网络成瘾与内隐、外显心理健康
|
摘要
本研究旨在研究网络成瘾与内隐、外显心理健康及心理症状的关系。
首先以开放式问卷调查、访谈法、投射测验等,收集资料进行质化研究,探索出内隐心理健康观的七因素理论。在该理论的基础上,编制心理健康自评问卷,然后以在校学生为被试,施以心理健康自评问卷、症状自评量表、网络成瘾量表测验,探讨大学生网络成瘾与外显心理健康及心理症状的关系;最后使用内隐联想测验研究内隐心理健康观的内隐认知。研究表明:
(1)大学生网络成瘾存在性别差异。大学生网络成瘾与心理症状呈显著正相关,与自评心理健康呈显著负相关。
(2)自评心理健康性别差异不显著。自评心理健康与各种心理症状呈显著负相关。
(3)内隐联想测验证实,内隐心理健康观的内隐认知存在,有个体与群体两个层面。
(4)内隐心理健康观包含内隐心理健康观的朴素理论与内隐心理健康观的内隐认知。
The main aim of the study was to explore the relationship among the internet addiction, implicit and explicit mental health and psychological symptoms of college students.
The data were collected by the open surveys, interviewing method and Projective Test. Qualitative research was carried out and exploring the seven-factor theory about the implicit view of mental health. Based on the theory, Mental Health Self-Rating Scale (MHSRS) were developed. College students were asked as the testees to finished MHSRS, Symptom Checklist 90, Chen Internet Addiction Scale and Young Internet Addiction Scale, so as to explore the relationship among the college student’s internet addiction, explicit self-rating mental health and mental symptoms. Finally, the implicit cognition of mental health view was studied with the Implicit Association Test. The results as follows:
i. The gender difference of College students exists in Internet Addiction. College students Internet Addiction was positively related to mental symptoms, negatively correlated with mental health view and variable-sharing.
ii. Gender difference was not significant in MHSRS. MHSRS showed the negative correlation to a variety of psychological symptoms.
iii. The excessive use of network students group and control group has the significant implicit cognition effects of mental health, confirmed the presence of implicit cognition of mental health view. It includes individual and group implicit cognition of mental health view.
iv. The implicit view of mental health includes the seven-factor theory about the implicit view of mental health and the implicit cognition of mental health view.
首先以开放式问卷调查、访谈法、投射测验等,收集资料进行质化研究,探索出内隐心理健康观的七因素理论。在该理论的基础上,编制心理健康自评问卷,然后以在校学生为被试,施以心理健康自评问卷、症状自评量表、网络成瘾量表测验,探讨大学生网络成瘾与外显心理健康及心理症状的关系;最后使用内隐联想测验研究内隐心理健康观的内隐认知。研究表明:
(1)大学生网络成瘾存在性别差异。大学生网络成瘾与心理症状呈显著正相关,与自评心理健康呈显著负相关。
(2)自评心理健康性别差异不显著。自评心理健康与各种心理症状呈显著负相关。
(3)内隐联想测验证实,内隐心理健康观的内隐认知存在,有个体与群体两个层面。
(4)内隐心理健康观包含内隐心理健康观的朴素理论与内隐心理健康观的内隐认知。
The main aim of the study was to explore the relationship among the internet addiction, implicit and explicit mental health and psychological symptoms of college students.
The data were collected by the open surveys, interviewing method and Projective Test. Qualitative research was carried out and exploring the seven-factor theory about the implicit view of mental health. Based on the theory, Mental Health Self-Rating Scale (MHSRS) were developed. College students were asked as the testees to finished MHSRS, Symptom Checklist 90, Chen Internet Addiction Scale and Young Internet Addiction Scale, so as to explore the relationship among the college student’s internet addiction, explicit self-rating mental health and mental symptoms. Finally, the implicit cognition of mental health view was studied with the Implicit Association Test. The results as follows:
i. The gender difference of College students exists in Internet Addiction. College students Internet Addiction was positively related to mental symptoms, negatively correlated with mental health view and variable-sharing.
ii. Gender difference was not significant in MHSRS. MHSRS showed the negative correlation to a variety of psychological symptoms.
iii. The excessive use of network students group and control group has the significant implicit cognition effects of mental health, confirmed the presence of implicit cognition of mental health view. It includes individual and group implicit cognition of mental health view.
iv. The implicit view of mental health includes the seven-factor theory about the implicit view of mental health and the implicit cognition of mental health view.
