企业的本质、性质与企业成长的理论研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
企业是与市场结合却又不同于市场的协调资源配置的另一种必不可少的机制。企业的成长构成了一国经济发展和经济繁荣的基础,具有极高的研究价值。本文认为,对企业成长理论的研究,首先必须以对企业本身的认识为出发点。而企业的本身,主要是企业的本质,以及企业的性质这两大问题。
     本文首先从对企业本质的认识开始。通过对新古典经济学、新制度学派与古典经济学、演化经济学、资源能力知识理论以及马克思、熊彼特、钱德勒与杨小凯等对企业本质认识的回顾、比较、评析与综合,本文认为,企业的本质是“高效率的生产组织”。它包括三层含义:首先,企业的本质,首要在于其生产属性,这是企业之所以区别于市场的地方;其次,之所以由企业组织生产,而不是分散生产是由于企业能够进行高效率的生产,这是企业之所以取代小生产组织的原因;而最后,企业无疑是一种组织,只有通过组织,企业才能够进行生产,才能够进行可以利用分工协作的效率优势的生产。
     本文随后在对企业本质认识的基础上,探讨了企业的性质及其企业成长意义。通过对新古典经济学、交易成本经济学与演化经济学、资源能力知识等企业理论中对企业性质认识的回顾、比较与综合,本文认为,异质性是企业的基本性质,其基本涵义包括:第一,企业是一个历史的不断内生成长和演化的有机体,企业在成长中所积累的核心知识和能力是独特的和有价值的;第二,企业的核心知识和能力作为企业的关键性生产要素是非竞争性的和难以模仿与替代的,既无法通过市场公开定价和获得又使其他企业的模仿和替代行为面临成本约束。本文进而认为,企业的成长根源于核心知识与能力的积累,更根源于持续的知识创新,这是一个内生的企业成长问题。最后,本文介绍了一个基于人力资本与知识理论的企业成长的知识结构模型。
     结合企业的异质观,本文基于对企业本质的认识,考查其企业成长意义。本文认为,面向产品的创新,是企业在市场竞争中求得生存与发展,求得持续成长的最基本手段。其中,企业本质的生产性,决定了企业的基于产品的竞争;而高效率,这一企业存在的规定性,决定了企业的基于创新的竞争。在这个认识的基础上,本文研究了基于面向产品的创新的企业成长模式与模式选择。随后,本文以产品创新为主,兼顾面向产品的流程创新,分析其与企业成长的关系、影响因素以及相关的国外经验研究成果。
The firm is another necessary mechanism of allocating resources, which integrates with market but different from market. The growth of the firm is the foundation of a country's economy development and has high researching value. This paper thinks that researching the growth of the firm should begin from the firm itself, mainly including the nature and the property of the firm.Beginning from the nature of the firm, this paper reviews and analyzes the viewpoints of neo-classical, new institutional, evolution economics etc. and Marx et al. Then it is concluded that the nature of the firm is a productive organization with high efficiency. There are three aspects of meanings. Firstly, the nature of the firm is firstly productive, which is what the firm differs from the market. Secondly, production is an organized production by the firm rather than a dispersed production. That is because firm can produce in a high efficiency. Finally, the firm is a kind of organization. Only through organizing, the firm can carry though production, a high efficient production taking advantage of the work division and collaboration.Based on the nature of the firm, the firm's property are discussed. Through the review and comparison, it is thought that the property of the firm is heterogeneity. It includes two aspects of meanings. On one hand, the firm is an organism of historically and continuously endogenous growth and evolution. In this growth process, the core knowledge and capabilities accumulated are special and valuable. On the other hand, core knowledge and capabilities are noncompetitive, inimitable and no-substitutable. They can't be priced and achieved through the public market, but also are a cost restriction for other firms to imitate. Moreover, this paper thinks that the growth of the firm rooted from the accumulation of the core knowledge and capabilities, and sustained knowledge innovation, which is an endogenous growth process. At last, a firm growth model from knowledge structure perspective is presented.According with the firm heterogeneity, the significance of the nature of the firm to the firm growth is that product-oriented innovation is a basic means for the firm's growth. Hereinto, the productiveness of the firm decides the competition based on product. And the high efficiency decides the competition based on innovation. Based on this, the firm growth pattern of product-oriented innovation and the choice of it are discussed. Then, the correlation and influence between product innovation and firm growth is analyzed. And the empirical research achievements abroad are introduced.
