2001(53): 189~204
    [67] Markusen, J.R. and L.E.O. Svenson. Trade in Goods and Factors with International Differences in Technology, International Economic Review, 1985(26): 175~192
    [68] Matsuyama, Kiminori. Agricultural Productivity, Comparative Advantage, and Economic Growth. Journal of Economic Theory, 1992(58): 317~343
    [69] Michele, Pottelsberaghe De La Potterie. International R&D Spillover: a Survey. http://hompages.ulb.ac.be/~mcincera/research/CEB-169-MCBVP.PDF, 2003
    [70] Moschos, D. Export Expansion, Growth and The Level of Economic Development: an Empirical Analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 1989(30): 93~102
    [71] Ohlin, B. 1933. Interregional and International Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, revised edition, 1967
    [72] Posner, M.V. International Trade and Technological Progress. Oxford Economic Papers, 1961(13): 323~341
    [73] Rapp, Richard T. and Richard P.Rozek. Benefits and Costs of Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries. Working Paper No.3, National Economic Research Associate, 1990
    [74] Ricardo, D. 1817. The Principle of Political Economy and Taxation. London, Gaernsey Press, 1973
    [75] Romer, Paul. Increasing Returns and Long-run Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1986(94): 1002~1037
    [76] Romer, Paul. Human Capital and Growth: Theory and Evidence. NBER Working Paper No.3173, 1989
    [77] Sherwood, Robert M. Intellectual Property and Economic Development. Westview Press, Boulder, CO., 1990. 165~194
    [78] Smith, Adam, 1776. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. New York, Random House, 1937
    [79] Stewart, Frances. Technology and Underdevelopment. London: The Macmillan Press., 1978
    [80] Stokey, Nancy L. Human Capital, Product Quality, and Growth. Quartely Journal of Economics, 1991(106): 587~616
    [81] Taylor, Curtis, R. Digging for Golden Carrots: An Analysis of Research Tournaments. American Economic Review, 1995(85): 872~889
    [82] Vernon, R. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966(80): 190~207
    [83] W. Keller. International Technology Diffusion. NBER Working Paper 8573, 2001
    [84] World Bank. Intellectual Property: Balancing Incentives with Competitive Access. In Global Economic Prospects, 2001:129~150
    [85] Yan Wang and Yudong Yao. Sources of China’s Economic Growth 1952~1999: Incorporating Human Capital Accumulation. China Economic Review, 2003(14): 32~52
    [86] Yang, Guifang and Keith Markus. Intellectual Property Rights, Licensing, and Innovation in an Endogenous Product Cycle Model. Journal of International Economics, 2001(53): 169~188
    [87] Young, Alwyn. Learning by Doing and the Dynamic Effects of Internatioanl Trade. Journal of Political Economy, 1991(106): 369~406
    [88] Yuko Kinoshita. R&D and Technology Spillovers via FDI: Innovation and Absorptive Capacity. William Davidson Institute Working Papers Series 349, 2000
    [89] Zigic, Kresimir. Strategic Trade Policy, Intellectual Property Rights Protection and North-South Trade. Journal of Development Economics, 2000(61): 27~60