引文
1. 金勇,郭力平.心理健康观的历史演进.心理科学,1998,21(5):465- 466.
2. 佐斌.中国传统文化的心理健康观.教育研究与实验,1994,1:33- 37.
3. 刘华山.心理健康概念与标准的再认识.心理科学,2001,24(4)481- 482.
4. 郑日昌 .大学生心理卫生.济南 :山东教育出版社 , 1996:43- 48.
5. 张海钟.正确处理心理健康标准中的几个关系.健康心理学杂志,1998,6(3):332- 335.
6. 张海钟.心理健康标准研究的争鸣综述及其进一步的思辩.心理学探新,2001,21(79):42- 46.
7. 刘华山.心理健康概念与标准的再认识.心理科学,2001,24(4)481- 482.
8. 江光荣,柳珺珺,黎少游等. 国内外心理健康素质研究综述. 心理与行为研究, 2004,2(4):586- 591.
9. 余志核,周敏. 不同人群的心理测查(CPI-RC)结果分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2004,12(2):480- 482.
10. 许明智,龚耀先. 心理健康量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(2):111- 115.
11. 桑标,宋志虹. 上海公众心理健康观的初步调查研究. 心理科学,1998,21(5):407- 412.
12. 李凌,缪小春. “中小学生心理健康”公众观的调查和分析. 心理科学,2000,23(5):537- 542.
13. 何心展,陈传锋,沈斌表. 不同阶层心理健康观念及需求状况的调查研究. 应用心理学,2002,8(2):35- 38.
14. 翟宏,张挚,孟庆茂. 大学生心理健康多维结构的探讨. 中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(3):197- 199.
15. 蔡华俭. Greenwald 提出的内隐联想测验介绍. 心理科学进展,2003,11(3):339- 344.
16. 蔡华俭,杨治良. 大学生性别自我概念的结构. 心理学报, 2002,34(2):168- 174.
17. 梁宁建,吴名证,高旭成. 基于反应时范式的内隐社会认知研究方法. 心理科学,2003,26(2):208- 211.
18. 申继亮,洪郡,彭华茂.中学教师关于学生心理健康标准的内隐认识.2001,3:54-
58.
19. 边玉芳,滕春燕.教师心理健康内隐观研究.心理科学,2003,26(3):483- 486.
20. 田宏碧,陈家麟.中国大陆心理健康标准研究十年的述评.心理科学,2003,26(4):
704- 708.
21. 陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究.教育科学出版社,2000,1:12,332.
22. 胡雁. 质性研究. 护士进修杂志,2006,21(9):773- 775.
23. 梁宁建.当代心理学理论与重要实验研究.华东师范大学出版社,2007:241.
24. 陈侠,黄希庭,白纲.关于网络成瘾的心理学研究.心理科学进展,2003,11(3):
355- 359.
25. 崔丽娟,刘琳.互联网对大学生社会性发展的影响.心理科学,2003,26(1):64-66.
26. 祝卓宏,高文斌,高晶等.走出网络迷途.北京:科学出版社,2006.
27. 高文斌,高晶,祝卓宏等.中国青少年网络成瘾研究与调查.北京:科学出版社,2006.
28. 中 国 互 联 网 络 发 展 状 况 统 计 报 告 .2007-01-23. http://www.cnnic.cn/uploadfiles/doc/2007/1/22/212245.doc.
29. 林绚晖,阎巩固.大学生上网行为及网络成瘾探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15(4):281.
30. 王立皓,童辉杰. 大学生网络成瘾与社会支持、交往焦虑、自我和谐的关系研究. 健康心理学杂志,2003,11( 2):94- 96.
31. 张宏如. 网络成瘾大学生动机与人格特征. 健康心理学杂志, 2003,11(5):398- 400.