引文
[1] Acs, Z. J. and Audretsch, D. B. 1988. Testing the Schumpeterian Hypothesis. Eastern Economic Journal, 14(2): 129-140.
    [2] Alchian & Demsetz, 1972. Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization. The American Economic Review, 62: 777-795.
    [3] Alchian, A. A. 1950. Uncertainty, Evolution and Economic Theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58:211-222.
    [4] Andersen, E. S. 1996. Evolutionary Economics: Post-Schumpeterian Contributions. Pinter, London.
    [5] Andersen, E. S. 2001. Satiation in an Evolutionary Model of Structural Economic Dynamics. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 11(1): 143-164.
    [6] Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate Strategy. McGraw-Hill.
    [7] Arrow, K. J. 1964. Control in Large Organizations. Management Science, 10(3): 397-408.
    [8] Arrow, K. J. 1969. The Organization of Economic Activity, in The Analysis and evaluation of Public Expenditure: The PPB System. 91st Congress, 1st session, Vol. 1, JEC, 47-64.
    [9] Bacon, G., Beckman, S., Mowery, D. & Wilson, E. 1994. Managing Product Definition in High-technology Industries: A Pilot Study. California Management Review, 2: 32-56.
    [10] Barney, J. B. 1986. Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy. Management Science, 32:1231-1241.
    [11] Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99-120.
    [12] Becker, G. & Murphy, K. 1992. The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Economics, Nov: 1137-1160.
    [13] Bettis R.A. & Hitt M.A. 1995. The New Competitive Landscape. Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 16: 7-19.
    [14] Bottazzi, G. & Secchi, A. 2002. On the Laplace distribution of firm growth rates. Working Paper, LEM.
    [15] Bottazzi, G, Dosi, G. & Roccheti, G. 2001. Modes of Knowledge Accumulation, Entry Regimes and Patterns of Industrial Evolution. Working Paper, LEM.
    [16] Carter, A. P. 1996. Production Workers, Meta-investment, and the Pace of Change(forthcoming).
    [17] Cheung, S. 1983. The Contractual Nature of the Firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(1): 1-21.
    [18] Coase, R. H. 1937. The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4: 386-405.
    [19] Coldwell, B. 1997. Hayek and Socialism. Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 1856-1890.
    [20] Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
    [21] Collis, D. J. 1994. Research Note: How Valuable are Organizational Capabilities? Strategic Management Journal, VOL 15: 143-152.
    [22] Conner, K.R. 1991. A Historical Comparison of Resource-based Theory and Five Schools of Thought within Industrial Organization Economics: Do We Have a New Theory of the Firm?. Journal of Management, 17:121-154.
    
    [23] Cool, K. & Schendel, D. 1988. Performance Differences among Strategic Group Members. Strategic Management Journal. 9 (May-June): 207-233.
    [24] David S. Evans. Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth. Journal of Political Economy, 1987, vol. 95(4): 657-674.
    [25] Demsetz, H. 1996. Rationality, Evolution, and Acquistitiveness. Economic Inquiry, 34: 484-495.
    [26] Dierickx, I. & Cool, K. 1989. Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage. Management Science, 35: 1504-1511.
    [27] Dosi, G. 1984. Technical Change and Industrial Transformation - The Theory and an Application to the Semiconductor Industry. MacMillan, London.
    [28] Eliasson, G. 1990. The Firm as a Competent Team. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 13: 275-298.
    [29] Fisher, M. What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product. Harvard Business Review, March-April, 1997.
    [30] Freeman, C, Clark, J. & Soete, L. 1982. Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development. Pinter, London.
    [31] George Taninecz. 1997. Global Grocers. Industry Week, March, 17, p74.
    [32] Grossman & Hart, 1986. The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration. Journal of Politic Economy, 94: 691-719.
    [33] Hayek, F. A. 1933. The Trend of Economic Thinking. Economica, May, p85.
    [34] Helfat, C. E. 1997. Know-ho.w and Asset Complementarity and Dynamic Capability Accumulation: the Case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 18(5): 339-360.
    [35] Helmstadter, E. & Perlman, M. Behavioral Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, 183-198.
    [36] Katsoulacos, Y. 1984. Product Innovation and Employment. European Economic Review, 26:83-108.
    [37] Kerin, R. A., Harvey, M. G. & Rothe, J. T. 1978. Cannibalism and New Product Development, Business Horizons, Oct: 25-31.