    [90]阿巴斯,王金营.人力资本在经济增长中的作用:中国和巴基斯坦的比较研究.市场与人口分析,2000(6):14~19
    [91]蔡增正.教育对经济增长贡献的计量分析——科教兴国战略的实证依据.经济研究,1999(2):39~47
    [92]查理·辛格.技术史(第六卷).王平(译).成都:成都科技出版社,1995
    [93]陈晓枫.以研究开发力度提高技术引进的有效性——论企业技术引进与研究开发.福州大学学报(社会科学版),1997(10):12~16
    [94]仇怡,方齐云.基于进口贸易的国际技术外溢测度与应用.中国软科学,2005(10):132~138
    [95]仇怡.中国基于国际贸易的技术进步效应研究:[博士学位论文].武汉:华中科技大学图书馆,2005
    [96]崔玉平.中国高等教育对经济增长率的贡献.北京师范大学学报,2000(1):31~37
    [97]第三次全国工业普查办公室.中华人民共和国1995年第三次全国工业普查资料汇编.北京:中国统计出版社,1997
    [98]丁仁船,杨军昌.技术进步对中国劳动力就业的影响.统计与决策,2002(12):36~37
    [99]郑成思.国际知识产权保护和我国面临的挑战.法制与社会发展,2006(6):3~13
    [100]方希桦,包群,赖明勇.国际技术溢出:基于进口传导机制的实证研究.中国软科学,2004(7):58~64
    [101]傅家骥.技术创新学.北京:清华大学出版社,1998:5~22,98~105
    [102]高建.中国所处的技术创新阶段与科技起飞.科技导报,1998(6):48~50
    [103]管汉晖.与贸易相关的知识产权保护与经济增长:[博士学位论文].杭州:浙江大学图书馆,2005
    [104]黄先海,石东楠.对外贸易对中国全要素生产率影响的测度与分析.世界经济研究,2005(1):22~26
    [105]胡鞍纲.如何认识中国的技术追赶效应.科学中国人,2004(6):34~38
    [106]胡景岩.开发市场与外资和技术的引进.国际经济合作,2003(9):2~7
    [107]胡永远.中国居民人力资本投资研究.长沙:湖南人民出版社,2003.169~180
    [108]姜鸿.我国进口贸易对技术进步的影响.中南财经政法大学学报,2003(3):89~92
    [109]梁琦.产业集聚论.北京:商务印书馆,2004.198~213
    [110]赖明勇,袁媛.R&D、国际技术外溢及人力资本:一个经验研究.科研管理,2005(7): 62~67
    [111]赖明勇,张新,等.经济增长的源泉:人力资本、研究开发与技术外溢.中国社会科学,2005(2): 32~46
    [112]林毅夫,董先安,殷韦.技术选择、技术扩散与经济收敛.林毅夫发展论坛(http://jlin.ccer.edu.cn/article/article.asp?id=175),2002
    [113]林毅夫,李永军.对外贸易与经济增长关系的再考察.北京大学中国经济研究中心.讨论稿No.C2001008,2001
    [114]李平,崔喜君.知识产权保护对国际技术扩散的影响及中国的对策分析.工业技术经济,2005(10):67~74
    [115]李宏伟.美国的研发体系及研发投入概况.全国科技经济瞭望,2002(3):39~43
    [116]李小平,朱钟棣.国际贸易的技术溢出门槛效应——基于中国各地区面板数据的分析.统计研究,2004(10):27~32
    [117]刘晓鹏.协整分析与误差修正模型——我国对外贸易与经济增长的实证研究.南开经济研究,2001(5):53~56
    [118]骆勤.我国教育支出的财政分析和对策选择.财经论丛,2004(5):36~40
    [119]孟凡麟,张朝霞.对加入WTO后中国知识产权保护的思考.山东社会科学,2004(1):93~96
    [120]任永菊.中国进口与出口间的关系检验.当代经济科学,2003(4):21~26
    [121]沈利生,朱运法.人力资本与经济增长分析.北京:社会科学文献出版社,1999.201~229
    [122]史清琪,尚勇.中国产业技术创新能力研究.北京:中国轻工业出版社,2000.6~9
    [123]宋泓,柴喻.以劳动力寻找型为主——中国外国直接投资的性质分析.国际贸易,2002(10):49~53
    [124]宋京.开放经济条件下的技术进步——理论与基于中国经验的实证研究:[博士学位论文].上海:复旦大学图书馆,2004
    [125]孙文学.调整税收政策导向与促进人力资本投资研究.现代财经,2003(11):4~5
    [126]佟家栋.关于我国进口与经济增长关系的探讨.南开学报(哲学社会科学版),1995(3):9~12
    [127]王玉清.从出口增长奇迹到进口增长奇迹——1980年以来全球进口贸易国别格局与中国地位的变化.南开经济研究,2004(2):3~11
    [128]吴振宇,沈利生.中国对外贸易对GDP贡献的经验分析.世界经济,2004(2):13~20
    [129]许和连,赖明勇.中国进口贸易影响因素的实证分析.湖南大学学报(社会科学版),2002(5):37~40
    [130]杨全发,舒元.广东对外贸易促进经济增长分析.世界经济文汇,1999(4):8-11
    [131]姚战琪,夏杰长.资本深化、技术进步对中国就业效应的经验分析.世界经济,2005(5):58~67
    [132]易先忠,张亚斌.技术差距、知识产权保护与后法国技术进步.数量经济技术经济研究,2006(10):111~121
    [133]袁泳.知识产权法与技术、文化创新.北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1995(5):101~103
    [134]喻美辞,喻春娇.中国进口贸易技术溢出效应的实证分析.国际贸易问题,2006(3):26~31
    [135]袁志刚.知识经济学导论.上海:上海人民出版社,1999:31~34
    [136]张鲁青.进口贸易对经济增长影响的研究:[博士学位论文].北京:对外经济贸易大学图书馆,2006a
    [137]张增臣.我国高等教育投资的现状及对策.中国市场,2006(12): 80~81
    [138]赵江林.外资与人力资源开发:对中国经验的总结.经济研究,2004(2):47~54
    [139]赵兰香,穆荣平.技术创新发展阶段对技术发展战略选择的约束.科学学研究,2003(12):652~656
    [140]赵陵,宋少华,宋泓明.中国出口导向型经济增长的经济分析.世界经济,2001(8):14~20
    [141]赵伟,汪全立.人力资本与技术溢出:基于进口传导机制的实证研究.中国软科学,2006(4):66~74
    [142]郑成思.国际知识产权保护和中国面临的挑战.法制与社会发展,2006(6):3~13
    [143]朱东平.外商直接投资、知识产权保护与发展中国家的社会福利.经济研究,2004(1):93~101

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700