32. 雷雳,李宏利. 病理性使用互联网的界定与测量. 心理科学进展,2003,11(1):73- 77.
33. 高文斌,陈祉妍. 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究.心理科学进展,2006,14(4):596- 603.
34. 张兰君. 大学生网络成瘾倾向多因素研究. 健康心理学杂志,2003,11(4):279- 280.
35. 付慧鹏,霍军,于俊丽等. 父母教养方式与儿童网络成瘾行为的关系. 临床精神医学杂志,2004,14(5):278- 279.
36. 吴汉荣,朱克京. 影响大学生网络成瘾相关因素的路径分析. 中国公共卫生,2004,11(20):1363- 1364.
37. 刘树娟,张智君. 网络成瘾的社会-心理-生理模型及研究展望. 应用心理学,2004,l0(2):48- 54.
38. 陈淑惠. 中文网络成瘾量表的编制与心理计量特性研究. 台湾中华心理学刊,2001,45(3):279.
39. 陈淑惠、翁俪祯、苏逸人、吴和懋、杨品凤.中文网络成瘾量表之编制与心理计量特性研究.中华心理学刊,2003,45(3):279- 294.
40. 杨容,邵智,郑涌. 中学生网络成瘾症的综合干预. 中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(7):457- 459.
41. 曾文星, 徐静. 心理治疗:原则与方法. 北京医科大学出版社,2000: 160.
42. 张凤宁,张怿萍,邹锦山. 青少年网络成瘾及系统家庭治疗.中国全科医学,2006,9(1):48- 50.
43. 杨昕. 网络成瘾的防治理论与实践研究. 精神疾病与精神卫生,2006,6(4):314- 317.
44. 韩利雄,周玉来,田恬. 网络成瘾症的集体心理治疗. 中国临床医药研究杂志,2006,151:90- 91.
45. 徐鹰,李仁福,杨春雷. 运用森田疗法治疗网络成瘾一例. 国际中华应用心理学杂志,2005,2(3- 4):290- 291.
46. 肖顺贞,胡雁.护理研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.61-66.
47. 童辉杰. 投射技术——对适合中国人文化的心理测评技术的探索.黑龙江人民出版社,2003:41.
48. 汪向东等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12.
49. 毕玉,苏文亮,孙雅峰等.大学生网络成瘾者心理行为特点的在线研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(2):170- 173.
50. 张国富,周二强,刘栋等.青少年网络成瘾的影响因素.新乡医学院学报,2006,23(1):50-52.
51. 周涛.大学生社交焦虑与网络成瘾的相关研究.湖南师大教育科学学报,2003,2(3):85- 87.
52. 梁宁建,吴明证,邱扶东等.互联网成瘾者内隐网络态度及其干预研究.心理科学,2004,27(4):796- 798.
53. 熊燕,于祥成,胡义秋等. 硕士研究生新生心理健康状况的调查研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):56-58.
54. 李英华,孟宪鹏,庞静等. 北京市东城区高中生心理健康状况及其影响因素分析. 中国健康教育,2007,23(3):173-176.
1. Dweck C. S., Chiu C. Y, Hong Y. Y. Implicit theories and their role in judgment and reaction: A world forms two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6:267-285.
2. Beck A.T. Depression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber press, 1967.
3. Greewald A. G. & Banaji M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1):1, 4-27.
4. De Houwer, J. A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & Klauer K.C. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003, 219-244.
5. Fazio R. H., Sanbonmatsu D. M., Powell M. C., & Kardes F. R. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 50: 229-238.
6. Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E.,Schwartz, J. L. K. Measuring individual difference in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6) : 1464-1480.
7. Farnham S. D., Greenwald A. G., Banaji M R. Implicit self-esteem. In: Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A ed. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Blackwell Publishers Inc, 1999. 230- 248.
8. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., Banaji, M. R. Implicit attitude measure: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 2001, 12(2): 163-170.
9. Greenwald A. G., Farham S. D. Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(6): 1022-1038.
10. Dasgupta N., McGhee D. E., Greenwald A. G., Banaji M R. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36:316- 328.
11. McConnell A. R., Leibold J. M. Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001, 37: 435-442.
12. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R. The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition, 2001, 19: 625-666.