    [38] Kline, S. J. and Rosenberg, N. 1986. An Overview of Innovation, from The Positive Sum Strategy - Harnessing Technology for Economic Growth. National Academic Press, USA, 275-305.
    [39] Langlois, R. & Roberton, P. 1995. Firms, Markets and Economic Change. London: Routledge.
    [40] Langlois, R. 1994. Cognition and Capabilities: Opportunities Seized and Missed in the History of the Computer Industry, Working Paper, University of Connecticut. Presented at the Conference on Technological Oversights and Foresights, Stern School of Business, New York University, March.l 1-12.
    [41] Langlois, R. 1995. Capabilities and Coherence in Firms and Markets, in Montgomery, C. A. Resource-Based and Evolutionary Thoeries of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Norwell: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995, 71-100.
    [42] Laursen, K. & Foss, N. J. 2003. New HRM Practices, Complementarities and the Impacton Innovative Performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2): 243-263.
    [43] Laursen, K., Mahnke, V. & Vejrup-Hansen, P. 2000. Firm Growth from a Knowledge Structure Perspective. DRUID Conference, 6~th-8~th January, Denmark.
    
    [44] Leonard-Barton, D. 1992. Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: a Paradox in Managing New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, 13: 111-125.
    [45] Loasby, B. J. 1998. The Organization of Capabilities. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 35: 139-160.
    [46] Lund, R. 2003. The organisation of actors' learning in connection with new product development, in J. L. Christensen, B. A. Lundvall and J. Tolsby. Product Innovation, Interactive Learning and Economic Performance, Edward Elgar.
    [47] Lundvall, B. A. 2002. Innovation, Growth and Social Cohesion - The Danish Model. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.
    [48] Mazzucato, M. 2000. Firm Size, Innovation and Market Structure: The evolution of Industry Concentration and Stability, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
    [49] Meade Nigle. 1985. Forecasting Using Growth Curve-An Adaptive Approach. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 36: 103-115.
    [50] Modis Theodore & Alain Debecker. 1992. Chaoslike States can be Expected Before and After Logistic Growth. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 41: 111-120.
    [51] Murat Yyldyzoglu. 2001. Modeling Adaptive Learning: R&D Strategies in the Model of Nelson & Winter. Universite Montesquieu Bordeaux IV, 1FREDE-E3i (Workingpapers).
    [52] Nelson R. & Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    [53] Nonaka, I. 1991. A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science, 5(l):14-37.
    [54] Pasinetti, L. L. 1993. Structural Economic Dynamics: A Theory of the Economic Consequences of Human Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
    [55] Pavitt, K. 1984. Sectoral Patterns of Technological Change: Towards a Taxonomy and Theory. Research Policy, 13: 343-373.
    [56] Penrose, E. T. 1959. The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [57] Peteraf, M. A. 1993. The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-based View. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 95-117.
    [58] Philip Kotler & Gray Armstrong. 1996. Principles of Marketing (7th Edition). Prentice Hall, Inc.
    [59] Porter, M.E. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. London: The MacMillan Press Ltd.
    [60] Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel,G. 1990. The Core Competence of the Corporation, Harvard Business Review, May-June: 79-91.
    [61] Prescott, E. & Visscher, M. 1980. Organization Capital. Journal of Political Economy, 88: 446-461.
    [62] Priem & Butler. 2001. Tautology in the Resource-based View and the Implications of Externally Determined Resource Value: Further Comments. Academy of Management Review, 26: 57-66.
    [63] Rajan, R. & Zingales, L. 1997. Rower in Theory of the Firm. NBER, No. 6274.
    [64] Rothwell, R. 1977. The Characteristics of Successful Innovators and Technical Progressive Firms. R&D Management, 7: 191-206.
    [65J Rumelt, R. P. 1984. Toward a Strategic Theory of the Firm, in R. B. Lamb. Competitive Strategic Management. Prentice Hall.
    
    [66] Rumelt, R. P., Schendel, D. & David J. Teece. 1991. Strategic Management and Economics. Strategic Management Journal. 12 (Winter Special Issue): 5-29.
    [67] Schumpeter, J. A. 1934. The Theory of Economic Development. Harvard University Press.
    [68] Schumpeter, J. A. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (with Introduction by Tom Bottomore). New York: Harper Collins.
    [69] Statistics Canada. 2001. Employer and Employee Perspectives on Human Resource Practices. The Evolving Workplace Series Catalogue No. 71-584-MPE, No. 1, Statistics Canada.