13. De Houwer, J. The extrinsic affective simon task. Experimental Psychology, 2003, 50: 77- 85.
14. Strauss, A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, 1987:5.
15. Patton M. Q. Variety in Qualitative Inquiry: Theoretical Orientation. In Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods[M]. 3ed. California: Thousand Oaks, 2002. 126- 142.
16. Martin E. P. Seligman, Tracy A. Steen, Nansook Park, et al. Positive psychology progress empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist 2005, 60(5): 410-421.
17. Katherine D., Peterson C., Seligman. M. E. P. Shared Virtue: The Convergence of Valued Human Strengths Across Culture and History. Review of General Psychology, 2005, 9(3):203-213.
18. Young K. S. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1998, l (3): 237-244.
19. Kim Ryu E., Chon M. Y. et a1. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation:A questionnaire survey.International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2006, 43:185-192.
20. Yong K. S. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1996, 13(3): 23-25.
21. Davis, R. A. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 17(2): 187-195.
22. Hall, A. S., Parsons, Jeffrey. Internet Addiction: College Student Case Study Using Best Practices in Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 2001, 23(4):312-328.
23. Chou C., Hsiao M. C. Internet addiction usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students’case. Computers and Education, 2000, 35(1): 65-80.
24. Young K. S. What makes online usage stimulating-potential explanation for pathological internet use? Paper presented at the 105th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association 1997.
25. Kraut R., Kielser S., Bonka B., et al. Internet Paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issue, 2002, 58(1): 49-74.
26. Hamburger Y. A., Ben-Artzi E. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19(11):71-80.
27. Armstrong L., Phillips J. G., Saling L. L. Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000, 53(4): 537-50.
28. Greenberg J. L., Lewis S., David K. Overlapping addictions and self-esteem among college men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 1999, 24(4): 565-571.
29. Shapiro N. A., Goldsmith T. D., Keck P. E., et al. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2000, 57(1-3): 267-272.
30. Wang W. Interact dependency and psychosocial maturity among college students. Human Computer Studies, 2001, 55(6): 919-938.
31. Bread K. V. Notification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Cyber Psychology Behavior, 2001, 4(3): 377-383.
32. Young K. S. Cognitive behavior therapy with internet addicts: treatment outcomes and implications. Cyber psychology & Behavior 2007, 10(5):671-679.
33. Alex S. H., Jeffrey P. Internet addiction: college student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 2001,23(4):312-327.
34. Jong-Un Kim. A reality therapy group counseling program as an internet addiction recovery method for college students in Korea. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 2007, 10. (2): 3-9.
35. Coyne I.T. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1997, 26(3): 623-630. Beard K. W., Wolf E. M. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyber psychology & Behavior 2001, 4(3):377-383.
36. Kraut R., Patterson M., & mark L. V. et al. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social and involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologist, 1998, 9:1017-1031.
37. Tigemann M. The impact of adolescent girl’s life concerns and self-esteem. The Jouranal of Genetic Psychology, 2001, 162(3): 133- 142.
38. Masi G., Mucci M., Favilla L. et al. Temperament in adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders and in their families. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2003, 33(3):245- 259.
39. Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L. A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 1998, 95: 256- 273.
40. Strupp H. H. The tripartite model and the consumer reports study, American psychologist, 1996, 51(10): 1017-1024.
41. Chih Hung Ko, Ju Yu Yen, Sue Huei Chen, et al. Screening for Internet Addiction: an empirical study on cut-off points for the Chen Internet Addiction Scale. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2005, 21: 545- 51.
2. 佐斌.中国传统文化的心理健康观.教育研究与实验,1994,1:33- 37.
3. 刘华山.心理健康概念与标准的再认识.心理科学,2001,24(4)481- 482.
4. 郑日昌 .大学生心理卫生.济南 :山东教育出版社 , 1996:43- 48.
5. 张海钟.正确处理心理健康标准中的几个关系.健康心理学杂志,1998,6(3):332- 335.
6. 张海钟.心理健康标准研究的争鸣综述及其进一步的思辩.心理学探新,2001,21(79):42- 46.