    [70] Sutton, J. 1998. Technology and Market Structure-Theory and History. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
    [71] Teece, D. J. & Pisano, G. 1994. The Dynamic Capabilities of Firm: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change 3: 537-555.
    [72] Teece, D. J. 1980. Economics of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1: 223-247.
    [73] Teece, D. J., Pisano, G. & Shuen. 1997. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 509-533.
    [74] Toke Reichstein. 2003. Firm Growth Rate Distributions, Firm Size Distributions and the Industry Life Cycle-Combining Evolutionary Simulation and Empirical Analysis. A PhD-Thesis of IKE group, Department of Business Studies, Aalborg University.
    [75] Williamson, O. 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Anti-Trust Implications. New York: The Free Press.
    [76] Winter, S. G. 2002. Understanding Dynamic Capabilities. A working paper of Regin Aid H. Joes Center, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, WP 2002-05.
    [77] Zollo, M. & Winter, S. G. 1999. From organizational routines to dynamic capabilities, A working paper of the Reginald H. Jones Center, the Wharton school University of Pennsylvania.
    [78] 白华英,杨亚妮.企业的性质:西方企业理论的不同解说[J].石油大学学报(社会科学版),2003,(2):32-36.
    [79] 常志霄.“演进经济学”的新演进[J].经济科学,2000,(4):98-104.
    [80] 程承坪.论企业理论的两个基本问题[J].江海学刊,2004,(2):56-61.
    [81] 程启智.马克思的企业理论与科斯等人的企业理论的比较研究[J].当代经济研究,1999,(6):50-53.
    [82] 韩太祥.企业成长理论综述[J].经济学动态,2002,(5):82-86.
    [83] 何维达.马克思与科斯的企业理论之比较[J].当代财经,1998,(3):21-25.
    [84] 贾根良.报酬递增经济学:回顾与展望(Ⅰ)[J].南开经济研究,1998,(6):29-34.
    [85] 贾良定.企业是什么?——西方企业理论述评兼论现代工商企业的本质[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学版),2001,(4):140-147.
    [86] 贾生华,邬爱其.企业成长的知识结构模型及其启示[J].科研管理,2003,(2):83-88.
    [87] 蒋恩尧、逄红梅.基于核心能力的企业成长研究[J].商业研究,2004,(5):14-16.
    [88] 李怀,秦玉兰,赵德久.对当代几种企业性质理论的再评论[J].哈尔滨学院学报,2002,(9):55-61.
    [89] 李石泉,王炜.马克思的企业理论[J].财经研究,1998,(7):3-11.
    [90] 李相银.核心竞争力:从内部寻求竞争优势[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学),2001,
    
    [91] 连建辉,黄文锋.企业的同质性假设、异质性假设与企业所有权安排——两种企业治理观的经济学分析[J].当代经济研究,2002,(9):57-64.
    [92] 梁嘉骅、葛振忠、范建平.企业生态与企业发展[J].管理科学学报,2002,(2):34-40.
    [93] 梁江,刘冀生.资源观的价值决定问题[J].经济管理·新管理,2003,(8):9-12.
    [94] 林民书.生产·技术·规模——比较分析马克思与现代西方经济学的企业理论[J].东南学术,2000,(6),20-23.
    [95] 林勇、马士华.基于产品的供应链设计[J].中国机械工程,1998,(10):24-26.
    [96] 刘灿.马克思企业理论与科斯企业理论的比较和再认识[J].当代经济研究,1997,(3):57-61.
    [97] 刘刚,李国俊.组织决策的知识问题和企业的内生成长[J].经济评论,2002,(5):107-110.
    [98] 刘刚,任路平.浅析马克思的企业理论[J].教学与研究,1998,(5):60-62.
    [99] 刘刚.基于产品需求特点的供应链设计[J].甘肃社会科学,2003,(6):66-68.
    [100] 刘刚.企业成长之谜——一个演化经济学的解释[J].南开经济研究,2003,(5):9-14.
    [101] 刘刚.企业的异质性假设——对企业本质和行为基础的演化论解释[J].中国社会科学,2002,(2):56-68.
    [102] 刘刚.知识积累和企业的内生成长[J].南开经济研究,2002,(2):47-51.
    [103] 刘洪,李必强.自然增长的分形规律研究与应用.科技导报,1996,(10):21-24.
    [104] 刘洪,周健.企业系统演化的一般规律[J].系统辩证学学报,2002,(1):37-40.