7. 刘华山.心理健康概念与标准的再认识.心理科学,2001,24(4)481- 482.
8. 江光荣,柳珺珺,黎少游等. 国内外心理健康素质研究综述. 心理与行为研究, 2004,2(4):586- 591.
9. 余志核,周敏. 不同人群的心理测查(CPI-RC)结果分析. 中国心理卫生杂志, 2004,12(2):480- 482.
10. 许明智,龚耀先. 心理健康量表的初步编制. 中国临床心理学杂志,2004,12(2):111- 115.
11. 桑标,宋志虹. 上海公众心理健康观的初步调查研究. 心理科学,1998,21(5):407- 412.
12. 李凌,缪小春. “中小学生心理健康”公众观的调查和分析. 心理科学,2000,23(5):537- 542.
13. 何心展,陈传锋,沈斌表. 不同阶层心理健康观念及需求状况的调查研究. 应用心理学,2002,8(2):35- 38.
14. 翟宏,张挚,孟庆茂. 大学生心理健康多维结构的探讨. 中国临床心理学杂志,2002,10(3):197- 199.
15. 蔡华俭. Greenwald 提出的内隐联想测验介绍. 心理科学进展,2003,11(3):339- 344.
16. 蔡华俭,杨治良. 大学生性别自我概念的结构. 心理学报, 2002,34(2):168- 174.
17. 梁宁建,吴名证,高旭成. 基于反应时范式的内隐社会认知研究方法. 心理科学,2003,26(2):208- 211.
18. 申继亮,洪郡,彭华茂.中学教师关于学生心理健康标准的内隐认识.2001,3:54-
58.
19. 边玉芳,滕春燕.教师心理健康内隐观研究.心理科学,2003,26(3):483- 486.
20. 田宏碧,陈家麟.中国大陆心理健康标准研究十年的述评.心理科学,2003,26(4):
704- 708.
21. 陈向明.质的研究方法与社会科学研究.教育科学出版社,2000,1:12,332.
22. 胡雁. 质性研究. 护士进修杂志,2006,21(9):773- 775.
23. 梁宁建.当代心理学理论与重要实验研究.华东师范大学出版社,2007:241.
24. 陈侠,黄希庭,白纲.关于网络成瘾的心理学研究.心理科学进展,2003,11(3):
355- 359.
25. 崔丽娟,刘琳.互联网对大学生社会性发展的影响.心理科学,2003,26(1):64-66.
26. 祝卓宏,高文斌,高晶等.走出网络迷途.北京:科学出版社,2006.
27. 高文斌,高晶,祝卓宏等.中国青少年网络成瘾研究与调查.北京:科学出版社,2006.
28. 中 国 互 联 网 络 发 展 状 况 统 计 报 告 .2007-01-23. http://www.cnnic.cn/uploadfiles/doc/2007/1/22/212245.doc.
29. 林绚晖,阎巩固.大学生上网行为及网络成瘾探讨.中国心理卫生杂志,2001,15(4):281.
30. 王立皓,童辉杰. 大学生网络成瘾与社会支持、交往焦虑、自我和谐的关系研究. 健康心理学杂志,2003,11( 2):94- 96.
31. 张宏如. 网络成瘾大学生动机与人格特征. 健康心理学杂志, 2003,11(5):398- 400.
32. 雷雳,李宏利. 病理性使用互联网的界定与测量. 心理科学进展,2003,11(1):73- 77.
33. 高文斌,陈祉妍. 网络成瘾病理心理机制及综合心理干预研究.心理科学进展,2006,14(4):596- 603.
34. 张兰君. 大学生网络成瘾倾向多因素研究. 健康心理学杂志,2003,11(4):279- 280.
35. 付慧鹏,霍军,于俊丽等. 父母教养方式与儿童网络成瘾行为的关系. 临床精神医学杂志,2004,14(5):278- 279.
36. 吴汉荣,朱克京. 影响大学生网络成瘾相关因素的路径分析. 中国公共卫生,2004,11(20):1363- 1364.
37. 刘树娟,张智君. 网络成瘾的社会-心理-生理模型及研究展望. 应用心理学,2004,l0(2):48- 54.
38. 陈淑惠. 中文网络成瘾量表的编制与心理计量特性研究. 台湾中华心理学刊,2001,45(3):279.
39. 陈淑惠、翁俪祯、苏逸人、吴和懋、杨品凤.中文网络成瘾量表之编制与心理计量特性研究.中华心理学刊,2003,45(3):279- 294.
40. 杨容,邵智,郑涌. 中学生网络成瘾症的综合干预. 中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(7):457- 459.
41. 曾文星, 徐静. 心理治疗:原则与方法. 北京医科大学出版社,2000: 160.
42. 张凤宁,张怿萍,邹锦山. 青少年网络成瘾及系统家庭治疗.中国全科医学,2006,9(1):48- 50.
43. 杨昕. 网络成瘾的防治理论与实践研究. 精神疾病与精神卫生,2006,6(4):314- 317.
44. 韩利雄,周玉来,田恬. 网络成瘾症的集体心理治疗. 中国临床医药研究杂志,2006,151:90- 91.
45. 徐鹰,李仁福,杨春雷. 运用森田疗法治疗网络成瘾一例. 国际中华应用心理学杂志,2005,2(3- 4):290- 291.
46. 肖顺贞,胡雁.护理研究[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.61-66.
47. 童辉杰. 投射技术——对适合中国人文化的心理测评技术的探索.黑龙江人民出版社,2003:41.
48. 汪向东等.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].中国心理卫生杂志社,1999,12.
49. 毕玉,苏文亮,孙雅峰等.大学生网络成瘾者心理行为特点的在线研究.中国临床心理学杂志,2005,13(2):170- 173.
50. 张国富,周二强,刘栋等.青少年网络成瘾的影响因素.新乡医学院学报,2006,23(1):50-52.
51. 周涛.大学生社交焦虑与网络成瘾的相关研究.湖南师大教育科学学报,2003,2(3):85- 87.
52. 梁宁建,吴明证,邱扶东等.互联网成瘾者内隐网络态度及其干预研究.心理科学,2004,27(4):796- 798.
53. 熊燕,于祥成,胡义秋等. 硕士研究生新生心理健康状况的调查研究. 中国临床心理学杂志,2007,15(1):56-58.
54. 李英华,孟宪鹏,庞静等. 北京市东城区高中生心理健康状况及其影响因素分析. 中国健康教育,2007,23(3):173-176.
1. Dweck C. S., Chiu C. Y, Hong Y. Y. Implicit theories and their role in judgment and reaction: A world forms two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 1995, 6:267-285.
2. Beck A.T. Depression: clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects. New York: Hoeber press, 1967.
3. Greewald A. G. & Banaji M. R. Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 1995, 102(1):1, 4-27.
4. De Houwer, J. A structural analysis of indirect measures of attitudes. In J. Musch & Klauer K.C. The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2003, 219-244.
5. Fazio R. H., Sanbonmatsu D. M., Powell M. C., & Kardes F. R. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1996, 50: 229-238.
6. Greenwald A. G., McGhee D. E.,Schwartz, J. L. K. Measuring individual difference in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 74(6) : 1464-1480.
7. Farnham S. D., Greenwald A. G., Banaji M R. Implicit self-esteem. In: Abrams, Dominic, Hogg, Michael A ed. Social Identity and Social Cognition. Blackwell Publishers Inc, 1999. 230- 248.
8. Cunningham, W. A., Preacher, K. J., Banaji, M. R. Implicit attitude measure: Consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychological Science, 2001, 12(2): 163-170.
9. Greenwald A. G., Farham S. D. Using the Implicit Association Test to Measure Self-Esteem and Self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2000, 79(6): 1022-1038.
10. Dasgupta N., McGhee D. E., Greenwald A. G., Banaji M R. Automatic preference for White Americans: Eliminating the familiarity explanation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2000, 36:316- 328.
11. McConnell A. R., Leibold J. M. Relations among the Implicit Association Test, Discriminatory Behavior, and Explicit Measures of Racial Attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2001, 37: 435-442.
12. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R. The Go/No-go Association Task. Social Cognition, 2001, 19: 625-666.