    [105] 刘小怡.马克思的企业理论[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2002,(1):31-36.
    [106] 路风,张宏音,王铁民.寻求竞争优势的源泉:动态能力战略观[J].管理世界,2002,2,124-127.
    [107] 路风.动态企业理论的发展[J].国际经济评论,2000,(5):46-51.
    [108] 路言、袁宏伟.创新经营[J].中州审计,2002,(4):8-9.
    [109] 马昀.资源基础理论的回顾与思考[J].经济管理·新管理,2001,(12):23-27.
    [110] 戚永红,宝贡敏.知识管理:概念、框架和问题[J].经济管理·新管理,2003,12:4-9.
    [111] 任锦鸾,顾培亮.基于复杂系统理论的技术系统演化分析[J].天津大学学报(社会科学版),2002,Vol.4(3):228-232.
    [112] 荣兆梓.企业性质研究的两个层面——科斯的企业理论与马克思的企业理论[J].经济研究,1995,(5):21-28.
    [113] 苏树厚,张福明.论马克思的企业性质和起源理论[J].山东社会科学,2001,(6):49-51.
    [114] 谭新生.组织能力观与传统资源观的比较分析——对持续竞争优势的新阐释[J].外国经济与管理,2003,(8):22-26.
    [115] 王开明.团队生产与团队协调——企业知识理论与主流企业理论的比较、综合与发展[J].经济评论,2002,(6):106-110.
    [116] 王迎春,尹碧波,刘长庚.后古典解析框架下的企业理论及其实证分析[J].经济评论,2004,(2):65-68.
    [117] 邬爱其,贾生华,陈宏辉.企业成长过程中的企业家能力转换与家族企业组织演替[J].外国经济与管理,2003,(6):20-24.
    [118] 邬爱其,贾生华.国外企业成长理论研究框架探析[J].外国经济与管理,2002,12:2-5.
    [119] 吴永林.创新与企业成长[J].北方工业大学学报,1999,(12):14-19.
    
    [120] 夏华龙.产业演进理论评述[J].江汉论坛,2000,(3):28-30.
    [121] 肖硝等.产品创新的意义、机制及战略[J].航空制造技术,2004,(2):53-57.
    [122] 徐全军.企业理论新探:企业自组织理论[J].南开管理评论,2003,(3):37-42.
    [123] 杨立岩,王新丽.现代企业理论评析[J].学术月刊,2003,(4):32-40.
    [124] 杨瑞龙,刘刚.企业的异质性假设和企业竞争优势的内生性分析[J].中国工业经济,2002,(1):88-95.
    [125] 杨小凯.企业理论的新发展[J].经济研究,1994,(7):60-65.
    [126] 张富春.论马克思的企业理论[J].当代经济研究,1997,(1):38-43.
    [127] 张银杰.马克思的企业理论与西方新制度学派的企业理论之比较[J].教学与研究,1998,(10):46-51.
    [128] 郑江淮.企业理论:演进经济学的观点述评[J].经济评论,2001,(2):24-28.
    [129] 董俊武著,王爱民指导.可持续发展时代的绿色营销研究[D].武汉理工大学硕士学位论文,2001.
    [130] 樊圣君著,芮明杰指导.企业成长模型及其管理含义[D].复旦大学博士论文,2003.
    [131] 黄江圳著,谭力文指导.企业能力理论的研究[D].武汉大学博士学位论文,2003.
    [132] 江金彦著,戴达远指导.企业的成长:理论与解释[D].江西财经大学硕士学位论文,2003.
    [133] 任锦鸾著,顾培亮指导.基于复杂性理论的创新系统理论及应用研究[D].天津大学博士学位论文,2002.
    [134] 袁春晓著,杨继瑞指导.产业组织演化论[D].四川大学博士学位论文,2002.
    [135] 张华著,朱方明指导.高技术企业成长研究[D].四川大学博士学位论文,2003.
    [136] 赵晓著,闵庆全指导.企业成长理论研究[D].北京大学博士学位论文,1999.
    [137] 埃瑞克·菲吕博顿、鲁道大·瑞切特编,孙经纬译.新制度经济学[M].上海:上海财经大学山版社,1998.
    [138] 彼得·德鲁克等著,杨开峰译.知识管理[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
    [139] 戴维·贝赞可等著,武亚军等译.公司战略经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1999.