13. De Houwer, J. The extrinsic affective simon task. Experimental Psychology, 2003, 50: 77- 85.
14. Strauss, A. Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge University Press, 1987:5.
15. Patton M. Q. Variety in Qualitative Inquiry: Theoretical Orientation. In Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods[M]. 3ed. California: Thousand Oaks, 2002. 126- 142.
16. Martin E. P. Seligman, Tracy A. Steen, Nansook Park, et al. Positive psychology progress empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist 2005, 60(5): 410-421.
17. Katherine D., Peterson C., Seligman. M. E. P. Shared Virtue: The Convergence of Valued Human Strengths Across Culture and History. Review of General Psychology, 2005, 9(3):203-213.
18. Young K. S. Internet Addiction: The Emergence of a New Disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1998, l (3): 237-244.
19. Kim Ryu E., Chon M. Y. et a1. Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation:A questionnaire survey.International Journal of Nursing Studies, 2006, 43:185-192.
20. Yong K. S. Internet addiction: the emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 1996, 13(3): 23-25.
21. Davis, R. A. A cognitive-behavioral model of pathological Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2001, 17(2): 187-195.
22. Hall, A. S., Parsons, Jeffrey. Internet Addiction: College Student Case Study Using Best Practices in Cognitive Behavior Therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 2001, 23(4):312-328.
23. Chou C., Hsiao M. C. Internet addiction usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students’case. Computers and Education, 2000, 35(1): 65-80.
24. Young K. S. What makes online usage stimulating-potential explanation for pathological internet use? Paper presented at the 105th Annual Convention of American Psychological Association 1997.
25. Kraut R., Kielser S., Bonka B., et al. Internet Paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issue, 2002, 58(1): 49-74.
26. Hamburger Y. A., Ben-Artzi E. Loneliness and Internet use. Computers in Human Behavior, 2003, 19(11):71-80.
27. Armstrong L., Phillips J. G., Saling L. L. Potential determinants of heavier internet usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2000, 53(4): 537-50.
28. Greenberg J. L., Lewis S., David K. Overlapping addictions and self-esteem among college men and women. Addictive Behaviors, 1999, 24(4): 565-571.
29. Shapiro N. A., Goldsmith T. D., Keck P. E., et al. Psychiatric features of individuals with problematic internet use. Journal of Affective Disorders, 2000, 57(1-3): 267-272.
30. Wang W. Interact dependency and psychosocial maturity among college students. Human Computer Studies, 2001, 55(6): 919-938.
31. Bread K. V. Notification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for Internet addiction. Cyber Psychology Behavior, 2001, 4(3): 377-383.
32. Young K. S. Cognitive behavior therapy with internet addicts: treatment outcomes and implications. Cyber psychology & Behavior 2007, 10(5):671-679.
33. Alex S. H., Jeffrey P. Internet addiction: college student case study using best practices in cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling 2001,23(4):312-327.
34. Jong-Un Kim. A reality therapy group counseling program as an internet addiction recovery method for college students in Korea. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 2007, 10. (2): 3-9.
35. Coyne I.T. Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1997, 26(3): 623-630. Beard K. W., Wolf E. M. Modification in the proposed diagnostic criteria for internet addiction. Cyber psychology & Behavior 2001, 4(3):377-383.
36. Kraut R., Patterson M., & mark L. V. et al. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social and involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologist, 1998, 9:1017-1031.
37. Tigemann M. The impact of adolescent girl’s life concerns and self-esteem. The Jouranal of Genetic Psychology, 2001, 162(3): 133- 142.
38. Masi G., Mucci M., Favilla L. et al. Temperament in adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders and in their families. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2003, 33(3):245- 259.
39. Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L. A social cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 1998, 95: 256- 273.
40. Strupp H. H. The tripartite model and the consumer reports study, American psychologist, 1996, 51(10): 1017-1024.
41. Chih Hung Ko, Ju Yu Yen, Sue Huei Chen, et al. Screening for Internet Addiction: an empirical study on cut-off points for the Chen Internet Addiction Scale. Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2005, 21: 545- 51.