    [140] 道格拉斯·C·诺思著,陈郁、罗华平译.经济史中的结构与变迁[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
    [141] 菲利普R.凯特奥拉、约翰L.格雷厄姆著,周祖成、赵银德、张磷等译.国际市场营销学(第10版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000.
    [142] 哈罗德·德姆塞茨著,段毅才等译.所有权、控制与企业[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [143] 哈罗德·德姆塞茨著,梁小民译.企业经济学[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
    [144] 亨利·明茨伯格等著,刘瑞红等译.战略历程:纵览战略管理学派[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001.
    [145] 路易斯·普特曼、兰德尔·克罗茨纳编,孙经纬译.企业的经济性质[M].上海:上海财经大学出版社,2000.
    [146] 罗纳德·哈里·科斯著,盛洪等译.论生产的制度结构[M].上海:上海三联书店,1994.
    [147] 罗纳德·哈里·科斯著,盛洪等译.企业、市场与法律[M].上海:上海三联书店,1990.
    [148] 马尔科姆·S·格林伍德、马丁·J·卡特著,阙澄宇译.企业经济学原理与案例[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,2002.
    [149] 马克思.资本论(第二卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
    [150] 马克思.资本论(第一卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1975.
    [151] 马歇尔著,朱志泰译.经济学原理[M].北京:商务印书馆,1981.
    
    [152] 迈克尔·波特著,陈小锐译.竞争战略[M].北京:华夏出版社,1997.
    [153] 迈克尔·迪屈奇著,王铁生、葛立成译.交易成本经济学——关于公司的新的经济意义[M].北京:经济科学山版社,1999.
    [154] 纳尔逊、温特著.胡世凯译.经济变迁的演化理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1997.
    [155] 尼古莱·J.福斯,克里斯第安·克努森编,李东红译.企业万能:面向企业能力理论[M].大连:东北财经大学出版社,1998.
    [156] 诺斯、托马斯著,历以平、蔡磊译.西方世界的兴起[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
    [157] 欧阳莹之著,田宝国等译.复杂系统理论基础[M].上海:上海科技教育出版社,2002.
    [158] 钱德勒著,孟昕译.战略与结构:美国工商企业成长的若干篇章[M].昆明:云南人民出版社,2002.
    [159] 钱德勒著,张逸人等译.企业规模经济与范围经济——工业资本主义的原动力[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1999.
    [160] 钱德勒著,重武译.看得见得手——美国企业的管理革命[M].北京:商务印书馆,1987.
    [161] 乔治·J·施蒂格勒著,李青原等译.价格理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1992.
    [162] 乔治·斯托尔克等著,赵锡军等译.企业成长战略[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1999.
    [163] 萨缪尔森著,肖琛译.经济学(第十六版)[M].北京:华夏山版社,1999.
    [164] 西蒙著,杨砾译.管理行为[M].北京:北京经济学院出版社,1988.
    [165] 熊彼特著,何畏译.经济发展理论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
    [166] 杨小凯、黄有光著,张玉纲译.专业化与经济组织——一种新兴古典微观经济学框架[M].北京:经济科学出版社,1999.
    [167] 伊查克·爱迪斯著,赵睿等译.企业生命周期[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1997.
    [168] 陈郁编.企业制度与市场组织——交易费用经济学文献[M].上海:上海三联书店、上海人民出版社,1996.
    [169] 邓荣霖主编.现代企业制度概论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1995.
    [170] 傅家骥主编.技术创新学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,1998.
    [171] 甘碧群主编.国际市场营销学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2001.
    [172] 高程德主编.现代公司理论[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2000.
    [173] 刘守英主编.战略:45位战略家谈如何建立核心竞争力[M].北京:中国发展出版社,2002.
    [174] 祁顺生著.归核化战略[M].上海:复旦大学山版社,2002.
    [175] 盛昭瀚,蒋德鹏.演化经济学[M].上海:上海三联书店,2002.
    [176] 唐海滨著.企业生命的秘密[M].北京:中国经济出版社,2002.
    [177] 万君康,蔡希贤.技术经济学[M].武汉:华中科技大学出版社,1996.
    [178] 杨杜著.企业成长论[M].北京:中国人民大学山版社,1996.
    [179] 杨小凯著.经济学原理[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1998.
    [180] 姚小涛、席酉民著.环境变革中的企业与企业集团[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2002.
    [181] 周三多、邹统钎著.战略管理思想史[M].上海:复旦大学出版社,2002.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700